1
|
Taylor RM, Whelan JS, Barber JA, Alvarez-Galvez J, Feltbower RG, Gibson F, Stark DP, Fern LA. The Impact of Specialist Care on Teenage and Young Adult Patient-Reported Outcomes in England: A BRIGHTLIGHT Study. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2024; 13:492-501. [PMID: 38285524 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2023.0141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose: In England, health care policy promotes specialized age-appropriate cancer services for teenagers and young adults (TYA), for those aged 13-24 years at diagnosis. Specialist Principal Treatment Centers (PTCs) provide enhanced age-specific care for TYA, although many still receive all or some of their care in adult or children's cancer services. Our aim was to determine the patient-reported outcomes associated with TYA-PTC based care. Methods: We conducted a multicenter cohort study, recruiting 1114 TYA aged 13-24 years at diagnosis. Data collection involved a bespoke survey at 6,12,18, 24, and 36 months after diagnosis. Confounder adjusted analyses of perceived social support, illness perception, anxiety and depression, and health status, compared patients receiving NO-TYA-PTC care with those receiving ALL-TYA-PTC and SOME-TYA-PTC care. Results: Eight hundred and thirty completed the first survey. There was no difference in perceived social support, anxiety, or depression between the three categories of care. Significantly higher illness perception was observed in the ALL-TYA-PTC and SOME-TYA-PTC group compared to the NO-TYA-PTC group, (adjusted difference in mean (ADM) score on Brief Illness Perception scale 2.28 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.48-4.09) and 2.93 [1.27-4.59], respectively, p = 0.002). Similarly, health status was significantly better in the NO-TYA-PTC (ALL-TYA-PTC: ADM -0.011 [95%CI -0.046 to 0.024] and SOME-TYA-PTC: -0.054 [-0.086 to -0.023]; p = 0.006). Conclusion: The reason for the difference in perceived health status is unclear. TYA who accessed a TYA-PTC (all or some care) had higher perceived illness. This may reflect greater education and promotion of self-care by health care professionals in TYA units.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel M Taylor
- Centre for Nurse, Midwife and Allied Health Profession Led Research (CNMAR), University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jeremy S Whelan
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Julie A Barber
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Javier Alvarez-Galvez
- Department of Biomedicine, Biotechnology and Public Health, University of Cadiz, Cádiz, Spain
| | - Richard G Feltbower
- Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Faith Gibson
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom
- Centre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability (ORCHID), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Dan P Stark
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Lorna A Fern
- Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, University Hospitals London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Morgan S, Gibson F, Aldiss S, Porter L. Effective transition of young people with long-term conditions into adult services. Nurs Child Young People 2023; 35:34-42. [PMID: 35989553 DOI: 10.7748/ncyp.2022.e1439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Healthcare transition involves the purposeful and planned process of preparing, empowering and supporting young people with long-term conditions and their families when they are moving from child to adult services. Transition is a series of events that provides the young person with the knowledge and skills they require to be able to function in adult services. Until recently little has been done to address the perceived barriers and challenges involved in transition. In this article, the authors discuss the challenges associated with effective transition and describe their experience of implementing a healthcare transition pathway using a quality improvement model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue Morgan
- hosted by Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, England
| | - Faith Gibson
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, England and Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, England
| | - Susie Aldiss
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, England
| | - Louise Porter
- hosted by Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, England
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cable M, Watts T, Reagon C, Kelly D. Experiences of early‐career nurses working in specialist adolescent/young adult cancer units: A narrative inquiry. J Adv Nurs 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/jan.15488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Cable
- School of Healthcare Sciences Cardiff University Cardiff UK
| | - Tessa Watts
- School of Healthcare Sciences Cardiff University Cardiff UK
| | - Carly Reagon
- School of Healthcare Sciences Cardiff University Cardiff UK
| | - Daniel Kelly
- School of Healthcare Sciences Cardiff University Cardiff UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Olesen AMR, Boisen KA, Missel M. How Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer Experience an Age-Appropriate Intervention When Undergoing Treatment in Adult Surgery Clinics: A Qualitative Study. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2022; 12:177-184. [PMID: 35759421 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2022.0012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Despite growing international attention, few interventions specifically target adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer even though appropriate interventions may improve care delivery during cancer treatment. The study's purpose was to explore how AYAs with cancer experience an age-appropriate intervention when undergoing treatment in adult surgery clinics. Methods: Twenty AYAs with cancer, aged 18-29 years, from five surgery clinics at Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet participated in an intervention consisting of three main components: care provided by trained youth coordinator nurses (YCNs) to the greatest extent possible; a 1-hour one-on-one conversation with a YCN during hospitalization; and a postdischarge phone call. Semistructured interviews were used to collect data, which were analyzed in a stepwise process based on inductive content analysis. Results: Three themes were identified: a beacon in the dark; from patient to person; and the caring check-up. Participants felt safe and experienced a sense of presence and a caring environment in a significant and trusting relationship with YCNs, which encouraged them to share thoughts, feelings, and needs they previously had kept silent about. The one-on-one conversations helped them begin reflecting and in emotional processing and the postdischarge phone call was perceived as a caring check-up. Conclusions: The study shows how an age-appropriate intervention was experienced overall as meaningful for the participants hospitalized in adult surgery clinics, but more research is required to further examine the significance and effect of interventions that target AYAs with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Marie Roholm Olesen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kirsten A Boisen
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Centre of Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Malene Missel
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lea S, Taylor R, Gibson F. Developing, Nurturing, and Sustaining an Adolescent and Young Adult-Centered Culture of Care. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2022; 32:956-969. [PMID: 35356832 DOI: 10.1177/10497323221084910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Adolescents and young adults have unique needs which differ from those of children or adults. In the United Kingdom, we have dedicated services, which are diverse in how they are managed and delivered. A multiple-case study was conducted in young people's cancer services in four geographical regions of England. Data collection included: semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals (n = 41) and young people (n = 29); and observation (total = 120 hours). Thematic analysis was used to synthesize and interpret five emerging themes describing the way a culture of adolescent and young adult-specific care developed. To develop a cultural attitude which embraced and promoted core values, leadership was needed, as well as high patient volume accessing a service. Time was essential, an adolescent and young adult-centered culture of care does not happen overnight, it needs time and dedicated staff to evolve, but once in place, services have a significant impact on the experience of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Lea
- 8964University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rachel Taylor
- 8964University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Faith Gibson
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Psychosocial Needs and Preferences for Care among Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Patients (Ages 15–39): A Qualitative Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030710. [PMID: 35158975 PMCID: PMC8833451 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) are a unique population: they are a diverse group between the ages of 15–39 years with distinct needs and experience numerous developmental milestones during this age range. Notably, AYAs have faced worse outcomes in cancer care, both with shorter survival and worse quality of life compared to children and older adults. Understanding AYAs’ psychosocial, communication and informational needs is crucial to addressing this disparity and improving cancer care delivery. By hearing directly from AYAs, we are able to capture nuances of their experiences and provide clinical recommendations to healthcare providers involved in the care of AYAs with cancer. This study specifically interviewed AYAs with cancer to understand their perspectives, identify needs and to develop recommendations for cancer care delivery and accommodations across the cancer experience. Abstract Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) require a multidisciplinary approach to cancer care due to their complex biopsychosocial situations and varied developmental maturity. Currently, age and diagnosis determine referral to pediatric or adult oncology, with differing treatment paradigms and service utilization patterns, contributing to suboptimal improvements in outcomes. Understanding the unique perspectives of AYAs is essential to designing patient-centered AYA services. Thus, we conducted six focus groups with AYAs (n = 25) treated by medical or pediatric oncologists to evaluate: (1) the unique experiences of cancer care as an AYA; (2) AYA-specific information needs and communication preferences; and (3) recommendations for service provision, delivery and accommodations for AYAs. Transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic content analysis and identified six major themes to inform clinically-actionable recommendations and the development of a patient-reported outcome measure: (1) AYAs experience social isolation and loss of independence; (2) AYAs have an uncertain sense of the future and need conversations around survivorship and long-term and late effects; (3) AYAs desire greater control over discussions with their care team; (4) AYAs need additional navigational and social/caregiver supports; (5) AYAs prefer an inclusive AYA space in the hospital; and (6) LGBTQ+ patients experience distinct concerns as AYA cancer patients. These will form the basis for specific and tailored clinical recommendations to improve AYA cancer care delivery.
Collapse
|
7
|
Taylor RM, Fern LA, Barber J, Gibson F, Lea S, Patel N, Morris S, Alvarez-Galvez J, Feltbower R, Hooker L, Martins A, Stark D, Raine R, Whelan JS. Specialist cancer services for teenagers and young adults in England: BRIGHTLIGHT research programme. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2021. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar09120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background
When cancer occurs in teenagers and young adults, the impact is far beyond the physical disease and treatment burden. The effect on psychological, social, educational and other normal development can be profound. In addition, outcomes including improvements in survival and participation in clinical trials are poorer than in younger children and older adults with similar cancers. These unique circumstances have driven the development of care models specifically for teenagers and young adults with cancer, often focused on a dedicated purpose-designed patient environments supported by a multidisciplinary team with expertise in the needs of teenagers and young adults. In England, this is commissioned by NHS England and delivered through 13 principal treatment centres. There is a lack of evaluation that identifies the key components of specialist care for teenagers and young adults, and any improvement in outcomes and costs associated with it.
Objective
To determine whether or not specialist services for teenagers and young adults with cancer add value.
Design
A series of multiple-methods studies centred on a prospective longitudinal cohort of teenagers and young adults who were newly diagnosed with cancer.
Settings
Multiple settings, including an international Delphi study of health-care professionals, qualitative observation in specialist services for teenagers and young adults, and NHS trusts.
Participants
A total of 158 international teenage and young adult experts, 42 health-care professionals from across England, 1143 teenagers and young adults, and 518 caregivers.
Main outcome measures
The main outcomes were specific to each project: key areas of competence for the Delphi survey; culture of teenagers and young adults care in the case study; and unmet needs from the caregiver survey. The primary outcome for the cohort participants was quality of life and the cost to the NHS and patients in the health economic evaluation.
Data sources
Multiple sources were used, including responses from health-care professionals through a Delphi survey and face-to-face interviews, interview data from teenagers and young adults, the BRIGHTLIGHT survey to collect patient-reported data, patient-completed cost records, hospital clinical records, routinely collected NHS data and responses from primary caregivers.
Results
Competencies associated with specialist care for teenagers and young adults were identified from a Delphi study. The key to developing a culture of teenage and young adult care was time and commitment. An exposure variable, the teenagers and young adults Cancer Specialism Scale, was derived, allowing categorisation of patients to three groups, which were defined by the time spent in a principal treatment centre: SOME (some care in a principal treatment centre for teenagers and young adults, and the rest of their care in either a children’s or an adult cancer unit), ALL (all care in a principal treatment centre for teenagers and young adults) or NONE (no care in a principal treatment centre for teenagers and young adults). The cohort study showed that the NONE group was associated with superior quality of life, survival and health status from 6 months to 3 years after diagnosis. The ALL group was associated with faster rates of quality-of-life improvement from 6 months to 3 years after diagnosis. The SOME group was associated with poorer quality of life and slower improvement in quality of life over time. Economic analysis revealed that NHS costs and travel costs were similar between the NONE and ALL groups. The ALL group had greater out-of-pocket expenses, and the SOME group was associated with greater NHS costs and greater expense for patients. However, if caregivers had access to a principal treatment centre for teenagers and young adults (i.e. in the ALL or SOME groups), then they had fewer unmet support and information needs.
Limitations
Our definition of exposure to specialist care using Hospital Episode Statistics-determined time spent in hospital was insufficient to capture the detail of episodes or account for the variation in specialist services. Quality of life was measured first at 6 months, but an earlier measure may have shown different baselines.
Conclusions
We could not determine the added value of specialist cancer care for teenagers and young adults as defined using the teenage and young adult Cancer Specialism Scale and using quality of life as a primary end point. A group of patients (i.e. those defined as the SOME group) appeared to be less advantaged across a range of outcomes. There was variation in the extent to which principal treatment centres for teenagers and young adults were established, and the case study indicated that the culture of teenagers and young adults care required time to develop and embed. It will therefore be important to establish whether or not the evolution in services since 2012–14, when the cohort was recruited, improves quality of life and other patient-reported and clinical outcomes.
Future work
A determination of whether or not the SOME group has similar or improved quality of life and other patient-reported and clinical outcomes in current teenage and young adult service delivery is essential if principal treatment centres for teenagers and young adults are being commissioned to provide ‘joint care’ models with other providers.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full in Programme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 9, No. 12. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel M Taylor
- Centre for Nurse, Midwife and Allied Health Profession Led Research, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lorna A Fern
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- National Cancer Research Institute, London, UK
| | - Julie Barber
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Faith Gibson
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
- Centre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children’s Health, Illness and Disability, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sarah Lea
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Nishma Patel
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Stephen Morris
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Javier Alvarez-Galvez
- Department of Biomedicine, Biotechnology and Public Health, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain
| | - Richard Feltbower
- Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Louise Hooker
- Wessex Teenage and Young Adult Cancer Service, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Ana Martins
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Dan Stark
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Rosalind Raine
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jeremy S Whelan
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Experiences of living with cancer of adolescents and young adults and their families: A narrative review and synthesis. ENFERMERÍA CLÍNICA (ENGLISH EDITION) 2021; 31:234-246. [PMID: 34243911 DOI: 10.1016/j.enfcle.2020.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adolescence is a critical life stage marked by significant physical, psychological, and social change. Cancer diagnosis during adolescence profoundly affects this experience for adolescents and young adults (AYA) and their families with an impact that continues throughout life. It is important to understand these experiences to ensure delivery of appropriate and high-quality supportive care. This narrative review critically appraised and synthesised qualitative literature that explored the experiences of AYAs and their families living with cancer. METHOD Narrative review and synthesis of qualitative research of AYAs' and their families' experiences of cancer. MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycINFO were searched between February 2000 and September 2019 using search terms including "adolescent", "young people", "young adult", "cancer", "family", and "qualitative". Literature was appraised and synthesised using Popay et al.'s1 framework. RESULTS 3016 articles were retrieved (Medline n=1298, CINAHL n=1632, PsycINFO n=86). Of these, 151 duplicates were removed. 2865 papers were screened with 121 abstracts considered for eligibility for inclusion. Eighteen papers met the inclusion criteria. Three inter-related themes were identified: being diagnosed with cancer; uncertainty - holding on to life and gaps in care delivery. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Few studies discuss the impact of cancer on the families of AYA living with cancer. Future research should explore this experience. By doing so the relational impact of cancer will be better understood as the basis of supportive family-centred care. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42017084148.
Collapse
|
9
|
The BRIGHTLIGHT National Survey of the Impact of Specialist Teenage and Young Adult Cancer Care on Caregivers' Information and Support Needs. Cancer Nurs 2021; 44:235-243. [PMID: 31895170 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Teenage and young adult cancer services in England are centralized in 13 principal treatment centers (TYA-PTC). These "specialist services" are designed to support caregivers as well as young people. OBJECTIVES To evaluate whether caregivers of young people with cancer had fewer unmet information and support needs if they had all/some care in a TYA-PTC. METHODS Participants in a cohort study of young people with cancer nominated their main carer to complete the BRIGHTLIGHT Carer Questionnaire, completed 6 months after diagnosis. Comparisons were made according to where young people's care was delivered: all, some, or no care in a TYA-PTC. Principal components analysis reduced the questionnaire to 5 dimensions, which were used as dependent variables in subsequent regression analysis. RESULTS Four hundred seventy-six responses of 514 returned questionnaires (92%) were included in the analysis. The majority of caregivers were white, middle-aged, married/cohabiting mothers. Adjusted analysis indicated caregivers who had all/some care in a TYA-PTC had more satisfaction with support and also with services specifically provided for carers. Those who had some TYA-PTC care had greater satisfaction with information but less opportunity to be involved in decisions. CONCLUSIONS Caregivers of young people who had no TYA-PTC care have the most unmet information and support needs. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Nurses outside of the TYA-PTC need to be supported by the TYA-PTC in providing information/support for caregivers. When a young person is receiving care in multiple hospitals, nurses need to optimize opportunities for caregivers to be involved in decision making.
Collapse
|
10
|
McInally W, Gray-Brunton C, Chouliara Z, Kyle RG. Life Interrupted: Experiences of adolescents, young adults and their family living with malignant melanoma. J Adv Nurs 2021; 77:3867-3879. [PMID: 34245464 DOI: 10.1111/jan.14959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Revised: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIM Melanoma is one of the most common human malignancies; yet, it is often thought of as a disease of adulthood rather than one affecting adolescents and young adults. This study sought to understand the experiences of adolescents, young adults and their family living with malignant melanoma. DESIGN A qualitative study using Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis, through a multi-perspective design. METHODS Data collection was conducted between January and August 2018 in each participant's Primary Care Centre when they were attending for an outpatient appointment. Each young person and a nominated family member were interviewed (n = 10) either individually (n = 4) or as a dyad (n = 6) according to their personal choice. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted and audio-recorded with the participant's consent. Interview data were transcribed verbatim and analysed. FINDINGS The metanarrative 'Life Interrupted' was the core conceptual thread woven throughout the findings. It represents the interconnections and interrelationships between the adolescent or young adult and their family. Being able to recognize the disease and seek support was challenging with often limited physical, emotional or social support resulting in feelings of fear and isolation. Four super-ordinate themes were identified: (a) 'Is it Serious', (b) 'Too Much too Young', (c) 'Not the Same' and (d) 'Time to Live'. CONCLUSIONS With the rising incidence of MM in the adolescents and young adults population globally, there are demands to improve healthcare professionals and nurse's knowledge and understanding of MM. As young people with MM experience their journey outside specialist cancer services, the care delivery for this patient group and their families require stronger links between services. IMPACT This study will inform the improvement of care delivery for MM in order that this patient group is provided with the same access to service delivery as other adolescents and young adults with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Zoe Chouliara
- Senior Practitioner, Counselling & Psychologist Edinburgh
| | - Richard G Kyle
- Research and Evaluation Division, Public Health Wales, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gibson F, Fern LA, Phillips B, Gravestock H, Malik S, Callaghan A, Dyker K, Groszmann M, Hamrang L, Hough R, McGeachy D, Morgan S, Smith S, Upadhyaya S, Veitch H, Williamson M, Whelan J, Aldiss S. Reporting the whole story: Analysis of the 'out-of-scope' questions from the James Lind Alliance Teenage and Young Adult Cancer Priority Setting Partnership Survey. Health Expect 2021; 24:1593-1606. [PMID: 34247435 PMCID: PMC8483195 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2020] [Revised: 04/17/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective We conducted a UK‐wide survey to identify the top 10 research questions for young people's cancer. We conducted secondary analysis of questions submitted, which were ‘out‐of‐scope’ of the original survey aim. We sought to disseminate these questions, to inform practice, policy and the development of potential interventions to support young people with cancer. Design James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership. Participants Young people aged 13‐24 with a current/previous cancer diagnosis, their families/friends/partners and professionals who work with this population. Methods Eight hundred and fifty‐five potential research questions were submitted, and 326 were classified as ‘out‐of‐scope’. These questions, along with 49 ‘free‐text’ comments, were analysed using thematic analysis. Results The 375 out‐of‐scope questions and comments were submitted by: 68 young people, 81 family members/partners/friends and 42 professionals. Ten overarching themes were identified: diagnostic experience; communication; coordination of care; information needs and lack of information; service provision; long‐term effects and aftercare support; family support; financial impact; end‐of life care; and research methods and current research. Conclusions The need to tailor services, information and communication is a striking thread evidenced across the ‘out‐of‐scope’ questions. Gaps in information highlight implications for practice in revisiting information needs throughout the cancer trajectory. We must advocate for specialist care for young people and promote the research priorities and these findings to funding bodies, charities, young people and health and social care policymakers, in order to generate an evidence base to inform effective interventions across the cancer trajectory and improve outcomes. Patient/public contributions Patients and carers were equal stakeholders throughout.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faith Gibson
- Centre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Lorna A Fern
- Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Bob Phillips
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK.,Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Leeds Children's Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Helen Gravestock
- Policy, Influencing and Voice, Young Lives vs Cancer, London, UK
| | - Sonia Malik
- Policy and Influencing, Young Lives vs Cancer, London, UK
| | - Amy Callaghan
- Teenage and Young Adult Cancer Priority Setting Partnership steering group, Glasgow, UK
| | - Karen Dyker
- Clinical Oncology Department, Clinical Oncology Department, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Mike Groszmann
- Psychological Medicine Department, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Leila Hamrang
- Teenage and Young Adult Cancer Priority Setting Partnership steering group, Manchester, UK
| | - Rachael Hough
- Department of Adolescent Haematology, Children and Young People's Cancer Service, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Demi McGeachy
- Teenage and Young Adult Cancer Priority Setting Partnership steering group, Glasgow, UK
| | - Sue Morgan
- Teenage and Young Adult Cancer Service, Ward L33, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Sheela Upadhyaya
- Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, The James Lind Alliance, National Institute for Health Research Evaluation, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Max Williamson
- Teenage and Young Adult Cancer Priority Setting Partnership steering group, London, UK
| | - Jeremy Whelan
- Division of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Susie Aldiss
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Olesen AMR, Missel M, Boisen KA. The Needs and Care Experiences of Adolescents and Young Adults Treated for Cancer in Adult Surgery Clinics: A Qualitative Study. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2021; 11:48-55. [PMID: 33844956 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2021.0010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer hospitalized in adult surgery clinics are an overlooked group of patients. They are a minority hospitalized among elderly surgical patients, and the surroundings and care are designed with older patients in mind. A growing body of research focuses on AYAs' experiences of cancer care. However, studies exploring care experiences in terms of in-patient surgery treatment are still needed. Hence, the purpose of the study was to explore the needs and care experiences of AYAs, 15-29 years of age, treated for cancer in adult surgery clinics. Methods: This qualitative study was based on semistructured interviews with 15 AYAs with cancer from seven surgery clinics at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark. Data were analyzed and interpreted using inductive content analysis. The Danish Data Protection Agency approved the study (project no.: 05617). Results: Three themes were identified: (1) being the black sheep - experiences of being young in an adult environment, (2) the significant nurse - experiences of the essential relationship between AYAs and the nurses, and (3) the wounded body - experiences of how the physically changed body affects the mind. Conclusions: Our findings showed that the psychosocial needs of AYAs with cancer hospitalized in adult surgery clinics were not being adequately met. Initiatives are needed to improve the psychological and social well-being of this vulnerable patient group, while hospitalized for treatment in surgery clinics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Marie Roholm Olesen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Malene Missel
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kirsten A Boisen
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Center of Adolescent Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bozovic-Spasojevic I, Balsat M, Blondeel A, Castleton A, De Munter J, Gamble AS, Kienesberger A, Konsoulova-Kirova AA, Rizvi K, Schneider C, Vermeersch J, Ferrari A, Stark D. A European Network for Teenagers and Young Adults with Cancer. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2021; 10:117-119. [PMID: 33847510 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2021.0028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marie Balsat
- Department of Hematology, Lyon-Sud Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Anne Blondeel
- The European Society for Paediatric Oncology, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - Ashley S Gamble
- Children's Cancer and Leukaemia Group, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Carina Schneider
- CCI Europe, Vienna, Austria.,Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Andrea Ferrari
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniel Stark
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fern LA, Taylor RM, Barber J, Alvarez-Galvez J, Feltbower R, Lea S, Martins A, Morris S, Hooker L, Gibson F, Raine R, Stark DP, Whelan J. Processes of care and survival associated with treatment in specialist teenage and young adult cancer centres: results from the BRIGHTLIGHT cohort study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e044854. [PMID: 33827838 PMCID: PMC8031022 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Survival gains in teenagers and young adults (TYA) are reported to be lower than children and adults for some cancers. Place of care is implicated, influencing access to specialist TYA professionals and research.Consequently, age-appropriate specialist cancer care is advocated for TYA although systematic investigation of associated outcomes is lacking. In England, age-appropriate care is delivered through 13 Principal Treatment Centres (TYA-PTC). BRIGHTLIGHT is the national evaluation of TYA cancer services to examine outcomes associated with differing places and levels of care. We aimed to examine the association between exposure to TYA-PTC care, survival and documentation of clinical processes of care. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING 109 National Health Service (NHS) hospitals across England. PARTICIPANTS 1114 TYA, aged 13-24, newly diagnosed with cancer between 2012 and 2014. INTERVENTION Participants were assigned a TYA-PTC category dependent on the proportion of care delivered in a TYA-PTC in the first year after diagnosis: all care in a TYA-PTC (ALL-TYA-PTC, n=270), no care in a TYA-PTC (NO-TYA-PTC, n=359), and some care in a TYA-PTC with additional care in a children's/adult unit (SOME-TYA-PTC, n=419). PRIMARY OUTCOME Data were collected on documented processes indicative of age-appropriate care using clinical report forms, and survival through linkage to NHS databases. RESULTS TYA receiving NO-TYA-PTC care were less likely to have documentation of molecular diagnosis, be reviewed by a children's or TYA multidisciplinary team, be assessed by supportive care services or have a fertility discussion. There was no significant difference in survival according to category of care. There was weak evidence that the association between care category and survival differed by age (p=0.08) with higher HRs for those over 19 receiving ALL or SOME-TYA-PTC compared with NO-TYA-PTC. CONCLUSION TYA-PTC care was associated with better documentation of clinical processes associated with age-appropriate care but not improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorna A Fern
- Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rachel M Taylor
- Centre for Nurse, Midwife and AHP Led Research (CNMAR), University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Julie Barber
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Javier Alvarez-Galvez
- Department of Biomedicine, Biotechnology and Public Health, University of Cadiz, Cadiz, Spain
| | | | - Sarah Lea
- Cancer Service, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ana Martins
- Cancer Clinical Trials, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Stephen Morris
- Primary Care Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Louise Hooker
- Wessex Teenage and Young Adult Cancer Service, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Faith Gibson
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
- Centre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability (ORCHID), Great Ormond Street Hospital For Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rosalind Raine
- Institute of Epidemiology & Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Dan P Stark
- Leeds Insitute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Jeremy Whelan
- Cancer Service, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ferrari A, Stark D, Peccatori FA, Fern L, Laurence V, Gaspar N, Bozovic-Spasojevic I, Smith O, De Munter J, Derwich K, Hjorth L, van der Graaf WTA, Soanes L, Jezdic S, Blondeel A, Bielack S, Douillard JY, Mountzios G, Saloustros E. Adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer: a position paper from the AYA Working Group of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE). ESMO Open 2021; 6:100096. [PMID: 33926710 PMCID: PMC8103533 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
It is well recognised that adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer have inequitable access to oncology services that provide expert cancer care and consider their unique needs. Subsequently, survival gains in this patient population have improved only modestly compared with older adults and children with cancer. In 2015, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE) established the joint Cancer in AYA Working Group in order to increase awareness among adult and paediatric oncology communities, enhance knowledge on specific issues in AYA and ultimately improve the standard of care for AYA with cancer across Europe. This manuscript reflects the position of this working group regarding current AYA cancer care, the challenges to be addressed and possible solutions. Key challenges include the lack of specific biological understanding of AYA cancers, the lack of access to specialised centres with age-appropriate multidisciplinary care and the lack of available clinical trials with novel therapeutics. Key recommendations include diversifying interprofessional cooperation in AYA care and specific measures to improve trial accrual, including centralising care where that is the best means to achieve trial accrual. This defines a common vision that can lead to improved outcomes for AYA with cancer in Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Ferrari
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
| | - D Stark
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, School of Medicine University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | - F A Peccatori
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - L Fern
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - V Laurence
- Medical Oncology Department and SIREDO Oncology Center (Care, Innovation and Research for Children and AYA with Cancer), Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - N Gaspar
- Department of Oncology for Child and Adolescent, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - I Bozovic-Spasojevic
- Medical Oncology Department, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia
| | - O Smith
- National Children's Cancer Service, Children's Health Ireland at Crumlin and Systems Biology Ireland, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - J De Munter
- University Hospital Ghent Cancer Center, UZ Gent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - K Derwich
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Transplantology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| | - L Hjorth
- Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Pediatrics, Lund, Sweden
| | - W T A van der Graaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L Soanes
- Teenage Cancer Trust, London, UK
| | - S Jezdic
- Scientific and Medical Division, European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - A Blondeel
- Department of Scientific Programme Coordination, European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE), Brussels, Belgium
| | - S Bielack
- Zentrum für Kinder, Jugend und Frauenmedizin Pädiatrie 5, KlinikumStuttgart - Olgahospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - J-Y Douillard
- Scientific and Medical Division, European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - G Mountzios
- 2nd Department of Medical Oncology and Clinical Trial Unit, Henry Dunant Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - E Saloustros
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
McInally W, Gray-Brunton C, Chouliara Z, Kyle RG. Experiences of living with cancer of adolescents and young adults and their families: A narrative review and synthesis. ENFERMERIA CLINICA 2021; 31:S1130-8621(21)00034-6. [PMID: 33810981 DOI: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2020.12.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adolescence is a critical life stage marked by significant physical, psychological, and social change. Cancer diagnosis during adolescence profoundly affects this experience for adolescents and young adults (AYA) and their families with an impact that continues throughout life. It is important to understand these experiences to ensure delivery of appropriate and high-quality supportive care. This narrative review critically appraised and synthesised qualitative literature that explored the experiences of AYAs and their families living with cancer. METHOD Narrative review and synthesis of qualitative research of AYAs' and their families' experiences of cancer. MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycINFO were searched between February 2000 and September 2019 using search terms including "adolescent", "young people", "young adult", "cancer", "family", and "qualitative". Literature was appraised and synthesised using Popay et al.'s1 framework. RESULTS 3016 articles were retrieved (Medline n=1298, CINAHL n=1632, PsycINFO n=86). Of these, 151 duplicates were removed. 2865 papers were screened with 121 abstracts considered for eligibility for inclusion. Eighteen papers met the inclusion criteria. Three inter-related themes were identified: being diagnosed with cancer; uncertainty - holding on to life and gaps in care delivery. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Few studies discuss the impact of cancer on the families of AYA living with cancer. Future research should explore this experience. By doing so the relational impact of cancer will be better understood as the basis of supportive family-centred care. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42017084148.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy McInally
- Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies, Open University, Edinburgh, UK.
| | | | - Zoe Chouliara
- Faculty of Social & Health Sciences, Division of Mental Health & Counselling, Abertay University, Dundee, UK
| | - Richard G Kyle
- Research & Evaluation Division, Public Health Wales, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hart RI, Cowie FJ, Jesudason AB, Lawton J. Adolescents and young adults' (AYA) views on their cancer knowledge prior to diagnosis: Findings from a qualitative study involving AYA receiving cancer care. Health Expect 2020; 24:307-316. [PMID: 33275814 PMCID: PMC8077068 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Revised: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 11/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cancer is rare amongst adolescents and young adults (AYA). Previous research has reported (healthy) AYA’s knowledge of risk factors and symptoms as limited, with this potentially leading to delays in help‐seeking and diagnosis. Objectives We explored AYA’s views on their cancer knowledge prior to diagnosis and if/how they perceived this as having affected their experiences of diagnosis and care. Methods We interviewed 18 AYA diagnosed with cancer (aged 16‐24 years). Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. We undertook qualitative descriptive analysis, exploring both a priori topics and emergent themes, including cancer knowledge prior to diagnosis. Results Adolescents and young adults characterized their knowledge of cancer and treatment prior to diagnosis and treatment initiation as limited and superficial. AYA perceived gaps in their knowledge as having profound consequences throughout their cancer journey. These included: hindering recognition of symptoms, thereby delaying help‐seeking; impeding understanding of the significance of tests and referrals; amplifying uncertainty on diagnosis; and affording poor preparation for the harsh realities of treatment. Conclusions Adolescents and young adults perceived their limited cancer knowledge prior to diagnosis as affecting experiences of diagnosis and initial/front‐line care. These findings prompt consideration of whether, when and how, AYA’s knowledge of cancer might be improved. Two broad approaches are discussed: universal education on AYA cancer and/or health; and targeted education (enhanced information and counselling) at and after diagnosis. Patient or Public Contribution Our work was informed throughout by discussions with an advisory group, whose membership included AYA treated for cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth I Hart
- Usher Institute, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Angela B Jesudason
- Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Julia Lawton
- Usher Institute, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Taylor RM, Fern LA, Barber J, Alvarez-Galvez J, Feltbower R, Lea S, Martins A, Morris S, Hooker L, Gibson F, Raine R, Stark DP, Whelan J. Longitudinal cohort study of the impact of specialist cancer services for teenagers and young adults on quality of life: outcomes from the BRIGHTLIGHT study. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e038471. [PMID: 33243793 PMCID: PMC7692812 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In England, healthcare policy advocates specialised age-appropriate services for teenagers and young adults (TYA), those aged 13 to 24 years at diagnosis. Specialist Principal Treatment Centres (PTC) provide enhanced TYA age-specific care, although many still receive care in adult or children's cancer services. We present the first prospective structured analysis of quality of life (QOL) associated with the amount of care received in a TYA-PTC DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study. SETTING Hospitals delivering inpatient cancer care in England. PARTICIPANTS 1114 young people aged 13 to 24 years newly diagnosed with cancer. INTERVENTION Exposure to the TYA-PTC defined as patients receiving NO-TYA-PTC care with those receiving ALL-TYA-PTC and SOME-TYA-PTC care. PRIMARY OUTCOME Quality of life measured at five time points: 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months after diagnosis. RESULTS Group mean total QOL improved over time for all patients, but for those receiving NO-TYA-PTC was an average of 5.63 points higher (95% CI 2.77 to 8.49) than in young people receiving SOME-TYA-PTC care, and 4·17 points higher (95% CI 1.07 to 7.28) compared with ALL-TYA-PTC care. Differences were greatest 6 months after diagnosis, reduced over time and did not meet the 8-point level that is proposed to be clinically significant. Young people receiving NO-TYA-PTC care were more likely to have been offered a choice of place of care, be older, from more deprived areas, in work and have less severe disease. However, analyses adjusting for confounding factors did not explain the differences between TYA groups. CONCLUSIONS Receipt of some or all care in a TYA-PTC was associated with lower QOL shortly after cancer diagnosis. The NO-TYA-PTC group had higher QOL 3 years after diagnosis, however those receiving all or some care in a TYA-PTC experienced more rapid QOL improvements. Receipt of some care in a TYA-PTC requires further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel M Taylor
- Centre for Nurse, Midwife and AHP Led Research (CNMAR), University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lorna A Fern
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Julie Barber
- Department of Statistical Science, University College, London, UK
| | - Javier Alvarez-Galvez
- Department of Biomedicine, Biotechnology and Public Health, University of Cadiz, Cadiz, Spain
| | | | - Sarah Lea
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ana Martins
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Stephen Morris
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Louise Hooker
- Wessex Teenage and Young Adult Cancer Service, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Faith Gibson
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
- Centre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability (ORCHID), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rosalind Raine
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Dan P Stark
- Leeds Insitute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Jeremy Whelan
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Taylor RM, Lobel B, Thompson K, Onashile A, Croasdale M, Hall N, Gibson F, Martins A, Wright D, Morgan S, Whelan JS, Fern LA. BRIGHTLIGHT researchers as 'dramaturgs': creating There is a Light from complex research data. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2020; 6:48. [PMID: 32789023 PMCID: PMC7418195 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-020-00222-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND BRIGHTLIGHT is a national evaluation of cancer services for young people aged 13-24 years in England. It is a mixed methods study with six interlinked studies aiming to answer the question: do specialist cancer services for teenagers and young adults add value? http://www.brightlightstudy.com/. Young people have been integral to study development and management, working as co-researchers, consultants and collaborators throughout. We aimed to share results in a way that was meaningful to young people, the public, and multidisciplinary professionals. This paper reports the development of 'There is a Light: BRIGHTLIGHT', a theatrical interpretation of study results by young people, and offers insight into the impact on the cast, researchers and audiences. METHODS The BRIGHTLIGHT team collaborated with Contact Young Company, a youth theatre group in Manchester. Twenty members of Contact Young Company and four young people with cancer worked together over an eight-week period during which BRIGHTLIGHT results were shared along with explanations of cancer, healthcare policy and models of care in interactive workshops. Through their interpretation, the cast developed the script for the performance. The impact of the process and performance on the cast was evaluated through video diaries. The research team completed reflective diaries and audiences completed a survey. RESULTS 'There is a Light' contained five acts and lasted just over an hour. It played 11 performances in six cities in the United Kingdom, to approximately 1377 people. After nine performances, a 30-min talk-back between members of the cast, creative team, an expert healthcare professional, and the audience was conducted, which was attended by at least half the audience. Analysis of cast diaries identified six themes: initial anxieties; personal development; connections; cancer in young people; personal impact; interacting with professionals. The cast developed strong trusting relationships with the team. Professionals stated they felt part of the process rather than sitting on the periphery sharing results. Both professional and lay audiences described the performance as meaningful and understandable. Feedback was particularly positive from those who had experienced cancer themselves. CONCLUSIONS Using theatre to present research enabled BRIGHTLIGHT results to be accessible to a larger, more diverse audience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel M. Taylor
- Centre for Nurse, Midwife and Allied Health Profession Led Research (CNMAR), University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Brian Lobel
- Rose Bruford College, Sidcup, UK
- The Royal Central School of Speech and Drama, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Faith Gibson
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Kate Granger Building, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
- Centre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children’s Health, Illness and Disability (ORCHID), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ana Martins
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - David Wright
- Top Floor Palatine Treatment Centre, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Sue Morgan
- Teenage and Young Adult Cancer Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Jeremy S. Whelan
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lorna A. Fern
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Aldiss S, Fern LA, Phillips RS, Callaghan A, Dyker K, Gravestock H, Groszmann M, Hamrang L, Hough R, McGeachy D, Morgan S, Smith S, Upadhyaya S, Veitch H, Veitch L, Williamson M, Whelan JS, Gibson F. Research priorities for young people with cancer: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e028119. [PMID: 31383701 PMCID: PMC6688702 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To conduct a UK-wide survey of young people who have experienced cancer, carers and professionals, to identify and prioritise research questions to inform decisions of research funders and support the case for research with this unique cancer population. DESIGN James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership. SETTING UK health service and community. METHODS A steering group oversaw the initiative and partner organisations were recruited. Unanswered questions were collected in an online survey. Evidence searching verified uncertainties. An interim survey was used to rank questions prior to a final prioritisation workshop. PARTICIPANTS Young people aged 13-24 years with a current or previous cancer diagnosis, their families, friends, partners and professionals who work with this population. RESULTS Two hundred and ninety-two respondents submitted 855 potential questions. Following a refining process and removal of 'out of scope' questions, 208 unique questions remained. Systematic evidence checking identified seven answered questions and 16 were the subject of ongoing studies. The interim survey was completed by 174 participants. The top 30 questions were prioritised at a workshop attended by 25 young people, parents and multidisciplinary professionals. The top three priorities are: (1) What psychological support package improves psychological well-being, social functioning and mental health during and after treatment? (2) What interventions, including self-care, can reduce or reverse adverse short-term and long-term effects of cancer treatment? (3) What are the best strategies to improve access to clinical trials? The remaining questions reflect the complete cancer pathway: new therapies, life after cancer, support, education/employment, relapse and end-of-life care. CONCLUSIONS We have identified shared research priorities for young people with cancer using a rigorous, person-centred approach involving stakeholders typically not involved in setting the research agenda. The breadth of priorities suggest future research should focus on holistic and psychosocial care delivery as well as traditional drug/biology research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susie Aldiss
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Lorna A Fern
- Oncology Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Teenage, Young Adult and Germ Cell Clinical Studies Group, National Cancer Research Institute, London, UK
| | | | - Amy Callaghan
- Teenage and Young Adult Cancer Priority Setting Partnership steering group, London, UK
| | - Karen Dyker
- Oncology, Level 4, Bexley Wing, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Michael Groszmann
- Paediatric & Adolescent Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Leila Hamrang
- Teenage and Young Adult Cancer Priority Setting Partnership steering group, London, UK
| | - Rachael Hough
- Children and Young Peoples Cancer Service, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Demi McGeachy
- Teenage and Young Adult Cancer Priority Setting Partnership steering group, London, UK
| | - Sue Morgan
- Teenage and Young Adult Cancer Service, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| | - Sam Smith
- Service Delivery, Teenage Cancer Trust, London, UK
| | - Sheela Upadhyaya
- The James Lind Alliance, National Institute for Health Research Evaluation, Southampton, UK
| | - Helen Veitch
- Service Delivery, Teenage Cancer Trust, London, UK
| | - Lara Veitch
- Teenage, Young Adult and Germ Cell Clinical Studies Group, National Cancer Research Institute, London, UK
- Teenage and Young Adult Cancer Priority Setting Partnership steering group, London, UK
| | - Max Williamson
- Teenage, Young Adult and Germ Cell Clinical Studies Group, National Cancer Research Institute, London, UK
- Teenage and Young Adult Cancer Priority Setting Partnership steering group, London, UK
| | - Jeremy S Whelan
- Oncology Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Faith Gibson
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
- Centre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability (ORCHID), Great Ormond Street Hospital For Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lea S, Gibson F, Taylor RM. The culture of young people's cancer care: A narrative review and synthesis of the UK literature. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2019; 28:e13099. [DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Revised: 04/01/2019] [Accepted: 04/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Lea
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - Faith Gibson
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust London UK
- University of Surrey Guildford UK
| | - Rachel M. Taylor
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Taylor RM, Fern LA, Barber J, Alvarez-Galvez J, Feltbower R, Morris S, Hooker L, McCabe MG, Gibson F, Raine R, Stark DP, Whelan JS. Description of the BRIGHTLIGHT cohort: the evaluation of teenage and young adult cancer services in England. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e027797. [PMID: 31005941 PMCID: PMC6500338 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE International recognition of the unique needs of young people with cancer is growing. Many countries have developed specialist age-appropriate cancer services believing them to be of value. In England, 13 specialist principal treatment centres (PTCs) deliver cancer care to young people. Despite this expansion of specialist care, systematic investigation of associated outcomes and costs has, to date, been lacking. The aim of this paper is to describe recruitment and baseline characteristics of the BRIGHTLIGHT cohort and the development of the bespoke measures of levels of care and disease severity, which will inform the evaluation of cancer services in England. DESIGN Prospective, longitudinal, observational study. SETTING Ninety-seven National Health Service hospitals in England. PARTICIPANTS A total of 1114 participants were recruited and diagnosed between July 2012 and December 2014: 55% (n=618) were men, mean age was 20.1 years (SD=3.3), most (86%) were white and most common diagnoses were lymphoma (31%), germ cell tumour (19%) and leukaemia (13%). RESULTS At diagnosis, median quality of life score was significantly lower than a published control threshold (69.7 points); 40% had borderline to severe anxiety, and 21% had borderline to severe depression. There was minimal variation in other patient-reported outcomes according to age, diagnosis or severity of illness. Survival was lower in the cohort than for young people diagnosed during the same period who were not recruited (cumulative survival probability 4 years after diagnosis: 88% vs 92%). CONCLUSIONS Data collection was completed in March 2018. Longitudinal comparisons will determine outcomes and costs associated with access/exposure to PTCs. Findings will inform international intervention and policy initiatives to improve outcomes for young people with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel M Taylor
- Cancer Clinical Trials, University College Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lorna A Fern
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Julie Barber
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Javier Alvarez-Galvez
- Department of Biomedicine, Biotechnology and Public Health, University of Cadiz, Cádiz, Spain
| | | | - Stephen Morris
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Louise Hooker
- Wessex Teenage and Young Adult Cancer Service, University Hospital Southhamptom, Southampton, UK
| | - Martin G McCabe
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Faith Gibson
- ORCHID, Great Ormond Street Hospital For Children NHS Trust, London, UK
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Rosalind Raine
- Institute of Epidemiology & Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Dan P Stark
- Leeds Insitute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Jeremy S Whelan
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Taylor RM, Whelan JS, Gibson F, Morgan S, Fern LA. Involving young people in BRIGHTLIGHT from study inception to secondary data analysis: insights from 10 years of user involvement. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2018; 4:50. [PMID: 30607259 PMCID: PMC6307198 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-018-0135-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2018] [Accepted: 11/29/2018] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
PLAIN ENGLISH SUMMARY Young people with cancer are often described as 'hard to reach', 'difficult to engage' and/or 'vulnerable'. Consequently, they are often over looked for patient and public involvement activities. We set out to involve young people with cancer to work as co-researchers in the design of the largest ever study of young people with cancer, called BRIGHTLIGHT. In the 10 years since the BRIGHTLIGHT feasibility work began we have involved more than 1200 young people as co-researchers, collaborators, consultants and dissemination partners. We chronicle the key points of this 10-year journey, sharing our success, describing our challenges and the solutions we put in place; sharing also what worked and did not work. Here we share some of these experiences of involving young people in this research and offer some practical advice for those looking to do the same. ABSTRACT Background Young people with cancer, broadly those aged 13-24 years at diagnosis, warrant special attention; physiological and psychological growth creates complex psychosocial needs which neither adult nor child systems are suitably designed to deal with. Resulting from these needs, they are often described as 'vulnerable', 'hard to reach' and 'difficult to engage', and consequently are often over looked for patient and public involvement/engagement (PPIE) roles. In our study 'BRIGHTLIGHT', we set out to evaluate whether specialist care for young people adds value, ensuring young people were central to our PPIE activities. We believe that BRIGHTLIGHT is unique as a very large study of young people with cancer which has successfully overcome the challenges of including young people in the research process so we are confident that they have influenced every aspect of study design, conduct and dissemination. Methods We chronicle a period of 10 years, over which we describe our approach and our methods to involving young people in PPIE activities in BRIGHTLIGHT. We describe the feasibility work, study set up, conduct and dissemination of our findings, and weave through our story of PPIE to illustrate its benefits. Through the narration of our experience we highlight significant points that both influenced and changed our direction of travel. We reflect on our experiences and offer some practical advice for those looking to do the same. Results In the 10 years since the BRIGHTLIGHT feasibility work began we have involved more than 1200 young people. Their contributions have been isolated and mapped over a 10-year period. We begin at an early step of identifying what research questions to prioritize, we then plot PPIE activities for one of these research priorities, place of care, which evolved into BRIGHTLIGHT. We document steps along the way to evidence the impact of this involvement. Conclusions Young people can make a valuable contribution to healthcare research given adequate support from the research team. Although some challenges exist, we propose that the benefits to young people, researchers and the study considerably outweigh these challenges and PPIE with young people should be integrated in all similar research studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel M. Taylor
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jeremy S. Whelan
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Faith Gibson
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH UK
- Centre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children’s Health, Illness and Disability (ORCHID), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sue Morgan
- Teenage Cancer Trust Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Lorna A. Fern
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|