Diagnosis and management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: 10 key lessons

Association between heart failure and arteriovenous access patency in patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Heart disease and chronic kidney disease are often comorbid conditions owing to shared risk factors, including diabetes and hypertension. However, the effect of congestive heart failure (CHF) on arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and AV graft (AVG) patency rates is poorly understood. We hypothesize preexisting HF may diminish blood flow to the developing AVF and worsen patency.

METHODS

We conducted a single-institution retrospective review of 412 patients with end-stage renal disease who underwent hemodialysis access creation from 2015 to 2021. Patients were stratified based on presence of preexisting CHF, defined as clinical symptoms plus evidence of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) (<50%) or diastolic dysfunction on preoperative echocardiography. Baseline demographics, preoperative measures of cardiac function, and dialysis access-related surgical history were collected. Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analyses were performed for primary patency, primary-assisted patency, and secondary patency using standard definitions for patency from the literature. We assessed differences in patency for patients with CHF vs patients without CHF, patients with a reduced vs a normal EF, and AVG vs AVF in patients with CHF.

RESULTS

We included 204 patients (50%) with preexisting CHF with confirmatory echocardiography. Patients with CHF were more likely to be male and have comorbidities including, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, and a history of cerebrovascular accident. The groups were not significantly different in terms of prior fistula history (P = .99), body mass index (P = .74), or type of hemodialysis access created (P = .54). There was no statistically significant difference in primary patency, primary-assisted patency, or secondary patency over time in the CHF vs non-CHF group (log-rank P > .05 for all three patency measures). When stratified by preoperative left ventricular EF, patients with an EF of <50% had lower primary (38% vs 51% at 1 year), primary-assisted (76% vs 82% at 1 year), and secondary patency (86% vs 93% at 1 year) rates than those with a normal EF. Difference reached significance for secondary patency only (log-rank P = .029). AVG patency was compared against AVF patency within the CHF subgroup, with significantly lower primary-assisted (39% vs 87% at 1 year) and secondary (62% vs 95%) patency rates for AVG (P < .0001 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

In this 7-year experience of hemodialysis access creation, reduced EF is associated with lower secondary patency. Preoperative CHF (including HF with reduced EF and HF with preserved EF together) is not associated with significant differences in overall hemodialysis access patency rates over time, but patients with CHF who receive AVG have markedly worse patency than those who receive AVF. For patients with end-stage renal disease and CHF, the risks and benefits must be carefully weighed, particularly for those with low EF or lack of a suitable vein for fistula creation.

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Technique Principles, Current Evidence, and Future Perspectives

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a multifactorial clinical syndrome involving a rather complex pathophysiologic substrate and quite a challenging diagnosis. Exercise intolerance is a major feature of HFpEF, and in many cases, diagnosis is suspected in subjects presenting with exertional dyspnea. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a noninvasive, dynamic technique that provides an integrative evaluation of cardiovascular, pulmonary, hematopoietic, neuropsychological, and metabolic functions during maximal or submaximal exercise. The assessment is based on the principle that system failure typically occurs when the system is under stress, and thus, CPET is currently considered to be the gold standard for identifying exercise intolerance, allowing the differential diagnosis of underlying causes. CPET is used in observational studies and clinical trials in HFpEF; however, in most cases, only a few from a wide variety of CPET parameters are examined, while the technique is largely underused in everyday cardiology practice. This article discusses the basic principles and methodology of CPET and studies that utilized CPET in patients with HFpEF, in an effort to increase awareness of CPET capabilities among practicing cardiologists.

Understanding heterogeneous mechanisms of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction through cardiorenal mathematical modeling

In contrast to heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), effective interventions for HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have proven elusive, in part because it is a heterogeneous syndrome with incompletely understood pathophysiology. This study utilized mathematical modeling to evaluate mechanisms distinguishing HFpEF and HFrEF. HF was defined as a state of chronically elevated left ventricle end diastolic pressure (LVEDP > 20mmHg). First, using a previously developed cardiorenal model, sensitivities of LVEDP to potential contributing mechanisms of HFpEF, including increased myocardial, arterial, or venous stiffness, slowed ventricular relaxation, reduced LV contractility, hypertension, or reduced venous capacitance, were evaluated. Elevated LV stiffness was identified as the most sensitive factor. Large LV stiffness increases alone, or milder increases combined with either decreased LV contractility, increased arterial stiffness, or hypertension, could increase LVEDP into the HF range without reducing EF. We then evaluated effects of these mechanisms on mechanical signals of cardiac outward remodeling, and tested the ability to maintain stable EF (as opposed to progressive EF decline) under two remodeling assumptions: LV passive stress-driven vs. strain-driven remodeling. While elevated LV stiffness increased LVEDP and LV wall stress, it mitigated wall strain rise for a given LVEDP. This suggests that if LV strain drives outward remodeling, a stiffer myocardium will experience less strain and less outward dilatation when additional factors such as impaired contractility, hypertension, or arterial stiffening exacerbate LVEDP, allowing EF to remain normal even at high filling pressures. Thus, HFpEF heterogeneity may result from a range of different pathologic mechanisms occurring in an already stiffened myocardium. Together, these simulations further support LV stiffening as a critical mechanism contributing to elevated cardiac filling pressures; support LV passive strain as the outward dilatation signal; offer an explanation for HFpEF heterogeneity; and provide a mechanistic explanation distinguishing between HFpEF and HFrEF.

Comparing the Diagnostic Performance of HFA-PEFF and H2FPEF Scoring Systems in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Patients: Insights from the APOLLON Registry

BACKGROUND

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is a complex and heterogeneous clinical syndrome, poses significant diagnostic challenges. The HFA-PEFF [Heart Failure Association of ESC diagnostic algorithm, P (Pretest Assessment), E  (Echocardiographic and Natriuretic Peptide score), F1 (Functional testing in Case of Uncertainty), F2 (Final Aetiology)] and H2FPEF [Heavy (BMI>30 kg/m2), Hypertensive (use of ≥2 antihypertensive medications), atrial Fibrillation (paroxysmal or persistent), Pulmonary hypertension (Doppler Echocardiographic estimated Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure >35 mm Hg), Elderly (age >60 years), Filling pressure (Doppler Echocardiographic E/e' >9)] scoring systems were developed to aid in diagnosing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. This study aimed to assess the concordance and clinical accuracy of these scoring systems in the 'A comPrehensive, ObservationaL registry of heart faiLure with mildly reduced and preserved ejection fractiON' cohort.

METHODS

A comPrehensive, ObservationaL registry of heart faiLure with mildly reduced and preserved ejection fractiON study was conducted as a multicenter, cross-sectional, and observational study; to evaluate a group of Heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients who were seen by cardiologists in 13 participating centers across 12 cities in Türkiye.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 819 patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, with high probability heart failure with preserved ejection fraction rates of 40% and 26% for HFA-PEFF and H2FPEF scorings, respectively. The concordance between the 2 scoring systems was found to be low (Kendall's taub correlation coefficient of 0.242, P < .001). The diagnostic performance of both scoring systems was evaluated, revealing differences in their approach and ability to accurately identify heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients.

CONCLUSION

The low concordance between the HFA-PEFF and H2FPEF scoring systems underscores the ongoing challenge of accurately diagnosing and managing patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Clinicians should be aware of the strengths and limitations of each scoring system and use them in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings to arrive at an accurate diagnosis. Future research should focus on identifying additional diagnostic factors, developing more accurate and comprehensive diagnostic algorithms, and investigating alternative methods of diagnosis or stratification of patients based on different clinical characteristics.

Application of Accelerator Mass Spectrometry to Characterize the Mass Balance Recovery and Disposition of AZD4831, a Novel Myeloperoxidase Inhibitor, following Administration of an Oral Radiolabeled Microtracer Dose in Humans

This study evaluated the mass balance and disposition of AZD4831, a novel myeloperoxidase inhibitor, in six healthy participants using a ¹⁴C-labeled microtracer coupled with analysis by accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS). A single oral dose of 10 mg ¹⁴C-AZD4831 (14.8 kBq) was administered as a solution, and ¹⁴C levels were quantified by AMS in blood, urine, and feces over 336 hours postdose. AZD4831 was rapidly absorbed, and AZD4831 plasma concentrations declined in a biphasic manner, with a long half-life of 52 hours. AZD4831 was eliminated via metabolism and renal excretion. An N-carbamoyl glucuronide metabolite of AZD4831 (M7), formed primarily via UGT1A1, was the predominant circulating metabolite. Presumably, M7 contributed to the long half-life of AZD4831 via biliary elimination and hydrolysis/enterohepatic recirculation of AZD4831. On average, ∼84% of administered ¹⁴C-AZD4831 was recovered by 336 hours postdose (urine, 51.2%; feces, 32.4%). Between 32%-44% of the dose was excreted as unchanged AZD4831 in urine, indicating renal elimination as the major excretory route. Only 9.7% of overall fecal recovery was recorded in the first 48 hours, with the remainder excreted over 48%-336 hours, suggesting that most fecal recovery was due to biliary elimination. Furthermore, only 6% of unchanged AZD4831 was recovered in feces. Overall, the fraction of the administered AZD4831 dose absorbed was high. ¹⁴C-AZD4831 was well tolerated. These findings contribute to increasing evidence that human absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion studies can be performed with acceptable mass balance recovery at therapeutically relevant doses and low radiolabel-specific activity using an AMS-¹⁴C microtracer approach. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: In this study, the human absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (hADME) of the novel myeloperoxidase inhibitor AZD4831 was assessed following oral administration. This included investigation of the disposition of M7, the N-carbamoyl glucuronide metabolite. Resolution of challenges highlighted in this study contributes to increasing evidence that hADME objectives can be achieved in a single study for compounds with therapeutically relevant doses and low radiolabel-specific activity by using an AMS-¹⁴C microtracer approach, thus reducing the need for preclinical radiolabeled studies.

Detecting heart failure using novel bio-signals and a knowledge enhanced neural network

BACKGROUND

Clinical decisions about Heart Failure (HF) are frequently based on measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), relying mainly on echocardiography measurements for evaluating structural and functional abnormalities of heart disease. As echocardiography is not available in primary care, this means that HF cannot be detected on initial patient presentation. Instead, physicians in primary care must rely on a clinical diagnosis that can take weeks, even months of costly testing and clinical visits. As a result, the opportunity for early detection of HF is lost.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The standard 12-Lead ECG provides only limited diagnostic evidence for many common heart problems. ECG findings typically show low sensitivity for structural heart abnormalities and low specificity for function abnormalities, e.g., systolic dysfunction. As a result, structural and functional heart abnormalities are typically diagnosed by echocardiography in secondary care, effectively creating a diagnostic gap between primary and secondary care. This diagnostic gap was successfully reduced by an AI solution, the Cardio-HART™ (CHART), which uses Knowledge-enhanced Neural Networks to process novel bio-signals. Cardio-HART reached higher performance in prediction of HF when compared to the best ECG-based criteria: sensitivity increased from 53.5% to 82.8%, specificity from 85.1% to 86.9%, positive predictive value from 57.1% to 70.0%, the F-score from 56.4% to 72.2%, and area under curve from 0.79 to 0.91. The sensitivity of the HF-indicated findings is doubled by the AI compared to the best rule-based ECG-findings with a similar specificity level: from 38.6% to 71%.

CONCLUSION

Using an AI solution to process ECG and novel bio-signals, the CHART algorithms are able to predict structural, functional, and valve abnormalities, effectively reducing this diagnostic gap, thereby allowing for the early detection of most common heart diseases and HF in primary care.

From Primary to Tertiary Care: Expert Position Statements to Guide Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Diagnosis

Globally, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is quickly becoming the dominant form of heart failure (HF) in ageing populations. However, there are still multiple gaps and challenges in making a firm diagnosis of HFpEF in many low-to-middle income Asian countries. In response to this unmet need, the Malaysian HFpEF Working Group (MY-HPWG) gathered and reviewed evidence surrounding the use of different diagnostic modalities indicated for patients with HFpEF to identify diagnostic tools that could be conveniently accessed across different healthcare settings. As a result, five recommendation statements were proposed and an accompanying algorithm was developed, with the aim of improving the diagnostic rate of HFpEF. The MY-HPWG recommends using more easily accessible and non-invasive tools, such as natriuretic peptide (NP) biomarkers and basic echocardiogram (ECHO), to ensure timely HFpEF diagnosis in the primary and secondary care settings, and prompt referral to a tertiary care centre for more comprehensive assessments in uncertain cases.

Therapeutic Efficacy of Shexiang Baoxin Pill Combined with Exercise in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Single-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of Shexiang Baoxin Pill combined with exercise in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

METHODS

Sixty patients with HFpEF were randomly divided into group A (n=20), receiving Shexiang Baoxin Pill combined with home-based exercise training based on conventional drugs for 12 weeks; group B (n=20), receiving conventional drugs combined with home-based exercise training for 12 weeks; and group C (n=20), receiving conventional drug treatment only. Peak oxygen uptake (peakVO₂), anaerobic threshold (AT), 6-min walking test (6MWT), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and SF-36 questionnaire (SF-36) results before and after treatment were compared among groups.

RESULTS

After the 12-week intervention, patients in group C showed significant declines in peakVO₂, AT, 6MWT, PSQI, and SF-36 compared with pre-treatment (P<0.01), while groups A and B both showed significant improvements in peakVO₂, AT, 6MWT, PSQI, and SF-36 results compared with pre-treatment (P<0.01). Compared with group C, patients in groups A and B showed significant improvements in peakVO₂, AT, 6MWT, PSQI, and SF-36 (P<0.01). In addition, patients in group A showed more significant improvements in physical function, role-physical, vitality, and mental health scores on the SF-36 questionnaire, and PSQI scores than those in group B (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Exercise training improved exercise tolerance, sleep quality and quality of life (QoL) in patients with HFpEF. Notably, Shexiang Baoxin Pill played an active role in sleep quality and QoL of patients with HFpEF. (The trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2100054322)).

High-Intensity Interval Training for Heart Failure Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HIT-HF)-Rational and Design of a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial

Background: The pathophysiology of HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has not yet been fully understood and HFpEF is often misdiagnosed. Remodeling and fibrosis stimulated by inflammation appear to be main factors for the progression of HFpEF. In contrast to patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction, medical treatment in HFpEF is limited to relieving HF symptoms. Since mortality in HFpEF patients remains unacceptably high with a 5-year survival rate of only 30%, new treatment strategies are urgently needed. Exercise seems to be a valid option. However, the optimal training regime still has to be elucidated. Therefore, the aim of the study is to investigate the effects of a high-intensity interval (HIT) training vs. a moderate continuous training (MCT) on exercise capacity and disease-specific mechanisms in a cohort of patients with HFpEF. Methods: The proposed study will be a prospective, randomized controlled trial in a primary care setting including 86 patients with stable HFpEF. Patients will undergo measurements of exercise capacity, disease-specific blood biomarkers, cardiac and arterial vessel structure and function, total hemoglobin mass, metabolic requirements, habitual physical activity, and quality of life (QoL) at baseline and follow-up. After the baseline visit, patients will be randomized to the intervention or control group. The intervention group (n = 43) will attend a supervised 12-week HIT on a bicycle ergometer combined with strength training. The control group (n = 43) will receive an isocaloric supervised MCT combined with strength training. After 12 weeks, study measurements will be repeated in all patients to quantify the effects of the intervention. In addition, telephone interviews will be performed at 6 months, 1, 2, and 3 years after the last visit to assess clinical outcomes and QoL. Discussion: We anticipate clinically significant changes in exercise capacity, expressed as VO_2peak, as well as in disease-specific mechanisms following HIT compared to MCT. Moreover, the study is expected to add important knowledge on the pathophysiology of HFpEF and the clinical benefits of a training intervention as a novel treatment strategy in HFpEF patients, which may help to improve both QoL and functional status in affected patients. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03184311, Registered 9 June 2017.

Stress Testing in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Exertional dyspnea is the most common symptom in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; however, it is not specific to this disease. Stress testing provides crucial information about the diagnosis and prognosis of heart failure with preserved ejection before it reaches the advanced stage. Among various stress tests, noninvasive supine bicycle diastolic stress echocardiography has provided the most evidence for diagnosing and predicting the prognosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. In current practice guidelines, a noninvasive or invasive diastolic stress test is recommended when a diagnosis is unclear in resting echocardiography.

Relaxin and the Cardiovascular System: from Basic Science to Clinical Practice

The peptide hormone relaxin was originally linked to reproductive physiology, where it is believed to mediate systemic and renal hemodynamic adjustments to pregnancy. Recently, its broad range of effects in the cardiovascular system has been the focus of intensive research regarding its implications under pathological conditions and potential therapeutic potential. An understanding of the multitude of cardioprotective actions prompted the study of serelaxin, recombinant human relaxin-2, for the treatment of acute heart failure. Despite early promising results from phase II studies, recently revealed RELAX-AHF-2 outcomes were rather disappointing and the treatment for acute heart failure remains an unmet medical need. This article reviews the physiologic actions of relaxin on the cardiovascular system and its relevance in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease. We summarize the most updated clinical data and discuss future directions of serelaxin for the treatment of acute heart failure. This should encourage additional work to determine how can relaxin's beneficial effects be exploited for the treatment of cardiovascular disease.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: strategies for disease management and emerging therapeutic approaches

Approximately 50% of patients with heart failure (HF) have a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and the incidence of HFpEF is increasing relative to HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Both types of HF are associated with reduced survival and increased risk for hospitalization. However, in contrast to HFrEF, there are no approved treatments specifically indicated for HFpEF, and current therapy is largely focused on management of symptoms and comorbidities. Diagnosis of HFpEF in the outpatient setting also presents unique challenges compared with HFrEF because of factors including a high burden of comorbidities in HFpEF and difficulties in distinguishing HFpEF from normal aging. Primary care providers (PCPs) play a pivotal role in the delivery of holistic, patient-centric care from diagnosis to management and palliative care. As the prevalence of HF continues to rise in an aging population, PCPs will need to play a greater role in HFpEF care. This article will review HFpEF etiology and pathophysiology, diagnostic workup, and management of symptoms and comorbidities, with a focus on the critical role of PCPs throughout the clinical course of HFpEF.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: disease burden for patients, caregivers, and the health-care system

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) will soon become the most prevalent form of HF because of an aging population and an accompanying increase in the number of risk factors for this disease. The high frequency of comorbidities typical of this population contributes to an increased risk for hospitalization and death. It is also partially responsible for the symptomatic deterioration that results in hospitalization and impaired quality of life and functional capacity in patients. The effects of HFpEF are felt by patients and their caregivers, who might experience detriment to their own health and their social and working lives. Financial burden is associated with HFpEF, stemming from hospitalization and long-term care costs, as well as absenteeism from work in the case of caregivers. Early identification of patients at risk and aggressive management are key to preventing this disease and its progression.

Increased myocardial stiffness more than impaired relaxation function limits cardiac performance during exercise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a virtual patient study

AIMS

The relative impact of left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) and impaired left atrial (LA) function on cardiovascular haemodynamics in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is largely unknown. We performed virtual patient simulations to elucidate the relative effects of these factors on haemodynamics at rest and during exercise.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The CircAdapt cardiovascular system model was used to simulate cardiac haemodynamics in wide ranges of impaired LV relaxation function, increased LV passive stiffness, and impaired LA function. Simulations showed that LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was preserved (>50%), despite these changes in LV and LA function. Impairment of LV relaxation function decreased E/A ratio and mildly increased LV filling pressure at rest. Increased LV passive stiffness resulted in increased E/A ratio, LA dilation and markedly elevated LV filling pressure. Impairment of LA function increased E/A ratio and LV filling pressure, explaining inconsistent grading of LVDD using echocardiographic indices. Exercise simulations showed that increased LV passive stiffness exerts a stronger exercise-limiting effect than impaired LV relaxation function does, especially with impaired LA function.

CONCLUSION

The CircAdapt model enabled realistic simulation of virtual HFpEF patients, covering a wide spectrum of LVDD and related limitations of cardiac exercise performance, all with preserved resting LVEF. Simulations suggest that increased LV passive stiffness, more than impaired relaxation function, reduces exercise tolerance, especially when LA function is impaired. In future studies, the CircAdapt model can serve as a valuable platform for patient-specific simulations to identify the disease substrate(s) underlying the individual HFpEF patient's cardiovascular phenotype.

Impact of the updated diastolic function guidelines in the real world

BACKGROUND

Echocardiographic assessment of diastolic function is complex but can aid in the diagnosis of heart failure, particularly in patients with preserved ejection fraction. In 2016, the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) published an updated algorithm for the evaluation of diastolic function. The objective of our study was to assess its impact on diastolic function assessment in a real-world cohort of echo studies.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 71,727 consecutive transthoracic echo studies performed at a tertiary care center between February 2010 and March 2016 in which diastolic function was reported based on the 2009 ASE Guidelines. We then programmed a software algorithm to assess diastolic function in these echo studies according to the 2016 ASE/EACVI Guidelines.

RESULTS

When diastolic function assessment based on the 2009 guidelines was compared to that using the 2016 guidelines, there were significant differences in proportion of studies classified as normal (23% vs. 32%) or indeterminate (43% vs. 36%) function, and mild (23% vs. 23%), moderate (10% vs. 8%), or severe (1% vs. 2%) diastolic dysfunction, with poor agreement between the two methods (Kappa 0.323, 95% CI 0.318-0.328). Furthermore, within the subgroup of studies with preserved ejection fraction and no evidence of myocardial disease, there was significant reclassification from mild diastolic dysfunction to normal diastolic function.

CONCLUSION

The updated guidelines result in significant differences in diastolic function interpretation in the real world. Our findings have important implications for the identification of patients with or at risk for heart failure.

Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: the Major Unmet Need in Cardiology

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has recently been recognized as the single greatest unmet need in cardiovascular medicine. As the population ages and the comorbidity increases, the prevalence of HFpEF increases considerably. Even though there have been large numbers of studies on pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of HFpEF for latest years, there are no current pharmacologic interventions that can reduce mortality. HFpEF is currently understood as a heterogeneous syndrome originated from the interplay of cardiac and extracardiac abnormalities recognized by systemic inflammation, endothelial and coronary microvascular dysfunction, cardiomyocyte dysfunction and skeletal muscle dysfunction. The difficult “jigsaw puzzle” called HFpEF has been filled with some pieces, but it is still not enough to meet clinical needs. Here, we review recent evidences and unsolved problems about HFpEF to improve our understanding of HFpEF. Finally, we hope to accelerate to completion of the problematic “jigsaw puzzle”.

Ventricular-vascular coupling in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a complex disease underlined by impaired ventricular-vascular coupling (VVC).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the VVC ratio in HFpEF patients at rest and during exercise and compare it to the healthy and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) controls.

METHODS

PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for trials that matched the inclusion criteria. Random-effects models were used to estimate the pooled mean difference with 95% confidence interval using Open Meta[Analyst] software.

RESULTS

A total of 13 trials met the inclusion criteria. Although VVC ratio was comparable between HFpEF and healthy controls at rest, it was significantly lower in HFrEF compared to HFpEF. During exercise, there was a significant decline in VVC ratio in HFpEF (-0.119, 95% CI (-0.183 to -0.055), p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

VVC ratio, although 'preserved' at rest in HFpEF patients, was overtly impaired during exercise highlighting the importance of dynamic testing.

Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in a Postpartum Patient with Superimposed Preeclampsia and COVID-19

Our understanding of COVID-19 in pregnant and postpartum women is rapidly evolving. We present a case from March 2020 of a 25-year-old G2P2002 whose delivery was complicated by preeclampsia with severe features who presented to the emergency department 9 days after cesarean delivery with chest tightness and dyspnea on exertion. On presentation she had severe hypertension, pulmonary edema, elevated brain natriuretic peptide, and high-sensitivity troponin-I, suggesting a diagnosis of hypertensive emergency leading to heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction resulting in pulmonary edema and abnormal cardiac screening tests. However, bilateral opacities were seen on a computed tomography of the chest, and COVID-19 testing was positive. A high index of suspicion for both COVID-19 and cardiovascular complications are critical for optimal patient outcomes and protection of health care workers.

Re-evaluating the causes and consequences of non-resolving inflammation in chronic cardiovascular disease

Cardiac injuries, like heart attacks, drive the secondary pathology with advanced heart failure. In this process, non-resolving inflammation is a prime component of accelerated cardiovascular disease and subsequent fatal events associated with imbalanced diet, physical inactivity, disrupted circadian rhythms, neuro-hormonal stress, and poly- or co-medication. Laboratory rodents have established that splenic leukocyte-directed resolution mechanisms are essential for cardiac repair after injury. Here, we discuss the impact of three lifestyle-related factors that are prime causes of derailed cardiac healing, putative non-resolving inflammation-resolution mechanisms in cardiovascular diseases, and progressive heart failure after cardiac injury. The presented review resurfaces the lifestyle-related risks and future research directions required to understand the molecular and cellular mechanisms between the causes of cardiovascular disease and their related consequences of non-resolving inflammation.

Optimising Management of Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Primary Care (OPTIMISE-HFpEF): rationale and protocol for a multi-method study

BACKGROUND

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is less well understood than heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), with greater diagnostic difficulty and management uncertainty.

AIM

The primary aim is to develop an optimised programme that is informed by the needs and experiences of people with HFpEF and healthcare providers. This article presents the rationale and protocol for the Optimising Management of Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Primary Care (OPTIMISE-HFpEF) research programme.

DESIGN & SETTING

This is a multi-method programme of research conducted in the UK.

METHOD

OPTIMISE-HFpEF is a multi-site programme of research with three distinct work packages (WPs). WP1 is a systematic review of heart failure disease management programmes (HF-DMPs) tested in patients with HFpEF. WP2 has three components (a, b, c) that enable the characteristics, needs, and experiences of people with HFpEF, their carers, and healthcare providers to be understood. Qualitative enquiry (WP2a) with patients and providers will be conducted in three UK sites exploring patient and provider perspectives, with an additional qualitative component (WP2c) in one site to focus on transitions in care and carer perspectives. A longitudinal cohort study (WP2b), recruiting from four UK sites, will allow patients to be characterised and their illness trajectory observed across 1 year of follow-up. Finally, WP3 will synthesise the findings and conduct work to gain consensus on how best to identify and manage this patient group.

RESULTS

Results from the four work packages will be synthesised to produce a summary of key learning points and possible solutions (optimised programme) which will be presented to a broad spectrum of stakeholders to gain consensus on a way forward.

CONCLUSION

HFpEF is often described as the greatest unmet need in cardiology. The OPTIMISE-HFpEF programme aims to address this need in primary care, which is arguably the most appropriate setting for managing HFpEF.

Motivational interviewing can support physical activity in elderly patients with diastolic heart failure: results from a pilot study

Aims

Patients suffering from heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) report similar symptoms and reduction in quality of life to those with reduced ejection fraction but remain largely untreated. We conducted a preliminary evaluation of the acceptance, feasibility, and efficacy of a motivational interviewing (MI) intervention to support elderly patients suffering from HFpEF in maintaining or starting physical activity.

Methods and results

At the conclusion of the exercise training in diastolic heart failure parent trial that examined the effects of supervised exercise, patients with HFpEF were offered participation in a two‐group pilot study. Based on their preference, consenting patients were assigned to either a 6 month MI intervention group (n = 19) or their physicians' usual care (n = 20). To support participants in increasing and/or maintaining their physical activity, counsellors delivered a mean of 6.5 MI sessions (face to face and via telephone) and also provided a physical activity diary as self‐management tool. At baseline and 6 months, we assessed participants' physical activity motivation (Sportbezogene Selbstkonkordanz Scale) and their physical improvements with the 6 min walk test and a cardiopulmonary exercise test. Of the entire sample (N = 39), 46% were female, their mean age was 73, 90% were in New York Heart Association Class II, and the mean ejection fraction was 61.4%. The majority of MI participants rated the intervention as acceptable, 90% perceived MI as helpful in setting specific exercise goals and overcoming barriers concerning physical activity, and 58% considered the physical activity diary as very helpful. Three‐quarters of MI participants (79%) reported an increase in their physical activity compared with the previous year. Intervention participants showed a greater increase in median peak VO₂ from baseline to 6 months (baseline: 18.4 mL/kg/min; 6 months: 20.4 mL/kg/min) compared with the control group (baseline: 20.0 mL/kg/min; 6 months: 19.2 mL/kg/min; P = 0.015). There was no significant change in motivation on the Sportbezogene Selbstkonkordanz Scale for either group (MI: 1.7 vs. 3, P = 0.55; control: 4.7 vs. 4, P = 0.26) nor did patients show any significant improvements in the 6 min walk test (MI: 549 vs. 540 m, P = 0.80; control: 572 vs. 580 m, P = 0.37). Counsellors rated the implementation of the MI intervention as feasible.

Conclusions

The results from this pilot study suggest that our MI intervention was well accepted by participants and deemed feasible. It also appears to be an effective treatment to increase and maintain physical activity and exercise capacity in patients suffering from HFpEF. Our findings need to be confirmed in a randomized clinical trial with larger and unselected patient cohorts.

Effects of heavy-intensity priming exercise on pulmonary oxygen uptake kinetics and muscle oxygenation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Exercise intolerance is a hallmark feature in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Prior heavy exercise ("priming exercise") speeds pulmonary oxygen uptake (V̇o_2p) kinetics in older adults through increased muscle oxygen delivery and/or alterations in mitochondrial metabolic activity. We tested the hypothesis that priming exercise would speed V̇o_2p on-kinetics in patients with HFpEF because of acute improvements in muscle oxygen delivery. Seven patients with HFpEF performed three bouts of two exercise transitions: MOD1, rest to 4-min moderate-intensity cycling and MOD2, MOD1 preceded by heavy-intensity cycling. V̇o_2p, heart rate (HR), total peripheral resistance (TPR), and vastus lateralis tissue oxygenation index (TOI; near-infrared spectroscopy) were measured, interpolated, time-aligned, and averaged. V̇o_2p and HR were monoexponentially curve-fitted. TPR and TOI levels were analyzed as repeated measures between pretransition baseline, minimum value, and steady state. Significance was P < 0.05. Time constant (τ; tau) V̇o_2p (MOD1 49 ± 16 s) was significantly faster after priming (41 ± 14 s; P = 0.002), and the effective HR τ was slower following priming (41 ± 27 vs. 51 ± 32 s; P = 0.025). TPR in both conditions decreased from baseline to minimum TPR ( P < 0.001), increased from minimum to steady state ( P = 0.041) but remained below baseline throughout ( P = 0.001). Priming increased baseline ( P = 0.003) and minimum TOI ( P = 0.002) and decreased the TOI muscle deoxygenation overshoot ( P = 0.041). Priming may speed the slow V̇o_2p on-kinetics in HFpEF and increase muscle oxygen delivery (TOI) at the onset of and throughout exercise. Microvascular muscle oxygen delivery may limit exercise tolerance in HFpEF.

Circulating endothelial cells as biomarker for cardiovascular diseases

BACKGROUND

Endothelial dysfunction is involved in several cardiovascular diseases. Elevated levels of circulating endothelial cells (CECs) and low levels of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) have been described in different cardiovascular conditions, suggesting their potential use as diagnostic biomarkers for endothelial dysfunction. Compared to typical peripheral blood leukocyte subsets, CECs and EPCs occur at very low frequency. The reliable identification and characterization of CECs and EPCs is a prerequisite for their clinical use, however, a validated method to this purpose is still missing but a key for rare cell events.

OBJECTIVES

To establish a validated flow cytometric procedure in order to quantify CECs and EPCs in human whole blood.

METHODS

In the establishment phase, the assay sensitivity, robustness, and the sample storage conditions were optimized as prerequisite for clinical use. In a second phase, CECs and EPCs were analyzed in heart failure with preserved (HFpEF) and reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction, in arterial hypertension (aHT), and in diabetic nephropathy (DN) in comparison to age-matched healthy controls.

RESULTS

The quantification procedure for CECs and EPCs showed high sensitivity and reproducibility. CEC values resulted significantly increased in patients with DN and HFpEF in comparison to healthy controls. CEC quantification showed a diagnostic sensitivity of 90% and a sensitivity of 68.0%, 70.4%, and 66.7% for DN, HFpEF, and aHT, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A robust and precise assay to quantify CECs and EPCs in pre-clinical and clinical studies has been established. CEC counts resulted to be a good diagnostic biomarker for DN and HFpEF.

The tip of the iceberg: finding patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in primary care. An observational study

Background

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is under-identified in primary care.

Aim

The aim of this study was to determine what information is available in patients' primary care practice records that would identify patients with HFpEF.

Design & setting

Record review in two practices in east of England.

Method

Practices completed a case report form on each patient on the heart failure register and sent anonymised echocardiography reports on patients with an ejection fraction (EF) >50%. Reports were reviewed and data analysed using SPSS (version 25).

Results

One hundred and forty-eight patients on the heart failure registers with mean age 77 +12 years were reviewed. Fifty-three patients (36%) had possible HFpEF based on available information. These patients were older and multimorbid, with a high prevalence of overweight and obesity. Confirmation of diagnosis was not possible as recommended HFpEF diagnostic information (natriuretic peptides, echocardiogram parameters of structural heart disease and diastolic function) was widely inconsistent or absent in these patients.

Conclusion

Without correct identification of HFpEF, patient management may be suboptimal or inappropriate, and lack the needed focus on comorbidities and lifestyle that can improve patient outcomes. This study describes in detail the characteristics of many of the patients who probably have HFpEF in a real-world sample, and the improvements and diagnostic information required to better identify them. Identifying more than the tip of the iceberg that is the HFpEF population will allow the improvement of the quality of their management, the prevention of ineffective health care, and the recruitment of patients into research.

[Heart or lung? : Diagnostics and management of unclear exertional dyspnea]

Exertional dyspnea is a nonspecific symptom with a variety of underlying causes. It can be challenging to differentiate a beginning cardiac disease from a pulmonary disease or from deconditioning alone. In the presence of obesity, the overall assessment is even more difficult. Rare diseases, such as pulmonary hypertension with dyspnea on exertion as the cardinal symptom are usually diagnosed late in the course of disease. The starting point of a successful evaluation is a thorough patient history. The combination of symptoms, clinical signs and findings leads to a preferred differential diagnosis. Readily available basic findings, such as physical examination, electrocardiogram (ECG), spirometry and laboratory tests help with the diagnosis. For unexplained causes, extended diagnostics such as echocardiography, blood gas analysis and finally special examinations are available. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and exercise echocardiography as well as right heart catheterization at rest and during exercise in the hands of experienced physicians allow an exact differentiation.

PET Imaging of Cardiac Hypoxia: Hitting Hypoxia Where It Hurts

Purpose of Review

In this review, we outline the potential for hypoxia imaging as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in cardiology. We describe the lead hypoxia PET radiotracers currently in development and propose a rationale for how they should most appropriately be screened and validated.

Recent Findings

While the majority of hypoxia imaging agents has been developed for oncology, the requirements for hypoxia imaging in cardiology are different. Recent work suggests that the bis(thiosemicarbazone) family of compounds may be capable of detecting the subtle degrees of hypoxia associated with cardiovascular syndromes, and that they have the potential to be “tuned” to provide different tracers for different applications.

Summary

New tracers currently in development show significant promise for imaging evolving cardiovascular disease. Fundamental to their exploitation is their careful, considered validation and characterization so that the information they provide delivers the greatest prognostic insight achievable.

Myocardial transcription factors in diastolic dysfunction: clues for model systems and disease

There are multiple intrinsic mechanisms for diastolic dysfunction ranging from molecular to structural derangements in ventricular myocardium. The molecular mechanisms regulating the progression from normal diastolic function to severe dysfunction still remain poorly understood. Recent studies suggest a potentially important role of core cardio-enriched transcription factors (TFs) in the control of cardiac diastolic function in health and disease through their ability to regulate the expression of target genes involved in the process of adaptive and maladaptive cardiac remodeling. The current relevant findings on the role of a variety of such TFs (TBX5, GATA-4/6, SRF, MYOCD, NRF2, and PITX2) in cardiac diastolic dysfunction and failure are updated, emphasizing their potential as promising targets for novel treatment strategies. In turn, the new animal models described here will be key tools in determining the underlying molecular mechanisms of disease. Since diastolic dysfunction is regulated by various TFs, which are also involved in cross talk with each other, there is a need for more in-depth research from a biomedical perspective in order to establish efficient therapeutic strategies.

Coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

There are multiple proposed mechanisms for the pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We hypothesized that coronary microvascular dysfunction is common in these patients. In a prospective, observational study, patients undergoing cardiac catheterization with HFpEF [left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction ≥ 50% and with clinical HF] were compared with similar patients without HFpEF. Patients with ≥50% stenosis were excluded, and coronary flow reserve (CFR) and the index of microvascular resistance (IMR) were measured after adenosine administration using a guidewire, with CFR ≤ 2 and IMR ≥ 23 being abnormal. Baseline characteristics and CFR and IMR were compared in 30 HFpEF patients and 14 control subjects. Compared with control subjects, HFpEF patients were older (65.4 ± 9.6 vs. 55.1 ± 3.1 yr, P < 0.01), had higher numbers of comorbidities (4.4 ± 1.5 vs. 2.6 ± 1.9, P = 0.002), had higher median B-type natriuretic peptide [161 (interquartile range: 75-511) pg/dl vs. 37 (interquartile range: 18.5-111) pg/dl, P < 0.01], and had higher LV end-diastolic pressure (17.8 ± 4.2 vs. 8.4 ± 4.2, P < 0.01). HFpEF patients had lower CFR (2.55 ± 1.60 vs. 3.84 ± 1.89, P = 0.024) and higher IMR (26.7 ± 10.3 vs. 19.7 ± 9.7 units, P = 0.037) than control subjects. Most (71.4%) control subjects had normal coronary physiology, whereas 36.7% of HFpEF patients had both abnormal CFR and IMR and another 36.7% had either abnormal CFR or IMR. In conclusion, this is the first study that has reported invasively determined CFR and IMR in HFpEF patients. We demonstrated the presence of four distinct coronary physiology groups in HFpEF patients. Investigation into the potential mechanisms for these findings is needed. NEW & NOTEWORTHY In this prospective observational study of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), we found that patients with HFpEF had more abnormalities of coronary flow and resistance than asymptomatic control patients, indicating that coronary microvascular dysfunction may play a role in the HFpEF disease process.

Management protocols for chronic heart failure in India

Heart failure is a common clinical syndrome and a global health priority. The burden of heart failure is increasing at an alarming rate worldwide as well as in India. Heart failure not only increases the risk of mortality, morbidity and worsens the patient's quality of life, but also puts a huge burden on the overall healthcare system. The management of heart failure has evolved over the years with the advent of new drugs and devices. This document has been developed with an objective to provide standard management guidance and simple heart failure algorithms to aid Indian clinicians in their daily practice. It would also inform the clinicians on the latest evidence in heart failure and provide guidance to recognize and diagnose chronic heart failure early and optimize management.

Quality of life questionnaire predicts poor exercise capacity only in HFpEF and not in HFrEF

BACKGROUND

The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) is the most widely used measure of quality of life (QoL) in HF patients. This prospective study aimed to assess the relationship between QoL and exercise capacity in HF patients.

METHODS

The study subjects were 118 consecutive patients with chronic HF (62 ± 10 years, 57 females, in NYHA I-III). Patients answered a MLHFQ questionnaire in the same day of complete clinical, biochemical and echocardiographic assessment. They also underwent a 5 min walk test (6-MWT), in the same day, which grouped them into; Group I: ≤ 300 m and Group II: >300 m. In addition, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF), divided them into: Group A, with preserved EF (HFpEF) and Group B with reduced EF (HFrEF).

RESULTS

The mean MLHFQ total scale score was 48 (±17). The total scale, and the physical and emotional functional MLHFQ scores did not differ between HFpEF and HFpEF. Group I patients were older (p = 0.003), had higher NYHA functional class (p = 0.002), faster baseline heart rate (p = 0.006), higher prevalence of smoking (p = 0.015), higher global, physical and emotional MLHFQ scores (p < 0.001, for all), larger left atrial (LA) diameter (p = 0.001), shorter LV filling time (p = 0.027), higher E/e' ratio (0.02), shorter isovolumic relaxation time (p = 0.028), lower septal a' (p = 0.019) and s' (p = 0.023), compared to Group II. Independent predictors of 6-MWT distance for the group as a whole were increased MLHFQ total score (p = 0.005), older age (p = 0.035), and diabetes (p = 0.045), in HFpEF were total MLHFQ (p = 0.007) and diabetes (p = 0.045) but in HFrEF were only LA enlargement (p = 0.005) and age (p = 0.013. A total MLHFQ score of 48.5 had a sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 63% (AUC on ROC analysis of 72%) for limited exercise performance in HF patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Quality of life, assessment by MLHFQ, is the best correlate of exercise capacity measured by 6-MWT, particularly in HFpEF patients. Despite worse ejection fraction in HFrEF, signs of raised LA pressure independently determine exercise capacity in these patients.

How to Develop and Implement a Specialized Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Clinical Program

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), a highly prevalent and complex clinical syndrome with high morbidity and mortality, is often unrecognized and not optimally treated. Clinical trials for HFpEF have been plagued by low enrollment, and clinicians often approach HFpEF patients with "therapeutic nihilism" given the perceived lack of available therapies based on the disappointing results of these prior trials. Due to these challenges, we have pioneered the successful creation of dedicated, specialized HFpEF clinical programs. Here, we discuss (1) the rationale for the development of a specialized HFpEF clinical program; (2) strategies for the systematic identification of HFpEF patients; (3) a standardized diagnostic and therapeutic approach; (4) validation of the HFpEF clinical program paradigm; (5) staffing and reimbursement considerations; (6) HFpEF clinical trial enrollment; and (7) challenges and future directions for HFpEF clinical programs. We conclude that it is feasible to create HFpEF clinical programs that fulfill the major unmet need of identifying and caring for patients with HFpEF. These clinics are essential for confirming the HFpEF diagnosis, providing standardized treatment, and facilitating clinical trial enrollment. It is our hope that the information provided here will encourage others to establish their own specialized HFpEF programs, thereby allowing for comprehensive care for these complex patients.

Transcatheter Interatrial Shunt Device for the Treatment of Heart Failure: Rationale and Design of the Randomized Trial to REDUCE Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Heart Failure (REDUCE LAP-HF I)

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), a major public health problem with high morbidity and mortality rates, remains difficult to manage because of a lack of effective treatment options. Although HFpEF is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome, elevated left atrial pressure-either at rest or with exertion-is a common factor among all forms of HFpEF and one of the primary reasons for dyspnea and exercise intolerance in these patients. On the basis of clinical experience with congenital interatrial shunts in mitral stenosis, it has been hypothesized that the creation of a left-to-right interatrial shunt to decompress the left atrium (without compromising left ventricular filling or forward cardiac output) is a rational, nonpharmacological strategy for alleviating symptoms in patients with HFpEF. A novel transcatheter interatrial shunt device has been developed and evaluated in patients with HFpEF in single-arm, nonblinded clinical trials. These studies have demonstrated the safety and potential efficacy of the device. However, a randomized, placebo-controlled evaluation of the device is required to further evaluate its safety and efficacy in patients with HFpEF. In this article, we give the rationale for a therapeutic transcatheter interatrial shunt device in HFpEF, and we describe the design of REDUCE Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Heart Failure (REDUCE LAP-HF I), the first randomized controlled trial of a device-based therapy to reduce left atrial pressure in HFpEF.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02600234.

Targets for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) is responsible for half of all HF cases and will be the most common form of HF within the next 5 years. Previous studies of pharmacological agents in HFPEF have proved neutral or negative, in part due to phenotypic heterogeneity and complex underlying mechanisms. This review summarizes the key molecular and cellular pathways characterized in HFPEF as well as current and future therapies that target these mechanisms.

Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment of Patients with Heart Failure and Pulmonary Hypertension

OPINION STATEMENT

Right heart catheterization (RHC) with a pulmonary artery (PA) catheter is a minimally invasive method of obtaining hemodynamic data (e.g., right atrial and pulmonary pressures, cardiac output, pulmonary vascular resistance), which are used to diagnose and manage patients with advanced heart failure (HF), HF with preserved ejection fraction, and pulmonary hypertension (PH). Invasive hemodynamic data obtained from RHC can aid in the prognostication of HF and PH patients and are important in guiding decisions of implanting mechanical circulatory support devices and listing patients for heart and/or lung transplantation. The basis of RHC has also paved the way for implantable hemodynamic devices to monitor pulmonary artery pressures in the outpatient setting, which can reduce rates of HF-related hospitalizations. We will discuss the utility of PA catheters in the diagnosis and management of the aforementioned disease states, the role of implantable hemodynamic monitors, and the complications associated with RHC procedures.

Treatment of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction-Recent Developments

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) represents at least half of the cases of heart failure, which is a syndrome defined as the inability of the heart to supply the body's tissues with an adequate amount of blood under conditions of normal cardiac filling pressure. HFrEF is responsible for high costs and rates of mortality, morbidity, and hospital admissions, mainly in developed countries. Thus, the need for better diagnostic methods and therapeutic approaches and consequently better outcomes is clear. In this article, we review the principal aspects of pathophysiology and diagnosis of HFrEF, with focus on emerging biomarkers and on recent echocardiographic methods for the assessment of left ventricular function. Furthermore, we discuss several major developments in pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment of HFrEF in the last years, including cardiac resynchronization therapy, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and the recent and promising drug LCZ696, focusing on current indications, unanswered questions, and other relevant aspects.

Comparison of echocardiographic parameters between pre-clinical and clinical advanced diastolic dysfunction patients

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction requires evidence of grade 2 or 3 (advanced) diastolic dysfunction (ADD), but many patients with ADD do not have clinical HF manifestations, hence termed pre-clinical diastolic dysfunction (PDD). The prevalence and characteristics of PDD in comparison to overt HF disease (clinical-ADD) are still debated.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 373 patients with LVEF≥45% and ADD in our echo-lab database. Exclusion criteria were acute coronary syndromes, ≥moderate valvular disease, cardiomyopathies or pericardial disease. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence/absence of HF symptoms, namely PDD (n=249) and clinical-ADD (n=124). Demographic, clinical and echocardiographic parameters were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Age, gender and comorbidities were similar between groups, with only a higher body mass index and renal failure significantly more prevalent in the clinical-ADD patients. Neither LV mass nor the ADD severity was related to the presence of symptoms; lateral mitral E/E' and pulmonary artery systolic pressure were significantly higher in clinical-ADD patients (14±5 vs. 12±4, p<0.05 and 40±13 vs. 36±11mmHg, p<0.05, respectively) and were the only parameters to correlate with the presence of symptoms of clinical-ADD in multivariable logistic regression (odds ratio=1.07 (CI 1.02-1.1, p=0.008) and 1.03 (CI 1.01-1.05, p=0.01), respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients referred for an echocardiogram at a community cardiology center, PDD was twice as common as clinical-ADD. Hemodynamic parameters reflecting elevated filling and pulmonary pressures, rather than traditional comorbidities and/or classical structural abnormalities, were the only parameters related to the presence of HF symptoms.