Does eosinophilic COPD exacerbation have a better patient outcome than non-eosinophilic in the intensive care unit?

Impact of blood eosinophil count on clinical outcomes in hospitalized Syrian patients with COPD exacerbation

OBJECTIVE

In this multicenter retrospective study, we evaluated the prognostic role of blood eosinophil count on clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHODS

We included patients aged 20 to 90 years with a COPD diagnosis. Patients were divided into groups with blood eosinophil count ≤300 or >300 cells/μL and then further classified into 1-99, 100-300, or >300 cells/μL. We compared sociodemographic features and clinical outcomes between groups and identified risk factors associated with mortality in hospitalized patients with COPD and blood eosinophil count ≤300 cells/μL.

RESULTS

In total, 217 patients were included (82% men, average age 64.3±10.3 years). Patients with eosinophil counts ≤300 cells/μL had significantly longer hospital stays, more admissions to the intensive care unit (22.2% vs. 4.3%), and more frequent mechanical ventilation (21.6% vs. 4.3%) than those with eosinophil counts >300 cells/μL. Mortality only occurred in the group with ≤300 cells/μL; patients with COPD who had eosinophil counts >300 cells/μL had significantly better survival rates (17.0% vs. 0%).

CONCLUSION

High blood eosinophil counts at admission were associated with improved short-term outcomes. Our findings reveal the importance of considering eosinophil counts in clinical decision-making to manage hospitalized patients with COPD.

Predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for adverse outcomes in hospitalized patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A retrospective study

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) stands as one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. Acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) lead to rapid respiratory function decline and worsened disease status. Despite recent studies, the ability of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) to predict outcomes in patients with COPD remains controversial. We investigated the predictive value of NLR for adverse outcomes in hospitalized patients with AECOPD. A retrospective study was conducted at the Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Cho Ray Hospital (Vietnam) from November 2019 to November 2021. The study extracted data from patients diagnosed with AECOPD at discharge and met the inclusion criteria. NLR is calculated by dividing the number of neutrophils by the number of lymphocytes in the peripheral blood test. Adverse outcomes are defined as invasive mechanical ventilation, admission to intensive care unit, or in-hospital mortality. Multivariable regression analysis was conducted to identify variables predicting adverse outcomes. The cutoff, sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve, and receiver operating characteristic of NLR were determined for predicting adverse outcomes. Two hundred eighty-seven patients with AECOPD were included in the final analysis, with a mean age of 70.9, and males comprising 92.7%. The rate of adverse outcomes was 15.7%. Multivariable logistic regression identified reduced consciousness at admission (adjusted odds ratio = 0.08, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.02-0.38, P = .001) and high NLR (adjusted odds ratio = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.10-1.24, P < .001) as predictors of adverse outcomes. The receiver operating characteristic of NLR's predictive value yielded an area under the curve of 0.877 (95% CI: 0.83-0.93). An NLR cutoff of 11.0 predicted adverse outcomes with a sensitivity of 80.0%, specificity of 77.7%, and an odds ratio of 13.9 (95% CI: 6.3-30.7), P < .001. NLR is a simple, routine, and cost-effective tool for predicting adverse outcomes in hospitalized patients with AECOPD. Future studies should evaluate the kinetics of NLR in predicting treatment response in patients with AECOPD.

Mucus Plugs as Precursors to Exacerbation and Lung Function Decline in COPD Patients

BACKGROUND

Mucus plugs identified through chest computed tomography (CT) scans have emerged as potential prognostic factors in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This 5-year longitudinal study investigated their impact on exacerbations and FEV1 decline.

METHODS

COPD patients with baseline chest CT and spirometric assessments were categorized based on mucus plug presence. Propensity-score matching yielded balanced groups. Exacerbation rates, time to exacerbation events, hazard ratio (HR) for exacerbations, and annual rates of FEV1 decline were evaluated. Sensitivity analysis was performed with stratification according to mucus plug scores of 0, 1-2, and ≥3.

RESULTS

Among 623 eligible patients, the mucus plug group was 44.3%. Through 1:1 propensity-score matching, each group was comprised of 187 individuals with balanced covariates. The mucus plug group showed higher rates of moderate-to-severe (0.51/year vs. 0.58/year, P=0.035), severe exacerbations (0.21/year vs. 0.24/year, P=0.032), and non-eosinophilic exacerbations (0.45/year vs. 0.52/year, P=0.008). Mucus plugs were associated with increased hazard of moderate-to-severe (adjusted HR=1.502 [95% CI 1.116-2.020]), severe (adjusted HR=2.106 [95% CI, 1.429-3.103]), and non-eosinophilic exacerbations (adjusted HR=1.551 [95% CI, 1.132-2.125]). Annual FEV1 decline was accelerated in the mucus plug group (β-coefficient=-62 [95% CI, -120 to -5], P=0.035). Sensitivity analysis showed higher risk of exacerbations and accelerated FEV1 decline in mucus plug score ≥3 compared to score 0.

CONCLUSIONS

Mucus plugs are associated with increased risks of exacerbations, particularly non-eosinophilic, and accelerated FEV1 declines over 5 years. Our study identified the potential prognostic value of mucus plugs on future exacerbation risks and lung function decline trajectories.

Eosinophils and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) in hospitalized COVID-19 patients

BACKGROUND

The emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as a global health emergency necessitates continued investigation of the disease progression. This study investigated the relationship between eosinophilia and the severity of COVID-19 in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted on 73 COPD patients infected by COVID-19 in Afzalipour Hospital, Iran. Peripheral blood samples were collected for hematological parameter testing, including eosinophil percentage, using Giemsa staining. Eosinophilia was defined as≥ 2% and non-eosinophilia as< 2%. The severity of pulmonary involvement was determined based on chest CT severity score (CT-SS) (based on the degree of involvement of the lung lobes, 0%: 0 points, 1-25%: 1 point, 26-50%: 2 points, 51-75%: 3 points, and 76-100%: 4 points). The CT-SS was the sum of the scores of the five lobes (range 0-20).

RESULTS

The average age of patients was 67.90±13.71 years, and most were male (54.8%). Non-eosinophilic COPD patients were associated with more severe COVID-19 (P= 0.01) and lower oxygen saturation (P= 0.001). In addition, the study revealed a significant difference in the chest CT severity score (CT-SS) between non-eosinophilic (9.76±0.7) and eosinophilic COPD patients (6.26±0.63) (P< 0.001). Although non-eosinophilic COPD patients had a higher mortality rate, this difference was not statistically significant (P= 0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that reduced peripheral blood eosinophil levels in COPD patients with COVID-19 correlate with unfavorable outcomes. Understanding this association can help us identify high-risk COPD patients and take appropriate management strategies to improve their prognosis.

Meta-analysis of peripheral blood eosinophils in clinical testing of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients

Introduction

Meta-analysis was used to investigate the relationship between peripheral blood eosinophil (EOS) levels, clinical characteristics, and prognosis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)patients in previous literature.

Aim

To analyse the correlation between peripheral blood EOS levels and clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with COPD using meta-analysis.

Material and methods

In databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wan Fang Data, literature related to the clinical characteristics or prognosis of COPD patients with high-level EOS published before July 2023 was searched for meta-analysis.

Results

Through computer search and screening, 29 articles were ultimately included. The meta-analysis results showed that compared to conventional EOS levels, COPD patients with high EOS levels had a lower proportion of GOLD III-IV grade patients (OR = 00.78, 95% CI (0.68, 0.88), p < 0.001), lower CAT scores (OR = -1.01, 95% CI (-1.75, -0.28), p = 0.007), shorter hospital stay (OR = -1.33, 95% CI (-1.52, -1.14), p < 0.001), and lower mortality rate (OR = 0.53, 95% CI (0.42, 0.66), p < 0.001). The readmission rate was low (OR = 0.40, 95% CI (0.33, 0.48), p < 0.001), and there was no statistically significant difference in FEV1%pred (OR = -0.55, 95% CI (-1.33, 0.23), p = 0.17), higher FEV1/FVC values (OR = -0.45, 95% CI (-1.08, 0.18), p = 0.160), and mechanical ventilation usage rate (OR = 0.89, 95% CI (0.65, 1.21), p = 0.450) among COPD patients with different EOS levels.

Conclusions

The levels of peripheral blood EOS in COPD patients are related to lung function, respiratory symptoms, etc.; Moreover, COPD patients with high-level EOS have shorter hospital stays, lower mortality and readmission rates. Therefore, ESO can be used as an auxiliary indicator for clinical symptom diagnosis of COPD patients and as an auxiliary indicator for predicting prognosis.

The association between blood eosinophils and clinical outcome of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Studies have shown an association between eosinophilia and clinical outcomes in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). However, contradictory findings exist. Our study aims to systematically evaluate the association between elevated peripheral blood eosinophils and clinical outcome of patients with AECOPD.

METHODS

An electronic search was conducted for relevant studies published from database inception to February 28, 2023, on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The analysis covered studies on the correlation between EOS AECOPD and mortality, hospital stay duration, readmission and hospitalization rates, and invasive mechanical ventilation. Where applicable, relative risk (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) were extracted, pooled, and assessed using meta-analysis. Sensitivity analysis was performed to explore the source of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Fifteen high-quality studies including 14 cohort studies and one case-control study were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with non-eosinophilic AECOPD patients, those with eosinophilic AECOPD had a lower risk of mortality (RR = 0.65, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.54, 0.77, P < 0.001), shorter length of hospital stay (WMD = -1.56, 95%CI -2.16, -0.96, P < 0.001), and higher readmission rate (RR = 1.07, 95%CI 1.01,1.13, P = 0.029). No difference was found concerning the rate of hospitalization and invasive mechanical ventilation between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Individuals diagnosed with eosinophilic AECOPD had a reduced mortality rate, a truncated period of hospitalization, and an insubstantial increase in the probability of readmission relative to their non-eosinophilic AECOPD counterparts. The level of eosinophils in blood has been shown to serve as a potential predictive biomarker for AECOPD patients.

Association of Upon-Diagnosis Blood Eosinophilic Count with Frequency and Severity of Annual Exacerbation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Prospective Longitudinal Analysis

Introduction

There is a controversy regarding the relationship between blood eosinophil count and COPD exacerbation. We aimed to determine whether peripheral eosinophils upon COPD diagnosis could affect the frequency and severity of annual acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD).

Methods

This prospective study was conducted on 973 newly diagnosed COPD patients who were under 1-year follow-up in a pulmonology center in Iran. The Cox proportional model, polynomial regression, and receiver operator characteristic curves were conducted to evaluate the impact of the eosinophil levels on AECOPD. A linear regression model was conducted to evaluate the continuous association of eosinophilic count with AECOPDs.

Results

Patients with eosinophil >200 cells/microliter were higher pack-year smokers with more pulmonary hypertension prevalence compared to COPD patients with <200 cells/microliter. There was a positive correlation between the eosinophilic count and the frequency of AECOPDs. Eosinophil >900 cells/microliter and eosinophil >600 cells/microliter had a sensitivity of 71.1% and 64.3%, respectively, in predicting the occurrence of more than one AECOPD. Eosinophilic count cutoff of 800 cells/microliter had the highest Youden index with sensitivity and specificity of 80.2% and 76.6%, respectively, for incident AECOPD in newly diagnosed patients. Using a linear model, increasing 180 cells/microliter in serum eosinophils was associated with further exacerbation. Evaluating gender, BMI, smoking pack-year, FEV1/FVC, CAT score, GOLD score, pulmonary hypertension, annual influenza, pneumococcal vaccinations, leukocytosis, and blood eosinophils, only blood eosinophils (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.44; 95% confidence interval = 1.33-2.15; p value = 0.03) and GOLD score (HR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.30-1.52; p value = 0.03) were found as independent risk factors of AECOPD >3 episodes/year. Requirement for ICU admission, invasive ventilation, and mortality rate due to AECOPDs was similar between eosinophilic and noneosinophilic groups.

Conclusion

Eosinophilia upon COPD diagnosis is a factor of recurrent AECOPDs. To reduce the risk of AECOPDs and the burden of disease, clinicians may consider inhaler corticosteroids and domiciliary oxygen with a lower threshold for eosinophilic-COPD patients regardless of their clinical status.

Impact of Acute Exacerbation and Its Phenotypes on the Clinical Outcomes of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Hospitalized Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

Acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) are clinically significant events having therapeutic and prognostic consequences. However, there is a lot of variation in its clinical manifestations described by phenotypes. The phenotypes of AECOPD were categorized in this study based on pathology and exposure. In our cross-sectional study, conducted between 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2020, the patients were categorized into six groups based on pathology: non-bacterial and non-eosinophilic; bacterial; eosinophilic; bacterial infection with eosinophilia; pneumonia; and bronchiectasis. Further, four groups were classified based on exposure to tobacco smoke (TS), biomass smoke (BMS), both, or no exposure. Cox proportional-hazards regression analyses were performed to assess hazard ratios, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess survival, which was then compared using the log-rank test. The odds ratio (OR) and independent predictors of ward admission type and length of hospital stay were assessed using binomial logistic regression analyses. Of the 2236 subjects, 2194 were selected. The median age of the cohort was 67.0 (60.0 to 74.0) and 75.2% were males. Mortality rates were higher in females than in males (6.2% vs. 2.3%). AECOPD-B (bacterial infection) subjects [HR 95% CI 6.42 (3.06-13.46)], followed by AECOPD-P (pneumonia) subjects [HR (95% CI: 4.33 (2.01-9.30)], were at higher mortality risk and had a more extended hospital stay (6.0 (4.0 to 9.5) days; 6.0 (4.0 to 10.0). Subjects with TS and BMS-AECOPD [HR 95% CI 7.24 (1.53-34.29)], followed by BMS-AECOPD [HR 95% CI 5.28 (2.46-11.35)], had higher mortality risk. Different phenotypes have different impacts on AECOPD clinical outcomes. A better understanding of AECOPD phenotypes could contribute to developing an algorithm for the precise management of different phenotypes.

Practical parameters that can be used for nutritional assessment in patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit with the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Prognostic nutritional index, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte, platelet-to-lymphocyte, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio

Malnutrition is an important condition in patients diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). There is a need for practical and objective nutritional assessment methods in patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit with the diagnosis of COPD. In this study, it was aimed to determine the parameters that can practically evaluate the nutritional status of these patients. It was aimed to determine the relationship between prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and nutritional risk screening (NRS)-2002, nutrition risk in the critical ill (Nutric) Score and to determine a cut-off value for PNI, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and other complete blood count parameters.Hemogram values, albumin values, NLR, PLR, LMR, NRS-2002, PNI and modified Nutric Score calculations of the patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit due to COPD were recorded. The relationship between PNI and NRS-2002 and modified Nutric Score, as well as the relationship between NLR, PLR, LMR, hemogram parameters and PNI were analyzed using statistical methods.The PNI cut-off value for nutritional assessment in patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit due to COPD was determined as 38.5 (area under curve = 0.891, sensitivity 80.8%, specificity 88.1%, positive predictive value 92.9%, negative predictive value 88%). High-risk group according to PNI compared to low-risk group, lymphocyte count (P < .001), basophil count (P = .004), red blood cell (P < .001), hemoglobin (P < .001), hematocrit (P < .001), and LMR (P = .001) were statistically significantly lower, while NLR (P < .001) and PLR (P = .001) were statistically significantly higher. Cut-off values for lymphocyte count, basophil count, NLR, PLR, and LMR were found to be 1.18, 0.035, 7.97, 291.10, and 2.606, respectively.Nutritional risk assessment can be made in a practical way by using PNI in patients hospitalized in intensive care unit due to COPD. For this, the PNI cut-off value was determined as 38.5 in our study. In addition, NLR, PLR, LMR, basophil and lymphocyte values, which can be calculated using complete blood count parameters, may also be useful in the evaluation of nutritional status in these patients. In our study, the cut-off values determined for NLR, PLR, LMR, basophil and lymphocyte were 7.97, 291.10 and 2.606, 0.035 and 1.18, respectively. We think that the results we have obtained can provide preliminary information for future research.

What Are the Most Effective Factors in Determining Future Exacerbations, Morbidity Weight, and Mortality in Patients with COPD Attack?

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the important factors that affect COPD prognosis. Materials and Methods: We included 160 hospitalized patients with COPD exacerbation in the study. The hemoglobin (HB), hematocrit (HCT), leukocytes, red cell distribution width (RDW), mean platelet volume, platelet distribution width, plateletcrits, platelets, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, platelet/lymphocyte ratio, eosinophils, uric acid, albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, arterial blood gases (PO2 and PCO2), pulmonary function test (FEV1 and FVC), echocardiography (ejection fraction-EF), Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage, Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) and Borg scales, Charlson comorbidity index, body mass index (BMI), and the length of hospital stay were examined on the first day of hospitalization. Admission to the hospital with a new attack, hospitalization in the intensive care unit (ICU), and mortality during the six months after discharge were evaluated. Results: High CRP and procalcitonin levels were observed in the group with a long hospital stay. In the mortality group, the HB, HCT, BMI, and PO2 values were significantly lower than in the group without mortality, while the age and GOLD stage were higher. The age, Borg and mMRC scores, number of exacerbations experienced in the previous year, RDW, eosinophil count, and PCO2 were significantly higher in the ICU group than that without an ICU stay. The HCT and EF values were lower in the ICU group than that without an ICU stay. The FEV1 and FVC values were significantly lower in the follow-up attack group than those without a follow-up attack. The duration of COPD and the number of attacks that were experienced in the previous year were high. Conclusion: Scoring combining selected biomarkers and other factors is a strong determinant of the prognosis.

Long‐term oxygen treatment need is less frequent in eosinophilic COPD patients

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

The predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

There was inconsistent results regarding the associations of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with the progression and prognosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

AREAS COVERED

This paper assess the role of NLR on the progression and prognosis of COPD using a meta-analytic approach. PubMed, EmBase, and the Cochrane library were systematically searched. The pooled weighted mean differences and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were applied for continuous and categorical variables using the random-effects model.

EXPECT COMMENATRY

NLR was significantly high when comparing COPD patients to healthy individuals, and acute exacerbation COPD to stable COPD. Moreover, elevated NLR were significantly associated with higher risk of mortality and exacerbation.

Biomarkers as a Prognostic Factor in COPD Exacerbation: A Cohort Study

The acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) are one of the main causes of hospitalization and morbimortality in the adult population. There are not many tools available to predict the clinical course of these patients during exacerbations. Our goal was to estimate the clinical utility of C Reactive Protein (CRP), Mean Platelet Volume (MPV), eosinophil count and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as in-hospital prognostic factors in patients with AECOPD. A prospective cohort study was conducted in patients who consulted three reference hospitals in the city of Medellín for AECOPD and who required hospitalization between 2017 and 2020. A multivariate analysis was performed to estimate the effect of biomarkers in the two primary outcomes: the composite outcome of in-hospital death and/or admission to the ICU and hospital length-of-stay. A total of 610 patients with a median age of 74 years were included; 15% were admitted to the ICU and 3.9% died in the hospital. In the multivariate analysis adjusted for confounding variables, the only marker significantly associated with the risk of dying or being admitted to the ICU was the NLR > 5 (OR: 3; CI95%: 1.5; 6). Similarly, the NLR > 5 was also associated to a lower probability of being discharged alive from the institution (SHR: 0.73; CI95%: 0.57; 0.94) and, therefore, a longer hospital stay. It was found that a neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio greater than 5 is a strong predictor of mortality or ICU admissions and a longer hospital stay in patients hospitalized with AECOPD.

The role of eosinophils in sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Septic shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are characterized by a dysregulated immune host response that may respond to steroid therapy. Eosinophils contribute to type 2 inflammation that often responds to steroid therapy; their role in immune dysregulation and outcomes in sepsis and ARDS is unclear.

SOURCE

A systematic search of Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE was performed from inception to 9 September 2020. The search comprised the following terms: eosinophils, sepsis, septic shock, and ARDS. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and texts and extracted data on disease severity and clinical outcomes.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Thirty-nine studies were identified: 30 evaluated serum eosinophil count in sepsis, one evaluated eosinophil activity in sepsis, three assessed bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) eosinophil count in ARDS, four assessed eosinophil activity in ARDS, and one assessed peripheral eosinophil count in ARDS. Eleven studies showed an association between eosinopenia and sepsis, and eight studies found persistent eosinopenia at > 48 hr of intensive care unit admission to predict mortality and readmission in septic patients. Three studies found BAL eosinophil count to be low in ARDS, although one found that levels rose in late-phase ARDS. Three studies found eosinophil activity markers in BAL to be high in ARDS and correlate with ARDS severity.

CONCLUSION

Persistent peripheral eosinopenia is a marker of bacterial sepsis and is independently associated with poor outcomes. Bronchoalveolar lavage eosinophil counts are low in early-phase ARDS, but increase in late-phase ARDS, while elevated markers of eosinophil activity correlate with ARDS severity. Further studies understanding the mechanisms leading to eosinopenia in sepsis and increased eosinophil activity in ARDS are needed.

Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) as a Predictor of Outcomes during Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Systemic inflammation may be the common denominator between COPD and type 2 diabetes and may explain the correlation in both diseases' development and progress. The aim of this prospective observational study is to examine the prognostic value of glycated hemoglobin levels (HbA1c) and HbA1c-adjusted glycemic variables (glycemic gap, stress hyperglycemia ratio και modified stress hyperglycemia ratio) in an acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) as well as in COPD disease's morbidity and mortality during the following year. We evaluated patients hospitalized only for COPD exacerbations. Levels of HbA1c and HbA1c-adjusted glycemic variables were recorded upon admission. The study outcomes included duration of hospital stay, need for mechanical ventilation and exacerbation outcome. All subjects were followed up for one year. A total of 156 patients were included in the study (74.4% men, age [mean ± SD] 72 ± 7 years). Patients (21.8%) had type 2 diabetes and 67.9% of patients were receiving ICS treatment. The median value of HbA1c was 5.9 (IQR: 5.4, 6.5). Necessity for mechanical ventilation was significantly higher for patients with lower values of HbA1c [median: 5.3 (IQR 5.02, 6.3) vs. 5.9 (IQR 5.5, 6.5), p = .038]. However, duration of hospitalization, death during hospitalization as well as the number of new exacerbation events, time to next exacerbation and mortality during the following year did not differ significantly. Moreover, none of the HbA1c-adjusted glycemic variables examined, demonstrated any statistical significance. In conclusion neither the preceding nor the present glycemic state exhibit a predictive value regarding short- or long-term outcomes of an AECOPD.

Epidemiology and issues of NIV-treated AECOPD patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure in Shanghai: A multicentre retrospective survey

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the epidemiology, clinical features, treatment and outcome of Noninvasive ventilation (NIV)-treated acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) patients in secondary hospitals of Shanghai.

METHOD

Relying on Shanghai alliances for respiratory diseases, a retrospective observational study was performed in 34 secondary hospitals of Shanghai. The AECOPD patients treated with NIV and admitted to the respiratory department or respiratory intensive care unit were recruited between December 1, 2016, and November 30, 2017.

RESULTS

There were 555 patients finally recruited in this study. The age was 75.8 ± 9.6 years old and 380 patients (68.5%) were male. 70.5% of all patients had respiratory acidosis (pH <7.35). 55.3% of all patients received nebulised bronchodilator and 77.7% were treated with systemic or inhaled corticosteroids during hospitalisation. 525 patients (94.6%) recovered successfully and the mortality was 3.2%. The hospitalisation was 15.3 ± 6.7 days and hospital expenses were 22 911 ± 13 595 RMB. Inadequate and nonstandard drug treatments were the most important problems during management.

CONCLUSION

The NIV can be successfully used for AECOP patients in local hospitals of Shanghai, but accompanied by high costs and long hospital stays. However, the treatments for exacerbation and stable COPD patients are still insufficient.

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Clinical Outcome of Severe Acute Exacerbation of COPD in Frequent Exacerbators

Purpose

Frequent exacerbators are a specific phenotype of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), whose clinical characteristics and prognostic biomarkers during severe acute exacerbation (AECOPD) have not yet been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical features of severe AECOPD in frequent exacerbators and explore the predictive value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for outcome in this phenotype during severe exacerbation.

Patients and Methods

A total of 604 patients with severe AECOPD were retrospectively included in the study. Subjects were defined as frequent exacerbators if they experienced two or more exacerbations in the past year. Clinical characteristics and worse outcome (ICU admission, or invasive ventilation, or in-hospital mortality) during severe AECOPD were compared between frequent exacerbators and non-frequent ones. Furthermore, the relationship between NLR and worse outcome in frequent exacerbators was analyzed using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC).

Results

Among 604 patients with severe AECOPD, 282 (46.69%) were frequent exacerbators and 322 (53.31%) were non-frequent exacerbators. Compared with the non-frequent ones, frequent exacerbators presented higher levels of NLR (5.93 [IQR, 3.40–9.28] vs 4.41 [IQR, 2.74–6.80]; p<0.001), and more worse outcome incidence (58 [20.57%] vs 38 [11.80%]; p=0.003). Moreover, among the frequent exacerbators, NLR levels in the patients with worse outcome were much higher than in those without worse outcome (11.09 [IQR, 7.74–16.49] vs 5.28 [IQR, 2.93–7.93]; p<0.001). Increased NLR was significantly associated with a higher risk of worse outcome in frequent exacerbators (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.28–1.64; p<0.001). Furthermore, ROC analysis revealed that a cut-off value of 10.23, NLR could predict worse outcome of severe AECOPD in frequent exacerbators (sensitivity 62.1%, specificity 92.0%, AUC 0.833).

Conclusion

Frequent exacerbators exhibited an increased level of NLR and a higher proportion of worse outcome during severe AECOPD. NLR is expected to be a promising predictive biomarker for the prognosis of severe AECOPD in frequent exacerbators.

Association Between Blood Eosinophils and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

To explore the relationship between the blood eosinophil concentrations in the early stage and mortality in critically ill patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

METHODS

Patient data were extracted from the MIMIC-III V1.4 database. Only the acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with the first measurement time of blood eosinophil concentrations (%) between 24 hours before admission and 24 hours after admission was included. The logistic regression model was used to analyze the association between eosinophil and outcomes.

RESULTS

1019 patients were included in the study. Two multivariate regression models were built. The adjusted odds ratio of in-hospital mortality, in-ICU mortality, hospital length of stay and ICU length of stay for initial blood eosinophil concentrations in model 1 (adjusted for SAPS Ⅱ, cardiac arrhythmias, solid tumor, metastatic cancer, liver disease, neutrophils) were 0.792 (95% CI: 0.643-0.976, p=0.028), 0.812 (95% CI: 0.645-1.022, p=0.076), 0.847 (95% CI: 0.772-0.930, p=0.001) and 0.914 (95% CI: 0.836-1.000, p=0.049) respectively. Meanwhile, in model 2 (adjusted for SOFA score, age, cardiac arrhythmias, solid tumor, metastatic cancer, liver disease, neutrophils) ORs were 0.785 (95% CI: 0.636-0.968, p=0.024), 0.807 (95% CI: 0.641-1.016, p=0.068), 0.854 (95% CI: 0.778-0.939, p=0.001) and 0.917 (95% CI: 0.838-1.004, p=0.060) respectively. The area under the ROC curve for eosinophil initial was 0.608 (95% CI: 0.559-0.657). The discriminatory eosinophil thresholds were 0.35% (sensitivity=0.59, specificity=0.61) for in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSION

Increased blood eosinophils were associated with decreased in-hospital mortality and shorten hospital length of stay in critically ill patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A discriminatory eosinophil threshold of 0.35% for mortality was found, but further studies were needed to verify it.

The lower the eosinophils, the stronger the inflammatory response? The relationship of different levels of eosinophils with the degree of inflammation in acute exacerbation chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD)

Background

Blood eosinophil levels are a known marker for the effects of therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to clarify the cutoff values for blood eosinophils (EOS) to predict exacerbation risk and prognosis of acute exacerbation COPD (AECOPD) and investigate their correlation using inflammatory indicators and clinical characteristics.

Methods

In this observational study of 174 patients with AECOPD, we assessed the relationship between EOS and COPD. According to the percentage of blood EOS, patients were grouped into two groups (Group 1: EOS <2%, n=98; Group 2: EOS ≥2%, n=76), and Group 2 was further divided into Group A (2%≤ EOS <4%) and Group B (EOS ≥4%) based on a cutoff value of 4%. Patients received standardized treatment after collection of peripheral blood specimen. Associations of EOS with laboratory indicators before any treatment in hospital and with clinical data were compared.

Results

Patients in Group 1 showed significantly severe inflammation, worse pulmonary function, longer length of stay (LOS) (P<0.001), higher mMRC score (P<0.05), higher CAT score (P<0.05), higher rates of mortality (P<0.05), and greater noninvasive mechanical ventilation usage (P<0.05) compared with Group 2. Intriguingly, the CRP, total mMRC and CAT scores of patients in Group A were significantly lower than those in Group B (P<0.001; P<0.01; P<0.05, respectively). Pearson correlation analysis showed that a low percentage blood eosinophil level was negatively associated with higher WBC count (r=–0.155, P<0.05), NLR (r=–0.227, P<0.01) and CRP (r=–0.308, P<0.01).

Conclusions

Different cutoff values for percentage blood EOS might be useful biomarkers for predicting the severity of exacerbation and prognosis of inpatients with AECOPD.

Evaluation of the relationship of neutrophil-to lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio with in-hospital mortality in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

INTRODUCTION

Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) has the highest mortality rate and medical costs. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR) ratio are inflammatory markers that have been recently linked to the AECOPD severity and patient outcome.

OBJECTIVE

Therefore, the present study aimed at evaluating the diagnostic value of NLR and PLR in the prognosis of the in-hospital mortality in AECOPD patients.

METHODS

The present retrospective study was performed on 829 AECOPD patients. Age, gender and laboratory results of CBC tests including lymphocyte count, neutrophil count, platelet count, hemoglobin count, white blood cell count (WBC), eosinophil cell count, NLR, PLR and CRP as well as the mortality data were collected from the patients' records and subsequently recorded.

RESULTS

The results of the present study revealed that NLR with the cut-off value of 6.90, sensitivity of 60.87%, and specificity of 73.29% had a significant diagnostic value in the prognosis of in-hospital mortality in AECOPD patients (P < 0.05). A similar significant finding regarding the diagnostic value in the prognosis of in-hospital mortality in AECOPD patients was obtained for CRP with the cut-off value of 30, sensitivity of 73.08%, and specificity of 60.26% (P < 0.05). However, the diagnostic value of PLR in the prognosis of in-hospital mortality in AECOPD patients was found to be insignificant (P = 0.18).

CONCLUSION

According to the results of the present study, NLR > 6.90 can be considered as a valuable and accurate marker in the prognosis of in-hospital mortality in AECOPD patients.

Effectiveness of Steroid Therapy on Pneumonic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose

To date, no consensus exists on the effects of systemic steroid use on pneumonic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation owing to trial design issues in previous trials involving these conditions. This multicenter study aimed to evaluate more precisely the effectiveness of the use of systemic steroids in treating pneumonic COPD exacerbation in a larger sample by adjusting for confounding factors.

Patients and Methods

This multicenter, retrospective, observational study was conducted across five acute general hospitals in Japan. We analyzed the association between parenteral/oral steroid therapy and time to clinical stability in pneumonic COPD exacerbation. We used a validated algorithm derived from the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10) to include patients with pneumonic COPD exacerbation. We excluded patients with other hypoxia causes (asthma exacerbation, pneumothorax, heart failure) and complicated pneumonia (obstructive pneumonia, empyema), those who required tracheal intubation/vasopressors, and those who were clinically stable on day of admission. The primary outcome was the time to clinical stability. Multiple imputation was used for missing data. Propensity scores within each imputed dataset were calculated using potential confounding factors. The Fine and Gray model was used within each dataset to account for the competing risk of death and hospital discharge without clinical stability, and we combined the results.

Results

Altogether, 1237 patients were included. Systemic steroid therapy was administered to 658 patients (53%). The pooled estimated subdistribution hazard ratio of time to clinical stability in steroid vs non-steroid users was 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 1.0).

Conclusion

This study revealed that systemic steroid therapy may not improve the time to clinical stability in patients with pneumonic COPD exacerbation of mild to moderate severity. Further randomized controlled trials including more severe patients will be needed to evaluate the effectiveness of systemic steroid therapy accurately.

Low serum lymphocyte level is associated with poor exercise capacity and quality of life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of serum lymphocyte level with several clinical parameters in COPD. The study population included 451 COPD patients from the Korean Obstructive Lung Disease cohort study. Serum lymphocyte level was measured every year along with various clinical parameters, such as lung function, 6-min walking (6 MW) distance, quality of life using COPD assessment test (CAT) and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores, exacerbations, and survival. Serum lymphocyte level less than 20% was considered as a low lymphocyte level. Normal lymphocyte and low lymphocyte groups comprised of 409 (90.7%) and 42 (9.3%) patients, respectively. Clustered analysis showed that patients in low lymphocyte group had a lower post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s % predicted (estimated mean =  - 5.70%; P = 0.001), a lower forced vital capacity % predicted (estimated mean =  - 5.63%; P = 0.005), a shorter 6 MW distance (estimated mean =  - 41.31 m; P < 0.001), a higher CAT score (estimated mean = 2.62; P = 0.013), and a higher SGRQ score (estimated mean = 10.10; P < 0.001). Serum lymphocyte level was not associated with frequent acute exacerbations nor mortality. Low serum lymphocyte group showed poorer pulmonary function, lower 6 MW distance, and worse quality of life. Serum lymphocyte levels could be a simple and widely available predictive marker for variable clinical outcomes in COPD patients.

Role of peripheral eosinophilia in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Eosinophil counts are a promising guide to systemic steroid administration for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

AIM

To study the role of peripheral eosinophilia in hospitalized patients with acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD).

METHODS

From January 2014 to May 2017, patients with AECOPD hospitalized in Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital were retrospectively stratified into two groups according to their peripheral eosinophil count: The EOS group (eosinophil count ≥ 2%) and the non-EOS group (eosinophil count < 2%). Demographics, comorbidities, laboratory data, steroid use, length of hospital stay, and COPD-related readmissions were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 625 patients were recruited, with 176 patients (28.2%) in the EOS group. The EOS group showed a lower prevalence of infection, lower cumulative doses of prednisolone equivalents, shorter length of hospital stay, and higher number of COPD-related readmissions than the non-EOS group. There were significantly linear correlations between eosinophil percentage and number of readmissions and between eosinophil percentage and length of hospital stay (P < 0.001, Pearson's r = 0.147; P = 0.031, Pearson's r = -0.086, respectively). The EOS group and a lower percent-predicted value of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were associated with shorter time to first COPD-related readmission [adjusted hazard ratio (adj. HR) = 1.488, P < 0.001; adj. HR = 0.985, P < 0.001, respectively].

CONCLUSION

The study findings suggest that the EOS group had the features of a shorter length of hospital stay, and lower doses of systemic steroids, but more frequent readmissions. The EOS group and lower percent-predicted FEV1 values were risk factors for shorter time to first COPD-related readmission.

Clinical value of IL-13 and ECP in the serum and sputum of eosinophilic AECOPD patients

IMPACT STATEMENT

Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is an inevitable trend in the development of the disease and eosinophils (EOS) participate in inflammation process. It is important to explore some relatively simple biomarkers in AECOPD which are useful to recognize the disease. In the present study, 108 hospitalized patients with AECOPD were collected and the levels of IL-13 and ECP in the serum and sputum were measured. The levels of IL-13 and ECP in sputum in the eosinophilic group were higher than those in the noneosinophilic group. Moreover, the noneosinophilic group had a higher rate of rehospitalization due to acute exacerbation during the one-year follow-up. The results show that eosinophils in peripheral blood are a simple, convenient, and inexpensive index for assessing the condition and prognosis of AECOPD patients. IL-13 and ECP are involved in the pathogenesis of eosinophilic AECOPD and may be the new targeted anti-inflammatory therapies.

Blood Eosinophilia and Its Stability in Hospitalized COPD Exacerbations are Associated with Lower Risk of All-Cause Mortality

Purpose

Peripheral blood eosinophilic counts are susceptible to many factors and have variability over time. There are limited studies on association of blood eosinophilia with long-term mortality of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients and these results remain controversial. Our aims were to explore the association of blood eosinophilia at index hospitalization and stability of blood eosinophilia stability over 5 years with all-cause mortality of patients hospitalized for acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD).

Patients and Methods

Eight hundred twenty-nine patients hospitalized for AECOPD between 2013 and 2014 were included in this study and grouped into two groups according to blood eosinophil with 150 cells/μL used as the cutoff value to form eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic groups. Two hundred forty-one COPD inpatients with at least three blood eosinophils measured from different hospitalizations were used for analysis of longitudinally eosinophilic stability and divided into three groups according to the same cutoff value: predominantly (PE), intermittently (IE) and rarely (RE) eosinophilic groups. Cox regression analysis was used to determine the association of blood eosinophilia and all-cause mortality.

Results

In patients hospitalized for AECOPD, 261 (31.5%) at baseline and 41 (17%) based on at least three measurements of blood eosinophils had increased blood eosinophils. For all-cause mortality, eosinophilic COPD patients at index hospitalization had a lower all-cause mortality compared with non-eosinophilic COPD patients (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.6–0.99, P=0.04). In patients readmitted for AECOPD by longitudinal eosinophil stability, with the RE group used as reference, the PE group was associated with a lower all-cause mortality of AECOPD patients (hazard ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.22–0.85, P=0.016), compared to the IE group (hazard ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.47–1.11, P=0.133).

Conclusion

Patients with increased eosinophils (using eosinophil 150 cells/μL as a cutoff value), especially predominantly increased eosinophil levels based on multiple measurements, had a lower risk of all-cause mortality. Blood eosinophilia can be used as a biomarker in hospitalized COPD exacerbations for predicting the risk of all-cause mortality.

Point your SmartPhone at the code above. If you have a QR code reader the video abstract will appear. Or use:

https://youtu.be/RroTKw3Hisg

Elevated blood eosinophils in acute COPD exacerbations: better short- and long-term prognosis

Background: Elevated eosinophils in COPD is recognized as a potential risk factor for exacerbations, but the prognostic role of elevated eosinophils during exacerbations of COPD is unclear. We investigated short-term and long-term outcomes in patients with exacerbations of eosinophilic phenotype, compared with patients with low blood eosinophils. Methods: A single-centre retrospective study of all patients admitted for a COPD exacerbation to Bispebjerg University Hospital in 2010-2011 was established by linking inpatient data with national patient and prescription registries, with a three-year follow-up period. Elevated eosinophils were defined as a blood eosinophil level at admission of ≥0.30 × 10⁹ cells/L. Results: A total of 811 patients were included; 13.2% had an eosinophilic exacerbation. The eosinophilic group had less need for non-invasive ventilation, shorter inpatient stay, and lower in-hospital mortality, compared to the non-eosinophilic group. However, the eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic groups showed similar risks of readmission (incidence rate ratio[95], 0.99 [0.73-1.36]). Three-year mortality was high in both groups, although lower in the eosinophilic group (40% vs. 54%, p = 0.006). Conclusions: COPD exacerbations in patients with high blood eosinophil have a better short-term prognosis without higher risk of subsequent exacerbation. Eosinophilic exacerbations have also a lower three-year mortality.

Association Between Routine Blood Biomarkers and Clinical Phenotypes and Exacerbations in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with increased lung and systemic inflammation. We aimed to identify associations between easy-to-obtain blood biomarkers and the frequency and severity of exacerbations.

Methods

Cross-sectional, multicentre study performed in four centres in Spain, Italy, Bulgaria, and Slovenia. Blood samples were obtained for blood cell count, C-reactive protein (CRP), alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) and fibrinogen analysis. The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and eosinophil/basophil ratio (EBR) were calculated. Firstly, patients were divided into clinical phenotypes according to the Spanish guidelines of COPD, and secondly, patients were classified into 2 groups: non-exacerbators (≤1 ambulatory exacerbation in the previous year) and exacerbators (≥2 ambulatory exacerbations or 1 hospitalisation in the previous year). A multivariate stepwise logistic regression model was performed to identify laboratory parameters associated with exacerbators.

Results

A total of 355 patients with a mean age 66 years (SD=8.9) were included, and 64% were male. The mean FEV1% (forced expiratory volume in the first second) was 55% (SD=20%), and the mean COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score was 15.6 (SD=7.9). One hundred ninety-six (55.2%) patients were classified in the non-exacerbator group, and 159 (44.8%) were exacerbators. Patients in the exacerbators group presented lower haemoglobin levels (p=0.019) and ERB (p= 0.023) but higher CRP levels (p=0.001). In the multivariate analysis, females, higher levels of CRP, lower FEV1% and low EBR were independently related to exacerbators.

Conclusion

Female sex, having a more severe impairment of lung function, higher CRP levels and a lower EBR are associated with an exacerbator phenotype in COPD.

Peripheral Blood Eosinophil as a Biomarker in Outcomes of Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Purpose

Mounting evidence suggests that eosinophil levels correlate with the effects of therapy and phenotype for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to clarify the relationship between eosinophil levels and clinical outcomes in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD).

Methods

A prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study was performed in three teaching hospitals. Patients were grouped by quartile percentage (0, 0.7, 2.55) and absolute blood eosinophils count (0, 0.05×10⁹/L, 0.17×10⁹/L) and divided into four numbered groups ranked from low to high.

Results

The study included 493 AECOPD patients. In the percentile-ranked groups, patients in Group 1 experienced significantly longer hospital stays, higher rates of both noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV), and heart failure than those in Group 4 (12 days vs 10 days, p = 0.005; 29.5% vs 23.6%, p = 0.007; 48.4% vs 28.5%, p = 0.001). Group 1 also had higher frequencies of respiratory failure and pulmonary heart disease compared to Groups 3 and 4 (54.8% vs 34.8%, p = 0.002; 54.8% vs 35%, p = 0.003). In the absolute count-ranked groups, patients in Group 1 had significantly higher rates of NIMV than those in Group 3 (41.1% vs 21.7%, p = 0.001), had higher rates of heart failure, respiratory failure, and pulmonary heart disease than those in Group 3 and 4 (48.1% vs 30.2%, p = 0.003; 48.1% vs 30.4%, p = 0.005; 50.8% vs 32.2%, p = 0.004; 50.8% vs 34.1%, p = 0.008; 51.9% vs 34.1%, p = 0.004; 51.9% vs 33%, p = 0.003). There were outcome differences among the admitting hospital of stays in the absolute count groups (p = 0.002), but the differences were not significant in a pairwise comparison. The proportion of ICU admissions and mortality was different in two cohorts with no difference in a pairwise comparison.

Conclusion

Patients with lower eosinophil counts experienced poorer clinical outcomes. Eosinophil levels may be a helpful marker to predict outcomes in AECOPD.

Prevalence and Baseline Clinical Characteristics of Eosinophilic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disease with different clinical and pathophysiological characteristics. Cumulative evidence shows that eosinophil levels may be connected to the therapeutic effects and phenotype of COPD. However, the prevalence of eosinophilic inflammation in COPD and the baseline characteristics of eosinophilic COPD remain unknown. Our study investigated the prevalence of COPD with eosinophil levels of >2% and the characteristics of eosinophilic COPD. Methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Library, Medline, Embase, and the Web of Science for trials of eosinophil and COPD published from database inception to May 1, 2019. Results: In total, 40,112 COPD patients that were involved in 19 trials were included in the final analysis. The prevalence of eosinophilic COPD ranged from 18.84 to 66.88%, with an average prevalence of 54.95% across all studies. We found that men, ex-smokers, individuals with a history of ischemic heart disease, and individuals with a higher body mass index (BMI) were at higher risk of eosinophilic COPD (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.26-1.46, P < 0.00001; OR 1.23, 1.12-1.34, P < 0.0001; OR 1.31, 1.14-1.50, P = 0.001; MD 0.70, 0.27-1.12, P = 0.001). There was, however, a lower proportion of GOLD stage I patients among those with eosinophilic COPD (OR 0.84, 0.73-0.96, P = 0.01). No significant differences were found in terms of age, current smoker status, pack-years smoked, percent of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s, hypertension, diabetes, or other GOLD stages between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Our analysis suggests that eosinophilic inflammation is prevalent in COPD. Eosinophilic COPD was more likely to occur in men, ex-smokers, those with a higher BMI, and those with a high risk of some comorbidity; however, a lower proportion of patients with eosinophilic COPD experienced mild airflow limitations.

[Study of the role of blood eosinophil count in patients with severe acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease hospitalized in a Tunisian Center]

INTRODUCTION

There is a controversy over the relationship between blood eosinophil count (BEC) and the severity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. The purpose of our study was to determine the relationship between blood eosinophil count and multiple parameters in assessing the severity of serious acute exacerbation (AE) of obstructive pulmonary disease.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective monocentric study of hospitalized patients with obstructive pulmonary disease treated between 2005 and 2015. We compared 2 groups of patients: G1(BEC+): BEC ≥ 200 cell/μl (103 cases, 20.4%), G2(BEC-): BEC < 200 cell/μl (403 patients: 79.6%).

RESULTS

A total of 506 subjects with obstructive pulmonary disease were included in the study. No significant difference between the two groups in age, gender, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and the number of AE/year (BEC+: 2.6, BEC-:2.5 AE/year; p = 0.48) was found. The analysis of the parameters of severity of serious AE showed no difference between the two groups in partial pressure of oxygen PaO2 measured on admission (60.5, 59.2 mmHg; p = 0.26), capnia (p=0.57), pH (p=0.74), C-reactive protein rate (mg/L) (82.7, 81; p = 0.89), leukocytosis (p = 0.36), non-invasive mechanical ventilation (5.8%, 6.5%; p = 0.81), invasive mechanical ventilation (p = 0.5),length of stay in hospital (9.7, 9 days; p = 0.21), mean time to next AECOPD (p = 0.32). Survival at 1 year was comparable between the two groups (94% vs 96%; Log Rank: 0.708).

CONCLUSION

Increased BEC in patients with COPD does not appear to have a negative effect on patients with severe AE. Despite the recent guidelines recommend to consider blood eosinophil count while making treatment decisions, the role and the prognostic interest of blood eosinophil count in patients with COPD could be population-dependent.

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of treatment response and mortality in septic shock patients in the intensive care unit

Background/aim

While C-reactive protein (CRP) is a well-studied marker for predicting treatment response and mortality in sepsis, it was aimed to assess the efficacy of the neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a predictor of mortality and treatment response in sepsis patients in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Materials and methods

In this retrospective cross-sectional study, sepsis patients were divided according to the presence of septic shock on the 1st day of ICU stay, and then subgrouped according to mortality. Patient demographics, acute physiologic and chronic health evaluation II and sequential organ failure assessment scores, NLR and CRP (on the 1st, 3rd, and last day in the ICU), microbiology data, antibiotic responses, ICU data, and mortality were recorded. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the area under curve (AUC) were calculated for the inflammatory markers and ICU severity scores for mortality.

Results

Of the 591 (65% male) enrolled patients, 111 (18.8%) were nonsurvivors with shock, 117 (19.8%) were survivors with shock, 330 (55.8%) were survivors without shock, and 33 (5.6%) were nonsurvivors without shock. On the 1st day of ICU stay, the NLR and CRP were similar in all of the groups. On the 3rd day of antibiotic response, the NLR was increased (11.8) in the nonresponsive patients when compared with the partially responsive (11.0) and responsive (8.5) patients. If the NLR was ≥15 on the 3rd day, the mortality odds ratio was 6.96 (CI: 1.4–34.1, P < 0.017). The NLR and CRP on the 1st, 3rd, and last day of ICU stay (0.52, 0.58, 0.78 and 0.56, 0.70, 0.78, respectively) showed a similar increasing trend for mortality.

Conclusion

The NLR can predict mortality and antibiotic responsiveness in ICU patients with sepsis and septic shock. If the NLR is >15 on the 3rd day of postantibiotic initiation, the risk of mortality is high and treatment should be reviewed carefully.

[Eosinophilic inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disease that combines various clinical manifestations and pathophysiological mechanisms. It underlies the separation of patients with COPD by phenotypes, endotypes and a personalized therapy of this disease. The implementation of this approach is possible only with the use of appropriate biomarkers. One of the most important biomarkers of COPD is eosinophilia of blood and/or sputum, which is considered as a predictor of frequent exacerbations and the effectiveness of inhaled glucocorticosteroids in patients with COPD. The literature discusses the impact of eosinophilic inflammation on the prognosis, clinical and functional parameters in COPD, and the role of the targeted therapy in the treatment of eosinophilic COPD.

Predictive Value of Novel Inflammation-Based Biomarkers for Pulmonary Hypertension in the Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Recently, there has been an increasing interest in the potential clinical use of several inflammatory indexes, namely, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic-immune-inflammation index (SII). This study aimed at assessing whether these markers could be early indicators of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). A total of 185 patients were enrolled in our retrospective study from January 2017 to January 2019. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the clinical significance of these biomarkers to predict PH in patients with AECOPD. According to the diagnostic criterion for PH by Doppler echocardiography, the patients were stratified into two groups. The study group consisted of 101 patients complicated with PH, and the control group had 84 patients. The NLR, PLR, and SII values of the PH group were significantly higher than those of the AECOPD one (p < 0.05). The blood biomarker levels were positively correlated with NT-proBNP levels, while they had no significant correlation with the estimated pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP) other than PLR. NLR, PLR, and SII values were all associated with PH (p < 0.05) in the univariate analysis, but not in the multivariate analysis. The AUC of NLR used for predicting PH was 0.701 and was higher than PLR and SII. Using 4.659 as the cut-off value of NLR, the sensitivity was 81.2%, and the specificity was 59.5%. In conclusion, these simple markers may be useful in the prediction of PH in patients with AECOPD.

Blood eosinophils could be useful as a biomarker in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations

Introduction The aim of analysing the usefulness of the blood eosinophil count (BEC) as a prognostic marker in exacerbations of patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), evaluating its relationship with hospital mortality, the length of stay and the early and late re-admissions. Materials and Methods We have carried out a retrospective study including all patients who required hospital admission from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2009, with a diagnosis on hospital discharge of COPD exacerbation. These patients were classified using three cut-off points of BEC: less than 200 vs ≥ 200/µL, less than 300 vs ≥ 300/µL and less than 400 vs ≥ 400/µL. Results There were a total of 1626 hospital admissions during the study period with the diagnosis of exacerbation of COPD. In this study we have included 358 patients. The probability of any late re-admission increased with a BEC ≥ 300/µL (odds ratio: 1.684) and for those with a BEC ≥ 400/µL (odds ratio: 2.068). The BEC does not appear to be related to hospital mortality or the probability of early re-admission after an exacerbation of COPD. Conclusions In our study an elevated BEC is associated with a higher incidence of late hospital readmissions in COPD exacerbations.

Independent factors associate with hospital mortality in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease requiring intensive care unit admission: Focusing on the eosinophil-to-neutrophil ratio

Background

Factors associated with hospital mortality are unclear in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission. We aimed to characterize these patients and identify factors associated with hospital mortality.

Patients and methods

We used a retrospective observational case-control design and recruited patients between January 2015 and March 2017. Of 146 patients enrolled, 24 (16.4%) died during their hospital stay, while 122 survived.

Results

Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed factors associated with hospital mortality: age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.12, 95% CI: 1.03–1.23), C-reactive protein (CRP) level >7.5 mg/dL at the emergency room (AOR 4.52, 95% CI: 1.27–16.04), peak eosinophil-to-neutrophil ratio (ENR)×10² on days 8–14 of treatment (AOR 0.22, 95% CI: 0.08–0.63), and in-hospital complications (AOR 4.23, 95% CI: 1.12–15.98) (all P<0.05). After receiver operating characteristic curve analyses, cutoff level for peak ENR×10² was 0.224. To examine the synergistic effects of CRP level and peak ENR, we divided patients into four groups: (G0, reference group) Peak ENR×10² >0.224 on days 8–14 and initial CRP <7.5 mg/dL; (G1) Peak ENR×10² >0.224 on days 8–14 and initial CRP >7.5 mg/dL; (G2) Peak ENR×10² <0.224 on days 8–14 and initial CRP <7.5 mg/dL; and (G3) Peak ENR×10² <0.224 on days 8–14 and initial CRP >7.5 mg/dL. For G2 and G3 patients, the AOR of mortality was significantly different from that of the reference group (G2: AOR 10.00, P = 0.020; G3: AOR 61.79, P<0.001). The relationship between 28-day mortality and the four groups was statistically significant (log-rank test, P<0.001).

Conclusion

Older age, initial CRP >7.5 mg/dL, peak ENR on days 8–14, and in-hospital complications were associated with hospital mortality in patients with AECOPD requiring ICU admission. Patients with both biomarkers, initial CRP >7.5 mg/dL, and peak ENR×10² <0.224 on days 8–14 of treatment, had an increased risk of hospital mortality.

The prognostic values of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio for outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

OBJECTIVE

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is considered as an inflammatory biomarker for clinical outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic values of NLR for the exacerbation and mortality in patients with COPD.

METHODS

We searched the database of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, and PubMed, before September 2017. The eligible studies were retrieved by 2 authors independently following the criteria. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) of included studies were used to evaluate the prognostic values of NLR. Subgroup analyses were conducted to make the results more accurate.

RESULTS

Nine studies with 5140 patients were enrolled in this analysis. The high NLR was associated with higher risk of exacerbation (OR: 3.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20-12.13, P = .02) and mortality (OR: 2.60, 95% CI: 1.48-4.57, P < .01). By subgroup analysis, high NLR could predict the mortality in patients >70 years (OR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.17-3.98, P = .01) but not in patients <70 years (OR: 4.08, 95% CI: 0.91-18.24, P = .07), and had a higher predictive ability in Asian group (OR: 3.64, 95% CI: 1.87-7.08, P < .01) than Eurasia group (OR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.43-2.32, P < .01). In addition, high NLR could predict the short-term mortality (OR: 2.70, 95% CI: 1.10-6.63, P = .03) and the long-term mortality (OR: 2.61, 95% CI: 1.20-5.65, P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

The NLR may be an independent predictor for incidence of exacerbation in patients with COPD. In addition, high NLR may be associated with higher mortality in patients with COPD, especially for Asian and the patients with higher mean NLR.

The effect of peripheral blood eosinophilia on inflammatory markers in asthmatic patients with lower respiratory tract infections

Background

To investigate the behaviour of the inflammatory marker neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in the presence of peripheral blood eosinophilia (PBE) in paediatric asthma patients with lower respiratory tract (LRT) infections.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled consecutive patients aged ≥5 years who were diagnosed with asthma and whose haemogram values were available. The patients were further subdivided based on the presence or absence of LRT infections and allergies. NLR and C-reactive protein (CRP) were evaluated in relation to the presence or absence of PBE (≥4% eosinophils).

Results

A total of 991 patients were enrolled in the study. Patients with LRT infections had significantly higher leucocyte and neutrophil counts, a greater NLR and a higher level of CRP compared with patients without LRT infections. Overall, patients with PBE had significantly lower NLRs and CRP regardless of the presence or absence of an LRT infection. The PBE percentage showed moderate inverse correlations with NLR (r = −0.34) and CRP (r = −0.20).

Conclusion

The presence of PBE was significantly associated with lower NLR and CRP regardless of the presence or absence of an infectious condition.

Greater eosinophil counts at first COPD hospitalization are associated with more readmissions and fewer deaths

Purpose

The impacts of high blood eosinophil count (HBEC) at admission for COPD exacerbation on posthospitalization outcomes are still unclear. Previous studies have focused on its associations with first readmission rates; yet, its impacts on longitudinal outcomes such as subsequent readmissions still have to be explored. The main objective of this study is to investigate outcomes associated with HBEC following a first hospitalization for COPD exacerbation.

Patients and methods

This is an observational cohort study design. We retrospectively analyzed data of patients with a first hospitalization within 5 years for COPD exacerbation between April 2006 and March 2013. Patients were stratified into the HBEC group if the blood eosinophil count at admission was ≥200 cells/µL and/or ≥2% of the total white blood cells. With information on exact dates of subsequent hospitalizations and death, we modeled readmissions and death as states in a multi-state Markov model and estimated transition probabilities to the next states. Sensitivity analyses were performed by varying thresholds for the definition of HBEC (≥300 cells/µL and/or ≥3%).

Results

A total of 479 patients were included, of which 173 had HBEC. The transition probabilities for a first readmission was 74% (95% CI, 66%–83%) for patients with HBEC vs 70% (95% CI, 63%–77%) for patients with normal blood eosinophil count (NBEC). The transition probabilities for a second readmission were 91% (95% CI, 84%–100%) for HBEC patients in contrast with 83% (95% CI, 74%–92%) for NBEC patients. Meanwhile, transition probability for death was lower in patients with HBEC. The differences enlarged in sensitivity analyses with higher cutoff.

Conclusion

Greater blood eosinophil cell counts during a first hospitalization for COPD predict increased susceptibility to up to two readmissions. These patients may however have a lower risk of death.

Defining the role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in COPD: a systematic literature review

COPD is characterized by a pulmonary and systemic inflammatory process. Several authors have reported the elevation of multiple inflammatory markers in patients with COPD; however, their use in routine clinical practice has limitations. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a useful and cost-effective inflammatory marker derived from routine complete blood count. We performed a systematic literature review using the PRISMA statement. Twenty-two articles were included, recruiting 7,601 COPD patients and 784 healthy controls. Compared with controls, COPD patients had significantly higher NLR values. We found a significant correlation between the NLR and clinical/functional parameters (FEV₁, mMRC, and BODE index) in COPD patients. Elevation of the NLR is associated with the diagnosis of acute exacerbation of COPD (pooled data propose a cut-off value of 3.34 with a median sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of 80%, 86%, and 0.86, respectively). Additionally, increased NLR is also associated with the diagnosis of a bacterial infection in exacerbated patients, with a cut-off value of 7.30, although with a low sensitivity and specificity. The NLR is an independent predictor of in-hospital and late mortality after exacerbation. In conclusion, the NLR could be a useful marker in COPD patients; however, further studies are needed to better identify the clinical value of the NLR.

Eosinophil counts in first COPD hospitalizations: a comparison of health service utilization

Purpose

Current evidence suggests that a higher blood eosinophil cell count at admission for acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) is associated with a favorable response to systemic steroids. However, the impact of blood eosinophil counts at admission on post-hospitalization outcomes is still unclear. The main objective of this study is to investigate readmission outcomes associated with blood eosinophilia following severe COPD exacerbation in patients with infrequent COPD hospitalizations.

Patients and methods

This is an observational cohort study design. We retrospectively analyzed data of patients with a first hospitalization within 5 years for COPD exacerbation between April 2006 and March 2013. Patients were stratified into the eosinophilic group if the blood eosinophil count on admission was ≥200 cells/µL and/or ≥2% of the total white blood cell (WBC) count. The primary outcome was 1-year COPD-related readmission. Secondary outcomes included 1-year all-cause mortality, 1-year all-cause readmission, length of stay, time to COPD-related readmission, and number of 1-year COPD-associated emergency department (ED) and ambulatory visits.

Results

A total of 479 patients were included. Of whom, 173 were stratified into the eosinophilic group. Higher blood eosinophil cell count was associated with an increased risk of 1-year COPD-related readmission (OR, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.16-2.89]; P<0.01), a shorter time to first COPD-related readmission (HR, 1.64 [95% CI, 1.14-2.36]; P<0.01), and an increased number of 1-year COPD-related ED visits (incidence rate ratio, 1.78 [95% CI, 1.21-2.61]; P<0.01). All-cause mortality, all-cause readmission, length of stay, and number of ambulatory visits did not differ between groups.

Conclusion

Higher blood eosinophil cell count at admission for a COPD exacerbation is associated with increased COPD readmission rates in patients with infrequent COPD hospitalizations.

A Revised Treatment Approach for Hospitalized Patients with Eosinophilic and Neutrophilic Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

OBJECTIVES

The choice of treatment according to the inflammation type in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) has been of recent interest. This study investigated the role of novel biomarkers, hospital outcomes, and readmission rates in the first month in patients with eosinophilic or neutrophilic AECOPD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study in a Chest Teaching Hospital with hospitalized AECOPD patients. Subjects' characteristics, hemogram results, C-reactive protein (CRP), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), platelet/mean platelet volume (PLT/MPV), length of hospital stay, mortality, and steroid use were recorded. Eosinophilic AECOPD defined as peripheral blood eosinophilia (PBE) was >2% and neutrophilic AECOPD as PBE ≤2%. Readmission within 28 days of discharge was recorded.

RESULTS

Of 2727(31.5% females) patients, eosinophilic AECOPD was found in 510 (18.7%) patients. Leucocytes, CRP, NLR, and PLR were significantly higher in neutrophilic AECOPD than in eosinophilic AECOPD (p<0.001). Steroid use and mortality rate were 45% and 0.6% in eosinophilic AECOPD and 71%, and 1.4% in neutrophilic AECOPD, respectively (p=0.001, p=0.19). Age >75 years, albumin <2.5 g/dL, CRP >50 mg/dL, and PLT/MPV <20×103 were found to be risks factors for hospital mortality (p<0.05 each). Readmission rates within 28 days of discharge were 5% (n=136), and this rate was higher in eosinophilic AECOPD patients not taking steroids (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

NLR, PLR, and CRP levels were higher in neutrophilic AECOPD compared with eosinophilic AECOPD. These markers decreased with treatment in neutrophilic AECOPD. A PLT/MPV ratio of <20×103 resulted in an increased mortality rate. Thus, appropriate steroid therapy may reduce readmission rates in the first 28 days after discharge in eosinophilic AECOPD.

Clinical features, bacteriology of endotracheal aspirates and treatment outcomes of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and community-acquired pneumonia in an intensive care unit in Taiwan with an emphasis on eosinophilia versus non-eosinophilia: a retrospective case-control study

OBJECTIVES

The clinical implications of blood eosinophil level in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and intensive care unit (ICU) admission are still unknown. Thus, this study aimed to compare the features of such patients with and without blood eosinophilia.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective case-control study.

SETTING

An ICU of a medical centre in central Taiwan.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 262 patients with COPD and CAP requiring IMV and ICU admission.

RESULTS

Of all participants (n=262), 32 (12.2%) had an eosinophil percentage (EP) >2% and 169 (64.5%) had an absolute eosinophil count (AEC) >300 cells/µL. Regardless of whether 2% or 300 cells/µL was used as a cut-off value, the eosinophilia group were slightly older (years) (82.9±5.4 vs 78.1±9.1, p=0.000 and 79.2±8.4 vs 77.6±9.6, p=0.246, respectively), and had a higher forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity (%) (56.0±8.0 vs 51.3±11.6, p=0.005 and 53.1±11.2 vs 49.5±11.2, p=0.013, respectively), less severe spirometric classification (p=0.008 and p=0.001, respectively), and lower white cell count 109/L (8.8±3.2 vs 11.1±4.9, p=0.009 and 10.3±4.4 vs 11.8±5.3, p=0.017, respectively) than the non-eosinophilia group. The bacteriology of endotracheal aspirates showed that Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other gram-negative bacilli were the most common organisms in all study groups. Participants with an EP >2% had a shorter ICU length of stay (OR=12.13, p=0.001) than those with an EP ≤2%, while an AEC >300 cells/µL was not associated with any in-ICUoutcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study have significant clinical implications and should be considered when making treatment decisions for the management of patients with COPD and CAP requiring IMV and ICU admission.

Shall We Focus on the Eosinophil to Guide Treatment with Systemic Corticosteroids during Acute Exacerbations of COPD?: PRO

In an era of precision medicine, it seems regressive that we do not use stratified approaches to direct treatment of oral corticosteroids during an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This is despite evidence suggesting that 40% of COPD patients have eosinophilic inflammation and this is an indicator of corticosteroid response. Treatments with oral corticosteroids are not always effective and not without harm, with significant and increased risk of hyperglycemia, sepsis, and fractures. Eosinophils are innate immune cells with an incompletely understood role in the pathology of airway disease. They are detected at increased levels in some patients and can be measured using non-invasive methods during states of exacerbation and stable periods. Despite the eosinophil having an unknown mechanism in COPD, it has been shown to be a marker of length of stay in severe hospitalized exacerbations, a predictor of risk of future exacerbation and exacerbation type. Although limited, promising data has come from one prospective clinical trial investigating the eosinophil as a biomarker to direct systemic corticosteroid treatment. This identified that there were statistically significant and clinically worsened symptoms in patients with low eosinophil levels who were prescribed prednisolone, demonstrating the potential utility of the eosinophil. In an era of precision medicine our patients' needs are best served by accurate diagnosis, correct identification of maximal treatment response and the abolition of harm. The peripheral blood eosinophil count could be used towards reaching these aims.

Inflammatory Markers in Patients Using Domiciliary Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation: C Reactive Protein, Procalcitonin, Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio

Aim: Early identification and treatment of infections in patients using domiciliary non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) due to chronic respiratory failure (CRF) can reduce hospital admissions. We assessed C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as indicators of infection/inflammation.

Methods: The study was designed as a retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study, and was performed in 2016 in an intensive care unit outpatient clinic in patients using NIMV. Patients who came to the outpatient clinic with dyspnea, increased sputum, increased prothrombin, and who had hemogram, procalcitonin, and serum CRP, NLR, and PLT/MPV levels assessed, were enrolled into the study. Demographic characteristics, co-morbid diseases, respiratory symptoms, hemogram, biochemistry, CRP, and procalcitonin values in stable and acute attack patients were recorded from patient files. The descriptive statistics and CRP, NLR, and procalcitonin values were assessed.

Results: During the study period, 49 patients (24 female) with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, n = 24), obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS, n = 15), or interstitial lung disease, n = 10), and having had three inflammatory markers assessed, were included in the study. Their mean age was 67 (SD ± 12). Stable patients vs. those who had an acute attack was 41 vs. eight, and within 7 days of outpatient admission four patients were hospitalized. CRP, NLR, and PLT/MPV values were similar in patients' who had sputum purulence, and an increase in dyspnea and sputum, but procalcitonin was significantly higher in patients who had an acute attack. Procalcitonin was not correlated with CRP, NLR, and PLT/MPV.

Conclusions: Patients with CRF had similar levels of CRP and NLR during a stable and acute attack state. Procalcitonin may be a better marker for therapeutic decisions in advanced chronic inflammatory diseases.

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is a better indicator of COPD exacerbation severity in neutrophilic endotypes than eosinophilic endotypes

Background

Complete blood count parameters provide novel inflammatory markers, namely neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR). We aimed to assess any differences in these novel inflammatory markers according to exacerbation severity in patients with COPD in both eosinophilic and neutrophilic endotypes.

Method

This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary education hospital. Previously diagnosed COPD patients admitted to the hospital with acute COPD exacerbation (AECOPD) were enrolled into the study. Patients were grouped according to COPD endotype, eosinophilic (peripheral blood eosinophil rate ≥2%) and neutrophilic (peripheral blood eosinophil rate <2%), and further subdivided according to place of admission (outpatient clinic, ward, or intensive care unit [ICU]) as an indicator of disease severity. Complete blood count, biochemistry, C-reactive protein (CRP), NLR, PLR, and platelet to mean platelet volume values were recorded from an electronic hospital database system and compared among all groups.

Results

Of the 10,592 patients included in the study, 7,864 were admitted as outpatients, 2,233 to the wards, and 495 to ICU. Neutrophilic COPD patients (n=6,536, 62%) had increased inflammatory markers compared with eosinophilic COPD patients (n=4,056, 38%); median NLR was 5.11 vs 2.62 (P<0.001), PLR was 175.66 vs 130.00 (P<0.001), and CRP was 11.6 vs 7.7 (P<0.001). All values increased relative to admission to the outpatient clinic, ward, or ICU: median NLR was 3.20, 6.33, and 5.94, respectively, median PLR was 140.43, 208.46, and 207.39, respectively, and median CRP was 6.4, 15.0, and 22.8, respectively. The median NLR values of patients in outpatients/ward/ICU increased in neutrophilic and eosinophilic endotypes: 4.21/7.57/8.60 (P<0.001) and 2.50/3.43/3.42 (P=0.81), respectively. CRP showed a similar increased pattern according to severity of AECOPD endotypes.

Conclusion

In COPD exacerbation, the inflammatory markers show different increases in each COPD endotypes. These findings may be crucial for defining exacerbation endotypes, the severity of exacerbation, and treatment response during follow-up in COPD patients.

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a marker of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and its exacerbations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The main white blood cell populations, neutrophils and lymphocytes, are involved in the pathophysiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigating the relationship between the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR, a marker of subclinical inflammation), presence of COPD, and its exacerbations.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Pubmed, Web of Science and Scopus databases; two investigators independently reviewed suitable studies.

RESULTS

Nine studies, from 247 initially identified, were included in the meta-analysis. Seven studies, in 775 COPD patients with stable disease and 496 healthy controls, showed a significant increase in NLR values in stable COPD (standardised mean difference, SMD, 0.773, 95% CI 0.410-1.136; P < 0.001). Furthermore, in six studies in 527 COPD patients with acute exacerbation and 620 COPD patients with stable disease, NLR values were significantly higher in patients with exacerbations (random effects SMD 0.850, 95% CI 0.549-1.151; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis showed that NLR values are significantly higher in stable COPD patients when compared to healthy individuals, although the magnitude of the difference is reduced after trim and fill adjustment, and in patients with COPD exacerbations when compared to patients with stable disease. Further studies, in larger cohorts, are needed to confirm whether the NLR is a useful tool in discriminating between COPD patients with stable disease, those with acute exacerbations, and subjects without the disease.