Pharmacokinetic interactions of topiramate

Managing Cluster Headache in Patients with Medical, Psychiatric, and Surgical Comorbidities

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

What should a provider know about medications and other treatments in patients with cluster headache who have medical, psychiatric, and surgical comorbidities? What conversations should providers have with patients about living with and managing cluster headache?

RECENT FINDINGS

While the number of treatments used in cluster headache is relatively small, numerous considerations were identified related to managing patients with comorbidities. Many of these touch on cardiac, cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular health, but full histories are needed to guide safe and effective treatment. Both older and newer treatments may be contraindicated in certain patients with cluster headache or should be considered carefully. In addition to incorporating medical, psychiatric, and surgical histories in the management plan, collaboration with other providers may be beneficial. Providers should also inquire about patient practices and discuss participation in clinical trials that might be a good fit for the individual.

Anticonvulsant Classes and Possible Mechanism of Actions

Epilepsy is considered one of the most common neurological disorders worldwide; it needs long-term or life-long treatment. Despite the presence of several novel antiepileptic drugs, approximately 30% patients still suffer from drug-resistant epilepsy. Subsequently, searching for new anticonvulsants with lower toxicity and better efficacy is still in paramount demand. Using target-based studies in the discovery of novel antiepileptics is uncommon owing to the insufficient information on the molecular pathway of epilepsy and complex mode of action for most of known antiepileptic drugs. In this review, we investigated the properties of anticonvulsants, types of epileptic seizures, and mechanism of action for anticonvulsants.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Topiramate in Patients with Epilepsy Using Nonparametric Modeling

BACKGROUND

Topiramate (TPM) is used for the treatment of various epileptic seizures and the prevention of migraine. This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic model and identify covariates that influence TPM behavior in patients with epilepsy in Kuwait.

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively from 108 patients (2 years old and above) with epilepsy who were treated with oral TPM and 174 TPM blood samples from 3 hospitals in Kuwait from 2009 to 2016. Data were randomly divided into 2 groups for model development and validation. The population pharmacokinetic model was built using the nonparametric modeling algorithm (Pmetrics). The model was evaluated internally through the visual predictive check method and externally using a new data set.

RESULTS

A 1-compartment model with first-order elimination fitted the data well. Covariates showing a significant effect on the elimination rate constant were renal function and coadministration of carbamazepine (CBZ). The mean estimated clearance was 2.11 L/h; this was 50% higher for patients coadministered with CBZ. Age and sex were essential covariates for the volume of distribution (V). The visual predictive check of the final model could predict the measured concentrations. External validation further confirmed the favorable predictive performance of the model with low bias and imprecision for predicting the concentration in a particular population.

CONCLUSIONS

TPM elimination was increased with CBZ coadministration and was affected by renal function. Meanwhile, age and sex were the main predictors for V. The predictive performance of the final model proved to be valid internally and externally.

Third-Generation Antiseizure Medication in the Treatment of Benzodiazepine-Refractory Status Epilepticus in Poststroke Epilepsy: A Retrospective Observational Register-Based Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy is a challenging condition because of multiple vascular comorbidities and the advanced age of patients. Data on third-generation antiseizure medication (ASM) in this condition are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of third-generation ASMs in the second- or third-line therapy of benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy following acute ischemic stroke.

METHODS

Data on the effectiveness of third-generation ASMs in patients with status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy were gathered from two German Stroke Registries and the Mainz Epilepsy Registry. We included only cases with epilepsy remote to the ischemic event. No patients with acute symptomatic seizures were included. The following third-generation ASMs were included: brivaracetam, lacosamide, eslicarbazepine, perampanel, topiramate, and zonisamide. The assessment of effectiveness was based on seizure freedom within 48 h since the start of therapy with the respective ASM. Seizure freedom was evaluated both clinically (clinical evaluation at least three times per day) and by daily electroencephalogram records.

RESULTS

Of the 138 patients aged 70.8 ± 8.1 years with benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus in ischemic poststroke epilepsy, 33 (23.9%) were treated with lacosamide, 24 (17.4%) with brivaracetam, 23 (16.7%) with eslicarbazepine, 21 (15.2%) with perampanel, 20 (14.5%) with topiramate, and 17 (12.3%) with zonisamide. Seizure freedom within 48 h was achieved in 66.7% of patients with lacosamide, 65.2% with eslicarbazepine, 38.1% with perampanel, 37.5% with brivaracetam, 35.0% with topiramate, and 35.3% with zonisamide (p < 0.05 for comparison of lacosamide or eslicarbazepine to other ASMs).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these data, lacosamide and eslicarbazepine might be more favorable in the treatment of refractory status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy, when administered as second- or third-line ASMs before anesthesia. Because of the fact that these ASMs share the same mechanism of action (slow inactivation of sodium channels), our findings could motivate further research on the role that this pharmaceutical mechanism of action has in the treatment of poststroke epilepsy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05267405).

Population pharmacokinetics of topiramate in Chinese children with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Topiramate, a broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug, exhibits substantial inter-individual variability in both its pharmacokinetics and therapeutic response. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of patient characteristics and genetic variants on topiramate clearance using population pharmacokinetic (PPK) models in a cohort of Chinese pediatric patients with epilepsy.

METHOD

The PPK model was constructed using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach, utilizing a dataset comprising 236 plasma concentrations of topiramate obtained from 181 pediatric patients with epilepsy. A one-compartment model combined with a proportional residual model was employed to characterize the pharmacokinetics of topiramate. Covariate analysis was performed using forward addition and backward elimination to assess the influence of covariates on the model parameters. The model was thoroughly evaluated through goodness-of-fit analysis, bootstrap, visual predictive checks, and normalized prediction distribution errors. Monte Carlo simulations were utilized to devise topiramate dosing strategies.

RESULT

In the final PPK models of topiramate, body weight, co-administration with oxcarbazepine, and a combined genotype of GKIR1-UGT (GRIK1 rs2832407, UGT2B7 rs7439366, and UGT1A1 rs4148324) were identified as significant covariates affecting the clearance (CL). The clearance was estimated using the formulas CL (L/h) = 0.44 × (BW⁄11.7)0.82 × eOXC for the model without genetic variants and CL (L/h) = 0.49 × (BW⁄11.7)0.81 × eOXC × eGRIK1-UGT for the model incorporating genetic variants. The volume of distribution (Vd) was estimated using the formulas Vd (L) = 6.6 × (BW⁄11.7). The precision of all estimated parameters was acceptable. Furthermore, the model demonstrated good predictability, exhibiting stability and effectiveness in describing the pharmacokinetics of topiramate.

CONCLUSION

The clearance of topiramate in pediatric patients with epilepsy may be subject to the influence of factors such as body weight, co-administration with oxcarbazepine, and genetic polymorphism. In this study, PPK models were developed to better understand and account for these factors, thereby improving the precision and individualization of topiramate therapy in children with epilepsy.

Efficacy and Safety of Five Broad-Spectrum Antiseizure Medications for Adjunctive Treatment of Refractory Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Overall, up to one-third of epilepsy patients have drug-resistant epilepsy. However, there was previously no meta-analysis to support the guidelines for broad-spectrum antiseizure medication selection for the adjunctive treatment of refractory epilepsy. In the present meta-analysis, we assessed the efficacy and safety of three second-generation broad-spectrum antiseizure medications, lamotrigine (LTG), levetiracetam (LEV), and topiramate (TPM), and two third-generation broad-spectrum antiseizure medications, perampanel (PER) and lacosamide (LCM), for the adjunctive treatment of refractory epilepsy.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL from inception to July 15, 2022. The studies included in the meta-analysis were required to meet the following criteria: (1) be randomized, double-blind clinical trials; (2) include patients aged >2 years with a clinical diagnosis of drug-resistant epilepsy; (3) have at least 8 weeks for the treatment period excluding the titration phase; and (4) report the outcomes of seizure response, seizure freedom and the withdrawal rate due to treatment-emergent adverse effects. Data were extracted, and the risk of bias for each study was assessed by two authors independently using RoB2 tools. We performed the network meta-analysis for each outcome through a group of programs in the mvmeta and network packages in Stata. Relative odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated as the result of the analyses. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) and mean ranks were used to rank these treatments.

RESULTS

Forty-two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (LTG-placebo: n = 6, LEV-placebo: n = 13, TPM-placebo: n = 9, PER-placebo: n = 6, LCM-placebo: n = 7, LEV-TPM: n = 1) with 10257 participants (LTG = 569, LEV = 1626, TPM = 701, PER = 1734, LCM = 1908, placebo = 3719) were included. Levetiracetam had subequal efficacy in 50 % seizure frequency reduction to TPM [odds ratio (OR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-1.38], and LEV had a higher rate of ≥ 50% seizure frequency reduction than LCM (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.11-2.01) and PER (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.24-2.29). Levetiracetam was also related to a higher proportion of seizure freedom participants than TPM (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.20-2.89), PER (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.12-4.43), and LCM (OR 2.97, 95% CI 1.46-6.05). In addition, LEV was associated with a lower risk of experiencing at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) than PER (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.46-0.85) and TPM (OR 0.51, 95 % CI 0.36-0.72) and a lower proportion of patients experiencing TEAEs leading to discontinuation than PER (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27-0.97) and TPM (OR 0.50, 95 % CI 0.27-0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

Third-generation drugs (PER and LCM) had no advantages in terms of efficacy and safety for adjunctive treatment of refractory epilepsy compared with several second-generation drugs (LEV and LTG). Levetiracetam was the priority choice for adjunctive treatment of refractory epilepsy. Perampanel and LCM had no advantages in terms of efficacy and safety among the five drugs.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number, CRD42022344153; last edited on December 23, 2022.

Drug-drug interactions between antiseizure medications and antipsychotic medications: a narrative review and expert opinion

INTRODUCTION

Antiseizure medications (ASMs) and antipsychotic drugs are frequently coadministered with the potential for drug-drug interactions. Interactions may either be pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic, resulting in a decrease or increase in efficacy and/or an increase or decrease in adverse effects.

AREAS COVERED

The clinical evidence for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between ASMs and antipsychotics is reviewed based on the results of a literature search in MEDLINE conducted in April 2023.

EXPERT OPINION

There is now extensive published evidence for the clinical importance of interactions between ASMs and antipsychotics. Enzyme-inducing ASMs can decrease blood concentrations of many of the antipsychotics. There is also evidence that enzyme-inhibiting ASMs can increase antipsychotic blood concentrations. Similarly, there is limited evidence showing that antipsychotic drugs may affect the blood concentrations of ASMs through pharmacokinetic interactions. There is less available evidence for pharmacodynamic interactions, but these can also be important, as can displacement from protein binding. The lack of published evidence for an interaction should not be interpreted as meaning that the given interaction does not occur; the evidence is building continually. There is no substitute for careful patient monitoring and sound clinical judgment.

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Antiseizure and Psychiatric Medications

Antiseizure medications and drugs for psychiatric diseases are frequently used in combination. In this context, pharmacokinetic interactions between these drugs may occur. The vast majority of these interactions are primarily observed at a metabolic level and result from changes in the activity of the cytochrome P450 (CYP). Carbamazepine, phenytoin, and barbiturates induce the oxidative biotransformation and can consequently reduce the plasma concentrations of tricyclic antidepressants, many typical and atypical antipsychotics and some benzodiazepines. Newer antiseizure medications show a lower potential for clinically relevant interactions with drugs for psychiatric disease. The pharmacokinetics of many antiseizure medications is not influenced by antipsychotics and anxiolytics, while some newer antidepressants, namely fluoxetine, fluvoxamine and viloxazine, may inhibit CYP enzymes leading to increased serum concentrations of some antiseizure medications, including phenytoin and carbamazepine. Clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions may be anticipated by knowledge of CYP enzymes involved in the biotransformation of individual medications and of the influence of the specific comedication on the activity of these CYP enzymes. As a general rule, these interactions can be managed by careful evaluation of clinical response and, when indicated, individualized dosage adjustments guided by measurement of drugs serum concentrations, especially if pharmacokinetic interactions may cause any change in seizure control or signs of toxicity. Further studies are required to improve predictions of pharmacokinetic interactions between antiseizure medications and drugs for psychiatric diseases providing practical helps for clinicians in the clinical setting.

Preventive Approaches in Women's Neurology: Prepartum, Pregnancy, and Postpartum

Women's neurology is the subspecialty within neurology concerned with the distinct healthcare needs of women. In this article, we review current literature and expert management strategies regarding disease-specific neurologic concerns of women, with an emphasis on issues related to contraception, pregnancy, and lactation. Health conditions that we discuss in this article include epilepsy, headache, stroke, multiple sclerosis, and Chiari I malformation. Current findings on neurologic disease in women suggest that many women with neurologic disease can safely manage their disease during pregnancy and have healthy children, though pregnancy planning is important in many conditions to mitigate risks and effective contraceptive management is important when pregnancy prevention is desired.

Simulations of topiramate dosage recommendations for poor compliance events

PURPOSE

To determine the influences of one or two consecutive missed topiramate (TPM) doses on TPM pharmacokinetics and to suggest the proper TPM replacement dosing schemes using Monte Carlo simulations.

METHODS

Monte Carlo simulations were performed for various replacement dosing schemes using the parameters from the published population pharmacokinetic models. The lowest percentage of deviation of simulated concentrations outside the reference range of 5-20 mg/L from the compliance scenario for each replacement dosing scheme was used as a criterion for choosing the proper replacement dosing scheme.

RESULTS

For the one missed dose, the replacement with an immediate regular dose and a partial dose resulted in the lowest and highest percentages of concentration below 5 mg/L, respectively. While the opposite results were observed for the upper bound of the reference range (20 mg/L). For the two consecutive missed doses, the replacement with one and a half-missed doses resulted in a lower percentage of deviation of concentrations below 5 mg/L from the compliance scenario than the replacement with one regular dose.

CONCLUSIONS

For the one missed dose, taking an immediate regular dose might be suitable for patients who require higher TPM levels, while for patients who require lower TPM levels, an immediate partial dose could be used. For the two consecutive missed doses, an immediate one and a half regular dose might be suitable. However, these results were merely based on simulations; thus, they should be used alongside the clinician's justification based on seizure control.

Topiramate intoxications & hemodialysis - Literature review and the first case report of a massive suicidal intoxication treated with hemodialysis

Background

Topiramate is an anticonvulsant from sulfamate-substituted monosaccharides that is increasingly used to treat migraines. Serious topiramate intoxications have been described. Unfortunately, indications for and the effect of interventions, including hemodialysis, in severe intoxications seem expert-based and lack empirical evidence. We aim to review the literature on topiramate intoxication cases and to describe the first topiramate intoxication with toxicokinetic data following treatment with hemodialysis.

Methods

A literature review was conducted using the PubMed database. Included articles were reviewed for symptoms; management, including acute hemodialysis; toxicokinetic data; and outcomes.

Results

We found 61 hits in the PubMed database and checked 392 references in the snowball search; 22 were included for data extraction, reporting 29 cases. The majority of the patients were female (n = 23/29, 79%), ranging in age from 2 to 44 years (median 21). The ingested topiramate amount ranged from 175 to 40,000 mg (usual maintenance dose of 50 mg BID and a general maximum of 500 mg BID). Topiramate concentrations were reported in eight cases, ranging from 3.7 to 356.6 mg/L (for reference, the therapeutic range is 2-30 mg/L). Serious topiramate intoxications can result in seizures, coma, hemodynamic instability and severe metabolic acidosis. In no single case was hemodialysis used.

Conclusion

Serious symptoms of topiramate intoxications exist, and hemodialysis is used infrequently. If symptoms are refractory to symptomatic treatment, hemodialysis can reduce topiramate concentrations and symptomatology.

Managing idiopathic intracranial hypertension in pregnancy: practical advice

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is more common in women of reproductive age who have obesity, yet there is little information on its management specifically in pregnancy. Women with IIH should plan their pregnancy including discussing contraception before pregnancy, recognising that hormonal contraceptives are not contraindicated. Potentially teratogenic medications including acetazolamide and topiramate are not recommended during pregnancy or in those with immediate plans to conceive; prescribing acetazolamide in pregnancy must only follow discussion with the patient and their obstetrician. Ideally, patients should aim to achieve disease remission or control before pregnancy, through optimising their weight. Although weight gain is expected in pregnancy, excessive weight gain may exacerbate IIH and increase maternal and fetal complications; evidence-based recommendations for non-IIH pregnancies may help in guiding optimal gestational weight gain. The vast majority of women with IIH can have a normal vaginal delivery, with spinal or epidural anaesthesia if needed, provided the papilloedema is stable or the IIH is in remission.

Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interactions among Antiepileptic Drugs, Including CBD, Drugs Used to Treat COVID-19 and Nutrients

Anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) are an important group of drugs of several generations, ranging from the oldest phenobarbital (1912) to the most recent cenobamate (2019). Cannabidiol (CBD) is increasingly used to treat epilepsy. The outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in 2019 created new challenges in the effective treatment of epilepsy in COVID-19 patients. The purpose of this review is to present data from the last few years on drug–drug interactions among of AEDs, as well as AEDs with other drugs, nutrients and food. Literature data was collected mainly in PubMed, as well as google base. The most important pharmacokinetic parameters of the chosen 29 AEDs, mechanism of action and clinical application, as well as their biotransformation, are presented. We pay a special attention to the new potential interactions of the applied first-generation AEDs (carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital and primidone), on decreased concentration of some medications (atazanavir and remdesivir), or their compositions (darunavir/cobicistat and lopinavir/ritonavir) used in the treatment of COVID-19 patients. CBD interactions with AEDs are clearly defined. In addition, nutrients, as well as diet, cause changes in pharmacokinetics of some AEDs. The understanding of the pharmacokinetic interactions of the AEDs seems to be important in effective management of epilepsy.

Voltage gated sodium channel inhibitors as anticonvulsant drugs: A systematic review on recent developments and structure activity relationship studies

Voltage-gated sodium channel blockers are one of the vital targets for the management of several central nervous system diseases, including epilepsy, chronic pain, psychiatric disorders, and spasticity. The voltage-gated sodium channels play a key role in controlling cellular excitability. This reduction in excitotoxicity is also applied to improve the symptoms of epileptic conditions. The effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs as sodium channel depends upon the reversible blocking of the spontaneous discharge without blocking its propagation. There are number of antiepileptic drug(s) which are in pipeline to flour the market to conquer abnormal neuronal excitability. They inhibit the seizures through the inhibition of complex voltage- and frequency-dependent ionic currents through sodium channels. Over the past decade, the sodium channel is one of the most explored targets to control or treat the seizure, but there has not been any game-changing discovery yet. Although there are large numbers of drugs approved for the treatment of epilepsy, however they are associated with several acute to chronic side effects. Many research groups have tirelessly worked for better therapeutic medication on this popular target to treat epileptic seizures. The review quotes briefly the developments of the approved examples of sodium channel blockers as anticonvulsant drugs. Medicinal chemists have tried the design and development of some more potent anticonvulsant drugs to minimize the toxicity that are discussed here, and an emphasis is given for their possible mechanism and the structure-activity relationship (SAR).

Monitoring topiramate concentrations at delivery and during lactation

OBJECTIVE

To determine transplacental passage of topiramate and its transport to colostrum, mature maternal milk and breastfed infants, we examined data from 27 women treated with topiramate from 2004 to 2020.

METHODS

In this cohort study, maternal serum, umbilical cord serum, milk and infant serum levels were measured by gas chromatography in the delivery subgroup, the colostrum subgroup (3-4 days postpartum) and the mature milk subgroup (7-30 days postpartum). Paired umbilical cord serum, maternal serum, breastfed infant serum, and milk levels were used to assess the ratios of umbilical cord/maternal serum, milk/maternal serum and infant/maternal serum levels.

RESULTS

Topiramate levels varied from 1.0 to 7.1 mg/L in maternal serum and from 0.8 to 6.2 mg/L in umbilical cord serum, and the mean umbilical cord/maternal serum ratio was 0.93 ± 0.11. At 3-4 days after delivery, topiramate concentrations were 1.4-8.4 mg/L in maternal serum, 1.5-8.6 mg/L in milk and 0.3-4.4 mg/L in infant serum. The mean milk/maternal serum ratio was 0.99 ± 0.45, and the mean infant/maternal serum ratio was 0.25 ± 0.15. At 7-30 days after delivery, maternal serum levels varied from 1.9 to 9.7 mg/L, milk levels ranged from 2.3 to 10.6 mg/L and infant serum levels ranged from 0.3 to 6.5 mg/L. The mean milk/maternal serum ratio was 1.07 ± 0.31, and the mean infant/maternal serum ratio was 0.51 ± 0.27.

CONCLUSIONS

We extended information about free transplacental passage of topiramate and its extensive transport to maternal milk with lower serum concentrations in breastfed infants in the largest group of patients ever reported to our knowledge.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Authors declare that take full responsibility for the data, the analyses and interpretation, and the conduct of the research; that they have full access to all of the data; and that they have the right to publish all data. Authors were not participations in industry-sponsored research and corporate activities for evaluation of a manuscript.

Medications Available for Weight Reduction in Elective Total Joint Arthroplasty

Arthroplasty in patients with elevated body mass index results in increased rates of reoperation, instability, revision, and infection. Preoperative weight loss may reduce the complication rate associated with orthopaedic surgery. In addition to lifestyle modification, anti-obesity medications are available to help patients to reduce their preoperative weight. Currently, there are 6 U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved anti-obesity medications in the United States: phentermine, orlistat, phentermine with topiramate extended release (ER), lorcaserin, sustained release (SR) naltrexone with bupropion, and liraglutide. Anti-obesity medications potentially provide a new way to optimize patients before surgery and to ensure successful recovery postoperatively.

Topiramate pharmacokinetics in neonates undergoing therapeutic hypothermia and proposal of an optimised dosing schedule

AIM

The adequate dosing of topiramate in neonates undergoing therapeutic hypothermia has not been established. The aim of this study was to design a dosing schedule capable of providing topiramate serum concentrations within the accepted therapeutic range.

METHODS

Neonates (n = 52) with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy and subjected to therapeutic hypothermia were dosed with topiramate, 5 mg/kg on day one and 3 mg/kg on days two to five, to decrease seizure events. A total of 451 topiramate serum concentrations obtained in the patients were used to develop a population pharmacokinetic model using a non-linear mixed-effects modelling approach.

RESULTS

A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and two different clearance terms, one for the cooling period and another for the post-warming period, were used to describe the concentration-time topiramate data. The probability of no-seizure events could not be related to topiramate concentrations, which was attributed to excessively low topiramate concentrations. A modified dosage schedule was designed with the aim of obtaining more than 90% of patients with topiramate concentrations within the therapeutic range after the first dose.

CONCLUSION

The dosage schedule of topiramate in these patients should be modified with the aim of decreasing the frequency of seizure events.

Antiepileptic drug therapy in the elderly: a clinical pharmacological review

Seizure disorder is the third most common neurological disorder in the elderly after stroke and dementia. With the increasing geriatric population, the situation of clinicians seeing more and more elderly epilepsy patients is very likely. Not only is the diagnosis of epilepsy tedious in the elderly, its management raises many challenging issues for the treating physicians. Altered physiology, age-related decline in organ function, and plasma protein binding and altered pharmacodynamics make the elderly patients with seizure disorder a difficult group to treat. This is further complicated by the presence of comorbidities and polypharmacy which increase the chances of drug interactions. The adverse effects that might be tolerated well in younger populations may be disastrous for the aged. Although the newer antiepileptic drugs are found to have a favorable safety profile, there is relative scarcity of randomized-controlled trials involving older and newer antiepileptics in the geriatric population. This review tries to compile the available literature on management of epilepsy in the elderly population including evidence of safety and efficacy of newer and older antiepileptics with special reference to the 'geriatric giants'. It also deals with the interactions between antiepileptic medications and other commonly prescribed drugs in the elderly such as anti-hypertensives and antiischemic agents. The recommended guidelines of various international bodies are also analyzed from the perspective of elderly with seizure disorder.

Topiramate Blood Levels During Polytherapy for Epilepsy in Children

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic range of topiramate (TPM) blood level is not set because the efficacy and safety are not considered to be related to the level. However, the therapeutic target without side effects is necessary, so the optimal range of TPM blood level was analyzed in this study.

STUDY QUESTION

This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of TPM over 2 years and the utility of measuring blood levels of TPM during the follow-up of epileptic patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Thirty patients (18 males, 12 females; age range, 6 months-15 years) were treated with TPM for epilepsy. The initial dosage of TPM was 1-3 mg·kg·d. If the effect proved insufficient after 2 weeks, the dosage was increased to 4-9 mg·kg·d.

MEASURES AND OUTCOMES

Blood levels of TPM were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after levels reached steady state. The efficacy of TPM was evaluated by the reduction in epileptic seizure rate (RR) at the time of blood sampling. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

A positive correlation was seen between blood levels and maintenance dosages, but no correlation was observed between blood levels and RR. Any significant difference was not identified in TPM levels between the effective group (RR ≥50%) and the ineffective group (RR <50%; P = 0.159). In the subgroup of patients who did not use valproic acid, a significant difference in TPM levels was apparent between the effective and ineffective groups (P = 0.029). The optimal range of TPM was advocated 3.5-5.0 μg/mL. The optimal range was set, so that ranges did not overlap between the effective and ineffective groups. No patients experienced any side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Measuring blood levels of TPM based on the classification of concomitant drugs and adjusting the dosage to reach the optimal range were recommended.

Effect of carbamazepine on spontaneous recurrent seizures recorded from the dentate gyrus in rats with kainate-induced epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Animal models of chronic epilepsy with spontaneous recurrent seizures (SRSs) may be useful in the discovery and mechanistic analyses of antiseizure drugs (ASDs). Carbamazepine (CBZ), a widely used ASD with a well-defined mechanism, was analyzed in this proof-of-principle study to determine how a traditional ASD affects the properties of SRSs.

METHODS

The effects of CBZ on electrographic SRSs recorded from the dentate gyrus were studied in freely behaving rats using a repeated, low-dose kainate model of acquired epilepsy with a repeated-measures, crossover protocol.

RESULTS

Almost all seizure durations were >20 seconds. Both seizure likelihood and duration appeared to be similar between 1 and 8 hours after individual CBZ injections. CBZ-induced decreases in seizure frequency were not significant at 10 mg/kg; however, at 30 mg/kg, seizure frequency was significantly reduced for convulsive but not nonconvulsive seizures. At 100 mg/kg, CBZ strongly suppressed both convulsive and nonconvulsive seizures. Although CBZ had a dose-dependent effect on seizure frequency, CBZ did not affect seizure duration at any dose. The preceding interictal interval did not affect seizure duration; however, at 30 mg/kg CBZ, nearly all seizures were nonconvulsive when the interictal interval was <30 minutes (ie, during clusters).

SIGNIFICANCE

Increased doses of CBZ (10-100 mg/kg) suppressed the frequency but not the duration of convulsive and nonconvulsive seizures in the repeated, low-dose kainate model. The repeated-measures, crossover protocol, which requires relatively few animals and compensates for progressive increases in seizure frequency during epileptogenesis after status epilepticus, allowed quantitative analyses of clinically relevant and translatable properties of SRSs.

Pharmacokinetic Interactions of Clinical Interest Between Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Antiepileptic Drugs

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), namely apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban are being increasingly prescribed among the general population, as they are considered to be associated to lower bleeding risk than classical anticoagulants, and do not require coagulation monitoring. Likewise, DOACs are increasingly concomitantly prescribed in patients with epilepsy taking, therefore, antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), above all among the elderly. As a result, potential interactions may cause an increased risk of DOAC-related bleeding or a reduced antithrombotic efficacy. The objective of the present review is to describe the pharmacokinetic interactions between AEDs and DOACs of clinical relevance. We observed that there are only few clinical reports in which such interactions have been described in patients. More data are available on the pharmacokinetics of both drugs classes which allow speculating on their potential interactions. Older AEDs, acting on cytochrome P450 isoenzymes, and especially on CYP3A4, such as phenobarbital, phenytoin, and carbamazepine are more likely to significantly reduce the anticoagulant effect of DOACs (especially rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban). Newer AEDs not affecting significantly CYP or P-gp, such as lamotrigine, or pregabalin are not likely to affect DOACs efficacy. Zonisamide and lacosamide, which do not affect significantly CYP activity in vitro, might have a quite safe profile, even though their effects on P-gp are not well-known, yet. Levetiracetam exerts only a potential effect on P-gp activity, and thus it might be safe, as well. In conclusion, there are only few case reports and limited evidence on interactions between DOACs and AEDs in patients. However, the overall evidence suggests that the interaction between these drug classes might be of high clinical relevance and therefore further studies in larger patients' cohorts are warranted for the future in order to better clarify their pharmacokinetic and define the most appropriate clinical behavior.

A Review of Women's Neurology

Concern about what is best practice when caring for women with neurologic disease is a common clinical scenario. Therefore, knowledge about women's health issues and their intersection with neurologic disorders is imperative. This review will discuss the appropriate gender-based considerations in epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, migraine, autoimmune disease, sleep disorders, stroke, and paraneoplastic disorders.

Current pharmacotherapy for obesity

More than one-third of adults in the USA have obesity, which causes, exacerbates or adversely impacts numerous medical comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease. Despite intensive lifestyle modifications, the disease severity warrants further aggressive intervention, including pharmacotherapy, medical devices and bariatric surgery. Noninvasive anti-obesity drugs have thus now resurfaced as targeted adjunctive therapeutic approaches to intensive lifestyle intervention, bridging the gap between lifestyle and bariatric surgery. In this Review, we discuss FDA-approved anti-obesity drugs in terms of safety and efficacy. As most of these drugs have a mean percentage weight loss reported in clinical trials but individual variations in response rates, a future direction of obesity pharmacotherapy research might include the potential for personalized medicine to target early responders to these anti-obesity drugs.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Topiramate in Japanese Pediatric and Adult Patients With Epilepsy Using Routinely Monitored Data

BACKGROUND

Topiramate is a second-generation antiepileptic drug used as monotherapy and adjunctive therapy in adults and children with partial seizures. A population pharmacokinetic (PPK) analysis was performed to improve the topiramate dosage adjustment for individualized treatment.

METHODS

Patients whose steady-state serum concentration of topiramate was routinely monitored at Kyoto University Hospital from April 2012 to March 2013 were included in the model-building data. A nonlinear mixed effects modeling program was used to evaluate the influence of covariates on topiramate pharmacokinetics. The obtained PPK model was evaluated by internal model validations, including goodness-of-fit plots and prediction-corrected visual predictive checks, and was externally confirmed using the validation data from January 2015 to December 2015.

RESULTS

A total of 177 steady-state serum concentrations from 93 patients were used for the model-building analysis. The patients' age ranged from 2 to 68 years, and body weight ranged from 8.6 to 105 kg. The median serum concentration of topiramate was 1.7 mcg/mL, and half of the patients received carbamazepine coadministration. Based on a one-compartment model with first order absorption and elimination, the apparent volume of distribution was 105 L/70 kg, and the apparent clearance was allometrically related to the body weight as 2.25 L·h·70 kg without carbamazepine or phenytoin. Combination treatment with carbamazepine or phenytoin increased the apparent clearance to 3.51 L·h·70 kg. Goodness-of-fit plots, prediction-corrected visual predictive check, and external validation using the validation data from 43 patients confirmed an appropriateness of the final model. Simulations based on the final model showed that dosage adjustments allometrically scaling to body weight can equalize the serum concentrations in children of various ages and adults.

CONCLUSIONS

The PPK model, using the power scaling of body weight, effectively elucidated the topiramate serum concentration profile ranging from pediatric to adult patients. Dosage adjustments based on body weight and concomitant antiepileptic drug help obtain the dosage of topiramate necessary to reach an effective concentration in each individual.

Recurrent Admissions for Hypothermia From Concomitant Topiramate and Phenobarbital: A Case Report

Introduction:

This article presents an additional case of concomitant topiramate and phenobarbital administration that resulted in 8 hospital admissions for hypothermia that resolved after discontinuation of phenobarbital.

Case:

A 56-year-old white female with cerebral palsy and quadriplegia, epilepsy, and hypothyroidism was admitted to a community teaching hospital multiple times with documented hypothermia. These admissions followed a subsequent dose increase of topiramate in December 2014. In February 2015, the patient was admitted with 35°C rectal temperature. Her 2 admissions in April were for hypothermia with temperatures of 34.6°C and 33.6°C, respectively. The patient had 5 other admissions with hypothermia through December 2015. All other causes of hypothermia were ruled out. The hypothermia resolved when phenobarbital was discontinued.

Discussion:

A recent case series noted an association between phenobarbital and topiramate causing hypothermia. The patient’s hypothermia developed while on concomitant phenobarbital and topiramate but only after an increase in topiramate. No other causes for hypothermia were found based upon physical examination or lab work. The Naranjo nomogram noted a probable causation.

Conclusion:

This case report points to an association of hypothermia with concomitant topiramate and phenobarbital with resolution after phenobarbital discontinuation. Improvement after discontinuation of phenobarbital seems to support a drug-effect relationship.

Drug Interactions with Lithium: An Update

Lithium has been used for the management of psychiatric illnesses for over 50 years and it continues to be regarded as a first-line agent for the treatment and prevention of bipolar disorder. Lithium possesses a narrow therapeutic index and comparatively minor alterations in plasma concentrations can have significant clinical sequelae. Several drug classes have been implicated in the development of lithium toxicity over the years, including diuretics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory compounds, but much of the anecdotal and experimental evidence supporting these interactions is dated, and many newer medications and medication classes have been introduced during the intervening years. This review is intended to provide an update on the accumulated evidence documenting potential interactions with lithium, with a focus on pharmacokinetic insights gained within the last two decades. The clinical relevance and ramifications of these interactions are discussed.

Intractable Epistaxis Associated with Topiramate Administration

Objective:

To report a case of a patient who experienced serious, intractable epistaxis warranting emergency department (ED) visits and hospital admission after initiation of topiramate therapy.

Case Summary:

A 61-year-old woman with significant cardiovascular disease was started on topiramate 25 mg daily for lower extremity neuropathy. After 7 days of treatment, she began to experience severe, intractable epistaxis that lasted 8 days, warranting an ED visit. The epistaxis resolved 1 week after topiramate discontinuation. Topiramate was restarted 3 months later, and the patient again developed intractable epistaxis. After 2 days of epistaxis, she returned to the ED with significant anginal pain and was admitted to the hospital, where she received 2 units of packed red blood cells. One week after stopping topiramate, the epistaxis stopped. At the time of writing, she had exhibited no epistaxis for 6 months. According to the Naranjo probability scale, topiramate was the probable cause of epistaxis.

Discussion:

Topiramate is a neuromodulatory compound approved for management of migraines, as well as partial and generalized tonic–clonic seizures. Over the past decade, its use has expanded to include many other neuropathic conditions. Currently, epistaxis has been reported in only 1–4% of patients receiving topiramate in clinical trials; however, these data were derived from a young study population. Like topiramate, calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) modulate voltage-gated L type calcium ion channels. These specific channels are located on vascular smooth muscle and non-contractile tissues such as platelets. Due to their possible antiplatelet effects, CCBs have been associated with an increased risk of hemorrhage, epistaxis, and prolonged bleeding time. The same may hold true for topiramate.

Conclusions:

Topiramate, particularly in combination with antiplatelet medications, may be associated with severe, intractable epistaxis. Intractable epistaxis should be added to the list of potentially serious adverse reactions that are monitored when topiramate is administered.

Drug interaction considerations in the therapeutic use of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs) of the sulfonamide and sulfamate type are clinically used drugs as diuretics, antiglaucoma, antiepileptic, antiobesity and anti-high altitude disease agents. Anticancer agents based on CAIs are also in clinical development for the management of hypoxic, metastatic tumors. Acetazolamide, methazolamide, dichlorophenamide, dorzolamide and brinzolamide are mainly used as antiglaucoma drugs, sulthiame, topiramate and zonisamide as antiepileptic/antiobesity agents, celecoxib and polmacoxib are dual carbonic anhydrase/cycloxygenase inhibitors. Girentuximab, a monoclonal antibody and SLC-0111, a sulfonamide inhibitor, are in clinical trials as anticancer agents.

AREAS COVERED

The drug interactions with many classes of pharmacological agents are reviewed. Some of these drugs, such as acetazolamide, topiramate and celecoxib show a large number of interactions with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), diuretics, antiepileptics, immunosupressants, anticholinesterase drugs, β-blockers, anesthetics, oral contraceptives, anticancer agents, antifungals, anti-mycobacterials, lithium, metformin and clopidogrel.

EXPERT OPINION

The multiple drug interactions in which CAIs are involved should be carefully considered when such drugs are used in combination with the drug classes mentioned above, as the risks of developing toxicity and serious side effects if the dosages are not adjusted are high. There are also synergistic effects between CAIs and some NSAIDs, anticancer agents and benzodiazepines for the management of cystoid macular edema, some tumor types and neuropathic pain, respectively.

International Veterinary Epilepsy Task Force consensus proposal: medical treatment of canine epilepsy in Europe

In Europe, the number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) licensed for dogs has grown considerably over the last years. Nevertheless, the same questions remain, which include, 1) when to start treatment, 2) which drug is best used initially, 3) which adjunctive AED can be advised if treatment with the initial drug is unsatisfactory, and 4) when treatment changes should be considered. In this consensus proposal, an overview is given on the aim of AED treatment, when to start long-term treatment in canine epilepsy and which veterinary AEDs are currently in use for dogs. The consensus proposal for drug treatment protocols, 1) is based on current published evidence-based literature, 2) considers the current legal framework of the cascade regulation for the prescription of veterinary drugs in Europe, and 3) reflects the authors' experience. With this paper it is aimed to provide a consensus for the management of canine idiopathic epilepsy. Furthermore, for the management of structural epilepsy AEDs are inevitable in addition to treating the underlying cause, if possible.

Modified-Release Formulations of Second-Generation Antiepileptic Drugs: Pharmacokinetic and Clinical Aspects

Modified-release or extended-release (XR) formulations are used to decrease the frequency of dosing for drugs with rapid elimination, to improve convenience and adherence. Use of a modified-release formulation can decrease the peak to trough fluctuations in serum concentrations and theoretically improve the therapeutic benefit of the drug, by decreasing adverse events associated with the higher peak concentrations. Once-daily formulations of lamotrigine (Lamictal XR(®)), levetiracetam (Keppra XR(®)), oxcarbazepine (Oxtellar XR(®), Apydan(®) extent) and topiramate (Qudexy XR™, Trokendi XR™) are approved for the treatment of focal and/or generalized onset seizures. Other seizure medications have been approved for non-epileptic symptoms. Gabapentin XR (Gralise(®)) is approved for the treatment of post-herpetic neuralgias. Gabapentin enacarbil XR (Horizant(®)) is a prodrug of gabapentin and is indicated for treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia and restless leg syndrome, a novel indication. For all but Qudexy XR™, the tablets/capsules must be swallowed whole, without cutting, crushing or chewing, in order to maintain the XR properties of the formulation. Qudexy XR™ can be swallowed intact or the capsules can be opened and sprinkled onto soft food for those with swallowing difficulties, for example, children and the elderly. The bioavailability of Gralise(®) and Horizant(®) is significantly affected by food, specifically fat content, and should be taken with a meal to maximize absorption. Overall, the primary advantage of the newly released XR formulations is the once-daily dosing to improve convenience and adherence, with very limited data suggesting improved tolerability.

A review of the efficacy and safety of extended-release topiramate in the adjunctive treatment for refractory partial-onset seizures

Topiramate has been widely utilized worldwide as an effective medication against partial- and generalized-onset seizures. Extended-release topiramate was developed to provide patients with the convenience of once-daily dosing and potentially improved tolerability by reducing serum concentration fluctuation. USL255 is a once-daily, extended-release formulation of topiramate, which was recently approved in the USA. Compared with immediate-release topiramate taken twice daily, once-daily USL255 provides equivalent topiramate exposure with a 26% reduction in plasma fluctuations. A multinational, phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in patients with refractory partial-onset seizures demonstrated that USL255 (200 mg/day) significantly improved seizure control and was well tolerated with low overall neuropsychiatric and neurocognitive adverse events.

The effects of antiepileptic inducers in neuropsychopharmacology, a neglected issue. Part I: A summary of the current state for clinicians

The literature on inducers in epilepsy and bipolar disorder is seriously contaminated by false negative findings. This is part i of a comprehensive review on antiepileptic drug (AED) inducers using both mechanistic pharmacological and evidence-based medicine to provide practical recommendations to neurologists and psychiatrists concerning how to control for them. Carbamazepine, phenobarbital and phenytoin, are clinically relevant AED inducers; correction factors were calculated for studied induced drugs. These correction factors are rough simplifications for orienting clinicians, since there is great variability in the population regarding inductive effects. As new information is published, the correction factors may need to be modified. Some of the correction factors are so high that the drugs (e.g., bupropion, quetiapine or lurasidone) should not co-prescribed with potent inducers. Clobazam, eslicarbazepine, felbamate, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, rufinamide, topiramate, vigabatrin and valproic acid are grouped as mild inducers which may (i)be inducers only in high doses; (ii)frequently combine with inhibitory properties; and (iii)take months to reach maximum effects or de-induction, definitively longer than the potent inducers. Potent inducers, definitively, and mild inducers, possibly, have relevant effects in the endogenous metabolism of (i)sexual hormones, (ii) vitamin D, (iii)thyroid hormones, (iv)lipid metabolism, and (v)folic acid.

USL255 extended-release topiramate for the treatment of epilepsy

USL255 is a once-daily, extended-release formulation of the well-established antiepileptic drug topiramate that was recently approved by the US FDA. As a capsule formulation, USL255 can be swallowed intact or opened and sprinkled onto soft food for patients with swallowing difficulties, including children (≥2 years old) and older patients. USL255 has been evaluated in seven key Phase I and III studies. Compared with immediate-release topiramate taken twice daily, once-daily USL255 provides equivalent topiramate exposure with a 26% reduction in plasma fluctuations. A multinational, Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in patients with refractory partial-onset seizures (PREVAIL) demonstrated that USL255 (200 mg/day) significantly improved seizure control and clinical outcomes versus placebo. USL255 is generally safe and well-tolerated, with a low incidence of neuropsychiatric and neurocognitive adverse events. These data suggest that USL255 may provide a useful treatment option for seizure control with convenient once-daily dosing.

Pharmacokinetic interactions between topiramate and pioglitazone and metformin

OBJECTIVE

To investigate potential drug-drug interactions between topiramate and metformin and pioglitazone at steady state.

METHODS

Two open-label studies were performed in healthy adult men and women. In Study 1, eligible participants were given metformin alone for 3 days (500 mg twice daily [BID]) followed by concomitant metformin and topiramate (titrated to 100mg BID) from days 4 to 10. In Study 2, eligible participants were randomly assigned to treatment with pioglitazone 30 mg once daily (QD) alone for 8 days followed by concomitant pioglitazone and topiramate (titrated to 96 mg BID) from days 9 to 22 (Group 1) or to topiramate (titrated to 96 mg BID) alone for 11 days followed by concomitant pioglitazone 30 mg QD and topiramate 96 mg BID from days 12 to 22 (Group 2). An analysis of variance was used to evaluate differences in pharmacokinetics with and without concomitant treatment; 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the ratio of the geometric least squares mean (LSM) estimates for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under concentration-time curve for dosing interval (AUC12 or AUC24), and oral clearance (CL/F) with and without concomitant treatment were used to assess a drug interaction.

RESULTS

A comparison to historical data suggested a modest increase in topiramate oral clearance when given concomitantly with metformin. Coadministration with topiramate reduced metformin oral clearance at steady state, resulting in a modest increase in systemic metformin exposure. Geometric LSM ratios and 90% CI for metformin CL/F and AUC12 were 80% (75%, 85%) and 125% (117%, 134%), respectively. Pioglitazone had no effect on topiramate pharmacokinetics at steady state. Concomitant topiramate resulted in decreased systemic exposure to pioglitazone and its active metabolites, with geometric LSM ratios and 90% CI for AUC24 of 85.0% (75.7%, 95.6%) for pioglitazone, 40.5% (36.8%, 44.6%) for M-III, and 83.8% (76.1%, 91.2%) for M-IV, respectively. This effect appeared more pronounced in women than in men. Coadministration of topiramate with metformin or pioglitazone was generally well tolerated by healthy participants in these studies.

CONCLUSIONS

A modest increase in metformin exposure and decrease in topiramate exposure was observed at steady state following coadministration of metformin 500 mg BID and topiramate 100mg BID. The clinical significance of the observed interaction is unclear but is not likely to require a dose adjustment of either agent. Pioglitazone 30 mg QD did not affect the pharmacokinetics of topiramate at steady state, while coadministration of topiramate 96 mg BID with pioglitazone decreased steady-state systemic exposure to pioglitazone, M-III, and M-IV. While the clinical consequence of this interaction is unknown, careful attention should be given to the routine monitoring for adequate glycemic control of patients receiving this concomitant therapy. Concomitant administration of topiramate with metformin or pioglitazone was generally well tolerated and no new safety concerns were observed.

Synthetic oligosaccharides as active pharmaceutical ingredients: lessons learned from the full synthesis of one heparin derivative on a large scale

Covering: up to November 2013. Heparin and heparan sulfate are natural polysaccharides with strong structural variations, which are responsible for their numerous specific biological properties. One key target of heparin, among others, is antithrombin, a serine protease inhibitor that, upon activation, mainly targets anticoagulation factors IIa and Xa. It is well documented that inhibition of the latter is due to a specific pentasaccharidic sequence, its synthetic analog being the registered drug fondaparinux. The replacement of hydroxyls by methoxy groups, N-sulfates by O-sulfonates and the modulation of the sulfation pattern gave rise to both idraparinux and its neutralizable form, idrabiotaparinux, two pentasaccharides with a significantly increased half-life compared to fondaparinux. Although numerous efforts have been devoted to improving the chemoenzymatic preparation of heparin fragments, enzymes are usually selective for their natural substrates, which limits the generation of some specific non-natural structures. Up to now, total synthesis has proved to be a valuable approach for the preparation of tailor-made and pure saccharides in the milligram to gram scale. This highlight will focus on the synthesis and the technical challenges associated with the development and the production of complex carbohydrates which will be exemplified with idrabiotaparinux. Particular attention will be paid to the process improvements needed in order to implement the production in a pilot plant, achieving batch generation on a multi-kilogram scale with a purity higher than 99.5%, and with no unknown impurity over 0.1%.

The insulin sensitizing effect of topiramate involves KATP channel activation in the central nervous system

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Topiramate improves insulin sensitivity, in addition to its antiepileptic action. However, the underlying mechanism is unknown. Therefore, the present study was aimed at investigating the mechanism of the insulin-sensitizing effect of topiramate both in vivo and in vitro.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Male C57Bl/6J mice were fed a run-in high-fat diet for 6 weeks, before receiving topiramate or vehicle mixed in high-fat diet for an additional 6 weeks. Insulin sensitivity was assessed by hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp. The extent to which the insulin sensitizing effects of topiramate were mediated through the CNS were determined by concomitant i.c.v. infusion of vehicle or tolbutamide, an inhibitor of ATP-sensitive potassium channels in neurons. The direct effects of topiramate on insulin signalling and glucose uptake were assessed in vivo and in cultured muscle cells.

KEY RESULTS

In hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp conditions, therapeutic plasma concentrations of topiramate (∼4 μg·mL(-1) ) improved insulin sensitivity (glucose infusion rate + 58%). Using 2-deoxy-D-[(3) H]glucose, we established that topiramate improved the insulin-mediated glucose uptake by heart (+92%), muscle (+116%) and adipose tissue (+586%). Upon i.c.v. tolbutamide, the insulin-sensitizing effect of topiramate was completely abrogated. Topiramate did not directly affect glucose uptake or insulin signalling neither in vivo nor in cultured muscle cells.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

In conclusion, topiramate stimulates insulin-mediated glucose uptake in vivo through the CNS. These observations illustrate the possibility of pharmacological modulation of peripheral insulin resistance through a target in the CNS.

Drug interactions with the newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs)--Part 2: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between AEDs and drugs used to treat non-epilepsy disorders

Since antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are prescribed to treat various non-epilepsy-related disorders in addition to the fact that patients with epilepsy may develop concurrent disorders that will need treatment, the propensity for AEDs to interact with non-AEDs is considerable and indeed can present a difficult clinical problem. The present review details the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions that have been reported to occur with the new AEDs (eslicarbazepine acetate, felbamate, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, pregabalin, retigabine (ezogabine), rufinamide, stiripentol, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide) and drugs used to treat non-epilepsy disorders. Interaction study details are described, as necessary, so as to allow the reader to take a view as to the possible clinical significance of particular interactions. Pharmacokinetic interactions relate to hepatic enzyme induction or inhibition and involved a variety of drugs including psychoactive drugs, cardioactive drugs, oral contraceptives, antituberculous agents, analgesics and antineoplastic drugs. A total of 68 pharmacokinetic interactions have been described, with lamotrigine (n = 22), topiramate (n = 18) and oxcarbazepine (n = 7) being associated with most, whilst lacosamide, pregabalin, stiripentol and vigabatrin are associated with none. Overall, only three pharmacodynamic interactions have been described and occur with oxcarbazepine, perampanel and pregabalin.

Clinical pharmacokinetic interactions between antiepileptic drugs and hormonal contraceptives

Contraceptive management in women with epilepsy is critical owing to the potential maternal and fetal risks if contraception or seizure management fails. This article briefly describes the pharmacokinetic interactions between antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and hormonal contraceptives and the rational strategies that may overcome these risks. Hormonal contraception, including the use of oral contraceptives (OCs), is widely used in many women with epilepsy - there is no strong evidence of seizures worsening with their use. AEDs are the mainstay for seizure control in women with epilepsy. However, there are many factors to consider in the choice of AED therapy and hormonal contraception, since some AEDs can reduce the efficacy of OCs owing to pharmacokinetic interactions. Estrogens and progestogens are metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4. AEDs, such as phenytoin, phenobarbital, carbamazepine, felbamate, topiramate, oxcarbazepine and primidone, induce cytochrome P450 3A4, leading to enhanced metabolism of either or both the estrogenic and progestogenic component of OCs, thereby reducing their efficacy in preventing pregnancy. OCs can also decrease the concentrations of AEDs such as lamotrigine and, thereby, increase the risk of seizures. Increased awareness of AED interactions may help optimize seizure therapy in women with epilepsy.