The burden of traumatic brain injury from low-energy falls among patients from 18 countries in the CENTER-TBI Registry: A comparative cohort study

Disparities in casemix, acute interventions, discharge destinations and mortality of patients with traumatic brain injury between Europe and India

Background

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major global health problem that disproportionally affects low- and middle-income countries. The needs for patients with TBI therefore may differ between levels of national development. We aimed to describe differences in epidemiology and acute care provision of TBI between India and Europe.

Methods

We used data from two prospective observational registry studies - the Collaborative Indian NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in TBI (CINTER-TBI) and the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in TBI (CENTER-TBI), which included TBI patients with an indication for brain CT-scan presenting to 65 centres across Europe and Israel and two trauma centres in India. We performed descriptive analyses of demographic, injury, and treatment characteristics and used random-effects logistic regression with covariate adjustment to examine the likelihood of acute neurosurgical interventions and in-hospital mortality.

Results

We included 22 849 patients from CENTER-TBI and 3904 from CINTER-TBI. The median age in Europe was 55 years (IQR = 32-76) compared to 27 years (IQR = 18-40) in India. The most common cause of TBI in Europe were falls (n = 12150 (53%), while traffic incidents predominated in India (n = 2130 (55%)). The proportion of patients with severe TBI was higher in India (n = 867 (22%)) than in Europe (n = 1661 (7%). Professional pre-hospital care involving ambulance service was utilised by three-fourths (n = 17203 (75%)) of European and less than a one-tenth (n = 224 (6%)) of Indian patients in our sample. Patients with severe TBI were more likely to undergo surgical contusion/haematoma evacuation in India compared to Europe (OR = 2.0; 95% CI = 1.7-2.5) and Indian patients had higher odds of undergoing intracranial pressure monitor placement (OR = 2.3; 95% CI = 2.0-2.7). A primary decompressive craniectomy was likewise more often performed in the Indian cohort (OR = 5.1; 95% CI = 3.5-7.5). Discharge destinations in Europe included rehabilitation centres (n = 1261 (6%)) or nursing homes (n = 1208 (5%)), which was rarely the case in India (n = 13 (0%) and n = 9 (0%), respectively).

Conclusions

Substantial disparities between India and Europe exist along the neurotrauma care chain, with both systems being likely to face unique features and challenges in the future.

Global neurotrauma: A systematic review and summary of the current state of registries around the world

Neurotrauma registries (NTR) collect data on traumatic brain injuries (TBI) to advance knowledge, shape policies, and improve outcomes. This study reviews global NTRs from High-Income (HICs) and Low- and Middle-Income countries (LMICs). A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and Web of Science following PRISMA guidelines to identify relevant NTRs. Twenty-six articles were included, revealing ten different NTRs from Europe, North America, Latin America, the Middle East, and Asia. North America had the most registries at four, followed by Europe and Asia with two each, and Latin America and the Middle East with one each. The median database size was 1,734 patients (Range: 65-25,000), with the largest registry from the United States (FITBIR DB) and the smallest from Iran (NSCIR-IR). The longest data collection period was 32 years, with a mean age of 43.1 years (Range: 9.07-60.0). Males comprised 70 % of patients. Sixty-six percent of articles emphasized outcomes such as functionality, length of stay, and mortality. Key challenges identified included issues with missing data and incomplete records (n = 4), lack of standardization in data collection procedures (n = 3), staffing shortages (n = 5), lack of IT infrastructure (n = 3), and problems with reproducibility, particularly in high-income countries (n = 4). Our review highlights the need for a large-scale global NTR, addressing LMIC barriers through private-public partnerships with organized neurosurgery members.

Head injuries in prehospital and Emergency Department settings: a prospective multicenter cross-sectional study in France

BACKGROUND

Head injuries are the leading cause of trauma in Emergency Departments (EDs). Recent studies have shown epidemiological changes in patients consulting ED for head injuries. The main objective of this study was to describe the profile of head injury patients consulting in the EDs in France and assess i) head injury severity across age groups; ii) the delay between the occurrence of head injury and ED arrival; iii) factors associated with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH).

METHODS

This cross-sectional study collected patient data over a three-day period in March 2023. All adult patients (≥ 18 years old) admitted to the ED with a head injury (defined as a trauma to the head) were included. TBI severity was classified according to patients' initial Glasgow Coma Scale score in the ED: severe (3-8); moderate (9 -12); mild (13-15); and simple head trauma in the absence of transient or persistent neurological symptoms.

RESULTS

Among the 71 participating EDs, 26,008 patients visited EDs and a total of 1070 patients (4.1%, IC 95 3.9-4.4) presented a head injury were included in the study, with a median age of 68.5 [37-85] years old. Most of the patients (66.7%) were referred to ED after a call to the Emergency Medical Dispatcher (EMD). The median time from head injury to ED visit was 2 h [1.0 - 5.5]. Ground-level falls were the leading cause of head injury (60.3%). Most of patient presented a simple head trauma (n = 715, 66.8%) followed by mild TBI (n = 337, 31.5%). CT head scans were performed for 636 patients (59.6%), of which 58 were positive. Traumatic ICH prevalence was 5.4% (95% CI: 4.1-6.9) and three patients (0.3%) required an urgent neurosurgical intervention. Neither preinjury anticoagulant (p = 0.97) nor antiplatelet (p = 0.93) use was associated with an increased risk of traumatic ICH.

CONCLUSIONS

One head injury patient out of two presenting in the ED is aged over 65 years. Patients referred by EMD were more likely to visit ED promptly. The majority of older patients underwent a head CT scan and preinjury anticoagulant use was not associated with increased risk of traumatic ICH.

The Burden of Head Injuries in Iran from 1990 to 2019: Findings from The Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

Introduction

Head injuries (HI) pose a significant public health concern globally, impacting morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. This study aimed to evaluate the epidemiology and trends associated with head injuries in Iran from 1990 to 2019.

Methods

Our study, based on data from the Global Burden of Diseases (GBD) Study 2019, undertook a comprehensive comparison of the burden of HI in Iran with the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) and global benchmarks. We assessed the incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability (YLD) through various metrics, including absolute numbers, age-standardized rates (ASR), percentage changes, and estimated annual percentage changes (EAPC) from 1990 to 2019.

Results

The incidence of HI in Iran decreased significantly from 1990 to 2019, with a notable reduction compared to MENA and global trends (EAPC: -1.44, 0.71, and -0.11, respectively). Prevalence showed a declining trend (EAPC: -1.00), with a slight increase in YLDs (EAPC: 0.12). Notable peaks in HI incidence coincided with natural disasters, notably the 1990 Manjil-Rudbar earthquake and the 2003 Bam earthquake.

Conclusion

Our study reveals a decline in the overall burden of HI in Iran over the study period. To sustain this positive trend and minimize the impact of HI on public health and socioeconomic well-being, policy efforts should be directed toward ongoing prevention, early detection, and preparedness for natural disasters.

Experiences with home monitoring technology in older adults with traumatic brain injury: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Home monitoring systems utilising artificial intelligence hold promise for digitally enhanced healthcare in older adults. Their real-world use will depend on acceptability to the end user i.e. older adults and caregivers. We explored the experiences of adults over the age of 60 and their social and care networks with a home monitoring system installed on hospital discharge after sustaining a moderate/severe Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), a growing public health concern.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive approach was taken to explore experiential data from older adults and their caregivers as part of a feasibility study. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 6 patients and 6 caregivers (N = 12) at 6-month study exit. Data were analysed using Framework analysis. Potential factors affecting acceptability and barriers and facilitators to the use of home monitoring in clinical care and research were examined.

RESULTS

Home monitoring was acceptable to older adults with TBI and their caregivers. Facilitators to the use of home monitoring were perceived need for greater support after hospital discharge, the absence of sound and video recording, and the peace of mind provided to care providers. Potential barriers to adoption were reliability, lack of confidence in technology and uncertainty at how data would be acted upon to improve safety at home.

CONCLUSIONS

Remote monitoring approaches are likely to be acceptable, especially if patients and caregivers see direct benefit to their care. We identified key barriers and facilitators to the use of home monitoring in older adults who had sustained TBI, which can inform the development of home monitoring for research and clinical use. For sustained use in this demographic the technology should be developed in conjunction with older adults and their social and care networks.

Risk of epilepsy after traumatic brain injury: a nationwide Norwegian matched cohort study

Background

Post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE) is a well-known complication of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Although several risk factors have been identified, prediction of PTE is difficult. Changing demographics and advances in TBI treatment may affect the risk of PTE. Our aim was to provide an up-to-date estimate of the incidence of PTE by linking multiple nationwide registers.

Methods

Patients with TBI admitted to hospital 2015-2018 were identified in the Norwegian Trauma Registry and matched to trauma-free controls on sex and birth year according to a matched cohort design. They were followed up for epilepsy in nationwide registers 2015-2020. Cumulative incidence of epilepsy in TBI patients and controls was estimated taking competing risks into account. Analyses stratified by the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) severity score, Glasgow Coma Scale score and age were conducted for the TBI group. Occurrence of PTE in different injury types was visualized using UpSet plots.

Results

In total, 8,660 patients and 84,024 controls were included in the study. Of the patients, 3,029 (35%) had moderate to severe TBI. The cumulative incidence of epilepsy in the TBI group was 3.1% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 2.8-3.5%) after 2 years and 4.0% (3.6-4.5%) after 5 years. Corresponding cumulative incidences in the control group were 0.2% (95% CI 0.2-0.3%) and 0.5% (0.5-0.6%). The highest incidence was observed in patients with severe TBI according to AIS (11.8% [95% CI 9.7-14.4%] after 2 years and 13.2% [10.8-16.0%] after 5 years) and in patients >40 years of age.

Conclusion

Patients with TBI have significantly higher risk of developing epilepsy compared to population controls. However, PTE incidence following moderate-severe TBI was notably lower than what has been reported in several previously published studies.

[Traumatic brain injury in patients over 65 years of age attended in the emergency department, characteristics and complications]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Ageing is associated with an increased risk of falls and trauma. The aim of the study was to assess the characteristics of patients over 65 years of age who consulted the ED for traumatic brain injury (TBI) in 2022, their relationship with cognitive impairment, functional dependence, use of oral antiplatelet/anticoagulant drugs and complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study conducted from 1 January to 31 December 2022. Demographic data were collected: age, sex, origin; cardiovascular risk factors; cognitive impairment using the Pfeiffer questionnaire; physical disability according to the Barthel Index; number of drugs; use of antiplatelet and oral anticoagulant (OAC); mechanism of fall; performance of cranial X-ray/CT, and presence of complications: intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), death.

RESULTS

599 patients were included. The mean age was 82.3±8.2 years. 63.8% were female and 36.2% male. 75.3% were from home, 24.7% from residence. No dementia in 61.4%, moderate-severe dementia in 38.6%. 58.1% were functionally independent, 25.1% had moderate-severe dependence. 85.7% had CVRF: HT 476 (79.5%), dyslipidaemia 354 (59.1%), DM 217 (36.2%), obesity 173 (28.9%), smoking 15 (2.5%). The number of drugs per patient was 9.2±4.3. Polypharmacy was present in 94.7% of patients. 35.9% were taking antiplatelet drugs and 30.2% anticoagulants. Intracranial haemorrhage occurred in 11 (2.3%) patients. Four (0.7%) patients died.

CONCLUSIONS

The TBI in our study was caused by low-energy trauma in a female patient, without dementia, functionally independent and with polypharmacy. There were few serious complications: 2.3% ICH and 0.7% deaths. 90.1% of ICH occurred in patients on antiplatelet and/or OAC therapy.

Perioperative management of adults with traumatic brain injury

Despite advances in management strategy, traumatic brain injury remains strongly associated with neurological impairment and mortality. Management of traumatic brain injury requires careful and targeted management of the physiological consequences which extend beyond the scope of the primary impact to the cranium. Here, we present a review of the principles of its acute management in adults. We outline the procedure which patients are assessed and the critical physiological variables which must be monitored to prevent further neurological damage. We describe current interventional strategies from the context of the underlying physiological mechanisms and recent clinical data and identify persisting challenges in traumatic brain injury management and potential avenues of future progress.

The Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective (PART-O): measurement properties of the Norwegian version after traumatic brain injury

OBJECTIVE

To translate and evaluate the validity of the Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective (PART-O) in a Norwegian context.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty persons with TBI with verified intracranial lesions and persistent symptoms lasting more than 2 years, included in a randomized controlled trial, rated their participation using the PART-O at baseline. The PART-O with its three subscales (Productivity, Out and About, and Social Relations) was translated to Norwegian. Descriptive statistics, Cronbach's alpha, Rasch analysis, and correlation analysis were applied.

RESULTS

The Rasch analysis indicated a unidimensional construct of PART-O and its subscales (χ2 < 12.69, p > 0.28). The internal consistency was moderate (Cronbach's alpha 0.48-0.52) and there was a need to reduce scaling options for most of the items. The Out and About and Productivity subscales had considerable floor effects. PART-O showed moderate positive correlation to TBI-related quality of life and global functioning.

CONCLUSIONS

PART-O and its subscales reflect unidimensional aspects of participation. In the present Norwegian TBI population the original scaling of PART-O was too detailed for all subscales. The floor effects and suboptimal targeting between items and subjects participation level of the Out and About subscale is a matter of concern.

Cognition and Behavior in the Aging Brain Following TBI: Surveying the Preclinical Evidence

Elderly individuals (65 years and older) represent the fastest-growing demographic of new clinical traumatic brain injury (TBI) cases, yet there is a paucity of preclinical research in aged animals. The limited preclinical work available aligns with the clinical literature in that there appear to be significant differences in pathophysiology, recovery potential, and response to medications between animals at different points across the age spectrum. The aim of this review is to discuss the limited studies and highlight critical age-related differences in affective, cognitive, and neurobehavioral deficits, to discuss factors that influence functional outcomes, and to identify targets for future research. The consensus is that aged rodents face challenges related to dysregulated inflammation, reduced neuroplasticity, and age-related cellular changes, which hinder their recovery after TBI. The most successful intervention studies in animal models to date, of the limited array available, have explored interventions targeting inflammatory downregulation. Current standards of neuropsychopharmacology for post-TBI neurocognitive recovery have not been investigated in a significant capacity. In addition, currently available animal models do not sufficiently account for important age-related comorbidities, dual insults, or differences in TBI mechanism of injury in elderly individuals. TBI in the aged population is more likely to lead to additional neurodegenerative diseases that further complicate recovery. The findings underscore the need for tailored therapeutic interventions to improve outcomes in both adult and elderly populations.

Classification and Characterization of Traumatic Brain Injuries in the Northern Region of Sweden

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a common cause of death and disability, the incidence of which in northern Sweden is not fully investigated. This study classifies and characterize epidemiological and demographic features of TBIs in a defined population in Umeå county, Sweden. Specifically, to evaluate frequencies of (1) intracranial lesions detected with computed tomography (CT), (2) need for emergency intervention, and (3) hospital admission, in minimal, mild, moderate, and severe TBI, respectively.

METHODS

The data were gathered from 4057 TBI patients visiting our emergency room (ER) during a two-year period (2015-2016), of whom 56% were men and approximately 95% had minimal TBIs (Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), score 15).

RESULTS

Of all injuries, 97.8% were mild (GCS 14-15), 1.7% were moderate (GCS 9-13), and 0.5% were severe (GCS < 9). CT scans were performed on 46% of the patients, with 28% being hospitalized. A high annual TBI incidence of 1350 cases per 100,000 citizens was found. The mortality rate was 0.5% with the majority as expected in the elderly group (>80 years).

CONCLUSIONS

Minimal TBIs were not as mild as previously reported, with a relatively high frequency of abnormal CT findings and a high mortality rate. No emergency intervention was required in patients in the GCS 13-15 group with normal CT scans. These findings have implications for clinical practice in the ER with the suggestion to include biomarkers to reduce unnecessary CT scans.

Intramural Healthcare Consumption and Costs After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) Study

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a global public health problem and a leading cause of mortality, morbidity, and disability. The increasing incidence combined with the heterogeneity and complexity of TBI will inevitably place a substantial burden on health systems. These findings emphasize the importance of obtaining accurate and timely insights into healthcare consumption and costs on a multi-national scale. This study aimed to describe intramural healthcare consumption and costs across the full spectrum of TBI in Europe. The Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) core study is a prospective observational study conducted in 18 countries across Europe and in Israel. The baseline Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was used to differentiate patients by brain injury severity in mild (GCS 13-15), moderate (GCS 9-12), or severe (GCS ≤8) TBI. We analyzed seven main cost categories: pre-hospital care, hospital admission, surgical interventions, imaging, laboratory, blood products, and rehabilitation. Costs were estimated based on Dutch reference prices and converted to country-specific unit prices using gross domestic product (GDP)-purchasing power parity (PPP) adjustment. Mixed linear regression was used to identify between-country differences in length of stay (LOS), as a parameter of healthcare consumption. Mixed generalized linear models with gamma distribution and log link function quantified associations of patient characteristics with higher total costs. We included 4349 patients, of whom 2854 (66%) had mild, 371 (9%) had moderate, and 962 (22%) had severe TBI. Hospitalization accounted for the largest part of the intramural consumption and costs (60%). In the total study population, the mean LOS was 5.1 days at the intensive care unit (ICU) and 6.3 days at the ward. For mild, moderate, and severe TBI, mean LOS was, respectively, 1.8, 8.9, and 13.5 days at the ICU and 4.5, 10.1, and 10.3 days at the ward. Other large contributors to the total costs were rehabilitation (19%) and intracranial surgeries (8%). Total costs increased with higher age and greater trauma severity (mild; €3,800 [IQR €1,400-14,000], moderate; €37,800 [IQR €14,900-€74,200], severe; €60,400 [IQR €24,400-€112,700]). The adjusted analysis showed that female patients had lower costs than male patients (odds ratio (OR) 0.80 [CI 0.75-1.85]). Increasing TBI severity was associated with higher costs, OR 1.46 (confidence interval [CI] 1.31-1.63) and OR 1.67 [CI 1.52-1.84] for moderate and severe patients, respectively. A worse pre-morbid overall health state, increasing age and more severe systemic trauma, expressed in the Injury Severity Score (ISS), were also significantly associated with higher costs. Intramural costs of TBI are significant and are profoundly driven by hospitalization. Costs increased with trauma severity and age, and male patients incurred higher costs. Reducing LOS could be targeted with advanced care planning, in order to provide cost-effective care.

Study protocol for investigating the clinical performance of an automated blood test for glial fibrillary acidic protein and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 blood concentrations in elderly patients with mild traumatic BRAIN Injury and reference values (BRAINI-2 Elderly European study): a prospective multicentre observational study

INTRODUCTION

Two blood brain-derived biomarkers, glial fibrillar acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), can rule out intracranial lesions in patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) when assessed within the first 12 hours. Most elderly patients were excluded from previous studies due to comorbidities. Biomarker use in elderly population could be affected by increased basal levels. This study will assess the performance of an automated test for measuring serum GFAP and UCH-L1 in elderly patients to predict the absence of intracranial lesions on head CT scans after mTBI, and determine both biomarkers reference values in a non-TBI elderly population.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a prospective multicentre observational study on elderly patients (≥65 years) that will be performed in Spain, France and Germany. Two patient groups will be included in two independent substudies. (1) A cohort of 2370 elderly patients (1185<80 years and 1185≥80 years; BRAINI2-ELDERLY DIAGNOSTIC AND PROGNOSTIC STUDY) with mTBI and a brain CT scan that will undergo blood sampling within 12 hours after mTBI. The primary outcome measure is the diagnostic performance of GFAP and UCH-L1 measured using an automated assay for discriminating between patients with positive and negative findings on brain CT scans. Secondary outcome measures include the performance of both biomarkers in predicting early (1 week) and midterm (3 months) neurological status and quality of life after trauma. (2) A cohort of 480 elderly reference participants (BRAINI2-ELDERLY REFERENCE STUDY) in whom reference values for GFAP and UCHL1 will be determined.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Boards of Hospital 12 de Octubre in Spain (Re#22/027) and Southeast VI (Clermont Ferrand Hospital) (Re# 22.01782.000095) in France. The study's results will be presented at scientific meetings and published in peer-review publications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05425251.

Analysis of effectiveness and outcome of traumatic brain injury treatment in ED during COVID-19 pandemic: A multicenter in Taiwan

The coronavirus disease 2019 has become a threat to global healthcare because of its rapid spread and evolution. In severe cases, the initial management of the disease is mainly supportive therapy and mechanical ventilation. Therefore, we investigated whether a modified emergency department workflow affects the efficacy will influence the efficacy and patient outcomes of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in Taiwan. This retrospective observational study used the Chang Gung Research Database in Taiwan from 7 hospitals in the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital System. Clinical index parameters and treatment efficiencies were analyzed between the locally transmitted period (January 20, 2020-June 7, 2020, period 2) and the community spread period (May 19, 2021-July 27, 2021, period 4) with the same interval of the pre-pandemic in 2019 as a reference period. During the locally transmitted period, only the time interval for patients who had to wait for a brain CT examination was, on average, 7.7 minutes shorter, which reached statistical significance. In addition, the number of TBI patients under 18 years of age decreased significantly during the community spread period. The "Door to the operating room (OR)," with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing, was on average 109.7 minutes slower than without the PCR testing in the reference period 2019. TBI treatment efficiency was delayed because of the PCR test. However, the surgical volume and functional outcome during these 2 periods were statistically insignificant compared to the pre-pandemic period because the spread of the virus was well controlled and hospital capacity was increased.

National Neurotrauma Registry Data in Low- and Middle-Income Countries - Current Status and Future Requirements Comment on "Neurotrauma Surveillance in National Registries of Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review and Comparative Analysis of Data Dictionaries"

Since 1990 National Trauma Registries, - taking the form of "not for profit" small and medium enterprises - have been integral to improvementsin major injury case fatality in high-income settings. This is laudable but unsatisfactory as globally most years of life lost to injury occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). International Journal of Health Policy and Management, recently published a scoping review of neurotrauma registries in LMICs by Barthelemy et al; from this the commentary reflects on the state of the art and how these LMIC registries could be taken to "the next level" as meaningful tools for improving major injury patient care.

Neurosurgical Emergencies in the Amazon: An Epidemiologic Study of Patients Referred by Air Transport for Neurosurgical Evaluation at a Referral Center in Amazonas

BACKGROUND

Amazonas is the largest state in Brazil, covering an area of 1,559,159.148 km2 and primarily occupied by the Amazon rainforest. Fluvial and aerial transport are the primary means of transportation. Studying the epidemiologic profile of patients transported by neurologic emergencies is essential because there is only 1 referral center hospital serving approximately 4 million inhabitants in Amazonas.

METHODS

This work studies the epidemiologic profile of patients referred by air transport for evaluation by the neurosurgery team at a referral center in the Amazon.

RESULTS

Of the 68 patients transferred, 50 (75.53%) were men. The study covered 15 municipalities in Amazonas. Of the patients, 67.64% had a traumatic brain injury due to various causes, and 22.05% had had a stroke. Of all patients, 67.65% did not undergo surgery and 43.9% evolved with good evolution and without complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Air transportation for neurologic evaluation is essential in Amazonas. However, most patients did not require neurosurgical intervention, indicating that investments in medical infrastructures, such as computed tomography scanners and telemedicine, may optimize health costs.

Validation of the cutaneous impact location to predict intracranial lesion among elderly admitted to the Emergency Department after a ground-level fall

INTRODUCTION

In the Emergency Departments, almost one out of two head CT scans are carried out for traumatic brain injuries among elderly victims of ground level-falls. Recently, a new predictive factor for intracranial lesions in this population has been suggested: presence and location of cutaneous impact. The aim of this study was to establish determinants of intracranial lesion among older patients admitted to EDs due to ground-level falls with traumatic brain injury using the head cutaneous impact location.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational and monocentric study of patients admitted to Emergency Department for ground-level falls with traumatic brain injury was carried out between 01 January 2017 and 31 July 2017. The primary outcome was identification of an acute intracranial lesion. A bootstrap procedure was employed to evaluate performance and internal validity of the final model.

RESULTS

Among the 1036 patients included, the mean age was 85.6 (SD 7.6) years and 94/1036 (9.1%, 95% CI 7.4-10.9) patients presented with an acute intracranial lesion. Multivariable analysis adjusted by bootstrap shrinkage showed that compared with temporal-parietal or occipital impact, Odds Ratio of intracranial lesions were 0.61 (95% CI 0.39-0.95, p = 0.03) in patients with frontal impact, 0.27 (95% CI 0.12-0.59, p = 0.001) in patients with facial impact and 0.21 (95% CI 0.06-0.77, p = 0.018) in patients without cutaneous impact. Subcutaneous hematoma (OR 1.97, p = 0.007), loss of consciousness (OR 4.66, p<0.001), fall-related amnesia (OR 2.58, p = 2.6), vomiting (OR 2.62, p = 0.002) and altered Glasgow Score (OR 6.79, p<0.001) were as well associated with high risk of intracranial lesion. Taking antiplatelets or anticoagulants were not associated with an increased risk of intracranial lesions. The model discrimination was adequate (C-statistic 0.79; 95% CI 0.73 - 0.85).

CONCLUSION

Our results establish specific determinants of intracranial lesions among elderly after ground level-falls. The cutaneous impact location may identify patients with high risk of intracranial lesion. Further researches are needed to propose a specific score based on these determinants so as to better target Head CT scan use.

Infection-Related Ventilator-Associated Complications in Critically Ill Patients with Trauma: A Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

Trauma is a leading cause of death and disability. Patients with trauma undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) are at risk for ventilator-associated events (VAEs) potentially associated with a longer duration of IMV and increased stay in the intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the incidence of infection-related ventilator-associated complications (IVACs), possible ventilator-associated pneumonia (PVAP), and their characteristics among patients experiencing severe trauma that required ICU admission and IMV for at least four days. We also determined pathogens implicated in PVAP episodes and characterized the use of antimicrobial therapy.

RESULTS

In total, 88 adult patients were included in the main analysis. In this study, we observed that 29.5% of patients developed a respiratory infection during ICU stay. Among them, five patients (19.2%) suffered from respiratory infections due to multi-drug resistant bacteria. Patients who developed IVAC/PVAP presented lower total GCS (median value, 7; (IQR, 9) vs. 12.5, (IQR, 8); p = 0.068) than those who did not develop IVAC/PVAP.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed that less than one-third of trauma patients fulfilling criteria for ventilator associated events developed a respiratory infection during the ICU stay.

Inpatient management of complicated mTBI with the BIG assessment tool: Review and summary of the evidence

Introduction

The management of mild traumatic brain injury has evolved through the years with an emphasis on the safe discharge of patients given current resources. In this article, we discuss key studies published in the past 12 years that have influenced the direction of complicated mild traumatic brain injury (cmTBI) management. We summarize the evidence on the utilization of the Brain Injury Guideline (BIG) algorithm.

Methods

An independent literature search was conducted on the BIG, updated versions of BIG, and the prognostic studies of adult mild traumatic brain injury admissions cited by the BIG articles. Evidence resources included the search engines of PubMed, Medline, Ovid, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar bibliographic databases of items published between 1 January 2010 and 30 December 2021. The evidence focused on BIG and its modified versions, as a potential risk assessment tool for discharging mTBI patients early.

Results

Studies supporting the BIG algorithm prior to 2019 presented evidence with serious limitations to their findings. These limitations threaten their veracity and fail to support the efficacy or validation of the BIG algorithm's utilization for mTBI patient management.

Conclusion

The lack of rigor in the BIG algorithm studies suggest the research is currently insufficient to support early discharge and research needs to continue on modified versions of the tool before its widespread use.

Protective responses of older adults for avoiding injury during falls: evidence from video capture of real-life falls in long-term care

BACKGROUND

falls are common in older adults, and any fall from standing height onto a rigid surface has the potential to cause a serious brain injury or bone fracture. Safe strategies for falling in humans have traditionally been difficult to study.

OBJECTIVE

to determine whether specific 'safe landing' strategies (body rotation during descent, and upper limb bracing) separate injurious and non-injurious falls in seniors.

DESIGN

observational cohort study.

SETTING

two long-term care homes in Vancouver BC.

METHODS

videos of 2,388 falls experienced by 658 participants (mean age 84.0 years; SD 8.1) were analysed with a structured questionnaire. General estimating equations were used to examine how safe landing strategies associated with documented injuries.

RESULTS

injuries occurred in 38% of falls, and 4% of falls caused injuries treated in hospitals. 32% of injuries were to the head. Rotation during descent was common and protective against injury. In 43% of falls initially directed forward, participants rotated to land sideways, which reduced their odds for head injury 2-fold. Upper limb bracing was used in 58% of falls, but rather than protective, bracing was associated with an increased odds for injury, possibly because it occurred more often in the demanding scenario of forward landings.

CONCLUSIONS

the risk for injury during falls in long-term care was reduced by rotation during descent, but not by upper limb bracing. Our results expand our understanding of human postural responses to falls, and point towards novel strategies to prevent fall-related injuries.

Emergency Care in the Occupied Palestinian Territory: A Scoping Review

The development of robust emergency care systems as a critical platform for addressing the global burden of disease has been increasingly recognized by global health policy makers over the past decade. A human rights-based approach to securing the right to quality emergency care is also essential to respond to the structural and political determinants of poor health outcomes. In the occupied Palestinian territory, human rights violations have contributed to significant deficiencies in health and quality of health care. In this scoping review, we identify deficiencies in the management of high-risk presentations to emergency departments in the Palestinian health care system for traumatic injury, acute myocardial infarction, and stroke. We subsequently apply a human rights-based analysis to demonstrate how structural racism in the administration of the occupation has contributed to deficiencies in emergency care. Specifically, deficiencies in resource and system organization within the Palestinian emergency care system arise due to occupation-related restrictions on freedom of movement, the procurement of essential drugs and medical equipment, and the development of a national Palestinian health care system. Further research and intervention are needed to understand gaps in emergency care for Palestinians and, in turn, to improve the management of emergency medical and traumatic conditions through capacity building of a Palestinian emergency care system. Importantly, deconstruction of the structural determinants of poor health for Palestinians in the occupied territory is needed to improve public health and ensure the protection of human rights.

Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) has the highest incidence of all common neurological disorders, and poses a substantial public health burden. TBI is increasingly documented not only as an acute condition but also as a chronic disease with long-term consequences, including an increased risk of late-onset neurodegeneration. The first Lancet Neurology Commission on TBI, published in 2017, called for a concerted effort to tackle the global health problem posed by TBI. Since then, funding agencies have supported research both in high-income countries (HICs) and in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). In November 2020, the World Health Assembly, the decision-making body of WHO, passed resolution WHA73.10 for global actions on epilepsy and other neurological disorders, and WHO launched the Decade for Action on Road Safety plan in 2021. New knowledge has been generated by large observational studies, including those conducted under the umbrella of the International Traumatic Brain Injury Research (InTBIR) initiative, established as a collaboration of funding agencies in 2011. InTBIR has also provided a huge stimulus to collaborative research in TBI and has facilitated participation of global partners. The return on investment has been high, but many needs of patients with TBI remain unaddressed. This update to the 2017 Commission presents advances and discusses persisting and new challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research.

In LMICs, the occurrence of TBI is driven by road traffic incidents, often involving vulnerable road users such as motorcyclists and pedestrians. In HICs, most TBI is caused by falls, particularly in older people (aged ≥65 years), who often have comorbidities. Risk factors such as frailty and alcohol misuse provide opportunities for targeted prevention actions. Little evidence exists to inform treatment of older patients, who have been commonly excluded from past clinical trials—consequently, appropriate evidence is urgently required. Although increasing age is associated with worse outcomes from TBI, age should not dictate limitations in therapy. However, patients injured by low-energy falls (who are mostly older people) are about 50% less likely to receive critical care or emergency interventions, compared with those injured by high-energy mechanisms, such as road traffic incidents.

Mild TBI, defined as a Glasgow Coma sum score of 13–15, comprises most of the TBI cases (over 90%) presenting to hospital. Around 50% of adult patients with mild TBI presenting to hospital do not recover to pre-TBI levels of health by 6 months after their injury. Fewer than 10% of patients discharged after presenting to an emergency department for TBI in Europe currently receive follow-up. Structured follow-up after mild TBI should be considered good practice, and urgent research is needed to identify which patients with mild TBI are at risk for incomplete recovery.

The selection of patients for CT is an important triage decision in mild TBI since it allows early identification of lesions that can trigger hospital admission or life-saving surgery. Current decision making for deciding on CT is inefficient, with 90–95% of scanned patients showing no intracranial injury but being subjected to radiation risks. InTBIR studies have shown that measurement of blood-based biomarkers adds value to previously proposed clinical decision rules, holding the potential to improve efficiency while reducing radiation exposure. Increased concentrations of biomarkers in the blood of patients with a normal presentation CT scan suggest structural brain damage, which is seen on MR scanning in up to 30% of patients with mild TBI. Advanced MRI, including diffusion tensor imaging and volumetric analyses, can identify additional injuries not detectable by visual inspection of standard clinical MR images. Thus, the absence of CT abnormalities does not exclude structural damage—an observation relevant to litigation procedures, to management of mild TBI, and when CT scans are insufficient to explain the severity of the clinical condition.

Although blood-based protein biomarkers have been shown to have important roles in the evaluation of TBI, most available assays are for research use only. To date, there is only one vendor of such assays with regulatory clearance in Europe and the USA with an indication to rule out the need for CT imaging for patients with suspected TBI. Regulatory clearance is provided for a combination of biomarkers, although evidence is accumulating that a single biomarker can perform as well as a combination. Additional biomarkers and more clinical-use platforms are on the horizon, but cross-platform harmonisation of results is needed. Health-care efficiency would benefit from diversity in providers.

In the intensive care setting, automated analysis of blood pressure and intracranial pressure with calculation of derived parameters can help individualise management of TBI. Interest in the identification of subgroups of patients who might benefit more from some specific therapeutic approaches than others represents a welcome shift towards precision medicine. Comparative-effectiveness research to identify best practice has delivered on expectations for providing evidence in support of best practices, both in adult and paediatric patients with TBI.

Progress has also been made in improving outcome assessment after TBI. Key instruments have been translated into up to 20 languages and linguistically validated, and are now internationally available for clinical and research use. TBI affects multiple domains of functioning, and outcomes are affected by personal characteristics and life-course events, consistent with a multifactorial bio-psycho-socio-ecological model of TBI, as presented in the US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) 2022 report. Multidimensional assessment is desirable and might be best based on measurement of global functional impairment. More work is required to develop and implement recommendations for multidimensional assessment. Prediction of outcome is relevant to patients and their families, and can facilitate the benchmarking of quality of care. InTBIR studies have identified new building blocks (eg, blood biomarkers and quantitative CT analysis) to refine existing prognostic models. Further improvement in prognostication could come from MRI, genetics, and the integration of dynamic changes in patient status after presentation.

Neurotrauma researchers traditionally seek translation of their research findings through publications, clinical guidelines, and industry collaborations. However, to effectively impact clinical care and outcome, interactions are also needed with research funders, regulators, and policy makers, and partnership with patient organisations. Such interactions are increasingly taking place, with exemplars including interactions with the All Party Parliamentary Group on Acquired Brain Injury in the UK, the production of the NASEM report in the USA, and interactions with the US Food and Drug Administration. More interactions should be encouraged, and future discussions with regulators should include debates around consent from patients with acute mental incapacity and data sharing. Data sharing is strongly advocated by funding agencies. From January 2023, the US National Institutes of Health will require upload of research data into public repositories, but the EU requires data controllers to safeguard data security and privacy regulation. The tension between open data-sharing and adherence to privacy regulation could be resolved by cross-dataset analyses on federated platforms, with the data remaining at their original safe location. Tools already exist for conventional statistical analyses on federated platforms, however federated machine learning requires further development. Support for further development of federated platforms, and neuroinformatics more generally, should be a priority.

This update to the 2017 Commission presents new insights and challenges across a range of topics around TBI: epidemiology and prevention (section 1 ); system of care (section 2 ); clinical management (section 3 ); characterisation of TBI (section 4 ); outcome assessment (section 5 ); prognosis (Section 6 ); and new directions for acquiring and implementing evidence (section 7 ). Table 1 summarises key messages from this Commission and proposes recommendations for the way forward to advance research and clinical management of TBI.

Acute traumatic brain injury in frail patients: the next pandemic

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To highlight recent findings on the evaluation and impact of frailty in the management of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

RECENT FINDINGS

Frailty is not a direct natural consequence of aging. Rather, it commonly results from the intersection of age-related decline with chronic diseases and conditions. It is associated with adverse outcomes such as institutionalization, falls, and worsening health status. Growing evidence suggests that frailty should be a key consideration both in care planning and in adverse outcome prevention. The prevalence of elderly patients with TBI is increasing, and low-energy trauma (i.e., ground or low-level falls, which are typical in frail patients) is the major cause. Establishing the real incidence of frailty in TBI requires further studies. Failure to detect frailty potentially exposes patients to interventions that may not benefit them, and may even harm them. Moreover, considering patients as 'nonfrail' purely on the basis of their age is unacceptable. The future challenge is to shift to a new clinical paradigm characterized by more appropriate, goal-directed care of frail patients.

SUMMARY

The current review highlights the crucial importance of frailty evaluation in TBI, also given the changing epidemiology of this condition. To ensure adequate assessment, prevention and management, both in and outside hospital, there is an urgent need for a valid screening tool and a specific frailty-based and comorbidity-based clinical approach.

Health and Well-Being of Persons of Working Age up to Seven Years after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Northern Sweden: A Mixed Method Study

Purpose: To explore the health and well-being of persons seven years after severe traumatic brain injury (STBI). Material and methods: Follow-up of 21 persons 1 and 7 years after STBI using surveys for functional outcome, anxiety/depression, health and mental fatigue. Interviews were conducted and analysed using qualitative content analysis. Convergent parallel mixed method then merged and analysed the results into an overall interpretation. Results: Good recovery, high functional outcome and overall good health were relatively unchanged between 1 and 7 years. Well-being was a result of adaptation to a recovered or changed life situation. Persons with good recovery had moved on in life. Persons with moderate disability self-estimated their health as good recovery but reported poorer well-being. For persons with severe disability, adaptation was an ongoing process and health and well-being were low. Only a few persons reported anxiety and depression. They had poorer health but nevertheless reported well-being. Persons with moderate and severe mental fatigue had low functional outcomes and overall health and none of them reported well-being. Conclusions: The life of a person who has suffered STBI is still affected to a lesser or greater degree several years after injury due to acceptance of a recovered or changed life situation. Further studies are needed on how health and well-being can be improved after STBI in the long-term perspective.