Clarithromycin and omeprazole as helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in patients with H. pylori-associated gastric disorders

Quality control of traditional Chinese medicine Chelidonii herba based on 2D-Q-NMR

Chelidonii herba is a traditional Chinese medicinal herb with effects including antispasmodic, analgesic, antitussive, and bronchodilator properties. Alkaloids are the main bioactive ingredients in Chelidonii herba. In this study, a two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance (Heteronuclear Singular Quantum Correlation, HSQC-2D-NMR) technique was employed to quantitatively analyze the total alkaloid content and three major active alkaloid monomers in Chelidonii herba from eleven different sources. The quantification results of the three monomeric alkaloids were also verified using conventional quantitative control methods such as HPLC. Experimental findings indicate that the total alkaloid content is not directly correlated with the content of the three monomeric alkaloids. Furthermore, the content of any individual monomeric alkaloid does not accurately reflect the overall quality of Chelidonii herba. It was demonstrated that the 2D-Q-NMR NMR can be applied as an alternative method. While maintaining the same levels of accuracy and precision, the 2D-Q-NMR method is simpler to operate and provides more comprehensive results with higher reproducibility in some cases.

Dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection

ABSTRACT

Bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT) has long been recommended for Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori ) eradication in China. Meanwhile, in the latest national consensus in China, dual therapy (DT) comprising an acid suppressor and amoxicillin has also been recommended. In recent years, the eradication rate of H. pylori has reached >90% using DT, which has been used not only as a first-line treatment but also as a rescue treatment. Compared with BQT, DT has great potential for H. pylori eradication; however, it has some limitations. This review summarizes the development of DT and its application in H. pylori eradication. The H. pylori eradication rates of DT were comparable to or even higher than those of BQT or standard triple therapy, especially in the first-line treatment. The incidence of adverse events associated with DT was lower than that with other therapies. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the effects of dual and quadruple therapies on gastrointestinal microecology. In the short term, H. pylori eradication causes certain fluctuations in the gastrointestinal microbiota; however, in the long term, the gastrointestinal microbiota eventually returns to its normal state. In the penicillin-naïve population, patients receiving DT have a high eradiation rate, better compliance, lower incidence of adverse reactions, and lower primary and secondary resistance to amoxicillin. These findings suggest the safety, efficacy, and potential of DT for H. pylori eradication.

[Modeling of drug-drug interactions between omeprazole and erythromycin with cytochrome P450 3A4 in vitro assay]

In the present study the electrochemical system based on recombinant cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) was used for the investigation of potential drug-drug interaction between medicinal preparations employed for Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. Drug interactions were demonstrated in association of omeprazole as a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and macrolide antibiotic erythromycin during cytochrome P450 3A4-mediated metabolism. It was shown that in the presence of omeprazole the rate of N-demethylase activity of CYP3A4 to erythromycin measured by means of product (formaldehyde) formation decreased. Mass-spectrometry analysis of omeprazole sulfone as a CYP3A4-mediated metabolite demonstrated the absence of erythromycin influence on CYP3A4-dependent omeprazole metabolism. This phenomenon may be explained by lower spectral dissociation constant of CYP3A4-omeprazole complex (Kd = 18±2 μM) than that of CYP3A4-erythromycin complex (Kd = 52 μM). Using the electrochemical model of electrochemically-driven drug metabolism it is possible to register CYP3A4-mediated catalytic conversion of certain drugs. In vitro experiments of potential CYP3A4-mediated drug-drug interactions are in accordance with in silico modeling with program PASS and PoSMNA descriptors in the case of omeprazole/erythromycin combinations.

Treatment and dosing of Helicobacter pylori infection: when pharmacology meets clinic

Helicobacter pylori infection is a major cause of diseases located in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Successful eradication of the bacteria may improve H. pylori-related symptomatic complaints in functional dyspepsia, cure peptic ulcer disease and prevent gastric cancer. As vaccines are not available, the search for the optimal drug regimen has dominated the last decade. Today, most countries prefer a 7- to 10-day regimen containing a proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin and amoxicillin as first-line treatment. An alternative (or second-line) treatment contains a proton pump inhibitor, bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole. This review also highlights the impact of new drugs, new drug combinations, and their optimal dosing required to maximise clinical outcome.

Inhibition of Human Intestinal Wall Metabolism by Macrolide Antibiotics: Effect of Clarithromycin on Cytochrome P450 3A4/5 Activity and Expression*

BACKGROUND

Clarithromycin increases both hepatic and intestinal availability of the selective cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A probe midazolam. This study was designed to identify determinants of variability in the extent of intestinal wall CYP3A inhibition by clarithromycin, such as CYP3A5 genotype, and the mechanism of inhibition.

METHODS

Ten healthy volunteers received 500 mg oral clarithromycin twice a day for 7 days. Before and after administration of clarithromycin, small-bowel mucosal biopsy specimens were obtained endoscopically. Intestinal CYP3A activity was determined from the rate of 1'-hydroxymidazolam and 4-hydroxymidazolam formation by incubation of small-bowel homogenate with midazolam (25 micromol/L) and NADPH for 5 minutes. Intestinal CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 messenger ribonucleic acid was quantified by real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Intestinal CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 protein concentrations were determined by immunoblotting. Serum and homogenate concentrations of midazolam, clarithromycin, and metabolites were determined by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. CYP3A5 genotype was determined by real-time polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

The formation of 1'-hydroxymidazolam (1.36 +/- 0.46 pmol . min(-1) . mg(-1) at baseline versus 0.35 +/- 0.16 pmol . min(-1) . mg(-1) after administration) and 4-hydroxymidazolam (0.39 +/- 0.12 pmol . min(-1) . mg(-1) at baseline versus 0.12 +/- 0.05 pmol . min(-1) . mg(-1) after administration) was significantly (P < .001) reduced after clarithromycin administration. Clarithromycin administration did not result in a significant change in intestinal CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 messenger ribonucleic acid and protein expression. All subjects had detectable serum clarithromycin concentrations after 7 days of clarithromycin (3.71 +/- 2.43 micromol/L). The mean concentration of clarithromycin in the intestinal biopsy homogenate was 1.2 +/- 0.7 nmol/L (range, 0.42-2.39 nmol/L). Compared with CYP3A5 nonexpressers, subjects with at least 1 CYP3A5*1 allele (CYP3A5 expressers) had greater inhibition of intestinal CYP3A activity after treatment with clarithromycin. There was a strong linear relationship between the decrease in intestinal CYP3A activity and baseline catalytic activity (R(2) = 0.9).

CONCLUSION

Baseline intestinal activity of CYP3A4 was a key determinant of variability of the inhibitory effect of clarithromycin among individuals. CYP3A5*1 alleles were associated with greater baseline intestinal CYP3A activity and, therefore, greater extent of inhibition. The primary in vivo mechanism was not rapidly reversible competitive or irreversible inhibition but was likely formation of metabolic intermediate complexes.

Quantification of clarithromycin, its 14-hydroxy and decladinose metabolites in rat plasma, gastric juice and gastric tissue using high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection

A rapid, selective and sensitive HPLC assay has been developed for the simultaneous analysis of clarithromycin, its 14-hydroxy-clarithromycin metabolite, and its decladinose acid degradation product, in small volumes of rat gastric juice aspirate, plasma and gastric tissue. Sample were extracted with n-hexane/2-butanol (4:1) and the internal standard was roxithromycin. A Kromasil ODS 5 micrometer(75x4.6 mm I.D.) column was used with a mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile/aqueous phosphate buffer (pH 7, 0.086 M) (45:55 v/v). The column temperature was 30 degrees C and coulometric detection was used at 850 mV using a screen voltage of 600 mV. The analysis time was less than 8 min. The limits of quantitation for clarithromycin, 14-OH clarithromycin and decladinose clarithromycin were 0.15 microgram ml(-1) or lower in plasma (0.05 ml); 0.16 microgram ml(-1) or lower in gastric juice (0.2 ml); and 0.51 microgram g(-1) or lower for gastric tissue (0.25 g). The method was linear up to at least 20.3, 15.4 and 12.5 microgram ml(-1) for clarithromycin, 14-OH-clarithromycin and decladinose, respectively, in gastric juice aspirate and plasma and up to 40.6, 30.9 and 25.0 microgram g(-1) in gastric tissue. The assay was applied to the measurement of clarithromycin, 14-OH-clarithromycin and, for the first time, decladinose clarithromycin in pharmacokinetic studies of gastric transfer of clarithromycin in individual rats.

Famotidine versus omeprazole, in combination with amoxycillin and tinidazole, for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

Eradication regimens combining two antibiotics with a proton pump inhibitor have been studied intensively. In contrast, only a few studies have focused on the possible role of H2-receptor antagonists in eradication therapy. The mechanism involved in the synergy between antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors is still controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the results of two triple-therapy regimens, different only in the antisecretory drugs used, in patients with Helicobacter pylori infection, and to assess the impact of primary resistance to metronidazole on treatment outcome.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients with peptic ulcer and non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomly assigned to a 2-week course of either: famotidine 40 mg twice a day, amoxycillin 1 g twice a day and tinidazole 500 mg twice a day (FAT group; n = 60); or omeprazole 20 mg twice a day, amoxycillin 1 g twice a day and tinidazole 500 mg twice a day (OAT group; n = 60). Upper endoscopy was performed prior to treatment and at least 4 weeks after completion of treatment and discontinuation of the antisecretory therapy. H. pylori status was assessed by a biopsy urease test, histology and culture.

RESULTS

In the intention-to-treat analysis, eradication of H. pylori was achieved in 48 of the 60 patients (80%; 95% confidence interval: 70-90%) in the FAT group, compared to 50 of the 60 patients (83.3%; 95% confidence interval: 74-93%) in the OAT group. In the per protocol analysis, eradication therapy was achieved in 48 out of 53 patients (90.6%; 95% confidence interval: 83-98%) treated with FAT and 50 out of 57 patients (87.7%; 95% confidence interval: 79-96%) treated with OAT (not significant). The primary metronidazole resistance was present in 28.8% of strains. Overall, per protocol eradication rates in strains resistant and susceptible to metronidazole were 83.3% and 91.3% respectively (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Two-week courses of either high-dose famotidine or omeprazole, both combined with amoxycillin and tinidazole, are equally effective for eradication of H. pylori infection. In a 2-week triple therapy, metronidazole resistance has no significant impact on eradication rates.

The newer macrolides: azithromycin and clarithromycin

Azithromycin and clarithromycin are two relatively new macrolide antimicrobial agents. Although azithromycin and clarithromycin are structural analogues of erythromycin, they offer distinct advantages in comparison. This article reviews the pharmacokinetics, antimicrobial activity, clinical use, and adverse affects of these antimicrobial agents.

Influence of age on the steady state disposition of drugs commonly used for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND

The success of eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori might be affected by the age of patients.

AIM

To investigate whether disposition of drugs commonly used for H. pylori eradication is age-dependent.

METHODS

Trough steady state serum levels of lansoprazole or ranitidine, amoxycillin, clarithromycin and metronidazole were monitored in 232 patients during the last dosing interval of a 5-day quadruple H. pylori eradication regimen. Detailed pharmacokinetic analysis was performed in 28 patients.

RESULTS

Linear correlations between age and trough serum levels were observed with lansoprazole (r=0.25; P=0.002), ranitidine (r=0. 38; P=0.001) and clarithromycin (r=0.36; P < 0.0001). These associations were also inversely dependent of creatinine clearance for ranitidine (r=0.36; P=0.001) and clarithromycin (r=0.30; P < 0. 0001). Multiple linear regression revealed age as an important factor influencing trough serum levels of lansoprazole, clarithromycin and ranitidine. There were significant inverse relationships between creatinine clearance and area under curve of ranitidine (r=0.88; P < 0.0001) and amoxycillin (r=0.56; P=0.002). Multiple linear regression revealed serum creatinine as the most important factor influencing the area under curve of ranitidine, clarithromycin and amoxycillin.

CONCLUSIONS

Age per se has little influence on pharmacokinetics of amoxycillin and ranitidine, which depend more on age-dependent decline in renal function. The influence of age, but not renal function was established for lansoprazole. Age and renal function have independent impacts on clarithromycin disposition.

Pharmacokinetic considerations in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori

As Helicobacter pylori plays an important role in the aetiopathogenesis of peptic ulcer, therapeutic strategies aimed at maintaining long term remission have shifted from the control of intragastric pH to targeting H. pylori. According to recent international guidelines the clinical goals--rapid ulcer healing and prevention of relapse--can be best accomplished by combination therapy consisting of an antisecretory drug (proton pump inhibitor or ranitidine) and 2 antimicrobial agents (preferable amoxicillin, clarithromycin or metronidazole). When applying such multidrug regimens, possible synergy between the agents suggests that pharmacokinetic considerations might help to improve H. pylori eradication rates, which should be above 85 to 90% on an intention-to-treat basis. The present review summarises the pharmacokinetic properties and interaction potential of all drugs presently used in the various H. pylori eradication regimens, with emphasis on particular patient populations such as the elderly and those with renal impairment. The drugs considered are omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, rabeprazole, ranitidine and ranitidine bismutrex, bismuth salts, amoxicillin, clarithromycin, azithromycin, roxithromycin, metronidazole, tinidazole and tetracycline. When addressing the clinically important questions of the efficacy, safety and costs of the recommended regimens, the impact of drug disposition on H. pylori eradication should not be neglected.

In vitro activities of rabeprazole, a novel proton pump inhibitor, and its thioether derivative alone and in combination with other antimicrobials against recent clinical isolates of Helicobacter pylori

The MICs of rabeprazole sodium (RPZ), a newly developed benzimidazole proton pump inhibitor (PPI), against 133 clinical Helicobacter pylori strains revealed a higher degree of activity than the another two PPIs, lansoprazole and omeprazole. Time-kill curve assays of RPZ, when combined with amoxicillin, clarithromycin, or metronidazole, disclosed that synergistic effects were demonstrated in combination with each antibiotic examined. Moreover, no apparent antagonistic effect appeared among all of the strains tested.

Practice patterns for peptic ulcer disease: are family physicians testing for H. pylori?

BACKGROUND

Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is a problem common in family medicine. Recent evidence of Helicobacter pylori as an etiological agent of PUD has led to National Institutes of Health recommendations for treatment to eradicate H. pylori through antibiotic therapy. The purpose of this study is to examine practice patterns of family physicians in treating PUD, their use of H. pylori testing, and knowledge of current recommendations for PUD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A mail survey was sent to a random sample of 1,500 members of the American Academy of Family Physicians. Six hundred thirty useable surveys (49.1%) were available for analysis. Descriptive statistics were obtained, as were inferential statistics focusing on the relationship of physician background characteristics to practices.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight percent of the respondents order diagnostic procedures for the majority (50% or more) of their suspected PUD cases. Of the physicians who reported ordering any diagnostic tests, 52% ordered the combination of upper gastrointestinal series and endoscopic gastroduodenoscopy. For patients with clinical diagnoses of PUD, 77% of doctors reported ordering a diagnostic test for H. pylori. Approximately 68% were aware that some kind of guidelines existed; only 11% reported that they were familiar with the National Institutes of Health recommendations for PUD.

CONCLUSIONS

Although some of the practices of family physicians for treatment of PUD deviate from current recommendations, the majority of practices are consistent with current evidence.

Eradication ofHelicobacter pylori in the Treatment of Peptic Ulcer Disease

Helicobacter pylori is responsible for the majority of cases of peptic ulcer disease. Peptic ulcer disease should no longer be regarded as a “chronic, recurring, lifelong disease, but rather a curable infection.” Treatment and eradication of H. pylori infection in patients with peptic ulcer disease has been shown to resolve the chronic inflammation present and prevent further ulcer relapse. Despite the vast amount of literature on H. pylori infection in peptic ulcer disease, the diagnosis and management of this common infection have become increasingly straightforward. This article will summarize the role of H. pylori in patients with peptic ulcer disease and will address the current clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of H. pylori in the subset of patients.

The macrolides: erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin

In addition to erythromycin, macrolides now available in the United States include azithromycin and clarithromycin. These two new macrolides are more chemically stable and better tolerated than erythromycin, and they have a broader antimicrobial spectrum than erythromycin against Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), Haemophilus influenzae, nontuberculous mycobacteria, and Chlamydia trachomatis. All three macrolides have excellent activity against the atypical respiratory pathogens (C. pneumoniae and Mycoplasma species) and the Legionella species. Azithromycin and clarithromycin have pharmacokinetics that allow shorter dosing schedules because of prolonged tissue levels. Both azithromycin and clarithromycin are active agents for MAC prophylaxis in patients with late-stage acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), although azithromycin may be the preferable agent because of fewer drug-drug interactions. Clarithromycin is the most active MAC antimicrobial agent and should be part of any drug regimen for treating active MAC disease in patients with or without AIDS. Although both azithromycin and clarithromycin are well tolerated by children, azithromycin has the advantage of shorter treatment regimens and improved tolerance, potentially improving compliance in the treatment of respiratory tract and skin or soft tissue infections. Intravenously administered azithromycin has been approved for treatment of adults with mild to moderate community-acquired pneumonia or pelvic inflammatory diseases. An area of concern is the increasing macrolide resistance that is being reported with some of the common pathogens, particularly Streptococcus pneumoniae, group A streptococci, and H. influenzae. The emergence of macrolide resistance with these common pathogens may limit the clinical usefulness of this class of antimicrobial agents in the future.

Helicobacter pylori eradication: comparison of three treatment regimens in India

Conventional bismuth-based triple therapy has multiple problems, such as inadequate drug compliance, side effects, and drug resistance. Combination of omeprazole and clarithromycin with or without combination with antibiotics like amoxycillin has been shown to be effective in eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Reports from India are few on the efficacy of clarithromycin-based drug combinations. Therefore, we evaluated efficacy of omeprazole and clarithromycin with or without amoxycillin for treating H. pylori infection. Sixty-four consecutive patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms and having H. pylori infection were included. In every patient, complete upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was done. H. pylori infection was diagnosed by identification of organism on antral biopsies and positive rapid urease test. Patients were treated with omeprazole 40 mg/day + clarithromycin 250 mg twice daily (group I, n = 22), or omeprazole 40 mg/day + clarithromycin 250 mg twice daily + amoxycillin 500 mg three times daily (group II, n = 20), or bismuth subcitrate 120 mg four times daily + amoxycillin 500 mg three times daily + metronidazole 400 mg three times daily (group III, n = 22) for 2 weeks. H. pylori status was reevaluated 1 month after completion of treatment. One patient in each group stopped drugs due to side effects. Eradication rate was not significantly different in group I (15/22, 68%), group II (14/20, 70%), and group III (13/22, 59%). Of those completing therapy, side effects were observed in three patients in group III (nausea, skin rash, metallic taste), whereas none of the patients in group I and group II had any side effects. Addition of amoxycillin did not appear to improve efficacy of dual omeprazole and clarithromycin therapy and appeared to be no different than bismuth, metronidazole, and amoxycillin triple therapy. Overall, none of regimens was particularly good.

Mutations in 23S rRNA in Helicobacter pylori conferring resistance to erythromycin do not always confer resistance to clarithromycin

Mutations conferring resistance to erythromycin or clarithromycin in Helicobacter pylori were studied. Mutation A2142G was consistently associated with clarithromycin MIC of > 256 micrograms/ml, whereas mutants carrying A2143G had MICs ranging from < or = 0.016 to > 256 micrograms/ml, suggesting that additional factors account for the observed multiple levels of resistance to clarithromycin.

Helicobacter pylori: rational management options

In the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-associated peptic ulcer disease, the complexity (ie, frequency and duration) of drug administration, the presence or development of bacterial antibiotic resistance, and the occurrence of side effects influence patient compliance and eradication rates, which consequently affect the costs of treatment regimens. The National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference and 1997 Digestive Health Initiative Update Conference have recommended that all patients with gastric or duodenal ulcer and H. pylori infection, whether on first presentation or recurrence, be treated with antimicrobials. However, H. pylori resistance to antimicrobials, specifically to nitroimidazole compounds, has resulted in varied and decreasing success rates of treatment regimens. Comparing the efficacy, safety, and costs of current treatment strategies for the eradication of H. pylori, a combination triple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin is recommended as an effective alternative to standard bismuth-based triple therapy. When compared with other therapies, these offer more rapid symptomatic relief, improved tolerability, increased compliance and efficacy, and moderate costs.

Omeprazole. A review of its use in Helicobacter pylori infection, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and peptic ulcers induced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Omeprazole is a well studied proton pump inhibitor that reduces gastric acid secretion. This review examines its use in Helicobacter pylori infection, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) with or without oesophagitis and gastrointestinal damage caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Optimal omeprazole regimens for anti-H. pylori therapy are those that administer the drug at a dosage of 40 mg/day (in 1 or 2 divided doses) for 7, 10 or 14 days in combination with 2 antibacterial agents. As a component of 3-drug regimens in direct comparative studies, omeprazole was at least as effective as lansoprazole, pantoprazole, bismuth compounds and ranitidine. However, a meta-analysis suggests that triple therapies with omeprazole are more effective than comparable regimens containing ranitidine, lansoprazole or bismuth. Omeprazole also appears to be successful in triple therapy regimens used in children with H. pylori infection. In patients with acute GORD with oesophagitis, omeprazole is at least as effective as lansoprazole or pantoprazole in promoting healing, and superior to ranitidine, cimetidine or cisapride in oesophagitis healing and symptom relief. Omeprazole was similar to lansoprazole and superior to ranitidine in preventing oesophagitis relapse in patients with all grades of oesophagitis, but may be superior to lansoprazole or pantoprazole in patients with more severe disease. More patients with symptomatic GORD without oesophagitis experienced symptom relief after short term treatment with omeprazole than with ranitidine, cisapride or placebo, and symptoms were more readily prevented by omeprazole than by cimetidine or placebo. Omeprazole was effective in healing and relieving symptoms of reflux oesophagitis in children with oesophagitis refractory to histamine H2 receptor antagonists. Omeprazole is superior to placebo in preventing NSAID-induced gastrointestinal damage in patients who must continue to take NSAIDs. It is also similar to misoprostol and superior to ranitidine in its ability to heal NSAID-induced peptic ulcers and erosions, and superior to misoprostol, ranitidine or placebo in its ability to prevent relapse. In long and short term studies, omeprazole was well tolerated, with diarrhoea, headache, dizziness, flatulence, abdominal pain and constipation being the most commonly reported adverse events. Usual omeprazole dosages, alone or combined with other agents, are 10 to 40 mg/day for adults and 10 to 20 mg/day for children.

CONCLUSIONS

Omeprazole is a well studied and well tolerated agent effective in adults or children as a component in regimens aimed at eradicating H. pylori infections or as monotherapy in the treatment and prophylaxis of GORD with or without oesophagitis or NSAID-induced gastrointestinal damage.

Influence of clarithromycin dosage on pantoprazole combined triple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND

Low-dose clarithromycin (250 mg b.d.) in combination with omeprazole and metronidazole has been recommended for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Whether the substitution of omeprazole by pantoprazole requires adjustment of the clarithromycin dose is not known.

AIM

To directly compare the efficacy and tolerability of two different dosages of clarithromycin in combination with pantoprazole and metronidazole.

METHODS

One hundred and sixty-three patients with endoscopically confirmed gastritis, gastric or duodenal ulcers and positive H. pylori findings in the rapid urease test were randomized and treated for 7 days with pantoprazole (40 mg b.d.). metronidazole (500 mg b.d.) and clarithromycin using either a regimen of 500 mg b.d. (group PMC 500) or 250 mg b.d. (group PMC 250). Eradication success was determined no less than 4 weeks after concluding therapy using the 13C-urea breath test.

RESULTS

One-hundred and thirty-nine patients completed the study. Based on a per protocol analysis. successful eradication was documented in 63/70 patients (90.0%) in group PMC 500 and in 62/69 patients (89.9%) in group PMC 250. Based on the intention-to-treat analysis, eradication rates were 78.8% (group PMC 500) and 75.6% (group PMC 250). The incidence of adverse effects was significantly higher in patients receiving PMC 500 (50.0%) than in those receiving PMC 250 (25.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Triple therapy with pantoprazole, metronidazole and clarithromycin provides an efficient eradication regimen for H. pylori infection. A low dose of clarithromycin is equal to a higher dose in therapeutic efficacy and it offers the advantage of improved tolerance and lower cost.

Clarithromycin. A review of its efficacy in the treatment of respiratory tract infections in immunocompetent patients

Clarithromycin is a broad spectrum macrolide antibacterial agent active in vitro and effective in vivo against the major pathogens responsible for respiratory tract infections in immunocompetent patients. It is highly active in vitro against pathogens causing atypical pneumonia (Chlamydia pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Legionella spp.) and has similar activity to other macrolides against Staphylococcus aureus. Streptococcus pyogenes, Moraxella catarrhalis and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Haemophilus influenzae is susceptible or intermediately susceptible to clarithromycin alone, but activity is enhanced when the parent drug and metabolite are combined in vitro. Absorption of clarithromycin is unaffected by food. More than half of an oral dose is systemically available as the parent drug and the active 14-hydroxy metabolite. Pharmacokinetics are nonlinear, with plasma concentrations increasing in more than proportion to the dosage. First-pass metabolism results in the rapid appearance of the active metabolite 14-hydroxy-clarithromycin in plasma. Clarithromycin and its active metabolite are found in greater concentrations in the tissues and fluids of the respiratory tract than in plasma. Dosage adjustments are required for patients with severe renal failure, but not for elderly patients or those with hepatic impairment. Drug interactions related to the cytochrome P450 system may occur with clarithromycin use. In addition to the standard immediate-release formulation for administration twice daily, a modified-release formulation of clarithromycin is now available for use once daily. In dosages of 500 to 1000 mg/day for 5 to 14 days, clarithromycin was as effective in the treatment of community-acquired upper and lower respiratory tract infections in hospital and community settings as beta-lactam agents (with or without a beta-lactamase inhibitor), cephalosporins and most other macrolides. Clarithromycin was similar in efficacy to azithromycin in comparative studies and is as effective as and better tolerated than erythromycin. Adverse events are primarily gastrointestinal in nature, but result in fewer withdrawals from therapy than are seen with erythromycin. Clarithromycin provides similar clinical and bacteriological efficacy to that seen with beta-lactam agents, cephalosporins and other macrolides. It offers a cost-saving alternative to intravenous erythromycin use in US hospitals and is available in both once-daily and twice-daily formulations. The spectrum of activity of clarithromycin against common and emerging respiratory tract pathogens may make it suitable for use in the community as empirical therapy of respiratory tract infections in both children and adults.

Pantoprazole. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in acid-related disorders

Pantoprazole is an irreversible proton pump inhibitor which, at the therapeutic dose of 40mg, effectively reduces gastric acid secretion. In controlled clinical trials, pantoprazole (40mg once daily) has proved superior to ranitidine (300mg once daily or 150mg twice daily) and equivalent to omeprazole (20mg once daily) in the short term (< or = 8 weeks) treatment of acute peptic ulcer and reflux oesophagitis. Gastric and duodenal ulcer healing proceeded significantly faster with pantoprazole than with ranitidine, and at similar rates with pantoprazole and omeprazole. The time course of gastric ulcer pain relief was similar with pantoprazole, ranitidine and omeprazole, whereas duodenal ulcer pain was alleviated more rapidly with pantoprazole than ranitidine. Pantoprazole (40mg once daily) showed superior efficacy to famotidine (40mg once daily) in ulcer healing and pain relief after 2 weeks in patients with duodenal ulcer in a large multicentre nonblinded study. In mild to moderate acute reflux oesophagitis, significantly greater healing was obtained with pantoprazole than with ranitidine and famotidine, whereas similar healing rates were seen with pantoprazole and omeprazole. Pantoprazole showed a significant advantage over ranitidine in relieving symptoms of heartburn and acid regurgitation. Reflux symptoms were similarly alleviated by pantoprazole and omeprazole. Preliminary results indicate that triple therapy with pantoprazole, clarithromycin and either metronidazole or tinidazole is effective in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-associated disease; however, these findings require confirmation in large well-controlled studies. Pantoprazole appears to be well tolerated during short term oral administration, with diarrhoea (1.5%), headache (1.3%), dizziness (0.7%), pruritus (0.5%) and skin rash (0.4%) representing the most frequent adverse events. The drug has lower affinity than omeprazole or lansoprazole for hepatic cytochrome P450 and shows no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interactions at therapeutic doses with a wide range of drug substrates for this isoenzyme system. In conclusion, pantoprazole is superior to ranitidine and as effective as omeprazole in the short term treatment of peptic ulcer and reflux oesophagitis, has shown efficacy when combined with antibacterial agents in H. pylori eradication, is apparently well tolerated and offers the potential advantage of minimal risk of drug interaction.