Comparison of cardiovascular and renal outcomes between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes without prior cardiovascular or renal disease

Real-Life Individual Comparison of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Patients with Heart Failure and Diabetes Mellitus

BACKGROUND

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are breakthrough agents for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and heart failure (HF). However, among patients with HF and T2DM, some uncertainty remains about individual comparisons, including dosing.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to make a real-life individual comparison of SGLT2is among patients with HF and T2DM.

METHODS

This was a subgroup analysis of the Turkish Ministry of Health's National Electronic Database for adult patients with HF (TRends-HF). All-cause mortality (ACM) data up to 7 years were evaluated. Patients with HF and T2DM who were prescribed an SGLT2i were identified, and individual doses of empagliflozin 25 mg, empagliflozin 10 mg, and dapagliflozin 10 mg were compared. For individual comparisons, propensity score-matching analysis was generated as 1:1:1, and disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for HF were considered.

RESULTS

In the triple-matched cohort, 1-, 5-, and 7-year survival rates were 95%, 81%, and 76% versus 94%, 78%, and 72% versus 94%, 80%, and 75% for empagliflozin 25 mg, empagliflozin 10 mg, and dapagliflozin 10 mg, respectively. Among patients who were on triple DMT for HF, 1-, 5-, and 7-year survival rates were 95%, 78%, and 70% for empagliflozin 25 mg, 95%, 74%, and 66% for empagliflozin 10 mg, and 94%, 77%, and 69% for dapagliflozin, respectively. Annual emergency department visits were slightly lower with empagliflozin 10 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg than with empagliflozin 25 mg. A greater proportion of patients on dapagliflozin 10 mg did not experience hospitalization during the 7-year follow-up compared with both doses of empagliflozin, albeit with a small effect size.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with HF and T2DM, SGLT2is are instrumental, and empagliflozin 10 mg remains significantly inferior to dapagliflozin 10 mg and empagliflozin 25 mg in terms of 5- and 7-year ACM.

The influence of SGLT-2 inhibitors on lipid profiles in heart failure patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Sodium-glucose cotransporter two inhibitors can reduce cardiovascular events by modulating lipid profiles in patients with heart failure, irrespective of diabetes status. In this study, we aimed to assess the effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors on the lipid profiles of patients with heart failure via a meta-analysis.

METHODS

The PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched up to 2023 to retrieve relevant article titles, abstracts, and full texts. STATA software was used to conduct the meta-analysis.

RESULT

The Forest plot of fasting blood sugar levels in patients receiving SGLT-2 inhibitors differed significantly from those the in control group (mean difference = -0.08, 95% CI [-0.13, -0.02], P < 0.05). Analysis of lipid profile parameters, including total cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL, and LDL in patients with HF receiving SGLT-2 inhibitors, did not show a notable difference from the control group (P > 0.005). However, the mean difference was towards the reduction of LDL, cholesterol, and triglycerides and showed an increase in HDL levels. Egger's test for publication bias revealed some publication bias (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our topic analysis did not reveal any notable alterations in the lipid profile. To arrive at a more definite agreement, further research on subjects with heart failure is necessary because there is currently insufficient evidence.

Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials

Objective

Evaluate the effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases.

Methods

Articles of SGLT2i on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases were searched. Two authors independently screened the literature, extracted the data, assessed the quality of the study and performed statistical analyses using Review Manager 5.4.

Results

Random-effect model was used to merge the OR values, and the pooled effect showed that SGLT2i had significant preventive effects on cardiovascular death (OR=0.76, 95%CI 0.64 to 0.89), myocardial infarction (OR=0.90, 95%CI 0.84 to 0.96), heart failure (OR=0.69, 95%CI 0.64 to 0.74) and all-cause mortality (OR=0.65, 95%CI 0.58 to 0.73). Empagliflozin, dapagliflozin and canagliflozin all reduced the incidence of heart failure (OR=0.72, 95%CI 0.64 to 0.82; OR=0.56, 95%CI 0.39 to 0.80; OR=0.62, 95%CI 0.53 to 0.73), but only dapagliflozin displayed a favorable effect on inhibiting stroke (OR=0.78, 95%CI 0.63 to 0.98). SGLT2i could prevent stroke (OR=0.86, 95%CI 0.75 to 0.99), heart failure (OR=0.63, 95%CI 0.56 to 0.70) and all-cause mortality (OR=0.64, 95%CI 0.57 to 0.72) compared to DPP-4i. Furthermore, SGLT2i could reduce the incidence of heart failure (OR=0.72, 95%CI 0.67 to 0.77) and cardiovascular death (OR=0.72, 95%CI 0.54 to 0.95) in patients with high-risk factors.

Conclusions

SGLT2i affects cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, heart failure and all-cause mortality. Only dapagliflozin displayed a favorable effect on inhibiting stroke. SGLT2i could prevent stroke, heart failure and all-cause mortality compared to DPP-4i. In addition, SGLT2i significantly reduced the development of heart failure and cardiovascular death in patients with high-risk factors.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42024532783.

Comparative cardiovascular and renal effectiveness of empagliflozin and dapagliflozin: Scandinavian cohort study

AIMS

To assess the comparative cardiovascular and renal effectiveness and safety of empagliflozin vs. dapagliflozin among patients with type 2 diabetes in routine clinical practice.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Cohort study using data from nationwide registers in Sweden, Denmark, and Norway, from June 2014 to June 2021 included 141 065 new users of empagliflozin and 58 306 new users of dapagliflozin. Coprimary outcomes were major cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death), heart failure (hospitalization or death because of heart failure) and serious renal events (renal replacement therapy, hospitalization for renal events, and death from renal causes). Secondary outcomes were the individual components of the primary outcomes, any cause death, and diabetic ketoacidosis. Use of empagliflozin vs. dapagliflozin was associated with similar risk of major cardiovascular events [adjusted incidence rate: 15.9 vs. 15.8 events per 1000 person-years; HR 1.02, (95% confidence interval 0.97-1.08)], heart failure [6.5 vs. 6.3 events per 1000 person-years; HR 1.05 (0.97-1.14)] and serious renal events [3.7 vs. 4.1 events per 1000 person-years; HR 0.97 (0.87-1.07)]. In secondary outcome analyses, the HRs for use of empagliflozin vs. dapagliflozin were 1.00 (0.93-1.07) for myocardial infarction, 1.03 (0.95-1.12) for stroke, 1.01 (0.92-1.13) for cardiovascular death, 1.06 (1.00-1.11) for any cause death, 0.77 (0.60-0.99) for renal replacement therapy, 1.20 (0.75-1.93) for renal death, 1.01 (0.90-1.12) for hospitalization for renal events and 1.12 (0.94-1.33) for diabetic ketoacidosis.

CONCLUSION

Use of empagliflozin and dapagliflozin was associated with similar risk of cardiovascular and renal outcomes, mortality, and diabetic ketoacidosis.

Cardiovascular outcomes between dapagliflozin versus empagliflozin in patients with diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been demonstrated to decrease cardiovascular adverse events. However, there is little real-world clinical evidence regarding a direct comparison between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM).

HYPOTHESIS

A difference in the cardiovascular efficancy of dapagliflozin versus empagliflozin in DM patients was anticipated, aiming to guide the optimal choice of SGLT2 inhibitors based on cardiovascular outcomes.

METHODS

From 2014 to 2020, a total of 1549 patients with DM who were prescribed SGLT2 inhibitors such as dapagliflozin or empagliflozin were retrospectively enrolled. We categorized the study population into two groups: dapagliflozin (n = 981) and empagliflozin group (n = 568). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure (HF) over a 3-year period.

RESULTS

Propensity-score matching was performed (537 patients in each group). The mean age and hemoglobin A1c were 58.2 ± 13.0 years and 8.4 ± 1.7%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the dapagliflozin and empagliflozin groups in the risk of MACE (3.7% vs. 4.8%, hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-2.35; p = 0.349). Furthermore, there were no differences between the two groups in secondary endpoints including all-cause death, MI, stroke, and hospitalization for HF. Prior MI and history of HF were independent predictors of MACE.

CONCLUSIONS

Dapagliflozin and empagliflozin showed no significant difference of real-world clinical cardiovascular outcomes in patients with DM over a 3-year period. Further large randomized clinical trials will be warranted for better evaluation.

A systematic review on renal effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in rodent models of diabetic nephropathy

We have performed a systematic review of studies reporting on the renal effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in rodent models of diabetes. In 105 studies, SGLT2 inhibitors improved not only the glycemic control but also various aspects of renal function in most cases. These nephroprotective effects were similarly reported whether treatment with the SGLT2 inhibitor started concomitant with the onset of diabetes (within 1 week), early after onset (1-4 weeks) or after nephropathy had developed (>4 weeks after onset) with the latter probably having the greatest translational value. They were observed across various animal models of type 1 and type 2 diabetes/obesity (4 and 23 models, respectively), although studies in the type 2 diabetes model of db/db mice more often had negative data than in other models. Among possibly underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of nephroprotection, treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors had beneficial effects on lipid metabolism, blood pressure, glomerulosclerosis as well as renal tubular fibrosis, apoptosis, oxidative stress, and inflammation. These pathomechanisms highly influence atherosclerosis and renal health, which are two major factors that lead to an enhanced mortality in patients with diabetes and/or chronic kidney disease. Interestingly, renal SGLT2 inhibitor effects did not always correlate with those on glucose homeostasis, particularly in a limited number of direct comparative studies with other anti-diabetic treatments, indicating that nephroprotection may at least partly occur by mechanisms other than improving glycemic control. Our analyses did not provide evidence for different nephroprotective efficacy between SGLT2 inhibitors. Importantly, only four of 105 studies reported on female animals, and none provided direct comparative data between sexes. We conclude that more data on female animals and more direct comparative studies with other anti-diabetic compounds and combinations of treatments are needed.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor may not prevent atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) frequently coexist because of their similar pathological basis. However, whether sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), a novel class of anti-HF medication, decreases the risk of AF in HF patients remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between SGLT2i and AF in HF patients.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails evaluating the effects of SGLT2i on AF in HF patients was performed. PubMed and ClinicalTrails.gov were searched for eligible studies until 27 November 2022. The risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed through the Cochrane tool. Pooled risk ratio of AF for SGLT2i versus placebo in eligible studies was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 10 eligible RCTs examining 16,579 patients were included in the analysis. AF events occurred in 4.20% (348/8292) patients treated with SGLT2i, and in 4.57% (379/8287) patients treated with placebo. Meta-analysis showed that SGLT2i did not significantly reduce the risk of AF (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.80-1.06; p = 0.23) in HF patients when compared to placebo. Similar results remained in the subgroup analyses, regardless of the type of SGLT2i, the type of HF, and the duration of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidences showed that SGLT2i may have no preventive effects on the risk of AF in patients with HF.

TRANSLATIONAL PERSPECTIVE

Despite HF being one of the most common heart diseases and conferring increased risk for AF, affective prevention of AF in HF patients is still unresolved. The present meta-analysis demonstrated that SGLT2i may have no preventive effects on reducing AF in patients with HF. How to effectively prevent and early detect the occurrence of AF is worth discussing.