Health-Related Quality of Life: A Rapid Predictor of Hospitalization in Patients With Cirrhosis

Health-related quality of life in patients with liver cirrhosis following adjunctive nurse-based care versus standard medical care: a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled study

OBJECTIVES

Patients have difficulties in understanding how to manage their liver cirrhosis. This highlights a need for support in comprehending health-related information, which remains largely lacking within liver cirrhosis care. Involvement of registered nurses (RNs) in outpatient liver cirrhosis care has potential to improve quality of care and reduce patient mortality. However, the benefits of nursing care on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are scarcely studied. This study compared HRQoL in patients receiving either standard medical outpatient care or adjunctive, nurse-led care. The risk of malnutrition, decompensation events and mortality were also compared between the two study groups.

METHODS

This was a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised trial, which enrolled 167 patients with liver cirrhosis. The primary outcome measure, HRQoL, was assessed using the RAND-36 questionnaire. The physical component summary (PCS) and the mental component summary (MCS) scores of RAND-36 were compared, using linear mixed-effects models for repeated measures, at 12 and 24 months.

RESULTS

83 patients received standard medical care, and 84 patients received adjunctive, nurse-led care for 24 months. Due to unforeseen circumstances, the final study population of 167 participants was less than the intended 500. Group comparisons were non-significant of the PCS and MCS scores (-1.1, p=0.53 and -0.7, p=0.67, respectively), malnutrition (p=0.62) and decompensation events (p=0.46), after 24 months. However, mortality was three times higher in the control group compared with the intervention group (12 vs 4, p=0.04) after 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, adjunctive nurse-led care was not superior to standard medical outpatient care regarding HRQoL, risk of developing malnutrition or decompensation. However, RN involvement contributed to early identification of decompensation and reduced mortality.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02957253.

Development and external validation of Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition-dictated nomograms predicting long-term mortality in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis

OBJECTIVES

Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria have gradually accounted for the mainstay evaluating nutritional status. We sought to establish GLIM-dictated nomograms with other prognostic factors influencing long-term mortality and externally validate their predictive performance in decompensated cirrhosis.

METHODS

The derivation cohort comprised 301 patients presenting with cirrhosis-associated acute insults, while the validation cohort encompassed 101 subjects from another tertiary hospital. Two nomograms were constructed to predict the 1-year all-cause mortality by integrating the GLIM criteria. The study population was stratified into low-, moderate- and high-risk mortality groups according to aforesaid proposed models.

RESULTS

Adjusting Child-Turcotte-Pugh classification (Nomo#1) or Model for End-stage Liver Disease-Sodium score (Nomo#2) separately, the GLIM criteria were independently associated with 1-year mortality in the multivariate Cox regression analysis (Nomo#1 hazard ratio (HR) = 3.139, p < 0.001; Nomo#2 HR = 3.456, p < 0.001). The C-index and time AUC for Nomo#1 and Nomo#2 performed significantly better than those of the GLIM criteria or conventional scoring systems alone. The survival rate of the low-risk group was significantly higher than those of the moderate- or high-risk groups (Nomo#1: 95% vs 65.8% vs 33.3%, p < 0.001; Nomo#2: 94.3% vs 64.5% vs 25%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, our proposed models exhibited moderate prediction accuracy and may identify malnourished patients with poor survival conditions in the external validation cohort.

CONCLUSION

GLIM criteria-defined malnutrition negatively impacted long-term mortality in the context of decompensated cirrhosis. Our established nomograms may predict survival status with sufficient discriminatory ability, alongside good consistency and clinical benefits, supporting their effectiveness in daily practice.

Health-related quality of life and frailty in liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There is limited evidence concerning the predictive value of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) on the presence of frailty in the context of cirrhosis. We aimed to elucidate the relationship between HRQoL and multidimensional frailty and to determine which HRQoL dimension independently impacted frail phenotype in our established cohort.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study by consecutively enrolling 355 patients with cirrhotic with decompensated signs in China. The HRQoL and frail phenotype were evaluated by the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) Questionnaire and Frailty Index, respectively. The relationship between EQ-5D utility index, as well as respective EQ-5D dimension, and Frailty Index was analysed according to the multiple linear regression analyses.

RESULTS

More than half of the patients (56.3%) reported problems in any dimension of the EQ-5D, suggestive of impaired HRQoL. Moreover, the proportion of patients experiencing some/extreme problems significantly increased across all five dimensions (all p<0.001) in correspondence to transition from the robust to frail phenotype. Multiple linear regression analyses demonstrated that age, ascites and hepatic encephalopathy were positively associated with Frailty Index, while EQ-5D utility index (standardised β coefficient= -0.442, p<0.001) negatively associated with Frailty Index. Notably, usual activities, self-care and mobility were the most influencing predictors associated with frailty.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support a rapid HRQoL assessment via EQ-5D may assist in predicting multidimensional frailty, and usual activities, self-care and mobility tend to be remediable targets while taking their effect on frail phenotype into consideration among patients with cirrhosis.

Frailty serves as an adverse predictor for mortality in liver transplant candidates: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Physical frailty increases susceptibility to stressors and has been associated with increased mortality among liver transplant candidates. However, evidence about this population's frailty prevalence and mortality is inconsistent and needs to be clarified. This study aimed to quantitatively synthesize the prevalence of frailty and the role of frailty on mortality in liver transplant candidates.

METHODS

All eligible studies published in Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception until March 5, 2024, were included. The pooled prevalence and hazard ratio (HR) corresponding to 95 % confidence intervals (CI) in mortality estimates were conducted. The random-effects model was used for the calculations.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies containing 4509 patients with liver transplant waitlist candidates were included. The prevalence of frailty in liver transplant waitlist candidates was 32 % (95 % CI = 25-38; p < 0.01). In this population, frailty was associated with an increased hazard ratio for mortality (8 studies) (HR = 2.49; 95 % CI = 1.77-3.51; p < 0.01). Furthermore, subgroup analysis showed that frailty was associated with a higher mortality in the USA (HR = 4.03; 95 % CI = 1.77-3.51; p < 0.01) compared with the non-USA area (HR = 2.03; 95 % CI = 1.51-2.72; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that frailty is prevalent in patients awaiting liver transplants, which strongly predicts waitlist mortality among this population. These findings highlight the importance of frailty in the decision of transplantation and in designing studies that consider frailty. Reducing the severity or impact of frailty on this population may improve prognosis.

Prognostic Communication, Symptom Burden, Psychological Distress, and Quality of Life Among Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Timely prognostic communication is a critical component of care for patients with decompensated cirrhosis (DC). However, few studies have examined the association of prognostic communication with symptoms, mood, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in this population.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study of 218 outpatients with DC, we assessed their self-reported health status (terminally ill vs not terminally ill), their prognostic communication with their hepatologists (Prognosis and Treatment Preferences Questionnaire), symptom burden (Revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale), psychological distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and HRQOL (Short-Form Liver Disease Quality of Life scale). We used linear regression to examine associations among patients' self-reported health status and prognostic communication with their symptom burden, psychological distress, and HRQOL.

RESULTS

Over 75% of patients reported that prognostic communication was helpful for making treatment decisions, maintaining hope, and coping with their disease. However, 81% had never discussed their end-of-life care wishes with their hepatologists. Overall, 36% self-reported a terminally ill health status, which was associated with higher symptom burden (B = 8.33; P = .003), anxiety (B = 1.97; P = .001), and depression (B = 2.01; P = .001) and lower HRQOL (B = -7.22; P = .002). Patients who wished they had more information on their prognosis reported higher symptom burden (B = 7.14; P = .010), anxiety (B = 1.63; P = .005), and depression (B = 1.50; P = .010) and lower HRQOL (B = -7.65; P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although most patients with DC highly valued prognostic communication, the majority reported never discussing their end-of-life care preferences with their hepatologists. Self-reported terminally ill health status and inadequate prognostic communication were associated with poorer symptoms, mood, and HRQOL. Interventions to improve prognostic communication while simultaneously providing adequate supportive care are warranted.

Qualitative service evaluation of a multimodal pilot service for early detection of liver disease in high-risk groups: 'Alright My Liver?'

OBJECTIVE

Liver disease is a growing cause of premature death in the UK. The National Health Service in England (NHS England) has funded regional early detection programmes through Community Liver Health Check pilots. 'Alright My Liver?' is Bristol and Severn's pilot service offering early detection of liver disease through screening events serving populations at risk, including people with a history of drug or alcohol use, type 2 diabetes and obesity. The service offers point-of-care testing for liver disease and a supported follow-up process.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews were conducted with 14 service users and six service providers over a 6-month period using diversity sampling. Topic guides encouraged discussion of experiences of the service as well as barriers and facilitators to accessing the service. Data were analysed using thematic analysis, and positive and negative comments pertaining to the service were collated in a 'table of changes' to inform optimisation.

RESULTS

Three main themes were identified: (1) motivations for engagement, (2) experience of the service and (3) health impacts. Key motivations for engagement were screening as a novel opportunity, a response to immediate health concerns or as reassurance. Service users commented on its convenience and that staff interactions were warm and informative. Some felt that follow-up could be more intensive. Impacts varied depending on perceived risk factors and screening results but generally involved stating a commitment to healthy lifestyle changes, including reducing alcohol use.

CONCLUSION

Targeted screening for liver disease in high-risk groups through this pilot service was deemed an appropriate and accessible intervention, with important optimisations identified.

Influence of Comorbidities on Health-Related Quality of Life in Alcohol-Related Liver Disease: A Population-Based Survey

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Extrahepatic comorbidities are common in alcohol-related liver disease (ALD). We examined associations between burden of comorbidities, alcohol, and smoking with low health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among patients with ALD.

METHODS

Patients with ALD and matched comparators were identified among respondents of the Danish National Health Survey waves in 2010-2017. Survey data included generic measures of physical and mental HRQoL (12-Item Short Form Health Survey), comorbidities, alcohol and smoking. Low HRQoL in ALD was defined as ≥1.5 SD worse than the average HRQoL in the comparators. Odds ratios (ORs) of low HRQoL were estimated with multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

We included 772 ALD patients, 53% of whom had cirrhosis; 37% had low physical HRQoL and 22% had low mental HRQoL. Disc herniation (found in 21%), osteoarthritis (36%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (11%), cancer (6%), stroke (1%), and psychiatric disease (9%) were associated with low physical and/or mental HRQoL, whereas alcohol use disorder (24%), diabetes (19%), acute myocardial infarction (1%), hypertension (34%), and osteoporosis (12%) were not. For example, osteoarthritis was associated with low physical (OR, 2.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.54-3.05) and low mental (OR, 1.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-2.88) HRQoL. For lifestyle factors, drinking ≥20 units/week was associated with low physical and smoking ≥20 cigarettes/day with low mental HRQoL when compared with abstainers and nonsmokers, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Common comorbidities including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, musculoskeletal disease, and psychiatric disease are associated with low HRQoL in ALD, independent of liver disease severity, and so are alcohol consumption and smoking. These findings highlight the importance of multidisciplinary management of patients with ALD.

Low socioeconomic status exacerbates unmet health-related needs in patients with autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Diminished quality of life has been well characterized in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH); however, the full spectrum of unmet needs is unclear. We hypothesized that there is a high burden of health-related unmet needs in patients with AIH, and this burden differs by socioeconomic status (SES).

METHODS

Members of the Autoimmune Hepatitis Association were invited online and by email to complete a modified version of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patient Needs Questionnaire. Demographic and clinical data were also captured. Low SES was defined as annual household income <30 k, education level below high school, or moderate-high concern for transportation, food or housing. Multivariable logistic regression assessed the association between unmet health-related needs and SES.

RESULTS

There were 433 participants; 89.8% identified as women, 16.2% lived outside the US, and 25.6% were classified as low SES. Over 70% of respondents reported at least one moderate-high need in the health-related unmet need domains. In multivariable logistic regression, patients in the low-SES group reported significantly higher odds of unmet needs compared to the moderate-high-SES group: for adequate information about side effects (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.06-2.53, p = 0.026), opportunity to speak with others with AIH (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.50-3.66, p < 0.001), healthcare professionals acknowledging patient emotions (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.56-3.74, p < 0.001) and being taken seriously by medical providers (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.34-3.28, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

There is a high burden of health-related unmet needs in all patients with AIH that is exacerbated by low SES.

Dysphagia risk evaluated by the Eating Assessment Tool-10 is associated with health-related quality of life in patients with chronic liver disease

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to reveal the prevalence and characteristics of individuals at risk of dysphagia in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and its association with health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 335 outpatients with CLD. Dysphagia risk, sarcopenia risk, malnutrition risk, and HRQOL were assessed using the Eating Assessment tool-10 (EAT-10), SARC-F, Royal Free Hospital-Nutrition Prioritizing Tool (RFH-NPT), and Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ), respectively. Dysphagia risk and low HRQOL were based on EAT-10 ≥3 and CLDQ overall score <5, respectively. Factors associated with dysphagia risk and low HRQOL were assessed using the logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Dysphagia risk and lower HRQOL were observed in 10% and 31% of the patients, respectively. Patients with dysphagia risk were older, had lower liver functional reserve, were at higher risk for sarcopenia and malnutrition, and showed lower CLDQ overall score (median, 4.41 vs. 5.69; P < 0.001) than those without. After adjustment, SARC-F (odds ratio [OR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.50; P = 0.029) and RFH-NPT (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.04-2.81; P = 0.034) scores were independently associated with dysphagia risk. EAT-10 (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.04-1.30; P = 0.008) and SARC-F (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.18-1.59; P < 0.001) scores were also independently associated with low HRQOL.

CONCLUSIONS

Dysphagia risk was prevalent in approximately 10% of patients with CLD and was associated with a risk of sarcopenia and malnutrition. Furthermore, dysphagia risk was related to HRQOL in patients with CLD.

Unmet Needs and Burden of Caregivers of Patients Being Evaluated for a Liver Transplant Are Similar to Those of Cancer Caregivers

BACKGROUND

The caregivers (CG) of patients with serious illnesses often experience stress and psycho-social issues. High burden is expected for CG of patients for whom liver transplant (LT) is the only curative option. This study aims to measure the burden, unmet needs, and quality of life (QoL) of CG of patients being evaluated for LT.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study enrolled CG of patients being evaluated for LT. CaTCoN (Caregiving Tasks, Consequences and Needs Questionnaire) was used to assess caregiving consequences and needs related to interactions with healthcare professionals (HCPs). ZBI-12 (Zarit Burden Interview) was used to assess CG burden, and PROMIS-29 (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) to assess QoL. Caregivers completed the study instruments in person, while they were in the clinic. CaTCoN scores from our study were compared with cancer caregivers' historical data.

RESULTS

18 CG were enrolled, mean age 54 [14] years; 72% were white and 77% were women. 61% worked full time; 45% provided >20 hours of care per week. Two-thirds cared for patients with alcoholic liver disease. All CaTCoN scores were no different from CGs of cancer patients (all P > .05). The total ZBI score (mean SD 12.4 [8.3]) did not differ from published scores for CG of cancer patients (12.0 [8.5]). 44% had high (≥12) ZBI scores reflecting "high burden." Their PROMIS-29 T scores, compared to those with low burden, showed more anxiety (P = .01), depression (P = .04), fatigue (P = .02) and deteriorated social function (P = .009). Physical function and social function were diminished among these CGs compared to the general population (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

CGs of patients being evaluated for LT suffer from high burden similar to cancer CGs and have reduced physical and social function. Despite the small sample size, the data completion rate was almost 100%.

Association Between Quality of Life Defined by EuroQol Group 5 Dimension and Composite Inferior Outcome Among Inpatients with Cirrhosis

Purpose

The utility of the EuroQol Group 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has been verified; however, knowledge gaps remain concerning predictive performance in cirrhosis. We aimed to identify the optimal threshold for risk stratification and the pronounced domain in the EQ-5D linked to inferior outcomes.

Patients and Methods

The X-tile project was used to obtain a threshold, considering the composite outcome of 1-year all-cause mortality or readmission. A restricted cubic spline (RCS) was performed to test the non-linear relationship between the EQ-5D utility value and the primary outcome. Six multivariate Cox regression models incorporating EQ-5D utility value and each of the five domains were constructed.

Setting/Participants

Totally, 420 patients with cirrhosis were recruited.

Results

The median utility value of the study population was 0.77 and 59.8% reported impairment in minimal one EQ-5D domain. RCS indicated a linear relationship between the utility value and composite inferior outcome. X-tile pinpointed a utility value of 0.59 stratifying populations into high- and low-risk groups based on the outcome. Inpatients with cirrhosis and deteriorated HRQoL (utility value ≤0.59) were at higher risk of death or readmission (adjusted HR: 2.18, P < 0.001). Furthermore, mobility and usual activities were the most pronounced domains associated with composite inferior outcome.

Conclusion

A utility value ≤0.59 can identify cirrhotic inpatients exhibiting compromised HRQoL and mortality/readmission risk. It is tempting to reverse the decreased HRQoL by applying longitudinal measurements and keeping surveillance on utility value, while interventions appear to mainly focus on improving mobility and usual activities.

Increasing prevalence of cirrhosis among insured adults in the United States, 2012-2018

BACKGROUND

Liver cirrhosis is a chronic disease that is known as a "silent killer" and its true prevalence is difficult to describe. It is imperative to accurately characterize the prevalence of cirrhosis because of its increasing healthcare burden.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, trends in cirrhosis prevalence were evaluated using administrative data from one of the largest national health insurance providers in the US. (2011-2018). Enrolled adult (≥18-years-old) patients with cirrhosis defined by ICD-9 and ICD-10 were included in the study. The primary outcome measured in the study was the prevalence of cirrhosis 2011-2018.

RESULTS

Among the 371,482 patients with cirrhosis, the mean age was 62.2 (±13.7) years; 53.3% had commercial insurance and 46.4% had Medicare Advantage. The most frequent cirrhosis etiologies were alcohol-related (26.0%), NASH (20.9%) and HCV (20.0%). Mean time of follow-up was 725 (±732.3) days. The observed cirrhosis prevalence was 0.71% in 2018, a 2-fold increase from 2012 (0.34%). The highest prevalence observed was among patients with Medicare Advantage insurance (1.67%) in 2018. Prevalence increased in each US. state, with Southern states having the most rapid rise (2.3-fold). The most significant increases were observed in patients with NASH (3.9-fold) and alcohol-related (2-fold) cirrhosis.

CONCLUSION

Between 2012-2018, the prevalence of liver cirrhosis doubled among insured patients. Alcohol-related and NASH cirrhosis were the most significant contributors to this increase. Patients living in the South, and those insured by Medicare Advantage also have disproportionately higher prevalence of cirrhosis. Public health interventions are important to mitigate this concerning trajectory of strain to the health system.

Thirty-Day Readmissions Are Largely Not Preventable in Patients With Cirrhosis

INTRODUCTION

Hospital readmissions are common in patients with cirrhosis, but there are few studies describing readmission preventability. We aimed to describe the incidence, causes, and risk factors for preventable readmission in this population.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study of patients with cirrhosis hospitalized at a single center between June 2014 and March 2020 and followed up for 30 days postdischarge. Demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic data, functional status, and quality of life were collected. Readmission preventability was independently and systematically adjudicated by 3 reviewers. Multinomial logistic regression was used to compare those with (i) preventable readmission, (ii) nonpreventable readmission/death, and (iii) no readmission.

RESULTS

Of 654 patients, 246 (38%) were readmitted, and 29 (12%) were preventable readmissions. Reviewers agreed on preventability for 70% of readmissions. Twenty-two (including 2 with preventable readmission) died. The most common reasons for readmission were hepatic encephalopathy (22%), gastrointestinal bleeding (13%), acute kidney injury (13%), and ascites (6%), and these reasons were similar between preventable and nonpreventable readmissions. Preventable readmission was often related to paracentesis timeliness, diuretic adjustment monitoring, and hepatic encephalopathy treatment. Compared with nonreadmitted patients, preventable readmission was independently associated with racial and ethnic minoritized individuals (odds ratio [OR] 5.80; 95% CI, 1.96-17.13), nonmarried marital status (OR 2.88; 95% CI, 1.18-7.05), and admission in the prior 30 days (OR 3.45; 95% CI, 1.48-8.04).

DISCUSSION

For patients with cirrhosis, readmission is common, but most are not preventable. Preventable readmissions are often related to ascites and hepatic encephalopathy and are associated with racial and ethnic minorities, nonmarried status, and prior admissions.

The influence of prehabilitation in patients with liver cirrhosis before liver transplantation: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The high prevalence of liver cirrhosis in Slovakia leads to a great need for transplant treatment. The outcome of liver transplantation is influenced by several factors.

AIM

The main objective of this study is to test the effectiveness of prehabilitation compared to standard of care.

DESIGN

Prospective, double-arm, randomized, open-registry study.

SETTING

Patient in F. D. Roosevelt Teaching Hospital, Slovakia, Banská Bystrica.

POPULATION

The participants consisted of patients with liver cirrhosis (55 men, 25 women).

METHODS

The patients were randomized to the active prehabilitation group (N.=39) or the standard of care group (SOC) (N.=41). SOC represents the standard of care for patients prior to liver transplantation, consisting of a formal oral interview lasting 30 minutes. In addition to SOC, each patient with decompensated liver cirrhosis also underwent a prehabilitation intervention that included rehabilitation and nutrition support. Patients completed the exercises under the supervision of a physician during hospitalisation.

RESULTS

After one month, the liver frailty index improved in the prehabilitation group (P=0.05). No improvement in MELD (Model of End Stage Liver Disease) was found in the group that underwent the prehabilitation program (P=0.28), and no improvement was found in the Child-Pugh score after one month (P=0.13). In the prehabilitation groups compared with the SOC group, differences were not found in the MELD score (P=0.11). Better clinical outcomes according to the Child-Pugh score was found for the prehabilitation group compared with the SOC group (P=0.02). According to LFI, there was no difference between the groups (P=0.26). Very low adherence was found after three months. Only three patients in the SOC group and six patients in the prehabilitation group came to the check-up. Due to low adherence after 3 months in patients with liver cirrhosis, it is not possible to make an adequate comparison between groups after three months.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the great effort to maintain adherence, it was not possible to draw a conclusion about the effectiveness of prehabilitation in patients before liver transplantation compared to standard of care because the main problem in Slovak patients with liver cirrhosis is low adherence. More studies are needed to identify the barriers that lead to low adherence in patients with liver cirrhosis.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

A promising result was found due to improvement of the Liver Frailty Index and the Child-Pugh Score after one month in the prehabilitation group.

Correlation between sarcopenia and cirrhosis: a meta-analysis

Background

The relationship between sarcopenia and cirrhosis is unclear. In this research, our aim is to evaluate the prevalence of sarcopenia among individuals with liver cirrhosis and its correlation with survival and mortality risks.

Methods

We conducted searches on PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane for English articles published up to July 10, 2023, and additionally manually searched the bibliography of relevant articles. We incorporated research on sarcopenia in patients with cirrhosis to examine the connection between sarcopenia and the likelihood of survival and mortality. Statistical analyses were carried out utilizing the Stata version 15.1 software. Depending on the heterogeneity of the results, we employed either fixed-effects models or random-effects models for data synthesis. To assess publication bias, we employed funnel plots and conducted Egger's test.

Results

We included 40 studies involving 8,945 patients with cirrhosis. The overall prevalence of cirrhosis was 41% (95% CI 34%-48%). Male patients and those with liver cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy had a higher prevalence of sarcopenia (44% for male patients and 48% for hepatic encephalopathy patients). Sarcopenia emerged as a risk factor for both survival (HR = 2.57, 95% CI 2.02-3.27, p < 0.001) and mortality (HR = 2.13, 95% CI 1.86-2.44, p < 0.001) in patients with cirrhosis. Subgroup analyses consistently yielded the same results for study sites, whether HCC patients were excluded from the cohort, whether patients were from the liver transplant cohort or had undergone tips surgery, the definition of sarcopenia (L3-SMI or other methods), and the diagnostic criteria used by patients. The presence of sarcopenia was also a significant risk factor for hepatic encephalopathy [HR = 2.27, 95% CI (1.76-2.94), p < 0.001].

Conclusion

This systematic review and meta-analysis reveal that patients with cirrhosis have a prevalence of sarcopenia of 41% and is associated with survival rate and mortality rate. Therefore, we should attach importance to the screening of sarcopenia in patients with cirrhosis, early detection of susceptible populations, and appropriate measures to reduce the occurrence and adverse outcomes.Systematic review registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails.

Factors Affecting and Promoting Health-related Quality of Life in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: An Underestimated Domain in Patient Care

Cirrhosis patients have poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). To enhance medical care and therapeutic approaches, it is crucial to identify factors that alter HRQoL in patients with cirrhosis. The present study aims to identify the potential factors affecting and promoting HRQoL in patients with liver cirrhosis. Four databases were extensively searched, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar. All original articles with liver cirrhosis and factor-altering HRQoL were included. The present study showed that elderly age, female gender, low family income, low body mass index (BMI), presence of anxiety and depression, presence of cirrhosis complications including ascites, hepatic encephalopathy (HE), and abnormal endoscopic findings, high disease severity score, presence of sarcopenia, disturbed sleep pattern, muscle cramps, poor sexual health, and increased levels of bilirubin, prothrombin time, and albumin-bilirubin ratio were the significant factors associated with lower HRQoL scores. Meanwhile, physical exercise, liver transplant, stem cell therapy, mindfulness, and the use of probiotics, rifaximin, and lactulose were associated with increased HRQoL scores. The present study recommends more prospective or randomized control trials with interventions including health education, yoga, psychotherapy, and other potential factors promoting HRQoL in patients with liver cirrhosis. The present study also emphasizes that the treating physician should consider taking HRQoL into account when prescribing medical therapy.

Palliative clinical trials in advanced chronic liver disease: Challenges and opportunities

Patients with advanced chronic liver disease have a complex symptom burden and many are not candidates for curative therapy. Despite this, provision of palliative interventions remains woefully inadequate, with an insufficient evidence base being a contributory factor. Designing and conducting palliative interventional trials in advanced chronic liver disease remains challenging for a multitude of reasons. In this manuscript we review past and ongoing palliative interventional trials. We identify barriers and facilitators and offer guidance on addressing these challenges. We hope that this will reduce the inequity in palliative care provision in advanced chronic liver disease.

Telemedicine in Patients Affected by Chronic Liver Disease: A Scoping Review of Clinical Outcomes and the Devices Evaluated

For patients with chronic liver disease (CLD), telemedicine is emerging as a useful tool to prevent liver decompensation or hospitalization, allowing access to and the decentralization of care, even for patients with limited resources. However, research and attendant evidence are still lacking; thus, this review aims to systematically explore the topic of telemonitoring for CLD to describe the currently used tools and clinical outcomes. The review was conducted by using key terms on PubMed/EMBASE and searching for observational studies or clinical trials (according to PRISMA recommendations) that were published between 6 April 2013 and 6 April 2023 to keep the technological framework limited to the last 10 years. The studies were described and grouped according to the aim of telemonitoring, the underlying disease, and the tools adopted to achieve remote monitoring. A total of 32 articles met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 11 articles report the successful use of a telehealth program to support and improve access to care in the management of HCV-related cirrhosis, eight articles examine the efficacy of telemedicine for remote monitoring interventions to prevent or decrease the risk of decompensation in high-risk patients, and five articles examine improvements in the physical performance and quality of life of cirrhotic patients through telehealth rehabilitation programs. Four studies were completed during the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Telehealth has the potential to provide and expand treatment access and reduce barriers to care for the most disadvantaged patients and might be able to reduce the need for hospital readmission for CLD, though most practice to test feasibility is still in the pilot stage.

Accumulating awareness on the clinical significance and relevance of frailty in cirrhosis: Time to dig deeper into mechanistic basis!

Frailty corresponds to an emerging construct in the hepatology which is originally introduced as a validated geriatric syndrome regarding increased vulnerability to pathophysiological stressors. As for patients with cirrhosis, the presence of frailty is indicative of debilitating conditions that subjects are prone to deleterious acute insults and have difficulties to restore even if the underlying liver function partially returned to normal levels. Since this conceptual development, a variety of tools assessing frailty have been proposed and evaluated in the context of cirrhosis. A recent performance-based metric for frailty, designated as Liver Frailty Index, has broadly been applied in patients with cirrhosis and exhibited acceptable predictive ability in relation to disease progression, mortality and hospitalization. However, those functional tests measuring frailty may be impossible to perform in circumstance that patients are critically ill or undergoing detrimental events. An interesting modality indicates the use of alternative tests to evaluate frailty, which may be more adaptable and of choice for specific subgroups. The interrelation between frailty and various cirrhosis-associated pathological entities is of clinical importance and implication. Noticeably, it is imperative to clarify these complex linkages to highlight novel therapeutic targets or interventional endpoints. The efficient and effective management of frailty is still challenging, but many attempts have been made to overcome barriers of affordability and availability. Some clinical trials on small scale revealed that home-based exercise and individualized nutrition therapy show benefits in patients with cirrhosis, and high adherence to the treatment regimen may direct better efficacy and performance.

Branched-chain amino acids supplementation improves liver frailty index in frail compensated cirrhotic patients: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Physical frailty is related with morbidity and mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Currently, there is no approved treatment of frailty in these patients. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of 16 weeks branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) supplementation on frailty in frail compensated cirrhotic patients.

METHODS

After a 4-week run-in period consisted of dietary and exercise counseling, compensated cirrhotic patients with frailty, defined by liver frailty index (LFI)≥4.5, were randomly assigned (1:1) to BCAA or control group. The BCAA group received twice daily BCAAs supplementation (210 kcal, protein 13.5 g, BCAA 2.03 g) for 16 weeks. The primary outcome was frailty reversion. The secondary outcomes were changes in biochemistries, body composition evaluated by bioelectrical impedance analysis, and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

54 patients were prospectively enrolled (age 65.5 ± 9.9 years, 51.9% female, Child-Pugh A/B 68.5%/31.5%, MELD 10.3 ± 3.1). Baseline characteristics were similar between both groups. At week 16, BCAA group had a significant improvement in LFI (-0.36 ± 0.3 vs. -0.15 ± 0.28, P = 0.01), BMI (+ 0.51 ± 1.19 vs. -0.49 ± 1.89 kg/m², P = 0.03), and serum albumin (+ 0.26 ± 0.27 vs. +0.06 ± 0.3 g/dl, P = 0.01). The proportion of frailty reversion at week 16 was significantly higher in BCAA group (36% vs. 0%, P < 0.001). Compared with baseline, BCAA group had a significant increase in skeletal muscle index (7.5 ± 1.6 to 7.8 ± 1.5 kg/m², P = 0.03). Regarding the QoL, only the BCAA group had a significant improvement in all 4 domains of physical component score of the SF-36 questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS

A 16-week BCAA supplementation improved frailty in frail compensated cirrhotic patients. In addition, this intervention resulted in an improvement of muscle mass and physical domain of QoL in these patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered with Thai Clinical Trial Registry (TCTR20210928001; https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/# ).

Comparison of the quality of life of patients with liver cirrhosis before and during the COVID-19 lockdown in Slovakia

Liver cirrhosis is associated with a poor quality of life (QOL). The COVID-19 pandemic has led to several restriction measures and psychosocial consequences whose impact on QOL has combined with that of cirrhosis in an unknown way. Therefore, we have used our cirrhosis registry to assess the quality of life before the pandemic (on the first admission to the tertiary liver unit) and during the most pronounced phase of the first lockdown. In this cross-sectional study conducted during the first lockdown in Slovakia (from April to May 2020), we have repeated the QOL measurement of QOL in cirrhotic patients previously enrolled in the RH7 registry. Patients who were alive (according to the national registry of deaths) were identified and contacted by phone with a structured and standardized interview led by trained professionals. The tool used for both QOL measurements (at enrolment in RH7 and during lockdown) was a standardized and validated EuroQOL-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire. The study included 97 patients, of which 37 (38.1%) were women and 60 (61.9%) were men. Responses were achieved from 75 patients (68.18%). In general, patients scored their quality of life significantly higher during the pandemic compared to examination at admission to RH7 (that is, at admission to our tertiary liver unit with cirrhosis) (p = 0.005). In particular, of the domains included in EQ-5D: (1) self-care was better during lockdown compared to the first record on admission to RH7 (p < 0.001). (2) the ability to perform daily activities has also improved during lockdown (p = 0.002). On the other hand, (3) pain and discomfort did not change significantly during the lockdown compared to the previous measurement (p = 0.882). (4) anxiety and depression were lower during lockdown compared to admission to RH7 (p = 0.01). The quality of life in patients with liver cirrhosis was better during the lockdown of SARS-CoV-2 compared to the previous measurement at admission to the tertiary liver unit.

Malnutrition according to the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria is associated with in-hospital mortality and prolonged length of stay in patients with cirrhosis

OBJECTIVES

Malnutrition is prevalent and negatively affects patients with cirrhosis, but a generally accepted consensus pertaining to its diagnosis is lacking. Recently, a framework called the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) has been proposed to diagnose malnutrition, but there is scant evidence regarding its validity. We aimed to investigate associations of malnutrition according to the GLIM criteria, as well as its individual indicator with in-hospital adverse outcomes.

METHODS

This was a prospective, observational study of consecutively hospitalized patients with cirrhosis. The malnutrition diagnosis was built on a stepwise GLIM process with initial screening, followed by fulfillment of at least one phenotypic and one etiologic criterion. Patients were followed up for a combined endpoint of in-hospital mortality and prolonged length of stay (LOS). Covariates compromise malnutrition according to the GLIM criteria and its indicators in separation. Logistic regression analyses were implemented to determine predictive validity.

RESULTS

A total of 387 cirrhotic patients were assessed. Malnutrition was diagnosed in 28.7% of patients according to the GLIM criteria, and increased the risk of in-hospital mortality and prolonged LOS by 2.166 and 1.767 times, respectively, adjusting for age, sex, biochemical parameters, and clinical scores of disease severity. When analyzing separate criteria, all constituents were independently associated with in-hospital adverse outcomes, adjusting for model for end-stage liver disease sodium score.

CONCLUSIONS

Malnutrition according to the GLIM criteria was considerably prevalent among hospitalized patients with cirrhosis, and associated with approximately two times greater probability of in-hospital mortality and prolonged LOS. These diagnostic criteria may be implemented and disseminated during daily practice considering their predictive validity.

Risk factors for hepatic encephalopathy and mortality in cirrhosis: The role of cognitive impairment, muscle alterations and shunts

INTRODUCTION/AIM

Muscle alterations, portosystemic shunts (SPSS) and minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) are related to hepatic encephalopathy (HE), however no studies have investigated the relative role of all these risk factors detected in the same patients. The aim of the study was to assess the prognostic impact of muscle alterations, MHE and SPSS on hepatic encephalopathy and transplant free survival.

PATIENTS/METHODS

114 cirrhotics were submitted to Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score (PHES) and Animal Naming Test (ANT) to detect MHE. CT scan was used to analyze the skeletal muscle index (SMI), muscle attenuation and SPSS. The incidence of the first episode of HE and survival were estimated.

RESULTS

Previous HE was present in 47 patients (41%). The variables independently associated to previous HE were: sarcopenia, MHE and SPSS. 44 patients (39%) developed overt HE during 14±11 months; MHE and SPSS were the only variables significantly asociated to overt HE. During the same follow-up, 42 patients died (37%); MELD and sarcopenia were the only variables significantly asociated to transplant free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

MHE, sarcopenia and SPSS are clinically relevant and should be sought for in cirrhotics. In particular, MHE and SPSS are the only risk factors significantly associated to the development of HE while MELD and sarcopenia are independently associated to overall mortality.

Palliative long-term abdominal drains for the management of refractory ascites due to cirrhosis: a consensus document

Palliative care remains suboptimal in advanced cirrhosis, in part relating to a lack of evidence-based interventions. Ascites remains the most common cirrhosis complication resulting in hospitalisation. Many patients with refractory ascites are not candidates for liver transplantation or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, and therefore, require recurrent palliative large volume paracentesis in hospital. We review the available evidence on use of palliative long-term abdominal drains in cirrhosis. Pending results of a national trial (REDUCe 2) and consistent with recently published national and American guidance, long-term abdominal drains cannot be regarded as standard of care in advanced cirrhosis. They should instead be considered only on a case-by-case basis, pending definitive evidence. This manuscript provides consensus to help standardise use of long-term abdominal drains in cirrhosis including patient selection and community management. Our ultimate aim remains to improve palliative care for this under researched and vulnerable cohort.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Modestly Enhance Prediction of Readmission in Patients with Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients with cirrhosis have high rates of hospital readmission, but prediction models are suboptimal and have not included important patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). In a large prospective cohort, we examined the impact of PROMs on prediction of 30-day readmissions.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study of adults with cirrhosis admitted to a tertiary center between June 2014 and March 2020. We collected clinical information, socioeconomic status, and PROMs addressing functional status and quality of life. We used hierarchical competing risk time-to-event analysis to examine the impact of PROMs on readmission prediction.

RESULTS

A total of 654 patients were discharged alive, and 247 (38%) were readmitted within 30 days. Readmission was independently associated with cerebrovascular disease, ascites, prior hospital admission, admission via the emergency department, lower albumin, higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease, discharge with public transportation, and impaired basic activities of daily living and quality-of-life activity domain. Reduced readmission was associated with cancer, admission for infection, children at home, and impaired emotional function. Compared with a model including only clinical variables, addition of functional status and quality-of-life variables improved the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve from 0.72 to 0.73 and 0.75, with net reclassification indices of 0.22 and 0.18, respectively. Socioeconomic variables did not significantly improve prediction compared with clinical variables alone. Compared with a model using electronically available variables only, no models improved prediction when examined with integrated discrimination improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

PROMs may marginally add to the prediction of 30-day readmissions for patients with cirrhosis. Poor social support and disability are associated with readmissions and may be high-yield targets for future interventions.

Survival benefit of L-carnitine supplementation in patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

L-carnitine supplementation is effective in improving muscle cramps, hyperammonemia, and hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis. However, limited evidence is available on the effect of L-carnitine supplementation on the survival of patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 674 patients with cirrhosis admitted to Gifu University Hospital or Chuno Kosei Hospital between October 2011 and December 2018 were enrolled. L-carnitine supplementation was defined as the use of L-carnitine for more than 30 consecutive days during the follow-up period. Propensity score matching was applied to create comparable groups between L-carnitine-treated and untreated patients. Mortality was evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Among the patients, 93 were excluded. Of the remaining 581 patients, 71 (12%) received L-carnitine supplementation. Propensity matching identified 189 patients (63 L-carnitine-treated and 126 untreated patients) with comparable baseline characteristics in both groups. Of the matched patients, 33 (52%) L-carnitine-treated and 74 (59%) untreated patients died during the median follow-up period of 36.3 months. Overall survival was significantly higher in L-carnitine-treated patients than in untreated patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-0.99). A subgroup analysis showed that the survival benefit of L-carnitine supplementation was prominent in patients with Child-Pugh class B or C (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.23-0.68), albumin levels ≤3.5 g/dL (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.37-0.95), and ammonia levels ≥90 μg/dL (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.26-0.97) and those without sarcopenia (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.35-0.90).

CONCLUSION

L-carnitine supplementation may improve survival in patients with cirrhosis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCY STATEMENT

Carnitine is a vitamin-like compound that regulates lipid and energy metabolism. Although it has been recognized that L-carnitine supplementation improves hyperammonemia, hepatic encephalopathy, sarcopenia, and frailty in patients with cirrhosis, the relationship between L-carnitine supplementation mortality remains unknown. The results of our study provide the first evidence that L-carnitine supplementation may improve survival in patients with cirrhosis. L-carnitine supplementation may shed a new light on the nutritional intervention for patients with cirrhosis. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Health-Related Quality of Life and Its Contributors According to a Preference-Based Generic Instrument in Cirrhosis

It is essential to determine contributors around impairment in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with cirrhosis aiming at improving health care and therapeutic strategy. Studies simultaneously incorporating disease severity based on biochemical parameters and other physical/psychological effects (i.e., sleep disturbance and frailty) are heterogeneous and the subject of the present study. We analyzed and compared HRQoL, using the EuroQol Group 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire and the utility index retrieved, in patients with cirrhosis and across groups stratified by sleep disturbance or frailty phenotype. Sleep disturbance and frailty were determined by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Frailty Index, respectively. Multiple linear regression was implemented to clarify contributors of poor HRQoL. In this cohort of 227 patients with mean age of 61.7 years and 47.2% male, more than half of the study population represented impairment in HRQoL in at least one domain, according to EQ-5D. Furthermore, sleep disturbance and frailty have proved to be independently associated with poor HRQoL in two separate regression models, whereas conventional scoring systems such as Child-Pugh classification and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease are not closely relevant. Intriguingly, not all health domains within EQ-5D correlated well with PSQI and Frailty Index, with the exception of usual activities. Pain and anxiety/depression were the most frequently affected HRQoL domains even in patients without sleep disturbance or frailty. Conclusion: Impaired HRQoL is prevalent in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Sleep disturbance and frailty are independently associated with poor HRQoL. It is imperative to timely intervene with these symptoms and deliver tailored health care.

Continued alcohol consumption and hepatic encephalopathy determine quality of life and psychosocial burden of caregivers in patients with liver cirrhosis

Background

Patients with liver cirrhosis suffer from significantly reduced health-related quality of life and are often dependent on support from caregivers. In this context, caregivers often suffer from impaired quality of life (QoL) as well as psychosocial burden (PB). The aim of the present study was to identify factors influencing QoL and PB of caregivers in order to improve the social care of patients and caregivers.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 106 patients with liver cirrhosis and their caregivers were included. (Health-related) QoL was surveyed in patients (CLDQ) and caregivers (SF-36) and PB was determined by Zarit Burden Interview.

Results

Alcohol related liver cirrhosis (55%) was the predominant etiology of liver cirrhosis and the median MELD of the cohort was 14. QoL did not differ between patients with and without alcohol-related liver cirrhosis (p = 0.6). In multivariable analysis, continued alcohol consumption (p = 0.020), a history of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) (p = 0.010), poorer QoL of patients (p = 0.030) and poorer QoL of caregivers (p = 0.005) were associated with a higher PB of caregivers. Factors independently associated with poorer QoL of caregivers were continued alcohol consumption (p = 0.003) and a higher PB of caregivers (p = 0.030).

Conclusion

Caregivers of patients with liver cirrhosis suffer from impaired QoL and PB, especially in case of continued alcohol consumption or the occurrence of HE.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12955-022-01923-z.

Symptom Burden Is Associated with Increased Emergency Department Utilization among Patients with Cirrhosis

Background: Patients with cirrhosis have significant morbidity and mortality, as well as substantial symptom burden. Objective: We investigated the relationship between symptom burden and inpatient health care utilization among patients with cirrhosis. Methods: Adult patients with cirrhosis being evaluated for or awaiting liver transplantation at an academic institution in the United States completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS), a validated symptom evaluation tool with total scores ranging from 0 to 90. The outcomes of interest were emergency department (ED) visits, nonelective hospitalizations, hospital days, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and 30-day readmissions within 6 months. Adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were used to examine the relationship between ESAS scores and outcomes. Results: Of 233 patients (43% female, median age 61), the median total ESAS score was 16 (interquartile range 6-30). Higher total scores on the ESAS were associated with increased ED visits, hospitalizations, hospital days, and ICU days (all p < 0.04). After adjusting for age, gender, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-sodium, ESAS total score remained an independent predictor of ED visits (IRR 1.05, confidence interval [95% CI] 1.00-1.10, p = 0.03). Multivariate ESAS subscale analyses revealed that the physical symptom score was associated with ED visits (IRR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.16, p = 0.01), but the psychological symptom score was not (IRR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.08, p = 0.15). Conclusions: Patient-reported symptoms, particularly physical symptoms, are independently associated with ED visits among patients with cirrhosis being considered for liver transplantation. Further research is needed to examine whether addressing symptoms more aggressively, such as with palliative care co-management, could decrease ED utilization in this population.

A Comparison of Different Frailty Scores and Impact of Frailty on Outcome in Patients With Cirrhosis

Background & aims

There is no "gold standard" tool for the assessment of frailty in cirrhosis. This study compares Liver Frailty Index (LFI), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Fried Frailty Criteria (FFC), and Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) for frailty assessment and ascertains its impact on predicting mortality and hospitalizations in a cohort of outpatients with cirrhosis.

Methods

116 patients were enrolled in this prospective observational cohort study. Frailty assessment was done using LFI, SPPB, FFC, and CFS. All patients were followed up for 6 months. The primary outcome was the first of either all-cause unplanned hospitalization or all-cause mortality occurring within 6 months of the study period.

Results

100 (86.2%) males and 16 (13.8%) females with a mean age of 50.2 (48.4-51.9, 95% CI) years were included. The most common cause of cirrhosis was alcoholic liver disease (47.4%) followed by hepatitis C (12.9%) and Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (10.3%). There was no significant difference in prevalence of frailty based on LFI (43.1%), FFC (36.2%), CFS (44%), and SPPB (47.4%) (P > 0.05). Frail patients had worse outcomes compared to the Not frail group. At 6 months, the mortality rate in Frail patients was 42% versus 1.5% for the Not frail; hospitalization in Frail patients occurred in 92% versus 6% in the Not frail. On multivariable analysis, independent predictors of mortality were Frailty [OR 14 (1.4-54.2)], alcohol-related cirrhosis [OR 4.2 (1.1-16.3)], Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) [OR 2.1 (1.4-2.9)] and Chronic liver disease questionnaire (CLDQ) [OR 0.1 (0.1-0.4)] scores.

Conclusions

LFI, SPPB, FFC, and CFS are comparable in frailty assessment in patients with cirrhosis. Importantly, comparability of the commonly used scores for frailty assessment and prediction of hospitalization and mortality allows flexibility for clinical application.

A Telemonitoring Intervention for Cirrhotic Ascites Management Is Cost-Saving

BACKGROUND

Patients with cirrhosis and ascites experience frequent hospital admissions, leading to poor quality of life and high healthcare costs. Monitoring weight is a component of ascites care and telemonitoring may improve outcomes and costs. Goals We aimed to evaluate the cost and outcomes of current care compared to a telemonitoring system for ascites. Study We developed a decision-analytic model that examined 100 simulated patients over a 6-month horizon. We compared usual care to a new telemonitoring program, which we estimate costs $50,000/6 months.

RESULTS

The cost of standard of care for 100 patients with cirrhotic ascites over a 6-month period is $167,500 more expensive than telemonitoring. By varying parameter probabilities by ± 10% and outcome costs by ± 20%, we found that standard of care remains more expensive than care with a telemonitoring intervention by $9400 to $340,200 per 6-month period. Standard of care leads to 9 more admissions (range 4 to 12) than a telemonitoring intervention, while telemonitoring leads to 9 more outpatient visits (range 6 to 9) and 28 additional outpatient large volume paracenteses (LVPs) (range 17 to 28). With more and less expensive telemonitoring interventions, standard of care remained more expensive. With 50% adherence to the intervention, standard of care was $89,848 more expensive.

CONCLUSIONS

In almost all probability and cost scenarios, a telemonitoring intervention is cost-saving for the management of cirrhotic ascites. Using hospital admissions as a surrogate for quality of care, patient outcomes are improved primarily though more proactive medical intervention and more LVPs.

Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy: Current Pharmacologic Treatments and Improving Clinical Outcomes

Overt hepatic encephalopathy is a generally reversible neurologic complication of cirrhosis. Overt hepatic encephalopathy has been associated with poor hospitalization- and mortality-related outcomes, which is important given increasing hepatic encephalopathy-related hospitalizations over time. The aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview of hospital- and mortality-related outcomes in patients with overt hepatic encephalopathy and the pharmacologic therapies that may improve these outcomes. Guideline-recommended prophylaxis with lactulose (first-line therapy) or secondary prophylaxis with rifaximin plus lactulose decreases hospital admissions and mortality rates. Rifaximin or lactulose treatment was beneficial for reducing the hospitalization rate in patients with hepatic encephalopathy compared with no treatment. Further, retrospective studies have shown that rifaximin with or without lactulose was effective for decreasing the number of hepatic encephalopathy episodes, hepatic encephalopathy-related hospitalizations, and duration of hospitalization. Ornithine phenylacetate, an ammonia-reducing agent currently in development, is also being investigated in hospitalized patients with hepatic encephalopathy. Overall, data support that prophylaxis for the prevention of hepatic encephalopathy recurrence improves outcomes in patients with cirrhosis and a history of hepatic encephalopathy.

Frailty as tested by the Liver Frailty Index is associated with decompensation and unplanned hospitalization in patients with compensated cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Frailty is associated with morbidity and mortality in advanced cirrhosis. However, the information on the association between frailty and outcome in compensated cirrhosis is scarce. We aimed to explore the prognostic impact of frailty in compensated cirrhosis.

METHODS

Compensated cirrhotic patients were prospectively enrolled. Frailty was defined by the Liver Frailty Index (LFI). Development of new hepatic decompensation (worsening ascites, portal hypertension-related bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, or acute kidney injury), unplanned hospitalization, and decompensation-free survival were recorded. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed by SF-36 questionnaire.

RESULTS

152 patients were included (MELD 9.2 ± 3.4, Child-Pugh A/B 84.9%/15.1%), and 24.3% were frail. By multivariable logistic regression analysis, age > 65 years, MELD score > 10, and Child-Pugh B were associated with frailty. Compared to the robust group, pre-frail and frail patients had significantly higher cumulative 1-year probabilities of developing decompensation (0% vs. 8.5% vs. 18.4%, p = .009), and unplanned hospitalization (0% vs. 13.5% vs. 34.2%, p < .001), and lower 1-year decompensation-free survival (100% vs. 90.8% vs. 80.4%, p = .014). Two models of multivariable Cox regression analysis were done adjusted with MELD-Na and Child-Pugh B, frailty was associated with developing decompensation (HR 3.01, p = .04; and 2.98, p = .04, respectively) and unplanned hospitalization (HR 2.46, p = .02; and 2.39, p = .03, respectively), but not the decompensation-free survival. By multivariable linear regression analysis, Child-Pugh B and frailty significantly decreased both physical and mental component scores of the SF-36 questionnaire.

CONCLUSION

Frailty is prevalent in compensated cirrhosis. The LFI provides additional prognostic values to recognized risk scores regarding the development of decompensation, hospitalization, and impaired QoL.

Sarcopenia and Frailty in Chronic Liver Damage: Common and Different Points

AIM

To elucidate the common and different points between sarcopenia and frailty in chronic liver damage (CLD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with both grip strength decline and skeletal muscle index decline were regarded as sarcopenia. Frailty was defined as a syndrome in which 3 or more of the following criteria were met: i) exhaustion, ii) body weight loss, iii) slow walking speed, iv) muscle weakness, and v) low physical activity.

RESULTS

Sarcopenia and frailty were identified in 52 patients (15.2%) and 46 (13.5%), respectively. The prevalence of sarcopenia and frailty was well stratified according to age and the liver cirrhosis (LC) status. In the multivariate analysis, we identified significant factors for sarcopenia: i) age, ii) LC, iii) body mass index and iv) extracellular water (ECW) to total body water (TBW) ratio, while only the ECW to TBW ratio was significant for frailty.

CONCLUSION

Sarcopenia and frailty in CLD should be separately evaluated.

A predictive nomogram incorporating gait speed for all-cause mortality in hospitalized cirrhotics

OBJECTIVES

No tailored model incorporating physical frailty for 2-year mortality in cirrhosis is available for practitioners in general practice. Thus we aimed to develop a model based on laboratory results and physical frailty allowing clinicians for stratifying cirrhotics by using individual estimate.

METHODS

One hundred and thirteen cases were assigned to the primary cohort, and all other 76 patients were regarded as the validation cohort. Multivariate Cox regression was performed, and a nomogram including five-meter gait speed (5MGS) were generated. The performance of the proposed model was assessed by C-index, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

On multivariate analysis, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium, albumin and 5MGS were independent predictors for 2-year mortality in cirrhosis. A nomogram incorporating all these parameters achieved a C-index of 0.804 (95%CI, 0.731-0.877). The calibration curve implied optimal correspondence between the predicted survival and actual outcomes. Our model is useful in the clinical settings based on DCA. Similar results were observed in the validation cohort with a C-index of 0.796 (95%CI, 0.689-0.899). Moreover, 5MGS, as a surrogate of physical performance, significantly correlated with multiple domains of general frailty according to Frailty Index (our published data), including instrumental activities of daily living, self-reported health, social activity and falls.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the nomogram incorporating 5MGS may represent an individualized tool for predicting mortality in cirrhosis for primary care physicians.

The Patient's Perspective in Cirrhosis: Unmet Supportive Care Needs Differ by Disease Severity, Etiology, and Age

Patients with cirrhosis have significant physical, psychological, and practical needs. We documented patients' perceived need for support with these issues and the differences with increasing liver disease severity, etiology, and age. Using the supportive needs assessment tool for cirrhosis (SNAC), we examined the rate of moderate-to-high unmet needs (Poisson regression; incidence rate ratio [IRR]) and the correlation between needs and sociodemographic/clinical characteristics (multivariable linear regression) in 458 Australians adults with cirrhosis. Primary liver disease etiology was alcohol in 37.6% of patients, chronic viral hepatitis C in 25.5%, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in 23.8%. A total of 64.6% of patients had Child-Pugh class A cirrhosis. Most patients (81.2%) had at least one moderate-to-high unmet need item; more than 25% reported a moderate-to-high need for help with "lack of energy," "sleep poorly," "feel unwell," "worry about … illness getting worse (liver cancer)," "have anxiety/stress," and "difficulty with daily tasks." Adjusting for key sociodemographic/clinical factors, patients with Child-Pugh C had a greater rate of "practical and physical needs" (vs. Child-Pugh A; IRR = 2.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.57-3.37), patients with NAFLD/NASH had a greater rate of needs with "lifestyle changes" (vs. alcohol; IRR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.18-2.77) and "practical and physical needs" (IRR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.23-1.65), and patients aged ≥65 years had fewer needs overall (vs. 18-64 years; IRR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.64-0.76). Higher overall SNAC scores were associated with Child-Pugh B and C (both P < 0.001), NAFLD/NASH (P = 0.028), patients with "no partner, do not live alone" (P = 0.004), unemployment (P = 0.039), ascites (P = 0.022), and dyslipidemia (P = 0.024) compared with their counterparts. Conclusion: Very high levels of needs were reported by patients with cirrhosis. This information is important to tailor patient-centered care and facilitate timely interventions or referral to support services.

AGA Clinical Practice Update on Palliative Care Management in Cirrhosis: Expert Review

Care with palliative care principles (aka Palliative Care, PC) is an approach to care that focuses on improving the quality of life of patients and their caregivers who are facing life-limiting illness. It encompasses the assessment and management of symptoms and changes in functional status, the provision of advance care planning and goals of care discussions, prognostication and caregiver support. PC is applicable across the spectrum of cirrhosis regardless of transplant eligibility. Although a common misconception, PC is not synonymous with hospice care. Unfortunately, despite a high symptom burden and challenges with predicting disease course and mounting evidence to support the benefits of PC in patients with cirrhosis, comprehensive PC and referral to hospice are carried out infrequently and very late in the course of disease. In order to meet the needs of our increasingly prevalent cirrhosis population, it is important that all clinicians who care for these patients are able to work together to deliver PC as a standard of care. To date there are limited guidelines/guidance statements to direct clinicians in the area of PC and cirrhosis. Herein we present an evidence-based review of ten Best Practice Advice statements that address key issues pertaining to PC in patients with cirrhosis.

Relevance of Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunts Detected with CT in Patients with Cirrhosis

Background Cirrhosis leads to portal hypertension and to the consequent formation of spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSSs), leading to complications related to the diversion of portal blood into the systemic circulation, which is called portosystemic shunt syndrome. Purpose To investigate the characteristics of patients with cirrhosis and an SPSS and secondarily to assess the prognostic impact of SPSSs on portal hypertension-related complications and transplant-free survival. Materials and Methods A retrospective database review of patients with cirrhosis (observed from March 2015 to July 2019) was performed to identify patients with CT imaging and outcomes data. For each patient, clinical and biochemical data were collected, and the presence, types, and sizes of SPSSs were investigated with CT. Patients were followed for a mean of 27.5 months ± 22.8. Multivariable logistic analysis was used to identify the clinical characteristics associated with the presence of SPSSs (any size) and presence of SPSSs 1 cm or larger. Competitive risk analysis (Fine and Gray model) was used to identify the association between SPSSs and complications and mortality. Results Two hundred twenty-two patients with cirrhosis (157 male, 65 female; mean age, 62 years ± 12 [standard deviation]) were evaluated. An SPSS was found in 141 of 222 patients (63.5%), and 40 of 222 (18%) had a shunt diameter of at least 1 cm. At presentation, variables independently associated with the presence of SPSSs (any size) were portal vein thrombosis (odds ratio, 5.5; P = .008) and Child-Pugh class C (odds ratio, 3.0; P = .03). Previous hepatic encephalopathy (odds ratio, 4.4; P = .001) and portal vein thrombosis (odds ratio, 5.3; P = .001) were the only variables associated with SPSSs larger than 1 cm. Patients with SPSSs of any size had higher mortality (subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.9; P < .001) and higher frequency of hepatic encephalopathy (subdistribution hazard ratio, 2.3; P = .023), gastrointestinal bleeding (subdistribution hazard ratio, 2.9; P = .039), and portal vein thrombosis (subdistribution hazard ratio, 7.6; P = .005). Conclusion The presence of spontaneous portosystemic shunts on CT images in patients with cirrhosis was associated with higher mortality and complications, including portal vein thrombosis, hepatic encephalopathy, and gastrointestinal bleeding. © RSNA, 2021 See also the editorial by Reeder in this issue.

Health-Related Quality of Life and Frailty in Chronic Liver Diseases

We sought to examine the relationship between frailty and health-related quality of life as evaluated using the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire in Japanese chronic liver disease (CLD) patients (n = 341, 122 liver cirrhosis cases, median age = 66 years). Frailty was defined as a clinical syndrome in which three or more of the following criteria were met (frailty score 3, 4, or 5): unintentional body weight loss, self-reported exhaustion, muscle weakness (grip strength: <26 kg in men and <18 kg in women), slow walking speed (<1.0 m/s), and low physical activity. Robust (frailty score 0), prefrail (frailty score 1 or 2), and frailty were found in 108 (31.7%), 187 (54.8%), and 46 (13.5%) patients, respectively. In all eight scales of the SF-36 (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health perception, vitality, social functioning, role emotion, and mental health), and the physical component summary score and mental component summary score, each score was well stratified according to the frailty status (all p < 0.0001). In the multivariate analysis, age (p = 0.0126), physical functioning (p = 0.0005), and vitality (p = 0.0246) were independent predictors linked to the presence of frailty. In conclusion, Japanese CLD patients with frailty displayed poorer conditions, both physically and mentally.

Serum Zinc Level Is Associated with Frailty in Chronic Liver Diseases

We sought to examine the serum zinc (Zn) level and frailty in patients with chronic liver diseases (CLDs, n = 285, 107 liver cirrhosis cases, median age = 66 years). Frailty was defined as a clinical syndrome in which three or more of the following criteria were met (frailty score 3, 4, or 5): unintentional body weight loss, self-reported exhaustion, muscle weakness (grip strength: <26 kg in men and <18 kg in women), slow walking speed (<1.0 m/s), and low physical activity. Robust (frailty score 0), prefrail (frailty score 1 or 2), and frailty were found in 90 (31.6%), 157 (55.1%), and 38 (13.3%), respectively. The median serum Zn levels in patients with frailty, prefrailty, and robust were 59.7 μg/dL, 72.8 μg/dL, and 76.9 μg/dL, respectively (p-values: frailty vs. prefrail, p < 0.0001; prefrail vs. robust, p = 0.0063; frailty vs. robust, p < 0.0001; overall p < 0.0001). For all cases, variables with absolute values of correlation coefficient with frailty score (0–5) ≥ 0.3 were age (r_s = 0.3570, p < 0.0001), serum albumin (r_s = −0.3212, p < 0.0001), extracellular water to total body water ratio using bioimpedance analysis (r_s = 0.4386, p < 0.0001), and serum Zn level (r_s = −0.3406, p < 0.0001). In conclusion, decreased serum Zn level in patients with CLDs can be closely associated with the presence of frailty.