Inflammatory ocular adverse events with the use of oral bisphosphonates: a retrospective cohort study

VKH-like uveitis during donafenib therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature

Background

The incidence of uveitis has risen with the use of targeted therapies, particularly prevalent in the administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors and MAP-kinase pathway inhibitors. We report the first case of VKH-like uveitis linked to Donafenib employed for the primary hepatocellular carcinoma, highlighting the necessity of ophthalmological follow-up in patients undergoing treatment with Donafenib.

Case presentation

A 55-year-old man developed VKH-like symptoms, including sporadic white patches, tinnitus, headache, and mild bilateral vision reduction, after 18 months of treatment with Donafenib and Sintilimab for hepatocellular carcinoma. Based on ophthalmological examinations that fundus fluorescein angiography images demonstrating multiple focal areas of pinpoint hyperfluorescence, along with pooling indicative of neurosensory detachment and disc leakage in both eyes, choroid thickening in swept-source optical coherence tomography, and "sunset-glow" fundus appearance, a tentative diagnosis of VKH-like uveitis was made. Initially, his best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/200 in the right eye and 20/80 in the left eye. Upon discontinuing Donafenib and starting a 3-month course of oral glucocorticoids, his BCVA improved to 20/30 in the right eye and 20/40 in the left eye.

Conclusion

Targeted drugs have been commonly used for cancer treatment in recent years, but challenges of ocular side effects emerged gradually. To optimize patient outcomes, regular ophthalmological follow-ups are essential for those undergoing treatment with targeted therapies like Donafenib.

Case report: A severe case of zoledronate-associated diffuse orbital inflammation and uveitis in a patient with metastatic breast cancer

Introduction

Zoledronate is a commonly prescribed medication to maintain bone health; however, a rare side effect includes ocular inflammation. We report a case of simultaneous anterior uveitis and orbital inflammation associated with zoledronate infusion in a patient with metastatic breast cancer. We also performed a literature search to provide an up-to-date summary of cases with zoledronate-associated ocular inflammation.

Methods

This is a case report with literature review. Literature search (timeline 2010 to 2023) was performed using PubMed with the search team: (zoledronate) AND (uveitis OR scleritis OR orbital inflammation OR ocular inflammation).

Results

A 48-year-old female presented with left eye pain, swelling, and decreased vision 2 days after receiving zoledronic acid infusion. An ophthalmic exam showed non-granulomatous anterior uveitis. CT orbits and ocular ultrasound showed signs of posterior scleritis and orbital inflammation. Ocular inflammation caused by an infection or metastatic cancer was ruled out. The patient was treated with both topical and systemic corticosteroids. Complete resolution of the inflammation occurred after 2.5 weeks.

Conclusion

Orbital inflammation and uveitis are an uncommon side effect of zoledronate but needs to be promptly recognized and treated to prevent sight-threatening complications.

[Scleritis and episcleritis]

Scleritis and episcleritis are rare ocular inflammatory diseases but deserve to be known by internists because of their frequent association with systemic autoimmune diseases. It is important to distinguish them between because their prognosis, therapeutic management and potential complications are very different. Episcleritis represents a superficial ocular inflammation with usually benign visual prognosis, no complication with local treatment, and is associated with a systemic autoimmune disease in rare cases. In contrast, scleritis is a potentially serious ophthalmological condition that can threaten the visual prognosis in the absence of appropriate systemic treatment. It is associated with an underlying disease in 40-50% of cases, in particular a systemic autoimmune disease (25-35% of cases) or an infectious cause (5-10% of cases). Rheumatoid arthritis and systemic vasculitides, particularly antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides, are the main autoimmune causes of scleritis and episcleritis. Scleritis can reveal the underlying autoimmune disease and requires systematic etiological investigations. Aggressive, complicated, refractory forms or those associated with a systemic autoimmune disease require glucocorticoids or even immunosuppressants, and close collaboration between ophthalmologists and internists is required. The development of biologic agents offers new effective therapeutic tools in the management of these difficult cases.

Treatment of Steroid-Resistant Nodular Episcleritis With Tacrolimus: A Case Report

A 46-year-old male, with no chronic medical illness, complained of pain, tearing, and redness for one-month duration, with no photophobia, discharge, or decrease in visual acuity. Examination revealed a small, painful, red swelling in the left sclera. Slit-lamp examination using a narrow bright slit beam revealed edema of the episcleral layer and injection of the superficial episcleral blood vessels. The rest of the anterior segment exam and fundoscopy were normal. The laboratory investigations and systemic workup were normal. The patient was initially treated with prednisolone acetate (Pred Forte) 1% every three hours per day for one week, and then four times per day for another week, and tapered gradually over eight weeks with systemic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as diclofenac sodium for eight weeks with mild improvement of clinical symptoms, but the size of the lesion remained without any change and the patient started to have a relapse of symptoms at the end of the course. Topical tacrolimus drops of 0.1% concentration were prepared in the pharmacy under complete sterile precautions and were used four times per day for the following six weeks duration instead of the initial therapy (steroids and NSAIDs). Tacrolimus drops were then tapered gradually over another six weeks duration. The patient showed dramatic suppression of inflammation and exceptional remission of symptoms with complete resolution of the episcleritis. Topical tacrolimus is very effective in the treatment of nodular episcleritis, which is resistant to steroid therapy. Patients with nodular episcleritis suffer from prolonged bouts of inflammation that are characteristically more painful than the diffuse type and may be associated with other systemic diseases. The case is steroid-resistant nodular episcleritis, which did not respond to the usual treatment and showed a good response to treatment with tacrolimus, which was first introduced in episcleritis. Tacrolimus is being used in other ocular diseases, but its use in episcleritis is unique.

Ocular Side Effects of Bisphosphonates: A Review of Literature

In rare cases, bisphosphonates are well established to cause ocular inflammation, presenting as uveitis, episcleritis, scleritis, orbital inflammation, and/or conjunctivitis. Some reports of bisphosphonate-associated neuro-ophthalmic complications also exist. We identified 101 reports in the literature relating to bisphosphonate-associated ocular complications. In a great majority of cases, symptoms resolve after discontinuation of the drug and anti-inflammatory treatment. Many cases recur if rechallenged with the same bisphosphonate. First-generation nonamino bisphosphonates, including clodronate and etidronate, are not associated with ocular inflammation. Only 2nd- and 3rd-generation amino bisphosphonates, including pamidronate, alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, and zoledronate are associated with these complications. The mechanism of bisphosphonate-induced ocular inflammation may be related to activation of γ/δ T cells or M1 macrophages. Intravenous forms, such as pamidronate and zoledronate, tend to have higher rates and faster onset of ocular inflammation, generally presenting within days of infusion. In oral bisphosphonates, such as alendronate and risedronate, these complications present with more sporadic timing. Rates of complications are also higher when bisphosphonates are used for malignancy, as doses tend to be higher compared with doses for osteoporosis.

Bisphosphonates Related Ocular Side Effects: A Case Series and Review of Literature

OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical features of patients with bisphosphonate related ocular side effects (BROSE).

METHODS

The medical records of all patients with BROSE between January 2009 and December 2019 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Nine cases with BROSE were identified. All subjects were female. Median age at diagnosis was of 69 years. The leading indication for bisphosphonate treatment was osteoporosis (n=7), Paget's disease of bone (n=1) and breast cancer (n=1). Six (66.67%) patients presented with uveitis, one (11%) episcleritis and two (22%) with orbital inflammation. Five events (55.5%) occurred within 10 days of initiating the bisphosphonate and the rest (44.44%) developed within 2 weeks to 3 years later. Four (44.44%) patients had concurrent thyroid disease. An association was found between underlying thyroid disease or autoimmunity.

CONCLUSION

BROSE is an uncommon complication of bisphosphonate therapy occurring more frequently in patients with an autoimmune predisposition.

Osteoporosis, bisphosphonates, and ocular inflammation

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis, as a musculoskeletal disease, is very common, especially in the era of aging society. It is described by a reduction in bone strength and increased risk of fractures, which are linked to considerable morbidity, mortality, and high healthcare burdens. Bisphosphonates are the most commonly used drugs to manage osteoporosis and they consequently reduce fracture risk. However, one of the clinical challenges is fear of side effects in patients who are using bisphosphonates as the administration of these drugs is lengthy. Ocular inflammation has been reporting as one of the potential vision-threatening side effects of bisphosphonates.

PURPOSE

To review previously reported ocular inflammation in patients taking bisphosphonates.

METHOD

A literature survey was conducted using databases in order to collect data for a narrative review of published reports regarding ocular side effects of bisphosphonates.

RESULTS

People taking bisphosphonates were at a relatively low risk of ocular inflammation, with the onset from a few hours after exposure up to more than 3 years. The release of inflammatory mediators mainly by activated gamma delta T cells in response to bisphosphonates was the main cause of ocular inflammation.

CONCLUSION

Strategies for treating patients with osteoporosis should consider the potential ocular side effects of bisphosphonates. Ocular inflammation, as one of the side effects of bisphosphonates, is a serious sight-threatening sign and should be taken seriously. Greater awareness of the association between bisphosphonate use and ocular inflammation may allow for earlier identification and timely treatment of future cases.

The ocular findings related to oral bisphosphonate use

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate ocular involvement findings in female osteoporosis patients using oral bisphosphonate (BP).

METHODS

A total of 51 female osteoporosis patients aged 50-75 years using oral BP for at least one year for the study group and 64 age-matched non-osteoporosis female patients for the control group were included in the study. The BP type and exposure time were noted. The ophthalmic examination findings and measurements of the flare of the patients who received oral BP due to osteoporosis and the controls were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean duration of BP use was 3.96 years. In the study group, it was detected four of 51 patients were diagnosed with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) (7.8%), seven of 102 eyes had erythematous, irregular, thickened lid margin or telangiectasia around the glandular orifices. There were no pathological findings on fundus examination. The mean value of measurements of the flare (ph/ms) was 7.90±7.96 in the study group, and 5.02±0.81 in the control group. When the mean values were compared, there was a significant difference between the two groups (P=.001). A significant difference was found in the mean value of measurements of the flare between the patients using alendronate, and ibandronate with the control group (P=.001; P=.005, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that the flare in the anterior chamber associated with chronic ocular inflammation can be seen higher rate in patients using oral alendronate, and ibandronate compared to those who do not. Morever it can be said that oral BPs may cause similar ocular side effects like as intravascular BPs.

Epidemiology and Risk Factors in Non-infectious Uveitis: A Systematic Review

Purpose: Non-infectious uveitis is a leading cause of vision loss in the developed world. The purpose of this systematic review is to investigate the epidemiology and risk factors of non-infectious uveitis over the last 50 years.

Methods: A systematic literature search of Pubmed/MEDLINE database was performed in the 50-year period from January 1971 to January 2021, according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies that assessed the epidemiology and risk factors for non-infectious uveitis were included.

Results: Few epidemiologic studies focus specifically on non-infectious uveitis. In the Unites States, the estimated prevalence of non-infectious uveitis is 121/100,000. The incidence and prevalence varies considerably worldwide. Females and the working age group (20–50 years) appear to be the most affected. Smoking and vitamin D deficiency are the biggest risk factors for non-infectious uveitis, while pregnancy appears to be protective. Additional risk factors include presence of other autoimmune diseases (thyroid disease, diabetes, celiac), pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, psychological stress, and certain medications (bisphosphonates, immune checkpoint inhibitors, female hormone therapy, and etanercept).

Discussion: Our systematic review summarizes the incidence and prevalence of non-infectious uveitis and associated modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors.

Update on Rare Adverse Events from Osteoporosis Therapy and Bisphosphonate Drug Holidays

Bisphosphonates remain a first-line treatment for osteoporosis and decrease vertebral and hip fractures without side effects in most patients. With extended treatment, osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femoral fracture occur rarely, but fear of side effects has led to not starting or discontinuing treatment. Atrial fibrillation and uveitis are less appreciated by the general public, but their rare incidence must be recognized. A strategy for safe long-term treatment is provided based on 2 major studies. Interruption of treatment after 3 to 5 years is possible for some patients, but those remaining at high fracture risk require longer term therapy.

Pharmacologically induced uveitis

Treatments of numerous systemic and local diseases of different etiologies may be accompanied by an unwanted side effect in the form of uveitis. We inform readers about medications that have the potential to cause uveitis and analyze the strength of association of these medications with uveitis. Subsequently, cessation of medication or appropriate treatment can be individualized for each patient for the purpose of preventing further damage to tissue structure and function. Being aware of these associations, physicians may readily identify medications that may cause uveitis and avoid expensive and unnecessary clinical and laboratory testing.

Zoledronate-induced acute anterior uveitis: a three-case report and brief review of literature

PURPOSE

This three-case report aims to highlight the ocular adverse effects induced by bisphosphonate therapy and to call clinicians' attention.

METHODS

Three cases of acute anterior uveitis secondary to the initial dose of zoledronate infusion were reported with focus on their symptoms, treatment regimens, and outcomes. A review of published reports provided a basis for discussion.

RESULTS

Three cases of acute anterior uveitis were either bilateral or unilateral. They demonstrated typical manifestations of bisphosphonate-induced acute anterior uveitis such as eye pain, blurred vision, conjunctival and ciliary hyperemia, keratic precipitates, and flare in the anterior chamber. After topical corticosteroid-containing comprehensive treatments, these symptoms resolved completely without any vision loss and long-term sequelae.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute anterior uveitis may be part of the acute phase reaction induced by zoledronate. Patients should be informed of its symptoms in advance and be monitored closely during and after administration. Clinicians should have a good awareness of the zoledronate-associated acute anterior uveitis and to treat it in a prompt and appropriate manner.

Extra-skeletal effects of bisphosphonates

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are pyrophosphate analogues widely used in diseases related to bone loss and increased bone turnover. Their high affinity for bone hydroxyapatite makes them ideal agents for bone diseases, while preventing them from reaching other cells and tissues. Data of the last decade, however, have demonstrated extra-skeletal tissue deposition and a variety of non-skeletal effects have been recently recognized. As such, BPs have been shown to exert anti-tumor, immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory and anti-diabetic effects. In addition, new delivery systems (liposomes, nanoparticles, hydrogels) are being developed in an effort to expand BPs clinical application to extra-skeletal tissues and enhance their overall therapeutic spectrum and effectiveness. In the present review, we outline current data on extra-skeletal actions of bisphosphonates and attempt to unravel the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.

Evolving spectrum of drug-induced uveitis at the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors results from the WHO's pharmacovigilance database

PURPOSE

Drug-induced uveitis is a rare but sight-threatening condition. We seek to determine the spectrum of drug-induced uveitis at the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).

METHODS

Retrospective pharmacovigilance study based on adverse drug reactions reported within VigiBase, the WHO international pharmacovigilance database. We included deduplicated individual case safety reports (ICSRs) reported as 'uveitis' at Preferred Term level according to the Medical Dictionary for Drug Regulatory Activities between 1967 and 04/28/2019. We performed a case/non-case analysis to study if suspected drug-induced uveitis were differentially reported for each suspected treatment compared to the full database. We excluded drugs with potential indication bias.

RESULTS

1404 ICSRs corresponding to 37 drugs had a significant over-reporting signal with a median age of 57 [42-68] years and 45.7% of males. We identified five major groups of treatments: bisphosphonates (26.9%), non-antiviral anti-infectious drugs (25.4%), protein kinase inhibitors (15.5%), ICI (15.0%), and antiviral drugs (11.1%). Severe visual loss was reported in 12.1% of cases. ICI and protein kinase inhibitors were the most recently emerging signals. The time to onset between first infusion and uveitis was significantly different between groups ranging from 5 days [2-19] in the bisphosphonate group to 138.5 [47.25-263.75] in protein kinase inhibitors group (p < 0.0001). Anti-Programmed Cell death 1 represented more than 70% of ICI-induced uveitis. We identified Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH)-like syndrome as being associated with ICI use.

CONCLUSIONS

The spectrum of drug-induced uveitis has changed with the evolution of pharmacopeia and the recent emergence of ICIs. VKH-like syndrome has been reported with ICI and protein kinase inhibitors therapy.

Western Osteoporosis Alliance Clinical Practice Series: Evaluating the Balance of Benefits and Risks of Long-Term Osteoporosis Therapies

Osteoporosis is a chronic disease that requires life-long strategies to reduce fracture risk. Few trials have investigated the balance of benefits and risk with long-term use of osteoporosis therapies, and fewer still have investigated the consequences of treatment discontinuation. The best available evidence suggests that up to 10 years of treatment with an oral bisphosphonate maintains the degree of fracture risk reduction observed in the 3-year registration trials. With denosumab, 10 years of therapy appears to provide fracture risk reduction similar to or better than that observed in the 3-year registration trial. Available data suggest an increasing but low risk of fractures with atypical features with increasing duration of bisphosphonate therapy. Published data linking duration of therapy to osteonecrosis of the jaw are lacking for bisphosphonates and denosumab. Other side effects associated with denosumab or bisphosphonates do not appear to be related to therapy duration. The antifracture benefits of long-term therapy with bisphosphonates and denosumab in appropriately selected patients outweigh the low risk of serious side effects.

Filling the gaps in SARDs research: collection and linkage of administrative health data and self-reported survey data for a general population-based cohort of individuals with and without diagnoses of systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARDs) from British Columbia, Canada

PURPOSE

Systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) are a group of debilitating autoimmune diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus and related disorders. Assessing the healthcare and economic burden of SARDs has been challenging: while administrative databases can be used to determine healthcare utilisation and costs with minimal selection and recall bias, other health, sociodemographic and economic data have typically been sourced from highly selected, clinic-based cohorts. To address these gaps, we are collecting self-reported survey data from a general population-based cohort of individuals with and without SARDs and linking it to their longitudinal administrative health data.

PARTICIPANTS

Using administrative data from the province of British Columbia (BC), Canada, we established a population-based cohort of all BC adults receiving care for SARDs during 1996-2010 (n=20 729) and non-SARD individuals randomly selected from the general population. BC Ministry of Health granted us contact information for 12 000 SARD and non-SARD individuals, who were recruited to complete the surveys by mail or online.

FINDINGS TO DATE

Four hundred individuals were initially invited to participate, with 135 (34%) consenting and 127 (94%) submitting the first survey (72% completed online). Sixty-three (49.6%) reported ≥1 SARD diagnosis. The non-SARDs group (n=64) was 92% female with mean age 57.0±11.6 years. The SARDs group (n=63) was 94% female with mean age 56.5±13.1 years. Forty-eight per cent of those with SARDs were current-or-former smokers (mean 10.6±16.2 pack-years), and 33% were overweight or obese (mean body mass index of 24.4±5.3).

FUTURE PLANS

Health and productivity data collected from the surveys will be linked to participants' administrative health data from the years 1990-2013, allowing us to determine the healthcare and lost productivity costs of SARDs, and assess the impact of patient-reported variables on utilisation, costs, disability and clinical outcomes. Findings will be disseminated through scientific conferences and peer-reviewed journals.

Preventive Effect of Phosphodiesterase Inhibitor Pentoxifylline Against Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: An Animal Study

PURPOSE

The aim of this experimental study was to investigate the prophylactic effect of pentoxifylline (PTX) on medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Female Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 33) received zoledronic acid (ZA) for 8 weeks to create an osteonecrosis model. The left mandibular second molars were extracted and the recovery period lasted 8 weeks before sacrifice. PTX was intraperitoneally administered to prevent MRONJ. The specimens were histopathologically and histomorphometrically evaluated.

RESULTS

Histomorphometrically, between the control and ZA groups, there was no statistically significant difference in total bone volume (P = .999), but there was a statistically significant difference in bone ratio in the extraction sockets (P < .001). A comparison of the bone ratio of the ZA group with the ZA/PTX group (PTX administered after extraction) showed no statistically significant difference (P = .69), but there was a statistically significant difference with the ZA/PTX/PTX group (PTX administered before and after extraction; P = .008). Histopathologically, between the control and ZA groups, there were statistically significant differences for inflammation (P = .013), vascularization (P = .022), hemorrhage (P = .025), and regeneration (P = .008). Between the ZA and ZA/PTX groups, there were no statistically significant differences for inflammation (P = .536), vascularization (P = .642), hemorrhage (P = .765), and regeneration (P = .127). Between the ZA and ZA/PTX/PTX groups, there were statistically significant differences for inflammation (P = .017), vascularization (P = .04), hemorrhage (P = .044), and regeneration (P = .04).

CONCLUSION

In this experimental model of MRONJ, it might be concluded that although PTX, given after tooth extraction, improves new bone formation that positively affects bone healing, it is not prophylactic. However, PTX given before tooth extraction is prophylactic. Therefore, PTX might affect healing in a positive way by optimizing the inflammatory response.

The Risk of Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism in Primary Sjögren Syndrome: A General Population-based Study

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the future risk and time trends of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in individuals with newly diagnosed primary Sjögren syndrome (pSS) in the general population.

METHODS

Using a population database that includes all residents of British Columbia, Canada, we created a study cohort of all patients with incident SS and up to 10 controls from the general population matched for age, sex, and entry time. We compared incidence rates (IR) of pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and VTE between the 2 groups according to SS disease duration. We calculated HR, adjusting for confounders.

RESULTS

Among 1175 incident pSS cases (mean age 56.7 yrs, 87.6% women), the IR of PE, DVT, and VTE were 3.9, 2.8, and 5.2 per 1000 person-years (PY), respectively; the corresponding rates in the comparison cohort were 0.9, 0.8, and 1.4 per 1000 PY. Compared with non-SS individuals, the multivariable HR for PE, DVT, and VTE among SS cases were 4.07 (95% CI 2.04-8.09), 2.80 (95% CI 1.27-6.17), and 2.92 (95% CI 1.66-5.16), respectively. The HR matched for age, sex, and entry time for VTE, PE, and DVT were highest during the first year after SS diagnosis (8.29, 95% CI 2.57-26.77; 4.72, 95% CI 1.13-19.73; and 7.34, 95% CI 2.80-19.25, respectively).

CONCLUSION

These findings provide population-based evidence that patients with pSS have a substantially increased risk of VTE, especially within the first year after SS diagnosis. Further research into the involvement of monitoring and prevention of VTE in SS may be warranted.

Use of Adjuvant Bisphosphonates and Other Bone-Modifying Agents in Breast Cancer: A Cancer Care Ontario and American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline

Purpose To make recommendations regarding the use of bisphosphonates and other bone-modifying agents as adjuvant therapy for patients with breast cancer. Methods Cancer Care Ontario and ASCO convened a Working Group and Expert Panel to develop evidence-based recommendations informed by a systematic review of the literature. Results Adjuvant bisphosphonates were found to reduce bone recurrence and improve survival in postmenopausal patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer. In this guideline, postmenopausal includes patients with natural menopause or that induced by ovarian suppression or ablation. Absolute benefit is greater in patients who are at higher risk of recurrence, and almost all trials were conducted in patients who also received systemic therapy. Most studies evaluated zoledronic acid or clodronate, and data are extremely limited for other bisphosphonates. While denosumab was found to reduce fractures, long-term survival data are still required. Recommendations It is recommended that, if available, zoledronic acid (4 mg intravenously every 6 months) or clodronate (1,600 mg/d orally) be considered as adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal patients with breast cancer who are deemed candidates for adjuvant systemic therapy. Further research comparing different bone-modifying agents, doses, dosing intervals, and durations is required. Risk factors for osteonecrosis of the jaw and renal impairment should be assessed, and any pending dental or oral health problems should be dealt with prior to starting treatment. Data for adjuvant denosumab look promising but are currently insufficient to make any recommendation. Use of these agents to reduce fragility fractures in patients with low bone mineral density is beyond the scope of the guideline. Recommendations are not meant to restrict such use of bone-modifying agents in these situations. Additional information at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-adjuvant-bisphosphonates-guideline , www.asco.org/guidelineswiki , https://www.cancercareontario.ca/guidelines-advice/types-of-cancer/breast .

Oral Bisphosphonates and Risk of Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration

PURPOSE

To examine the risk of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with oral bisphosphonates.

DESIGN

Three study designs were used: (1) disproportionality analysis; (2) case-control study; (3) self-controlled case series (SCCS).

METHODS

setting: (1) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database; (2) 2 patient cohorts from British Columbia, Canada.

STUDY POPULATION

(1) All reports of AMD to the FDA with oral bisphosphoantes; (2) patients with wet AMD in British Columbia (2009-2013) and 1 million controls (2000-2007).

INTERVENTION

Oral bisphosphonates.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

(1) Reports of AMD to the FDA; (2) first diagnosis of wet AMD verified by a retina specialist in British Columbia.

RESULTS

In the disproportionality analysis there were 133 cases of AMD reported with alendronate, 20 with ibandronate, and 14 with risedronate. The reported odds ratios (RORs) for alendronate, ibandronate, and risedronate were 3.82 (95% CI: 2.94-4.96), 2.40 (95% CI: 1.49-3.86), and 2.87 (95% CI: 1.58-5.19), respectively. In the case-control analysis there were 6367 cases and 6370 corresponding controls. The adjusted OR for wet AMD among regular users of bisphosphonates in the 1, 2, and 3 years prior to the index date were 1.24 (1.12-1.38), 1.38 (1.22-1.56), and 1.59 (1.38-1.82), respectively. In the SCCS analysis there were 198 cases of wet AMD on continuous bisphosphonate therapy. The rate ratio for wet AMD for continuous bisphosphonate use was 1.99 (95% CI: 1.41-2.79). We did not have information on intravenous bisphosphonates.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous users of oral bisphosphonates are at a higher risk of developing wet AMD. Given the observational nature of this study and limitation of the data, future studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Acute bilateral uveitis and right macular edema induced by a single infusion of zoledronic acid for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis as a substitution for oral alendronate: a case report

BACKGROUND

Zoledronic acid-induced uveitis (ZAIU) is rare but severe, and has been recently considered part of an acute phase reaction. Only 15 cases have been reported since 2005. Here we describe a case with macular edema, which is the first reported case observed after long-term alendronate tolerance.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 63-year-old Asian woman received her first intravenous zoledronic acid treatment for the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis as a more convenient substitute for oral alendronate. Twenty-four hours later, bilateral eye irritations, periorbital swelling, blurred vision, and diplopia presented. The complete blood count and transaminase levels were normal, but the erythrocytic sedimentation, C-reactive protein, and serum C4 levels were elevated. On detailed ophthalmological examination, a diagnosis of bilateral acute uveitis and macular edema in the right eye was made. The ocular symptoms were not improved until administration of topical and oral steroids. Complete resolution was achieved. There was no rechallenge of bisphosphonates, and no recurrence at 6 months follow-up. Based on an extensive review, abnormal fundus is rarely reported, especially in cases of macular edema. Rechallenge with zoledronic acid in five cases induced no additional uveitis, and changing the medication to pamidronate in another patient was also tolerated. Interestingly, our patient suffered from uveitis soon after intravenous zoledronate exposure after a two-year tolerance to oral alendronate.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report of zoledronic acid induced uveitis with macular edema after long-term alendronate tolerance. Prior oral alendronate may not entirely prevent ZAIU. Steroids are usually necessary in the treatment of ZAIU. Bisphosphonate rechallenge is not fully contraindicated, and prior steroid administration may be a more reasonable treatment choice according to the available evidence.

Evaluación del manejo farmacológico de la Osteoporosis y la Osteopenia en una institución de régimen especial de Bogotá

<p><strong>Objetivo</strong> Evaluar los hábitos de prescripción de medicamentos utilizados en el tratamiento de osteoporosis y osteopenia en una institución de salud de régimen especial de Bogotá, comparados guías de manejo internacional de la osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Metodología </strong>Se realizó un estudio observacional descriptivo de corte transversal con recolección retrospectiva de la información. Corresponde a un estudio de utilización de medicamentos sobre hábitos de prescripción, para el cual se tomó la información de 332 pacientes tratados con Bifosfonatos, sales de calcio, Ranelato de Estroncio y Teriparatida. Se evaluaron los hábitos de prescripción mediante la comparación con las Guías de manejo de la National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) y el National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE).</p><p><strong>Resultados </strong>El 89 % de la población corresponde a mujeres con un promedio de edad de 67 años. La dosis y frecuencia de administración corresponde a lo establecido por las guías de manejo; el 32,2 % fue tratado con Bisfosfonatos por más de 3 años, el 94,2 % fue tratado en prevención primaria y el 89,6 % fue tratado sin diagnóstico de Osteoporosis mediante Densitometría Mineral Ósea (DMO). De acuerdo a las recomendaciones de la guía NOF el 67,3 % de los pacientes se trató innecesariamente.</p><p><strong>Conclusiones</strong> Los hábitos de prescripción de medicamentos utilizados en el tratamiento de las osteoporosis no están de acuerdo a las guías de manejo, evidenciándose un uso no adecuado especialmente de bifosfonatos.</p>

Inflammatory eye reactions with bisphosphonates and other osteoporosis medications: what are the risks?

Inflammatory eye reactions (IERs) are rare but have been associated with medications to treat osteoporosis. The aim of this review is to summarize the current literature on the association between IERs and specific medications to treat osteoporosis (bisphosphonates, selective estrogen receptor modulators, strontium, denosumab and teriparatide). We cover the known epidemiology, potential pathogenic mechanisms and a resume of unanswered questions. Briefly, this review highlights that none of the existing randomized clinical trials were powered to identify these rare adverse events, and the majority of the information available is from spontaneous case reports and case series reporting associations between bisphosphonates and IERs. No case reports describe IERs after other anti-osteoporosis medications. Importantly, some case reports describe recurrence of the IER after affected patients were rechallenged with the same or another bisphosphonate, and that no reported cases resolved without discontinuation of the bisphosphonate. However, three large population-based cohort studies have shown conflicting results between osteoporosis treatments and IERs, but overall these studies suggest that IERs may actually be part of underlying inflammatory disease processes that also cause osteoporosis, rather than due to the medications used to treat osteoporosis themselves. There are no clear pathogenic mechanisms for how bisphosphonates could potentially cause IERs. However, the drug is secreted into the tears by the lacrimal gland and could cause irritation to the mucous membranes with subsequent release of inflammatory mediators, similar to the systemic response typically seen after infusion of bisphosphonates. However, in summary it is still not known whether there is a true causal association between bisphosphonates or other anti-osteoporosis medications and IERs, or whether it is confounding by indication and is actually due to underlying inflammatory diseases that cause both osteoporosis and IERs.

Drug-induced uveitis

INTRODUCTION

Drug-induced uveitis is a well described but often overlooked and/or misdiagnosed adverse reaction to medication. There are an increasing number of medications that have been related to the onset of intraocular inflammation. Identification of these inciting agents may decisively help the diagnostic algorithm involving new cases of uveitis.

AREAS COVERED

This review intends to be an updated comprehensive, practical guide for practitioners regarding the main drugs that have been associated with uveitis. A classification proposed by Naranjo et al. in 1981 for establishing potential causality is applied examining possible mechanisms of action. A guide for clinicians about the rationale of these observations when dealing with patients with uveitis is provided.

EXPERT OPINION

Several agents with different routes of administration (systemic, topical and/or intraocular) may cause intraocular inflammation. The mechanism behind ocular inflammation is frequently unknown. Clinicians should be aware of the potential drug effect to optimize diagnosis and management of such patients.

Current challenges in the treatment of osteoporosis: an opportunity for bazedoxifene

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis affects millions of postmenopausal women worldwide. Osteoporosis-related fractures can lead to chronic pain, disability, systemic complications, and increased risk of recurrent fractures, resulting in increased healthcare costs and mortality. Because currently available therapies have unique benefit/risk profiles, challenges remain in selecting the most appropriate treatment for each osteoporotic woman. RESEARCH AND RESULTS: Bazedoxifene (BZA), a new selective estrogen receptor modulator, is being developed for postmenopausal osteoporosis. In a 3 year, global, phase 3 study, BZA significantly reduced the risk of new vertebral fractures and nonvertebral fractures in women with higher baseline fracture risk compared with placebo. In two extensions of this study, the efficacy of BZA in reducing vertebral fracture risk was sustained over 7 years. BZA improved lumbar spine and total hip bone mineral density compared with placebo at 3 and 5 years, and demonstrated a favorable safety/tolerability profile, with no endometrial or breast stimulation. BZA was cost-effective compared with raloxifene in a 3 year, head-to-head comparative trial. Indirect comparisons further suggest that BZA may be as effective as bisphosphonates in reducing risk of nonvertebral fractures in women at high risk of fracture. BZA demonstrated efficacy and safety for treating postmenopausal osteoporosis over 7 years, particularly in women at a higher fracture risk.

CONCLUSION

Because of its specific pharmacologic profile, BZA may be appropriate for postmenopausal women seeking a tolerable, safe, effective, and cost-effective long-term osteoporosis treatment.

Uveitis risk following oral fluoroquinolone therapy: a nested case-control Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk of uveitis associated with the use of oral fluoroquinolones.

METHODS

Nested case-control study of all patients who visited an ophthalmologist in British Columbia, Canada, between 2000 and 2007, as captured in the British Columbia Health Linked Database.

RESULTS

A total 3383 incident cases of uveitis and 33,830 corresponding controls were identified. Among patients who had used oral fluoroquinolones within the past 30 days, the adjusted relative risk of uveitis was 3.53 (95% CI, 2.84-4.39). However, the relative risk of uveitis among patients taking oral macrolides and beta-lactams was also significantly elevated.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data do not provide convincing evidence of an association between fluoroquinolones and uveitis, as this study found an association between several classes of antibiotics and uveitis. It is possible that the systemic processes for which these antibiotics are being prescribed are in fact the inciting factors for the uveitis.

Pro-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic effects of bisphosphonates on human cultured retinal pigment epithelial cells

AIM

Bisphosphonates have been shown to induce ocular inflammatory diseases such as uveitis and scleritis, while being protective against angiogenic diseases like neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Therefore, we studied the effects of bisphosphonates on primary culture of human fetal retinal pigment epithelium (hRPE), a cell type known to secrete both inflammatory and angiogenic factors. Alendronate and etidronate were selected for this experiment as they are members of the two structurally different classes of bisphosphonates.

METHODS

Primary cultures of hRPE were serum-starved for 24 h and then treated for 24 h with alendronate (0.0001, 0.1, 100 µM) or etidronate (0.01, 1 µM). Cell viability was measured using the MTT assay. Investigation of secreted cytokines induced by bisphosphonates was performed using a human cytokine 29-Plex Panel (Bio-Plex) array and the results were analysed with an analysis of variance (ANOVA).

RESULTS

Etidronate, at the lower concentration, significantly increased the expression of interleukin (IL)-6 (p=0.03) and IL-8 (p=0.04). At the higher concentration, etidronate significantly decreased the expression of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (p=0.02) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) (p=0.02). Alendronate, at the highest concentration, significantly increased the expression of IL-8 (p=0.02) and decreased the expression of eotaxin (p=0.02). Alendronate also significantly decreased the expression of bFGF at all concentrations (p<0.05) and demonstrated a trend towards decreasing vascular endothelial growth factor expression at low concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

Alendronate and etidronate display dose dependent effects in hRPE cells. Alendronate and etidronate administration resulted in concentration dependent elevations in inflammatory cytokines. Furthermore, alendronate and etidronate administration resulted in reduced expression of a number of angiogenic factors. These findings may explain the increased incidence of ocular inflammation as well as the therapeutic effect on neovascular AMD which have been described with bisphosphonates.

Inflammatory eye reactions in patients treated with bisphosphonates and other osteoporosis medications: cohort analysis using a national prescription database

Ocular inflammatory reactions have been described in patients on bisphosphonate treatment. We estimated the incidence rate of ocular inflammation at 3 and 12 months in patients treated for osteoporosis using a register-based cohort linked to prescription data (hospitals and private practice) and hospital data. From January 1, 1997 to December 31, 2007, a total of 88,202 patients beginning osteoporosis therapy were identified. Of those patients, 82,404 (93%) began oral bisphosphonates and 5798 (7%) nonbisphosphonates. Within the first year of treatment, 4769 (5.4%) of patients on osteoporosis therapy filled one or more prescriptions for topical eye steroids (TES). TES treatment rates (per 1000 patient-years) in the first year of osteoporosis treatment were 44 (95% confidence interval [CI] 42 to 46) for alendronate, 40 (95% CI 38 to 43) for etidronate, 45 (95% CI 35 to 57) for risedronate, 32 (95% CI 27 to 37) for raloxifene, and 64 (95% CI 49 to 83) for strontium ranelate. After adjustment for age, Charlson index, and the number of comedications, pulmonary disease in men was associated with an increased use of TES (odds ratio [OR] = 1.48; 95% CI 1.17 to 1.86; p = 0.001). In women, malignant disease (OR = 1.27; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.60; p = 0.04) and pulmonary disease (OR = 1.32; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.62; p = 0.01) were significant predictors at 3 months and rheumatic diseases at 12 months (OR = 1.20; 95% CI 1.10 to 1.31; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the different drug classes (bisphosphonates versus nonbisphosphonates, alendronate versus nonalendronate-bisphosphonates) for risk of ocular inflammation, with age and the number of comedications being the only significant predictors. Hospital-treated uveitis (48 patients, or 0.05%) showed a similar trend. In conclusion, after initiation of treatment for osteoporosis, the risk of inflammatory eye reactions requiring TES is relatively low and not significantly different between bisphosphonate and nonbisphosphonate users. Patients with a rheumatic or pulmonary disease are at increased risk.

Clinical role of bisphosphonate therapy

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are synthetic analogues of pyrophosphate. They inhibit bone resorption and are therefore widely used in disorders where there are increases or disruptions in bone resorption. This includes postmenopausal osteoporosis, glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, Paget's disease of bone, and malignancy-related bone loss. To best understand the clinical application of BPs, an understanding of their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics is important. This review describes the structure, pharmacology and mode of action of BPs, focusing on their role in clinical practice. Controversies and side effects surrounding their use will also be discussed.