The molecular genetics of head development in Drosophila melanogaster

Specificity of the Hox member Deformed is determined by transcription factor levels and binding site affinities

Hox proteins have similar binding specificities in vitro, yet they control different morphologies in vivo. This paradox has been partially solved with the identification of Hox low-affinity binding sites. However, anterior Hox proteins are more promiscuous than posterior Hox proteins, raising the question how anterior Hox proteins achieve specificity. We use the AP2x enhancer, which is activated in the maxillary head segment by the Hox TF Deformed (Dfd). This enhancer lacks canonical Dfd-Exd sites but contains several predicted low-affinity sites. Unexpectedly, these sites are strongly bound by Dfd-Exd complexes and their conversion into optimal Dfd-Exd sites results only in a modest increase in binding strength. These small variations in affinity change the sensitivity of the enhancer to different Dfd levels, resulting in perturbed AP-2 expression and maxillary morphogenesis. Thus, Hox-regulated morphogenesis seems to result from the co-evolution of Hox binding affinity and Hox dosage for precise target gene regulation.

Despite the central role of Hox genes in controlling morphogenesis, the DNA binding of different Hox members is relatively similar. Here they show that specificity of Hox member Dfd relies on a precise balance of transcription factors and binding site affinities.

Empty-spiracles is maternally expressed and essential for neurodevelopment and early embryo determination in Rhodnius prolixus

Since empty-spiracles (ems) was identified and characterized in Drosophila melanogaster as a head-gap gene, several studies have been carried out in other insect orders to confirm its evolutionary conserved function. Using the blood-sucking bug Rhodnius prolixus as biological model, we found an ems transcript with three highly conserved regions: Box-A, Box-B, and the homeodomain. R. prolixus embryos silenced by parental RNAi for two of these ems conserved regions showed both maternal and zygotic defects. Rp-emsB fragment results in early lethal embryogenesis, with eggs without any embryonic structure inside. Rp-emsB expression pattern is only maternally expressed and localized in the ovary tropharium, follicular cells, and in the unfertilized female pronucleus. Rp-emsA fragment is zygotically expressed during early blastoderm formation until late developmental stages in two main patterns: anterior in the antennal segment, and in a segmentary in the neuroblast and tracheal pits. R. prolixus knockdown embryos for Rp-emsA showed an incomplete larval hatching, reduced heads, and severe neuromotor defects. Furthermore, in situ hybridization revealed a spatial and temporal expression pattern that highly correlates with Rp-ems observed function. Here,Rp-ems function in R. prolixus development was validated, showing that empty-spiracles does not act as a true head-gap gene, but it is necessary for proper head development and crucial for early embryo determination and neurodevelopment.

Single-Cell Multiomic Approaches Reveal Diverse Labeling of the Nervous System by Common Cre-Drivers

Neural crest development involves a series of dynamic, carefully coordinated events that result in human disease when not properly orchestrated. Cranial neural crest cells acquire unique multipotent developmental potential upon specification to generate a broad variety of cell types. Studies of early mammalian neural crest and nervous system development often use the Cre-loxP system to lineage trace and mark cells for further investigation. Here, we carefully profile the activity of two common neural crest Cre-drivers at the end of neurulation in mice. RNA sequencing of labeled cells at E9.5 reveals that Wnt1-Cre2 marks cells with neuronal characteristics consistent with neuroepithelial expression, whereas Sox10-Cre predominantly labels the migratory neural crest. We used single-cell mRNA and single-cell ATAC sequencing to profile the expression of Wnt1 and Sox10 and identify transcription factors that may regulate the expression of Wnt1-Cre2 in the neuroepithelium and Sox10-Cre in the migratory neural crest. Our data identify cellular heterogeneity during cranial neural crest development and identify specific populations labeled by two Cre-drivers in the developing nervous system.

The design and logic of terminal patterning in Drosophila

Terminal regions of the early Drosophila embryo are patterned by the highly conserved ERK cascade, giving rise to the nonsegmented terminal structures of the future larva. In less than an hour, this signaling event establishes several gene expression boundaries and sets in motion a sequence of elaborate morphogenetic events. Genetic studies of terminal patterning discovered signaling components and transcription factors that are involved in numerous developmental contexts and deregulated in human diseases. This review summarizes current understanding of signaling and morphogenesis during terminal patterning and discusses several open questions that can now be rigorously investigated using live imaging, omics, and optogenetic approaches. The anatomical simplicity of the terminal patterning system and its amenability to a broad range of increasingly sophisticated genetic perturbations will continue to make it a premier quantitative model for studying multiple aspects of tissue patterning by dynamically controlled cell signaling pathways.

Expression of NK genes that are not part of the NK cluster in the onychophoran Euperipatoides rowelli (Peripatopsidae)

Background

NK genes are a group of homeobox transcription factors that are involved in various molecular pathways across bilaterians. They are typically divided into two subgroups, the NK cluster (NKC) and NK-linked genes (NKL). While the NKC genes have been studied in various bilaterians, corresponding data of many NKL genes are missing to date. To further investigate the ancestral roles of NK family genes, we analyzed the expression patterns of NKL genes in the onychophoran Euperipatoides rowelli.

Results

The NKL gene complement of E. rowelli comprises eight genes, including BarH, Bari, Emx, Hhex, Nedx, NK2.1, vax and NK2.2, of which only NK2.2 was studied previously. Our data for the remaining seven NKL genes revealed expression in different structures associated with the developing nervous system in embryos of E. rowelli. While NK2.1 and vax are expressed in distinct medial regions of the developing protocerebrum early in development, BarH, Bari, Emx, Hhex and Nedx are expressed in late developmental stages, after all major structures of the nervous system have been established. Furthermore, BarH and Nedx are expressed in distinct mesodermal domains in the developing limbs.

Conclusions

Comparison of our expression data to those of other bilaterians revealed similar patterns of NK2.1, vax, BarH and Emx in various aspects of neural development, such as the formation of anterior neurosecretory cells mediated by a conserved molecular mechanism including NK2.1 and vax, and the development of the central and peripheral nervous system involving BarH and Emx. A conserved role in neural development has also been reported from NK2.2, suggesting that the NKL genes might have been primarily involved in neural development in the last common ancestor of bilaterians or at least nephrozoans (all bilaterians excluding xenacoelomorphs). The lack of comparative data for many of the remaining NKL genes, including Bari, Hhex and Nedx currently hampers further evolutionary conclusions. Hence, future studies should focus on the expression of these genes in other bilaterians, which would provide a basis for comparative studies and might help to better understand the role of NK genes in the diversification of bilaterians.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12861-019-0185-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Patterns of cell death in the embryonic antenna of the grasshopper Schistocerca gregaria

We have investigated the pattern of apoptosis in the antennal epithelium during embryonic development of the grasshopper Schistocerca gregaria. The molecular labels lachesin and annulin reveal that the antennal epithelium becomes subdivided into segment-like meristal annuli within which sensory cell clusters later differentiate. To determine whether apoptosis is involved in the development of such sensory cell clusters, we examined the expression pattern of the cell death labels acridine orange and TUNEL in the epithelium. We found stereotypic, age-dependent, wave-like patterns of cell death in the antenna. Early in embryogenesis, apoptosis is restricted to the most basal meristal annuli but subsequently spreads to encompass almost the entire antenna. Cell death then declines in more basal annuli and is only found in the tip region later in embryogenesis. Apoptosis is restricted throughout to the midregion of a given annulus and away from its border with neighboring annuli, arguing against a causal role in annular formation. Double-labeling for cell death and sensory cell differentiation reveals apoptosis occurring within bands of differentiating sensory cell clusters, matching the meristal organization of the apical antenna. Examination of the individual epithelial lineages which generate sensory cells reveals that apoptosis begins peripherally within a lineage and with age expands to encompass the differentiated sensory cell at the base. We conclude that complete lineages can undergo apoptosis and that the youngest cells in these lineages appear to die first, with the sensory neuron dying last. Lineage-based death in combination with cell death patterns in different regions of the antenna may contribute to odor-mediated behaviors in the grasshopper.

Dissection of the complex genetic basis of craniofacial anomalies using haploid genetics and interspecies hybrids in Nasonia wasps

The animal head is a complex structure where numerous sensory, structural and alimentary structures are concentrated and integrated, and its ontogeny requires precise and delicate interactions among genes, cells, and tissues. Thus, it is perhaps unsurprising that craniofacial abnormalities are among the most common birth defects in people, or that these defects have a complex genetic basis involving interactions among multiple loci. Developmental processes that depend on such epistatic interactions become exponentially more difficult to study in diploid organisms as the number of genes involved increases. Here, we present hybrid haploid males of the wasp species pair Nasonia vitripennis and Nasonia giraulti, which have distinct male head morphologies, as a genetic model of craniofacial development that possesses the genetic advantages of haploidy, along with many powerful genomic tools. Viable, fertile hybrids can be made between the species, and quantitative trail loci related to shape differences have been identified. In addition, a subset of hybrid males show head abnormalities, including clefting at the midline and asymmetries. Crucially, epistatic interactions among multiple loci underlie several developmental differences and defects observed in the F2 hybrid males. Furthermore, we demonstrate an introgression of a chromosomal region from N. giraulti into N. vitripennis that shows an abnormality in relative eye size, which maps to a region containing a major QTL for this trait. Therefore, the genetic sources of head morphology can, in principle, be identified by positional cloning. Thus, Nasonia is well positioned to be a uniquely powerful model invertebrate system with which to probe both development and complex genetics of craniofacial patterning and defects.

Patterned Contractile Forces Promote Epidermal Spreading and Regulate Segment Positioning during Drosophila Head Involution

Epithelial spreading is a fundamental mode of tissue rearrangement occurring during animal development and wound closure. It has been associated either with the collective migration of cells [1, 2] or with actomyosin-generated forces acting at the leading edge (LE) and pulling the epithelial tissue [3, 4]. During the process of Drosophila head involution (HI), the epidermis spreads anteriorly to envelope the head tissues and fully cover the embryo [5]. This results in epidermal segments of equal width that will give rise to the different organs of the fly [6]. Here we perform a quantitative analysis of tissue spreading during HI. Combining high-resolution live microscopy with laser microsurgery and genetic perturbations, we show that epidermal movement is in part, but not solely, driven by a contractile actomyosin cable at the LE. Additional driving forces are generated within each segment by a gradient of actomyosin-based circumferential tension. Interfering with Hedgehog (Hh) signaling can modulate this gradient, thus suggesting the involvement of polarity genes in the regulation of HI. In particular, we show that disruption of these contractile forces alters segment widths and leads to a mispositioning of segments. Within the framework of a physical description, we confirm that given the geometry of the embryo, a patterned profile of active circumferential tensions can indeed generate propelling forces and control final segment position. Our study thus unravels a mechanism by which patterned tensile forces can regulate spreading and positioning of epithelial tissues.

Second order regulator Collier directly controls intercalary-specific segment polarity gene expression

In Drosophila, trunk metamerization is established by a cascade of segmentation gene activities: the gap genes, the pair rule genes, and the segment polarity genes. In the anterior head, metamerization requires also gap-like genes and segment polarity genes. However, because the pair rule genes are not active in this part of the embryo, the question on which gene activities are fulfilling the role of the second order regulator genes still remains to be solved. Here we provide first molecular evidence that the Helix-Loop-Helix-COE transcription factor Collier fulfills this role by directly activating the expression of the segment polarity gene hedgehog in the posterior part of the intercalary segment. Collier thereby occupies a newly identified binding site within an intercalary-specific cis-regulatory element. Moreover, we identified a direct physical association between Collier and the basic-leucine-zipper transcription factor Cap'n'collar B, which seems to restrict the activating input of Collier to the posterior part of the intercalary segment and to lead to the attenuation of hedgehog expression in the intercalary lobes at later stages.

Defective proventriculus specifies the ocellar region in the Drosophila head

A pair of the Drosophila eye-antennal disc gives rise to four distinct organs (eyes, antennae, maxillary palps, and ocelli) and surrounding head cuticle. Developmental processes of this imaginal disc provide an excellent model system to study the mechanism of regional specification and subsequent organogenesis. The dorsal head capsule (vertex) of adult Drosophila is divided into three morphologically distinct subdomains: ocellar, frons, and orbital. The homeobox gene orthodenticle (otd) is required for head vertex development, and mutations that reduce or abolish otd expression in the vertex primordium lead to ocelliless flies. The homeodomain-containing transcriptional repressor Engrailed (En) is also involved in ocellar specification, and the En expression is completely lost in otd mutants. However, the molecular mechanism of ocellar specification remains elusive. Here, we provide evidence that the homeobox gene defective proventriculus (dve) is a downstream effector of Otd, and also that the repressor activity of Dve is required for en activation through a relief-of-repression mechanism. Furthermore, the Dve activity is involved in repression of the frons identity in an incoherent feedforward loop of Otd and Dve.

Molecular mechanisms of cranial neural crest cell migration and patterning in craniofacial development

During vertebrate craniofacial development, neural crest cells (NCCs) contribute much of the cartilage, bone and connective tissue that make up the developing head. Although the initial patterns of NCC segmentation and migration are conserved between species, the variety of vertebrate facial morphologies that exist indicates that a complex interplay occurs between intrinsic genetic NCC programs and extrinsic environmental signals during morphogenesis. Here, we review recent work that has begun to shed light on the molecular mechanisms that govern the spatiotemporal patterning of NCC-derived skeletal structures – advances that are central to understanding craniofacial development and its evolution.

The Drosophila Pax6 paralogs have different functions in head development but can partially substitute for each other

There are two Pax6 genes in Drosophila melanogaster; eyeless (ey) and twin-of-eyeless (toy), due to a duplication, which most likely occurred in the insect lineage. They encode transcription factors important for head development. Misexpression of either toy or ey can induce formation of ectopic compound eyes. Toy regulates the ey gene by binding to an eye-specific enhancer in its second intron. However, Toy can induce ectopic eyes also in an ey( - ) background, which indicates a redundancy between the two Pax6 copies in eye formation. To elucidate to what extent these two genes are interchangeable, we first generated toy-Gal4 constructs capable of driving the Pax6 genes in a toy-specific manner. Genetic dissection of the promoter proximal region of toy identified a 1,300-bp region around the canonical transcription start that is sufficient to drive toy expression in embryonic brain and eye primorida and in larval eye-antennal discs. We find that exogenous expression of toy can partially rescue the lethality and eye phenotype caused by lethal mutations in ey and vice versa. We therefore conclude that Toy and Ey, to some extent, can substitute for each other. Nevertheless, the phenotypes of the rescued flies indicate that the two Pax6 genes are specialized to regulate defined structures of the fly head.

Emx and Otx gene expression in the developing mouse brain

The homeobox genes Emx1, Emx2, Otx1 and Otx2 are all expressed in the rostral brain of embryos at E10. Their expression domains are continuous regions of the developing brain contained within each other, such that the expression domain of Otx2 contains that of the other three genes, the expression domain of Otx1 contains that of Emx1 and Emx2, and the expression domain of Emx2 contains that of Emx1. The Emx1 expression domain includes the dorsal telencephalon and it has a posterior boundary slightly anterior to that between the presumptive diencephalon and telencephalon, whereas the Otx2 expression domain covers almost the entire forebrain and midbrain. Starting from E10.75, Otx2 expression disappears progressively from the presumptive cerebral cortex, whereas Emx1, Emx2 and Otx1 are expressed in this structure until late gestation. In particular, Emx2 appears to be expressed exclusively in the germinal ventricular zone of the developing cerebral cortex.

Tracking down the "head blob": comparative analysis of wingless expression in the developing insect procephalon reveals progressive reduction of embryonic visual system patterning in higher insects

The evolution of larval head morphology in holometabolous insects is characterized by reduction of antennal appendages and the visual system components. Little insight has been gained into molecular developmental changes underlying this morphological diversification. Here we compare the expression of the segment polarity gene wingless (wg) in the pregnathal head of fruit fly, flour beetle and grasshopper embryos. We provide evidence that wg activity contributes to segment border formation, and, subsequently, the separation of the visual system and protocerebrum anlagen in the anterior procephalon. In directly developing insects like grasshopper, seven expression domains are formed during this process. The activation of four of these, which correspond to polar expression pairs in the optic lobe anlagen and the protocerebral ectoderm, has shifted to postembryonic stages in flour beetle and Drosophila. The remaining three domains map to the protocerebral neuroectoderm, and form by disintegration of a large precursor domain in flour beetle and grasshopper. In Drosophila, the precursor domain remains intact, constituting the previously described "head blob". These data document major changes in the expression of an early patterning gene correlated with the dramatic evolution of embryonic visual system development in the Holometabola.

Orthodenticle and empty spiracles genes are expressed in a segmental pattern in chelicerates

Members of the orthodenticle (otd/Otx) and empty spiracles (ems/Emx) gene families are head gap genes that encode homeodomain-containing DNA-binding proteins. Although numerous studies show their central role in developmental processes in brain specification, a surprisingly high number of other developmental processes have been shown to involve their expression. In this paper, we report the identification and expression of ems and otd in two chelicerate species: a scorpion, Euscorpius flavicaudis (Chactidae, Scorpiona, Arachnida, Euchelicerata) and a spider, Tegenaria saeva (Aranea, Arachnida, Euchelicerata). We show that both ems and otd are expressed not only in an anterior head domain but also along the entire anterior-posterior axis during embryonic development. The expression patterns for both genes are typically segmental and concern neurectodermal territories. During patterning of the opisthosoma, ems and otd are expressed in the lateral ectoderm just anterior to the limb bud primordia giving rise to respiratory organs and spinnerets (spider). This common pattern found in two divergent species thus appears to be a conserved character of chelicerates. These results are discussed in terms of evolutionary origin of respiratory organs and/or functional pathway recruitment.

Neuroblast formation and patterning during early brain development inDrosophila

The Drosophila embryo provides a useful model system to study the mechanisms that lead to pattern and cell diversity in the central nervous system (CNS). The Drosophila CNS, which encompasses the brain and the ventral nerve cord, develops from a bilaterally symmetrical neuroectoderm, which gives rise to neural stem cells, called neuroblasts. The structure of the embryonic ventral nerve cord is relatively simple, consisting of a sequence of repeated segmental units (neuromeres), and the mechanisms controlling the formation and specification of the neuroblasts that form these neuromeres are quite well understood. Owing to the much higher complexity and hidden segmental organization of the brain, our understanding of its development is still rudimentary. Recent investigations on the expression and function of proneural genes, segmentation genes, dorsoventral-patterning genes and a number of other genes have provided new insight into the principles of neuroblast formation and patterning during embryonic development of the fly brain. Comparisons with the same processes in the trunk help us to understand what makes the brain different from the ventral nerve cord. Several parallels in early brain patterning between the fly and the vertebrate systems have become evident.

Commissure formation in the embryonic insect brain

The primary axon scaffold of the insect brain is established early in embryogenesis and comprises a preoral protocerebral commissure, a postoral tritocerebral commissure and longitudinal fiber pathways linking the two. In both grasshopper and fly its form is approximately orthogonal and is centered around the stomodeum. We show how pioneer fibers from the protocerebrum and tritocerebrum cross the brain midline directly via their respective commissures. The deutocerebrum, however, lacks its own commissure and we describe how deutocerebral pioneers circumnavigate the gut to cross the midline either via the protocerebral commissure or the tritocerebral commissure. In contrast to all other commissures of the central nervous system, the protocerebral commissure persists, albeit in reduced form, in the commissureless mutation in the fly. Besides the com gene, a further, as yet unidentified, mechanism must regulate this commissure. The formation of the tritocerebral commissure involves labial, a member of the Hox gene group. Genetic rescue experiments in labial mutants reveal that the formation of this commissure can be rescued by all other Hox genes except Abdominal-B. However, only in the labial and Deformed null mutants are the commissures associated with the respective expression domains (tritocerebral, mandibular, respectively) absent. This suggests that the molecular mechanisms regulating postoral brain commissure formation are distinct from those in the neuromeres of the ventral nerve cord.

Genomic organization and promoter and transcription regulatory regions for the expression in the anterior brain (sensory vesicle) of Hroth, the otx homologue of the ascidian, Halocynthia roretzi

Otx (otd in Drosophila) is a well-conserved homeobox gene throughout animal phylogeny and commonly expressed in the anterior part of the embryo. In embryos of the ascidian Halocynthia roretzi, Hroth, the otx homologue in this species, is expressed in the endoderm and the sensory vesicle, the anterior part of the larval ascidian central nervous system (CNS), which has been thought to be homologous to vertebrate forebrain and midbrain. The developmental expression pattern of Hroth is very similar to that of vertebrate counterparts, which leads to a possibility that a similar mechanism may exist in the patterning of the CNS between ascidians and vertebrates. To better understand the mechanism, we decided to undertake analysis of the transcriptional regulatory regions of Hroth. We isolated and determined the nucleotide sequence of the 11.4-kbp region upstream of the translation start site of Hroth. We found that Hroth transcripts are modified likely with spliced leader RNA; therefore, we could not determine the transcription start site. However, first, we identified three introns that are unknown with vertebrate otx genes. Second, we found two regions that are capable of functioning as a promoter through deletion analysis, one of which appeared to be an endogenous promoter of Hroth. We analyzed the 5' upstream region 5402-1473bp, the region between 1473 and 5402 base pairs upstream from the translation start site of Hroth, including the putative endogenous promoter. This region was capable of driving Hroth expression in the sensory vesicle lineage cells as well as some other lineages at the early tail bud stage. Deletion analysis of this region suggested that three regions, 1659-1650bp, 1628-1613bp, and 1542-1473bp are responsible for regulating Hroth expression in the sensory vesicle cells at the tail bud stage. Among these regions, no apparent sequence conservation was observed. The present study has revealed a complex organization of transcription regulatory regions for the ascidian otx.

Morphological and molecular data argue for the labrum being non-apical, articulated, and the appendage of the intercalary segment in the locust

Our analysis of head segmentation in the locust embryo reveals that the labrum is not apical as often interpreted but constitutes the topologically fused appendicular pair of appendages of the third head metamere. Using molecular, immunocytochemical and retrograde axonal staining methods we show that this metamere, the intercalary segment, is innervated by the third brain neuromere-the tritocerebrum. Evidence for the appendicular nature of the labrum is firstly, the presence of an engrailed stripe within its posterior epithelium as is typical of all appendages in the early embryo. Secondly, the labrum is innervated by a segmental nerve originating from the third brain neuromere (the tritocerebrum). Immunocytochemical staining with Lazarillo and horseradish peroxidase antibodies reveal that sensory neurons on the labrum contribute to the segmental (tritocerebral) nerve via the labral nerve in the same way as for the appendages immediately anterior (antenna) and posterior (mandible) on the head. All but one of the adult and embryonic motoneurons innervating the muscles of the labrum have their cell bodies and dendrites located completely within the tritocerebral neuromere and putatively derive from engrailed expressing tritocerebral neuroblasts. Molecular evidence (repo) suggests the labrum is not only appendicular but also articulated, comprising two jointed elements homologous to the coxa and trochanter of the leg.

A single cell analysis of engrailed expression in the early embryonic brain of the grasshopper Schistocerca gregaria: ontogeny and identity of the secondary headspot cells

The expression pattern of the segment polarity gene engrailed was studied at the single cell level in the protocerebrum of the early embryonic brain of the grasshopper Schistocerca gregaria, the neuromere containing the secondary headspot cells. The engrailed protein is first expressed in the protocerebrum at about 22% of embryogenesis by a group of identified neuroblasts bordering the antennal lobe. The number of immunoreactive neuroblasts increases up to 26% of embryogenesis and then rapidly declines so that by 30% only the three most posterior remain immunoreactive. These three neuroblasts become incorporated into the developing antennal lobe of the deutocerebrum. Subsequently, there is a progressive re-expression of the engrailed protein in the protocerebrum by the so-called six secondary headspot cells. These are the first born sibling progeny of three identified protocerebral neuroblasts which themselves expressed the engrailed protein prior to generating their lineages, and so represents a reacquisition of engrailed expression within identified clones. The secondary headspot cells are neurons which direct axonal processes into the developing optic tract and so contribute to the primary axon scaffold of the brain. From our analysis of their ontogeny, we conclude that the secondary headspot cells do not represent a segmental border in the brain.

The radial-symmetric hydra and the evolution of the bilateral body plan: an old body became a young brain

The radial symmetric cnidarians are regarded as being close to the common metazoan ancestor before bilaterality evolved. It is proposed that a large fraction of the body of this gastrula-like organism gave rise to the head of more evolved organisms. The trunk was added later in evolution from an unfolding of a narrow zone between the tentacles and the blastoporus. This implies that, counter intuitively, the foot of the hydra corresponds to the most anterior part (forebrain and heart) while the opening of the gastric column gave rise to the anus. Two fundamentally different modes of midline formation evolved. In vertebrates, the organiser attracts cells from the both sides of the marginal zone. These leave the organiser as a unified band. The midline is formed sequentially from anterior to posterior. In insects, the midline forms opposite a dorsal repelling center, i.e., on the ventral side. This can occur more or less simultaneously over the whole anteroposterior extension.

Otx2 can activate the isthmic organizer genetic network in the Xenopus embryo

Development and differentiation of the vertebrate caudal midbrain and anterior hindbrain are dependent on the isthmic organizer signals at the midbrain/hindbrain boundary (MHB). The future MHB forms at the boundary between the Otx2 and Gbx2 expression domains. Recent studies in mice and chick suggested that the apposition of Otx2- and Gbx2-expressing cells is instrumental for the positioning and early induction of the MHB genetic cascade. We show that Otx2 and Gbx2 perform different roles in this process. We find that ectopically expressed Otx2 on its own can induce a substantial part of the MHB genetic network, namely En2, Wnt1, Pax-2, Fgf8 and Gbx2, in a concentration-dependent manner. This induction does not require protein synthesis and ends during neurulation. In contrast, Gbx2 is a negative regulator of Otx2 and the MHB genes. Based on the temporal patterns of expression of the genes involved, we propose that Otx2 might be the early inducer of the isthmic organizer genetic network while Gbx2 restricts Otx2 expression along the anterior-posterior axis and establishes an Otx2 gradient.

Common developmental genetic mechanisms for patterning invertebrate and vertebrate brains

Recent genetic studies on embryonic brain development in the fly Drosophila melanogaster together with investigations on early morphogenesis and patterning in the embryonic brain of the mouse revealed developmental mechanisms that are strikingly similar in insects and mammals. The homeotic (Hox) genes are expressed in a virtually colinear anteroposterior pattern in the developing posterior brain of insects and mammals, where they are required for the specification of segmental neuronal identity. The otd/Otx cephalic gap genes are expressed in the anterior brain of insects and mammals and are of central importance for its formation because in both phyla loss of otd/Otx2 causes the loss of the entire rostral brain. Specific Pax genes are involved in numerous aspects of brain development in both phyla. These developmental genetic findings reveal a striking evolutionary conservation of cephalic gap gene, homeotic gene, and Pax gene action in embryonic brain development that extends beyond gene structure to encompass patterned expression and function. This comparative evidence indicates that the genetic programs which direct embryonic brain development are remarkably conserved and lends further support to the hypothesis that a common molecular bauplan underlies brain development in invertebrates and vertebrates. In consequence, it seems increasingly likely that both modern brain types share their evolutionary origin in a common ancestral bilaterian brain which was established before the protostome-deuterostome divergence over 600 million years ago.

Stem Cells and Neuronal Progenitors and Their Diversity in the CNS: Are Time and Place Important?

Stem cells are multilineage progenitor cells that are capable of self-regenerating and giving rise to different cell types. The proper assembly of the CNS into functionally relevant circuits requires that stem cells produce the right types of cells in the right number and position at the appropriate time. We suggest that the positional specification of stem cells is provided by the pattern of expression of early transcriptional regulators along the body axes. These mechanisms restrict the competence of stem cells to programming a local cellular repertoire. Conversely, we argue that the specification of different cell types in the appropriate number and sequence is independently carried out within CNS domains by subprograms that progressively change the intrinsic properties of the stem cells. Temporal changes in proliferation and differentiation of stem cells are controlled by cascades of extracellular signals and basic helix-loop-helix (bHlH) transcription factors. These regulators in turn may activate homeodomain transcription factors with more restricted effector functions. Fibroblast growth factors (FGF) are among the earliest acting signals providing local changes in growth within the developing CNS. Basic FGF (FGF2) increases the proliferation of either stem cells or their immediate progeny, increasing the number of founder cells in the developing cerebral cortex.

Lazarillo expression reveals a subset of neurons contributing to the primary axon scaffold of the embryonic brain of the grasshopper Schistocerca gregaria

The authors studied the contribution of seven clusters of Lazarillo-expressing cells to the primary axon scaffold of the brain in the grasshopper Schistocerca gregaria from 26% to 43% of embryogenesis. Each cluster, which was numbered according to when Lazarillo expression first appeared, was uniquely identifiable on the basis of its stereotypic position in the brain and the number of Lazarillo-expressing cells it contained. At no time during embryogenesis was Lazarillo expression found in brain neuroblasts: It was found only in progeny. For ease of analysis, axogenesis was followed in a cell cluster that contained only a single Lazarillo-expressing cell (the lateral cell) in the dorsal median domain of the brain midline. Bromodeoxyuridine incorporation revealed the presence of only a single midline precursor cell in this region during embryogenesis. Intracellular injection of Lucifer yellow into the lateral cell at various ages showed that there was no dye coupling to the midline precursor or to the nearby term-1-expressing primary commissure pioneers. The lateral cell is not related lineally to these cells and most likely differentiates directly from the neuroectoderm of the brain midline. Lazarillo expression appears at the onset of axogenesis as the lateral cell projects an axon laterally toward the next Lazarillo-expressing cell cluster. The cells of this target cluster direct axons into separate brain regions, thereby establishing an orthogonally organized scaffold that the lateral cell axon follows as it navigates away from the brain midline. The primary axon scaffold of the brain results from a stepwise interlinking of discrete brain regions, as exemplified by axons from neighboring Lazarillo-expressing cell clusters.

Expression, regulation and function of the homeobox gene empty spiracles in brain and ventral nerve cord development of Drosophila

We analyse the role of the empty spiracles (ems) gene in embryonic brain and ventral nerve cord development. ems is differentially expressed in the neurectoderm of the anterior head versus the trunk region of early embryos. A distal enhancer region drives expression in the deutocerebral brain anlage and a proximal enhancer region drives expression in the VNC and tritocerebral brain anlage. Mutant analysis indicates that in the anterior brain ems is necessary for regionalized neurogenesis in the deutocerebral and tritocerebral anlagen. In the posterior brain and VNC ems is necessary for correct axonal pathfinding of specific interneurons. Rescue experiments indicate that the murine Emx2 gene can partially replace the fly ems gene in CNS development.

spen encodes an RNP motif protein that interacts with Hox pathways to repress the development of head-like sclerites in the Drosophila trunk

Drosophila has eight Hox proteins, and they require factors acting in parallel to regulate different segmental morphologies. Here we find that the Drosophila gene split ends (spen), has a homeotic mutant phenotype, and appears to encode such a parallel factor. Our results indicate that spen plays two important segment identity roles. One is to promote sclerite development in the head region, in parallel with Hox genes; the other is to cooperate with Antennapedia and teashirt to suppress head-like sclerite development in the thorax. Our results also indicate that without spen and teashirt functions, Antennapedia loses its ability to specify thoracic identity in the epidermis. spen transcripts encode extraordinarily large protein isoforms (approx. 5,500 amino acids), which are concentrated in embryonic nuclei. Both Spen protein isoforms and Spen-like proteins in other animals possess a clustered repeat of three RNP (or RRM) domains, as well as a conserved motif of 165 amino acids (SPOC domain) at their C-termini. Spen is the only known homeotic protein with RNP binding motifs, which indicates that splicing, transport, or other RNA regulatory steps are involved in the diversification of segmental morphology. Previous studies by Dickson and others (Dickson, B. J., Van Der Straten, A., Dominguez, M. and Hafen, E. (1996). Genetics 142, 163–171) identified spen as a gene that acts downstream of Raf to suppress Raf signaling in a manner similar to the ETS transcription factor Aop/Yan. This raises the intriguing possibility that the Spen RNP protein might integrate signals from both the Raf and Hox pathways.

Head versus trunk patterning in the Drosophila embryo; collier requirement for formation of the intercalary segment

Whereas the segmental nature of the insect head is well established, relatively little is known about the genetic and molecular mechanisms governing this process. In this paper, we report the phenotypic analysis of mutations in collier (col), which encodes the Drosophila member of the COE family of HLH transcription factors and is activated at the blastoderm stage in a region overlapping a parasegment (PS0: posterior intercalary and anterior mandibular segments) and a mitotic domain, MD2. col mutant embryos specifically lack intercalary ectodermal structures. col activity is required for intercalary-segment expression both of the segment polarity genes hedgehog, engrailed, and wingless, and of the segment identity gene cap and collar. The parasegmental register of col activation is controlled by the combined activities of the head-gap genes buttonhead and empty spiracles and the pair-rule gene even skipped; it therefore integrates inputs from both the head and trunk segmentation systems, which were previously considered as being essentially independent. After gastrulation, positive autoregulation of col is limited to cells of anterior PS0. Conversely, heat-pulse induced ubiquitous expression of Col leads to disruption of the head skeleton. Together, these results indicate that col is required for establishment of the PS(−1)/PS0 parasegmental border and formation of the intercalary segment. Our data support neither a simple combinatorial model for segmental patterning of the head nor a direct activation of segment polarity gene expression by head-gap genes, but rather argue for the existence of parasegment-specific second order regulators acting in the head, at a level similar to that of pair-rule genes in the trunk.

Cell autonomous and non-cell autonomous functions of Otx2 in patterning the rostral brain

Previous studies have shown that the homeobox gene Otx2 is required first in the visceral endoderm for induction of forebrain and midbrain, and subsequently in the neurectoderm for its regional specification. Here, we demonstrate that Otx2 functions both cell autonomously and non-cell autonomously in neurectoderm cells of the forebrain and midbrain to regulate expression of region-specific homeobox and cell adhesion genes. Using chimeras containing both Otx2 mutant and wild-type cells in the brain, we observe a reduction or loss of expression of Rpx/Hesx1, Wnt1, R-cadherin and ephrin-A2 in mutant cells, whereas expression of En2 and Six3 is rescued by surrounding wild-type cells. Forebrain Otx2 mutant cells subsequently undergo apoptosis. Altogether, this study demonstrates that Otx2 is an important regulator of brain patterning and morphogenesis, through its regulation of candidate target genes such as Rpx/Hesx1, Wnt1, R-cadherin and ephrin-A2.

Six class homeobox genes in drosophila belong to three distinct families and are involved in head development

The vertebrate Six genes are homologues of the Drosophila homeobox gene sine oculis (so), which is essential for development of the entire visual system. Here we describe two new Six genes in Drosophila, D-Six3 and D-Six4, which encode proteins with strongest similarity to vertebrate Six3 and Six4, respectively. In addition, we report the partial sequences of 12 Six gene homologues from several lower vertebrates and show that the class of Six proteins can be subdivided into three major families, each including one Drosophila member. Similar to so, both D-Six3 and D-Six4 are initially expressed at the blastoderm stage in narrow regions of the prospective head and during later stages in specific groups of head midline neurectodermal cells. D-Six3 may also be essential for development of the clypeolabrum and several head sensory organs. Thus, the major function of the ancestral Six gene probably involved specification of neural structures in the cephalic region.

Expression of the head gene Lox22-Otx in the leech Helobdella and the origin of the bilaterian body plan

The orthodenticle orthologue Lox22-Otx was isolated from an annelid worm, the leech Helobdella triserialis. In situ hybridization reveals that embryonic expression of Lox22-Otx RNA is primarily restricted to an unsegmented head domain, including tissues in the foregut, surface ectoderm, and the head ganglion of the central nervous system. The patterns of head expression form concentric rings about the stomadeum and mark tissue domains that exhibit discrete behaviors during later morphogenesis and differentiation. Expression was also observed in one to two bilateral pairs of neurons in each segmental ganglion or neuromere of the body trunk. The largely head-specific expression of Lox22-Otx in this annelid species supports data from two other bilaterian phyla in suggesting the existence of a genetically defined head/trunk distinction. We suggest here that this head/trunk distinction is a synapomorphy of the Bilateria as a whole, and that it reflects the body plan of an early bilaterian ancestor. In addition, we discuss the possibility that the radial organization of gene expression and cell lineages in the leech's head domain may reflect the symmetry properties of a prebilaterian ancestor that had a radially symmetric body plan.

Retinoic acid affects patterning along the anterior-posterior axis of the ascidian embryo

Because retinoic acid (RA) is known to affect anterior posterior patterning in vertebrate embryos, it was questioned whether it shows similar effects in a more primitive chordate, the ascidian Halocynthia roretzi. Ascidian embryos treated with RA exhibited truncated phenotypes in a dose-dependent manner similar to the anterior truncations seen in vertebrate embryos. The most severely affected larvae possessed a round trunk without the papillae characteristic of the anterior terminal epidermis. Retinoic acid also altered the expression of HrHox-1 and Hroth in a dose-dependent manner. Expression of HrHox-1 increased, whereas expression of Hroth decreased with increasing levels of RA. In treated embryos, HrHox-1 was first expressed pan-ectodermally, then degraded in all but specific regions of the embryo. By contrast, initiation of Hroth expression was not affected, but epidermal expression was lost while expression in the neural tube narrowed toward the anterior in tail-bud embryos. These alterations in the expression of homeobox genes appear to correlate closely to the morphological defects elicited by RA treatment, suggesting broad conservation of developmental patterning mechanisms within the Phylum Chordata.

Ectopic orthodenticle expression alters segment polarity gene expression but not head segment identity in the Drosophila embryo

The cephalic gap genes specify anterior head development in the Drosophila embryo. However, the mechanisms of action of these genes remain poorly understood. Here, we focused on the cephalic gap gene orthodenticle (otd), which establishes a specific region of the anterior head. It has been proposed that otd acts in a combinatorial fashion with the cephalic gap genes empty spiracles (ems) and buttonhead (btd) to assign segmental identities in this region. To test this model, we used a heat-inducible transgene to generate pulses of ubiquitous otd expression during embryonic development. Ectopic otd expression caused significant defects in head formation, including the duplication of sensory structures derived from otd-dependent segments. However, these defects do not appear to result from the transformation of head segment identities predicted by the combinatorial model. Instead, they correlate with specific regulatory effects of otd on the expression of the segment polarity genes engrailed (en) and wingless (wg). Ectopic otd expression also caused the loss of head structures derived from the maxillary segment, which lies posterior to the otd domain. We show that this effect is associated with otd repression of the homeotic selector gene Deformed (Dfd).

Equivalence of the fly orthodenticle gene and the human OTX genes in embryonic brain development of Drosophila

Members of the orthodenticle gene family are essential for embryonic brain development in animals as diverse as insects and mammals. In Drosophila, mutational inactivation of the orthodenticle gene results in deletions in anterior parts of the embryonic brain and in defects in the ventral nerve cord. In the mouse, targeted elimination of the homologous Otx2 or Otx1 genes causes defects in forebrain and/or midbrain development. To determine the morphogenetic properties and the extent of evolutionary conservation of the orthodenticle gene family in embryonic brain development, genetic rescue experiments were carried out in Drosophila. Ubiquitous overexpression of the orthodenticle gene rescues both the brain defects and the ventral nerve cord defects in orthodenticle mutant embryos; morphology and nervous system-specific gene expression are restored. Two different time windows exist for the rescue of the brain versus the ventral nerve cord. Ubiquitous overexpression of the human OTX1 or OTX2 genes also rescues the brain and ventral nerve cord phenotypes in orthodenticle mutant embryos; in the brain, the efficiency of morphological rescue is lower than that obtained with overexpression of orthodenticle. Overexpression of either orthodenticle or the human OTX gene homologs in the wild-type embryo results in ectopic neural structures. The rescue of highly complex brain structures in Drosophila by either fly or human orthodenticle gene homologs indicates that these genes are interchangeable between vertebrates and invertebrates and provides further evidence for an evolutionarily conserved role of the orthodenticle gene family in brain development.

Sequential roles for Otx2 in visceral endoderm and neuroectoderm for forebrain and midbrain induction and specification

The homeobox gene Otx2 is a mouse cognate of the Drosophila orthodenticle gene, which is required for development of the brain, rostral to rhombomere three. We have investigated the mechanisms involved in this neural function and specifically the requirement for Otx2 in the visceral endoderm and the neuroectoderm using chimeric analysis in mice and explant recombination assay. Analyses of chimeric embryos composed of more than 90% of Otx2−/− ES cells identified an essential function for Otx2 in the visceral endoderm for induction of the forebrain and midbrain. The chimeric studies also demonstrated that an anterior neural plate can form without expressing Otx2. However, in the absence of Otx2, expression of important regulatory genes, such as Hesx1/Rpx, Six3, Pax2, Wnt1 and En, fail to be initiated or maintained in the neural plate. Using explant-recombination assay, we could further demonstrate that Otx2 is required in the neuroectodem for expression of En. Altogether, these results demonstrate that Otx2 is first required in the visceral endoderm for the induction, and subsequently in the neuroectoderm for the specification of forebrain and midbrain territories.

Novel segment polarity gene interactions during embryonic head development in Drosophila

In the trunk of the Drosophila embryo, the segment polarity genes are initially activated by the pair-rule genes, and later maintain each other's expression through a complex network of cross-regulatory interactions. These interactions, which are critical to cell fate specification, are similar in each of the trunk segments. To determine whether segment polarity gene expression is established differently outside the trunk, we studied the regulation of the genes hedgehog (hh), wingless (wg), and engrailed (en) in each of the segments of the developing head. We show that the cross-regulatory relationships among these genes, as well as their initial mode of activation, in the anterior head are significantly different from those in the trunk. In addition, each head segment exhibits a unique network of segment polarity gene interactions. We propose that these segment-specific interactions evolved to specify the high degree of structural diversity required for head morphogenesis.

Complex regulatory region mediating tailless expression in early embryonic patterning and brain development

tailless encodes a transcription factor expressed in multiple domains in the developing embryo. Early and transient expression at the posterior pole is required to establish a domain from which the eighth abdominal segment, telson and posterior gut arise. Just a few nuclear cycles later, a brain-specific domain is initiated at the anterior; expression in this domain is maintained with complex modulations throughout embryogenesis. Expression of tailless in this domain is required to establish the most anterior region of the brain. To understand the function and regulation of these different domains of expression, we provide a detailed description of tailless expression in brain neuroblasts and show that this expression is not detectably regulated by the head gap genes buttonhead or orthodenticle, by the proneural gene lethal of scute or by tailless itself. We show that approximately 6 kb of sequenced upstream regulatory DNA can drive lacZ expression in a pattern that mimics the full tailless embryonic expression pattern. Within this sequence we identify multiple modules responsible for different aspects of the tailless pattern. In addition to identifying additional torso response elements that mediate early blastoderm polar expression, we show that the complex brain expression pattern is driven by a combination of modules; thus expression at a low level throughout the brain and at a high level in the dorsal medial portion of the brain and in the optic lobe, as well as neuroblast-specific repression are mediated by different DNA regions.

Cis-acting elements conserved between mouse and pufferfish Otx2 genes govern the expression in mesencephalic neural crest cells

Previous studies suggested that the Otx2 gene plays an essential role in the development of cranial skeletons and nerves of mesencephalic neural crest origin. To clarify this role, we have identified the cis-acting elements in mouse and pufferfish Otx2 genes responsible for the expression in the crest cells using a transgenic approach with the lacZ reporter gene. In mouse, 49 bp sequences in the proximal 5′ region upstream were essential and sufficient to direct the transgene expression in the cephalic mesenchyme. In pufferfish, the 1.1 kb distal region, located far downstream (from +14.4 to +15.5 kb), had almost identical activity. Between them, several DNA sequences were conserved, and mutational analyses indicated that motif A was critical for the transgene expression in the premandibular region while motif B was critical in both premandibular and mandibular regions. Motif B, CTAATTA, contains the core motif for binding of homeodomain proteins while motif A, TAAATCTG, does not match any known consensus binding sequences for transcriptional factors. The cephalic mesenchyme that expressed beta-galactosidase under these cis-elements is most likely to correspond to mesencephalic crest cells. Thus the molecular machinery regulating Otx2 expression in these cells appears to be conserved between mouse and fish, implying a crucial role of the Otx2 gene in development of the neural-crest-derived structures of the gnathostome rostral head.

Integration of the head and trunk segmentation systems controls cephalic furrow formation in Drosophila

Genetic and molecular analyses of patterning of the Drosophila embryo have shown that the process of segmentation of the head is fundamentally different from the process of segmentation of the trunk. The cephalic furrow (CF), one of the first morphological manifestations of the patterning process, forms at the juxtaposition of these two patterning systems. We report here that the initial step in CF formation is a change in shape and apical positioning of a single row of cells. The anteroposterior position of these initiator cells may be defined by the overlapping expression of the head gap gene buttonhead (btd) and the primary pair-rule gene even-skipped (eve). Re-examination of the btd and eve phenotypes in live embryos indicated that both genes are required for CF formation. Further, Eve expression in initiator cells was found to be dependent upon btd activity. The control of eve expression by btd in these cells is the first indication of a new level of integrated regulation that interfaces the head and trunk segmentation systems. In conjunction with previous data on the btd and eve embryonic phenotypes, our results suggest that interaction between these two genes both controls initiation of a specific morphogenetic movement that separates two morphogenetic fields and contributes to patterning the hinge region that demarcates the procephalon from the segmented germ band.

Regionalization in the mammalian telencephalon

Regionalization in the telencephalon results in the formation of functionally and anatomically distinct territories. Cell fate analysis and gene expression studies suggest these subdivisions arise relatively late in development compared with the spinal cord or hindbrain. The mechanisms underlying the commitment of telencephalic cells to specific regional identities have been examined through recent transplantation experiments.

Transcription factors and head formation in vertebrates

Evidence from Drosophila and also vertebrates predicts that two different sets of instructions may determine the development of the rostral and caudal parts of the body. This implies different cellular and inductive processes during gastrulation, whose genetic requirements remain to be understood. To date, four genes encoding transcription factors expressed in the presumptive vertebrate head during gastrulation have been studied at the functional level: Lim-1, Otx-2, HNF-3 beta and goosecoid. We discuss here the potential functions of these genes in the formation of rostral head as compared to posterior head and trunk, and in the light of recent fate map and expression analyses in mouse, chick, Xenopus and zebrafish. These data indicate that Lim-1, Otx-2 and HNF-3 beta may be involved in the same genetic pathway controlling the formation of the prechordal mesendoderm, which is subsequently required for rostral head development. goosecoid may act in a parallel pathway, possibly in conjunction with other, yet unidentified, factors.

Structure of the insect head in ontogeny and phylogeny: a view from Drosophila

Evolutionary, developmental and insect biologists are currently using a three-pronged approach to study the evolution and development of the insect head. First, genetic manipulation of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster has led to the identification of many genes, including the segmentation and homeotic genes, that are important for embryonic pattern formation and development. Second, a comparison of orthologous gene expression patterns in other insects reveals that these regulatory genes are deployed in similar, yet distinct, patterns in different insects. Third, comparisons of embryonic morphology with gene expression patterns suggest that in general these genes promote a common insect body plan, but that variations in gene expression can often be correlated to variations in morphology. Here, we present a detailed review of the development of the cephalic ectoderm of Drosophila and extrapolate to development of a generalized insect head. Our analysis of the variations among insect species, in both morphology and gene expression patterns, conducted within an evolutionary framework supported by traditional phylogenies and paleontology provides the basis for hypotheses about the genetic factors governing morphologic and developmental evolution.

Structure of the insect head as revealed by the EN protein pattern in developing embryos

The structure of the insect head has long been a topic of enjoyable yet endless debate among entomologists. More recently geneticists and molecular biologists trying to better understand the structure of the head of the Dipteran Drosophila melanogaster have joined the discourse extrapolating from what they have learned about Drosophila to insects in general. Here we present the results of an investigation into the structure of the insect head as revealed by the distribution of engrailed related protein (Engrailed) in the insect orders Diptera, Siphonaptera, Orthoptera and Hemiptera. The results of this comparative embryology in conjunction with genetic experiments on Drosophila melanogaster lead us to conclude: (1) The insect head is composed of six Engrailed accumulating segments, four postoral and two preoral. The potential seventh and eighth segments (clypeus or labrum) do not accumulate Engrailed. (2) The structure known as the dorsal ridge is not specific to the Diptera but is homologous to structures found in other insect orders. (3) A part of this structure is a single segment-like entity composed of labial and maxillary segment derivatives which produce the most anterior cuticle capable of taking a dorsal fate. The segments anterior to the maxillary segment produce only ventral structures. (4) As in Drosophila, the process of segmentation of the insect head is fundamentally different from the process of segmentation in the trunk. (5) The pattern of Engrailed accumulation and its presumed role in the specification and development of head segments appears to be highly conserved while its role in other pattern formation events and tissue-specific expression is variable. An overview of the pattern of Engrailed accumulation in developing insect embryos provides a basis for discussion of the generality of the parasegment and the evolution of Engrailed patterns.

EMX1 homeoprotein is expressed in cell nuclei of the developing cerebral cortex and in the axons of the olfactory sensory neurons

We analyzed the distribution of EMX1 during mouse development. EMX1 is a homeoprotein encoded by Emx1, a regulatory homeobox gene expressed in the developing forebrain. Its distribution essentially overlaps the expression domains of Emx1 transcripts. The EMX1 protein is present in the developing dorsa telencephalon, that is in the cerebral cortex, olfactory bulb and hippocampus. In the cerebral cortex EMX1 is present in nuclei of proliferating, differentiating and most mature neurons belonging to all cortical layers. In the olfactory bulb it is present in all proliferating cells during development, whereas postnatally it is faintly expressed in some mitral cells. Non-cerebral localizations include a transient expression in branchial pouches, in the apical ectodermal ridge of the developing limbs and in the developing kidney. Of particular interest is the presence of EMX1 in the olfactory nerve from its first appearance during embryogenesis to birth. The protein is present in axons of olfactory sensory neurons along their entire length, including their terminals in spherical regions of neuropil in the olfactory bulb called glomeruli.

hedgehog, wingless and orthodenticle specify adult head development in Drosophila

The adult head capsule of Drosophila forms primarily from the eye-antennal imaginal discs. Here, we demonstrate that the head primordium is patterned differently from the discs which give rise to the appendages. We show that the segment polarity genes hedgehog and wingless specify the identities of specific regions of the head capsule. During eye-antennal disc development, hedgehog and wingless expression initially overlap, but subsequently segregate. This regional segregation is critical to head specification and is regulated by the orthodenticle homeobox gene. We also show that orthodenticle is a candidate hedgehog target gene during early eye-antennal disc development.

Collier, a novel regulator of Drosophila head development, is expressed in a single mitotic domain

BACKGROUND

Segmentation of the Drosophila embryo is based on a cascade of hierarchical gene interactions that is initiated by maternal morphogens; these interactions define spatially restricted domains of zygotic gene expression within the blastoderm. Although the hierarchy of the segmentation genes that subdivide the trunk is well established, the patterning of the head is less well understood. Seven head segments can be assigned on the basis of metameric patterns of segment-polarity gene expression and internal sensory organs. The domains of expression of head gap-like genes broadly overlap, with their posterior margins out of phase by one segment. Taken together with the lack of pair-rule gene expression in the head, these observations led to the suggestion that head gap genes act in a combinatorial manner, determining head segmental borders and segmental identity at the same time.

RESULTS

We have identified a new Drosophila gene, collier (col), whose expression at the blastoderm stage is restricted to a single stripe of cells corresponding to part of the intercalary and mandibular segment primordia, possibly parasegment O. Reduction of col activity in early gastrula embryos by antisense RNA expression results in a specific lack of head structures derived from these segments. The expression of col coincides with a mitotic domain, which supports the proposal that cells in this domain undergo a concerted mitotic and differentiation program that is orchestrated at the transcriptional level. Col is an ortholog of mammalian early B-cell factor/Olfactory-1. These proteins define a new family of transcription factors that contain a helix-loop-helix dimerization motif and a new type of DNA-binding domain that is highly conserved during evolution.

CONCLUSIONS

Here we describe Col, the first Drosophila member of a new family of transcription factors. Col may act as a "second-level regulator' of head patterning. The structural conservation of Col during evolution raises the questions of its conservation of function in head specification and its interactions with other factors conserved between insects and vertebrates.