Potent Anticoagulation Does Not Reduce Venous Thromboembolism in High-Risk Patients

Trends in Deep Vein Thrombosis Prophylaxis After Total Knee Arthroplasty: 2016 to 2021

BACKGROUND

In 2011, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons released a consensus recommending venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of our study was to examine (1) incidences of postoperative complications, including pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and transfusion rates; (2) trends from 2016 to 2021 in VTE prophylaxis; and (3) independent risk factors for 90-day total complications following TKA between aspirin, enoxaparin, rivaroxaban, and warfarin.

METHODS

Using a national, all-payer database from 2016 to 2021, we identified all patients who underwent primary TKA. Exclusions included all patients who had prescribed anticoagulants within 1 year prior to TKA, hypercoagulable states, and cancer. Data were collected on baseline demographics, including age, sex, diabetes, and a comorbidity index, in each of the VTE prophylaxis cohorts. Postoperative outcomes included rates of PE, DVT, and transfusion. Multivariable regressions were performed to determine independent risk factors for total complications at 90 days following TKA.

RESULTS

From 2016 to 2021, aspirin was the most used anticoagulant (n = 62,054), followed by rivaroxaban (n = 26,426), enoxaparin (n = 20,980), and warfarin (n = 13,305). The cohort using warfarin had the highest incidences of PE (1.8%) and DVT (5.7%), while the cohort using aspirin had the lowest incidences of PE (0.6%) and DVT (1.6%). The rates of aspirin use increased the most from 2016 to 2021 (32.1% to 70.8%), while the rates of warfarin decreased the most (19.3% to 3.0%). Enoxaparin, rivaroxaban, and warfarin were independent risk factors for total complications at 90 days.

CONCLUSIONS

An epidemiological analysis of VTE prophylaxis use from 2016 to 2021 shows an increase in aspirin following TKA compared to other anticoagulant cohorts in a nationally representative population. This approach provides more insight and a better understanding of anticoagulation trends over this time period in a nationally representative sample.

Low-Dose Aspirin Is the Safest Prophylaxis for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism After Total Knee Arthroplasty Across All Patient Risk Profiles

BACKGROUND

The International Consensus Meeting on Venous Thromboembolism (ICM-VTE) in 2022 proclaimed low-dose aspirin as the most effective agent in patients across all risk profiles undergoing joint arthroplasty. However, data on large patient populations assessing trends in chemoprophylactic choices and related outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remain scant. The present study was designed to characterize the clinical use of various chemoprophylactic agents in patients undergoing TKA and to determine the efficacy of aspirin compared with other agents in patient groups stratified by VTE risk profiles.

METHODS

This study utilized a national database to determine the proportion of patients undergoing TKA who received low-dose aspirin versus other chemoprophylaxis between 2012 and 2022. VTE risk profiles were determined on the basis of comorbidities established in the ICM-VTE. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between various classes of thromboprophylaxis in patients with high and low risk of VTE were calculated. The odds of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolus (PE), bleeding events, infections, mortality, and hospitalizations were also assessed in the 90-day postoperative period for propensity-matched cohorts receiving low-dose (81 mg) aspirin only versus other prophylaxis, segregating patients by VTE risk profile.

RESULTS

A total of 126,692 patients undergoing TKA across 60 health-care organizations were included. The proportion of patients receiving low-dose aspirin increased from 7.65% to 55.29% between 2012 and 2022, whereas the proportion of patients receiving other chemoprophylaxis decreased from 96.25% to 42.98%. Low-dose-aspirin-only use increased to approximately 50% in both high-risk and low-risk populations but was more likely in low-risk populations (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.20) relative to high-risk populations. Both low-risk and high-risk patients in the low-dose-aspirin-only cohorts had decreased odds of DVT, PE, bleeding, infections, and hospitalizations compared with other prophylaxis regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of the present study on a very large population of patients undergoing TKA support the recent ICM-VTE statement by showing that low-dose aspirin is a safe and effective method of prophylaxis in patients across various risk profiles.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Aspirin or enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis after primary partial, total or revision hip or knee arthroplasty: A secondary analysis from the CRISTAL cluster randomized trial

BACKGROUND

This study compares aspirin to enoxaparin for symptomatic VTE prophylaxis within 90 days of any type of hip or knee arthroplasty performed for any diagnosis, in patients enrolled in the CRISTAL trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CRISTAL was a cluster-randomised crossover, registry-nested non-inferiority trial across 31 hospitals in Australia. The primary publication was restricted to patients undergoing primary total hip or knee arthroplasty for a diagnosis of osteoarthritis. This report includes all enrolled patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty procedures (partial or total, primary or revision) performed for any indication. Hospitals were randomized to administer patients aspirin (100mg daily) or enoxaparin (40mg daily), for 35 days after hip arthroplasty and 14 days after knee arthroplasty. Crossover occurred after the patient enrolment target had been met for the first group. The primary outcome was symptomatic VTE within 90 days. Analyses were performed by randomization group.

RESULTS

Between April 20, 2019 and December 18, 2020, 12384 patients were enrolled (7238 aspirin group and 5146 enoxaparin). Of these, 6901 (95.3%) given aspirin and 4827 (93.8%) given enoxaparin (total 11728, 94.7%) were included in the final analyses. Within 90 days, symptomatic VTE occurred in 226 (3.27%) aspirin patients and 85 (1.76%) enoxaparin patients, significant for the superiority of enoxaparin (estimated treatment difference 1.85%, 95% CI 0.59% to 3.10%, p = 0.004). Joint-related reoperation within 90 days was lower in the enoxaparin group (109/4827 (2.26%) vs 171/6896 (2.47%) with aspirin, estimated difference 0.77%; 95% CI 0.06% to 1.47%, p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in the other secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty (of any type, performed for any indication) enrolled in the CRISTAL trial, aspirin compared to enoxaparin resulted in a significantly higher rate of symptomatic VTE and joint-related reoperation within 90 days. These findings extend the applicability of the CRISTAL trial results.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Anzctr.org.au, identifier: ACTRN12618001879257.

Anticoagulant therapy in orthopedic surgery - a review on anticoagulant agents, risk factors, monitoring, and current challenges

Orthopedic surgeries are associated with high-risk of thromboembolism which occurs in 40% to 60% of orthopedic patients in the absence of thromboprophylaxis. Conventionally heparin anticoagulants were used for thromboprophylaxis and currently direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used due to their minimal complexity. Anticoagulant use carries bleeding risk and requires optimal laboratory monitoring through conventional thrombin-based assays, anti-Xa assay, anti-IIa assay and contemporary ecarin chromogenic assay (ECA) and rotational thromboelastometry. Monitoring requires multiple hospital visits and hence, the development of point-of-care assays is gaining momentum. Also, a thorough risk assessment model (RAM) is necessary for successful anticoagulant therapy since it enables personalized approach for better thromboprophylaxis outcomes. Despite welcoming changes, lack of guideline consensus, population-based thromboprophylaxis, deficiencies in risk stratification and non-adherence are still a concern. Stronger clinical and process support system with uniform guidelines approaches and patient-specific RAM can aid in the successful implementation of anticoagulant therapy.

An analysis of risk factors for venous thromboembolism in primary versus revision total joint arthroplasty

Background

One of the most serious complications after primary or revision lower extremity total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is venous thromboembolism disease (VTE). Identifying patients at high risk for VTE allows tailoring of prophylactic anticoagulation regimens to those most vulnerable. This study aimed to identify risk factors for VTE in primary and revision lower extremity TJA.

Methods

The Electronic Medical Record was queried from a single academic institution for all patients who underwent a lower extremity TJA between 2007 and 2020. Demographics, comorbid conditions, perioperative characteristics, and postoperative complications were identified. An Elastic Net Multiple Logistic Regression Model was used to assess 49 covariates and predict those associated with a significant risk of VTE.

Results

We identified 4900 primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients. There was no significant difference between primary and revision THA. Primary TKA had a higher rate of VTE than revision TKA. Significant risk factors identified for VTE in THA patients include histories of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), metastatic tumors, hemiplegia, and Hispanic ethnicity. Risk factors for VTE in TKA patients include histories of DVT, PE, metastatic tumors, and postoperative warfarin and heparin use. In all patients, age was a significant predictor of VTE risk.

Conclusion

Our work identifies many risk factors for VTE following TJA. While the increased rate of VTE in some populations may represent selection bias, it also highlights the incomplete understanding of the etiology and prevention of this complication in the joint arthroplasty population and requires further study.

Comparative effectiveness of aspirin for symptomatic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty, a cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study compares the symptomatic 90-day venous thromboembolism (VTE) rates in patients receiving aspirin to patients receiving low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), after total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Data were collected from a multi-centre cohort study, including demographics, confounders and prophylaxis type (aspirin alone, LMWH alone, aspirin and LMWH, and DOACs). The primary outcome was symptomatic 90-day VTE. Secondary outcomes were major bleeding, joint related reoperation and mortality within 90 days. Data were analysed using logistic regression, the Student's t and Fisher's exact tests (unadjusted) and multivariable regression (adjusted).

RESULTS

There were 1867 eligible patients; 365 (20%) received aspirin alone, 762 (41%) LMWH alone, 482 (26%) LMWH and aspirin and 170 (9%) DOAC. The 90-day VTE rate was 2.7%; lowest in the aspirin group (1.6%), compared to 3.6% for LMWH, 2.3% for LMWH and aspirin and 2.4% for DOACs. After adjusted analysis, predictors of VTE were prophylaxis duration < 14 days (OR = 6.7, 95% CI 3.5-13.1, p < 0.001) and history of previous VTE (OR = 2.4, 95% CI 1.1-5.8, p = 0.05). There were no significant differences in the primary or secondary outcomes between prophylaxis groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Aspirin may be suitable for VTE prophylaxis following THA and TKA. The comparatively low unadjusted 90-day VTE rate in the aspirin group may have been due to selective use in lower-risk patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, trial number NCT01899443 (15/07/2013).

Aspirin for Venous Thromboembolic Prophylaxis Following Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Safety and Efficacy Accounting for Surgeon Selection Bias

BACKGROUND

Aspirin may be effective at preventing venous thromboembolism following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA). Current evidence is limited by bias as many surgeons who use aspirin prescribe for high-risk patients alternative chemoprophylactic agents. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients who received aspirin and warfarin while accounting for surgeon selection bias.

METHODS

A national database was queried for patients undergoing primary elective TKA or THA from 2015 to 2020. Patients whose surgeon used aspirin in >90% of their patients were compared to patients whose surgeon used warfarin in >90% of cases. Instrumental variable analyses were performed to assess for PE, DVT, and transfusion while accounting for selection bias. Among TKA patients, 26,657 (18.8%) were in the warfarin cohort and 115,005 (81.2%) were in the aspirin cohort. Among THA patients, 13,035 (17.7%) were in the warfarin cohort and 60,726 (82.3%) were in the aspirin cohort.

RESULTS

Analyses were unable to identify a difference in the risk of PE (TKA: adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.98, P = .659; THA: aOR = 0.93, P = .310) and DVT (TKA: aOR = 1.05, P = .188; THA: aOR = 0.96, P = .493) between the aspirin and warfarin cohorts. However, the aspirin cohort was associated with a lower risk of transfusion (TKA: aOR = 0.58, P < .001, THA: 0.84, P < .001).

DISCUSSION

After accounting for surgeon selection bias, aspirin was as effective as warfarin at preventing PE and DVT following TKA and THA. Furthermore, aspirin was associated with a lower risk of transfusion compared to warfarin.

Comparison of 90-Day Adverse Events Associated With Aspirin and Potent Anticoagulation Use for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis: A Cohort Study of 72,288 Total Knee and 35,142 Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients

BACKGROUND

While aspirin is acceptable for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis following total joint arthroplasty in most patients, more potent agents are used in patients considered higher risk for VTE. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of aspirin versus potent anticoagulation agents following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

A cohort study of 72,288 TKA and 35,142 THA from the Kaiser Permanente Total Joint Replacement Registry was performed (2009 to 2019). Identified medications were aspirin, factor Xa inhibitors, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), and warfarin. A validated VTE risk score was assigned to each patient. Propensity score-weighted logistic regressions were used to evaluate 90-day VTEs. Noninferiority testing was performed with a margin of 1.25 using the upper bound (UB) of the 1-sided 95% CI.

RESULTS

For TKA, aspirin was not inferior to LMWH (odds ratio [OR] = 0.77, UB = 1.09) and warfarin (OR = 0.64, UB = 0.90); there was no evidence to support noninferiority of aspirin compared to factor Xa inhibitors. Findings were consistent for THA (LMWH: OR = 0.59, UB = 0.75; warfarin: OR = 0.69, UB = 0.89). TKA was considered higher risk for VTE, whereas aspirin use demonstrated noninferiority compared to warfarin (OR = 0.54, UB = 0.81), we lacked evidence of noninferiority when compared to LMWH and factor Xa inhibitors. We lacked evidence of noninferiority of aspirin versus any potent anticoagulation in higher-risk THA.

CONCLUSION

Aspirin was found to be effective and safe for VTE prevention in primary total joint arthroplasty, including in patients considered higher risk for VTE.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Effectiveness of different antithrombotic agents in combination with tranexamic acid for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and blood management after total knee replacement: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been widely applied in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to significantly reduce perioperative blood loss and improve knee function recovery in patients after surgery. The choice of antithrombotic agents for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention after TKA is controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effects of different antithrombotic agents on patients after primary unilateral TKA in the context of applied TXA.

METHODS

A total of 180 patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA from October 2020 to December 2021 were included in this study. All patients were given an intraoperative drip of 60 mg/kg TXA. Thereafter, patients were divided into three groups (n = 60 each). Baseline data were comparable among the three groups. The average follow-up time was 3.02 ± 0.09 months. Group 1 enrolled patients receiving oral rivaroxaban (RA) at 10 mg, Group 2 included patients who received subcutaneous Dalteparin sodium at 2500 IU, while Group 3 included patients taking oral aspirin (ASA) at 100 mg. Patients in all the three groups received treatment once a day for 30 days at 12 h postoperatively. The primary outcomes in this study were post-treatment drainage volume and thrombotic complication rate. The secondary outcomes included hematologic parameters, transfusion rate, intraoperative blood loss, total blood loss (TBL), and bleeding complication rate.

RESULTS

The average drainage volume after treatment was significantly lower in Group 3 than in Group 1 and Group 2 (205.2 ± 69.0 vs 243.4 ± 72.5 vs 295.4 ± 72.5 ml, P < 0.001), and there was a significant difference between Group 1 and Group 2 (243.4 ± 72.5 mL vs 295.4 ± 72.5 mL, P < 0.001). The blood transfusion rate of Group 2 dramatically increased compared with Group 1 and Group 3 (20.0% vs 6.7% vs 5.0%, P = 0.01). The bleeding complication rate in Group 1 apparently increased relative to Group 2 and Group 3 (26.7% vs 10.0% vs 8.3%, P = 0.008). Besides, there was no significant difference in the thrombotic complication rate among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

Under the background of TXA application, ASA, RA, and Dalteparin sodium were all effective on preventing VTE after TKA. In addition, ASA effectively reduced post-treatment Hemoglobin (Hb) loss, drainage volume, TBL, transfusion rate, and bleeding complications compared with RA and Dalteparin sodium.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200060169). Date of Registration: 21/05/2022.

[Low molecular weight heparin combined with aspirin to prevent perioperative venous thromboembolism in patients with splenic rupture and lower extremity fracture]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness and safety of low molecular weight heparin combined with aspirin for perioperative prophylactic anticoagulation in patients with lower extremity fracture after splenectomy.

METHODS

The clinical data of 50 patients with splenic rupture combined with lower extremity fracture between January 2009 and June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were given enoxaparin sodium at 48 hours after splenectomy, and stopped at 24 hours before fracture surgery. After fracture surgery, the patients were divided into aspirin group (group A, 15 cases), low molecular weight heparin group (group B, 16 cases), and low molecular weight heparin combined with aspirin group (group C, 19 cases) according to different anticoagulation regimens. The treatment course was 28 days. There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, cause of injury, fracture site, time from injury to operation, complications, and other general data between groups ( P>0.05). The occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was observed; hemoglobin (Hb), platelet (PLT), D-D dimer, and fibrinogen degradation product (FDP) were recorded before operation and at 1, 3, and 7 days after operation, and the effect of anticoagulation regimen on coagulation function was observed. The incidences of wound complications and bleeding related complications were recorded, and the total perioperative blood loss, hidden blood loss, and overt blood loss were calculated.

RESULTS

The incidences of VTE in groups A, B, and C were 13.33% (2/15), 12.50% (2/16), and 5.26% (1/19), respectively, and there was no significant difference between groups ( χ ²=0.770, P=0.680). There was no portal vein thrombosis and no VTE-related death in the 3 groups. There was no significant difference in the levels of Hb, PLT, D-D dimer, and FDP between groups before and after operation ( P>0.05); and there was no significant difference in total perioperative blood loss, hidden blood loss, and overt blood loss between groups ( P>0.05). No local skin necrosis was found in all patients. In group A, 1 case occurred redness and swelling of incision; in group B, 1 case had incision discharge, redness, and swelling, and 1 case had fat liquefaction; in group C, 1 case had repeated incision exudation accompanied by local tissue redness and swelling, and 1 case had local hematoma. The incidences of adverse incision in groups A, B, and C were 6.66% (1/15), 12.50% (2/16), and 11.76% (2/19), respectively, with no significant difference ( χ ²=0.302, P=0.860). There were 4 cases of bleeding related complications, including 1 case of incision ecchymosis in groups A and B respectively, with the incidence of 6.66% and 6.25%, respectively; there was 1 case of incision hematoma and 1 case of bleeding in group C, with the incidence of 11.76%; showing no significant difference in the incidence of bleeding related complications between groups ( χ ²=0.268, P=0.875).

CONCLUSION

Perioperative combined use of low molecular weight heparin and aspirin for prevention of anticoagulation in patients with splenic rupture and lower extremity fracture can effectively prevent the occurrence of VTE without increasing the incidence of complications, which is an effective and safe treatment method. However, whether the incidence of VTE can be reduced needs to be further studied by expanding the sample size.

Aspirin May Be a Suitable Prophylaxis for Patients with a History of Venous Thromboembolism Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

In recent years, aspirin has become a popular agent for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Yet patients with a history of VTE are often given more aggressive prophylactic agents because of their increased baseline risk. The purpose of this study was to assess whether aspirin is an effective prophylactic agent in patients with a history of VTE.

METHODS

This was a single-institution, retrospective cohort study. The electronic clinical records of 36,333 patients undergoing TJA between 2008 and 2020 were reviewed. Data on demographic characteristics, comorbidities, intraoperative factors, and postoperative complications were collected. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed, as well as a multivariate regression analysis to account for confounders.

RESULTS

Of the 36,333 patients undergoing TJA, 1,087 patients (3.0%) had a history of VTE and were not receiving chronic non-aspirin. The risk for subsequent VTE was significantly higher (p = 0.03) in patients with a history of VTE (1.4%) compared with patients without prior VTE (0.9%). However, the incidence of VTE was not significantly lower (p = 0.208) in patients with a history of VTE who received aspirin (0.4%) compared with patients who received other VTE prophylaxis (1.5%). Propensity score matching showed no difference in VTE rates between the 2 groups (2.2% compared with 0.55%; p = 0.372). In a regression analysis accounting for VTE risk, the administration of aspirin was not associated with an increased risk for subsequent VTE (adjusted odds ratio, 0.32 [95% confidence interval, 0.02 to 1.66]; p = 0.274).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that, although patients with a history of VTE have an increased baseline risk for subsequent VTE, aspirin may be a suitable VTE prophylaxis in this group of patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

High Mortality After Total Knee Arthroplasty Periprosthetic Joint Infection is Related to Preoperative Morbidity and the Disease Process but Not Treatment

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) mortality rate is approximately 20%. The etiology for high mortality remains unknown. The objective of this study was to determine whether mortality was associated with preoperative morbidity (frailty), sequalae of treatment, or the PJI disease process itself.

METHODS

A multicenter observational study was completed comparing 184 patients treated with septic revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to a control group of 38 patients treated with aseptic revision TKA. Primary outcomes included time and the cause of death. Secondary outcomes included preoperative comorbidities and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCMI) measured preoperatively and at various postoperative timepoints.

RESULTS

The septic revision TKA cohort experienced earlier mortality compared to the aseptic cohort, with a higher mortality rate at 90 days, 1, 2, and 3 years after index revision surgery (P = .01). There was no significant difference for any single cause of death (P > .05 for each). The mean preoperative CCMI was higher (P = .005) in the septic revision TKA cohort. Both septic and aseptic cohorts experienced a significant increase in CCMI from the preoperative to 3 years postoperative (P < .0001 and P = .002) and time of death (P < .0001 both) timepoints. The septic revision TKA cohort had a higher CCMI 3 years postoperatively (P = .001) and at time of death (P = .046), but not one year postoperatively (P = .119).

CONCLUSION

Compared to mortality from aseptic revision surgery, septic revision TKA is associated with earlier mortality, but there is no single specific etiology. As quantified by changes in CCMI, PJI mortality was associated with both frailty and the PJI disease process, but not treatment.

Aspirin Is an Effective Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism in Ambulatory Patients with Femoral Neck Fracture Undergoing Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Although aspirin has been adopted as an effective and safe prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism (VTE) by the arthroplasty community, the role of aspirin in the prevention of VTE in the setting of arthroplasty for trauma remains insufficiently known. Therefore, the present multicenter study investigated the efficacy of aspirin as VTE prophylaxis for patients with femoral neck fracture undergoing total hip arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 1,141 patients with femoral neck fracture who underwent total hip arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty from 2008 to 2018 at 3 different institutions. Data on patient demographic characteristics, body mass index, history of VTE, and comorbidities were obtained from an electronic chart query and were confirmed by reviewing the medical records manually. Patients were allocated to cohorts based on the type of prophylaxis administered: aspirin (n = 454) and other anticoagulants (n = 687). Patients were then propensity score-matched on the basis of the risk score calculated using a previously validated tool and the remaining confounding variables. The primary outcome was the development of symptomatic VTE, namely deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) confirmed by appropriate imaging, within 90 days after the surgical procedure. A bivariable analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The overall VTE rate was 1.98% for patients who received aspirin compared with 6.7% for patients who received other anticoagulants (p < 0.001). After propensity score matching and regression modeling, aspirin was found to be noninferior to more potent anticoagulation in preventing VTE after both total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

Aspirin is an effective option for VTE prophylaxis in patients with femoral neck fracture who undergo hip arthroplasty. Based on the patient management benefits of aspirin for elective arthroplasty and the present study, we suggest its use in standard-risk ambulatory patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Prevention of venous thromboembolism with aspirin following knee surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-known complication following orthopaedic surgery. The incidence of this complication has decreased substantially since the introduction of routine thromboprophylaxis. However, concerns have been raised about increased bleeding complications caused by aggressive thromboprophylaxis.Attention has grown for aspirin as a safer thromboprophylactic agent following orthopaedic surgery.A systematic review using MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science databases was undertaken to compare the effectiveness of aspirin prophylaxis following knee surgery with the current standard prophylactic agents (low molecular weight heparin [LMWH], vitamin K antagonists and factor Xa inhibitors).No significant difference in effectiveness of VTE prevention was found between aspirin, LMWH and warfarin. Factor Xa inhibitors were more effective, but increased bleeding complications were reported.As evidence is limited and of low quality with substantial heterogeneity, further research with high-quality, adequately powered trials is needed. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:892-904. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200120.

Low-Dose vs Regular-Dose Aspirin for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Consensus on whether low-dose (81 mg) or regular-dose (325 mg) aspirin (ASA) is more effective for venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis in primary total joint arthroplasties (TJAs) is not reached. The goal of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of low-dose and regular-dose ASA for VTE chemoprophylaxis in primary total hip arthroplasties and total knee arthroplasties.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 3512 primary TJAs (2344 total hip arthroplasties and 1168 total knee arthroplasties) with ASA used as VTE chemoprophylaxis between 2000 and 2019. Patients received ASA twice daily for 4-6 weeks after surgery with 961 (27%) receiving low-dose ASA and 2551 (73%) receiving regular-dose ASA. The primary endpoint was 90-day incidence of symptomatic VTEs. Secondary outcomes were gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding events and mortality. The mean age at index TJA was 66 years, 54% were female, and mean body mass index was 31 kg/m². The mean Charlson Comorbidity Index was 3.5. Mean follow-up was 3 years.

RESULTS

There was no difference in 90-day incidence of symptomatic VTEs between low-dose and regular-dose ASA (0% vs 0.1%, respectively; P = .79). There were no GI bleeding events in either group. There was no difference in 90-day mortality between low-dose and regular-dose ASA (0.3% vs 0.1%, respectively; P = .24).

CONCLUSION

In 3512 primary TJA patients treated with ASA, we found a cumulative incidence of VTE <1% at 90 days. Although this study is underpowered, it appears that twice daily low-dose ASA was equally effective to twice daily regular-dose ASA for VTE chemoprophylaxis, with no difference in risk of GI bleeds or mortality.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective cohort study.

Aspirin Use for Venous Thromboembolism Prevention Is Safe and Effective in Overweight and Obese Patients Undergoing Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), defined as pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis, is a rare but serious complication following revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA) and revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA). Previous studies show that obesity may be associated with an increased risk for pulmonary embolism, wound complications, and infection. With no current universal standard of care for VTE prophylaxis, we sought to determine whether aspirin prescribed (ASA) is safe and effective in obese patients undergoing RTHA/RTKA.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 1578 consecutive RTHA/RTKA cases (751 RTHAs and 827 RTKAs) was conducted identifying patients prescribed 325 or 81 mg ASA. Ninety-day postoperative VTE rates, bleeding, wound complications, deep infections, and mortality were collected. Cohorts were stratified according to body mass index (BMI): normal (18-24.9 kg/m²), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m²), obese (30-34.9 kg/m²), severely obese (35-39.9 kg/m²), and morbidly obese (≥40 kg/m²).

RESULTS

The cohort comprised of 335 patients with a normal BMI, 511 were overweight, 408 obese, 232 severely obese, and 92 morbidly obese. Total VTE rates were statistically similar between BMI groups (0.90% vs 0.78% vs 0.74% vs 0.43% vs 0%, P = .89). There were no differences in bleeding rates (0.90% vs 0% vs 0% vs 0.43% vs 0%, P = .08), wound complications (0.30% vs 0.20% vs 0.25% vs 0% vs 0%, P = .93), infection (1.49% vs 1.57% vs 0.98% vs 1.29% vs 1.09%, P = .66), or mortality (0% vs 0.20% vs 0% vs 0% vs 0%, P = .72).

CONCLUSION

ASA is safe and effective for VTE prevention in obese patients with similar complication rates to nonobese patients undergoing RTHA/RTKA.

Utilization Patterns, Efficacy, and Complications of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Strategies in Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty as Reported by American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II Candidates

BACKGROUND

The optimum venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis strategy to minimize risk of VTE and bleeding complications following revision total hip and knee arthroplasty (rTHA/rTKA) is controversial. The purpose of this study is to describe current VTE prophylaxis patterns following revision arthroplasty procedures to determine efficacy, complication rates, and prescribing patterns for different prophylactic strategies.

METHODS

The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II (oral) examination case list database was analyzed. Current Procedural Terminology codes for rTHA/rTKA were queried and geographic region, VTE prophylaxis strategy, and complications were obtained. Less aggressive prophylaxis patterns were defined if only aspirin and/or sequential compression devises were utilized. More aggressive VTE prophylaxis patterns were considered if any of low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin), warfarin, rivaroxaban, fondaparinux, or other strategies were used.

RESULTS

In total, 6387 revision arthroplasties were included. The national rate of less aggressive VTE prophylaxis strategies was 35.3% and more aggressive in 64.7%. Use of less aggressive prophylaxis strategy was significantly associated with patients having no complications (89.8% vs 81.9%, P < .001). Use of more aggressive prophylaxis patterns was associated with higher likelihood of mild thrombotic (1.2% vs 0.3%, P < .001), mild bleeding (1.7% vs 0.6%, P < .001), moderate thrombotic (2.6% vs 0.4%, P < .001), moderate bleeding (6.2% vs 4.0%, P < .001), severe bleeding events (4.4% vs 2.4%, P < .001), infections (6.4% vs 3.8%, P < .001), and death within 90 days (3.1% vs 1.3%, P < .001). There were no significant differences in rates of fatal pulmonary embolism (0.1% vs 0.04%, P = .474). Subgroup analysis of rTHA and rTKA patients showed similar results.

CONCLUSION

The individual rationale for using a more aggressive VTE prophylaxis strategy was unknown; however, more aggressive strategies were associated with higher rates of bleeding and thrombotic complications. Less aggressive strategies were not associated with a higher rate of thrombosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III.

PREVENTion of CLots in Orthopaedic Trauma (PREVENT CLOT): a randomised pragmatic trial protocol comparing aspirin versus low-molecular-weight heparin for blood clot prevention in orthopaedic trauma patients

INTRODUCTION

Patients who sustain orthopaedic trauma are at an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), including fatal pulmonary embolism (PE). Current guidelines recommend low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for VTE prophylaxis in orthopaedic trauma patients. However, emerging literature in total joint arthroplasty patients suggests the potential clinical benefits of VTE prophylaxis with aspirin. The primary aim of this trial is to compare aspirin with LMWH as a thromboprophylaxis in fracture patients.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

PREVENT CLOT is a multicentre, randomised, pragmatic trial that aims to enrol 12 200 adult patients admitted to 1 of 21 participating centres with an operative extremity fracture, or any pelvis or acetabular fracture. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality. We will evaluate non-inferiority by testing whether the intention-to-treat difference in the probability of dying within 90 days of randomisation between aspirin and LMWH is less than our non-inferiority margin of 0.75%. Secondary efficacy outcomes include cause-specific mortality, non-fatal PE and deep vein thrombosis. Safety outcomes include bleeding complications, wound complications and deep surgical site infections.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The PREVENT CLOT trial has been approved by the ethics board at the coordinating centre (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health) and all participating sites. Recruitment began in April 2017 and will continue through 2021. As both study medications are currently in clinical use for VTE prophylaxis for orthopaedic trauma patients, the findings of this trial can be easily adopted into clinical practice. The results of this large, patient-centred pragmatic trial will help guide treatment choices to prevent VTE in fracture patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02984384.

An Update on Venous Thromboembolism Rates and Prophylaxis in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in 2020

Patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty are at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) with an incidence of approximately 0.6-1.5%. Given the high volume of these operations, with approximately one million performed annually in the U.S., the rate of VTE represents a large absolute number of patients. The rate of VTE after total hip arthroplasty has been stable over the past decade, although there has been a slight reduction in the rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), but not pulmonary embolism (PE), after total knee arthroplasty. Over this time, there has been significant research into the optimal choice of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis for individual patients, with the objective to reduce the rate of VTE while minimizing adverse side effects such as bleeding. Recently, aspirin has emerged as a promising prophylactic agent for patients undergoing arthroplasty due to its similar efficacy and good safety profile compared to other pharmacologic agents. However, there is no evidence to date that clearly demonstrates the superiority of any given prophylactic agent. Therefore, this review discusses (1) the current prevalence and trends in VTE after total hip and knee arthroplasty and (2) provides an update on pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis in regard to aspirin usage.

Multimodal prophylaxis in patients with a history of venous thromboembolism undergoing primary elective hip arthroplasty

Aims

We studied the safety and efficacy of multimodal thromboprophylaxis in patients with a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) who undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA) within the first 120 postoperative days, and the mortality during the first year. Multimodal prophylaxis includes discontinuation of procoagulant medications, VTE risk stratification, regional anaesthesia, an intravenous bolus of unfractionated heparin prior to femoral preparation, rapid mobilization, the use of pneumatic compression devices, and chemoprophylaxis tailored to the patient’s risk of VTE.

Methods

Between 2004 to 2018, 257 patients with a proven history of VTE underwent 277 primary elective THA procedures by two surgeons at a single institution. The patients had a history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (186, 67%), pulmonary embolism (PE) (43, 15.5%), or both (48, 17.5%). Chemoprophylaxis included aspirin (38 patients), anticoagulation (215 patients), or a combination of aspirin and anticoagulation (24 patients). A total of 50 patients (18%) had a vena cava filter in situ at the time of surgery. Patients were followed for 120 days to record complications, and for one year to record mortality.

Results

Postoperative VTE was diagnosed in seven patients (2.5%): DVT in five, and PE with and without DVT in one patient each. After hospitalization, three patients required readmiss-ion for evacuation of a haematoma, one for wound drainage, and one for monitoring of an elevated international normalized ratio (INR). Seven patients died (2.5%). One patient died five months postoperatively of a PE during open thrombectomy. She had discontinued anticoagulation. One patient died of a haemorrhagic stroke while receiving Coumadin. PE or bleeding was not suspected in the remaining five fatalities.

Conclusion

Multimodal prophylaxis is safe and effective in patients with a history of VTE. Postoperative anticoagulation should be prudent as very few patients developed VTE (2.5%) or died of suspected or confirmed PE. Mortality during the first year was mostly unrelated to either VTE or bleeding. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7 Supple B):71–77.

Surgical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: clinical practice update

BACKGROUND

Perioperative medicine continues to evolve as new literature emerges. This article provides an update on prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in surgical patients.

METHODS

We reviewed articles on VTE prevention in surgical patients published in peer-reviewed journals since the publication of 2012 ACCP guidelines on VTE prevention in surgical patients.

RESULTS

Methods of VTE prophylaxis include aggressive ambulation, mechanical prophylaxis, and pharmacological prophylaxis. In non-orthopedic surgery, the overall approach remains assessment of thrombosis risk with the recommendation to use a risk assessment tool such as the modified Caprini score. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) appears to be more effective than unfractionated heparin (UFH) for VTE prophylaxis in non-orthopedic surgery. For orthopedic surgery, recent studies now recognize aspirin as an option for VTE prophylaxis after total hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty, and hip fracture surgery. Extended prophylaxis with LMWH reduces the risk of symptomatic VTE in high risk abdominal and pelvic cancer surgery without an appreciable increase in risk of bleeding and decreased symptomatic VTE in major orthopedic surgery but with more minor but not major bleeding. Prophylactic Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement or surveillance compression ultrasonography is not recommended in management or detection of VTE in surgical patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This article aims to provide insight into data from last several years which has potential to change clinical practices in perioperative setting.

Stratifying Venous Thromboembolism Risk in Arthroplasty: Do High-Risk Patients Exist?

BACKGROUND

While there are many possible complications associated with total joint arthroplasty (TJA), venous thromboembolism (VTE) is both frequent and potentially severe. Despite this importance, there are inconsistent recommendations for prophylaxis based on patient risk factors.

METHODS

A predictive model was constructed to compare low-molecular-weight heparin(LMWH) and aspirin (ASA) for prevention of VTE-associated complications following TJA.The model used risks from prior prophylaxis studies to estimate the risk of developing a symptomatic deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, thrombocytopenia, and operative or nonoperative site bleeding. We also evaluated the progression to 4 possible final health states: postphlebitis syndrome, intracranial hemorrhage, death, or baseline health. Within published ranges, we selected assumptions that were favorable to LMWH such that these analyses represent a best case scenario for LMWH or an alternative more aggressive low-molecular-weight heparin alternative (LMWHA). Events and outcomes were assigned quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) losses according to prior studies to determine the effect on patients' outcomes for ASA and LMWHA prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Assessing VTE risk populations from 0.2% to 2% with life expectancies ranging from 5 to 40 years postoperatively, patients with a risk ratio less than 3.7 showed increased expected QALY with ASA compared to LMWHA. For patients with a baseline VTE risk of 1% and a 15 year life expectancy, a risk ratio of 13.4 was needed to identify patients that would benefit from LMWHA. With life expectancy increased to 30 years, the risk ratio needed to idetify these patients was 7.4.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing TJA should receive ASA chemoprophylaxis in nearly all situations, unless the patient has a significantly increased VTE risk compared to the baseline population and a long life expectancy.

Patients Who Have Cannabis Use Disorder Have Higher Rates of Venous Thromboemboli, Readmission Rates, and Costs Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that cannabis can interfere with hematological parameters and platelet morphology. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether patients with cannabis use disorder undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have higher rates of (1) venous thromboemboli (VTEs); (2) readmissions; and (3) costs.

METHODS

Study group patients undergoing primary TKA were identified from a large, nationwide database. Patients who had a history of VTEs, deep vein thromboses (DVTs), pulmonary emboli (PEs), and coagulopathies before their TKA were excluded. Study group patients were matched to controls in a 1:4 ratio by age, sex, a comorbidity index, and medical comorbidities. The query yielded 18,388 patients (cannabis = 3680; controls = 14,708). Outcomes analyzed included rates of 90-day VTEs, DVTs, and PEs, in addition to 90-day readmissions and costs. A P value less than .01 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Patients who have cannabis use disorder were found to have significantly higher incidence and odds (2.79% vs 1.78%; odds ratio [OR], 1.58; P < .0001) of VTEs, DVTs (2.41% vs 1.44%; OR, 1.68; P < .0001), and PEs (0.97% vs 0.62%; P = .01). Readmissions were significantly higher (27.03% vs 23.18%; OR, 1.22; P < .0001) in patients who have cannabis use disorder. Patients with cannabis use disorder have significantly higher day of surgery ($14,024.88 vs $12,127.49; P < .0001) and 90-day costs ($19,155.45 vs $16,315.00; P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

This study found that patients who have a cannabis use disorder have higher rates of thromboembolic complications, readmission rates, and costs following primary TKA compared to a matched cohort.

Rheumatoid Arthritis Is Associated With Thromboembolic Complications Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have demonstrated patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have deranged coagulation parameters predisposing them to venous thromboembolisms (VTEs). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether patients who have RA undergoing primary TKA have higher rates of (1) VTEs; (2) readmission rates; and (3) costs of care.

METHODS

Patients who have RA undergoing primary TKA were identified and matched to controls in a 1:5 ratio by age, sex, and comorbidities. Exclusions included patients with a history of VTEs and hypercoagulable states. Primary outcomes analyzed included rates of 90-day VTEs, along with lower extremity deep vein thromboses and pulmonary embolisms, 90-day readmission rates, in addition to day of surgery, and 90-day costs of care. A P-value less than .05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Patients who have RA were found to have significantly higher incidence and odds (OR) of VTEs (1.9 vs 1.3%; OR: 1.51, P < .0001), deep vein thromboses (1.6 vs 1.1%; OR: 1.55, P < .0001), and pulmonary embolisms (0.4 vs 0.3%; OR: 1.26, P= .0001). Study group patients also had significantly higher incidence and odds of readmissions (21.6 vs 14.1%; OR: 1.67, P < .0001) compared to controls. In addition, RA patients incurred significantly higher day of surgery ($12,475.17 vs $11,428.96; P < .0001) and 90-day costs of care ($15,937.34 vs $13,678.85; P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

After adjusting for age, sex, and comorbidities, the study found patients who have RA undergoing primary TKA had significantly higher rates of VTEs, readmissions, and costs.

A Nationwide Analysis on the Impact of Schizophrenia Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Matched-Control Analysis of 49,176 Medicare Patients

BACKGROUND

The influence of schizophrenia on total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is limited in the literature. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether patients with schizophrenia undergoing primary TKA have (1) longer in-hospital length of stay (LOS); (2) higher readmission rates; (3) higher medical complications; (4) higher implant-related complications; and (5) higher costs of care compared to controls.

METHODS

Patients with schizophrenia undergoing primary TKA were identified within the Medicare claims database. The study group was randomly matched in a 1:5 ratio to controls according to age, sex, and medical comorbidities. The query yielded 49,176 patients with (n = 8,196) and without (n = 40,980) schizophrenia undergoing primary TKA. Primary outcomes analyzed included in-hospital LOS, 90-day readmission rates, 90-day medical complications, 2-year implant-related complications, in addition to day of surgery and 90-day costs of care. A P-value less than .01 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Schizophrenia patients had longer in-hospital LOS (3.73 days vs 3.22 days, P < .0001) and had higher incidence and odds ratios (ORs) of readmission rates (18.26 vs 12.07%; OR: 1.58, P < .0001) compared to controls. Schizophrenia patients had higher incidence and odds of medical (3.23 vs 1.10%; OR: 2.99, P < .0001) and implant-related complications (5.92 vs 3.59%; OR: 1.68, P < .0001) and incurred significantly higher day of surgery ($13,300.58 vs $11,681.77, P < .0001) and 90-day costs of care ($18,222.18 vs $14,845.64, P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that patients with schizophrenia have longer in-hospital LOS, higher readmission rates, higher complications, and increased costs of care after primary TKA.

Opioid Disorders Are Associated With Thromboemboli Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is defined as a problematic pattern of opioid abuse and dependency leading to problems or distress. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether OUD patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have higher rates of venous thromboembolisms (VTEs), readmissions, and costs of care.

METHODS

Patients undergoing TKA with OUD were identified and matched to controls in a 1:4 ratio according to age, gender, comorbidity index, and comorbidities within the Medicare database. Ninety-day VTEs, 90-day readmissions, and costs of care were compared. A P-value less than .01 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The study yielded 54,480 patients with (n = 10,929) and without (n = 43,551) OUD undergoing primary TKA. Matching was successful as there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics. OUD patients were found to have greater odds of VTEs (odds ratio 2.27, P < .0001) 90 days following primary TKA. OUD patients were found to have greater odds of 90-day readmissions (odds ratio 1.39, P < .0001) in addition to incurring higher day of surgery ($13,360.73 vs $11,911.94, P < .0001) and 90-day costs ($18,380.89 vs $15,565.57, P < .0001) compared to controls.

CONCLUSION

After adjusting for confounders, this analysis of 54,480 patients identified that patients with OUD have higher rates of VTEs, readmissions, and costs following primary TKA. In addition to using these data to help educate and counsel patients, the study should be used to help further regulate and control opioid prescriptions written by healthcare professionals.