Pharmacodynamic properties of beta-adrenergic receptor blocking drugs in man

The β-Blocker Carvedilol and Related Aryloxypropanolamines Promote ERK1/2 Phosphorylation in HEK293 Cells with K A Values Distinct From Their Equilibrium Dissociation Constants as β 2-Adrenoceptor Antagonists: Evidence for Functional Affinity

The determination of affinity by using functional assays is important in drug discovery because it provides a more relevant estimate of the strength of interaction of a ligand to its cognate receptor than radioligand binding. However, empirical evidence for so-called, "functional affinity" is limited. Herein, we determined whether the affinity of carvedilol, a β-adrenoceptor antagonist used to treat heart failure that also promotes extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) phosphorylation, differed between these two pharmacological activities. Four structurally related β-adrenoceptor antagonists (alprenolol, carazolol, pindolol, propranolol) that also activated ERK1/2 were included as comparators to enhance our understanding of how these drugs work in the clinical setting. In HEK293 cells stably expressing the human β 2-adrenoceptor carvedilol and related aryloxypropanolamines were partial agonists of ERK1/2 phosphorylation with potencies ([A]50s) that were lower than their equilibrium dissociation constants (K Bs) as β 2-adrenoceptor antagonists. As the [A]50 of a partial agonist is a good approximation of its K B, then these data indicated that the affinities of carvedilol and related ligands for these two activities were distinct. Moreover, there was a significant negative rank order correlation between the [A]50 of each ligand to activate ERK1/2 and their intrinsic activities (i.e., as intrinsic activity for ERK1/2 phosphorylation increased, so did affinity). Genome editing revealed that the transducer that coupled the β 2-adrenoceptor to ERK1/2 phosphorylation in response to carvedilol and other β 2-adrenoceptor antagonists was Gαs. Collectively, these data support the concept of "functional affinity" and indicate that the ability of the β 2-adrenoceptor to recruit Gαs may influence the affinity of the activating ligand. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: In HEK293 cells overexpressing the human β2-adrenoceptor carvedilol and four related aryloxypropanolamines behaved as β2-adrenoceptor antagonists and partial agonists of ERK1/2 phosphorylation with rank orders of affinity that were distinct. These data imply that carvedilol and other β-blockers can stabilize the β2-adrenoceptor in different affinity conformations that are revealed when functionally distinct responses are measured. This is the basis for the pharmacological concept of "functional affinity."

Patient-Centered Paradigm for Managing Autonomic Long COVID Symptoms During Sports and Exercise

ABSTRACT

This report highlights a new, patient-centered paradigm for managing post-COVID-19 dysautonomia symptoms during sports and exercise. The patient was a healthcare worker exposed before vaccination. She experienced postural orthostatic tachycardia plus exertional tachycardia, with postexertional fatigue, beginning a few weeks after testing positive for COVID-19. Stress test, echo, and an extensive dysautonomia evaluation were negative. Recommended nonpharmacological and pharmacological interventions were poorly tolerated. Prescription of a novel regimen of "basal-dose" ivabradine, plus very low-dose metoprolol according to an exertional "sliding scale" managed symptoms to an acceptable level for work and recreation.

Beta1-blocker (practolol) and exercise in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease

Ventilatory and circulatory data from 20 patients suffering from chronic obstructive lung disease have been obtained before, during and after exercise at 600 kpm/min for 5 min on a bicycle ergometer. The patients had been given intravenously practolol, 15 mg, or saline alternatively, using a double-blind cross-over technique. A slight postexercise reduction of FEV1 (8%) was noted after practolol medication as compared to placebo, with an accompanying decrease in PaCO2; PaO2 did not differ substantially. No wheezing or inappropriate dyspnea attributable to the medication was noted in any of the patients. The well known beta1-blocking effects on the circulation were confirmed, with maintained Q and reduced HR, together with a lowered systemic BP during and after exercise. There was a significant positive relationship between the postexercise reduction of FEV1 and the concomitant fall in HR. It is concluded that practolol in doses with near maximal circulatory effects had a slight, but clinically insignificant effect on the ventilatory parameters.

Pathophysiology and management of self-poisoning with beta-blockers

The prognosis of self-poisoning with beta-blockers is excellent, especially if medical management is started immediately but the wide variety of clinical symptoms and proposed treatments complicate the therapeutic strategy. Beta-blockers that are liposoluble or have marked anti-arrhythmic activity are more lethal (e.g. propranolol, sotalol). Similarly, pre-existing cardiac pathology or co-ingestion of psychotropic or cardioactive drugs increases mortality. The first-line symptomatic treatment is administration of atropine and volume-expanding fluids to treat bradycardia and hypotension, respectively. However atropine is often unsuccessful in reversing beta-blocker-induced bradycardia and repeated doses can provoke atropine poisoning. If symptomatic treatment fails, then antidotes should be administered in a precise order: first, high doses of glucagon, followed by isoproterenol, epinephrine, and the new inhibitors of phosphodiesterases. Mechanical ventilation should be started at the same time as pharmacological treatment in cases of severe collapse or prolonged QRS.

The applied pharmacology of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (beta blockers) in relation to clinical outcomes

Despite the fact that beta blockers were introduced into clinical practice 25 years ago, new beta blockers with differing kinetic and dynamic profiles continue to be developed and marketed. This overview assesses some of the more extensively studied agents from the point of view of proof of utility and the validity of claims for therapeutic advances. The clinical data suggests that despite the expectations of improvements based on kinetic and dynamic consideration, none of the newer agents have been shown unequivocally, either in terms of efficiency or tolerability, to be an advance over the reference agents, the beta 1 antagonists atenolol and metoprolol. This may be either because such improvements will not occur or because of shortcomings in the design and duration of comparative studies. There are trends to suggest that celiprolol has lesser effects on bronchial function and that it has a lesser impact on lipoprotein profiles. Approaches are suggested that might enable clinicians to appraise for themselves the validity of claims for the improved efficiency of new beta blockers.

Kinetics and hemodynamic effects of intravenous nicardipine modified by previous propranolol oral treatment

Intravenous nicardipine, 5 mg, was administered in two comparable groups of eight patients with chronic coronary artery disease but no clinical signs of heart failure. One group had received no previous treatment and served as a control group, and the other had received long-term treatment with large oral doses of propranolol. Blood concentrations of nicardipine were higher, and the area under the plasma concentration curve was greater in the group previously treated by propranolol. The total clearance of nicardipine was decreased in patients taking propranolol, without a change in the half-life of the drug. Typical hemodynamic responses, namely, a decrease in aortic pressure and in arterial resistances, were greater and more lasting in patients previously treated orally by propranolol. Filling pressure remained stable in both groups. The nicardipine infusion did not induce signs of dromotropic or inotropic negative effects in either group. The greater and more lasting hemodynamic effects of nicardipine in the group previously treated orally by propranolol do not seem to be related to an overall hemodynamic action of propranolol, but are probably due to higher nicardipine plasma levels, and may be caused by a decrease in hepatic blood flow induced by propranolol, with a consequent decrease in nicardipine clearance and by a smaller nicardipine volume of distribution in the propranolol group.

Effects of a week's beta-adrenoceptor blockade with atenolol and metoprolol CR/ZOK on the response to exercise in healthy women aged 50 to 70 years

12 healthy women with a mean age of 60 years (range 50-70 years) were treated with 50 mg atenolol or 100 mg metoprolol CR/ZOK or placebo for 1 week in a double-blind, randomized, cross-over study. Laboratory measurements of the cardiovascular responses to exercise were made 2-4 hours after and again 24 hours after the last tablet. Blood pressure and heart rate at rest were reduced equally by the two beta-adrenoceptor antagonists. The reductions in blood pressure and heart rate during graded exercise and then during prolonged steady treadmill exercise 3-4 hours after the tablet were greater for atenolol than metoprolol CR/ZOK. The reductions in cardiac output showed a similar pattern. Lactate concentrations and ratings of perceived exertion tended to be highest on metoprolol CR/ZOK, but these differences were inconsistent. We conclude that despite the changes in the cardiovascular system in these 50-70 year-old women, exercise tolerance was not greatly affected by beta-adrenoceptor blockade.

Pharmacodynamic comparison of L-bunolol with propranolol, metoprolol, and placebo

Twelve healthy volunteers received single oral doses of propranolol (80 mg), metoprolol (100 mg), L-bunolol (2 mg), and placebo in a four-way crossover study. Blood pressure, ventricular rate, and echocardiographically determined ejection fraction, ejection time, and mean rate of circumferential fiber shortening (mVcf) were measured before dosing and at multiple time points during 10 hours after each dose, with subjects maintained in the supine position. Reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure following administration of each of the beta blockers were greater than those observed with placebo, but differences among the four treatments were not significant. Heart rate reductions with the beta blockers differed significantly from placebo (P less than .001), but differences among the three beta blockers were not significant. Differences among the four treatments in mVcf decrement did not attain significance at the 5% level (.05 less than P less than .1), and there were no significant differences in ejection-time prolongation or ejection-fraction reduction. Thus, reduced blood pressure, heart rate slowing, and reduced cardiac contractility may be associated with placebo treatment and may indicate the need for placebo controls in studies of the cardiovascular effects of beta blockers. Despite differing secondary pharmacologic properties, the three beta blockers reduced heart rate to a similar extent. Other effects of the beta blockers on blood pressure and cardiac contractility could not be consistently distinguished from those associated with placebo.

Effects of beta 1- and beta 1 + beta 2-antagonists on training-induced myocardial hypertrophy and enzyme adaptation

The effects of beta 1- and beta 1 + beta 2-antagonists on the myocardial adaptation to exercise training were investigated in male Sprague-Dawley rats randomly divided into trained (treadmill, 1 hr/day, 5 days/week for 10 weeks at 27 m/min, 15% grade) without drug (TC), sedentary without drug (SC), trained treated with atenolol (TA) (10 mg/kg body wt, i.p.), trained treated with propranolol (TP, 30 mg/kg body wt, i.p.), and sedentary propranolol. Doses of both beta-antagonists were titrated to decrease the exercise heart rate by 25% compared to the controls. The heart weight and heart/body weight ratio were significantly greater in TC (1.28 +/- 0.07 g (P less than 0.01); 296 +/- 12 mg/100 g body wt (P less than 0.05) respectively) than in SC (1.09 +/- 0.04 g and 268 +/- 11 mg/100 g body wt), or in TP and TA. Myocardial mitochondrial protein was unchanged by training or beta-blockade. Citrate synthase and beta-hydroxyacyl CoA dehydrogenase activities were not altered. Carnitine palmitoyltransferase activity was increased in SP compared to SC. Training increased hexokinase activity only in TC (5.22 +/- 0.12 vs 4.26 +/- 0.23 mumol/min/g wet wt, P less than 0.01). Lactate dehydrogenase activity increased significantly (P less than 0.01) in both TC (383 +/- 14 mumol/min/g wet wt) and TA (372 +/- 14 mumol/min/g wet wt) compared to SC (276 +/- 14 mumol/min/g wet wt), but not in TP versus SP. These data indicate that (1) beta-adrenergic blockade prevents training-induced cardiac hypertrophy; (2) beta-antagonists have little effect on the myocardial oxidative capacity; and (3) while the training induction of myocardial hexokinase is inhibited by both beta 1- and beta 1 + beta 2-antagonists, myocardium may increase its ability to utilize lactate during exercise with training despite beta 1-blockade.

Cardiac effects of beta-adrenoceptor blockade with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity during submaximal exercise

1. beta-adrenoceptor blocking agents with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA) are characterized by lesser depression of cardiac performance during low levels of sympathetic stimulation than beta-adrenoceptor blocking agents lacking ISA. Studies of the effects of ISA on cardiac output and on the determinants of myocardial oxygen demand during submaximal exercise are described and distinct differences between beta-adrenoceptor antagonists with and without ISA emerge. 2. At doses which produce similar effects on maximal exercise heart rate, and resting and exercise systolic blood pressure, pindolol, a beta-adrenoceptor blocking agent with substantial ISA, allows a higher submaximal exercise cardiac output and submaximal heart rate X systolic blood pressure product than does propranolol, a beta-adrenoceptor antagonist without ISA. 3. These findings may have clinical relevance in specific groups of patients such as those with arterial hypertension, where the preservation of cardiac function may allow for a more physiologic exercise response. Implications in patients with coronary artery disease and chronic heart failure await further study.

Cardiorespiratory response to exercise before and after acute beta-adrenoreceptor blockade in nonsmokers and chronic smokers

To evaluate the effects of chronic smoking on exercise performance we studied 5 smokers and 7 nonsmokers of comparable age and physical characteristics. The resting heart rate in smokers (75 +/- 3 beats/min; mean +/- SD) was significantly (P less than 0.01) higher than in nonsmokers (64 +/- 5). During exercise on a bicycle ergometer the heart rate remained significantly (P less than 0.01) higher in smokers than in nonsmokers. After exercise, the heart rate in nonsmokers settled to 78 +/- 9 beats/min at 10 minutes compared with 105 +/- 11 (P less than 0.01) in smokers. Oxygen consumption was similar in both groups throughout. Beta-adrenergic blockade reduced the exercise tachycardia in both groups but the heart rate for the same workload remained significantly (P less than 0.01) higher in smokers. Beta-blockade significantly reduced (P less than 0.05) oxygen consumption in nonsmokers but not in smokers who also incurred a significantly (P less than 0.05) greater oxygen debt and had higher serum lactate levels. These differences were attributed mainly to carboxyhaemoglobinaemia and partly to the effect of prolonged smoking on the heart and on intermediary metabolism.

Effect of beta blockade with betaxolol on left ventricular systolic function in chronic stable angina pectoris and left ventricular dysfunction

To assess the effect of beta blockade on left ventricular (LV) performance in patients with LV dysfunction and stable angina pectoris, 18 subjects taking a placebo followed by incremental doses of the cardioselective beta-adrenergic blocking agent betaxolol (5, 10, 20, 40 and 80 mg/day) were studied. The study ended with the achievement of optimal clinical beta blockade (heart rate at rest 50 to 60 beats/min, a 20% or smaller increase in heart rate during stage 1 of symptom-limited treadmill exercise using the modified Bruce protocol). Optimal clinical beta blockade produced a decrease in mean frequency of angina, from 6.8 +/- 1.7 to 0.7 +/- 0.8 episodes per week (p less than 0.0005) and an increase in mean treadmill exercise capacity, from 3.1 +/- 1.7 to 7.7 +/- 2.8 minutes (p less than 0.0005). LV systolic function was assessed at rest and during symptom-limited exercise with radionuclide left ventriculography. Mean LV ejection fraction (EF) during therapy with placebo was 39 +/- 7% at rest and 40 +/- 8% at peak exercise. Mean LVEF during optimal clinical beta blockade was 43 +/- 11% at rest and 45 +/- 10% at peak exercise. Neither of these changes was statistically significant. No patient had clinical or radiographic signs of LV failure. The results suggest that optimal clinical beta blockade with betaxolol, in doses sufficient to significantly reduce the frequency of angina and improve exercise capacity in patients with stable angina pectoris and mild to moderate LV systolic dysfunction, does not cause significant deterioration of LV systolic function or produce LV failure.

Effect of beta1 selective adrenoceptor blockade on physiological response to exercise

The effect of the beta1 selective adrenoceptor blocker, atenolol, on the physiological response to exercise was studied in 12 healthy young men. Oral atenolol (100 mg) and placebo were administered in a randomised double blind crossover fashion an hour and a half before an intermittent multistage cycle ergometer exercise test. At maximal effort oxygen consumption, pulmonary ventilation, carbon dioxide output, and respiratory exchange ratio were not modified by atenolol. In contrast, maximal heart rate and performance time were significantly reduced after atenolol. Nevertheless, because the relation of percentage of maximal oxygen consumption to percentage of maximal heart rate was not changed by atenolol both the absolute and relative oxygen consumption corresponding to 70% and 85% of the maximal heart rate remained unaltered. These data suggest that recommendations of exercise intensity may be determined on the basis of a calculated percentage of the predetermined maximal heart rate in persons without symptomatic coronary heart disease receiving beta1 selective adrenoceptor blockers.

Effect of selective and nonselective beta-adrenoceptor blockade on thermoregulation during prolonged exercise in heat

The effect of selective and nonselective beta-adrenoceptor blockade on the thermoregulatory responses of 11 physically active, healthy, young adult men was studied during 2-hour block-stepping in heat. The trial consisted of 3 periods of 6 days each during which propranolol (160 mg/day), atenolol (100 mg) or matching placebo was administered in a randomized, double-blind crossover fashion. Propranolol and atenolol induced similar, significant (p less than 0.001) increases in subjective ratings of perceived exertion. The mechanism of this increased fatigue was not evident from the documented alterations in serum electrolyte, blood glucose and blood lactate levels or ventilatory parameters. Propranolol did, however, induce a postexercise delayed serum-potassium reversion. Although rectal and mean skin temperature responses were essentially unaltered by beta-adrenoceptor blockade during block-stepping, an increased total sweat loss was observed with propranolol (p less than 0.01 versus placebo) and to a lesser degree with atenolol (p = not significant versus placebo). This indicates that persons receiving beta-adrenoceptor blockers have an increased need to adhere to a strict fluid-replacement regimen during exercise. This potentially adverse response was minimal with atenolol in contrast to propranolol, and this in turn suggests the use of beta1-selective adrenoceptor blockers during prolonged exercise when adequate fluid replacement is not possible.

Effect of beta 1-selective and nonselective beta blockade on blood pressure relative to physical performance in men with systemic hypertension

Eleven physically active men with systemic hypertension were studied after 5 weeks of treatment with placebo, atenolol or propranolol. A double-blind, crossover randomized design was used. Blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), physical performance capacity, rate of perceived exertion and blood lactate concentrations were measured during rest, exercise to exhaustion and postexercise, at 8 and 24 hours after intake of the last dose. Blood pressure at rest and during exercise was similarly decreased with both drugs (8 and 24 hours), and there was no difference between 8 and 24 hours with any of the treatments. Heart rate (8 hours) was decreased similarly by both drugs, but after 24 hours, HR at increased workloads (above 120 watts) was higher with atenolol compared with propranolol. Maximal HR was lower with propranolol than atenolol at both 8 and 24 hours. Maximal exercise loads (8 and 24 hours) were 231 and 232 watts with placebo, 211 and 212 with propranolol and 228 and 227 with atenolol. That is, maximal workload was decreased with propranolol compared with placebo and atenolol at both 8 and 24 hours. No difference was found between placebo and atenolol at either 8 or 24 hours. The rate of perceived exertion values were higher with propranolol than atenolol. Blood lactate concentrations did not differ according to treatments. The results indicate that atenolol, when given in a dose that decreases resting and exercise BP to the same extent as propranolol, limits physical performance less than propranolol.

Beta adrenergic influence on esophageal and colonic motility in man

Gastrointestinal (GI) motility is centrally controlled through the sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves, sympathetic effects being partly mediated by beta adrenoceptors. Although beta adrenoceptor agonists and antagonists are widely used for different disorders, little is known about the influence of these agents on GI motility. The present study was initiated to investigate whether there is a physiological, beta adrenergic influence on human GI motility and to describe the effects of selective beta adrenoceptor stimulation on motility in the proximal and distal parts of the GI tract. Esophageal peristalsis was measured in healthy subjects using electronic catheters. Distal colonic motility was measured with an open-tipped, water-perfused catheter in the sigmoid colon and from an air-filled balloon in the rectum in healthy subjects and in patients with the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). In one study, colonic motility was stimulated with continuous infusion of the octapeptide of cholecystokinin (CCK-OP). Esophagus: Peristaltic amplitude was increased in the distal smooth muscle part of the esophageal body after infusion of both the nonselective beta blocker propranolol and the beta-1 selective blocker metoprolol. After infusion of the beta-1 agonist prenalterol and the beta-2 selective agonist terbutaline, a profound decrease in esophageal peristaltic amplitude was seen. Pretreatment with metoprolol selectively blocked the response to a moderate dose of prenalterol but did not block the response to terbutaline. The latter response was blocked by propranolol. Peristaltic velocity in the proximal part of the esophagus was decreased by beta-1 stimulation and in the distal part by beta-2 stimulation. Distal colon: In healthy subjects the sigmoid motility index showed a dose-dependent increase after metoprolol and propranolol, respectively. The increase was more marked after propranolol infusion. Terbutaline decreased the sigmoid motility index both in healthy subjects and in patients with the IBS. Furthermore, the rectal motility index was decreased in the group of healthy subjects. The effects of prenalterol on rectal and sigmoid motility did not differ from those of placebo. The IBS patient group showed larger intraindividual variations in sigmoid motility from day to day and also lower rectal motility indices than the healthy subjects. Infusion of CCK-OP increased the sigmoid motility index compared to non-stimulated conditions. No effects on CCK-OP stimulated motility were seen after either terbutaline, prenalterol or placebo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Walking capacity of patients with intermittent claudication during chronic antihypertensive treatment with metoprolol and methyldopa

In a placebo-controlled double-blind crossover trial, the effect of a 3-week course of treatment with metoprolol (100-200 mg daily) and methyldopa (500-1000 mg daily) on walking capacity on a treadmill with increasing work load was studied in 14 hypertensive patients with intermittent claudication. The walking capacity was not affected by the antihypertensive treatment.

Isometric muscle endurance during acute beta-adrenergic blockade

Isometric muscle endurance was measured in fourteen physically active men without (placebo) and after acute oral administration of 160 mg propranolol (Inderal). Quadriceps muscle contractions were sustained at 65% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) to exhaustion. Muscle biopsies were obtained from m. vastus lateralis at rest for subsequent histochemical analysis for myofibrillar ATPase and amylase-PAS in order to determine fiber type composition and capillary density. The time to exhaustion was shorter (p less than 0.01) during beta-blockade (0.82 +/- 0.22) min than placebo (0.90 +/- 0.23) min. Changes in endurance time, induced by beta-blockade, were not correlated with any of the muscle morphological or histochemical variables examined. It is concluded that muscular performance is impaired as a result of beta-blockade on muscle tissue irrespective of any concomitant change in central circulation.

Oxprenolol: clinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics

Oxprenolol is clinically a well-established beta blocker that shares with other members of this group the ability to control a variety of disorders, in particular, hypertension and angina. Pharmacologically it is a nonselective beta blocker that possesses partial agonist activity (intrinsic sympathomimetic activity). Pharmacokinetically, oxprenolol behaves as a moderately lipophilic agent. This means that it is well absorbed, but then undergoes considerable first-pass loss. It penetrates well into most tissues, including the central nervous system. About 80% of oxprenolol is bound to protein in the blood, and when acute-phase proteins increase, as, for example, in patients with inflammatory disease, total plasma concentrations of oxprenolol also increase. Apart from this, the plasma concentration:time profile produced after the oral administration of oxprenolol is remarkably consistent and reproducible. Intrasubject and intersubject variability is small, and the administration of the drug after food or with many other drugs has very little effect. The beta-blocking effects of oxprenolol correlate well with the plasma concentrations, but as with other beta blockers, it has not been possible to correlate plasma concentrations directly with its therapeutic actions such as lowering blood pressure or controlling arrhythmias.

Beta-adrenoceptors in the rat kidney. Immunohistochemical study

The direct histochemical detection of beta-blocker binding sites was studied in sections of rat kidney using an immunohistochemical technique developed in our laboratory. Frozen sections of rat kidney were incubated in a solution of (-)alprenolol, washed, exposed to fluorescent (-)alprenolol antibodies (FAA) and then observed at a fluorescence microscope. Strong fluorescence was found within the wall of renal artery and vein, but primarly in the artery. At the level of blood vessels (-)alprenolol binding sites were located chiefly in the media and in the intima. The renal glomerulus, the loop of Henle and collecting tubules appear to be free of any fluorescence. Consequently they do not have beta-adrenoceptors. On the contrary, the glomerular afferent and afferent arterioles, the cellular elements of the juxtaglomerular apparatus, proximal and distal convoluted tubules, are rich in (-)alprenolol binding sites. At higher magnifications the immunoreactivity appears to be located in the basal membrane of cellular elements which indicates that (-)alprenolol binding sites are membrane receptors. The direct immunohistochemical detection of beta-blocker binding sites in the kidney may offer useful information concerning the site of action of beta-blockers at the level of an important target organ for this class of drugs.

Effect of some beta-adrenergic blocking agents on tissue guanylate cyclase and cyclic nucleotides in the rat

Pretreatment of rats with the beta-adrenergic blocking agents, atenolol, practolol, pronethalol and propranolol, at a dosage of 150 mg/kg/day for 5 days, produced marked increases in guanylate cyclase activity in the liver, gastric and intestinal mucosae, but with concomitant decreases in cyclic GMP levels. The ratios of cAMP/cGMP in each of the tissues were not changed significantly from control values after pretreatment with these drugs. These observations indicate that any oncogenicity seen with beta-blocking agents is not due to the common pharmacological action of beta-adrenoreceptor blockade.

Pindolol and propranolol in patients with angina pectoris and normal or near-normal ventricular function. Lack of influence of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity on global and segmental left ventricular function assessed by radionuclide ventriculography

To investigate the role of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity on left ventricular (LV) function during antianginal therapy with beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists, 23 patients with chronic, exercise-induced angina pectoris and normal or near normal LV function underwent radionuclide ventriculography at rest and during exercise, during 3 randomly allocated periods: (a) treatment with oral propranolol, a drug without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, 40 to 80 mg 4 times a day; (2) treatment with pindolol, a drug with marked intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, 5 to 10 mg 2 times a day; and (3) a control period. During the control period, the LV ejection fraction decreased from rest (58.9 +/- 8.2%) to exercise (54.3 +/- 10.7%), and the wall motion score decreased from 0.57 +/- 1.08 at rest to 2.39 +/- 2.10 during exercise, p less than 0.001. After propranolol, the ejection fraction did not change significantly at rest (57.2 +/- 8.1%) but improved during exercise (56.8 +/- 11.8%), compared with control values. After pindolol, the ejection fraction did not change at rest (57.9 +/- 8.6%) but improved during exercise (56.9 +/- 8.1%), compared with control values. Similarly, the wall motion score after administration of both agents did not change significantly at rest, but improved during exercise (p less than 0.001). The number of anginal episodes, nitroglycerin tablets consumed, and magnitude of S-T segment depression decreased significantly with both pindolol and propranolol. With both drugs, a similar improvement in exercise tolerance and a similar decrease in exercise heart rate and blood pressure were obtained. It is concluded that pindolol and propranolol, beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists with and without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, respectively, have similar effects on global and regional LV function in patients with angina pectoris, at doses producing equal suppression of exercise heart rate and similar antianginal effect.

Long-term antihypertensive treatment inhibiting progression of diabetic nephropathy

Six men aged 26-35 years with proteinuria due to insulindependent juvenile-onset diabetes were treated for moderate hypertension (mean blood pressure 162/103 mm Hg) and studied for a mean of 73 months for the effect on the progression of nephropathy. All patients were of normal weight. During a mean control period of 28 months before treatment the mean glomerular filtration rate (three or four measurements) was 86.1 ml/min and mean 24-hour urinary albumin excretion (also three or four measurements) 3.9 g (range 0.5-8.8 g).During antihypertensive treatment the mean systolic blood pressure fell to 144 mm Hg and mean diastolic pressure to 95 mm Hg. In the control period five patients had shown a mean monthly decline in glomerular filtration rate of 1.23 ml/min; with antihypertensive treatment, however, this decline fell to 0.49 ml/min (2p=0.042). In the remaining patient the glomerular filtration rate was 137 ml/min before treatment and 135 ml/min at the end of the treatment period. In all patients the mean yearly increase in albumin clearance (expressed as a percentage of the glomerular filtration rate) fell from 107% before treatment to 5% during treatment (2p=0.0099).This small study indicates that antihypertensive treatment slows the decline in renal function in diabetic nephropathy. Clinical trials beginning treatment in the incipient phase of diabetic nephropathy will define the optimal modality of treatment in this large patient population.

Kinetics and cardiac effects of propranolol in humans

Six healthy volunteers received single 20-mg intravenous (IV) and 80-mg oral doses of propranolol on two occasions in random sequence. Serum propranolol concentrations were determined by gas chromatography in multiple samples drawn during 24 h after each dose. Mean (+/- SE) kinetic variables for IV propranolol were: elimination half-life (t 1/2 beta), 5.3 (+/- 0.6) h; volume of distribution, 2.3 (+/- 0.3) l/kg; total clearance, 4.9 (+/- 0.3) ml/min/kg; predicted extraction ratio, 0.23 (+/- 0.02). After single oral doses, t 1/2 beta (3.8 +/- 0.2 h) tended to be smaller than after the IV dose, and actual systemic availability (0.60 +/- 0.07) was less than that based on the predicted extraction ratio. During multiple oral dosage (80 mg every 12 h), observed steady state serum levels (47 +/- 5 ng/ml) tended to be less than those predicted based on the single oral dose (61 +/- 5 ng/ml), thus providing no evidence for reduced propranolol clearance at steady-state. Echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular performance (posterior wall velocity, diastolic dimensions) made during the single-dose oral study indicated significant impairment of function; impairment was maximal at 3 h post-dosage, and corresponded to the time of the peak serum propranolol concentration (341 ng/ml).

Pindolol: a review of its pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical uses, and adverse effects

Pindolol is a new noncardioselective beta adrenergic blocking agent with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. In the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension, pindolol provides effective control of blood pressure in a large majority of patients when administered alone or, more commonly, when combined with a thiazide diuretic. Pindolol is approximately as effective as propranolol in the therapy of hypertension, but in some crossover trials central nervous system side effects were more frequent with pindolol. A "ceiling effect" may be observed as dosages are titrated upward above approximately 20 to 30 mg per day, such that further blood pressure reductions may not be achievable. Some patients will exhibit a paradoxical increase in blood pressure with an increase in dosage. In patients who respond to modest doses of pindolol, twice or even once daily dosing is often adequate. This prolonged duration of hypotensive activity, while not suggested by the kinetics of this or similar drugs, is probably common to most beta blockers. Investigations in small numbers of patients with angina pectoris have reported variable but generally beneficial results with pindolol.

The effects of propranolol and acebutolol on the overnight plasma levels of anterior pituitary and related hormones

1 The effects of single evening doses of the beta-adrenoceptor blocking agents propranolol (80 mg orally) and acebutolol (200 mg orally) on plasma levels throughout the night of prolactin, growth hormone, luteinising hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, cortisol and testosterone have been studied in seven healthy male volunteers. 2 Three way analysis of variance showed that acebutolol significantly reduced circulating levels of prolactin and follicle stimulating hormone, but did not alter the levels of the other hormones studied. 3 Propranolol significantly reduced follicle stimulating hormone and testosterone, and significantly increased circulating levels of cortisol, but caused no change in the other hormones studied. 4 Prolactin, luteinising hormone, testosterone and cortisol showed a significant variation with time indicating the existence of a diurnal rhythm in the pattern of their secretion. 5 There was a significant inter-subject variability in all the hormones studied. 6 There was a significant between-subject variation in response to both propranolol and acebutolol. 7 Different subjects showed significant variations with respect to time in prolactin, growth hormone and cortisol levels. 8 Neither propranolol nor acebutolol significantly altered the time course of secretion of any of the hormones studied. 9 Possible relationships of these beta-adrenoceptor blocker-induced changes in anterior pituitary and related hormones to the antihypertensive mechanism of acebutolol and propranolol are discussed.

The effects of atenolol on spontaneous and reflex activity of the sympathetic nerves in the anaesthetized cat

1 The reduction in the sympathetic efferent discharge observed after propranolol may be due to either a central or a peripheral effect. The beta-adrenoceptor blocking drug, atenolol, is not thought to enter the brain and therefore any reduction in the level of sympathetic efferent discharge observed after atenolol is likely to be mediated peripherally rather than centrally. 2 Cats were anaesthetized with alpha-chloralose and artificially ventilated and a number of variables known to affect the sympathetic nerves were monitored throughout the experiment and maintained within normal limits. Recordings were made from few fibre preparations from the lumber trunk and the renal nerves. Blood pressure was either raised or lowered by the injection of phenylephrine (1-4 microgram/kg) or glyceryl trinitrate (2-20 microgram/kg) and the sympathetic efferent discharge was recorded over a range of blood pressures when the blood pressure was steady. 3 Thirty min after giving atenolol (3 mg/kg) the blood pressure, heart rate and sympathetic efferent discharge were significantly reduced. Atenolol also attenuated the reflex responses of the sympathetic nerves to changes in the blood pressure. 4 It is suggested tht atenolol has its actions on sympathetic nerves at a site outside the CNS and some possible mechanisms are discussed.

Hemodynamic response to exercise after propranolol in patients with mitral stenosis

Hemodynamic response to exercise before and 10 minutes after propranolol (5 mg intravenously) was studied in 10 young patients with pure mitral stenosis who had normal sinus rhythm and no cardiac failure. After propranolol the mean heart rate and cardiac index at rest were lower than during the control state (respectively, 95 +/- 4 versus 82 +/- 3 beats/min, P less than 0.005; 3.4 +/- 0.2 versus 2.8 +/- 0.1 liters/min per m2, P less than 0.025). As a result, the mean pulmonary wedge pressure and mean mitral valve gradient at rest were lower (respectively, 22 +/- 2 versus 18 +/- 2 mm Hg, P less than 0.005; 24 +/- 2 versus 17 +/- 2 mm Hg, P less than 0.001). During exercise after propranolol the values of pulmonary wedge pressure and mitral valve gradient were lower than control values during exercise (respectively, 39 +/- 3 versus 30 +/- 2 mm Hg, P less than 0.005; 44 +/- 3 versus 32 +/- 3 mm Hg, P less than 0.005), again because of the lower heart rate and cardiac index (130 +/- 6 versus 104 +/- 6 beats/min, P less than 0.001; 4.6 +/- 3 versus 3.7 +/- 2 liters/min per m2, P less than 0.01). Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and stroke index showed no significant changes. Thus, propranolol may benefit patients with pure mitral stenosis with sinus rhythm and no cardiac failure whose symptoms occur during those reversible conditions characterized by an increase in heart rate or cardiac output, or both.

beta-Adrenoreceptor antagonists in essential tremor

Three different beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists--propranolol, sotalol, and atenolol--were compared in a double-blind study with placebo in nine patients with essential tremor. All three drugs produced an equal reduction in standing pulse rate but atenolol was less effective in reducing tremor than propranolol and sotalol. These results suggest that the reduction in tremor produced by beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists is mediated by an effect on peripheral beta 2-adrenoreceptors.

Limitation of work performance in normal adult males in the presence of beta-adrenergic blockade

The effect on work performance of a single oral dose of the cardio-selective beta-adrenoreceptor blocking agent, metoprolol, was compared with an equipotent dose of the non-selective agent, propranolol, in the same subjects. A number of biochemical and physiological variables including heart rate, oxygen consumption, ventilation, lactate, free fatty acid and glucose levels were measured. Following exercise in the presence of both active drugs, subjects complained of excessive leg fatique. For the group there was a significant reduction in the total work performed and the maximum heart rate achieved on both drugs. There was a significant correlation between plasma levels of metoprolol, reduction in total work performed and reduction in maximum heart rate. By contrast, after propranolol, there was a wide variation in work performed at a time when the reduction in maximum heart rate was similar for all subjects. This suggests for propranolol that a reduction in heart rate alone is an inappropriate guide to the impairment of work performance. There was a fail in the circulating level of free fatty acids at the end of exercise in the presence of both drugs and it is possible that this biochemical variable contributed to the decrease in work performance.

Effects of atenolol and propranolol on human performance and subjective feelings

In a double-blind, double crossover experiment, 18 healthy young men received over 3-day periods either 100 mg atenolol, 80 mg propranolol, or placebo. The subjects underwent various motor and cognitive tests 18 h after each last dose had been taken. Propranolol significantly increased variability of a choice reaction-time task. Scores on various subjective rating scales showed that propranolol had a larger mood elevating effect than atenolol. Heart rate and blood pressure were significantly reduced 24h after atenolol medication; these effects were absent or reduced after propranolol had been given.

A study of the relationship between cardiac beta-adrenoceptor blockade and intrinsic sympathomimetic activity in rats depleted of catecholamines

1. The intrinsic sympathomimetic activity of a range of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists and its relationship to beta-adrenoceptor blockade was studied in pentobarbitone-anaesthetized, vagotomized rats which had been depleted of catecholamines by pretreatment with syrosingopine. Dichlorisoprenaline, practolol, oxprenolol, pindolol and acebutolol, produced dose-dependent positive chronotropic responses in this preparation. 2. The relationship between the dose requirements for this intrinsic sympathomimetic activity and beta-adrenoceptor-blocking activity was not the same for all drugs: (i) dichlorisoprenaline and practolol had intrinsic activity at all beta-adrenoceptor-blocking doses; and (ii) oxprenolol, pindolol and acebutolol had predominantly beta-adrenoceptor blockade at the lower dose levels and agonist activity only became significant at high doses relative to those producing beta-adrenoceptor blockade. 3. The positive chronotropic response to both practolol and pindolol was observed in rats which had been pithed and was antagonized by propranolol (0.1-3.0 mg/kg, i.v.), indicating that beta-adrenoceptors were involved. 4. It was concluded that the intrinsic sympathomimetic activity of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists was not a simple property as it was described by the relationship between the dose requirements for intrinsic sympathomimetic activity and for beta-adrenoceptor blockade as well as the degree of partial agonist activity.

The influence of the intrinsic sympathomimetic activity of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists on haemodynamic effects in anaesthetized dogs

1. The effects of propranolol, atenolol (ICI 66,082), practolol and pindolol on heart rate and maximal left ventricular dp/dt, atrioventricular conduction time, mean aortic flow and diastolic blood pressure during cardiac pacing were investigated over a wide dose range (0.025-4.0 mg/kg, i.v.) in dogs anaesthetized with pentobarbitone.2. Propranolol and atenolol produced similar reductions in haemodynamic parameters. Propranolol had no further effect in dogs pretreated with atenolol. 3. Practolol tended to cause smaller reductions in the haemodynamic parameters than either propranolol or atenolol. Subsequent administration of propranolol still had some depressant activity. 4. Pindolol produced a biphasic response, with depression of cardiac function at the low doses (0.025 and 0.1 mg/kg), but a reversal of effect as the dose was increased. 5. It is therefore concluded that, in anaesthetized dogs, the intrinsic activity of practolol and pindolol limits the fall in heart rate, cardiac conduction, aortic flow and maximal dp/dt observed with beta-adrenoceptor blockade. With pindolol, however, the influence of intrinsic activity is observed only in high doses related to beta-adrenoceptor blockade.

Double-blind comparison of metoprolol, alprenolol, and oxprenolol in hypertension

A double-blind comparison of the beta-blockers metoprolol, alprenolol and oxprenolol was carried out to evaluate their antihypertensive effect and tolerability. 105 patients with previously untreated hypertension entered the trial and 72 completed it. Side-effects were infrequent and were never the reason for drop-out. All three drugs caused a statistically significant reduction in blood-pressure at the lower of the two doses used during a dose-finding period. At the higher dose employed in this period, metoprolol caused a significantly greater reduction in diastolic blood-pressure than did alprenolol or oxprenolol. All three drugs caused a significant reduction in heart rate. During the following period, the beta-blockers were supplemented if necessary with hydrochlorothiazide. This was required less frequently in the metoprolol group than in the other two groups.

Impairment of antipyrine clearance in humans by propranolol

The effect of propranolol on antipyrine clearance in humans was evaluated in six healthy volunteers who received single 1.4 to 1.5 g doses of intravenous antipyrine on two occasions. The first (control) antipyrine trial was without concurrent drug administration; the second trial was done during treatment with therapeutic doses of propranolol (40 mg every 4 to 6 hours). Antipyrine elimination half-life (t1/2), volume of distribution (Vd), and total clearance were determined after each trial. In all subjects isoproterenol sensitivity decreased markedly during propranolol treatment, indicating a high degree of beta blockade produced by the drug. Mean antipyrine t1/2 during the propranolol treatment period was significantly prolonged, and total clearance significantly reduced, over the control values. Twenty-four-hour urinary excretion of 4-hydroxyantipyrine, the major metabolite of antipyrine, likewise was reduced from 23.6% of the dose on the control trial to 14.8% of the dose during propranolol coadministration (0.1 less than P less than 0.2). Vd however, was nearly identical during both trials (0.62 L/kg). Thus propranolol prolongs the half-life and reduces the clearance or biotransformation rate of antipyrine, a drug whose clearance is independent of hepatic blood flow. Propranolol may influence the activity of hepatic microsomal enzymes responsible for drug hydroxylation.

Effect of adrenergic beta receptor blockade on ethanol elimination and on ethanol-induced changes in carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in man

The effect of adrenergic beta receptor blockade on the elimination rate of ethanol was studied in seven healthy young men. The studies were performed before and after 14 days of propranolol 240 mg/day: the ethanol was given per-orally--0.8 mg/kg b.w. The blood concentration of ethanol, glucose, lactate and glycerol, and the plasma concentration of free fatty acids and triglycerides were followed in samples from the superior vena cava taken every 20 min for four hours. The splanchnic hepatic blood flow was estimated with a single i.v. injection of indocyanine green. The absorption rate, absorption fraction and elimination rate of ethanol were not changed by propranolol. The splanchnic hepatic blood flow was significantly reduced (mean 19 per cent) during beta receptor blockade. The ethanol-induced change in the concentration of glucose, lactate and free fatty acids was affected by propranolol, the time-concentration curves for glucose and lactate being significantly elevated and that for free fatty acids being significantly reduced. The time-concentration curves for glycerol and triglycerides did not differ in the two studies.

The second Lilly Prize Lecture, University of Newcastle, July 1977. beta-Adrenergic receptor blockade in hypertension, past, present and future

All beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs that have been described share the common property of being competitive inhibitors. They differ in their associated properties, the presence or absence of cardioselectivity, membrane stabilizing activity, and partial agonist activity. Recently some beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs have been reported which also possess alpha-adrenoceptor blocking activity. The associated properties have been used as a basis for classifying beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs (Fitzgerald, 1969, 1972). The presence or absence of cardioselectivity is most useful for dividing beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs. The non-selective drugs (Division I) can be further divided according to the presence or absence of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA) and membrane stabilizing activity (Fitzgerald's groups I-IV). Group I possess both membrane activity and ISA, e.g. alprenolol, oxprenolol, group II just membrane action, e.g. propanolol, group III ISA but no membrane action, e.g. pindolol. Fitzgerald placed pindolol in group I but should be placed in group III as it possesses a high degree of beta-adrenoceptor blocking potency in relation to its membrane activity (Prichard, 1974). Finally drugs in group IV have neither ISA nor membrane action, e.g. sotalol, timolol. The cardioselective drugs (Division II) can be similarly sub-divided into groups I-IV according to the presence or absence of ISA or membrane action (Fitzgerald grouped all these together as group V). Lastly there are new beta-adrenergic receptor blocking drugs which in addition have alpha- adrenergic receptor blocking properties (Division III).

Penbutolol in hypertension: a pilot study with single daily doses

A pilot single-blind placebo controlled crossover within-patient study was undertaken in essential hypertension. In ten patients single daily doses of 25 mg and 50 mg and in two patients 25 mg, 50 mg and 100 mg were used. Satisfactory reductions in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure in the supine and erect postures were observed. Reduction in heart rate was of the order of 6-32%, there being no correlation between reductions in blood pressure and decrements in heart rate. Three patients were dropped from the final analyses. Seventy-eight per cent (7/9) of patients had a final diastolic pressure (lying) of 90 mm Hg or less. Single doses of penbutolol controlled blood pressure for at least twenty-four hours. At the end of two weeks on placebo medication, following nine weeks of active drug medication, blood pressure had reverted to near pre-treatment levels. Penbutolol was well tolerated.