1
|
Lormans T, de Graaf E, de Vries S, Leget C, Teunissen S. 'It is important to feel invited': what patients require when using the Utrecht Symptom Diary - 4 Dimensional, a qualitative exploration. Palliat Care Soc Pract 2024; 18:26323524241260426. [PMID: 38911602 PMCID: PMC11191620 DOI: 10.1177/26323524241260426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background In palliative care, the Utrecht Symptom Diary - 4 Dimensional (USD-4D), a Dutch-adapted and validated patient-reported outcome measure, supports multidimensional symptom management through identification and monitoring of, as well as dialogue on symptoms and needs. For the USD-4D to optimally support patients' autonomy, it is essential to know what patients need to use it. Objective This study aims to identify what patients need when using the USD-4D in clinical palliative care. Design A generic qualitative design with primary and secondary analyses of semistructured interviews. Methods Patients ⩾18 years with a life-limiting illness were purposefully recruited within hospice and home care settings if they were in their last year of life as identified by the surprise question. Patients had to be aware of their life-threatening condition. Patients were selected in two tranches. In the first tranche, patients had to have completed the USD-4D at least once. The second tranche consisted of patients who were not familiar with the USD-4D in clinical practice and were interviewed in a previous study on the content validity of the USD-4D. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and were subjected to thematic analysis. Results Twenty-five patients were included (14 men, ages 44-87). Patients' needs when using the USD-4D were summarized in three themes: (1) feeling invited, (2) being aware of the purpose and function of the USD-4D, and (3) experiencing a personal and nonjudgmental approach. Conclusion For patients to optimally benefit from the USD-4D as a supportive measure of their autonomy in clinical palliative care, it is essential that they feel invited to use it. Healthcare providers are tasked with setting the right preconditions for patients to want and to be able to use the USD-4D. For patients, this means healthcare providers should always be attuned to their personal preferences when communicating the purpose and function of the USD-4D and when they enter into dialogue with them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Lormans
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, Utrecht 3584CG, The Netherlands
| | - Everlien de Graaf
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sita de Vries
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carlo Leget
- Care Ethics, University of Humanistic Studies, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia Teunissen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Martínez-Moragón E, Antepara Ercoreca I, Muñoz García M, Casas Maldonado F, Calvín Lamas M, Chiner Vives E, Crespo Diz C, Díaz-Pérez D, Eguiluz Gracia I, García Gil S, González-Pérez R, Habernau Mena A, Hermida Valverde T, Jornet Montaña S, López-Carrasco V, Martínez López I, Merino-Bohórquez V, Moreno-Ancillo Á, Mínguez Cabeza AC, Monte-Boquet E, Revuelta-Herrero JL, Sánchez-Cuellar S. Patient-reported outcome measures in severe asthma: an expert consensus. J Asthma 2024; 61:619-631. [PMID: 38146964 DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2023.2297372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The study aimed to reach a consensus on the most relevant patient-reported outcomes (PROs), the corresponding measures (PROMs), and measurement frequency during severe asthma patient follow-up. METHODS Two Delphi rounds were conducted. The questionnaire was developed based on a systematic literature review, a focus group with patients, and a nominal group with experts. It assessed PROs' relevance and the appropriateness (A) and feasibility (F) of PROMs using a Likert scale (1=totally agree; 9=totally disagree). The consensus was established when ≥75% of participants agreed (1-3) or disagreed (7-9). RESULTS Sixty-three professionals (25 hospital pharmacists, 14 allergists, 13 pulmonologists, and 11 nurses) and 5 patients answered the Delphi questionnaire. A consensus was reached on all PROs regarding their relevance. Experts agreed on the use of ACT (A:95.24%; F:95.24%), mini AQLQ (A:93.65; F:79.37%), mMRC dyspnea scale (A:85.71%; F:85.71%), TAI (A:92.06%; F:85.71%), MMAS (A:75.40%; F:82%), and the dispensing register (A:96.83%; F:92.06%). Also considered suitable were: SNOT-22 (A:90.48%; F:73.80%), PSQI (A:82.54; F:63.90%), HADS (A:82.54; F:64%), WPAI (A:77.78%; F:49.20%), TSQM-9 (A:79.37; F:70.50%) and knowledge of asthma questionnaire (A:77%; F:68.80%); however, their use in clinical practice was considered unfeasible. Panelists also agreed on the appropriateness of EQ-5D, which was finally included despite being considered unfeasible (A: 84.13%; F:67.20%) in clinical practice. Agreement was reached on using ACT, TAI, mMRC, and a dispensing register every three months; mini-AQLQ and MMAS every six months; and EQ-5D every twelve months. CONCLUSION This consensus paves the way toward patient-centered care, promoting the development of strategies supporting routine assessment of PROs in severe asthma management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - María Muñoz García
- Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Marta Calvín Lamas
- Servicio de Farmacia, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Eusebi Chiner Vives
- Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Carlos Crespo Diz
- Servicio de Farmacia, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain
| | - David Díaz-Pérez
- Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Ibon Eguiluz Gracia
- Servicio de Alergología, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga, Spain
| | - Sara García Gil
- Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, La Laguna, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Icíar Martínez López
- Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | | | - Álvaro Moreno-Ancillo
- Servicio de Alergología, Hospital General Nuestra Señora del Prado, Talavera de la Reina, Spain
| | | | - Emilio Monte-Boquet
- Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Srinivasan R, Rodgers-Melnick SN, Rivard RL, Kaiser C, Vincent D, Adan F, Dusek JA. Implementing paper-based patient-reported outcome collection within outpatient integrative health and medicine. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0303985. [PMID: 38809886 PMCID: PMC11135778 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the feasibility of pre- and post-encounter patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure collection within an outpatient integrative health and medicine (IHM) clinic and to characterize factors associated with successful completion. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of 27,464 outpatient IHM encounters including 9,520 chiropractic; 8,237 acupuncture; 5,847 massage; 2,345 IHM consultation; and 1,515 osteopathic manipulation treatment encounters at four clinics offering IHM over 18 months. Patients were asked to complete paper questionnaires rating pain, anxiety, and stress from 0-10 immediately pre- and post-encounter. Generalized linear mixed effect regression models were used to examine the relationship between demographic, clinical, and operational covariates and completing (1) pre-encounter and (2) paired (i.e., pre and post) PROs. RESULTS Patients (N = 5587, mean age 49 years, 74% white, 77% female) generally presented for musculoskeletal conditions (81.7%), with a chief complaint of pain (55.1%). 21,852 (79.6%) encounters were among patients who completed pre-encounter PROs; 11,709/21,852 (53.6%) completed subsequent post-encounter PROs. Odds of PRO completion were more impacted by provider, operational, and clinical-level factors than patient factors. Covariates associated with increased odds of pre-encounter PRO completion included being female, having additional IHM encounters, and having a pain or anxiety complaint. Covariates associated with increased odds of paired PRO completion included being aged 31-40 vs. 51-60 years and having additional IHM encounters. CONCLUSION Implementing a paper-based PRO collection system in outpatient IHM is feasible; however, collecting post-encounter PROs was challenging. Future endeavors should leverage the electronic health record and patient portals to optimize PRO collection and engage patients and clinical providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roshini Srinivasan
- Connor Whole Health, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Samuel N. Rodgers-Melnick
- Connor Whole Health, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Rachael L. Rivard
- Connor Whole Health, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
- Center for Evaluation Survey and Research, HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
| | - Christine Kaiser
- Connor Whole Health, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - David Vincent
- Connor Whole Health, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Francoise Adan
- Connor Whole Health, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
- Department of Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Jeffery A. Dusek
- Susan Samueli Integrative Health Institute, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States of America
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kamran R, Jackman L, Laws A, Stepney M, Harrison C, Jain A, Rodrigues J. Developing feasible and acceptable strategies for integrating the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in gender-affirming care: An implementation study. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0301922. [PMID: 38625952 PMCID: PMC11020962 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/18/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Use CFIR guidance to create comprehensive, evidence-based, feasible, and acceptable gender-affirming care PROM implementation strategies. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS A 3-Phase participatory process was followed to design feasible and acceptable strategies for integrating PROMs in gender-affirming care. In Phase 1, barriers and enablers to PROM implementation for gender-affirming care were identified from a previous systematic review and our prior qualitative study. We used the CFIR-ERIC tool to match previously identified barriers and enablers with expert-endorsed implementation strategies. In Phase 2, implementation strategy outputs from CFIR-ERIC were organised according to cumulative percentage value. In Phase 3, gender-affirming care PROM implementation strategies underwent iterative refinement based on rounds of stakeholder feedback with seven patient and public partners and a gender-affirming healthcare professional. RESULTS The systematic review and qualitative study identified barriers and enablers to PROM implementation spanning all five CFIR domains, and 30 CFIR constructs. The top healthcare professional-relevant strategies to PROM implementation from the CFIR-ERIC output include: identifying and preparing implementation champions, collecting feedback on PROM implementation, and capturing and sharing local knowledge between clinics on implementation. Top patient-relevant strategies include: having educational material on PROMs, ensuring adaptability of PROMs, and collaborating with key local organisations who may be able to support patients. CONCLUSIONS This study developed evidence-based, feasible, and acceptable strategies for integrating PROMs in gender-affirming care, representing evidence from a systematic review of 286 international articles, a qualitative study of 24 gender-affirming care patients and healthcare professionals, and iteration from 7 patient and public partners and a gender-affirming healthcare professional. The finalised strategies include patient- and healthcare professional-relevant strategies for implementing PROMs in gender-affirming care. Clinicians and researchers can select and tailor implementation strategies best applying to their gender-affirming care setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rakhshan Kamran
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Liam Jackman
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna Laws
- Northern Region Gender Dysphoria Service, Newcastle, United Kingdom
| | - Melissa Stepney
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Conrad Harrison
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Abhilash Jain
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jeremy Rodrigues
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Warwick, United Kingdom
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Aylesbury, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Öberg Westin M, Wikberg C, Björkelund C, Ariai N, Lindahl AC, Hange D. Laying the Groundwork: A Pilot Study Exploring Improved Endometriosis Management Strategies in Primary Healthcare. Int J Gen Med 2024; 17:1325-1333. [PMID: 38596645 PMCID: PMC11003436 DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s375279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate if a brief educational intervention for primary health care staff regarding endometriosis gives sustainable knowledge of endometriosis symptoms and if a brief questionnaire for women seeking care for common symptoms is feasible in the Swedish primary care context. Design Pilot study. Setting 3 primary care centres (PCCs) in Sweden. Exploring knowledge among staff about endometriosis at baseline and 3 months after an information workshop. Evaluation of feasibility of a brief questionnaire for women seeking care for common symptoms For PCC personnel: knowledge about endometriosis at baseline and after 3 months. For patient questionnaire: whether adequate, understandable, acceptable, and feasible. Participants Females in primary care centre waiting room, and staff members at participating PCCs. Results The knowledge level of endometriosis was improved or sustained after 3 months compared to baseline among staff at PCCs. Over 90% of the patients stated that the questionnaire was adequate, understandable, acceptable, and feasible. Conclusion We found that an educational programme improved the staff's knowledge about endometriosis. The programme together with the patient questionnaire could be a way to enhance knowledge about endometriosis among PCCs. This combined effort might facilitate earlier detection and treatment of women with endometriosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Öberg Westin
- Primary Health Care/School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Carl Wikberg
- Primary Health Care/School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Research, Education, Development & Innovation, Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Cecilia Björkelund
- Primary Health Care/School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Nashmil Ariai
- Primary Health Care/School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ann-Christine Lindahl
- Primary Health Care/School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Dominique Hange
- Primary Health Care/School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Research, Education, Development & Innovation, Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bridgewater S, Ndosi M, Dawson J, Richards P, Silverthorne C, Dures E, Goodman SM, Hill C, Mackie SL, Robson JC. Validation of a new glucocorticoid-specific Patient-Reported Outcome Questionnaire (the Steroid PRO). Ann Rheum Dis 2024; 83:394-400. [PMID: 37949468 PMCID: PMC10894813 DOI: 10.1136/ard-2023-224946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Glucocorticoids used in the treatment of inflammatory rheumatic conditions can impact on health-related quality of life. An underpinning qualitative study developed a long-list of candidate items for a treatment-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure. The objective of this paper is to determine scale structure and psychometric properties of the Steroid PRO. METHODS A cross-sectional survey of adults from the UK, USA, Australia and New Zealand, taking glucocorticoids for a rheumatic disease. Initial survey collected demographics, clinical information, 40 Steroid PRO candidate items and EuroQol-5 Dimensions- 5 levels (EQ-5D-5L). Follow-up, 3-5 days later, collected Steroid PRO candidate items and a condition-change ('transition') question. Analysis included Rasch measurement model, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and hypothesis testing for discriminative validity, convergence validity and test-retest reliability. RESULTS Total responses 946: UK n=743 (79%); USA n=139 (15%); Australia/New Zealand n=64 (7%); mean age 57.6 (SD=13.6); 833 (88%) women. Participants with inflammatory arthritis n=197 (21%), connective tissue disease and/or vasculitis n=402 (42%), giant cell arteritis and/or polymyalgia rheumatica n=347 (37%). Twenty-five items were removed due to lack of fit to Rasch model. Of the remaining items, EFA suggested four subscales: Social impact (4 items); Impact on appearance (3 items); Psychological impact (5 items); Treatment concerns (3 items). Rasch modelling supported a four-subscale structure and total score, confirming construct validity and reliability. Hypothesis testing confirmed discriminant and convergence validity. Intraclass correlation coefficient (total score) was 0.809 demonstrating excellent (test-retest) reliability. CONCLUSIONS The Steroid PRO is a 15-item, valid and reliable scale for measuring the impact of glucocorticoid therapy in people with rheumatic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Bridgewater
- School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
- Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Mwidimi Ndosi
- School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
- Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Jill Dawson
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Pamela Richards
- School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
- Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Christine Silverthorne
- School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
- Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Emma Dures
- School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
- Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Susan M Goodman
- Rheumatology Department, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Catherine Hill
- Rheumatology Department, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Sarah L Mackie
- Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Joanna C Robson
- School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
- Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gettel CJ, Suter LG, Bagshaw K, Sheares KD, Balestracci KMB, Lin Z, Venkatesh AK. Patient-Reported Outcome-Based Performance Measures in Alternative Payment Models: Current Use, Implementation Barriers, and Principles to Succeed. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024; 27:199-205. [PMID: 38042334 PMCID: PMC10872237 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patient-reported outcome (PRO)-based performance measures (PRO-PMs) offer opportunities to aggregate survey data into a reliable and valid assessment of performance at the entity-level (eg, clinician, hospital, and accountable care organization). Our objective was to address the existing literature gap regarding the implementation barriers, current use, and principles for PRO-PMs to succeed. METHODS As quality measurement experts, we first highlighted key principles of PRO-PMs and how alternative payment models (APMs) may be integral in promoting more widespread use. In May 2023, we reviewed the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Measures Inventory Tool for active PRO-PM usage within CMS programs. We finally present principles to prioritize as part PRO-PMs succeeding within APMs. RESULTS We identified 5 implementation barriers to PRO-PM use: original development of instrument, response rate sufficiency, provider burden, hesitancy regarding fairness, and attribution of desired outcomes. There existed 54 instances of active PRO-PM usage across CMS programs, including 46 unique PRO-PMs within 14 CMS programs. Five principles to prioritize as part of greater PRO-PM development and incorporation within APMs include the following: (1) clinical salience, (2) adequate sample size, (3) meaningful range of performance among measured entities and the ability to detect performance change in a reasonable time frame, (4) equity focus, and (5) appropriate risk adjustment. CONCLUSIONS Identified barriers and principles to prioritize should be considered during PRO-PM development and implementation phases to link available and novel measures to payment programs while ensuring provider and stakeholder engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron J Gettel
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven CT, USA.
| | - Lisa G Suter
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven CT, USA; Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Veterans Affairs Connecticut Health System, West Haven, CT, USA
| | - Kyle Bagshaw
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven CT, USA
| | - Karen D Sheares
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven CT, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Zhenqiu Lin
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven CT, USA; Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Arjun K Venkatesh
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Aldhahi MI, Bakhsh HR, Bin Sheeha BH, Alhasani R. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of an Arabic version of PROMIS® of dyspnea activity motivation, requirement item pool and sleep-related impairments item bank. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2024; 22:11. [PMID: 38279166 PMCID: PMC10821257 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-023-02223-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Dyspnea Activity Motivation & Requirement item pool and sleep related impairments (SRI) item bank are designed in assessing the impact of dyspnea and sleep and guiding patient management. However, to effectively utilize this tool in Arabic-speaking populations, it is essential to perform a thorough translation and cultural adaptation process. Therefore, the aim of the study is to translate and cross-culturally adapt the translated items of the PROMIS® dyspnea activity motivation and requirement and SRI into Arabic. METHODS A universal approach to translation adopted from PROMIS guideline document for translation and cultural adaptation, and the Chronic Illness Therapy translation methodology. The forward translation step followed by back work translation and Harmonization and quality assurance. Cognitive interview and pilot testing was conducted among 30 Arabic respondents across 5 different countries of Arabic speaker to produce a single version for Arab countries. RESULTS A successful translation and cross-cultural adaptation into Arabic was achieved while maintaining equivalency. The translation was clear and more colloquial sentences were semantically equivalent and easy to understand. Equivalence of meaning of PROMIS® dyspnea activity motivation, requirement and SRI were achieved. All items were appropriate, relevant to culture and it measured the same concept as the original items. In Items 2 of the dyspnea activity motivation related to leisure activity "shopping", the term "catalog and website" was added instead of "catalog only" which makes item in line with the original source but more comprehensive and applicable to current shopping trends. CONCLUSIONS The PROMIS® dyspnea activity motivation, requirement items pool and SRI item bank are culturally and linguistically suitable to be used in Arab country. By extending the accessibility of this measure to Arabic-speaking population, this study contributes significantly to the advancement of management and patient-centered care in the region. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the psychometric properties of these instruments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monira I Aldhahi
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (PNU), Riyadh, P.O. Box 84428, 11671, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Hadeel R Bakhsh
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (PNU), Riyadh, P.O. Box 84428, 11671, Saudi Arabia
| | - Bodor H Bin Sheeha
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (PNU), Riyadh, P.O. Box 84428, 11671, Saudi Arabia
| | - Rehab Alhasani
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (PNU), Riyadh, P.O. Box 84428, 11671, Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
O'Brien KK, Erlandson KM, Brown DA, Carusone SC, Vera JH, Bergin C, Avery L, Bayoumi AM, Hanna SE, Harding R, Solomon P, Clair-Sullivan NS, O'Shea N, Murray C, Boffito M, Da Silva G, Torres B, McDuff K, Davis AM. Episodic disability questionnaire (EDQ) measurement properties among adults living with HIV in Canada, Ireland, United Kingdom, and United States. BMC Infect Dis 2024; 24:71. [PMID: 38200425 PMCID: PMC10782617 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-023-08958-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Episodic Disability Questionnaire (EDQ) is a generic 35-item patient-reported outcome measure of presence, severity and episodic nature of disability. We assessed the measurement properties of the Episodic Disability Questionnaire (EDQ) with adults living with HIV. METHODS We conducted a measurement study with adults living with HIV in eight clinical settings in Canada, Ireland, United Kingdom, and United States. We electronically administered the EDQ followed by three reference measures (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule; Patient Health Questionnaire; Social Support Scale) and a demographic questionnaire. We administered the EDQ only 1 week later. We assessed the internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha; > 0.7 acceptable), and test-retest reliability (Intra Class Correlation Coefficient; > 0.7 acceptable). We estimated required change in EDQ domain scores to be 95% certain that a change was not due to measurement error (Minimum Detectable Change (MDC95%)). We evaluated construct validity by assessing 36 primary hypotheses of relationships between EDQ scores and scores on the reference measures (> 75% hypotheses confirmed indicated validity). RESULTS Three hundred fifty nine participants completed the questionnaires at time point 1, of which 321 (89%) completed the EDQ approximately 1 week later. Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency ranged from 0.84 (social domain) to 0.91 (day domain) for the EDQ severity scale, and 0.72 (uncertainty domain) to 0.88 (day domain) for the EDQ presence scale, and 0.87 (physical, cognitive, mental-emotional domains) to 0.89 (uncertainty domain) for the EDQ episodic scale. ICCs for test-retest reliability ranged from 0.79 (physical domain) to 0.88 (day domain) for the EDQ severity scale and from 0.71 (uncertainty domain) to 0.85 (day domain) for the EDQ presence scale. Highest precision was demonstrated in the severity scale for each domain (MDC95% range: 19-25 out of 100), followed by the presence (MDC95% range: 37-54) and episodic scales (MDC95% range:44-76). Twenty-nine of 36 (81%) construct validity hypotheses were confirmed. CONCLUSIONS The EDQ possesses internal consistency reliability, construct validity, and test-retest reliability, with limited precision when administered electronically with adults living with HIV across in clinical settings in four countries. Given the measurement properties, the EDQ can be used for group level comparisons for research and program evaluation in adults living with HIV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly K O'Brien
- Department of Physical Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada.
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (IHPME), Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute (RSI), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | | | - Darren A Brown
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Soo Chan Carusone
- McMaster Collaborative for Health and Aging, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Casey House, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jaime H Vera
- Department of Global Health and Infection, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Colm Bergin
- GUIDE Clinic, St. James's Hospital, Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Lisa Avery
- Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ahmed M Bayoumi
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (IHPME), Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of General Internal Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Steven E Hanna
- Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Richard Harding
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Patricia Solomon
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Natalie St Clair-Sullivan
- Department of Global Health and Infection, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Noreen O'Shea
- GUIDE Clinic, St. James's Hospital, Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Marta Boffito
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - George Da Silva
- Department of Physical Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada
| | - Brittany Torres
- Department of Physical Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada
| | - Kiera McDuff
- Department of Physical Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada
| | - Aileen M Davis
- Department of Physical Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (IHPME), Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute (RSI), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ndosi M, Almeida C, Dawson J, Dures E, Greenwood R, Bromhead A, Guly C, Stern S, Hill C, Mackie S, Robson JC. Validation of a patient-reported outcome measure for giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2024; 63:181-189. [PMID: 37144946 PMCID: PMC10765151 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES GCA is systemic vasculitis manifesting as cranial, ocular or large vessel vasculitis. A prior qualitative study developed 40 candidate items to assess the impact of GCA on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to determine final scale structure and measurement properties of the GCA patient reported outcome (GCA-PRO) measure. METHODS Cross-sectional study included UK patients with clinician-confirmed GCA. They completed 40 candidate items for the GCA-PRO at times 1 and 2 (3 days apart), EQ-5D-5L, ICECAP-A, CAT-PROM5 and self-report of disease activity. Rasch and exploratory factor analyses informed item reduction and established structural validity, reliability and unidimensionality of the final GCA-PRO. Evidence of validity was also established with hypothesis testing (GCA-PRO vs other PRO scores, and between participants with 'active disease' vs those 'in remission') and test-retest reliability. RESULTS The study population consisted of 428 patients: mean (s.d.) age 74.2 (7.2), 285 (67%) female; 327 (76%) cranial GCA, 114 (26.6%) large vessel vasculitis and 142 (33.2%) ocular involvement. Rasch analysis eliminated 10 candidate GCA items and informed restructuring of response categories into four-point Likert scales. Factor analysis confirmed four domains: acute symptoms (eight items), activities of daily living (seven items), psychological (seven items) and participation (eight items). The overall scale had adequate Rasch model fit (χ2 = 25.219, degrees of freedom = 24, P = 0.394). Convergent validity with EQ5D-5L, ICECAP-A and Cat-PROM5 was confirmed through hypothesis testing. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were excellent. CONCLUSION The final GCA-PRO is a 30-item, four-domain scale with robust evidence of validity and reliability in measuring HRQoL in people with GCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mwidimi Ndosi
- School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
- Academic Rheumatology Unit, Bristol Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Celia Almeida
- School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
- Academic Rheumatology Unit, Bristol Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Jill Dawson
- Nuffield Department of Population Health (HSRU), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Emma Dures
- School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
- Academic Rheumatology Unit, Bristol Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Rosemary Greenwood
- NIHR Research Design Service South West, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Alison Bromhead
- School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
- Academic Rheumatology Unit, Bristol Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Catherine Guly
- Bristol Eye Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Steve Stern
- School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
- Academic Rheumatology Unit, Bristol Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Catherine Hill
- Discipline of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Rheumatology Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Sarah Mackie
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Joanna C Robson
- School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
- Academic Rheumatology Unit, Bristol Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nicolas‐Boluda A, Le Roux E, Tavenet A, Bouaziz J, Vercellini P, Stratton P, Fauconnier A. Developing a set of patient-centered outcomes for routine use in endometriosis: An international Delphi study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2024; 103:138-152. [PMID: 37905359 PMCID: PMC10755132 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is large variation in individual patient care for endometriosis. A uniform approach to measure outcomes could be incorporated into routine clinical practice to personalize and monitor treatments and potentially improve the quality of care. The aim of this study is to identify a group of patient-centered outcomes for use in routine endometriosis care which are relevant to all patient profiles. MATERIAL AND METHODS By means of a modified two-round Delphi study with international representation including healthcare professionals, researchers and patient representatives (51 participants, 16 countries) we developed a set of patient-centered measurements. The participants evaluated 47 Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and 30 Clinician Reported Outcome Measures (CROMs) regarding their feasibility and relevance for their use in routine endometriosis care. After the two rounds of quotation, meetings of the experts were convened to participate in a final discussion to finalize the consensus of the final set of included measures. RESULTS The final set of patient-centered outcomes includes six PROMs (measuring symptomatic impact, pain, work productivity and quality of life) and 10 CROMs (measuring clinical, imaging and surgical indicators). A supplementary list of outcomes was added to include important dimensions that were considered essential by the expert panel but are not relevant to all patients. In addition the need for development of specific tools (PROMs) measuring the psychological impact and the impact in sexual activity of endometriosis was highlighted. CONCLUSIONS We have developed a set of patient-centered outcomes measures in endometriosis care. The selected outcomes comprise the common features for all patients suffering from endometriosis. adapted for use in routine practice. The list of outcomes has been adapted for use in routine practice from which clinicians can chose, depending on their needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alba Nicolas‐Boluda
- One ClinicParisFrance
- European Association of Value‐Based Health CareBrusselsBelgium
| | - Enora Le Roux
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Hôpital Universitaire Robert DebréAP‐HP Nord‐Université de Paris, Inserm, CIC 1426ParisFrance
- ECEVE UMR 1123Université de Paris, InsermParisFrance
| | | | | | - Paolo Vercellini
- Gynecology UnitFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore PoliclinicoMilanItaly
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community HealthUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
| | - Pamela Stratton
- Office of the Clinical Director, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institutes of HealthBethesdaMarylandUSA
| | - Arnaud Fauconnier
- Research Unit 7285 Clinical Risks and Safety in Women's Health and Perinatal Health (RISCQ), UVSQUniversité Paris‐SaclayMontigny‐le‐BretonneuxFrance
- Gynecology and Obstetrics DepartmentCentre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy‐Saint‐Germain‐en‐LayePoissyFrance
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Weiss-Laxer NS, Pavlesen S, Arevalo A, Jeffords J, Haider MN, Bisson LJ. Predictors of Postoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Response Rates Among Patients With Rotator Cuff Repair. Am J Sports Med 2024; 52:215-223. [PMID: 38164664 DOI: 10.1177/03635465231209441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) contribute to evaluating and improving the quality of patient care. Patient outcomes after rotator cuff repair (RCR) have been researched; however, the relationship between PROM response rates and individual and health care correlates has not been thoroughly investigated. PURPOSE To examine differences in individual and health care factors among patients who had undergone RCR based on their PROM response rates. STUDY DESIGN Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS Shoulder-specific and general PROMs were solicited via email and text message of all patients who underwent RCR between 2016 and 2020. Three subgroups were classified: (1) complete responders completed all 1-year postoperative PROMs, (2) partial responders answered enough questions to produce ≥1 usable score, and (3) nonresponders did not respond to a single measure. Correlates were assessed using analysis of variance and chi-square tests. Adjusted multinomial logistic regression models identified predictors of 1-year PROM response. RESULTS Of 2195 patients included at the 1-year follow-up, 34% were complete responders; 11%, partial responders; and 55%, nonresponders. Patients had a mean age of 61.8 years, 63% were men, and 90% were White. Pre- and postoperative PROM scores were similar across responder groups. In stepwise selection, 1-year responses (complete or partial) were associated with older age, later year of surgery, White race, and having workers' compensation insurance. The strongest predictor of PROM response was having workers' compensation insurance. CONCLUSION Patients with workers' compensation insurance compared with other insurance types responded to PROMs at disproportionately higher rates. This could distort postoperative PROM scores in the population studied because there are known differences among patients with this insurance status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nomi S Weiss-Laxer
- Department of Orthopaedics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Sonja Pavlesen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Alfonso Arevalo
- Department of Orthopaedics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Joycelyn Jeffords
- Department of Orthopaedics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Mohammad N Haider
- Department of Orthopaedics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Leslie J Bisson
- Department of Orthopaedics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Liapis I, Gammie A, Mohamed-Ahmed R, Yates D, Selai C, Cotterill N, Rantell A, Toozs-Hobson P. Can we increase the value of data from bladder diaries? International Consultation on Incontinence-Research Society 2023. Neurourol Urodyn 2023. [PMID: 38149784 DOI: 10.1002/nau.25374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bladder diaries represent a fundamental component in the assessment of patients presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms. Nevertheless, their importance often remains underappreciated and undervalued within clinical practice. This paper aims to conduct a comprehensive review of the existing literature concerning the utility of bladder diaries, underscore the criticality of their precision, elucidate the factors contributing to noncompliance with bladder diary completion, and investigate potential strategies for enhancing patient compliance. MATERIALS AND METHODS A review of the English-language scientific literature available in the domains of Medline, Embase, Emcare, Midirs, and Cinahl was conducted. This was supplemented by discussion at the International Consultation on Incontinence Research Society Proposal session to define knowledge and identify gaps in knowledge surrounding the utility of bladder diaries. The existing evidence and outcome of the relevant discussion held in the meeting are presented. RESULTS Bladder diaries (BD) serve to characterize the nature and severity of storage lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and provide an objective record of an individual's urination patterns. They aid in the refinement and customization of treatment strategies based on the clinical responses documented in the diary, optimizing treatment outcomes. Notably, both BD and urodynamic studies (UDS) play complementary yet distinct roles in LUTS evaluation. BD offers a more comprehensive and accessible approach to assessing specific storage LUTS, particularly due to their affordability and widespread availability, especially in resource-limited settings. Nevertheless, the absence of a standardized BD format across global healthcare systems presents a significant challenge. Despite being recognized as reliable, noninvasive, validated, and cost-effective tools for evaluating patients with LUTS, the implementation and completion of BD have proven to be complex. The introduction of automated bladder diaries heralds an era of precise, real-time data collection, potentially enhancing the patient-clinician relationship. Completion of bladder diaries depends on an array of individual, social, and healthcare-specific factors. Compliance with bladder diary completion could be enhanced with clear instructions, patient education, regular follow-ups and positive re-enforcement. This study has identified four critical areas for future research: Addressing healthcare disparities between affluent and developing nations, enhancing the current functionality and effectiveness of bladder diaries, exploring the feasibility of incorporating bladder diaries into the treatment and education process and improving the quality and functionality of existing bladder diaries. CONCLUSION Bladder diaries play a pivotal role in the evaluation and management of patients with LUTS, providing a holistic perspective. When their complete potential is harnessed, they have the capacity to revolutionize the paradigm of LUTS management, ushering in a patient-centered era of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilias Liapis
- Department of Urogynaecology, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Andrew Gammie
- Bristol Urological Institute, Southmead Hospital, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Derick Yates
- Library and Knowledge Service, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Caroline Selai
- Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nicky Cotterill
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Angela Rantell
- Department of Urogynaecology, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Philip Toozs-Hobson
- Department of Urogynaecology, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Aravantinou-Karlatou A, Bouloukaki I, Christodoulakis A, Tsiligianni I. The Influence of Social Support in PROMs of Patients with COPD in Primary Care: A Scoping Review. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:3141. [PMID: 38132031 PMCID: PMC10742576 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11243141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a prevalent and multidimensional disease with symptoms that greatly influence patients' health. Healthcare professionals utilize patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to classify and better manage the disease. Despite the value of PROMs, they inadequately represent some important dimensions of COPD, like social support and healthcare access/utilization. This is important, especially for social support, since it can positively influence PROMs results and the overall health of patients with COPD. Therefore, a scoping review was conducted to determine how social support affects PROMs of patients with COPD in primary care. The PRISMA-Scoping approach was adopted, and we sought articles published in MEDLINE and COHRANE. We screened 2038 articles for inclusion and finally included a total of 10 articles. Most of the articles were conducted in the U.S. and Norway. Social support had a strong positive impact on PROMs. Additionally, different types of social support were observed. Moreover, higher levels of social support were linked to better quality of life, mental health, self-care behaviors, self-management, functionality, and less severe COPD. Consequently, this scoping review highlights the value of social support in patients with COPD and its underrepresentation and misrepresentation in PROMs literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonia Aravantinou-Karlatou
- Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Voutes-Stavrakia, 71003 Heraklion, Greece; (I.B.); (A.C.); (I.T.)
| | - Izolde Bouloukaki
- Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Voutes-Stavrakia, 71003 Heraklion, Greece; (I.B.); (A.C.); (I.T.)
| | - Antonios Christodoulakis
- Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Voutes-Stavrakia, 71003 Heraklion, Greece; (I.B.); (A.C.); (I.T.)
- Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71410 Heraklion, Greece
| | - Ioanna Tsiligianni
- Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Voutes-Stavrakia, 71003 Heraklion, Greece; (I.B.); (A.C.); (I.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Iyngkaran P, Usmani W, Hanna F, de Courten M. Challenges of Health Data Use in Multidisciplinary Chronic Disease Care: Perspective from Heart Failure Care. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 2023; 10:486. [PMID: 38132654 PMCID: PMC10743507 DOI: 10.3390/jcdd10120486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
The healthcare sector generates approximately 30% of all the world's data volume, mostly for record keeping, compliance and regulatory requirements, and patient care. Healthcare data often exist in silos or on different systems and platforms due to decentralised storage and data protection laws, limiting accessibility for health service research. Thus, both the lack of access to data and more importantly the inability to control data quality and explore post-trial (phase IV) data or data with translational relevance have an impact on optimising care and research of congestive heart failure (CHF). We highlight that for some diseases, such as CHF, generating non-traditional data has significant importance, but is hindered by the logistics of accessing chronic disease data from separate health silos and by various levels of data quality. Modern multidisciplinary healthcare management of cardiovascular diseases-especially when spanning across community hubs to tertiary healthcare centres-increases the complexities involved between data privacy and access to data for healthcare and health service research. We call for an increased ability to leverage health data across systems, devices, and countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pupalan Iyngkaran
- Department of Health Sciences, Torrens University Australia, Melbourne 3000, Australia;
| | - Wania Usmani
- Department of Health Sciences, Torrens University Australia, Melbourne 3000, Australia;
| | - Fahad Hanna
- Public Health Program, Department of Health and Education, Torrens University Australia, Melbourne 3000, Australia;
| | - Maximilian de Courten
- Mitchell Institute for Health and Education Policy, Victoria University, Melbourne 3000, Australia;
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Stichler JF, Pelletier LR. Applying the Patient Empowerment, Engagement, and Activation Survey to Improve Patient Outcomes. J Nurs Adm 2023; 53:668-674. [PMID: 37983606 DOI: 10.1097/nna.0000000000001364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
This article focuses on applying the patient empowerment, engagement, and activation (PEEA) model as an implementation strategy to achieve patient- or person-centered care. There is substantial evidence linking PEEA to improved patient care outcomes and reduced healthcare costs. Interrelationships among the 3 concepts are discussed and how the PEEA survey can be used to evaluate patients' activation for self-care postdischarge and their perceptions of nurses' empowering and engaging them during the care encounter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaynelle F Stichler
- Author Affiliations: Consultant (Dr Stichler) and Clinical Nurse Specialist (Pelletier), Terrence and Barbara Caster Institute for Nursing Excellence, Sharp Prebys Innovation and Education Center, San Diego, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Humayun MM, Brouillette MJ, Fellows LK, Mayo NE. The Patient Generated Index (PGI) as an early-warning system for predicting brain health challenges: a prospective cohort study for people living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). Qual Life Res 2023; 32:3439-3452. [PMID: 37428407 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03475-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In research people are often asked to fill out questionnaires about their health and functioning and some of the questions refer to serious health concerns. Typically, these concerns are not identified until the statistician analyses the data. An alternative is to use an individualized measure, the Patient Generated Index (PGI) where people are asked to self-nominate areas of concern which can then be dealt with in real-time. This study estimates the extent to which self-nominated areas of concern related to mood, anxiety and cognition predict the presence or occurrence of brain health outcomes such as depression, anxiety, psychological distress, or cognitive impairment among people aging with HIV at study entry and for successive assessments over 27 months. METHODS The data comes from participants enrolled in the Positive Brain Health Now (+ BHN) cohort (n = 856). We analyzed the self-nominated areas that participants wrote on the PGI and classified them into seven sentiment groups according to the type of sentiment expressed: emotional, interpersonal, anxiety, depressogenic, somatic, cognitive and positive sentiments. Tokenization was used to convert qualitative data into quantifiable tokens. A longitudinal design was used to link these sentiment groups to the presence or emergence of brain health outcomes as assessed using standardized measures of these constructs: the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Mental Health Index (MHI) of the RAND-36, the Communicating Cognitive Concerns Questionnaire (C3Q) and the Brief Cognitive Ability Measure (B-CAM). Logistic regressions were used to estimate the goodness of fit of each model using the c-statistic. RESULTS Emotional sentiments predicted all of the brain health outcomes at all visits with adjusted odds ratios (OR) ranging from 1.61 to 2.00 and c-statistics > 0.73 (good to excellent prediction). Nominating an anxiety sentiment was specific to predicting anxiety and psychological distress (OR 1.65 & 1.52); nominating a cognitive concern was specific to predicting self-reported cognitive ability (OR 4.78). Positive sentiments were predictive of good cognitive function (OR 0.36) and protective of depressive symptoms (OR 0.55). CONCLUSIONS This study indicates the value of using this semi-qualitative approach as an early-warning system in predicting brain health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Mustafa Humayun
- Division of Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, 5252 de Maisonneuve, Montreal, QC, H4A 3S5, Canada.
- Center for Outcome Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| | - Marie-Josée Brouillette
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Lesley K Fellows
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Nancy E Mayo
- Center for Outcome Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bridgewater S, Shepherd MA, Dawson J, Richards P, Silverthorne C, Ndosi M, Almeida C, Black RJ, Cheah JTL, Dures E, Ghosh N, Hoon EA, Lyne S, Navarro-Millan I, Pearce-Fisher D, Ruediger C, Tieu J, Yip K, Mackie SL, Goodman S, Hill C, Robson JC. Measuring the impact of steroid therapy on health-related quality of life in patients with rheumatic diseases: international development of a glucocorticoid treatment-specific patient-reported outcome measure. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2023; 62:3565-3575. [PMID: 36840642 PMCID: PMC10629780 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Glucocorticoids (GCs) ('steroids') are used to treat rheumatic diseases but adverse effects are common. We aimed to explore the impact of GC therapy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), to inform the development of a treatment-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for use in clinical trials and practice. METHODS Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with patients from the UK, USA and Australia, treated for a rheumatic condition with GCs in the last 2 years. Purposive sampling was used to select participants with a range of demographic and disease features. An initial conceptual framework informed interview prompts and cues. Interviews elicited GC-related physical and psychological symptoms and salient aspects of HRQoL in relation to GC therapy. Interview data were analysed inductively to develop initial individual themes and domains. Candidate questionnaire items were developed and refined. RESULTS Sixty semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted (UK n = 34, USA n = 10, Australia n = 16). The mean age was 58 years; 39/60 were female; and 18 rheumatic diseases were represented. Some 126 individual themes were identified and organized into six domains: physical symptoms; psychological symptoms; psychological impact of steroids; impact of steroids on participation; impact of steroids on relationships; and benefits of steroids. Candidate questionnaire items were tested and refined by piloting with patient research partners, iterative rounds of cognitive interviews and linguistic translatability assessment, informing a draft questionnaire. CONCLUSION We describe an international qualitative study to develop candidate items for a treatment-specific PROM for patients with rheumatic diseases. A future survey will enable the validation of a final version of the PROM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Bridgewater
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England—UWE Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Academic Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Michael A Shepherd
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England—UWE Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Academic Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Jill Dawson
- Department of Population Health (HSRU), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Pamela Richards
- Academic Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Christine Silverthorne
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England—UWE Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Academic Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Mwidimi Ndosi
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England—UWE Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Academic Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Celia Almeida
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England—UWE Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Academic Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Rachel J Black
- Discipline of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Rheumatology Department, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
- Department of Rheumatology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Jonathan T L Cheah
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Emma Dures
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England—UWE Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Academic Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Nilasha Ghosh
- Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Hoon
- Discipline of General Practice, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Suellen Lyne
- Discipline of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Department of Rheumatology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Iris Navarro-Millan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Diyu Pearce-Fisher
- Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carlee Ruediger
- Department of Rheumatology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Joanna Tieu
- Department of Rheumatology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
- Rheumatology Unit, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Kevin Yip
- Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sarah L Mackie
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Susan Goodman
- Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Catherine Hill
- Discipline of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Rheumatology Department, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
- Department of Rheumatology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Joanna C Robson
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England—UWE Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Academic Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Battershell M, Vu H, Callander EJ, Slavin V, Carrandi A, Teede H, Bull C. Development, women-centricity and psychometric properties of maternity patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): A systematic review. Women Birth 2023; 36:e563-e573. [PMID: 37316400 DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2023.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Measuring maternity care outcomes based on what women value is critical to promoting woman-centred maternity care. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are instruments that enable service users to assess healthcare service and system performance. AIM To identify and critically appraise the risk of bias, woman-centricity (content validity) and psychometric properties of maternity PROMs published in the scientific literature. METHODS MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, PsycINFO and Embase were systematically searched for relevant records between 01/01/2010 and 07/10/2021. Included articles underwent risk of bias, content validity and psychometric properties assessments in line with COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidance. PROM results were summarised according to language subgroups and an overall recommendation for use was determined. FINDINGS Forty-four studies reported on the development and psychometric evaluation of 9 maternity PROMs, grouped into 32 language subgroups. Risk of bias assessments for the PROM development and content validity showed inadequate or doubtful methodological quality. Internal consistency reliability, hypothesis testing (for construct validity), structural validity and test-retest reliability varied markedly in sufficiency and evidence quality. No PROMs received a level 'A' recommendation, required for real-world use. CONCLUSION Maternity PROMs identified in this systematic review had poor quality evidence for their measurement properties and lacked sufficient content validity, indicating a lack of woman-centricity in instrument development. Future research should prioritise women's voices in deciding what is relevant, comprehensive and comprehensible to measure, as this will impact overall validity and reliability and facilitate real-world use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Battershell
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, VIC, Australia
| | - H Vu
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, VIC, Australia
| | - E J Callander
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, VIC, Australia
| | - V Slavin
- Women-Newborn-Childrens Services, Gold Coast Health, QLD, Australia; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Meadowbrook, QLD, Australia
| | - A Carrandi
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, VIC, Australia
| | - H Teede
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, VIC, Australia; Endocrinology and Diabetes Units, Monash Health, VIC, Australia
| | - C Bull
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ruseckaite R, Caruso M, Mudunna C, Helwani F, Millis N, Ahern S. Informing a national rare disease registry strategy in Australia: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1187. [PMID: 37907945 PMCID: PMC10619239 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10049-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rare disease registries (RDRs) facilitate monitoring of rare diseases by pooling small datasets to increase clinical and epidemiological knowledge of rare diseases and promote patient centred best practice. The aim of this study was to understand the current state of RDRs in Australia, data captured, impact on patient outcomes, funding models, and barriers and enablers regarding their establishment and maintenance. METHODS An exploratory sequential mixed methods study design was adopted. First, a list of Australian RDRs, primary contacts and data custodians was generated through online and consumer group (Rare Voices Australia (RVA)) contacts. A cross-sectional, anonymous online survey was distributed to registry custodians, managers, or principal investigators of 74 identified Australian RDRs, 88 RVA Partners, 17 pharmaceutical organizations and 12 RVA Scientific and Medical Advisory Committee members. Next, managers and coordinators of RDRs and databases who participated in the survey were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using basic descriptive statistics and content analysis, respectively. RESULTS Forty RDRs responded to the survey; nine were national, five were based in Australia and New Zealand, and the remaining were global. Of the 40 survey respondents, eight were interviewed. Most of the RDRs captured similar information regarding patient characteristics, comorbidities and clinical features, diagnosis, family history, genetic testing, procedures or treatment types, response to treatments and complications of treatments. Better treatment outcomes, changes in process of care and changes in quality of care were the most frequently reported benefits of the RDRs. The main challenges proved to be cost/funding of data collection, data completeness, and patient consent. When asked, the participants identified opportunities and challenges regarding potential options to streamline RDRs in Australia in the future. CONCLUSION Findings from this study highlighted significant dataset heterogeneity based on the individual disease, and current lack of interoperability and coordination between different existing RDRs in Australia. Nevertheless, a nationally coordinated approach to RDRs should be investigated given the particular benefits RDRs offer, such as access to research and the monitoring of new disease-modifying treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rasa Ruseckaite
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, 3004, Australia.
| | - Marisa Caruso
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Chethana Mudunna
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | - Susannah Ahern
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Soares Ferreira Junior A, Pinheiro Maux Lessa M, Kaplan S, Coles TM, Terrell DR, Onwuemene OA. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5155. [PMID: 37568558 PMCID: PMC10420299 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12155155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) impacts of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) have been captured in clinical studies using patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (PROMs) that are validated for other diseases. However, the validity evidence to support the use of existing PROMs in patients with TTP is unknown. In a systematic review of the literature, including studies of adults and children with TTP, we assessed the validity evidence for use of PROMs in clinical research and clinical practice, characterized HRQoL, described the integration of PROMs in clinical practice and evaluated PRO scores for patients with TTP compared with reference populations. From an initial 4518 studies, we identified 14 studies using 16 PROMs to assess general HRQoL domains in patients in remission. No identified studies assessed the validity of PROMs for the context of use of TTP and no studies described PROM integration into TTP clinical practice or evaluated PROMs that were specific for patients with TTP. Moreover, PRO scores were worse in patients with TTP compared with reference populations and other chronic conditions. We conclude that, in patients with TTP, PROMs pick up on important patient experiences not captured by clinical outcomes at present. There is, therefore, a need for studies that assess the validity of existing PROMs in patients with TTP to determine if TTP-specific PROMs specific to patients with TTP should be developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Morgana Pinheiro Maux Lessa
- Department of Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto, São José do Rio Preto 15090-000, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Samantha Kaplan
- Medical Center Library & Archives, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA;
| | - Theresa M. Coles
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA;
| | - Deirdra R. Terrell
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Hudson College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA;
| | - Oluwatoyosi A. Onwuemene
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Olariu E, Caplescu R, Vale L, Niculescu-Aron IG, Oluboyede Y, Paveliu MS. Population norms for the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in Romania. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2023; 21:80. [PMID: 37507760 PMCID: PMC10386277 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-023-02144-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The majority of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) don't have population norms in Romania. This is the case with the EQ-5D as well. Therefore, we aimed to estimate population norms for the Romanian versions of the EQ-5D-5L, EQ-5D-3L, their indexes, and the EQ-VAS. METHODS A cross-sectional survey was conducted in all regions of Romania from November 2018 to November 2019. A three-stage probability sampling procedure stratified by region and settlement size was used to select a representative sample. Interviews were computer-assisted and conducted in respondents' homes by trained interviewers. Health status was assessed with the EQ-5D-5L, the EQ-5D-3L and the EQ VAS. Descriptive statistics were used to estimate population norms by age groups and sex for the EQ-5D-5L, the EQ-5D-3L, their indexes and the EQ VAS. Population norms were weighted using survey weights. Indexes for the EQ-5D questionnaires were estimated using the recently developed Romanian value sets. RESULTS Data from 1,649 interviews was analysed in the present study. Survey weights were used so that sex and place of residence ratios for the weighted sample matched the Romanian general population distribution. Participants' mean age was 47.4 years (SE = 1.157) and 50.3% of them reported being in good health. The dimension for which people reported the highest number of problems for both questionnaires was the pain/discomfort dimension. Men aged 35 plus reported fewer problems with pain/discomfort than women for both the EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-3L. Health decreased with age as shown by the decrease from age group 18-24 to age group 75 plus in the indexes of both questionnaires: from 0.977 (SE = 0.005) to 0.765 (SE = 0.017) for EQ-5D-5L and from 0.981 (SE = 0.005) to 0.784 (SE = 0.019) for EQ-5D-3L. There was 29.9 points drop in the EQ VAS score between the youngest and oldest group. CONCLUSIONS Population norms for the Romanian versions of the EQ-5D-5L, EQ-5D-3L, their indexes, and the EQ VAS are now available. These can now be used as reference values by healthcare professionals, researchers and decision-makers leading to a further development of health-related quality of life research in Romania.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Olariu
- Health Economics Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
| | - Raluca Caplescu
- Department of Statistics and Econometrics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, 010374, Romania
| | - Luke Vale
- Health Economics Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Yemi Oluboyede
- Health Economics Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Marian Sorin Paveliu
- Department of Pharmacology, Titu Maiorescu University, Bucharest, 031593, Romania
- Romanian Academic Society, Bucharest, 020071, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
da Silva Lopes AM, Colomer-Lahiguera S, Darnac C, Giacomini S, Bugeia S, Gutknecht G, Spurrier-Bernard G, Aedo-Lopez V, Mederos N, Latifyan S, Addedo A, Michielin O, Eicher M. Development of an eHealth-enhanced model of care for the monitoring and management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:484. [PMID: 37480546 PMCID: PMC10363070 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07934-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The use of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) data in routine care has been tied to direct patient benefits such as improved quality of care and symptom control and even overall survival. The modes of action behind such benefits are seldom described in detail. Here, we describe the development of a model of care leveraging ePRO data to monitor and manage symptoms of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. METHODS Development was split into four stages: (1) identification of an underlying theoretical framework, (2) the selection of an ePRO measure (ePROM), (3) the adaptation of an electronic application to collect ePRO data, and (4) the description of an ePRO-oriented workflow. The model of care is currently evaluated in a bicentric longitudinal randomized controlled phase II trial, the IePRO study. RESULTS The IePRO model of care is grounded in the eHealth Enhanced Chronic Care Model. Patients are prompted to report symptoms using an electronic mobile application. Triage nurses are alerted, review the reported symptoms, and contact patients in case of a new or worsening symptom. Nurses use the UKONS 24-hour telephone triage tool to issue patient management recommendations to the oncology team. Adapted care coordinating procedures facilitate team collaboration and provide patients with timely feedback. CONCLUSION This report clarifies how components of care are created and modified to leverage ePRO to enhance care. The model describes a workflow that enables care teams to be proactive and provide patients with timely, multidisciplinary support to manage symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André Manuel da Silva Lopes
- Institute for Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IFS), Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Route de la Corniche 10, CH-1010, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sara Colomer-Lahiguera
- Institute for Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IFS), Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Route de la Corniche 10, CH-1010, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Célia Darnac
- Institute for Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IFS), Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Route de la Corniche 10, CH-1010, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Stellio Giacomini
- Institute for Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IFS), Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Route de la Corniche 10, CH-1010, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sébastien Bugeia
- Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital (HUG), Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Genève, Switzerland
| | - Garance Gutknecht
- Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital (HUG), Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Genève, Switzerland
| | | | - Veronica Aedo-Lopez
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Medicine and Dentistry, Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nuria Mederos
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sofiya Latifyan
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Alfredo Addedo
- Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital (HUG), Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Genève, Switzerland
| | - Olivier Michielin
- Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital (HUG), Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Genève, Switzerland
| | - Manuela Eicher
- Institute for Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IFS), Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Route de la Corniche 10, CH-1010, Lausanne, Switzerland.
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kidanemariam M, Pieterse AH, van Staalduinen DJ, Bos WJW, Stiggelbout AM. Does value-based healthcare support patient-centred care? A scoping review of the evidence. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e070193. [PMID: 37429675 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standardisation of outcome measures is integral to value-based healthcare (VBHC), which may conflict with patient-centred care, focusing on personalisation. OBJECTIVES We aimed to provide an overview of measures used to assess the effect of VBHC implementation and to examine to what extent the evidence indicates that VBHC supports patient-centred care. DESIGN A scoping review guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE We searched the following databases on 18 February 2021: Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Web of Science. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We included empirical papers assessing the effect of the implementation of VBHC, published after introduction of VBHC in 2006. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two independent reviewers double-screened papers and data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by the other. We classified the study measures used in included papers into six categories: process indicator, cost measure, clinical outcome, patient-reported outcome, patient-reported experience or clinician-reported experience. We then assessed the patient-centredness of the study measures used. RESULTS We included 39 studies using 94 unique study measures. The most frequently used study measures (n=72) were process indicators, cost measures and clinical outcomes, which rarely were patient-centred. The less frequently used (n=20) patient-reported outcome and experience measures often measured a dimension of patient-centred care. CONCLUSION Our study shows that the evidence on VBHC supporting patient-centred care is limited, exposing a knowledge gap in VBHC research. The most frequently used study measures in VBHC research are not patient-centred. The major focus seems to be on measures of quality of care defined from a provider, institution or payer perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha Kidanemariam
- Biomedical Data Sciences, Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Arwen H Pieterse
- Biomedical Data Sciences, Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Dorine J van Staalduinen
- Biomedical Data Sciences, Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Institute of Public Administration, Leiden University, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Willem Jan W Bos
- Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Internal Medicine, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Anne M Stiggelbout
- Biomedical Data Sciences, Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Louis G, Voz B, Guillaume M, Kirkove D, Pétré B. The use of patient-reported outcome measures by healthcare professionals in specialized asthma management centers in French-speaking Belgium: A mixed-methods study. Clin Transl Allergy 2023; 13:e12248. [PMID: 37227417 DOI: 10.1002/clt2.12248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recently, the literature has promoted the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in clinical practice as a means to foster patient engagement. However, conditions necessary to support the use of PROMs to encourage asthma patient engagement are not clearly defined. Therefore, we sought (1) to explore the current and ideal use of PROMs by healthcare professionals (HP) in specialized asthma management centers in French-speaking Belgium and (2) to understand under which conditions the use of PROMs contributes to patient engagement. METHODS We undertook a mixed-methods study with both anonymous online survey and in-person qualitative semi-structured interviews conducted with HPs to understand their perspectives on the routine use of PROMs. HPs were recruited from 16 asthma centers (French-speaking Belgium) identified via the Belgian Respiratory Society. RESULTS Of the 170 HPs identified from the 16 participating centers, 51 (30%) responded to the survey (n = 51) and 11 completed semi-structured interviews. 53% (27/51) of the surveyed HPs reported using PROMs primarily for asthma monitoring and clinical research while all reported that PROMs should primarily be used in practice to facilitate communication with the patient and to address neglected aspects of the care relationship such as the psychosocial aspects of the disease. The qualitative interviews revealed avenues for moving from a medical-centered and utilitarian use of PROMs to a use serving patient engagement. This would require HPs to go beyond their current representation of PROMs, to use instruments offering a more holistic image of the patient, to incorporate PROMs into a digital tool and to integrate PROMs in a patient education process. CONCLUSION The main findings of this study suggest relevant avenues for using PROMs in ways that support patient engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilles Louis
- Department of Public Health, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium
| | - Bernard Voz
- Department of Public Health, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium
| | | | - Delphine Kirkove
- Department of Public Health, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium
| | - Benoit Pétré
- Department of Public Health, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Grant S, Tonkin E, Craddock I, Blom A, Holmes M, Judge A, Masullo A, Perello Nieto M, Song H, Whitehouse M, Flach P, Gooberman-Hill R. Toward Enhanced Clinical Decision Support for Patients Undergoing a Hip or Knee Replacement: Focus Group and Interview Study With Surgeons. JMIR Perioper Med 2023; 6:e36172. [PMID: 37093626 PMCID: PMC10167586 DOI: 10.2196/36172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Revised: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current assessment of recovery after total hip or knee replacement is largely based on the measurement of health outcomes through self-report and clinical observations at follow-up appointments in clinical settings. Home activity-based monitoring may improve assessment of recovery by enabling the collection of more holistic information on a continuous basis. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to introduce orthopedic surgeons to time-series analyses of patient activity data generated from a platform of sensors deployed in the homes of patients who have undergone primary total hip or knee replacement and understand the potential role of these data in postoperative clinical decision-making. METHODS Orthopedic surgeons and registrars were recruited through a combination of convenience and snowball sampling. Inclusion criteria were a minimum required experience in total joint replacement surgery specific to the hip or knee or familiarity with postoperative recovery assessment. Exclusion criteria included a lack of specific experience in the field. Of the 9 approached participants, 6 (67%) orthopedic surgeons and 3 (33%) registrars took part in either 1 of 3 focus groups or 1 of 2 interviews. Data were collected using an action-based approach in which stimulus materials (mock data visualizations) provided imaginative and creative interactions with the data. The data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS Each data visualization was presented sequentially followed by a discussion of key illustrative commentary from participants, ending with a summary of key themes emerging across the focus group and interview data set. CONCLUSIONS The limitations of the evidence are as follows. The data presented are from 1 English hospital. However, all data reflect the views of surgeons following standard national approaches and training. Although convenience sampling was used, participants' background, skills, and experience were considered heterogeneous. Passively collected home monitoring data offered a real opportunity to more objectively characterize patients' recovery from surgery. However, orthopedic surgeons highlighted the considerable difficulty in navigating large amounts of complex data within short medical consultations with patients. Orthopedic surgeons thought that a proposed dashboard presenting information and decision support alerts would fit best with existing clinical workflows. From this, the following guidelines for system design were developed: minimize the risk of misinterpreting data, express a level of confidence in the data, support clinicians in developing relevant skills as time-series data are often unfamiliar, and consider the impact of patient engagement with data in the future. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021862.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Grant
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Emma Tonkin
- Digital Health, Faculty of Engineering, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Ian Craddock
- Digital Health, Faculty of Engineering, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Ashley Blom
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Holmes
- Digital Health, Faculty of Engineering, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Judge
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Hao Song
- Digital Health, Faculty of Engineering, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Whitehouse
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Flach
- Intelligent Systems Laboratory, Department of Computer Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Rachael Gooberman-Hill
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
O'Brien KK, Erlandson KM, Brown DA, Carusone SC, Vera JH, Bergin C, Avery L, Bayoumi AM, Hanna SE, Harding R, Solomon P, St Clair-Sullivan N, O'Shea N, Murray C, Boffito M, Da Silva G, Torres B, McDuff K, Davis AM. Episodic Disability Questionnaire (EDQ) measurement properties among adults living with HIV in Canada, Ireland, United Kingdom, and United States. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-2758163. [PMID: 37066168 PMCID: PMC10104244 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2758163/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/18/2023]
Abstract
Background The Episodic Disability Questionnaire (EDQ) is a generic 35-item patient-reported outcome measure of presence, severity and episodic nature of disability. We assessed the measurement properties of the Episodic Disability Questionnaire (EDQ) with adults living with HIV. Methods We conducted a measurement study with adults living with HIV in eight clinical settings in Canada, Ireland, United Kingdom, and United States. We electronically administered the EDQ followed by three reference measures (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule; Patient Health Questionnaire; Social Support Scale) and a demographic questionnaire. We administered the EDQ only 1 week later. We assessed the internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha; >0.7 acceptable), and test-retest reliability (Intra Class Correlation Coefficient; >0.7 acceptable). We estimated required change in EDQ domain scores to be 95% certain that a change was not due to measurement error (Minimum Detectable Change (MDC95%)). We evaluated construct validity by assessing 36 primary hypotheses of relationships between EDQ scores and scores on the reference measures (> 75% hypotheses confirmed indicated validity). Results 359 participants completed the questionnaires at time point 1, of which 321 (89%) completed the EDQ approximately 1 week later. Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency ranged from 0.84 (social domain) to 0.91 (day domain) for the EDQ severity scale, and 0.72 (uncertainty domain) to 0.88 (day domain) for the EDQ presence scale, and 0.87 (physical, cognitive, mental-emotional domains) to 0.89 (uncertainty domain) for the EDQ episodic scale. ICCs for test-retest reliability ranged from 0.79 (physical domain) to 0.88 (day domain) for the EDQ severity scale and from 0.71 (uncertainty domain) to 0.85 (day domain) for the EDQ presence scale. Highest precision was demonstrated in the severity scale for each domain (MDC95% range: 19-25 out of 100), followed by the presence (MDC95% range: 37-54) and episodic scales (MDC95% range:44-76). Twenty-nine of 36 (81%) construct validity hypotheses were confirmed. Conclusions The EDQ possesses internal consistency reliability, construct validity, and test-retest reliability, with limited precision when administered electronically with adults living with HIV across in clinical settings in four countries. Given the measurement properties, the EDQ can be used for group level comparisons for research and program evaluation in adults living with HIV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Marta Boffito
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Brognara L, Mazzotti A, Arceri A, Artioli E, Casadei G, Bonelli S, Traina F, Faldini C. Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Surgery: Evaluation after Minimally Invasive Reduction and Percutaneous K-Wires Fixation for Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures. Diseases 2023; 11:diseases11020057. [PMID: 37092439 PMCID: PMC10123612 DOI: 10.3390/diseases11020057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The optimal surgical treatment of intra-articular calcaneal fractures (IACF) is still under debate. In the literature, results are based on clinical or radiographical findings. Few studies have evaluated the effect of patient expectations on patient-reported outcomes after surgery and little is known about outcomes directly reported by the patient who experienced it. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) may represent a viable and useful tool for evaluating the efficacy of the procedure and can be considered as an indicators of health-care quality. The aim of this study is to evaluate PROMs after minimally invasive reduction and percutaneous Kirschner-wires fixation for IACF, and to compare PROMs to pre-operative and last follow-up radiographic findings. Methods: 33 consecutive patients with IACF treated with minimally invasive reduction and percutaneous K-wires fixation were included. Data collection included demographics, pre-operative and last available Böhler and Gissane angle X-rays, foot function index (FFI), and foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS). Results: At a mean follow up of 36.7 months, the mean FFI score was 24.3 ± 19.9 and the mean FAOS score was 68 ± 24.8. Patients with better Gissane angle showed better activity limitations FFI subscores. Moreover, worse pre-operative Gissane and Böhler angle were significantly associated with a worse total FAOS score and subscores. Conclusions: Minimally invasive reduction and percutaneous K-wires fixation provided satisfactory PROMs. Despite these results, prospective randomized studies are required to confirm the validity and reliability of PROMs in evaluating different treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Brognara
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Antonio Mazzotti
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
- 1st Orthopaedics and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Alberto Arceri
- 1st Orthopaedics and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Elena Artioli
- 1st Orthopaedics and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Giacomo Casadei
- 1st Orthopaedics and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Simone Bonelli
- 1st Orthopaedics and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Traina
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
- Ortopedia-Traumatologia e Chirurgia Protesica e dei Reimpianti d’anca e di Ginocchio, IRCCS Istituto, Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40125 Bologna, Italy
| | - Cesare Faldini
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
- 1st Orthopaedics and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Turchioe MR, Mangal S, Goyal P, Axsom K, Myers A, Liu LG, Lee J, Campion TR, Creber RM. A RE-AIM Evaluation of a Visualization-Based Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome System. Appl Clin Inform 2023; 14:227-237. [PMID: 36603838 PMCID: PMC10033223 DOI: 10.1055/a-2008-4036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Health care systems are primarily collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for research and clinical care using proprietary, institution- and disease-specific tools for remote assessment. The purpose of this study was to conduct a Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) evaluation of a scalable electronic PRO (ePRO) reporting and visualization system in a single-arm study. METHODS The "mi.symptoms" ePRO system was designed using gerontechnological design principles to ensure high usability among older adults. The system enables longitudinal reporting of disease-agnostic ePROs and includes patient-facing PRO visualizations. We conducted an evaluation of the implementation of the system guided by the RE-AIM framework. Quantitative data were analyzed using basic descriptive statistics, and qualitative data were analyzed using directed content analysis. RESULTS Reach-the total reach of the study was 70 participants (median age: 69, 31% female, 17% Black or African American, 27% reported not having enough financial resources). Effectiveness-half (51%) of participants completed the 2-week follow-up survey and 36% completed all follow-up surveys. Adoption-the desire for increased self-knowledge, the value of tracking symptoms, and altruism motivated participants to adopt the tool. Implementation-the predisposing factor was access to, and comfort with, computers. Three enabling factors were incorporation into routines, multimodal nudges, and ease of use. Maintenance-reinforcing factors were perceived usefulness of viewing symptom reports with the tool and understanding the value of sustained symptom tracking in general. CONCLUSION Challenges in ePRO reporting, particularly sustained patient engagement, remain. Nonetheless, freely available, scalable, disease-agnostic systems may pave the road toward inclusion of a more diverse range of health systems and patients in ePRO collection and use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sabrina Mangal
- University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, Washington, United States
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States
| | - Parag Goyal
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States
| | - Kelly Axsom
- Division of Cardiology, Center for Advanced Cardiac Care, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States
| | - Annie Myers
- Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, United States
| | - Lisa G. Liu
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
| | - Jessie Lee
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
| | - Thomas R. Campion
- University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, Washington, United States
- Clinical and Translational Science Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Crawshaw H, Janagan S, Austin K, Baker C, Day J, Robson JC. Patient-reported outcomes in vasculitis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2023; 37:101829. [PMID: 37277246 DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2023.101829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Systemic vasculitis encompasses a group of multisystem disorders; both the diseases and the treatment strategies can have a significant impact on a patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) to evaluate the patient's view of their condition, treatments, and healthcare journey is essential to the patient-centered care approach. In this paper, we discuss the use of generic, disease-specific, and treatment-specific PROMs and PREMs in systemic vasculitis and future research goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Crawshaw
- Rheumatology Department Gloucestershire Royal Hospital NHS Trust, Great Western Road, Gloucester, Gloucestershire, GL1 3NN, UK.
| | - Shalini Janagan
- Rheumatology Department, Bristol Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Marlborough Street, Bristol, BS1 3NU, UK.
| | - Keziah Austin
- Rheumatology Department, Bristol Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Marlborough Street, Bristol, BS1 3NU, UK; Rheumatology Department, Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Combe Park, Bath, BA1 3NG, UK.
| | - Charlotte Baker
- Rheumatology Department, Bristol Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Marlborough Street, Bristol, BS1 3NU, UK.
| | - Julia Day
- Rheumatology Department, Bristol Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Marlborough Street, Bristol, BS1 3NU, UK.
| | - Joanna C Robson
- Centre for Health and Clinical Research, University of the West of England, Bristol, Room 5-054, Rheumatology Research B502, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, BS2 8HW, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Vach W, Jakob M, Luta G. The double use of PROMs to improve patient-provider communication and to compare providers: a potential conflict? Int J Qual Health Care 2023; 35:6998177. [PMID: 36688588 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 12/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Werner Vach
- Basel Academy for Quality and Research in Medicine, Steinenring 6, Basel CH-4051, Switzerland.,Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel, Spalenring 145, Basel CH-4055, Switzerland
| | - Marcel Jakob
- Crossklinik, Bundesstrasse 1, Basel CH-4054, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 61, Basel CH-4056, Switzerland
| | - George Luta
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomathematics, Georgetown University, 4000 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, DC 20057, USA.,The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Nordre Fasanvej 57, Frederiksberg DK-2000, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Olof Palmes Allé 43-45, Aarhus N DK-8200, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Louis G, Schleich F, Guillaume M, Kirkove D, Nekoee Zahrei H, Donneau AF, Henket M, Paulus V, Guissard F, Louis R, Pétré B. Development and validation of a predictive model combining patient-reported outcome measures, spirometry and exhaled nitric oxide fraction for asthma diagnosis. ERJ Open Res 2023; 9:00451-2022. [PMID: 36755965 PMCID: PMC9900444 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00451-2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Although asthma is a common disease, its diagnosis remains a challenge in clinical practice with both over- and underdiagnosis. Here, we performed a prospective observational study investigating the value of symptom intensity scales alone or combined with spirometry and exhaled nitric oxide fraction (F ENO) to aid in asthma diagnosis. Methods Over a 38-month period we recruited 303 untreated patients complaining of symptoms suggestive of asthma (wheezing, dyspnoea, cough, sputum production and chest tightness). The whole cohort was split into a training cohort (n=166) for patients recruited during odd months and a validation cohort (n=137) for patients recruited during even months. Asthma was diagnosed either by a positive reversibility test (≥12% and ≥200 mL in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)) and/or a positive bronchial challenge test (provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 ≤8 mg·mL-1). In order to assess the diagnostic performance of symptoms, spirometric indices and F ENO, we performed receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and multivariable logistic regression to identify the independent factors associated with asthma in the training cohort. Then, the derived predictive models were applied to the validation cohort. Results 63% of patients in the derivation cohort and 58% of patients in the validation cohort were diagnosed as being asthmatic. After logistic regression, wheezing was the only symptom to be significantly associated with asthma. Similarly, FEV1 (% pred), FEV1/forced vital capacity (%) and F ENO were significantly associated with asthma. A predictive model combining these four parameters yielded an area under the curve of 0.76 (95% CI 0.66-0.84) in the training cohort and 0.73 (95% CI 0.65-0.82) when applied to the validation cohort. Conclusion Combining a wheezing intensity scale with spirometry and F ENO may help in improving asthma diagnosis accuracy in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilles Louis
- Department of Public Health, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium,Corresponding author: Gilles Louis ()
| | - Florence Schleich
- Department of Pneumology, GIGAI3, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium
| | | | - Delphine Kirkove
- Department of Public Health, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium
| | | | | | - Monique Henket
- Department of Pneumology, GIGAI3, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium
| | - Virginie Paulus
- Department of Pneumology, GIGAI3, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium
| | | | - Renaud Louis
- Department of Pneumology, GIGAI3, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium
| | - Benoit Pétré
- Department of Public Health, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Gintaute A, Zitzmann NU, Brägger U, Weber K, Joda T. Patient-reported outcome measures compared to professional dental assessments of monolithic ZrO 2 implant fixed dental prostheses in complete digital workflows: A double-blind crossover randomized controlled trial. J Prosthodont 2023; 32:18-25. [PMID: 35938349 PMCID: PMC10087166 DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This double-blind randomized controlled trial analyzed patient-reported outcome measures in terms of subjective patient satisfaction compared to objective dental evaluation of prosthetic treatment with 3-unit monolithic zirconium dioxide implant fixed dental prostheses (iFDPs) in 3 digital workflows. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty patients were restored with 3 iFDPs each on Straumann TL-implants with 2 completely digital workflows using different intraoral optical scanning systems with model-free fabrication of the restoration (Trios 3/3Shape [Test-1]; Virtuo Vivo/Straumann [Test-2]), and mixed analog-digital workflow with conventional impressions and digitized gypsum casts (Impregum/3M Espe [Control]). The order of impression-taking and the prosthetic try-in were randomly allocated. Sixty iFDPs were compared for patient satisfaction and dental evaluation using ANOVA. RESULTS For iFDP evaluation, patients generally provided more favorable ratings than dental experts, regardless of the workflow. ANOVA revealed no significant difference for overall satisfaction when comparing Test-1, Test-2, or Control, either for patients (f-ratio: 0.13; p = 0.876) or dentist (f-ratio: 1.55: p = 0.221). Secondary, patients clearly favored the digital impression workflows over the conventional approach (f-ratio: 14.57; p < 0.001). Overall, the 3Shape workflow (Test-1) received the highest scores for all analyses. CONCLUSIONS The different digital workflows demonstrated minor influence on the subjective and objective evaluation of the monolithic zirconium dioxide iFDPs in nonesthetic regions; however, the dentist may significantly increase patient satisfaction by choosing intraoral scanning instead of conventional impressions. The dentist has to consider individual patients' needs to fulfill their expectations for a personalized solution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aiste Gintaute
- Department of Reconstructive Dentistry, University Center for Dental Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Nicola U Zitzmann
- Department of Reconstructive Dentistry, University Center for Dental Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Urs Brägger
- Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Karin Weber
- Department of Reconstructive Dentistry, University Center for Dental Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Tim Joda
- Department of Reconstructive Dentistry, University Center for Dental Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Sipma WS, de Jong MFC, Meuleman Y, Hemmelder MH, Ahaus KCTB. Facing the challenges of PROM implementation in Dutch dialysis care: Patients' and professionals' perspectives. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0285822. [PMID: 37186606 PMCID: PMC10184911 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are increasingly used in routine clinical practice to facilitate patients in sharing and discussing health-related topics with their clinician. This study focuses on the implementation experiences of healthcare professionals and patients during the early implementation phase of the newly developed Dutch set of dialysis PROMs and aims to understand the process of early implementation of PROMs from the users' perspectives. METHODS This is a qualitative study among healthcare professionals (physicians and nursing staff: n = 13) and patients (n = 14) of which 12 were receiving haemodialysis and 2 peritoneal dialysis. Semi-structured interviews were used to understand the barriers and facilitators that both professionals and patients encounter when starting to implement PROMs. RESULTS The early PROM implementation process is influenced by a variety of factors that we divided into barriers and facilitators. We identified four barriers: patient´s indifference to PROMs, scepticism on the benefits of aggregated PROM data, the limited treatment options open to doctors and organizational issues such as mergers, organizational problems and renovations. We also describe four facilitators: professional involvement and patient support, a growing understanding of the use of PROMs during the implementation, quick gains from using PROMs such as receiving instant feedback and a clear ambition on patient care such as a shared view on patient involvement and management support. CONCLUSIONS In this qualitative study carried out during the early implementation phase of the Dutch dialysis PROM set, we found that patients did not yet consider the PROM set to be a useful additional tool to share information with their doctor. This was despite the professionals' primary reason for using PROMs being to improve patient-doctor communication. Furthermore, the perceived lack of intervention options was frustrating for some of the professionals. We found that nurses could be important enablers of further implementation because of their intensive relationship with dialysis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wim S Sipma
- Department of Health Services Management & Organisation, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margriet F C de Jong
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Yvette Meuleman
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marc H Hemmelder
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- CARIM school for cardiovascular research, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kees C T B Ahaus
- Department of Health Services Management & Organisation, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hasannejadasl H, Roumen C, van der Poel H, Vanneste B, van Roermund J, Aben K, Kalendralis P, Osong B, Kiemeney L, Van Oort I, Verwey R, Hochstenbach L, J. Bloemen- van Gurp E, Dekker A, Fijten RRR. Development and external validation of multivariate prediction models for erectile dysfunction in men with localized prostate cancer. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0276815. [PMID: 36867616 PMCID: PMC9983834 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 03/04/2023] Open
Abstract
While the 10-year survival rate for localized prostate cancer patients is very good (>98%), side effects of treatment may limit quality of life significantly. Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common burden associated with increasing age as well as prostate cancer treatment. Although many studies have investigated the factors affecting erectile dysfunction (ED) after prostate cancer treatment, only limited studies have investigated whether ED can be predicted before the start of treatment. The advent of machine learning (ML) based prediction tools in oncology offers a promising approach to improve the accuracy of prediction and quality of care. Predicting ED may help aid shared decision-making by making the advantages and disadvantages of certain treatments clear, so that a tailored treatment for an individual patient can be chosen. This study aimed to predict ED at 1-year and 2-year post-diagnosis based on patient demographics, clinical data and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) measured at diagnosis. We used a subset of the ProZIB dataset collected by the Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (Integraal Kankercentrum Nederland; IKNL) that contained information on 964 localized prostate cancer cases from 69 Dutch hospitals for model training and external validation. Two models were generated using a logistic regression algorithm coupled with Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE). The first predicted ED 1 year post-diagnosis and required 10 pre-treatment variables; the second predicted ED 2 years post-diagnosis with 9 pre-treatment variables. The validation AUCs were 0.84 and 0.81 for 1 year and 2 years post-diagnosis respectively. To immediately allow patients and clinicians to use these models in the clinical decision-making process, nomograms were generated. In conclusion, we successfully developed and validated two models that predicted ED in patients with localized prostate cancer. These models will allow physicians and patients alike to make informed evidence-based decisions about the most suitable treatment with quality of life in mind.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hajar Hasannejadasl
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Cheryl Roumen
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Henk van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Joep van Roermund
- Department of Urology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Katja Aben
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Petros Kalendralis
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Biche Osong
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Lambertus Kiemeney
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Inge Van Oort
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Renee Verwey
- Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Esther J. Bloemen- van Gurp
- Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands
- Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Andre Dekker
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rianne R. R. Fijten
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- * E-mail: ,
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bandurska E. The Voice of Patients Really Matters: Using Patient-Reported Outcomes and Experiences Measures to Assess Effectiveness of Home-Based Integrated Care-A Scoping Review of Practice. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 11:healthcare11010098. [PMID: 36611558 PMCID: PMC9819009 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11010098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The aim of the study is to analyze the prevalence of using patients’ reported outcomes measures and experiences (PROMs and PREMs) in relation to integrated care (IC). Material and methods: To select eligible studies (<10 years, full-text), PubMed was used. The general subject of the articles referring to the type of disease was indicated on the basis of a review of all full-text publications discussing the effectiveness of IC (N = 6518). The final search included MeSH headings related to outcomes measures and IC. Full-text screening resulted in including 73 articles (23 on COPD, 40 on diabetes/obesity and 10 on depression) with 93.391 participants. Results: Analysis indicated that authors used multiple outcome measures, with 54.8% of studies including at least one patient reported. PROMs were more often used than PREMs. Specific (disease or condition/dimension) outcome measures were reported more often than general, especially those dedicated to self-assessment of health in COPD and depression. PROMs and PREMs were most commonly used in studies from the USA and Netherlands. Conclusion: Using PROMS/PREMS is becoming more popular, although it is varied, both due to the place of research and type of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ewa Bandurska
- Center for Competence Development, Integrated Care and e-Health, Medical University of Gdańsk, Debowa 30, 80-208 Gdansk, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Antonio MG, Davis S, Smith M, Burgener P, Price M, Lavallee DC, Fletcher S, Lau F. Advancing digital patient-centered measurement methods for team-based care. Digit Health 2022; 8:20552076221145420. [PMID: 36601284 PMCID: PMC9806437 DOI: 10.1177/20552076221145420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To conceptualize new methods for integrating patient-centered measurement into team-based care. Methods A standalone portal was introduced into a rural clinic to support conceptualization of new methods for integration of patient-centered measurement in team-based care. The portal housed mental health-related online resources, three patient-reported measures and a self-action plan. Six providers and four patients used the portal for four months. Our data collection techniques included clinic discussions, one-on-one interviews, workflow diagrams and data generated through the portal. Analysis was supported through coding interview transcripts, looking across multiple sources of research data and research team discussions. Results Our research team conceptualized five team-based patient-centered measurement methods through this study. Patient-centered measurement Team Mapping offfers a technique to provide greater clarity of care-team roles and responsibilities in data collected through patient-centered measurement. Longitudinal Care Alignment can guide the care-team on incorporating patient-centered measurement into ongoing provider-patient interactions. Digital Tool Exploration can be used to evaluate a team's readiness toward digital tool adoption, and the impact of these tools. Team-based quality improvement serves as a framework for engaging teams in patient-centered quality improvement. Shared learning is a method that promotes patientprovider interactions that validate patient's perspectives of their care. Conclusion The portal illuminated new methods for the integration of patient-centered measurement in team-based care. The first three proposed patient-centered measurement methods provides ways to assess how a clinic can incorporate patient-centered measurement methods into team-based care. The latter two methods focus on the aim of patient-generated data in which patient's values and perspectives are represented and quality of patient-centered care can be evaluated. Further testing is needed to assess the utility of these patient-centered measurement methods across different clinical settings and domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcy G Antonio
- School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA,Marcy G Antonio, School of Information,
University of Michigan, School of Information, 105 State Street, S Ann Arbor,
MI, 48109, USA.
| | - Selena Davis
- School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada
| | - Mindy Smith
- College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI, USA,Patient Advisory Committee of the Kootenay-Boundary Collaborative
Services Committee, Cranbrook, Canada
| | | | - Morgan Price
- Department of Family Practice, Innovation and Support Unit, Faculty
of Medicine, University of British
Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Danielle C Lavallee
- BC SUPPORT Unit, Michael Smith Health Research BC, Vancouver,
Canada,School of Population and Public Health, University of British
Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Sarah Fletcher
- Department of Family Practice, Innovation and Support Unit, Faculty
of Medicine, University of British
Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Francis Lau
- School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Furumaya A, Nooijen LE, Haring MPD, van Oers HA, van Beneden M, van Rosmalen BV, Takkenberg RB, Kazemier G, Besselink MG, de Meijer VE, Erdmann JI. Development of a set of patient reported outcome measures for patients with benign liver tumours and cysts: patient focus groups and systematic review. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2022; 6:124. [PMID: 36484883 PMCID: PMC9733760 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-022-00531-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) may be useful for patients with benign liver tumours and cysts (BLTC) to evaluate the impact of treatment and/or guide shared decision making. Yet, a set of PROMs relevant to patients with BLTC is currently unavailable. In this study, we selected a PROMs set for patients with BLTC. METHODS Potentially relevant patient reported outcomes (PROs) were selected by psychologist-researchers based on keywords used or suggested by participants of two virtual focus groups meetings consisting of thirteen female BLTC patients with a median age of 50 years. Subsequently, patients were asked to report their most relevant PROs. PROMs identified by systematic literature review and computerized adaptive tests (CATs) in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) were considered in selecting the final PROMs set to assess relevant outcomes. RESULTS The most important PROs were: insecurity/anxiety (11/12 patients), pain (9/12 patients), fatigue (8/12 patients), and limitations in daily life (5/12 patients). The literature review included 23 studies, which used various generic and disease-specific PROMs, often not measuring (all) relevant PROs. The final selected PROMs set included numerical rating scales for pain, two questions on overall health and quality of life and four PROMIS CATs. CONCLUSIONS A PROMs set generically and efficiently measuring outcomes relevant for patients with BLTC was developed and may be used in future research and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia Furumaya
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lynn E. Nooijen
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn P. D. Haring
- grid.4494.d0000 0000 9558 4598Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Hedy A. van Oers
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychosocial Care, Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,Amsterdam Reproduction and Development and Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marlou van Beneden
- grid.12380.380000 0004 1754 9227Department of Strategy and Policy and Care Support, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Belle V. van Rosmalen
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R. Bart Takkenberg
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- grid.12380.380000 0004 1754 9227Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.16872.3a0000 0004 0435 165XCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent E. de Meijer
- grid.4494.d0000 0000 9558 4598Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Joris I. Erdmann
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Grumi S, Morelli F, Mascherpa E, Decortes F, Luparia A, Provenzi L, Signorini S. Patient- and parent-reported outcome measures of developmental adaptive abilities in visually impaired children: The Visual Impairment Developmental Autonomy (VIDA) scale. RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES 2022; 131:104331. [PMID: 36174376 DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
In the pediatric context, parents' and patients' engagement in the care process is strongly recommended and could be pursued using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), which therefore become useful for planning and monitoring treatments. Nevertheless, few data are available from families of children with neurodevelopmental disorders such as visual impairment (VI). The Visual Impairment Developmental Autonomy (VIDA) project aims to develop and validate a patient- and parent-reported tool to measure the most relevant aspects concerning everyday adaptive abilities in children and adolescents with visual impairment: the VIDA scale. The present paper illustrates the Delphi process of item generation engaging parents and patients and presents a protocol for the validation of this new co-designed tool in an Italian visually impaired pediatric population. Twenty-three families and five adolescents provided a list of 192 items and assessed their relevance. Items were categorized in 5 areas of adaptive abilities (i.e., table manners, clothing, personal hygiene, orientation and mobility, and socio-affectivity) and into three age ranges based on the patient's age. The final 102-item Vida Scale will be administered to a minimum of 300 visually impaired children together with measures of quality of life and child adjustment to investigate its psychometric properties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Grumi
- Developmental Psychobiology Lab, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Federica Morelli
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Developmental Neuro-Ophthalmology Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Eleonora Mascherpa
- Developmental Neuro-Ophthalmology Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesco Decortes
- Developmental Neuro-Ophthalmology Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Antonella Luparia
- Developmental Neuro-Ophthalmology Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Livio Provenzi
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Developmental Psychobiology Lab, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Sabrina Signorini
- Developmental Neuro-Ophthalmology Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hutchens J, Frawley J, Sullivan EA. Quality of life and mental health of women who had cardiac disease in pregnancy and postpartum. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 22:797. [PMID: 36307772 PMCID: PMC9617394 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-05123-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Cardiac disease is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality yet there is limited research on women’s experiences and quality of life (QoL) outcomes. The aim of this study is to explore the general and health-related QoL (HRQoL) and mental health outcomes for women who have experienced cardiac disease in pregnancy and the first 12 months postpartum (CDPP). Methods This exploratory descriptive study recruited 43 women with acquired, genetic and congenital CDPP. Patient reported outcomes measures (PROMs) used were: WHOQoL-Bref, a Kansas City Cardiac Questionnaire (KCCQ), the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21), the Cardiac Anxiety Questionnaire (CAQ) plus newly developed questions. Results Women reported low health satisfaction (51.7/100), physical health (55.2/100) and low HRQoL (63.1/100). Women had clinically significant scores for depression (24%), anxiety (22%) and stress (19.5%) (DASS-21) and 44.5% scored at least moderate anxiety on the CAQ. Most women (83.7%) were advised to avoid pregnancy which 88.9% found “upsetting” to “devastating”; 10.0% were offered counselling. Most women were concerned about reduced longevity (88.1%), offspring developing a cardiac condition (73.8%), and the limitations on enjoyment of life (57.1%). Women missed medical appointments due to cost (25.03%) and difficulty arranging childcare (45.5%). Conclusion The majority of women reported inadequate information and counselling support, with women with CDPP having sustained impaired QoL and mental health outcomes. The new and modified questions relating to mothering and children reflected the primacy of mothering to women’s identity and needs. Supplementary information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-05123-x.
Collapse
|
41
|
Slovak Translation and Cross-Cultural Validation of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT10 ®). J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11195966. [PMID: 36233831 PMCID: PMC9570619 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11195966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The objective of the study was the language adaptation and verification of psychometric properties of the Slovak version of the EAT10® questionnaire. Methods: The original English version of the questionnaire was translated into the Slovak language. The research group included 136 control participants and 51 dysphagic patients. Test−retest reliability, item analysis, internal consistency, construct and clinical validity, and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis were performed to verify the psychometric properties of the Slovak EAT10®. Results: The internal consistency assessed with Cronbach’s alpha is excellent (α = 0.94). Statistical analysis of the Slovak version of EAT10® showed excellent reliability (0.91, p < 0.001) in the test−retest. Through item-to-total correlation, we found out that all items significantly correlated with the overall score in EAT10®. Factor analysis proved a high construct validity. The EAT10® questionnaire was able to reveal a latent variable: a swallowing disorder, which was affecting a group of patients. The clinical validity results confirmed statistically significant differences in the mean scores of the control and dysphagic groups (z = −10.30; p < 0.001). By dividing the dysphagic group into four subgroups (Head and Neck Cancer, Extraesophageal Reflux, Iatrogenic, and Neurological) there were nonsignificant differences in the mean scores of the subgroups. The cut-off value for the Slovak EAT10® is three points. Conclusion: The Slovak EAT10® is a valid and reliable tool designed for the subjective assessment of oropharyngeal dysphagia in patients.
Collapse
|
42
|
Patients' and clinicians' perspectives on the clinical utility of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Foot Disease Activity Index. Rheumatol Int 2022; 42:1807-1817. [PMID: 35622086 PMCID: PMC9136191 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-022-05147-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Although patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are recommended in clinical practice, their application in routine care is limited. The Rheumatoid Arthritis Foot Disease Activity Index (RADAI-F5) is a validated PROM for assessing foot disease in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To explore patient and clinician opinions and perceptions of the clinical utility of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Foot Disease Activity Index (RADAI-F5), eight RA patients and eight clinicians routinely involved in the management of RA patients participated in one semi-structured remote video-based interview. They provided their perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to clinical implementation of the RADAI-F5. Three global themes were identified; 'Feet are a priority' as the impact of RA on the feet negatively impacted upon patient quality of life. The second theme was 'Need for a clinically feasible foot PROM' as participants recognised the current lack of a clinically feasible tool to determine RA foot disease. The third global theme of 'Implementation' was drawn together to form two subordinate themes: 'Facilitators to RADAI-F5 implementation' as the tool can promote communication, guide management, help screen foot symptoms, monitor foot disease status and treatments, and promote patient education and; 'Barriers to RADAI-F5 implementation' as there were associated practical difficulties, including lack of appointment time, administrative burdens, IT barriers and preference for further RADAI-F5 validation using imaging. The RADAI-F5 has significant potential as a clinical tool to aid foot disease management. However, implementation challenges must be overcome before broad adoption in rheumatology clinics.
Collapse
|
43
|
Antela A, Bernardino JI, de Quirós JCLB, Bachiller P, Fuster-RuizdeApodaca MJ, Puig J, Rodríguez S, Castrejón I, Álvarez B, Hermenegildo M. Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in HIV Infection: Points to Consider and Challenges. Infect Dis Ther 2022; 11:2017-2033. [PMID: 36066841 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-022-00678-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to reach consensus on the use of PROs (patient-reported outcome measures) in people living with HIV (PLHIV). METHODS A scientific committee of professionals with experience in PROMs methodology issued recommendations and defined the points to support by evidence. A systematic review of the literature identified the coverage, utility, and psychometric properties of PROMs used in PLHIV. A Delphi survey was launched to measure the degree of agreement with the recommendations of a group of practicing clinicians and a group of patient representatives. RESULTS Four principles and ten recommendations were issued; however, the results of the Delphi showed significant differences in the opinion between health professionals and PLHIV, and polarization within collectives, hampering consensus. CONCLUSIONS Despite a wealth of evidence on the benefit of PROMs, there are clear barriers to their use by healthcare professionals in HIV care. Intervention on these barriers is paramount to allow truly patient-centered care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Antela
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago (CHUS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
| | | | | | - Pablo Bachiller
- Internal Medicine Department, Complejo Asistencial de Segovia, Segovia, Spain
| | | | - Jordi Puig
- Hospital Universitario Germans Trias I Pujol, Fundació Lluita Contra La Sida I Les Malalties Infeccioses, Badalona, Spain
| | | | - Isabel Castrejón
- Rheumatology Department, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Madrid, Spain
| | - Beatriz Álvarez
- HIV and Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Karvandi E, Hanrahan JG, Khan DZ, Boloux PM, Bremner F, Cabrilo I, Dorward N, Grieve J, Jackson S, Jimenez G, Serrano I, Nowak VA, Kolias A, Baldeweg SE, Marcus HJ. A patient-reported outcome measure for patients with pituitary adenoma undergoing transsphenoidal surgery. Pituitary 2022; 25:673-683. [PMID: 35838913 PMCID: PMC9345822 DOI: 10.1007/s11102-022-01251-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pituitary adenomas affect patients' quality-of-life (QoL) across several domains, with long-term implications even following gross-total resection or disease remission. While clinical outcomes can assess treatment efficacy, they do not capture variations in QoL. We present the development and validation of a patient reported outcome measure (PROM) for patients with pituitary adenomas undergoing transsphenoidal surgery. METHODS The COSMIN checklist informed the development of the pituitary outcome score (POS). Consecutive patients undergoing surgical treatment for suspected pituitary adenoma at a single centre were included prospectively. An expert focus group and patient interviews informed item generation. Item reduction was conducted through exploratory factor analysis and expert consensus, followed by assessment of the tool's validity, reliability, responsiveness, and interpretability. RESULTS 96 patients with a median age of 50 years validated the POS. The final questionnaire included 25 questions with four subscales: EQ-5D-5L-QoL, Visual Symptoms, Endocrine Symptoms and Nasal Symptoms. CONCLUSION The POS is the first validated PROM for patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery for a pituitary adenoma. This PROM could be integrated into contemporary practice to provide patient-centred outcomes assessment for this patient group, aligning more closely with patient objectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elika Karvandi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
- Division of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
| | - John Gerrard Hanrahan
- Division of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Danyal Zaman Khan
- Division of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Pierre-Marc Boloux
- Department of Diabetes & Endocrinology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Fion Bremner
- Department of Neuro-Ophthalmology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Ivan Cabrilo
- Division of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Neil Dorward
- Division of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Joan Grieve
- Division of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Sue Jackson
- Department of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Glenda Jimenez
- Division of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Inma Serrano
- Division of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Victoria Anne Nowak
- Department of Neuro-Ophthalmology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Angelos Kolias
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Division of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Stephanie E Baldeweg
- Department of Diabetes & Endocrinology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Centre for Obesity and Metabolism, Department of Experimental and Translational Medicine, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Hani Joseph Marcus
- Division of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Mou D, Mjaset C, Sokas CM, Virji A, Bokhour B, Heng M, Sisodia RC, Pusic AL, Rosenthal MB. Impetus of US hospital leaders to invest in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e061761. [PMID: 35793919 PMCID: PMC9260769 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Though hospital leaders across the USA have invested significant resources in collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), there are very limited data on the impetus for hospital leadership to establish PROM programmes. In this qualitative study, we identify the drivers and motivators of PROM collection among hospital leaders in the USA. DESIGN Exploratory qualitative study. SETTING Thirty-seven hospital leaders representing seven different institutions with successful PROMs programs across twenty US states. METHODS Semistructured interviews conducted with hospital leaders. Transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Leaders strongly believe that collecting PROMs is the 'right thing to do' and that the culture of the institution plays an important role in enabling PROMs. The study participants often believe that their institutions deliver superior care and that PROMs can be used to demonstrate the value of their services to payors and patients. Direct financial incentives are relatively weak motivators for collection of PROMs. Most hospital leaders have reservations about using PROMs in their current state as a meaningful performance metric. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that hospital leaders feel a strong moral imperative to collect PROMs, which is also supported by the culture of their institution. Although PROMs are used in negotiations with payors, direct financial return on investment is not a strong driver for the collection of PROMs. Understanding why leaders of major healthcare institutions invest in PROMs is critical to understanding the role that PROMs play in the US healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danny Mou
- Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Physician Organization, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Christer Mjaset
- Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Commonwealth Fund, New York, New York, USA
| | - Claire M Sokas
- Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Azan Virji
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Barbara Bokhour
- Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marilyn Heng
- Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rachel C Sisodia
- Physician Organization, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrea L Pusic
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Patient Reported Outcome Value and Experience (PROVE) Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Meredith B Rosenthal
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
van der Horst D, van Uden-Kraan C, Parent E, Bart J, Waverijn G, Verberk-Jonkers I, van den Dorpel M, Pieterse A, Bos W. Optimizing the use of patients’ individual outcome information – development and usability tests of a Chronic Kidney Disease dashboard. Int J Med Inform 2022; 166:104838. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
47
|
Assessing multidimensional complexity in home care: congruencies and discrepancies between patients and nurses. BMC Nurs 2022; 21:166. [PMID: 35751082 PMCID: PMC9230082 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-022-00942-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Person-centered care allows for the inclusion of the totality of a person’s needs and preferences, beyond just the clinical or medical aspect. This approach requires the development of tools to allow for the integration of the patient in his/her healthcare. Based on a 30-item tool developed for nurses to evaluate the complexity of home care situations (COMID), this study proposed a version for the patients (i.e. COMID-P). Both instruments were used, independently by nurses and patients, to rate the complexity of individual situations, in order to compare ratings. Methods The COMID-P and the COMID were completed during the fraXity study at the patients’ homes, independently by patients (aged 65 and over) and nurses. Item-level and scale-level analyses were performed using, Kappa and McNemar tests, and intra-class correlation (ICC). Results A total of 159 pairs of COMID and COMID-P ratings were retained for analyses. Results demonstrated a high degree of patient/nurse agreement for 12/30 items, a moderate agreement for 10/30 items, and a low degree of agreement for 7/30 items. The intra-class correlation between the COMID-P and the COMID was high (ICC= .826, 95%CI [.761-.873]). Conclusions The results demonstrate that patients and nurses can assess complexity using tools that have comparable structural properties. They also reveal congruencies and discrepancies in scoring the components of complexity, highlighting the need of reaching consensus in designing care plans. Further work is needed to demonstrate the benefits of joint assessment in developing care plans that truly meet patients’ needs. Trial registration The fraXity study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03883425, on March 20, 2019.
Collapse
|
48
|
Knauer J, Terhorst Y, Philippi P, Kallinger S, Eiler S, Kilian R, Waldmann T, Moshagen M, Bader M, Baumeister H. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a web-based routine assessment with integrated recommendations for action for depression and anxiety (RehaCAT+): protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial for patients with elevated depressive symptoms in rehabilitation facilities. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e061259. [PMID: 35738644 PMCID: PMC9226881 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The integration of a web-based computer-adaptive patient-reported outcome test (CAT) platform with persuasive design optimised features including recommendations for action into routine healthcare could provide a promising way to translate reliable diagnostic results into action. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of such a platform for depression and anxiety (RehaCAT+) compared with the standard diagnostic system (RehaCAT) in cardiological and orthopaedic health clinics in routine care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A two-arm, pragmatic, cluster-randomised controlled trial will be conducted. Twelve participating rehabilitation clinics in Germany will be randomly assigned to a control (RehaCAT) or experimental group (RehaCAT+) in a 1:1 design. A total sample of 1848 participants will be recruited across all clinics. The primary outcome, depression severity at 12 months follow-up (T3), will be assessed using the CAT Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Emotional Distress-Depression Item set. Secondary outcomes are depression at discharge (T1) and 6 months follow-up (T2) as well as anxiety, satisfaction with participation in social roles and activities, pain impairment, fatigue, sleep, health-related quality of life, self-efficacy, physical functioning, alcohol, personality and health economic-specific general quality of life and socioeconomic cost and benefits at T1-3. User behaviour, acceptance, facilitating and hindering factors will be assessed with semistructured qualitative interviews. Additionally, a smart sensing substudy will be conducted, with daily ecological momentary assessments and passive collection of smartphone usage variables. Data analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle with additional per-protocol analyses. Cost-effectiveness analyses will be conducted from a societal perspective and the perspective of the statutory pension insurance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study will be conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki. The Ethics Committee of Ulm University, has approved the study (on 24 February 2021 ref. 509/20). Written informed consent will be obtained for all participants. Results will be published via peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER DRKS00027447.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Knauer
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Yannik Terhorst
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Paula Philippi
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Selina Kallinger
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Sandro Eiler
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Reinhold Kilian
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Tamara Waldmann
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Morten Moshagen
- Department of Psychological Research Methods, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Martina Bader
- Department of Psychological Research Methods, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Harald Baumeister
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Mangal S, Park L, Reading Turchioe M, Choi J, Niño de Rivera S, Myers A, Goyal P, Dugdale L, Masterson Creber R. Building trust in research through information and intent transparency with health information: representative cross-sectional survey of 502 US adults. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022; 29:1535-1545. [PMID: 35699571 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocac084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Participation in healthcare research shapes health policy and practice; however, low trust is a barrier to participation. We evaluated whether returning health information (information transparency) and disclosing intent of data use (intent transparency) impacts trust in research. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted an online survey with a representative sample of 502 US adults. We assessed baseline trust and change in trust using 6 use cases representing the Social-Ecological Model. We assessed descriptive statistics and associations between trust and sociodemographic variables using logistic and multinomial regression. RESULTS Most participants (84%) want their health research information returned. Black/African American participants were more likely to increase trust in research with individual information transparency (odds ratio (OR) 2.06 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-4.34]) and with intent transparency when sharing with chosen friends and family (3.66 [1.98-6.77]), doctors and nurses (1.96 [1.10-3.65]), or health tech companies (1.87 [1.02-3.40]). Asian, Native American or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, Multirace, and individuals with a race not listed, were more likely to increase trust when sharing with health policy makers (1.88 [1.09-3.30]). Women were less likely to increase trust when sharing with friends and family (0.55 [0.35-0.87]) or health tech companies (0.46 [0.31-0.70]). DISCUSSION Participants wanted their health information returned and would increase their trust in research with transparency when sharing health information. CONCLUSION Trust in research is influenced by interrelated factors. Future research should recruit diverse samples with lower baseline trust levels to explore changes in trust, with variation on the type of information shared.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Mangal
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Leslie Park
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Jacky Choi
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Annie Myers
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Parag Goyal
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lydia Dugdale
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ruth Masterson Creber
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ennis N, Vance C, Bradbury R. Academic-industry partnership advancing cannabis science: A Complementary Care Practice-Based Research Network. Complement Ther Med 2022; 66:102821. [PMID: 35247600 PMCID: PMC10680467 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2022.102821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Data collected during routine care holds the potential to support hypothesis generation, study feasibility, and provide insight regarding how to address problems under real world conditions. Currently there are no practice-based research networks in Florida that focus on complementary care in general or medical marijuana specifically. Through an academic-industry partnership, we sought to develop a practice-based research network focused on cannabis science and create a de-identified database for analyses that support hypothesis generation, study feasibility estimation, and a network that also facilitates recruitment into future research studies. DESIGN The Complementary Care Practice-Based Research Network (CC-PBRN) is a centralized repository, which contains electronic health records (EHR) from a private medical cannabis health system in the state of Florida. RESULTS This paper provides cross-sectional descriptive analyses of the CC-PBRN's 43,802 currently active patients. There are 24 clinics in the network with nine in North Florida, 11 in Central Florida, and 4 in South Florida. CONCLUSION This network serves as a statewide resource for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) research in medical marijuana. The network currently has numerous outpatient practices with thousands of patients that are a potential source of research participants for both observational studies as well as traditional clinical trials. The outpatient clinical practices can also serve as units of analysis for pragmatic trials comparing different care protocols and organizational structure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Ennis
- Dept. of Behavioral Sciences and Social Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
| | - Cameron Vance
- Medical Marijuana Treatment Clinics of Florida, Tallahassee, FL, United States
| | - Russell Bradbury
- Dept. of Behavioral Sciences and Social Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|