1
|
Heath L, Stevens R, Nicholson BD, Wherton J, Gao M, Callan C, Haasova S, Aveyard P. Strategies to improve the implementation of preventive care in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med 2024; 22:412. [PMID: 39334345 PMCID: PMC11437661 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03588-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 08/27/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Action on smoking, obesity, excess alcohol, and physical inactivity in primary care is effective and cost-effective, but implementation is low. The aim was to examine the effectiveness of strategies to increase the implementation of preventive healthcare in primary care. METHODS CINAHL, CENTRAL, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Dissertations & Theses - Global, Embase, Europe PMC, MEDLINE and PsycINFO were searched from inception through 5 October 2023 with no date of publication or language limits. Randomised trials, non-randomised trials, controlled before-after studies and interrupted time series studies comparing implementation strategies (team changes; changes to the electronic patient registry; facilitated relay of information; continuous quality improvement; clinician education; clinical reminders; financial incentives or multicomponent interventions) to usual care were included. Two reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed bias with an adapted Cochrane risk of bias tool for Effective Practice and Organisation of Care reviews. Meta-analysis was conducted with random-effects models. Narrative synthesis was conducted where meta-analysis was not possible. Outcome measures included process and behavioural outcomes at the closest point to 12 months for each implementation strategy. RESULTS Eighty-five studies were included comprising of 4,210,946 participants from 3713 clusters in 71 cluster trials, 6748 participants in 5 randomised trials, 5,966,552 participants in 8 interrupted time series, and 176,061 participants in 1 controlled before after study. There was evidence that clinical reminders (OR 3.46; 95% CI 1.72-6.96; I2 = 89.4%), clinician education (OR 1.89; 95% CI 1.46-2.46; I2 = 80.6%), facilitated relay of information (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.10-3.46, I2 = 88.2%), and multicomponent interventions (OR 3.10; 95% CI 1.60-5.99, I2 = 96.1%) increased processes of care. Multicomponent intervention results were robust to sensitivity analysis. There was no evidence that other implementation strategies affected processes of care or that any of the implementation strategies improved behavioural outcomes. No studies reported on interventions specifically designed for remote consultations. Limitations included high statistical heterogeneity and many studies did not account for clustering. CONCLUSIONS Multicomponent interventions may be the most effective implementation strategy. There was no evidence that implementation interventions improved behavioural outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42022350912.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Heath
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
| | - Richard Stevens
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Brian D Nicholson
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Joseph Wherton
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Min Gao
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Caitriona Callan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Simona Haasova
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
- Department of Marketing, University of Lausanne, Quartier UNIL-Chamberonne, Lausanne, Quartier, CH-1015, Switzerland
| | - Paul Aveyard
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Heath L, Ordóñez-Mena JM, Aveyard P, Wherton J, Nicholson BD, Stevens R. How has the COVID-19 pandemic affected the delivery of preventive healthcare? An interrupted time series analysis of adults in English primary care from 2018 to 2022. Prev Med 2024; 181:107923. [PMID: 38432306 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.107923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Offering advice and support for smoking, obesity, excess alcohol, and physical inactivity is an evidence-based component of primary care. The objective was to quantify the impact of the pandemic on the rate of advice or referral for these four risk factors. METHODS A retrospective cohort study using primary care data from 1847 practices in England and 21,191,389 patients contributing to the Oxford Clinical Informatics Digital Hub. An interrupted time series analysis was undertaken with a single change point (March 2020). Monthly trends were modelled from 1st January 2018 - 30th June 2022 using segmented linear regression. RESULTS There was an initial step reduction in advice and referrals for smoking, obesity, excess alcohol, and physical inactivity in March 2020. By June 2022, advice on smoking (slope change -0.02 events per hundred patient years/month (EPH/month); 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.17, 0.21), obesity (0.06 EPH/month; 95% CI 0.01, 0.12), alcohol (0.02 EPH/month; 95% CI -0.01, 0.05) and physical inactivity (0.05 EPH/month; 95% CI 0.01, 0.09) had not returned to pre-pandemic levels. Similarly, smoking cessation referral remained lower (0.01 EPH/month; 95% CI -0.01, 0.09), excess alcohol referral returned to similar levels (0.0005 EPH/month; 95% CI 0.0002, 0.0008), while referral for obesity (0.14 EPH/month; 95% CI 0.10, 0.19) and physical inactivity (0.01 EPH/month; 95% CI 0.01, 0.02) increased relative to pre-pandemic rates. CONCLUSION Advice and support for smoking, and advice for weight, excess alcohol and physical inactivity have not returned to pre-pandemic levels. Clinicians and policy makers should prioritise preventive care in COVID-19 recovery plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Heath
- GP and Clinical Doctoral Fellow Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - José M Ordóñez-Mena
- Medical Statistician Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Paul Aveyard
- GP and Professor of Behavioural Medicine Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Joseph Wherton
- Senior Researcher Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Brian D Nicholson
- GP and Associate Professor Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard Stevens
- Associate Professor of Medical Statistics Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sprenger S, Anderson JS. Dying to Quit: Understanding the Burden of Tobacco in Psychiatric Patients-A Clinical Review. J Psychiatr Pract 2024; 30:23-31. [PMID: 38227724 DOI: 10.1097/pra.0000000000000764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
Smoking is the leading cause of preventable death worldwide and remains a critical public health challenge. The burden of disease caused by smoking is disproportionately borne by persons living with mental illness. Public health efforts to address smoking have not historically translated to a significant reduction in smoking prevalence among patients with mental illness. Smoking is a substantial cause of morbidity and mortality among psychiatric patients who smoke at 1.7 to 3.3 times the rate of the general population. Among those with serious mental illness, tobacco-related illness accounts for half of all deaths. Nicotine dependence also interferes with treatment and worsens many psychiatric symptoms. Interventions are underutilized due to persistent misunderstandings regarding tobacco cessation for patients who are mentally ill. Addressing these misunderstandings is crucial in targeting the disparate rates of smoking in this population. Therefore, it is incumbent on psychiatrists to address the outsized effect that smoking has on patients with mental illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Sprenger
- SPRENGER, ANDERSON: Deparment of Psychiatry, Tristar Centennial Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Burns A, Gutta J, Kooreman H, Spitznagle M, Yeager VA. Strategic use of tobacco treatment specialists as an innovation for tobacco cessation health systems change within health care organizations. Health Care Manage Rev 2023; 48:323-333. [PMID: 37615942 DOI: 10.1097/hmr.0000000000000380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tobacco screening interventions have demonstrated effectiveness at improving population health, yet many people who want to quit using tobacco lack access to professional assistance. One way to address this gap is to train members of the clinical team as tobacco treatment specialists (TTSs). PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to understand how TTSs have been used across a variety of health care organizations implementing health systems change for tobacco treatment and examine the sustainability of TTSs as a health systems change innovation for tobacco cessation. METHODOLOGY This study used qualitative interviews ( n = 25) to identify themes related to implementing TTSs as a health systems change innovation and examined these themes within the constructs of the theory of innovation implementation. RESULTS Insights about implementing TTSs as an innovation primarily aligned with four theoretical constructs: implementation policies and practices, implementation climate, innovation-values fit, and implementation effectiveness. Specific themes were perceived to facilitate the sustainability of TTSs including team-based TTS efforts, widespread awareness of TTS roles, leadership buy-in, and recognized value of TTS services. Barriers to sustainability included inadequate resources (e.g., time and staff), lack of tracking outcomes, inappropriate referrals, and lack of reimbursement. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Health care organizations planning to implement health systems change for tobacco cessation can encourage committed use of TTSs as an innovation by considering the insights provided in this study. These primarily related to five overarching implementation considerations: staff selection and training, tracking and dissemination of impacts, adequate resources, referrals and workflow, and billing and reimbursement.
Collapse
|
5
|
Maciosek MV, Donovan EM, LaFrance AB, Schillo BA. Illuminating a Path Forward for Tobacco Nation: Projected Impacts of Recommended Policies on Geographic Disparities. Tob Use Insights 2023; 16:1179173X231182473. [PMID: 37736025 PMCID: PMC10510357 DOI: 10.1177/1179173x231182473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/29/2022] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction This study quantifies the impacts of strengthening 2 tobacco control policies in "Tobacco Nation," a region of the United States (U.S.) with persistently higher smoking rates and weaker tobacco control policies than the rest of the US, despite high levels of support for tobacco control policies. Methods We used a microsimulation model, ModelHealthTM:Tobacco, to project smoking-attributable (SA) outcomes in Tobacco Nation states and the U.S. from 2022 to 2041 under 2 scenarios: (1) no policy change and (2) a simultaneous increase in cigarette taxes by $1.50 and in tobacco control expenditures to the CDC-recommended level for each state. The simulation uses state-specific data to simulate changes in cigarette smoking as individuals age and the health and economic consequences of current or former smoking. We simulated 500 000 individuals for each Tobacco Nation state and the U.S. overall, representative of each population. Results Over the next 20 years, without policy changes, disparities in cigarette smoking will persist between Tobacco Nation and other U.S. states. However, compared to a scenario with no policy change, the simulated policies would lead to a 3.5% greater reduction in adult smoking prevalence, 2361 fewer SA deaths per million persons, and $334M saved in healthcare expenditures per million persons in Tobacco Nation. State-level findings demonstrate similar impacts. Conclusions The simulations indicate that the simulated policies could substantially reduce cigarette smoking disparities between Tobacco Nation and other U.S. states. These findings can inform tobacco control advocacy and policy efforts to advance policies that align with evidence and Tobacco Nation residents' wishes.
Collapse
|
6
|
Huang V, Head A, Hyseni L, O'Flaherty M, Buchan I, Capewell S, Kypridemos C. Identifying best modelling practices for tobacco control policy simulations: a systematic review and a novel quality assessment framework. Tob Control 2023; 32:589-598. [PMID: 35017262 PMCID: PMC10447402 DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Policy simulation models (PSMs) have been used extensively to shape health policies before real-world implementation and evaluate post-implementation impact. This systematic review aimed to examine best practices, identify common pitfalls in tobacco control PSMs and propose a modelling quality assessment framework. METHODS We searched five databases to identify eligible publications from July 2013 to August 2019. We additionally included papers from Feirman et al for studies before July 2013. Tobacco control PSMs that project tobacco use and tobacco-related outcomes from smoking policies were included. We extracted model inputs, structure and outputs data for models used in two or more included papers. Using our proposed quality assessment framework, we scored these models on population representativeness, policy effectiveness evidence, simulated smoking histories, included smoking-related diseases, exposure-outcome lag time, transparency, sensitivity analysis, validation and equity. FINDINGS We found 146 eligible papers and 25 distinct models. Most models used population data from public or administrative registries, and all performed sensitivity analysis. However, smoking behaviour was commonly modelled into crude categories of smoking status. Eight models only presented overall changes in mortality rather than explicitly considering smoking-related diseases. Only four models reported impacts on health inequalities, and none offered the source code. Overall, the higher scored models achieved higher citation rates. CONCLUSIONS While fragments of good practices were widespread across the reviewed PSMs, only a few included a 'critical mass' of the good practices specified in our quality assessment framework. This framework might, therefore, potentially serve as a benchmark and support sharing of good modelling practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincy Huang
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Anna Head
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Lirije Hyseni
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Martin O'Flaherty
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Iain Buchan
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Simon Capewell
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Chris Kypridemos
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tahan C, Dobbins T, Hyslop F, Lingam R, Richmond R. Effect of digital health, biomarker feedback and nurse or midwife-led counselling interventions to assist pregnant smokers quit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e060549. [PMID: 36963792 PMCID: PMC10040078 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of digital health (DH), biomarker feedback (BF) and nurse or midwife-led counselling (NoMC) interventions on abstinence in pregnant smokers during pregnancy and postpartum. SETTINGS Any healthcare setting servicing pregnant women, including any country globally. PARTICIPANTS Pregnant women of any social, ethnic or geographical background who smoke. METHODS We searched Embase, Medline, Web Of Science, Google Scholar, PsychINFO, CINAHL and PubMed between 2007 and November 2021. We included published original intervention studies in English with comparators (usual care or placebo). Two independent assessors screened and abstracted data. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis, assessed risk of bias with the Cochrane Tool and used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation to assess the quality of evidence. RESULTS We identified 57 studies and included 54 in the meta-analysis. Sixteen studies assessed DH (n=3961), 6 BF (n=1643), 32 NoMC (n=60 251), 1 assessed NoMC with BF (n=1120) and 2 NoMC with DH interventions (n=2107). DH interventions had moderate certainty evidence to achieve continuous abstinence (CA) at late pregnancy (4 studies; 2049 women; RR=1.98, 95% CI 1.08 to 3.64, p=0.03) and low certainty evidence to achieve point prevalence abstinence (PPA) postpartum (5 studies; 2238 women; RR=1.46, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.02, p=0.02). NoMC interventions had moderate certainty evidence to achieve PPA in late pregnancy (15 studies; 16 234 women; RR=1.54, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.06, p<0.01) and low certainty evidence to achieve PPA postpartum (13 studies; 5466 women; RR=1.79, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.83, p=0.01). Both DH and BF interventions did not achieve PPA at late pregnancy, nor NoMC interventions achieve CA postpartum. The certainty was reduced due to risk of bias, heterogeneity, inconsistency and/or imprecision. CONCLUSION NoMC interventions can assist pregnant smokers achieve PPA and DH interventions achieve CA in late pregnancy. These interventions may achieve other outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chadi Tahan
- School of Population Health, University of New South Wales - Kensington Campus, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Timothy Dobbins
- School of Population Health, University of New South Wales - Kensington Campus, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Fran Hyslop
- School of Population Health, University of New South Wales - Kensington Campus, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Raghu Lingam
- Paediatric Population Health, School of Women's & Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robyn Richmond
- School of Population Health, University of New South Wales - Kensington Campus, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Taylor AH, Thompson TP, Streeter A, Chynoweth J, Snowsill T, Ingram W, Ussher M, Aveyard P, Murray RL, Harris T, Green C, Horrell J, Callaghan L, Greaves CJ, Price L, Cartwright L, Wilks J, Campbell S, Preece D, Creanor S. Motivational support intervention to reduce smoking and increase physical activity in smokers not ready to quit: the TARS RCT. Health Technol Assess 2023; 27:1-277. [PMID: 37022933 PMCID: PMC10150295 DOI: 10.3310/kltg1447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Physical activity can support smoking cessation for smokers wanting to quit, but there have been no studies on supporting smokers wanting only to reduce. More broadly, the effect of motivational support for such smokers is unclear. Objectives The objectives were to determine if motivational support to increase physical activity and reduce smoking for smokers not wanting to immediately quit helps reduce smoking and increase abstinence and physical activity, and to determine if this intervention is cost-effective. Design This was a multicentred, two-arm, parallel-group, randomised (1 : 1) controlled superiority trial with accompanying trial-based and model-based economic evaluations, and a process evaluation. Setting and participants Participants from health and other community settings in four English cities received either the intervention (n = 457) or usual support (n = 458). Intervention The intervention consisted of up to eight face-to-face or telephone behavioural support sessions to reduce smoking and increase physical activity. Main outcome measures The main outcome measures were carbon monoxide-verified 6- and 12-month floating prolonged abstinence (primary outcome), self-reported number of cigarettes smoked per day, number of quit attempts and carbon monoxide-verified abstinence at 3 and 9 months. Furthermore, self-reported (3 and 9 months) and accelerometer-recorded (3 months) physical activity data were gathered. Process items, intervention costs and cost-effectiveness were also assessed. Results The average age of the sample was 49.8 years, and participants were predominantly from areas with socioeconomic deprivation and were moderately heavy smokers. The intervention was delivered with good fidelity. Few participants achieved carbon monoxide-verified 6-month prolonged abstinence [nine (2.0%) in the intervention group and four (0.9%) in the control group; adjusted odds ratio 2.30 (95% confidence interval 0.70 to 7.56)] or 12-month prolonged abstinence [six (1.3%) in the intervention group and one (0.2%) in the control group; adjusted odds ratio 6.33 (95% confidence interval 0.76 to 53.10)]. At 3 months, the intervention participants smoked fewer cigarettes than the control participants (21.1 vs. 26.8 per day). Intervention participants were more likely to reduce cigarettes by ≥ 50% by 3 months [18.9% vs. 10.5%; adjusted odds ratio 1.98 (95% confidence interval 1.35 to 2.90] and 9 months [14.4% vs. 10.0%; adjusted odds ratio 1.52 (95% confidence interval 1.01 to 2.29)], and reported more moderate-to-vigorous physical activity at 3 months [adjusted weekly mean difference of 81.61 minutes (95% confidence interval 28.75 to 134.47 minutes)], but not at 9 months. Increased physical activity did not mediate intervention effects on smoking. The intervention positively influenced most smoking and physical activity beliefs, with some intervention effects mediating changes in smoking and physical activity outcomes. The average intervention cost was estimated to be £239.18 per person, with an overall additional cost of £173.50 (95% confidence interval -£353.82 to £513.77) when considering intervention and health-care costs. The 1.1% absolute between-group difference in carbon monoxide-verified 6-month prolonged abstinence provided a small gain in lifetime quality-adjusted life-years (0.006), and a minimal saving in lifetime health-care costs (net saving £236). Conclusions There was no evidence that behavioural support for smoking reduction and increased physical activity led to meaningful increases in prolonged abstinence among smokers with no immediate plans to quit smoking. The intervention is not cost-effective. Limitations Prolonged abstinence rates were much lower than expected, meaning that the trial was underpowered to provide confidence that the intervention doubled prolonged abstinence. Future work Further research should explore the effects of the present intervention to support smokers who want to reduce prior to quitting, and/or extend the support available for prolonged reduction and abstinence. Trial registration This trial is registered as ISRCTN47776579. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 4. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian H Taylor
- Faculty of Health, Peninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Tom P Thompson
- Faculty of Health, Peninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Adam Streeter
- Faculty of Health, Peninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Jade Chynoweth
- Faculty of Health, Peninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Tristan Snowsill
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Wendy Ingram
- Faculty of Health, Peninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Michael Ussher
- Institute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Paul Aveyard
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Rachael L Murray
- Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Tess Harris
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Colin Green
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jane Horrell
- Faculty of Health, Peninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Lynne Callaghan
- Faculty of Health, Peninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Colin J Greaves
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Lisa Price
- Sport and Health Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Lucy Cartwright
- Faculty of Health, Peninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Jonny Wilks
- Faculty of Health, Peninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Sarah Campbell
- Faculty of Health, Peninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Dan Preece
- Public Health, Plymouth City Council, Plymouth, UK
| | - Siobhan Creanor
- Faculty of Health, Peninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Non-Pharmacologic Approaches to Tobacco Cessation. Respir Med 2023. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-24914-3_5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/04/2023]
|
10
|
Hill SV, Palenski P, Crane HM, O’Cleirigh C, Matthews LT, Cropsey K. "You Almost Feel Out of Touch [For Saying] … 'Oh, and by the way, Stop Smoking.'" A Qualitative Exploration of Provider Perspectives About Discussing Tobacco and Cannabis Use With 18-24-Year-Old Young Adults With HIV. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care 2023; 22:23259582231163125. [PMID: 37009663 PMCID: PMC10074605 DOI: 10.1177/23259582231163125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Youth with HIV (YWH) aged 18-24 are overburdened by tobacco, with half also using cannabis recreationally. Increasing tobacco cessation necessitates exploring providers' approaches to cessation. Methods: Grounded in social cognitive theory, we explored cognitive, socioenvironmental, and behavioral factors impacting providers' approaches to tobacco use among recreational cannabis users. Virtual interviews were conducted among healthcare providers caring for YWH in Washington (legalized cannabis), Massachusetts (legalized cannabis), and Alabama (cannabis not legal). Interviews were transcribed and analyzed via deductive and exploratory, thematic approaches using NVivo 12 Plus. Results: Twelve providers participated; 80% were subspecialist physicians. All providers (N = 12) reported discussing tobacco use; none reported discussing tobacco use in conjunction with cannabis use. Identified themes included competing demands including cannabis co-use, prioritization of social determinants of health, and need for youth-tailored tools. Conclusions: YWH disproportionately use tobacco and recreational cannabis. Optimizing clinical visits to identify opportunities to address tobacco is crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha V. Hill
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Paige Palenski
- Department of Psychiatry, The University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Heidi M. Crane
- Department of Medicine, The University of
Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Conall O’Cleirigh
- Department of Psychology, Massachusetts
General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lynn T. Matthews
- Division of Infectious Disease, The University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Karen Cropsey
- Department of Psychiatry, The University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chen B, Silvestri GA, Dahne J, Lee K, Carpenter MJ. The Cost-Effectiveness of Nicotine Replacement Therapy Sampling in Primary Care: a Markov Cohort Simulation Model. J Gen Intern Med 2022; 37:3684-3691. [PMID: 35091913 PMCID: PMC9585132 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-07335-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacotherapies remain a central focus of successful tobacco control, but uptake remains very low. OBJECTIVE To estimate the cost effectiveness of a primary care nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) sampling intervention. DESIGN A Markov cohort simulation model was constructed to conduct cost-effectiveness analyses. Clinical trial results were used to initialize the Markov model. All other model parameters were derived from the literature. The study was conducted over a lifetime horizon, from the payers' budgetary perspective. PARTICIPANTS Smokers with a primary care visit. INTERVENTION Medication sampling, which provided short, starter packets of NRT (nicotine patch and lozenge) to smokers in the primary care setting. MAIN MEASURES Lifetime healthcare expenditures, quality-adjusted life years, and life years. KEY RESULTS Medication sampling was the dominant strategy compared to standard care. Our intervention cost $75, yielding a discounted lifetime savings of $1065 in healthcare expenditures, and increased both discounted quality-adjusted life years and discounted life years by 0.01. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that medication sampling remained dominant in plausible ranges except when it failed to increase cessation relative to standard care. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed that medication sampling was dominant in 94.1% of the simulated cases, with an implementation cost of $74 (95% CI $73-$76) and discounted lifetime savings in health expenditures of $1061 (- $1106 to - $1,017), increasing quality-adjusted life years by 0.008 (0.0085-0.0093) and life years by 0.008 (0.0081-0.0089). CONCLUSION Medication sampling, an easily implementable, scalable and low-cost intervention to encourage smoking cessation, is cost saving and improves quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Chen
- Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene St. #354, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
| | - Gerard A Silvestri
- Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, USA
- Hollings Cancer Center, MUSC, Charleston, USA
| | - Jennifer Dahne
- Hollings Cancer Center, MUSC, Charleston, USA
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, MUSC, Charleston, USA
| | - Kyueun Lee
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Matthew J Carpenter
- Hollings Cancer Center, MUSC, Charleston, USA
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, MUSC, Charleston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Taksler GB, Le P, Hu B, Alberts J, Flynn AJ, Rothberg MB. Personalized Disease Prevention (PDP): study protocol for a cluster-randomized clinical trial. Trials 2022; 23:892. [PMID: 36273151 PMCID: PMC9587586 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06750-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends 25 primary preventive services for middle-aged adults, but it can be difficult to do them all. METHODS The Personalized Disease Prevention (PDP) cluster-randomized clinical trial will evaluate whether patients and their providers benefit from an evidence-based decision tool to prioritize preventive services based on their potential to improve quality-adjusted life expectancy. The decision tool will be individualized for patient risk factors and available in the electronic health record. This Phase III trial seeks to enroll 60 primary care providers (clusters) and 600 patients aged 40-75 years. Half of providers will be assigned to an intervention to utilize the decision tool with approximately 10 patients each, and half will be assigned to usual care. Mixed-methods follow-up will include collection of preventive care utilization from electronic health records, patient and physician surveys, and qualitative interviews. We hypothesize that quality-adjusted life expectancy will increase by more in patients who receive the intervention, as compared with controls. DISCUSSION PDP will test a novel, holistic approach to help patients and providers prioritize the delivery of preventive services, based on patient risk factors in the electronic health record. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05463887. Registered on July 19, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glen B Taksler
- Cleveland Clinic Community Care, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave., G10, Cleveland, OH, USA.
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
- Population Health Research Institute, Case Western Reserve University at The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - Phuc Le
- Cleveland Clinic Community Care, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave., G10, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Bo Hu
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jay Alberts
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Allen J Flynn
- School of Information and Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Michael B Rothberg
- Cleveland Clinic Community Care, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave., G10, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Golden SE, Schweiger L, Melzer AC, Ono SS, Datta S, Davis JM, Slatore CG. "It's a decision I have to make": Patient perspectives on smoking and cessation after lung cancer screening decisions. Prev Med Rep 2022; 30:102014. [PMID: 36237837 PMCID: PMC9551209 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.102014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Revised: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Few studies exist showing that involvement in lung cancer screening (LCS) leads to a change in rates of cigarette smoking. We investigated LCS longitudinally to determine whether teachable moments for smoking cessation occur downstream from the initial provider-patient LCS shared decision-making discussion and self-reported effects on smoking behaviors. We performed up to two successive semi-structured interviews to assess the experiences of 39 individuals who formerly or currently smoked cigarettes who underwent LCS decision-making discussions performed during routine care from three established US medical center LCS programs. The majority of those who remembered hearing about the importance of smoking cessation after LCS-related encounters did not report communication about smoking influencing their motivation to quit or abstain from smoking, including patients who were found to have pulmonary nodules. Patients experienced little distress related to LCS discussions. Patients reported that there were other, more significant, reasons for quitting or abstinence. They recommended clinicians continue to ask about smoking at every clinical encounter, provide information comparing the benefits of LCS with those of quitting smoking, and have clinicians help them identify triggers or other motivators for improving smoking behaviors. Our findings suggest that there may be other teachable moment opportunities outside of LCS processes that could be utilized to motivate smoking reduction or cessation, or LCS processes could be improved to integrate cessation resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara E. Golden
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA,Corresponding author at: 3710 SW US Veterans Hospital Rd. R&D 66, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
| | - Liana Schweiger
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Anne C Melzer
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA,Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Sarah S. Ono
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA,Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Santanu Datta
- Health Services Research, Management and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - James M. Davis
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA,Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Christopher G. Slatore
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA,Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA,Section of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
van Dover TJ, Kim DD. Do Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Quality Measures Reflect Cost-Effectiveness Evidence? VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 24:1586-1591. [PMID: 34711358 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Revised: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Despite its importance of quality measures used by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the underlying cost-effectiveness evidence has not been examined. This study aimed to analyze cost-effectiveness evidence associated with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services quality measures. METHODS After classifying 23 quality measures with the Donabedian's structure-process-outcome quality of care model, we identified cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) relevant to these measures from the Tufts Medical Center CEA Registry based on the PICOTS (population, intervention, comparator, outcome, time horizon, and setting) framework. We then summarized available incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) to determine the cost-effectiveness of the quality measures. RESULTS The 23 quality measures were categorized into 14 process, 7 outcome, and 2 structure measures. Cost-effectiveness evidence was only available for 8 of 14 process measures. Two measures (Tobacco Screening and Hemoglobin bA1c Control) were cost-saving and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) improving, and 5 (Depression Screening, Influenza Immunization, Colon Cancer Screening, Breast Cancer Screening, and Statin Therapy) were highly cost-effective (median ICER ≤ $50 000/QALY). The remaining measure (Fall Screening) had a median ICER of $120 000/QALY. No CEAs were available for 15 measures: 10 defined by subjective patient ratings and 5 employed outcome measures without specifying an intervention or process. CONCLUSIONS When relevant CEAs were available, cost-effectiveness evidence was consistent with quality measures (measures were cost-effective). Nevertheless, most quality measures were based on subjective ratings or outcome measures, posing a challenge in identifying supporting economic evidence. Refining and aligning quality measures with cost-effectiveness evidence can help further improve healthcare efficiency by demonstrating that they are good indicators of both quality and cost-effectiveness of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy J van Dover
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David D Kim
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Prevalence and correlates of lifetime e-cigarette use among adolescents attending public schools in a low income community in the US. Addict Behav 2021; 114:106738. [PMID: 33341432 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The prevalence of e-cigarette use among US adolescents is increasing. However, there is limited research on the prevalence and correlates of e-cigarette use among adolescents in low income and under resourced communities. We report on their e-cigarette susceptibility and use behaviors, and perceived risks of harm and addiction. METHODS Students in grades 7, 9, and 11 from a Title I school district in the northeastern US completed an online survey during a class period. Lifetime e-cigarette use and its correlates were tested in bivariate and logistic regression models. RESULTS Most students were of Latino ethnicity (66%), and 36% identified as Black/African American. Overall, 55% of the full sample were considered 'susceptible' to e-cigarette use: 19% were lifetime e-cigarette users while 6% were lifetime smokers. Students in 11th grade were more likely (OR = 2.5) to have ever used e-cigarettes compared to students in 7th grade. Those that were more curious (OR = 11.8), intended to use e-cigarettes in the next 12 months (OR = 2.8), and would use the product if it was offered by a friend (OR = 2.4) had greater odds of lifetime e-cigarette use. By contrast, students who perceived at least moderate risks of health harm (OR = 0.44) were less likely to have used e-cigarettes. CONCLUSIONS Adolescents from marginalized communities are susceptible to and are using e-cigarettes. Prevention efforts targeting underserved areas may benefit from e-cigarette health education messages that reduce curiosity, interrupt social aspects of initiation, and emphasize health harms.
Collapse
|
16
|
Yarnoff B, Honeycutt A, Bradley C, Khavjou O, Bates L, Bass S, Kaufmann R, Barker L, Briss P. Validation of the Prevention Impacts Simulation Model (PRISM). Prev Chronic Dis 2021; 18:E09. [PMID: 33544072 PMCID: PMC7879963 DOI: 10.5888/pcd18.200225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Demonstrating the validity of a public health simulation model helps to establish confidence in the accuracy and usefulness of a model’s results. In this study we evaluated the validity of the Prevention Impacts Simulation Model (PRISM), a system dynamics model that simulates health, mortality, and economic outcomes for the US population. PRISM primarily simulates outcomes related to cardiovascular disease but also includes outcomes related to other chronic diseases that share risk factors. PRISM is openly available through a web application. Methods We applied the model validation framework developed independently by the International Society of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research and the Society for Medical Decision Making modeling task force to validate PRISM. This framework included model review by external experts and quantitative data comparison by the study team. Results External expert review determined that PRISM is based on up-to-date science. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that no parameter affected results by more than 5%. Comparison with other published models, such as ModelHealth, showed that PRISM produces lower estimates of effects and cost savings. Comparison with surveillance data showed that projected model trends in risk factors and outcomes align closely with secular trends. Four measures did not align with surveillance data, and those were recalibrated. Conclusion PRISM is a useful tool to simulate the potential effects and costs of public health interventions. Results of this validation should help assure health policy leaders that PRISM can help support community health program planning and evaluation efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Yarnoff
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.,RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
| | | | | | - Olga Khavjou
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Laurel Bates
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Sarah Bass
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Rachel Kaufmann
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Lawrence Barker
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Peter Briss
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Nystrand C, Gebreslassie M, Ssegonja R, Feldman I, Sampaio F. A systematic review of economic evaluations of public health interventions targeting alcohol, tobacco, illicit drug use and problematic gambling: Using a case study to assess transferability. Health Policy 2021; 125:54-74. [PMID: 33069504 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2019] [Revised: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To identify and assess the cost-effectiveness of public health interventions targeting the use of alcohol, illicit drugs and tobacco, as well as problematic gambling behavior (ANDTS), and consider whether the results from these evaluations are transferable to the Swedish setting. METHODS A systematic review of economic evaluations within the area of ANDTS was conducted including studies published between January 2000 and November 2018, identified through Medline, PsychINFO, Web of Science, the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database and Health Technology Assessment. The quality of relevant studies and the possibilities of transferring results were assessed using criteria set out by the Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment. RESULTS Out of 54 relevant studies, 39 were of moderate to high quality and included in the review, however none for problematic gambling. Eighty-one out of a total of 91 interventions were cost-effective. The interventions largely focusing on taxed-based policies or screening and brief interventions. Thirteen of these studies were deemed to have high potential for transferability, with effect estimates considered relevant, and with good feasibility for implementation in Sweden. CONCLUSIONS Interventions targeting alcohol- and illicit-drug use and tobacco use are cost-effective approaches, and results may be transferred to the Swedish setting. Caution must be taken regarding cost estimates and the quality of the evidence which the studies are based upon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Nystrand
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, P.O Box 564, 751 22, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Mihretab Gebreslassie
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, P.O Box 564, 751 22, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Richard Ssegonja
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, P.O Box 564, 751 22, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Inna Feldman
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, P.O Box 564, 751 22, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Filipa Sampaio
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, P.O Box 564, 751 22, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
The U.S. is in the midst of an opioid epidemic. At the same time, tobacco use remains the leading cause of preventable death and disability. While the shared biological underpinnings of nicotine and opioid addiction are well established, clinical implications for co-treatment of these two substance use disorders has not been emphasized in the literature, nor have researchers, clinicians, and policy makers adequately outlined pathways for incorporating co-treatment into existing clinical workflows. The current brief review characterizes the metabolic and neural mechanisms which mediate co-use of nicotine and opioids, and then outlines clinical and policy implications for concurrently addressing these two deadly epidemics. Screening, assessment, medication-assisted treatment (MAT), and tobacco-free policy are discussed. The evidence suggests that clinical care and policies that facilitate co-treatment are an expedient means of delivering healthcare to individuals that result in better health for the population while also meeting patients' substance abuse disorder recovery goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chad D Morris
- University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 1784 Racine Street, Campus Box F478, Building 401, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
| | - Christine E Garver-Apgar
- University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 1784 Racine Street, Campus Box F478, Building 401, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kotsen C, Santorelli ML, Bloom EL, Goldstein AO, Ripley-Moffitt C, Steinberg MB, Burke MV, Foulds J. A Narrative Review of Intensive Group Tobacco Treatment: Clinical, Research, and US Policy Recommendations. Nicotine Tob Res 2020; 21:1580-1589. [PMID: 30124924 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/nty162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2018] [Accepted: 08/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Clinical practice guidelines recommend comprehensive treatment for tobacco dependence including pharmacotherapies and behavioral interventions. Group counseling may deliver unique treatment aspects not available with other modalities. This manuscript provides a narrative review of group treatment outcomes from real-world practice settings and complements recent meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Our primary goals were to determine whether group treatments delivered in these settings have yielded similar quit rates compared to individual treatment and to provide recommendations for best practices and policy. METHODS Group treatment was defined as occurring in a clinical or workplace setting (ie, not provided as part of a research study), led by a professionally trained clinician, and offered weekly over several weeks. English language PubMed articles from January 2000 to July 2017 were searched to identify studies that included outcomes from both group and individual treatment offered in real-world settings. Additional data sources meeting our criteria were also included. Reports not using pharmacotherapy and research studies (eg, RCTs) were excluded. The primary outcome was short-term, carbon monoxide (CO)-validated point prevalence abstinence (4-week postquit date). RESULTS The review included data from 11 observational studies. In all cases, group treatment(s) had higher 4-week CO-validated quit rates (range: 35.5%-67.3%) than individual treatment(s) (range: 18.6%-53.3%). CONCLUSIONS Best practice group treatments for tobacco dependence are generalizable from research to clinical settings and likely to be at least as effective as intensive individual treatment. The added advantages of efficiency and cost-effectiveness can be significant. Group treatment is feasible in various settings with good results. IMPLICATIONS A major barrier to achieving high rates of tobacco abstinence is under-utilization of evidence-based treatment interventions. This review demonstrates the effectiveness and utility of group treatment for tobacco dependence. Based on the available data described in this narrative review in conjunction with existing RCT data, group treatment for tobacco dependence should be established and available in all behavioral health and medical settings. Group tobacco treatment is now one of the mandated reimbursable tobacco treatment formats within the US health care system, creating enormous opportunities for widespread clinical reach. Finally, comprehensive worksite group programs can further extend impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Kotsen
- Tobacco Quitcenter, Lung Cancer Institute, Steeplechase Cancer Center, RWJ Barnabas Health, Robert Wood Johnson Barnabas Health University Hospital Somerset, Somerville, NJ
| | - Melissa L Santorelli
- Community Health and Wellness Unit, New Jersey Department of Health, State of New Jersey, Trenton, NJ
| | - Erika Litvin Bloom
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
- Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
- Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Adam O Goldstein
- Tobacco Intervention Programs, Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Carol Ripley-Moffitt
- Nicotine Dependence Program, Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Michael B Steinberg
- Rutgers Tobacco Dependence Program, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| | | | - Jonathan Foulds
- Population Health and Cancer Control Program, Cancer Institute, College of Medicine, Penn State University, Hershey, PA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Golden SE, Ono SS, Melzer A, Davis J, Zeliadt SB, Heffner JL, Kathuria H, Garcia-Alexander G, Slatore CG. "I Already Know That Smoking Ain't Good for Me": Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Lung Cancer Screening Decision-Making Discussions as a Teachable Moment. Chest 2020; 158:1250-1259. [PMID: 32304776 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Revised: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung cancer screening (LCS) is now recommended for people at high risk of dying of lung cancer. RESEARCH QUESTION The purpose of this study was to use the LCS decision discussion as a case study to understand possible underlying components of a teachable moment to enhance motivation for smoking cessation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS The study investigated how patients and clinicians communicate about smoking. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were performed of the experiences of 51 individuals who formerly or currently smoked who were offered LCS and 24 clinicians. Only the baseline interviews were used because including the follow-up interviews would have been beyond the scope of this article. The interviews focused on communication about smoking, the perceived importance of discussing smoking and screening together, and patients' perceived challenges to smoking cessation. RESULTS Patients and clinicians differed in their views on the role of the LCS decision discussion as a teachable moment. Although clinicians felt that this discussion was a good opportunity to positively influence smoking behaviors, neither patients nor clinicians perceived the discussion as a teachable moment affecting smoking behaviors. Other motivating factors for smoking cessation were found. INTERPRETATION Our findings indicate that LCS decision discussions are not currently a teachable moment for behavior change in smoking cessation, but perhaps clinicians could address other aspects of communication to enhance motivation for cessation. Our hypothesized teachable moment model helps explain that there may not be sufficient emotional response elicited during the discussion to motivate a major behavior change such as smoking cessation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara E Golden
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR; Department of Sociology, Portland State University, Portland, OR.
| | - Sarah S Ono
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR; Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Anne Melzer
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN; Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - James Davis
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Steven B Zeliadt
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA; Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Hasmeena Kathuria
- The Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | | | - Christopher G Slatore
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR; Section of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR; Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Maciosek MV, LaFrance AB, St. Claire AW, Keller PA, Xu Z, Schillo BA. The 20-year impact of tobacco price and tobacco control expenditure increases in Minnesota, 1998-2017. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0230364. [PMID: 32187225 PMCID: PMC7080278 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Accepted: 02/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Tobacco control programs and policies reduce tobacco use and prevent health and economic harms. The majority of tobacco control programs and policies in the United States are implemented at local and state levels. Yet the literature on state-level initiatives reports a limited set of outcomes. To facilitate decision-making that is increasingly focused on costs, we provide estimates of a broader set of measures of the impact of tobacco control policy, including smoking prevalence, disease events, deaths, medical costs, productivity and tobacco tax revenues, using the experience of Minnesota as an example. Methods Using the HealthPartners Institute’s ModelHealth™: Tobacco MN microsimulation, we assessed the impact of the stream of tobacco control expenditures and cigarette price increases from 1998 to 2017. We simulated 1.3 million individuals representative of the Minnesota population. Results The simulation estimated that increased expenditures on tobacco control above 1997 levels prevented 38,400 cancer, cardiovascular, diabetes and respiratory disease events and 4,100 deaths over 20 years. Increased prices prevented 14,600 additional events and 1,700 additional deaths. Both the net increase in tax revenues and the reduction in medical costs were greater than the additional investments in tobacco control. Conclusion Combined, the policies address both short-term and long-term goals to reduce the harms of tobacco by helping adults who wish to quit smoking and deterring youth from starting to smoke. States can pay for initial investments in tobacco control through tax increases and recoup those investments through reduced expenditures on medical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael V. Maciosek
- HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Amy B. LaFrance
- HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Ann W. St. Claire
- ClearWay Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Paula A. Keller
- ClearWay Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Zack Xu
- HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Barbara A. Schillo
- Truth Initiative, Washington, District of Colombia, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Imtiaz MH, Ramos-Garcia RI, Wattal S, Tiffany S, Sazonov E. Wearable Sensors for Monitoring of Cigarette Smoking in Free-Living: A Systematic Review. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2019; 19:E4678. [PMID: 31661856 PMCID: PMC6864810 DOI: 10.3390/s19214678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Revised: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Globally, cigarette smoking is widespread among all ages, and smokers struggle to quit. The design of effective cessation interventions requires an accurate and objective assessment of smoking frequency and smoke exposure metrics. Recently, wearable devices have emerged as a means of assessing cigarette use. However, wearable technologies have inherent limitations, and their sensor responses are often influenced by wearers' behavior, motion and environmental factors. This paper presents a systematic review of current and forthcoming wearable technologies, with a focus on sensing elements, body placement, detection accuracy, underlying algorithms and applications. Full-texts of 86 scientific articles were reviewed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to address three research questions oriented to cigarette smoking, in order to: (1) Investigate the behavioral and physiological manifestations of cigarette smoking targeted by wearable sensors for smoking detection; (2) explore sensor modalities employed for detecting these manifestations; (3) evaluate underlying signal processing and pattern recognition methodologies and key performance metrics. The review identified five specific smoking manifestations targeted by sensors. The results suggested that no system reached 100% accuracy in the detection or evaluation of smoking-related features. Also, the testing of these sensors was mostly limited to laboratory settings. For a realistic evaluation of accuracy metrics, wearable devices require thorough testing under free-living conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masudul H Imtiaz
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA.
| | - Raul I Ramos-Garcia
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA.
| | - Shashank Wattal
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA.
| | - Stephen Tiffany
- Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 12246, USA.
| | - Edward Sazonov
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Suárez-Varela Úbeda JF, Rodríguez-Vázquez S, Ordóñez Barranco JA, Vega Caldera G, Pérez Alvárez PP, Buitrago F. Effectiveness of individual and group multicomponent interventions for smoking cessation in primary care: a quasi-experimental study. Fam Pract 2019; 36:627-633. [PMID: 30772892 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmz005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2018] [Revised: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy of smoking cessation interventions can be quite diverse in day-to-day clinical practice. OBJECTIVE To analyse the effectiveness in smoking cessation of multicomponent interventions carried out in groups or individually in primary care practices. METHODS A quasi-experimental, multicentre study of 12-month follow-up of patients treated in multicomponent smoking cessation interventions was carried out in Urban health care centres in Sevilla, Spain. Two hundred and twenty smoking patients, ≥18 years of age, participated either in a multicomponent intervention group (n = 145; mean age 51.7 years; 53.1% women) or in individual interventions (n = 77; mean age 50.5 years; 61.0% women). The abstinence or relapse status was computed from patient self-reports, confirmed by relatives or companions when possible and supplemented by CO-oxymetry tests in 89 patients. RESULTS The overall percentage of smoking cessation was 36.9% (37.9% with group and 35.1% with individual intervention, P = 0.398). Patients who quit smoking were younger (48.7 versus 52.9 years old, P < 0.01), with fewer years of smoking (32.9 versus 36.8 years, P < 0.05), with higher education (39.0% versus 25.0%, P < 0.05) and had received pharmacological treatment (91.5% versus 67.9%, P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, level of education [odds ratio (OR): 1.995; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.065-3.735, P < 0.01], group intervention (OR: 1.743; 95% CI: 1.006-3.287, P < 0.05) and drug prescription (OR: 2.368; 95% CI: 1.126-4.980, P < 0.05) were significantly associated with smoking cessation. CONCLUSIONS Our study found that multicomponent group and individual interventions in primary care were associated with an overall quit rate of smoking of 36.9% at 12-month follow-up, with higher probability of success among patients with higher education and those who received the group intervention and drug treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Francisco Buitrago
- Servicio Extremeño de Salud, Centro de Salud Universitario 'La Paz', Unidad Docente de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Departamento de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Maciosek MV, LaFrance AB, St Claire A, Xu Z, Brown M, Schillo BA. Twenty-year health and economic impact of reducing cigarette use: Minnesota 1998-2017. Tob Control 2019; 29:564-569. [PMID: 31413150 PMCID: PMC7476261 DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2018] [Revised: 06/18/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background Adult smoking prevalence in Minnesota fell from 21.8% in 1997 to 15.2% in 2016. This reduction improved heart and lung health, prevented cancers, extended life and reduced healthcare costs, but quantifying these benefits is difficult. Methods 1.3 million individuals were simulated in a tobacco policy model to estimate the gains to Minnesotans from 1998 to 2017 in health, medical spending reductions and productivity gains due to reduced cigarette smoking. A constant prevalence scenario was created to simulate the tobacco harms that would have occurred had smoking prevalence stayed at 1997 levels. Those harms were compared with tobacco harms from a scenario of actual smoking prevalence in Minnesota from 1998 to 2017. Results The simulation model predicts that reducing cigarette smoking from 1998 to 2017 has prevented 4560 cancers, 31 691 hospitalisations for cardiovascular disease and diabetes, 12 881 respiratory disease hospitalisations and 4118 smoking-attributable deaths. Minnesotans spent an estimated $2.7 billion less in medical care and gained $2.4 billion in paid and unpaid productivity, inflation adjusted to 2017 US$. In sensitivity analysis, medical care savings ranged from $1.7 to $3.6 billion. Conclusions Minnesota’s investment in comprehensive tobacco control measures has driven down smoking rates, saved billions in medical care and productivity costs and prevented tobacco related diseases of its residents. The simulation method employed in this study can be adapted to other geographies and time periods to bring to light the invisible gains of tobacco control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Zack Xu
- HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Morgan Brown
- HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tompkins EL, Beltran TA, Bedno SA. Differentiating between smokers and nonsmokers using serum cotinine. Biomark Med 2019; 13:1025-1033. [PMID: 31385532 DOI: 10.2217/bmm-2019-0027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: Our goal is to evaluate implications of cotinine cut points in subgroups of smokers and nonsmokers. Materials & methods: Data were assessed from 13,357 adult participants and collected over a period of 6 years by the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2009-2014). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to identify optimal cut points. Rao-Scott χ2 tests measured associations between group characteristics. Results: The optimal serum cotinine cut point adult cigarette smokers was 3.63 ng/ml (sensitivity of 96.7%; specificity of 93.0%). This cut point differed by gender as well as race/ethnicity. Conclusion: There are notable differences in subgroup cut points compared with previous research. Use of gender or race/ethnicity specific cut points is more appropriate when feasible and may help clinician recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin L Tompkins
- Department of Internal Medicine, Womack Army Medical Center, Fort Bragg, NC 28310, USA
| | - Thomas A Beltran
- Department of Clinical Investigation, Womack Army Medical Center, Fort Bragg, NC 28310, USA
| | - Sheryl A Bedno
- Department of Public Health, Womack Army Medical Center, Fort Bragg, NC 28310, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Adeoye O, Nyström KV, Yavagal DR, Luciano J, Nogueira RG, Zorowitz RD, Khalessi AA, Bushnell C, Barsan WG, Panagos P, Alberts MJ, Tiner AC, Schwamm LH, Jauch EC. Recommendations for the Establishment of Stroke Systems of Care: A 2019 Update. Stroke 2019; 50:e187-e210. [PMID: 31104615 DOI: 10.1161/str.0000000000000173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 225] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
In 2005, the American Stroke Association published recommendations for the establishment of stroke systems of care and in 2013 expanded on them with a statement on interactions within stroke systems of care. The aim of this policy statement is to provide a comprehensive review of the scientific evidence evaluating stroke systems of care to date and to update the American Stroke Association recommendations on the basis of improvements in stroke systems of care. Over the past decade, stroke systems of care have seen vast improvements in endovascular therapy, neurocritical care, and stroke center certification, in addition to the advent of innovations, such as telestroke and mobile stroke units, in the context of significant changes in the organization of healthcare policy in the United States. This statement provides an update to prior publications to help guide policymakers and public healthcare agencies in continually updating their stroke systems of care in light of these changes. This statement and its recommendations span primordial and primary prevention, acute stroke recognition and activation of emergency medical services, triage to appropriate facilities, designation of and treatment at stroke centers, secondary prevention at hospital discharge, and rehabilitation and recovery.
Collapse
|
27
|
Vakil N. Editorial: population-based testing for Helicobacter pylori in Western countries. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2019; 49:1360. [PMID: 31016767 DOI: 10.1111/apt.15224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nimish Vakil
- Univ. WI Medical School, Aurora Summit Medical Center, Summit, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Igniting activation: Using unannounced standardized patients to measure patient activation in smoking cessation. Addict Behav Rep 2019; 9:100179. [PMID: 31193839 PMCID: PMC6544561 DOI: 10.1016/j.abrep.2019.100179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2018] [Revised: 03/26/2019] [Accepted: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Despite a decline, smoking rates have remained high, especially in communities with lower income, education, and limited insurance options. Evidence shows that physician-initiated counseling on smoking cessation is effective and saves lives, and that specific skills are needed to appropriately lead this type of patient-physician communication. Residency is a critical moment for future physicians and may be the optimal time to learn, practice, and refine this skillset. Unannounced Standardized Patients (USPs) have been found to be effective, incognito evaluators of resident practices. Methods This study introduced rigorously trained actors (USPs) into two urban, safety-net clinics to assess resident ability to engage, activate, and counsel a pre-contemplative smoker. A complementary chart review assessed appropriate documentation in the patient's electronic health record (EHR) and its relationship to counseling style and prescribing practices. Results Resident scores (% well done) on patient education and engagement were low (33% and 23%, respectively). Residents who coupled cessation advice with an open discussion style activated their patients more than those who solely advised cessation across all comparable measures. On EHR documentation, residents who accurately documented smoking history were more likely to directly advise their patient to quit smoking when compared to residents who did not document (t(97) = 2.828, p = .006, Cohen's D = 0.56). Conclusions Results highlight the need to reinforce training in patient-centered approaches including motivational interviewing, counseling, and shared decision-making. Future research should focus on the effects of smokers in pre-contemplation on physician counseling style and examine the relationship between medical training and provider communication to guide interventions. Counseling, documentation, and prescribing all vary when residents meet an Unannounced Standardized Patient (USP) smoker. Patients are activated to quit smoking when a provider couples cessation advice with an open discussion of pros and cons. Training in motivational interviewing and shared decision-making can enhance patient-provider cessation communication.
Collapse
|
29
|
Piper ME, Cook JW, Schlam TR, Jorenby DE, Smith SS, Collins LM, Mermelstein R, Fraser D, Fiore MC, Baker TB. A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Optimized Smoking Treatment Delivered in Primary Care. Ann Behav Med 2018; 52:854-864. [PMID: 30212849 PMCID: PMC6135958 DOI: 10.1093/abm/kax059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The effectiveness of smoking cessation treatment is limited in real-world use, perhaps because we have not selected the components of such treatments optimally nor have treatments typically been developed for and evaluated in real-world clinical settings. Purpose To validate an optimized smoking cessation treatment package that comprises intervention components identified as effective in factorial screening experiments conducted as per the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST). Methods Adult smokers motivated to quit were recruited from primary care clinics (N = 623). Participants were randomized to receive either recommended usual care (R-UC; 10 min of in-person counseling, 8 weeks of nicotine patch, and referral to quitline services) or abstinence-optimized treatment (A-OT; 3 weeks of prequit mini-lozenges, 26 weeks of nicotine patch + mini-lozenges, three in-person and eight phone counseling sessions, and 7-11 automated calls to prompt medication use). The key outcomes were self-reported and biochemically confirmed (carbon monoxide, CO <6 ppm) 7-day point-prevalence abstinence. Results A-OT participants had significantly higher self-reported abstinence rates than R-UC participants at 4, 8, 16, and 26 weeks (ORs: 1.91-3.05; p <. 001). The biochemically confirmed 26-week abstinence rates were lower than the self-reported 26-week rates, but revealed a similar treatment effect size (OR = 2.94, p < .001). There was no moderation of treatment effects on 26-week abstinence by demographic, psychiatric, or nicotine dependence variables. A-OT had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for 26-week CO-confirmed abstinence of $7,800. Conclusions A smoking cessation treatment that is optimized via MOST development meaningfully enhances cessation rates beyond R-UC smoking treatment in smokers seen in primary care. Clinical Trial Registration NCT02301403.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan E Piper
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medicine, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Jessica W Cook
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medicine, Madison, WI, USA
- William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Tanya R Schlam
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medicine, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Douglas E Jorenby
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medicine, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Stevens S Smith
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medicine, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Linda M Collins
- The Methodology Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
- Department of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Robin Mermelstein
- Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David Fraser
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Michael C Fiore
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medicine, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Timothy B Baker
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medicine, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Yue X, Guo JJ, Wigle PR. Trends in Utilization, Spending, and Prices of Smoking-Cessation Medications in Medicaid Programs: 25 Years Empirical Data Analysis, 1991-2015. AMERICAN HEALTH & DRUG BENEFITS 2018; 11:275-285. [PMID: 30464795 PMCID: PMC6207314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2017] [Accepted: 04/12/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Smoking remains the single largest preventable cause of death and disease. Smoking-cessation medications provide patients a multitude of benefits and can prevent certain diseases, including some cancers. Because of the limited amount of studies on smoking-cessation medications, we wanted to find general trends about the use of these medications. OBJECTIVE To examine trends in the utilization, pharmacy reimbursement, and prices of smoking-cessation medications and nicotine replacement therapy in the US Medicaid-covered population. METHODS Using national summary files for outpatient drug utilization and expenditure, we extracted data on smoking-cessation medications from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services in the 25 years from January 1991 through June 2015. We conducted a retrospective drug utilization study to examine the annual (or quarterly) trends of the number of prescriptions, reimbursement expenditures, and the prices of smoking-cessation medications. The study drugs included varenicline (Chantix), bupropion (Zyban), and nicotine. We calculated per-prescription pharmacy reimbursement, which was used as a proxy for drug price, as the total quarterly expenditure for the drug, divided by the total number of prescriptions. All expenditures were inflated to 2015 US dollars using the medical services component of the Consumer Price Index. RESULTS The total number of prescriptions for smoking-cessation medications increased rapidly from 46,396 in 1991 to 942,562 in 2014, an increase of more than 1931%. During the same period, the total pharmacy reimbursement for smoking-cessation medications in Medicaid increased by 3562%, from approximately $2.8 million in 1991 to approximately $101 million in 2014. The use of the nonnicotine prescription drugs varenicline and bupropion also increased rapidly, with a high cost expenditure. The price per nonnicotine prescription drug increased over time, ranging from approximately $169 for bupropion to approximately $251 for varenicline in 2015. CONCLUSIONS The substantial increase in nonnicotine prescription drugs and nicotine replacement therapy between 2007 and 2015 may be attributed to smoking-cessation participants nationwide. Cost-containment policies might have inadvertently prevented Medicaid-covered smokers from obtaining appropriate pharmacotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaomeng Yue
- PhD Student, James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, OH
| | - Jeff Jianfei Guo
- Professor of Pharmacoeconomics & Pharmacoepidemiology, James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, OH
| | - Patricia R Wigle
- Professor, Pharmacy Practice, James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, OH
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Baker CL, Ding Y, Ferrufino CP, Kowal S, Tan J, Subedi P. A cost-benefit analysis of smoking cessation prescription coverage from a US payer perspective. CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2018; 10:359-370. [PMID: 30038510 PMCID: PMC6052927 DOI: 10.2147/ceor.s165576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Smoking drives substantial direct health care spending, comprising 8.7% ($168 billion) of annual United States aggregated spending. Smoking cessation (SC) prescription use is an effective strategy to improve health outcomes, increase quit rates, and reduce economic burden. However, patient out-of-pocket costs may limit the use. Health care payers play a vital role in driving use through formulary decisions and copayment policies but must consider both the near-term financial investment as well as downstream effects of increased coverage on health care budgets. This study estimates the return on investment (ROI) of providing Affordable Care Act (ACA)-recommended prescription SC coverage. Methods A cost–benefit analysis (CBA) estimates the ROI of providing prescription SC coverage, based on pharmacy costs and savings from smoking-attributable medical expenditures among Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial plan enrollees over 10 years. The CBA incorporated national-level population demographics, smoking prevalence estimates, proportion of smokers attempting to quit, and the utilization of SC products. A five-state Markov chain model simulated patterns of quit attempts, relapse, and cessation assuming two quit attempts per year, no patient cost-sharing, and 25.4% utilization of prescription SC aids. Results include number of quitters, annual pharmacy and smoking-attributable medical costs, and ROI. Results After initial investment in SC treatment, smoking-attributable medical benefits accrue over time, generating a positive ROI by year 4 for commercial (11.3%) and Medicaid (78.4%) plans and by year 3 for Medicare (30.6%). Over 10 years, an average return of $1.18, $2.50, and $3.22 savings per dollar spent on SC prescriptions for commercial, Medicaid, and Medicare plans, respectively, may be realized. Discussion Given the proven efficacy of SC pharmacotherapy, near-term investments in supporting ACA-recommended SC coverage translate into a positive ROI. As smoking is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, increased access to prescription SC medications may improve health outcomes and reduce smoking-attributable costs to payers over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yao Ding
- Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Real World Evidence Solutions, IQVIA, Fairfax, VA, USA,
| | - Cheryl P Ferrufino
- Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Real World Evidence Solutions, IQVIA, Fairfax, VA, USA,
| | - Stacey Kowal
- Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Real World Evidence Solutions, IQVIA, Fairfax, VA, USA,
| | | | - Prasun Subedi
- Patient & Health Impact, Pfizer, Inc, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Smith RA, Andrews KS, Brooks D, Fedewa SA, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Saslow D, Brawley OW, Wender RC. Cancer screening in the United States, 2018: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68:297-316. [PMID: 29846940 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 340] [Impact Index Per Article: 56.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2017] [Accepted: 12/19/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Each year, the American Cancer Society publishes a summary of its guidelines for early cancer detection, data and trends in cancer screening rates from the National Health Interview Survey, and select issues related to cancer screening. In this 2018 update, we also summarize the new American Cancer Society colorectal cancer screening guideline and include a clarification in the language of the 2013 lung cancer screening guideline. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:297-316. © 2018 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert A Smith
- Vice President, Cancer Screening, Cancer Control Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Kimberly S Andrews
- Director, Guidelines Process, Cancer Control Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Durado Brooks
- Vice President, Cancer Control Interventions, Cancer Control Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Stacey A Fedewa
- Strategic Director for Risk Factors & Screening Surveillance, Department of Epidemiology and Research Surveillance, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - Debbie Saslow
- Senior Director, HPV Related and Women's Cancers, Cancer Control Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Otis W Brawley
- Chief Medical Officer, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Richard C Wender
- Chief Cancer Control Officer, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ahačič M, Kadivec S, Farkaš-Lainščak J. Dokumentiranje navodil o življenjskem slogu in samoobvladovanju bolezni pri pacientih s kronično obstruktivno pljučno boleznijo. OBZORNIK ZDRAVSTVENE NEGE 2018. [DOI: 10.14528/snr.2018.52.1.184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Uvod: Za boljše doseganje kakovosti življenja pacientov s kronično obstruktivno pljučno boleznijo je slednje treba poučiti o značilnostih bolezni ter o ukrepih za njeno učinkovito samoobvladovanje. Namen raziskave je bil ugotoviti pogostost dokumentiranja in vrsto dokumentiranih navodil o življenjskem slogu in samoobvladovanju bolezni v bolnišnični dokumentaciji pacientov s kronično obstruktivno pljučno boleznijo.Metode: Izvedena je bila retrospektivna kvantitativna raziskava, v kateri je bila pregledana celotna bolnišnična dokumentacija (terapevtski listi, liste zdravstvene nege, arhivi zdravstvenovzgojnih šol, odpustna pisma) 253 pacientov s kronično obstruktivno pljučno boleznijo. Za analizo podatkov sta bila poleg osnovne deskriptivne statistike uporabljena tudi hi-kvadrat test in ordinalna logistična regresija.Rezultati: V bolnišnični dokumentaciji so pacienti s kronično obstruktivno pljučno boleznijo imeli dokumentirana v povprečju manj kot 4 navodila o življenjskem slogu in samoobvladovanju bolezni (x = 3,8, s = 5,1). V odpustnem pismu je polovica pacientov (x = 0,5, s = 0,9) imela zabeleženih manj navodil o življenjskem slogu in samoobvladovanju bolezni kot v bolnišnični dokumentaciji (x2 = 33,455, p < 0,001). Diplomirane medicinske sestre so navodila dokumentirale petkrat pogosteje kot zdravniki.Diskusija in zaključek: Raziskava je za bolnišnično dokumentacijo pacientov s kronično obstruktivno pljučno boleznijo ugotovila nizko število dokumentiranih navodil o življenjskem slogu in samoobvladovanju bolezni. Treba bo povečati ozaveščenost o pomenu dokumentiranja zdravstvenovzgojnih navodil in oblikovati orodja za izboljšanje medpoklicne komunikacije.
Collapse
|
34
|
Bailey SR, Stevens VJ, Fortmann SP, Kurtz SE, McBurnie MA, Priest E, Puro J, Solberg LI, Schweitzer R, Masica AL, Hazlehurst B. Long-Term Outcomes From Repeated Smoking Cessation Assistance in Routine Primary Care. Am J Health Promot 2018. [PMID: 29534598 DOI: 10.1177/0890117118761886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To test the association between repeated clinical smoking cessation support and long-term cessation. DESIGN Retrospective, observational cohort study using structured and free-text data from electronic health records. SETTING Six diverse health systems in the United States. PARTICIPANTS Patients aged ≥18 years who were smokers in 2007 and had ≥1 primary care visit in each of the following 4 years (N = 33 691). MEASURES Primary exposure was a composite categorical variable (comprised of documentation of smoking cessation medication, counseling, or referral) classifying the proportions of visits for which patients received any cessation assistance (<25% (reference), 25%-49%, 50%-74%, and ≥75% of visits). The dependent variable was long-term quit (LTQ; yes/no), defined as no indication of being a current smoker for ≥365 days following a visit where nonsmoker or former smoker was indicated. ANALYSIS Mixed effects logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, race, and comorbidities, with robust standard error estimation to account for within site correlation. RESULTS Overall, 20% of the cohort achieved LTQ status. Patients with ≥75% of visits with any assistance had almost 3 times the odds of achieving LTQ status compared to those with <25% visits with assistance (odds ratio = 2.84; 95% confidence interval: 1.50-5.37). Results were similar for specific assistance types. CONCLUSIONS These findings provide support for the importance of repeated assistance at primary care visits to increase long-term smoking cessation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steffani R Bailey
- 1 Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Victor J Stevens
- 2 Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Stephen E Kurtz
- 2 Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Rebecca Schweitzer
- 6 Department is Office of Public Health Studies, University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | | | - Brian Hazlehurst
- 2 Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Calabro KS, Marani SK, Le TA, Khalil GE, Tami-Maury IM, Prokhorov AV. A Pilot Study for Linking Adolescent Patients to an Interactive Tobacco Prevention Program. Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol 2017; 4:2333392817703208. [PMID: 28516127 PMCID: PMC5415292 DOI: 10.1177/2333392817703208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2017] [Accepted: 02/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT The American Academy of Pediatrics and professional guidelines recommend intervening with adolescents about avoiding tobacco use in the health-care setting. Barriers in the clinical setting limit consistent provision of this critical service. OBJECTIVES This pilot study compared 2 approaches for referring adolescents to an evidence-based tobacco prevention and cessation program in the outpatient setting. Secondary aims assessed tobacco use, knowledge, and program evaluation. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS The study setting was a medical and dental clinic. Participants aged 13 to 18 received tobacco advice and instructions to work through "A Smoking Prevention Interactive Experience." The program addresses health concerns of adolescents about tobacco use and is founded on behavioral change theories. The link to access it is featured on the website of the National Cancer Institute's Research-Tested Interventions. Participants (N = 197) were randomized to 1 of 2 approaches (ie, a program link via e-mail or referral by a printed card). RESULTS The program was accessed by 57% (112 of 197) of participants. Both referral approaches were equally effective. Non-Hispanics were twice as likely to access the program as Hispanics (adjusted odds ratio = 2.1, 95% confidence interval = 1.2-3.8, P < .05). Over 95% of participants identified themselves as nonusers of tobacco and evaluated the program as beneficial in increasing knowledge and motivation to remain tobacco-free. CONCLUSION Linking adolescent patients to an evidence-based tobacco prevention/cessation program at a community health clinic was highly promising and feasible. We present conclusions for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen S. Calabro
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Salma K. Marani
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Thuan A. Le
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Georges E. Khalil
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Irene M. Tami-Maury
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alexander V. Prokhorov
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
O'Connor PJ, Sperl-Hillen JM, Margolis KL, Kottke TE. Strategies to Prioritize Clinical Options in Primary Care. Ann Fam Med 2017; 15:10-13. [PMID: 28376456 PMCID: PMC5217839 DOI: 10.1370/afm.2027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2016] [Revised: 11/18/2016] [Accepted: 11/29/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick J O'Connor
- HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota. HealthPartners Center for Chronic Care Innovation, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - JoAnn M Sperl-Hillen
- HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota. HealthPartners Center for Chronic Care Innovation, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Karen L Margolis
- HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota. HealthPartners Center for Chronic Care Innovation, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Thomas E Kottke
- HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota. HealthPartners Center for Chronic Care Innovation, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|