Systematic review of the predictors of statin adherence for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease

Prevalence and associated factors of non-adherence to antihyperlipidemic medication: a nationwide cross sectional survey in Pakistan

Hyperlipidemia significantly contributes to the risk of developing cardiovascular diseases. However, about half of the patients do not adhere to their antihyperlipidemic medications, leading to healthcare costs and premature mortality. This study's objective was to determine the prevalence and associated factors of non-adherence to antihyperlipidemic medications. The study covered hypertensive patients (21,451) aged 21-75 years, presenting to the primary and secondary healthcare facilities across Pakistan (covering 21 divisions) from January 2022 to April 2023. The outcome intended was non-adherence to antihyperlipidemic medication, which was assessed by SEAMS and pill-counting methods (non-adherence < 80%). The study found overall non-adherence to antihyperlipidemic medication of 60.6% across Pakistan, with the highest non-adherence rates found in Azad Jammu and Kashmir (71.9%) and the lowest in Islamabad (47.7%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that female, no health card (Sehat Sahulat Program government insurance), < 5 years of illness, < 5 daily medications, and dose frequency of twice daily revealed a positively significant association with non-adherence. While monthly income 51,000-100,000, graduation level of education, Muhajir, and hyperlipidemia with one comorbid condition had a significant negative association with the non-adherence. Antihyperlipidemic non-adherence is a multifaceted, multifactorial, profound problem requiring a multipronged approach.

A real-world analysis of adherence, biochemical outcomes, and healthcare costs in patients treated with rosuvastatin/ezetimibe as single-pill combination vs. free combination in Italy

Aims

To compare medication adherence, lipid goal attainment, and healthcare costs between patients receiving a single-pill combination (SPC) vs. a free combination treatment (FCT) of rosuvastatin/ezetimibe (ROS/EZE) in Italy.

Methods and results

Administrative databases of healthcare entities covering ∼7 million individuals were used to identify adults prescribed with ROS/EZE as SPC or FCT between January 2018 and June 2020. Adherence was calculated as the proportion of days covered (PDC) after cohort balancing by propensity score matching. Patients with available LDL cholesterol testing were assessed for the proportion of those who at baseline were above lipid targets recommended by ESC/EAS Guidelines for their cardiovascular risk category and reached the target during follow-up. Among 25 886 patients on SPC and 7309 on FCT, adherent patients were more represented in SPC than FCT cohort (56.8 vs. 44.5%, P < 0.001), and this difference remained significant (P < 0.001) after stratification by cardiovascular risk (very high, high, and other). The proportion of patients reaching LDL cholesterol target at 1 year follow-up was significantly (P < 0.001) higher in SPC vs. FCT cohort: 35.4 vs. 23.8% for very high cardiovascular risk, 46.9 vs. 23.1% for high risk and 71.6 vs. 49.5% for other risk. Total healthcare costs per patient at 1 year follow-up were lower in SPC vs. FCT users (2337€ vs. 1890€, P < 0.001). In both cohorts, costs were mainly driven by drug expenses and hospitalizations.

Conclusion

This real-world analysis in dyslipidaemic patients found that treatment with ROS/EZE as SPC resulted in better adherence, higher chances of reaching lipid goals, and cost savings over FCT, in all cardiovascular risk categories.

Validation of a novel direct method to determine reduced adherence to atorvastatin therapy

AIMS

Objective methods to determine statin adherence are requested to improve lipid management. We have recently established a method to detect reduced adherence to atorvastatin therapy with cut-off values based on the sum of atorvastatin and its major metabolites in the blood. We aimed to validate this method in patients with and without cardiovascular disease, and optimize previous cut-off values.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The pharmacokinetic study included 60 participants treated with atorvastatin 20 mg (N = 20), 40 mg (N = 20), and 80 mg (N = 20). Atorvastatin was then stopped and blood samples collected from day zero to day four. Quantification of the parent drug and its metabolites in blood plasma was performed with a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay. The cut-off values for reduced adherence were validated and optimized by calculating diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Our candidate cut-off value of dose-normalized six-component sum of atorvastatin plus metabolites <0.10 nM/mg provided a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 93% for detecting ≥2 omitted doses. An optimized cut-off <0.062 nM/mg provided a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 100%. An alternative simplified two-component metabolite sum with a cut-off value <0.05 nM/mg provided a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 76%. An optimized cut-off <0.02 nM/mg provided a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 98%.

CONCLUSION

This validation study confirms that our direct method discriminates reduced adherence from adherence to atorvastatin therapy with high diagnostic accuracy. The method may improve lipid management in clinical practice and serve as a useful tool in future studies.

Self-Administration of Aspirin After Chest Pain for the Prevention of Premature Cardiovascular Mortality in the United States: A Population-Based Analysis

BACKGROUND

Aspirin, an effective, low-cost pharmaceutical, can significantly reduce mortality if used promptly after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, many AMI survivors do not receive aspirin within a few hours of symptom onset. Our aim was to quantify the mortality benefit of self-administering aspirin at chest pain onset, considering the increased risk of bleeding and costs associated with widespread use.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We developed a population simulation model to determine the impact of self-administering 325 mg aspirin within 4 hours of severe chest pain onset. We created a synthetic cohort of adults ≥ 40 years old experiencing severe chest pain using 2019 US population estimates, AMI incidence, and sensitivity/specificity of chest pain for AMI. The number of annual deaths delayed was estimated using evidence from a large, randomized trial. We also estimated the years of life saved (YOLS), costs, and cost per YOLS. Initiating aspirin within 4 hours of severe chest pain onset delayed 13 016 (95% CI, 11 643-14 574) deaths annually, after accounting for deaths due to bleeding (963; 926-1003). This translated to an estimated 166 309 YOLS (149391-185 505) at the cost of $643 235 (633 944-653 010) per year, leading to a cost-effectiveness ratio of $3.70 (3.32-4.12) per YOLS.

CONCLUSIONS

For <$4 per YOLS, self-administration of aspirin within 4 hours of severe chest pain onset has the potential to save 13 000 lives per year in the US population. Benefits of reducing deaths post-AMI outweighed the risk of bleeding deaths from aspirin 10 times over.

Strategies aiming to improve statin therapy adherence in older adults: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Randomized clinical trials have shown that, under optimal conditions, statins reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in older adults. Given the prevalence and consequences of suboptimal adherence to statin among older adults, it is essential to document strategies designed to increase statin adherence in this population. The objective of this systematic review is to describe and summarize the effectiveness of interventions to improve statin adherence in older adults (≥ 65 years old).

METHODS

This review followed PRISMA guidelines. Studies were identified from PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science. Study selection was conducted independently by four reviewers working in pairs. Included studies reported data on interventions designed to increase adherence to statin therapy in older adults and were original trials or observational studies. Interventions were pragmatically regrouped into 8 different categories going from patient to administrative level. Two reviewers extracted study data and assessed study quality independently. Given the heterogeneity between the included studies, a narrative critique and summary was conducted.

RESULTS

Twelve out of the 2889 identified articles were included in the review. Our review showed that simplifying patients' drug regimen, administrative improvements and large-scale pharmacy-led automated telephone interventions show positive effects on patient adherence to statin therapy, with odds ratios between > 1.0 and 3.0, while education-based strategies and intensified patient care showed mixed results.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests that some interventions can increase statin adherence in older adults, which could help in the reduction of the risk of a cardiovascular event in this population.

National treatment guidelines poorly achieved among older subjects with type 2 diabetes - call to action!

OBJECTIVE

To assess risk factors and factors associated with nonachievement of the treatment target levels among 75-year-old Finns with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Outpatient.

SUBJECTS

Seventy-five-year-old participants of the Turku Senior Health Clinic Study (N = 1296) with T2D (n = 247).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Nonachievement of fasting blood glucose (FBG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C), and blood pressure (BP) levels set by the national treatment guidelines.

RESULTS

Nonachievement rates of FBG, BP and LDL-C were 47%, 85%, and 47%, respectively. Non-usage of T2D medication was negatively (adjusted OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.16-0.88) and central obesity positively (1.88, 1.09-3.24) related to nonachievement of FBG target level; alcohol use was positively (3.71, 1.04-13.16) and decreased self-rated health negatively (0.34, 0.12-0.97) related to the nonachievement of BP target level. Nonachievement of LDL-C target level was positively related to poor financial status (3.50, 1.19-10.28) and non-use of lipid-lowering medication (7.70, 4.07-14.56).

CONCLUSIONS

Nonachievement rates of the national treatment goals were high among older T2D patients, and nonachievement was related to use of medication, obesity, alcohol use, poor health, and poor financial status. We emphasize the importance of customized target setting by risk factor levels and active treatment.

Intensity of and adherence to lipid-lowering therapy as predictors of goal attainment and major adverse cardiovascular events in primary prevention

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in routine care may depend on treatment intensity and adherence.

METHODS

Observational study of adults with newly initiated LLT for primary prevention of ASCVD in Stockholm, Sweden, during 2017-2021. Study exposures were LLT adherence [proportion of days covered (PDC)], LLT intensity (expected reduction of LDL cholesterol), and the combined measure of adherence and intensity. At each LLT fill, adherence and intensity were calculated during the previous 12 months, and the patients estimated ASCVD risk was categorized. Study outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and LDL-C goal attainment.

RESULTS

Thirty-six thousand two hundred eighty-three individuals (mean age 63 years, 47% women, median follow-up 2 years), with a baseline low-moderate (40%), high (49%), and very-high (11%) ASCVD risk started LLT. Increases in LLT adherence, intensity, or adherence-adjusted intensity of 10% over 1 year were associated with lower risks of MACE (with hazard ratios of 0.95 [95% CI, 0.93-0.98]; 0.93 [0.86-1.00]; and 0.90 [0.85-0.95], respectively) and higher odds of attaining LDL goals. Patients with good adherence (≥80%) had similar risks of MACE and similar odds ratios for LDL-C goal attainment with low-moderate and high-intensity LLT. Treatment discontinuation was associated with increased MACE risk. The relative and absolute benefits of good adherence were greatest in patients with very high ASCVD risk.

CONCLUSION

In routine-care primary prevention, better adherence to LLT was associated with a lower risk of MACE across all treatment intensities. Improving adherence is especially important among patients with very high ASCVD risk.

The Association between Deductibles and Cardiovascular Medication Adherence: A Retrospective Inception Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Drug non-adherence in primary preventive cardiovascular therapy is one of the most important modifiable drivers of cardiovascular events. The effect of deductibles in healthcare cost-sharing plans (the amount that has to be paid for healthcare services before the insurance company starts to pay) on such non-adherence in a European setting is unknown. Therefore, we estimated the association between deductibles and the adherence to primary preventive antihypertensive and antihyperlipidemic medication.

METHODS

Using the claims database of Menzis Health Insurer in the Netherlands, we applied ordered beta regression mixed modelling to estimate the association between deductibles and adherence taking several demographic and social-economic factors, repeated measurements and within-patient variation into account.

RESULTS

All in all, 106,316 patients starting primary preventive antihypertensive or antihyperlipidemic monotherapy were eligible for analysis. At index date, mean age of the study population was 58 years and 52% were male. Reaching the deductible limit and no need to pay for medication anymore increased the adherence [relative adherence ratio (RAR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.00-1.05] for antihyperlipidemic therapy and 1.02 (95% CI: 1.00-1.04) for antihypertensive therapy. A larger deductible amount decreases the adherence of antihyperlipidemic and antihypertensive therapy (RAR 0.83; 95% CI: 0.69-1.00 and RAR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74-0.98, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Independent of other risk factors for non-adherence, presence of deductibles in health insurance is associated with a small negative effect on the adherence to both primary preventive antihypertensive as well as antihyperlipidemic therapy. Further study is needed on the potential health-economic consequences.

Risk Factors for Non-Adherence to Pharmacist or Non-Pharmacist Explanations on Preoperative Medication Discontinuation: A Retrospective Japanese Study

Purpose

The risk factors for non-adherence to pharmacist or non-pharmacist explanations of preoperative medication discontinuation are unknown. The primary outcome of this study was to determine whether the final explainer's occupation was a risk factor for non-adherence. The secondary outcomes were to determine the risk factors for non-adherence after limiting the departments or adjusting for age.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively examined the data (including patient age, sex, prescription medications, comorbidities, presence of roommate, and number of days between receiving explanation and surgery) of 1132 patients on medications that could affect surgery at a Japanese university hospital between April 1, 2017, and March 31, 2020. The primary endpoint was whether the occupation of the last person explaining medication discontinuation to the patient was an independent risk factor for non-adherence (age ≥65 years vs <65 years). Secondary endpoints included subgroup analyses in urological, gastrointestinal, and otolaryngological areas, as well as a sensitivity analysis (age as a continuous variable) to confirm the validity of the primary endpoint results. A multivariate binary logistic regression identified independent non-adherence risk factors.

Results

The main analysis showed that discontinuing two or more medications was a risk factor for non-adherence (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13-2.47; p = 0.01). However, in analyses coordinated by department (urological, gastrointestinal, and otolaryngological), ≥65 (versus <65) years of age was determined as a risk factor for increased nonadherence (AOR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.11-4.63; p=0.024). Age-adjusted analysis (continuous variables) showed similar results to the primary endpoint (AOR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.14-2.49, p = 0.009).

Conclusion

Two or more medications, and not the final explainer's occupation, were associated with pre-surgery medication non-adherence. To prevent non-adherence, pharmacists and non-pharmacists should educate patients about preoperative medication discontinuation. These findings could help identify high-risk non-adherence patients.

Differences in lipid and blood pressure measurements between individuals with type 1 diabetes and the general population: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a precarious complication of type 1 diabetes (T1D). Alongside glycaemic control, lipid and blood pressure (BP) management are essential for the prevention of CVD. However, age-specific differences in lipid and BP between individuals with T1D and the general population are relatively unknown.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Six diabetes outpatient clinics and individuals from the Lifelines cohort, a multigenerational cohort from the Northern Netherlands.

PARTICIPANTS

2178 adults with T1D and 146 22 individuals without diabetes from the general population.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-cholesterol), systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP), stratified by age group, glycated haemoglobin category, medication use and sex.

RESULTS

In total, 2178 individuals with T1D and 146 822 without diabetes were included in this study. Total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol were lower and SBP and DBP were higher in individuals with T1D in comparison to the background population. When stratified by age and medication use, total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol were lower and SBP and DBP were higher in the T1D population. Men with T1D achieved lower LDL-cholesterol levels both with and without medication in older age groups in comparison to women. Women with T1D had up to 8 mm Hg higher SBP compared with the background population, this difference was not present in men.

CONCLUSIONS

Lipid and BP measurements are not comparable between individuals with T1D and the general population and are particularly unfavourable for BP in the T1D group. There are potential sex differences in the management of LDL-cholesterol and BP.

Gender-Related Factors in Medication Adherence for Metabolic and Cardiovascular Health

This review explores the impact of gender on medication adherence in the context of metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. Optimal adherence to medication is crucial for achieving treatment goals and preventing adverse outcomes in chronic diseases. The review examines specific conditions such as type 2 diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, arterial hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, and heart failure. In type 2 diabetes, female sex, younger age, new drug prescription, non-white ethnicity, low education level, and low income were identified as predictors of non-adherence. Depressive disorders were also found to influence adherence. In hypercholesterolemia, women exhibited poorer adherence to statin therapy compared to men, with statin-related side effects and patient perception being significant factors. Adherence to anti-hypertensive therapy showed conflicting results, with studies reporting both higher and lower adherence in women. Limited evidence suggests that women may have poorer adherence after acute myocardial infarction and stroke. Regarding heart failure, adherence studies have shown inconsistent findings. The reasons for gender differences in medication adherence are multifactorial and include sociodemographic, disease-related, treatment-related, and psychological factors. This review emphasizes the need for further research to better understand these differences and develop gender-customized interventions that can improve medication adherence and reduce the burden of metabolic and cardiovascular diseases.

Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Medication Adherence in Young Adults With Youth-Onset Type 2 Diabetes

Importance

Youth-onset type 2 diabetes is associated with early development of chronic complications. Treatment of elevated blood pressure (BP), nephropathy, and dyslipidemia are critical to reduce morbidity. Data are needed on adherence to BP- and lipid-lowering medications in young adults with youth-onset diabetes.

Objective

To assess adherence and factors associated with adherence to BP- and lipid-lowering medications in young adults with youth-onset type 2 diabetes and diagnoses of hypertension, nephropathy, or dyslipidemia.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study measured medication adherence with 3 monthly unannounced pill counts at 2 time points 1 year apart during iCount, conducted during the last years (2017-2019) of the observational phase of the Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Youth study. Psychosocial factors associated with medication adherence were examined. Participants included individuals with youth-onset type 2 diabetes with hypertension, nephropathy, or dyslipidemia receiving diabetes care in their communities. Data were analyzed from September 2022 to September 2023.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome was BP- and lipid-lowering medication adherence, with low adherence defined as using less than 80% of pills and high adherence, at least 80% of pills. Psychosocial factors were measured using the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire and Material Needs Insecurities Survey.

Results

Of 381 participants in iCount, 243 participants (mean [SD] age, 26.12 [2.51] years; 159 [65.43%] women) with hypertension, nephropathy, or dyslipidemia were included in analysis. Among 196 participants with hypertension or nephropathy, 157 (80.1%) had low adherence. Participants with low adherence, compared with those with high adherence, were younger (mean [SD] age, 25.99 [2.41] vs 27.26 [2.41] years; P = .005), had higher glycated hemoglobin A1c (mean [SD], 10.33% [2.66 percentage points] vs 8.85% [2.39 percentage points]; P = .001), shorter diabetes duration (mean [SD], 12.32 [1.49] vs 12.90 [1.46] years; P = .03), and less education (eg, 17 participants [10.83%] vs 0 participants with no high school diploma; P = .004). Of 146 participants with dyslipidemia, 137 (93.8%) had low adherence and only 9 participants (6.2%) had high adherence. Of 103 participants with low adherence to BP-lowering medications and using oral hypoglycemic agents, 83 (80.58%) had low adherence to oral hypoglycemic agents. Beliefs that medications are necessary were higher for participants with high adherence to BP-lowering medications than those with low adherence in unadjusted analyses (mean [SD] necessity score, 16.87 [6.78] vs 13.89 [9.15]; P = .03). In adjusted multivariable analyses of participants with hypertension or nephropathy, having at least 1 unmet social need (odds ratio [OR], 0.20; 95% CI, 0.05-0.65; P = .04) and medication concerns (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40-0.96; P = .01) were associated with worse medication adherence 1 year follow-up. Diabetes distress, self-efficacy, depressive and anxiety symptoms, and self-management support were not associated with 1-year medication adherence.

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings suggest that adherence to BP- and lipid-lowering medications was very poor in this cohort. To improve medication adherence and prevent early vascular events, approaches that identify and address medication concerns and unmet social needs are needed.

Analysis of risk factors for systemic inflammatory response syndrome in patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to determine the risk factors of postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in patients with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), identify those with a high risk of SIRS, and help reduce SIRS occurrence.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted to collect the clinical data of patients who underwent TAVR from January 2014 to December 2019 at a tertiary hospital in Zhejiang Province. The study included 156 men and 94 women. Patients were divided into SIRS and non-SIRS groups. The pre-, intra-, and postoperative indices of the two groups were recorded. The data of the two groups were compared, and univariate analysis was performed. All statistically significant factors were assessed using binary logistic regression analysis to clarify the risk factors of SIRS after TAVR.

RESULTS

Overall, 30 patients developed SIRS after TAVR, with an incidence rate of 12%, an odds ratio (OR) of 0.571, and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.469-0.694 (p = 0.000). There was a significant correlation between SIRS and glucose (OR: 0.823, 95% CI: 0.678-1.000, p = 0.049), albumin (OR: 0.938, 95% CI: 0.881-0.998, p = 0.044), brain natriuretic peptide (OR: 1.000, 95% CI: 1.000-1.000, p = 0.010), sex (OR: 0.412, 95% CI: 0.190-0.892, p = 0.025), and history of hypertension (OR: 0.375, 95% CI: 0.169-0.819, p = 0.014). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that age (OR: 1.190, 95%CI: 1.073-1.319, p = 0.001) and body mass index (BMI; OR: 0.559, 95% CI: 0.447-0.698, p = 0.000) were independent risk factors for postoperative SIRS in patients with TAVR.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of SIRS after TAVR was 12%. There was a significant correlation between SIRS and albumin, glucose, and hypertension. The independent risk factors for SIRS after TAVR were age and BMI.

Factors Affecting Adherence to Lipid-lowering Drugs: A Scoping Review

Objectives

Dyslipidemia is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease. In developed countries, only 50% of patients with chronic illness adhere to their long-term therapy. This article aimed to review the factors affecting adherence to lipid-lowering drugs (LLDs).

Methods

The searched articles were selected based on the available keywords in the title and abstract with the publication restricted between January 2010 and September 2020. Articles generated from the databases must fulfill both inclusion and exclusion criteria in the present systematic review. Our initial search retrieved 221 literature reviews. After excluding articles with irrelevant topics, a total of 23 articles were chosen for this current review.

Results

The factors were classified based on three main factors: patient-related, medication-related, and healthcare workers-related factors. For patient-related factors, gender, age, number of family members, education level, post-hospitalization, comorbidities and cardiovascular disease risk, follow-up status, occupation, socio-economy, insurance, perception, ethnicity, and health plan were among the factors affecting adherence to LLDs. As for medication-related factors, timing, polypharmacy, duration of treatment, generic medication, intensity of medication, side effects, initiating dose, packaging, drug dosing, and type of drugs were revealed as contributing factors. In the light of healthcare workers, related factors shown were counseling, medication optimization, type of provider, and location of the hospital.

Conclusions

Recommendations to improve adherence include educating patients on the disease itself and the importance of the treatment, modification of the dosing, timing and type of LLDs, and effective consultations by healthcare workers. Further studies need to be done in Malaysia as there is inadequate research on this topic.

Prescriber Adoption of SLCO1B1 Genotype-Guided Simvastatin Clinical Decision Support in a Clinical Pharmacogenetics Program

Pharmacogenetic implementation programs are increasingly feasible due to the availability of clinical guidelines for implementation research. The utilization of these resources has been reported with selected drug-gene pairs; however, little is known about how prescribers respond to pharmacogenetic recommendations for statin therapy. We prospectively assessed prescriber interaction with point-of-care clinical decision support (CDS) to guide simvastatin therapy for a diverse cohort of primary care patients enrolled in a clinical pharmacogenetics program. Of the 1,639 preemptively genotyped patients, 298 (18.2%) had an intermediate function (IF) OATP1B1 phenotype and 25 (1.53%) had a poor function (PF) phenotype, predicted by a common single nucleotide variant in the SLCO1B1 gene (c.521T>C; rs4149056). Clinicians were presented with CDS when simvastatin was prescribed for patients with IF or PF through the electronic health record. Importantly, 64.2% of the CDS deployed at the point-of-care was accepted by the prescribers and resulted in prescription changes. Statin intensity was found to significantly influence prescriber adoption of the pharmacogenetic-guided CDS, whereas patient gender or race, prescriber type, or pharmacogenetic training status did not significantly influence adoption. This study demonstrates that primary care providers readily adopt pharmacogenetic information to guide statin therapy for the majority of patients with preemptive genotype data.

Statin use improves survival of patients with known or suspected lower extremity artery disease on all ankle brachial index levels

Background: Statin medication improves the prognosis of patients with lower extremity artery disease (LEAD). Research has previously focused on patients with a lowered ankle brachial index (ABI) excluding patients with a normal or elevated ankle brachial index. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of statin use on survival and cardiovascular mortality in patients with LEAD of different severity depicted by the ABI level. Patients and methods: 4128 ABI measurements by trained and experienced nurses between 2000 and 2009 were combined with medication data from the Social Insurance Institution and causes of death data from the national causes of death registry. End of follow-up was set at the end of 2014. The data of statin use included all statin medication with the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification codes between C10AA01 and C10AA08. Results: 1956 (47.4%) patients had statin medication. Statin use was associated with improved overall survival and amputation free survival (AFS) on all ABI levels. When adjusted for age, sex and diabetes the greatest overall survival benefit from statin use was for the patients with ABI>1.3 (hazard ratio, HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.48-0.94, p=0.020, reference group statin non-users) and ABI 0.9-1.3 (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65-0.94, p=0.008). In propensity score matched pairs statin treatment was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality (p<0.0001), cardiovascular mortality (p=0.034), cerebrovascular mortality (p=0.003) and embolic stroke related mortality (p=0.001) in patients with ABI >1.3 or <0.9. Overall survival benefit was significant in females with ABI<0.5 and in males across several ABI levels. Conclusions: According to our study, statins seem to improve overall and amputation free survival regardless of ABI level. Statin use was associated with lower mortality from cerebrovascular disease, overall mortality and in the propensity score matched patients with ABI<0.9 or >1.3 with cardiovascular mortality.

Facts and ideas on statins with respect to their lipophilicity: a focus on skeletal muscle cells and bone besides known cardioprotection

Statins are known to block cholesterol synthesis in the liver. They also exhibit non-lipid pleiotropic effects due to the inhibition of protein prenylation, thereby modulating various signaling pathways of cellular homeostasis and integrity. Both lipid control and pleiotropic action of statins are clinically used, mainly for treatment of hypercholesterolemia and primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Because the prescription of statins is increasing and statin therapy is often lifelong, in particular in patients with other risk factors, safety issues being associated with polymorbidity and polypragmasia as well as the persistence with and adherence to statins are specific points of attention of clinicians and clinical pharmacologists. Furthermore, because skeletal myocytes have a cholesterol inhibitory sensitivity greater than hepatocytes, a choice of an appropriate statin based on its lipophilicity and the associated likelihood of its side effects on skeletal muscle cells and bone is warranted in such polymorbid patients. These approaches can effectively modulate the risk: benefit ratio and highlight a need for personalized therapy as much as possible, thereby minimizing risk of discontinuation of therapy and poor compliance.

Influencing Appropriate Statin Use in a Charity Care Primary Clinic

According to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) new cholesterol management guidelines in 2019, statin regimen was prescribed to only about 46.4% and 30% of diabetes (DM) patients and patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), respectively. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease accounts for most deaths and disabilities in North America. This study argues that a systematic approach to identifying targeted interventions to adhere to the statin regimen for ASCVD is sparse in previous studies. This study seeks to address the research gap. Besides, the study argues that the statin regimen could improve cholesterol management with the enablers of pharmacy, providers, electronic medical records (E.M.R.), and patients. It paves the way for future research on cardiovascular and statin regimens from different perspectives. Current study has adopted the Qualitative observation method. Accordingly, the study approached the charity care primary clinic serving a large population in the northeastern part of the United States, which constitutes the project's setting. The facility has 51 internal medicine residents. The facility has E.H.R., which is used by the clinical staff. Besides, providers use electronic medication prescribing (E-Scribe). Four PDSA cycles were run in six months. Here, the interventions were intensified during each subsequent cycle. The interventions were then incorporated into routine clinical practice. Based on the observation, the study found a 25% relative improvement by six months based on the baseline data of the appropriate intensity statin prescription for patients with ASCVD or DM by medical resident trainees in our single-center primary care clinic. A total of 77% of cardiovascular disease patients were found to be on an appropriate statin dose at baseline. On the other hand, the proportion of patients with DM who were on proper dose statin was 80.4%. According to the study's findings, PDSA could result in a faster uptake and support of the ACC/AHA guidelines. Evidence indicates that overmedication of persons at low risk and time constraints are some of the most significant impediments to the greater use of prescription medications. Proactive panel management can help improve statins' use by ensuring they are used appropriately.

Use of machine learning to predict medication adherence in individuals at risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Background

Medication nonadherence is a critical problem with severe implications in individuals at risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Many studies have attempted to predict medication adherence in this population, but few, if any, have been effective in prediction, sug-gesting that essential risk factors remain unidentified.

Objective

This study's objective was to (1) establish an accurate prediction model of medi-cation adherence in individuals at risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and (2) identify significant contributing factors to the predictive accuracy of medication adherence. In particular, we aimed to use only the baseline questionnaire data to assess medication adherence prediction feasibility.

Methods

A sample of 40 individuals at risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease was recruited for an eight-week feasibility study. After collecting baseline data, we recorded data from a pillbox that sent events to a cloud-based server. Health measures and medication use events were analyzed using machine learning algorithms to identify variables that best predict medication adherence.

Results

Our adherence prediction model, based on only the ten most relevant variables, achieved an average error rate of 12.9%. Medication adherence was closely correlated with being encouraged to play an active role in their treatment, having confidence about what to do in an emergency, knowledge about their medications, and having a special person in their life.

Conclusions

Our results showed the significance of clinical and psychosocial factors for predicting medication adherence in people at risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. Clini-cians and researchers can use these factors to stratify individuals to make evidence-based decisions to reduce the risks.

Association of Statin Adherence With the Development of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Nested Case-Control Study Using a Japanese Claims Database

BACKGROUND

Statins are expected to have beneficial effects on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD); however, evidence remains insufficient.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aim to investigate the association between statin adherence and NAFLD development.

METHODS

We conducted a nested case-control study of statin users using the Japan Medical Data Center administrative claims database (January 2005 to January 2020). Individuals who developed NAFLD were designated as cases. For each case, we randomly selected a maximum of 10 controls using risk set sampling. Good adherence was defined as the proportion of days covered (PDC) of ≥0.80. Higher intensity was defined as the median or higher of a cumulative defined daily dose (cDDD) per day covered by statin prescription. Conditional logistic regression analysis was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

In this study, 253 383 patients with the first statin prescription were identified. Of them, 7080 were selected and matched to 70 734 controls. The medians of PDC and intensity were 0.88 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.61-0.96) and 0.32 (IQR, 0.25-0.50) cDDD/day, respectively. Good adherence was significantly associated with a reduced risk of NAFLD development (adjusted OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.78-0.86). Higher intensity was not significantly associated with a reduced risk of NAFLD development (adjusted OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.97-1.08).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Good adherence to statins is associated with a reduced risk of NAFLD development, regardless of the statin intensity. Appropriate statin therapy could reduce the risk of NAFLD development.

Patient-Reported Reasons for Switching or Discontinuing Statin Therapy: A Mixed Methods Study Using Social Media

Introduction

Statin discontinuation can have major negative health consequences. Studying the reasons for discontinuation can be challenging as traditional data collection methods have limitations. We propose an alternative approach using social media.

Methods

We used natural language processing and machine learning to extract mentions of discontinuation of statin therapy from an online health forum, WebMD (http://www.webmd.com). We then extracted data according to themes and identified key attributes of the people posting for themselves.

Results

We identified 2121 statin reviews that contained information on discontinuing at least one named statin. Sixty percent of people posting declared themselves as female and the most common age category was 55–64 years. Over half the people taking statins did so for < 6 months. By far the most common reason given (90%) was patient experience of adverse events, the most common of which were musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders. The rank order of adverse events reported in WebMD was largely consistent with those reported to regulatory agencies in the US and UK. Data were available on age, sex, duration of statin use, and, in some instances, adverse event resolution and rechallenge. In some instances, details were presented on resolution of the adverse event and rechallenge.

Conclusion

Social media may provide data on the reasons for switching or discontinuation of a medication, as well as unique patient perspectives that may influence continuation of a medication. This information source may provide unique data for novel interventions to reduce medication discontinuation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40264-022-01212-0.

Health equity in the implementation of genomics and precision medicine: A public health imperative

Recent reviews have emphasized the need for a health equity agenda in genomics research. To ensure that genomic discoveries can lead to improved health outcomes for all segments of the population, a health equity agenda needs to go beyond research studies. Advances in genomics and precision medicine have led to an increasing number of evidence-based applications that can reduce morbidity and mortality for millions of people (tier 1). Studies have shown lower implementation rates for selected diseases with tier 1 applications (familial hypercholesterolemia, Lynch syndrome, hereditary breast and ovarian cancer) among racial and ethnic minority groups, rural communities, uninsured or underinsured people, and those with lower education and income. We make the case that a public health agenda is needed to address disparities in implementation of genomics and precision medicine. Public health actions can be centered on population-specific needs and outcomes assessment, policy and evidence development, and assurance of delivery of effective and ethical interventions. Crucial public health activities also include engaging communities, building coalitions, improving genetic health literacy, and building a diverse workforce. Without concerted public health action, further advances in genomics with potentially broad applications could lead to further widening of health disparities in the next decade.

Adherence to Statin Therapy and Attainment of LDL Cholesterol Targets in an Outpatient Population of Type 2 Diabetes Patients: Analysis in the DIAbetes and LifEstyle Cohort Twente (DIALECT)

Objective: To assess adherence to statin therapy and its association with sociodemographic data, medical characteristics, LDLc levels, and LDLc target attainment in real-world T2D patients treated in secondary care.

Research Design and Methods: Cross-sectional analyses were performed on baseline data of 393 patients in the DIAbetes and LifEstyle Cohort Twente (DIALECT). The medication possession ratio (MPR), calculated with pharmacy dispensing data, was used to determine adherence to statins for an intended period of 24 months. Statins were included in the analyses if they were used for at least six consecutive months with at least three dispenses. Adherence was defined as an MPR ≥80%. Associations with adherence were assessed using descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression.

Results: Overall, 80% of the patients had a statin prescription and of those, 89% were adherent. The proportion of patients who reached LDLc targets of ≤2.5 mmol/L and &lt;1.8 mmol/L differed significantly between the adherent, nonadherent and non-statin group (90% vs. 74% vs. 46%; p &lt; 0.01 and 56% vs. 26% vs. 6%; p &lt; 0.01, respectively). Serum LDLc levels were lower in the adherent versus the nonadherent and non-statin group (1.76 ± 0.60 vs. 2.23 ± 0.90 vs. 2.71 ± 0.67 mmol/L; p &lt; 0.01). Higher HbA1c levels were independently associated with nonadherence (OR: 1.05, 95% CI 1.01–1.08; p &lt; 0.01). Mediation adherence (OR: 2.88, 95% CI 1.04–7.97; p = 0.041) and lower BMI (OR: 0.88, 95% CI 0.81–0.96; p &lt; 0.01) were independently associated with attaining the LDLc target of ≤2.5 mmol/L.

Conclusion: In patients with T2D treated in secondary care, statin adherence was relatively high and was associated with significantly lower LDLc levels. It is important to identify nonadherence as it appeared an important determinant of failure to reach LDLc targets. The finding that many patients who failed to attain LDLc targets did not receive statin treatment offers an opportunity to improve diabetes care.

The Effect of Statins on Clinical Outcome Among Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: A Multi-Centric Cohort Study

The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is caused by SARS-CoV-2, leading to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), thrombotic complications, and myocardial injury. Statins, prescribed for lipid reduction, have anti-inflammatory, anti-thrombotic, and immunomodulatory properties and are associated with reduced mortality rates in COVID-19 patients. Our goal was to investigate the beneficial effects of statins in hospitalized COVID-19 patients admitted to three multi-specialty hospitals in India from 1 June 2020, to 30 April 2021. This retrospective study included 1,626 patients, of which 524 (32.2%) were antecedent statin users among 768 patients (384 statin users, 384 non-statin users) identified with 1:1 propensity-score matching. We established a multivariable logistic regression model to identify the patients’ demographics and adjust the baseline clinical and laboratory characteristics and co-morbidities. Statin users showed a lower mean of white blood cell count (7.6 × 10³/µL vs. 8.1 × 10³/µL, p < 0.01), and C-reactive protein (100 mg/L vs. 120.7 mg/L, p < 0.001) compared to non-statin COVID-19 patients. The same positive results followed in lipid profiles for patients on statins. Cox proportional-hazards regression models evaluated the association between statin use and mortality rate. The primary endpoint involved mortality during the hospital stay. Statin use was associated with lower odds of mortality in the propensity-matched cohort (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.33-0.64, p < 0.001). These results support the previous evidence of the beneficial effects of statins in reducing mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Progression of precision statin prescribing for reduction of statin-associated muscle symptoms

Background: Statins are among the most commonly prescribed medications, and improve patient outcomes by lowering cholesterol levels, but also have side effects. Variations in statin response can be attributed to a handful of factors that include pharmacogenetics. Methods: While not a true review article, this work was written using various search engines and terms and previous and newly published Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines for statins to provide a historical perspective in addition to the current status of statin-related pharmacogenetics and future perspectives. Results: This article provides historical background on statins and associated adverse effects, reviews pharmacogenetic implications, applies clinical-decision support, incorporates the latest CPIC guidelines and addresses future implications. Conclusion: Statins are a beneficial medication, but not without risk. Pharmacogenomics can help mitigate some risk factors. Clinical-decision support, implementation, research and guidelines will continue to influence statin prescribing.

Lack of Awareness of Own Hypercholesterolemia or Statin Medication among Adult Statin Users in the United States: Prevalence and Patient Characteristics in a Repeated Cross-Sectional Study

Knowledge of a patient’s medication is important in treating hyperlipidemia; however, little is known about this in practice. We carried out a repeated cross-sectional study to analyze a nationally representative sample of US adult statin users from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999−2018. We used medication bottle checks and self-reported survey data to estimate the percentage of individuals who are unaware of their hypercholesterolemia, type of medication, or how to take their medication. We used logistic regression to examine their characteristics. We included 8798 statin users; however, 17.6% were unaware of their hypercholesterolemia or statin use. Being older, male, non-Hispanic Black, taking a wider range of prescription medications, and previous diabetes or cardiovascular disease diagnosis were associated with lack of awareness. Serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was lower among those lacking awareness (85.5 vs. 100.7 mg/dL; p < 0.001). Many of those unaware of drug type had been given little information about statins; 34.0% had no diagnosis of diabetes or cardiovascular disease, and of these, 27.1% were >75 years old. Roughly one in six lacked awareness, but no association was found with hypercholesterolemia control. Healthcare providers should ascertain a patient’s understanding and consider the risks and benefits of statin medication.

Drug Treatment of Hypercholesterolemia in Older Adults: Focus on Newer Agents

There is increasing research interest in cholesterol-lowering therapy in older patients. The newer lipid-lowering agents (the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 [PCSK9] inhibitors evolocumab and alirocumab; the PCSK9 synthesis inhibitor inclisiran, and the adenosine triphosphate–citrate lyase inhibitor bempedoic acid) might also provide more options for the future treatment of older patients. Data analyses of the phase III outcome trials of the PCSK9 inhibitors suggest that their clinical benefits are maintained at older ages and that there is no increased relative risk of adverse events in older patients; however, data from patients aged ≥ 75 years and particularly aged ≥ 85 years are limited, and the trials did not collect information on the frailty status of patients. Frailty is a predictor of adverse outcomes, including mortality, and might help guide therapy decisions. To date, no outcome data are available for cardiovascular endpoints for the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering drugs inclisiran and bempedoic acid. Except for the risk of gout and tendon rupture with bempedoic acid, which remains to be further characterized in larger populations, the safety profile of the novel lipid-lowering agents in older patients seems favorable. The newer lipid-lowering agents could be added to other lipid-lowering medication or used as an alternative treatment in older patients with documented statin intolerance (as is already recommended in guidelines for the PCSK9 inhibitors), such as myopathy. Especially in older patients needing high-intensity therapy despite polypharmacy or certain comedications, the absence of clinically relevant drug–drug interactions with the PCSK9 inhibitors and inclisiran might be an advantage.

Investigating the effects of statins on ischemic heart disease allowing for effects on body mass index: a Mendelian randomization study

Despite effective lipid reduction and corresponding benefits for cardiovascular disease prevention and treatment, statins have pleiotropic effects potentially increasing the risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD), particularly by increasing body mass index (BMI). We assessed whether the effects of genetically mimicked statins on IHD were strengthened by adjusting for BMI in men and women. We also assessed if increasing BMI was specific to statins in comparison to other major lipid-lowering treatments in current use, i.e., proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors and ezetimibe. Using univariable and multivariable Mendelian randomization (MR) we found genetically mimicked effects of statins increased BMI (0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.28 to 0.38), but genetically mimicked PCSK9 inhibitors and ezetimibe did not. Genetically mimicked effects of statins on IHD reduction in both sexes (odds ratio (OR) 0.55 per unit decrease in effect size of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40 to 0.76), was largely similar after adjusting for BMI, in both men (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.61) and women (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.82). Compared with variations in PCSK9 and NPC1L1, only variation in HMGCR was associated with higher BMI. The effects on IHD of mimicking statins were similar after adjusting for BMI in both men and women. The BMI increase due to statins does not seem to be a concern as regards the protective effects of statins on IHD, however other factors driving BMI and the protective effects of statins could be.

Statin usage and cardiovascular risk among people living with HIV in the U.S. Military HIV Natural History Study

OBJECTIVES

Using the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association 2013 atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) management guidelines, we conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of people living with HIV in the US Military HIV Natural History Study to determine whether individuals were receiving statins when indicated.

METHODS

Prescription data was taken from Military Health System data. Statin eligibility was defined by ASCVD guidelines. We used the 10-year ASCVD pooled cohorts' equation to evaluate risk for each participant.

RESULTS

Across all categories, 31.9% (n = 390) of individuals met criteria for statin use, and when adding these subjects to the number of those already receiving statins (n = 96), 62.1% of all eligible subjects (n = 302/486) were actually receiving statin therapy. In multivariable analysis, individuals of African American race [odds ratio (OR) = 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.31-0.73] or Hispanic ethnicity (OR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.19-0.94) were less likely to receive statin prescriptions than white individuals. Individuals with a higher CD4 count (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05-1.20 per 100 cells/μL]) were significantly more likely to receive a statin prescription.

CONCLUSIONS

These data highlight discrepancies between ASCVD guidelines and primary care management of people living with HIV (PLWH) in the military health system, along with important racial differences. Targeted interventions are critical to identify and treat appropriate candidates for statin therapy among PLWH in the military and other settings.

Statin treatment effectiveness and the SLCO1B1*5 reduced function genotype: long-term outcomes in women and men

Objective

To estimate the effect of rs4149056 (SLCO1B1*5) genotype (decreases statin transport) on cholesterol control and treatment duration in male and female primary care patients prescribed common statin medications.

Methods and Analysis

This study comprised 69 185 European‐ancestry UK Biobank cohort participants prescribed simvastatin or atorvastatin (aged 40‐79 years at first prescription, treatment duration 1 month to 29 years, mean 5.7 years). Principal outcomes were clinically high total cholesterol (>5 mmol/L) at baseline, plus treatment discontinuation.

Results

A total of 48.4% of 591 females homozygous for SLCO1B1*5 decreased function genotype had raised cholesterol vs 41.7% of those with functioning SLCO1B1 (odds ratio 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1‐1.55, P = .001). Fewer males had high cholesterol and the genotype effect was attenuated. In primary care prescribing, females homozygous for SLCO1B1*5 were more likely to stop receiving these statins (29.5%) than women with normal SLCO1B1 (25.7%) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.19, 95% CI 1.03‐1.37, P = .01), amounting to five discontinuations per 100 statin‐years in the SLCO1B1*5 group vs four in the normal SLCO1B1 function group. This remained significant after the first year of treatment (HR for discontinuing >1 year after first prescription 1.3, 95% CI 1.08‐1.56, P = .006). In men SLCO1B1*5 was only associated with treatment discontinuation in the first year.

Conclusions

In this large community sample of patients on commonly prescribed statins, the SLCO1B1*5 decreased function variant had much larger effects on cholesterol control and treatment duration in women than in men. Efforts to improve the effectiveness of statin therapy in women may need to include SLCO1B1*5 genotype‐guided statin selection.

LDL-cholesterol trajectories and statin treatment in Finnish type 2 diabetes patients: a growth mixture model

We aimed to identify distinct longitudinal trends of LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and investigate these trajectories' association with statin treatment. This retrospective cohort study used electronic health records from 8592 type 2 diabetes patients in North Karelia, Finland, comprising all primary and specialised care visits 2011‒2017. We compared LDL-C trajectory groups assessing LDL-C treatment target achievement and changes in statin treatment intensity. Using a growth mixture model, we identified four LDL-C trajectory groups. The majority (85.9%) had "moderate-stable" LDL-C levels around 2.3 mmol/L. The second-largest group (7.7%) consisted of predominantly untreated patients with alarmingly "high-stable" LDL-C levels around 3.9 mmol/L. The "decreasing" group (3.8%) was characterised by large improvements in initially very high LDL-C levels, along with the highest statin treatment intensification rates, while among patients with "increasing" LDL-C (2.5%), statin treatment declined drastically. In all the trajectory groups, women had significantly higher average LDL-C levels and received less frequent any statin treatment and high-intensity treatment than men. Overall, 41.9% of patients had no statin prescribed at the end of follow-up. Efforts to control LDL-C should be increased-especially in patients with continuously elevated levels-by initiating and intensifying statin treatment earlier and re-initiating the treatment after discontinuation if possible.

Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Elevated Body Mass Index in a Study Comparing Group Medical Visits Focused on Weight Management and Medication Intensification

BACKGROUND

Illuminating heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE) within trials is important for identifying target populations for implementation.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine HTE in a trial of group medical visits (GMVs) for patients with type 2 diabetes and elevated body mass index.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND MEASURES

Participants (n=263) were randomized to GMV-based medication management plus low carbohydrate diet-focused weight management (WM/GMV; n=127) or GMV-based medication management alone (GMV; n=136) for diabetes control. We used QUalitative INteraction Trees, a tree-based clustering method, to identify subgroups with greater improvement in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and weight from either WM/GMV or GMV. Subgroup predictors included 32 baseline demographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors. Internal validation was conducted to estimate bias in the range of mean outcome differences between arms.

RESULTS

QUalitative INteraction Trees analyses indicated that for patients who had not previously attempted weight loss, WM/GMV resulted in better glycemic control than GMV (mean difference in HbA1c improvement=1.48%). For patients who had previously attempted weight loss and had lower cholesterol and blood urea nitrogen, GMV was better than WM/GMV (mean difference in HbA1c improvement=1.51%). No treatment-subgroup effects were identified for weight. Internal validation resulted in moderate corrections in mean HbA1c differences between arms; however, differences remained in the clinically significant range.

CONCLUSION

This work represents a novel step toward targeting care approaches for patients to maximize benefit based on individual patient characteristics.

A Cost-Consequence Analysis of Preemptive SLCO1B1 Testing for Statin Myopathy Risk Compared to Usual Care

There is a well-validated association between SLCO1B1 (rs4149056) and statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS). Preemptive SLCO1B1 pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing may diminish the incidence of SAMS by identifying individuals with increased genetic risk before statin initiation. Despite its potential clinical application, the cost implications of SLCO1B1 testing are largely unknown. We conducted a cost-consequence analysis of preemptive SLCO1B1 testing (PGx+) versus usual care (PGx-) among Veteran patients enrolled in the Integrating Pharmacogenetics in Clinical Care (I-PICC) Study. The assessment was conducted using a health system perspective and 12-month time horizon. Incremental costs of SLCO1B1 testing and downstream medical care were estimated using data from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs' Managerial Cost Accounting System. A decision analytic model was also developed to model 1-month cost and SAMS-related outcomes in a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 Veteran patients, where all patients were initiated on simvastatin. Over 12 months, 13.5% of PGx+ (26/193) and 11.2% of PGx- (24/215) participants in the I-PICC Study were prescribed Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guideline-concordant statins (Δ2.9%, 95% CI -4.0% to 10.0%). Differences in mean per-patient costs for lipid therapy prescriptions, including statins, for PGx+ compared to PGx- participants were not statistically significant (Δ USD 9.53, 95% CI -0.86 to 22.80 USD). Differences in per-patient costs attributable to the intervention, including PGx testing, lipid-lowering prescriptions, SAMS, laboratory and imaging expenses, and primary care and cardiology services, were also non-significant (Δ- USD 1004, 95% CI -2684 to 1009 USD). In the hypothetical cohort, SLCO1B1-informed statin therapy averted 109 myalgias and 3 myopathies at 1-month follow up. Fewer statin discontinuations (78 vs. 109) were also observed, but the SLCO1B1 testing strategy was 96 USD more costly per patient compared to no testing (124 vs. 28 USD). The implementation of SLCO1B1 testing resulted in small, non-significant increases in the proportion of patients receiving CPIC-concordant statin prescriptions within a real-world primary care context, diminished the incidence of SAMS, and reduced statin discontinuations in a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 patients. Despite these effects, SLCO1B1 testing administered as a standalone test did not result in lower per-patient health care costs at 1 month or over 1 year of treatment. The inclusion of SLCO1B1, among other well-validated pharmacogenes, into preemptive panel-based testing strategies may provide a better balance of clinical benefit and cost.

Coronary artery calcium scoring in patients with statin associated muscle symptoms: Prescribing statins for those most likely to benefit

For primary prevention, statin therapy reduces the incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events in adults with intermediate or high estimated 10-year risk using traditional population-based risk calculators. While a variety of reported symptoms may limit statin adherence, muscle complaints, whether typical or atypical of that associated with statin therapy, are the most common reported by patients. Because additional testing, alteration in the patient's medical regimen and subsequent medical visits are often required, an informed clinician-patient discussion and shared decision making are necessary to achieve the best outcomes. The authors provide support for the perspective that coronary calcium scoring, by individualizing estimated risk and helping to identify those most likely to benefit, plays a vital role in preventive therapy decision-making for the primary prevention patient with troublesome muscle complaints attributed to statin therapy.

A multistate transition model for statin-induced myopathy and statin discontinuation

The overarching goal of this study was to simultaneously model the dynamic relationships among statin exposure, statin discontinuation, and potentially statin-related myopathic outcomes. We extracted data from the Indiana Network of Patient Care for 134,815 patients who received statin therapy between January 4, 2004, and December 31, 2008. All individuals began statin treatment, some discontinued statin use, and some experienced myopathy and/or rhabdomyolysis while taking the drug or after discontinuation. We developed a militate model to characterize 12 transition probabilities among six different states defined by use or discontinuation of statin and its associated myopathy or rhabdomyolysis. We found that discontinuation of statin therapy was common and frequently early, with 44.4% of patients discontinuing therapy after 1 month, and discontinuation is a strong indicator for statin-induced myopathy (risk ratio, 10.8; p < 0.05). Women more likely than men (p < 0.05) and patients aged 65 years and older had a higher risk than those aged younger than 65 years to discontinue statin use or experience myopathy. In conclusion, we introduce an innovative multistate model that allows clear depiction of the relationship between statin discontinuation and statin-induced myopathy. For the first time, we have successfully demonstrated and quantified the relative risk of myopathy between patients who continued and discontinued statin therapy. Age and sex were two strong risk factors for both statin discontinuation and incident myopathy.

Adherence to Lipid-Lowering Treatment by Single-Pill Combination of Statin and Ezetimibe

INTRODUCTION

Although several studies have shown that a simplified cardiovascular drug treatment leads to better treatment adherence, limited and conflicting findings have been reported on the separate or single-pill combination of the now recommended association between a statin and ezetimibe. We addressed this issue in a large cohort of patients newly treated with statins to whom ezetimibe was additionally administered, either separately or as a single-pill combination.

METHODS

A total of 256,012 patients (age 40-80 years) from the Lombardy Region (Italy) newly treated with statins during 2011-2013 were followed until 2018 to identify those to whom ezetimibe was added. The 2881 and 5351 patients who started a two-pill or a single-pill combination, respectively, of statin and ezetimibe were identified and matched for propensity score. Adherence to drug therapy at 1 year was measured as the ratio between the number of days in which the drug was available and the days of follow-up (the proportion of days covered; PDC). Patients who had a PDC > 75% or < 25% were, respectively, defined as highly and poorly adherent to drug therapy. Analysis was extended to the association between adherence and the risk of fatal/non-fatal cardiovascular events.

RESULTS

Compared to those prescribed a two-pill combination, those prescribed a single-pill combination had an 87% (75-99%) greater odds of being highly adherent and a 79% (72-84%) lower odds of being poorly adherent to treatment. These advantages were manifest in all strata of age, sex, and clinical profile. The risk of cardiovascular outcomes decreased by 55% in patients with high adherence compared to those with low adherence.

CONCLUSION

Patients who were prescribed a single-pill combination of statin/ezetimibe more frequently exhibit a good adherence and less frequently bad adherence to treatment than those prescribed a two-pill combination of these drugs.

Statin associated adverse reactions in Latin America: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

We aim to describe the frequency and type of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in patients on statins in published studies from Latin American (LATAM) countries.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in three databases (PubMed, EMBASE and LILACS) in addition to a manual search in relevant journals from LATAM universities or medical societies. A snowballing technique was used to identify further references. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies between 2000 and 2020 were included. Studies were considered eligible if they included adults on statin therapy from LATAM and reported data on ADRs. Data on ADRs were abstracted and presented by study design.

RESULTS

Out of 8076 articles, a total of 20 studies were included (7 RCTs and 13 observational studies). We identified three head-to-head statin RCTs, two statin-versus-policosanol RCTs and only two placebo-controlled trials. The statin-related ADRs frequency ranged from 0% to 35.1% in RCTs and 0% to 28.4% in observational studies. The most common ADRs were muscle-related events including myalgia and elevated creatine phosphokinase. Other reported ADRs were gastrointestinal symptoms, headache and altered fasting plasma glucose.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified differences in the frequency of ADRs in both observational studies and RCTs from LATAM countries. This could be due to the absence of standard definitions and reporting of ADRs as well as differences among the study's interventions, population characteristics or design. The variability of ADRs and the absence of definitions are similar to studies from other geographical locations. Further placebo-controlled trials and real-world data registries with universal definitions should follow.

Associations of statin adherence and lipid targets with adverse outcomes in myocardial infarction survivors: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To examine associations between statin adherence and lipid target achievement in myocardial infarction (MI) survivors, and their associations with mortality and recurrent MIs.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using linked clinical records within the National Health Service Greater Glasgow and Clyde (NHS GGC) Data Safe Haven.

SETTING

Routine clinical practice in the NHS GGC area between January 2009 and July 2017.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients ≥18 years who experienced a non-fatal MI hospital admission (ICD10: I21, I22) between January 2009 and July 2014 (n=11 031), followed up from the date of MI admission until July 2017 or death, whichever occurred first.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Statin adherence was estimated using encashed prescriptions and lipid results from routine biochemistry data. Primary lipid and statin adherence targets were LDL ≤1.8 mmol/L and adherence ≥50%, and were related to all-cause death, deaths due to cardiovascular disease (CVD) (ICD10: I00-I99 as the underlying cause), and recurrent MI in unadjusted models and models adjusting for age, sex, socioeconomic deprivation and year of MI.

RESULTS

Over 4.5 years follow-up, 76% achieved LDL ≤1.8 mmol/L, and 84.5% had average adherence ≥50%. Patients with adherence <50% had an increased risk of not meeting LDL ≤1.8 mmol/L, in adjusted models (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.78 to 2.31, p<0.0001). In univariable models, not meeting LDL ≤1.8 mmol/L was associated with increased risks of all-cause mortality (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.39, p<0.0001) and CVD mortality (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.51, p=0.0013). Adherence <50% was associated with increased risks of all-cause mortality (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.44 to 1.74, p<0.0001) and CVD mortality (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.36 to 1.88, p<0.0001). Adjustment for confounders did not abrogate these associations. Neither exposure was associated with recurrent MIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-achievement of lipid and adherence targets are associated with increased risks of all-cause and CVD mortality. Further work is required to optimise their use to improve outcomes in clinical practice.

A Novel Statin Compound from Monacolin J Produced Using CYP102A1-Catalyzed Regioselective C-Hydroxylation

Statins inhibit the 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMG-CoA reductase), which is the rate-limiting enzyme in cholesterol biosynthesis. Statin therapy reduces morbidity and mortality in those who are at high risk of cardiovascular disease. Monacolin J is a statin compound, which is an intermediate in the lovastatin biosynthesis pathway, in the fungus Aspergillus terreus. It is also found in red yeast rice, which is made by culturing rice with the yeast Monascus purpureus. Monacolin J has a hydroxyl substituent at position C’-8 of monacolin L. Here, a new statin derivative from monacolin J was made through the catalysis of CYP102A1 from Bacillus megaterium. A set of CYP102A1 mutants of monacolin J hydroxylation with high catalytic activity was screened. The major hydroxylated product was C-6′a-hydroxymethyl monacolin J, whose structure was confirmed using LC–MS and NMR analysis. The C-6′a-hydroxymethyl monacolin J has never been reported before. It showed a greater ability to inhibit HMG-CoA reductase than the monacolin J substrate itself. Human liver microsomes and human CYP3A4 also showed the ability to catalyze monacolin J in producing the same product of the CYP102A1-catalyzed reaction. This result motivates a new strategy for the development of a lead for the enzymatic and chemical processes to develop statin drug candidates.

Monitoring adherence to pharmacological therapy and follow-up examinations among patients with type 2 diabetes in community pharmacies. Results from an experience in Italy

Introduction

Type 2 diabetes is an important public health issue, yet adherence to drugs and regular clinical follow-up is still suboptimal. This study aims to evaluate a community pharmacy programme for monitoring and enhancing adherence to prescribed pharmacological therapies and recommended examinations among patients with confirmed diabetes.

Methods

The intervention was conducted in different Italian areas between April 2017 and January 2018. All adult patients who entered a pharmacy with a personal prescription for any antidiabetic drug and agreed to participate, were interviewed. Those found to be non-adherent received counselling from the pharmacists. All patients were invited for a follow-up interview after 3 months.

Results

Overall, 930 patients were enrolled and completed the baseline interview. We found low rates of non-adherence, ranging from 8% to 13% for prescribed pharmacological therapies, and 11–29% for the recommended clinical examinations. Non-adherence to oral therapies was higher among younger and recently diagnosed patients; that to clinical examinations was higher in men, those with an intermediate duration of diabetes and less educated patients. Large geographical differences persisted after the adjustment for individual factors. Only 306 patients (32.9%) returned for the follow-up interview, most of whom were already adherent at baseline.

Conclusions

Poor adherence to drugs or clinical examinations is not easy to identify in the usual operating setting of community pharmacies. Furthermore, the majority of patients did not return for follow-up, making it impossible to evaluate the efficacy of the pharmacists’ counselling. It might be more effective to plan interventions addressed to specific subgroups of patients or areas.

The Role of the BH4 Cofactor in Nitric Oxide Synthase Activity and Cancer Progression: Two Sides of the Same Coin

Cancer development is associated with abnormal proliferation, genetic instability, cell death resistance, metabolic reprogramming, immunity evasion, and metastasis. These alterations are triggered by genetic and epigenetic alterations in genes that control cell homeostasis. Increased reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS, RNS) induced by different enzymes and reactions with distinct molecules contribute to malignant transformation and tumor progression by modifying DNA, proteins, and lipids, altering their activities. Nitric oxide synthase plays a central role in oncogenic signaling modulation and redox landscape. Overexpression of the three NOS isoforms has been found in innumerous types of cancer contributing to tumor growth and development. Although the main function of NOS is the production of nitric oxide (NO), it can be a source of ROS in some pathological conditions. Decreased tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) cofactor availability is involved in NOS dysfunction, leading to ROS production and reduced levels of NO. The regulation of NOSs by BH4 in cancer is controversial since BH4 has been reported as a pro-tumoral or an antitumoral molecule. Therefore, in this review, the role of BH4 in the control of NOS activity and its involvement in the capabilities acquired along tumor progression of different cancers was described.

Diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular risk management in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an international audit

Aim

The objective was to examine the prevalence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and its risk factors among patients with RA with diabetes mellitus (RA-DM) and patients with RA without diabetes mellitus (RAwoDM), and to evaluate lipid and blood pressure (BP) goal attainment in RA-DM and RAwoDM in primary and secondary prevention.

Methods

The cohort was derived from the Survey of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis from 53 centres/19 countries/3 continents during 2014–2019. We evaluated the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) among RA-DM and RAwoDM. The study population was divided into those with and without ASCVD, and within these groups we compared risk factors and CVD preventive treatment between RA-DM and RAwoDM.

Results

The study population comprised of 10 543 patients with RA, of whom 1381 (13%) had DM. ASCVD was present in 26.7% in RA-DM compared with 11.6% RAwoDM (p<0.001). The proportion of patients with a diagnosis of hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and use of lipid-lowering or antihypertensive agents was higher among RA-DM than RAwoDM (p<0.001 for all). The majority of patients with ASCVD did not reach the lipid goal of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <1.8 mmol/L. The lipid goal attainment was statistically and clinically significantly higher in RA-DM compared with RAwoDM both for patients with and without ASCVD. The systolic BP target of <140 mm Hg was reached by the majority of patients, and there were no statistically nor clinically significant differences in attainment of BP targets between RA-DM and RAwoDM.

Conclusion

CVD preventive medication use and prevalence of ASCVD were higher in RA-DM than in RAwoDM, and lipid goals were also more frequently obtained in RA-DM. Lessons may be learnt from CVD prevention programmes in DM to clinically benefit patients with RA.

Public perceptions and knowledge of cholesterol management in a multi-ethnic Asian population: A population-based survey

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Hyperlipidemia is one of the important modifiable risk factors for CVDs. Raising public awareness of CVD risks is an important step in reducing CVD burdens. In this study, we aimed to assess public awareness and knowledge of cholesterol and its management in a multiethnic Asian population.

METHODS

We recruited 1000 participants from three major ethnic groups for this nationwide population-based survey. A structured questionnaire was used to collect socio-demographics, knowledge of cholesterol and cholesterol-lowering medications. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with good knowledge on cholesterol and its management.

RESULTS

Of the participants, 65% thought that high cholesterol produces symptoms and that lifestyle modification would be as effective as medication at lowering cholesterol. Nearly 70% believed that long term statin could lead to kidney or liver damage, and 56% thought that statin was associated with higher risk of cancer. A third saw herbal medicine or supplements as healthier and safer. About 45% believed that statin therapy should not be taken long term and that one could stop taking cholesterol medication when cholesterol is under control. Malays were more likely to have poor knowledge (adjusted OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.47-0.98; P = 0.039) compared to Chinese. Participants with intermediate education were more likely to have good knowledge of cholesterol and its management (adjusted OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.11-2.51; P = 0.013) compared to those with primary education.

CONCLUSION

Public knowledge and awareness of high cholesterol and its management remains poor in Asian multi-ethnic population. Understanding gaps in public knowledge can inform the implementation of health promotion programs to effectively raise awareness of cholesterol and its management.

A phenome-wide association study of genetically mimicked statins

BACKGROUND

Beyond their success in cardiovascular disease prevention, statins are increasingly recognized to have sex-specific pleiotropic effects. To gain additional insight, we characterized associations of genetically mimicked statins across the phenotype sex-specifically. We also assessed whether any apparently non-lipid effects identified extended to genetically mimicking other widely used lipid modifiers (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors and ezetimibe) or were a consequence of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c).

METHODS

We performed a sex-specific phenome-wide association study assessing the association of genetic variants in HMGCR, mimicking statins, with 1701 phenotypes. We used Mendelian randomization (MR) to assess if any non-lipid effects found were evident for genetically mimicked PCSK9 inhibitors and ezetimibe or for LDL-c.

RESULTS

As expected, genetically mimicking statins was inversely associated with LDL-c, apolipoprotein B (ApoB), and total cholesterol (TC) and positively associated with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and was related to body composition. Genetically mimicking statins was also inversely associated with serum calcium, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), and platelet count and positively associated with basal metabolic rate (BMR) and mean platelet volume. Stronger associations with genetically mimicked statins were evident for women than men for lipid traits (LDL-c, ApoB, and TC), calcium, and SHBG, but not for platelet attributes, body composition, or BMR. Genetically mimicking PCSK9 inhibitors or ezetimibe was also associated with lower lipids, but was not related to calcium, SHBG, BMR, or body composition. Genetically higher LDL-c increased lipids and decreased BMR, but did not affect calcium, HbA1c, platelet attributes, or SHBG with minor effects on body composition.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar inverse associations were found for genetically mimicking statins on lipid traits in men and women as for other lipid modifiers. Besides the positive associations with HbA1c, BMI (which may explain the higher BMR), and aspects of body composition in men and women, genetically mimicking statins was additionally associated with platelet attributes in both sexes and was inversely associated with serum calcium and SHBG in women. This genetic evidence suggests potential pathways that contribute to the effects of statins particularly in women. Further investigation is needed to confirm these findings and their implications for clinical practice.

Compliance in Primary Prevention With Statins and Associations With Cardiovascular Risk and Death in a Low-Risk Population With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Background

We examined whether primary prevention with statins and high adherence to statins reduce the associated risk of cardiovascular events or death in a low‐risk population with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D).

Methods and Results

Using Danish nationwide registers, we included patients with new‐onset T2D, aged 40 to 89 years, between 2005 and 2011, who were alive 18 months following the T2D diagnosis (index date). In patients who purchased statins within 6 months following T2D diagnosis, we calculated the proportion of days covered (PDC) within 1 year after the initial 6‐month period. We studied the combined end point of myocardial infarction, stroke, or all‐cause mortality, whichever came first, with Cox regression. Reported were standardized 5‐year risk differences for fixed comorbidity distribution according to statin treatment history, stratified by sex and age. Among 77 170 patients, 42 975 (56%) were treated with statins, of whom 31 061 (72%) had a PDC ≥80%. In men aged 70 to 79 years who were treated with statins, the standardized 5‐year risk was 22.9% (95% CI, 21.5%–24.3%), whereas the risk was 29.1% (95% CI, 27.4%–30.7%) in men not treated, resulting in a significant risk reduction of 6.2% (95% CI, 4.0%–8.4%), P<0.0001. The risk reduction associated with statins increased with advancing age group (women: age 40–49 years, 0.0% [95% CI, −1.0% to 1.0%]; age 80–89 years, 10.8% [95% CI, 7.2%–14.4%]). Standardizing to all patients treated with statins, PDC <80% was associated with increased risk difference (reference PDC ≥80%; PDC <20%, 4.2% [95% CI, 2.9%–5.6%]).

Conclusions

This study supports the use of statins as primary prevention against cardiovascular diseases or death in 18‐month surviving low‐risk patients with T2D, with the highest effect in the elderly and adherent patients.

Treatment Adherence in Integrative Medicine-Part One: Review of Literature

Treatment adherence is a topic that is well studied but not well understood. Low treatment adherence is a significant issue that limits the effective management and treatment of chronic conditions, creating significant health care burden, costs, and poor patient outcomes. This report provides a review of the factors that facilitate or create barriers to treatment adherence, as well as strategies recommended to overcome adherence barriers. A total of 25 interviews were conducted with practitioners demonstrating both high (n = 16) and low (n = 9) treatment adherence rates. A total of 185 survey responses were received from high-treatment adherence rate practitioners (n = 21), low-treatment adherence rate practitioners (n = 83), and practitioners that were neither in the high- or low-treatment adherence rate range (n = 81). Practitioner prescribing behaviors and adherence statistics were determined and stratified by high-treatment adherence rate and low-treatment adherence rate practitioners. From the interviews, 78% of low-rate practitioners mentioned that establishing trust is a primary best practice for optimizing adherence, and for high-rate practitioners, 69% thought that facilitating trust was important to optimizing adherence. Both low- and high-adherence rate practitioners prioritized using a staged approach as a strategy to overcome barriers to adherence. From the total survey sample it was found that key strategies to improving adherence included the practice of booking follow-up appointments, using lab results to explain treatment plans, and using a staged approach for treatment plans. Our research sought to elicit strategies and skills that can help improve treatment adherence in integrative medicine and our findings have identified several common practices that can help to improve adherence. Research taking advantage of mobile devices and the internet for adherence has started to expand within the last 10 to 15 years. Technology has the potential to lead the development and establishment of a centralized database that acquires adherence information and provides solutions to its practitioners and patients. Further work to advance the field of integrative medicine through additional research and interventions that support treatment adherence would be valuable to the effective treatment and management of integrative medicine patients.

Primary nonadherence to statin medications: Survey of patient perspectives

Statin medications reduce cardiovascular events, but many patients never start taking their prescribed statin (primary nonadherence). Limited knowledge exists about the attitudes and beliefs of those with primary nonadherence. In this study, patients with primary nonadherence to statin medications (n = 173) completed a self-administered cross-sectional survey that assessed their attitudes and beliefs related to primary nonadherence and to potential motivators for statin use. Patients were recruited in 2019 from two academic health systems and nationwide internet advertisements. Only 49 of 173 (28.3%) patients with primary nonadherence reported having cardiovascular disease (CVD). Ninety-nine patients (57.2%) never filled their prescription, and 74 (42.8%) filled but never took any statin. Over half failed to initially inform their prescriber they might not take the statin. Patients strongly or somewhat agreed that they desired alternate treatment plans such as diet and/or exercise (n = 134; 77.4%) or natural remedies/dietary supplements (n = 125; 72.3%). Ninety-eight (56.6%) stronglyor somewhat worried about the possibility of statin dependence or addiction. Twenty-seven (15.6%) patients noted that they would not take a statin based solely on CVD risk estimates; 50 (28.9%) selected a CVD risk threshold of >20%; and 23 (13.3%) a threshold of >50% as motivating factors to take statins. Patients with primary nonadherence have attitudes about taking statins based on CVD risk that differ from scientific recommendations, may not tell providers about their hesitation to take statins, and likely prefer alternative initial approaches to cholesterol lowering. Early shared decision-making and assessment of patient attitudes about statins could potentially better align initial approaches for CVD risk reduction.