Effect of octreotide on glucose tolerance in acromegaly

Glucose metabolism, gut-brain hormones, and acromegaly treatment: an explorative single centre descriptive analysis

PURPOSE

Active acromegaly is associated with impaired glucose metabolism, which improves upon treatment. Treatment options include surgery, medical therapy with somatostatin analogues (SSA) and Pegvisomant (PEG), and irradiation. The objective of the study was to describe the differential effect of various treatment regimens on the secretion of glucose, insulin, glucagon, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) in patients with acromegaly.

METHODS

23 surgically treated, non-diabetic patients with acromegaly and 12 healthy controls underwent an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and subsequently isoglycaemic intravenous glucose infusion on a separate day. Baseline hormone concentrations, time-to-peak and area under the curve (AUC) on the OGTT-day and incretin effect were compared according to treatment regimens.

RESULTS

The patients treated with SSA (N = 15) had impaired GIP-response (AUC, P = 0.001), and numerical impairment of all other hormone responses (P > 0.3). Patients co-treated with PEG (SSA + PEG, N = 4) had increased secretion of insulin and glucagon compared to patients only treated with SSA (SSA ÷ PEG, N = 11) (insulin_AUC mean ± SEM, SSA + PEG 49 ± 8.3 nmol/l*min vs SSA ÷ PEG 25 ± 3.4, P = 0.007; glucagon_AUC, SSA + PEG 823 ± 194 pmol/l*min vs SSA ÷ PEG 332 ± 69, P = 0.009). GIP secretion remained significantly impaired, whereas GLP-1 secretion was numerically increased with PEG (SSA + PEG 3088 ± 366 pmol/l*min vs SSA ÷ PEG 2401 ± 239, P = 0.3). No difference was found in patients treated with/without radiotherapy nor substituted or not with hydrocortisone.

CONCLUSION

SSA impaired the insulin, glucagon, and incretin hormone secretions. Co-treatment with PEG seemed to counteract the somatostatinergic inhibition of the glucagon and insulin response to OGTT. We speculate that PEG may exert its action through GH-receptors on pancreatic δ-cells. Clinical trial registration NCT02005978.

Impact of Long-Acting Somatostatin Analogues on Glucose Metabolism in Acromegaly: A Hospital-Based Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the change in glucose tolerance in treatment-naïve patients with acromegaly after administration of SSA and to identify predictive factors of glucose impairment during SSA therapy.

METHODS

Oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) was performed on 64 newly diagnosed and treatment-naïve patients with acromegaly both at pretreatment and 3 months after initiation of treatment with long-acting SSA. Insulin resistance (IR) was assessed by homeostatic model assessment- (HOMA-) IR and IS_OGTT. Insulin secretion was assessed by HOMA-β, INS₀/BG₀, IGI (insulinogenic index), IGI/IR, ISSI2, and AUC_INS/AUC_BG. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine the optimal cutoffs to predict the impact of SSA on glucose metabolism.

RESULTS

Pretreatment, 19, 24, and 21 patients were categorized as having normal glucose tolerance (NGT), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and diabetes mellitus (DM), respectively. Posttreatment, IR, represented by IS_OGTT, was significantly improved in all 3 groups. Insulin secretion, represented by HOMA-β, declined in the NGT and IGT groups, but was unaltered in the DM group. The glucose tolerance status deteriorated in 18 (28.1%) patients, including 13 patients in the NGT group and 5 patients in the IGT group. Deterioration was associated with lower baseline BG₁₂₀ (plasma glucose 120 min post-OGTT), less reduction of growth hormone (GH), and greater reduction of insulin secretion after SSA therapy. BG₁₂₀ greater than 8.1 mmol/l provided the greatest sensitivity and specificity in predicting the stabilization and/or improvement of glucose tolerance status after SSA treatment (PPV 90.7%, NPV 66.7%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The deterioration of glucose metabolism induced by SSA treatment is caused by the less reduction of GH and the more inhibition of insulin secretion, which can be predicted by the baseline BG₁₂₀ during OGTT.

Glycemic profile in patients with acromegaly treated with somatostatin analogue

Hypothesis. The growth hormone (GH) excess displayed in acromegaly induces insulin resistance up to diabetes mellitus (DM). The somatostatin analogues (as octreotide LAR) are useful in controlling the GH levels but disturbances of glucose metabolism might be seen.

Objective. This study evaluates the acromegalic glycemic profile under octreotide.

Methods & Results. Out of the total number of patients (N=34) diagnosed with active acromegaly, only some were followed (N=25; male/ female ratio: 6/ 19; mean age: 51.8 years) by testing GH, IGF1 (Insulin Growth Factor 1), basal glucose and oral glucose tolerance test (OCGTT) at baseline, 6 and 12 months under Octreotide (first 6 months with 20 mg/ 28 days + 6 months with 30 mg/ 28 days). Pre-treatment values were 17.6% of patients had DM, 14.7% - impaired glucose tolerance, 26.5% - impaired fasting glucose, and 41.2% - normal assays. From the statistical point of view, the DM patients were significantly older and had higher GH levels than the acromegalic without glycaemia disturbances. They did not achieve significant changes in basal blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin after 6 months, neither after 12 months.

After 6 months, there were no significant changes in basal glycaemia in patients with normal baseline glycaemia but 2-hours OGTT glucose values were significantly lower than initially (82.35 mg/ dl vs. 93 mg/ dl, p=0.005) consistent with reduced levels of GH and IGF1. After 12 months, both basal and 2-hours glucose levels in OGTT were similar to baseline despite the significant lower GH (3.3 vs. 6.61 ng/ mL, p=0.003) and IGF1 (332 vs. 713 ng/ mL, p=0.001).

Conclusions. Octreotide therapy induces an improvement in glycemic profile in patients with active acromegaly without diabetes mellitus consistent with decreased levels of GH and IGF1. In patients with diabetes, partial control of glucose metabolism is due to inadequate suppression of GH and IGF1 after one year of treatment.

Italian Society for the Study of Diabetes (SID)/Italian Endocrinological Society (SIE) guidelines on the treatment of hyperglycemia in Cushing's syndrome and acromegaly

Hyperglycemia is a common feature associated with states of increased growth hormone secretion and glucocorticoid levels. The purpose of these guidelines is to assist clinicians and other health care providers to take evidence-based therapeutic decisions for the treatment of hyperglycemia in patients with growth hormone and corticosteroid excess. Both the SID and SIE appointed members to represent each society and to collaborate in Guidelines writing. Members were chosen for their specific knowledge in the field. Each member agreed to produce-and regularly update-conflicts of interest. The authors of these guidelines prepared their contributions following the recommendations for the development of Guidelines, using the standard classes of recommendation shown below. All members of the writing committee provided editing and systematic review of each part of the manuscript, and discussed the grading of evidence. Consensus was guided by a systematic review of all available trials and by interactive discussions.

Italian Society for the Study of Diabetes (SID)/Italian Endocrinological Society (SIE) guidelines on the treatment of hyperglycemia in Cushing's syndrome and acromegaly

BACKGROUND

Hyperglycemia is a common feature associated with states of increased growth hormone secretion and glucocorticoid levels.

AIMS

The purpose of these guidelines is to assist clinicians and other health care providers to take evidence-based therapeutic decisions for the treatment of hyperglycemia in patients with growth hormone and corticosteroid excess.

METHODOLOGY

Both the SID and SIE appointed members to represent each society and to collaborate in Guidelines writing. Members were chosen for their specific knowledge in the field. Each member agreed to produce--and regularly update--conflicts of interest. The Authors of these guidelines prepared their contributions following the recommendations for the development of Guidelines, using the standard classes of recommendation shown below. All members of the writing committee provided editing and systematic review of each part of the manuscript, and discussed the grading of evidence. Consensus was guided by a systematic review of all available trials and by interactive discussions.

Somatostatin receptors: from signaling to clinical practice

Somatostatin is a peptide with a potent and broad antisecretory action, which makes it an invaluable drug target for the pharmacological management of pituitary adenomas and neuroendocrine tumors. Somatostatin receptors (SSTR1, 2A and B, 3, 4 and 5) belong to the G protein coupled receptor family and have a wide expression pattern in both normal tissues and solid tumors. Investigating the function of each SSTR in several tumor types has provided a wealth of information about the common but also distinct signaling cascades that suppress tumor cell proliferation, survival and angiogenesis. This provided the rationale for developing multireceptor-targeted somatostatin analogs and combination therapies with signaling-targeted agents such as inhibitors of the mammalian (or mechanistic) target of rapamycin (mTOR). The ability of SSTR to internalize and the development of rabiolabeled somatostatin analogs have improved the diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors.

Effects of medical therapies for acromegaly on glucose metabolism

OBJECTIVE

Abnormalities of glucose metabolism are common findings of acromegaly. However, robust evidence on whether therapy with somatostatin analogs (SSAs) or pegvisomant (PEG) differently affects glucose metabolism is lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of therapy with SSAs, PEG, or their combination on glucose metabolism in a large series of acromegalic patients.

DESIGN

This was a historical-prospective study. Among 50 consecutive acromegalic patients under SSA therapy, acromegaly in 19 patients was controlled. PEG used in combination with SSA therapy allowed the control of acromegaly in the remaining 31 patients and was then continued as monotherapy in 18 patients.

METHODS

The following parameters were evaluated at the diagnosis of acromegaly and during DIFFERENT TREATMENTS: fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and insulin concentrations, insulin sensitivity (QUICK-I), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR), and plasma glucose and insulin concentrations during the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Comparison was made using analysis for paired data.

RESULTS

Insulin resistance improved when acromegaly was controlled with therapy with SSAs, PEG, or SSA+PEG. However, FPG concentrations were higher during SSA therapy (alone or combined with PEG) than at the diagnosis of acromegaly, even when corrected for disease activity, whereas they were reduced during PEG therapy. Mean glucose concentrations during the OGTT were higher in patients receiving SSA therapy than in those receiving PEG therapy. In addition, the prevalence of diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance was higher during SSA therapy than at diagnosis or during PEG therapy and was not influenced by disease control.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical therapies for acromegaly reduce insulin resistance and increase insulin sensitivity; on the contrary, glucose indexes may be differently affected by SSA or PEG therapy.

Hypothesis: Extra-hepatic acromegaly: a new paradigm?

Medical treatment of acromegaly with long-acting somatostatin analogs (LA-SMSA) and the GH receptor antagonist, pegvisomant (PEGV), has made it possible to achieve normal serum IGF1 concentrations in a majority of patients with acromegaly. These two compounds, however, impact the GH-IGF1 axis differently, which challenges the traditional biochemical assessment of the therapeutic response. We postulate that LA-SMSA in certain patients normalizes serum IGF1 levels in the presence of elevated GH actions in extra-hepatic tissues. This may result in persistent disease activity for which we propose the term extra-hepatic acromegaly. PEGV, on the other hand, blocks systemic GH actions, which are not necessarily reliably reflected by serum IGF1 levels, and this treatment causes a further elevation of serum GH levels. Medical treatment is therefore difficult to monitor with the traditional biomarkers. Moreover, the different modes of actions of LA-SMSA and PEGV make it attractive to use the two drugs in combination. We believe that it is time to challenge the existing concepts of treatment and monitoring of patients with acromegaly.

A randomized, controlled, multicentre trial comparing pegvisomant alone with combination therapy of pegvisomant and long-acting octreotide in patients with acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

For patients with acromegaly who are suboptimally controlled on long-acting octreotide (LAR), treatment options are to switch to pegvisomant monotherapy (PM) or add pegvisomant to LAR (P-LAR). Our objective was to evaluate if the safety and efficacy of these regimens differ.

DESIGN

This was an open-label, multicentre, randomized, 40-week outpatient study. The control arm consisted of patients controlled on LAR (n = 28).

PATIENTS

A total of 27 patients with suboptimally controlled acromegaly [as indicated by a serum IGF-I level > or = 1.3 x upper limit of normal (ULN) of the age-related reference range] were randomized to PM (10 mg once daily initially, then adjusted in 5-mg increments every 8 weeks based on IGF-I levels) and 29 to P-LAR (LAR dosing remained fixed).

MEASUREMENTS

The primary end-point was adverse events (AEs). The secondary end-point was biochemical IGF-I-based efficacy. The RIA for IGF-I was discontinued by the manufacturer during the study and a chemiluminescent assay was subsequently used. Previously obtained IGF-I levels were re-analysed.

RESULTS

PM and P-LAR were well tolerated and there were no differences in the number of AEs. Patients receiving P-LAR tended to be more likely to have clinically significant increases in hepatic transaminase levels, especially those receiving high-dose LAR. Normalization of IGF-I was similar with both regimens (56% and 62% of patients for PM and P-LAR respectively). The change in IGF-I assay resulted in lower rates of IGF-I normalization than expected. Reductions in fasting glucose levels were greater with PM than with P-LAR (-0.8 mmol/l; 95% confidence interval -1.16, -0.53 mmol/l).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients suboptimally controlled on LAR, PM and P-LAR were equally well tolerated and effective in normalizing IGF-I, and overall clinical improvement was observed with both regimens. Thus, pegvisomant monotherapy and adjunctive therapy are equally viable options for the treatment of LAR-resistant acromegaly.

Secondary diabetes associated with principal endocrinopathies: the impact of new treatment modalities

The secondary occurrence of type 2 diabetes with various hormonal diseases (e.g. pituitary, adrenal and/or thyroid diseases) is a recurrent observation. Indeed, impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and overt diabetes mellitus are frequently associated with acromegaly and hypercortisolism (Cushing syndrome). The increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with acromegaly and Cushing syndrome may partly be a consequence of increased insulin resistance that normally accompanies hormone excess. Acromegalic patients are insulin resistant, both in the liver and in the periphery, displaying hyperinsulinemia and increased glucose turnover in the basal post-absorptive states. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus and that of IGT in acromegaly is reported to range 16-56%, whereas the degree of glucose tolerance seems correlated with circulating growth hormone (GH) levels, age, and disease duration. Moreover, a family history of diabetes and concomitant presence of arterial hypertension have been found to predispose to diabetes as well. GH has physiological effects on glucose metabolism, stimulating gluconeogenesis and lipolysis, which results in increased blood glucose and free fatty acid levels. Conversely, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-I) enhances insulin sensitivity primarily on skeletal muscles. However, in acromegaly, increased IGF-I levels are unable to counteract the insulin-resistance status determined by GH excess. Therapy with somatostatin analogues (SSAs) induce control of GH and IGF-I excess in the majority of patients, but their inhibitory effect on pancreatic insulin secretion might complicate the overall effect of this treatment on glucose tolerance. Hypercortisolism produces visceral obesity, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia that together with hypertension, hypercoagulability, and ventricular morphologic and functional abnormalities increase cardiovascular risk, and persist up to 5 years after resolution of hypercortisolism. Hypercortisolism leads to hyperglycaemia and reduced glucose tolerance, determines insulin resistance, stimulates hepatic gluconeogenesis and glicogenolisis. In Cushing syndrome the prevalence of diabetes varies between 20 and 50%, but probably this prevalence is underestimated, as not always an oral glucose tolerance test is performed in the presence of an apparently normal fasting glycaemia. Again, disease duration, rather than hormone levels, seems to be the major determinant in the occurrence of systemic complications in Cushing syndrome. Due to the impact they have on mortality and morbidity in both acromegaly and Cushing syndrome, these complications should be treated aggressively. In patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) the occurrence of altered glucose tolerance may be due to a decreased insulin secretion, like it happens in patients who underwent pancreatic surgery and in those with pheochromocytoma, or to an altered counterbalance between hormones, such as in patients with glucagonoma and somatostatinoma. Moreover, SSAs represent a valid therapeutic choice in the symptomatic treatment of NETs, and also in this case the medical therapy of the primary disease, may have a significant impact on the prevalence of glucose metabolism imbalance. In thyroid disorders, an abnormal glucose tolerance may be principally encountered in hyperthyroidism. The pathogenesis is complex and scant data on prevalence and severity are found in the literature. Adequate treatment for glucose imbalance is mandatory in these peculiar patients in line with the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes consensus statement. In particular, since traditional insulins have two features that may complicate therapy (absorption profiles, delayed onset of action and peak activity), the new insulin analogues could be of particular interest in the management of the secondary diabetes associated with endocrinopathies, considering the frailty of these patients. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that insulin glargine, given once daily, reduces the risk of hypoglycaemia compared with other formulations, and can facilitate a more aggressive insulin treatment in this class of patients.

The effect of acute application of pegvisomant alone and in combination with octreotide on endogenous GH levels during a 6-h test in patients with acromegaly on constant pegvisomant treatment

OBJECTIVE

Co-treatment with somatostatin analogues and growth hormone receptor antagonists in acromegaly might be a new treatment option abolishing the negative effects of monotherapy. Nevertheless, little is known about the acute effect of the combined treatment on endogenous GH and pegvisomant levels.

DESIGN

Ten acromegalic patients on constant pegvisomant therapy were included. Two 6-h GH secretion profiles were performed once after pegvisomant alone (P), the other after an additional 100 microg octreotide sc injection (PO). After 180 min, all patients received a standardized light mixed meal. Endogenous serum GH and pegvisomant levels were measured by special in-house assays. In addition, insulin and glucose were measured.

RESULTS

In the combined profile PO, a significant decrease of median endogenous GH was seen (p<0.01, median percentage decline 75.2%, range 23.7-88.2), which was not seen in profile P. Seven of 10 patients had a decline >70% and might be seen as responders. After meal, endogenous GH significantly decreased only in profile P (p<0.01). Pegvisomant levels did not differ significantly between profiles and did not change significantly during the tests. After meal, glucose levels rose higher and later and insulin levels lower and later in profile PO than in profile P.

CONCLUSION

During pegvisomant treatment, endogenous GH can be reduced significantly by acute application of a somatostatin analogue. Therefore, in acromegalic patients on pegvisomant therapy GH regulation due to somatostatin analogues seems to be preserved.

Effects of somatostatin analogs on glucose homeostasis: a metaanalysis of acromegaly studies

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin analogs (SSA) may influence glucose metabolism, but the clinical relevance of this effect is uncertain because trials performed so far are limited in terms of number of patients and heterogeneity for length and type of follow-up.

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to assess, via the metaanalysis of acromegaly studies, the clinical impact of SSA on glucose metabolism. The outcomes analyzed were fasting plasma glucose, fasting plasma insulin, hemoglobin A(1c), and plasma glucose concentrations during oral glucose tolerance test.

STUDY SELECTION

Eligibility criteria were: 1) duration of SSA treatment of at least 3 wk; 2) available numerical data for at least one of the four biochemical outcomes investigated; 3) measurement of the outcomes before and after SSA treatment; and 4) no selection of acromegalic patients for their responsivity to SSA. After revision, only 31 studies fulfilled eligibility criteria and were therefore selected for data extraction and analysis.

DATA SYNTHESIS

SSA treatment was found to induce statistically significant decrease in fasting plasma insulin [effect size -0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) from -0.58 to -0.32, P < 0.001], without any significant change of fasting plasma glucose (effect size +0.04, 95% CI from -0.07 to +0.15, P = 0.52) and hemoglobin A(1c) (effect size +0.11, 95% CI from -0.02 to +0.23, P = 0.09). Serum glucose values during the oral glucose tolerance test were shown to significantly change during SSA treatment (effect size +0.31, 95% CI from +0.17 to +0.45, P < 0.001), although with high inconsistency among trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that modifications of glucose homeostasis induced by SSA may have an overall minor clinical impact in acromegaly.

Effects of growth hormone on glucose, lipid, and protein metabolism in human subjects

In evolutionary terms, GH and intracellular STAT 5 signaling is a very old regulatory system. Whereas insulin dominates periprandially, GH may be viewed as the primary anabolic hormone during stress and fasting. GH exerts anabolic effects directly and through stimulation of IGF-I, insulin, and free fatty acids (FFA). When subjects are well nourished, the GH-induced stimulation of IGF-I and insulin is important for anabolic storage and growth of lean body mass (LBM), adipose tissue, and glycogen reserves. During fasting and other catabolic states, GH predominantly stimulates the release and oxidation of FFA, which leads to decreased glucose and protein oxidation and preservation of LBM and glycogen stores. The most prominent metabolic effect of GH is a marked increase in lipolysis and FFA levels. In the basal state, the effects of GH on protein metabolism are modest and include increased protein synthesis and decreased breakdown at the whole body level and in muscle together with decreased amino acid degradation/oxidation and decreased hepatic urea formation. During fasting and stress, the effects of GH on protein metabolism become more pronounced; lack of GH during fasting increases protein loss and urea production rates by approximately 50%, with a similar increase in muscle protein breakdown. GH is a counterregulatory hormone that antagonizes the hepatic and peripheral effects of insulin on glucose metabolism via mechanisms involving the concomitant increase in FFA flux and uptake. This ability of GH to induce insulin resistance is significant for the defense against hypoglycemia, for the development of "stress" diabetes during fasting and inflammatory illness, and perhaps for the "Dawn" phenomenon (the increase in insulin requirements in the early morning hours). Adult patients with GH deficiency are insulin resistant-probably related to increased adiposity, reduced LBM, and impaired physical performance-which temporarily worsens when GH treatment is initiated. Conversely, despite increased LBM and decreased fat mass, patients with acromegaly are consistently insulin resistant and become more sensitive after appropriate treatment.

Advances in the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Molecular Genetics of Pituitary Adenomas in Childhood

Collapse

[Evaluation of glucose metabolism in acromegalic patients before and after treatment with octreotide LAR]

AIM OF THE STUDY

To evaluate the glucose metabolism in acromegalic patients before and after treatment with octreotide LAR.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective and longitudinal study involving 30 patients from the acromegaly research outpatient clinic of the Endocrinology unit of the HUCFF/UFRJ. They underwent clinical and laboratorial evaluations, with measurements of growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor type I (IGF-I), insulin, proinsulin, C peptide, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), IGF binding protein type 1 (IGFBP-1) and glucose, during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), before and after six months of treatment with octreotide LAR. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used and values of 5% were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

We found 16 (54%) patients with normal glucose tolerance, 7 (23%) with impaired glucose tolerance and 7 (23%) diabetics. Twelve patients completed the six-month treatment, out of which three showed worsening of glucose tolerance and two (diabetics) had worse blood glucose control. Whereas there was an increase in waist circumference (p=0.03), there was a decrease in GH (p=0.04), with %IGF-I above the upper limit of reference values (% ULRV) [p=0.001], insulin (p=0.019), C peptide levels (p=0.002) and homeostatic model assessment (HOMA-IR) [p=0.039].

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, treatment with octreotide LAR led to a worsening of glucose tolerance in three non-diabetic patients and worsened glycemic control in two diabetics, in spite of reducing insulin resistance.

Use of somatostatin analogues in obesity

Obesity is a condition that results from dysregulation of energy balance. Insulin, a component of the efferent pathway of the energy-regulatory circuit, promotes storage of energy substrates in adipose tissue and is, therefore, a potential target for pharmacotherapy. Somatostatin and its analogues (octreotide and lanreotide) bind to somatostatin subtype 5 receptors on the beta-cell membrane, which limits insulin release and, consequently, may decrease adipogenesis. Somatostatin and its analogues have been used in trials in patients with paediatric hypothalamic obesity. These children have hypothalamic dysfunction, mainly due to brain tumours such as craniopharyngiomas, which are thought to generate increased vagal output, leading to hyperinsulinaemia and weight gain. Two small trials, each of 6 months' duration, in children with paediatric hypothalamic obesity showed either a minimal weight loss or stabilization of bodyweight. In children with Prader-Willi syndrome, the most common genetic hypothalamic disorder associated with hyperphagia, hyperghrelinaemia, massive obesity and other endocrine disturbances, somatostatin failed to control hyperphagia and weight gain in a small number of patients, although it lowered the levels of the anorexigenic hormone ghrelin. Long-acting release octreotide was recently used in hyperinsulinaemic obese adults without cranial pathology. Insulin suppression was associated with small decreases in the body mass indexes of obese subjects receiving the higher dosages of the drug, with an acceptable safety profile, similar to that in previous studies. In conclusion, somatostatin and its analogues, by suppressing beta-cell insulin secretion, can retard weight gain in children with hypothalamic obesity and induce a small amount of weight loss in some adults with hyperinsulinaemic obesity.

Therapeutic options in the management of acromegaly: focus on lanreotide Autogel

BACKGROUND

In acromegaly, expert surgery is curative in only about 60% of patients. Postoperative radiation therapy is associated with a high incidence of hypopituitarism and its effect on growth hormone (GH) production is slow, so that adjuvant medical treatment becomes of importance in the management of many patients.

OBJECTIVE

To delineate the role of lanreotide in the treatment of acromegaly.

METHODS

Search of Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases for clinical studies of lanreotide in acromegaly.

RESULTS

Treatment with lanreotide slow release and lanreotide Autogel((R)) normalized GH and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) concentrations in about 50% of patients. The efficacy of 120 mg lanreotide Autogel((R)) on GH and IGF-I levels was comparable with that of 20 mg octreotide LAR. There were no differences in improvement of cardiac function, decrease in pancreatic beta-cell function, or occurrence of side effects, including cholelithiasis, between octreotide LAR and lanreotide Autogel(R). When postoperative treatment with somatostatin analogs does not result in normalization of serum IGF-I and GH levels after noncurative surgery, pegvisomant alone or in combination with somatostatin analogs can control these levels in a substantial number of patients.

Pituitary tumors in childhood: update of diagnosis, treatment and molecular genetics

Pituitary tumors are rare in childhood and adolescence, with a reported prevalence of up to one per 1 million children. Only 2-6% of surgically treated pituitary tumors occur in children. Although pituitary tumors in children are almost never malignant and hormonal secretion is rare, these tumors may result in significant morbidity. Tumors within the pituitary fossa are mainly of two types: craniopharyngiomas and adenomas. Craniopharyngiomas cause symptoms by compressing normal pituitary, causing hormonal deficiencies and producing mass effects on surrounding tissues and the brain; adenomas produce a variety of hormonal conditions such as hyperprolactinemia, Cushing disease and acromegaly or gigantism. Little is known about the genetic causes of sporadic lesions, which comprise the majority of pituitary tumors, but in children, more frequently than in adults, pituitary tumors may be a manifestation of genetic conditions such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, Carney complex, familial isolated pituitary adenoma and McCune-Albright syndrome. The study of pituitary tumorigenesis in the context of these genetic syndromes has advanced our knowledge of the molecular basis of pituitary tumors and may lead to new therapeutic developments.

Long-term efficacy and safety of combined treatment of somatostatin analogs and pegvisomant in acromegaly

BACKGROUND

We previously reported the efficacy of a combined treatment of active acromegaly with both long-acting somatostatin analogs (SSA) and pegvisomant (PEG-V).

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to assess long-term efficacy and safety in a larger group of acromegalic patients after a period of 138 (35-149) wk [median (range)].

DESIGN

PEG-V was added to high-dose SSA treatment in 32 subjects (13 females) who had not shown a normalization in serum IGF-I concentrations during SSA monotherapy. PEG-V dosage was increased until IGF-I concentration normalized. The maximal dose was 80 mg twice weekly.

RESULTS

After dose finding, IGF-I remained within the normal range in all subjects with PEG-V administered once (n = 24) or twice (n = 8) weekly, on a total weekly dose of 60 (40-160) mg. Baseline IGF-I levels were positively correlated with the required dosage of PEG-V (r = 0.48; P = 0.006). PEG-V-dependent liver enzyme disturbances were observed in 11 (6 diabetic) subjects, of which symptomatic gallstones explained two cases. These liver enzyme disturbances were transient in all subjects without discontinuation or dose adaptation of PEG-V. In our series, diabetic patients had a 5.1 times (odds ratio) (confidence interval, 1.02-25.54; P < 0.05) higher risk for developing liver enzyme disturbances. These liver enzyme disturbances seemed to occur earlier. Pituitary adenoma size decreased in four patients. No increase in tumor size was observed in any of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Long-term combined treatment with long-acting SSA and (twice) weekly PEG-V for active acromegaly seems to be effective and safe. Patients with acromegaly and diabetes seem to have a higher risk of developing transient liver enzyme disturbances.

Management of type 2 diabetes mellitus associated with pituitary gigantism

Pituitary gigantism, a condition of endogenous growth hormone (GH) hypersecretion prior to epiphyseal closure, is a rare condition. In the adult condition of GH excess, acromegaly, the occurrence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) have been reported, with resolution following normalization of GH levels. We report the case of a 16-year-old male with pituitary gigantism due to a large invasive suprasellar adenoma who presented with T2DM and DKA. Despite surgical de-bulking, radiotherapy and medical treatment with cabergoline and pegvisomant, GH and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels remained elevated. However, the T2DM and recurrent DKA were successfully managed with metformin and low-dose glargine insulin, respectively. We review the pathophysiology of T2DM and DKA in growth hormone excess and available treatment options.

Growth hormone receptor antagonists

The currently available long-acting somatostatin analogs normalize serum growth hormone (GH) levels and insulin-like growth factor-I levels in approximately 60% of patients with acromegaly. The recently introduced GH receptor antagonist, pegvisomant, is able to normalize insulin-like growth factor-I levels in virtually all acromegalic subjects. Although no correlation between increased GH concentrations and tumor size has been found, long-term safety studies are still in progress. Also, pegvisomant monotherapy is administered once daily and is very costly. Combined treatment of a somatostatin analog with pegvisomant appears to be an effective and rational approach.

Etiologic aspects and management of acromegaly

Acromegaly is a systemic disease with various etiologies. It can occur as a sporadic or, more rarely, as a familial disease. Numerous complications such as endocrine, cardiovascular, respiratory, metabolic, osteoarticular and neoplastic disturbances occur and must be taken into account when establishing a therapeutic strategy. For this reason, the decision as to a treatment modality of acromegaly must be followed by a thorough evaluation of the patient and once the diagnosis of complications is settled, adequate treatment should be instituted. Follow up of the patients requires periodical re-assessment of complications’ status.

The long-term efficacy of conventional radiotherapy in patients with GH-secreting pituitary adenomas

OBJECTIVE

To assess the long-term efficacy and safety of conventional radiotherapy (RT) in the control of acromegaly according to recent stringent criteria of cure.

DESIGN

A retrospective longitudinal study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-seven patients with active acromegaly were treated with conventional RT between 1982 and 1994. All patients were first operated on and successively irradiated at a dose of 45-50 Gy in 25-28 fractions for persistent (n = 40) or recurrent (n = 7) disease.

MEASUREMENTS

Long-term GH/IGF-I secretion and local tumour control were evaluated regularly, and possible side-effects were searched for systematically, especially in terms of secondary endocrine dysfunction. Biochemical cure of acromegaly was defined by glucose-suppressed plasma GH levels below 1 microg/l during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and normal age-corrected IGF-I values.

RESULTS

The 5-, 10- and 15-year overall survival rates were 98%, 95% and 93%, respectively. Suppression of GH during OGTT was seen in 9% of patients at 2 years, 29% at 5 years, 52% at 10 years, and 77% at 15 years. Age-corrected IGF-I levels were normal in 8% of patients 2 years after RT, and this proportion increased to 23%, 42% and 61% after 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively. Normalization of GH/IGF-I mainly depended on pre-RT levels. Local tumour control was 95% at 5, 10 and 15 years after treatment. Late toxicity was mainly represented by progressive hypopituitarism, which was present in 33% of patients at baseline and increased to 57%, 78% and in 85% of patients at 5 10 and 15 years after RT, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Conventional RT is effective in the long-term control of GH-secreting pituitary adenomas, although with a high prevalence of progressive hypopituitarism. At present, it remains a suitable option in acromegalic patients uncontrolled by surgery or medical therapy.

Pharmacologic Therapies for Acromegaly

Acromegaly is associated with insulin resistance and an increased incidence of cardiovascular disease. However, it remains unclear to what extent the effects of growth hormone (GH) excess on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are mediated through insulin resistance versus through other direct or indirect effects of GH. Adequate control of GH excess by surgery or pharmacologic interventions is associated with decreased insulin resistance, reflected in decreased plasma insulin levels and fasting glucose levels or improved glucose tolerance. Despite divergent effects of both somatostatin and somatostatin analogs on GH, insulin and glucagon secretion, and glucose absorption, treatment with the somatostatin analogs octreotide and lanreotide has only limited effects on glucose metabolism. However, glucose sensitivity has only been formally examined using a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp in a minority of these studies. Treatment with the GH-receptor antagonist pegvisomant ameliorates insulin sensitivity, reflected in decreased fasting plasma insulin levels and fasting glucose levels. Nonetheless, the effect of pegvisomant on glucose sensitivity has not been formally tested by hyperinsulinemic clamp conditions. In acromegaly, preliminary observations on new octreotide analogs with greater specificity for somatostatin-receptor subtypes indicate that these compounds achieve better control of GH hypersecretion than octreotide, but may also negatively influence insulin release. Assessment of insulin secretion and glucose levels in acromegalic patients during administration of these compounds is thus mandatory.

Pharmacological approach to the treatment of acromegaly

The treatment of patients with persistently active acromegaly has been facilitated over the past decade by the advent of highly specific and selective pharmacological agents. Somatostatin analogs, derived from the native inhibitory hormone somatostatin, are available in extended-duration preparations and are effective in reducing serum levels of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) as well as in improving the adverse clinical effects of acromegaly. Cabergoline, an agonist with a specificity for the dopamine D-2 receptor, has been shown to suppress IGF-I levels and induce tumor shrinkage in 35 and 50% of patients, respectively. The GH receptor antagonists compete with naturally occurring GH for binding with the GH receptor. As such, pegvisomant normalizes circulating IGF-I levels in 80 to 90% of patients with acromegaly. This last line of therapy should be considered for use in patients in whom surgery and medical therapy with somatostatin and/or dopamine agonists are either ineffective or poorly tolerated.

Octreotide long-acting release (LAR): a review of its use in the management of acromegaly

Octreotide long-acting release (LAR) is a somatostatin analogue designed for once monthly intramuscular injection. As with endogenous somatostatin, octreotide LAR inhibits secretion of growth hormone (GH) as well as various other peptide hormones. In the treatment of acromegaly, octreotide LAR effectively controlled the secretion of GH and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) in about 55-70% of patients (n > 100) who had previously been treated with somatostatin analogues, a similar degree of control to that observed with subcutaneous octreotide and lanreotide slow release (SR). Progressive control of serum levels of GH and IGF-1 was achieved with octreotide LAR in clinical studies of up to 4 years' duration. In addition, primary therapy with octreotide LAR provided effective control of GH and IGF-1 secretion, particularly in patients with a pretreatment GH level <20 microg/L. The percentage of patients achieving a target serum GH level of <2-2.5 micro g/L or normal IGF-1 levels was significantly greater with octreotide LAR 10, 20 or 30 mg every 28 days than with lanreotide SR 30 mg every 7-14 days in a large (n = 125) sequential, 6-month study, but was not significantly different between treatment groups in a small, randomised, nonblind, parallel group study of previously untreated patients. The volume of pituitary tumour shrinkage achieved with octreotide LAR or lanreotide SR was also similar ( approximate, equals 33% after 24 months). Acromegaly symptoms, such as headache, increased perspiration, paraesthesia, fatigue and osteoarthralgia were improved during treatment with octreotide LAR or lanreotide SR. Overall, octreotide LAR is generally well tolerated by most patients. The incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms is about 30% but, in most cases, events are transient and mild to moderate. Gallbladder abnormalities (sediment, sludge, microlithiasis and gallstones) can occur, but only 1% have become symptomatic to date. The prevalence of biliary abnormalities did not change after switching from subcutaneous octreotide, or from lanreotide SR, to octreotide LAR. Glucose metabolism can be affected by octreotide LAR in some patients; about 15% become hyperglycaemic, usually mild in severity. In summary, octreotide LAR controls GH and IGF-1 secretion in about 55-70% of patients with acromegaly. Octreotide LAR is administered intramuscularly every 28 days, offering improved patient compliance and convenience over three-times-daily subcutaneous octreotide. Long-term therapy provides progressive control of serum GH and IGF-1 levels, and is generally well tolerated by most patients. Thus, for the medical management of acromegaly, octreotide LAR is an effective, well tolerated and convenient treatment option.

The role of the growth hormone-insulin-like growth factor axis in glucose homeostasis

Homeostatic mechanisms normally maintain the plasma glucose concentration within narrow limits despite major fluctuations in supply and demand. There is increasing evidence that the growth hormone (GH)-insulin-like growth factor (IGF) axis may play an important role in glucose metabolism. GH has potent effects on intermediary metabolism, some of which antagonize the actions of insulin. In contrast, IGF-I has insulin-like actions, which are, in the case of glucose metabolism, opposite to those of GH. There is often deranged glucose metabolism in situations where GH is deficient or in excess. The clinical administration of GH or IGF-I results in altered glucose metabolism and changes in insulin resistance. Despite these observations, the precise role of GH and IGF-I and their interactions with insulin in controlling normal glucose homeostasis are unknown. In diabetes, GH secretion is abnormally increased as a result of reduced portal insulin resulting in impaired hepatic IGF-I generation. Evidence suggests that this may contribute to the development of diabetic microvascular complications. IGF-I 'replacement' in diabetes is under investigation and new methods of delivering IGF-I as a complex with IGFBP-3 offer exciting new prospects.

Growth hormone receptor antagonist improves insulin resistance in acromegaly

Growth hormone hypersecretion is a known cause of insulin resistance. This change in insulin sensitivity is believed to be mediated directly by growth hormone binding to its receptor. Five subjects ages 28-55 years who were participating in a clinical study that had been designed to assess the effects of a growth hormone receptor antagonist (Pegvisomant) on disease activity in acromegaly were evaluated to determine the role of growth hormone hypersecretion in inducing changes in insulin sensitivity. These subjects were treated with the 15-30 mg/day of Pegvisomant for periods ranging from 14 to 23 months. These doses were adequate to normalize IGF-I in four of the five subjects. The subjects were monitored to ensure that there were no significant changes in diet, exercise, or weight. Mean pretreatment IGF-I was 1104+/-277 ng/ml and decreased to a nadir of 355+/-157 ng/ml on treatment. After a 6-week withdrawal period, mean IGF-I had increased to 549+/-142 ng/ml. Fasting insulin was 35.2+/-16 uU/ml prior to treatment then decreased to a nadir of 19.9+/-14.6 uU/ml on treatment and then increased to 24.5+/-11.3 uU/ml. Fasting glucose decreased from 187+/-68 to 122+/-38 mg/dl and then increased to 159+/-41 mg/dl. Hemoglobin A(1)C decreased from 8.1+/-1.7 to 6.3+/-1.5%. Two subjects with overt type II diabetes had decreases in hemoglobin A(1)C from 8.3 to 5.9% and from 11.4 to 8.6%. These changes were associated with decreases in the amount of medication needed to control blood glucose. Weight remained stable throughout the study. The results show that the Pegvisomant is an effective agent for improving insulin resistance in subjects who have acromegaly and that this effect is independent of weight loss. The results suggest a potential role for Pevisomant in the treatment of insulin resistant states other than acromegaly.

Effects of two different somatostatin analogs on glucose tolerance in acromegaly

Impaired glucose tolerance is present in many acromegalic patients and treatment with somatostatin analogs has variable effects on glycemic control. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of 2 somatostatin analogs on glucose metabolism, lanreotide slow release (L-SR) and octreotide long acting release (O-LAR), in 10 patients with acromegaly (2 of whom with overt Type 2 diabetes mellitus). Glucose and insulin levels in fasting conditions and in response to OGTT, evaluated as AUC, insulin resistance (IR) evaluated by homeostatic model assessment (HOMA-IR), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), GH, IGF-I, were assessed during L-SR and O-LAR treatment. Mean fasting glucose, glucose response to OGTT and HbA1c levels in 8 non-diabetic patients did not significantly change after L-SR therapy while they all increased after O-LAR treatment (p<0.05 vs baseline and L-SR). Mean HOMA-IR values calculated in acromegalic patients before medical therapy were higher than in normal subjects (p<0.005) and showed a significant decrease during both treatments (p<0.05). In the 2 diabetic acromegalic patients a worsening in glucose metabolism was observed during O-LAR treatment but not during L-SR. GH and IGF-I levels significantly decreased with both drugs and normalized respectively in 38% and 12% with L-SR, 50% and 25% with O-LAR. In conclusion, both drugs decreased IR in acromegalic patients; O-LAR seems to be more detrimental to glucose metabolism than L-SR, despite being more effective in reducing GH and IGF-I levels.

A comparison of the effects of pegvisomant and octreotide on glucose, insulin, gastrin, cholecystokinin, and pancreatic polypeptide responses to oral glucose and a standard mixed meal

Standard medical therapy for patients with acromegaly includes somatostatin analogs. Owing to the widespread expression of somatostatin receptors, these may be associated with unwanted effects, such as altered glucose tolerance and impaired gut hormone release. Pegvisomant is a novel pegylated GH analog that competes with wild-type GH for GH-receptor binding sites but contains a position 120, amino acid substitution that prevents functional GH receptor dimerization, a known prerequisite for GH signal transduction and generation of IGF-I. We have studied the short-term effects of these two therapies (pegvisomant 20 mg/d for 7 d and octreotide 50 microg thrice daily for 7 d) on glucose tolerance and stimulated gut hormone release in six healthy male volunteers in an open-label, random-order, cross-over study. Subjects were assessed at baseline (oral glucose tolerance test and standard mixed meal) and on d 6 and 7 of each therapy with a minimum washout of 2 wk between treatments. Area under the curve and peak responses were analyzed using one-way repeated-measures ANOVA (on ranks where appropriate). Pegvisomant had no effect on glucose tolerance or stimulated gut hormone response during an oral glucose tolerance test and a standard meal. In contrast, octreotide significantly increased fasting plasma glucose, lowered fasting plasma insulin, and led to deterioration in glucose tolerance; three subjects developed impaired glucose tolerance and one diabetes mellitus by World Health Organization criteria. Octreotide significantly impaired stimulated release of cholecystokinin, gastrin, insulin, and pancreatic polypeptide. In conclusion, pegvisomant, unlike octreotide, is not associated with deterioration in glucose tolerance and impairment of stimulated gut hormone release in normal males.

Efficacy and tolerability of the long-acting somatostatin analog lanreotide in acromegaly. A 12-month multicenter study of 58 acromegalic patients. French Multicenter Study Group on Lanreotide in Acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of the new somatostatin analogue, lanreotide, in its prolonged released form (PR), in patients with acromegaly.

DESIGN

Prospective open multicenter non comparative study.

SETTING

Thirty-three university-affiliated medical centers.

PATIENTS

One hundred sixteen acromegalic patients with active disease, of whom 58 patients complied with the protocol and completed the 12-month period treatment.

INTERVENTION

Lanreotide PR treatment was started at a dose of 30 mg intramuscularly every 14 days. If integrated mean plasma GH levels were not below 5 micrograms/L and/or IGF-I levels were not normalized after one month of treatment, injections were given every 10 days. The duration of the study was 12 months.

RESULTS

After one month of treatment mean plasma GH and IGF-I levels had fallen from 10.7 +/- 11.1 micrograms/L (mean +/- SD; range, 2.6-74.8 micrograms/L; median, 7 micrograms/L) and 718 +/- 270 micrograms/L (range 338-1440 micrograms/L; median, 645 micrograms/L), respectively, to 7.8 +/- 10.1 micrograms/L and 575 +/- 252 micrograms/L, respectively. Thirty patients (22%) had plasma GH levels below 2.5 micrograms/L, and 8 patients (16%) had age-adjusted normal plasma IGF-I levels. At the sixth month of treatment mean plasma GH levels of 2.5 micrograms/L or less, and normal plasma IGF-I levels were observed in 33%, and 33% of patients, respectively. At the twelvth month of treatment, these percentages were 41%, and 41%, respectively. The interval between two injections was shortened (one injection every 10 days) in 8 of the 58 patients (13%) at the second month of treatment, and at the end of the study, 70% of patients required 3 injections per month. The most frequent adverse event elicited by enquiry was transient diarrhea (76% of patients), followed by abdominal pain (62%) and pain at the injection site (59%). Based on the analysis of a subgroup of 46 patients who had at least a measurement of fecal fat content after day 0 of the study, a non significant increase (from 4.2 +/- 3.4 to 5.1 +/- 4.3 g/24 h, p = 0.3) in mean steatorrhea was observed during treatment. Before treatment, steatorrhea was present in 9 (19%) patients. During the study, 15 additional patients (32%) developed persistent steatorrhea, and there was a transient increase in fecal fat content above 6 g/24 h in another 11 patients. After exclusion of the 7 patients (12%) with gallstones at enrollment, new gall-stones were diagnosed in 6 out of 50 patients (12%) during the study.

CONCLUSION

Two or three monthly injections of lanreotide PR decreased GH concentration to less than 2.5 micrograms/L and normalized IGF-I levels in 41% of patients treated during 12 months. The good tolerability of this treatment, and the reduction in the frequency of injections, plus the sustained drug serum concentrations, confirm the usefulness of this new somatostatin analog formulation.

Medical therapy for acromegaly

Both somatostatin analogues, which bind to the somatostatin receptor subtypes 2 and 5, and dopamine agonists, which are specific for the D2 receptor, have been used to treat acromegaly. Each of these classes of drugs contains several compounds that vary in duration of action, efficacy, and side effect profile. Although somatostatin analogues reduce GH levels and alleviate symptoms in most patients and restore IGF-1 levels to normal in 60% to 65% of patients, tumor shrinkage is limited to 40% of patients. evidence in the literature supports the use of these medications as secondary therapy in patients with acromegaly who have had surgery and who continue to have elevated GH levels (above 2 ng/mL during an oral glucose tolerance test) with or without IGF-1 concentrations that are above the upper limit of normal for age. In addition, medical therapy indicated in patients who refuse surgery and in patients who are poor surgical candidates. The controversial question is whether medical therapy should be an option for primary treatment of the acromegalic patient. Currently, ther are no data from prospective randomized trials comparing the effects of surgery versus somatostatin analogues as first-line therapy for for newly diagnosed acromegalic patients. Limited data from nonrandomized studies demonstrate that somatostatin analogues are effective long-term in suppressing GH and reducing IGF-1 into the normal range in approximately two-thirds of patients who have never undergone previous treatment. It is still the consensus that patients with GH-secreting microadenomas should undergo surgical resection, because the likelihood of complete cure by an experience neurosurgeon is high, at least 70% or greater. Successful surgical treatment has the advantage of completely removing the tumor in contrast to medical therapy, which rarely produces shrinkage greater than 50% despite the fact that IGF-1 and GH levels may be normal. In patients with macroadenomas of a size and location that suggest that the chance of complete resection is 40% or less, primary treatment with a somatostatin analogue should be considered as one option in the initial management of the patient. Another option in such an individual would be surgical debulking followed by medical therapy, because it is theoretically possible that biochemical cure with medical therapy after surgical debulking might be achieved with lower doses. The cost-effectiveness of these approaches has not yet been determined. Once the decision has been made to begin medical therapy, a choice must be made between dopamine agonists and somatostatin analogues. Most evidence suggests that somatostatin analogues are more effective than dopamine agonists and therefore would be the therapy of choice. In select patients, dopamine agonists, particularly the long-acting agonist cabergoline, may be preferred initially if the patient is unwilling to take injections or if the GH elevations are relatively modest (< 10 ng/mL). Biochemical cure should be assessed by measurement of GH (which can be performed 2 hours after an octreotide injection) and IGF-1 concentrations. The goal of treatment include reduction of of GH below 2 ng/mL and reduction of IGF-1 into the normal range. In patients who do not reach these goals, the dose or frequency of injection of the somatostatin analogue or both should be increased. If such measures are unsuccessful, a dopamine agonist may be added to the medical regimen because some studies suggest that combination therapy may be more effective in select cases than octreotide therapy alone. If such measures are still unsuccessful, other options should be considered, including surgery, pituitary radiation, and medical treatment with investigational drugs.

Combined Octreotide and Insulin Therapy in Acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

To describe an unusual treatment strategy for certain patients with both acromegaly and insulin-requiring diabetes.

METHODS

We present a case history of a man with a pituitary adenoma and diabetes mellitus and chronicle his response to various treatment modalities.

RESULTS

Acromegaly, a disease state with excess growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-I, is associated with carbohydrate intolerance. Octreotide, a somatostatin analogue, is used in the treatment of acromegaly to lower GH levels. Despite effective lowering of GH levels, certain patients with acromegaly have persistent or even worsening carbohydrate intolerance and may require insulin therapy. Such a regimen would necessitate five or more injections per day. We describe a 51-year-old man who was diagnosed with a GH-producing pituitary adenoma in 1987. Despite transsphenoidal resection, frontal craniotomy, and radiation therapy, symptoms and increased levels of GH persisted. The patient was diagnosed with diabetes mellitus in August 1989 and treated with glipizide. Because of persistently increased GH levels, he was treated with octreotide. His glycohemoglobin level increased to 21% despite use of maximal doses of glipizide. The patient refused insulin therapy because of his objection to numerous daily injections. Despite adjustments in diet and exercise, glycemic control remained poor. As a trial, we thus attempted combining octreotide and regular insulin in the same syringe and administering the medications in a single subcutaneous injection. No precipitate formation was evident, and he had no adverse effects. Glucose control improved, and the glycohemoglobin level was lower but still elevated. GH levels remained at less than 5 ng/mL. His symptoms of acromegaly were unchanged, but his overall attitude and energy level improved.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of the individual components of this treatment was demonstrated in the combination of insulin and octreotide. The combined administration of insulin and octreotide has limited application in patients with acromegaly and insulin-requiring diabetes mellitus.