1
|
Roa CC, de Los Reyes MRA, Plennevaux E, Smolenov I, Hu B, Gao F, Ilagan H, Ambrosino D, Siber G, Clemens R, Han HH. SCB-2019 protein vaccine as heterologous booster of neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants after immunization with other COVID-19 vaccines. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2024; 20:2301632. [PMID: 38206168 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2301632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
We assessed the non-inferiority of homologous boosting compared with heterologous boosting with the recombinant protein vaccine, SCB-2019, in adults previously immunized with different COVID-19 vaccines. Three equal cohorts (N ~ 420) of Philippino adults (18-80 years) previously immunized with Comirnaty, CoronaVac or Vaxzevria COVID-19 vaccines were randomized 1:1 to receive homologous or heterologous (SCB-2019) boosters. Neutralizing antibodies against prototype SARS-CoV-2 (Wuhan-Hu-1) were measured in all participants and against Delta variant and Omicron sub-lineages in subsets (30‒50 per arm) 15 days after boosting. Participants recorded solicited adverse events for 7 days and unsolicited and serious adverse events until Day 60. Prototype SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing responses on Day 15 after SCB-2019 were statistically non-inferior to homologous Vaxzevria boosters, superior to CoronaVac, but lower than homologous Comirnaty. Neutralizing responses against Delta and Omicron BA.1, BA.2, BA.4 and BA.5 variants after heterologous SCB-2019 were higher than homologous CoronaVac or Vaxzevria, but lower than homologous Comirnaty. Responses against Omicron BF.7, BQ.1.1.3, and XBB1.5 following heterologous SCB-2019 were lower than after homologous Comirnaty booster but significantly higher than after Vaxzevria booster. SCB-2019 reactogenicity was similar to CoronaVac or Vaxzevria, but lower than Comirnaty; most frequent events were mild/moderate injection site pain, headache and fatigue. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. Heterologous SCB-2019 boosting was well tolerated and elicited neutralizing responses against all tested SARS-COV-2 viruses including Omicron BA.1, BA.2, BA.4, BA.5, BF.7, BQ.1.1.3, and XBB1.5 sub-lineages that were non-inferior to homologous boosting with CoronaVac or Vaxzevria, but not homologous Comirnaty booster.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilo C Roa
- Department of Physiology, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines
| | | | - Eric Plennevaux
- Clinical Development, Clover Biopharmaceuticals, Cambridge, UK
| | - Igor Smolenov
- Clinical Development, Clover Biopharmaceuticals, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Branda Hu
- Clinical Development, Clover Biopharmaceuticals, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Faith Gao
- Clinical Development, Clover Biopharmaceuticals, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hannalyn Ilagan
- Clinical Development, Clover Biopharmaceuticals, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Ralf Clemens
- Global Research in Infectious Diseases, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Htay Htay Han
- Clinical Development, Clover Biopharmaceuticals, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Casadevall A, McConnell S, Focosi D. Considerations for the development of monoclonal antibodies to address new viral variants in COVID-19. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2024:1-11. [PMID: 39088242 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2024.2388186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2024] [Revised: 07/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/31/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies proved safe and effective in preventing progression of COVID-19 to hospitalization, but most were eventually defeated by continued viral evolution. mAb combinations and those mAbs that were deliberatively selected to target conserved regions of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein proved more resilient to viral escape variants as evident by longer clinical useful lives. AREAS COVERED We searched PubMed for literature covering the need, development, and use of mAb therapies for COVID-19. As much of humanity now has immunity to SARS-CoV-2, the population at most risk is that of immunocompromised individuals. Hence, there continues to be a need for mAb therapies for immunocompromised patients. However, mAb use in this population carries the risk for selecting mAb-resistant variants, which could pose a public health concern if they disseminate to the general population. EXPERT OPINION Going forward, structural knowledge of the interactions of Spike with its cellular receptor has identified several regions that may be good targets for future mAb therapeutics. A focus on designing variant-resistant mAbs together with cocktails that target several epitopes and the use of other variant mitigating strategies such as the concomitant use of small molecule antivirals and polyclonal preparations could extend the clinical usefulness of future preparations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arturo Casadevall
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Scott McConnell
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniele Focosi
- North-Western Tuscany Blood Bank, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Grebe E, Stone M, Spencer BR, Akinseye A, Wright DJ, Di Germanio C, Bruhn R, Zurita KG, Contestable P, Green V, Lanteri MC, Saa P, Biggerstaff BJ, Coughlin MM, Kleinman S, Custer B, Jones JM, Busch MP. Detection of Nucleocapsid Antibodies Associated with Primary SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Unvaccinated and Vaccinated Blood Donors. Emerg Infect Dis 2024; 30:1621-1630. [PMID: 38981189 PMCID: PMC11286071 DOI: 10.3201/eid3008.240659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Nucleocapsid antibody assays can be used to estimate SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence in regions implementing spike-based COVID-19 vaccines. However, poor sensitivity of nucleocapsid antibody assays in detecting infection after vaccination has been reported. We derived a lower cutoff for identifying previous infections in a large blood donor cohort (N = 142,599) by using the Ortho VITROS Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Total-N Antibody assay, improving sensitivity while maintaining specificity >98%. We validated sensitivity in samples donated after self-reported swab-confirmed infections diagnoses. Sensitivity for first infections in unvaccinated donors was 98.1% (95% CI 98.0-98.2) and for infection after vaccination was 95.6% (95% CI 95.6-95.7) based on the standard cutoff. Regression analysis showed sensitivity was reduced in the Delta compared with Omicron period, in older donors, in asymptomatic infections, <30 days after infection, and for infection after vaccination. The standard Ortho N antibody threshold demonstrated good sensitivity, which was modestly improved with the revised cutoff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Bryan R. Spencer
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA (E. Grebe, M. Stone, C. Di Germanio, R. Bruhn, K.G. Zurita, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- University of California, San Francisco (M. Stone, R. Bruhn, M.C. Lanteri, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- American Red Cross, Rockville, Maryland, USA (B.R. Spencer, P. Saa)
- Westat, Rockville (A. Akinseye, D. Wright); QuidelOrtho, Rochester, New York, USA (P. Contestable)
- Creative Testing Solutions, Tempe, Arizona, USA (V. Green, M.C. Lanteri)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA (B.J. Biggerstaff)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (M.M. Coughlin, J.M. Jones)
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S. Kleinman)
| | - Akintunde Akinseye
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA (E. Grebe, M. Stone, C. Di Germanio, R. Bruhn, K.G. Zurita, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- University of California, San Francisco (M. Stone, R. Bruhn, M.C. Lanteri, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- American Red Cross, Rockville, Maryland, USA (B.R. Spencer, P. Saa)
- Westat, Rockville (A. Akinseye, D. Wright); QuidelOrtho, Rochester, New York, USA (P. Contestable)
- Creative Testing Solutions, Tempe, Arizona, USA (V. Green, M.C. Lanteri)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA (B.J. Biggerstaff)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (M.M. Coughlin, J.M. Jones)
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S. Kleinman)
| | - David J. Wright
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA (E. Grebe, M. Stone, C. Di Germanio, R. Bruhn, K.G. Zurita, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- University of California, San Francisco (M. Stone, R. Bruhn, M.C. Lanteri, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- American Red Cross, Rockville, Maryland, USA (B.R. Spencer, P. Saa)
- Westat, Rockville (A. Akinseye, D. Wright); QuidelOrtho, Rochester, New York, USA (P. Contestable)
- Creative Testing Solutions, Tempe, Arizona, USA (V. Green, M.C. Lanteri)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA (B.J. Biggerstaff)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (M.M. Coughlin, J.M. Jones)
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S. Kleinman)
| | - Clara Di Germanio
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA (E. Grebe, M. Stone, C. Di Germanio, R. Bruhn, K.G. Zurita, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- University of California, San Francisco (M. Stone, R. Bruhn, M.C. Lanteri, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- American Red Cross, Rockville, Maryland, USA (B.R. Spencer, P. Saa)
- Westat, Rockville (A. Akinseye, D. Wright); QuidelOrtho, Rochester, New York, USA (P. Contestable)
- Creative Testing Solutions, Tempe, Arizona, USA (V. Green, M.C. Lanteri)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA (B.J. Biggerstaff)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (M.M. Coughlin, J.M. Jones)
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S. Kleinman)
| | - Roberta Bruhn
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA (E. Grebe, M. Stone, C. Di Germanio, R. Bruhn, K.G. Zurita, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- University of California, San Francisco (M. Stone, R. Bruhn, M.C. Lanteri, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- American Red Cross, Rockville, Maryland, USA (B.R. Spencer, P. Saa)
- Westat, Rockville (A. Akinseye, D. Wright); QuidelOrtho, Rochester, New York, USA (P. Contestable)
- Creative Testing Solutions, Tempe, Arizona, USA (V. Green, M.C. Lanteri)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA (B.J. Biggerstaff)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (M.M. Coughlin, J.M. Jones)
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S. Kleinman)
| | - Karla G. Zurita
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA (E. Grebe, M. Stone, C. Di Germanio, R. Bruhn, K.G. Zurita, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- University of California, San Francisco (M. Stone, R. Bruhn, M.C. Lanteri, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- American Red Cross, Rockville, Maryland, USA (B.R. Spencer, P. Saa)
- Westat, Rockville (A. Akinseye, D. Wright); QuidelOrtho, Rochester, New York, USA (P. Contestable)
- Creative Testing Solutions, Tempe, Arizona, USA (V. Green, M.C. Lanteri)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA (B.J. Biggerstaff)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (M.M. Coughlin, J.M. Jones)
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S. Kleinman)
| | - Paul Contestable
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA (E. Grebe, M. Stone, C. Di Germanio, R. Bruhn, K.G. Zurita, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- University of California, San Francisco (M. Stone, R. Bruhn, M.C. Lanteri, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- American Red Cross, Rockville, Maryland, USA (B.R. Spencer, P. Saa)
- Westat, Rockville (A. Akinseye, D. Wright); QuidelOrtho, Rochester, New York, USA (P. Contestable)
- Creative Testing Solutions, Tempe, Arizona, USA (V. Green, M.C. Lanteri)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA (B.J. Biggerstaff)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (M.M. Coughlin, J.M. Jones)
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S. Kleinman)
| | - Valerie Green
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA (E. Grebe, M. Stone, C. Di Germanio, R. Bruhn, K.G. Zurita, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- University of California, San Francisco (M. Stone, R. Bruhn, M.C. Lanteri, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- American Red Cross, Rockville, Maryland, USA (B.R. Spencer, P. Saa)
- Westat, Rockville (A. Akinseye, D. Wright); QuidelOrtho, Rochester, New York, USA (P. Contestable)
- Creative Testing Solutions, Tempe, Arizona, USA (V. Green, M.C. Lanteri)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA (B.J. Biggerstaff)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (M.M. Coughlin, J.M. Jones)
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S. Kleinman)
| | - Marion C. Lanteri
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA (E. Grebe, M. Stone, C. Di Germanio, R. Bruhn, K.G. Zurita, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- University of California, San Francisco (M. Stone, R. Bruhn, M.C. Lanteri, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- American Red Cross, Rockville, Maryland, USA (B.R. Spencer, P. Saa)
- Westat, Rockville (A. Akinseye, D. Wright); QuidelOrtho, Rochester, New York, USA (P. Contestable)
- Creative Testing Solutions, Tempe, Arizona, USA (V. Green, M.C. Lanteri)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA (B.J. Biggerstaff)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (M.M. Coughlin, J.M. Jones)
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S. Kleinman)
| | - Paula Saa
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA (E. Grebe, M. Stone, C. Di Germanio, R. Bruhn, K.G. Zurita, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- University of California, San Francisco (M. Stone, R. Bruhn, M.C. Lanteri, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- American Red Cross, Rockville, Maryland, USA (B.R. Spencer, P. Saa)
- Westat, Rockville (A. Akinseye, D. Wright); QuidelOrtho, Rochester, New York, USA (P. Contestable)
- Creative Testing Solutions, Tempe, Arizona, USA (V. Green, M.C. Lanteri)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA (B.J. Biggerstaff)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (M.M. Coughlin, J.M. Jones)
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S. Kleinman)
| | - Brad J. Biggerstaff
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA (E. Grebe, M. Stone, C. Di Germanio, R. Bruhn, K.G. Zurita, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- University of California, San Francisco (M. Stone, R. Bruhn, M.C. Lanteri, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- American Red Cross, Rockville, Maryland, USA (B.R. Spencer, P. Saa)
- Westat, Rockville (A. Akinseye, D. Wright); QuidelOrtho, Rochester, New York, USA (P. Contestable)
- Creative Testing Solutions, Tempe, Arizona, USA (V. Green, M.C. Lanteri)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA (B.J. Biggerstaff)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (M.M. Coughlin, J.M. Jones)
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S. Kleinman)
| | - Melissa M. Coughlin
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA (E. Grebe, M. Stone, C. Di Germanio, R. Bruhn, K.G. Zurita, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- University of California, San Francisco (M. Stone, R. Bruhn, M.C. Lanteri, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- American Red Cross, Rockville, Maryland, USA (B.R. Spencer, P. Saa)
- Westat, Rockville (A. Akinseye, D. Wright); QuidelOrtho, Rochester, New York, USA (P. Contestable)
- Creative Testing Solutions, Tempe, Arizona, USA (V. Green, M.C. Lanteri)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA (B.J. Biggerstaff)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (M.M. Coughlin, J.M. Jones)
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S. Kleinman)
| | - Steve Kleinman
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA (E. Grebe, M. Stone, C. Di Germanio, R. Bruhn, K.G. Zurita, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- University of California, San Francisco (M. Stone, R. Bruhn, M.C. Lanteri, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- American Red Cross, Rockville, Maryland, USA (B.R. Spencer, P. Saa)
- Westat, Rockville (A. Akinseye, D. Wright); QuidelOrtho, Rochester, New York, USA (P. Contestable)
- Creative Testing Solutions, Tempe, Arizona, USA (V. Green, M.C. Lanteri)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA (B.J. Biggerstaff)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (M.M. Coughlin, J.M. Jones)
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S. Kleinman)
| | - Brian Custer
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA (E. Grebe, M. Stone, C. Di Germanio, R. Bruhn, K.G. Zurita, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- University of California, San Francisco (M. Stone, R. Bruhn, M.C. Lanteri, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- American Red Cross, Rockville, Maryland, USA (B.R. Spencer, P. Saa)
- Westat, Rockville (A. Akinseye, D. Wright); QuidelOrtho, Rochester, New York, USA (P. Contestable)
- Creative Testing Solutions, Tempe, Arizona, USA (V. Green, M.C. Lanteri)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA (B.J. Biggerstaff)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (M.M. Coughlin, J.M. Jones)
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S. Kleinman)
| | - Jefferson M. Jones
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA (E. Grebe, M. Stone, C. Di Germanio, R. Bruhn, K.G. Zurita, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- University of California, San Francisco (M. Stone, R. Bruhn, M.C. Lanteri, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- American Red Cross, Rockville, Maryland, USA (B.R. Spencer, P. Saa)
- Westat, Rockville (A. Akinseye, D. Wright); QuidelOrtho, Rochester, New York, USA (P. Contestable)
- Creative Testing Solutions, Tempe, Arizona, USA (V. Green, M.C. Lanteri)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA (B.J. Biggerstaff)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (M.M. Coughlin, J.M. Jones)
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S. Kleinman)
| | - Michael P. Busch
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA (E. Grebe, M. Stone, C. Di Germanio, R. Bruhn, K.G. Zurita, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- University of California, San Francisco (M. Stone, R. Bruhn, M.C. Lanteri, B. Custer, M.P. Busch)
- American Red Cross, Rockville, Maryland, USA (B.R. Spencer, P. Saa)
- Westat, Rockville (A. Akinseye, D. Wright); QuidelOrtho, Rochester, New York, USA (P. Contestable)
- Creative Testing Solutions, Tempe, Arizona, USA (V. Green, M.C. Lanteri)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA (B.J. Biggerstaff)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (M.M. Coughlin, J.M. Jones)
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S. Kleinman)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mohan GS, Mina MJ, Ankomah PO. Evaluating COVID-19 Vaccines in the Era of Endemicity-Recency vs Reformulation. JAMA Intern Med 2024; 184:940-942. [PMID: 38913364 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.1637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/25/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Gopi S Mohan
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Michael J Mina
- eMed, Miami, Florida
- The Immune Observatory, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pierre O Ankomah
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Figueroa AL, Ali K, Berman G, Zhou H, Deng W, Xu W, Lussier S, Girard B, Dutko FJ, Slobod K, Yeakey A, Priddy F, Miller JM, Das R. Safety and durability of mRNA-1273-induced SARS-CoV-2 immune responses in adolescents: results from the phase 2/3 TeenCOVE trial. EClinicalMedicine 2024; 74:102720. [PMID: 39091673 PMCID: PMC11293523 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Revised: 06/13/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Longitudinal changes in vaccination-induced immune response remain inadequately characterized in adolescents. We present long-term safety, immunogenicity, and COVID-19 incidence following a 2-dose mRNA-1273 100-μg primary series, and immunogenicity following a single dose of mRNA-1273 50 μg in vaccine-naïve adolescents. Methods TeenCOVE (NCT04649151) Part 1 randomized adolescents (12-17 years) to 2-dose mRNA-1273 100 μg (n = 2490) or placebo (n = 1243) 28 days apart. Subsequently, placebo recipients (n = 91) could receive open-label mRNA-1273. Primary objectives included prespecified adverse events through 12 months; secondary objectives were COVID-19 incidence and neutralizing and spike-binding antibodies (nAbs/bAbs) against SARS-CoV-2 (ancestral/variants) through 12 months (study period: December 2020-January 2022). In Part 2, vaccine-naïve adolescents (n = 52) received up to 2 doses of mRNA-1273 50 μg; interim analysis included Day 28 (D28) nAbs post-injection 1 in SARS-CoV-2-baseline-positive participants (serologic/virologic evidence of prior infection). Findings In SARS-CoV-2-baseline-negative adolescents (N = 369), mRNA-1273 induced robust nAb responses versus baseline (geometric mean concentration [GMC] = 11; 95% CI, 11-12) at D28 (1868 [1759-1985]), 6 months (625 [583-670]) and 12 months (550 [490-618]) post-injection 2. Similar bAb responses were observed to alpha/beta/delta/gamma variants; nAb/bAb responses were similar in SARS-CoV-2-baseline-positive adolescents. The 2-dose mRNA-1273 100-μg primary series was generally well-tolerated; one case of nonserious, moderate, probable acute myocarditis resolved by 8 days from symptom onset. A single dose of mRNA-1273 50 μg in SARS-CoV-2-baseline-positive adolescents induced higher D28 nAb GMCs against ancestral SARS-CoV-2 than 2-dose mRNA-1273 100 μg in young adults (geometric mean ratio = 4.322 [3.274-5.707]). Interpretation The overall risk-benefit profile of mRNA-1273 remains favorable in adolescents, with durable 12-month immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 (ancestral/variants). A single mRNA-1273 50-μg injection in vaccine-naïve adolescents elicited robust immune responses against SARS-CoV-2. Funding This project has been funded in whole or in part with federal funds by the Department of Health and Human Services, United States; Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response, United States; Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, United States, under Contract No. 75A50120C00034. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Health and Human Services or its components.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kashif Ali
- Kool Kids Pediatrics, DM Clinical Research, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gary Berman
- Clinical Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dickey TH, Salinas ND, Patel P, Orr-Gonzalez S, Ouahes T, McAleese H, Richardson BL, Singleton M, Murphy M, Eaton B, Kwan JL, Holbrook MR, Lambert LE, Tolia NH. RBD design increases the functional antibody titers elicited by SARS-CoV-2 spike vaccination. Antiviral Res 2024; 228:105937. [PMID: 38901738 PMCID: PMC11250568 DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2024.105937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Revised: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
Most COVID-19 vaccines contain the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein as an antigen, but they lose efficacy as neutralizing antibody titers wane and escape variants emerge. Modifying the spike antigen to increase neutralizing antibody titers would help counteract this decrease in titer. We previously used a structure-based computational design method to identify nine amino acid changes in the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of spike that stabilize the RBD and increase the neutralizing antibody titers elicited by vaccination. Here, we introduce those enhancing amino acid changes into a full-length spike (FL-S-2P) ectodomain representative of most approved vaccine antigens. These amino acid changes can be incorporated into the FL-S-2P protein without negatively effecting expression or stability. Furthermore, the amino acid changes improved functional antibody titers in both mice and monkeys following vaccination. These amino acid changes could increase the duration of protection conferred by most COVID-19 vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thayne H Dickey
- Laboratory of Malaria Immunology and Vaccinology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA
| | - Nichole D Salinas
- Laboratory of Malaria Immunology and Vaccinology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA
| | - Palak Patel
- Laboratory of Malaria Immunology and Vaccinology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA
| | - Sachy Orr-Gonzalez
- Laboratory of Malaria Immunology and Vaccinology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA
| | - Tarik Ouahes
- Laboratory of Malaria Immunology and Vaccinology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA
| | - Holly McAleese
- Laboratory of Malaria Immunology and Vaccinology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA
| | - Brandi L Richardson
- Laboratory of Malaria Immunology and Vaccinology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA
| | - Myesha Singleton
- Laboratory of Malaria Immunology and Vaccinology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA
| | - Michael Murphy
- Integrated Research Facility, Division of Clinical Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Frederick, MD, 21702, USA
| | - Brett Eaton
- Integrated Research Facility, Division of Clinical Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Frederick, MD, 21702, USA
| | - Jennifer L Kwan
- Epidemiology and Population Studies Unit, Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA
| | - Michael R Holbrook
- Integrated Research Facility, Division of Clinical Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Frederick, MD, 21702, USA
| | - Lynn E Lambert
- Laboratory of Malaria Immunology and Vaccinology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA
| | - Niraj H Tolia
- Laboratory of Malaria Immunology and Vaccinology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hamilton KW, Hua E, Dutcher L, Fernandez Lynch H, Junker P, Doucette AG, Werner D, Kannel EZ, Civitello T, Gabriel P, Ahya VN, Jacobs DA, Garfall A, Pratz K, Degnan KO, Blumberg EA, Capozzi D, Craig E, Takach P, Payne AS, Geara A, Koenig H, Holzman L, Tebas P. Implementation of an Approach to Equitable Allocation of SARS-CoV-2 Monoclonal Antibodies for Preexposure Prophylaxis: Experience From a Single Medical Center. Open Forum Infect Dis 2024; 11:ofae388. [PMID: 39100528 PMCID: PMC11297503 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofae388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 08/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies for preexposure prophylaxis (SMA-PrEP) offered patients who were immunocompromised another option for protection. However, SMA-PrEP posed administrative, operational, and ethical challenges for health care facilities, resulting in few patients receiving them. Although the first SMA-PrEP medication, tixagevimab and cilgavimab, had its authorization revoked due to compromised in vitro efficacy, new SMA-PrEP medications are currently completing clinical trials. This article provides an operational framework for administrative organization, patient identification and prioritization, equitable medication allocation, medication ordering and administration, and patient tracking. Methods A retrospective cohort study evaluating our hospital's SMA-PrEP administration strategy was performed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with receipt of SMA-PrEP. Results Despite the barriers in administering this medication and the scarcity of resources, our hospital was able to administer at least 1 dose of SMA-PrEP to 1359 of 5902 (23.0%) eligible patients. Even with the steps taken to promote equitable allocation, multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that there were still differences by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. As compared with patients who identified as Black, patients who identified as White (odds ratio [OR], 1.85; 95% CI, 1.46-2.33), Asian (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.03-2.46), and Hispanic (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.02-2.44) were more likely to receive SMA-PrEP. When compared with patients with low socioeconomic status, patients with high socioeconomic status (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.05-1.78) were more likely to be allocated SMA-PrEP. Conclusions Despite efforts to mitigate health care disparities, differences by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status still arose in patients receiving SMA-PrEP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith W Hamilton
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Elvis Hua
- Department of Pharmacy, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lauren Dutcher
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Holly Fernandez Lynch
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Paul Junker
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Abigail G Doucette
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Danielle Werner
- Clinical Practices of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ethan Z Kannel
- University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Thomas Civitello
- University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Peter Gabriel
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Vivek N Ahya
- Clinical Practices of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Dina A Jacobs
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alfred Garfall
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Keith Pratz
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kathleen O Degnan
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Emily A Blumberg
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Donna Capozzi
- Oncology Pharmacy and Investigational Drug Services, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ethan Craig
- Division of Rheumatology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Patricia Takach
- Section of Allergy and Immunology, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Aimee S Payne
- Department of Dermatology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Abdallah Geara
- Division of Renal, Electrolyte, and Hypertension, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Helen Koenig
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lawrence Holzman
- Division of Renal, Electrolyte, and Hypertension, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Pablo Tebas
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lopes R, Pham K, Klaassen F, Chitwood MH, Hahn AM, Redmond S, Swartwood NA, Salomon JA, Menzies NA, Cohen T, Grubaugh ND. Combining genomic data and infection estimates to characterize the complex dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants in the US. Cell Rep 2024; 43:114451. [PMID: 38970788 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 05/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Omicron surged as a variant of concern in late 2021. Several distinct Omicron variants appeared and overtook each other. We combined variant frequencies and infection estimates from a nowcasting model for each US state to estimate variant-specific infections, attack rates, and effective reproduction numbers (Rt). BA.1 rapidly emerged, and we estimate that it infected 47.7% of the US population before it was replaced by BA.2. We estimate that BA.5 infected 35.7% of the US population, persisting in circulation for nearly 6 months. Other variants-BA.2, BA.4, and XBB-together infected 30.7% of the US population. We found a positive correlation between the state-level BA.1 attack rate and social vulnerability and a negative correlation between the BA.1 and BA.2 attack rates. Our findings illustrate the complex interplay between viral evolution, population susceptibility, and social factors during the Omicron emergence in the US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Lopes
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases and Public Health Modeling Unit, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | - Kien Pham
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases and Public Health Modeling Unit, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Fayette Klaassen
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Melanie H Chitwood
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases and Public Health Modeling Unit, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Anne M Hahn
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases and Public Health Modeling Unit, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Seth Redmond
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases and Public Health Modeling Unit, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Nicole A Swartwood
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joshua A Salomon
- Department of Health Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Nicolas A Menzies
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ted Cohen
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases and Public Health Modeling Unit, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | - Nathan D Grubaugh
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases and Public Health Modeling Unit, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Romine JK, Li H, Coughlin MM, Jones JM, Britton A, Tyner HL, Fuller SB, Bloodworth R, Edwards LJ, Etolue JN, Morrill TC, Newes-Adeyi G, Olsho LEW, Gaglani M, Fowlkes A, Hollister J, Bedrick EJ, Uhrlaub JL, Beitel S, Sprissler RS, Lyski Z, Porter CJ, Rivers P, Lutrick K, Caban-Martinez AJ, Yoon SK, Phillips AL, Naleway AL, Burgess JL, Ellingson KD. Hybrid Immunity and SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies: Results of the HEROES-RECOVER Prospective Cohort Study. Clin Infect Dis 2024; 79:96-107. [PMID: 38466720 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are limited data on whether hybrid immunity differs by count and order of immunity-conferring events (infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [SARS-CoV-2] or vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]). From a multi-site cohort of frontline workers, we examined the heterogeneity of the effect of hybrid immunity on SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels. METHODS Exposures included event count and event order, categorized into 7 permutations. Outcome was level of serum antibodies against receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (total RBD-binding immunoglobulin). Means were examined up to 365 days after each of the first to seventh events. RESULTS Analysis included 5793 participants measured from 7 August 2020 to 15 April 2023. Hybrid immunity from infection before 1 or 2 vaccine doses elicited modestly superior antibody responses after the second and third events (compared with infections or vaccine doses alone). This superiority was not repeated after additional events. Among adults infected before vaccination, adjusted geometric mean ratios (95% confidence interval [CI]) of anti-RBD early response (versus vaccinated only) were 1.23 (1.14-1.33), 1.09 (1.03-1.14), 0.87 (.81-.94), and 0.99 (.85-1.15) after the second to fifth events, respectively. Post-vaccination infections elicited superior responses; adjusted geometric mean ratios (95% CI) of anti-RBD early response (versus vaccinated only) were 0.93 (.75-1.17), 1.11 (1.06-1.16), 1.17 (1.11-1.24), and 1.20 (1.07-1.34) after the second to fifth events, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Evidence of heterogeneity in antibody levels by permutations of infection and vaccination history could inform COVID-19 vaccination policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James K Romine
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Huashi Li
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Melissa M Coughlin
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jefferson M Jones
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Amadea Britton
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Harmony L Tyner
- St. Luke's Regional Health Care System, Duluth, Minnesota, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ashley Fowlkes
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - James Hollister
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Edward J Bedrick
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Jennifer L Uhrlaub
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Shawn Beitel
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Ryan S Sprissler
- University of Arizona Genetics Core, Office for Research, Innovation and Impact, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Zoe Lyski
- Department of Immunobiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Cynthia J Porter
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Patrick Rivers
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Karen Lutrick
- College of Medicine-Tucson, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | | | - Sarang K Yoon
- Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Andrew L Phillips
- Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Allison L Naleway
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Jefferey L Burgess
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Katherine D Ellingson
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gayed J, Bangad V, Xu X, Mensa F, Cutler M, Türeci Ö, Şahin U, Modjarrad K, Swanson KA, Anderson AS, Gurtman A, Kitchin N. Immunogenicity of the Monovalent Omicron XBB.1.5-Adapted BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccine against XBB.1.5, BA.2.86, and JN.1 Sublineages: A Phase 2/3 Trial. Vaccines (Basel) 2024; 12:734. [PMID: 39066372 PMCID: PMC11281410 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12070734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2024] [Revised: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
We report neutralization titer data against contemporary SARS-CoV-2 sublineages from an ongoing, phase 2/3, open-label, clinical trial of a single dose (30 μg) of an Omicron XBB.1.5-adapted BNT162b2 monovalent mRNA vaccine. The trial included healthy participants who had received at least three previous doses of an mRNA vaccine authorized in the United States, with the most recent authorized vaccine dose being a bivalent Omicron BA.4/BA.5-adapted vaccine given at least 150 days before the study vaccination. In this analysis, Omicron XBB.1.5, BA.2.86, and JN.1 serum neutralizing titers were assessed at baseline and at 1 month after vaccination. Analyses were conducted in a subset of participants who were at least 18 years of age (N = 40) and who had evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. Immunogenicity was also evaluated in a group of participants who received bivalent BA.4/BA.5-adapted BNT162b2 in another study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05472038) and who were matched demographically to the participants in the current trial. In this analysis, monovalent XBB.1.5-adapted BNT162b2 vaccine elicited higher XBB.1.5, BA.2.86, and JN.1 neutralizing titers than those elicited by bivalent BA.4/BA.5-adapted BNT162b2. Overall geometric mean fold rises in neutralizing titers from baseline to 1 month after vaccination were higher among participants who received XBB.1.5-adapted BNT162b2 than those who received bivalent BA.4/BA.5-adapted BNT162b2 for XBB.1.5 (7.6 vs. 5.6), slightly higher for JN.1 (3.9 vs. 3.5), and similar for BA.2.86 (4.8 vs. 4.9). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05997290.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juleen Gayed
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Ltd., Marlow International, Parkway, Marlow SL7 1YL, UK;
| | - Vishva Bangad
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, PA 19426, USA
| | - Xia Xu
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, PA 19426, USA
| | | | - Mark Cutler
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Pearl River, NY 10965, USA
| | | | | | - Kayvon Modjarrad
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Pearl River, NY 10965, USA
| | - Kena A. Swanson
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Pearl River, NY 10965, USA
| | | | - Alejandra Gurtman
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Pearl River, NY 10965, USA
| | - Nicholas Kitchin
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Ltd., Marlow International, Parkway, Marlow SL7 1YL, UK;
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Thomas A, Battenfeld T, Kraiselburd I, Anastasiou O, Dittmer U, Dörr AK, Dörr A, Elsner C, Gosch J, Le-Trilling VTK, Magin S, Scholtysik R, Yilmaz P, Trilling M, Schöler L, Köster J, Meyer F. UnCoVar: a reproducible and scalable workflow for transparent and robust virus variant calling and lineage assignment using SARS-CoV-2 as an example. BMC Genomics 2024; 25:647. [PMID: 38943066 PMCID: PMC11214259 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-10539-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND At a global scale, the SARS-CoV-2 virus did not remain in its initial genotype for a long period of time, with the first global reports of variants of concern (VOCs) in late 2020. Subsequently, genome sequencing has become an indispensable tool for characterizing the ongoing pandemic, particularly for typing SARS-CoV-2 samples obtained from patients or environmental surveillance. For such SARS-CoV-2 typing, various in vitro and in silico workflows exist, yet to date, no systematic cross-platform validation has been reported. RESULTS In this work, we present the first comprehensive cross-platform evaluation and validation of in silico SARS-CoV-2 typing workflows. The evaluation relies on a dataset of 54 patient-derived samples sequenced with several different in vitro approaches on all relevant state-of-the-art sequencing platforms. Moreover, we present UnCoVar, a robust, production-grade reproducible SARS-CoV-2 typing workflow that outperforms all other tested approaches in terms of precision and recall. CONCLUSIONS In many ways, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has accelerated the development of techniques and analytical approaches. We believe that this can serve as a blueprint for dealing with future pandemics. Accordingly, UnCoVar is easily generalizable towards other viral pathogens and future pandemics. The fully automated workflow assembles virus genomes from patient samples, identifies existing lineages, and provides high-resolution insights into individual mutations. UnCoVar includes extensive quality control and automatically generates interactive visual reports. UnCoVar is implemented as a Snakemake workflow. The open-source code is available under a BSD 2-clause license at github.com/IKIM-Essen/uncovar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Thomas
- Data Science Research Group, Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Thomas Battenfeld
- Data Science Research Group, Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ivana Kraiselburd
- Data Science Research Group, Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Olympia Anastasiou
- Institute for Virology, University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ulf Dittmer
- Institute for Virology, University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ann-Kathrin Dörr
- Data Science Research Group, Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Adrian Dörr
- Data Science Research Group, Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Carina Elsner
- Institute for Virology, University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jule Gosch
- Data Science Research Group, Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Vu Thuy Khanh Le-Trilling
- Institute for Virology, University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Institute for the Research on HIV & AIDS-associated Diseases, University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Simon Magin
- Data Science Research Group, Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - René Scholtysik
- Institute for the Research on HIV & AIDS-associated Diseases, University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Pelin Yilmaz
- Data Science Research Group, Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Mirko Trilling
- Institute for Virology, University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Institute for the Research on HIV & AIDS-associated Diseases, University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Lara Schöler
- Institute for Virology, University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Institute for the Research on HIV & AIDS-associated Diseases, University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Institute of Cell Biology (Cancer Research), University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Johannes Köster
- Bioinformatics and Computational Oncology, Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Folker Meyer
- Data Science Research Group, Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chervo TC, Elkin EP, Nugent JR, Valice E, Amsden LB, Ergas IJ, Munneke JR, Flores M, Saelee GN, Hsiao CA, Schapiro JM, Quesenberry CP, Corley DA, Habel LA, Kushi LH, Skarbinski J. Relative contribution of COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection to population-level seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies in a large integrated health system. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0303303. [PMID: 38900738 PMCID: PMC11189213 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding the relative contributions of SARS-CoV-2 infection-induced and vaccine-induced seroprevalence is key to measuring overall population-level seroprevalence and help guide policy decisions. METHODS Using a series of six population-based cross-sectional surveys conducted among persons aged ≥7 years in a large health system with over 4.5 million members between May 2021 and April 2022, we combined data from the electronic health record (EHR), an electronic survey and SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody binding assay, to assess the relative contributions of infection and vaccination to population-level SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence. EHR and survey data were incorporated to determine spike antibody positivity due to SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination. We used sampling and non-response weighting to create population-level estimates. RESULTS We enrolled 4,319 persons over six recruitment waves. SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody seroprevalence increased from 83.3% (CI 77.0-88.9) in May 2021 to 93.5% (CI 89.5-97.5) in April 2022. By April 2022, 68.5% (CI 61.9-74.3) of the population was seropositive from COVID-19 vaccination only, 13.9% (10.7-17.9) from COVID-19 vaccination and prior diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infection, 8.2% (CI 4.5-14.5) from prior diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infection only and 2.9% (CI 1.1-7.6) from prior undiagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infection only. We found high agreement (≥97%) between EHR and survey data for ascertaining COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection status. CONCLUSIONS By April 2022, 93.5% of persons had detectable SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody, predominantly from COVID-19 vaccination. In this highly vaccinated population and over 18 months into the pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 infection without COVID-19 vaccination was a small contributor to overall population-level seroprevalence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler C. Chervo
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, United States of America
| | - Eric P. Elkin
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, United States of America
| | - Joshua R. Nugent
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, United States of America
| | - Emily Valice
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, United States of America
| | - Laura B. Amsden
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, United States of America
| | - Isaac J. Ergas
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, United States of America
| | - Julie R. Munneke
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, United States of America
| | - Monica Flores
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, United States of America
| | - Gina N. Saelee
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, United States of America
| | - Crystal A. Hsiao
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, United States of America
| | - Jeffery M. Schapiro
- The Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, United States of America
| | - Charles P. Quesenberry
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, United States of America
| | - Douglas A. Corley
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, United States of America
- The Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, United States of America
| | - Laurel A. Habel
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, United States of America
| | - Lawrence H. Kushi
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, United States of America
| | - Jacek Skarbinski
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, United States of America
- The Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, United States of America
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Oakland Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, United States of America
- Physician Researcher Program, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mallory M, Munt JE, Narowski TM, Castillo I, Cuadra E, Pisanic N, Fields P, Powers JM, Dickson A, Harris R, Wargowsky R, Moran S, Allabban A, Raphel K, McCaffrey TA, Brien JD, Heaney CD, Lafleur JE, Baric RS, Premkumar L. COVID-19 point-of-care tests can identify low-antibody individuals: In-depth immunoanalysis of boosting benefits in a healthy cohort. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2024; 10:eadi1379. [PMID: 38865463 PMCID: PMC11168476 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adi1379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
The recommended COVID-19 booster vaccine uptake is low. At-home lateral flow assay (LFA) antigen tests are widely accepted for detecting infection during the pandemic. Here, we present the feasibility and potential benefits of using LFA-based antibody tests as a means for individuals to detect inadequate immunity and make informed decisions about COVID-19 booster immunization. In a health care provider cohort, we investigated the changes in the breadth and depth of humoral and T cell immune responses following mRNA vaccination and boosting in LFA-positive and LFA-negative antibody groups. We show that negative LFA antibody tests closely reflect the lack of functional humoral immunity observed in a battery of sophisticated immune assays, while positive results do not necessarily reflect adequate immunity. After booster vaccination, both groups gain depth and breadth of systemic antibodies against evolving SARS-CoV-2 and related viruses. Our findings show that LFA-based antibody tests can alert individuals about inadequate immunity against COVID-19, thereby increasing booster shots and promoting herd immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Mallory
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, UNC Chapel Hill School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer E. Munt
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, UNC Chapel Hill School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Tara M. Narowski
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Izabella Castillo
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Edwing Cuadra
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Nora Pisanic
- Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - John M. Powers
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, UNC Chapel Hill School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Alexandria Dickson
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Rohan Harris
- Department Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Richard Wargowsky
- Department of Medicine, Division of Genomic Medicine, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Seamus Moran
- Department Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Ahmed Allabban
- Department Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Kristin Raphel
- Department Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Timothy A. McCaffrey
- Department of Medicine, Division of Genomic Medicine, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - James D. Brien
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Christopher D. Heaney
- Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John E. Lafleur
- Department Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Ralph S. Baric
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, UNC Chapel Hill School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Lakshmanane Premkumar
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Theel ES, Kirby JE, Pollock NR. Testing for SARS-CoV-2: lessons learned and current use cases. Clin Microbiol Rev 2024; 37:e0007223. [PMID: 38488364 PMCID: PMC11237512 DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00072-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2024] Open
Abstract
SUMMARYThe emergence and worldwide dissemination of SARS-CoV-2 required both urgent development of new diagnostic tests and expansion of diagnostic testing capacity on an unprecedented scale. The rapid evolution of technologies that allowed testing to move out of traditional laboratories and into point-of-care testing centers and the home transformed the diagnostic landscape. Four years later, with the end of the formal public health emergency but continued global circulation of the virus, it is important to take a fresh look at available SARS-CoV-2 testing technologies and consider how they should be used going forward. This review considers current use case scenarios for SARS-CoV-2 antigen, nucleic acid amplification, and immunologic tests, incorporating the latest evidence for analytical/clinical performance characteristics and advantages/limitations for each test type to inform current debates about how tests should or should not be used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elitza S. Theel
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - James E. Kirby
- Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nira R. Pollock
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Xie Z, Stallings-Smith S, Patel S, Case S, Hong YR. COVID-19 booster vaccine uptake and reduced risks for long-COVID: A cross-sectional study of a U.S. adult population. Vaccine 2024; 42:3529-3535. [PMID: 38670844 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.04.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
Long-COVID (having symptoms lasting 3 months or longer post-infection) is an emerging public health concern, yet research on whether COVID-19 booster vaccines can mitigate this condition is limited. This study examined associations between booster uptake and long-COVID prevalence among U.S. adults. Data were analyzed from 8757 adults aged 18 years or older with a history of COVID-19 infection from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey. Weighted prevalence and logistic regression models examined relationships between self-reported COVID-19 booster vaccination status and long-COVID, adjusting for sociodemographics and health factors. 19.5 % reported experiencing long-COVID. Individuals receiving the COVID-19 booster vaccine had significantly lower adjusted odds of long-COVID (OR 0.75, 95 % CI 0.61-0.93) compared to unvaccinated individuals. Overall, these findings suggest that COVID-19 booster vaccination is associated with a reduced prevalence of long-COVID among the U.S. adult population, underscoring the importance of optimizing booster uptake to mitigate the long-term impacts of COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhigang Xie
- Department of Public Health, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
| | | | - Shraddha Patel
- Department of Public Health, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Stuart Case
- Department of Health Services Research, Management, and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Young-Rock Hong
- Department of Health Services Research, Management, and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Suthar MS. Durability of immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination. Semin Immunol 2024; 73:101884. [PMID: 38861769 DOI: 10.1016/j.smim.2024.101884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2024] [Revised: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
Infection with SARS-CoV-2 in humans has caused a pandemic of unprecedented dimensions. SARS-CoV-2 is primarily transmitted through respiratory droplets and targets ciliated epithelial cells in the nasal cavity, trachea, and lungs by utilizing the cellular receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). The innate immune response, including type I and III interferons, inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β), innate immune cells (monocytes, DCs, neutrophils, natural killer cells), antibodies (IgG, sIgA, neutralizing antibodies), and adaptive immune cells (B cells, CD8+ and CD4+ T cells) play pivotal roles in mitigating COVID-19 disease. Broad and durable B-cell- and T-cell immunity elicited by infection and vaccination is essential for protection against severe disease, hospitalization and death. However, the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants that evade neutralizing antibodies continue to jeopardize vaccine efficacy. In this review, we highlight our understanding the infection- and vaccine-mediated humoral, B and T cell responses, the durability of the immune responses, and how variants continue to threaten the efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehul S Suthar
- Emory Vaccine Center, Emory National Primate Research Center, Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Emory Center of Excellence of Influenza Research and Response (CEIRR), Atlanta, GA, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Center for Childhood Infections and Vaccines of Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
O'Brien SF, Goldman M, Ehsani-Moghaddam B, Fan W, Osmond L, Pambrun C, Drews SJ. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in Canadian blood donors: Insight into donor representativeness of the general population. Vaccine X 2024; 18:100498. [PMID: 38800670 PMCID: PMC11127215 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Blood donors world-wide were indispensable for monitoring anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies generated by infection and vaccination during the pandemic. Prior to the pandemic, donor vaccination behaviours were under-studied. We aimed to compare the percentage of Canadian blood donors with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination antibodies with the percentage of the general population who received at least one dose of vaccine each month during initial vaccine deployment. We also report donor attitudes towards SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Methods Canadian blood donors were randomly selected for SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing over 2021 (N = 165,240). The percentage of donor samples with vaccination antibodies were compared with the percentage of general population who received at least one dose of vaccine in each month of 2021 except February. A random sample of Canadian blood donors were surveyed about vaccination intent and attitudes (N = 4,558 participated, 30.4 % response rate). Results The percentages of the general population vaccinated and donors with vaccination antibodies increased from 1 % to over 90 %. General population vaccination was greater early in vaccine deployment than donors (p < 0.05), greater in donors than the general population by mid-2021 (p < 0.05) but they were similar by the end of 2021. While 52.6 % of surveyed donors had received vaccine in May 2021, a further 41.1 % intended to when eligible. Most donors thought COVID-19 infection could be serious (83.5 %) and that it was important to be vaccinated even if previously infected (77.8 %). Conclusion Early pandemic vaccine prioritization to at-risk individuals and healthcare workers gave rise to higher general population vaccination percentages, while donors had higher vaccine antibody percentages as vaccine was deployed to progressively younger age groups. Since blood donors may be more willing to receive vaccination, under pandemic conditions they may be valuable for monitoring vaccination-induced seroprevalence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheila F. O'Brien
- Epidemiology & Surveillance, Canadian Blood Services, 1800 Alta Vista Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1G 4J5, Canada
- School of Epidemiology & Public Health, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, Ottawa, Ontario K1G 5Z3, Canada
| | - Mindy Goldman
- Donation and Policy Studies, Canadian Blood Services, 1800 Alta Vista Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1G 4J5, Canada
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, Ottawa, Ontario K1G 5Z3, Canada
| | - Behrouz Ehsani-Moghaddam
- Epidemiology & Surveillance, Canadian Blood Services, 1800 Alta Vista Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1G 4J5, Canada
- Centre for Studies in Primary Care, Department of Family Medicine, Queens University, 220 Bagot Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3G2, Canada
| | - Wenli Fan
- Epidemiology & Surveillance, Canadian Blood Services, 1800 Alta Vista Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1G 4J5, Canada
| | - Lori Osmond
- Epidemiology & Surveillance, Canadian Blood Services, 1800 Alta Vista Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1G 4J5, Canada
| | - Chantale Pambrun
- Innovation & Portfolio Management, Medical Affairs & Innovation, Canadian Blood Services, 1800 Alta Vista Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1G 4J5, Canada
| | - Steven J. Drews
- Microbiology, Canadian Blood Services, 8249-114 Street, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R8, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, 118 Street & 86 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Whiting KA, Guest R, Seshan VE, Kamboj M. Susceptibility of healthcare personnel with severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) hybrid immunity to XBB lineage reinfection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2024; 45:781-784. [PMID: 38374682 DOI: 10.1017/ice.2023.282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
Among 8,678 vaccinated healthcare personnel (HCP) with previous coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), by August 28, 2023, 909 (10%) had an infection of severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) omicron XBB variant. Reinfection risk was comparable irrespective of previous infection type except for the omicron BQ.1 variant. Bivalent vaccination had a protective effect. COVID-19 vaccines remain vital to protect HCP, including those with hybrid immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karissa A Whiting
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Rebecca Guest
- Employee Health, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Venkatraman E Seshan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Mini Kamboj
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Infection Control, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Joan and Sanford Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ford ND, Slaughter D, Dalton AF, Edwards D, Ma K, King H, Saydah S. Health Insurance and Access to Care in U.S. Working-Age Adults Experiencing Long COVID. Am J Prev Med 2024:S0749-3797(24)00164-8. [PMID: 38762206 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 05/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Long COVID encompasses a wide range of health problems that emerge, persist, or recur following acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) illness. Given that the prevalence of self-reported Long COVID is highest among U.S. adults in their prime working years, it is important to identify unmet needs and gaps in healthcare access and coverage among working-age adults. METHODS Prevalences (95% confidence intervals [CI]) of health insurance coverage and access to care by Long COVID status were estimated among adults 18-64 years (n=18,117), accounting for survey design and weighted to the U.S. non-institutionalized population in the 2022 National Health Interview Survey. Analyses were conducted in 2023. RESULTS Overall, 3.7% (95% CI 3.4, 4.0) of respondents were experiencing Long COVID. Adults experiencing Long COVID were less likely to report being uninsured relative to adults not experiencing Long COVID (p=0.004); however, 49.0% (95% CI 43.2, 54.7) had high deductible health plans. Adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, adults experiencing Long COVID were more likely to access healthcare compared to adults not experiencing Long COVID (p<0.01 for seeing a doctor, telemedicine appointments, ≥2 urgent care visits, ≥2 emergency department visits, and hospitalized overnight). Despite more frequent healthcare use, adults experiencing Long COVID were also more likely to abstain from and delay medical care, therapy, and prescriptions due to cost compared to adults not experiencing Long COVID (p<0.0001 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS These findings may be used to inform healthcare planning for adults experiencing Long COVID and highlight the ongoing need to improve access and affordability of quality and comprehensive care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole D Ford
- Coronavirus and Other Respirator Viruses Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia.
| | - Douglas Slaughter
- Coronavirus and Other Respirator Viruses Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia; General Dynamics Information Technology, Falls Church, Virginia
| | - Alexandra F Dalton
- Coronavirus and Other Respirator Viruses Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Deja Edwards
- Coronavirus and Other Respirator Viruses Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia; Eagle Global Scientific, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kevin Ma
- Coronavirus and Other Respirator Viruses Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia; Epidemic Intelligence Service, Division of Workforce Development, Public Health Infrastructure Center, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Hope King
- Coronavirus and Other Respirator Viruses Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Sharon Saydah
- Coronavirus and Other Respirator Viruses Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hồ NT, Hughes SG, Ta VT, Phan LT, Đỗ Q, Nguyễn TV, Phạm ATV, Thị Ngọc Đặng M, Nguyễn LV, Trịnh QV, Phạm HN, Chử MV, Nguyễn TT, Lương QC, Tường Lê VT, Nguyễn TV, Trần LTL, Thi Van Luu A, Nguyen AN, Nguyen NTH, Vu HS, Edelman JM, Parker S, Sullivan B, Sullivan S, Ruan Q, Clemente B, Luk B, Lindert K, Berdieva D, Murphy K, Sekulovich R, Greener B, Smolenov I, Chivukula P, Nguyễn VT, Nguyen XH. Safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of the self-amplifying mRNA ARCT-154 COVID-19 vaccine: pooled phase 1, 2, 3a and 3b randomized, controlled trials. Nat Commun 2024; 15:4081. [PMID: 38744844 PMCID: PMC11094049 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-47905-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Combination of waning immunity and lower effectiveness against new SARS-CoV-2 variants of approved COVID-19 vaccines necessitates new vaccines. We evaluated two doses, 28 days apart, of ARCT-154, a self-amplifying mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, compared with saline placebo in an integrated phase 1/2/3a/3b controlled, observer-blind trial in Vietnamese adults (ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT05012943). Primary safety and reactogenicity outcomes were unsolicited adverse events (AE) 28 days after each dose, solicited local and systemic AE 7 days after each dose, and serious AEs throughout the study. Primary immunogenicity outcome was the immune response as neutralizing antibodies 28 days after the second dose. Efficacy against COVID-19 was assessed as primary and secondary outcomes in phase 3b. ARCT-154 was well tolerated with generally mild-moderate transient AEs. Four weeks after the second dose 94.1% (95% CI: 92.1-95.8) of vaccinees seroconverted for neutralizing antibodies, with a geometric mean-fold rise from baseline of 14.5 (95% CI: 13.6-15.5). Of 640 cases of confirmed COVID-19 eligible for efficacy analysis most were due to the Delta (B.1.617.2) variant. Efficacy of ARCT-154 was 56.6% (95% CI: 48.7- 63.3) against any COVID-19, and 95.3% (80.5-98.9) against severe COVID-19. ARCT-154 vaccination is well tolerated, immunogenic and efficacious, particularly against severe COVID-19 disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nhân Thị Hồ
- Vinmec-VinUni Institute of Immunology, Vinmec Healthcare System, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | | | | | | | - Quyết Đỗ
- Vietnam Military Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mến Văn Chử
- Vietnam Military Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | | | | | | | | | - Lý-Thi-Lê Trần
- Hi-tech Center, Vinmec Healthcare System, Hanoi, Vietnam
- Vietnam Biocare Biotechnology Jointstock Company, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Anh Thi Van Luu
- Vietnam Biocare Biotechnology Jointstock Company, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Anh Ngoc Nguyen
- Vietnam Biocare Biotechnology Jointstock Company, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | | | - Hai-Son Vu
- Vinmec-VinUni Institute of Immunology, Vinmec Healthcare System, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | | | | | | | | | - Qian Ruan
- Arcturus Therapeutics, Inc, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | - Brian Luk
- Arcturus Therapeutics, Inc, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Kat Murphy
- Arcturus Therapeutics, Inc, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Vân Thu Nguyễn
- Vietnam Biocare Biotechnology Jointstock Company, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Xuan-Hung Nguyen
- Vinmec-VinUni Institute of Immunology, Vinmec Healthcare System, Hanoi, Vietnam.
- Hi-tech Center, Vinmec Healthcare System, Hanoi, Vietnam.
- College of Health Sciences, Vin University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lippi G, Mattiuzzi C, Sanchis-Gomar F. Physical Activity, Long-COVID, and Inactivity: A Detrimental Endless Loop. J Phys Act Health 2024; 21:420-422. [PMID: 38467123 DOI: 10.1123/jpah.2024-0057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
The risk of developing medium- and long-term sequelae after recovery from COVID-19 is validated. Long-COVID burden represents a major health care issue, thus paving the way to effective prevention and/or treatment measures. Physical activity prevents many human pathologies, including COVID-19. Being physically active before and immediately after a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection substantially lowers the risk of developing long-COVID. In addition, long-COVID is an important cause of physical inactivity. Physically inactive individuals are at increased risk of developing long-COVID, while patients with long-COVID are more likely to reduce their physical activity levels after recovering from the acute infection, with the risk of generating a continuous loop. This harmful interaction needs to be recognized by public health institutions, and the adoption of physical activity as a routine clinical practice in all individuals after a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection needs to be proactively promoted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Lippi
- Section of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Camilla Mattiuzzi
- Medical Direction, Rovereto Hospital, Service of Clinical Governance and Medical Direction, Provincial Agency for Social and Sanitary Services (APSS), Trento, Italy
| | - Fabian Sanchis-Gomar
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wells CR, Pandey A, Moghadas SM, Fitzpatrick MC, Singer BH, Galvani AP. Evaluation of Strategies for Transitioning to Annual SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Campaigns in the United States. Ann Intern Med 2024; 177:609-617. [PMID: 38527289 DOI: 10.7326/m23-2451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has proposed administering annual SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of an annual SARS-CoV-2 vaccination campaign, quantify the health and economic benefits of a second dose provided to children younger than 2 years and adults aged 50 years or older, and optimize the timing of a second dose. DESIGN An age-structured dynamic transmission model. SETTING United States. PARTICIPANTS A synthetic population reflecting demographics and contact patterns in the United States. INTERVENTION Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 with age-specific uptake similar to that of influenza vaccination. MEASUREMENTS Incidence, hospitalizations, deaths, and direct health care cost. RESULTS The optimal timing between the first and second dose delivered to children younger than 2 years and adults aged 50 years or older in an annual vaccination campaign was estimated to be 5 months. In direct comparison with a single-dose campaign, a second booster dose results in 123 869 fewer hospitalizations (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 121 994 to 125 742 fewer hospitalizations) and 5524 fewer deaths (95% UI, 5434 to 5613 fewer deaths), averting $3.63 billion (95% UI, $3.57 billion to $3.69 billion) in costs over a single year. LIMITATIONS Population immunity is subject to degrees of immune evasion for emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. The model was implemented in the absence of nonpharmaceutical interventions and preexisting vaccine-acquired immunity. CONCLUSION The direct health care costs of SARS-CoV-2, particularly among adults aged 50 years or older, would be substantially reduced by administering a second dose 5 months after the initial dose. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Notsew Orm Sands Foundation, National Institutes of Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Science Foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chad R Wells
- Center for Infectious Disease Modeling and Analysis, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut (C.R.W., A.P., A.P.G.)
| | - Abhishek Pandey
- Center for Infectious Disease Modeling and Analysis, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut (C.R.W., A.P., A.P.G.)
| | - Seyed M Moghadas
- Agent-Based Modelling Laboratory, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.M.M.)
| | - Meagan C Fitzpatrick
- Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (M.C.F.)
| | - Burton H Singer
- Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (B.H.S.)
| | - Alison P Galvani
- Center for Infectious Disease Modeling and Analysis, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut (C.R.W., A.P., A.P.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Forkin KT, Guinn NR, Warner MA, Panigrahi AK. Addressing Patient Concerns with Blood Transfusion from Donors Vaccinated Against COVID-19: A Clinician Primer. Anesthesiology 2024; 140:1020-1025. [PMID: 38457190 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000004913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
Patient requests to avoid blood products from donors vaccinated against COVID-19 are on the rise. This primer provides the educational resources and tools for clinicians discussing these concerns with their patients, particularly in the perioperative period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine T Forkin
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia Health, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Nicole R Guinn
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Matthew A Warner
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Anil K Panigrahi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pathology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Berman K, Van Slyke G, Novak H, Rock JM, Bievenue R, Damjanovic AK, DeRosa KL, Mirabile G, Girardin RC, Dupuis AP, McDonough KA, Parker MM, Styer LM, Mantis NJ. Quantitating SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies from Human Dried Blood Spots. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.03.18.585599. [PMID: 38562708 PMCID: PMC10983952 DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.18.585599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Background In the earliest days of COVID-19 pandemic, the collection of dried blood spots (DBS) enabled public health laboratories to undertake population-scale seroprevalence studies to estimate rates of SARS-CoV-2 exposure. With SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity levels now estimated to exceed 94% in the United States, attention has turned to using DBS to assess functional (neutralizing) antibodies within cohorts of interest. Methods Contrived DBS eluates from convalescent, fully vaccinated and pre-COVID-19 serum samples were evaluated in SARS-CoV-2 plaque reduction neutralization titer (PRNT) assays, a SARS-CoV-2 specific 8-plex microsphere immunoassay, a cell-based pseudovirus assay, and two different spike-ACE2 inhibition assays, an in-house Luminex-based RBD-ACE2 inhibition assay and a commercial real-time PCR-based inhibition assay (NAB-Sure™). Results DBS eluates from convalescent individuals were compatible with the spike-ACE2 inhibition assays, but not cell-based pseudovirus assays or PRNT. However, the insensitivity of cell-based pseudovirus assays was overcome with DBS eluates from vaccinated individuals with high SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers. Conclusion SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing titers can be derived with confidence from DBS eluates, thereby opening the door to the use of these biospecimens for the analysis of vulnerable populations and normally hard to reach communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Berman
- Division of Infectious Disease, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12208
| | - Greta Van Slyke
- Division of Infectious Disease, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12208
| | - Hayley Novak
- Division of Infectious Disease, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12208
| | - Jean M. Rock
- Division of Infectious Disease, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12208
| | - Rachel Bievenue
- Division of Infectious Disease, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12208
| | - Amanda K. Damjanovic
- Division of Infectious Disease, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12208
| | - Kate L. DeRosa
- Division of Infectious Disease, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12208
| | - Gianna Mirabile
- Division of Infectious Disease, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12208
| | - Roxie C. Girardin
- Division of Infectious Disease, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12208
| | - Alan P. Dupuis
- Division of Infectious Disease, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12208
| | - Kathleen A. McDonough
- Division of Infectious Disease, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12208
| | - Monica M. Parker
- Division of Infectious Disease, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12208
| | - Linda M. Styer
- Division of Infectious Disease, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12208
| | - Nicholas J. Mantis
- Division of Infectious Disease, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12208
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Stave GM, Nabeel I, Durand-Moreau Q. Long COVID-ACOEM Guidance Statement. J Occup Environ Med 2024; 66:349-357. [PMID: 38588073 DOI: 10.1097/jom.0000000000003059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Persistent symptoms are common after acute COVID-19, often referred to as long COVID. Long COVID may affect the ability to perform activities of daily living, including work. Long COVID occurs more frequently in those with severe acute COVID-19. This guidance statement reviews the pathophysiology of severe acute COVID-19 and long COVID and provides pragmatic approaches to long COVID symptoms, syndromes, and conditions in the occupational setting. Disability laws and workers' compensation are also addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregg M Stave
- From the Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC (G.M.S.); Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (I.N.); and Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada (Q.D.-M.)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Mahan K, Kiel S, Freese R, Marka N, Dunitz J, Billings J. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG in people with cystic fibrosis. Heliyon 2024; 10:e27567. [PMID: 38501003 PMCID: PMC10945179 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Background When the first known US case of COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) was reported in early 2020, little was known about the impact of this novel virus on the cystic fibrosis community. As the majority of individuals with CF have chronic lung disease, this population was initially considered to be at high risk for severe disease as infection with a multitude of viruses has proven to cause pulmonary exacerbation. SARS-CoV-2 virus has proven challenging to study given the multiple disease manifestations, range of severity, and wave-like phenomenon that varies geographically. People with CF who become infected with COVID-19 can be asymptomatic or have symptoms ranging from mild cough and congestion to full respiratory failure, similar to the manifestations seen in non-CF individuals. By studying the seroprevalence, clinical course, and antibody durability due to COVID-19 and vaccinations, we will be better equipped to provide appropriate and informed care to people with CF. Methods Between July 2020 and April 2021 we enrolled 123 people with CF (pwCF) who receive care at the MN CF Center. We monitored their serology every 6 months for SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulins (nucleocapsid and spike IgG) for evidence of natural and induced immunity. Medication use, pulmonary function, exacerbation history, and hospitalizations were extracted via electronic medical record (EMR). Results 84% (101/120) of enrolled participants were vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 during the study. Eighty three percent of the cohort showed evidence of either natural or induced "immunity." The average duration of antibody from induced immunity in participants was 6.1 months and from natural immunity was 7.4 months with an overall average duration of antibody of 6.8 months. Earliest antibody detected was 12 days after a single dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine and antibody was detectable across a span of 13 months. Eleven percent of vaccinated individuals did not have measurable IgG. 36% of non-responders (NRs) were solid organ transplant patients on chronic immunosuppressive therapy. Only 3 people within this cohort were hospitalized due to COVID pneumonia and all three survived. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first report on the seroprevalence and longevity of SARS-CoV-2 IgG to 1 year in adults with CF after the widespread availability of SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations. These data show that pwCF respond to the COVID vaccination and produce long-lasting antibodies similar to the general population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen Mahan
- University of Minnesota, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, USA
| | - Sarah Kiel
- University of Minnesota, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, USA
| | - Rebecca Freese
- Biostatistical Design and Analysis Center, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota, USA
| | - Nicholas Marka
- Biostatistical Design and Analysis Center, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota, USA
| | - Jordan Dunitz
- University of Minnesota, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, USA
| | - Joanne Billings
- University of Minnesota, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Planas D, Peng L, Zheng L, Guivel-Benhassine F, Staropoli I, Porrot F, Bruel T, Bhiman JN, Bonaparte M, Savarino S, de Bruyn G, Chicz RM, Moore PL, Schwartz O, Sridhar S. Beta-variant recombinant booster vaccine elicits broad cross-reactive neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 including Omicron variants. Heliyon 2024; 10:e27033. [PMID: 38486776 PMCID: PMC10938114 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Background SARS-CoV-2 Omicron lineage contains variants with multiple sequence mutations relative to the ancestral strain particularly in the viral spike gene. These mutations are associated inter alia with loss of neutralization sensitivity to sera generated by immunization with vaccines targeting ancestral strains or prior infection with circulating (non-Omicron) variants. Here we present a comparison of vaccine formulation elicited cross neutralization responses using two different assay readouts from a subpopulation of a Phase II/III clinical trial. Methods Human sera from a Phase II/III trial (NCT04762680) was collected and evaluated for neutralizing responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike antigen protein vaccines formulated with AS03 adjuvant, following a primary series of two-doses of ancestral strain vaccine in individuals who were previously unvaccinated or as an ancestral or variant strain booster vaccine among individuals previously vaccinated with the mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine. Results We report that a neutralizing response to Omicron BA.1 is induced by the two-dose primary series in 89% of SARS-CoV-2-seronegative individuals. A booster dose of each vaccine formulation raises neutralizing antibody titers that effectively neutralizes Omicron BA.1 and BA.4/5 variants. Responses are highest after the monovalent Beta variant booster and similar in magnitude to human convalescent plasma titers. Conclusion The findings of this study suggest the possibility to generate greater breadth of cross-neutralization to more recently emerging viral variants through use of a diverged spike vaccine in the form of a Beta variant booster vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lin Peng
- Clinical Sciences and Operations, Sanofi, Chengdu, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jinal N. Bhiman
- MRC Antibody Immunity Research Unit, School of Pathology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- National Institute for Communicable Diseases of the National Health Laboratory Services, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | | | | | | | | - Penny L. Moore
- MRC Antibody Immunity Research Unit, School of Pathology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- National Institute for Communicable Diseases of the National Health Laboratory Services, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Trottier CA, La J, Li L, Fillmore NR, Monach PA, Doron S, Branch-Elliman W. Longitudinal trends in 30-day mortality attributable to SARS-CoV-2 among vaccinated and unvaccinated US veteran patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2024; 45:393-395. [PMID: 37960943 DOI: 10.1017/ice.2023.245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin A Trottier
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer La
- Veterans' Affairs (VA) Boston Cooperative Studies Program, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lucy Li
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nathanael R Fillmore
- Veterans' Affairs (VA) Boston Cooperative Studies Program, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Paul A Monach
- Veterans' Affairs (VA) Boston Cooperative Studies Program, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Rheumatology Section, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shira Doron
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Westyn Branch-Elliman
- Veterans' Affairs (VA) Boston Cooperative Studies Program, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Infectious Diseases Section, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
- VA Boston Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Chervo TC, Elkin EP, Nugent JR, Valice E, Amsden LB, Ergas IJ, Munneke JR, Flores M, Saelee GN, Hsiao CA, Schapiro JM, Quesenberry CP, Corley DA, Habel LA, Kushi LH, Skarbinski J. Relative contribution of COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection to population-level seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies in a large integrated health system. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.01.31.24301674. [PMID: 38352327 PMCID: PMC10863028 DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.31.24301674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
Background Understanding the relative contributions of SARS-CoV-2 infection-induced and vaccine- induced seroprevalence is key to measuring overall population-level seroprevalence and help guide policy decisions. Methods Using a series of six population-based cross-sectional surveys conducted among persons aged ≥7 years in a large health system with over 4.5 million members between May 2021 and April 2022, we combined data from the electronic health record (EHR), an electronic survey and SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody binding assay, to assess the relative contributions of infection and vaccination to population- level SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence. EHR and survey data were incorporated to determine spike antibody positivity due to SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination. We used sampling and non-response weighting to create population-level estimates. Results We enrolled 4,319 persons over six recruitment waves. SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody seroprevalence increased from 83.3% (CI 77.0-88.9) in May 2021 to 93.5% (CI 89.5-97.5) in April 2022. By April 2022, 68.5% (CI 61.9-74.3) of the population was seropositive from COVID-19 vaccination only, 13.9% (10.7-17.9) from COVID-19 vaccination and prior diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infection, 8.2% (CI 4.5- 14.5) from prior diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infection only and 2.9% (CI 1.1-7.6) from prior undiagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infection only. We found high agreement (≥97%) between EHR and survey data for ascertaining COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection status. Conclusions By April 2022, 93.5% of persons had detectable SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody, predominantly from COVID-19 vaccination. In this highly vaccinated population and over 18 months into the pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 infection without COVID-19 vaccination was a small contributor to overall population-level seroprevalence. Article summary By April 2022, >93% of people had antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 with COVID-19 vaccination as the main driver of overall population-level seroprevalence in our healthcare system. SARS-CoV-2 infection without vaccination made a small contribution to population-level seroprevalence in our healthcare system.
Collapse
|
30
|
Le Bert N, Samandari T. Silent battles: immune responses in asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cell Mol Immunol 2024; 21:159-170. [PMID: 38221577 PMCID: PMC10805869 DOI: 10.1038/s41423-024-01127-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2024] Open
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 infections manifest with a broad spectrum of presentations, ranging from asymptomatic infections to severe pneumonia and fatal outcomes. This review centers on asymptomatic infections, a widely reported phenomenon that has substantially contributed to the rapid spread of the pandemic. In such asymptomatic infections, we focus on the role of innate, humoral, and cellular immunity. Notably, asymptomatic infections are characterized by an early and robust innate immune response, particularly a swift type 1 IFN reaction, alongside a rapid and broad induction of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells. Often, antibody levels tend to be lower or undetectable after asymptomatic infections, suggesting that the rapid control of viral replication by innate and cellular responses might impede the full triggering of humoral immunity. Even if antibody levels are present in the early convalescent phase, they wane rapidly below serological detection limits, particularly following asymptomatic infection. Consequently, prevalence studies reliant solely on serological assays likely underestimate the extent of community exposure to the virus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Le Bert
- Program in Emerging Infectious Diseases, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Taraz Samandari
- Program in Emerging Infectious Diseases, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Gayed J, Diya O, Lowry FS, Xu X, Bangad V, Mensa F, Zou J, Xie X, Hu Y, Lu C, Cutler M, Belanger T, Cooper D, Koury K, Anderson AS, Türeci Ö, Şahin U, Swanson KA, Modjarrad K, Gurtman A, Kitchin N. Safety and Immunogenicity of the Monovalent Omicron XBB.1.5-Adapted BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccine in Individuals ≥12 Years Old: A Phase 2/3 Trial. Vaccines (Basel) 2024; 12:118. [PMID: 38400102 PMCID: PMC10893482 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12020118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Vaccination remains an important mitigation tool against COVID-19. We report 1-month safety and preliminary immunogenicity data from a substudy of an ongoing, open-label, phase 2/3 study of monovalent Omicron XBB.1.5-adapted BNT162b2 (single 30-μg dose). Healthy participants ≥12 years old (N = 412 (12-17 years, N = 30; 18-55 years, N = 174; >55 years, N = 208)) who previously received ≥3 doses of a US-authorized mRNA vaccine, the most recent being an Omicron BA.4/BA.5-adapted bivalent vaccine ≥150 days before study vaccination, were vaccinated. Serum 50% neutralizing titers against Omicron XBB.1.5, EG.5.1, and BA.2.86 were measured 7 days and 1 month after vaccination in a subset of ≥18-year-olds (N = 40) who were positive for SARS-CoV-2 at baseline. Seven-day immunogenicity was also evaluated in a matched group who received bivalent BA.4/BA.5-adapted BNT162b2 in a previous study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05472038). There were no new safety signals; local reactions and systemic events were mostly mild to moderate in severity, adverse events were infrequent, and none led to study withdrawal. The XBB.1.5-adapted BNT162b2 induced numerically higher titers against Omicron XBB.1.5, EG.5.1, and BA.2.86 than BA.4/BA.5-adapted BNT162b2 at 7 days and robust neutralizing responses to all three sublineages at 1 month. These data support a favorable benefit-risk profile of XBB.1.5-adapted BNT162b2 30 μg. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05997290.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juleen Gayed
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Ltd., Hurley SL6 6RJ, UK (N.K.)
| | - Oyeniyi Diya
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Ltd., Hurley SL6 6RJ, UK (N.K.)
| | - Francine S. Lowry
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, PA 19426, USA (X.X.); (V.B.)
| | - Xia Xu
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, PA 19426, USA (X.X.); (V.B.)
| | - Vishva Bangad
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, PA 19426, USA (X.X.); (V.B.)
| | | | - Jing Zou
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA (X.X.)
| | - Xuping Xie
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA (X.X.)
| | - Yanping Hu
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA (X.X.)
| | - Claire Lu
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Pearl River, NY 10965, USA (T.B.); (K.M.)
| | - Mark Cutler
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Pearl River, NY 10965, USA (T.B.); (K.M.)
| | - Todd Belanger
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Pearl River, NY 10965, USA (T.B.); (K.M.)
| | - David Cooper
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Pearl River, NY 10965, USA (T.B.); (K.M.)
| | - Kenneth Koury
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Pearl River, NY 10965, USA (T.B.); (K.M.)
| | - Annaliesa S. Anderson
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Pearl River, NY 10965, USA (T.B.); (K.M.)
| | | | | | - Kena A. Swanson
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Pearl River, NY 10965, USA (T.B.); (K.M.)
| | - Kayvon Modjarrad
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Pearl River, NY 10965, USA (T.B.); (K.M.)
| | - Alejandra Gurtman
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Pearl River, NY 10965, USA (T.B.); (K.M.)
| | - Nicholas Kitchin
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Ltd., Hurley SL6 6RJ, UK (N.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Roubinian NH, Greene J, Liu VX, Lee C, Mark DG, Vinson DR, Spencer BR, Bruhn R, Bravo M, Stone M, Custer B, Kleinman S, Busch MP, Norris PJ. Clinical outcomes in hospitalized plasma and platelet transfusion recipients prior to and following widespread blood donor SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination. Transfusion 2024; 64:53-67. [PMID: 38054619 PMCID: PMC10842807 DOI: 10.1111/trf.17616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The safety of transfusion of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in high plasma volume blood components to recipients without COVID-19 is not established. We assessed whether transfusion of plasma or platelet products during periods of increasing prevalence of blood donor SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination was associated with changes in outcomes in hospitalized patients without COVID-19. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized adults who received plasma or platelet transfusions at 21 hospitals during pre-COVID-19 (3/1/2018-2/29/2020), COVID-19 pre-vaccine (3/1/2020-2/28/2021), and COVID-19 post-vaccine (3/1/2021-8/31/2022) study periods. We used multivariable logistic regression with generalized estimating equations to adjust for demographics and comorbidities to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS Among 21,750 hospitalizations of 18,584 transfusion recipients without COVID-19, there were 697 post-transfusion thrombotic events, and oxygen requirements were increased in 1751 hospitalizations. Intensive care unit length of stay (n = 11,683) was 3 days (interquartile range 1-5), hospital mortality occurred in 3223 (14.8%), and 30-day rehospitalization in 4144 (23.7%). Comparing the pre-COVID, pre-vaccine and post-vaccine study periods, there were no trends in thromboses (OR 0.9 [95% CI 0.8, 1.1]; p = .22) or oxygen requirements (OR 1.0 [95% CI 0.9, 1.1]; p = .41). In parallel, there were no trends across study periods for ICU length of stay (p = .83), adjusted hospital mortality (OR 1.0 [95% CI 0.9-1.0]; p = .36), or 30-day rehospitalization (p = .29). DISCUSSION Transfusion of plasma and platelet blood components collected during the pre-vaccine and post-vaccine periods of the COVID-19 pandemic was not associated with increased adverse outcomes in transfusion recipients without COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nareg H Roubinian
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, Oakland, California, USA
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - John Greene
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Vincent X Liu
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Catherine Lee
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Dustin G Mark
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, Oakland, California, USA
| | - David R Vinson
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Bryan R Spencer
- American Red Cross, Scientific Affairs, Dedham, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Roberta Bruhn
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Mars Stone
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Brian Custer
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Steve Kleinman
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Michael P Busch
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Philip J Norris
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Carlson J, Simeone RM, Ellington S, Galang R, DeSisto CL, Fleming-Dutra K, Riley L, Meaney-Delman D, Tong VT. Pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron Periods of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic and Health Outcomes During Delivery Hospitalization. Obstet Gynecol 2024; 143:131-138. [PMID: 37917932 PMCID: PMC10949122 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the relationship between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis at delivery and adverse maternal health and pregnancy outcomes during pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron variant predominance, with a focus on the time period of Omicron variant predominance. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional observational study with data from delivery hospitalizations in the Premier Healthcare Database from February 2020 to August 2023. The pre-Delta (February 2020-June 2021), Delta (July 2021-December 2021), and Omicron (January 2022-August 2023) periods of variant predominance were examined. Exposure to COVID-19 was identified by having a diagnostic code for COVID-19 during the delivery hospitalization. Adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) were calculated to compare the risks of adverse maternal and pregnancy outcomes for women with and without COVID-19 diagnoses at the time of delivery for each variant period. RESULTS Among 2,990,973 women with delivery hospitalizations, 1.9% (n=56,618) had COVID-19 diagnoses noted at delivery admission discharge, including 26,053 during the Omicron period. Across all variant time periods, the prevalence of many adverse maternal and pregnancy outcomes during the delivery hospitalization was significantly higher for pregnant women with COVID-19 compared with pregnant women without COVID-19. In adjusted models, COVID-19 during the Omicron period was associated with significant increased risks for maternal sepsis (COVID-19: 0.4% vs no COVID-19: 0.1%; aPR 3.32, 95% CI, 2.70-4.08), acute respiratory distress syndrome (0.6% vs 0.1%; aPR 6.19, 95% CI, 5.26-7.29), shock (0.2% vs 0.1%; aPR 2.14, 95% CI, 1.62-2.84), renal failure (0.5% vs 0.2%; aPR 2.08, 95% CI, 1.73-2.49), intensive care unit admission (2.7% vs 1.7%; aPR 1.64, 95% CI, 1.52-1.77), mechanical ventilation (0.3% vs 0.1%; aPR 3.15, 95% CI, 2.52-3.93), in-hospital death (0.03% vs 0.01%; aPR 5.00, 95% CI, 2.30-10.90), stillbirth (0.7% vs 0.6%; aPR 1.17, 95% CI, 1.01-1.36), and preterm delivery (12.3% vs 9.6%; aPR 1.28, 95% CI, 1.24-1.33). CONCLUSION Despite the possibility of some level of immunity due to previous severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, vaccination, or testing differences, risks of adverse outcomes associated with COVID-19 diagnosis at delivery remained elevated during the Omicron variant time period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Carlson
- Eagle Global Scientific, LLC, and the Division of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, the Coronavirus and Other Respiratory Viruses Division, the Influenza Division, the Division of Reproductive Health, and the Division of Viral Disease, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Black B, Thaw DB. Vaccinating against a Novel Pathogen: A Critical Review of COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Evidence. Microorganisms 2023; 12:89. [PMID: 38257917 PMCID: PMC10820171 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12010089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
We study the experience with COVID-19 vaccination of an initially naïve population, which can inform planning for vaccination against the next novel, highly transmissible pathogen. We focus on the first two pandemic years (wild strain through Delta), because after the Omicron wave in early 2022, very few people were still SARS-CoV-2-naïve. Almost all were vaccinated, infected, or often both. We review the evidence on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) and waning effectiveness over time and the relative effectiveness of the four principal vaccines used in developed Western countries: BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), mRNA1273 (Moderna), Ad26.CoV2.S (Johnson&Johnson), and ChAdOx1-S (AstraZeneca). As a basis for our analysis, we conducted a PRISMA-compliant review of all studies on PubMed through 15 August 2022, reporting VE against four endpoints for these four vaccines: any infection, symptomatic infection, hospitalization, and death. The mRNA vaccines (BNT162b2, mRNA1273) had high initial VE against all endpoints but protection waned after approximately six months, with BNT162b2 declining faster than mRNA1273. Both mRNA vaccines outperformed the viral vector vaccines (Ad26.CoV2.S and ChAdOx1-S). A third "booster" dose, roughly six months after the initial doses, substantially reduced symptomatic infection, hospitalization, and death. In hindsight, a third dose should be seen as part of the normal vaccination schedule. Our analysis highlights the importance of the real-time population-level surveillance needed to assess evidence for waning, and the need for rapid regulatory response to this evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernard Black
- Pritzker School of Law and Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60201, USA
| | - David B. Thaw
- School of Computing & Information and School of Law, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Oliver SE, Wallace M, Twentyman E, Moulia DL, Godfrey M, Link-Gelles R, Meyer S, Fleming-Dutra KE, Hall E, Wolicki J, MacNeil J, Bell BP, Lee GM, Daley MF, Cohn A, Wharton M. Development of COVID-19 vaccine policy - United States, 2020-2023. Vaccine 2023:S0264-410X(23)01466-4. [PMID: 38158297 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.12.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
COVID-19 vaccines represent a great scientific and public health achievement in the face of overwhelming pressures from a global pandemic, preventing millions of hospitalizations and deaths due to COVID-19 vaccines in the United States. Over 675 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines have been administered in the United States, and over 80% of the U.S. population has had at least 1 dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. Over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, over one million people died from COVID-19, and over six million were hospitalized. It has been estimated that COVID-19 vaccines prevented more than 18 million additional hospitalizations and more than 3 million additional deaths due to COVID-19 in the United States. From the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 through June 2023, ACIP had 35 COVID-19 focused meetings and 24 votes for COVID-19 vaccine recommendations. ACIP had the critical task of rapidly and thoroughly reviewing emerging and evolving data on COVID-19 epidemiology and vaccines, as well as making comprehensive population-based recommendations for vaccine policy and considerations for implementation through a transparent and evidence-based framework. Safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines, recommended through transparent policy discussions with ACIP, remain the best tool we have to prevent serious illness, hospitalization and death from COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara E Oliver
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - Megan Wallace
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Evelyn Twentyman
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Danielle L Moulia
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Monica Godfrey
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Ruth Link-Gelles
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sarah Meyer
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Katherine E Fleming-Dutra
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Elisha Hall
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - JoEllen Wolicki
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jessica MacNeil
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Grace M Lee
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Matthew F Daley
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Amanda Cohn
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Melinda Wharton
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Rodilla AM, Valanparambil RM, Mack PC, Hsu CY, Cagan J, Tavolacci SC, Carreño JM, Brody R, Moore A, King JC, Gomez JE, Rohs N, Rolfo C, Bunn PA, Gerber DE, Minna JD, Krammer F, Ramalingam SS, García-Sastre A, Shyr Y, Ahmed R, Hirsch FR. Longitudinal nucleocapsid antibody testing reveals undocumented SARS-CoV-2 infections in patients with lung cancer. Cancer Cell 2023; 41:1838-1840. [PMID: 37863065 PMCID: PMC11161204 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
Patients diagnosed with lung cancer (LC) exhibit increased susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Rodilla et al. monitor the levels of plasma anti-nucleocapsid antibodies within a cohort of fully vaccinated LC patients and reveal that the actual infection rate is nearly twice the documented rate, indicating a significant prevalence of unreported cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ananda M Rodilla
- Center for Thoracic Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rajesh M Valanparambil
- Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Philip C Mack
- Center for Thoracic Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chih-Yuan Hsu
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jazz Cagan
- Center for Thoracic Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sooyun C Tavolacci
- Center for Thoracic Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Juan Manuel Carreño
- Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Center for Vaccine Research and Pandemic Preparedness (C-VaRPP), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Rachel Brody
- Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amy Moore
- LUNGevity Foundation, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Jorge E Gomez
- Center for Thoracic Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicholas Rohs
- Center for Thoracic Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christian Rolfo
- Center for Thoracic Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paul A Bunn
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - David E Gerber
- Hamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology Research, Departments of Internal Medicine and Pharmacology UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - John D Minna
- Hamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology Research, Departments of Internal Medicine and Pharmacology UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Florian Krammer
- Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Center for Vaccine Research and Pandemic Preparedness (C-VaRPP), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Suresh S Ramalingam
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Adolfo García-Sastre
- Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Global Health and Emerging Pathogens Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; The Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yu Shyr
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Rafi Ahmed
- Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Fred R Hirsch
- Center for Thoracic Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Bloch EM, Busch MP, Corash LM, Dodd R, Hailu B, Kleinman S, O'Brien S, Petersen L, Stramer SL, Katz L. Leveraging Donor Populations to Study the Epidemiology and Pathogenesis of Transfusion-Transmitted and Emerging Infectious Diseases. Transfus Med Rev 2023; 37:150769. [PMID: 37919210 PMCID: PMC10841704 DOI: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2023.150769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
The tragedy of transfusion-associated hepatitis and HIV spurred a decades-long overhaul of the regulatory oversight and practice of blood transfusion. Consequent to improved donor selection, testing, process control, clinical transfusion practice and post-transfusion surveillance, transfusion in the United States and other high-income countries is now a very safe medical procedure. Nonetheless, pathogens continue to emerge and threaten the blood supply, highlighting the need for a proactive approach to blood transfusion safety. Blood donor populations and the global transfusion infrastructure are under-utilized resources for the study of infectious diseases. Blood donors are large, demographically diverse subsets of general populations for whom cross-sectional and longitudinal samples are readily accessible for serological and molecular testing. Blood donor collection networks span diverse geographies, including in low- and middle-income countries, where agents, especially zoonotic pathogens, are able to emerge and spread, given limited tools for recognition, surveillance and control. Routine laboratory storage and transportation, coupled with data capture, afford access to rich epidemiological data to assess the epidemiology and pathogenesis of established and emerging infections. Subsequent to the State of the Science in Transfusion Medicine symposium in 2022, our working group (WG), "Emerging Infections: Impact on Blood Science, the Blood Supply, Blood Safety, and Public Health" elected to focus on "leveraging donor populations to study the epidemiology and pathogenesis of transfusion-transmitted and emerging infectious diseases." The 5 landmark studies span (1) the implication of hepatitis C virus in post-transfusion hepatitis, (2) longitudinal evaluation of plasma donors with incident infections, thus informing the development of a widely used staging system for acute HIV infection, (3) explication of the dynamics of early West Nile Virus infection, (4) the deployment of combined molecular and serological donor screening for Babesia microti, to characterize its epidemiology and infectivity and facilitate routine donor screening, and (5) national serosurveillance for SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic. The studies highlight the interplay between infectious diseases and transfusion medicine, including the imperative to ensure blood transfusion safety and the broader application of blood donor populations to the study of infectious diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan M Bloch
- Division of Transfusion Medicine, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Michael P Busch
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Laurence M Corash
- Cerus Corporation, Concord, CA, USA; Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Roger Dodd
- Scientific Affairs, American Red Cross, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| | - Benyam Hailu
- Division of Blood Diseases Research, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Sheila O'Brien
- Canadian Blood Services, Epidemiology and Surveillance, Microbiology, Ottawa, ON, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Lyle Petersen
- Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
| | - Susan L Stramer
- Scientific Affairs, American Red Cross, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| | - Louis Katz
- ImpactLife Blood Services, Davenport, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Quirk GE, Schoenle MV, Peyton KL, Uhrlaub JL, Lau B, Burgess JL, Ellingson K, Beitel S, Romine J, Lutrick K, Fowlkes A, Britton A, Tyner HL, Caban-Martinez AJ, Naleway A, Gaglani M, Yoon S, Edwards L, Olsho L, Dake M, LaFleur BJ, Nikolich JŽ, Sprissler R, Worobey M, Bhattacharya D. Determinants of de novo B cell responses to drifted epitopes in post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 infections. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.09.12.23295384. [PMID: 37745498 PMCID: PMC10516057 DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.12.23295384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
Vaccine-induced immunity may impact subsequent de novo responses to drifted epitopes in SARS-CoV-2 variants, but this has been difficult to quantify due to the challenges in recruiting unvaccinated control groups whose first exposure to SARS-CoV-2 is a primary infection. Through local, statewide, and national SARS-CoV-2 testing programs, we were able to recruit cohorts of individuals who had recovered from either primary or post-vaccination infections by either the Delta or Omicron BA.1 variants. Regardless of variant, we observed greater Spike-specific and neutralizing antibody responses in post-vaccination infections than in those who were infected without prior vaccination. Through analysis of variant-specific memory B cells as markers of de novo responses, we observed that Delta and Omicron BA.1 infections led to a marked shift in immunodominance in which some drifted epitopes elicited minimal responses, even in primary infections. Prior immunity through vaccination had a small negative impact on these de novo responses, but this did not correlate with cross-reactive memory B cells, arguing against competitive inhibition of naïve B cells. We conclude that dampened de novo B cell responses against drifted epitopes are mostly a function of altered immunodominance hierarchies that are apparent even in primary infections, with a more modest contribution from pre-existing immunity, perhaps due to accelerated antigen clearance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace E Quirk
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Marta V Schoenle
- Department of Immunobiology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Kameron L Peyton
- Department of Immunobiology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Jennifer L Uhrlaub
- Department of Immunobiology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Branden Lau
- University of Arizona Genomics Core and the Arizona Research Labs, University of Arizona Genetics Core, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Jefferey L Burgess
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Katherine Ellingson
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson
| | - Shawn Beitel
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - James Romine
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Karen Lutrick
- College of Medicine-Tucson, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Ashley Fowlkes
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Amadea Britton
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Harmony L Tyner
- St. Luke's Regional Health Care System, Duluth, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Allison Naleway
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Manjusha Gaglani
- Baylor Scott & White Health and Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Temple, Texas, USA
| | - Sarang Yoon
- Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | | | - Michael Dake
- Office of the Senior Vice-President for Health Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | | | - Janko Ž Nikolich
- BIO5 Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
- University of Arizona Center on Aging, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Ryan Sprissler
- University of Arizona Genomics Core and the Arizona Research Labs, University of Arizona Genetics Core, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Michael Worobey
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
- BIO5 Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Deepta Bhattacharya
- Department of Immunobiology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA
- BIO5 Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ma KC, Dorabawila V, León TM, Henry H, Johnson AG, Rosenberg E, Mansfield JA, Midgley CM, Plumb ID, Aiken J, Khanani QA, Auche S, Bayoumi NS, Bennett SA, Bernu C, Chang C, Como-Sabetti KJ, Cueto K, Cunningham S, Eddy M, Falender RA, Fleischauer A, Frank DM, Harrington P, Hoskins M, Howsare A, Ingaiza LM, Islam AS, Jensen SA, Jones JM, Kambach G, Kanishka F, Levin Y, Masarik JF, Meyer SD, Milroy L, Morris KJ, Olmstead J, Olsen NS, Omoike E, Patel K, Pettinger A, Pike MA, Reed IG, Slocum E, Sutton M, Tilakaratne BP, Vest H, Vostok J, Wang JS, Watson-Lewis L, Wienkes HN, Hagen MB, Silk BJ, Scobie HM. Trends in Laboratory-Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Reinfections and Associated Hospitalizations and Deaths Among Adults Aged ≥18 Years - 18 U.S. Jurisdictions, September 2021-December 2022. MMWR. MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT 2023; 72:683-689. [PMID: 37347715 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7225a3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
Although reinfections with SARS-CoV-2 have occurred in the United States with increasing frequency, U.S. epidemiologic trends in reinfections and associated severe outcomes have not been characterized. Weekly counts of SARS-CoV-2 reinfections, total infections, and associated hospitalizations and deaths reported by 18 U.S. jurisdictions during September 5, 2021-December 31, 2022, were analyzed overall, by age group, and by five periods of SARS-CoV-2 variant predominance (Delta and Omicron [BA.1, BA.2, BA.4/BA.5, and BQ.1/BQ.1.1]). Among reported reinfections, weekly trends in the median intervals between infections and frequencies of predominant variants during previous infections were calculated. As a percentage of all infections, reinfections increased substantially from the Delta (2.7%) to the Omicron BQ.1/BQ.1.1 (28.8%) periods; during the same periods, increases in the percentages of reinfections among COVID-19-associated hospitalizations (from 1.9% [Delta] to 17.0% [Omicron BQ.1/BQ.1.1]) and deaths (from 1.2% [Delta] to 12.3% [Omicron BQ.1/BQ.1.1]) were also substantial. Percentages of all COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths that were reinfections were consistently higher across variant periods among adults aged 18-49 years compared with those among adults aged ≥50 years. The median interval between infections ranged from 269 to 411 days by week, with a steep decline at the start of the BA.4/BA.5 period, when >50% of reinfections occurred among persons previously infected during the Alpha variant period or later. To prevent severe COVID-19 outcomes, including those following reinfection, CDC recommends staying up to date with COVID-19 vaccination and receiving timely antiviral treatments, when eligible.
Collapse
|
40
|
Moulia DL, Wallace M, Roper LE, Godfrey M, Rosenblum HG, Link-Gelles R, Britton A, Daley MF, Meyer S, Fleming-Dutra KE, Oliver SE, Twentyman E. Interim Recommendations for Use of Bivalent mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines for Persons Aged ≥6 Months - United States, April 2023. MMWR. MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT 2023; 72:657-662. [PMID: 37319020 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7224a3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Throughout the national public health emergency declared in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, CDC, guided by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), has offered evidence-based recommendations for the use of COVID-19 vaccines in U.S. populations after each regulatory action by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). During August 2022-April 2023, FDA amended its Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) to authorize the use of a single, age-appropriate, bivalent COVID-19 vaccine dose (i.e., containing components from the ancestral and Omicron BA.4/BA.5 strains in equal amounts) for all persons aged ≥6 years, use of bivalent COVID-19 vaccine doses for children aged 6 months-5 years, and additional bivalent doses for immunocompromised persons and adults aged ≥65 years (1). ACIP voted in September 2022 on the use of the bivalent vaccine, and CDC made recommendations after the September vote and subsequently, through April 2023, with input from ACIP. This transition to a single bivalent COVID-19 vaccine dose for most persons, with additional doses for persons at increased risk for severe disease, facilitates implementation of simpler, more flexible recommendations. Three COVID-19 vaccines are currently available for use in the United States and recommended by ACIP: 1) the bivalent mRNA Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, 2) the bivalent mRNA Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, and 3) the monovalent adjuvanted, protein subunit-based Novavax COVID-19 vaccine.* As of August 31, 2022, monovalent mRNA vaccines based on the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain are no longer authorized for use in the United States (1).
Collapse
|
41
|
Kohli MA, Maschio M, Joshi K, Lee A, Fust K, Beck E, Van de Velde N, Weinstein MC. The potential clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of the updated COVID-19 mRNA fall 2023 vaccines in the United States. J Med Econ 2023; 26:1532-1545. [PMID: 37961887 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2281083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To assess the potential clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines updated for fall 2023 in adults aged ≥18 years over a 1-year analytic time horizon (September 2023-August 2024). MATERIALS AND METHODS A compartmental Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Recovered model was updated to reflect COVID-19 cases in summer 2023. The numbers of symptomatic infections, COVID-19-related hospitalizations and deaths, and costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained were calculated using a decision tree model. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of a Moderna updated mRNA fall 2023 vaccine (Moderna Fall Campaign) was compared to no additional vaccination. Potential differences between the Moderna and the Pfizer-BioNTech fall 2023 vaccines were also examined. RESULTS Base case results suggest that the Moderna Fall Campaign would decrease the expected 64.2 million symptomatic infections by 7.2 million (11%) to 57.0 million. COVID-19-related hospitalizations and deaths are expected to decline by 343,000 (-29%) and 50,500 (-33%), respectively. The Moderna Fall Campaign would increase QALYs by 740,880 and healthcare costs by $5.7 billion relative to no vaccine, yielding an ICER of $7700 per QALY gained. Using a societal cost perspective, the ICER is $2100. Sensitivity analyses suggest that vaccine effectiveness, COVID-19 incidence, hospitalization rates, and costs drive cost-effectiveness. With a relative vaccine effectiveness of 5.1% for infection and 9.8% for hospitalization for the Moderna vaccine versus the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, use of the Moderna vaccine is expected to prevent 24,000 more hospitalizations and 3300 more deaths than the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS As COVID-19 becomes endemic, future incidence, including patterns of infection, are highly uncertain. The effectiveness of fall 2023 vaccines is unknown, and it is unclear when a new variant that evades natural or vaccine immunity will emerge. Despite these limitations, our model predicts the Moderna Fall Campaign vaccine is highly cost-effective across all sensitivity analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Amy Lee
- Quadrant Health Economics Inc., Cambridge, ON, Canada
| | - Kelly Fust
- Quadrant Health Economics Inc., Cambridge, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|