Antipsychotic use in pregnancy

Safety of psychotropic medications in pregnancy: an umbrella review

Weighing risks and benefits of the use of psychotropic medications during pregnancy remains a challenge worldwide. We systematically assessed the strength of associations between psychotropic medication use in pregnant people with mental disorders and various adverse health outcomes in both pregnant people and foetuses. Systematic reviews with meta-analyses of observational studies investigating the association between exposure to psychotropic medication in pregnancy and any adverse health outcomes were included. Credibility was graded into convincing, highly suggestive, suggestive, weak or not significant. Quality of the meta-analyses and of individual studies were assessed with A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), respectively. We considered 21 meta-analyses encompassing 17,290,755 participants (AMSTAR 2 high = 1, low = 12, or critically low = 8). Evidence was suggestive for: (1) preterm birth in pregnant people with either any mental disorder (equivalent odds ratio 1.62 (95% confidence interval 1.24-2.12) or depression (1.65 [1.34-2.02]) receiving antidepressants during any trimester of pregnancy; (2) small for gestational age for pregnant people with depression receiving a SSRI during any trimester of pregnancy (1.50 [1.19-1.90]); and (3) major congenital malformation (1.24 [1.09-1.40]) or cardiac malformations (1.28 [1.11-1.47]) in babies for pregnant people with depression or anxiety receiving paroxetine during first trimester of pregnancy. Additional associations were supported by weak evidence, or were not statistically significant. This umbrella review found no convincing or highly suggestive level of evidence of adverse health outcomes associated with psychotropic medication use in pregnant people with mental disorders.

Comparative Safety of Antipsychotic Medications and Mood Stabilizers During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Congenital Malformations and Prenatal Outcomes

BACKGROUND

A network meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the risk of congenital malformations and other prenatal outcomes in fetuses after exposure to antipsychotic medications and mood stabilizers during pregnancy.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases up to 15 December 2023, to identify experimental and observational studies comparing antipsychotic and mood stabilizer treatments with control treatments (no exposure). The primary outcome of the study was the incidence of congenital malformations and the secondary outcomes were preterm birth and spontaneous abortion. Additionally, two authors independently assessed the risk of bias in each domain of the included studies using the ROBINS-I tool and evaluated the quality of evidence using the CINeMA rating tool.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 18,334 potential records, and 22 studies involving 3,042,997 pregnant women were ultimately included. Compared with the unexposed group, quetiapine [odds ratio (OR), 1.19; 95% credible interval (CrI), 1.01-1.39], aripiprazole (OR, 1.30; 95% CrI 1.10-1.65), olanzapine (OR, 1.33; 95% CrI 1.11-1.64), risperidone (OR, 1.43; 95% CrI 1.18-1.77), and lithium (OR, 1.61; 95% CrI 1.07-2.30) were associated with a slightly increased risk of congenital malformations. In contrast, lamotrigine (OR, 1.21; 95% CrI 0.86-1.64), ziprasidone (OR, 1.14; 95% CrI 0.73-1.72), and haloperidol (OR, 1.26; 95% CrI 0.90-1.75) did not show significant differences compared with the unexposed group, with narrower credible intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence from this analysis suggests that, overall, quetiapine has the lowest teratogenic risk when used during pregnancy, making it the safer option for pregnant women. Lamotrigine and haloperidol follow closely behind. At the same time, the use of lurasidone and ziprasidone should be approached with caution, and further clinical studies are necessary to better assess their safety.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD4201811373.

Risk of congenital anomalies associated with psychotropic medications: a review of neonatal reports in the FDA adverse event reporting System (FAERS)

PURPOSE

This study investigates the potential association between commonly prescribed psychotropic medications, such as Atypical Antipsychotics (AAs), Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs), and Serotonin Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors (SNRIs), and congenital anomalies in newborns. The analysis uses data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

METHODS

Spontaneously reported cases of congenital anomalies in newborns (under 28 days old) were extracted from the FAERS database, covering January 2004 to June 2023. Four signal detection methods-Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS)-were employed to identify signals associated with neonatal deformities caused by specific drugs, ensuring signal stability and reliability.

RESULTS

The FAERS database contains 21,605 reports involving neonates, with 6,208 cases reporting congenital anomalies. Of these, 6,164 cases (99.29%) attributed the adverse events to drugs. The top ten psychotropic drugs associated with neonatal congenital anomalies were venlafaxine, quetiapine, olanzapine, sertraline, citalopram, mirtazapine, duloxetine, paroxetine, aripiprazole, and fluoxetine. Different drug classes showed varying risks of congenital anomalies, with higher signal frequencies observed for cardiac, nervous system, respiratory-thoracic-mediastinal, and musculoskeletal-connective tissue disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that commonly used psychotropic drugs may increase the risk of congenital abnormalities in newborns, necessitating caution for pregnant women. Compared to other psychotropic drugs, the teratogenic effects of aripiprazole and fluoxetine are relatively minor.

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

Overcoming the Limitations of Clinical Trials in Special Populations: Due to ethical considerations involving pregnant women and newborns, conducting clinical trials is often challenging. Real-world studies are currently one of the most important sources of evidence for evaluating the safety of medication use during pregnancy. Addressing Challenges in International Signal Detection: There is no established gold standard for signal detection, and different countries use varying methods. To minimize the impact of false-positive signals on the results, this study employs a combination of four different methods for signal mining. Advancing Beyond Small Retrospective Cohort Studies and Case Reports: Most current research on the safety of medication use during pregnancy relies on small retrospective cohort studies or case reports. Studies based on large pharmacovigilance databases overcome these limitations. This approach not only captures information on all drugs that may lead to congenital anomalies in newborns but also monitors rare yet significant safety information, providing more comprehensive data support for assessing the safety of medication use during pregnancy.

Use of Long-Acting Injectables for Severe Mental Illness in the Peripartum Period: A Case Report and a Scoping Review

The management of acute mania during pregnancy poses a complex clinical task, necessitating careful consideration of treatment options and demanding a delicate balance between the risks associated with medication use and the adverse impacts of untreated severe mental illness on the fetus. Medication nonadherence stands out as a significant factor contributing to relapse, with rates potentially reaching 40%. The pharmacokinetic profile of long-acting injectable (LAI) risperidone contrasts with that of oral risperidone, characterized by a gradual and consistent release from the depot, mitigating fluctuations between peak and trough concentrations. Clinically, this sustained plasma profile of LAI risperidone has been linked to a reduction in adverse events, such as extrapyramidal side effects, metabolic syndrome, and hyperprolactinemia. Numerous studies have indicated that LAI antipsychotic therapy correlates with reduced mortality rates and decreased number of hospitalizations. This case report illustrates the effective management of acute mania in a pregnant 32-year-old through the utilization of LAI risperidone. This case underscores the significance of individualized treatment strategies and emphasizes the potential utility of LAI antipsychotics as a viable therapeutic option for managing acute mania in pregnancy. Further research is warranted to delineate the long-term outcomes and safety profile of LAI antipsychotics in this population.

Tolerability and safety outcomes of first-line oral second-generation antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia

INTRODUCTION

Antipsychotics are the foundation of pharmacologic treatment for schizophrenia. There are many oral antipsychotics available and given that these medications are generally considered comparably efficacious when titrated to an adequate dose, their varied tolerability, and safety profiles become critically important for medication selection.

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviews tolerability and safety considerations for first-line second-generation oral antipsychotics currently approved for the treatment of schizophrenia in the USA. Excluded from consideration are clozapine and non-oral formulations.

EXPERT OPINION

Among antipsychotics, there are many differences in adverse reactions observed in clinical trials, such as variable likelihood to cause sedation vs insomnia, weight gain and abnormalities in glucose/lipid metabolism, hyperprolactinemia, potential for impact on the QT interval, and motoric adverse effects. Additional safety data that can help with medication selection include safety in pregnancy and lactation, and potential for drug-drug interactions. Ultimately, working with patients to personalize treatment by focusing on safety and individual tolerability considerations for various adverse effects can help in building a therapeutic alliance and improving patients' outcomes.

Management of the Agitated Patient

The acutely agitated patient should be managed in a step-wise fashion, beginning with non-coercive de-escalation strategies and moving on to pharmacologic interventions and physical restraints as necessary. Face-to-face examination, monitoring, and documentation by the physician are essential. The emergency physician should be familiar with multiple pharmaceutical options, tailored to the individual patient. Use of ketamine, benzodiazepines and antipsychotics should be considered. Patient autonomy, safety, and medical well-being are paramount.

Navigating the Complexity of a Bipolar Pregnant Patient With Multiple Comorbidities

Bipolar disorder I (BDI) is a psychiatric disorder characterized by the occurrence of at least one manic episode. Within the scope of neurological disorders, epilepsy and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) share clinical features and can be differentiated using electroencephalogram (EEG). Substance use disorder is a condition defined by impaired control, risky use, social impairment, and addictive behaviors. We present the case of a 20-year-old pregnant woman with BDI associated with a history of epilepsy, PNES, and polyvalent substance use. The patient presented to the emergency department via the Baker Act involuntary hold multiple times throughout her pregnancy. Recognizing that the welfare of the mother and child was at risk, the court ordered a two-month commitment of inpatient psychiatric treatment at 30 weeks' gestation to ensure safe delivery. Comprehensive inpatient treatment, including risperidone, levetiracetam, lacosamide, haloperidol, diphenhydramine, lorazepam, and later clozapine, and a discharge plan for both the mother and the child are described in detail. Our goal is to contribute to the growing body of knowledge on the management of complex pregnant patients with psychiatric conditions in order to optimize outcomes for maternal and fetal health.

Psychiatric Treatment in Pregnancy: A Narrative Review

Pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium are a series of transformations and huge changes in a woman's life, which may also be accompanied by various mental problems. Very often, women experiencing mental disorders during this period and their doctors face a decision on safety of treatment. The purpose of the following review was to assess the safety of treatment during pregnancy. Internet scientific database PubMed was searched. There are groups of psychiatric medications contraindicated during pregnancy such as valproates as well as relatively safe ones such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or antipsychotics. However, in every clinical situation, a decision should be made with caution, based on individual characteristics of patient, severity of disorder and clinical picture.

Association of In Utero Antipsychotic Medication Exposure With Risk of Congenital Malformations in Nordic Countries and the US

Importance

Psychiatric disorders are common among female individuals of reproductive age. While antipsychotic medication use is increasing, the safety of such medications in pregnancy is an area with large evidence gaps.

Objective

To evaluate the risk of first-trimester antipsychotic exposure with respect to congenital malformations, focusing on individual drugs and specific malformation subtypes.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study used data from nationwide health registers from the 5 Nordic countries and the US and spanned 1996 to 2018. The Nordic cohort included all pregnancies resulting in singleton live-born infants, and the US cohort consisted of publicly insured mothers linked to their live-born infants nested in the nationwide Medicaid Analytic eXtract. Data were analyzed from November 2020 to April 2022.

Exposures

One or more first-trimester dispensing of any atypical, any typical, and individual antipsychotic drugs.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Any major congenital malformation and specific malformation subtypes previously suggested to be associated with antipsychotic exposure in utero: cardiovascular malformations, oral clefts, neural tube defects, hip dysplasia, limb reduction defects, anorectal atresia/stenosis, gastroschisis, hydrocephalus, other specific brain anomalies, and esophageal disorders. Propensity score stratification was used to control for potential confounders. Pooled adjusted estimates were calculated using indirect standardization.

Results

A total of 6 455 324 unexposed mothers (mean maternal age range across countries: 24-31 years), 21 751 mothers exposed to atypical antipsychotic drugs (mean age range, 26-31 years), and 6371 mothers exposed to typical antipsychotic drugs (mean age range, 27-32 years) were included in the study cohort. Prevalence of any major malformation was 2.7% (95% CI, 2.7%-2.8%) in unexposed infants, 4.3% (95% CI, 4.1%-4.6%) in infants with atypical antipsychotic drug exposure, and 3.1% (95% CI, 2.7%-3.5%) in infants with typical antipsychotic drug exposure in utero. Among the most prevalent exposure-outcome combinations, adjusted relative risks (aRR) were generally close to the null. One exception was olanzapine exposure and oral cleft (aRR, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.1-4.3]); however, estimates varied across sensitivity analyses. Among moderately prevalent combinations, increased risks were observed for gastroschisis and other specific brain anomalies after atypical antipsychotic exposure (aRR, 1.5 [95% CI, 0.8-2.6] and 1.9 [95% CI, 1.1-3.0]) and for cardiac malformations after chlorprothixene exposure (aRR, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.0-2.7]). While the association direction was consistent across sensitivity analyses, confidence intervals were wide, prohibiting firm conclusions.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, considering the evidence from primary and sensitivity analyses and inevitable statistical noise for very rare exposure-outcome combinations, in utero antipsychotic exposure generally was not meaningfully associated with an increased risk of malformations. The observed increased risks of oral clefts associated with olanzapine, gastroschisis, and other specific brain anomalies with atypical antipsychotics and cardiac malformations with chlorprothixene requires confirmation as evidence continues to accumulate.

Antipsychotic Abuse, Dependence, and Withdrawal in the Pediatric Population: A Real-World Disproportionality Analysis

Antipsychotic drugs (APs) aim to treat schizophrenia, bipolar mania, and behavioral symptoms. In child psychiatry, despite limited evidence regarding their efficacy and safety, APs are increasingly subject to off-label use. Studies investigating addictology-related symptoms in young people being scarce, we aimed to characterize the different patterns of AP misuse and withdrawal in children and adolescents relying on the WHO pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase^®, Uppsala Monitoring Centre, Sweden). Using the standardized MedDRA Query 'drug abuse, dependence and withdrawal', disproportionality for each AP was assessed with the reporting odds ratio and the information component. A signal was detected when the lower end of the 95% confidence interval of the information component was positive. Results revealed mainly withdrawal symptoms in infants (under 2 years), intentional misuse in children (2 to 11 years), and abuse in adolescents (12 to 17 years). Olanzapine, risperidone, aripiprazole, and quetiapine were disproportionately reported in all age groups, with quetiapine being subject to a specific abuse signal in adolescents. Thus, in adolescents, the evocation of possible recreational consumption may lead to addiction-appropriate care. Further, in young patients with a history of AP treatment, a careful anamnesis may allow one to identify misuse and its role in the case of new-onset symptoms.

Management of schizophrenia in women during the perinatal period: a synthesis of international recommendations

INTRODUCTION

The perinatal period in schizophrenia is associated with high risk of psychotic relapse and pregnancy/child outcomes. The extent to which antipsychotics may potentially affect the fetus or the child development is unclear and debated. Even though guidelines have been developed, there is a lack of consensual recommendations regarding the optimal strategy to manage schizophrenia during the perinatal period.

AREAS COVERED

This systematic review describes the current state of evidence with respect to the impact of recommended interventions for schizophrenia during the perinatal period, including childbearing age, pregnancy and post-partum. It compares recent international treatment guidelines for this specific group of women. Last, this review presents a set of major points to be discussed with patients and relatives for shared-decision making and a summary of key recommendations from the international guidelines.

EXPERT OPINION

Although treatment guidelines may be of significant help, discrepancies exist across them regarding the management of antipsychotics for schizophrenia women during the perinatal period. Shared decision-making and advance directives represent useful patient-centered approaches during this specific period. Further cohort-based evidence is needed to better identify maternal and fetal risks associated to antipsychotic treatment exposure.

Neonatal morbidity after fetal exposure to antipsychotics: a national register-based study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the admission rate to neonatal care and neonatal morbidity after maternal use of antipsychotics during pregnancy.

DESIGN

A population-based register study.

SETTING

Information on all singleton births between July 2006 and December 2017 in Sweden including data on prescription drugs, deliveries and infants' health was obtained from the Swedish Medical Birth Register, the Prescribed Drug Register and the Swedish Neonatal Quality Register. Exposed infants were compared with unexposed infants and with infants to mothers treated with antipsychotics before or after but not during pregnancy.

PARTICIPANTS

The cohort comprised a total of 1 307 487 infants, of whom 2677 (0.2%) were exposed to antipsychotics during pregnancy and 34 492 (2.6%) had mothers who were treated before/after the pregnancy.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was admission rate to neonatal care. Secondary outcomes were the separate neonatal morbidities.

RESULTS

Of the exposed infants, 516 (19.3%) were admitted to neonatal care compared with 98 976 (7.8%) of the unexposed infants (adjusted risk ratio (aRR): 1.7; 95% CI: 1.6 to 1.8), with a further increased risk after exposure in late pregnancy. The highest relative risks were seen for withdrawal symptoms (aRR: 17.7; 95% CI: 9.6 to 32.6), neurological disorders (aRR: 3.4; 95% CI: 2.4 to 5.7) and persistent pulmonary hypertension (aRR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.4 to 3.1) when compared with unexposed infants. The absolute risks for these outcomes were however low among the exposed infants, 1.3%, 1.8% and 1.0%, respectively, and the relative risks were lower when compared with infants to mothers treated before/after the pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

Fetal exposure to antipsychotics was associated with an increased risk of neonatal morbidity. The effects in the exposed infants seem transient and predominantly mild, and these findings do not warrant discontinuation of a necessary treatment but rather increased monitoring of these infants. The increased risk of persistent pulmonary hypertension requires further studies.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling in Pregnant Women Suggests Minor Decrease in Maternal Exposure to Olanzapine

Pregnancy is accompanied by significant physiological changes that might affect the in vivo drug disposition. Olanzapine is prescribed to pregnant women with schizophrenia, while its pharmacokinetics during pregnancy remains unclear. This study aimed to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of olanzapine in the pregnant population. With the contributions of each clearance pathway determined beforehand, a full PBPK model was developed and validated in the non-pregnant population. This model was then extrapolated to predict steady-state pharmacokinetics in the three trimesters of pregnancy by introducing gestation-related alterations. The model adequately simulated the reported time-concentration curves. The geometric mean fold error of Cmax and AUC was 1.14 and 1.09, respectively. The model predicted that under 10 mg daily dose, the systematic exposure of olanzapine had minor changes (less than 28%) throughout pregnancy. We proposed that the reduction in cytochrome P4501A2 activity is counteracted by the induction of other enzymes, especially glucuronyltransferase1A4. In conclusion, the PBPK model simulations suggest that, at least at the tested stages of pregnancy, dose adjustment of olanzapine can hardly be recommended for pregnant women if effective treatment was achieved before the onset of pregnancy and if fetal toxicity can be ruled out.

Antipsychotic Use During Pregnancy and Risk for Gestational Diabetes: A National Register-Based Cohort Study in Sweden

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to study whether antipsychotic use during pregnancy is associated with gestational diabetes.

METHODS

This was a Swedish national register-based cohort study on the Medical Birth Register and the Prescribed Drug Register including all 1,307,487 singleton births between July 2006 and December 2017. Antipsychotics were divided into first-generation antipsychotics (n = 728), high-risk metabolic second-generation antipsychotics including olanzapine, clozapine and quetiapine (n = 1710), and other second-generation antipsychotics (n = 541). The risks for gestational diabetes, foetal growth disturbances, pre-eclampsia, caesarean section and preterm labour were assessed. Women treated during pregnancy were compared to women not treated during pregnancy and to women who used antipsychotics before/after but not during pregnancy.

RESULTS

The crude risk ratio for gestational diabetes for women treated with high-risk metabolic second-generation antipsychotics during pregnancy was 2.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-2.9) compared to untreated pregnant women (n = 1,296,539) and 1.8 (95% CI 1.4-2.5) compared to women treated before/after pregnancy (n = 34,492). After adjustment for maternal factors including body mass index, the risk ratios were 1.8 (95% CI 1.3-2.4) and 1.6 (95% CI 1.2-2.1). Exposed infants had an increased risk of being large for gestational age: adjusted risk ratios 1.6 (95% CI 1.3-1.9) and 1.3 (95% CI 1.1-1.6) compared to no maternal antipsychotic use during pregnancy and maternal use before/after the pregnancy. Other antipsychotics were not associated with metabolic risks.

CONCLUSIONS

Olanzapine, clozapine and quetiapine used during pregnancy were associated with increased risks for gestational diabetes and the infant being large for gestational age. Enhanced metabolic monitoring should be considered for pregnant women using these drugs.

Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Medications in Pregnancy: A Review

BACKGROUND

Long-acting injectable antipsychotic medications (LAIs) are an evidence-based treatment option for people with severe mental illness. While women with severe mental illness who are prescribed LAIs can become pregnant, there is a dearth of research examining the safety of these medication formulations during pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE

This article summarizes available literature on the use of LAIs in pregnancy to help inform clinical decisions and guide future research.

METHODS

PubMed literature searches were completed using combinations of keywords including "antipsychotic" and "long-acting injectable" or "depot," or generic or brand names of LAIs with "pregnancy." Pregnancy outcomes were compared across studies.

RESULTS

Twelve relevant case reports of 13 pregnancies were identified. Six cases did not report any negative birth or infant outcomes, including prematurity, infants being born small for gestational age, congenital anomalies, and extrapyramidal symptoms. No cases reported abnormal Apgar scores, infants being born large for gestational age, or negative long-term developmental outcomes after exposure to LAIs during pregnancy. Cesarean section rate was comparable to the general population. Specific adverse outcomes included one infant with multiple congenital anomalies, 3 infants with minor congenital anomalies, and one infant with possible extrapyramidal symptoms. One infant was born prematurely, one infant was born small for gestational age, and 2 infants were born both prematurely and small for gestational age.

CONCLUSIONS

There is little research specifically examining the use of LAIs in pregnancy, so risks must be extrapolated from studies on oral antipsychotics in pregnancy. While the few published case reports examining LAIs in pregnancy somewhat align with research examining oral antipsychotics, these findings are inconclusive due to the inherently limited nature of case reports. Further investigation into the use of LAIs in pregnancy is warranted.

Schizophrenia during pregnancy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A diagnosis of schizophrenia has significant implications for women of childbearing age, pregnant or considering a pregnancy, ranging from sexual health, psychopharmacological treatment, to the occurrence of negative pregnancy and foetal outcomes. We provide a short narrative review of recent papers focusing on these issues.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although pregnancy rates have been increasing in women with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, they also tend to have altogether fewer pregnancies and fewer live births than women without this diagnosis, and also higher rates of induced abortions.Use of antipsychotics in pregnancy has also increased, and evidence suggests lack of significant contraindications for their use in this period. However, drug levels monitoring may be recommended across the three trimesters, as levels may change in relation to pregnancy-related physiology.Monitoring of physical health is an increasingly crucial issue, given higher risk of gestational diabetes, negative obstetric and infant outcomes in these women.

SUMMARY

There is an urgent need to generate valid and reproducible research that could help implement appropriate treatment protocols and relapse-prevention approaches, and interventions based on strong pharmaceutical targets for the benefit of pregnant women with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, their families and their children.

The use of antipsychotic agents during pregnancy and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have found contradicting results with regard to the use of antipsychotics during pregnancy and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). We aimed to evaluate the association between antipsychotic use in pregnancy and GDM.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library databases up to March 2019, for data from observational studies assessing the association between gestational antipsychotic use and GDM. Non-English studies, animal studies, case reports, conference abstracts, book chapters, reviews and summaries were excluded. The primary outcome was GDM. Estimates were pooled using a random effect model, with the I2 statistic used to estimate heterogeneity of results. Our study protocol was registered with PROSPERO number: CRD42018095014.

RESULTS

In total 10 cohort studies met the inclusion criteria in our systematic review with 6642 exposed and 1 860 290 unexposed pregnancies. Six studies were included in the meta-analysis with a pooled adjusted relative risk of 1.24 overall [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-1.42]. The I2 result suggested low heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 6.7%, p = 0.373).

CONCLUSION

We found that the use of antipsychotic medications during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of GDM in mothers. However, the evidence is still insufficient, especially for specific drug classes. We recommend more studies to investigate this association for specific drug classes, dosages and comorbidities to help clinicians to manage the risk of GDM if initiation or continuation of antipsychotic prescriptions during pregnancy is needed.

Antipsychotic Exposure in Pregnancy and the Risk of Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We have limited knowledge about the effects of antipsychotic exposure on the development of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Aim of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess GDM risk associated with antipsychotic exposure in pregnancy.

METHODS

Systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and Web of Science databases up to August 22, 2018. No restrictions to language or date were applied. Randomized, controlled trials, case-control, or cohort studies reporting GDM risk in antipsychotic-exposed, healthy controls or antipsychotic-ceased patients were included in the meta-analysis. The primary outcomes were study defined GDM, including number of events, odds ratios, and/or risk ratios (RR) with confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis. The total number of subjects was 6213 for the antipsychotic-exposed group, 6836 for antipsychotic-ceased control group, and 1 677 087 for the healthy control group. Compared with the healthy controls, the unadjusted cumulative RR for GDM associated with antipsychotic use was 1.63 (95% CI = 1.20-2.22). Adjusted risk for GDM was significantly higher in antipsychotic exposure group than in healthy controls (RR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.023-1.660). The adjusted RR for GDM was similar between the antipsychotic-exposed group and the antipsychotic-ceased group (RR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.281-2.164). No significant association was found between study quality, smoking, alcohol use, gestational age, and cumulative GDM risk.

DISCUSSION

Our results indicate an increased risk of GDM with antipsychotic exposure in pregnant women, who may benefit from close pregnancy monitoring, early testing for GDM, targeting modifiable risk factors, and lifestyle modifications.

Advances in Epidemiological Methods and Utilisation of Large Databases: A Methodological Review of Observational Studies on Central Nervous System Drug Use in Pregnancy and Central Nervous System Outcomes in Children

INTRODUCTION

Studies have used various epidemiological approaches to study associations between central nervous system (CNS) drug use in pregnancy and CNS outcomes in children. Studies have generally focused on clinical adverse effects, whereas variations in methodologies have not received sufficient attention.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to review the methodological characteristics of existing studies to identify any limitations and recommend further research.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted on observational studies listed in PubMed from 1 January 1946 to 21 September 2017. Following independent screening and data extraction, we conducted a review addressing the trends of relevant studies, differences between various data sources, and methods used to address bias and confounders; we also conducted statistical analyses.

RESULTS

In total, 111 observational studies, 25 case-control studies, and 86 cohort studies were included in the review. Publications dating from 1978 to 2006 mainly focused on antiepileptic drugs, but research on antidepressants increased from 2007 onwards. Only one study focused on antipsychotic use during pregnancy. A total of 46 studies obtained data from an administrative database/registry, 20 from ad hoc disease registries, and 41 from ad hoc clinical samples. Most studies (58%) adjusted the confounding factors using general adjustment, whereas only a few studies used advanced methods such as sibling-matched models and propensity score methods; 42 articles used univariate analyses and 69 conducted multivariable regression analyses.

CONCLUSION

Multiple factors, including different study designs and data sources, have led to inconsistent findings in associations between CNS drug use in pregnancy and CNS outcomes in children. Researchers should allow for study designs with clearly defined exposure periods, at the very least in trimesters, and use advanced confounding adjustment methodology to increase the accuracy of the findings.

Effect of Metformin on a Preeclampsia-Like Mouse Model Induced by High-Fat Diet

BACKGROUND

Metformin has been reported to decrease insulin resistance and is associated with a lower risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension and preeclampsia. It is widely accepted that the placenta plays a crucial role in the development of preeclampsia. Our aim is to explore the effect of metformin on preeclampsia.

STUDY DESIGN

We examined control diet-fed (isocaloric diet) pregnant mice (CTRL group), pregnant mice fed a high-fat diet (HF group), and high-fat-diet-fed pregnant mice treated with metformin (HF-M group). The HF mice were fed a high-fat diet six weeks before pregnancy to establish a preeclampsia-like model; then, the group was randomly divided into a HF group and a HF-M group after pregnancy. Blood pressure, urine protein, pregnancy outcomes, protein expression, and histopathological changes in the placentas of all groups were examined and statistically analysed.

RESULTS

We observed that metformin significantly improved high blood pressure, proteinuria, and foetal and placental weights in the HF-M group compared with the HF group. Metformin significantly improved placental labyrinth and foetal vascular development in preeclampsia. In addition, metformin effectively increased matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels in the placenta.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that metformin can improve preeclamptic symptoms and pregnancy outcomes.

Second-generation antipsychotics and pregnancy complications

Purpose

To study if second-generation antipsychotic (S-GA) use during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of pregnancy and neonatal complications.

Methods

A population-based birth cohort study using national register data extracted from the “Drugs and Pregnancy” database in Finland, years 1996–2016. The sampling frame included 1,181,090 pregnant women and their singleton births. Women were categorized into three groups: exposed to S-GAs during pregnancy (n = 4225), exposed to first-generation antipsychotics (F-GAs) during pregnancy (n = 1576), and unexposed (no purchases of S-GAs or F-GAs during pregnancy, n = 21,125). Pregnancy outcomes in S-GA users were compared with those in the two comparison groups using multiple logistic regression models.

Results

Comparing S-GA users with unexposed ones, the risk was increased for gestational diabetes (adjusted odds ratio, OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.25–1.65), cesarean section (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.18–1.53), being born large for gestational age (LGA) (OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.14–2.16), and preterm birth (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.03–1.62). The risk for these outcomes increased further with continuous S-GA use. Infants in the S-GA group were also more likely to suffer from neonatal complications. Comparing S-GA users with the F-GA group, the risk of cesarean section and LGA was higher (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.03–1.51; and OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.20–2.99, respectively). Neonatal complications did not differ between the S-GA and F-GA groups.

Conclusions

Prenatal exposure to S-GAs is associated with an increased risk of pregnancy complications related to impaired glucose metabolism. Neonatal problems are common and occur similarly in S-GA and F-GA users.

Effect of Pregnancy on Paroxetine-Induced Adiposity and Glucose Intolerance in Mice

Long-term use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) targeting the serotonin transporter (SERT) has been suggested to be associated with an increased risk for obesity and type 2 diabetes. Previously, using a murine knockout model of SERT, we showed that estrogen suppression is involved in SERT deficiency-induced obesity and glucose intolerance in nonpregnant mice. The present study investigated the effects of chronic paroxetine treatment on adiposity and glucose tolerance in mice before and during pregnancy. Chronic paroxetine treatment in nonpregnant mice resulted in visceral adiposity and glucose intolerance accompanied by reduced circulating 17β-estradiol levels and ovarian expression of the aromatase (CYP19a1). Remarkably, pregnancy significantly reduced adiposity and improved glucose tolerance in paroxetine-treated mice by rebooting ovarian CYP19a1 expression and 17β-estradiol production. These effects appear to be reversible as ovarian CYP19a1 expression and circulating 17β-estradiol returned to prepregnancy levels soon after parturition. As in pregnant mice, 17β-estradiol replacement treatment in nonpregnant mice reduced paroxetine-induced adiposity. Our findings further suggested that modulation of estrogen synthesis underlies the observed metabolic adverse effects of SSRIs. Although our data revealed a transient reversal effect of pregnancy on SSRI-induced metabolic abnormalities, these observations are experimental and limited to mice. The use of SSRIs during human pregnancy should be cautioned because of potential adverse effects to the fetuses.

Effects of unconventional recreational drug use in pregnancy

Recreational drug toxicity is a rapidly evolving aspect in clinical practice. The prevalence of recreational drug abuse in the past decade has achieved an epidemic scale due to invention of new agents and ease of accessibility to the abused drugs. "Unconventional recreational drugs" is the term that includes new psychoactive drugs and medications diverted for recreational goals. Misuse of unconventional recreational drugs during pregnancy can affect both the pregnant woman and the fetus. However, the problems are usually unrecognized and overlooked by healthcare professionals. In this articles, obstetric complications, teratogenicity and neonatal abstinence syndrome from exposure during pregnancy to synthetic cannabinoids, synthetic cathinones, tramadol, kratom, olanzapine, quetiapine, ketamine and ketamine are reviewed. The main purpose is to create awareness about maternal, fetal and neonatal effects of these unconventional recreational drugs, so healthcare professionals will have improved vigilance for these under-recognized issues.

Does Gender Influence Outcome in Schizophrenia?

Good outcome of schizophrenia has several meanings and most of these meanings carry both positive and negative undertones depending on perspective. Currently, a person's subjective sense that illness has been partly overcome and that life is meaningful has come to be viewed as the most valid signpost of a good outcome. A review of the literature shows that women have certain advantages over men in that their illness starts at a later age and that their symptoms respond more quickly and more completely to available treatments. These advantages serve women well at the outset of illness but benefits appear to dissipate over time. Gender differences in outcome thus vary depending on the age of the patient. They also vary with the social and cultural background of the study population. Neither sex, therefore, has a monopoly on good outcome. The hope is that studying gender differences will uncover critical elements of good outcome that lead to interventions that will benefit both women and men.

Patterns and predictors for prescription of psychotropics and mood-stabilizing antiepileptics during pregnancy in Denmark 2000-2016

AIMS

To analyse prescribing patterns during pregnancy for antipsychotics (APs), antidepressants (ADs) and mood-stabilizing antiepileptics (AEDs) in Denmark from 2000 to 2016.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the Danish Medical Birth Register, the Register for Legally Induced Abortions, the Danish National Patient Register and the Register of Medicinal Product Statistics. Data were linked through a unique personal identifier by Statistics Denmark.

RESULTS

The use of APs increased 2.5-fold from a prevalence of 1.5 per 1000 pregnancies to 3.8 for pregnancies ending in a delivery. Use of mood-stabilizing AEDs increased from a prevalence of 0.1 to 2.1 during the study period. The prevalence for APs and mood-stabilizing AEDs was nearly twice as high for pregnancies ending in miscarriage or termination compared to pregnancies ending in delivery. A marked increase in the prevalence of ADs use during pregnancy was seen from 2000-2011 (from 6 to 41 per 1000 pregnancies ending in a delivery) but appears slightly in decline. Age, smoking, obesity and social status were generally associated with increased use of psychotropic drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of APs, ADs and mood-stabilizing AEDs during pregnancy has increased substantially in Denmark from 2000-2016. The use of ADs appears to be slightly in decline since 2011.

Prenatal exposure to antipsychotic medication and use of primary health care system in childhood: a population-based cohort study in Denmark

Background

Antipsychotic (AP) medication is increasingly used for many health conditions. Prenatal exposure to AP medication has been associated with several adverse outcomes, but the findings remain inconsistent.

Purpose

We aimed to investigate prenatal exposure to AP medication and the use of primary health care system in childhood.

Subjects and methods

All live-born singletons in Denmark during 1997-2012 were identified in the nationwide Danish National Patient Register and followed until December 31, 2013 (n = 963,010). Information on prenatal exposure to AP medication was obtained from the Danish Register of Medicinal Product Statistics. Contacts to the general practitioner (GP) were used as a proxy for the overall health of the children. Negative binomial regression was used to calculate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between prenatal exposure to AP medication and number and type of GP contacts, excluding routine well-child visits and vaccinations. The models were adjusted for sex and birth date of the child, maternal age, parity, cohabitation status, income, education, smoking status, diagnosis of substance abuse, severe psychiatric disorder, depression and epilepsy as well as the use of antiepileptic drugs, antidepressants, benzodiazepines and insulin.

Results

The prenatally AP-exposed children had 7% more GP contacts than unexposed children, IRR: 1.07 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.11). The association was slightly stronger among children of mothers with no diagnosis of severe psychiatric disorder (IRR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.04-1.13) than among children of mothers with severe psychiatric disorder (IRR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.96-1.11), but the difference was not statistically significant. We found no difference between prenatally AP-exposed children and their unexposed siblings, IRR: 1.00 (95% CI: 0.97-1.04) for total contacts.

Conclusion

Children of women using AP medication in pregnancy had more GP contacts in childhood than children of mothers not using AP medication. However, this might be explained by confounding from maternal behavior and mental illness.

Antenatal antipsychotic exposure induces multigenerational and gender-specific programming of adiposity and glucose tolerance in adult mouse offspring

Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are well known for their metabolic side effects in humans, including obesity and diabetes. These compounds are maintained during pregnancy to prevent the relapse of psychoses, but they readily diffuse across the placenta to the fetus, as documented with the widely-prescribed drug olanzapine (OLZ). However, observational studies have provided conflicting results on the potential impact of SGAs on fetal growth and body weight, and their effects on metabolic regulation in the offspring. For this reason, our study has tested whether antenatal exposure of CD1 mice to OLZ influenced metabolic outcomes in the offspring of the first (F1) and second (F2) generations. In F1 mice, OLZ antenatal treatment caused a decrease in neonatal body weight in both genders, an effect that persisted throughout life only in male animals. Interestingly, F1 female mice also displayed altered glucose homoeostasis. F2 mice, generated by mating normal males with F1 female mice exposed to OLZ during antenatal life, exhibited higher neonatal body weights which persisted only in F2 female animals. This was associated with expansion of fat mass and a concordant pattern of adipose tissue gene expression. Moreover, male and female F2 mice were glucose-intolerant. Thus, our study has demonstrated that antenatal OLZ exposure induces multigenerational and gender-specific programming of glucose tolerance in the offspring mice as adults, and points to the need for careful monitoring of children exposed to SGAs during pregnancy.

Psychopharmacological treatment of schizophrenia during pregnancy and lactation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

It is necessary, in every-day clinical life when treating pregnant women with mental diseases, to reach quick decisions derived from recent comprehensive information. The knowledge of the use of antipsychotics in pregnancy has increased considerably in the last years. This review tries to summarize important considerations and facilitate clinical decisions.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review will cover not only the effects of exposure during pregnancy on outcomes, postnatal adaption syndrome and lactation, but also pharmacokinetic considerations on the use of antipsychotics during pregnancy.

SUMMARY

The recent publications have found only minimally increased risks for certain malformations, after using ever more sophisticated statistical models of analysis and reassuring amounts of data. Taken together, the quality of the studies has greatly improved and the results are reassuring with respect to the safety of the use of antipsychotics during pregnancy. The rates of weight gain and gestational diabetes warrant closer attention in the clinical setting.

How gender affects the pharmacotherapeutic approach to treating psychosis - a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The effectiveness, effective dosages and side effect profiles of antipsychotic medication differ significantly between the sexes. Areas covered: We present a systematic review of gender-differences in the treatment of psychosis focusing on randomized, controlled trials and meta-analyses. Expert opinion: Despite many years of research, the database on gender-differences affecting the pharmacotherapeutic approach to treating psychosis is insufficient. Currently, the US National Institute of Health encouraged the enrolment of female participants in federally supported phase III clinical trials to increase the data available of female patients. Emerging evidence points to a superior antipsychotic response in women, with men requiring higher dosages. In general, women metabolize drugs differently, resulting in side effects occuring more frequently when compared to men. In any case, women require electrocardiograms or bone density scans as well as diabetes and cardiovascular workups when treated with antipsychotics. Dose adjustments during the menstrual cycle (e.g. to raise antipsychotic doses premenstrually) should be considered. First-generation antipsychotics, drugs that are known to prolong QTc interval and increase prolactin levels should be avoided in postmenopausal female patients. Furthermore, the effects of antipsychotics during pregnancy and breastfeeding have been investigated insufficiently, and more research is urgently needed.

A review of the safety of clozapine during pregnancy and lactation

Clozapine is an antipsychotic used in the management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia. However, little is known about clozapine use during pregnancy and lactation, or its impact on the mother, foetus, and infant. This review aims to summarize the available literature on the safety of clozapine use during the perinatal period. EMBASE, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE were searched from their inceptions through June 2016. The review encompasses 21 studies that have examined clozapine use during pregnancy and lactation. The limited available data do not support an increased risk of congenital malformations in foetuses exposed to clozapine during pregnancy, though rates of gestational diabetes are twice as high in pregnant women using clozapine. Clozapine accumulation in foetal serum possibly contributes to increased rates of floppy infant syndrome at delivery, decreased foetal heart rate variability, and seizures in infancy. Clozapine crosses the placenta and also accumulates in breast milk, which may increase the risk of agranulocytosis in infants and may necessitate infant testing. The majority of these data come from case reports and case series, making it unclear if the published risks associated with clozapine are due to mental illness, lifestyle factors, or co-treatment with other psychotropic medications. While the available literature on clozapine use during the perinatal period is very limited, the risks of clozapine use during pregnancy and the postpartum period should be discussed with women and weighed against those associated with other treatments and partially or untreated schizophrenia.

Fetal exposure to lamotrigine and quetiapine in two consecutive pregnancies

We present the case of two healthy infants born to a bipolar female maintained on low-dose lamotrigine and quetiapine.

Issues related to sex differences in antipsychotic treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The effectiveness, side-effect profiles, and numerous other characteristics of antipsychotic medications have been extensively studied. However, the majority of publications do not address the many potential sex differences in efficacy and doses of medications, as well as other sex-specific considerations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Of studies that exist, some suggest that female patients respond to lower doses of antipsychotic medications than males and that side-effect profiles vary between the sexes. However, the majority of preclinical trials use only male laboratory animals, and human clinical trials consist of too few women to analyze their response as a separate group.

SUMMARY

Although changes in hormone production occurring at multiple stages throughout a women's life (such as during pregnancy, breast feeding, menopause, and postmenopausal) are presented as too complex to deal with in clinical trials, they could instead be embraced as clinical dilemmas that require additional study and consideration. We suggest that a focus should be made to reanalyze data from existing major treatment trials of antipsychotics to determine what medications specifically provide the most efficacy for female patients and at what dose range. In addition, new prospective studies are needed to specifically address appropriate adjustments in psychopharmacologic treatment for female patients during pregnancy, and when postmenopausal. More studies of the effects of antipsychotics on male and female fetuses in utero and during breast feeding are also needed to better manage women with schizophrenia and their offspring on a long-term basis in the community. There is currently too little known about sex differences in neuropharmacology. With the new USA National Institutes of Health policy to include sex in all new proposals, the time has come to close this gap in knowledge.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Pattern in Turkey: Analysis of the National Database in the Context of the First Pharmacovigilance Legislation

INTRODUCTION

In Turkey, pharmacovigilance began in 1985. A fully structured adverse drug reaction (ADR)-reporting system was established with the publication of the first pharmacovigilance regulation in 2005. Subsequent regulation published in 2014 brought further improvements to the system.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to analyse the ADR-reporting pattern in the context of the first pharmacovigilance legislation in Turkey.

METHODS

We analysed ADR reports submitted to the Turkish Pharmacovigilance Center (TUFAM) from 2005 to 2014 with respect to reporting rate (RR), patient characteristics, type of the ADRs, suspected drugs, source of the report and the profession of the reporter.

RESULTS

The annual RR increased gradually over the study period. RRs for females were greater than those for males. RRs were highly correlated with age. Most commonly reported ADRs were skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders. Most commonly suspected drugs were antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents. There was no remarkable change in reporting pattern of ADRs, patient characteristics or classes of suspected drugs over the years. The most common source of reports was spontaneous reporting. Contribution of the reports from studies increased gradually. Most of the reports were reported by physicians. RRs by pharmacists increased substantially over the years.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the annual RR increased gradually over the 9-year study period. This increase was neither due to an increased reporting of a specific group of ADRs or drugs, nor to an increased reporting in a specific group of patients. There was a general increase in RR in parallel to pharmacovigilance activities.