1
|
Switalla KM, Boughey JC, Dimitroff K, Yau C, Ladores V, Yu H, Tchou J, Golshan M, Ahrendt G, Postlewait LM, Piltin M, Reyna CR, Matsen CB, Tuttle TM, Wallace AM, Arciero CA, Lee MC, Tseng J, Son J, Rao R, Sauder C, Naik A, Howard-McNatt M, Lancaster R, Norwood P, Esserman LJ, Mukhtar RA. Clipping the Positive Lymph Node in Patients with Clinically Node Positive Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Impact on Axillary Surgery in the ISPY-2 Clinical Trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15792-x. [PMID: 38995451 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15792-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients with clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), retrieving previously clipped, biopsy-proven positive lymph nodes during sentinel lymph node biopsy [i.e., targeted axillary dissection (TAD)] may reduce false negative rates. However, the overall utilization and impact of clipping positive nodes remains uncertain. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed cN+ ISPY-2 patients (2011-2022) undergoing axillary surgery after NAC. We evaluated trends in node clipping and associations with type of axillary surgery [sentinel lymph node (SLN) only, SLN and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), or ALND only] and event-free survival (EFS) in patients that were cN+ on a NAC trial. RESULTS Among 801 cN+ patients, 161 (20.1%) had pre-NAC clip placement in the positive node. The proportion of patients that were cN+ undergoing clip placement increased from 2.4 to 36.2% between 2011 and 2021. Multivariable logistic regression showed nodal clipping was independently associated with higher odds of SLN-only surgery [odds ratio (OR) 4.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-6.8, p < 0.001]. This was also true among patients with residual pathologically node-positive (pN+) disease. Completion ALND rate did not differ based on clip retrieval success. No significant differences in EFS were observed in those with or without clip placement, both with or without successful clip retrieval [hazard ratio (HR) 0.85, 95% CI 0.4-1.7, p = 0.7; HR 1.8, 95% CI 0.5-6.0, p = 0.3, respectively]. CONCLUSION Clip placement in the positive lymph node before NAC is increasingly common. The significant association between clip placement and omission of axillary dissection, even among patients with pN+ disease, suggests a paradigm shift toward TAD as a definitive surgical management strategy in patients with pN+ disease after NAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kayla M Switalla
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Christina Yau
- Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Velle Ladores
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Hongmei Yu
- Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Julia Tchou
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mehra Golshan
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | | | - Mara Piltin
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Chantal R Reyna
- Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Cindy B Matsen
- Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Todd M Tuttle
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Anne M Wallace
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jennifer Son
- Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Roshni Rao
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Candice Sauder
- Department of Surgery, UC Davis Health Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Arpana Naik
- Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Rachael Lancaster
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Peter Norwood
- Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Laura J Esserman
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rita A Mukhtar
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
- UCSF Breast Care Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cabıoğlu N, Karanlık H, Yılmaz R, Emiroğlu S, Tükenmez M, Bademler S, Şimşek DH, Kantarcı TR, Yirgin İK, Bayram A, Dursun M. Targeted axillary dissection reduces residual nodal disease in clinically node- positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. World J Surg Oncol 2024; 22:178. [PMID: 38971793 PMCID: PMC11227135 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03413-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Any advantage of performing targeted axillary dissection (TAD) compared to sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB) is under debate in clinically node-positive (cN+) patients diagnosed with breast cancer. Our objective was to assess the feasibility of the removal of the clipped node (RCN) with TAD or without imaging-guided localisation by SLNB to reduce the residual axillary disease in completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) in cN+ breast cancer. METHODS A combined analysis of two prospective cohorts, including 253 patients who underwent SLNB with/without TAD and with/without ALND following NAC, was performed. Finally, 222 patients (cT1-3N1/ycN0M0) with a clipped lymph node that was radiologically visible were analyzed. RESULTS Overall, the clipped node was successfully identified in 246 patients (97.2%) by imaging. Of 222 patients, the clipped lymph nodes were non-SLNs in 44 patients (19.8%). Of patients in cohort B (n=129) with TAD, the clipped node was successfully removed by preoperative image-guided localisation, or the clipped lymph node was removed as the SLN as detected on preoperative SPECT-CT. Among patients with ypSLN(+) (n=109), no significant difference was found in non-SLN positivity at cALND between patients with TAD and RCN (41.7% vs. 46.9%, p=0.581). In the subgroup with TAD with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND; n=60), however, patients with a lymph node (LN) ratio (LNR) less than 50% and one metastatic LN in the TAD specimen were found to have significantly decreased non-SLN positivity compared to others (27.6% vs. 54.8%, p=0.032, and 22.2% vs. 50%, p=0.046). CONCLUSIONS TAD by imaging-guided localisation is feasible with excellent identification rates of the clipped node. This approach has also been found to reduce the additional non-SLN positivity rate to encourage omitting ALND in patients with a low metastatic burden undergoing TAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neslihan Cabıoğlu
- Department of Surgery, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
| | - Hasan Karanlık
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Istanbul University, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Ravza Yılmaz
- Department of Radiology, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Selman Emiroğlu
- Department of Surgery, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Mustafa Tükenmez
- Department of Surgery, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Süleyman Bademler
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Istanbul University, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Duygu Has Şimşek
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Tarık Recep Kantarcı
- Department of Surgery, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - İnci Kızıldağ Yirgin
- Department of Radiology, Istanbul University, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Aysel Bayram
- Department of Pathology, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Memduh Dursun
- Department of Radiology, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Connors C, Al-Hilli Z. De-escalation of Axillary Surgery After Neoadjuvant Therapy. Clin Breast Cancer 2024; 24:385-391. [PMID: 38735808 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
Surgical de-escalation of the axilla has evolved over the past 28 years since the emergence of sentinel lymph node surgery. Well-documented complications of the once standard of care axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), including lymphedema, led physician scientists towards a progressive push to study and incorporate less invasive techniques in the axilla. Many trials have justified oncologic safety of axillary de-escalation in patients who are spared neoadjuvant treatment. The applicability in the neoadjuvant setting, however, is less clear and axillary surgical approaches in this patient population have evolved at a slower pace. This review aims to analyze current data in axillary management for patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment and to discuss current surgical approaches based on nodal pathologic response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casey Connors
- Breast Center, Integrated Surgical Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Zahraa Al-Hilli
- Breast Center, Integrated Surgical Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chen X, Lu Z, Wang C, Lyu M, Qiao J, Sun X, Li L, Zhang C, Liu Z. Targeted axillary dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for highly selective patients with initial cN1 breast cancer: A single-center prospective trial. Chin Med J (Engl) 2024; 137:1421-1430. [PMID: 38557731 PMCID: PMC11188870 DOI: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000003007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is gradually accepted as the standard of care in breast cancer patients with down-staged axillary disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). However, it is still difficult to precisely define pre-NAC clinical node-positive (cN1) and post-NAC clinical node-negative (ycN0). This prospective single-center trial was designed to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of standard targeted axillary dissection (TAD) after NAC in highly selective pre-NAC cN1 patients (not considering ultrasound-based axillary ycN staging). METHODS This prospective trial included patients with initial pre-NAC cT1-3N1M0 invasive breast cancer but with a rigorous definition of cN1 from the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University. When NAC was effective (including complete and partial responses) and preoperative axillary palpation was negative, preoperative ultrasound-based axillary staging was not considered, and all patients underwent TAD followed by axillary lymph node (LN) dissection. The detection rate (DR) and false-negative rate (FNR) of TAD were calculated. RESULTS A total of 82 patients were included, and 77 of them were eligible for data analysis. The DR for TAD was 94.8% (73/77). There were 26 patients with one abnormal LN at the time of diagnosis based on ultrasound, 45 patients with two, and 2 patients with three. One patient had one TAD LN, four patients had two TAD LNs, and 68 patients had three or more TAD LNs. Preoperative axillary palpation yielded negative results for all 73 patients who successfully underwent TAD. Preoperative ultrasound-based ycN0 and ycN+ conditions were detected for 52 and 21 cases, respectively. The FNR was 7.4% (2/27) for standard TAD (≥3 SLNs), which was lower than that of all successful TAD (≥1 SLN; 10.0%, 3/30). CONCLUSIONS In rigorously defined pre-NAC cN1 breast cancer patients, standard TAD is feasible for those with negative axillary palpation after NAC, and FNR is also less than 10%. REGISTRATION chictr.org.cn , ChiCTR2100049093.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiuchun Chen
- Department of Breast Disease, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan 450008, China
| | - Zhenduo Lu
- Department of Breast Disease, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan 450008, China
| | - Chengzheng Wang
- Department of Breast Disease, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan 450008, China
| | - Minhao Lyu
- Department of Breast Disease, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan 450008, China
| | - Jianghua Qiao
- Department of Breast Disease, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan 450008, China
| | - Xianfu Sun
- Department of Breast Disease, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan 450008, China
| | - Lianfang Li
- Department of Breast Disease, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan 450008, China
| | - Chongjian Zhang
- Department of Breast Disease, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan 450008, China
| | - Zhenzhen Liu
- Department of Breast Disease, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan 450008, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Aragón-Sánchez S, Sánchez-Bayona R, López-Marín L, Ciruelos-Gil E, Parrilla-Rubio L, Zaragoza-Ballester P, Galindo-Izquierdo A, García-Chapinal B, Álvaro-Valiente L, Oliver-Pérez MR. De-escalating axillary management after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: The ratio of positive sentinel lymph nodes matters. Surg Oncol 2024; 54:102062. [PMID: 38531288 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND De-escalation of axillary surgery in breast cancer (BC) patients diminishes sequelae without compromising cancer outcomes. Surgical management of the axilla is challenging after neoadjuvant treatment. We aimed to identify the factors associated with residual axillary disease amenable to lymphadenectomy in patients with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). METHODS We conducted a retrospective observational study in Hospital 12 de Octubre (Spain). We included BC patients with positive SLNB who underwent axillary dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were performed to identify independent predictors of residual axillary disease. We estimated the ratio of positive nodes in SLNB and assessed the diagnostic validity of this ratio in relation to residual axillary disease. RESULTS We included 103 patients in the study. Residual axillary disease was identified in 54 patients (52.4%). Clinically node positive status at diagnosis (OR = 18.3, 95%CI: 4.0-83.6) and a ratio of positive nodes in SLNB ≥0.5 (OR = 6.5, 95%CI 41.7-23.7) were associated with residual axillary disease. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of a ratio of positive nodes in SLNB ≥0.5 were 87% (95%CI 75.1%-94.6%) and 75% (95%CI 55.1%-89.3%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS In our study, for patients with positive SLNB after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, stage N+ at diagnosis and a ratio of positive nodes in SLNB ≥0.5 were independent risk factors of positive residual axillary disease. This ratio is a feasible measure with a good diagnostic validity for residual axillary disease and could be used as a guiding factor in the surgical management of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Aragón-Sánchez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. University Hospital 12 de Octubre. Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre [imas12]. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Sánchez-Bayona
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre [imas12]. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology. University Hospital 12 de Octubre. Madrid, Spain.
| | - L López-Marín
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. University Hospital 12 de Octubre. Madrid, Spain
| | - E Ciruelos-Gil
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre [imas12]. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology. University Hospital 12 de Octubre. Madrid, Spain
| | - L Parrilla-Rubio
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre [imas12]. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Department of Pathology. University Hospital 12 de Octubre. Madrid, Spain
| | | | - A Galindo-Izquierdo
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain; Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain; Primary Care Interventions to Prevent Maternal and Child Chronic Diseases of Perinatal and Developmental Origin (RICORS network), RD21/0012/0024, Madrid, Spain
| | - B García-Chapinal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. University Hospital 12 de Octubre. Madrid, Spain
| | - L Álvaro-Valiente
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. University Hospital 12 de Octubre. Madrid, Spain
| | - M R Oliver-Pérez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. University Hospital 12 de Octubre. Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre [imas12]. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Montagna G, Mrdutt MM, Sun SX, Hlavin C, Diego EJ, Wong SM, Barrio AV, van den Bruele AB, Cabioglu N, Sevilimedu V, Rosenberger LH, Hwang ES, Ingham A, Papassotiropoulos B, Nguyen-Sträuli BD, Kurzeder C, Aybar DD, Vorburger D, Matlac DM, Ostapenko E, Riedel F, Fitzal F, Meani F, Fick F, Sagasser J, Heil J, Karanlık H, Dedes KJ, Romics L, Banys-Paluchowski M, Muslumanoglu M, Perez MDRC, Díaz MC, Heidinger M, Fehr MK, Reinisch M, Tukenmez M, Maggi N, Rocco N, Ditsch N, Gentilini OD, Paulinelli RR, Zarhi SS, Kuemmel S, Bruzas S, di Lascio S, Parissenti TK, Hoskin TL, Güth U, Ovalle V, Tausch C, Kuerer HM, Caudle AS, Boileau JF, Boughey JC, Kühn T, Morrow M, Weber WP. Omission of Axillary Dissection Following Nodal Downstaging With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. JAMA Oncol 2024; 10:793-798. [PMID: 38662396 PMCID: PMC11046400 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
Importance Data on oncological outcomes after omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with breast cancer that downstages from node positive to negative with neoadjuvant chemotherapy are sparse. Additionally, the best axillary surgical staging technique in this scenario is unknown. Objective To investigate oncological outcomes after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with dual-tracer mapping or targeted axillary dissection (TAD), which combines SLNB with localization and retrieval of the clipped lymph node. Design, Setting, and Participants In this multicenter retrospective cohort study that was conducted at 25 centers in 11 countries, 1144 patients with consecutive stage II to III biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer were included between April 2013 and December 2020. The cumulative incidence rates of axillary, locoregional, and any invasive (locoregional or distant) recurrence were determined by competing risk analysis. Exposure Omission of ALND after SLNB or TAD. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end points were the 3-year and 5-year rates of any axillary recurrence. Secondary end points included locoregional recurrence, any invasive (locoregional and distant) recurrence, and the number of lymph nodes removed. Results A total of 1144 patients (median [IQR] age, 50 [41-59] years; 78 [6.8%] Asian, 105 [9.2%] Black, 102 [8.9%] Hispanic, and 816 [71.0%] White individuals; 666 SLNB [58.2%] and 478 TAD [41.8%]) were included. A total of 1060 patients (93%) had N1 disease, 619 (54%) had ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-positive illness, and 758 (66%) had a breast pathologic complete response. TAD patients were more likely to receive nodal radiation therapy (85% vs 78%; P = .01). The clipped node was successfully retrieved in 97% of TAD cases and 86% of SLNB cases (without localization). The mean (SD) number of sentinel lymph nodes retrieved was 3 (2) vs 4 (2) (P < .001), and the mean (SD) number of total lymph nodes removed was 3.95 (1.97) vs 4.44 (2.04) (P < .001) in the TAD and SLNB groups, respectively. The 5-year rates of any axillary, locoregional, and any invasive recurrence in the entire cohort were 1.0% (95% CI, 0.49%-2.0%), 2.7% (95% CI, 1.6%-4.1%), and 10% (95% CI, 8.3%-13%), respectively. The 3-year cumulative incidence of axillary recurrence did not differ between TAD and SLNB (0.5% vs 0.8%; P = .55). Conclusions and Relevance The results of this cohort study showed that axillary recurrence was rare in this setting and was not significantly lower after TAD vs SLNB. These results support omission of ALND in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Montagna
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Mary M. Mrdutt
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Susie X. Sun
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Callie Hlavin
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Emilia J. Diego
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Stephanie M. Wong
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Andrea V. Barrio
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Neslihan Cabioglu
- Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Breast Surgery Service, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Varadan Sevilimedu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - E. Shelley Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Abigail Ingham
- University of Glasgow and National Health Service Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Department of Academic Surgery, Glasgow, Scotland
| | | | | | - Christian Kurzeder
- Breast Center, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Danilo Díaz Aybar
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen National Hospital, Lima, Peru
| | - Denise Vorburger
- Breast Cancer Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center Zurich, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Dieter Michael Matlac
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Edvin Ostapenko
- Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Fabian Riedel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Unit, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Fitzal
- Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria
| | - Francesco Meani
- Centro di Senologia della Svizzera Italiana, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland
- Gruppo Ospedaliero Moncucco, Ticino, Switzerland
| | - Franziska Fick
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Jacqueline Sagasser
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Unit, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hasan Karanlık
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Laszlo Romics
- University of Glasgow and National Health Service Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Department of Academic Surgery, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Mahmut Muslumanoglu
- Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Breast Surgery Service, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Marcelo Chávez Díaz
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen National Hospital, Lima, Peru
| | - Martin Heidinger
- Breast Center, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Mattea Reinisch
- Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center/Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Germany
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mustafa Tukenmez
- Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Breast Surgery Service, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nadia Maggi
- Breast Center, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Nicola Rocco
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Sebastián Solé Zarhi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRAM–Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile
| | - Sherko Kuemmel
- Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center/Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Germany
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Berlin, Germany
| | - Simona Bruzas
- Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center/Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Germany
| | - Simona di Lascio
- Centro di Senologia della Svizzera Italiana, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland
- Service of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | | | - Tanya L. Hoskin
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Uwe Güth
- Breast-Center Zurich AG, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Valentina Ovalle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRAM–Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile
| | - Christoph Tausch
- Breast-Center Zurich AG, Zurich, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Henry M. Kuerer
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Abigail S. Caudle
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Jean-Francois Boileau
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Judy C. Boughey
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Department of Gynecology, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Monica Morrow
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Walter P. Weber
- Breast Center, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Costarelli L, Arienzo F, Broglia L, La Pinta M, Scavina P, Meli EZ, Colavito MH, Ascarelli A, Campagna D, Mastropietro T, Manna E, Amato M, Andrulli AD, Schiavone A, Minelli M, Fortunato L. Clipping a Positive Lymph Node Improves Accuracy of Nodal Staging After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Patients, but Does It Drive Management Changes? Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:3186-3193. [PMID: 38427160 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15052-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for cN+ breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is controversial because the false-negative rate (FNR) is high. Identification of three or more SLNs with a dual tracer improves these results, and inclusion of a clipped lymph node (CLN) (targeted axillary dissection [TAD]) may be even more effective. METHODS A retrospective, single-institution analysis of consecutive cN+ patients undergoing NAC from 2019 to 2021 was performed. Patients routinely underwent placement of a clip in the positive lymph node before NAC, and TAD was performed after completion of therapy. RESULTS The study analyzed 73 patients, and the identification rate for CLN was 98.6% (72/73). A complete response in the lymph nodes was achieved for 43 (59%) of the 73 patients. Overall, the CLN was not a SLN in 18 (25%) of 73 cases, and for women who had one or two and those who had three or more SLNs identified, this occurred in 11 (32%) and 7 (21%) of 34 cases, respectively. Failure of SLN or TAD to identify a positive residual lymph node status after NAC occurred in 10 (15%) of 69 and 2 (3%) of 73 cases, respectively (p = 0.01). In four cases, a SLN was not retrieved (5.5%), and two of these cases had a positive CLN. In three cases, the CLN was the only positive node and did not match with a SLN, directing lymphadenectomy and oncologic management change in two cases. Therefore, 7 (10%) of 73 cases had a change in surgical or oncologic management with TAD. CONCLUSIONS For a conservative axillary treatment in this setting, TAD is an effective method. It is more accurate than SLN alone and allows management changes. Further studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leopoldo Costarelli
- Breast Center, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
- Pathology Unit, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
| | - Francesca Arienzo
- Breast Center, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Pathology Unit, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Broglia
- Breast Center, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Breast Radiology, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo La Pinta
- Breast Center, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Breast Surgery, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Scavina
- Breast Center, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Medical Oncology, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Emanuele Zarba Meli
- Breast Center, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Breast Surgery, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Helena Colavito
- Breast Center, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Breast Radiology, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Ascarelli
- Breast Center, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Breast Radiology, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Domenico Campagna
- Breast Center, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Pathology Unit, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Tiziana Mastropietro
- Breast Center, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Breast Surgery, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Manna
- Breast Center, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Breast Surgery, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Michela Amato
- Breast Center, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Pathology Unit, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Angela Damiana Andrulli
- Breast Center, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Radiotherapy Unit, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alfonso Schiavone
- Breast Center, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Breast Surgery, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Mauro Minelli
- Breast Center, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Medical Oncology, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Lucio Fortunato
- Breast Center, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Breast Surgery, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
de Wild SR, Koppert LB, van Nijnatten TJA, Kooreman LFS, Vrancken Peeters MJTFD, Smidt ML, Simons JM. Systematic review of targeted axillary dissection in node-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy: variation in type of marker and timing of placement. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znae071. [PMID: 38531689 PMCID: PMC10965400 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In node-positive (cN+) breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy, combining sentinel lymph node biopsy and targeted lymph node excision, that is targeted axillary dissection, increases accuracy. Targeted axillary dissection procedures differ in terms of the targeted lymph node excision technique. This systematic review aimed to provide an overview of targeted axillary dissection procedures regarding definitive marker type and timing of placement: before neoadjuvant systemic therapy (1-step procedure) or after neoadjuvant systemic therapy adjacent to a clip placed before the neoadjuvant therapy (2-step procedure). METHODS PubMed and Embase were searched, to 4 July 2023, for RCTs, cohort studies, and case-control studies with at least 25 patients. Studies of targeted lymph node excision only (without sentinel lymph node biopsy), or where intraoperative localization of the targeted lymph node was not attempted, were excluded. For qualitative synthesis, studies were grouped by definitive marker and timing of placement. The targeted lymph node identification rate was reported. Study quality was assessed using a National Institutes of Health quality assessment tool. RESULTS Of 277 unique records, 51 studies with a total of 4512 patients were included. Six definitive markers were identified: wire, 125I-labelled seed, 99mTc, (electro)magnetic/radiofrequency markers, black ink, and a clip. Fifteen studies evaluated one-step procedures, with the identification rate of the targeted lymph node at surgery varying from 8 of 13 to 47 of 47. Forty-one studies evaluated two-step procedures, with the identification rate of the clipped targeted lymph node on imaging after neoadjuvant systemic therapy varying from 49 to 100%, and the identification rate of the targeted lymph node at surgery from 17 of 24 to 100%. Most studies (40 of 51) were rated as being of fair quality. CONCLUSION Various targeted axillary dissection procedures are used in clinical practice. Owing to study heterogeneity, the optimal targeted lymph node excision technique in terms of identification rate and feasibility could not be determined. Two-step procedures are at risk of not identifying the clipped targeted lymph node on imaging after neoadjuvant systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine R de Wild
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Linetta B Koppert
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thiemo J A van Nijnatten
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Loes F S Kooreman
- Department of Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolein L Smidt
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Janine M Simons
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Seto A, Lin C, Norden S, Stratton J, O'Riordan M, Pass H. Radiographic identification of a positive clipped axillary lymph node in a mastectomy specimen following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Radiol Case Rep 2024; 19:435-441. [PMID: 38033675 PMCID: PMC10684379 DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2023.09.086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Sentinel lymph node biopsies are recommended for staging in node-positive breast cancer patients who become clinically node-negative after neoadjuvant therapy. Current guidelines support the omission of an axillary lymph node dissection if 3 negative sentinel nodes are retrieved during surgery. Consequently, the utility of routine clip placement in biopsied nodes prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the necessity of targeted removal of these clipped nodes is in question. There are various methods for retrieving clipped nodes. We describe a case in which an intraoperative radiograph of a mastectomy specimen identified a clipped node that had not been localized with targeted axillary dissection in a patient with breast cancer. Pathology revealed persistent nodal positivity after neoadjuvant therapy, resulting in an escalation in care and a complete axillary dissection. We review the current literature on nodal clipping, and discuss the importance of localizing clipped nodes and the impact it can have on management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Seto
- Department of Surgery, Stamford Hospital, 1 Hospital Plaza, Stamford, CT 06902, USA
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 630 West 168th St, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Cynthia Lin
- Department of Surgery, Stamford Hospital, 1 Hospital Plaza, Stamford, CT 06902, USA
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 630 West 168th St, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Samantha Norden
- Department of Surgery, Stamford Hospital, 1 Hospital Plaza, Stamford, CT 06902, USA
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 630 West 168th St, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Jamie Stratton
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Stamford Hospital, 1 Hospital Plaza, Stamford, CT 06902, USA
| | - Moira O'Riordan
- Department of Radiology, Stamford Hospital, 1 Hospital Plaza, Stamford, CT 06902, USA
| | - Helen Pass
- Department of Surgery, Stamford Hospital, 1 Hospital Plaza, Stamford, CT 06902, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Banys-Paluchowski M, Hartmann S, Ditsch N, Krawczyk N, Kühn T, de Boniface J, Banys-Kotomska J, Rody A, Krug D. Locoregional Therapy: From Mastectomy to Reconstruction, Targeted Surgery, and Ultra-Hypofractionated Radiotherapy. Breast Care (Basel) 2023; 18:428-439. [PMID: 38130814 PMCID: PMC10731028 DOI: 10.1159/000533748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The past 3 decades have seen an unprecedented shift toward treatment de-escalation in surgical therapy of breast cancer. Summary Radical mastectomy has been replaced by breast-conserving and oncoplastic approaches in most patients, and full axillary lymph node dissection by less radical staging procedures, such as sentinel lymph node biopsy and targeted axillary dissection. Further, attempts have been made to spare healthy tissue while increasing the probability of removing the tumor with clear margins, thus improving cosmetic results and minimizing the risk of local recurrence. In this context, modern probe-guided localization techniques have been introduced to guide surgical excision. This progress was accompanied by the development of targeted systemic therapies. At the same time, radiotherapy for breast cancer has undergone significant changes. The use of hypofractionation has decreased the typical length of a treatment course from 5-6 weeks to 1-3 weeks. Partial breast irradiation is now a valid option for de-escalation in patients with low-risk features. Axillary radiotherapy achieves similar recurrence rates and decreases the risk of lymphedema in patients with limited sentinel node involvement. Key Messages Taken together, these advances are important steps toward individualization of locoregional management strategies. This highlights the importance of interdisciplinary approaches for de-escalation of locoregional therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lubeck, Lubeck, Germany
| | - Steffi Hartmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Breast Cancer Center, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Natalia Krawczyk
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Die Filderklinik, Filderstadt, Germany
| | - Jana de Boniface
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Capio St. Göran’s Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Joanna Banys-Kotomska
- I Department and Clinic of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Achim Rody
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lubeck, Lubeck, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Munck F, Jepsen P, Zeuthen P, Carstensen L, Hauerslev K, Paaskesen CK, Andersen IS, Høyer U, Lanng C, Gerlach MK, Vejborg I, Kroman NT, Tvedskov THF. Comparing Methods for Targeted Axillary Dissection in Breast Cancer Patients: A Nationwide, Retrospective Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:6361-6369. [PMID: 37400618 PMCID: PMC10506928 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13792-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several techniques exist for performing targeted axillary dissection (TAD) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the removal of the sentinel node and a marked metastatic lymph node (LN). Two-step methods include coil-marking of the metastatic LN at diagnosis and re-marking with an intraoperatively identifiable marker before surgery. Because nondetection of the marked lymph node (MLN) warrants axillary clearance and many patients achieve axillary pathological complete response (ax-pCR), the success of TAD is crucial. We compare various two-step TAD methods in a Danish national cohort. METHODS We included patients who received two-step TAD between January 1, 2016 and August 31, 2021. Patients were identified from the Danish Breast Cancer Group database and cross-checked with locally accessible lists. Data were extracted from the patient's medical files. RESULTS We included 543 patients. In 79.4%, preoperative, ultrasound-guided re-marking was possible. Nonidentification of the coil-marked LN was more likely in patients with ax-pCR. The second markers used were hook-wire, iodine seeds, or ink marking on the axillary skin. Of patients with successful secondary marking, the MLN identification rate (IR) was 91%, and the sentinel node (SN) IR was 95%. Marking with iodine seeds was significantly more successful than ink marking with an odds ratio of 5.34 (95% confidence interval 1.62-17.60). The success rate of the complete TAD with the removal of MLN and SN was 82.3%. CONCLUSIONS With two-step TAD, nonidentification of the coiled LN before surgery is frequent, especially in patients with ax-pCR. Despite successful remarking, the IR of the MLN at surgery is inferior to one-step TAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederikke Munck
- Department of Breast Surgery, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark.
| | - Pernille Jepsen
- Department of Breast Surgery, Zealand University Hospital Roskilde, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Pernille Zeuthen
- Department of Surgery and Plastic Surgery, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Lena Carstensen
- Department of Surgery Esbjerg, Hospital of South West Jutland, Esbjerg, Denmark
| | - Katrine Hauerslev
- Department of Plastic and Breast Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Inge S Andersen
- Department of Breast Surgery, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark
| | - Ute Høyer
- Department of Plastic and Breast Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Charlotte Lanng
- Department of Breast Surgery, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Maria K Gerlach
- Department of Pathology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Ilse Vejborg
- Department of Breast Examinations and Capital Mammography Screening, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Niels T Kroman
- Department of Breast Surgery, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Tove H F Tvedskov
- Department of Breast Surgery, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Siso C, Esgueva A, Rivero J, Morales C, Miranda I, Peg V, Gil-Moreno A, Espinosa-Bravo M, Rubio IT. Feasibility and safety of targeted axillary dissection guided by intraoperative ultrasound after neoadjuvant treatment. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:106938. [PMID: 37244843 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Axillary management in cN + axillary nodes after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) in breast cancer (BC) remains under research with the aim of de-escalation of axillary node dissection (ALND). Several axillary guided localization techniques have been reported. This study evaluates the safety of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) guided targeted axillary dissection (TAD) in a large sample after the results of ILINA trial. MATERIALS Prospective data have been collected from October 2015 to June 2022 in patients with cT0-T4 and positive axillary lymph nodes (cN1) treated with NST. Before NST, an ultrasound visible marker was placed into the positive node. After NST, IOUS guided TAD was performed including sentinel node biopsy (SLN). Until December 2019, all patients underwent an ALND after TAD procedure. From January 2020, ALND was spared in those patients with an axillary pathological complete response (pCR). RESULTS 235 patients were included. pCR (ypT0/is ypN0) was achieved in 29% patients. Identification rate (IR) of the clipped node by IOUS was 96% (95% IC, 92.5-98.1%) and IR of SLN was 95% (95% IC, 90.8-97.2%). False negative rate (FNR) for TAD procedure (SLN + clipped node) was 7.0% (95% IC, 2.3-15.7%), which decreased to 4.9% when a total of 3 or more nodes were removed. Axillary ultrasound before surgery assessed residual disease with an AUC of 0.5241. Residual axillary disease tend to be the most significant factor for axillary recurrences. CONCLUSIONS This study confirms the feasibility, safety and accuracy of IOUS guided surgery for axillary staging after NST in node positive BC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Siso
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Esgueva
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Joaquin Rivero
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Clara Morales
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ignacio Miranda
- Departament of Radiology, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Vicente Peg
- Departament of Pathology, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Gil-Moreno
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Martin Espinosa-Bravo
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Isabel T Rubio
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
van Hemert AKE, van Duijnhoven FH, Vrancken Peeters MJTFD. This house believes that: MARI/TAD is better than sentinel node biopsy after PST for cN+ patients. Breast 2023; 71:89-95. [PMID: 37562108 PMCID: PMC10432821 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The increasing use and effectiveness of primary systemic treatment (PST) enables tailored locoregional treatment. About one third of clinically node positive (cN+) breast cancer patients achieve pathologic complete response (pCR) of the axilla, with higher rates observed in Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor (HER)2-positive or triple negative (TN) breast cancer subtypes. Tailoring axillary treatment for patients with axillary pCR is necessary, as they are unlikely to benefit from axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), but may suffer complications and long-term morbidity such as lymphedema and impaired shoulder motion. By combining pre-PST and post-PST axillary staging techniques, ALND can be omitted in most cN + patients with pCR. Different post-PST staging techniques (MARI/TAD/SN) show low or ultra-low false negative rates for detection of residual disease. More importantly, trials using the MARI (Marking Axillary lymph nodes with Radioactive Iodine seeds) procedure or sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as axillary staging technique post-PST have already shown the safety of tailoring axillary treatment in patients with an excellent response. Tailored axillary treatment using the MARI procedure in stage I-III breast cancer resulted in 80% reduction of ALND and excellent five-year axillary recurrence free interval (aRFI) of 97%. Similar oncologic outcomes were seen for post-SLNB in stage I-II patients. The MARI technique requires only one invasive procedure pre-NST and a median of one node is removed post-PST, whereas for the SLNB and TAD techniques two to four nodes are removed. A disadvantage of the MARI technique is its use of radioactive iodine, which is subject to extensive regulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annemiek K E van Hemert
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frederieke H van Duijnhoven
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Del Castillo A, Gomez-Modet S, Mata JM, Tejedor L. Targeted axillary dissection using Radioguided Occult Lesion Localization technique in the clinically negative marked lymph node after neoadjuvant treatment in breast cancer patients. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:1184-1188. [PMID: 36958951 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.03.208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To be aware of the feasibility of targeted axillary dissection (TAD) injecting 99mTechnetium-labeled macroaggregated albumin (99mTc-MAA) preoperatively into the clipped lymph node of patients with axillary complete clinical response (ycN0), after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective observational study was performed on N1 patients with a clipped positive node and a clinically negative axilla (ycN0) after NAC in one center. The pretreatment positive lymph node was injected with 99mTc-MAA the day before surgery and identified intraoperatively with a radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) technique. Patients were subjected to a TAD with the intent of identifying the clipped node and other/s sentinel nodes through a standard sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). RESULTS 54 patients and 55 axillary clipped nodes were included. The clip was intraoperatively encountered in every patient, accomplishing a 100% detection rate, although in one case no lymphatic tissue could be found in the intraoperative frozen section. An axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was avoided in 62.9% of the cases (34/54). CONCLUSION The use of the ROLL technique is a highly valuable tool since it allows a 100% success rate in retrieving the marker (and a 98.1% rate in detecting the clipped lymph node) in ycN0 breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Del Castillo
- General Surgery Service, Hospital Universitario Punta de Europa, Algeciras, 11207, Spain.
| | - Susana Gomez-Modet
- General Surgery Service, Hospital Universitario Punta de Europa, Algeciras, 11207, Spain.
| | - José María Mata
- General Surgery Service, Hospital Universitario Punta de Europa, Algeciras, 11207, Spain.
| | - Luis Tejedor
- General Surgery Service, Hospital Universitario Punta de Europa, Algeciras, 11207, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Munck F, Andersen IS, Vejborg I, Gerlach MK, Lanng C, Kroman NT, Tvedskov THF. Targeted Axillary Dissection with 125I Seed Placement Before Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in a Danish Multicenter Cohort. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:4135-4142. [PMID: 37062781 PMCID: PMC10250439 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13432-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Targeted axillary dissection (TAD), with marking of the metastatic lymph node before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), is increasingly used for breast cancer axillary staging. In the case of axillary pathological complete response (ax-pCR), axillary lymph node clearance can be omitted. Several marking methods exist, most using re-marking before surgery. Feasibility, learning curve, and identification rate (IR) vary. Marking with 125I seed before NACT makes re-marking at surgery redundant, possibly increasing feasibility and IR. Here, TAD with 125I seed placed before NACT is evaluated in a Danish multicenter cohort. METHODS Patients staged with 125I TAD in Denmark between 1 January 2016 and 31 August 2021 were included. Patients were identified in radioactivity-emitting implant registries at the radiology departments and from the Danish Breast Cancer Group database. Data were extracted from patients' medical records. Information on patient/tumor characteristics, 125I seed activity, marking period, TAD success, number of sentinel nodes (SNs), the histopathological status of excised nodes, and whether the marked lymph node (MLN) was an SN were registered. RESULTS 142 patients were included. The IR of the MLN was 99.3%, and the IR of the SLNB was 91.5%. TAD success was 91.5%. Minor challenges in marking or removal of the MLN were noted in three patients. In 72.3% of the patients, the MLN was a sentinel node. Overall, 40.8% had axillary pCR. CONCLUSION TAD with 125I seed marking before NACT is feasible without re-marking at surgery and with only minor surgical challenges. The IR is high. Staging with TAD spares 41% of breast cancer patients an axillary dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederikke Munck
- Department of Breast Surgery, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark.
| | - Inge S Andersen
- Department of Breast Surgery, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark
| | - Ilse Vejborg
- Department of Breast Examinations and Capital Mammography Screening, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - Maria K Gerlach
- Department of Pathology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - Charlotte Lanng
- Department of Breast Surgery, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - Niels T Kroman
- Department of Breast Surgery, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - Tove H F Tvedskov
- Department of Breast Surgery, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Banys-Paluchowski M, de Boniface J. Axillary staging in node-positive breast cancer converting to node negativity through neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Current evidence and perspectives. Scand J Surg 2023; 112:117-125. [PMID: 36642957 DOI: 10.1177/14574969221145892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Over the recent years, axillary staging of initially node-positive breast cancer patients converting to clinical node negativity after neoadjuvant chemotherapy has seen rapid changes. This narrative review aims to give a contemporary overview over published evidence and clinical practice, and thus provide some guidance to the surgical community in the process of re-evaluating and re-shaping surgical practice. METHODS The search strategy aimed at finding relevant studies. Only articles in English were considered. RESULTS The introduction of modern techniques offer more precise staging surgery and thus hopefully reduced arm morbidity. Clinical practice has however diverged both within countries and internationally. While some countries have adapted de-escalated axillary staging techniques such as targeted axillary dissection, targeted lymph node biopsy or sentinel lymph node biopsy, others continue to recommend a full axillary lymph node dissection. With the implementation of new techniques, many questions arise, regarding aspects of oncological safety, technical performance, budget and practicality, patient selection and indications for different levels of axillary staging procedures. CONCLUSIONS There is a growing body of evidence on de-escalation of axillary surgery in the setting of cN+ → ycN0 breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, standards differ between countries and future studies are necessary to fully assess the optimal strategy for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Jana de Boniface
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Di Paola V, Mazzotta G, Conti M, Palma S, Orsini F, Mola L, Ferrara F, Longo V, Bufi E, D'Angelo A, Panico C, Clauser P, Belli P, Manfredi R. Image-Guided Localization Techniques for Metastatic Axillary Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer; What Radiologists Should Know. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15072130. [PMID: 37046791 PMCID: PMC10093304 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15072130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) is an axillary staging technique after NACT that involves the removal of biopsy-proven metastatic lymph nodes in addition to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). This technique avoids the morbidity of traditional axillary lymph node dissection and has shown a lower false-negative rate than SLNB alone. Therefore, marking positive axillary lymph nodes before NACT is critical in order to locate and remove them in the subsequent surgery. Current localization methods include clip placement with intraoperative ultrasound, carbon-suspension liquids, localization wires, radioactive tracer-based localizers, magnetic seeds, radar reflectors, and radiofrequency identification devices. The aim of this paper is to illustrate the management of axillary lymph nodes based on current guidelines and explain the features of axillary lymph node markers, with relative advantages and disadvantages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerio Di Paola
- Department of Bioimaging, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, UOC of Radiodiagnostica Presidio Columbus, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgio Mazzotta
- Institute of Radiology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Conti
- Department of Bioimaging, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, UOC of Radiologia Toracica e Cardiovascolare, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Simone Palma
- Department of Bioimaging, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, UOC of Radiodiagnostica Presidio Columbus, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Federico Orsini
- Institute of Radiology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Mola
- Institute of Radiology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Ferrara
- Institute of Radiology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Longo
- Institute of Radiology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Enida Bufi
- Department of Bioimaging, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, UOC of Radiologia Toracica e Cardiovascolare, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Anna D'Angelo
- Department of Bioimaging, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, UOC of Radiologia Toracica e Cardiovascolare, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Camilla Panico
- Department of Bioimaging, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, UOC of Radiologia Toracica e Cardiovascolare, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Clauser
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Radiotherapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Paolo Belli
- Institute of Radiology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Bioimaging, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, UOC of Radiologia Toracica e Cardiovascolare, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Manfredi
- Department of Bioimaging, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, UOC of Radiodiagnostica Presidio Columbus, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Institute of Radiology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rella R, Conti M, Bufi E, Trombadori CML, Di Leone A, Terribile D, Masetti R, Zagaria L, Mulè A, Morciano F, Franceschini G, Belli P. Selective Axillary Dissection after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Lymph-Node-Positive Breast Cancer (CLYP Study): The Radio-Guided Occult Lesion Localization Technique for Biopsy-Proven Metastatic Lymph Nodes. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15072046. [PMID: 37046707 PMCID: PMC10093210 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15072046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2023] [Revised: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: To help to refine the accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer (BC) patients with biopsy-proven nodal disease prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), a method of marking the biopsy-proven positive LN at diagnosis to enable its removal during surgery was proposed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the Radio-Guided Occult Lesion Localization (ROLL) technique of biopsy-proven metastatic LN in nodal staging after NACT among node-positive BC patients. (2) Methods: Patients with invasive BC and biopsy-proven axillary metastases receiving NACT were enrolled. A clip marker was placed on the sampled LN (clipped lymph node, CLN) before NACT. Before surgery, the ROLL procedure (radioactive tracer injection into CLN under ultrasound guidance) was performed, and the CLN was surgically resected. The correspondence between the CLNs and SLNs was evaluated. The pathologic findings of the CLNs and SLN(s) were compared with remaining axillary nodes at ALND to determine false negative rates (FNRs). (3) Results: Seventy-two patients were analyzed. Surgery successfully identified the CLN in 70/72 procedures (97.2%). For 60/72 patients who underwent ALND, the FNRs dropped from 19.35% for SLNB to 3.13% for CLN biopsy. (4) Conclusions: The ROLL procedure got CLNs is accurate in axillary nodal staging after NACT in node-positive BC patients at diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rossella Rella
- UOC di Radiologia Toracica e Cardiovascolare, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Conti
- UOC di Radiologia Toracica e Cardiovascolare, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Enida Bufi
- UOC di Radiologia Toracica e Cardiovascolare, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Charlotte Marguerite Lucille Trombadori
- UOC di Radiologia Toracica e Cardiovascolare, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Alba Di Leone
- Centro Integrato di Senologia, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Terribile
- Centro Integrato di Senologia, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Masetti
- Centro Integrato di Senologia, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Zagaria
- UOC di Medicina Nucleare, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonino Mulè
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Unità di Gineco-Patologia e Patologia Mammaria, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Morciano
- Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Largo F. Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Franceschini
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Unità di Gineco-Patologia e Patologia Mammaria, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Belli
- UOC di Radiologia Toracica e Cardiovascolare, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Largo F. Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Thompson JL, Wright GP. Contemporary approaches to the axilla in breast cancer. Am J Surg 2023; 225:583-587. [PMID: 36522219 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.11.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Over the past decade, axillary management in breast cancer has fundamentally shifted. The former notion that any degree of axillary nodal involvement warrants axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has been challenged. Following publication of the ACOSOG Z0011 trial, national trends demonstrated significant reductions in ALND performance. Axillary radiotherapy in lieu of ALND is a consideration for select patients with a positive sentinel lymph node, while ongoing studies are investigating the role of adjuvant regional radiotherapy in women with positive nodes prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Efforts toward de-escalation of axillary surgery continue to evolve, as do the indications for sentinel node biopsy omission in select subsets of patients. This review highlights the recent advances and neoteric approaches to local therapy of the axilla in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica L Thompson
- Spectrum Health Medical Group Comprehensive Breast Clinic, 145 Michigan Street NE, Suite 4400, Grand Rapids, MI, 49503, USA; Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Department of Surgery, 15 Michigan Street NE, Grand Rapids, MI, 49503, USA.
| | - G Paul Wright
- Spectrum Health Medical Group Comprehensive Breast Clinic, 145 Michigan Street NE, Suite 4400, Grand Rapids, MI, 49503, USA; Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Department of Surgery, 15 Michigan Street NE, Grand Rapids, MI, 49503, USA; Spectrum Health Medical Group, Division of Surgical Oncology, 145 Michigan Street NE, Suite 5500, Grand Rapids, MI, 49503, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Vázquez JC, Piñero A, de Castro FJ, Lluch A, Martín M, Barnadas A, Alba E, Rodríguez-Lescure Á, Rojo F, Giménez J, Solá I, Quintana MJ, Bonfill X, Urrutia G, Sánchez-Rovira P. The value of sentinel lymph-node biopsy in women with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis and node-negative tumour after neoadjuvant therapy: a systematic review. CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE FEDERATION OF SPANISH ONCOLOGY SOCIETIES AND OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE OF MEXICO 2023; 25:417-428. [PMID: 36153763 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-022-02953-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To conduct a systematic review to analyse the performance of the sentinel lymph-node biopsy (SLNB) in women with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis and node-negative tumour after neoadjuvant therapy, compared to axillary lymph-node dissection. METHODS The more relevant databases were searched. Main outcomes were false-negative rate (FNR), sentinel lymph-node identification rate (SLNIR), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy. We conducted meta-analyses when appropriate. RESULTS Twenty studies were included. The pooled FNR was 0.14 (95% CI 0.11-0.17), the pooled SLNIR was 0.89 (95% CI 0.86-0.92), NPV was 0.83 (95% CI 0.79-0.87), and summary accuracy was 0.92 (95% CI 0.90-0.94). SLNB performed better when more than one node was removed and double mapping was used. CONCLUSIONS SLNB can be performed in women with a node-negative tumour after neoadjuvant therapy. It has a better performance when used with previous marking of the affected node and with double tracer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan C Vázquez
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Antonio Piñero
- GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - Francisco J de Castro
- Complejo Asistencial de Salamanca, GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Ana Lluch
- Medical Oncology Unit, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Oncología, CIBERONC-ISCIII, GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Miguel Martín
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Oncología, CIBERONC-ISCIII, GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Agustí Barnadas
- Medical Oncology Unit, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Oncología, CIBERONC-ISCIII, GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Emilio Alba
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Oncología, GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, UGCI Oncología Médica, Hospitales Regional y Virgen de la Victoria, IBIMA, CIBERONC-ISCIII, Málaga, Spain
| | | | - Federico Rojo
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Oncología, GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Hospital Universitario Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, CIBERONC-ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
| | - Julia Giménez
- Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia-IVO-GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ivan Solá
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria J Quintana
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Bonfill
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gerard Urrutia
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pedro Sánchez-Rovira
- Medical Oncology Unit, GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén, Jaén, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Laws A, Kantor O, King TA. Surgical Management of the Axilla for Breast Cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2023; 37:51-77. [PMID: 36435614 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2022.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
This review discusses the contemporary surgical management of the axilla in patients with breast cancer. Surgical paradigms are highlighted by clinical nodal status at presentation and treatment approach, including upfront surgery and neoadjuvant systemic therapy settings. This review focuses on the increasing opportunities for de-escalating the extent of axillary surgery in the era of sentinel lymph node biopsy, while also reviewing the remaining indications for axillary clearance with axillary lymph node dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Laws
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Olga Kantor
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tari A King
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Souza HDPG, Medeiros FDC, Lima MVA. É Possível Evitar a Biópsia do Linfonodo Sentinela em Pacientes com Câncer de Mama e Linfonodo Axilar Positivo com Resposta Patológica Completa à Quimioterapia Neoadjuvante? REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CANCEROLOGIA 2023. [DOI: 10.32635/2176-9745.rbc.2023v69n1.2759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Introdução: O câncer de mama representa 24,5% dos novos casos de neoplasias em mulheres no mundo. A quimioterapia neoadjuvante é uma importante ferramenta no tratamento dessa patologia, possibilita cirurgias menos agressivas na mama e axila, além de minimizar sequelas. Objetivo: Analisar a possibilidade de se evitar a realização da biópsia do linfonodo sentinela em pacientes com câncer de mama submetidas à quimioterapia neoadjuvante que apresentem resposta patológica completa no tumor primário e na axila, tratadas em uma instituição de referência no Nordeste brasileiro. Método: Estudo prospectivo, observacional, de coorte em pacientes com câncer de mama submetidas à quimioterapia neoadjuvante e operadas no Hospital Haroldo Juaçaba, no período de março de 2019 a julho de 2021. Resultados: Foram incluídas no estudo 45 pacientes, com média de idade de 52,6 anos, sendo todas do sexo feminino. Após quimioterapia neoadjuvante, nove pacientes (21,4%) apresentaram resposta patológica completa na mama e 17 (40,5%), resposta patológica completa nos linfonodos. Os pacientes com resposta completa na mama apresentaram uma prevalência de resposta completa em linfonodo 20,44 vezes superior aos pacientes que não tiveram a mesma resposta. Conclusão: A resposta patológica completa na mama à quimioterapia neoadjuvante mostra uma tendência em predizer uma resposta patológica nos linfonodos axilares, reforçando que, com essa condição, a biópsia do linfonodo sentinela poderia ser evitada sem causar prejuízos ao controle local do câncer de mama.
Collapse
|
23
|
Provenzano E, Shaaban AM. Pathology of neoadjuvant therapy and immunotherapy testing for breast cancer. Histopathology 2023; 82:170-188. [PMID: 36482270 DOI: 10.1111/his.14771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2022] [Revised: 08/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has become the standard of care for high-risk breast cancer, including triple-negative (TNBC) and HER2-positive disease. As a result, handling and reporting of breast specimens post-NACT is part of routine practice, and it is important for pathologists to recognise the changes in tumour cells, tumour-associated stroma and background breast tissue induced by NACT. Familiarity with characteristic stromal features enables identification of the pre-treatment tumour site and allows confident diagnosis of pathological complete response (pCR) which is important for decisions concerning adjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NAET) is used less frequently than NACT; however, the SARS-COVID-19 pandemic has changed practice, with increased use as bridging therapy if surgery is delayed. NAET also induces characteristic changes in the tumour and stroma. Changes in the tumour microenvironment following NACT and NAET are also described. Immunotherapy is approved for use in advanced TNBC, and there are several trials exploring its role in early TNBC in the neoadjuvant setting. The current biomarker to determine eligibility for treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors is programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry; however, this is complicated by lack of standardisation with different drugs linked to tests using different antibodies with different scoring systems. The situation in the neoadjuvant setting is further complicated by improved pCR rates for PD-L1-positive tumours in both immune therapy and placebo arms. Alternative biomarkers are urgently needed to identify which patients will derive benefit from immunotherapy and key candidates are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Provenzano
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Abeer M Shaaban
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Munoz P, Corral S, Martínez-Regueira F, Paz A, Muñoz-Madero V, Mena A, Cabañas J, Rivas S. Axillary staging and management of cN + breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results of a survey among breast cancer surgeons in Spain. CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE FEDERATION OF SPANISH ONCOLOGY SOCIETIES AND OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE OF MEXICO 2022; 25:1463-1471. [PMID: 36586064 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-022-03049-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Given the high rate of complete nodal response, the role of axillary lymph node dissection on staging the axilla has been questioned. This survey, addressed to breast cancer surgeons in Spain, has the objective of assessing current clinical trends on axillary staging of cN + patients treated with NAC. METHODS An online survey was conducted among breast surgeons from the Spanish Society of Surgery (AEC), Spanish Surgical Oncology Society (SEOQ), Spanish Breast Cancer Surgeons Society (AECIMA) and Spanish Gynecology and Obstetrics Society (SEGO). It was structured in 5 sections: general information and clinical practice, knowledge of clinical trials, diagnosis work-up and nodal marking, axillary staging, and axillary treatment. RESULTS 150 breast cancer surgeons completed the full survey (96.7%). 81.8% of respondents performed SLNB or targeted axillary dissection in cN1 patients treated with NAC. Radiological axillary response was the preferred parameter guiding the surgical strategy. The excision of the clipped node (92.0%), use of dual tracer (73.2%), and axillary US (65.9%) after treatment were the most important variables considered by respondents, to increase the accuracy of SLNB in cN + patients. CONCLUSION This survey confirms a trend toward a less invasive approach for axillary staging in cN + patients treated with NAC among breast cancer surgeons in Spain. While there is widespread agreement in less invasive approaches to axillary staging, there is, however, a lack of consensus around treatment strategy. Further, it shows a wide heterogeneity in their clinical practice. This study highlights the need for clear evidence concerning less invasive staging procedures and their oncological safety, to ensure consistent recommendations in surgical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula Munoz
- General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Quironsalud Torrevieja, Torrevieja, Alicante, Spain.
| | - Sara Corral
- General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Alejandro Paz
- General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Quironsalud Torrevieja, Torrevieja, Alicante, Spain
| | - Vicente Muñoz-Madero
- General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Quironsalud Torrevieja, Torrevieja, Alicante, Spain
| | - Antonio Mena
- General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jacobo Cabañas
- General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sonia Rivas
- General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Simons JM, van Nijnatten TJA, van der Pol CC, van Diest PJ, Jager A, van Klaveren D, Kam BLR, Lobbes MBI, de Boer M, Verhoef C, Sars PRA, Heijmans HJ, van Haaren ERM, Vles WJ, Contant CME, Menke-Pluijmers MBE, Smit LHM, Kelder W, Boskamp M, Koppert LB, Luiten EJT, Smidt ML. Diagnostic Accuracy of Radioactive Iodine Seed Placement in the Axilla With Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Node-Positive Breast Cancer. JAMA Surg 2022; 157:991-999. [PMID: 36069889 PMCID: PMC9453629 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.3907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Several less-invasive staging procedures have been proposed to replace axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with initially clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer, but these procedures may fail to detect residual disease. Owing to the lack of high-level evidence, it is not yet clear which procedure is most optimal to replace ALND. Objective To determine the diagnostic accuracy of radioactive iodine seed placement in the axilla with sentinel lymph node biopsy (RISAS), a targeted axillary dissection procedure. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a prospective, multicenter, noninferiority, diagnostic accuracy trial conducted from March 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019. Patients were included within 14 institutions (general, teaching, and academic) throughout the Netherlands. Patients with breast cancer clinical tumor categories 1 through 4 (cT1-4; tumor diameter <2 cm and up to >5 cm or extension to the chest wall or skin) and pathologically proven positive axillary lymph nodes (ie, clinical node categories cN1, metastases to movable ipsilateral level I and/or level II axillary nodes; cN2, metastases to fixed or matted ipsilateral level I and/or level II axillary nodes; cN3b, metastases to ipsilateral level I and/or level II axillary nodes with metastases to internal mammary nodes) who were treated with NAC were eligible for inclusion. Data were analyzed from July 2020 to December 2021. Intervention Pre-NAC, the marking of a pathologically confirmed positive axillary lymph node with radioactive iodine seed (MARI) procedure, was performed and after NAC, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) combined with excision of the marked lymph node (ie, RISAS procedure) was performed, followed by ALND. Main Outcomes and Measures The identification rate, false-negative rate (FNR), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for all 3 procedures: RISAS, SLNB, and MARI. The noninferiority margin of the observed FNR was 6.25% for the RISAS procedure. Results A total of 212 patients (median [range] age, 52 [22-77] years) who had cN+ breast cancer underwent the RISAS procedure and ALND. The identification rate of the RISAS procedure was 98.2% (223 of 227). The identification rates of SLNB and MARI were 86.4% (197 of 228) and 94.1% (224 of 238), respectively. FNR of the RISAS procedure was 3.5% (5 of 144; 90% CI, 1.38-7.16), and NPV was 92.8% (64 of 69; 90% CI, 85.37-97.10), compared with an FNR of 17.9% (22 of 123; 90% CI, 12.4%-24.5%) and NPV of 72.8% (59 of 81; 90% CI, 63.5%-80.8%) for SLNB and an FNR of 7.0% (10 of 143; 90% CI, 3.8%-11.6%) and NPV of 86.3% (63 of 73; 90% CI, 77.9%-92.4%) for the MARI procedure. In a subgroup of 174 patients in whom SLNB and the MARI procedure were successful and ALND was performed, FNR of the RISAS procedure was 2.5% (3 of 118; 90% CI, 0.7%-6.4%), compared with 18.6% (22 of 118; 90% CI, 13.0%-25.5%) for SLNB (P < .001) and 6.8% (8 of 118; 90% CI, 3.4%-11.9%) for the MARI procedure (P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance Results of this diagnostic study suggest that the RISAS procedure was the most feasible and accurate less-invasive procedure for axillary staging after NAC in patients with cN+ breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janine M. Simons
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- GROW—School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Thiemo J. A. van Nijnatten
- GROW—School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, the Netherlands
| | - Carmen C. van der Pol
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, the Netherlands
| | - Paul J. van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Agnes Jager
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - David van Klaveren
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Boen L. R. Kam
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marc B. I. Lobbes
- GROW—School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands
| | - Maaike de Boer
- GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Cees Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Paul R. A. Sars
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal, the Netherlands
| | - Harald J. Heijmans
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospital Group Twente, Breast Clinic Oost-Nederland, Hengelo, the Netherlands
| | - Els R. M. van Haaren
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter J. Vles
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Léonie H. M. Smit
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Treant Zorggroep Hospital, Hoogeveen, the Netherlands
| | - Wendy Kelder
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marike Boskamp
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Wilhelmina Hospital, Assen, the Netherlands
| | - Linetta B. Koppert
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ernest J. T. Luiten
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
- Tawam Breast Care Center, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi Emirate, United Arab Emirates
- Department of Surgery College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi Emirate, United Arab Emirates
| | - Marjolein L. Smidt
- GROW—School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Deparment of Surgical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Montagna G, Lee MK, Sevilimedu V, Barrio AV, Morrow M. Is Nodal Clipping Beneficial for Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy? Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:6133-6139. [PMID: 35902495 PMCID: PMC10109537 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12240-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In cN1 patients rendered cN0 with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the false-negative rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is < 10% when ≥ 3 sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are removed. The added value of nodal clipping in this scenario is unknown. Here we determine how often the clipped node is a sentinel node when ≥ 3 SLNs are retrieved. METHODS We identified cT1-3N1 patients treated between 02/2018 and 10/2021 with a clipped lymph node at presentation. SLNB was performed with a standardized approach of dual-tracer mapping and retrieval of ≥ 3 SLNs. Clipped nodes were not localized; SLNs were X-rayed intraoperatively to determine clip location. Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was performed for any residual disease or retrieval of < 3 SLNs. RESULTS Of 269 patients, 251 (93%) had ≥ 3 SLNs. Median age was 51 years; the majority (92%) had ductal histology; 46% were HR+/HER2-. The median number of SLNs removed was 4 (IQR 3,5). The clipped node was an SLN in 88% (220/251) of cases. Of the 31 where the clipped node was not, 13 had a positive SLN mandating ALND, and the clip was identified in the ALND specimen. In the remaining 18, where ≥ 3 negative SLNs were retrieved and an ALND was not performed, the clip was not retrieved, with no axillary failures in this group (median follow-up: 55 months). CONCLUSION When the SLNB procedure is optimized with dual tracer and retrieval of ≥ 3 SLNs, the clipped node is an SLN in the majority of cases, suggesting that failure to retrieve the clipped node should not be an indication for ALND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Montagna
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Minna K Lee
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Varadan Sevilimedu
- Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrea V Barrio
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Monica Morrow
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Accuracy and Limitations of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients with Positive Nodes. Breast J 2022; 2022:1507881. [PMID: 36051467 PMCID: PMC9411000 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1507881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Revised: 06/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Background Axillary surgical management in patients with node-positive breast cancer at the time of diagnosis converted to negative nodes through neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains unclear. Removal of more than two sentinel nodes (SLNs) in these patients may decrease the false negative rate (FNR) of sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNBs). We aim to analyse the detection rate (DR) and the FNR of SLNB assessment according to the number of SLNs removed. Methods A retrospective study was performed from October 2012 to December 2018. Patients with invasive breast cancer who had a clinically node-positive disease at diagnosis and with a complete axillary response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were selected. Patients included underwent SLNB and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) after NAC. The SLN was considered positive if any residual disease was detected. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the clinicopathologic features and the results of SLNB and ALND. The DR of SLNB was defined as the number of patients with successful identification of SLN. Presence of residual disease in ALND and negative SLN was considered false negative. Results A total of 368 patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent surgery after complete NAC were studied. Of them, 85 patients met the eligibility criteria and were enrolled in the study. The mean age at diagnosis was 50.8 years. Systematic lymphadenectomy was performed in all patients, with an average of 10 lymph nodes removed. The DR of SLNB was 92.9%, and the FNR was 19.1. The median number of SLNs removed was 3, and at least, three SLNs were obtained in 42 patients (53.2%). When at least three sentinel nodes were removed, the FNR decreased to 8.7%. Conclusions In this cohort, the SLN assessment was associated with an adequate DR and a high FNR. Removing three or more SLNs decreased the FNR from 19.1% to 8.7%. Complementary approaches may be considered for axillary lymph node staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The study was approved by our institution's ethics committee (Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain) (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCEI:20/0048).
Collapse
|
28
|
Feasibility of targeted axillary dissection for de-escalation of surgical treatment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Surg Oncol 2022; 44:101823. [DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
29
|
Nakhlis F, Portnow L, Gombos E, Daylan AEC, Leone JP, Kantor O, Richardson ET, Ho A, Dunn SA, Ohri N. Multidisciplinary Considerations in the Management of Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Curr Probl Surg 2022; 59:101191. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2022.101191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
30
|
Gasparri ML, de Boniface J, Poortmans P, Gentilini OD, Kaidar-Person O, Banys-Paluchowski M, Di Micco R, Niinikoski L, Murawa D, Bonci EA, Pasca A, Rubio IT, Karadeniz Cakmak G, Kontos M, Kühn T. Axillary surgery after neoadjuvant therapy in initially node-positive breast cancer: international EUBREAST survey. Br J Surg 2022; 109:857-863. [PMID: 35766257 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no consensus on axillary management after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer. To investigate current clinical practice, an international survey was conducted among breast surgeons and radiation oncologists. The aim of the first part of the survey was to provide a snapshot of international discrepancies regarding axillary surgery in this context. METHODS The European Breast Cancer Research Association of Surgical Trialists (EUBREAST) developed a web-based survey containing 39 questions describing clinical scenarios in the setting of axillary management in patients with cN1 disease converting to ycN0 after NAT. The survey was then distributed to breast surgeons and radiation oncologists via 14 breast cancer societies between April and October 2021. RESULTS Responses from 349 physicians in 45 countries were recorded. The most common post-NAT axillary surgery in patients with cN1 disease converting to ycN0 was targeted axillary dissection (54.2 per cent), followed by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone (20.9 per cent), level 1-2 axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) (18.4 per cent), level 1-3 ALND (4 per cent), and targeted lymph node biopsy (2.5 per cent). For SLNB alone, dual tracers were most commonly used (62.3 per cent). Management varied widely in patients with ambiguous axillary status before initiation of treatment or a residual metastatic burden in the axilla after NAT. In patients with ycN+ tumours, ALND was the preferred surgical approach for 66.8 per cent of respondents. CONCLUSION These results highlight the wide heterogeneity in surgical approaches to the axilla after NAT. To standardize the guidelines, further data from clinical research are urgently needed, which underlines the importance of the ongoing AXSANA (EUBREAST-3) study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Luisa Gasparri
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Lugano, CH.,Faculty of Biomedicine, University of the Italian Switzerland (USI), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Jana de Boniface
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Capio St. Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - Orit Kaidar-Person
- Breast Radiation Unit, Oncology Institute, Sheba Hospital Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.,GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology or GROW (Maastro), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.,Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Rosa Di Micco
- Breast Surgery Unit, San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Niinikoski
- Breast Surgery Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - David Murawa
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Collegium Medicum, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland
| | - Eduard Alexandru Bonci
- Department of Surgical Oncology, "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuță" Institute of Oncology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.,Department of Oncological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Andrei Pasca
- Department of Surgical Oncology, "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuță" Institute of Oncology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.,Department of Oncological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Isabel T Rubio
- Breast Surgical Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Guldeniz Karadeniz Cakmak
- Zonguldak BEUN The School of Medicine, General Surgery Department, Breast and Endocrine Unit, Kozlu/Zonguldak, Turkey
| | - Michalis Kontos
- 1st Department of Surgery, Laiko Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Interdisciplinary Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Acea-Figueira E, García-Novoa A, Díaz Carballada C, Bouzón Alejandro A, Conde C, Santiago Freijanes P, Mosquera Oses J, Acea-Nebril B. Lymph node staging after primary systemic therapy in women with breast cancer and lymph node involvement at diagnosis. Cir Esp 2022:S2173-5077(22)00158-2. [PMID: 35660095 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2022.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The main objective of this study is to analyze the efficacy of combined axillary marking (lymph node clipping and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB)) for axillary staging in patients with primary systemic treatment (PST) and pathologically confirmed node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis. The secondary objective is to determine the impact of lymph node marking in the suppression of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in the study group. METHODS We conducted a prospective study in which lymph node staging was performed using wire localization of positive lymph nodes and a SLNB with dual tracer. All patients who presented no metastatic involvement of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) or clip/wire-marked lymph node were spared an ALND. The multidisciplinary committee agreed on axillary treatment for patients with lymph node involvement. RESULTS Eighty one patients met the inclusion criteria. We identified and extirpated the clip/ wire-marked node in 80 of 81 patients (98.8%), with SLNB performed successfully in 88,9% of patients. The SLN and wire-marked node matched in 78.9% of patients; 76.2% of patients did not undergo ALND. CONCLUSIONS The combined axillary marking (clip and SLNB) in patients with metastatic lymph node at diagnosis and PST offers a high identification rate (98.8%) and a high correlation between the wire-marked lymph node and the SLN (78.9%). This procedure has enabled the suppression of ALND in 76.2% of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Acea-Figueira
- Servicio de Cirugía General, Unidad de Mama, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, La Coruña, Spain
| | - Alejandra García-Novoa
- Servicio de Cirugía General, Unidad de Mama, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, La Coruña, Spain.
| | - Carlota Díaz Carballada
- Servicio de Ginecología, Unidad de Mama, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, La Coruña, Spain
| | - Alberto Bouzón Alejandro
- Servicio de Cirugía General, Unidad de Mama, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, La Coruña, Spain
| | - Carmen Conde
- Servicio de Ginecología, Unidad de Mama, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, La Coruña, Spain
| | - Paz Santiago Freijanes
- Servicio de Anatomía Patológica, Unidad de Mama, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, La Coruña, Spain
| | - Joaquín Mosquera Oses
- Servicio de Radiología, Unidad de Mama, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, La Coruña, Spain
| | - Benigno Acea-Nebril
- Servicio de Cirugía General, Unidad de Mama, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, La Coruña, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Acea-Figueira E, García-Novoa A, Díaz Carballada C, Bouzón Alejandro A, Conde C, Santiago Freijanes P, Mosquera Oses J, Acea-Nebril B. Estadificación ganglionar tras terapia sistémica primaria en mujeres con cáncer de mama y afectación ganglionar al diagnóstico. Cir Esp 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2022.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
33
|
The History of Early Breast Cancer Treatment. Genes (Basel) 2022; 13:genes13060960. [PMID: 35741721 PMCID: PMC9222657 DOI: 10.3390/genes13060960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Revised: 05/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
“The story of cancer is the story of human ingenuity, resilience, and perseverance, but also of hubris, paternalism, and misperception” (Siddhartha Mukherjee). The present review discusses the evolution of early breast cancer (BC) treatment philosophy in the last 50 years and the shift from an emphasis on local therapy to an emphasis on systemic precision treatment options.
Collapse
|
34
|
Song YX, Xu Z, Liang MX, Liu Z, Hou JC, Chen X, Xu D, Fei YJ, Tang JH. Diagnostic accuracy of de-escalated surgical procedure in axilla for node-positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Med 2022; 11:4085-4103. [PMID: 35502768 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND More initial clinical node-positive breast cancer patients achieve axillary pathological complete response (ax-pCR) after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). Restaging axillary status and performing de-escalated surgical procedures to replace routine axillary lymph nodes dissection (ALND) is urgently needed. Targeted axillary lymph node biopsy (TLNB) is a novel de-escalated surgical strategy marking metastatic axillary nodes before NST and targeted dissection and biopsy intraoperatively to tailor individual axillary management. METHODS This study provided a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the feasibility and diagnosis accuracy of TLNB. Prospective and retrospective clinical trials on TLNB were searched from Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane. Identification rate (IFR), false-negative rate (FNR), negative predictive value (NPV), and rate of ax-pCR were the outcomes of this meta-analysis. RESULTS One thousand nine hundred and twenty patients attempted TLNB, with an overall IFR of 93.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 90.1%-96.2%). IFR of three nodal marking methods, namely iodine seeds, clips, and carbon dye, was 95.6% (95% CI 91.2%-98.7%), 91.7% (95% CI 87.3%-95.4%), and 97.1% (95% CI 89.1%-100.0%), respectively. Of them, 847 patients received ALND, with an overall FNR of 5.5% (95% CI 3.3%-8.0%), and NPV ranged from 90.1% to 96.1%. Regression analysis showed that the overlap of targeted and sentinel biopsied nodes might associate with IFRs and FNRs. CONCLUSION TLNB is a novel, less invasive surgical approach to distinguish initial node-positive breast cancer that achieves negative axillary conversion after NST. It yields an excellent IFR with a low FNR and a high NPV. A combination of preoperative imaging, intraoperative TLNB with SLNB, and postoperative nodal radiotherapy might affect the future treatment paradigm of primary breast cancer with nodal metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Xin Song
- The Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zheng Xu
- The Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Ming-Xing Liang
- The Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhen Liu
- The Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jun-Chen Hou
- The Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiu Chen
- The Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Di Xu
- The Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yin-Jiao Fei
- The Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jin-Hai Tang
- The Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Pinto CS, Peleteiro B, Pinto CA, Osório F, Costa S, Magalhães A, Mora H, Amaral J, Gonçalves D, Fougo JL. Initial experience with targeted axillary dissection after neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer 2022; 29:709-719. [PMID: 35304711 PMCID: PMC8933233 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-022-01349-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Background Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) combines sentinel node biopsy (SNB) with the removal of the previously marked metastatic node. TAD is a promising concept for axillary restaging in node-positive breast cancer patients with pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). We aimed to evaluate TAD feasibility in this context. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted in biopsy-confirmed cN1 patients. The removal of the clipped node (CN) was guided by intraoperative ultrasound. SNB used indocyanine green and patent blue V dye. If the CN or sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) had any metastatic foci, or the TAD procedure was unsuccessful, the patient underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Results Thirty-seven patients were included. TAD and SNB identification rates were 97.3%. Every retrieved CN was also a SLN. At the individual level, SNB identification rate was 89.2% with indocyanine green and 85.5% with patent blue V dye. The CN identification rate was 81.1%, being higher when the CN was localized on the intraoperative ultrasound (84.4% vs 60.0%). Nodal pCR was achieved by 54.1% of our patients and was more frequent in HER2-positive and triple-negative tumors (p = 0.039). Nineteen patients were spared from ALND. Conclusion TAD with intraoperative ultrasound-guided excision of the CN and SNB with indocyanine green and patent blue V dye is a feasible concept to identify patients without axillary residual disease after NAT, that can be spared from ALND, although the need for marking the biopsied node should be further investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C S Pinto
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal.
| | - B Peleteiro
- EPIUnit-Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Rua das Taipas, 135, 4050-598, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Public Health and Forensic Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
- Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), Rua das Taipas, 135, 4050-598, Porto, Portugal
| | - C A Pinto
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
| | - F Osório
- Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
- Centro de Mama, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
| | - S Costa
- Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
- Centro de Mama, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
| | - A Magalhães
- Centro de Mama, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
| | - H Mora
- Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
- Centro de Mama, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
| | - J Amaral
- Centro de Mama, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
| | - D Gonçalves
- Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
- Centro de Mama, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
| | - J L Fougo
- Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
- Centro de Mama, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
van Loevezijn AA, van der Noordaa MEM, Stokkel MPM, van Werkhoven ED, Groen EJ, Loo CE, Elkhuizen PHM, Sonke GS, Russell NS, van Duijnhoven FH, Vrancken Peeters MJTFD. Three-year follow-up of de-escalated axillary treatment after neoadjuvant systemic therapy in clinically node-positive breast cancer: the MARI-protocol. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 193:37-48. [PMID: 35239072 PMCID: PMC8993719 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06545-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Purpose In clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer patients, evidence supporting response-guided treatment after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) instead of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is increasing, but follow-up results are lacking. We assessed three-year axillary recurrence-free interval (aRFI) in cN+ patients with response-adjusted axillary treatment according to the ‘Marking Axillary lymph nodes with Radioactive Iodine seeds’ (MARI)-protocol. Methods We retrospectively assessed all stage II–III cytologically proven cN+ breast cancer patients who underwent the MARI-protocol between July 2014 and November 2018. Pre-NST axillary staging with FDG-PET/CT (less- or more than four suspicious axillary nodes; cALN < 4 or cALN ≥ 4) and post-NST pathological axillary response measured in the pre-NST largest tumor-positive axillary lymph node marked with an iodine seed (MARI-node; ypMARI-neg or ypMARI-pos) determined axillary treatment: no further treatment (cALN < 4, ypMARI-neg), axillary radiotherapy (ART) (cALN < 4, ypMARI-pos and cALN ≥ 4, ypMARI-neg) or ALND plus ART (cALN ≥ 4, ypMARI-pos). Results Of 272 women included, the MARI-node was tumor-negative in 56 (32%) of 174 cALN < 4 patients and 43 (44%) of 98 cALN ≥ 4 patients. According to protocol, 56 (21%) patients received no further axillary treatment, 161 (59%) received ART and 55 (20%) received ALND plus ART. Median follow-up was 3.0 years (IQR 1.9–4.1). Five patients (one no further treatment, four ART) had axillary metastases. Three-year aRFI was 98% (95% CI 96–100). The overall recurrence risk remained highest for patients with ALND (HR 4.36; 95% CI 0.95–20.04, p = 0.059). Conclusions De-escalation of axillary treatment according to the MARI-protocol prevented ALND in 80% of cN+ patients with an excellent three-year aRFI of 98%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariane A van Loevezijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke E M van der Noordaa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel P M Stokkel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik D van Werkhoven
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma J Groen
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Claudette E Loo
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paula H M Elkhuizen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gabe S Sonke
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicola S Russell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederieke H van Duijnhoven
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Rubio IT, Sobrido C. Neoadjuvant approach in patients with early breast cancer: patient assessment, staging, and planning. Breast 2022; 62 Suppl 1:S17-S24. [PMID: 34996668 PMCID: PMC9097809 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.12.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) has become an option in early stage (stage I-II) breast cancer (EBC). New advances in systemic and targeted therapies have increased rates of pathologic complete response increasing the number of patients undergoing NAT. Clear benefits of NAT are downstaging the tumor and the axillary nodes to de-escalate surgery and to evaluate response to treatment. Selection of patients for NAT in EBC rely in several factors that are related to patient characteristics (i.e, age and comorbidities), to tumor histology, to stage at diagnosis and to the potential changes in surgical or adjuvant treatments when NAT is administered. Imaging and histologic confirmation is performed to assess extent of disease y to confirm diagnosis. Besides mammogram and ultrasound, functional breast imaging MRI has been incorporated to better predict treatment response and residual disease. Contrast enhanced mammogram (CEM), shear wave elastography (SWE), or Dynamic Optical Breast Imaging (DOBI) are emerging techniques under investigation for assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapy as well as for predicting response. Surgical plan should be delineated after NAT taking into account baseline characteristics, tumor response and patient desire. In the COVID era, we have witnessed also the increasing use of NAT in patients who may be directed to surgery, unable to have it performed as surgery has been reserved for emergency cases only.
Collapse
|
38
|
Yang J, He T, Wu Y, Fu Z, Lv Q, Lu S, Wang X, Li H, Wang J, Chen J. Nanoparticle-assisted axillary staging: an alternative approach after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pretreatment node-positive breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 192:573-582. [PMID: 35129717 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06539-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In order to achieve an optimized method of axillary staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer patients with pretreatment positive axillary lymph nodes, we evaluated the feasibility and accuracy of nanoparticle-assisted axillary staging (NAAS) which combines carbon nanoparticles with standard sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with radioisotope and blue dye. METHODS Invasive breast cancer patients with pre-NAC positive axillary lymph nodes who converted to ycN0 and received surgeries from November 2020 to March 2021 were included. All patients underwent ipsilateral NAAS followed by axillary lymph node dissection. Detection rate (DR), false-negative rate (FNR), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of axillary staging were calculated. RESULTS Eighty of 136 (58.8%) breast cancer patients converted to ycN0 after NAC and received NAAS. The DR, NPV and accuracy was 95.0%, 93.3% and 97.4% for NAAS, respectively. And the FNR was 4.2% (2/48) for NAAS, which was lower than that of standard dual-tracer SLNB (SD-SLNB) (9.5%, 4/42). Pretreatment clinical T4 classification was a risk factor for detection failure in NAAS (p = 0.016). When patients with pretreatment inflammatory breast cancers were excluded from analysis, FNR dropped to 2.2% (1/45) for NAAS. CONCLUSION NAAS revealed great performance in invasive breast cancer patients with pre-NAC positive axillary lymph nodes who converted to ycN0. The application of NAAS reached a better balance between more accurate axillary evaluation and less intervention. Trial registration Chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2000039814). Registered Nov 11, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiqiao Yang
- Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China.,Clinical Research Center for Breast Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Tao He
- Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Yunhao Wu
- Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Zhoukai Fu
- Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Qing Lv
- Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Shan Lu
- Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Xiaodong Wang
- Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Hongjiang Li
- Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Jie Chen
- Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
de Wild SR, Simons JM, Vrancken Peeters MJTFD, Smidt ML, Koppert LB. De-Escalating Axillary Surgery in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy. Breast Care (Basel) 2022; 16:584-589. [PMID: 35087361 DOI: 10.1159/000518376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is a trend towards de-escalating axillary staging and treatment in breast cancer patients. On account of neoadjuvant systemic therapy, node-positive breast cancer patients can achieve a pathological complete response of the axilla. It is hypothesized that these patients do not benefit from an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), and thus may be spared the risk of severe post-surgical morbidity. In an effort to omit standard ALND, less invasive axillary staging procedures are being implemented to establish response-guided treatment. However, it is unclear which less invasive staging procedure is most accurate, and long-term data are missing with regard to their oncologic safety. Summary This article provides an overview of the literature on currently used less invasive axillary staging procedures, the accuracy and feasibility of these procedures in clinical practice, important issues concerning axillary treatment, and issues to be addressed in ongoing or future studies. Key messages More evidence is needed regarding the safety of replacing standard ALND by less invasive axillary staging procedures in terms of long-term prognosis. These less invasive staging procedures not only serve to select patients who may benefit from treatment de-escalation, but also to select patients who may benefit from treatment escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine R de Wild
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Janine M Simons
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein L Smidt
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Linetta B Koppert
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Dialani V, Dogan B, Dodelzon K, Dontchos BN, Modi N, Grimm L. Axillary Imaging Following a New Invasive Breast Cancer Diagnosis-A Radiologist's Dilemma. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2021; 3:645-658. [PMID: 38424939 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbab082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Traditionally, patients with newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer underwent axillary US to assess for suspicious axillary lymph nodes (LNs), which were then targeted for image-guided needle biopsy to determine the presence of metastasis. Over the past decade, there has been a shift towards axillary preservation. For patients with palpable lymphadenopathy, the decision to perform axillary imaging with documentation of the number and location of abnormal LNs in preparation for image-guided LN sampling is straightforward. Since LN involvement correlates with cancer size, it is reasonable to image the axilla in patients with tumors larger than 5 cm; however, for tumors smaller than 5 cm, axillary imaging is often deferred until after the tumor molecular subtype and treatment plan are established. Over the last decade, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is increasingly used for smaller cancers with more aggressive molecular subtypes. In most cases, detecting axillary metastasis is critical when deciding whether the patient would benefit from NACT. There is increasing evidence that abnormal axillary US findings correlates with LN metastases and reliably establishes a baseline to monitor response to NACT. Depending on hormone receptor status, practices may choose to image the axilla in the setting of clinical stage T1 and T2 cancers to evaluate nodal status and help determine further steps in care. Radiologists should understand the nuances of axillary management and the scope and challenges of LN marking techniques that significantly increase the precision of limited axillary surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vandana Dialani
- Beth Israel Lahey Hospital, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Basak Dogan
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Katerina Dodelzon
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Department of Radiology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brian N Dontchos
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Neha Modi
- Saint Vincent Hospital at Worcester Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Lars Grimm
- Duke University Hospital, Department of Radiology, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Rauch GM, Kuerer HM, Jochelson MS. To Look or Not to Look? Yes to Nodal Ultrasound! JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2021; 3:659-665. [PMID: 38424935 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbab079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Knowledge of axillary nodal status is highly important for correct staging and treatment planning in patients with breast cancer. Axillary US is a recognized highly specific and cost-effective tool for assessing nodal status and guiding appropriate treatment. Axillary US imaging with US-guided biopsy is routinely performed throughout the world. However, because of recent developments in the surgical management of the axilla in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer (American College of Surgeons Oncology Group [ACOSOG] Z0011 trial) and in patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy (ACOSOG Z1071, SENTinel NeoAdjuvant [SENTINA] and Sentinel Node biopsy aFter NeoAdjuvant Chemotherapy [SN FNAC] trials), some have questioned the utility of axillary US for nodal staging. Here, we review the evidence to date supporting the additional value of axillary US for patients with breast cancer. Nodal US in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer is useful for staging; in a significant proportion of patients, nodal US identifies additional axillary level II or level III nodal disease, which allows for appropriate treatment of disease. Furthermore, ongoing clinical trials may show that axillary surgery can be omitted in patients with negative findings on axillary US. In patients with lymph node-positive disease undergoing neoadjuvant systemic therapy, nodal US can guide the approach to axillary surgery. A more personalized patient approach, taking into the account tumor biology, among other factors, may help to mitigate the controversy surrounding the role of axillary US in breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaiane M Rauch
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Departments of Abdominal and Breast Imaging, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Henry M Kuerer
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maxine S Jochelson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, New York City, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kirkilesis G, Constantinidou A, Kontos M. False Negativity of Targeted Axillary Dissection in Breast Cancer. Breast Care (Basel) 2021; 16:532-538. [PMID: 34720813 DOI: 10.1159/000513037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) has been proposed as an alternative method for the staging of patients with node-positive breast cancer who undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, not much is known yet about the false-negative rate (FNR) of the method and the subsequent risk of underestimation of residual axillary disease. Methods This study reviews published articles with calculations of false negativity of TAD and potential factors that may influence it. Results The FNR of TAD is usually reported as being <10%, but this calculation is usually based on small study populations. Lower FNR is a common finding along with lower N status, while not enough data are available yet for greater axillary involvement. When a marked node is revealed to be a sentinel lymph node (SLN) at surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), this seems to be another factor that contributes to reliable TAD. With regard to the methods used to mark the positive node before chemotherapy and retrieval at surgery, there is no clear advantage of one over the other. The availability of relevant resources, the costs, and local legislation must all be taken into account for the selection of the optimal strategy. Conclusion Although still in its early days, the FNR of TAD can be low, at least in patients with relatively little axillary involvement and when the marked node is the SLN. All reported methods of lymph node marking seem reliable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Kirkilesis
- 3rd Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attiko" University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Michalis Kontos
- 1st Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Laiko" University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Pulappadi VP, Paul S, Hari S, Dhamija E, Manchanda S, Kataria K, Mathur S, Mani K, Gogia A, Deo S. Axillary ultrasonography combined with pre-operative wire localisation of clipped node in nodal restaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in node positive breast cancer patients: a pilot study. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20210788. [PMID: 34491822 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the role of axillary ultrasonography (axUS) and ultrasound-guided pre-operative wire localisation of pre-treatment positive clipped node (CN) for prediction of nodal response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in node positive breast carcinoma patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS A prospective study was conducted between June 2018 and August 2020 after Ethics Committee approval. Breast carcinoma patients (cT1-cT4b) with palpable axillary nodes (cN1-cN3) and suitable for NACT were recruited after written informed consent. Single, most suspicious node was biopsied and clipped. Nodal response to NACT was assessed on axUS. Wire localisation of CN was performed prior to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Diagnostic performances of axUS and CN excision were assessed. RESULTS Of the 69 patients evaluated, 32 patients (mean age, 43.5 ± 11.8 years; females, 31/32 [97%]; pre-menopausal, 18/32 [56.3%]) with metastatic nodes who received NACT were included. Nodal pathological complete response rate was 34.4% (11/32) overall and 70% (7/10) in patients with ≤2 suspicious nodes on pre-NACT axUS. False-negative rates (FNRs) of axUS and CN excision were 4.8% and 28.6% respectively. Combination of post-NACT axUS and CN excision had an FNR of 4.8% overall and 0% in patients with ≤2 suspicious nodes on pre-NACT axUS. CONCLUSION Combination of AxUS and ultrasound-guided wire localisation of pre-treatment positive CN has high diagnostic accuracy for nodal restaging after NACT in node positive breast cancer patients. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Addition of axUS assessment to wire localisation of CN reduces its FNR for detecting residual metastasis after NACT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vishnu Prasad Pulappadi
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Shashi Paul
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Smriti Hari
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Ekta Dhamija
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Smita Manchanda
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Kamal Kataria
- Department of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Sandeep Mathur
- Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Kalaivani Mani
- Department of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Ajay Gogia
- Department of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Svs Deo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Friedrich M, Kühn T, Janni W, Müller V, Banys-Pachulowski M, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Jackisch C, Krug D, Albert US, Bauerfeind I, Blohmer J, Budach W, Dall P, Fallenberg EM, Fasching PA, Fehm T, Gerber B, Gluz O, Hanf V, Harbeck N, Heil J, Huober J, Kreipe HH, Kümmel S, Loibl S, Lüftner D, Lux MP, Maass N, Möbus V, Mundhenke C, Nitz U, Park-Simon TW, Reimer T, Rhiem K, Rody A, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Sinn HP, Solbach C, Solomayer EF, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Untch M, Witzel I, Wöckel A, Thill M, Ditsch N. AGO Recommendations for the Surgical Therapy of the Axilla After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: 2021 Update. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2021; 81:1112-1120. [PMID: 34629490 PMCID: PMC8494519 DOI: 10.1055/a-1499-8431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
For many decades, the standard procedure to treat breast cancer included complete dissection of the axillary lymph nodes. The aim was to determine histological node status, which was then used as the basis for adjuvant therapy, and to ensure locoregional tumour control. In addition to the debate on how to optimise the therapeutic strategies of systemic treatment and radiotherapy, the current discussion focuses on improving surgical procedures to treat breast cancer. As neoadjuvant chemotherapy is becoming increasingly important, the surgical procedures used to treat breast cancer, whether they are breast surgery or axillary dissection, are changing. Based on the currently available data, carrying out SLNE prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not recommended. In contrast, surgical axillary management after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is considered the procedure of choice for axillary staging and can range from SLNE to TAD and ALND. To reduce the rate of false negatives
during surgical staging of the axilla in pN+
CNB
stage before NACT and ycN0 after NACT, targeted axillary dissection (TAD), the removal of > 2 SLNs (SLNE, no untargeted axillary sampling), immunohistochemistry to detect isolated tumour cells and micro-metastases, and marking positive lymph nodes before NACT should be the standard approach. This most recent update on surgical axillary management describes the significance of isolated tumour cells and micro-metastasis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the clinical consequences of low volume residual disease diagnosed using SLNE and TAD and provides an overview of this yearʼs AGO recommendations for surgical management of the axilla during primary surgery and in relation to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, HELIOS Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | | | - Wolfgang Janni
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Pachulowski
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, UK-SH, Lübeck, Germany.,Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ute-Susann Albert
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Landshut gemeinnützige GmbH, Landshut, Germany
| | - Jens Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum des Universitätsklinikums der Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Strahlentherapie, Radiologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Dall
- Frauenklinik, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Eva M Fallenberg
- Klinikum der Universität München, Campus Großhadern, Institut für Klinische Radiologie, München, Germany
| | | | - Tanja Fehm
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Klinikum Südstadt Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda, Brustzentrum, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Volker Hanf
- Frauenklinik, Nathanstift Klinikum Fürth, Fürth, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Universitäts-Klinikum Heidelberg, Brustzentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Patrick Lux
- Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik, St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz Krankenhaus GmbH, Germany
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Volker Möbus
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Christoph Mundhenke
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda, Brustzentrum, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Tjoung-Won Park-Simon
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Klinikum Südstadt Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Florian Schütz
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- Sektion Gynäkopathologie, Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Erich-Franz Solomayer
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Universitätsfrauenklinik, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hartmann S, Stachs A, Kühn T, de Boniface J, Banys-Paluchowski M, Reimer T. Targeted Removal of Axillary Lymph Nodes After Carbon Marking in Patients with Breast Cancer Treated with Primary Chemotherapy. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2021; 81:1121-1127. [PMID: 34629491 PMCID: PMC8494517 DOI: 10.1055/a-1471-4234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
In breast cancer patients who have received primary chemotherapy and then no longer have any suspicious lymph nodes clinically and/or on imaging, marking of initially suspicious axillary lymph nodes with targeted removal has recently been discussed and practised both in Germany and internationally as an alternative to complete axillary lymph node dissection. Tattooing of the suspicious lymph nodes with a highly purified carbon suspension is currently being investigated in clinical studies. Compared with other techniques, the advantages of this method are the high rate of intraoperative lymph node detection, avoidance of an immediately preoperative localisation procedure and the low costs. The practical aspects of lymph node tattooing and the current data regarding this method will be described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steffi Hartmann
- Universitätsklinikum Rostock, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Rostock, Germany
| | - Angrit Stachs
- Universitätsklinikum Rostock, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Rostock, Germany
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Klinikum Esslingen, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Jana de Boniface
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Capio St. Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Lübeck, Germany
- Medizinische Fakultät der Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsklinikum Rostock, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Options to Determine Pathological Response of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13164167. [PMID: 34439321 PMCID: PMC8394061 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13164167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Neoadjuvant therapy instituted prior to definitive surgery helps to reduce the tumor burden in the breast and axilla. De-escalation of surgery in the axilla may allow removal of just the involved nodes and sentinel nodes for determination of pathological response of previously biopsy proven positive axillary nodes. In order to attain the optimal surgical results with minimum risk of complications, it is important to choose the accurate method of identification of these positive nodes. In this review, we examine the different options to assure identification of the nodes deemed positive before neoadjuvant therapy, at the time of definitive surgery. Abstract Increasing use of neoadjuvant therapy in large tumors or node positive disease in breast cancer patients or hormone negative and HER 2 overexpressing cancers often gives rise to complete clinical response, with resolution of disease in the breast and axilla. These results have raised important questions to deescalate loco-regional surgical treatment options with minimum recurrence risk and treatment related morbidity. Although there is excellent prognosis following clinical response, the primary goal of surgery still remains to confirm complete pathological response in the biopsied node that was previously positive and now clinically/radiologically negative (ycN0). Biopsied lymph nodes are often marked with a clip to allow future identification at the time of definitive surgery. The goal of lymph node surgery in oncology is that it should be accurate, hence the significance of localizing the biopsied node. This article aims to review the different options to localize the deemed positive node at the time of definitive surgery, in order to help determine pathological response after neoadjuvant therapy.
Collapse
|
47
|
de Wild SR, Simons JM, Vrancken Peeters MJTFD, Smidt ML, Koppert LB. MINImal vs. MAXimal Invasive Axillary Staging and Treatment After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Node Positive Breast Cancer: Protocol of a Dutch Multicenter Registry Study (MINIMAX). Clin Breast Cancer 2021; 22:e59-e64. [PMID: 34446364 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Node positive breast cancer (cN+) patients with an axillary pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) are not expected to benefit from axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Therefore, less invasive axillary staging procedures have been introduced to establish response-guided treatment. However, evidence is lacking with regard to their oncologic safety and impact on quality of life (QoL). We hypothesize that if response-guided treatment is given, less invasive staging procedures are non-inferior to standard ALND in terms of oncologic safety, and superior to standard ALND in terms of QoL. PATIENTS AND METHODS MINIMAX is a Dutch multicenter registry study that includes patients with cN1-3M0 unilateral invasive breast cancer, who receive NST, followed by axillary staging and treatment according to local protocols. In a retrospective registry of ±4000 patients, the primary endpoint is oncologic safety at 5 and 10 years (disease-free, breast-cancer-specific and overall survival, and axillary recurrence rate). In a prospective multicenter registry, the primary endpoints are QoL at 1 and 5 years, and we aim to verify the 5-year oncologic safety. With an estimated 5-year disease-free survival of 72.5% and anticipated loss to follow-up of 10%, a sample size of 549 is needed to have 80% power to detect non-inferiority (with a 10% margin) of less invasive staging procedures. CONCLUSION In cN+ patients treated with NST, less invasive axillary staging procedures are already implemented globally. Evidence is needed to support the assumed oncologic safety and superior QoL of such procedures. This study will contribute to evidence-based guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine R de Wild
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Janine M Simons
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marjolein L Smidt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Linetta B Koppert
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Feasibility and validation of the targeted axillary dissection technique in the axillary staging of breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: Definitive results. Surg Oncol 2021; 38:101636. [PMID: 34303211 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Revised: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
AIM to study the feasibility and value of "Targeted Axillary Dissection" (TAD) in cN1 breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), in order to avoid unnecessary axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). MATERIALS AND METHODS Design: Prospective observational study. INCLUSION CRITERIA Patients with histologically confirmed cN1 staging BC and treated with NACT between January 2016 and August 2019 who accomplished clinical response. METHOD Fine-Needle Aspiration (FNA) positive axillary nodes were marked with a metallic clip prior to neoadjuvant treatment. All patients were summited to TAD and ALND. Analysis of data: We performed [1]: a feasibility analysis of clinical, radiological and pathological variables, as well as difficulties and complications of the TAD [2]; a diagnostic test study of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), clipped lymph node biopsy (BCLIP) and their combination (TAD), using ALND as the Gold Standard. RESULTS 60 patients were included. 43 patients (71.7%) had a complete clinical lymph node response to NACT. Neither limitations nor complications in clip placement were found. Intraoperative location of the clipped node was problematic in 7 cases (11.7%). The pathological complete response rate (pCR) was 30.5% (18 patients) and ypN0 staging rate was 38.3% (23 patients). Sensitivity values of each technique were: SLNB: 80.9% (95%CI: 61.8-100); BCLIP: 80.8% (95%CI: 63.7-97.8); TAD: 92.6% (95%CI: 80.9-100) with negative predictive values of: SLNB: 84.6% (95%CI: 68.8-100); BCLIP: 81.0% (95%CI: 63.7-97.8); TAD: 91.3% (95%CI: 77.6-100). CONCLUSION TAD is feasible and valid to rule out axillary metastatic involvement in cN1 breast cancer patients who respond to NACT.
Collapse
|
49
|
Is image-guided core needle biopsy of borderline axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients clinically helpful? Am J Surg 2021; 223:101-105. [PMID: 34311951 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.07.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND When borderline axillary lymph nodes (bALN) are identified on ultrasound (US) for breast cancer (BC) patients, preoperative management is unclear. We aimed to evaluate if core needle biopsy (CNB) for bALN is clinically helpful or disruptive. METHODS Retrospective review of BC patients with bALN from 2014 to 2019 was performed. Clinicopathologic data were compared for those who did and did not have CNB. RESULTS CNB (n = 34) and no CNB (n = 31) were similar with respect to clinicopathologic factors. Surgical LN-positive rate was the same between cohorts (p = 0.26). CNB was disruptive in 58.8 %; all had CNB for pN0 disease. CNB was helpful in 34.2 %: 14.7 % proceeded directly to axillary dissection; 17.6 % had positive LN localized after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS CNB for bALN is more likely clinically disruptive and did not impact surgical LN positive rate. BC patients with bALN should undergo CNB only if it will change clinical management.
Collapse
|
50
|
Breast and axillary surgery in malignant breast disease: a review focused on literature of 2018 and 2019. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2021; 32:91-99. [PMID: 31833973 DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000000593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW There have been fundamental changes in the surgical approach to breast cancer management over the last decades. The primary objective of achieving locoregional control, however, remains unchanged. RECENT FINDINGS In addition to strategies optimizing systemic treatment and radiotherapy, current discussions focus on improving the surgical approach to breast cancer. Especially in view of the increasingly pivotal role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy NAT/NAC (NACT), gauging the extent of tissue removal in the breast and the width of resection margins in breast-conserving surgery is highly important, as is the extent of axillary surgery. Although sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive patients always underwent axillary lymph node dissection in the past, this paradigm has been challenged in recent years. Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) has emerged as a new staging option in biopsy-proven node-positive patients who convert to clinical node negativity (cN0) after NACT. TAD combines the removal of the SLN and of the target lymph node marked prior to NACT. The accuracy of axillary staging both before and after NACT plays an important role for prognostication and multidisciplinary treatment plans, while its extent has significant effects on patients' arm morbidity and quality of life. SUMMARY The current review focuses on recent evidence regarding surgical management of the breast and axilla in patients with primary breast cancer based on a PubMed and EMBASE literature search for publication years 2018 and 2019.
Collapse
|