1
|
Zhao C, Li C, Yu X, Dai X, Zou W. Effectiveness and safety of pharmacological prophylaxis for chronic migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Neurol 2024; 271:5762-5777. [PMID: 38910144 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-024-12512-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Revised: 06/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic migraine (CM) significantly impacts both the physical and mental health of patients. Current studies on the safety and effectiveness of different pharmacological prophylaxis interventions for CM are limited. To address this gap, we conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare and rank the efficacy and safety of various drugs in preventing CM. METHODS Two independent researchers systematically searched four databases from their inception to August 1, 2023, to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Subsequently, they performed data extraction and assessed the risk of bias. A NMA was then performed. Continuous outcomes and binary outcomes were displayed as weighted mean difference (WMD) and risk ratio (RR), respectively, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to rank each intervention separately. RESULTS 24 RCTs involving 8789 patients were included. Compared to placebo, Botulinum toxin A demonstrated the most significant effect in reducing the monthly migraine days for CM patients (MD = 3.88, 95% CI 0.48, 7.28); in terms of improving the response rate by a 50% reduction in monthly migraine days, Topiramate (RR = 50.06, 95% CI 3.18, 787.30) was the most effective; there was no statistically significant difference between all preventive drugs and placebo in improving the migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) score; in terms of the incidence of adverse events, Eptinezumab (RR = 1.09, 95% CI 0.8, 1.54) exhibited the highest safety profile. CONCLUSION Among all the drugs for the preventive drugs for CM, Botulinum toxin A has the best efficacy and safety profile, closely followed by calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengqi Zhao
- First School of Clinical Medicine, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, 150040, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Changxin Li
- The Second Department of Rehabilitation, Heilongjiang Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Harbin, 150030, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Xueping Yu
- The Third Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, The First Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, 26 Heping Road, Xiangfang District, Harbin, 150040, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Xiaohong Dai
- The Third Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, The First Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, 26 Heping Road, Xiangfang District, Harbin, 150040, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Wei Zou
- The Third Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, The First Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, 26 Heping Road, Xiangfang District, Harbin, 150040, Heilongjiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Edvinsson JCA, Viganò A, Alekseeva A, Alieva E, Arruda R, De Luca C, D'Ettore N, Frattale I, Kurnukhina M, Macerola N, Malenkova E, Maiorova M, Novikova A, Řehulka P, Rapaccini V, Roshchina O, Vanderschueren G, Zvaune L, Andreou AP, Haanes KA. The fifth cranial nerve in headaches. J Headache Pain 2020; 21:65. [PMID: 32503421 PMCID: PMC7275328 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-020-01134-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The fifth cranial nerve is the common denominator for many headaches and facial pain pathologies currently known. Projecting from the trigeminal ganglion, in a bipolar manner, it connects to the brainstem and supplies various parts of the head and face with sensory innervation. In this review, we describe the neuroanatomical structures and pathways implicated in the sensation of the trigeminal system. Furthermore, we present the current understanding of several primary headaches, painful neuropathies and their pharmacological treatments. We hope that this overview can elucidate the complex field of headache pathologies, and their link to the trigeminal nerve, to a broader field of young scientists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C A Edvinsson
- Department of Clinical Experimental Research, Glostrup Research Institute, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, 2600, Glostrup, Denmark. .,Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - A Viganò
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy
| | - A Alekseeva
- Department of Neurology, First Pavlov State Medical University of St.Petersburg, St.Petersburg, Russia
| | - E Alieva
- GBUZ Regional Clinical Hospital № 2, Krasnodar, Russia
| | - R Arruda
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
| | - C De Luca
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Neurology Unit, University of Pisa, 56126, Pisa, Italy.,Department of Public Medicine, Laboratory of Morphology of Neuronal Network, University of Campania-Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - N D'Ettore
- Department of Neurology, University of Rome, Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - I Frattale
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - M Kurnukhina
- Department of Neurosurgery, First Pavlov State Medical University of St.Petersburg, Lev Tolstoy Street 6-8, St.Petersburg, Russia.,The Leningrad Regional State Budgetary Institution of health care "Children's clinical hospital", St.Petersburg, Russia
| | - N Macerola
- Department of Internal Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - E Malenkova
- Pain Department, Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery, Moscow, Russia
| | - M Maiorova
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - A Novikova
- F.F. Erisman Federal Research Center for Hygiene, Mytishchy, Russia
| | - P Řehulka
- Department of Neurology, St. Anne's University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - V Rapaccini
- Child Neurology and Psychiatry Unit, Systems Medicine Department, University Hospital Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.,Unità Sanitaria Locale (USL) Umbria 2, Viale VIII Marzo, 05100, Terni, Italy.,Department of Neurology, Headache Center, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - O Roshchina
- Department of Neurology, First Pavlov State Medical University of St.Petersburg, St.Petersburg, Russia
| | - G Vanderschueren
- Department of Neurology, ZNA Middelheim, Lindendreef 1, 2020, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - L Zvaune
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.,Department of Pain Medicine, Hospital Jurmala, Jurmala, Latvia.,Headache Centre Vivendi, Riga, Latvia
| | - A P Andreou
- Headache Research, Wolfson CARD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,The Headache Centre, Guy's and St Thomas, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - K A Haanes
- Department of Clinical Experimental Research, Glostrup Research Institute, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, 2600, Glostrup, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox®; a formulation of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A)] is indicated for the prevention of headaches in adults with chronic migraine (CM) in numerous countries, including those of Europe. In clinical trials, intramuscular administration of BoNT/A (155-195 units at 12-week intervals) to patients with CM was generally well tolerated and associated with sustained and clinically meaningful improvements in multiple assessments of headache symptoms, headache-related impact and/or disability and migraine-specific health-related quality of life over a period of 1 year (in the pivotal PREEMPT 1 and 2 studies) and 2 years (in the phase IV COMPEL study). The efficacy and safety of BoNT/A therapy have been confirmed in a number of large, prospective, real-world studies conducted in Europe, including the 2-year REPOSE study. Intramuscular BoNT/A has also demonstrated greater clinical utility than the oral prophylactic medication topiramate in a clinical practice setting (FORWARD study).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James E Frampton
- Springer Nature, Private Bag 65901, Mairangi Bay, Auckland, 0754, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ruscheweyh R, Förderreuther S, Gaul C, Gendolla A, Holle-Lee D, Jürgens T, Neeb L, Straube A. [Treatment of chronic migraine with botulinum neurotoxin A : Expert recommendations of the German Migraine and Headache Society]. DER NERVENARZT 2019; 89:1355-1364. [PMID: 29947936 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-018-0534-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Injection of botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) according to the PREEMPT (Phase 3 REsearch Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy) paradigm has been approved for the treatment of refractory chronic migraine in Germany in 2011. OBJECTIVE The practical application raises some questions, such as the choice of dose and injection intervals during the course of the treatment, and the appropriate time point for discontinuation of BoNT-A treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS Taking into account the existing literature, the German Migraine and Headache Society (Deutsche Migräne- und Kopfschmerzgesellschaft, DMKG) gives recommendations for the treatment of chronic migraine with BoNT-A. RESULTS Treatment is usually started with a dose of 155 U BoNT-A. During the first year of treatment, 3‑month injection intervals are recommended. Goal of the treatment is an improvement of migraine by ≥30%. If needed, dose escalation up to 195 U can be used to reach this goal. If improvement by ≥30% is not reached after the third injection cycle, the treatment is usually considered to be insufficiently efficient and discontinuation is recommended. If a stable success is reached during the first year of treatment, prolongation of injection intervals to 4 months can be considered. If success continues to be stable for at least two 4‑month intervals, discontinuation of BoNT-A treatment can be tried. CONCLUSION The literature on these points is insufficient for recommendations at the guideline level. The present recommendations are based on an expert consensus of the DMKG for the structured approach to the treatment of chronic migraine with BoNT-A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Ruscheweyh
- Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der LMU München, München, Deutschland.
| | - S Förderreuther
- Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der LMU München, München, Deutschland
| | - C Gaul
- Migräne- und Kopfschmerzklinik Königstein, Königstein im Taunus, Deutschland
| | | | - D Holle-Lee
- Klinik für Neurologie und Westdeutsches Kopfschmerzzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Deutschland
| | - T Jürgens
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Rostock, Deutschland
| | - L Neeb
- Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - A Straube
- Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der LMU München, München, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Odell J, Clark C, Hunnisett A, Ahmed OH, Branney J. Manual therapy for chronic migraine: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial study protocol. Chiropr Man Therap 2019; 27:11. [PMID: 30962877 PMCID: PMC6436233 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-019-0232-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Accepted: 01/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Chronic migraine is a largely refractory condition affecting between 1 and 2.2% of the overall population worldwide, with females more affected than males. There are also high health and socioeconomic costs associated both for the individual and society. The mainstay of chronic migraine management is pharmacological, but the options available have limited efficacy and there are often unwanted side effects. There is some evidence for manual therapy as a treatment option for migraine, but its effectiveness for chronic migraine is unknown. Therefore, we have designed a pragmatic randomised control trial to investigate whether adding manual therapy to the tertiary specialist treatment of chronic migraine improves patient-reported outcomes. Methods A pragmatic, randomised controlled trial in a hospital tertiary headache clinic. Participants will be randomised into one of two groups: treatment as usual or treatment as usual plus manual therapy. The primary outcome measure will be a change in the Headache Impact Test score. Secondary outcomes will also be measured over the 12-week study period including changes in headache frequency, migraine specific quality of life and reductions in relevant medicine consumption. The manual therapy group will have five treatment sessions each lasting 30 min. The recruitment target of 64 participants will allow power at 80% with p = 0.05 using minimal clinical difference for Headache Impact Test of 3.7 and includes provision for a 10% dropout rate. Recruitment will take place between August 2018 and February 2019. The results will form part of a doctoral study and be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national/international conferences. Discussion Current pharmacological approaches have limited effects in the management of chronic migraine and there is a requirement to improve treatment options and reduce the health and economic burden of the condition. Manual therapy has been shown to be effective in other chronic pain conditions as well as other primary headaches. This study will explore the effectiveness of manual therapy as an adjunctive approach to the management of chronic migraine. Trial registration The trial has received a favourable opinion from the UK Health Research Authority (IRAS 228901) and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.number NCT03395457. Registered 1st March 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jim Odell
- Bournemouth University, Royal London House, Christchurch Road, Bournemouth, BH1 3LT UK
| | - Carol Clark
- Bournemouth University, Royal London House, Christchurch Road, Bournemouth, BH1 3LT UK
| | - Adrian Hunnisett
- BPP University, McTimoney College, Kimber Road, Abingdon, OX14 1BZ UK
| | - Osman Hassan Ahmed
- Bournemouth University, Royal London House, Christchurch Road, Bournemouth, BH1 3LT UK
| | - Jonathan Branney
- Bournemouth University, Royal London House, Christchurch Road, Bournemouth, BH1 3LT UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bendtsen L, Sacco S, Ashina M, Mitsikostas D, Ahmed F, Pozo-Rosich P, Martelletti P. Guideline on the use of onabotulinumtoxinA in chronic migraine: a consensus statement from the European Headache Federation. J Headache Pain 2018; 19:91. [PMID: 30259200 PMCID: PMC6755553 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-018-0921-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2018] [Accepted: 09/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
OnabotulinumtoxinA is being increasingly used in the management of chronic migraine (CM). Treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA poses challenges compared with traditional therapy with orally administered preventatives. The European Headache Federation identified an expert group that was asked to develop the present guideline to provide recommendations for the use of onabotulinumtoxinA in CM. The expert group recommend onabotulinumtoxinA as an effective and well-tolerated treatment of CM. Patients should preferably have tried two to three other migraine prophylactics before start of onabotulinumtoxinA. Patients with medication overuse should be withdrawn from the overused medication before initiation of onabotulinumtoxinA if feasible, if not onabotulinumtoxinA can be initiated from the start or before withdrawal. OnabotulinumtoxinA should be administered according to the PREEMPT injection protocol, i.e. injecting 155 U–195 U to 31–39 sites every 12-weeks. We recommend that patients are defined as non-responders, if they have less than 30% reduction in headache days per month during treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA. However other factors such as headache intensity, disability and patient preferences should also be considered when evaluating response. Treatment should be stopped, if the patient does not respond to the first two to three treatment cycles. Response to continued treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA should be evaluated by comparing the 4 weeks before with the 4 weeks after each treatment cycle. It is recommended that treatment is stopped in patients with a reduction to less than 10 headache days per month for 3 months and that patients are re-evaluated 4–5 months after stopping onabotulinumtoxinA to make sure that the patient has not returned to CM. Questions regarding efficacy and tolerability of onabotulinumtoxinA could be answered on the basis of scientific evidence. The other recommendations were mainly based on expert opinion. Future research on the treatment of CM with onabotulinumtoxinA may further improve the management of this highly disabling disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Bendtsen
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2600, Glostrup, Denmark.
| | - Simona Sacco
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Messoud Ashina
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2600, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Dimos Mitsikostas
- 1st Department of Neurology, Aeginition Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Fayyaz Ahmed
- Department of Neurosciences, Hull York Medical School, Hull, UK
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache & Craniofacial Pain Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.,Headache Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
An intramuscular formulation of onabotulinumtoxinA (onabotA; Botox®) is currently the only therapy specifically approved for the prevention of headaches in adults with chronic migraine (CM) in the EU and North America. This article provides a narrative review of relevant data on the drug in this indication from an EU perspective. OnabotA was originally approved on the basis of pooled data from two phase III studies (PREEMPT 1 and 2). In these pivotal studies, injection of up to five cycles of onabotA (155-195 U/cycle) at 12-week intervals was generally well tolerated and effective in producing statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in headache symptoms, acute headache pain medication usage, headache impact and health-related quality of life in adults with CM, of whom approximately two-thirds were acute medication overusers and approximately one-third had failed to respond to ≥ 3 prior oral prophylactic therapies. More recently, the efficacy and tolerability of onabotA over a period of 1 year in the PREEMPT programme has been substantiated and extended by the results of a long-term phase IV study (COMPEL), in which patients received up to nine treatment cycles over a period of 2 years, and by findings from several real-world clinical practice studies from Europe, including the prospective multinational REPOSE and CM-PASS studies. In conclusion, the totality of evidence from clinical trials and real-world studies indicates that onabotA is an effective and generally well tolerated option for the prevention of CM that may be particularly useful for patients who have previously failed to respond to or are intolerant of commonly prescribed oral prophylactics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James E Frampton
- Springer, Private Bag 65901, Mairangi Bay, Auckland, 0754, New Zealand.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tassorelli C, Aguggia M, De Tommaso M, Geppetti P, Grazzi L, Pini LA, Sarchielli P, Tedeschi G, Martelletti P, Cortelli P. Onabotulinumtoxin A for the management of chronic migraine in current clinical practice: results of a survey of sixty-three Italian headache centers. J Headache Pain 2017; 18:66. [PMID: 28667550 PMCID: PMC5493599 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-017-0773-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2017] [Accepted: 06/17/2017] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic migraine is a complex clinical condition often undertreated. Onabotulinumtoxin A (OBT-A) was approved in Italy in 2013 for symptom relief in patients with chronic migraine who have failed, or do not tolerate, oral prophylactic treatments. However, the impact of OBT-A in clinical practice remains to be defined. METHODS To investigate the current management of chronic migraine with OBT-A in clinical practice, a web-based survey was conducted among clinicians working in third-level headache centers across Italy. A 26-item questionnaire was designed and developed by a group of 10 Italian headache specialists to address the following issues: treatment paradigm and OBT-A injection intervals, frequency of treatment and retreatment, definition of responders/non-responders, satisfaction with treatment potential impact of early treatment with OBT-A. Ninety-six headache centers were selected and contacted via e-mail. The online survey was anonymous and carried out using a secure website. RESULTS Overall, 64 of the 96 centers (66.7%) completed the questionnaire. Most centers (98.4%) had been using OBT-A for >1 year. OBT-A was administered according to the PREEMPT paradigm in most centers (88.9%). While during the first year of prophylaxis with OBT-A most clinicians (93.6%) repeated OBT-A treatment every 3 months, as recommended, in the following years interval duration was variable. Response to OBT-A was defined as a ≥ 50% reduction in the headache days by 58.7% of the clinicians, and as a ≥ 30% reduction by 25.4% of them. Almost 60% of the clinicians considered OBT-A as a long-lasting therapy, while for one-third of them treatment could be discontinued in patients showing a benefit for ≥6 months. According to 80% of the clinicians, early administration of OBT-A after the onset of chronic migraine was associated with better outcomes, and 47.6% felt that OBT-A should be recommended as a first-line option. CONCLUSIONS This survey indicates that in third-level headache centers in Italy OBT-A is used in good compliance with current recommendations. There is agreement about the definition of response as a reduction in headache days by 30% to 50%. Additional effort is required to define response to OBT-A and to establish optimal treatment duration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Tassorelli
- Headache Science Center, National Neurological Institute C. Mondino, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Via Mondino 2, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Marco Aguggia
- Headache Center, Neurology Department, Asti Hospital, Asti, Italy
| | - Marina De Tommaso
- Applied Neurophysiology and Pain Unit, SMBNOS Department, Polyclinic General Hospital, Bari Aldo Moro University, Bari, Italy
| | - Pierangelo Geppetti
- Headache Center, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Licia Grazzi
- Headache and Neuroalgology Unit, Neurological Institute “C. Besta” IRCCS Foundation, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Alberto Pini
- Center for Neuroscience and Neurotechnology, Polyclinic Hospital, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Paola Sarchielli
- Neurology Clinic, University Hospital of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Gioacchino Tedeschi
- Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging Sciences, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome and Regional Referral Headache Center, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Pietro Cortelli
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences of Bologna, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Guerzoni S, Pellesi L, Baraldi C, Cainazzo MM, Negro A, Martelletti P, Pini LA. Long-term Treatment Benefits and Prolonged Efficacy of OnabotulinumtoxinA in Patients Affected by Chronic Migraine and Medication Overuse Headache over 3 Years of Therapy. Front Neurol 2017; 8:586. [PMID: 29163347 PMCID: PMC5676047 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2017] [Accepted: 10/19/2017] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic migraine (CM) affects about the 2% of the general population and it has been recognized as one of the most-disabling conditions worldwide by the World Health Organization. CM is often associated with the overuse of abortive medication, which determines the worsening of headache itself and the development of a secondary headache called medication overuse headache. The management of these associated conditions is difficult, but a growing amount of evidence is pointing out the effectiveness and the good safety profile of OnabotulinumtoxinA (OnabotA). Despite this, data on OnabotA effects and safety in long-term use lack. The purpose of the present article is to retrospectively assess the efficacy and safety of OnabotA in a cohort of chronic migraineurs with drug overuse from the 18th month of treatment until the third year. Materials and methods 90 chronic migraineurs with medication overuse were enrolled between January 2013 and February 2017. All patients were treated with OnabotA according to PREEMPT dictates. Before every injection session the headache index, the analgesic consumption, the visual analog scale for pain score, the 36-items short form health survey questionnaire score, the 6-items headache impact test (HIT-6) score and the Zung self-rating anxiety and depression scale scores were collected. Adverse events were carefully registered. A simple linear regression was performed to explore the mean changes in the abovementioned parameters for a single injection session and mean comparison tests were performed using the one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey–Kramer post-hoc test. Results A significantly improvement for a single injection was registered for all the above-mentioned parameters. Headache index, analgesic consumption, visual analog pain scale, and 6-items HIT-6 scores were significantly lower than baseline from the 18th month of treatment onwards. The 36-items short form health survey questionnaire scores were significantly higher than baseline at every injections session from the 18th months onwards. Zung scales did not change. No serious adverse events were assessed and no adverse events-related drop-outs were seen. Conclusion OnabotA effectiveness and safety last until 3 years of therapy, raising the possibility of the use of this therapy even for many years in CM prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Guerzoni
- Headache and Drug Abuse Research Centre, Policlinico Hospital, Department of Diagnostic Medicine, Clinical and Public Health, University of Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Lanfranco Pellesi
- Headache and Drug Abuse Research Centre, Policlinico Hospital, Department of Diagnostic Medicine, Clinical and Public Health, University of Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Carlo Baraldi
- Headache and Drug Abuse Research Centre, Policlinico Hospital, Department of Diagnostic Medicine, Clinical and Public Health, University of Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Michela Maria Cainazzo
- Headache and Drug Abuse Research Centre, Policlinico Hospital, Department of Diagnostic Medicine, Clinical and Public Health, University of Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Andrea Negro
- Regional Referral Headache Centre, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- Regional Referral Headache Centre, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Alberto Pini
- Headache and Drug Abuse Research Centre, Policlinico Hospital, Department of Diagnostic Medicine, Clinical and Public Health, University of Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.,Center for Neuroscience and Neurotechnology, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gooriah R, Nimeri R, Ahmed F. Evidence-Based Treatments for Adults with Migraine. PAIN RESEARCH AND TREATMENT 2015; 2015:629382. [PMID: 26839703 PMCID: PMC4709728 DOI: 10.1155/2015/629382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2015] [Accepted: 12/09/2015] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Migraine, a significantly disabling condition, is treated with acute and preventive medications. However, some individuals are refractory to standard treatments. Although there is a host of alternative management options available, these are not always backed by strong evidence. In fact, most of the drugs used in migraine were initially designed for other purposes. Whilst effective, the benefits from these medications are modest, reflecting the need for newer and migraine-specific therapeutic agents. In recent years, we have witnessed the emergence of novel treatments, of which noninvasive neuromodulation appears to be the most attractive given its ease of use and excellent tolerability profile. This paper reviews the evidence behind the available treatments for migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Randa Nimeri
- Department of Neurology, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK
| | - Fayyaz Ahmed
- Department of Neurology, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Cluster headache (CH), one of the most painful syndromes known to man, is managed with acute and preventive medications. The brief duration and severity of the attacks command the use of rapid-acting pain relievers. Inhalation of oxygen and subcutaneous sumatriptan are the two most effective acute therapeutic options for sufferers of CH. Several preventive medications are available, the most effective of which is verapamil. However, most of these agents are not backed by strong clinical evidence. In some patients, these options can be ineffective, especially in those who develop chronic CH. Surgical procedures for the chronic refractory form of the disorder should then be contemplated, the most promising of which is hypothalamic deep brain stimulation. We hereby review the pathogenesis of CH and the evidence behind the treatment options for this debilitating condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rubesh Gooriah
- Department of Neurology, Hull Royal Infirmary, Kingston upon Hull, UK
| | - Alina Buture
- Department of Neurology, Hull Royal Infirmary, Kingston upon Hull, UK
| | - Fayyaz Ahmed
- Department of Neurology, Hull Royal Infirmary, Kingston upon Hull, UK
| |
Collapse
|