Frailty in Heart Failure: Implications for Management

Utilization of an undergraduate emergency department research associate program for the screening and recruitment of research subjects with heart failure into a clinical study

Background

Enrolling heart failure (HF) patients in clinical studies is challenging. Emergency department (ED) may use students as research associates programs, such as the University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC) ED Research Associate (EDRA) program, to screen and consent patients for clinical studies. This manuscript examines the effectiveness of the URMC EDRA program in consenting HF patients into a clinical study.

Methods

The URMC EDRA program recruited and consented HF patients presenting at URMC's ED. Research associates in the EDRA program identified potential patients based on age (>18 years) and chief complaints indicative of HF. After identifying potential patients, a thorough chart review was conducted, and any uncertainties were discussed with the patient and treating provider before patients were consented into the study. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the program's effectiveness.

Results

Over one fiscal year, the URMC EDRA program screened 1669 unique patients, of whom 118 (7.1 %) were consented. Consented patients tended to be younger (65 ± 12 years) than those who refused consent (70 ± 14 years) (p = 0.007). Of the 1551 patients not consented, 1021 (65.8 %) were deemed ineligible. Compared to a full time research associate, the URMC EDRA program was cheaper and more productive.

Conclusion

The URMC EDRA program was highly effective in screening and consenting HF patients, successfully consenting 118 patients (14 per month). This is a significant achievement, especially given the study's strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Compared to other studies and a full time research associate, the URMC EDRA program demonstrated remarkable productivity.

Frailty determinants in heart failure: Inflammatory markers, cognitive impairment and psychosocial interaction

AIMS

This study aimed to identify factors associated with frailty in heart failure (HF) patients, focusing on demographic, biochemical and health-related variables. It also explored the correlation between frailty and comorbidities such as malnutrition, cognitive impairment and depression, assessing how these factors interact to influence frailty risk.

METHODS

A total of 250 HF patients (mean age 73.5 ± 7.2 years; 45.6% female) hospitalized for acute decompensated HF were included. Frailty was assessed using Fried phenotype criteria. Cognitive function, depression and nutritional status were evaluated using validated instruments [Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA)]. Biochemical markers included C-reactive protein (CRP), N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), haemoglobin, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and systolic blood pressure (SBP). Statistical analyses, including logistic regression, were performed to assess associations and odds ratios (ORs) for frailty, adjusted for inflammation and HF type.

RESULTS

Frailty was present in 60.4% of patients. Frail individuals exhibited significantly higher CRP (median 4.60 vs. 2.54 mg/L, P < 0.001) and NT-proBNP (median 2558.8 vs. 1102.6 pg/mL, P = 0.001) and lower haemoglobin (13.7 vs. 14.3 g/dL, P = 0.012), eGFR (62 vs. 71 mL/min/1.73 m2, P = 0.025) and SBP (130 vs. 134 mmHg, P = 0.026). Each 10% increase in CRP was associated with a 5.5% increase in frailty odds (P < 0.001). Frailty was linked to cognitive impairment (OR 2.1, P = 0.018), malnutrition (OR 3.0, P < 0.001) and depression (OR 3.1, P < 0.001), while high adherence to treatment reduced frailty risk by 78.9% (P = 0.027). Interactions were observed between cognitive impairment and body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.020), where higher BMI mitigated the frailty odds difference between cognitively impaired and unimpaired patients. Depression's association with frailty odds varied by adherence levels (P = 0.034) and central obesity (P = 0.047), with the absence of depression offering protection against frailty in patients with central obesity. These interactions remained significant after adjustment for HF type and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and were consistent across stratifications by these factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty in HF is influenced by inflammatory markers, cognitive impairment and psychosocial factors. Elevated CRP and NT-proBNP were strong predictors of frailty. Cognitive impairment and depression were key modifiable factors, interacting with BMI, adherence and obesity. Targeting these factors with early interventions could mitigate frailty risk, improving outcomes and quality of life in HF patients.

Frailty in Kidney Disease: A Comprehensive Review to Advance Its Clinical and Research Applications

Frailty is a multisystem syndrome of decreased physiologic reserve that has been shown to strongly and independently predict morbidity and mortality. Frailty is prevalent in patients living with kidney disease and occurs earlier in individuals with kidney disease as compared to the general population. In this comprehensive review, we examine clinical and research applications of frailty in kidney disease populations. Specifically, we clarify the definition of frailty and address common misconceptions, review the mechanisms and epidemiology of frailty in kidney disease, discuss challenges and limitations in frailty measurement, and provide updated evidence related to risk factors for frailty, its associated adverse outcomes, and interventions. We further add to the literature in this topic by highlighting the potential applications of frailty measurement in the care of patients with kidney disease and conclude with our recommendations for future research related to this important syndrome.

Sex differences in the impact of frailty on patients with heart failure: A retrospective cohort study

AIMS

Limited literature shows the existence of sex differences in the long-term prognosis of heart failure (HF) patients with frailty. In this study, whether sex differences exist in the impact of frailty on death from cardiovascular causes in patients with HF was investigated by conducting a retrospective cohort study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) study (2009-2018) were used to conduct a retrospective cohort study of 958 participants with HF. Patients were grouped based on sex and frailty index (FI). The relationship between death from cardiovascular causes and baseline frailty was assessed by Cox proportional hazard analysis and the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) plot. The study population had an age of 67.3 ± 12.3. Among them, around 54.5% were male. A median follow-up of 3.6 years was performed. After that, females who died from cardiovascular causes exhibited higher baseline FI values, while males did not show this trend (P < 0.05; P = 0.1253). Cox regression analysis demonstrated a significant association between FI and cardiovascular mortality in females (most frail: hazard ratio (HR) = 3.65, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07 ~ 12.39, P < 0.05; per 1-unit increase in FI: HR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.33 ~ 2.39, P < 0.001). A dose-response association between FI and cardiovascular mortality was presented by restricted cubic splines.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty is related to an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality in HF patients, particularly female patients.

Pathway analysis of the impact of health literacy, social support, and self-management on frailty in patients with chronic heart failure: A cross-sectional study

Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a significant global health challenge, and frailty is common among CHF patients. Although abundant evidence has revealed significant intercorrelations among health literacy, social support, self-management, and frailty, no study has explored their associations into 1 model based on a theoretical framework. The study aimed to test the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills Model in a sample of Chinese CHF patients and explore the potential relationships among social support, health literacy, self-management, and frailty. A cross-sectional study was conducted on CHF patients (n = 219) at a tertiary hospital in China. The Tilburg Frailty Indicator, Heart Failure Specific Health Literacy Scale, Social Support Rating Scale, and Self-management Scale of Heart Failure Patients were used to assess frailty, health literacy, social support, and self-management, respectively. Structural equation modeling with the bootstrapping method was used to test the hypothesized relationships among the variables. The results showed that 47.9% of the CHF patients suffered from frailty. Frailty was negatively correlated with health literacy (r = -0.268, P < .01) with a moderate effect size, social support (r = -0.537, P < .01) with a large effect size, and self-management (r = -0.416, P < .01) with a moderate effect size. The structural equation modeling model showed that social support was positively associated with health literacy (β = 0.419, P < .01) and self-management (β = 0.167, P < .01) while negatively associated with frailty (β = -0.494, P < .01). Health literacy was positively associated with self-management (β = 0.565, P < .01), and self-management was negatively associated with frailty (β = -0.272, P < .01). Our study suggests the potential positive impacts of health literacy, social support, and self-management on improving frailty in CHF patients. Healthcare providers should strengthen patient health education, improve their health literacy, enhance their social support, and promote their self-management so as to reverse frailty and reduce the risk of adverse outcomes.

Examining Long-Term Influences of Frailty on Outcomes for Adults Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy

BACKGROUND

Frailty is common in adults with end-stage heart failure receiving a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Short-term studies show frailty reversal post-LVAD. Little is known about long-term frailty and how frailty relates to key LVAD outcomes, including depression, quality of life (QoL), and cognition beyond 6 months.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine physical frailty, depression, QoL, and cognition from pre-LVAD implantation to 3, 6, and 12 months post-LVAD implantation.

METHODS

Clinical data and measures of physical frailty, depression, QoL, and cognition pre- and post-LVAD were extracted from an existing institutional database. Descriptive statistics and tests for statistical significance were used to describe and compare changes over time. Frailty trajectories were identified to describe physical frailty from pre-LVAD to 12 months post-LVAD.

RESULTS

The sample (n = 46) was predominantly male (76%), with a mean age of 64.7 ± 11 years, and over half (n = 25) were physically frail. Physical frailty was reduced by nearly half at 12 months. Frailty, depression, and QoL significantly improved at all time points (P < .001). Improvements in cognition did not reach statistical significance. Recipients of LVAD without improvement in frailty exhibited worse depression, QoL, and cognition scores at 12 months compared with those not frail pre-LVAD or no longer frail post-LVAD implantation.

CONCLUSION

Some recipients of LVADs experienced physical frailty reversal with benefits sustained long-term. Those without improvement recorded worse long-term patient-reported outcomes. Identifying factors that predict physical frailty response to LVAD implantation is a key area of future research.

Frailty Assessment Scale for Heart Failure: Development and Psychometric Validation

BACKGROUND

Frailty is common in patients with heart failure. Specific scales, including the Clinical Frailty Scale, exist but have not undergone thorough psychometric validation among patients with heart failure.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop and validate the Frailty Assessment Scale for Heart Failure (FAS-HF) in patients with heart failure.

METHODS

This study included 3 phases. In phase I, conceptualization and item generation, the FAS-HF was initially developed through the analysis of qualitative research data and a literature review. In phase II, item selection and content validity, the Delphi method was used to gather experts' opinions and suggestions regarding the FAS-HF. In phase III, field testing and psychometric evaluation, a cross-sectional study of 184 patients with heart failure in northern Taiwan was conducted to test the reliability and validity of the FAS-HF.

RESULTS

The 15-item FAS-HF included the physical, psychological, and social frailty domains. The total score ranged from 0 to 45, with higher scores representing frailer individuals. Exploratory factor analysis revealed that the cumulative loading variance was 57.39%. In the confirmatory factor analysis, the goodness-of-fit index (0.91), adjusted goodness-of-fit index (0.87), and root mean square error of approximation (0.06) were acceptable for model fit. Acceptable reliability was found, with a Cronbach α coefficient of 0.87 and a test-retest reliability of 0.99. Compared with the Fried frailty phenotype, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.94, and the optimal cutoff score for frailty was 20.

CONCLUSIONS

The FAS-HF has good reliability, validity, and discrimination and can be used as a frailty indicator for patients with heart failure.

Development a nomogram prognostic model for survival in heart failure patients based on the HF-ACTION data

BACKGROUND

The risk assessment for survival in heart failure (HF) remains one of the key focuses of research. This study aims to develop a simple and feasible nomogram model for survival in HF based on the Heart Failure-A Controlled Trial Investigating Outcomes of Exercise TraiNing (HF-ACTION) to support clinical decision-making.

METHODS

The HF patients were extracted from the HF-ACTION database and randomly divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort at a ratio of 7:3. Multivariate Cox regression was used to identify and integrate significant prognostic factors to form a nomogram, which was displayed in the form of a static nomogram. Bootstrap resampling (resampling = 1000) and cross-validation was used to internally validate the model. The prognostic performance of the model was measured by the concordance index (C-index), calibration curve, and the decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

There were 1394 patients with HF in the overall analysis. Seven prognostic factors, which included age, body mass index (BMI), sex, diastolic blood pressure (DBP), exercise duration, peak exercise oxygen consumption (peak VO2), and loop diuretic, were identified and applied to the nomogram construction based on the training cohort. The C-index of this model in the training cohort was 0.715 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.700, 0.766) and 0.662 (95% CI: 0.646, 0.752) in the validation cohort. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) value of 365- and 730-day survival is (0.731, 0.734) and (0.640, 0.693) respectively in the training cohort and validation cohort. The calibration curve showed good consistency between nomogram-predicted survival and actual observed survival. The decision curve analysis (DCA) revealed net benefit is higher than the reference line in a narrow range of cutoff probabilities and the result of cross-validation indicates that the model performance is relatively robust.

CONCLUSIONS

This study created a nomogram prognostic model for survival in HF based on a large American population, which can provide additional decision information for the risk prediction of HF.

Association between frailty and gestational diabetes mellitus: a bidirectional and multivariable Mendelian randomization study

Background

The causality between frailty and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has not yet been fully explored. A potential bidirectional causality was also needed to be confirmed.

Methods

A bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) was conducted, with frailty-related data was collected from UK Biobank and TwinGen and GDM-related data was collected from the FinnGen consortium. We performed univariable and multivariable-adjusted MR with adjustments for body mass index (BMI). Several methodologies of MR were conducted to confirm the robustness of results.

Results

Frailty was significantly associated with elevated risks of GDM (OR, 3.563; 95% CI, 1.737 to 7.309; P< 0.001) and GDM was also significantly associated with elevated risks of frailty ( β , 0.087; 95% CI, 0.040 to 0.133; P< 0.001). There is no evidence demonstrating the existence of horizontal pleiotropy and heterogeneity. This association was robust after adjustments for BMI. The sensitivity analyses with Weighted median, Maximum likelihood, Penalised weighted median, MR Egger and MR PRESSO methods indicated consistent results.

Conclusion

Our study provides evidence of the bidirectional causal association between frailty and GDM from genetic perspectives, signaling that the identification and assessment of frailty should become a standard strategy during the early stages and care of gestational diabetes.

Exploring the correlates of frailty among hospitalized older adults: A cross-sectional study in a Saudi teaching hospital

Frailty is an important public health concern associated with aging. It increases the risk of adverse clinical outcomes, such as falls, late-life dependency, hospitalization, disability, and mortality. The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence of frailty and to identify factors associated with frailty among older adults (≥65 years) admitted to King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. This cross-sectional study was conducted at King Abdulaziz University Hospital. The data were collected during the months of January and February 2022 and included demographic characteristics, comorbidities, length of stay, and hospital mortality. Frailty status of participants was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale. A total of 147 patients (aged ≥ 65 years) were included in our study. The prevalence rates of frailty and non-frailty were 71.4% and 28.6%, respectively. Frail patients had higher comorbidity index (P = .003), polypharmacy (P = .003), heart failure (P = .001), and prolonged hospital stays (P = .007). The results of the multiple logistic regression revealed that the tall patients had a lower risk of frailty (odds ratio = 0.0089, 95% confidence interval: 0.0001-0.7588, P = .042) and patients with higher comorbidity indexes had higher risk of frailty (odds ratio = 1.4907, 95% confidence interval: 1.1449-1.9927, P = .004). In this study, more than two-thirds of the hospitalized older patients were classified as frail. High comorbidity index, heart failure, and polypharmacy were strong predictors of frailty. Patients with frailty were more likely to have a prolonged hospital stay than those without frailty. Therefore, early detection of frailty and proper intervention are essential for improving health outcomes in this vulnerable population.

Reducing heart failure deaths by 25% in 25 years: the '25in25' heart failure summit

Heart failure (HF) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in older people, and 80% of people with HF are aged over 60 years. HF is the end point for almost all common cardiovascular diseases, as well as many non-cardiovascular diseases. Despite this, HF remains underdetected and undertreated. Detection and treatment of HF has improved significantly in recent years, with several novel treatments developed in the last decade improving outcomes for patients. Therefore, earlier detection and improved treatment of HF has the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality for older people, particularly given the shift in ageing demographics anticipated over the coming decades. The British Geriatrics Society Cardiovascular Specialist Interest Group recently participated in the British Society for Heart Failure (BSH) '25in25' Heart Failure Summit, which aims to reduce deaths due to HF by 25% in the next 25 years. The 2023 summit comprised experts from over 45 top health organisations across Europe, Canada and the US. The summit brought together cross-disciplinary expertise to support the implementation of strategies to improve outcomes for people living with HF, and, in this commentary, we reflect upon the priorities identified. We discuss the current barriers to the early detection and management of HF, and the particular challenges and complexity of managing HF in older people. Finally, we discuss the role of patient empowerment and how this can lead to improved care for older people living with HF.

Investigating the relationship between FRailty And Quality of LIfe in patients with heart faiLure and CKD (FRAIL study)

AIMS

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) or heart failure (HF) are disproportionally affected by frailty, an independent predictor of morbidity. The prevalence of frailty and its impact on quality of life (QoL) in a unique population of patients with both CKD and HF (CKD-HF) is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between frailty and QoL in patients with CKD-HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients were identified from a tertiary care cardiorenal clinic. Eligible patients had CKD-HF with a stable estimated glomerular filtration rate of <60 mL/min/1.732. Data were collected from each participant at one point in time using surveys delivered by study personnel between 14 July 2022 and 31 March 2023. Frailty was defined as Modified Frailty Phenotype (MFP) score ≥3. The Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) was used to assess QoL. Demographic data were retrospectively collected from electronic patient records. Demographics and QoL were compared between frail and non-frail cohorts using Pearson's R and Student's t-test (two-tailed, alpha-priori = 0.05). One hundred five participants consented, and 103 completed the questionnaires in full. Amongst the 103 participants, 49.5% (n = 51) were frail. Frailty was related to sex (P = 0.021) and medication count (P = 0.007), however not to other clinical measures, including estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.437) and ejection fraction (P = 0.911). Frail patients reported poorer QoL across physical functioning (P < 0.001), general health (P < 0.001), bodily pain (P = 0.004), social functioning (P < 0.001), and energy levels (P < 0.001), however not emotional wellbeing (P = 0.058); 51.5% cited 'better quality of life' as their healthcare priority, over longer survival (23.3%) or avoiding hospital admissions (22.3%). This was consistent across frail and non-frail groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A large proportion of CKD-HF patients are frail, regardless of disease severity, and more susceptible to significantly poorer QoL across physical and social domains. Improving QoL is the priority of patients across both frail and non-frail cohorts, further emphasizing the need for prompt recognition of frailty as well as possible intervention and prevention.

The association between frailty and in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with congestive heart failure: results from MIMIC-IV database

Background

Frailty correlates with adverse outcomes in many cardiovascular diseases and is prevalent in individuals with heart failure (HF). The Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) offers an integrated, validated solution for frailty assessment in acute care settings, but its application in critically ill patients with congestive HF lacks exploration. This study aimed to identify the association between frailty assessed by the HFRS and in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with congestive HF.

Methods

This observational study retrospectively enrolled 12,179 critically ill patients with congestive HF. Data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database was used. The HFRS was calculated to assess frailty. Patients were categorized into three groups: non-frailty (HFRS < 5, n = 7,961), pre-frailty (5 ≤ HFRS < 15, n = 3,684), and frailty (HFRS ≥ 15, n = 534). Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, length of intensive care unit stay, and length of hospital stay. Multiple logistic regression and Locally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing (LOWESS) smoother were used to investigate the association between frailty and outcomes. Subgroup analysis was employed to elucidate the correlation between frailty levels and in-hospital mortality across diverse subgroups.

Results

12,179 patients were enrolled, 6,679 (54.8%) were male, and the average age was 71.05 ± 13.94 years. The overall in-hospital mortality was 11.7%. In-hospital mortality increased with the escalation of frailty levels (non-frailty vs. pre-frailty vs. frailty: 9.7% vs. 14.8% vs. 20.2%, P < 0.001). The LOWESS curve demonstrated that the HFRS was monotonically positively correlated with in-hospital mortality. Upon controlling for potential confounders, both pre-frailty and frailty statuses were found to be independently linked to a heightened risk of mortality during hospitalization (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: pre-frailty vs. non-frailty: 1.27 [1.10-1.47], P = 0.001; frailty vs. non-frailty: 1.40 [1.07-1.83], P = 0.015; P for trend < 0.001). Significant interactions between frailty levels and in-hospital mortality were observed in the following subgroups: race, heart rate, creatinine, antiplatelet drug, diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, chronic renal disease, and sepsis.

Conclusion

In critically ill patients with congestive HF, frailty as assessed by the HFRS emerged as an independent predictor for the risk of in-hospital mortality. Prospective, randomized studies are required to determine whether improvement of frailty levels could improve clinical prognosis.

An Updated Review of the Management of Chronic Heart Failure in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is common in patients with heart failure (HF) and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. There has been remarkable progress in the treatment of HF over recent years with the establishment of guideline-directed medical therapies including: (1) Beta-blockers, (2) renal angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibition (i.e., angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor [ACEi], aldosterone receptor blocker [ARB] or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor [ARNI]); (3) mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), and (4) sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). However, there are challenges to the implementation of these medications in patients with concomitant CKD due to increased vulnerability to common side-effects (including worsening renal function, hyperkalaemia, hypotension), and most of the pivotal trials which provide evidence of the efficacy of these medications excluded patients with severe CKD. Patients with CKD and HF often have regular healthcare encounters with multiple professionals and can receive conflicting guidance regarding their medication. Thus, despite being at higher risk of adverse cardiovascular events, patients who have both HF and CKD are more likely to be under-optimised on evidence-based therapies. This review is an updated summary of the evidence available for the management of HF (including reduced, mildly reduced and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction) in patients with various stages of CKD. The review covers the evidence for recommended medications, devices such as implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), intravenous (IV) iron, and discusses how frailty affects the management of these patients. It also considers emerging evidence for the prevention of HF in the cohort of patients with CKD. It synthesises the available evidence regarding when to temporarily stop, continue or rechallenge medications in this cohort. Chronic HF in context of CKD remains a challenging scenario for clinicians to manage, which is usually complicated by frailty, multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Treatment should be tailored to a patients individual needs and management in specialised cardio-renal clinics with a multi-disciplinary team approach has been recommended. This review offers a concise summary on this expansive topic.

RhoA/rho kinase pathway activation in age-associated endothelial cell dysfunction and thrombosis

The small GTPase RhoA and the downstream Rho kinase (ROCK) regulate several cell functions and pathological processes in the vascular system that contribute to the age-dependent risk of cardiovascular disease, including endothelial dysfunction, excessive permeability, inflammation, impaired angiogenesis, abnormal vasoconstriction, decreased nitric oxide production and apoptosis. Frailty is a loss of physiological reserve and adaptive capacity with advanced age and is accompanied by a pro-inflammatory and pro-oxidative state that promotes vascular dysfunction and thrombosis. This review summarises the role of the RhoA/Rho kinase signalling pathway in endothelial dysfunction, the acquisition of the pro-thrombotic state and vascular ageing. We also discuss the possible role of RhoA/Rho kinase signalling as a promising therapeutic target for the prevention and treatment of age-related cardiovascular disease.

The burden of frailty in heart failure: Prevalence, impacts on clinical outcomes and the role of heart failure medications

BACKGROUND

Frailty often coexists with heart failure (HF), which significantly aggravates the clinical outcomes of older adults. However, studies investigating the interplay between frailty and HF in older adults are scarce. We aimed to assess the prevalence of frailty using the cumulative deficit approach and evaluate the impacts of frailty on health utilization, use of HF-related medications and adverse clinical outcomes (all-cause mortality, all-cause readmissions and HF readmissions) among older HF patients.

METHODS

A total of 38 843 newly admitted HF patients were identified from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database and categorized into three frailty subgroups (fit, mild frailty and severe frailty) based on the multimorbidity frailty index. Cox regression models and Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard models were used to estimate the impacts of frailty on clinical outcomes at 1 and 2 years of follow-up. Generalized estimating equation models were further conducted to evaluate the associations between longitudinal and time-varying use of HF-related medications and clinical outcomes among distinct frailty subgroups.

RESULTS

Of 38 843 older HF patients (mean age 80.4 ± 8.5 years, 52.3% females) identified, 68.3% were categorized as frail (47.5% of mild frailty and 20.8% of severe frailty). The median number of readmissions (fit: 1 [inter-quartile range-IQR 2], mild frailty: 1 [IQR 2] and severe frailty: 2 [IQR 3]) increased with the severity of frailty. Only 27.3% of HF patients died of cardiovascular diseases regardless of their frailty status. Compared with the fit group, the severe frailty group was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-1.21), all-cause readmissions (subdistributional hazard ratio (sHR) 1.21, 95% CI 1.16-1.25) and HF-related readmissions (sHR 1.14, 95% CI 1.09-1.20) at 2 years of follow-up. Those who used triple or more HF-related medications were at lower risk for all-cause readmissions (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.49, 95% CI 0.44-0.54) and HF-related readmissions (aOR 0.42, 95% CI 0.37-0.47) at 2 years of follow-up even in the severe frailty group.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty is highly prevalent and associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality, all-cause readmissions and HF readmissions among older HF patients. Those who were using triple or more HF-related medications were at lower risk of adverse clinical outcomes across distinct frailty subgroups. Further studies are needed to optimize the treatment strategies for older HF patients with distinct frailty status.

Current frailty knowledge, awareness, and practices among physicians following the 2022 European consensus document on Frailty in Cardiology

Aims

Aging-related cardiovascular disease and frailty burdens are anticipated to rise with global aging. In response to directions from major cardiovascular societies, we investigated frailty knowledge, awareness, and practices among cardiologists as key stakeholders in this emerging paradigm a year after the European Frailty in Cardiology consensus document was published.

Methods and results

We launched a prospective multinational web-based survey via social networks to broad cardiology communities representing multiple World Health Organization regions, including Western Pacific and Southeast Asia regions. Overall, 578 respondents [38.2% female; ages 35-49 years (55.2%) and 50-64 years (34.4%)] across subspecialties, including interventionists (43.3%), general cardiologists (30.6%), and heart failure specialists (HFSs) (10.9%), were surveyed. Nearly half had read the consensus document (38.9%). Non-interventionists had better perceived knowledge of frailty assessment instruments (fully or vaguely aware, 57.2% vs. 45%, adj. P = 0.0002), exercise programmes (well aware, 12.9% vs. 6.0%, adj. P = 0.001), and engaged more in multidisciplinary team care (frequently or occasionally, 52.6% vs. 41%, adj. P = 0.002) than interventionists. Heart failure specialists more often addressed pre-procedural frailty (frequently or occasionally, 43.5% vs. 28.2%, P = 0.004) and polypharmacy (frequently or occasionally, 85.5% vs. 71%, adj. P = 0.014) and had consistently better composite knowledge (39.3% vs. 21.6%, adj. P = 0.001) and practice responses (21% vs. 11.1%, adj. P = 0.018) than non-HFSs. Respondents with better knowledge responses also had better frailty practices (40.3% vs. 3.6%, adj. P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Distinct response differences suggest that future strategies strengthening frailty principles should address practices peculiar to subspecialties, such as pre-procedural frailty strategies for interventionists and rehabilitation interventions for HFSs.

Impairments identified by comprehensive geriatric assessment in potential candidates for left ventricular assist device and heart transplantation

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of frailty and other impairments in potential left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and heart transplantation (HTx) candidates by performing a preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and reviewing the treatment recommendations resulting from the CGA.

Methods and results

This cross-sectional study included 73 patients aged ≥40 years who received a CGA as part of the patient selection procedure for LVAD and HTx. In every patient, a conclusion comprising frailty and other impairments was formulated based on the medical, mental, functional, and social domains and recommendations were made. The mean age was 58 years (range 40-71) and 70 % were male. In 97 % of patients, at least one impairment was identified by the CGA. The most common impairments were polypharmacy, high morbidity burden, reduced renal function, osteopenia, depression, poor quality of life, reduced functionality, (risk of) malnutrition, reduced grip strength and high caregiver burden. A small proportion of the potential LVAD and HTx candidates were frail (7 % according to Fried's frailty criteria, 6 % according to the Edmonton Frail Scale) and 39 % were pre-frail. The domains for which most impairments were found and the domains for which most treatment recommendations were given matched well, with the functional domain as the frontrunner.

Conclusion

This study showed that most of the potential candidates for LVAD or HTx have impairments on at least one domain of the CGA. Impairments and associated risks can contribute to the decision making process for candidacy for LVAD and HTx.

Weak grip strength predicts higher unplanned healthcare utilization among patients with heart failure

AIMS

Frailty increases healthcare utilization and costs for patients with heart failure but is challenging to assess in clinical settings. Hand grip strength (GS) is a single-item measure of frailty yet lacks evidence as a potential screening tool to identify patients at risk of higher unplanned events and related healthcare costs. We examined the association of baseline and longitudinal GS measurements with healthcare utilization and costs among patients with advanced heart failure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between July 2017 and April 2019, we enrolled 251 patients with symptoms of advanced heart failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV) in a prospective cohort study in Singapore. We measured GS at baseline and every 4 months for 2 years and linked patients' survey data with their medical and billing records. We categorized patients as having weak GS if their GS measurement was below the 5th percentile of the age- and gender-specific normative GS values in Singapore. We assessed the association between baseline GS and healthcare utilization (unplanned and planned events and healthcare costs, total costs, and length of inpatient stay) over the next 2 years using regression models. We investigated the association between longitudinal 4-monthly GS assessments and the ensuing 4 months of healthcare utilization and costs using mixed-effects logistic and two-part regression models. At baseline, 22.5% of patients had weak GS. Baseline and longitudinal GS measurements were significantly associated with longer length of inpatient stay, greater likelihood of unplanned events, and higher related costs. Patients with weak GS had higher odds of an unplanned event occurring by 8 percentage points [95% confidence interval (CI) (0.01, 0.14), P = 0.026], incurred longer inpatient stays by 4 days [95% CI (1.97, 6.79), P = 0.003], and additional SG$ 4792 [US$ ~ 3594, 95% CI (1894, 7689), P = 0.014] in unplanned healthcare costs over the next 4 months.

CONCLUSIONS

GS is a simple tool to identify and monitor heart failure patients at risk of unplanned events, longer inpatient stays, and higher related healthcare costs. Findings support its routine use in clinical settings.

The Safety and Efficacy of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors for Patients with Sarcopenia or Frailty: Double Edged Sword?

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) show cardiovascular protective effects, regardless of the patient's history of diabetes mellitus (DM). SGLT2is suppressed cardiovascular adverse events in patients with type 2 DM, and furthermore, SGLT-2is reduced the risk of worsening heart failure (HF) events or cardiovascular death in patients with HF. Along with these research findings, SGLT-2is are recommended for patients with HF in the latest guidelines. Despite these benefits, the concern surrounding the increasing risk of body weight loss and other adverse events has not yet been resolved, especially for patients with sarcopenia or frailty. The DAPA-HF and DELIVER trials consistently showed the efficacy and safety of SGLT-2i for HF patients with frailty. However, the Rockwood frailty index that derived from a cumulative deficit model was employed for frailty assessment in these trials, which might not be suitable for the evaluation of physical frailty or sarcopenia alone. There is no fixed consensus on which evaluation tool to use or its cutoff value for the diagnosis and assessment of frailty in HF patients, or which patients can receive SGLT-2i safely. In this review, we summarize the methodology of frailty assessment and discuss the efficacy and safety of SGLT-2i for HF patients with sarcopenia or frailty.

Prevalence and risk factors of frailty in older patients with chronic heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To provide a summary of the available evidence concerning prevalence and risk factors of frailty in elderly patients with CHF.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical Database (Sinomed), Weipu Database (VIP), and Wanfang database were searched from inception to July 2023. This study strictly followed the PRISMA guidelines. The quality of the included studies was rated by the Agency for Healthcare and Research and Quality and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

A total of 21 original studies were included, involving 4,797 patients. Meta-analysis results showed that the prevalence of frailty in older patients with heart failure was 38% (95%CI: 0.32-0.44). Age, cardiac function grading, left atrial diameter, left ventricular ejection fraction, hemoglobin, polypharmacy, BNP, nutritional risk, and hospitalization day are the influential factors of frailty in older patients with CHF.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of frailty in older patients with CHF is high, and clinical medical personnel should identify and intervene early to reduce or delay the frailty in older patients with CHF as much as possible.

Exploring Frailty in the Intersection of Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer in Older People

Advances in cardiovascular therapies and cancer treatments have resulted in longer patient survival. The coexistence of cancer and cardiovascular disease has been recognized as a complex clinical scenario. In addition to cardiovascular disease, older people with cancer are at greater risk of experiencing multimorbidity and geriatric syndromes, such as frailty. In older people, the concurrent presence of cancer and cardiovascular disease increases the risk of mortality, and the presence of frailty can exacerbate their conditions and hinder treatment effectiveness. Given the significant intersection among frailty, cardiovascular disease, and cancer in older people, this paper aims to provide an overview of the current research in this field and identifies gaps in the research to understand the burden and impact of frailty in these populations. While many studies have examined the prevalence and impact of frailty on adverse outcomes in patients with cancer or cardiovascular disease, evidence of frailty in individuals with both conditions is lacking. There is no universally accepted definition of frailty, which leads to inconsistencies in identifying and measuring frailty in older adults with cardiovascular disease and cancer. The frailty index seems to be a preferred frailty definition in studies of patients with cancer, while the frailty phenotype seems to be more commonly used in cardiovascular research. However, differences in how the frailty index was categorized and in how patients were classified as 'frail' depending on the cut points may have a negative effect on understanding the impact of frailty in the studied populations. This makes it challenging to compare findings across different studies and limits our understanding of the prevalence and impact of frailty in these populations. Addressing these research gaps will contribute to our understanding of the burden of frailty in older people with cardiovascular disease and cancer, and improve clinical care protocols in this vulnerable population.

Changes in Cardiovascular Spending, Care Utilization, and Clinical Outcomes Associated With Participation in Bundled Payments for Care Improvement - Advanced

BACKGROUND

Bundled Payments for Care Improvement - Advanced (BPCI-A) is a Medicare initiative that aims to incentivize reductions in spending for episodes of care that start with a hospitalization and end 90 days after discharge. Cardiovascular disease, an important driver of Medicare spending, is one of the areas of focus BPCI-A. It is unknown whether BPCI-A is associated with spending reductions or quality improvements for the 3 cardiovascular medical events or 5 cardiovascular procedures in the model.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we conducted difference-in-differences analyses using Medicare claims for patients discharged between January 1, 2017, and September 30, 2019, to assess differences between BPCI-A hospitals and matched nonparticipating control hospitals. Our primary outcomes were the differential changes in spending, before versus after implementation of BPCI-A, for cardiac medical and procedural conditions at BPCI-A hospitals compared with controls. Secondary outcomes included changes in patient complexity, care utilization, healthy days at home, readmissions, and mortality.

RESULTS

Baseline spending for cardiac medical episodes at BPCI-A hospitals was $25 606. The differential change in spending for cardiac medical episodes at BPCI-A versus control hospitals was $16 (95% CI, -$228 to $261; P=0.90). Baseline spending for cardiac procedural episodes at BPCI-A hospitals was $37 961. The differential change in spending for cardiac procedural episodes was $171 (95% CI, -$429 to $772; P=0.58). There were minimal differential changes in physicians' care patterns such as the complexity of treated patients or in their care utilization. At BPCI-A versus control hospitals, there were no significant differential changes in rates of 90-day readmissions (differential change, 0.27% [95% CI, -0.25% to 0.80%] for medical episodes; differential change, 0.31% [95% CI, -0.98% to 1.60%] for procedural episodes) or mortality (differential change, -0.14% [95% CI, -0.50% to 0.23%] for medical episodes; differential change, -0.36% [95% CI, -1.25% to 0.54%] for procedural episodes).

CONCLUSIONS

Participation in BPCI-A was not associated with spending reductions, changes in care utilization, or quality improvements for the cardiovascular medical events or procedures offered in the model.

Frailty and heart failure: State-of-the-art review

At least half of all patients with heart failure (HF) are affected by frailty, a syndrome that limits an individual ability to recover from acute stressors. While frailty affects up to 90% of patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction, it is also seen in ~30-60% of patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction, with ~26% higher prevalence in women compared with men. The relationship between frailty and HF is bidirectional, with both conditions exacerbating the other. Frailty is further complicated by a higher prevalence of sarcopenia (by ~20%) in HF patients compared with patients without HF, which negatively affects outcomes. Several frailty assessment methods have been employed historically including the Fried frailty phenotype and Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale to classify HF patients based on the severity of frailty; however, a validated HF-specific frailty assessment tool does not currently exist. Frailty in HF is associated with a poor prognosis with a 1.5-fold to 2-fold higher risk of all-cause death and hospitalizations compared to non-frail patients. Frailty is also highly prevalent in patients with worsening HF, affecting >50% of patients hospitalized for HF. Such patients with multiple readmissions for decompensated HF have markedly poor outcomes compared to younger, non-frail cohorts, and it is hypothesized that it may be due to major physical and functional limitations that limit recovery from an acute episode of worsening HF, a care aspect that has not been addressed in HF guidelines. Frail patients are thought to confer less benefit from therapeutic interventions due to an increased risk of perceived harm, resulting in lower adherence to HF interventions, which may worsen outcomes. Multiple studies report that <40% of frail patients are on guideline-directed medical therapy for HF, of which most are on suboptimal doses of these medications. There is a lack of evidence generated from randomized trials in this incredibly vulnerable population, and most current practice is governed by post hoc analyses of trials, observational registry-based data and providers' clinical judgement. The current body of evidence suggests that the treatment effect of most guideline-based interventions, including medications, cardiac rehabilitation and device therapy, is consistent across all age groups and frailty subgroups and, in some cases, may be amplified in the older, more frail population. In this review, we discuss the characteristics, assessment tools, impact on prognosis and impact on therapeutic interventions of frailty in patients with HF.

Feasibility of frailty screening among patients with advanced heart failure

BACKGROUND

Frailty is common among patients with advanced heart failure (HF), and screening for frailty to guide care is recommended. Although multiple tools are available to screen for frailty, the feasibility of routinely incorporating frailty screening into daily clinical practice among hospitalised advanced HF patients has not been rigorously tested.

METHODS

This was a prospective, single-centre, quality improvement study. Two brief frailty screening tools were incorporated into palliative care consultations for all patients ≥50 years from August 2021 to October 2022. In the first phase, the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) was implemented, followed by the Study of Osteoporotic Fracture (SOF) tool or a modified SOF (mSOF) version in the second phase. The primary outcome was feasibility (%) of performing frailty screenings for this high-risk population.

RESULTS

A total of 212 patients (mean age 69±10 years, 69% male, 79% white, 30% with ischaemic HF) were referred for palliative care consultation during the study period. Overall, frailty screens were completed in 86% (n=183) of patients. CFS and mSOF reached >80% of adoption, while SOF adoption was 54%. Altogether, 52% of the population screened frail by use of CFS and 52% also by mSOF. All clinicians (n=6) participating in the study reported that frailty screening tools were useful and acceptable, and 83% reported plans for continued utilisation in future clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty screening with CFS or mSOF tools was feasible in hospitalised patients with advanced HF. Tools that require physical assessment were more challenging to implement. These data support the feasibility of incorporating questionnaire-based frailty screening in a busy hospital setting.

End-Stage/Advanced Heart Failure: Geriatric Palliative Care Considerations

Heart failure remains a condition with high morbidity and mortality affecting 23 million people globally with a cost burden equivalent to 5.4% of the total health care budget in the United States. These costs include repeated hospitalizations as the disease advances and care that may not align with individual wishes and values. The coincidence of comorbid conditions with advanced heart failure poses significant challenges in the geriatric population. Advance care planning, medication education, and minimizing polypharmacy are primary palliative opportunities leading to specialist palliative care such as symptom management at end of life and timing of referral to hospice.

Circulating H-FABP as a biomarker of frailty in patients with chronic heart failure

Increased vulnerability to physiologic stressors, termed frailty, is a common occurrence in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). However, the definite biomarkers to assess frailty in CHF patients are not known. Here, we assessed the frailty phenotype and its potential association with heart failure (HF) markers in CHF patients. We categorized controls (n = 59) and CHF patients (n = 80), the participants, into robust, pre-frail, and frail based on the cardiovascular health study (CHS) frailty index. The plasma levels of HF markers, including tumorigenicity 2 (s-ST2), galectin-3, and heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP), were measured and correlated with frailty phenotype and cardiac function. The levels of plasma s-ST2, galectin-3, and H-FABP were profoundly elevated in CHF patients. Conversely, the frailty index scores were significantly lower in ischemic and non-ischemic CHF patients versus controls. Of the assessed HF markers, only H-FABP was positively correlated (r2 = 0.07, P = 0.02) with the frailty score in CHF patients. Collectively, these observations suggest that circulating H-FABP may serve as a biomarker of frailty in CHF patients.

A Prospective Case-Control Study Examining the Relationship Between Frailty and Serum Myostatin in Older Persons with Chronic Heart Failure

Background

Frailty affects the prognosis and management of patients with heart failure, and is often related with sarcopenia. Also, the serum myostatin (MSTN) involved in the development of sarcopenia and frailty. This study aimed to determine the connection between MSTN level and frailty in older adults with chronic heart failure (CHF).

Methods

This prospective case-control study enrolled older adult patients with CHF between May 2019 and May 2021, and analyzed their clinical data.

Results

In this study 75 older adults with CHF were included, 29 of whom were frail. The B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels were significantly higher in frail older adults with CHF than in older adults with CHF who were not frail (316.82 ± 235.64 pg/mL vs 198.61 ± 112.58 pg/mL; P = 0.016). The MSTN levels were significantly higher in frail participants than in participants who were not frail (2.93 ± 1.35 ng/mL vs 2.24 ± 0.84 ng/mL; P = 0.018). Based on multivariable analysis the BNP (odds ratio [OR] = 1.004, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1 0.001-1.008; P = 0.018) and MSTN (OR = 1.772, 95% CI = 1.079-2.912; P =0 0.024) levels were independently associated with frailty in older adults with CHF.

Conclusion

MSTN is a promising biomarker of frailty in elderly patients with CHF.

Combined assessment of frailty and nutritional status can be a prognostic indicator after percutaneous coronary intervention

The cardiac prognosis of patients with frailty and malnutrition remains poorly investigated. This study aimed to investigate the impact of frailty and malnutrition on cardiac prognosis by combining the clinical frailty scale (CFS) and the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In this study, 608 patients who underwent PCI for stable angina pectoris between January 2018 and December 2020 were included. CFS scores of ≥ 4 were defined as high CFS and patients with these scores were considered frail. GNRI scores of ≤ 98.0 were defined as low GNRI and patients with these scores were considered to have malnutrition. Patients were categorized into low-risk (n = 267, low CFS and high GNRI), intermediate-risk (n = 200, high CFS or low GNRI), and high-risk (n = 141, high CFS and low GNRI) groups. Major adverse clinical events (MACEs), including all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, revascularization, hospitalization for heart failure, and stroke, were assessed. The median follow-up period was 529 days. During the follow-up, MACEs were found in 135 patients. The high-risk group were older (77.0 ± 9.2 vs 71.4 ± 10.7 vs 65.0 ± 10.1 years, p < 0.001), had higher prevalence rates of chronic kidney disease [61.7% (87/141) vs 37.5% (75/200) vs 16.9% (45/267); p < 0.001] and heart failure [47.5% (67/141) vs 22.5% (45/200) vs 12.4% (33/267), p < 0.001], and had higher C-reactive protein levels (1.64 ± 2.66 vs 1.00 ± 2.02 vs 0.34 ± 0.90 mg/dL; p < 0.001) than the intermediate-risk and low-risk groups. The high-risk group [hazard ratio (HR), 4.39; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.87-6.72; p < 0.001] was an independent predictor of MACEs. In conclusion, patients with both frailty and malnutrition had a higher risk of MACEs after PCI than patients with frailty or malnutrition. Post-PCI patients should be evaluated for combined frailty and malnutrition.

Prevalence of transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis in elderly patients diagnosed with heart failure

OBJECTIVE

There is increased interest in studying ATTR-CA, a pathology that primarily affects patients of geriatric age and is frequently underdiagnosed. We aim to establish the prevalence of ATTR-CA in a cohort of patients with a history of HFpEF and to describe its characteristics.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study. Patients ≥75 years, clinical history of HFpEF, atrial dilation ≥34ml/m² and left ventricular wall thickening >13mm, were included. Demographic and analytical parameters were collected, and a comprehensive geriatric assessment was performed, along with a transthoracic echocardiogram and cardiac scintigraphy. Finally, telephone follow-up was carried out at 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

50 patients were recruited, mean age 86±6 years, 54% women. Age and functional class (I-II vs. III-IV) were factors associated with presenting with ATTR-CA. Patients with positive scintigraphy had a median time to admission of 5.2 months (confidence interval [CI] 95% 0-10.9), while in those with negative scintigraphy, it was 12.2 months (95% CI 11.7-12.8); log-rank: p=0.064. Patients with positive scintigraphy had a median time to the combined endpoint (death and readmission) of 1.9 months (95% CI 0-6.1), and patients with negative scintigraphy of 11.9 months (95% CI 11.7-12); log-rank: p=0.027.

CONCLUSIONS

ATTR-CA appears to be a prevalent etiology in elderly patients within the spectrum of HFpEF. Patients with a diagnosis of ATTR-CA had a shorter time to admission for HF and the combined event of death and admission than patients with a negative result on scintigraphy.

Exercise and nutritional interventions on sarcopenia and frailty in heart failure: a narrative review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

The purpose of this review is to describe the present evidence for exercise and nutritional interventions as potential contributors in the treatment of sarcopenia and frailty (i.e. muscle mass and physical function decline) and the risk of cardiorenal metabolic comorbidity in people with heart failure (HF). Evidence primarily from cross-sectional studies suggests that the prevalence of sarcopenia in people with HF is 37% for men and 33% for women, which contributes to cardiac cachexia, frailty, lower quality of life, and increased mortality rate. We explored the impact of resistance and aerobic exercise, and nutrition on measures of sarcopenia and frailty, and quality of life following the assessment of 35 systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The majority of clinical trials have focused on resistance, aerobic, and concurrent exercise to counteract the progressive loss of muscle mass and strength in people with HF, while promising effects have also been shown via utilization of vitamin D and iron supplementation by reducing tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-a), c-reactive protein (CRP), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels. Experimental studies combining the concomitant effect of exercise and nutrition on measures of sarcopenia and frailty in people with HF are scarce. There is a pressing need for further research and well-designed clinical trials incorporating the anabolic and anti-catabolic effects of concurrent exercise and nutrition strategies in people with HF.

Impact analysis of heart failure across European countries: an ESC-HFA position paper

Heart failure (HF) is a long-term clinical syndrome, with increasing prevalence and considerable healthcare costs that are further expected to increase dramatically. Despite significant advances in therapy and prevention, mortality and morbidity remain high and quality of life poor. Epidemiological data, that is, prevalence, incidence, mortality, and morbidity, show geographical variations across the European countries, depending on differences in aetiology, clinical characteristics, and treatment. However, data on the prevalence of the disease are scarce, as are those on quality of life. For these reasons, the ESC-HFA has developed a position paper to comprehensively assess our understanding of the burden of HF in Europe, in order to guide future policies for this syndrome. This manuscript will discuss the available epidemiological data on HF prevalence, outcomes, and human costs-in terms of quality of life-in European countries.

Why Do so Few People with Heart Failure Receive Cardiac Rehabilitation?

Many people with heart failure do not receive cardiac rehabilitation despite a strong evidence base attesting to its effectiveness, and national and international guideline recommendations. A more holistic approach to heart failure rehabilitation is proposed as an alternative to the predominant focus on exercise, emphasising the important role of education and psychosocial support, and acknowledging that this depends on patient need, choice and preference. An individualised, needs-led approach, exploiting the latest digital technologies when appropriate, may help fill existing gaps, improve access, uptake and completion, and ensure optimal health and wellbeing for people with heart failure and their families. Exercise, education, lifestyle change and psychosocial support should, as core elements, unless contraindicated due to medical reasons, be offered routinely to people with heart failure, but tailored to individual circumstances, such as with regard to age and frailty, and possibly for recipients of cardiac implantable electronic devices or left ventricular assist devices.

Frailty and Hospitalization Burden in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure

Frailty is associated with increased mortality and hospitalizations in patients with heart failure (HF). However, there is little evidence regarding the burden of morbidity. In this study, we aimed to assess the association between frailty and recurrent all-cause HF hospitalizations in patients with stable chronic HF. This was an observational and prospective study that enrolled HF outpatients followed in a specialized HF unit of a single tertiary care center from 2017 to 2019. Frailty was assessed by Fried criteria. Robustness, prefrailty, and frailty were defined as 0, 1 to 2, and ≥3, respectively. The independent association between frailty status and recurrent hospitalizations was assessed through Famoye's bivariate Poisson regression model, and risk estimates were expressed as incidence rate ratios (IRR). A total of 277 patients were included. The mean age was 74 ± 10 years, 118 were women (42.6%), and 131 patients (47.3%) had left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50. According to Fried's score 61 patients (22%) were robust, 95 patients (34%) were prefrail, and 121 patients (44%) were frail. After a median follow-up of 2.21 (1.6 to 2.8) years, 52 patients (19%) died. We registered 348 all-cause hospitalizations in 144 patients (52%) and 178 HF hospitalizations in 108 patients (39%). Compared with robust patients, frailty was associated with a higher risk of all-cause and HF recurrent hospitalizations in multivariable analysis (IRR 2.01, 95% confidence interval 1.14 to 3.57, p = 0.017 and IRR 2.25, 95% confidence interval 1.16-4.36, p = 0.016, respectively). In conclusion, in patients with chronic HF, frailty identifies patients with an increased risk of total and recurrent all-cause and HF hospitalizations.

Employing the Multivariate Edmonton Scale in the Assessment of Frailty Syndrome in Heart Failure

Background: Frailty syndrome (FS) is a syndrome characterized by a reduction in the body’s physiological reserves as a result of the accumulation of reduced efficiency of many organs and systems. Experts of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ECS) emphasize the need to assess frailty in all patients with heart failure (HF). There is no specific scale dedicated to this group of patients. The aim of the study was to assess the occurrence of the frailty syndrome in heart failure using the multidimensional Edmonton Frailty Scale (EFS). Methods: The study included 106 patients diagnosed with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF < 40%). The average age was 62.6 ± 9.7 years. Most of the patients (84%) studied were men. In 70 people (66%), the cause of heart failure was coronary artery disease. The study group included patients admitted to hospital on a scheduled basis and with exacerbation of heart failure. Frailty was measured using the EFS before discharge from the hospital. Demographic, sociodemographic and clinical data were obtained. A 12-month follow-up period was included in the project. The number of readmissions after 6 and 12 months was assessed. Results: A correlation was observed between the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class and the occurrence of frailty—this applies to the assessment at the beginning and at the end of hospitalization. When analyzing the age of the patients in relation to frailty, a statistically significant difference was obtained. The youngest group in terms of age were non-frail patients. Hospitalization of people prone to development of the frailty syndrome and diagnosed with the FS was significantly more often associated with the occurrence of complications during hospital stays. Rehospitalizations for exacerbation of heart failure were much more frequent in patients with frailty. Conclusions: Assessment and monitoring of the state of increased sensitivity to the development of frailty or FS in patients with heart failure should influence the differentiation of clinical management. The Edmonton Questionnaire may be a helpful tool for the assessment of frailty in hospitalized patients with HF.

Frailty and predictive factors in Chinese hospitalized patients with chronic heart failure: A Structural Equation Model Analysis

AIMS

Frailty is closely related to the prognosis and quality of life of patients with heart failure (HF). However, the predictors of it are still unclear. Our study aimed to describe the frailty status of Chinese hospitalized patients with heart failure and explore predictive factors guided by Theory of Unpleasant Symptoms.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this cross-sectional descriptive study, questionnaire-based survey was conducted among 323 patients hospitalized with heart failure in three tertiary hospitals in Wuhan, China. Frailty was measured by the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) in this study. The model based on Theory of Unpleasant Symptoms fits the sample well (root mean square error of approximation = 0.063, goodness of fit index = 0.977, normed fit index = 0.901, comparative fit index = 0.940). Frailty among Chinese patients hospitalized with heart failure was at high level (TFI = 6.57 ± 3.05). General demographic characteristics (older age, female gender, lower education level, and medical payment method), physical factors (higher New York Heart Association cardiac function class), psychological factors (more severe depression), and social factors (poorer social support) were significant predictors of more severe frailty (p < 0.05). Depression played an important mediating role in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Theory of Unpleasant Symptoms can be used to guide the research on the frailty of heart failure patients. It is suggested to strengthen emotional support and health education for heart failure patients in China. In addition, more attention should be paid to the less educated population by providing more personalized health guidance.

Burden of Repeated Hospitalizations on Patients with Heart Failure: An Analysis of Administrative and Claims Data in Japan

Background

Repeated hospitalization is a predictor of outcomes in heart failure, indicating the presence of symptoms, a deteriorated condition at pre-admission, and worsened prognosis.

Objectives

The current database study aimed to understand the clinical and economic burden of repeated hospitalizations among patients with heart failure in Japan. The effect of repeated hospitalizations on the subsequent in-hospital mortality was the primary objective; economic burden of heart failure after discharge was investigated as a secondary outcome.

Methods

Between 2013 and 2018, administrative claims and discharge summary data of patients aged ≥ 20 years and diagnosed with heart failure were obtained from a Diagnosis Procedure Combination database maintained by Medical Data Vision. Hospitalization, mortality, and economic burden data were analyzed.

Results

This study included 49,094 patients. The mean length of the first hospital stay was 22.9 days. The in-hospital mortality rate was approximately 10%, with one to five repeated hospitalizations. The time interval between repeated hospitalizations for heart failure decreased with an increasing number of hospitalizations. In-hospital mortality did not increase even with an increasing number of hospitalizations. The mean heart failure-related healthcare cost per patient was ¥564,281 ± 990,447 (US$5178 ± 9,088), 67.3% of which was hospitalization costs. Among hospitalization costs, other costs were high, mainly for basic hospitalization fees (71.7%; ¥233,146/person-year).

Conclusions

Repeated hospitalization did not increase in-hospital mortality; however, it may shorten the intervals between heart failure-related hospitalizations, potentially caused by deterioration of the patient’s condition, and increase the clinical and economic burden on patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40801-022-00315-5.

Frailty in older adults with heart disease

BACKGROUND

Heart failure prevalence will double in the next 40 years and affects more than 10% of persons over the age of 70 years in an age-dependent manner. Frailty is an age-associated clinical syndrome defined as a decrease in physiological reserve in situations of stress, such as operations, infections and acute illness based on a state of higher vulnerability. The prevalence is up to 74% in older individuals over the age of 80 years or those over 70 years old with a high burden of comorbidities and chronic diseases. This geriatric syndrome is associated with a worse clinical outcome and higher morbidity and mortality in acute and chronic disease than in age-matched cohorts without this syndrome.

METHODS

In this brief review, the scientific evidence of appropriate tools for diagnosis of frailty in heart failure patients is addressed. Heart failure management in this special group of patients requires a holistic care planning presented here in accordance with pathophysiologic particularities. A literature search in PubMed using the terms "heart failure" and "frailty" was carried out and a further search in the references based on the findings.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of frailty should influence the intensity of further diagnostic investigations and medical treatment based on the personal wishes of the patient, reduced organ reserves and general prognosis. The prognosis of heart failure patients remains poor, partially due to the intertwining with frailty. A clear statement for the use of an appropriate diagnostic tool for frailty and heart failure and specific therapeutic recommendations are presented based on clinical evidence.

Interconnected Clinical and Social Risk Factors in Breast Cancer and Heart Failure

Breast cancer and heart failure share several known clinical cardiovascular risk factors, including age, obesity, glucose dysregulation, cholesterol dysregulation, hypertension, atrial fibrillation and inflammation. However, to fully comprehend the complex interplay between risk of breast cancer and heart failure, factors attributed to both biological and social determinants of health must be explored in risk-assessment. There are several social factors that impede implementation of prevention strategies and treatment for breast cancer and heart failure prevention, including socioeconomic status, neighborhood disadvantage, food insecurity, access to healthcare, and social isolation. A comprehensive approach to prevention of both breast cancer and heart failure must include assessment for both traditional clinical risk factors and social determinants of health in patients to address root causes of lifestyle and modifiable risk factors. In this review, we examine clinical and social determinants of health in breast cancer and heart failure that are necessary to consider in the design and implementation of effective prevention strategies that altogether reduce the risk of both chronic diseases.

Physical, Psychological and Social Frailty Are Predictive of Heart Failure: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Little is known about frailty among patients hospitalized with heart failure (HF). To date, the limited information on frailty in HF is based on a unidimensional view of frailty, in which only physical aspects are considered when determining frailty. The aims of this study were to study different dimensions of frailty (physical, psychological and social) in patients with HF and the effect of different dimensions of frailty on the incidence of heart failure. Methods: The study used a cross-sectional design and included 965 patients hospitalized for heart failure and 164 healthy controls. HF was defined according to the ESC guidelines. The Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) was used to assess frailty. Probit regression analyses and chi-square statistics were used to examine associations between the occurrence of heart failure and TFI domains of frailty. Results: Patients diagnosed with frailty were 15.3% more likely to develop HF compared to those not diagnosed with frailty (p < 0.001). An increase in physical, psychological and social frailty corresponded to an increased risk of HF of 2.9% (p < 0.001), 4.4% (p < 0.001) and 6.6% (p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions: We found evidence of the association between different dimensions of frailty and incidence of HF.

Generalisability of Randomised Controlled Trials in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Background

Heart failure (HF) trials have stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria, but limited data exist regarding generalizability of trials. We compared patient characteristics and outcomes between patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in trials and observational registries.

Methods and Results

Individual patient data for 16 922 patients from five randomized clinical trials and 46 914 patients from two HF registries were included. The registry patients were categorized into trial-eligible and non-eligible groups using the most commonly used inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 26 104 (56%) registry patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Unadjusted all-cause mortality rates at 1 year were lowest in the trial population (7%), followed by trial-eligible patients (12%) and trial-non-eligible registry patients (26%). After adjustment for age and sex, all-cause mortality rates were similar between trial participants and trial-eligible registry patients [standardized mortality ratio (SMR) 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92–1.03] but cardiovascular mortality was higher in trial participants (SMR 1.19; 1.12–1.27). After full case-mix adjustment, the SMR for cardiovascular mortality remained higher in the trials at 1.28 (1.20–1.37) compared to RCT-eligible registry patients.

Conclusion

In contemporary HF registries, over half of HFrEF patients would have been eligible for trial enrolment. Crude clinical event rates were lower in the trials, but, after adjustment for case-mix, trial participants had similar rates of survival as registries. Despite this, they had about 30% higher cardiovascular mortality rates. Age and sex were the main drivers of differences in clinical outcomes between HF trials and observational HF registries.

Physical frailty and cognitive impairment in older nursing home residents: a latent class analysis

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the heterogeneous clinical profile of physical frailty and its association with cognitive impairment in older U.S. nursing home (NH) residents.

METHODS

Minimum Data Set 3.0 at admission was used to identify older adults newly-admitted to nursing homes with life expectancy ≥6 months and length of stay ≥100 days (n = 871,801). Latent class analysis was used to identify physical frailty subgroups, using FRAIL-NH items as indicators. The association between the identified physical frailty subgroups and cognitive impairment (measured by Brief Interview for Mental Status/Cognitive Performance Scale: none/mild; moderate; severe), adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics, was estimated by multinomial logistic regression and presented in adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

In older nursing home residents at admission, three physical frailty subgroups were identified: "mild physical frailty" (prevalence: 7.6%), "moderate physical frailty" (44.5%) and "severe physical frailty" (47.9%). Those in "moderate physical frailty" or "severe physical frailty" had high probabilities of needing assistance in transferring between locations and inability to walk in a room. Residents in "severe physical frailty" also had greater probability of bowel incontinence. Compared to those with none/mild cognitive impairment, older residents with moderate or severe impairment had slightly higher odds of belonging to "moderate physical frailty" [aOR (95%CI)moderate cognitive impairment: 1.01 (0.99-1.03); aOR (95%CI)severe cognitive impairment: 1.03 (1.01-1.05)] and much higher odds to the "severe physical frailty" subgroup [aOR (95%CI)moderate cognitive impairment: 2.41 (2.35-2.47); aOR (95%CI)severe cognitive impairment: 5.74 (5.58-5.90)].

CONCLUSIONS

Findings indicate the heterogeneous presentations of physical frailty in older nursing home residents and additional evidence on the interrelationship between physical frailty and cognitive impairment.

Impact of Social Frailty in Hospitalized Elderly Patients With Heart Failure: A FRAGILE-HF Registry Subanalysis

Background

Frailty is conceptualized as an accumulation of deficits in multiple areas and is strongly associated with the prognosis of heart failure (HF). However, the social domain of frailty is less well investigated. We prospectively evaluated the clinical characteristics and prognostic impact of social frailty (SF) in elderly patients with HF.

Methods and Results

FRAGILE‐HF (prevalence and prognostic value of physical and social frailty in geriatric patients hospitalized for heart failure) is a multicenter, prospective cohort study focusing on patients hospitalized for HF and aged ≥65 years. We defined SF by Makizako’s 5 items, which have been validated as associated with future disability. The primary end point was a composite of all‐cause death and rehospitalization because of HF. The impact of SF on all‐cause mortality alone was also evaluated. Among 1240 enrolled patients, 825 (66.5%) had SF. During the 1‐year observation period after discharge, the rates of the combined end point and all‐cause mortality were significantly higher in patients with SF than in those without SF (Log‐rank test: both P < 0.05). SF remained as significantly associated with both the combined end point (hazard ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.02–1.66; P = 0.038) and all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.01–2.30; P = 0.044), even after adjusting for key clinical risk factors. Furthermore, SF showed significant incremental prognostic value over known risk factors for both the combined end point (net‐reclassification improvement: 0.189, 95% CI, 0.063–0.316, P = 0.003) and all‐cause mortality (net‐reclassification improvement: 0.234, 95% CI, 0.073–0.395, P = 0.004).

Conclusions

Among hospitalized geriatric patients with HF, two thirds have SF. Evaluating SF provides additive prognostic information in elderly patients with HF.

Registration

URL: https://upload.umin.ac.jp/. Unique identifier: UMIN000023929.

The Association between Peripheral Blood Cells and the Frailty Syndrome in Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases

Background

Frailty syndrome is characterized by multisystem dysregulation frequently found in older individuals or even in younger patients with chronic disabling diseases such as cardiovascular diseases.

Objective

To determine whether peripheral blood cell count, and its subpopulations, red blood cell and platelets, morphology and different ratios (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and red blood distribution width-to-platelet ratio) are associated with cardiac frail patients, and through this to improve the prediction of frailty status in patients with cardiovascular diseases.

Methods

An observational, retrospective, cohort study enrolling 179 patients with cardiovascular disease divided into two groups: non-frail group (100 pts) and frail group (79 pts), a cohort detached from the Frail.RO study. The frailty was evaluated based on the Fried criteria; haematological markers, sociodemographic data, and variables related to cardiovascular diseases and comorbidities were also recorded.

Results

Lower lymphocytes, platelet count, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were significantly associated with a more severe frailty syndrome. Regarding red blood cells, haemoglobin concentration and red cell distribution width significantly correlated with the severity of the frailty syndrome. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for these markers associated with the frailty syndrome revealed an acceptable sensitivity of 66% and specificity of 65% to identify frail individuals. Malnutrition and hypercholesterolemia are relevant predictors for identifying frailty in hospitalized cardiovascular patients.

Conclusion

The evaluation of peripheral blood cell composition routinely measured in clinical practice can represent a valuable, but limited indicator, to diagnose frailty syndrome and eventually, the effects of interventions in frail patients with cardiovascular diseases.

Lung-to-finger circulation time can be measured stably with high reproducibility by simple breath holding method in cardiac patients

Lung to finger circulation time (LFCT) has been used to estimate cardiac function. We developed a new LFCT measurement device using a laser sensor at fingertip. We measured LFCT by measuring time from re-breathing after 20 s of breath hold to the nadir of the difference of transmitted red light and infrared light, which corresponds to percutaneous oxygen saturation. Fifty patients with heart failure were enrolled. The intrasubject stability of the measurement was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The ICC calculated from 44 cases was 0.85 (95% confidence interval: 0.77–0.91), which means to have “Excellent reliability.” By measuring twice, at least one clear LFCT value was obtained in 89.1% of patients and the overall measurability was 95.7%. We conducted all LFCT measurements safely. High ICCs were obtained even after dividing patients according to age, cardiac index (CI); 0.85 and 0.84 (≥ 75 or < 75 years group, respectively), 0.81 and 0.84 (N = 26, ≥ or < 2.2 L/min/M²). These results show that our new method to measure LFCT is highly stable and feasible for any type of heart failure patients.

Effect of heart failure on the outcome of COVID-19 - A meta analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Several comorbidities have been associated with an increased risk of severity and mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), including hypertension, diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

PURPOSE

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we attempted to investigate the association between heart failure (HF) and poor outcome in patients with COVID-19.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search from PubMed, EuropePMC, SCOPUS, Cochrane Central Database, and medRxiv with the search terms, "Heart failure" and "COVID-19". The outcome of interest was mortality and poor prognosis (defined by incidence of severe COVID-19 infection, admission to ICU, and use of ventilator) in patients with preexisting heart failure with coronavirus disease.

RESULTS

We identified 204 potential articles from our search, and 22 duplicates were removed. After screening of the titles and abstracts of the remaining 182 articles we identified 92 potentially relevant articles. We excluded 74 studies due to the following reasons: four studies were systematic reviews, two studies were meta-analyses, three articles were literature reviews, and 65 articles did not report on the outcome of interest. Finally, we included the remaining 18 studies in our qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis. There were 21,640 patients from 18 studies. HF was associated with hospitalization in COVID19 HR was 2.37 [1.48, 3.79; p < 0.001], high heterogeneity [I2, 82%; p < 0.001]. HF was associated with a poor outcome demonstrated by an OR of 2.86 [2.07; 3.95; p < 0.001] high heterogeneity [I2, 80%; p < 0.001]. Patient with preexisting HF was associated with higher mortality OR of 3.46 [2.52, 4.75; p < 0.001] moderately high heterogeneity [I2, 77%; p < 0.001].

CONCLUSION

Patients with heart failure are at increased risk for hospitalization, poor outcome, and death from COVID-19. A significant difference in mortality between patients with and without heart failure was observed, patients with heart failure having a higher mortality.

Frailty in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in a super-aged regional Japanese cohort

AIMS

The aim of this study was to investigate clinical characteristics of frail patients based on a comprehensive frailty assessment in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure (HF) (ADHF) in super-aged regional Japanese cohort.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We established the Kochi Registry of Subjects with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (Kochi YOSACOI) study, which was a prospective multicentre community-based cohort study in six participating hospitals in Kochi Prefecture, Japan. We enrolled 1061 patients (median age, 81 years; 50.0% men) hospitalized for ADHF between June 2017 and December 2019 in this registry. Patients were classified into the three groups by the severity of frailty using the Kihon Checklist: we identified frailty in 510 patients (53.7%), prefrailty in 293 patients (30.9%), and non-frailty in 146 patients (15.4%). Compared with prefrail and non-frail patients, frail patients were older (84 years interquartile range [IQR, 77-88] vs. 79 years [IQR, 69-86] and 72 years [IQR 65-81], P < 0.001) and more often had prior HF hospitalization (29.6% vs. 21.8% and 16.4%, P < 0.05), chronic kidney disease (81.6% vs. 71.7% and 61.0%, P < 0.01), anaemia (75.3% vs. 61.4% and 50.0%, P < 0.001), cerebrovascular accident (19.0% vs. 9.9% and 4.1%, P < 0.01). The proportion of patients with three or more comorbidities was larger in the frailty group than in the other groups (78.0% vs. 67.2% and 63.0%, P < 0.01). The frequency of functional decline in all domains increased with frailty status. Approximately 70% of frail patients were identified as functional decline in physical function and socialization domains. Fifty to sixty per cent of frail patients had functional decline in instrumental activities of daily living, cognitive function, and depression domains. The percentage of worsening walking ability during hospitalization was increasing with the frailty status (frailty, 27.5%; prefrailty, 21.8%; non-frailty, 8.9%). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, frailty was associated with age [odds ratio (OR) 1.031, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.011-1.052, P = 0.003], prior HF hospitalization (OR 1.789, 95% CI 1.165-2.764, P = 0.008), brain natriuretic peptide level at discharge (OR 1.001, 95% CI 1.000-1.001, P = 0.020) and prior cerebrovascular accident (OR 2.549, 95% CI 1.484-4.501, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

More than half of patients with ADHF were frail and had functional decline across multiple domains, not only physical function domain. The Kihon Checklist provided useful and valuable information for easily identifying frail patients and comprehensive management of HF.

The importance of physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness for patients with heart failure

The present review highlights current research on the importance of PA and fitness for patients with heart failure and recommendations with respect to heart failure phenotypes and special populations. Furthermore, the evidence for various exercise types and intensities/doses as an "exercise prescription", are discussed. The strong association between heart failure and traditional risk factors, physical inactivity and low fitness, underlines the importance of regular PA and exercise for prevention and treatment of heart failure. This is illustrated by cardiac stiffness which typically accelerates in middle-life and could be reversed by aerobic exercise. In patients with HFpEF, regular PA counteracts many of the changes observed, both metabolic and functional. Indeed, exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation has received a class 1A recommendation in current guidelines [1], in order to improve functional capacity, quality of life and lower the risk of rehospitalization. An individually tailored plan based on risk stratification, clinical assessment and cardiopulmonary exercise testing is encouraged before initiation of exercise training in patients with heart failure. In general, a combination of aerobic exercise and resistance training protocols is recommended (Table 1) [2], preferably throughout life. More studies are needed, regarding the role of PA and exercise in specific populations, such as frail patients with heart failure.