Cause of Death Following Surgery for Acute Type A Dissection: Evidence from the Canadian Thoracic Aortic Collaborative

Clinical implication of NT-proBNP to predict mortality in patients with acute type A aortic dissection: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Acute type A aortic dissection is a life-threatening cardiovascular disease commonly seen in emergency department, resulting in substantial mortality and morbidity. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) among this critically ill population.

DESIGN

The design of this study was a retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

The study population was recruited in the Emergency Department of Fuwai hospital in China from 2018 to 2020.

PARTICIPANTS

We consecutively enrolled 829 patients with acute type A aortic dissection and measurable baseline NT-proBNP.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

The primary endpoint was 1-year all-cause death.

RESULTS

Based on tertiles of NT-proBNP (pg/mL), patients were stratified into low (≤150.3, n=276), intermediate (150.3-667.6, n=277) and high (>667.6, n=276) NT-proBNP groups. Compared with patients with low NT-proBNP, the Kaplan-Meier estimates for primary 1-year mortality were higher in intermediate (32.5% vs 18.1%; HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.35 to 2.69) and high (42.0% vs 18.1%; HR 2.56, 95% CI 1.84 to 3.57) NT-proBNP groups, respectively. After multivariable regression adjusted for confounders, NT-proBNP tertiles were independent predictors for 1-year mortality (adjusted HR for intermediate group 1.52, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.27; adjusted HR for high group 2.17, 95% CI 1.41 to 3.32). Notably, the predictive performance of NT-proBNP for 1-year mortality was greater in patients receiving surgery than conservative treatment (between-cohorts difference in area under the curve 0.13, Delong's test p=0.04).

CONCLUSION

NT-proBNP provides incremental prognostic information for mortality in patients with acute type A aortic dissection who underwent surgical repairment, which could aid in risk stratification as a pragmatic and versatile biomarker in this critically ill population while having limited prognostic value for those receiving conservative treatment.

Diabetes does not increase in-hospital or short-term mortality in patients undergoing surgical repair for type A aortic dissection: insight from the national readmission database

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported a protective effect of type 2 diabetes on the incidence and progression of aortic aneurysms. We investigated whether this protective effect extends to aortic dissections.

METHODS

Data from the US Nationwide Readmission Database (2016-2019) were analyzed. Patients admitted for open surgery repair of acute type A aortic dissection (TAAD) were initially analyzed (index group). Those discharged alive were followed for up to 30 days (readmission group). The co-primary outcomes were in-hospital and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Between 2016 and 2019, 7,324 patients were admitted for open surgical repair of acute TAAD, of whom 965 (13.2%) had diabetes. Patients with diabetes were older and had a higher prevalence of obesity, hypertension, smoking, dyslipidemia, and chronic kidney disease (CKD). 15.2% of patients with diabetes and 14.6% without diabetes died; hence, diabetes did not have a significant impact on in-hospital mortality (adjusted odd ratio [aOR] = 1.02 [0.84-1.24]). Similarly, diabetes was not associated with a higher adjusted risk of atrial fibrillation (aOR = 1.03 [0.89-1.20]), stroke (aOR = 0.83 [0.55-1.26]), cardiogenic shock (aOR = 1.18 [0.98-1.42]), but increased the risk of acute renal failure (aOR = 1.20 [1.04-1.39]). Within 30 days of discharge, 154 (15.9%) patients with diabetes and 952 (15%) from the non-diabetes group were readmitted. Readmitted patients with diabetes were older and had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities. We didn't observe any significant difference in the adjusted risk of 30-day mortality between the diabetes and non-diabetes groups (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.81 [0.41-1.60]). However, diabetes was associated with a lower risk of readmission (aHR = 0.81 [0.68-0.97]). Age was the most significant predictor of all outcomes. CKD was the most significant predictor of 30-day mortality, with the risk increasing five-fold in patients with diabetes (HR = 5.58 [2.58-6.62]. Cardiovascular-related conditions were the most common causes of readmission in both groups. However, respiratory-related conditions were more prevalent in the diabetes group compared to the non-diabetes group (19.5% vs. 13%, respectively, p = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes does not increase in-hospital or short-term mortality in patients undergoing surgical repair for Type A aortic dissection.

Bleeding is associated with severely impaired outcomes in surgery for acute type a aortic dissection

Background. Surgery for acute type A aortic dissection confers a risk for significant bleeding. We analyzed the impact of massive bleeding on complications after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. Methods. Patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection from the retrospective multicenter Nordic Consortium for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection (NORCAAD) database 2005-2014 were eligible. Massive bleeding was defined according to the Universal Definition of Perioperative Bleeding. The primary outcome measure was early mortality and secondary outcome measures were perioperative stroke, mechanical ventilation more than 48 h, new-onset dialysis, and intensive care unit stay. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for differences in covariates. Results. Nine hundred ninety-seven patients were included, of whom 403 (40.4%) had massive bleeding. In the propensity score-matched cohort (344 pairs), patients with massive bleeding had higher 30-day mortality (17.2 versus 7.6%, p < .001), mechanical ventilation more than 48 h (52.8 versus 22.6%, p < .001), perioperative stroke (24.3 versus 14.8%, p = .002), new-onset dialysis (22.5 versus 4.9%, p < .001), and longer intensive care unit stay (6 versus 3 days, p < .001), compared with patients without massive bleeding. Risk factors for massive bleeding were previous cardiac surgery, preoperative clopidogrel or ticagrelor therapy, DeBakey type I dissection, and localized or generalized malperfusion. Conclusions. Massive bleeding in surgery for acute type A aortic dissection is associated with a markedly increased risk for severe complications as well as early death. Further improvement of surgical technique and pharmacological optimization of coagulation is paramount to possibly improve outcomes in acute type A aortic dissection repair.

Optimizing Therapeutic Hypothermia Depths in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Repair

INTRODUCTION

Existing evidence regarding the impact of hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) depth in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair lacks robustness concerning blood loss and mortality. We aimed to assess whether using mild and moderate HCA (MMHCA) versus deep and profound HCA (DPHCA) in ATAAD repair is associated with reduced bleeding risk, lower in-hospital mortality, and improved long-term survival.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study spanned from 2003 to 2023. ATAAD repair patients were identified from hospital records, with exclusion criteria applied to those who died before surgery, those with symptoms lasting longer than 14 d, and those who operated on without HCA. Patients in the DPHCA group underwent surgery with HCA (T ≤ 20°C), while those in the MMHCA group had temperatures ranging from 34°C to 20.1°C.

RESULTS

Out of 549 eligible ATAAD patients, the MMHCA group exhibited a reduced rate of chest re-exploration for bleeding (39% versus 14%, P < 0.005), decreased blood loss after surgery (1637 mL versus 1045 mL, P < 0.005), and lower volumes for red blood cell transfusions (1375 mL versus 903 mL, P < 0.005) compared with the DPHCA group. Additionally, the MMHCA group had lower crude and age- and sex-adjusted in-hospital mortality rates, with a mortality rate ratio of 0.65 (P = 0.003). Cox regression analysis revealed a 25% reduction in long-term mortality for the MMHCA group compared with the DPHCA group (hazard ratio = 0.75; P = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

ATAAD repair using MMHCA and antegrade cerebral perfusion is associated with lower blood loss and improved immediate and long-term survival.

Successful Percutaneous Treatment of Left Main Artery Occlusion Associated With Focal Type A Aortic Dissection

Type A aortic dissection is a rapidly progressive disease process with often fatal complications. We present a case of focal Type A aortic dissection complicated by left main occlusion and cardiogenic shock, treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and mechanical circulatory support.

Temperature management in acute type A aortic dissection treatment: deep vs. moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest. Is colder better?

Introduction

The impact of different degrees of hypothermia in patients undergoing type A aortic dissection (TAAD) repair remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients who received deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) (<20°C) and those of patients who received moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest (MHCA) (20-28°C).

Methods

Between January 2011 and December 2020, 143 patients underwent surgical treatment for TAAD with CA and unilateral antegrade selective cerebral perfusion (uSCP). In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated the clinical outcomes of 143 individuals (103 who received DHCA vs. 40 who received MHCA). The primary outcome was the composite of major events (CMEs) including delirium, acute kidney injury (AKI), and in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes were overall mortality, bleeding, rethoracotomy, and length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, among other things.

Results

Compared with the MHCA group, the DHCA group presented a greater incidence of postoperative complications, as follows: AKI (26 (25.2%) vs. 3 (7.5%), p = 0.020), delirium (23 (22.3%) vs. 2 (5%), p = 0.014), re-exploration rate (21 (20.4%) vs. 2 (5.0%), p = 0.024), and prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay (7.8 (4.4, 14.1) vs. 5.7 (2.4, 10) days, p = 0.019). The median cardiopulmonary bypass time (255 (210, 280) vs. 210 (190, 251) min, p = 0.010) and median cross-clamp time (140 (110, 180) vs. 125 (100, 160) min, p = 0.023) were significantly longer in the DHCA group. The German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A (GERAADA) score was significantly higher in the MHCA group (22.7 ± 9.1 vs. 19 ± 7.2, p = 0.012). The adjusted odds ratio for CME in the MHCA group was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.52-1.17, p = 0.001). The use of MHCA demonstrated a protective effect on reducing postoperative delirium (OR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.14-0.46, p < 0.01) and postoperative AKI (OR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.14-0.49, p < 0.01). Overall survival after two years did not differ between the two groups (log-rank, p = 0.16).

Conclusion

The principal findings of our study indicate that DHCA elevates the risk of postoperative AKI and delirium. As a result, the duration of hospitalization and intensive care unit stay was markedly extended. Consequently, MHCA should be favored over DHCA when the clinical circumstances permit, since DHCA remains a secure alternative in intricate dissection instances.

The Use of the Ascyrus Medical Dissection Stent in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Repair Reduces Distal Anastomotic New Entry Tear

BACKGROUND

A distal anastomotic new entry tear (DANE) can occur at the time of surgical repair for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). This study aimed to compare the occurrence of DANE following a standard hemiarch repair with that following a hemiarch repair with an uncovered arch dissection stent.

METHODS

All patients who received a hemiarch repair or a hemiarch repair with an Ascyrus Medical Dissection Stent (AMDS) for ATAAD from 2017 to 2021 were included. Baseline and intra- and postoperative characteristics were collected. All available pre- and postoperative computed tomographic scans were analysed. The primary outcome measures were the incidence of DANE, positive aortic remodelling, mortality, and aortic reintervention rates at last follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients underwent repair of Debakey I ATAAD during the study period with either an isolated hemiarch (n = 77) or a hemiarch with AMDS (n = 37). There was no significant difference in mortality (P = 0.768) or other in-hospital adverse events. During the follow-up period, DANE occurred in 43.3% (n = 26) of the isolated hemiarch group and in 11.8% (n = 4) of the hemiarch with AMDS group (P = 0.002). The incidence of false lumen thrombosis and obliteration favoured the AMDS group in the aortic arch (P = 0.029), the proximal descending thoracic aorta (P = 0.031), and level of pulmonary artery bifurcation (P = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of DANE is significantly reduced with the addition of an AMDS at the time of hemiarch repair for ATAAD repair. Further follow-up is necessary to identify late aortic complications that may have been prevented by reducing the incidence of postoperative DANE.

Endovascular Repair of Zone 0 Ascending Aortic Aneurysm: A Review of Current Knowledge and Developing Technology

Aortic aneurysms represent the 15th leading cause of death in men and women over 55 years of age. Where historically these lesions were all addressed via an open approach, endovascular aortic repair has entirely altered the way that surgeons approach aortic lesions. Although it was initially employed for patients who were poor surgical candidates, endovascular repair is now standard for abdominal aortic aneurysms and aneurysms in the descending thoracic aorta. Open surgery remains the gold standard for management of ascending aneurysms, in part due to the limitations portended by the anatomy of the ascending aorta, although increasing evidence suggests that endovascular approaches are feasible and may sometimes be optimal for patient outcomes. Here, we present some of the anatomical and technical challenges of the endovascular approach to these "Zone 0" aneurysms, the associated complications, and the current state of device development.

Molecular characterization and clinical investigation of patients with heritable thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection

OBJECTIVES

Thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection has a genetic predisposition and a variety of clinical manifestations. This study aimed to investigate the clinical and molecular characterizations of patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection and further explore the relationship between the genotype and phenotype, as well as their postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 1095 individuals with thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection admitted to our hospital between 2013 and 2022 were included. Next-generation sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification were performed, and mosaicism analysis was additionally implemented to identify the genetic causes.

RESULTS

A total of 376 causative variants were identified in 83.5% of patients with syndromic thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection and 18.7% of patients with nonsyndromic thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection, including 8 copy number variations and 2 mosaic variants. Patients in the "pathogenic" and "variant of uncertain significance" groups had younger ages of aortic events and higher aortic reintervention risks compared with genetically negative cases. In addition, patients with FBN1 haploinsufficiency variants had shorter reintervention-free survival than those with FBN1 dominant negative variants.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data expanded the genetic spectrum of heritable thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection and indicated that copy number variations and mosaic variants contributed to a small proportion of the disease-causing alterations. Moreover, positive genetic results might have a possible predictive value for aortic event severity and postoperative risk stratification.

The role of surgeon's intuition for acute type A aortic dissection in an era of evidence-based medicine: a prospective cohort study

Background

Intuition may play a role in clinical practice. This prospective cohort study aimed to explore whether surgeons' intuition is valid in predicting the operative mortality of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD).

Methods

After admission (before surgery), attending surgeons were asked to rate the mortality on a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 to 3 representing unlikely, 4-6 possible, and 7-10 very likely. The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the accuracy of prediction models.

Results

A significantly higher Surgeon's Score [5.0 (2.0, 8.0) vs. 8.0 (7.0, 10.0)] was observed in the mortality group, compared to the survival group. The odds ratio (OR) for Surgeon's Score was 1.32 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09-1.66, P=0.009]. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression picked the following variables as significant predictors for early mortality of ATAAD: Surgeon's Score, Penn classification, age, aortic regurgitation, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, platelet count, and ejection fraction. The AUC for the German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A (GERAADA) score and Surgeon's Score were 0.740 (95% CI: 0.625-0.854), and 0.710 (95% CI: 0.586-0.833), respectively. The combined model of GERAADA score and Surgeon's Score yielded an AUC of up to 0.761 (95% CI: 0.638-0.884).

Conclusions

Intuition certainly has a place alongside evidence-based medicine. The duet of intuition and statistics-based scoring systems allows us to make more accurate predictions, potentially resulting in more rational clinical decisions.

Postoperative glucocorticoids in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (GLAD): study protocol for a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Patients receiving surgical treatment of acute type A Aortic Dissection (aTAAD) are common to suffer organ dysfunction in the intensive care unit due to overwhelming inflammation. Previous studies have revealed that glucocorticoids may reduce complications in certain patient groups, but evidence between postoperative glucocorticoids administration and improvement in organ dysfunction after aTAAD surgery are lacking.

METHODS

This study will be an investigator-initiated, prospective, single-blind, randomized, single-center study. Subjects with confirmed diagnosis of aTAAD undergoing surgical treatment will be enrolled and 1:1 randomly assigned to receive either glucocorticoids or normal treatment. All patients in the glucocorticoids group will be given methylprednisolone intravenously for 3 days after enrollment. The primary endpoint will be the amplitude of variation of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score on post-operative day 4 compared to baseline.

DISCUSSION

The trial will explore the rationale for postoperative application of glucocorticoids in patients after aTAAD surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study has been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04734418).

Optimal Extent of Repair for Acute Type I Aortic Dissection-Frozen Elephant Trunk? How Long and Why?

Acute Type A dissection is a life-threatening condition requiring urgent surgical treatment. The operative technique involves repairs of a variety of distal extents of the transverse aortic arch and the downstream aorta. We review the evidence surrounding the extent of repair for acute Type A aortic dissection and describe our approach to this disease.

Coronary artery involvement in type A aortic dissection: Fate of the coronaries

BACKGROUND

Type A aortic dissection (TAAD) involves a tear in the intimal layer of the thoracic aorta proximal to the left subclavian artery, and hence, carries a high risk of mortality and morbidity and requires urgent intervention. This dissection can extend into the main coronary arteries. Coronary artery involvement in TAAD can either be due to retrograde extension of the dissection flap into the coronaries or compression and/or blockage of these vessels by the dissection flap, possibly causing myocardial ischemia. Due to the emergent nature of TAAD, coronary involvement is often missed during diagnosis, thereby delaying the required intervention.

AIMS

The main scope of this review is to summarize the literature on the incidence, mechanism, diagnosis, and treatment of coronary artery involvement in TAAD.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed using multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, Ovid, Scopus and Embase, to identify and extract relevant studies.

RESULTS

Incidence of coronary artery involvement in TAAD was seldom reported in the literature, however, some studies have described patients diagnosed either preoperatively, intraoperatively following aortic clamping, or even during autopsy. Among the few studies that reported on this matter, the treatment choice for coronary involvement in TAAD was varied, with the majority revascularizing the coronary arteries using coronary artery bypass grafting or direct local repair of the vessels. It is well-established that coronary artery involvement in TAAD adds to the already high mortality and morbidity associated with this disease. Lastly, the right main coronary artery was often more implicated than the left.

CONCLUSION

This review reiterates the significance of an accurate diagnosis and timely and effective interventions to improve prognosis. Finally, further large cohort studies and longer trials are needed to reach a definitive consensus on the best approach for coronary involvement in TAAD.

Extensive aortic dissection (Stanford Type A) presenting with confusion in a patient: a case report

Spontaneous extensive aortic dissection is rarely documented in the literature with a misdiagnosis rate of up to 38% in previous studies. Vital signs and clinical manifestations vary and depend on the extent of the dissection and location. We present a rare case of extensive Stanford Type A dissection in a 60-year-old female patient who presented with confusion. Type A aortic dissection is a surgical emergency that is important for clinicians to have a low threshold of suspicion of the life-threatening condition due to the diverse and potentially atypical clinical presentation of aortic dissection.

Aortic Pseudoaneurysm After Type A Aortic Dissection: Results of Conservative Management

Aortic pseudoaneurysms after acute Type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair have been reported as high as 10-24% and surgical treatment is usually recommended. The objective of this article is to examine the safety and efficacy of a conservative approach to aortic pseudoaneurysm and to compare this approach to standard surgical treatment. We retrospectively examined 39 patients who had an aortic pseudoaneurysm after ATAAD surgery in order to examine outcomes (baseline characteristics, presentation and freedom from aortic events and mortality). We initially identified 31 patients treated conservatively (CT). After close follow up, 5 of them were operated so 13 patients were treated surgically (ST) and analyzed at a long-term follow-up while 26 were in the conservative group. Mean follow- - up of the whole cohort was 7.9 ± 5.9 years. The freedom from aortic-related mortality at 1, 5, and 10 years was 100%, 83.3% and 72.9% for the ST group and 95.8%, 77.3%, and 77.3% for the CT group (P = 0.35). A conservative approach to aortic pseudoaneurysms could be justified in asymptomatic patients. A close follow-up by a dedicated aortic clinic is mandatory so that patients are referred for surgery when necessary.

Relationship Between Heart Rate at Discharge and Long-Term Outcomes of Surgically Treated Patients With Type A Acute Aortic Dissections

BACKGROUND

Resting heart rate (HR) at discharge is an important predictor of mortality after acute myocardial infarction. However, in patients with Stanford type A acute aortic dissections (TA-AADs), the relationship between HR and long-term outcomes is unclear. Therefore, this relationship was investigated in the present study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Surgically treated consecutive patients with TA-AAD (n=721) were retrospectively categorized according to HR quartiles, recorded within 24 h before discharge (<70, 70-77, 78-83, and ≥84 beats/min). The study endpoints included aortic aneurysm-related deaths, sudden deaths, aortic surgeries, and hospitalizations for recurrence of acute aortic dissections. The mean (±SD) patient age was 65.8±13.0 years. During a median observation period of 5.8 years (interquartile range 3.9-8.5 years), 17.2% of patients (n=124) experienced late aortic events. Late aortic surgery was performed in 14.0% of patients. After adjusting for potential confounders, including β-blocker use, HR at discharge remained an independent predictor of long-term aortic outcomes. Patients with discharge HR ≥84 beats/min had a higher risk (hazard ratio 1.86; 95% confidence interval 1.06-3.25; P=0.029) of long-term aortic events than those with HR <70 beats/min; the cumulative survival rates were similar among the groups (log-rank, P=0.905).

CONCLUSIONS

In surgically treated patients with TA-AAD, HR at discharge independently predicted long-term aortic outcomes. Consequently, HR in patients with TA-AAD should be optimized before discharge, particularly if the HR is ≥84 beats/min.

Towards Endovascular Treatment of Type A Aortic Dissection with Smaller Landing Zones and More Patient Eligibility

OBJECTIVE

Type A or ascending aortic dissection is an acute life-threatening condition with high morbidity and mortality. Open surgery remains standard-of-care. Development of minimally invasive endografts for Type A aortic dissection (TAAD) will require detailed understanding of dissection and aortic root anatomy to determine patient eligibility and optimal device specifications.

METHODS

Computed tomography images of TAAD cases at our institution from 2012-2019 were identified and three-dimensional reconstructions were performed using OsiriX 10.0 (Bernex, Switzerland). Analysis of key anatomic structures including centerline length measurements, ascending aorta/aortic root dimensions, as well as location and extent of dissection were determined in relation to coronary ostia.

RESULTS

A total of 53 patients were identified (mean±SD age 60.4±17.1 years; 36 male, 17 female), 46 of whom underwent surgery for TAAD. Four patients died within 30 days of surgery. In 47 patients (88.7%), the entry tear was distal to the highest coronary ostium. These cases were retrospectively considered for endovascular intervention with a non-branched, single endograft stent. Proximal landing zone (LZ) was defined as distance from the highest coronary ostium to entry tear: 35/53 (66.0%) had a proximal LZ length ≥2.0cm, 38/53 (71.7%) had proximal LZ length ≥1.5cm, and 42/53 (79.2%) had proximal LZ length ≥1.0cm. Proximal and distal LZ diameters of the sinotubular junction (STJ) and distal ascending aorta regions were (median [1^st quartile-3^rd quartile]) 3.29cm [2.73-4.10cm] and 3.49cm [3.09-3.87cm], respectively, with length from STJ to innominate takeoff 8.08cm [6.96-9.40cm]. Ascending aorta radius of curvature was 6.48cm [5.27-8.00cm]. 47.2% (25/53) of patients could be treated with a straight tube graft with ≤20% diameter mismatch between the proximal and distal LZ.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost 80% of patients with TAAD had a proximal LZ ≥1.0cm, and of these, 47.2% had anatomy amenable to endovascular therapy with a non-tapered straight tube graft commercially available devices. To increase patient eligibility for TAAD endovascular intervention, enhanced precision deployment with adequate seal in shorter LZs will be required. Our results serve as a guide for endovascular device specifications designed to treat this devastating condition.

Preoperative Imaging Risk Findings for Postoperative New Stroke in Patients With Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

Background: Stroke is a common postoperative complication in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). We aimed to explore the preoperative imaging risk findings for postoperative new stroke in patients with ATAAD.

Methods: From January 2015 to December 2018, 174 patients with ATAAD who underwent preoperative aortic computed tomography angiography (CTA) and cerebral diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) as well as postoperative brain CT were included, and divided into DWI (+) and DWI (–) groups. Pre- and intraoperative variables were collected, and logistic regression analysis was used to determine the independent risk predictors of postoperative new stroke.

Results: The incidence of postoperative new stroke was 18.4% (32/174) in patients with ATAAD. Postoperative stroke was detected in 13 (31.0%) patients in the DWI (+) group and in 19 (14.4%) patients in the DWI (–) group with significant difference (P = 0.016). In the DWI (+) group, the lesions of the cerebral infarction located in the unilateral cerebral hemisphere and distributed more than three lobes (P = 0.007) were an independent risk factor for postoperative new stroke. Hypotension (P = 0.002), retrograde ascending aorta dissection with thrombosis of the false lumen (P = 0.010), aortic arch entry (P = 0.035), and coronary artery involvement (P = 0.001) were independent risk factors for postoperative stroke in the DWI (–) cohort.

Conclusions: Patients with ATAAD with cerebral infarction are more likely to develop postoperative new stroke; thus, a preoperative DWI examination may be necessary. DWI lesions distributed more than 3 lobes in the unilateral hemisphere suggest a high possibility of postoperative stroke. For patients with ATAAD with normal brain, particular attention should be given to the CTA findings of false lumen thrombosis, aortic arch entry, and coronary artery involvement to avoid postoperative stroke.

Acute type A aortic dissection in-hours versus out-of-hours: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare clinical outcomes in patients with acute type A aortic dissection that undergone surgical repair during in-hours (IH) versus out-of-hours (OOH).

METHODS

An electronic literature search was done till March 2020 to include studies with comparative cohorts of IH versus OOH. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality, stroke, and reoperation for bleeding; secondary outcomes were acute kidney injury, total hospital stay, and intensive care unit stay.

RESULTS

Six articles with a total of 3744 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was similar, 60 ± 12 versus 60 ± 13 in IH versus OOH (p = .25). Aortic root and total arch replacement were similar in both cohorts, 22% in IH versus 25% in OOH (risk ratio [RR], 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI: 0.78, 1.55]; p = .58) and 29% in IH versus 32% in OOH (RR, 0.96; 95% CI [0.89, 1.04], p = .37) respectively. Reoperation for bleeding and stroke rate were similar, with 18% in IH versus 23% in OOH (RR, 0.89; 95% CI [0.73, 1.08]; p = .24), and 12% in IH versus 13% in OOH (RR, 0.83; 95% CI [0.66, 1.03]; p = .09) respectively. Thirty-day mortality was significantly lower in IH (RR, 0.81; 95% CI [0.72, 0.90]; p = .0001).

CONCLUSION

There was higher 30-day mortality rate during OOH surgery, yet this difference diminished following sensitivity analysis. There were no significant differences in major postoperative outcomes. Therefore, operating on such cases should be decided on clinical priority without delay.

Midterm Outcomes of the Dissected Aorta Repair Through Stent Implantation Trial

BACKGROUND

The intimal flap at the distal aortic anastomosis after standard aortic dissection repair creates distal anastomotic new entry, leading to false lumen (FL) pressurization and true lumen (TL) collapse and resulting in increased mortality, malperfusion, aortic growth, and reinterventions. The Ascyrus Medical Dissection Stent (AMDS; Ascyrus Medical, Boca Raton, FL) is a hybrid prosthesis that seals and depressurizes the FL at the distal anastomosis while expanding and pressurizing the TL.

METHODS

The Dissected Aorta Repair Through Stent Implantation trial is a prospective, nonrandomized, international type A dissection trial where patients with acute DeBakey I dissections were enrolled between March 2017 and January 2019. Forty-seven patients were enrolled (median age, 62.5; 67.4% men) with a median follow-up of 631 days.

RESULTS

All patients underwent emergent surgical repair with successful AMDS implantation. One patient was excluded because of use in iatrogenic dissection. Overall mortality at 30 days and 1 year was 13.0% (6/46) and 19.6% (9/46), whereas new strokes occurred in 6.5% (3/46). Over 95% of vessel malperfusions resolved because of AMDS-induced TL expansion, including 3 patients with preoperative paralysis. Positive remodeling of the aortic arch occurred in 100% of cases with complete obliteration or thrombosis of the FL in 74%. In the proximal descending thoracic aorta positive remodeling occurred in 77% and complete obliteration or FL thrombosis in 53% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

AMDS facilitates single-stage management of malperfusion and induces positive remodeling of the aortic arch through effective sealing of the distal anastomotic FL, depressurization of the FL with expansion, and pressurization of the TL. Importantly the use of AMDS is safe and reproducible.

Inflammatory biomarkers to predict adverse outcomes in postoperative patients with acute type A aortic dissection

Objectives. The present study aimed to evaluate prognostic value of inflammatory markers for in-hospital mortality and renal complication in patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). Design. Serum concentration of C-reactive protein, leukocyte counts, procalcitonin (PCT), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R), IL-6 and IL-8 were measured on the day of admission to the hospital (T0) and on 1st (T1), 2nd (T2), and 7th (T3) day after surgery. Results. 328 patients were included. There were significant differences between survivor group and non-survivor group in PCT, IL-2R, and IL-6 (p = .001, p = .015, and p = .005). There were significant differences between patients with different AKI stage in PCT and IL-2R (p = .001, p < .001). The area under receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve on 30-day death was 0.686 for PCT, 0.718 for IL-2R, 0.694 for IL-6 and 0.627 for IL-8. The area under ROC curve on stage III AKI was 0.852 for PCT, 0.749 for IL-2R, 0.626 for IL-8, and 0.636 for TNF-α. IL-2 > 1438 U/ml and IL-6 > 45.5 pg/ml were independently associated with 30-day mortality (p = .014 and p < .001). The area under ROC curve was 0.849 on score 2 (using 1 point for PCT > 4.58 ng/ml, 1 point for IL-2R > 1438 U/ml, 1 point for APACHE II score >15.5, and 1 point for IL-6 > 45.5 pg/ml). Conclusions. PCT and cytokines may be considered as predictors for adverse renal outcomes and mortality in patients with ATAAD patients after surgery. They are earlier than traditional biomarkers and combination of these biomarkers will improve the accuracy.

Factors predictive for early and late mortality after surgical repair for Stanford A acute aortic dissection

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate independent risk factors predictive for mortality of patients with Stanford A acute aortic dissection.

METHODS

From January 2006 to March 2015, a total of 240 consecutive patients diagnosed with acute Stanford A acute aortic dissection underwent surgical aortic repair in our center. After analysis of pre- and perioperative variables, univariate logistic and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed for mortality of patients. Subsequently, Kaplan-Meier estimation analysis of short- and long-term survival of these variables was carried out.

RESULTS

Primary entry tear in descending aorta (odds ratio = 4.71, p = 0.021), preoperative international normalized ratio higher than 1.2 (odds ratio = 7.36, p = 0.001), additional coronary artery bypass grafting (odds ratio = 3.39, p = 0.003), cannulation in ascending aorta (odds ratio = 3.22, p = 0.005), preoperative neurological coma (odds ratio = 3.30, p = 0.003), and reduced perfusion (odds ratio = 2.91, p = 0.006) as well as prolonged reperfusion time (odds ratio = 3.36, p = 0.002) showed to be independent predictors for early mortality as well as for late mortality (hazard ratio of all variables p < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival estimation analysis with up to 9-year-follow-up in terms of these risk factors showed significantly poorer short- and long-term survival (log-rank and Breslow test all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed that early and late mortality of patients with Stanford A acute aortic dissection surgery was significantly influenced by preoperative and perioperative variables as independent predictors especially of variables displaying coronary, cerebral, and visceral malperfusion. Also, short- and long-term survival of patients was significantly poorer in terms of these risk factors.

Impact of ascending aortic, hemiarch and arch repair on early and long-term outcomes in patients with Stanford A acute aortic dissection

BACKGROUND:

Stanford A acute aortic dissection (AAD) is a life-threatening emergency associated with major morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of three different surgical approaches in patients with Stanford A AAD.

METHODS:

From January 2006 to March 2015 a total of 240 consecutive patients with diagnosed Stanford A AAD underwent elective, isolated surgical aortic repair in our centre. Patients were divided into three groups according to the extent of surgical repair: isolated replacement of the ascending aorta, hemiarch replacement and total arch replacement. Patients were followed up for up to 9 years. After univariate analysis multinomial logistic regression was performed for subgroup analysis. Baseline characteristics and endpoints as well as long-term survival were analysed.

RESULTS:

There were no statistically significant differences among the three groups in terms of demographics and preoperative baseline and clinical characteristics. Incidence of in-hospital stroke ( p = 0.034), need for reopening due to bleeding ( p = 0.031) and in-hospital mortality ( p = 0.017) increased significantly with the extent of the surgical approach. There was no statistical difference in terms of long-term survival ( p = 0.166) among the three groups. Applying multinomial logistic regression for subgroup analysis significantly higher odds for stroke ( p = 0.023), reopening for bleeding ( p = 0.010) and in-hospital mortality ( p = 0.009) for the arch surgery group in comparison to the ascending aorta surgery group as well as significantly higher odds for stroke ( p = 0.029) for the total arch surgery group in comparison to the hemiarch surgery group were identified.

CONCLUSIONS:

With Stanford A AAD the incidence of perioperative complications increased significantly with the extent of the surgical approach. Subgroup analysis and long-term follow up in patients undergoing isolated ascending or hemiarch surgery showed a lower incidence of cerebrovascular events compared with surgery for total arch replacement.