Perioperative single dose ketorolac to prevent postoperative pain: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

Integrating mechanistic-based and classification-based concepts into perioperative pain management: an educational guide for acute pain physicians

Chronic pain begins with acute pain. Physicians tend to classify pain by duration (acute vs chronic) and mechanism (nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic). Although this taxonomy may facilitate diagnosis and documentation, such categories are to some degree arbitrary constructs, with significant overlap in terms of mechanisms and treatments. In clinical practice, there are myriad different definitions for chronic pain and a substantial portion of chronic pain involves mixed phenotypes. Classification of pain based on acuity and mechanisms informs management at all levels and constitutes a critical part of guidelines and treatment for chronic pain care. Yet specialty care is often siloed, with advances in understanding lagging years behind in some areas in which these developments should be at the forefront of clinical practice. For example, in perioperative pain management, enhanced recovery protocols are not standardized and tend to drive treatment without consideration of mechanisms, which in many cases may be incongruent with personalized medicine and mechanism-based treatment. In this educational document, we discuss mechanisms and classification of pain as it pertains to commonly performed surgical procedures. Our goal is to provide a clinical reference for the acute pain physician to facilitate pain management decision-making (both diagnosis and therapy) in the perioperative period.

Single-bolus injection of local anesthetic, with or without continuous infusion, for interscalene brachial plexus block in the setting of multimodal analgesia: a randomized controlled unblinded trial

INTRODUCTION

Previous trials favored a continuous interscalene brachial plexus block over a single injection for major shoulder surgery. However, these trials did not administer a multimodal analgesic regimen. This randomized, controlled unblinded trial tested the hypothesis that a continuous infusion of local anesthetic for an interscalene brachial plexus block still provides superior analgesia after major shoulder surgery when compared with a single injection in the setting of multimodal analgesia, inclusive of intravenous dexamethasone, magnesium, acetaminophen and ketorolac.

METHODS

Sixty patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty or arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were randomized to receive a bolus of ropivacaine 0.5%, 20 mL, with or without a continuous infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% 4-8 mL/hour, for an interscalene brachial plexus block. Patients were provided with intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia. The primary outcome was cumulative intravenous morphine consumption at 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included pain scores at rest and on movement, and functional outcomes, measured over 48 hours after surgery.

RESULTS

Median (IQR) cumulative intravenous morphine consumption at 24 hours postoperatively was 10 mg (4-24) in the continuous infusion group and 14 mg (8-26) in the single injection group (p=0.74). No significant between-group differences were found for any of the secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

A continuous infusion of local anesthetic for an interscalene brachial plexus block does not provide superior analgesia after major shoulder surgery when compared with a single injection in the setting of multimodal analgesia, inclusive of intravenous dexamethasone, magnesium, acetaminophen and ketorolac. The findings of this study are limited by performance and detection biases.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04394130.

Pain Levels Following Cosmetic Breast Surgery and An Easy-To-Use Pain Treatment Algorithm for Plastic Surgeons

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to examine the degrees of pain experienced following various breast cosmetic surgery procedures and to evaluate the existing pain treatment methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent subpectoral breast augmentation, mastopexy, or breast reduction between 2017 and 2022 were evaluated retrospectively. A total of 90 patients were randomly selected, with 30 patients in each group. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess pain levels. The data were analyzed using the statistical program SPSS 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

RESULTS

The subpectoral breast augmentation group exhibited the highest recovery VAS score. Postoperative 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24-h VAS values were higher in the breast augmentation group than in the breast reduction and mastopexy groups. No statistically significant difference observed between mastopexy and breast reduction in terms of VAS scores during the evaluation periods. Statistically significant higher VAS scores were observed for subpectoral breast augmentation at all times compared to the preoperative period.

CONCLUSIONS

Subpectoral breast augmentation is associated with higher levels of postoperative pain compared to breast reduction and mastopexy. Effective postoperative pain prevention is crucial following aesthetic breast surgeries. It not only helps to reduce hospital stays but also aids in patient recovery, facilitates a quicker return to daily activities, and enhances patient satisfaction. To achieve this objective, it is advantageous to utilize a practical pain treatment algorithm that is readily applicable.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Combination Drug Therapy for the Management of Chronic Neuropathic Pain

Chronic neuropathic pain (NP) is an increasingly prevalent disease and leading cause of disability which is challenging to treat. Several distinct classes of drugs are currently used for the treatment of chronic NP, but each drug targets only narrow components of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, bears limited efficacy, and comes with dose-limiting side effects. Multimodal therapies have been increasingly proposed as potential therapeutic approaches to target the multiple mechanisms underlying nociceptive transmission and modulation. However, while preclinical studies with combination therapies showed promise to improve efficacy over monotherapy, clinical trial data on their efficacy in specific populations are lacking and increased risk for adverse effects should be carefully considered. Drug-drug co-crystallization has emerged as an innovative pharmacological approach which can combine two or more different active pharmaceutical ingredients in a single crystal, optimizing pharmacokinetic and physicochemical characteristics of the native molecules, thus potentially capitalizing on the synergistic efficacy between classes of drugs while simplifying adherence and minimizing the risk of side effects by reducing the doses. In this work, we review the current pharmacological options for the treatment of chronic NP, focusing on combination therapies and their ongoing developing programs and highlighting the potential of co-crystals as novel approaches to chronic NP management.

Scheduled Postoperative Ketorolac Does Not Decrease Opiate Use following Free Flap Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

 In the setting of the opioid crisis, managing postoperative pain without the exclusive use of opiates has become a topic of interest. Many hospitals have begun implementing enhanced recovery after surgery protocols to decrease postoperative complications, hospital costs, and opiate utilization. Ketorolac has been added to many of these protocols, but few studies have examined its effects independently.

METHODS

 A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients that received autologous breast reconstruction from October 2020 to June 2022 at an academic institution. We identified patients who did and did not receive postoperative ketorolac. Use of ketorolac was based upon surgeon preference. The two groups were compared in basic demographics, reconstruction characteristics, length of stay, complications, reoperations, and morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs).

RESULTS

 One-hundred ten patients were included for the analysis, with 55 receiving scheduled postoperative ketorolac and 55 who did not receive ketorolac. There were seven incidences of postoperative complications in each group (12.7%, p = 1.00). The total mean postoperative MMEs were 344.7 for the nonketorolac group and 336.5 for the ketorolac group (p = 0.81). No variable was found to be independently associated with postoperative opiate use. Ketorolac was not found to contribute significantly to any postoperative complication.

CONCLUSION

 In this study, the use of ketorolac did not significantly reduce opiate use in a cohort of 110 patients. Surgeons should consider whether the use of ketorolac alone is the best option to reduce postoperative opiate use following free flap breast reconstruction.

Modern Perioperative Pain Management Strategies to Minimize Opioids after Total Knee Arthroplasty

Total Knee Arthroplasty is associated with significant postoperative pain that can limit functional outcomes and patient satisfaction. In recent years, the standard of care for postoperative pain management has reduced reliance on opioids in favor of multimodal analgesia. These regimens consist of systemic medications such as COX-2 inhibitors, acetaminophen, corticosteroids, and gabapentinoids, as well as regional and local approaches such as peripheral nerve blocks and local infiltrative analgesics. Newer therapies, such as cryoneurolysis, are still being studied but have shown promising results. Additional studies are needed to determine the ideal pain regimen that will optimize pain control and eliminate the need for postoperative opioids.

The benefits and risks of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for postoperative analgesia in sinonasal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have emerged as an alternative to opioids for optimal postoperative pain management. However, the adoption of NSAIDs in sinonasal surgery has been impeded by a theoretical concern for postoperative bleeding. Our objective is to systematically review the efficacy and safety of NSAIDs for patients undergoing sinonasal surgery.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched from inception to January 27, 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative observational studies in any language were considered. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed in duplicate. Our outcomes were postoperative pain scores, requirement for rescue analgesia, and postoperative adverse events (epistaxis, nausea/vomiting).

RESULTS

Out of 4661 records, 15 RCTs (enrolling 1210 patients) and two observational studies were included. Following endoscopic sinus surgery, there was no difference in pain scores between NSAIDs and non-NSAIDs groups (standardized mean differences [SMD] 0.44 units better, 95% CI -0.18 to 1.05). Following septorhinoplasty, NSAIDs decreased pain scores compared to non-NSAID regimens (SMD 1.14 units better, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.67 units better). Overall, NSAIDs reduced the need for rescue medication with a relative risk (RR) of 0.45 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.84). In addition, NSAIDs decreased the risk of nausea with an RR of 0.62 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.91) and did not increase the risk of epistaxis (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.23-2.22).

CONCLUSION

Among patients undergoing sinonasal surgery, NSAIDs are beneficial in postoperative pain management and avoidance of postoperative nausea without increasing the risk of postoperative epistaxis.

Comparison of Analgesic Effects of Ketorolac Plus Apotel to Meperidine in Patients Undergoing Right Thoracotomy: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

Background

Postoperative pain management using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with no narcotic-attributed adverse effects, such as respiratory depression, nausea, and vomiting, is still the subject of extensive research. However, concerns about bleeding and nephrotoxicity have limited routine use.

Objectives

The present trial aimed to compare the effects of ketorolac/apotel and meperidine on postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing thoracotomy.

Methods

This randomized controlled trial enrolled 122 patients who were candidates for right thoracotomy. The patients were randomly divided into two groups that received ketorolac (30 mg)/apotel (1 g) or meperidine (0.5 - 1 mg/kg) at the beginning of recovery, respectively. This study assessed the Numeric Rating Scale pain score immediately and 30 and 60 minutes after the surgery in the recovery room, blood pressure, oxygen saturation (SpO2), sweating, and pulse rate.

Results

The average pain score at recovery time was significantly lower in the ketorolac/apotel group (2.06 ± 1.40) than in the meperidine group (2.76 ± 1.61) (P = 0.011). In contrast to the ketorolac/apotel group, an increasing trend was observed in pain scores in the meperidine group throughout the time sequence (P < 0.05). However, a slight non-significant increase was also observed in the ketorolac/apotel group. No statistical differences were observed in blood pressure (P = 0.826), SpO2 (P = 0.826), and pulse rate (P = 0.811) between the two study groups.

Conclusions

This study provides support that the combination of ketorolac/apotel offers a slightly superior analgesic effect for patients undergoing thoracotomy, compared to meperidine. Pain management is crucial during recovery, and the current study's findings suggest that administering ketorolac/apotel provides effective analgesia during recovery after thoracic surgery.

Systemic Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatories for Analgesia in Postoperative Critical Care Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials

While opioids are part of usual care for analgesia in the ICU, there are concerns regarding excess use. This is a systematic review of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) use in postoperative critical care adult patients.

DATA SOURCES

We searched Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Excerpta Medica database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library, trial registries, Google Scholar, and relevant systematic reviews through March 2023.

STUDY SELECTION

Titles, abstracts, and full texts were reviewed independently and induplicate by two investigators to identify eligible studies. We included randomized control trials (RCTs) that compared NSAIDs alone or as an adjunct to opioids for systemic analgesia. The primary outcome was opioid utilization.

DATA EXTRACTION

In duplicate, investigators independently extracted study characteristics, patient demographics, intervention details, and outcomes of interest using predefined abstraction forms. Statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager software Version 5.4. (The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark).

DATA SYNTHESIS

We included 15 RCTs (n = 1,621 patients) for admission to the ICU for postoperative management after elective procedures. Adjunctive NSAID therapy to opioids reduced 24-hour oral morphine equivalent consumption by 21.4 mg (95% CI, 11.8-31.0 mg reduction; high certainty) and probably reduced pain scores (measured by Visual Analog Scale) by 6.1 mm (95% CI, 12.2 decrease to 0.1 increase; moderate certainty). Adjunctive NSAID therapy probably had no impact on the duration of mechanical ventilation (1.6 hr reduction; 95% CI, 0.4 hr to 2.7 reduction; moderate certainty) and may have no impact on ICU length of stay (2.1 hr reduction; 95% CI, 6.1 hr reduction to 2.0 hr increase; low certainty). Variability in reporting adverse outcomes (e.g., gastrointestinal bleeding, acute kidney injury) precluded their meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In postoperative critical care adult patients, systemic NSAIDs reduced opioid use and probably reduced pain scores. However, the evidence is uncertain for the duration of mechanical ventilation or ICU length of stay. Further research is required to characterize the prevalence of NSAID-related adverse outcomes.

Sensory block duration after spinal anaesthesia supplemented with intravenous dexamethasone: a randomised controlled double-blinded trial

BACKGROUND

Intravenous dexamethasone prolongs duration of analgesia or sensory block after injection of local anaesthetics close to peripheral nerves by an average of 8 h. Uncertainty remains on the potential increase in the duration of sensory block after spinal anaesthesia. The objective of this randomised controlled double-blinded trial was to investigate whether dexamethasone i.v. prolongs the sensory block of spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine when compared with a control group.

METHODS

Of 50 patients undergoing lower limb osteoarticular surgery under spinal anaesthesia with isobaric bupivacaine 15 mg i.t. with morphine 100 μg i.t. were randomised to receive either dexamethasone 0.15 mg kg^-1 i.v. or normal saline 3 ml i.v. The primary outcome was duration of sensory block defined as the time elapsed between injection of the local anaesthetic in the intrathecal space and the regression of sensory block by two dermatomes compared with the highest dermatome blocked. Secondary outcomes included intravenous morphine consumption, pain scores at rest and on movement, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and blood glucose at 2, 24, and 48 h.

RESULTS

Median duration of sensory block was 135 (105-225) min in the dexamethasone group and 158 (135-240 min) in the control group (P=0.19). Patients in the dexamethasone group received less morphine at 24 h, had significantly less postoperative nausea and vomiting at 2 h and 24 h, and had increased blood glucose at 24 h. Other secondary outcomes were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous dexamethasone did not prolong the sensory block of spinal anaesthesia with isobaric bupivacaine. However, it reduced morphine consumption and rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting at 24 h, at the expense of an increased blood glucose.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03527576 (Clinicaltrials.gov).

Does ketorolac administration at the time of hypospadias surgery increase unplanned encounters in the immediate postoperative period?

INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVE

The opioid crisis has raised concerns for long-term sequela of routine administration of opioids to patients, particularly in the pediatric population. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use is limited in hypospadias surgery due to concerns for post-operative bleeding, particularly with ketorolac. We hypothesize that ketorolac administration at the time of hypospadias repair is not associated with increased bleeding or immediate adverse events.

METHODS

A retrospective single institution study included all patients undergoing hypospadias surgery from 2018 to 2021. Outcomes measured include peri-operative ketorolac administration, opioid prescriptions, and unplanned encounters (i.e., emergency department or office visits). Comparative statistics using non-parametric and binary/categorical tests and a logistic regression were performed.

RESULTS

1044 patients were included, among whom there were 562 distal, 278 proximal and 204 hypospadias complication repairs. Ketorolac was administered to 396 (37.9%) patients and its utilization increased during the study period [Summary Figure]. Patients receiving ketorolac were older (p = 0.002) and were prescribed opioids less often after surgery (2.0% vs 5.2%, p = 0.009). There was no difference in unplanned encounters across repair types (p = 0.1). Multivariate logistic regression showed ketorolac use was not associated with an increased likelihood of an unplanned encounter.

DISCUSSION

The use of NSAIDs post-operatively has traditionally been limited due to concerns about bleeding risks, however the present study displayed no significant increases in unplanned patient encounters either in the ED or outpatient clinic after ketorolac administration. Our study has several limitations including its retrospective and single-institutional design, difficulties of pain assessment in pediatric population, and possibility of under estimation of unplanned encounters due to limited access to patients' records outside of our institution.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of ketorolac is not associated with an increase in unplanned encounters in children undergoing hypospadias repair. It should be considered a safe agent for perioperative analgesia to decrease opioid utilization. Further studies will evaluate long-term surgical outcomes in children receiving ketorolac after hypospadias repair.

Can Anti-inflammatory Drugs used in Plastic Surgery Procedures Increase the Risk of Hematoma?

BACKGROUND

Anti-inflammatory drugs are commonly used to lower inflammation which is linked to a variety of disorders. It acts by inhibiting cyclooxygenase-mediated prostaglandin synthesis at the molecular level. Hematoma is related with the use of anti-inflammatory medications. However, the specific link is still unknown. Thus, the main objective of the study is to find out the association of hematoma with ant-inflammatory drugs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The relevant studies were searched in PubMed and screened based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of full-text studies was assessed using suitable Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The overall estimate was calculated in terms of odds ratio with 95% confidence interval. The random effect model was used. The qualitative analysis of publication bias was done through funnel plot.

RESULTS

The overall estimate measures [OR 1.01 (0.50, 2.06)] have shown non-significant risk of hematoma with use of anti-inflammatory drugs in plastic surgery as compared to non-anti-inflammatory drugs. The heterogeneity among studies was found to be 34%. The subgroup analysis of individual drugs was not done due to availability of a smaller number of studies.

CONCLUSION

Based on available data, there is no significant risk of hematoma with use of anti-inflammatory drugs in plastic surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Risk of serious adverse events associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in orthopaedic surgery. A protocol for a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain is a common condition following orthopaedic surgeries and causes prolonged hospitalisation, delayed rehabilitation and hamper the quality of life. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are effective analgesics and anti-inflammatory mediators in the treatment of postoperative pain. The association of NSAIDs with serious adverse events may however keep some clinicians and clinical decision makers from using NSAIDs perioperatively. The evidence regarding the risks of serious adverse events following perioperative use of NSAIDs in orthopaedic surgery is sparse and needs to be assessed in a systematic review. This is a protocol for a systematic review that aims to identify the risks of serious adverse events from perioperative use of NSAIDs in orthopaedic patients.

METHODS

Our methodology is based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols and the eight-step assessment procedure suggested by Jakobsen and colleagues. We wish to assess if NSAIDs versus placebo, usual care or no intervention, will influence the risks of serious adverse events in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. We will include all randomised trials assessing the use of NSAIDs perioperatively. To identify trials we will search the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Excerpta Medica database, Cochrane Central Register, Science Citation Index Expanded on Web of Science and BIOSIS. Two authors will screen the literature and extract data. We will use the 'Risk of Bias 2 tool' to assess trials. Extracted data will be analysed using RStudio and Trial Sequential Analysis. We will create a 'Summary of Findings' table in which we will present our primary and secondary outcomes. We will assess the quality of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

DISCUSSION

This systematic review can potentially aid clinicians and clinical decision makers in the use of NSAIDs for treatment of postoperative pain following orthopaedic surgeries.

The Use of Dissemination and Implementation to Improve Multimodal Analgesia in Head and Neck Surgery

OBJECTIVES

To optimize the delivery of multimodal analgesia to patients undergoing major head and neck oncologic surgeries.

METHODS

Pilot study included patients enrolled to receive either scheduled acetaminophen and as-needed opioids (control group) or scheduled acetaminophen, gabapentin, ketorolac, and as-needed opioids (experimental group). RCT, a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation pragmatic trial, was designed to test the effectiveness of the intervention. Arm A received scheduled acetaminophen and as-needed opioids. Arm B received scheduled gabapentin, ketorolac, a regional nerve block at the free tissue donor site, scheduled acetaminophen and as-needed opioids.

RESULTS

Pilot: Thirty-one patients undergoing major head and neck surgery were enrolled. Mean MMEs administered in control group (n = 15) was 251.60 mg (SD = 224.57 mg); mean MMEs in Experimental group (n = 16) was 195.78 mg (SD = 131.08 mg), p = 0.401. LOS was 8.0 days in control versus 7.0 days in experimental group (p = 0.054). RCT: Interim analysis for safety and futility was planned during trial's design after 30 patients (n = 14 Arm A, and n = 16 Arm B). Mean MMEs administered were 135.1 mg in Arm A, (SD = 86.0 mg) versus mean MME of 51.3 mg in Arm B (SD = 43.3 mg, (p < 0.05)). Given clear superiority results, the trial was prematurely terminated. Functional pain scores, LOS, and complications were similar between the arms (p > 0.05). Variability of mean MME was compared before and after implementation of the management protocols: SD in RCT#1 was 181.46 mg versus 124.6 mg in RCT#2.

CONCLUSION

Multimodal analgesia significantly reduced the need for opioids in patients undergoing major head and neck surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1, Randomized Clinical Trial Laryngoscope, 133:S1-S11, 2023.

Optimizing anxiolysis and analgesia for percutaneous intervention by the abdominal radiologist

Abdominal radiologists perform a wide variety of image-guided interventions. Procedures performed by abdominal radiologists can be broadly categorized into paracentesis, thoracentesis, superficial and deep soft tissue biopsy, drain placement, and ablation. As these procedures continue to develop as an alternative to more invasive and potentially morbid interventions, and with continued improvements in minimally invasive technologies, it becomes increasingly important for abdominal radiologists to be familiar with options for peri-procedural analgesia and anxiolysis, as well as when to consult anesthesiology. In this review, we discuss analgesic, anxiolytic, and nonpharmacologic options available to the abdominal radiologist. We focus on practical agents that are relatively safe for general use, special populations, and considerations for post-procedural monitoring.

Lower Extremity Muscle Injuries in the Overhead Athlete

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lower extremity (LE) injuries are a common source of disability and time-loss for overhead athletes, and muscles have been found to be the predominant soft tissue structure affected. The current review highlights the orthopaedic literature examining lower extremity muscle injuries in overhead athletes in regard to epidemiology, diagnosis, and conventional and emerging treatment measures.

RECENT FINDINGS

The hamstring muscles have been found to be the most commonly injured lower extremity muscle group in professional baseball, followed by the adductors, quadriceps, iliopsoas, and gastrocnemius-soleus complex. Strains and contusions comprise over 90% of these muscle injuries. Various advanced imaging grading systems have been developed to help characterize the nature of a muscle injury, although a clear and consistent prognostic utility of these systems is still unclear. The vast majority of lower extremity muscle injuries in overhead athletes are managed nonoperatively, and there is promising data on the use of emerging treatments such as platelet-rich plasma and blood flow restriction therapy. Lower extremity muscle injuries-often referred to as strains-are a relatively common issue in high-demand overhead athletes and can be a significant source of time-loss. Within baseball, position players are affected far more often than pitchers, and sprinting and fielding are the most common activities leading to strains. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the gold standard imaging modality to evaluate these muscle injuries and will allow for a detailed assessment of tissue damage. Nonetheless, return-to-play is often dictated by a given athlete's progression through a nonoperative rehabilitation protocol, with surgical intervention reserved for less common, select injury patterns.

Postoperative Hematomas in the Era of Outpatient Mastectomy: Is Ketorolac Really to Blame?

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols following mastectomy with or without implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) include ketorolac for multimodal perioperative analgesia. There are concerns that ketorolac could be associated with increased risk of postoperative hematoma formation.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients undergoing mastectomy with or without IBBR between January 2013 and December 2019 at a single institution. Patients received 15 mg, 30 mg, or no ketorolac depending on ERAS protocol adherence, patient characteristics, and surgeon preference. Clinically significant hematoma was defined as requiring surgical intervention on day of surgery or postoperative day 1. Patients were compared by demographics, surgical characteristics, ketorolac dose, and hematoma prevalence. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression evaluated hematoma formation odds.

RESULTS

Eight hundred patients met inclusion criteria: 477 received ketorolac. Those who received ketorolac were younger, had lower ASA scores, were more likely to have bilateral procedures and undergo concomitant IBBR, had longer operative times, were less likely to take antiplatelet or anticoagulation medications, had higher PACU pain scores, and had higher incidence of hematomas requiring surgical intervention. Of the cohort, 4.4% had clinically significant hematomas. The 15 mg and 30 mg ketorolac groups had similar prevalence (6.0% vs 5.8%, p = 0.95). On univariable regression, there were increased odds of hematoma formation in patients who were younger, had bilateral procedures, had longer OR times, and who received ketorolac. On multivariable regression, none of the prior variables remained significant.

CONCLUSION

After accounting for associations with longer operative times, concomitant IBBR, and bilateral procedures, ketorolac administration did not remain an independent risk factor for hematoma formation.

Postoperative administration of ketorolac compared to other drugs for pain control after third molar surgery: A meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized, clinical trials

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic effectiveness and adverse reactions of ketorolac in comparison with other drugs when administered postoperatively after third molar surgery.

METHODS

PubMed and Google Scholar were utilized to search for articles comparing the efficacy and safety of ketorolac and other analgesic agents after third molar surgery. Data from papers with a lower risk of bias were recorded. The overall evaluation of analgesia onset, general and subgroup evaluation of the number of patients requiring rescue analgesic medication, general and subgroup assessment of the study medication (satisfaction on the study drugs), and the overall estimation of adverse effects were performed using the Review Manager Software 5.3 to analyse the data and obtain the meta-analysis plot.

RESULTS

The subgroup evaluation of the study medication showed that patients who received ketorolac 30 mg were more satisfied than those who were given parecoxib 1 mg (odds ratio [OR] = 8.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.66-20.08, P = .00001), parecoxib 2 mg (OR = 7.17, 95% CI = 2.88-17.86, P = .0001), parecoxib 5 mg (OR = 3.03, 95% CI = 1.69-5.41, P = .0002), and parecoxib 10 mg (OR = 2.42, 95% CI = 1.36-4.32, P = .003). Moreover, patients who received ketorolac reported fewer adverse reactions compared with those who had received opioid analgesics (OR = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.32-1.76, P = .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The data from this study demonstrates that the postoperative administration of ketorolac 30 mg presents better results on patient satisfaction when compared to parecoxib 1 mg to 10 mg, and presents a similar satisfaction to parecoxib 20 mg following third molar removal.

Editorial Commentary: Periarticular and Intra-Articular Injections May Do the Right Thing for Patients' Pain but May Be the Wrong Thing for Their Articular Cartilage: Be Careful

Periarticular and intra-articular injections are regularly used by orthopaedic surgeons both in the clinic and operative setting. These injections include the use of local anesthetics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories, steroidal anti-inflammatories, and other classes of pharmaceuticals. Local anesthetics can be injected alone or in conjunction with other pharmaceuticals to maximize pain control and to minimize narcotic use as part of a multimodal pain control algorithm. Use of intra-articular local anesthetics has been shown to improve postoperative pain scores and reduce intravenous and oral narcotic consumption and narcotic-related side effects, such as constipation, sedation, depression, respiratory depression, and long-term abuse potential. However, there have been reports of chondrolysis and other side effects from these injections. In general, it can be said that lidocaine is more chondrotoxic than bupivacaine and that methylprednisolone is more chondrotoxic when combined with either lidocaine or bupivacaine. Ropivacaine with steroid maybe less chondrotoxic, but this has yet to be established. It has been shown that ropivacaine with steroids may be toxic to chondrocytes as well as bovine tenocytes. In addition, it can be generalized that longer exposures, such as an indwelling, intra-articular catheter, are more chondrotoxic than shorter exposures, such as an intra-articular injection. Greater concentrations of lidocaine and bupivacaine (i.e., 1% vs 2% and 0.25% vs 0.5%, respectively) are more toxic to chondrocytes. Cellular morphine studies have resulted in conflicting reports of whether or not it is chondrotoxic. Both ketorolac and acetaminophen have been shown to decrease postoperative pain, but ketorolac also has been shown to be chondrotoxic in a human chondrocyte model. Doing the right thing for our patients' pain may be the wrong thing for their articular cartilage. Expansion of indications for these injections should be approached with caution.

Opioid-Sparing Perioperative Analgesia Within Enhanced Recovery Programs

Opioid-based analgesia in the perioperative period can provide excellent pain control, but this approach exposes the patient to avoidable side effects and possible harm. Optimal analgesia, an approach that targets the fastest functional recovery with adequate pain control while minimizing side effects, can be achieved with opioid minimization. Many different options for nonopioid multimodal analgesia exist and have been shown to be efficacious, with certain modalities being more beneficial for specific surgeries. This review will present the evidence and practical tips for these management strategies.

Opioid sparing strategies for perioperative pain management other than regional anaesthesia: A narrative review

Opioids play a crucial role in pain management in spite of causing increased hospital morbidity and related costs. It may also cause significant risks such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), sedation, sleep disturbances, urinary retention and respiratory depression (commonly referred to as opioid related adverse effects) in postoperative patients. In order to evade these opioid related side effects and also improve pain management, multimodal analgesia i.e., combination of different analgesics, was introduced more than a decade ago. Both pharmacological and non-pharmacological techniques are available as opioid sparing analgesia. Research from around the world have proved pharmacological techniques ranging from acetaminophen, NSAIDs (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists (NDMA), alpha-2 agonists, anticonvulsants such as gamma aminobutyric acid analogues, beta-blockers, capsaicin, lignocaine infusion to glucocorticoids to be effective. On the other hand, non-pharmacological methods include techniques such as cognitive behavioral therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), electroanalgesia, acupuncture and hypnosis. However, research regarding the effect of these non-pharmacological techniques on pain management is still needed.

Comparison of Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine and Intravenous Ketorolac for Postoperative Pain Management Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Background

Postoperative pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) arises from incision sites and residual intraperitoneal CO₂ gas. Opioids as a class of pain-relieving drugs are broadly used to control pain after LC; however, these drugs can cause various side effects.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of intraperitoneal injection of bupivacaine with that of intravenous ketorolac in managing postoperative pain in patients who had undergone LC.

Methods

This randomized, double-blind clinical trial was carried out on patients who had undergone LC. Ninety patients who had undergone elective LC were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 30 for each group). Group A received 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine solution intraperitoneally at the end of the operation; group B received 30 mg of ketorolac intravenously 30 minutes before surgery and every 8 hours after surgery, and patients in group C received normal saline intraperitoneally and intravenous injection. The patients were postoperatively assessed for Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, postoperative opioid consumption, shoulder pain, side effects (sedation, nausea, and vomiting), and satisfaction. The data were analyzed using SPSS. P values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

The intraperitoneal injection of bupivacaine and intravenous injection of ketorolac were significantly effective in reducing postoperative abdominal pain, shoulder pain, and incidence of nausea and vomiting compared to the placebo group (P < 0.001). Although intraperitoneal bupivacaine and intravenous ketorolac had no significant difference in pain relief compared with each other, patients in both bupivacaine and ketorolac groups were significantly more satisfied with their analgesia compared to the control group (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Intraperitoneal injection of bupivacaine and intravenous injection of ketorolac both are safe and effective methods to control pain, nausea, and vomiting after LC.

Opioid Sparing Anesthesia and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol for Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Background

Opioid sparing anesthesia and enhanced recovery after surgery protocols are not innovative ideas. However, the utilization of pancreaticoduodenectomy is limited. With the rise in awareness of the opioid epidemic in the United States, we have created a multimodal approach to anesthesia and postoperative care to limit adverse effects of opioids and curb the use of opioids postoperatively.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study performed by chart review of an opioid-sparing anesthetic and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol initiated jointly by the anesthesiology departments and transplant surgery for pancreaticoduodenectomy from January 2017 to October 2019.

Results

Demographic data was found to be comparable between the control and protocol groups. Hospital length of stay, ICU length of stay, and opioid requirements significantly decreased in the protocol group. Hospital length of stay decreased from 8.92 to 5.72 days, ICU days decreased from 1.52 to 0.42 days, and narcotics for the first five hospital days were significantly decreased from 130.13 to 71.2 morphine milligram equivalents.

Conclusion

Proper postoperative pain management can improve patient satisfaction and decrease complication rates. Pancreaticoduodenectomy is a complicated procedure with relatively limited data regarding enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. Likewise, there is limited data regarding opioid-sparing anesthesia techniques. Our protocol produced promising hospital length of stay and reduced opioid administration during the first five hospital days without increasing 30-day readmission rates.

The Routes of Administration for Acute Postoperative Pain Medication

Effective treatment of postoperative acute pain, together with early mobilization and nutrition, is one of the perioperative strategies advocated to improve surgical outcome and reduce the costs of hospitalization. Moreover, adequate pain control reduces perioperative morbidity related to surgical stress and can also prevent the incidence of chronic postoperative pain syndromes, whose treatment is still a challenge. The choice of the most appropriate analgesics depends not only on the drug class, but also on the most suitable route of administration, the best dosage for that route, and unique limitations and contraindications for every patient. In the present review, a comprehensive analysis was performed on the different routes of administration of acute postoperative pain medications and their indications and limitations, focusing on recent evidence and international recommendations.

Pharmacological Treatment for Acute Traumatic Musculoskeletal Pain in Athletes

Pain management is a crucial issue for athletes who train and compete at the highest performance levels. There are still evidence gaps for the use of analgesics for sports injuries despite the growing interest in training and competition settings. However, high-quality research is needed to determine the most appropriate and optimal timing and formulations in non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug and opioid management, particularly given the strictness of anti-doping regulations. Indeed, the role of pharmacological therapy in reducing acute traumatic pain in athletes should still be addressed to minimize the timing of return to sport. Therefore, the aim of this comprehensive review was to summarize the current evidence about pain management in the setting of acute injury in elite athletes, providing the most informed strategy for pain relief and performance recovery.

Polymeric Nanoparticles and Chitosan Gel Loading Ketorolac Tromethamine to Alleviate Pain Associated with Condyloma Acuminata during the Pre- and Post-Ablation

This study describes the preparation and evaluation of two formulations, a hydrogel and a nanostructured system, containing ketorolac tromethamine as an anti-inflammatory agent for the local therapy against the inflammatory process derived from the surgical excision of Condyloma acuminata. Both formulations were physicochemically characterized. In vitro release profiles show that the nanoparticles release 92% ± 2.3 of the total ketorolac tromethamine encapsulated, while the chitosan gel releases 18.6% ± 0.2. The ex vivo permeation and distribution through human skin were also assayed and was observed how the main amount of ketorolac tromethamine is retained in the epidermis. In vivo studies were accomplished to evaluate the anti-inflammatory efficacy in mice which also involved the histological analysis to confirm the in vivo results. The nanoparticles present a significantly higher anti-inflammatory efficacy than chitosan gel. The tolerability of developed formulations was assessed by monitoring the biomechanical properties of the skin before and after application of both formulations. No statistical differences in trans-epidermal water loss and skin hydration with respect to the basal values were observed and the formulations exhibited higher anti-inflammatory activity compared to a reference ketotorlac tromethamine solution. Therefore, it can be concluded that both formulations can be proposed as outstanding candidates for offering a local anti-inflammatory therapeutical tool with potential clinical application.

Comparison of the Effect of Dexamethasone and Ketorolac on Pain Control in Elective Foot Surgery

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effect of dexamethasone and ketorolac on pain control in elective foot surgery. Methods: Forty patients visiting Akhtar and Imam Hossein Hospital for lower limb orthopedic surgery were selected. They were randomly divided into two groups: (1) dexamethasone, and (2) ketorolac. The dexamethasone group received eight mg dexamethasone intravenously. Also, 90 mg ketorolac was infused in one liter of normal saline serum for 24 hours for the ketorolac group. Before injection and 2, 4, and 6 hours after the injection, pain control was measured employing the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score. Corresponding data were then analyzed using the independent t-test. Results: The conclusions revealed that in two and four hours after injection, there was a significant difference between the two groups in the amount of VAS score. That is, the pain was weaker in the ketorolac group than in the dexamethasone group. The findings additionally proved that there was no statistically important difference in pain levels between the two groups six hours after injection. Conclusions: Overall, according to the results of the research, it can be settled that ketorolac is a better drug in foot surgery pain control than dexamethasone.

Opioid Utilization in Geriatric Patients After Operation for Degenerative Spine Disease

BACKGROUND

Few studies have investigated opioid utilization by geriatric patients after spinal surgery, a population in whom degenerative spine disease (DSD) is highly prevalent. We aimed to quantify rates of chronic, continuous opioid utilization by geriatric patients following spine surgery for DSD-related diagnoses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Utilizing a national 5% Medicare sample database, we investigated individuals aged above 66 years who underwent spinal surgery for a DSD-related diagnosis between the years of 2008 and 2014. The outcomes of interest were the rate of and risk factors for continuous opioid utilization at 1-year following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, posterior cervical fusion, 360-degree cervical fusion, lumbar microdiscectomy, lumbar laminectomy, posterior lumbar fusion, anterior lumbar fusion, or 360-degree lumbar fusion for a DSD-related diagnosis.

RESULTS

Of the 14,583 Medicare enrollees who met study criteria, 6.0% continuously utilized opioids 1-year after spinal surgery. When stratified by preoperative opioid utilization (with the prior year divided into 4 quarters), the rates of continuous utilization at 1-year postsurgery were 0.3% of opioid-naive patients and 23.6% of patients with opioid use in all 4 quarters before surgery. Anxiety, benzodiazepine use within the year before surgery, and Medicaid dual-eligibility were associated with prolonged opioid utilization.

CONCLUSIONS

Of opioid-naive geriatric patients who underwent surgery for DSD, 0.3% developed chronic, continuous opioid use. Preoperative opioid use was the strongest predictor of prolonged utilization, which may represent suboptimal use of nonopioid alternatives, pre-existing opioid use disorders, delayed referral for surgical evaluation, or over-prescription of opioids for noncancer pain.

Perioperative Pain Management Issues Unique to Older Adults Undergoing Surgery: A Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

The older population is growing and with this growth there is a parallel rise in the operations performed on this vulnerable group. The perioperative pain management strategy for older adults is unique and requires a team-based approach for provision of high-quality surgical care.

METHODS

Literature search was performed using PubMed in addition to review of relevant protocols and guidelines from geriatric, surgical, and anesthesia societies. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses, randomized trials, observational studies, and society guidelines were summarized in this review.

MANAGEMENT

The optimal approach to a pain management strategy for older adults undergoing surgery involves addressing all phases of perioperative care. For example, preoperative assessment of a patient's cognitive function and presence of chronic pain may impact the pain management plan. Consideration should be also given to intraoperative strategies to improve pain control and minimize both the dose and side effects from opioids (e.g. regional anesthetic techniques). Postoperative pain control (e.g. under or over treatment of pain) may impact the development of elderly-specific complications such as postoperative delirium and functional decline. Finally, pain management does not stop after the older adult patient leaves the hospital. Both discharge planning and post-operative clinic follow-up provide important opportunities for collaboration and intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

An opioid-sparing pain management strategy for older adults can be accomplished with a comprehensive and collaborative interdisciplinary strategy addressing all phases of perioperative care.

Single-dose intravenous ketorolac for acute postoperative pain in adults

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain is common and may be severe. Postoperative administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reduces patient opioid requirements and, in turn, may reduce the incidence and severity of opioid-induced adverse events (AEs).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of single-dose intravenous ketorolac, compared with placebo or an active comparator, for moderate to severe postoperative pain in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases without language restrictions: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and LILACS on 20 April 2020. We checked clinical trials registers and reference lists of retrieved articles for additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized double-blind trials that compared a single postoperative dose of intravenous ketorolac with placebo or another active treatment, for treating acute postoperative pain in adults following any surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.  Our primary outcome was the number of participants in each arm achieving at least 50% pain relief over a four- and six-hour period. Our secondary outcomes were time to and number of participants using rescue medication; withdrawals due to lack of efficacy, adverse events (AEs), and for any other cause; and number of participants experiencing any AE, serious AEs (SAEs), and NSAID-related or opioid-related AEs. For subgroup analysis, we planned to analyze different doses of parenteral ketorolac separately and to analyze results based on the type of surgery performed. We assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 12 studies, involving 1905 participants undergoing various surgeries (pelvic/abdominal, dental, and orthopedic), with 17 to 83 participants receiving intravenous ketorolac in each study. Mean study population ages ranged from 22.5 years to 67.4 years. Most studies administered a dose of ketorolac of 30 mg; one study assessed 15 mg, and another administered 60 mg. Most studies had an unclear risk of bias for some domains, particularly allocation concealment and blinding, and a high risk of bias due to small sample size. The overall certainty of evidence for each outcome ranged from very low to moderate. Reasons for downgrading certainty included serious study limitations, inconsistency and imprecision. Ketorolac versus placebo Very low-certainty evidence from eight studies (658 participants) suggests that ketorolac results in a large increase in the number of participants achieving at least 50% pain relief over four hours compared to placebo, but the evidence is very uncertain (risk ratio (RR) 2.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.80 to 4.37). The number needed to treat for one additional participant to benefit (NNTB) was 2.4 (95% CI 1.8 to 3.7). Low-certainty evidence from 10 studies (914 participants) demonstrates that ketorolac may result in a large increase in the number of participants achieving at least 50% pain relief over six hours compared to placebo (RR 3.26, 95% CI 1.93 to 5.51). The NNTB was 2.5 (95% CI 1.9 to 3.7). Among secondary outcomes, for time to rescue medication, moderate-certainty evidence comparing intravenous ketorolac versus placebo demonstrated a mean median of 271 minutes for ketorolac versus 104 minutes for placebo (6 studies, 633 participants). For the number of participants using rescue medication, very low-certainty evidence from five studies (417 participants) compared ketorolac with placebo. The RR was 0.60 (95% CI 0.36 to 1.00), that is, it did not demonstrate a difference between groups. Ketorolac probably results in a slight increase in total adverse event rates compared with placebo (74% versus 65%; 8 studies, 810 participants; RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.19; number needed to treat for an additional harmful event (NNTH) 16.7, 95% CI 8.3 to infinite, moderate-certainty evidence). Serious AEs were rare. Low-certainty evidence from eight studies (703 participants) did not demonstrate a difference in rates between ketorolac and placebo (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.13 to 3.03). Ketorolac versus NSAIDs  Ketorolac was compared to parecoxib in four studies and diclofenac in two studies. For our primary outcome, over both four and six hours there was no evidence of a difference between intravenous ketorolac and another NSAID (low-certainty and moderate-certainty evidence, respectively). Over four hours, four studies (337 participants) produced an RR of 1.04 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.21) and over six hours, six studies (603 participants) produced an RR of 1.06 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.19). For time to rescue medication, low-certainty evidence from four studies (427 participants) suggested that participants receiving ketorolac waited an extra 35 minutes (mean median 331 minutes versus 296 minutes). For the number of participants using rescue medication, very low-certainty evidence from three studies (260 participants) compared ketorolac with another NSAID. The RR was 0.90 (95% CI 0.58 to 1.40), that is, there may be little or no difference between groups.   Ketorolac probably results in a slight increase in total adverse event rates compared with another NSAID (76% versus 68%, 5 studies, 516 participants; RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.23; NNTH 12.5, 95% CI 6.7 to infinite, moderate-certainty evidence). Serious AEs were rare. Low-certainty evidence from five studies (530 participants) did not demonstrate a difference in rates between ketorolac and another NSAID (RR 3.18, 95% CI 0.13 to 76.99). Only one of the five studies reported a single serious AE.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The amount and certainty of evidence for the use of intravenous ketorolac as a treatment for postoperative pain varies across efficacy and safety outcomes and amongst comparators, from very low to moderate. The available evidence indicates that postoperative intravenous ketorolac administration may offer substantial pain relief for most patients, but further research may impact this estimate. Adverse events appear to occur at a slightly higher rate in comparison to placebo and to other NSAIDs. Insufficient information is available to assess whether intravenous ketorolac has a different rate of gastrointestinal or surgical-site bleeding, renal dysfunction, or cardiovascular events versus other NSAIDs. There was a lack of studies in cardiovascular surgeries and in elderly populations who may be at increased risk for adverse events.

In the Arms of Morpheus without Morphia; Mitigating the United States Opioid Epidemic by Decreasing the Surgical Use of Opioids

The opioid epidemic is a major public health issue in the United States. Exposure of opioid naïve-patients to opioids in the perioperative period is a well-documented source of continued use with one in 20 opioid-naïve surgical patients continuing to use opioids beyond 90 days. There is no association with magnitude of surgery, major versus minor, and the strongest predictor of continued use is surgical exposure. Causal factors include over reliance on opioids for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia and excessive ambulatory opioid prescribing. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia can paradoxically result from intraoperative (anesthesia controlled) opioid administration. Increasing size of initial prescription is a strong predictor of continued use necessitating procedure specific supplies limited to under 3-days. Alternative multimodal pain management (non-opioid medications and regional anesthesia) that limit opioid use must be a high priority with opioids reserved for severe breakthrough pain. Barriers to implementation of opioid-sparing pathways include reluctance to adopt protocols and apprehension about opioid elimination. Considering the number of surgeries performed annually in the United States, perioperative physicians must aggressively address modifiable factors in surgical patients. Patient care pathways need to be constructed collaboratively by surgeons and anesthesiologists with continuing feedback to optimize patient outcomes including iatrogenic opioid dependence.

Topical Mucoadhesive Alginate-Based Hydrogel Loading Ketorolac for Pain Management after Pharmacotherapy, Ablation, or Surgical Removal in Condyloma Acuminata

Condyloma acuminata is an infectious disease caused by the human papilloma virus (HPV) and one of the most common sexually transmitted infections. It is manifested as warts that frequently cause pain, pruritus, burning, and occasional bleeding. Treatment (physical, chemical, or surgical) can result in erosion, scars, or ulcers, implying inflammatory processes causing pain. In this work, a biocompatible topical hydrogel containing 2% ketorolac tromethamine was developed to manage the painful inflammatory processes occurring upon the removal of anogenital condylomas. The hydrogel was physically, mechanically, and morphologically characterized: it showed adequate characteristics for a topical formulation. Up to 73% of ketorolac in the gel can be released following a one-phase exponential model. Upon application on human skin and vaginal mucosa, ketorolac can permeate through both of these and it can be retained within both tissues, particularly on vaginal mucosa. Another advantage is that no systemic side effects should be expected after application of the gel. The hydrogel showed itself to be well tolerated in vivo when applied on humans, and it did not cause any visible irritation. Finally, ketorolac hydrogel showed 53% anti-inflammatory activity, suggesting that it is a stable and suitable formulation for the treatment of inflammatory processes, such as those occurring upon chemical or surgical removal of anogenital warts.

Local and Intra-articular Administration of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs for Pain Management in Orthopedic Surgery

BACKGROUND

Although growing evidence demonstrates the benefits of locally administered nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for postoperative pain management, there is ongoing debate regarding NSAID use in orthopedic surgery.

AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY

Current data largely support a local site of NSAID action and suggest that effective pain control can be achieved with delivery of NSAIDs intra-articularly (IA) and/or locally at the site of injury, where they can block peripheral production of inflammatory mediators and may desensitize nociceptors. Improvements in postoperative pain control with locally administered NSAIDs have been widely reported in the total joint arthroplasty literature and may offer benefits in patient's undergoing arthroscopic procedures and those with osteoarthritis as well. The purpose of this review is to examine the available evidence in the literature regarding the efficacy and safety profile of the use of local and IA NSAIDs in orthopedic surgery.

DATA SOURCES

Narrative literature review using keywords, expert opinion, either during or from live conference.

THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES

Local and IA administration of NSAIDs for pain management in orthopedic surgery.

CONCLUSION

There is convincing evidence that NSAIDs administered locally in and around the joint reduce postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty, yet further research is required regarding the risks of potential chondrotoxicity and the inhibition of bone and soft-tissue healing with locally administered NSAIDs.

Acetaminophen, bupivacaine, Duramorph, and Toradol: A comparison of chondrocyte viability and gene expression changes in osteoarthritic human chondrocytes

BACKGROUND

A multitude of chemical agents are currently used intra-articularly to decrease pain after orthopaedic procedures including total knee arthroplasty. However, the possible deleterious effects of these injectable chemicals on chondrocyte viability have not been weighed against their potential benefits. Using a human osteoarthritic chondrocyte model, the purpose of this study was to assess the potential for cartilage damage caused by bupivacaine, Toradol, Duramorph, and acetaminophen from surgical local anesthesia.

METHODS

Human distal femur and proximal tibia cross sections were obtained during total knee arthroplasty and divided into control group and experimental groups treated by bupivacaine, Toradol, Duramorph, and acetaminophen respectively. Chondrocytes obtained from enzymatically digested cartilage were cultured using a 3D alginate bead culture method to ensure lower rates of dedifferentiation. Chondrocyte bead cultures were exposed to the study chemicals. The gene expression and chondrocyte viability were measured by RT-PCR and flow cytometry, respectively.

RESULTS

Compared with untreated group bupivacaine treatment led to the greatest cellular apoptosis with 30.5 ± 11% dead cells (P = 0.000). Duramorph and acetaminophen did not result in a significant increase in cell death. Bupivacaine treatment led to an increase in Caspase 3 gene expression (P = 0.000) as well as the acetaminophen treatment (P = 0.001) when compared to control.

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrated that Duramorph and Toradol were not cytotoxic to human chondrocytes and may be better alternatives to the frequently used and more cytotoxic bupivacaine. Acetaminophen did not result in increased cell death; however, it did show increased caspase 3 gene expression and caution should be considered.

Ketorolac Use for Pain Management in Trauma Patients With Rib Fractures Does not Increase of Acute Kidney Injury or Incidence of Bleeding

INTRODUCTION

Ketorolac is useful in acute pain management to avoid opiate-related complications; however, some surgeons fear associated acute kidney injury (AKI) and bleeding despite a paucity of literature on ketorolac use in trauma patients. We hypothesized that our institution's use of intravenous ketorolac for rib fracture pain management did not increase the incidence of bleeding or AKI.

METHODS

Rib fracture patients aged 15 years and above admitted between January 2016-June 2018 were identified in our trauma registry along with frequency of bleeding events. AKI was defined as ≥ 1.5x increase in serum creatinine from baseline measured on the second day of admission (after 24 hours of resuscitation) or an increase of ≥ .3 mg/dL over a 48-hour period. Patients receiving ketorolac were compared to patients with no ketorolac use.

RESULTS

Two cohorts of 199 control and 205 ketorolac patients were found to be similar in age, gender, admission systolic blood pressure (SBP), injury severity score, intravenous radiocontrast received, and transfusion requirements. Analysis revealed no difference in frequency of AKI using both definitions (8% vs. 7.3%, P = .79) and (19.6% vs. 15.1%, P = .24), respectively, or bleeding events (2.5% vs. 0%, P = .03). Logistic regression demonstrated that ketorolac use was not an independent predictor for AKI but age and admission SBP < 90 were.

CONCLUSION

Use of ketorolac in this cohort of trauma patients with rib fractures did not increase the incidence of AKI or bleeding events.

Impact of neuraxial analgesia on outcomes following radical cystectomy: A systematic review

Radical cystectomy (RC) is associated with significant morbidity. Neuraxial analgesia is recommended by enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines, but largely supported by evidence extrapolated from colorectal surgery outcomes. We synthesized current evidence regarding short- and long-term outcomes associated with neuraxial analgesia versus patient controlled non-neuraxial analgesia following RC. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant studies published up to May 2020. Studies reporting complications, length of stay (LOS), pain score, opioid usage within 72 hours, overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and recurrence rate were included. Of 550 identified studies, 9 met criteria for inclusion. Four studies demonstrated a higher percentage of 90-day complications in the neuraxial analgesia cohort. Out of 6 studies reporting information regarding LOS, 4 demonstrated no improvement in LOS in the neuraxial cohort. A reduction in 72 hours post-RC opioid usage was observed in 2 out of 3 studies with available data. Information regarding post-RC pain scores were variable up to 3 days post-RC. One out of 2 studies with available data reported a significant association between neuraxial analgesia and an earlier time to recurrence. No significant associations were seen with respect to overall survival or cancer-specific survival. A majority of low-to-moderate quality evidence demonstrates neuraxial analgesia is associated with a higher rate of complications, variable information regarding pain control, no improvements in LOS, and no significant association with long-term oncological outcomes. Further research regarding the incorporation of nonopiate-based analgesic modalities into RC ERAS protocols is warranted.

Optimizing non-opioid pain control after implant-based breast reconstruction: a review of the literature and proposed pain control algorithm

Despite the intense focus on the opioid epidemic and its known association with surgical procedures, there is a paucity of evidence-based literature on pain management in implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR). Herein, we present an updated review of the literature aimed at identifying pain treatment protocols to minimize narcotic use and its associated potential addiction in IBR. A comprehensive review of the published English literature was conducted using Ovid Medline/PubMed Database without timeframe limitations. The inclusion criteria of selected articles presented in this review included studies reporting objective outcomes of pain modulation (preoperatively, intraoperatively and postoperatively) in IBR. Articles for inclusion were stratified based on intervention. A total of 219 articles were identified in the initial search query, with 23 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Pain optimization interventions in IBR are herein summarized and analyzed based on the reported outcomes of each respective study. There is a substantial need for evidence-based guidelines in the plastic surgery literature for pain optimization without the use of opioids. While this review of studies to date investigates potential solutions, we hope this area of study continues to be a top priority for plastic surgeons to allow for optimized post-operative care for patients following IBR.

The Impact of Intraoperative Local Ketorolac on Opioid Use in the Management of Postoperative Pain in Thoracolumbar Spinal Fusions: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

The United States is facing an opioid addiction epidemic with >63,600 deaths from drug overdoses in 2016 alone. Ketorolac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug that has been shown to decrease postoperative pain in decompressive lumbar laminectomies. We sought to demonstrate that intraoperative intramuscular (IM) ketorolac is associated with decreased opioid use in the management of acute postoperative pain in thoracolumbar spinal fusions.

Methods

A retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing open and minimally invasive (MIS) thoracolumbar fusions between 2017 and 2018. Ketorolac (30 mg) was injected into the paraspinal muscles adjacent to the operative site before closure. Patients were placed on a standard pain control regimen. All demographic and surgical data were assessed with univariate analysis to assess for differences between groups. Univariate analysis was used to identify significant covariates for the linear regressions with postoperative morphine equivalents, length of stay (LOS), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain as dependent variables. A P < .025 was considered significant to account for multiple covariates.

Results

Two hundred twenty-five consecutive patients were included with 58 patients receiving intraoperative IM ketorolac. The average age of the ketorolac groups was 63.4 years (23-87 years) with an even distribution between genders. There was no significant difference in demographic or surgical data between the 2 cohorts. Postoperative opioid use, when corrected for LOS, showed no significance between cohorts, ketorolac 16.4 mg (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.3-20.5) and nonketorolac 6.7 mg (95% CI: 14.1-19.4, P = .8729). Other than postoperative day zero VAS (P = .05), ketorolac was not a predictor of opioid use, LOS, or VAS.

Conclusion

The use of a single dose of intraoperative IM ketorolac did not decrease the overall opioid requirements or shorten the LOS following open or MIS lumbar fusions. However, we did demonstrate benefit in early pain control, which makes this promising for further investigation.

Level of Evidence

3.

Clinical Relevance

This article promotes attention to the opioid crisis and the need for multimodal nonopioid based pain management in spine surgery.

A Practical Approach to Acute Postoperative Pain Management in Chronic Pain Patients

In the United States, more than 100 million people suffer from chronic pain. Among patients presenting for surgery, about one in four have chronic pain. Acute perioperative pain management in this population is challenging because many patients with chronic pain require long-term opioids for the management of this pain, which may result in tolerance, physical dependence, addiction, and opioid-induced hyperalgesia. These challenges are compounded by the ongoing opioid epidemic that has resulted in calls for a reduction in opioid use, with a concurrent increase in the number of patients with chronic opioid exposure presenting for surgery. This article aims to summarize practical considerations for acute postoperative pain management in patients with chronic pain conditions. A patient-centered acute pain management plan, including nonopioid analgesics, regional anesthesia, and careful selection of opioid medications, can lead to adequate analgesia and satisfaction with care. Also, a meticulous rotation from one opioid to another may decrease opioid requirement, increase analgesic effectiveness, and improve satisfaction with care.

Comparing the effects of ketorolac and Paracetamol on postoperative pain relief after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A randomized clinical trial

Introduction

Pain management after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery remains challenging.

Objective

This study aimed to compare the effects of Ketorolac and Paracetamol on postoperative CABG pain relief.

Method

This double-blind randomized clinical trial study was conducted in Ahvaz, Iran, from September 2018–December 2019. Two consecutive groups of 60 patients undergoing elective on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Intervention

The patients were divided into 0.5 mg/kg of ketorolac mg/dl and 10 mg/kg of Paracetamol after surgery for pain management. Primary outcomes were: visual analog pain scale (VAS) at the time point immediately after extubation (baseline) and at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h and the total dose of morphine consumption. Secondary outcomes included the hemodynamic variables, weaning time, chest tube derange, in-hospital mortality and myocardial infarction.

Statistical analysis: The data were analyzed using SPSS version 22(SPSS, Chicago, IL). The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare demographic data, VAS scores, vital signs, and side effects. Repeated measurements were tested within groups using Friedman’s ANOVA and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Values were expressed as means ± standard deviations. Statistical significance was defined as a p-value < 0.05.

Results

Compared with baseline scores, there were significant declines in VAS scores in both groups throughout the time sequence (P< 0.05). The statistical VAS score was slightly higher in the Paracetamol group at most time points, except for the time of 6 h. However, at 24 and 48 h, the VAS score in group Paracetamol was significantly higher than in group Ketorolac. There were no significant differences between groups about hemodynamic variables.

Conclusion

The efficacy of ketorolac is comparable to that of Paracetamol in postoperative CABG pain relief.

Trial registry

IRCT20150216021098N5. Registered at 2019-09-12.

Utilization of Pre-Anesthetic Medications for Major Surgical Procedures at a Tertiary Care Center: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study

Introduction:

Drug utilization research is an important tool to analyze the use of drugs with special emphasis on medical, social, and economic consequences in society. This study aims to find out the utilization of pre-anesthetic medications in a major surgical procedure.

Methods:

A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from 15th April - 15th August 2019 in the postoperative ward at Birat Medical College and Teaching Hospital. The convenience sampling method was used after ethical clearance from the Institutional Review Committee (IRC) of Birat Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Biratnagar, Nepal. About 400 patients were studied. The collected data were entered into a statistical package for social science version 20 for further calculations at 95% Confidence Interval.

Results:

Out of 400 patients, 215 (53.8%) of patients were underwent into different major surgeries. All patients received midazolam 2 mg except children (1 mg) and Pethidine 25 mg along with 0.2 mg glycopyrrolate 352 (88%), ondansetron 276 (69%) and others 58 (14.5%) as a preanesthetic agent. For general anesthesia propofol, 30 mg have been utilized followed by fentanyl 306 (76.5%) and others (halothane, isoflurane, etc) 115 (28.8%). In case of prophylactic drug were ceftriaxone 500 mg, 100 mg metoclopramide 387 (96.8%), dexamethasone 251 (62.8%), tramadol 237 (59.3%), 15 mg ketorolac 368 (92%), ranitidine 163 (40.8%), and pantoprazole 237 (59.3%).

Conclusions:

The most commonly administered pre-anesthetic drugs were midazolam, pethidine, glycopyrrolate, and ondansetron. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting the patient within 24 hours after surgery was significantly very low.

The Effects of Adjunctive Pain Medications on Postoperative Inpatient Opioid Use in Abdominally Based Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The purposes of this study were to quantify the amount of opioid medication used postoperatively in the hospital setting after abdominally based microsurgical breast reconstruction, to determine factors that are associated with increased opioid use, and to identify other adjunctive medications that may contribute to decreased opioid use.

METHODS

An electronic medical record data pull was performed at the University of Pennsylvania from November 2016 to October 2018. Cases were identified using Current Procedural Terminology code 19364. Only traditional recovery after surgery protocol patients were included. Patient comorbidities, surgical details, and pain scores were captured. Postoperative medications including non-patient-controlled analgesia opioid use and adjunctive nonopioid pain medications were recorded. Non-patient-controlled analgesia total opioid use was calculated and converted to oral morphine milligram equivalents (mme). Statistical analysis was performed using t test analyses and linear regression.

RESULTS

A total of 328 patients satisfied our inclusion criteria. Five hundred forty free flaps were performed (212 bilateral vs 116 unilateral, 239 immediate vs 89 delayed). Bilateral patients used on average 115.2 mme (95% confidence interval [CI], 103.4-127.0 mme) compared with 89.0 mme in unilateral patients (95% CI, 70.0-108.0 mme; P = 0.015). Patients with abdominal mesh placement (n = 249) required 113.0 mme (95% CI, 100.5-125.5 mme) compared with 83.8 mme (95% CI, 68.8-98.7 mme) for patients without mesh (n = 79; P = 0.016). Each additional hour of surgery increased postoperative mme by 9.4 (P < 0.01). Patients with a nonzero preoperative pain score required 100.3 mme (95% CI, 90.2-110.4 mme) compared with 141.1 mme (95% CI, 102.7-179.7 mme) for patients with preoperative pain score greater than 0/10 (P < 0.01). Patients with postoperative index pain score ≤5/10 required 89.2 mme (95% CI, 78.6-99.8 mme) compared with 141.1 mme (95% CI, 119.9-162.2 mme) for patients with postoperative index pain score >5/10 (P < 0.01). After regression analysis, a dose of intravenous acetaminophen 1000 mg was found to decrease postoperative mme by 11.7 (P = 0.024). A dose of oral ibuprofen 600 mg was found to decrease postoperative mme by 8.3 (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral reconstruction and longer surgery resulted in increased postoperative mme. Patients with no preoperative pain required less opioids than did patients with preexisting pain. Patients with good initial postoperative pain control required less opioids than did patients with poor initial postoperative pain control. Intravenous acetaminophen and oral ibuprofen were found to significantly decrease postoperative mme.

Ketorolac for Patients Undergoing Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Impact on Hospital Length of Stay and Postoperative Narcotic Use

BACKGROUND

Opioid drugs have been a mainstay medication for the management of postoperative pain for several decades; however, in recent years there has been a push towards investigating alternative treatment options. Although ketorolac has been widely used by other medical and surgical specialties for analgesia, its utilization in plastic surgery has been widely debated.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of ketorolac as an adjunct in postoperative pain management.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy between January 2012 and December 2016. Other risk factors, such as chronic anticoagulation, aspirin, or coagulopathies, were documented as well.

RESULTS

There were 198 patients who met the inclusion criteria. The results demonstrated that patients who received ketorolac utilized significantly fewer narcotics than patients who did not: 80 mg vs 108.8 mg (P = 0.002), respectively. The results showed that patients who received ketorolac had a decreased length of hospitalization: 1.9 days vs 2.1 days (P = 0.04), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Generous narcotic prescribing has received greater scrutiny in recent years. Aside from the risk of increased narcotic availability in the community, the side effects of nausea, puritis, and constipation delay patient recovery. These data show that patients who received ketorolac have a decreased length of hospital stay and lower narcotic use, suggesting ketorolac may be a safe and cost-effective adjustment to a multi-modal pain control regimen postoperatively.

Multimodal opioid-sparing postoperative pain regimen compared with the standard postoperative pain regimen in vaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain control after urogynecological surgery has traditionally been opioid centered with frequent narcotic administration. Few studies have addressed optimal pain control strategies for vaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery that limit opioid use.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine whether, ice packs, Tylenol, and Toradol, a novel opioid-sparing multimodal postoperative pain regimen has improved pain control compared with the standard postoperative pain regimen in patients undergoing inpatient vaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a multicenter randomized controlled trial of women undergoing vaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery. Patients were randomized to the ice packs, Tylenol, and Toradol postoperative pain regimen or the standard regimen. The ice packs, Tylenol, and Toradol regimen consists of around-the-clock ice packs, around-the-clock oral acetaminophen, around-the-clock intravenous ketorolac, and intravenous hydromorphone for breakthrough pain. The standard regimen consists of as-needed ibuprofen, as-needed acetaminophen/oxycodone, and intravenous hydromorphone for breakthrough pain. The primary outcome was postoperative day 1 pain evaluated the morning after surgery using a visual analog scale. Secondary outcomes included the validated Quality of Recovery Questionnaire, satisfaction scores, inpatient narcotic consumption, outpatient pain medication consumption, and visual analog scale scores at other time intervals. In all, 27 patients in each arm were required to detect a mean difference of 25 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale (90% power).

RESULTS

Thirty patients were randomized to ice packs, Tylenol, and Toradol and 33 to the standard therapy. Patient and surgical demographics were similar. The median morning visual analog scale pain score was lower in the ice packs, Tylenol, and Toradol group (20 mm vs 40 mm, P = .03). Numerical median pain scores were lower at the 96 hour phone call in the ice packs, Tylenol, and Toradol group (2 vs 3, P = .04). Patients randomized to the ICE-T regimen received fewer narcotics (expressed in oral morphine equivalents) from the postanesthesia care unit exit to discharge (2.9 vs 20.4, P < .001) and received fewer narcotics during the entire hospitalization (55.7 vs 91.2, P < .001). At 96 hour follow up, patients in the ice packs, Tylenol, and Toradol group used 4.9 ketorolac tablets compared with 4.6 oxycodone/acetaminophen tablets in the standard group (P = .81); however, ice packs, Tylenol, and Toradol patients required more acetaminophen than ibuprofen by patients in the standard arm (10.7 vs 6.2 tablets, P = .012). There were no differences in Quality of Recovery Questionnaire or satisfaction scores either in the morning after surgery or at 96 hour follow up.

CONCLUSION

The ice packs, Tylenol, and Toradol multimodal pain regimen offers improved pain control the morning after surgery and 96 hours postoperatively compared with the standard regimen with no differences in patient satisfaction and quality of recovery. Ice packs, Tylenol, and Toradol can significantly limit postoperative inpatient narcotic use and eliminate outpatient narcotic use in patients undergoing vaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery.