Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of vildagliptin

A Comprehensive Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Predicting Vildagliptin Pharmacokinetics: Insights into Dosing in Renal Impairment

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling is of great importance in the field of medicine. This study aims to construct a PBPK model, which can provide reliable drug pharmacokinetic (PK) predictions in both healthy and chronic kidney disease (CKD) subjects. To do so, firstly a review of the literature was thoroughly conducted and the PK information of vildagliptin was collected. PBPK modeling software, PK-Sim®, was then used to build and assess the IV, oral, and drug-specific models. Next, the average fold error, visual predictive checks, and predicted/observed ratios were used for the assessment of the robustness of the model for all the essential PK parameters. This evaluation demonstrated that all PK parameters were within an acceptable limit of error, i.e., 2 fold. Also to display the influence of CKD on the total and unbound AUC (the area under the plasma concentration-time curve) and to make modifications in dose, the analysis results of the model on this aspect were further examined. This PBPK model has successfully depicted the variations of PK of vildagliptin in healthy subjects and patients with CKD, which can be useful for medical practitioners in dosage optimization in renal disease patients.

Synthesis and clinical application of representative small-molecule dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by high blood glucose levels, which can cause many diseases, including osteoporosis, fractures, arthritis, and foot complications. The inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4), an enzyme involved in glucose metabolism regulation, are essential for managing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). The inhibition of DPP-4 has become a promising treatment approach for T2DM because it can increase levels of active glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), leading to improved insulin secretion in response to glucose and reduced release of glucagon. The review commences by elucidating the role of DPP-4 in glucose homeostasis and its significance in T2DM pathophysiology. Furthermore, it presents the mechanism of action, preclinical pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, and toxicity profiles of small-molecule DPP-4 inhibitors across various clinical stages. This comprehensive review provides valuable insights into the synthesis and clinical application of DPP-4 inhibitors, serving as an invaluable resource for researchers, clinicians, and pharmaceutical professionals interested in diabetes therapeutics and drug development.

Pharmacokinetics and Food Effect Between a 100-mg Sustained-Release Tablet and a 50-mg Immediate-Release Tablet of Vildagliptin in Healthy Subjects

Vildagliptin is one of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. This study aimed to compare vildagliptin exposure between 50-mg immediate-release (IR) and 100-mg new sustained-release (SR) tablets, and evaluate the food effect on the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of vildagliptin. A randomized, open-label, 3-period, 3-treatment, 6-sequence crossover study was conducted on healthy subjects. During each period, subjects received the SR tablet either in the fasted (T1) or high-fat fed (T2) state once a day, or IR tablets administered twice a day in the fasted state (R). Blood samples for PK analysis were obtained serially up to 24 hours after dosing. Thirty-four subjects completed the study. The geometric mean ratios for the Cmax and AUC0-24h of T1 to R were 1.15 and 0.89, respectively. The corresponding values of T2 to T1 were 0.94 and 1.07, respectively. Vildagliptin exposure over 24 hours was similar between the SR and IR tablets. In addition, the PK profiles of the SR tablets were not altered by food. The SR tablets can be administered without a food effect and be an alternative option to IR tablets.

A systematic review on the clinical pharmacokinetics of vildagliptin in healthy and disease populations

INTRODUCTION

Vildagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, is indicated to cure type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This systematic literature search aims to assess the current knowledge about the clinical pharmacokinetics (PK) of vildagliptin to provide recommendations for clinical use to prevent the harmful effects of this drug.

METHODS

The PubMed, Science Direct, EBSCO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar databases were screened for articles related to the clinical PK of vildagliptin using systematic search strategies.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 2118 records, among which 28 were subsumed in this systematic review that fulfilled the inclusion standards.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review can help dose optimization among critically ill patients (e.g. renal impairment) without exposing them to the drug's toxic effects.

DPP-4 inhibitors for treating T2DM - hype or hope? an analysis based on the current literature

DPP-4 inhibition is an interesting line of therapy for treating Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and is based on promoting the incretin effect. Here, the authors have presented a brief appraisal of DPP-4 inhibitors, their modes of action, and the clinical efficiency of currently available drugs based on DPP-4 inhibitors. The safety profiles as well as future directions including their potential application in improving COVID-19 patient outcomes have also been discussed in detail. This review also highlights the existing queries and evidence gaps in DPP-4 inhibitor research. Authors have concluded that the excitement surrounding DPP-4 inhibitors is justified because in addition to controlling blood glucose level, they are good at managing risk factors associated with diabetes.

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4(DPP4) inhibitors stride up the management of Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the 2^nd most common age-related hypokinetic disorder, characterized by dopaminergic degeneration and movement abnormalities. Dopaminergic degeneration in the basal ganglia is primarily seen in PD patients. The therapeutic strategies currently under investigation are to rescue dopaminergic degeneration and promote neuronal regeneration, which could halt disease progression. On the other hand, the therapeutic efficacy of existing drugs used in other disorders has been repurposed in neurodegenerative pathologies. DPP4 inhibitors widely used in treating diabetes have been considered viable target sites and are being tested for efficacy in neurodegenerative pathologies. DPP4 inhibitors have been reported to rescue neuronal degeneration and improve motor functions in various preclinical and clinical PD studies. The current review is focused on the neuroprotective potential, molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential of DPP4 inhibitors in PD pathology.

Lisinopril prevents bullous pemphigoid induced by dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors via the Mas receptor pathway

Recent studies have suggested that dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors increase the risk of development of bullous pemphigoid (BP), which is the most common autoimmune blistering skin disease; however, the associated mechanisms remain unclear, and thus far, no therapeutic targets responsible for drug-induced BP have been identified. Therefore, we used clinical data mining to identify candidate drugs that can suppress DPP4 inhibitor-associated BP, and we experimentally examined the underlying molecular mechanisms using human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (hPBMCs). A search of the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System and the IBM^® MarketScan^® Research databases indicated that DPP4 inhibitors increased the risk of BP, and that the concomitant use of lisinopril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, significantly decreased the incidence of BP in patients receiving DPP4 inhibitors. Additionally, in vitro experiments with hPBMCs showed that DPP4 inhibitors upregulated mRNA expression of MMP9 and ACE2, which are responsible for the pathophysiology of BP in monocytes/macrophages. Furthermore, lisinopril and Mas receptor (MasR) inhibitors suppressed DPP4 inhibitor-induced upregulation of MMP9. These findings suggest that the modulation of the renin-angiotensin system, especially the angiotensin1-7/MasR axis, is a therapeutic target in DPP4 inhibitor-associated BP.

Efficacy and safety of DBPR108 (prusogliptin) as an add-on to metformin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: A 24-week, multi-centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority, phase III clinical trial

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of DBPR108 (prusogliptin), a novel dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, as an add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) that is inadequately controlled with metformin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this 24-week, multi-centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority, phase III study, adult T2D patients with HbA1c levels ranging from 7.0% to 9.5% on stable metformin were enrolled and randomized (2:1) into the DBPR108 + metformin and placebo + metformin groups. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in HbA1c at week 24 of DBPR108 versus placebo as an add-on therapy to metformin.

RESULTS

At week 24, the least-square mean (standard error) change from baseline in HbA1c was significantly greater in the DBPR108 group (-0.70% [0.09%]) than in the placebo group (-0.07% [0.11%]) (P < .001), with a treatment difference of -0.63% (95% confidence interval: -0.87%, -0.39%) on the full analysis set. A higher proportion of patients achieved an HbA1c of 6.5% or less (19.7% vs. 8.5%) and an HbA1c of 7.0% or less (50.0% vs. 21.1%) at week 24 in the DBPR108 + metformin group. Furthermore, add-on DBPR108 produced greater reductions from baseline in fasting plasma glucose and 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose without causing weight gain. The overall frequency of adverse events was similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

DBPR108 as add-on therapy to metformin offered a significant improvement in glycaemic control, was superior to metformin monotherapy (placebo) and was safe and well-tolerated in patients with T2D that is inadequately controlled with metformin.

Mechanistic Study on the Effect of Renal Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Vildagliptin and its Carboxylic Acid Metabolite

PURPOSE

To clarify the mechanism of renal impairment leading to different degrees of increased plasma exposure to dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor vildagliptin and its major metabolite, M20.7.

METHODS

The 5/6 nephrectomized (5/6 Nx) rat model, to simulate chronic renal failure (CRF) patients, combined with kidney slices and transporter studies in vitro were used to assess this pharmacokinetic differences.

RESULTS

After intragastric administration to 5/6 Nx rats, vildagliptin showed increased plasma levels by 45.8%, and M20.7 by 7.51 times, which was similar to patients with severe renal impairment. The recovery rate of M20.7 in urine and feces increased by less than 20%, showing limited effect of renal impairment on vildagliptin metabolism. In vitro studies found M20.7 to be the substrate for organic anion transporter 3 (OAT3). However, the active uptake of M20.7 in renal slices showed no difference between the 5/6 Nx and normal rats. In OAT3 overexpressed cells, the protein-bound uremic toxins, 3-carboxy-4-methyl-5propyl-2-furanpropionate (CMPF), hippuric acid (HA) and indoxyl sulfate (IS), which accumulate in CRF patients, inhibited M20.7 uptake with IC₅₀ values of 5.75, 29.0 and 69.5 μM respectively, far lower than plasma concentrations in CRF patients, and showed a mixed inhibition type.

CONCLUSIONS

The large increase in plasma exposure of M20.7 could be attributed to the accumulation of uremic toxins in CRF patients, which inhibited OAT3 activity and blocked renal excretion of M20.7, while vildagliptin, with high permeability, showed a slight increase in plasma exposure due to reduced glomerular filtration.

Role of Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors in Antidiabetic Treatment

In recent years, important changes have occurred in the field of diabetes treatment. The focus of the treatment of diabetic patients has shifted from the control of blood glucose itself to the overall management of risk factors, while adjusting blood glucose goals according to individualization. In addition, regulators need to approve new antidiabetic drugs which have been tested for cardiovascular safety. Thus, the newest class of drugs has been shown to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events, including sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) and some glucagon like peptide 1 receptor (GLP1) analog. As such, they have a prominent place in the hyperglycemia treatment algorithms. In recent years, the role of DPP4 inhibitors (DPP4i) has been modified. DPP4i have a favorable safety profile and anti-inflammatory profile, do not cause hypoglycemia or weight gain, and do not require dose escalation. In addition, it can also be applied to some types of chronic kidney disease patients and elderly patients with diabetes. Overall, DPP4i, as a class of safe oral hypoglycemic agents, have a role in the management of diabetic patients, and there is extensive experience in their use.

Development, validation and application of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the activity and inhibition of DPP-4

Background: Inhibition of the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) is a pharmaceutical treatment for type 2 diabetes. To demonstrate bioequivalence of enzyme inhibition of a new dosage form of the inhibitor vildagliptin, a method for enzyme activity was developed, validated and applied using liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Results: The method was validated fit for purpose, including accuracy, precision as well as the stability of the activity and the inhibition of DPP-4 in human plasma. Conclusion: A method for the determination of the activity and inhibition of DPP-4 was developed using LC-MS/MS readout; the characteristics and performance of the method met predefined acceptance criteria and were fit for the purpose of a bioequivalence clinical trial.

Therapeutic equivalence of vildagliptin 100 mg once daily modified release to 50 mg twice daily immediate release formulation: An open-label, randomized, two-period, single- and multiple-dose, 6-day crossover study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Vildagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus, is available as immediate release (IR) tablets administered at 50 mg twice daily (BID). A 100 mg modified release (MR) formulation was developed for once daily (QD) dosing. This study aimed to compare the therapeutic equivalence of vildagliptin 100 mg MR QD (test) and 50 mg IR BID (reference) formulations at steady state under fasting conditions.

METHODS

This was an open-label, randomized, two-period, single- and multiple-dose, two-way crossover, steady state study conducted in healthy adult subjects. Both vildagliptin formulations were administered for six days. Endpoints included pharmacodynamic equivalence, pharmacokinetic parameters, and tolerability of both formulations.

RESULTS

Thirty subjects were enrolled and 26 completed both treatments. Maximum plasma concentration and exposure achieved with test was lower than reference formulation on day 1 and 6. The DPP-4 enzyme inhibition over time (DPP-4-AUEC_0-24) was comparable between the formulations. Both formulations were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the therapeutic equivalence of vildagliptin IR and MR formulations for DPP-4 enzyme inhibition over time. The study supports vildagliptin 100 mg MR QD as a useful therapeutic alternative to 50 mg IR BID formulation to possibly improve treatment adherence and patient compliance. Long-term safety of the vildagliptin 100 mg MR QD formulation is not evaluated in this study.

Luminescence studies of binding affinity of vildagliptin with bovine serum albumin

Vildagliptin (VDG)is a frontier drug for diabetes mellitus. It is prescribed both in the monotherapy as well as in an amalgamation with other antidiabetic drugs. Drug-serum protein binding is an essential parameter which influences ADME properties of the drug. In current study, binding of VDG with serum protein (bovine serum albumin: BSA) was investigated using multi-spectroscopic techniques. A computational approach was also employed to identify the binding affinity of VDG with BSA at both Sudlow I and II sites. An enzyme activity assay specific for esterase was also investigated to know the post-binding consequences of VDG with BSA. Fluorescence spectra of BSA samples treated with VDG shows static quenching with binding parameters for VDG-BSA complex show single class of equivalent binding stoichiometry(n = 1.331) and binding constant 1.1 x 10⁴M^-1 at 298.15 K. The binding constant indicates important role of non-polar interactions in the binding process. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) analysis of VDG absorption spectra and emission spectrum of BSA confirmed no significant resonance in energy transfer. Synchronous fluorescence of BSA after binding with VDG show maximum changes in emission intensity at tryptophan (Trp) residues. Post binding with VDG, BSA conformation changes as suggested by circular dichorism (CD) spectra of BSA and this lead to enhanced protein stability as indicated by a thermal melting curve of BSA.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Compliance with Prescription Guidelines for Glucose-Lowering Therapies According to Renal Function: Real-Life Study in Inpatients of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology and Cardiology Units

Background and objectives: Renal failure is a contraindication for some glucose-lowering drugs and requires dosage adjustment for others, particularly biguanides, sulfonylureas, and inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase 4. In this study, we assessed adherence to prescription recommendations for glucose-lowering drugs according to renal function in hospitalized diabetic subjects. Materials and Methods: This prospective cohort study was carried out over a 2-year period in a university hospital. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was determined by averaging all measurements performed during hospitalization. Glucose-lowering drug dosages were analyzed according to the recommendations of the relevant medical societies. Results: In total, 2071 diabetic patients (53% hospitalized in cardiology units) were examined. GFR was <30 mL/min/1.73 m² in 13.4% of these patients, 30–44 in 15.1%, 45–60 in 18.3%, and >60 in 53.3%. Inappropriate oral glucose-lowering treatments were administered to 273 (13.2%) patients, including 53 (2.6%) with a contraindication. In cardiology units, 53.1% and 14.3% of patients had GFRs of <60 and <30 mL/min/1.73 m², respectively, and 179 (15.4%) patients had a contraindication or were prescribed an excessive dose of glucose-lowering drugs. Conclusions: We showed that the burden of inappropriate prescriptions is high in diabetic patients. Given the high number of patients receiving these medications, particularly in cardiology units, a search for potential adverse effects related to these drugs should be performed.

Bioequivalence study of different brands of vildagliptin in healthy human subjects

Background

Vildagliptin is a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor used to treat diabetes mellitus. No bioequivalence study data have been published for the Indian population comparing bioequivalence of vildagliptin brands Galvus, Zomelis, and Jalra. This study aimed to evaluate the bioequivalence between three brands of vildagliptin 50 mg tablet (test 1, Zomelis; test 2, Jalra; and reference, Galvus) and to compare these test formulations with the reference formulation to meet the regulatory requirements of bioequivalence of CDSCO, India. The study was conducted in the clinical research center of the college after enrolling 12 healthy volunteers. This study was a single-dose, randomized, open-label, balanced, three treatment, three period, under fasting condition in 12 adult healthy volunteers. After overnight fasting, the subjects received a single dose of either of any three brands of the vildagliptin tablet (T1—test 1; T2—test 2; and R—reference). The washout period was 7 days. Randomization was in the way of T1T2R in the first period, T2T1R in the second period, and RT1T2 in the third period. Blood samples were collected, after that drug concentration in the plasma was measured with the help of HPLC. Outcome measures 90% confidence interval of the geometric mean ratios (test/reference) for the LnCmax, LnAUC0-t, and LnAUC0-∞ was calculated.

Results

The AUC0-t was 1390.03, 1401.50, and 1409.37 ng h/ml for the T1, T2, and R, respectively. Cmax was 287.89, 287.41, and 285.17 ng/ml for the T1, T2, and R, respectively. AUC0-∞ was 1452.03, 1467.59, and 1473.53 ng h/ml for the T1, T2, and R, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the pharmacokinetic parameters between the T1, T2, and R. The geometric mean ratios for T1/R for LnCmax, LnAUC0-t, and LnAUC0-∞ were 1.0014 (90% CI, 1.0002–1.0026), 0.9992 (90% CI, 0.9971–1.0013), and 0.9994 (90% CI, 0.9973–1.0016), respectively. For the T2/R, geometric mean ratios for LnCmax, LnAUC0-t, and LnAUC0-∞ were 1.0003 (90% CI, 0.9992–1.0013), 0.9988 (90% CI, 0.9969–1.0008), and 0.9985 (90% CI, 0.9961–1.0010), respectively.

Conclusion

In this single-dose study involving Indian healthy volunteers under fasting conditions, the three brands of vildagliptin (Zomelis, Jalra, and Galvus) were bioequivalent as per the bioequivalence criterion of CDSCO, India.

Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of a Generic Fixed-Dose Combination Tablet of Metformin Hydrochloride/Vildagliptin Versus a Branded Product in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fed and Fasting Conditions

The purpose of this study was to compare the bioequivalence and safety of test and reference preparations of fixed-dose combination tablets of metformin hydrochloride/vildagliptin 850 mg/50 mg in healthy volunteers under fasting and fed conditions for marketing authorization in China. A single-dose, randomized, open-label, 2-way crossover study was conducted. Blood samples were collected up to 36 hours after dosing in each period with a 7-day washout. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including maximum plasma concentration (C_max ), time to reach C_max , area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last time point of the measurable concentration, AUC from time 0 to infinity, terminal elimination half-life, and apparent clearance, were calculated using noncompartmental methods and compared between the 2 formulations. Safety profiles were assessed, including significant findings of vital signs, electrocardiogram, laboratory tests, physical examination, and adverse events. A total of 30 healthy subjects (19 men, 11 women) were randomized, and 29 subjects were treated under fasting conditions. Likewise, 30 subjects (24 men, 6 women) were randomized and treated under fed conditions. The geometric mean ratio and corresponding 90% confidence intervals of C_max , AUC from time 0 to the last time point of the measurable concentration , and AUC from time 0 to infinity for both metformin hydrochloride and vildagliptin between the 2 fixed-dose combination formulations were within the bioequivalence acceptance range of 80% to 125% under fasting or fed conditions. Therefore, the generic and branded formulations were bioequivalent and well tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects.

Cross Referencing 2D-LC Determination of Intact Gliptins in Urine

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, so-called gliptins, constitute a fairly novel class of oral hypoglycemic agents. The development and validation of an automated online SPE-LC-UV method to determine intact sitagliptin, saxagliptin, vildagliptin and metformin simultaneously in human urine samples were performed. For the two-dimensional chromatographic separation, a Gemini C18 (250.0 × 4.6 mm i.d., 110 A0, 5.0 μ) analytical column and a gradient elution with 10.0 mM o-phosphoric acid and methanol and for the online SPE analysis of urine samples, a LiChrospher® ADS SPE-column (20.0 mm × 2.0 mm i.d., 25.0 μm) were used through the study. The fractionation, transfer, elution and separation of the spiked urine samples were achieved in just 9.57 min runtime with 12.0 mL of solvent consumption which was green and economical compared to other sample preparation methods. The calibration curves were determined to be linear in a wide range of 0.10-100.00 μg/mL with satisfactory regression coefficients. Method developed for two-dimensional determination of gliptins would be useful as a reference in therapeutic drug monitoring and screening for forensic medical cases which involve the abuse, unintentional or misuse of multiple gliptins in terms of its practical use, easy detection and reliable results.

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i) have been available for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus since 2006. Although they are a diverse group, DPP4i are all small, orally available molecules that interact with the catalytic site of DPP4 without disturbing any of its other known functions, including its effects on the immune system. DPP4i have no intrinsic glucose-lowering activity, so their efficacy as anti-diabetic agents is related directly to their ability to inhibit DPP4 activity and is mediated through the effects of the substrates they protect. Of these, the incretin hormone, glucagon-like peptide 1, is probably the most important. As the effects of glucagon-like peptide 1 are glucose-dependent, the risk of hypoglycaemia with DPP4i is low. Class effects, which are directly related to the mechanism of action, are common to all DPP4i; these include their overall good safety profile and tolerability, as well as their efficacy in improving glycaemic control, but also, potentially, a small increased risk of acute pancreatitis. Compound-specific effects are those related to their differing chemistries and/or pharmacokinetic profiles. These compound-specific effects could affect the way in which individual DPP4i are used therapeutically and potentially explain off-target adverse effects, such as hospitalization for heart failure, which is seen only with one DPP4i. Overall, DPP4i have a favourable therapeutic profile and are safe and effective in the majority of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Insights from VERIFY: Early Combination Therapy Provides Better Glycaemic Durability Than a Stepwise Approach in Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes

The treatment aims for type 2 diabetes are to prevent complications and premature mortality, and improve quality of life. Glycaemic control is central to these aims; clinical guidelines have sought to achieve this with a stepwise approach starting with lifestyle measures and metformin, adding further medications once glycated haemoglobin (HbA_1c) levels rise above a predefined threshold. However, treatment intensification can be delayed when HbA_1c levels increase, and HbA_1c levels become inadequately controlled in many patients. Clinical inertia can result in sustained elevated levels of HbA_1c; when combined with a late diagnosis, this negatively impacts patients' prognosis. Early combination therapy using medications with complementary modes of action could achieve optimal glycaemic targets and alter the course of the disease more than metformin alone. The multinational VERIFY study (clinicaltrials.gov NCT01528254) provided evidence accrued over 5 years, demonstrating the potential of early combination therapy: time to loss of glycaemic control was nearly doubled, and more than twice the number of patients experienced extended glycaemic control, with a vildagliptin-metformin combination therapy versus metformin alone. The study also showed a delay in secondary treatment failure in patients receiving the combination. Early combination therapy therefore offers a different trajectory to the stepwise approach. Translating these findings into clinical practice will require early detection and diagnosis of type 2 diabetes plus a shift in disease management. Nonetheless, the potential benefits of sustained and continuous disease control that early combination therapy offers represent the start of a new era in early diagnosis and intensive management, to achieve the treatment aims of type 2 diabetes.

DPP-4 Inhibitors: Renoprotective Potential and Pharmacokinetics in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients with Renal Impairment

The continuously increasing incidence of diabetes worldwide has attracted the attention of the scientific community and driven the development of a novel class of antidiabetic drugs that can be safely and effectively used in diabetic patients. Of particular interest in this context are complications associated with diabetes, such as renal impairment, which is the main cause of high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in diabetic patients. Intensive control of glucose levels and other risk factors associated with diabetes and metabolic syndrome provides the foundations for both preventing and treating diabetic nephropathy. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors represent a highly promising novel class of oral agents used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus that may be successfully combined with currently available antidiabetic therapeutics in order to achieve blood glucose goals. Beyond glycemic control, emerging evidence suggests that DPP-4 inhibitors may have desirable off-target effects, including renoprotection. All type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with impaired renal function require dose adjustment of any DPP-4 inhibitor administered except for linagliptin, for which renal excretion is a minor elimination pathway. Thus, linagliptin is the drug most frequently chosen to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with renal failure.

Effects of Lixisenatide Versus Liraglutide (Short- and Long-Acting GLP-1 Receptor Agonists) on Esophageal and Gastric Function in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Short-acting glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) decelerate gastric emptying more than long-acting GLP-1 RAs. Delayed gastric emptying is a risk factor for gastroesophageal reflux disease. We aimed to measure esophageal reflux and function as well as gastric emptying and acid secretion during treatment with short-acting (lixisenatide) and long-acting (liraglutide) GLP-1 RAs.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 57 subjects with type 2 diabetes were randomized to a 10-week treatment with lixisenatide or liraglutide. Changes from baseline in the number of reflux episodes during 24-h pH registration in the lower esophagus, lower esophagus sphincter pressure, gastric emptying (¹³C-sodium octanoate acid breath test), and gastric acid secretion (¹³C-calcium carbonate breath test) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Gastric emptying half-time was delayed by 52 min (Δ 95% CI 16, 88) with lixisenatide (P = 0.0065) and by 25 min (3, 46) with liraglutide (P = 0.025). There was no difference in the number of reflux episodes (mean ± SEM 33.7 ± 4.1 vs. 40.1 ± 5.3 for lixisenatide and liraglutide, respectively, P = 0.17) or the extent of gastroesophageal reflux (DeMeester score) (35.1 ± 6.7 vs. 39.7 ± 7.5, P = 0.61), with similar results for the individual GLP-1 RAs. No significant changes from baseline in other parameters of esophageal motility and lower esophageal sphincter function were observed. Gastric acidity decreased significantly by -20.7% (-40.6, -0.8) (P = 0.042) with the GLP-1 RAs.

CONCLUSIONS

Lixisenatide exerted a more pronounced influence on gastric emptying after breakfast than liraglutide. Neither lixisenatide nor liraglutide had significant effects on esophageal reflux or motility. Gastric acid secretion appears to be slightly reduced by GLP-1 RAs.

Possibility of pharmacokinetic drug interaction between a DPP-4 inhibitor and a SGLT2 inhibitor

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a multifactorial condition characterized by high level of sugar in the blood. To control hyperglycemia, combination therapy is recommended if monotherapy fails to achieve glycemic control. The combination of a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor and a sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor is a promising option of the combination therapies in terms of safety as well as efficacy. Despite of the value of combination therapy of these two agents, the pharmacokinetic drug interactions between these two classes of agents have been evaluated in a few drugs. Thus, we reviewed the potential pharmacokinetic drug interaction based on the in vitro metabolism- and transporter-mediated drug interaction information as well as drug interaction studies in human, between a DPP-4 inhibitor and a SGLT2 inhibitor which are marketed in South Korea.

Vasculoprotective Effects of Vildagliptin. Focus on Atherogenesis

Vildagliptin is a representative of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, antihyperglycemic drugs, approved for use as monotherapy and combination therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. By inhibiting enzymatic decomposition, DPP-4 inhibitors increase the half-life of incretins such as GLP-1 (Glucagon-like peptide-1) and GIP (Gastric inhibitors polypeptide) and prolong their action. Some studies present results suggesting the anti-sclerotic and vasculoprotective effects of vildagliptin reaching beyond glycemic control. Vildagliptin is able to limit inflammation by suppression of the NF-κB (nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells) signaling pathway and proinflammatory agents such as TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor α), IL-1β (Interleukin-1β), and IL-8 (Interleukin 8). Moreover, vildagliptin regulates lipid metabolism; attenuates postprandial hypertriglyceridemia; and lowers serum triglycerides, apolipoprotein B, and blood total cholesterol levels. This DPP-4 inhibitor also reduces macrophage foam cell formation, which plays a key role in atheromatous plaque formation and stability. Vildagliptin reduces vascular stiffness via elevation of nitric oxide synthesis, improves vascular relaxation, and results in reduction in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Treatment with vildagliptin lowers the level of PAI-1 presenting possible antithrombotic effect. By affecting the endothelium, inflammation, and lipid metabolism, vildagliptin may affect the development of atherosclerosis at its various stages. The article presents a summary of the studies assessing vasculoprotective effects of vildagliptin with special emphasis on atherogenesis.

Myopathy with DPP-4 inhibitors and statins in the real world: investigating the likelihood of drug-drug interactions through the FDA adverse event reporting system

AIMS

To investigate the occurrence of myopathy with oral glucose-lowering drugs (OGLDs) and statins, with a focus on dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4-is).

METHODS

The FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) was queried (2004-2016) to compare the proportion of adverse events with OGLDs, alone and in combination with statins, using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) with relevant 95% confidence interval (95%Cl), adjusted for sex, age and concomitant presence of other OGLDs/lipid-lowering drugs. Drug-drug interaction is claimed whenever the frequency of an event is enhanced by combination treatment. Consistency/robustness of findings was tested by applying additive/multiplicative models and accounting for competition bias (i.e., adverse events previously known to be associated with OGLDs were removed).

RESULTS

Over a 13-year period, we retrieved 142,888 cases of myopathy. The use of DPP4-is alone was not associated with higher reporting of myopathy (no. of cases = 4898; adjusted ROR = 1.00; 95%CI = 0.96-1.04), with the notable exclusion of vildagliptin (262; 1.64; 1.42-1.88). No increased occurrence emerged when used in combination with statins, with consistent findings from additive/multiplicative models for all DPP4-is. Likewise, no increased reporting was found for other OGLDs (28,964; 0.64; 0.62-0.67); data on the interaction with statins were consistent/robust across analyses only for sulfonylureas (the interaction is likely and biologically plausible) and sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world FAERS data do not raise concern for muscular toxicity with DPP4-is in combination with statins, making a drug interaction very unlikely.

Drug-drug interactions when treating HIV-related metabolic disorders

Introduction: Drug-drug interactions (DDI) between antiretroviral drugs and drugs for the treatment of metabolic disturbances in people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (PLWH) have represented a problem of paramount importance in the recent times. The problem has been mainly driven by sharing common metabolizing pathways. This problem has classically been worsened by the frequent use of pharmacokinetic boosters to enhance protease inhibitors and some integrase inhibitors plasma levels. Areas covered: This article focuses on the interactions between antiretroviral drugs and those drugs used to treat metabolic disturbances which frequently appear in PLWH. These include dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, hyperuricemia, and finally, drugs for the treatment of overweight and clinical obesity. References from PubMed, Embase, or Web of Science, among others, were reviewed. Expert opinion: The advent of safer drugs, in terms of DDI, in the antiretroviral and the metabolic field,such as non-boosted antiretrovirals and drugs with divergent metabolizing paths. Besides, learning by the caregivers on how to decrease and manage DDI, together with the extensive use of online updated DDI databases, has undoubtedly minimized the problem. The foreseeable increase in the burden of HIV-associated comorbidities and their associated treatments anticipates further complexities in the management of DDI in PLWH.

Single-dose escalation study of yogliptin in healthy Chinese volunteers

BACKGROUND

Yogliptin is a novel xanthine dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor targeting type 2 diabetes. After promising preclinical pharmacological studies, the first human trial of yogliptin was designed.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled phase I single-dose escalation study was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability after single oral doses of yogliptin in healthy Chinese subjects. Healthy subjects were assigned to nine cohorts, which received a single dose of yogliptin at 2.5, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 200, 400, or 600 mg. Two subjects in each cohort received placebo. Blood samples were collected before dosing and up to 192 h afterwards. Urine samples were collected until 120 h after dosing. Plasma and urine drug concentrations were determined using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry, and DPP-4 activity was measured using a semi-quantitative, fluorescence-based kinetic assay.

RESULTS

A total of 104 subjects were enrolled, 103 of whom completed the study (mean age, 25.3 years; mean weight, 58.8 kg; mean BMI, 21.8 kg/m²). A total of 27 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 25 of 86 yogliptin subjects (29.1%), and 3 AEs occurred in 3 of 18 placebo subjects (16.7%). Yogliptin was absorbed with a median time of maximum observed concentration (T_max) of 3.0 h and was eliminated slowly with a t_1/2 of 25.45-43.84 h. The maximum observed concentration (C_max) and area under the curve (AUC) varied slightly more than dose-proportionally over the dose range from 2.5 to 400 mg. The fraction of drug excreted in urine ranged from 8.39% to 24.77%. Mean DPP-4 inhibition at 24 h after dosing ranged from 97.7% to 99.5%, and DPP-4 inhibition was >80% for 72 h at doses from 25 to 400 mg. DPP-4 inhibition was >80% for 1 week in the group receiving 400 mg.

CONCLUSION

Yogliptin was well tolerated in healthy subjects, with no dose-limiting toxicity observed in the range from 2.5 to 600 mg. Yogliptin inhibited plasma DPP-4 activity for 72 h at single doses of 25-200 mg and for 1 week at 400 mg, suggesting that once-weekly dosing of yogliptin is possible in type 2 diabetes patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR-IIR-17010311 (Chictr.org).

Identification of Novel Metabolites of Vildagliptin in Rats: Thiazoline-Containing Thiol Adducts Formed via Cysteine or Glutathione Conjugation

Vildagliptin (VG), a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, is used for treating type 2 diabetes. On rare occasions, VG causes liver injury as an adverse reaction. One case report suggested the involvement of immune responses in the hepatotoxicity, but the underlying mechanisms are unknown. We recently reported that VG binds covalently in vitro to l-cysteine to produce a thiazoline acid metabolite, M407, implying that the covalent binding may trigger the immune-mediated hepatotoxicity. There was no evidence, however, that such a thiazoline acid metabolite was formed in vivo. In the present study, we administered a single oral dose of VG to male Sprague-Dawley rats, and detected M407 in plasma. The sum of urinary and fecal excretions of M407 reached approximately 2% of the dose 48 hours postdosing. Using bile duct-cannulated rats, we demonstrated that M407 was secreted into bile as a glucuronide, designated as M583. Another newly identified thiazoline metabolite of VG, the cysteinylglycine conjugate M464, was detected in urine, feces, and bile. The formation of M464 was confirmed by in vitro incubation of VG with glutathione even in the absence of metabolic enzymes. A glutathione adduct against the nitrile moiety M611 was also detected in vitro but not in vivo. In summary, we found three new thiazoline-containing thiol adduct metabolites in VG-administered rats. Nonenzymatic covalent binding of VG would likely occur in humans, and it may be relevant to predicting adverse reactions.

Drug interactions of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors involving CYP enzymes and P-gp efflux pump

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors are oral antidiabetic drugs approved to manage type 2 diabetes mellitus. Saxagliptin is a substrate of CYP3A4/5 enzymes while other DPP4 inhibitors such as sitagliptin, linagliptin, gemigliptin and teneligliptin are weak substrates of CYP3A4. DPP4 inhibitors have also been identified as substrates of P-gp. Hence, the drugs inhibiting or inducing CYP3A4/5 enzymes and/or P-gp can alter the pharmacokinetics of DPP4 inhibitors. This review is aimed to identify the drugs interacting with DPP4 inhibitors. The plasma concentrations of saxagliptin have been reported to be increased significantly by the concomitant administration of ketoconazole or diltiazem while no significant interactions between various DPP4 inhibitors and drugs like warfarin, digoxin or cyclosporine have been identified.

Randomised clinical trial: the DPP-4 inhibitor, vildagliptin, inhibits gastric accommodation and increases glucagon-like peptide-1 plasma levels in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inactivates glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). Whether DPP-4 inhibition affects GLP-1 metabolism and/or food intake in humans remains unknown.

AIMS

To evaluate the effect of vildagliptin (DPP-4 inhibitor) on gastric accommodation and ad libitum food intake in healthy volunteers (HVs) METHODS: The effects of acute oral vildagliptin administration (50 mg) were evaluated in two randomised, placebo-controlled, single-blinded trials. Protocol 1 (n = 10, 32.3 ± 3 years, 23.4 ± 0.7 kg/m² ): 60 min after treatment, a nutrient drink (270 kcal) was infused intragastrically and intragastric pressure (IGP) was measured for 1 h. Protocol 2 (n = 10, 24.3 ± 0.8 years, 22.3 ± 0.9 kg/m² ): 60 min after treatment, HVs consumed one nutrient drink (300 kcal). Thirty minutes thereafter, HVs ate ad libitum from a free-choice buffet for 30 min. Blood was collected at several time points to measure active GLP-1 plasma levels.

RESULTS

During the first 20 min after nutrient infusion, the drop in IGP was smaller after vildagliptin compared to placebo (treatment-by-time interaction effect: P = 0.008). No differences were seen on epigastric symptom scores. Planned contrast analysis showed that active GLP-1 levels were higher after vildagliptin compared to placebo (P = 0.018) only after nutrient ingestion. Total food intake (316.38 ± 58.89 g vs 399.58 ± 63.02 g, P = 0.359) and total caloric intake (594.77 ± 115.17 kcal vs 742.77 ± 107.10 kcal, P = 0.371) did not differ between treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Vildagliptin inhibits gastric accommodation without affecting epigastric symptom scoring in HVs. Active GLP-1 plasma levels were increased after vildagliptin treatment, but the increase was not sufficient to affect ad libitum food intake. The study was registered at Clincialtrials.gov (NCT 03500900).

A Novel Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV Inhibitory Tea Peptide Improves Pancreatic β-Cell Function and Reduces α-Cell Proliferation in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Mice

Dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV) inhibitors occupy a growing place in the drugs used for the management of type 2 diabetes. Recently, food components, including food-derived bioactive peptides, have been suggested as sources of DPP-IV inhibitors without side effects. Chinese black tea is a traditional health beverage, and it was used for finding DPP-IV inhibitory peptides in this study. The ultra-filtrated fractions isolated from the aqueous extracts of black tea revealed DPP-IV inhibitory activity in vitro. Four peptides under 1 kDa were identified by SDS-PAGE and LC-MS/MS (Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry-Mass Spectrometry) from the ultra-filtrate. The peptide II (sequence: AGFAGDDAPR), with a molecular mass of 976 Da, showed the greatest DPP-IV inhibitory activity (in vitro) among the four peptides. After administration of peptide II (400 mg/day) for 57 days to streptozotocin (STZ)-induced hyperglycemic mice, the concentration of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) in the blood increased from 9.85 ± 1.96 pmol/L to 19.22 ± 6.79 pmol/L, and the insulin level was increased 4.3-fold compared to that in STZ control mice. Immunohistochemistry revealed the improved function of pancreatic beta-cells and suppressed proliferation of pancreatic alpha-cells. This study provides new insight into the use of black tea as a potential resource of food-derived DPP-IV inhibitory peptides for the management of type 2 diabetes.

Identification of a novel metabolite of vildagliptin in humans: Cysteine targets the nitrile moiety to form a thiazoline ring

The dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor vildagliptin (VG) is used to treat type 2 diabetes. In rare cases, VG-induced liver injury has been reported. One case report suggested that immune responses were involved in the hepatotoxicity. However, the underlying mechanisms of VG-induced hepatotoxicity are uncertain. In the present study, we investigated whether VG has the potential to covalently bind to macromolecules in cells, a process that could initiate immune-mediated hepatotoxicity. For comparison, M20.7, a major metabolite of VG, and other DPP-4 inhibitors were also evaluated. We found that VG and anagliptin (ANG), which both contain a cyanopyrrolidine moiety, rapidly reacted in non-enzymatic manners on co-incubation with l-cysteine. Both VG and ANG had half-lives of 20-30 min. In contrast, incubation with GSH, rather than l-cysteine, failed to decrease the concentrations of VG or ANG. M20.7, sitagliptin, linagliptin, and alogliptin, having no cyanopyrrolidine moiety, were stable on incubation with l-cysteine or GSH. Structural analysis of the VG- and ANG-cysteine adducts, designated M407 and M487, respectively, revealed that the nitrile moieties of VG and ANG were irreversibly converted to a thiazoline acid. In conclusion, we found that VG and ANG have the potential to covalently bind to a thiol residue of l-cysteine in proteins. Such binding may lead to unpredictable immune responses in humans. l-Cysteine, rather than GSH, would likely be useful to detect the potential for covalent binding that could initiate immune-mediated hepatotoxicity.

The DPP-4 inhibitor vildagliptin impacts the gut microbiota and prevents disruption of intestinal homeostasis induced by a Western diet in mice

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are agents designed to increase the half-life of incretins. Although they are administered orally, little is known about their effects on the gut microbiota and functions, despite the fact that some bacteria present in the gut microbiota exhibit DPP-4-like activity. Our objective was to study the impact of the DPP-4 inhibitor vildagliptin on gut functions and the intestinal ecosystem in a murine model of obesity induced by a Western diet (WD).

METHODS

Twenty seven male C57BL/6J mice were randomised to receive a control diet, a WD (45% kJ from fat and 17% kJ from sucrose) or a WD + vildagliptin (0.6 mg/ml in drinking water) for 8 weeks.

RESULTS

Vildagliptin significantly reduced DPP-4 activity in the caecal content and faeces. Vildagliptin impacted on the composition of the gut microbiota and its metabolic activity. It mainly decreased Oscillibacter spp. (a direct effect independent of DPP-4 activity was shown on cultured O. valericigenes), increased Lactobacillus spp. and propionate, and reduced the ligands of Toll-like receptors 2 and 4. Vildagliptin protected against the reductions in crypt depth and ileal expression of antimicrobial peptides induced by the WD. In the liver, the expression of immune cell populations (Cd3g and Cd11c [also known as Itgax]) and cytokines was decreased in the WD + vildagliptin-fed mice compared with the WD-fed group. Ex vivo exposure of precision-cut liver slices to vildagliptin showed that this response was not related to a direct effect of the drug on the liver tissue.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Our study is the first to consider the DPP-4-like activity of the gut microbiota as a target of DPP-4 inhibition. We propose that vildagliptin exerts beneficial effects at the intestinal level in association with modulation of gut microbiota, with consequences for hepatic immunity. If relevant in humans, this could open new therapeutic uses of DPP-4 inhibition to tackle gut dysfunctions in different pathophysiological contexts.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The sequences used for analysis can be found in the MG-RAST database under the project name MYNEWGUT3.

Effect of race on the glycaemic response to sitagliptin: Insights from the Trial Evaluating Cardiovascular Outcomes with Sitagliptin (TECOS)

AIM

Pooled efficacy studies suggest that glycaemic responses to dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes are greatest in Asians, who may also respond better to alpha-glucosidase inhibitors. We assessed the glycaemic impact of sitagliptin by race in the Trial Evaluating Cardiovascular Outcomes with Sitagliptin (TECOS), and whether this was enhanced in Asians with concomitant acarbose therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

TECOS enrolled 14 671 patients with type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and HbA1c of 48-64 mmol/mol (6.5%-8.0%), and randomized them, double-blind, to sitagliptin or placebo. There were 3265 patients (22.3%) from Asian countries. Background glucose-lowering therapies were unaltered for the first 4 months post randomization unless clinically essential, facilitating comparison of sitagliptin-associated effects in self-identified East Asian, Other (South) Asian, White Caucasian, Hispanic, Black and Indigenous groups.

RESULTS

Median baseline HbA1c by race was 54 to 57 mmol/mol (7.1%-7.4%). Mean 4-month reduction in placebo-adjusted HbA1c was greatest in East Asians (-6.6 mmol/mol [-0.60%] vs ≤6.0 mmol/mol [≤0.55%] in other groups), with significantly greater reduction vs the 2 largest groups (White Caucasians, Other Asians; P < .0001) after adjustment for covariates. After the first 4 months, East and Other Asians were more likely to initiate additional oral therapy (metformin and/or sulfonylureas) than insulin vs White Caucasians (P < .0001). Acarbose use increased in the Asian patients, but no glycaemic interaction with allocated study medication was observed (adjusted P = .12).

CONCLUSIONS

The greatest initial reduction in HbA1c with sitagliptin in the TECOS population was in East Asians. No enhanced glycaemic effect was seen when sitagliptin was given with acarbose.

The Role of Vildagliptin in the Therapy of Type 2 Diabetic Patients with Renal Dysfunction

Diabetes is the leading cause of chronic kidney disease, and even in the absence of albuminuria, decreased renal function in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients increases the risk for major adverse cardiovascular events and death. The evidence derived from recent studies suggests that intensive glucose control not only reduces the risk for microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria but may also decrease the rate of decline of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Although insulin therapy is widely used in patients with T2DM and renal disease, metabolic control is particularly difficult to achieve and manage because of the limited therapeutic options and the frequent comorbidities seen in this population. Recent evidence suggests that dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors may offer a better choice for improving glycemic control in T2DM patients with low GFR. This review will focus on vildagliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor with a large body of evidence in patients with moderate to severe renal failure and a good clinical profile in terms of efficacy and safety. In particular, vildagliptin, with appropriate dose adjustment, provides clinically important reductions in glycated hemoglobin, without increasing weight and the risk of hypoglycemia even in patients with severe chronic kidney disease.

Clinical Safety and Tolerability of Vildagliptin - Insights from Randomised Trials, Observational Studies and Post-marketing Surveillance

Vildagliptin is one of the most extensively studied dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in terms of its clinical utility. Over the last decade, a vast panorama of evidence on the benefit-risk profile of vildagliptin has been generated in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In this article, we review the cumulative evidence on the safety of vildagliptin from the clinical development programme, as well as reports of rare adverse drug reactions detected during the post-marketing surveillance of the drug. Across clinical studies, the overall safety and tolerability profile of vildagliptin was similar to placebo, and it was supported by real-world data in a broad population of patients with T2DM, making DPP-4 inhibitors, like vildagliptin, a safe option for managing patients with T2DM.

Ethnic Difference in the Pharmacodynamics-efficacy Relationship of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors Between Japanese and non-Japanese Patients: A Systematic Review

A systematic review of the differences in the efficacy of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors between Japanese and non-Japanese subjects was conducted. We searched for randomized controlled trials in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) that studied the intervention of a DPP-4 inhibitor once-daily vs. placebo, as monotherapy or as add-on therapy. Data regarding placebo-corrected HbA1c reduction and trough DPP-4 inhibition rate after ≥12 weeks' treatment were extracted. In the 12 eligible studies, linear regression analysis revealed that the hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) reduction at each DPP-4 inhibition level was larger in studies involving Japanese patients than in studies involving non-Japanese patients, with statistical significance between the two groups (P < 0.0001). Sensitivity analysis excluding studies of add-on therapies supported the robustness of the result. Our study indicated that DPP-4 inhibitors show greater efficacy in Japanese patients than in non-Japanese patients, which may be an important consideration in the global development strategy of new diabetic medications.

Consensus Statement on Dose Modifications of Antidiabetic Agents in Patients with Hepatic Impairment

Liver disease is an important cause of mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). It is estimated that diabetes is the most common cause of liver disease in the United States. Virtually, entire spectrum of liver disease is seen in T2DM including abnormal liver enzymes, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and acute liver failure. The treatment of diabetes mellitus (DM) in cirrhotic patients has particular challenges as follows: (1) about half the patients have malnutrition; (2) patients already have advanced liver disease when clinical DM is diagnosed; (3) most of the oral antidiabetic agents (ADAs) are metabolized in the liver; (4) patients often have episodes of hypoglycemia. The aim of this consensus group convened during the National Insulin Summit 2015, Puducherry, was to focus on the challenges with glycemic management, with particular emphasis to safety of ADAs across stages of liver dysfunction. Published literature, product labels, and major clinical guidelines were reviewed and summarized. The drug classes included are biguanides (metformin), the second- or third-generation sulfonylureas, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and currently available insulins. Consensus recommendations have been drafted for glycemic targets and dose modifications of all ADAs. These can aid clinicians in managing patients with diabetes and liver disease.

Old and new oral anticoagulants: Food, herbal medicines and drug interactions

The most commonly prescribed oral anticoagulants worldwide are the vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) such as warfarin. Factors affecting the pharmacokinetics of VKAs are important because deviations from their narrow therapeutic window can result in bleedings due to over-anticoagulation or thrombosis because of under-anticoagulation. In addition to pharmacodynamic interactions (e.g., augmented bleeding risk for concomitant use of NSAIDs), interactions with drugs, foods, herbs, and over-the-counter medications may affect the risk/benefit ratio of VKAs. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) including Factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban) and thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran) are poised to replace warfarin. Phase-3 studies and real-world evaluations have established that the safety profile of DOACs is superior to those of VKAs. However, some pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions are expected. Herein we present a critical review of VKAs and DOACs with focus on their potential for interactions with drugs, foods, herbs and over-the-counter medications.

Hepatic Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Controls Pharmacokinetics of Vildagliptin In Vivo

The main route of elimination of vildagliptin, which is an inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4), in humans is cyano group hydrolysis to produce a carboxylic acid metabolite M20.7. Our in vitro study previously demonstrated that DPP-4 itself greatly contributed to the hydrolysis of vildagliptin in mouse, rat, and human livers. To investigate whether hepatic DPP-4 contributes to the hydrolysis of vildagliptin in vivo, in the present study, we conducted in vivo pharmacokinetics studies of vildagliptin in mice coadministered with vildagliptin and sitagliptin, which is another DPP-4 inhibitor, and also in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic mice. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) value of M20.7 in mice coadministered with vildagliptin and sitagliptin was significantly lower than that in mice administered vildagliptin alone (P < 0.01). Although plasma DPP-4 expression level was increased 1.9-fold, hepatic DPP-4 activity was decreased in STZ-induced diabetic mice. The AUC values of M20.7 in STZ-induced diabetic mice were lower than those in control mice (P < 0.01). Additionally, the AUC values of M20.7 significantly positively correlated with hepatic DPP-4 activities in the individual mice (Rs = 0.943, P < 0.05). These findings indicated that DPP-4 greatly contributed to the hydrolysis of vildagliptin in vivo and that not plasma, but hepatic DPP-4 controlled pharmacokinetics of vildagliptin. Furthermore, enzyme assays of 23 individual human liver samples showed that there was a 3.6-fold interindividual variability in vildagliptin-hydrolyzing activities. Predetermination of the interindividual variability of hepatic vildagliptin-hydrolyzing activity might be useful for the prediction of blood vildagliptin concentrations in vivo.

Non-insulin anti-diabetic drugs: An update on pharmacological interactions

Nowadays, the goal in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains personalized control of glucose. Since less than 50% of patients with T2DM achieve glycemic treatment goal and most of them take medications for comorbidities associated to T2DM, drug interactions, namely pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions, may enhance or reduce the effect of compounds involved in hyperglycemia. Hence, clinicians should be aware of the severe complications in T2DM patients in case of a concomitant use of these medications. It is within this context that this review aims to evaluate the effect of a second drug on the pharmacokinetic of these compounds which may lead, along with several pharmacodynamic interactions, to severe clinical complications, i.e., hypoglycemia. Available drugs already approved in Europe, USA and Japan have been included.

Vildagliptin and its metabolite M20.7 induce the expression of S100A8 and S100A9 in human hepatoma HepG2 and leukemia HL-60 cells

Vildagliptin is a potent, orally active inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. It has been reported that vildagliptin can cause hepatic dysfunction in patients. However, the molecular-mechanism of vildagliptin-induced liver dysfunction has not been elucidated. In this study, we employed an expression microarray to determine hepatic genes that were highly regulated by vildagliptin in mice. We found that pro-inflammatory S100 calcium-binding protein (S100) a8 and S100a9 were induced more than 5-fold by vildagliptin in the mouse liver. We further examined the effects of vildagliptin and its major metabolite M20.7 on the mRNA expression levels of S100A8 and S100A9 in human hepatoma HepG2 and leukemia HL-60 cells. In HepG2 cells, vildagliptin, M20.7, and sitagliptin - another DPP-4 inhibitor - induced S100A9 mRNA. In HL-60 cells, in contrast, S100A8 and S100A9 mRNAs were significantly induced by vildagliptin and M20.7, but not by sitagliptin. The release of S100A8/A9 complex in the cell culturing medium was observed in the HL-60 cells treated with vildagliptin and M20.7. Therefore, the parental vildagliptin- and M20.7-induced release of S100A8/A9 complex from immune cells, such as neutrophils, might be a contributing factor of vildagliptin-associated liver dysfunction in humans.

Update on the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus

To achieve good metabolic control in diabetes and keep long term, a combination of changes in lifestyle and pharmacological treatment is necessary. Achieving near-normal glycated hemoglobin significantly, decreases risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications. At present there are different treatments, both oral and injectable, available for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Treatment algorithms designed to reduce the development or progression of the complications of diabetes emphasizes the need for good glycaemic control. The aim of this review is to perform an update on the benefits and limitations of different drugs, both current and future, for the treatment of T2DM. Initial intervention should focus on lifestyle changes. Moreover, changes in lifestyle have proven to be beneficial, but for many patients is a complication keep long term. Physicians should be familiar with the different types of existing drugs for the treatment of diabetes and select the most effective, safe and better tolerated by patients. Metformin remains the first choice of treatment for most patients. Other alternative or second-line treatment options should be individualized depending on the characteristics of each patient. This article reviews the treatments available for patients with T2DM, with an emphasis on agents introduced within the last decade.

Efficacy of different dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors on metabolic parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing dialysis

Hyperglycemia is associated with increased mortality and morbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who are undergoing dialysis. Although dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors have been widely used in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with T2DM, there are few studies on their efficacy in this population. We studied the effect of 3 different DPP-4 inhibitors on metabolic parameters in ESRD patients with T2DM.Two hundred ESRD patients with T2DM who were treated with DPP-4 inhibitors (sitagliptin, vildagliptin, or linagliptin) were enrolled and analyzed retrospectively. The changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose, and lipid profiles were assessed before and after 3 months of treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors. Subgroup analysis was done for each hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) group.There was no significant difference in the decrease in the HbA1c level among sitagliptin, vildagliptin, and linagliptin treatment groups (-0.74 ± 1.57, -0.39 ± 1.45, and -0.08 ± 1.40, respectively, P = 0.076). The changes in fasting blood glucose and lipid profiles were also not significantly different. In HD patients (n = 115), there was no difference in the HbA1c level among the 3 groups. In contrast, in PD patients (n = 85), HbA1c was reduced more after 3 months of treatment with sitagliptin compared with vildagliptin and linagliptin (-1.58 ± 0.95, -0.46 ± 0.98, -0.04 ± 1.22, respectively, P = 0.001).There was no significant difference in the glucose-lowering effect between the different DPP-4 inhibitors tested in ESRD patients. In PD patients, sitagliptin tends to lower the HbA1c level more than the other inhibitors. The glucose-lowering efficacy of the 3 DPP-4 inhibitors was comparable.

Pharmacological Actions of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1, Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide, and Glucagon

Glucagon family of peptide hormones is a group of structurally related brain-gut peptides that exert their pleiotropic actions through interactions with unique members of class B1 G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). They are key regulators of hormonal homeostasis and are important drug targets for metabolic disorders such as type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), obesity, and dysregulations of the nervous systems such as migraine, anxiety, depression, neurodegeneration, psychiatric disorders, and cardiovascular diseases. The current review aims to provide a detailed overview of the current understanding of the pharmacological actions and therapeutic advances of three members within this family including glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP), and glucagon.

Clinical pharmacology of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors indicated for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are a class of oral antidiabetic drugs that improve glycaemic control without causing weight gain or increasing hypoglycaemic risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The eight available DPP-4 inhibitors, including alogliptin, anagliptin, gemigliptin, linagliptin, saxagliptin, sitagliptin, teneligliptin, and vildagliptin, are small molecules used orally with identical mechanism of action and similar safety profiles in patients with T2DM. DPP-4 inhibitors may be used as monotherapy or in double or triple combination with other oral glucose-lowering agents such as metformin, thiazolidinediones, or sulfonylureas. Although DPP-4 inhibitors have the same mode of action, they differ by some important pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties that may be clinically relevant in some patients. The main differences between the eight gliptins include: potency, target selectivity, oral bioavailability, elimination half-life, binding to plasma proteins, metabolic pathways, formation of active metabolite(s), main excretion routes, dosage adjustment for renal and liver insufficiency, and potential drug-drug interactions. The off-target inhibition of selective DPP-4 inhibitors is responsible for multiorgan toxicities such as immune dysfunction, impaired healing, and skin reactions. As a drug class, the DPP-4 inhibitors have become accepted in clinical practice due to their excellent tolerability profile, with a low risk of hypoglycaemia, a neutral effect on body weight, and once-daily dosing. It is unknown if DPP-4 inhibitors can prevent disease progression. More clinical studies are needed to validate the optimal regimens of DPP-4 inhibitors for the management of T2DM when their potential toxicities are closely monitored.