Multicenter Evaluation of Cystatin C Measurement after Assay Standardization

Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Estimation with Cystatin C-Past, Present, and Future

BACKGROUND

Cystatin C is a long-established filtration marker which can be used to assess kidney function, but it has been sparingly used for clinical care due to creatinine's role as the primary biomarker for kidney function assessment based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

CONTENT

This review summarizes the evolution of cystatin C's role in kidney disease assessment and highlights new guidelines promoting more widespread use. Specifically, the 2021 National Kidney Foundation and American Society of Nephrology Task Force on Reassessing the Inclusion of Race in Diagnosing Kidney Disease report, and the 2024 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), recommend increased use of cystatin C as an alternative and complementary biomarker for kidney function assessment, since it does not differ by race like creatinine, correlates better with adverse outcomes compared to creatinine, and provides a more accurate eGFR when used in combination with creatinine.

SUMMARY

While robust literature demonstrates improved accuracy with cystatin C-based eGFR (eGFRcys) in certain clinical subpopulations, future research is needed to better understand its performance relative to creatinine-based eGFR (eGFRcr) and measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) in additional diverse cohorts, and to achieve assay standardization to match the performance of creatinine assays. Additionally, cystatin C testing availability will need to be broadened from primarily reference laboratories to local laboratories, and partnerships will need to be developed between clinical stakeholders and the laboratory to promote cystatin C's clinical use, to achieve widespread adoption of guideline-recommended eGFR equations.

Establishing, evaluating and monitoring analytical quality in the traceability era

Poor analytical quality may be the bane of medical use of laboratory tests, and the fight against excessive analytical variability presents a daily struggle. Laboratories should prioritize the perspectives and needs of their customers (the patients and healthcare personnel). Among them, comparability of results from the same patient sample when measured by different laboratories using different in vitro diagnostic (IVD) medical devices is a logical priority to avoid result misinterpretation and potential patient harm. Harmonization (standardization) of laboratory measurements can be achieved by establishing metrological traceability of the results on clinical samples to stated higher-order references and providing an estimate of the uncertainty of measurement (MU). This estimate should be based on an MU budget including all known MU contributions generated by the employed calibration hierarchy, which in turn should be validated against fit-for-purpose maximum allowable MU derived according to internationally recommended models. In this report, we review the available strategies for establishing, evaluating, and monitoring analytical quality, drawing on three decades experience in the field. We discuss the most important aspects that may influence obtaining and maintaining analytical standardization in laboratory medicine, and offer practical solutions aimed at educating all stakeholders for the achievement of harmonized laboratory results. To fully implement the recommended approaches, all involved parties-i.e. reference providers, IVD manufacturers, medical laboratories, and External Quality Assessment organizers-must agree on their importance and enhance their specific knowledge.

Comparison of three different cystatin C measurement procedures in a pediatric chronic kidney disease cohort: Calibration for longitudinal measurements and implications for clinical estimation of GFR

INTRODUCTION

Serum cystatin C (CysC) is used to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), including in the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children (CKiD) Under 25 years (U25eGFR) equations. Several CysC measurement procedures available from diagnostic vendors include reference material for calibration, but the extent of heterogeneity across manufacturers is unclear. Since heterogeneity may have clinical and research implications for eGFR, we evaluated three CysC procedures in samples from the CKiD study representing a wide spectrum of kidney function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The three CysC measurement procedures evaluated were: Siemens BN II N Latex CystatinC Assay; Gentian CystatinC Immunoassay; and Roche Tina-quant CystatinC Gen.2. Bland-Altman quantified agreement with Siemens as reference because that method was used for longitudinal CKiD samples from 2003 to 2023. We present derivation of the interquartile range (IQR) of U25eGFR as a measure of precision and describe differences outside this range.

RESULTS

From 53 samples from 44 participants, Gentian measurements were 7 % higher than Siemens (95 %CI: +5.6 %,+8.5 %), while Roche measurements were 4.8 % lower on average (95 %CI: -6.2 %,-3.3 %). Both had very high correlation: 0.9926 and 0.9906, respectively. There was strong agreement across procedures, but a simple correction factor of 7 % reduction applied to Gentian yielded unbiased estimates (+0.03 %, 95 %CI: -1.3 %,+1.4 %) and strong performance in Deming regression. For precision, 98 % of U25eGFR values based on Gentian and Roche CysC were each within the IQR of the Siemens-based estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite reference material calibration, heterogeneity across CysC measurement procedures was observed. Procedure variability was within the limits of U25eGFR estimates indicating that practically, all procedures are appropriate for clinical use. Clinicians may consider calculating IQR of U25eGFR estimates for pediatric chronic kidney disease management.

Challenges and Perspectives on the Adoption of Cystatin C testing in China: A laboratory technician's perspective

Cystatin C (CysC) belongs to the cysteine protease inhibitor superfamily and is produced by all nucleated cells in the body in very stable amounts independent of age, sex, diet, and muscle mass. CysC is considered an ideal biomarker for assessing glomerular filtration rate (GFR) compared to traditional biomarkers for assessing GFR, such as creatinine. However, CysC is not sufficiently utilized for GFR assessment by clinicians, probably for various reasons such as insufficient understanding among clinicians or a lack of standardized quantitative methods. This review discusses and analyzes the aforementioned issues from the perspective of laboratory technicians.

Which is the best glomerular filtration marker: Creatinine, cystatin C or both?

BACKGROUND

The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is estimated by the serum or plasma concentration of creatinine and/or cystatin C using equations that include demographic data. The equations worldwide most widely used are those of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) consortium and updated in 2021 to remove the Afro-American racial correction factor. In 2021 and then in 2023, the European Kidney Function Consortium also developed equations based on creatinine and cystatin C, usable across the full age spectrum, and constructed by including the Q value (i.e. the median creatinine or cystatin C in healthy men and women, which is customizable for specific populations).

METHODS

The aim of this narrative review is to examine the strengths and weaknesses of each biomarker.

RESULTS

Both biomarkers have non-GFR determinants, namely muscle mass, protein intake and tubular secretion for creatinine; dysthyroidism and systemic corticosteroids for cystatin C, as well as other more debated determinants (diabetes, obesity, proteinuria, inflammatory syndrome). These non-GFR determinants are the reason why no equation based on a single endogenous biomarker has an accuracy within 30% greater than 90% over the entire age spectrum (in at least one patient in 10, estimated GFR is at least 30% higher or at least 30% lower than the measured GFR).

CONCLUSION

Equations combining the two biomarkers provide a better estimate of GFR, particularly in the subgroup of patients whose estimates based on each of the biomarkers are highly discordant. These patients must also be identified as being at increased risk of morbidity, particularly cardiovascular, and mortality.

Accuracy of glomerular filtration rate estimation using creatinine and cystatin C for identifying and monitoring moderate chronic kidney disease: the eGFR-C study

Background

Estimation of glomerular filtration rate using equations based on creatinine is widely used to manage chronic kidney disease. In the UK, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration creatinine equation is recommended. Other published equations using cystatin C, an alternative marker of kidney function, have not gained widespread clinical acceptance. Given higher cost of cystatin C, its clinical utility should be validated before widespread introduction into the NHS.

Objectives

Primary objectives were to: (1) compare accuracy of glomerular filtration rate equations at baseline and longitudinally in people with stage 3 chronic kidney disease, and test whether accuracy is affected by ethnicity, diabetes, albuminuria and other characteristics; (2) establish the reference change value for significant glomerular filtration rate changes; (3) model disease progression; and (4) explore comparative cost-effectiveness of kidney disease monitoring strategies.

Design

A longitudinal, prospective study was designed to: (1) assess accuracy of glomerular filtration rate equations at baseline (n = 1167) and their ability to detect change over 3 years (n = 875); (2) model disease progression predictors in 278 individuals who received additional measurements; (3) quantify glomerular filtration rate variability components (n = 20); and (4) develop a measurement model analysis to compare different monitoring strategy costs (n = 875).

Setting

Primary, secondary and tertiary care.

Participants

Adults (≥ 18 years) with stage 3 chronic kidney disease.

Interventions

Estimated glomerular filtration rate using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equations.

Main outcome measures

Measured glomerular filtration rate was the reference against which estimating equations were compared with accuracy being expressed as P30 (percentage of values within 30% of reference) and progression (variously defined) studied as sensitivity/specificity. A regression model of disease progression was developed and differences for risk factors estimated. Biological variation components were measured and the reference change value calculated. Comparative costs of monitoring with different estimating equations modelled over 10 years were calculated.

Results

Accuracy (P30) of all equations was ≥ 89.5%: the combined creatinine-cystatin equation (94.9%) was superior (p < 0.001) to other equations. Within each equation, no differences in P30 were seen across categories of age, gender, diabetes, albuminuria, body mass index, kidney function level and ethnicity. All equations showed poor (< 63%) sensitivity for detecting patients showing kidney function decline crossing clinically significant thresholds (e.g. a 25% decline in function). Consequently, the additional cost of monitoring kidney function annually using a cystatin C-based equation could not be justified (incremental cost per patient over 10 years = £43.32). Modelling data showed association between higher albuminuria and faster decline in measured and creatinine-estimated glomerular filtration rate. Reference change values for measured glomerular filtration rate (%, positive/negative) were 21.5/-17.7, with lower reference change values for estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Limitations

Recruitment of people from South Asian and African-Caribbean backgrounds was below the study target.

Future work

Prospective studies of the value of cystatin C as a risk marker in chronic kidney disease should be undertaken.

Conclusions

Inclusion of cystatin C in glomerular filtration rate-estimating equations marginally improved accuracy but not detection of disease progression. Our data do not support cystatin C use for monitoring of glomerular filtration rate in stage 3 chronic kidney disease.

Trial registration

This trial is registered as ISRCTN42955626.

Funding

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 11/103/01) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 35. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

An LC-MS/MS method for serum cystatin C quantification and its comparison with two commercial immunoassays

OBJECTIVES

The standardization of cystatin C (CysC) measurement has received increasing attention in recent years due to its importance in estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Mass spectrometry-based assays have the potential to provide an accuracy base for CysC measurement. However, a precise, accurate and sustainable LC-MS/MS method for CysC is still lacking.

METHODS

The developed LC-MS/MS method quantified CysC by detecting signature peptide (T3) obtained from tryptic digestion. Stable isotope labeled T3 peptide (SIL-T3) was spiked to control matrix effects and errors caused by liquid handling. The protein denaturation, reduction and alkylation procedures were combined into a single step with incubation time of 1 h, and the digestion lasted for 3.5 h. In the method validation, digestion time-course, imprecision, accuracy, matrix effect, interference, limit of quantification (LOQ), carryover, linearity, and the comparability to two routine immunoassays were evaluated.

RESULTS

No significant matrix effect or interference was observed with the CysC measurement. The LOQ was 0.21 mg/L; the within-run and total imprecision were 1.33-2.05 % and 2.18-3.90 % for three serum pools (1.18-5.34 mg/L). The LC-MS/MS method was calibrated by ERM-DA471/IFCC and showed good correlation with two immunoassays traceable to ERM-DA471/IFCC. However, significant bias was observed for immunoassays against the LC-MS/MS method.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed LC-MS/MS method is robust and simpler and holds the promise to provide an accuracy base for routine immunoassays, which will promote the standardization of CysC measurement.

An improved implementation of metrological traceability concepts is needed to benefit from standardization of laboratory results

Non-harmonization of laboratory results represents a concrete risk for patient safety. To avoid harms, it is agreed that measurements by in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVD-MD) on clinical samples should be traceable to higher-order references and adjusted to give the same result. However, metrological traceability is not a formal claim and has to be correctly implemented, which in practice does not happen for a non-negligible number of measurands. Stakeholders, such as higher-order reference providers, IVD manufacturers, and External Quality Assessment organizers, have major responsibilities and should improve their contribution by unambiguously and rigorously applying what is described in the International Organization for Standardization 17511:2020 standard and other documents provided by the international scientific bodies, such as Joint Committee on Traceability in Laboratory Medicine and IFCC. For their part, laboratory professionals should take responsibility to abandon non-selective methods and move to IVD-MDs displaying proper selectivity, which is one of the indispensable prerequisites for the correct implementation of metrological traceability. The practicality of metrological traceability concepts is not impossible but relevant education and appropriate training of all involved stakeholders are essential to obtain the expected benefits in terms of standardization.

Extending the cystatin C based EKFC-equation to children - validation results from Europe

BACKGROUND

A new cystatin C based European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFCCysC) equation was recently developed for adults, using the same mathematical form as the previously published full age spectrum creatinine based EKFC-equation (EKFCCrea). In the present study the cystatin C based EKFC-equation is extended to children, by defining the appropriate cystatin C rescaling factor QCysC.

METHODS

Rescaling factor QCysC for cystatin C was defined as: a) 0.83 mg/L, exactly as it was defined for young adults in the adult equation, and b) a more complex QCysC-age relationship based on 4th degree cystatin C-age polynomials after evaluation of data from Uppsala, Stockholm and Canada and aggregated data from Germany. The EKFCCysC equation was then validated in an independent dataset in European children (n = 2,293) with measured GFR, creatinine, cystatin C, age, height and sex available.

RESULTS

The EKFCCysC with the simple QCysC-value of 0.83 had a bias of -7.6 [95%CI -8.4;-6.5] mL/min/1.73 m2 and a P30-value of 85.8% [95%CI 84.4;87.3] equal to the EKFCCysC with the more complex 4th degree QCysC-value. The arithmetic mean of the EKFCCrea and EKFCCysC with the simple QCysC of 0.83 had a bias of -4.0 [95%CI -4.5;-3.1] mL/min/1.73 m2 and P30 of 90.4% [95%CI 89.2;91.6] similar to using the more complex 4th degree QCysC-polynomial.

CONCLUSION

Using exactly the same QCysC of 0.83 mg/L, the adult EKFCCysC can easily be extended to children, with some bias but acceptable P30-values. The arithmetic mean of EKFCCrea and EKFCCysC results in bias closer to zero and P30 slightly over 90%.

Exploring Renal Function Assessment: Creatinine, Cystatin C, and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Focused on the European Kidney Function Consortium Equation

Serum creatinine and serum cystatin C are the most widely used renal biomarkers for calculating the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), which is used to estimate the severity of kidney damage. In this review, we present the basic characteristics of these biomarkers, their advantages and disadvantages, some basic history, and current laboratory measurement practices with state-of-the-art methodology. Their clinical utility is described in terms of normal reference intervals, graphically presented with age-dependent reference intervals, and their use in eGFR equations.

Diagnostic challenges of diabetic kidney disease

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is one of the most common microvascular complications of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes and the most common cause of the end-stage renal disease (ESRD). It has been evidenced that targeted interventions at an early stage of DKD can efficiently prevent or delay the progression of kidney failure and improve patient outcomes. Therefore, regular screening for DKD has become one of the fundamental principles of diabetes care. Long-established biomarkers such as serum-creatinine-based estimates of glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria are currently the cornerstone of diagnosis and risk stratification in routine clinical practice. However, their immanent biological limitations and analytical variations may influence the clinical interpretation of the results. Recently proposed new predictive equations without the variable of race, together with the evidence on better accuracy of combined serum creatinine and cystatin C equations, and both race- and sex-free cystatin C-based equation, have enabled an improvement in the detection of DKD, but also require the harmonization of the recommended laboratory tests, wider availability of cystatin C testing and specific approach in various populations. Considering the complex pathophysiology of DKD, particularly in type 2 diabetes, a panel of biomarkers is needed to classify patients in terms of the rate of disease progression and/or response to specific interventions. With a personalized approach to diagnosis and treatment, in the future, it will be possible to respond to DKD better and enable improved outcomes for numerous patients worldwide.

New and old GFR equations: a European perspective

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is estimated in clinical practice from equations based on the serum concentration of endogenous biomarkers and demographic data. The 2009 creatinine-based Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI2009) was recommended worldwide until 2021, when it was recalibrated to remove the African-American race factor. The CKD-EPI2009 and CKD-EPIcr2021 equations overestimate GFR of adults aged 18-30 years, with a strong overestimation in estimated GFR (eGFR) at age 18 years. CKD-EPICr2021 does not perform better than CKD-EPI2009 in US population, overestimating GFR in non-Black subjects, and underestimating it in Black subjects with the same magnitude. CKD-EPICr2021 performed worse than the CKD-EPI2009 in White Europeans, and provides no or limited performance gains in Black European and Black African populations. The European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) equation, which incorporates median normal value of serum creatinine in healthy population, overcomes the limitations of the CKD-EPI equations: it provides a continuity of eGFR at the transition between pediatric and adult care, and performs reasonably well in diverse populations, assuming dedicated scaling of serum creatinine (Q) values is used. The new EKFC equation based on cystatin C (EKFCCC) shares the same mathematical construction, namely, it incorporates the median cystatin C value in the general population, which is independent of sex and ethnicity. EKFCCC is therefore a sex-free and race-free equation, which performs better than the CKD-EPI equation based on cystatin C. Despite advances in the field of GFR estimation, no equation is perfectly accurate, and GFR measurement by exogenous tracer clearance is still required in specific populations and/or specific clinical situations.

Development and validation of a new equation based on plasma creatinine and muscle mass assessed by CT scan to estimate glomerular filtration rate: a cross-sectional study

Background

Inter-individual variations of non-glomerular filtration rate (GFR) determinants of serum creatinine, such as muscle mass, account for the imperfect performance of estimated GFR (eGFR) equations. We aimed to develop an equation based on creatinine and total lumbar muscle cross-sectional area measured by unenhanced computed tomography scan at the third lumbar vertebra.

Methods

The muscle mass-based eGFR (MMB-eGFR) equation was developed in 118 kidney donor candidates (iohexol clearance) using linear regression. Validation cohorts included 114 healthy subjects from another center (⁵¹Cr-EDTA clearance, validation population 1), 55 patients with chronic diseases (iohexol, validation population 2), and 60 patients with highly discordant creatinine and cystatin C-based eGFR, thus presumed to have atypical non-GFR determinants of creatinine (⁵¹Cr-EDTA, validation population 3). Mean bias was the mean difference between eGFR and measured GFR, precision the standard deviation (SD) of the bias, and accuracy the percentage of eGFR values falling within 20% and 30% of measured GFR.

Results

In validation population 1, performance of MMB-eGFR was not different from those of CKD-EPI_Cr2009 and CKD-EPI_Cr2021. In validation population 2, MMB-eGFR was unbiased and displayed better precision than CKD-EPI_Cr2009, CKD-EPI_Cr2021 and EKFC (SD of the biases: 13.1 vs 16.5, 16.8 and 15.9 mL/min/1.73 m²). In validation population 3, MMB-eGFR had better precision and accuracy {accuracy within 30%: 75.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 64.0-86.0] vs 51.5% (95% CI 39.0-64.3) for CKD-EPI_Cr2009, 43.3% (95% CI 31.0-55.9) for CKD-EPICr2021, and 53.3% (95% CI 40.7-66.0) for EKFC}. Difference in bias between Black and white subjects was -2.1 mL/min/1.73 m² (95% CI -7.2 to 3.0), vs -8.4 mL/min/1.73 m² (95% CI -13.2 to -3.6) for CKD-EPI_Cr2021.

Conclusion

MMB-eGFR displayed better performances than equations based on demographics, and could be applied to subjects of various ethnic backgrounds.

Imprecision remains to be improved in the measurement of serum cystatin C with heterogeneous systems

OBJECTIVES

Except for the large bias of some measurement systems for serum cystatin C (CysC) measurements, unacceptable imprecision has been observed for the heterogenous system. This study analyzed the external quality assessment (EQA) results in 2018-2021 to provide an insight into the imprecision of CysC assays.

METHODS

Five EQA samples were sent to participating laboratories every year. Participants were divided into reagent/calibrator-based peer groups, for which the robust mean of each sample and robust coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated by Algorithm A from ISO 13528. Peers with more than 12 participants per year were selected for further analysis. The limit of CV was determined to be 4.85% based on clinical application requirements. The concentration-related effect on CVs was investigated using logarithmic curve fitting; the difference in medians and robust CVs between instrument-based subgroups was also evaluated.

RESULTS

The total number of participating laboratories increased from 845 to 1,695 in four years and heterogeneous systems remained the mainstream (≥85%). Of 18 peers with ≥12 participants, those using homogeneous systems showed relatively steady and small CVs over four years, with the mean four-year CVs ranging from 3.21 to 3.68%. Some peers using heterogenous systems showed reduced CVs over four years, while 7/15 still had unacceptable CVs in 2021 (5.01-8.34%). Six peers showed larger CVs at the low or high concentrations, and some instrument-based subgroups presented greater imprecision than others.

CONCLUSIONS

More efforts should be made to improve the imprecision of heterogeneous systems for CysC measurement.

Multicenter Validation of a Urine CXCL10 Assay for Noninvasive Monitoring of Renal Transplants

BACKGROUND

Urine CXCL10 (C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10, interferon gamma-induced protein 10 [IP10]) outperforms standard-of-care monitoring for detecting subclinical and early clinical T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and may advance TCMR therapy development through biomarker-enriched trials. The goal was to perform an international multicenter validation of a CXCL10 bead-based immunoassay (Luminex) for transplant surveillance and compare with an electrochemiluminescence-based (Meso Scale Discovery [MSD]) assay used in transplant trials.

METHODS

Four laboratories participated in the Luminex assay development and evaluation. Urine CXCL10 was measured by Luminex and MSD in 2 independent adult kidney transplant trial cohorts (Basel and TMCT04). In an independent test and validation set, a linear mixed-effects model to predict (log 10 -transformed) MSD CXCL10 from Luminex CXCL10 was developed to determine the conversion between assays. Net reclassification was determined after mathematical conversion.

RESULTS

The Luminex assay was precise, with an intra- and interassay coefficient of variation 8.1% and 9.3%; showed modest agreement between 4 laboratories (R 0.96 to 0.99, P < 0.001); and correlated with known CXCL10 in a single- (n = 100 urines, R 0.94 to 0.98, P < 0.001) and multicenter cohort (n = 468 urines, R 0.92, P < 0.001) but the 2 assays were not equivalent by Passing-Bablok regression. Linear mixed-effects modeling demonstrated an intercept of -0.490 and coefficient of 1.028, showing Luminex CXCL10 are slightly higher than MSD CXCL10, but the agreement is close to 1.0. After conversion of the biopsy thresholds, the decision to biopsy would be changed for only 6% (5/85) patients showing acceptable reclassification.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate this urine CXCL10 Luminex immunoassay is robust, reproducible, and accurate, indicating it can be readily translated into clinical HLA laboratories for serial posttransplant surveillance.

Cystatin C for kidney function assessment in patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Muscle mass (MM) impairment observed in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) may bias estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on creatinine (eGFRcreat). eGFR based on cystatin C (eGFRcys), produced by all nucleated cells, should be an interesting alternative. Main objectives were to compare eGFRcreat and eGRFcys for chronic kidney disease (CKD) staging and for annual eGFR evolution. Secondary objective was to analyse creatinine, cystatin C with measured MM.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

During 4 years, 159 FSHD patients having one or more creatinine and cystatin C measurements (total samples: n=379), with MM determination by bio-impedancemetry during their follow-up were included. eGFR were determined with CKD-Epi and EKFC equations.

RESULTS

On first examination samples, mean eGFRcys was significantly lower than mean eGFRcreat of 25.5 and 17.9 ml/min/1.73m² using CKD-Epi and EKFC equations, respectively. 53.5% (CKD-Epi) and 59.1% (EKFC) of agreement were obtained when using eGFRcys instead of eGFRcreat with reclassifications occurring mainly towards more severe stages. Age was correlated with cystatin C but not with creatinine, MM was correlated with creatinine but not with cystatin C. eGFR decreases >1 ml/min/1.73m² were more important when using eGFRcys instead of eGFRcreat (CKD-Epi: 37.5 vs 15.4%, p<0.001; EKFC: 34.6 vs 20.2%, p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Cystatin C which is independent of MM appears as a promising candidate biomarker for CKD diagnosis and follow-up in FSHD patient.

Cystatin C in addition to creatinine for better assessment of glomerular renal function decline in people with HIV receiving antiretroviral therapy

OBJECTIVE

To compare the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the creatinine equation (eGFRcreat) or the cystatin C equation (eGFRcys) in people with HIV (PWH) under antiretroviral drugs. We specifically included patients with an eGFRcreat around 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 to evaluate agreement on stage 2 and 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD) classification.

DESIGN

eGFRcreat, eGFRcys and resulting CKD staging were determined in 262 consecutive patients with HIV-1 (PWH) with a suppressed viral load (<200 copies/ml) under antiretroviral drugs and having impaired renal function (eGFRcreat between 45 and 80 ml/min per 1.73 m2). Antiretroviral drugs regimens were classified into eight groups: cobicistat (COBI)+elvitegravir (EVG), ritonavir (RTV)+protease inhibitor, dolutegravir (DTG), DTG+rilpivirine (RPV), RPV, raltegravir (RAL), bictegravir (BIC), and other antiretroviral drugs.

RESULTS

Mean eGFRcys was higher than mean eGFRcreat (77.7 ± 0.5 vs. 67.9  ± 7.9 ml/min per 1.73 m2, P < 0.0001). The differences were significant in five treatment groups with COBI/EVG; DTG; DTG+RPV; RPV; RAL. CKD classification was modified for 51% of patients when using eGFRcys instead of eGFRcreat, with reclassification to less severe stages in 37% and worse stages in 14%.

CONCLUSION

This study highlighted significant differences in eGFR depending on the renal marker used in PWH, having a significant impact on CKD classification. eGFRcys should be an additive tool for patients having eGFRcreat around 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 for better identification of renal impairment.

Performance of creatinine-based equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate in White and Black populations in Europe, Brazil and Africa

BACKGROUND

A new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation without the race variable has been recently proposed (CKD-EPIAS). This equation has neither been validated outside USA nor compared with the new European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) and Lund-Malmö Revised (LMREV) equations, developed in European cohorts.

METHODS

Standardized creatinine and measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from the European EKFC cohorts (n = 13 856 including 6031 individuals in the external validation cohort), from France (n = 4429, including 964 Black Europeans), from Brazil (n = 100) and from Africa (n = 508) were used to test the performances of the equations. A matched analysis between White Europeans and Black Africans or Black Europeans was performed.

RESULTS

In White Europeans (n = 9496), both the EKFC and LMREV equations outperformed CKD-EPIAS (bias of -0.6 and -3.2, respectively versus 5.0 mL/min/1.73 m², and accuracy within 30% of 86.9 and 87.4, respectively, versus 80.9%). In Black Europeans and Black Africans, the best performance was observed with the EKFC equation using a specific Q-value (= concentration of serum creatinine in healthy males and females). These results were confirmed in matched analyses, which showed that serum creatinine concentrations were different in White Europeans, Black Europeans and Black Africans for the same measured GFR, age, sex and body mass index. Creatinine differences were more relevant in males.

CONCLUSION

In a European and African cohort, the performances of CKD-EPIAS remain suboptimal. The EKFC equation, using usual or dedicated population-specific Q-values, presents the best performance in the whole age range in the European and African populations included in this study.

Standardization of serum creatinine is essential for accurate use of unbiased estimated GFR equations: evidence from three cohorts matched on renal function

BACKGROUND

Differences in the performance of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations have been attributed to the mathematical form of the equations and to differences between patient demographics and measurement methods. We evaluated differences in serum creatinine (SCr) and eGFR in cohorts matched for age, sex, body mass index (BMI) and measured GFR (mGFR).

METHODS

White North Americans from Minnesota (n = 1093) and the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) (n = 1548) and White subjects from the European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) cohort (n = 7727) were matched for demographic patient characteristics (sex, age ± 3 years, BMI ± 2.5 kg/m2) and renal function (mGFR ± 3 ml/min/1.73 m2). SCr was measured with isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS)-traceable assays in the Minnesota and EKFC cohorts and with non-standardized SCr assays recalculated to IDMS in the CRIC. The Minnesota cohort and CRIC shared a common method to measure GFR (renal clearance of iothalamate), while the EKFC cohort used a variety of exogenous markers and methods, all with recognized sufficient accuracy. We compared the SCr levels and eGFR predictions [for Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and EKFC equations] of patients fulfilling these matching criteria.

RESULTS

For 305 matched individuals, mean SCr (mg/dL) was not different between the Minnesota and EKFC cohorts (females 0.83 ± 0.20 versus 0.86 ± 0.23, males 1.06 ± 0.23 versus 1.12 ± 0.37; P > .05) but significantly different from the CRIC [females 1.13 ± 0.23 (P < .0001), males 1.42 ± 0.31 (P < .0001)]. The CKD-EPI equations performed better than the EKFC equation in the CRIC, while the opposite was true in the Minnesota and EKFC cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Significant differences in SCr concentrations between the Minnesota and EKFC cohorts versus CRIC were observed in subjects with the same level of mGFR and equal demographic characteristics and can be explained by the difference in SCr calibration.

The race coefficient in glomerular filtration rate-estimating equations and its removal

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review new publications about the use of the race coefficient in glomerular filtration rate (GFR)-estimating equations since this topic was last reviewed a year ago in Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension .

RECENT FINDINGS

Accounting for race (or genetic ancestry) does improve the performance of GFR-estimating equations when serum creatinine (SCr) is used as the filtration marker but not when cystatin C is used. The National Kidney Foundation (NKF)-American Society of Nephrology (ASN) Task Force on Reassessing the Inclusion of Race in Diagnosing Kidney Disease recommended immediate adoption of a new refitted SCr-based equation without race and increased use of cystatin C. This report has created consensus but the endorsed new SCr equation without race underestimates GFR in Black Americans and overestimates GFR in non-Black Americans, which may result in diminished ability to detect racial disparities.

SUMMARY

The approach recommended by the NKF-ASN Task Force represents a compromise attempting to balance a number of competing values, including racial justice, benefit of classifying more Black Americans as having (more severe) chronic kidney disease, accuracy compared with measured GFR, and financial cost. The full implications of adopting the race-free refitted CKD-EPI SCr equation are yet to be known.

New strategies to improve clinical outcomes for diabetic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD), the most common cause of kidney failure and end-stage kidney disease worldwide, will develop in almost half of all people with type 2 diabetes. With the incidence of type 2 diabetes continuing to increase, early detection and management of DKD is of great clinical importance.

MAIN BODY

This review provides a comprehensive clinical update for DKD in people with type 2 diabetes, with a special focus on new treatment modalities. The traditional strategies for prevention and treatment of DKD, i.e., glycemic control and blood pressure management, have only modest effects on minimizing glomerular filtration rate decline or progression to end-stage kidney disease. While cardiovascular outcome trials of SGLT-2i show a positive effect of SGLT-2i on several kidney disease-related endpoints, the effect of GLP-1 RA on kidney-disease endpoints other than reduced albuminuria remain to be established. Non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists also evoke cardiovascular and kidney protective effects.

CONCLUSION

With these new agents and the promise of additional agents under clinical development, clinicians will be more able to personalize treatment of DKD in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Advantages, Limitations, and Clinical Considerations in Using Cystatin C to Estimate GFR

Cystatin C has been shown to be a reliable and accurate marker of kidney function across diverse populations. The 2012 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines recommended using cystatin C to confirm the diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD) determined by creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and to estimate kidney function when accurate eGFR estimates are needed for clinical decision-making. In the efforts to remove race from eGFR calculations in the United States, the National Kidney Foundation (NKF) and American Society of Nephrology (ASN) Joint Task Force recommended increasing availability and clinical adoption of cystatin C to assess kidney function. This review summarizes the key advantages and limitations of cystatin C use in clinical practice. Our goals were to review and discuss the literature on cystatin C; understand the evidence behind the recommendations for its use as a marker of kidney function to diagnose CKD and risk stratify patients for adverse outcomes; discuss the challenges of its use in clinical practice; and guide clinicians on its interpretation.

Improving acute kidney injury diagnostic precision using biomarkers

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in hospitalized patients of all ages and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Accurate prediction and early identification of AKI is of utmost importance because no therapy exists to mitigate AKI once it has occurred. Yet, serum creatinine lacks adequate sensitivity and specificity, and quantification of urine output is challenging in incontinent children without indwelling bladder catheters. Integration of clinically available biomarkers have the potential to delineate unique AKI phenotypes that could have important prognostic and therapeutic implications. Plasma Cystatin C, urine neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin (NGAL) and the urinary product of tissue inhibitor metalloproteinase (TIMP-2) and insulin growth factor binding protein-7 (IGFBP7) are clinically available. These biomarkers have been studied in heterogenous populations across the age spectrum and in a variety of clinical settings for prediction of AKI. The purpose of this review is to describe and discuss the clinically available AKI biomarkers including how they have been used to delineate AKI phenotypes.

The « race » correction in estimating glomerular filtration rate: an European point of view

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is currently a heated debate ongoing whether or not to use the race coefficient for black people in the Modification of Diet in Renal Diseases and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology-equation. The use of the race coefficient is thought by several American authors as a source of discrimination.

RECENT FINDINGS

It has recently been shown that the race coefficient is inaccurate in European and African black people. Therefore, it seems that the race correction is more a correction for black Americans, rather than for black in general. This 'correction' at the glomerular filtration rate (GFR)-level has been criticized, as it is misleading, and should be abandoned, as it has not been shown that GFR is different between black and white people. However, as differences in creatinine generation between black and white people might exist, a correction or adjustment, different for black and white people, at the creatinine level might be required, very similar to the different scaling of creatinine for males and females.

SUMMARY

The current debate on the race coefficient is particularly difficult because of the absence of good scientific data in black subjects and there lies the real discrimination in our opinion. We therefore call for future dedicated studies, both in Europe and USA.

The spectrum of kidney function alterations in adolescents with a solitary functioning kidney

BACKGROUND

A precise assessment of glomerular filtration rate is key to delineate the care of children with a solitary functioning kidney (SFK). Data regarding measured GFR (mGFR) in this population is restricted to a single study of 77 individuals, which suggested that a GFR estimation (eGFR) method based on creatinine and cystatin C (eGFR-CKiD2) performed better than Schwartz's equation (eGFR-Schwartz).

METHODS

We measured GFR in 210 consecutive adolescents (7 to 22 years old) with an SFK referred to our institution between 2014 and 2019 and in 43 young candidates for kidney donation (18 to 25 years old). We compared the distribution of mGFR in both groups and determined the factors associated with reduced mGFR in adolescents with an SFK. We further compared different eGFR formulas with mGFR and assessed the association of mGFR and eGFRs with PTH and FGF23, two early indicators of GFR reduction.

RESULTS

While adolescents with an SFK had a similar median mGFR to healthy controls (103 ± 24ml/min/1.73m² vs. 107 ± 12 ml/min/1.73m²), the fraction of individuals with an mGFR below 90 ml/min/1.73m² was higher in patients with SFK (23% vs. 5% in controls; P = 0.005). Multiple linear regression identified older age, ipsilateral abnormalities of the urinary tract, lack of compensatory hypertrophy, and treated hypertension as independent factors associated with reduced mGFR. A smaller bias using eGFR-Schwartz (95% confidence interval (95%CI): 3 to 7) was revealed when compared to other eGFR. Compared to eGFR-Schwartz, mGFR showed a stronger correlation with PTH (r = 0.04 vs. r = 0.1) and FGF23 (r = 0.03 vs. r = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

SFK is not a benign condition, since 20% of the patients display altered kidney function. Our results raise caution regarding the use of the cystatin-based equation. mGFR shows a better ability than eGFR-Schwartz to differentiate patients showing early homeostatic adaptation to GFR reduction.

AACC Guidance Document on Laboratory Investigation of Acute Kidney Injury

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a sudden episode of kidney damage or failure affecting up to 15% of hospitalized patients and is associated with serious short- and long-term complications, mortality, and health care costs. Current practices to diagnose and stage AKI are variable and do not factor in our improved understanding of the biological and analytical variability of creatinine. In addition, the emergence of biomarkers, for example, cystatin C, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 2, and electronic notification tools for earlier detection of AKI, highlights the need for updated recommendations to address these developments.

CONTENT

This AACC Academy guidance document is intended to provide laboratorians and clinicians up-to-date information regarding current best practices for the laboratory investigation of AKI. Topics covered include: clinical indications for further investigating potential AKI, analytical considerations for creatinine assays, the impact of biological variability on diagnostic thresholds, defining "baseline" creatinine, role of traditional markers (urine sodium, fractional excretion of sodium, fractional excretion of urea, and blood urea-to-creatinine ratio), urinary microscopic examination, new biomarkers, improving AKI-associated test utilization, and the utility of automated AKI alerts.

SUMMARY

The previous decade brought us a significant number of new studies characterizing the performance of existing and new biomarkers, as well as potential new tools for early detection and notification of AKI. This guidance document is intended to inform clinicians and laboratorians on the best practices for the laboratory investigation of AKI, based on expert recommendations where the preponderance of evidence is available.

Assessment of kidney function: clinical indications for measured GFR

In the vast majority of cases, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is estimated using serum creatinine, which is highly influenced by age, sex, muscle mass, body composition, severe chronic illness and many other factors. This often leads to misclassification of patients or potentially puts patients at risk for inappropriate clinical decisions. Possible solutions are the use of cystatin C as an alternative endogenous marker or performing direct measurement of GFR using an exogenous marker such as iohexol. The purpose of this review is to highlight clinical scenarios and conditions such as extreme body composition, Black race, disagreement between creatinine- and cystatin C-based estimated GFR (eGFR), drug dosing, liver cirrhosis, advanced chronic kidney disease and the transition to kidney replacement therapy, non-kidney solid organ transplant recipients and living kidney donors where creatinine-based GFR estimation may be invalid. In contrast to the majority of literature on measured GFR (mGFR), this review does not include aspects of mGFR for research or public health settings but aims to reach practicing clinicians and raise their understanding of the substantial limitations of creatinine. While including cystatin C as a renal biomarker in GFR estimating equations has been shown to increase the accuracy of the GFR estimate, there are also limitations to eGFR based on cystatin C alone or the combination of creatinine and cystatin C in the clinical scenarios described above that can be overcome by measuring GFR with an exogenous marker. We acknowledge that mGFR is not readily available in many centres but hope that this review will highlight and promote the expansion of kidney function diagnostics using standardized mGFR procedures as an important milestone towards more accurate and personalized medicine.

The progression of serum cystatin C concentrations within the first month of life after preterm birth-a worldwide systematic review

Multiple single-center studies have examined the progression of kidney function biomarkers such as serum cystatin C (Cys C) in the first 30 days of life (DOL) after preterm birth, but from different ethnicities and in different gestational ages (GA), without a functional summary available. We performed a systematic literature review within PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus, with additional use of the snowballing method to find studies including data on serum Cys C concentrations in the first 30 DOL. We identified 15 papers that met criteria, published from 2000 to 2019, from 10 countries across 4 continents, in 1468 babies born preterm. Cys C was superior to creatinine in 11/13 studies, and equal in 2/13. For infants born at 24-28 weeks GA, the DOL1 Cys C concentrations ranged from 1.44 to 1.90 mg/L, from 1.20 to 1.77 on DOL3, and from 1.36 to 2.02 between DOL 4 and 30. For infants born at 29-33 weeks GA, the DOL1 Cys C values ranged from 1.41 to 1.96 mg/L, from 1.28 to 1.70 on DOL3, and 1.51 to 1.87 between DOL 4 and 30. For preterm infants born after 34 weeks GA, the DOL1 Cys C values ranged from 1.22 to 1.96 mg/L, from 1.24 to 1.85 on DOL3, and 1.22 to 1.82 between DOL 4 and 30. This systematic review provides generalizable worldwide reference data on Cys C that could be used to estimate progression or resolution of abnormal kidney function in the first months after preterm birth, stratified by GA.

The Diagnostic Value of Cystatin C and Mild Hypothermia Therapy Based on Immunoturbidimetry Enhanced by Nanospheres in Asphyxia Neonate

In order to evaluate the early diagnosis value of CysC and the influence of mild hypothermia on the renal damage of asphyxia neonates, the serum cystatin C (CysC) levels of asphyxia neonates and normal neonates were measured by the nanomicrosphere-enhanced immunoturbidimetric method. The treatment was carried out, and the influence of mild hypothermia treatment on the renal damage of asphyxia neonates was analyzed. The results showed that the indicators of the asphyxia group were significantly higher than those of the control group, and the severe asphyxia group was significantly higher than that of the mild asphyxia group, which was statistically significant $\left(p<0.05\right)$ ; the heart rate of patients in the mild hypothermia treatment group decreased gradually with the decrease in body temperature. And compared with the control group, there was a significant difference ( $p<0.05$ ); after symptomatic treatment, the two groups of ALT, AST, BUN, and SCR were improved to varying degrees, and the difference was statistically significant compared with before treatment ( $p<0.05$ ). Studies have shown that serum CysC level can be used as an indicator to detect glomerular filtration function and early asphyxia newborns, and it is sensitive and specific for early diagnosis of kidney damage. At the same time, it can be used to monitor clinical renal function and determine the status of asphyxia newborns.

GFR Estimation After Cystatin C Reference Material Change

Introduction

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is routinely estimated with cystatin C. In June 2010, the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) released a certified cystatin C reference material (ERM-DA471/IFCC), and new cystatin C glomerular filtration rate estimation (eGFR) equations were developed with the IFCC standard. Early in 2018, Siemens discontinued their nonstandardized cystatin C reagent kits and replaced them with IFCC-calibrated kits in the US market. The aim of the current study was to assess the effect of IFCC calibration on cystatin C values and corresponding GFR estimations.

Methods

Cystatin C concentration was measured in 81 pediatric patients using a plasma sample from their nuclear GFR measurement with 99mTc-diethylenetriaminepentaaccetic acid. Calibration curves were generated using Siemens nonstandardized and IFCC-standardized kits to measure paired cystatin C concentrations in each sample. GFR-estimating equations using pre-IFCC and IFCC cystatin C values were compared using Bland-Altman analyses.

Results

The IFCC-standardized assay resulted in a mean increase in the measured cystatin C value of 24%. Estimating equations consistently overestimated GFR prior to IFCC standardization. Following incorporation of the IFCC standard, the Full Age Spectrum equation demonstrated the best overall performance, whereas the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children (CKiD) equation was more accurate in children with decreased GFR.

Conclusion

Incorporation of the IFCC standard significantly increased cystatin C values and affected the performance of GFR estimating equations. Clinical laboratories and providers may need to update the equation used for cystatin C-based estimation of GFR following adoption of the IFCC reference standard.

Cystatin C as a biomarker of chronic kidney disease: latest developments

INTRODUCTION

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is common, occurring in over 10% of individuals globally, and is increasing in prevalence. The limitations of traditional biomarkers of renal dysfunction, such as serum creatinine, have been well demonstrated in the literature. Therefore, augmenting clinical assessment with newer biomarkers, such as serum cystatin C, has the potential to improve disease monitoring and patient care.

AREAS COVERED

The present paper assesses the utility and limitations of serum cystatin C as a biomarker for CKD in light of the current literature.

EXPERT OPINION

Serum cystatin C has been well established as an early and accurate biomarker of CKD that is particularly helpful in patients for whom creatinine is an inadequate marker or for whom more cumbersome methods of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurement are impractical. Current research questions are no longer focused on if, but rather when and how often cystatin C should be used in the evaluation of CKD patients. However, transition of all reagents and estimated GFR equations to the newly established International Standard is critical for developing generalizable data.

Chronic Kidney Disease in Adolescents after Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease

BACKGROUND

The onset of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an important prognostic factor in young adults with congenital heart disease (CHD). Although it is likely that CKD is manifest early in CHD patients, the prevalence among adolescents is still unknown. The National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guidelines 2012 recommend new equations for the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and highlight the importance of albuminuria for CKD screening. The objective of the present study was to estimate the prevalence of CKD in CHD adolescents.

METHODS

This observational cross-sectional study included 115 patients aged 10-18 years attending the cardiologic outpatient clinic at our institution as a follow-up after cardiac surgery in infancy related to various CHDs. CKD assessment used the CKD criteria 2012, including eGFR equations based on serum creatinine and cystatin C, and measurement of albuminuria.

RESULTS

No patient had an eGFR <60 mL min-1 1.73 m-2. However, 28.7% of all patients (95% CI 20.7-37.9) had eGFRbetween 60 and 89 mL min-1 1.73 m-2 when estimated by the bedside Schwartz creatinine-based equation,and 17.4% (95% CI 11.2-24.1) had eGFRbetween 60 and 89 mL min-1 1.73 m-2 when estimated by the Zappitelli equation, combining creatinine and cystatin C. Of all patients, 20.0% (95% CI 12.1-26.7) had orthostatic proteinuria, and none had persistent albuminuria.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no evidence of CKD in the present population aged 10-18 years. The significance of an eGFR between 60 and 90 mL min-1 1.73 m-2 is not concordant for this age range and requires further investigations.

Glomerular filtration rate: when to measure and in which patients?

Of the glomerular, tubular and endocrine functions of the kidney, nephrologists have mostly focused their attention on the glomerular functions-albuminuria and glomerular filtration rate (GFR)-to grade the severity of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although both albuminuria and GFR are associated with renal and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, the utility of measured GFR (mGFR) has been questioned. GFR when measured adequately is the most precise measure of glomerular function and can be useful to individualize therapy among patients with CKD. In situations where estimated GFR is known to provide imprecise estimates of glomerular function, for example, sarcopenia and advanced cirrhosis, the measurement of GFR may be especially important. We discuss several clinical situations where mGFR can potentially influence the quality of life or complications of therapy because of interventions based on imperfect knowledge of GFR. We reason that although large databases may not detect the benefits of mGFR at the population level, precision medicine requires that therapy be individualized based on the best estimate of GFR that can be obtained particularly when the risk of harm is increased. The recent standardization of mGFRs is a step in the right direction and may help in treating the individual patient with CKD with a lower risk of complications and a better quality of life. We call for research in these subgroups of patients where it is clinically felt that mGFR is useful for clinical decision-making.

Increased levels of glycosylated hemoglobin, microalbuminuria and serum cystatin C predict adverse outcomes in high-risk pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus

In the present study, the predictive value of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), microalbuminuria (24 h mAlb) and serum cystatin C (Cys-C) levels on the outcome of pregnancy in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) was investigated. Samples of 144 females with GDM and 117 normal pregnant females as controls were selected for retrospective analysis. The following parameters were compared between the two groups: Levels of HbA1c, Cys-C and 24 h mAlb, maternal pregnancy outcome and adverse pregnancy rate. The predictive value of elevated 24 h mAlb, HbA1c and Cys-C regarding an adverse pregnancy outcome was then determined. Cys-C, 24 h mAlb and HbA1c levels in the GDM group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.001). The adverse pregnancy rate in the GDM group was significantly higher than that in the control group (40.97 vs. 16.24%; P<0.001). Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses indicated that, in subjects with GDM, HbA1c, Cys-C and 24 h mAlb levels were closely associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes (P<0.050) and may be considered as predictors for an adverse pregnancy outcome (risk ratio >1). Linear correlation analyses indicated that HbA1c, Cys-C and 24 h mAlb were negatively correlated with the neonatal Apgar scores (r=-0.509, -0.954 and -0.954, respectively; P<0.001). According to ROC analysis, the combined predictive sensitivity of HbAlc, Cys-C and 24 h mAlb for adverse pregnancy outcome in patients with GDM was 96.49% and the specificity was 77.19%. The increase in HbAlc, Cys-C and 24 h mAlb levels is expected to be an effective predictor of adverse pregnancy outcomes in high-risk pregnant women.

Determination of Cystatin C in human urine by isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry

This work presents the development of a methodology for the accurate and precise quantification of the renal biomarker Cystatin C in human urine by Isotope Dilution Mass Spectrometry (IDMS). The procedure is based on the addition of a known quantity of the proteotypic peptide ALDFAVG*EYNK labelled with ¹³C₂-glycine to the urine sample followed by protein hydrolysis using trypsin. Then, preconcentration and purification of the isotope diluted peptide was carried out by a selective monoclonal antibody bound to magnetic beads and final measurement was done after injection of the sample in a HPLC-MS/MS triple quadrupole instrument. The isotopic distribution of the isotope diluted proteotypic peptide was measured by low resolution selected reaction monitoring. Using this aquisition mode, the bandpass of the first quadrupole was widened (FWHM =13 u) so the whole isotopic clusters for both the natural abundance and the labelled peptides entered the collision cell. The proposed acquisition mode provided similar accuracy and precision than the regular SRM mode (FWHM =0.7 u) but a higher sensitivity was observed. The purification of the sample by antibody based enrichment of the target peptide was shown to remove interfering compounds more efficiently in comparison with a sample purification based on semipreparative liquid chromatography. Using 5 ng of the labelled peptide it was possible to quantify Cystatin C in human urine in patients with normal and impaired renal function. Recoveries from 100 to 104% were obtained in samples containing from 90 to 700 μg L^-1 of Cystatin C with relative standard deviations from 0.5 to 6%. The stability of Cystatin C in urine samples was evaluated under different storage conditions showing that only when the urine samples were stored at room temperature during more than 10 days, a significant degradation of Cystatin C was observed.

Renal Precision Medicine in Neonates and Acute Kidney Injury: How to Convert a Cloud of Creatinine Observations to Support Clinical Decisions

Renal precision medicine in neonates is useful to support decision making on pharmacotherapy, signal detection of adverse (drug) events, and individual prediction of short- and long-term prognosis. To estimate kidney function or glomerular filtration rate (GFR), the most commonly measured and readily accessible biomarker is serum creatinine (S_cr). However, there is extensive variability in S_cr observations and GFR estimates within the neonatal population, because of developmental physiology and superimposed pathology. Furthermore, assay related differences still matter for S_cr, but also exist for Cystatin C. Observations in extreme low birth weight (ELBW) and term asphyxiated neonates will illustrate how renal precision medicine contributes to neonatal precision medicine. When the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) definition of acute kidney injury (AKI) is used, this results in an incidence up to 50% in ELBW neonates, associated with increased mortality and morbidity. However, urine output criteria needed adaptations to broader time intervals or weight trends, while S_cr and its trends do not provide sufficient detail on kidney function between ELBW neonates. Instead, we suggest to use assay-specific centile S_cr values to better describe postnatal trends and have illustrated its relevance by quantifying an adverse drug event (ibuprofen) and by explaining individual amikacin clearance. Term asphyxiated neonates also commonly display AKI. While oliguria is a specific AKI indicator, the majority of term asphyxiated cases are non-oliguric. Asphyxia results in a clinical significant-commonly transient-mean GFR decrease (-50%) with a lower renal drug elimination. But there is still major (unexplained) inter-individual variability in GFR and subsequent renal drug elimination between these asphyxiated neonates. Recently, the Baby-NINJA (nephrotoxic injury negated by just-in-time action) study provided evidence on the concept that a focus on nephrotoxic injury negation has a significant impact on AKI incidence and severity. It is hereby important to realize that follow-up should not be discontinued at discharge, as there are concerns about long-term renal outcome. These illustrations suggest that integration of renal (patho)physiology into neonatal precision medicine are an important tool to improve contemporary neonatal care, not only for the short-term but also with a positive health impact throughout life.

Validation of standardized creatinine and cystatin C GFR estimating equations in a large multicentre European cohort of children

BACKGROUND

Most validations of paediatric glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimating equations using standardized creatinine (CR) and cystatin C (CYS) assays have comprised relatively small cohorts, which makes accuracy across subgroups of GFR, age, body mass index (BMI) and gender uncertain. To overcome this, a large cohort of children referred for GFR determination has been established from several European medical centres.

METHODS

Three thousand four hundred eight measurements of GFR (mGFR) using plasma clearance of exogenous substances were performed in 2218 children aged 2-17 years. Validated equations included Schwartz-2009_CR/2012_{CR/CYS/CR+CYS}, FAS_{CR/CYS/CR+CYS}, LMR_CR, Schwartz-Lyon_CR, Berg_CYS, CAPA_CYS, CKD-EPI_CYS, Andersen_CR+CYS and arithmetic means of the best single-marker equations in explorative analysis. Five metrics were used to compare the performance of the GFR equations: bias, precision and three accuracy measures including the percentage of GFR estimates (eGFR) within ± 10% (P₁₀) and ± 30% (P₃₀) of mGFR.

RESULTS

Three of the cystatin C equations, Berg_CYS, CAPA_CYS and CKD-EPI_CYS, exhibited low bias and generally satisfactory accuracy across all levels of mGFR; CKD-EPI_CYS had more stable performance across gender than the two other equations. Among creatinine equations, Schwartz-Lyon_CR had the best performance but was inaccurate at mGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m² and in underweight patients. Arithmetic means of the best creatinine and cystatin C equations above improved bias compared to the existing composite creatinine+cystatin C equations.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study strongly suggests that cystatin C should be the primary biomarker of choice when estimating GFR in children with decreased GFR. Arithmetic means of well-performing single-marker equations improve accuracy further at most mGFR levels and have practical advantages compared to composite equations.

Validation of a Metabolite Panel for a More Accurate Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Using Quantitative LC-MS/MS

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice guidelines recommend estimation of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using validated equations based on serum creatinine (eGFRcr), cystatin C (eGFRcys), or both (eGFRcr-cys). However, when compared with the measured GFR (mGFR), only eGFRcr-cys meets recommended performance standards. Our goal was to develop a more accurate eGFR method using a panel of metabolites without creatinine, cystatin C, or demographic variables.

METHODS

An ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay for acetylthreonine, phenylacetylglutamine, pseudouridine, and tryptophan was developed, and a 20-day, multiinstrument analytical validation was conducted. The assay was tested in 2424 participants with mGFR data from 4 independent research studies. A new GFR equation (eGFRmet) was developed in a random subset (n = 1615) and evaluated in the remaining participants (n = 809). Performance was assessed as the frequency of large errors [estimates that differed from mGFR by at least 30% (1 - P30); goal <10%].

RESULTS

The assay had a mean imprecision (≤10% intraassay, ≤6.9% interassay), linearity over the quantitative range (r 2 > 0.98), and analyte recovery (98.5%-113%). There was no carryover, no interferences observed, and analyte stability was established. In addition, 1 - P30 in the validation set for eGFRmet (10.0%) was more accurate than eGFRcr (13.1%) and eGFRcys (12.0%) but not eGFRcr-cys (8.7%). Combining metabolites, creatinine, cystatin C, and demographics led to the most accurate equation (7.0%). Neither equation had substantial variation among population subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

The new eGFRmet equation could serve as a confirmatory test for GFR estimation.

Analytical performances of PENIA and PETIA urinary cystatin C determination allow tubular injury investigation

Background

The study was designed to evaluate the analytical performances of two ERM-DA471/IFCC traceable cystatin C (CysC) reagents available on the market for urinary CysC (u-CysC) quantification. In addition, clinical relevance was assessed by measuring u-CysC in healthy controls and in patients with tubular dysfunction.

Methods

CysC in urine was measured by a particle-enhanced nephelometric immunoassay using Siemens reagents and by a particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay using DiaSys reagents. Imprecision, linearity, limit of detection and limit of quantification were evaluated according to CLSI recommendations. The two methods were tested on 150 urinary samples from 50 healthy subjects, 50 HIV patients with tubular dysfunction and 50 patients who developed acute kidney acute injury.

Results

Within-laboratory coefficients of variations were below 4%. The lower limit of quantification of the assay was found at 0.043 and 0.046 mg/L for DiaSys and Siemens, respectively. The following Passing-Bablok regression equations were obtained: DiaSys = 0.99 Siemens + 0.00. Using Bland-Altman analysis, the mean bias was –0.004 mg/L on the analytical range between 0.02 and 1 mg/L. Median u-CysC in 50 HIV patients with tubular dysfunction and in 50 patients with AKI was higher than in control subjects.

Conclusions

Both Siemens and DiaSys reagents demonstrated reliable and reproducible performances allowing easy determination of u-CysC on automated platforms in clinical practice with potential interest for the detection of tubular dysfunction.

Performance of Cystatin C-Based Equations for Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate in Diabetes Patients: A Prisma-Compliant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The accuracy of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients has been extensively questioned. We evaluated the performance of cystatin C-based equations alone or in combination with creatinine to estimate GFR in DM patients. A PRISMA-compliant systematic review was performed in the MEDLINE and Embase databases, with “diabetes mellitus” and “cystatin C” as search terms. Studies comparing cystatin C-based eGFR equations with measured GFR (mGFR) in DM patients were eligible. Accuracies P10, P15, P20, and P30 indicated the proportion of eGFR results within 10, 15, 20, and 30% of mGFR. Single-arm meta-analyses were conducted, and the Quality of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-II tool (QUADAS-2) was applied. Twenty-three studies comprising 7065 participants were included, and 24 equations were analyzed in a broad range of GFRs. Meta-analyses were completed for 10 equations. The mean P30 accuracies of the equations ranged from 41% to 87%, with the highest values found with both CKD-EPI equations. Mean P10-P15 achieved 35% in the best scenario. A sensitivity analysis to evaluate different mGFR methods did not change results. In conclusion, cystatin C-based eGFR equations represent measured GFR fairly at best in DM patients, with high variability among the several proposed equations.

Estimating glomerular filtration rate in children: evaluation of creatinine- and cystatin C-based equations

BACKGROUND

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimated by creatinine- and/or cystatin C-based equations (eGFR) is widely used in daily practice. The purpose of our study was to compare new and old eGFR equations with measured GFR (mGFR) by iohexol clearance in a cohort of children with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

We examined 96 children (median age 9.2 years (range 0.25-17.5)) with CKD stages 1-5. A 7-point iohexol clearance (GFR7p) was defined as the reference method (median mGFR 66 mL/min/1.73 m², range 6-153). Ten different eGFR equations, with or without body height, were evaluated: Schwartz_bedside, Schwartz_CKiD, Schwartz_cysC, CAPA, LM_REV, (LM_REV + CAPA) / 2, FAS_crea, FAS_cysC, FAS_combi, FAS_height. The accuracy was evaluated with percentage within 10 and 30% of GFR7p (P10 and P30).

RESULTS

In the group with mGFR below 60 mL/min/1.73 m², the Schwartz_cysC equation had the lowest median bias (interquartile range; IQR) 3.27 (4.80) mL/min/1.73 m² and the highest accuracy with P10 of 44% and P30 of 85%. In the group with mGFR above 60 mL/min/1.73 m², the Schwartz_CKiD presented with the lowest bias 3.41 (13.1) mL/min/1.73 m² and P10 of 62% and P30 of 98%. Overall, the Schwartz_cysC had the lowest bias - 1.49 (13.5) mL/min/1.73 m² and both Schwartz_cysC and Schwartz_CKiD showed P30 of 90%. P10 was 44 and 48%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Schwartz_cysC and the combined Schwartz_CKiD present with lower bias and higher accuracy as compared to the other equations. The Schwartz_cysC equation is a good height-independent alternative to the Schwartz_CKiD equation in children and can be reported directly by the laboratory information system.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov , Identifier NCT01092260, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01092260?term=tondel&rank=2.

The value of serum cystatin C in early evaluation of renal insufficiency in patients undergoing chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Several studies have shown that cystatin C levels can be used to detect decline in renal function in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, and can serve as a supplement to creatinine level measurement for early detection of renal insufficiency. Nevertheless, use of the parameter remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the value of serum cystatin C levels in evaluation of early renal insufficiency due to chemotherapy.

METHODS

Studies were retrieved from PubMed, Ovid Embase, the Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Ovid, and the CNKI databases up to May 15, 2018. Serum levels of cystatin C before and after chemotherapy were evaluated for its ability to assess renal function.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies, including 1775 participants, met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Pooled analysis revealed that the levels of serum cystatin C in cancer patients after chemotherapy were significantly higher than those of patients prior to treatment [standard mean difference (SMD) = 0.54, 95% CI 0.34-0.74, P = 0.0000]. Compared to creatinine, serum cystatin C increased significantly in the early phases of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) change before and after chemotherapy (GFR ≥ 90 ml/min/1.73 m², P < 0.05 vs. P > 0.05, 5.83%; 60 < GFR < 90 ml/min/1.73 m², P < 0.01 vs. P > 0.01, 38.83%) and increased more substantially in the later phases (GFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m², P < 0.01 vs. P < 0.01, 70.87% vs. 23.09%). However, creatinine decreased even in the early phases and did not increase in an obvious manner until the later phases (GFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m², P < 0.01, 23.09%). The GFR values were derived from measured methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Cystatin C may be superior to creatinine for the detection of minor changes in GFR in early stages of renal insufficiency secondary to chemotherapy. More studies are needed to further verify this result.

Novel glomerular filtration markers

Chronic kidney disease is currently assessed by estimated glomerular filtration rate, a mathematical construct based on creatinine or creatinine and cystatin concentration. Creatinine-based equations have improved with standardization efforts and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study (MDRD) and CKD-Epidemiology Collaboration Study (CKD-EPI). Because the measurement of creatinine is subject to interference from non-GFR determinants, alternative markers have long been sought. These have included cystatin C and low molecular weight proteins like β2-microglobulin and beta trace protein. Tubular disease often occurs before glomerular filtration is impaired and investigators have investigated the excretion of other low molecular weight proteins such as Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin (NGAL) and Kidney Injury Molecule-1 and N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase. While preliminary, there is some evidence linking these analytes with GFR, disease stage and mortality. Although asymmetrical dimethyl arginine, an inhibitor of nitric oxide, has been shown to be associated with progression of renal disease, symmetric dimethyl arginine may be a better marker. Recent work has also explored the potential of microRNA (miRNA) analysis and metabolomics studies to further elucidate this complex pathophysiologic disease process. Investigators hope to improve our ability to detect CKD by the use of test panels, i.e., various marker combinations thereof. Unfortunately, most of these markers lack standardization unlike traditional measures that rely on creatinine and cystatin C measurement.

A Validation Study on eGFR Equations in Chinese Patients With Diabetic or Non-diabetic CKD

Aims: It remains controversial to choose the optimal equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with diabetes. Materials and Methods: Two hundred and fifteen diabetic CKD patients and 192 non-diabetic CKD patients were enrolled in this study. Iohexol GFR, serum creatinine (SCr), and Cystatin C(CysC) were measured simultaneously for each patient. SCr- and CysC-based estimated GFR (eGFR) were calculated through eight equations, including three CKD-EPI equations, Revised Lund-Malmö study equation (RLM), CAPA equation, and three Full Age Spectrum (FAS) equations. Bias, precision, and accuracy were compared among eGFR equations with iohexol-GFR serving as measured GFR (mGFR). Independent predictive factors of accuracy were explored using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: In the diabetic group, CKD-EPI_SCr-CysC showed the best performance among three CKD-EPI equations (interquartile range of 13.88 ml/min/1.73 m² and 30% accuracy of 72.56%). Compared to CKD-EPI_SCr-CysC, the other five equations did not significantly improve the performance of GFR estimates. Mostly, eGFR equations were less accurate in diabetic group than in non-diabetic group. Significant differences were found in different mGFR range (P < 0.001). The multivariate logistic regression analysis identified that BMI, mGFR, and diabetic kidney disease (DKD) status were independent predictors of accuracy of three equations in diabetic group. HbA1c was a predictor of accuracy of CKD-EPI_SCr and CKD-EPI_CysC in diabetic group. Conclusions: This study showed that eGFR equations were less accurate in the diabetic group than in the non-diabetic group. CKD-EPI_Scr-CysC had the best performance among CKD-EPI equations in Chinese diabetic CKD patients. The other five equations did not significantly improve the performance of GFR estimates. BMI, mGFR, DKD status, and HbA1c were independent factors associated with accuracy in eGFR equations.

GFR estimation based on standardized creatinine and cystatin C: a European multicenter analysis in older adults

BACKGROUND

Although recommended by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPICR) creatinine equation was not targeted to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) among older adults. The Berlin Initiative Study (BIS1CR) equation was specifically developed in older adults, and the Lund-Malmö revised (LMRCR) and the Full Age Spectrum (FASCR) equations have shown promising results in older adults. Our aim was to validate these four creatinine equations, including addition of cystatin C in a large multicenter cohort of Europeans ≥70 years.

METHODS

A total of 3226 individuals (2638 with cystatin C) underwent GFR measurement (mGFR; median, 44 mL/min/1.73 m2) using plasma iohexol clearance. Bias, precision (interquartile range [IQR]), accuracy (percent of estimates ±30% of mGFR, P30), eGFR accuracy diagrams and probability diagrams to classify mGFR<45 mL/min/1.73 m2 were compared.

RESULTS

The overall results of BIS1CR/CKD-EPICR/FASCR/LMRCR were as follows: median bias, 1.7/3.6/0.6/-0.7 mL/min/1.73 m2; IQR, 11.6/12.3/11.1/10.5 mL/min/1.73 m2; and P30, 77.5%/76.4%/80.9%/83.5% (significantly higher for LMR, p<0.001). Substandard P30 (<75%) was noted for all equations at mGFR<30 mL/min/1.73 m2, and at body mass index values <20 and ≥35 kg/m2. LMRCR had the most stable performance across mGFR subgroups. Only LMRCR and FASCR had a relatively constant small bias across eGFR levels. Probability diagrams exhibited wide eGFR intervals for all equations where mGFR<45 could not be confidently ruled in or out. Adding cystatin C improved P30 accuracy to 85.7/86.8/85.7/88.7 for BIS2CR+CYS/CKD-EPICR+CYS/FASCR+CYS/MEANLMR+CAPA.

CONCLUSIONS

LMRCR and FASCR seem to be attractive alternatives to CKD-EPICR in estimating GFR by creatinine-based equations in older Europeans. Addition of cystatin C leads to important improvement in estimation performance.

Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimation Formulas for Pediatric and Neonatal Use

Renal function assessment is of the utmost importance in predicting drug clearance and in ensuring safe and effective drug therapy in neonates. The challenges to making this prediction relate not only to the extreme vulnerability and rapid maturation of this pediatric subgroup but also to the choice of renal biomarker, covariates, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimating formula. In order to avoid burdensome administration of exogenous markers and/or urine collection in vulnerable pediatric patients, estimation of GFR utilizing endogenous markers has become a useful tool in clinical practice. Several estimation methods have been developed over recent decades, exploiting various endogenous biomarkers (serum creatinine, cystatin C, blood urea nitrogen) and anthropometric measures (body length/height, weight, muscle mass). This article reviews pediatric GFR estimation methods with a focus on their suitability for use in the neonatal population.

Comparison of glomerular filtration rate estimating equations derived from creatinine and cystatin C: validation in the Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik elderly cohort

Background

Validation studies comparing glomerular filtration rate (GFR) equations based on standardized creatinine and cystatin C assays in the elderly are needed. The Icelandic Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Kidney cohort was used to compare two pairs of recently developed GFR equations, the revised Lund-Malmö creatinine equation (LMRCr) and the arithmetic mean of the LMRCr and Caucasian, Asian, Paediatric and Adult cystatin C equations (MEANLMR+CAPA), as well as the Full Age Spectrum creatinine equation (FASCr) and its combination with cystatin C (FASCr+Cys), with the corresponding pair of Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equations (CKD-EPICr and CKD-EPICr+Cys).

Methods

A total of 805 individuals, 74-93 years of age, underwent measurement of GFR (mGFR) using plasma clearance of iohexol. Four metrics were used to compare the performance of the GFR equations: bias, precision, accuracy [including the percentage of participants with estimated GFR (eGFR) within 30% of mGFR (P30)] and the ability to detect mGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Results

All equations had a P30 >90%. LMRCr and FASCr yielded significantly higher precision and P30 than CKD-EPICr, while bias was significantly worse. LMRCr, FASCr and CKD-EPICr showed similar ability to detect mGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves. MEANLMR+CAPA, FASCr+Cys and CKD-EPICr+Cys all exhibited consistent improvements compared with the corresponding creatinine-based equations.

Conclusion

None of the creatinine-based equations was clearly superior overall in this community-dwelling elderly cohort. The addition of cystatin C improved all of the creatinine-based equations.

Reference intervals for plasma cystatin C and plasma creatinine in adults using methods traceable to international calibrators and reference methods

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to establish reference intervals for plasma cystatin C and creatinine in adults using the Gentians cystatin C method traceable to the international calibrator standard ERM-DA471/IFCC and a creatinine method traceable to the IDMS (Isotope Dilution Mass Spectrometry) creatinine reference method.

METHODS

Blood samples were collected from 304 healthy blood donors (152 men and 152 women between 17 and 66 years old) with 30-31 men and 30-31 women in each ten-year interval. Plasma cystatin C was analyzed using the Gentian Cystatin C assay on a Roche cobas c702 analyzer, and plasma creatinine was analyzed using the CREA Plus assay on the Roche Modular P analyzer.

RESULTS

The nonparametric reference intervals for plasma cystatin C were 0.58-1.00 mg/L in women (median 0.78 mg/L, range 0.56-1.06 mg/L) and 0.62-1.04 mg/L in men (median 0.79 mg/L, range 0.61-1.07 mg/L). The Mann-Whitney U test revealed no gender-related difference in plasma cystatin C (P = .21). A common reference interval in women and men was calculated to be 0.61-1.01 mg/L (median 0.79 mg/L, range 0.56-1.07 mg/L). The nonparametric reference interval for plasma creatinine was 52-89 μmol/L in women (median 69 μmol/L, range 52-92 μmol/L) and 61-108 μmol/L in men (median 86 μmol/L, range 56-118 μmol/L). The Mann-Whitney U test revealed a gender-related difference in plasma creatinine (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we have established reference intervals for plasma cystatin C and creatinine in adults using methods traceable to international standards.

Novel automated immune turbidimetric assay for routine urinary cystatin-C determinations

AIM

There is no commercially available urinary cystatin-C (u-CYSC) test in the market. Therefore, we optimized and validated an automated immune turbidimetric test for u-CYSC measurements and investigated u-CYSC concentrations in acute and chronic diseases which might lead to renal tubular disorders.

MATERIALS & METHODS

A particle-enhanced immune turbidimetric assay was adapted and validated on a Cobas 8000/c502 analyzer. Urine samples of different patient groups were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Our method showed excellent analytical performance. U-CYSC/u-creatinine (u-CREAT) was higher in sepsis-related acute kidney injury group (p < 0.001) compared with controls and to patients with chronic hypertension and Type 2 diabetes.

CONCLUSION

We validated a fast, sensitive, fully automated u-CYSC assay which is ideal for routine use and might be a potential complementary laboratory test to evaluate renal tubular function.