Pill burden, adherence, hyperphosphatemia, and quality of life in maintenance dialysis patients

Medication burden in patients with dialysis-dependent CKD: a systematic review

This systematic review aimed to statistically profile the medication burden and associated influencing factors, and outcomes in patients with dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (DD-CKD). Studies of medication burden in patients with DD-CKD in the last 10 years from 1 January 2013 to 31 March 2024 were searched from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) or Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) methodology checklist was used to evaluate quality and bias. Data extraction and combining from multiple groups of number (n), mean, and standard deviation (SD) were performed using R programming language (version4.3.1; R Core Team, Vienna, Austria). A total of 10 studies were included, and the results showed a higher drug burden in patients with DD-CKD. The combined pill burden was 14.57 ± 7.56 per day in hemodialysis (HD) patients and 14.63 ± 6.32 in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. The combined number of medications was 9.74 ± 3.37 in HD and 8 ± 3 in PD. Four studies described the various drug classes and their proportions, in general, antihypertensives and phosphate binders were the most commonly used drugs. Five studies mentioned factors associated with medication burden. A total of five studies mentioned medication burden-related outcomes, with one study finding that medication-related burden was associated with increased treatment burden, three studies finding that poor medication adherence was associated with medication burden, and another study finding that medication complexity was not associated with self-reported medication adherence. Limitations: meta-analysis was not possible due to the heterogeneity of studies.

Cannabis Use, Perspectives, and Experiences Among Patients Receiving Hemodialysis: A Descriptive Patient Survey

Background

Patients with chronic kidney disease experience high burden of symptoms, negatively affecting their quality of life. Medication therapy is often initiated to address these symptoms but is limited by variable efficacy and high pill burden. There is interest among clinicians and patients to explore cannabis and cannabinoids as an alternative treatment to manage symptoms related to kidney disease.

Objective

The objectives were to characterize cannabis use among patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis (HD), to describe patient perspectives on cannabis, and to explore patient experiences with their kidney health care team related to cannabis.

Design

This was a descriptive, cross-sectional paper-based patient survey.

Setting/Participants

Patients receiving maintenance HD at Toronto General Hospital in the ambulatory setting between July and August 2020 were included.

Methods

A 33-item questionnaire was developed to address the study questions based on existing cannabis questionnaires and input from kidney specialist physicians, pharmacists, kidney nurse practitioners, and patients. The questionnaire was distributed to patients during their in-center HD session. Patients who chose to participate in the study completed the questionnaire and returned it to the study team.

Results

In total, there were 52 respondents, of which 11 (21%) reported cannabis use in the preceding 3 months, and 23 (44%) reported historical cannabis use. Baseline characteristics were similar between those who used cannabis and those who did not, with a possible trend of cannabis users being younger. The most commonly reported reasons for using cannabis were recreation and symptom management. Those who reported using cannabis for symptom management were doing so without medical authorization or documentation. Common symptoms that cannabis was used to self-treat were insomnia, anxiety, and/or non-neuropathic pain. Dried flower was the most common type of product used, and smoking was the most common route. Care gaps and opportunities to improve patient care related to cannabis use were identified, related to monitoring and management of adverse effects, management of drug interactions, harm reduction strategies, informed decision-making, and prescriber education.

Limitations

The overall participation rate was low, at approximately 17%, possibly related to the COVID-19 pandemic, lack of interest, or fear of revealing cannabis use. Non-response bias is a possible limitation as this was a voluntary survey. The questionnaire was limited to multiple-choice and Likert scale questions, therefore limiting the depth of patient responses.

Conclusions

Our study showed that cannabis use among patients receiving HD is common and comparable with the general population. Patients may be using cannabis to self-manage symptoms related to kidney disease, without the involvement of the health care team. Multiple opportunities to improve patient care related to cannabis use were identified.

Tenapanor: A Phosphate Absorption Inhibitor for the Management of Hyperphosphatemia in Patients With Kidney Failure

Because of increased risks of cardiovascular disease and death, patients with hyperphosphatemia receiving maintenance dialysis are advised to limit phosphorus consumption and are prescribed phosphate binders in an effort to better control serum phosphate concentrations. Because of large pill size, pill burden, and tolerability issues, phosphate binder adherence is relatively poor. On ingestion, phosphate is absorbed from the intestine via transcellular or paracellular transport. Data show that inhibiting sodium-hydrogen exchanger 3 modulates paracellular phosphate absorption (the predominant pathway in humans). Tenapanor is a first-in-class, minimally absorbed, phosphate absorption inhibitor that selectively inhibits sodium-hydrogen exchanger 3, with a mechanism distinct from, and complementary to, that of phosphate binders. In phase 3 and postregistrational studies, tenapanor conferred statistically significant and clinically meaningful reductions in serum phosphate in patients receiving maintenance dialysis with hyperphosphatemia. Here, we review the available preclinical and clinical data on the effects of tenapanor on controlling intestinal phosphate absorption.

Feeling gutted in chronic kidney disease (CKD): Gastrointestinal disorders and therapies to improve gastrointestinal health in individuals CKD, including those undergoing dialysis

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects 9.1% of the population worldwide. CKD may lead to structural and functional gastrointestinal alterations, including impairment in the intestinal barrier, digestion and absorption of nutrients, motility, and changes to the gut microbiome. These changes can lead to increased gastrointestinal symptoms in people with CKD, even in early grades of kidney dysfunction. Gastrointestinal symptoms have been associated with lower quality of life and reduced nutritional status. Therefore, there has been considerable interest in improving gastrointestinal health in this clinical population. Gastrointestinal health can be influenced by lifestyle and medications, particularly in advanced grades of kidney dysfunction. Therapies focused on gastrointestinal health have been studied, including the use of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics, yielding limited and conflicting results. This review summarizes the alterations in the gastrointestinal tract structure and function and provides an overview of potential nutritional interventions that kidney disease professionals can provide to improve gastrointestinal health in individuals with CKD.

The Burden of Cardiovascular Disease and Geriatric Syndromes in Older Patients Undergoing Chronic Hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence on the complexity of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and geriatric syndromes in older patients with end-stage renal disease. Our aims were to (1) examine the prevalence of CVD in older patients on chronic hemodialysis, (2) compare the burden of geriatric syndromes in patients with and without CVD, and (3) examine the impact of CVD on hospitalization.

METHODS

This prospective, observational, multi-center study was conducted at two dialysis units of two major hospitals in Vietnam. Consecutive older adults receiving chronic hemodialysis were recruited from November 2020 to June 2021. CVD was defined as having one of these conditions: heart failure, ischemic heart disease, or stroke. Participants were assessed for geriatric conditions including frailty, malnutrition, impairment in instrumental activities/activities of daily living, depression, falls, and polypharmacy. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to examine the impact of CVD on 6-month hospitalization, adjusting for age, sex, duration of dialysis, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and geriatric conditions. Results were presented as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

There were 175 participants (mean age 72.4 ± 8.5 and 58.9% female). CVD was present in 80% of the participants (ischemic heart disease: 49.7%, heart failure: 60.0%, and stroke: 25.7%). Participants with CVD had a higher burden of geriatric syndromes compared to those without CVD. During the 6-month follow-up, 48.6% of the participants were hospitalized (56.4% of those with CVD vs. 17.1% of those without CVD), p < 0.001). CVD independently increased the risk of hospitalization (adjusted OR 3.32, 95% CI 1.12-9.80).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, there was a very high prevalence of CVD in older patients undergoing chronic dialysis. Participants with CVD had a higher burden of geriatric syndromes and their risk of 6-month hospitalization increased by three times. There is a need for a multidisciplinary and patient-centered approach to treatment planning for these patients.

Management of serum phosphorus over a 1-year follow-up in patients on peritoneal dialysis prescribed sucroferric oxyhydroxide as part of routine care: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Hyperphosphatemia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Whereas clinical and observational studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SO) in controlling serum phosphorus (sP) in ESKD, data on the real-world impact of switching to SO in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) are limited. In this retrospective database analysis, we examine the impact of SO on sP management over a 1-year period among PD patients prescribed SO as part of routine clinical care.

METHODS

We analyzed de-identified data from adults on PD in Fresenius Kidney Care clinics who were prescribed SO monotherapy between May 2018 and December 2019 as part of routine clinical management. Changes from baseline in sP levels, phosphate binder (PB) pill burden, and laboratory parameters were evaluated during the four consecutive 91-day intervals of SO treatment.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 402 patients who completed 1 year of SO was 55.2 years at baseline, and they had been on PD for an average of 19.9 months. SO was initiated with no baseline PB recorded in 36.1% of patients, whereas the remaining 257 patients were switched to SO from sevelamer (39.7%), calcium acetate (30.4%), lanthanum (1.2%), ferric citrate (14.0%), or more than one PB (14.8%). Mean sP at baseline was 6.26 mg/dL. After being prescribed SO, the percentage of patients achieving sP ≤ 5.5 mg/dL increased from 32.1% (baseline) to 46.5-54.0% during the 1-year follow-up, whereas the mean number of PB pills taken per day decreased from 7.7 at baseline (among patients on a baseline PB) to 4.6 to 5.4. Serum phosphorus and PB pill burden decreased regardless of changes in residual kidney function over the 12-month period. Similar results were observed for the full cohort (976 patients who either completed or discontinued SO during the 1-year follow-up).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients on PD who were prescribed SO as part of routine care for phosphorus management experienced significant reductions in SP and PB pills per day and improvements in sP target achievement, suggesting the effectiveness of SO on SP management with a concurrent reduction in pill burden.

Clinical Pertinence and Determinants of Potential Drug-Drug Interactions in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: A Cross-sectional Study

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is one of the major health issues effecting around 15% of world population, and its further complications has raised the need of polypharmacy for management. But this polypharmacy also upsurges the risk of potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) in CKD patients, which may further be responsible for increased morbidity and mortality. Objective: The main objective is therefore to evaluate the distribution, severity, causes, associated drug interactions, and clinical relevance of determination of pDDIs in CKD patients. Methods: Medical files of CKD patients examined at nephrology department, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research (MMIMSR), Mullana, between December 2022 and May 2023 were cross-sectionally assessed for this study. Medscape drug interaction checker was used to study patient profiles for pDDIs, and suggestive measures to minimize those pDDIs were studied using DDInter to ensure better clinical decision-making and patient safety. IBM SPSS (version 24) was utilized for statistical analysis. Results: The data reveal that 74.5% of the 200 medical files being evaluated had 839 pDDIs in total, out of which nearly 78.3% of patients had moderate, 15.6% had minor, and 6.07% had serious interactions. The potential adverse outcomes of pDDIs included an irregular heartbeat, hypokalemia, central nervous system (CNS) adverse effects, hypoglycemia, and a decline in therapeutic efficacy. The prevalence of pDDIs was discovered to be substantially correlated with age ≥60 years, (odds ratio [OR] = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.4-0.9; P = 0.040), length of stay ≥10 days (OR = 4.0; 95% CI = 1.29-6.1; P = 0.016), and number of prescribed drugs ≥10 (OR = 5.5; 95% CI = 2.45-10.69; P = 0.004). Conclusion: Patients with CKD have a high incidence of pDDIs (mainly mild to moderate). Older age, duration of hospital stays, and polypharmacy all raise the risk of pDDIs. Healthcare professionals (physicians and clinical pharmacist) should use drug interaction checker software programs like Medscape and DDInter to acquire knowledge about different pDDIS and their alternative measures so that the associated adverse drug reactions (ADRs) can be controlled and rational drug combination can be prescribed for management of CKD ensuring better patient care.

Polypharmacy in Patients with CKD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Key Points

The prevalence of polypharmacy in patients with CKD was over 80%. Polypharmacy was highest in patients with a kidney transplant and those receiving dialysis. Polypharmacy is associated with worse clinical outcomes, lower quality of life, and medication-related problems in patients with CKD.

Background

Despite the high prevalence of polypharmacy in patients with CKD, the extent of polypharmacy across patients with (different stages of) CKD, as well as the association with clinical outcomes remains unknown. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the prevalence of polypharmacy in (different subgroups of) patients with CKD and assess the association between polypharmacy and patient-important outcomes.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception until July 2022. Studies that reported the prevalence of polypharmacy, medication use, or pill burden in patients with CKD (including patients receiving dialysis and kidney transplant recipients) and their association with patient-important outcomes (i.e ., mortality, kidney failure, quality of life [QoL], and medication nonadherence) were included. Two reviewers independently screened title and abstract and full texts, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Data were pooled in a random-effects single-arm meta-analysis.

Results

In total, 127 studies were included (CKD 3–5 n =39, dialysis: n =38, kidney transplant n =13, different CKD stages n =37). The pooled prevalence of polypharmacy, based on 63 studies with 484,915 patients, across all patients with CKD was 82% (95% confidence interval, 76% to 86%), and the pooled mean number of prescribed medications was 9.7 (95% confidence interval, 8.4 to 11.0). The prevalence of polypharmacy was higher in patients who received dialysis or a kidney transplant compared with patients with CKD 3–5 but did not differ between studies with regards to region or patients' mean age or sex. In patients with CKD, polypharmacy was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality, kidney failure, faster eGFR decline, lower QoL, and higher medication nonadherence, adverse drug reactions, and potentially inappropriate medications.

Conclusions

The prevalence of polypharmacy in patients with CKD was over 80%, and highest in patients with a kidney transplant and those receiving dialysis. No causes of heterogeneity were identified, indicating that polypharmacy is an issue for all patients with CKD. Polypharmacy is associated with worse clinical outcomes, lower QoL, and medication-related problems in patients with CKD.

Clinical Trial registry name and registration number:

PROSPERO (CRD42022331941).

Citrate-Buffered, Magnesium-Enriched Dialysate on Calcification Propensity in Hemodialysis Patients - The CitMag Study

Introduction

Serum calcification propensity (T50 time) is associated with mortality in patients on dialysis. Several solitary interventions improve T50. However, whether a combination of interventions yields further increases in T50 is unknown. We hypothesized that a combination of 2 interventions, namely increasing magnesium concentration while simultaneously substituting acetate for citrate in the dialysis fluid, leads to increases in T50 values.

Methods

In a randomized controlled trial, 60 patients on chronic hemodialysis were allocated to either continue on standard (S) dialysate (3 mmol/l acetate, 0.5 mmol/l magnesium) or a sequence of magnesium-enriched (Mg0.75) dialysate (3 mmol/l acetate, 0.75 mmol/l magnesium) for 2 weeks followed by combination treatment using citrate-buffered, magnesium-enriched (Cit+Mg0.75) dialysate (1 mmol/l citrate, 0.75 mmol/l magnesium) for 3 weeks. The primary end point was the difference in T50 times between the S group and the Cit+Mg0.75 group.

Results

There was no significant difference in T50 time between the S group and the Cit+Mg0.75 group (236 ± 77 vs. 265 ± 97 min, P = 0.23). The size (hydrodynamic radius) of secondary calciprotein particles did not differ between the S group and the Cit+Mg0.75 group (294 ± 95 vs. 309 ± 91 nm, P = 0.56). In longitudinal analyses, serum magnesium concentrations increased from 1.07 ± 0.17 to 1.24 ± 0.17 mmol/l with the Mg0.75 dialysate (P < 0.0001) but decreased again to 1.19 ± 0.16 mmol/l with the Cit+Mg0.75 dialysate (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

The combination of citrate buffer with increased magnesium concentration in dialysate does not improve T50.

Complex Emulsions as an Innovative Pharmaceutical Dosage form in Addressing the Issues of Multi-Drug Therapy and Polypharmacy Challenges

This review explores the intersection of microfluidic technology and complex emulsion development as a promising solution to the challenges of formulations in multi-drug therapy (MDT) and polypharmacy. The convergence of microfluidic technology and complex emulsion fabrication could herald a transformative era in multi-drug delivery systems, directly confronting the prevalent challenges of polypharmacy. Microfluidics, with its unparalleled precision in droplet formation, empowers the encapsulation of multiple drugs within singular emulsion particles. The ability to engineer emulsions with tailored properties-such as size, composition, and release kinetics-enables the creation of highly efficient drug delivery vehicles. Thus, this innovative approach not only simplifies medication regimens by significantly reducing the number of necessary doses but also minimizes the pill burden and associated treatment termination-issues associated with polypharmacy. It is important to bring forth the opportunities and challenges of this synergy between microfluidic-driven complex emulsions and multi-drug therapy poses. Together, they not only offer a sophisticated method for addressing the intricacies of delivering multiple drugs but also align with broader healthcare objectives of enhancing treatment outcomes, patient safety, and quality of life, underscoring the importance of dosage form innovations in tackling the multifaceted challenges of modern pharmacotherapy.

De-simplifying antiretroviral therapy from a single-tablet to a two-tablet regimen: Acceptance, patient-reported outcomes, and cost savings in a multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Antiretroviral therapy (ART), which is increasingly used by people with HIV, accounts for significant care costs, particularly because of single-tablet regimens (STRs). This study explored de-simplification to a two-tablet regimen (TTR) for cost reduction. The objectives of this study were: (1) acceptance of de-simplification, (2) patient-reported outcomes, and (3) cost savings.

METHODS

All individuals on Triumeq®, Atripla® or Eviplera® in five HIV clinics in the Netherlands were eligible. Healthcare providers informed individuals of this study. After inclusion, individuals were free to de-simplify. An electronic questionnaire was sent to assess study acceptance, adherence, quality of life (SF12) and treatment satisfaction (HIVTSQ). After 3 and 12 months, questionnaires were repeated. Cost savings were calculated using Dutch drug prices.

RESULTS

In total, 283 individuals were included, of whom 55.5% agreed to de-simplify their ART, with a large variability between treatment centres: 41.1-74.2%. Individuals who were willing to de-simplify tended to be older, had a longer history of HIV diagnosis, and used more co-medication than those who preferred to remain on an STR regimen. Patient-reported outcomes, including quality of life and treatment satisfaction, showed no significant difference between people with HIV who switched to a TTR and those who remained on an STR regimen. Furthermore, we observed a 17.8% reduction in drug costs in our cohort of people with HIV who were initially on an STR.

CONCLUSIONS

De-simplification from an STR to a TTR within the Dutch healthcare setting has been demonstrated as feasible, leads to significant cost reductions and should be discussed with every eligible person with HIV in the Netherlands.

Structural Equation Modelling to Identify Psychometric Determinants of Medication Adherence in a Survey of Kidney Dialysis Patients

Purpose

Medication non-adherence in dialysis patients is associated with increased mortality and higher healthcare costs. We assessed whether medication adherence is influenced by specific psychometric constructs measuring beliefs about the necessity for medication and concerns about them. We also tested whether medication knowledge, health literacy, and illness perceptions influenced this relationship.

Patients and Methods

This study is based on data from a cross-sectional in-person questionnaire, administered to a random sample of all adult dialysis patients at a teaching hospital. The main outcome was self-assessed medication adherence (8-Item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale). The predictors were: concerns about medications and necessity for medication (Beliefs About Medication Questionnaire); health literacy; medication knowledge (Medication Knowledge Evaluation Tool); cognitive, emotional, and comprehensibility Illness perceptions (Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire). Path analysis was performed using structural equations in both covariance and variance-based models.

Results

Necessity for medication increased (standardized path coefficient [β] 0.30 [95% CI 0.05, 0.54]) and concerns about medication decreased (standardized β -0.33 [-0.57, -0.09]) medication adherence, explaining most of the variance in outcome (r2=0.95). Medication knowledge and cognitive illness perceptions had no effects on medication adherence, either directly or indirectly. Higher health literacy, greater illness comprehension, and a more positive emotional view of their illness had medium-to-large sized effects in increasing medication adherence. These were indirect rather and direct effects mediated by decreases in concerns about medications (standardized β respectively -0.40 [-0.63,-0.16], -0.60 [-0.85, -0.34], -0.33 [-0.52, -0.13]).

Conclusion

Interventions that reduce patients' concerns about their medications are likely to improve adherence, rather than interventions that increase patients' perceived necessity for medication. Improving patients' general health literacy and facilitating a better understanding and more positive perception of the illness can probably achieve this. Our study is potentially limited by a lack of generalizability outside of the population and setting in which it was conducted.

Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effect of an Exercise Rehabilitation Program on Symptom Burden in Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Clinical Research Protocol

Background

People receiving hemodialysis experience high symptom burden that contributes to low functional status and poor health-related quality of life. Management of symptoms is a priority for individuals receiving hemodialysis but limited effective treatments exist. There is emerging evidence that exercise programming can improve several common dialysis-related symptoms.

Objective

The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of an exercise rehabilitation program on symptom burden in individuals receiving maintenance hemodialysis.

Design

Multicenter, randomized controlled, 1:1 parallel, open label, prospective blinded end point trial.

Setting

Three facility-based hemodialysis units in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Participants

Adults aged 18 years or older with end-stage kidney disease receiving facility-based maintenance hemodialysis for more than 3 months, with at least 1 dialysis-related symptom as indicated by the Dialysis Symptom Index (DSI) severity score >0 (n = 150).

Intervention

Supervised 26-week exercise rehabilitation program and 60 minutes of cycling during hemodialysis thrice weekly. Exercise intensity and duration were supervised and individualized by the kinesiologist as per participant baseline physical function with gradual progression over the course of the intervention.

Control

Usual hemodialysis care (no exercise program).

Measurements

Our primary outcome is change in symptom burden at 12 weeks as measured by the DSI severity score. Secondary outcomes include change in modified DSI severity score (includes 10 symptoms most plausible to improve with exercise), change in DSI severity score at 26 and 52 weeks; time to recover post-hemodialysis; health-related quality of life measured using EuroQol (EQ)-5D-5L; physical activity behavior measured by self-report (Godin-Shepherd questionnaire) and triaxial accelerometry; exercise capacity (shuttle walk test); frailty (Fried); self-efficacy for exercise; and 1-year hospitalization and mortality.

Methods

Change in primary outcome will be compared between groups by independent 2-tailed t test or Mann-Whitney U test depending on data distribution and using generalized linear mixed models, with study time point as a random effect and adjusted for baseline DSI score. Similarly, change in secondary outcomes will be compared between groups over time using appropriate parametric and nonparametric statistical tests depending on data type and distribution.

Limitations

The COVID-19 pandemic restrictions on clinical research at our institution delayed completion of target recruitment and prevented collection of accelerometry and physical function outcome data for 15 months until restrictions were lifted.

Conclusions

The application of an exercise rehabilitation program to improve symptom burden in individuals on hemodialysis may ameliorate common symptoms observed in individuals on hemodialysis and result in improved quality of life and reduced disability and morbidity over the long term. Importantly, this pragmatic study, with a standardized exercise intervention that is adaptable to baseline physical function, addresses an important gap in both clinical care of hemodialysis patients and our current knowledge.

Resistant Hypertension in Dialysis: Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Management

Apparent treatment-resistant hypertension is defined as an elevated BP despite the use of ≥3 antihypertensive medications from different classes or the use of ≥4 antihypertensives regardless of BP levels. Among patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis, using this definition, the prevalence of apparent treatment-resistant hypertension is estimated to be between 18% and 42%. Owing to the lack of a rigorous assessment of some common causes of pseudoresistance, the burden of true resistant hypertension in the dialysis population remains unknown. What distinguishes apparent treatment-resistance from true resistance is white-coat hypertension and adherence to medications. Accordingly, the diagnostic workup of a dialysis patient with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension on dialysis includes the accurate determination of BP control status with the use of home or ambulatory BP monitoring and exclusion of nonadherence to the prescribed antihypertensive regimen. In a patient on dialysis with inadequately controlled BP, despite adherence to therapy with maximally tolerated doses of a β -blocker, a long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, and a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor, volume-mediated hypertension is the most important treatable cause of resistance. In daily clinical practice, such patients are often managed with intensification of antihypertensive therapy. However, this therapeutic strategy is likely to fail if volume overload is not adequately recognized or treated. Instead of increasing the number of prescribed BP-lowering medications, we recommend diet and dialysate restricted in sodium to facilitate achievement of dry weight. The achievement of dry weight is facilitated by an adequate time on dialysis of at least 4 hours for delivering an adequate dialysis dose. In this article, we review the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of resistant hypertension among patients on dialysis.

Trust, Multidimensional Health Literacy, and Medication Adherence among Patients Undergoing Long-Term Hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Basic health literacy and trust in physicians can influence medication adherence in patients receiving dialysis. However, how high-order health literacy is associated with medication adherence and how trust in physicians mediates this association remain unclear. We assessed the inter-relationships between health literacy, trust in physicians, and medication adherence. We investigated the mediating role of trust in physicians in the relationship between health literacy and medication adherence.

METHODS

This multicenter cross-sectional study included Japanese adults receiving outpatient hemodialysis at six dialysis centers. Multidimensional health literacy was measured using the 14-item Functional, Communicative, and Critical Health Literacy scale. Trust in physicians was measured using the five-item Wake Forest Physician Trust scale. Medication adherence was measured using the 12-item Adherence Starts with Knowledge scale. A series of general linear models were created to analyze the associations between health literacy and Adherence Starts Knowledge scores with and without trust in physicians. Mediation analysis was performed to determine whether trust in physicians mediated this association.

RESULTS

In total, 455 patients were analyzed. Higher functional and communicative health literacies were associated with less adherence difficulties (per 1-point higher: -1.79 [95% confidence interval (CI): -2.59 to -0.99] and -2.21 [95% CI: -3.45 to -0.96], respectively), whereas higher critical health literacy was associated with greater adherence difficulties (per 1-point higher: 1.69 [95% CI: 0.44 to 2.94]). After controlling for trust in physicians, the magnitude of the association between health literacies and medication adherence decreased. Trust in physicians partially mediated the association between functional or communicative health literacy and medication adherence (especially beliefs) and completely mediated the association between critical health literacy and medication adherence (especially behaviors).

CONCLUSIONS

Functional and communicative health literacies were positively associated with medication adherence, whereas critical health literacy was negatively associated with it. Each association was mediated by trust in physicians.

Effects of the novel sodium-dependent phosphate cotransporter 2b inhibitor DZ1462 on hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Serum phosphate levels remain insufficiently controlled in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, and novel therapeutic strategies are needed. Blocking intestinal phosphate absorption mediated by sodium-dependent phosphate cotransporter type 2b (NPT2b) holds promise as one such strategy.

METHODS

The in vitro cellular potency of DZ1462 was evaluated using a radioactive Pi uptake assay on stable Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell clones transfected with human NPT2b (hNPT2b) or rat NPT2b (rNPT2b). The ability of DZ1462 to inhibit phosphate absorption was studied in vivo in an acute model after oral bolus challenge with 33PO4 and in an adenine-induced chronic hyperphosphatemia rat model. PK and minitox was also evaluated.

RESULTS

The cellular assays with the hNPT2b-CHO and rNPT2b-CHO clones showed that DZ1462 significantly and potently inhibited phosphate uptake. In vivo, in a chronic Pi-fed rat model, DZ1462 effectively inhibited intestinal Pi uptake. In a hyperphosphatemia rat model, DZ1462 significantly inhibited Pi uptake, and DZ1462 in combination with sevelamer had a synergistic effect. The pharmacokinetics (PK) study confirmed that DZ1462 is a gastrointestinal (GI)-restricted compound that can remain in the intestine for a sufficient duration. In addition, DZ1462 also reduced cardiovascular events and ameliorated osteoporosis in a CKD animal model.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that a GI-restricted NPT2b inhibitor DZ1462 potently inhibits NPT2b in vitro and blocks intestinal phosphate uptake in multiple animal models with potential to reduce various cardiovascular events in CKD models. Therefore, DZ1462 may be useful to treat renal disease patients who have shown an unsatisfactory response to phosphate binders.

Tenapanor for peritoneal dialysis patients with hyperphosphatemia: a phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Tenapanor is a novel selective inhibitor of intestinal sodium/hydrogen exchanger 3 transporter. This is the first trial to assess the efficacy and safety of tenapanor in Japanese patients with hyperphosphatemia who are undergoing peritoneal dialysis.

METHODS

This phase 3, open-label, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial targeted patients whose serum phosphorus was within 3.5-7.0 mg/dL with phosphate binders at screening. After phosphate binder washout, tenapanor was orally administered twice-daily, stepwise from 5 to 30 mg/dose for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint, mean change in serum phosphorus level, was evaluated at week 8. The 16-week treatment period was completed with tenapanor alone, and only one phosphate binder type was allowed for combined use after the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

Of the 54 patients enrolled, 34 completed the study. At week 8, the primary endpoint, mean change in serum phosphorus level (last observation carried forward), was - 1.18 mg/dL (95% confidence interval: - 1.54, - 0.81 mg/dL) with tenapanor. From a baseline value of 7.65 mg/dL, serum phosphorus decreased to 6.14 and 5.44 mg/dL at weeks 8 and 16, respectively, and 46.3% and 76.5% of patients achieved serum phosphorus within 3.5-6.0 mg/dL at week 8 and week 16, respectively. The most common adverse event, diarrhea, occurred in 74.1% of patients; the severity of diarrhea was mild or moderate. Thus, the discontinuation percentage due to diarrhea was low at 5.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of tenapanor resulted in a sufficient reduction in serum phosphorus level at week 8 and was considered safe and tolerable.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04766385.

Effectiveness of Existing Insomnia Therapies for Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis : A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Chronic insomnia is common in patients undergoing in-center hemodialysis, yet there is limited evidence on effective treatments for this population.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), trazodone, and placebo for insomnia in patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis.

DESIGN

Randomized, multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03534284).

SETTING

26 dialysis units in Albuquerque, New Mexico, and Seattle, Washington.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) score of 10 or greater, with sleep disturbances on 3 or more nights per week for 3 or more months.

INTERVENTION

Participants were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of CBT-I, trazodone, or placebo.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was the ISI score at 7 and 25 weeks from randomization.

RESULTS

A total of 923 patients were prescreened, and of the 411 patients with chronic insomnia, 126 were randomly assigned to CBT-I (n = 43), trazodone (n = 42), or placebo (n = 41). The change in ISI scores from baseline to 7 weeks with CBT-I or trazodone was no different from placebo: CBT-I, -3.7 (95% CI, -5.5 to -1.9); trazodone, -4.2 (CI, -5.9 to -2.4); and placebo, -3.1 (CI, -4.9 to -1.3). There was no meaningful change in ISI scores from baseline to 25 weeks: CBT-I, -4.8 (CI, -7.0 to -2.7); trazodone, -4.0 (CI, -6.0 to -1.9); and placebo, -4.3 (CI, -6.4 to -2.2). Serious adverse events (SAEs), particularly serious cardiovascular events, were more frequent with trazodone (annualized cardiovascular SAE incidence rates: CBT-I, 0.05 [CI, 0.00 to 0.29]; trazodone, 0.64 [CI, 0.34 to 1.10]; and placebo, 0.21 [CI, 0.06 to 0.53]).

LIMITATION

Modest sample size and most participants had mild or moderate insomnia.

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing hemodialysis with mild or moderate chronic insomnia, there was no difference in the effectiveness of 6 weeks of CBT-I or trazodone compared with placebo. The incidence of SAEs was higher with trazodone.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

Polypharmacy and Quality of Life Among Dialysis Patients: A Qualitative Study

Rationale & Objective

Almost all patients who receive dialysis experience polypharmacy, but little is known about their experiences with medication or perceptions toward it. In this qualitative study, we aimed to gain insight into dialysis patients' experiences with polypharmacy, the ways they integrate their medication into their daily lives, and the ways it affects their quality of life.

Study Design

Qualitative study using semistructured interviews.

Setting & Participants

Patients who received dialysis from 2 Dutch university hospitals.

Analytical Approach

Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed independently by 2 researchers through thematic content analysis.

Results

Overall, 28 individuals were interviewed (29% women, mean age 63 ± 16 years, median dialysis vintage 25.5 [interquartile range, 15-48] months, mean daily number of medications 10 ± 3). Important themes were as follows: (1) their own definition of what constitutes "medication," (2) their perception of medication, (3) medication routines and their impact on daily (quality of) life, and (4) interactions with health care professionals and others regarding medication. Participants generally perceived medication as burdensome but less so than dialysis. Medication was accepted as an essential precondition for their health, although participants did not always notice these health benefits directly. Medication routines and other coping mechanisms helped participants reduce the perceived negative effects of medication. In fact, medication increased freedom for some participants. Participants generally had constructive relationships with their physicians when discussing their medication.

Limitations

Results are context dependent and might therefore not apply directly to other contexts.

Conclusions

Polypharmacy negatively affected dialysis patients' quality of life, but these effects were overshadowed by the burden of dialysis. The patients' realization that medication is important to their health and effective coping strategies mitigated the negative impact of polypharmacy on their quality of life. Physicians and patients should work together continuously to evaluate the impact of treatments on health and other aspects of patients' daily lives.

Plain-Language Summary

People receiving dialysis treatment are prescribed a large number of medications (polypharmacy). Polypharmacy is associated with a number of issues, including a lower health-related quality of life. In this study we interviewed patients who received dialysis treatment to understand how they experience polypharmacy in the context of their daily lives. Participants generally perceived medication as burdensome but less so than dialysis and accepted medication as an essential precondition for their health. Medication routines and other coping mechanisms helped participants mitigate the perceived negative effects of medication. In fact, medication led to increased freedom for some participants. Participants had generally constructive relationships with their physicians when discussing their medication but felt that physicians sometimes do not understand them.

Polypharmacy in chronic kidney disease: Health outcomes & pharmacy-based strategies to mitigate inappropriate polypharmacy

The rising prevalence of comorbidities in an increasingly aging population has sparked a reciprocal rise in polypharmacy. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a greater burden of polypharmacy due to the comorbidities and complications associated with their disease. Polypharmacy in CKD patients has been linked to myriad direct and indirect costs for patients and the society at large. Pharmacists are uniquely positioned within the healthcare team to streamline polypharmacy management in the setting of CKD. In this article, we review the landscape of polypharmacy and examine its impacts through the lens of the ECHO model of Economic, Clinical, and Humanistic Outcomes. We also present strategies for healthcare teams to improve polypharmacy care through comprehensive medication management process that includes medication reconciliation during transitions of care, medication therapy management, and deprescribing. These pharmacist-led interventions have the potential to mitigate adverse outcomes associated with polypharmacy in CKD.

Social and Behavioral Barriers to Effective Care During the Transition to End-Stage Kidney Care

Individuals living with CKD are disproportionately burdened by a multitude of adverse clinical and person-centered outcomes. When patients transition from advanced kidney disease to kidney failure, the psychosocial effects as well as social determinants of health challenges are magnified, making this a particularly difficult time for patients beginning kidney replacement therapy. The key social determinants of health challenges often include food and housing insecurity, poverty, unreliable transportation, low level education and/or health literacy, lack of language interpreters and culturally concordant educational materials, lack of health care insurance coverage, and mistrust of the health care system. Psychosocial and physical stressors, such as depression, anxiety, sexual dysfunction, sleep difficulty, fatigue, and pain, are often part of the illness burden among individuals living with CKD and can interact synergistically with the social challenges making the transition to kidney replacement therapy particularly challenging. To better support patients during this time, it is critical that social and structural determinants of health as well as mental health be assessed and if needs are identified, that services be provided.

[Polypharmacy in acute and chronic kidney diseases]

The prevalence for chronic kidney disease (CKD) has steadily increased over the past decades. It is a gradually progressive disease that is associated with several comorbidities including cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, anemia, disorders of bone and mineral metabolism, electrolyte imbalance and acid-base abnormalities. All these comorbidities require adequate medication. Therefore, patients with CKD have a high risk for polypharmacy, which is defined as five or more medications daily. Polypharmacy causes a greatly increased risk for adverse drug effects and severe drug-drug interactions, which if not closely controlled and the individual doses adapted to the decreased renal function during the progression of the CKD, can result in increased morbidity and mortality. Therefore, several aspects of the medication need to be considered and constantly addressed. This article summarizes the problems arising from inadequate polypharmacy in CKD patients, including undesired adverse drug effects, drug interactions, the complexity of medication plans, treatment burden and nonadherence to the treatment. Furthermore, the most important steps to identify patients with inadequate polypharmacy are discussed, whereby complications can also be avoided and the benefits of the medication can be increased. Finally, the polypharmacy in acute kidney injury is dealt with.

The mediation effect of treatment fatigue in the association between memory and health-related quality of life in men with HIV who have sex with men

Approximately half of all adults living with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) experience cognitive alterations related to difficulties in treatment adherence and, therefore, to a significant decrease in quality of life. In this sense, new studies are needed to identify potential mediators related to treatment in this association, such as treatment fatigue. This fact is especially important in at specific groups of individuals with HIV, namely men with HIV who have sex with men (MSM). The objective of this study was to analyze the association between cognitive functioning, Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), and treatment fatigue in MSM with HIV. A cross-sectional study was developed with a sample of 70 MSM, from the Infectious Diseases Unit of the General University Hospital of Alicante (Spain). Participants completed questionnaires related to sociodemographic data, HRQoL, and treatment fatigue in an initial phase; in a second phase, they were administered a computerized cognitive evaluation. Our results demonstrate a significant relationship between a lower cognitive performance in the memory domain and worse HRQoL. Mediation analysis has revealed the total mediation effect of treatment fatigue, specifically, the treatment cynicism domain, on this relationship. This mediation effect remained significant after controlling the sociodemographic and clinical HIV-related variables in the model. No significant mediation effects of the rest of evaluated cognitive domains (attention, perception, reasoning, or coordination) were found in this relationship. The results of this study highlight how MSM with a significant deterioration of memory are at greater risk of developing high levels of treatment fatigue, and, therefore, a lower adherence to the same and a significant deterioration in their HRQoL.

Serum Phosphorus Management with Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide as a First-Line Phosphate Binder within the First Year of Hemodialysis

INTRODUCTION

Sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SO), a non-calcium, chewable, iron-based phosphate binder (PB), effectively lowers serum phosphorus (sP) concentrations while reducing pill burden relative to other PBs. To date, SO studies have largely examined treatment-experienced, prevalent hemodialysis populations. We aimed to explore the role of first-line SO initiated during the first year of dialysis.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed deidentified data from adults receiving in-center hemodialysis who were prescribed SO monotherapy within the first year of hemodialysis as part of routine clinical care. All patients continuing SO monotherapy for 12 months were included. Changes from baseline in sP, achievement of sP ≤5.5 and ≤4.5 mg/dL, and other laboratory parameters were analyzed quarterly for 1 year.

RESULTS

The overall cohort included 596 patients, 286 of whom had a dialysis vintage ≤3 months. In the 3 months preceding SO initiation, sP rapidly increased (mean increases of 1.02 and 1.65 mg/dL in the overall cohort and incident cohort, respectively). SO treatment was associated with significant decreases in quarterly sP (mean decreases of 0.26-0.36; p < 0.0001 for each quarter and overall). While receiving SO, 55-60% of patients achieved sP ≤5.5 mg/dL and 21-24% achieved sP ≤4.5 mg/dL (p < 0.0001 for each quarter and overall vs. baseline). Daily PB pill burden was approximately 4 pills. Serum calcium concentrations increased and intact parathyroid hormone concentrations decreased during SO treatment (p < 0.0001 vs. baseline).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients on hemodialysis, initiating SO as a first-line PB resulted in significant reductions in sP while maintaining a relatively low PB pill burden.

Taking care of myself in a different and broken world: self-care practices of adolescents on dialysis

PURPOSE

Being on dialysis is a traumatic situation particularly during adolescence. Therefore, adolescents must have self-care support according to their special needs. The goal of this study was to describe the adolescents´ self-care practices when they are on dialysis. This paper reports only the adolescents´ selfcare practices based on the health care team guidelines but adjusted to their beliefs and habits.

METHODS

The methodology of the study was interpretive phenomenology. In-depth interviews were conducted with 15 adolescents; Smith´s IPA procedure was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Being on dialysis meant to the adolescents living in a different and broken world. Self-care practices included: 1) coexisting with the dialysis slavery or being attached to a machine day or night, 2) struggling with the maddening thirst experience, 3) Deciding what, when and how much food to eat, 4) taking care of an alien that helps to survive, 5) taking the medicines when feeling in need of them.

CONCLUSION

The adolescents tried to care for themselves adjusting their care activities to the health team´s recommendations. However, they also adjusted those practices to their beliefs and habits, which allows them to live with dialysis in a less traumatic way.

Long-term safety and decrease of pill burden by tenapanor therapy: a phase 3 open-label study in hemodialysis patients with hyperphosphatemia

Phosphate binders (PBs) generally have a high pill burden. Tenapanor selectively inhibits sodium/hydrogen exchanger isoform 3, reducing intestinal phosphate absorption. Tenapanor is a novel drug administered as a small tablet, twice daily. This multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase 3 study aimed to evaluate the long-term safety of tenapanor and its efficacy in decreasing PB pill burden. Tenapanor 5 mg twice daily was administered to hemodialysis patients with serum phosphorus level 3.5-7.0 mg/dl at baseline; the dose could be increased up to 30 mg twice daily. Patients could also switch from PBs. The primary endpoint was safety during 52-week administration. The key secondary endpoint was a ≥ 30% reduction in the total pill number of daily PBs and tenapanor from baseline. Of 212 patients starting treatment, 154 completed the study. Diarrhea was the most frequent adverse event, occurring in 135 patients (63.7%); most events were classified as mild (74.8%). No clinically significant changes occurred other than serum phosphorus level. At Week 52/discontinuation, 158/204 patients (77.5%) achieved the key secondary endpoint. Complete switching from PBs to tenapanor was achieved in 50-76 patients (26.7%-41.5%), and 80 patients (51.9%) at Week 8-12 and Week 50, respectively. Serum phosphorus remained generally stable within the target range (3.5-6.0 mg/dl). These findings suggest the long-term safety and tolerability of tenapanor. Tenapanor could reduce or eliminate PB pill burden while controlling serum phosphorus levels.Trial registration: NCT04771780.

Tenapanor Improves Long-Term Control of Hyperphosphatemia in Patients Receiving Maintenance Dialysis: the NORMALIZE Study

Key Points

Tenapanor is a first-in-class, minimally systemic sodium–hydrogen exchanger 3 inhibitor with a mechanism of action distinct from phosphate binders. Tenapanor alone or with phosphate binders led to 35%–49% of patients achieving serum phosphate ≤4.5 mg/dl over an 18-month period versus 22% at baseline. Tenapanor alone or with phosphate binders may help adults with CKD on maintenance dialysis achieve normal serum phosphate concentrations.

Background

Most patients with ESKD and hyperphosphatemia have difficulty controlling serum phosphate (sP) concentrations despite maintenance dialysis, dietary restriction, and phosphate binder treatment. NORMALIZE evaluated the efficacy and safety of tenapanor 30 mg twice daily alone or in combination with phosphate binders to achieve sP within the adult population reference range (2.5–4.5 mg/dl).

Methods

Patients who completed the Phase 3 PHREEDOM study could enroll in NORMALIZE. Patients enrolled in NORMALIZE who had received tenapanor during the PHREEDOM study (n =111) added sevelamer carbonate if sP was >4.5 mg/dl. Patients who had received sevelamer carbonate during the PHREEDOM study (n =61) added tenapanor and decreased sevelamer carbonate if sP was ≤4.5 mg/dl, per protocol titration schedule. Patients were followed in NORMALIZE for up to 18 months. We assessed efficacy in the full analysis set, defined as patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug and had ≥1 post-treatment sP measurement (n =171). We assessed safety in all patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug (n =172).

Results

At the end point visit, 57 of 171 patients (33%) in the full analysis set achieved sP between 2.5 and 4.5 mg/dl. Eight of 23 patients (35%) who were on tenapanor alone at the end point visit achieved sP between 2.5 and 4.5 mg/dl. The mean reduction from PHREEDOM baseline to end of NORMALIZE in sP was 2.0 mg/dl. Serum intact fibroblast growth factor-23 was significantly reduced; serum intact parathyroid hormone was significantly reduced among patients with intact parathyroid hormone ≥300 pg/ml at PHREEDOM baseline. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse event was diarrhea in 38 of 172 patients (22%), which led to tenapanor discontinuation in four patients (2%).

Conclusions

Tenapanor alone or in combination with phosphate binders helped adult patients on maintenance dialysis achieve normal sP concentrations. Safety was consistent with previous studies of tenapanor.

Clinical trial registry name and registration number

A Long-Term Study to Evaluate the Ability of Tenapanor Alone or in Combination With Sevelamer to Treat to Goal Serum Phosphorus in Patients With ESKD on Dialysis (NORMALIZE), NCT03988920 .

Managing Phosphate Burden in Patients Receiving Dialysis: Beyond Phosphate Binders and Diet

Most patients receiving dialysis rely on dietary restriction and phosphate binders to minimize the risk of hyperphosphatemia, which is associated with increased mortality. However, dietary restriction is difficult because of hidden phosphate additives in processed foods and medications. Restriction of dietary phosphate sources such as protein may increase the risk of malnutrition. Phosphate binders, the only pharmacologic option for phosphate management since aluminum salts were introduced several decades ago, are often insufficient for binding the 1400-2500 mg of phosphate potentially consumed daily. Over the last decade, serum phosphate levels in the United States have risen, and >69% of patients receiving dialysis exhibited a most recent phosphate level >4.5 mg/dl (above the normal range), indicating an urgent need for new, more effective therapies to manage phosphate burden. Novel, nonbinder therapies such as transcellular and paracellular phosphate absorption inhibitors may be used for phosphate management, and future studies should examine whether they allow fewer dietary restrictions for patients receiving dialysis, potentially improving patient quality of life and nutritional status. It is imperative that we collaborate to move beyond the restrictive approaches available today and provide patients and clinicians with an array of strategies so that they may choose the most appropriate patient-centered therapy.

Association between phosphate binder pill burden and mortality risk in patients on maintenance hemodialysis: a single-center cohort study with 7-year follow-up of 513 patients

BACKGROUND

Dialysis patients often take multiple oral medications, leading to a high pill burden. Phosphate binders (PBs) account for a large proportion of this daily pill burden (DPB). The relationship between DPB and mortality risk remains unclear, and we hypothesized that this relationship might be influenced by the proportion of PBs to all medications.

METHODS

We divided DPB into those derived from PBs and non-PB drugs and analyzed the association with mortality risk over a 7-year period in 513 chronic hemodialysis patients using a baseline model.

RESULTS

The median (interquartile range) DPB from all drugs was 15.8 (11.2-21.0) pills/day/patient, and the median ratio of PB pills to all drug pills was 29.3 (13.7-45.9)% at baseline. During a median observation period of 5.2 years, 161 patients (31.4%) died. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference in all-cause mortality between PB users and non-users. However, a significant survival advantage was observed in the highest tertile of DPB from PBs compared to the lowest tertile. Conversely, the highest tertile of DPB from non-PB drugs was associated with worse survival. Consequently, the highest tertile of the ratio of PBs to all pills was associated with better survival. This association remained significant even after adjusting for patient characteristics in the Cox proportional hazards model. However, when serum nutritional parameters were included as covariates, the significant association disappeared.

CONCLUSIONS

Dialysis patients prescribed a higher rate of PB pills to all medications exhibited a lower mortality risk, possibly due to their better nutritional status.

Humoral and cellular factors inhibit phosphate-induced vascular calcification during the growth period

Hyperphosphatemia is an independent and non-classical risk factor of cardiovascular disease and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Increased levels of extracellular inorganic phosphate (Pi) are known to directly induce vascular calcification, but the detailed underlying mechanism has not been clarified. Although serum Pi levels during the growth period are as high as those observed in hyperphosphatemia in adult CKD, vascular calcification does not usually occur during growth. Here, we have examined whether the defence system against Pi-induced vascular calcification can exist during the growth period using mice model. We found that calcification propensity of young serum (aged 3 weeks) was significantly lower than that of adult serum (10 months), possibly due to high fetuin-A levels. In addition, when the aorta was cultured in high Pi medium in vitro, obvious calcification was observed in the adult aorta but not in the young aorta. Furthermore, culture in high Pi medium increased the mRNA level of tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (TNAP), which degrades pyrophosphate, only in the adult aorta. Collectively, our findings indicate that the aorta in growing mouse may be resistant to Pi-induced vascular calcification via a mechanism in which high serum fetuin-A levels and suppressed TNAP expression.

Pharmacological management of hypertension and outcome among patients on hemodialysis at Muhimbili National Hospital, Tanzania: a cross-sectional study

Introduction

hypertension is prevalent among patients attending hemodialysis. However, published information on hypertension management among patients on hemodialysis in African countries is scarce. This study assessed antihypertensive medication prescribing patterns and blood pressure control among patients with hypertension on hemodialysis in Tanzania.

Methods

an analytical cross-sectional study was conducted at Muhimbili National Hospital in Dar es Salaam from April to June 2022. The study population consisted of patients with hypertension undergoing hemodialysis. Data on demographic, clinical characteristics and the antihypertensive medications used by the patients was collected using a structured questionnaire. Analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software version 26. Uncontrolled pre-dialysis blood pressure determinants were assessed using a modified Poisson regression model. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

out of 314 participants, the majority (68.2%, n= 214) were male, and the median age was 52 (interquartile range: 42, 60) years. Only 16.9% (n= 53) of patients had their pre-dialysis blood pressure controlled. The most frequent antihypertensive medications prescribed were calcium channel blockers (73.2%, n= 230). Patients with less than three dialysis sessions were 20% more likely to have uncontrolled blood pressure than those with three sessions in a week (adjusted prevalence ratio = 1.2).

Conclusion

most patients on hemodialysis with hypertension had poor blood pressure control, according to the study. Patients with hypertension should be strongly encouraged to adhere to at least three hemodialysis treatments to achieve optimal blood pressure control.

Stakeholder Perspectives on Factors Related to Deprescribing Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Older Adults Receiving Dialysis

BACKGROUND

Potentially inappropriate medications, or medications that generally carry more risk of harm than benefit in older adults, are commonly prescribed to older adults receiving dialysis. Deprescribing, a systematic approach to reducing or stopping a medication, is a potential solution to limit potentially inappropriate medications use. Our objective was to identify clinicians and patient perspectives on factors related to deprescribing to inform design of a deprescribing program for dialysis clinics.

METHODS

We conducted rapid qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews and focus groups with clinicians (dialysis clinicians, primary care providers, and pharmacists) and patients (adults receiving hemodialysis aged 65 years or older and those aged 55-64 years who were prefrail or frail) from March 2019 to December 2020.

RESULTS

We interviewed 76 participants (53 clinicians [eight focus groups and 11 interviews] and 23 patients). Among clinicians, 24 worked in dialysis clinics, 18 worked in primary care, and 11 were pharmacists. Among patients, 13 (56%) were aged 65 years or older, 14 (61%) were Black race, and 16 (70%) reported taking at least one potentially inappropriate medication. We identified four themes (and corresponding subthemes) of contextual factors related to deprescribing potentially inappropriate medications: ( 1 ) system-level barriers to deprescribing (limited electronic medical record interoperability, time constraints and competing priorities), ( 2 ) undefined comanagement among clinicians (unclear role delineation, clinician caution about prescriber boundaries), ( 3 ) limited knowledge about potentially inappropriate medications (knowledge limitations among clinicians and patients), and ( 4 ) patients prioritize symptom control over potential harm (clinicians expect resistance to deprescribing, patient weigh risks and benefits).

CONCLUSIONS

Challenges to integration of deprescribing into dialysis clinics included siloed health systems, time constraints, comanagement behaviors, and clinician and patient knowledge and attitudes toward deprescribing.

A Questionnaire Survey of Prescription Preferences and Leftover Medication Conversations: Comparisons Among Kidney Disease Patients and Healthcare Professionals

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and patients with kidney failure receiving hemodialysis (HD) receive various types of medications. However, little is known about the differences in medication preference and how to deal with leftover medication among CKD patients and HD patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in medication preference and ways of dealing with leftover medication between CKD patients, HD patients, physicians, and pharmacists via a questionnaire survey.

METHODS

The ethics committee of Oita University, Oita, Japan, approved this survey. Outpatients undergoing treatment by a nephrologist in four facilities in Oita prefecture, Japan, were asked to answer a questionnaire on their preference for medication and how to deal with leftover medication. Respondents gave their informed written consent. The same questionnaire was administered to nephrologists and pharmacists online.

RESULTS

In this survey, 383 patients (260 patients with CKD and 123 patients with HD), 22 nephrologists, and 28 pharmacists responded. The response rate of valid responses was more than 90% for each of the groups. In particular, 41% of patients with CKD and 56% of patients with HD never inform their doctor about leftover medication or only inform them when there is a lot of leftover medication. On the other hand, 23% of physicians have never asked their patients about them. Ordinary logistic regression analysis indicated that there is no significant relationship between how often patients talk about leftover medication, patients' preferences, or patient states.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the age and state of the patients, it is important to discuss the perception of medication with each other and confirm the condition of the remaining medication to improve concordance and obtain the desired treatment effect.

Managing the symptom burden associated with maintenance dialysis: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference

Individuals with kidney failure undergoing maintenance dialysis frequently report a high symptom burden that can interfere with functioning and diminish life satisfaction. Until recently, the focus of nephrology care for dialysis patients has been related primarily to numerical targets for laboratory measures, and outcomes such as cardiovascular disease and mortality. Routine symptom assessment is not universal or standardized in dialysis care. Even when symptoms are identified, treatment options are limited and are initiated infrequently, in part because of a paucity of evidence in the dialysis population and the complexities of medication interactions in kidney failure. In May of 2022, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) held a Controversies Conference-Symptom-Based Complications in Dialysis-to identify the optimal means for diagnosing and managing symptom-based complications in patients undergoing maintenance dialysis. Participants included patients, physicians, behavioral therapists, nurses, pharmacists, and clinical researchers. They outlined foundational principles and consensus points related to identifying and addressing symptoms experienced by patients undergoing dialysis and described gaps in the knowledge base and priorities for research. Healthcare delivery and education systems have a responsibility to provide individualized symptom assessment and management. Nephrology teams should take the lead in symptom management, although this does not necessarily mean taking ownership of all aspects of care. Even when options for clinical response are limited, clinicians should focus on acknowledging, prioritizing, and managing symptoms that are most important to individual patients. A recognized factor in the initiation and implementation of improvements in symptom assessment and management is that they will be based on locally existing needs and resources.

Impact on health outcomes of hemodialysis patients based on the experience level of registered nurses in the hemodialysis department: a cross-sectional analysis

Background

The aim of the study is to improve the policy of health authorities regarding registered nurses (RNs) staffing by understanding how the health outcomes of hemodialysis (HD) patients vary depending on the level of HD nursing experience of at least 2 years.

Methods

The study included 21,839 patients who started maintenance HD for 3 months in early 2013 in the same medical institutions. Demographic variables such as sex, age, and causes of HD; institutional variables such as type of institution and number of RNs; and health outcomes such as HD adequacy, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), hemoglobin (Hb), and serum albumin were collected through web-based questionnaires. To determine the relationship between variables, t-test, chi-square test, and ANOVA were employed. Binary logistic regression was used to examine the odds ratio.

Results

Institutions with 100% of experienced RNs with at least 2 years of experience in HD units were found to have higher NKF K-DOQI criteria satisfaction rate than Institutions with <50% of experienced RNs with at least 2 years of experience in HD units for all health outcomes, except DBP (42.9% vs. 38.8%, p < .001) and Hb (27.8% vs. 24.4%, p < .001). Four of the six health-related variables-HD adequacy (Kt/v, urea reduction rate, URR), SBP, and serum albumin-were higher in institutions with 100% of experienced RNs than those with less than 50%.

Conclusions

In order to improve HD patients' health outcomes, HD institutions should prioritize recruiting RNs who are proficient in HD care. A higher proportion of skilled RNs results in a higher ability to prepare for emergencies and early detection of patient complications. RNs with extensive experience in HD nursing, therefore, promote quality management of HD patients.

Effects of Technology Assisted Stepped Collaborative Care Intervention to Improve Symptoms in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis: The TĀCcare Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing long-term hemodialysis often experience a high burden of debilitating symptoms for which effective treatment options are limited.

Objective

To compare the effectiveness of a stepped collaborative care intervention vs attention control for reducing fatigue, pain, and depression among patients with ESKD undergoing long-term hemodialysis.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Technology Assisted Stepped Collaborative Care (TĀCcare) was a parallel-group, single-blinded, randomized clinical trial of adult (≥18 years) patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis and experiencing clinically significant levels of fatigue, pain, and/or depression for which they were considering treatment. The trial took place in 2 US states (New Mexico and Pennsylvania) from March 1, 2018, to June 31, 2022. Data analyses were performed from July 1, 2022, to April 10, 2023.

Interventions

The intervention group received 12 weekly sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy delivered via telehealth in the hemodialysis unit or patient home, and/or pharmacotherapy using a stepped approach in collaboration with dialysis and primary care teams. The attention control group received 6 telehealth sessions of health education.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The coprimary outcomes were changes in fatigue (measured using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue), average pain severity (Brief Pain Inventory), and/or depression (Beck Depression Inventory-II) scores at 3 months. Patients were followed up for 12 months to assess maintenance of intervention effects.

Results

There were 160 participants (mean [SD] age, 58 [14] years; 72 [45%] women and 88 [55%] men; 21 [13%] American Indian, 45 [28%] Black, 28 [18%] Hispanic, and 83 [52%] White individuals) randomized, 83 to the intervention and 77 to the control group. In the intention-to-treat analyses, when compared with controls, patients in the intervention group experienced statistically and clinically significant reductions in fatigue (mean difference [md], 2.81; 95% CI, 0.86 to 4.75; P = .01) and pain severity (md, -0.96; 95% CI, -1.70 to -0.23; P = .02) at 3 months. These effects were sustained at 6 months (md, 3.73; 95% CI, 0.87 to 6.60; P = .03; and BPI, -1.49; 95% CI, -2.58 to -0.40; P = .02). Improvement in depression at 3 months was statistically significant but small (md -1.73; 95% CI, -3.18 to -0.28; P = .02). Adverse events were similar in both groups.

Conclusions and Relevance

This randomized clinical trial found that a technology assisted stepped collaborative care intervention delivered during hemodialysis led to modest but clinically meaningful improvements in fatigue and pain at 3 months vs the control group, with effects sustained until 6 months.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03440853.

Mediation effect of self-neglect in family resilience and medication adherence in older patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis

OBJECTIVES

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with regular dialysis treatment for more than 3 months are called maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). The degree of patients' adherence with the doctor's advice to take medicine on time is called medication adherence, which is very important for the control of the disease and the improvement of the quality of life for MHD patients. Living alone, lack of communication with children and self-neglect are risk factors for medication adherence in the older adults. Inappropriate substance use behaviors are common among older adults with self-neglect. Family resilience denotes the ability of a family to retain the stability of its structure by relying on its internal and external resources when facing a difficult situation. Family resilience entails the combination of family beliefs, interaction styles, problem-solving skills, and emotional communication which reflect supportive and positive psychological adjustment effects to benefit older persons. This study aims to provide a theoretical basis for clinical intervention level to improve medication adherence of older patients on MHD through examineing the correlation among family resilience, self-neglect, and medication adherence based on the self-reports.

METHODS

A random sampling method was used to gather information from 632 older patients receiving MHD treatment in Hemodialysis Center of Hunan Province between July to December 2021. For this purpose, a self-designed demographic questionnaire, the Family Resilience Questionnaire (FRQ), the Scale of the Elderly Self-Neglect (SESN), and the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-4 (MMAS-4) were used to investigate the questionnaire data of the participants. Pearson correlation was used to examine the relationship between family resilience, self-neglect, and medication adherence in older patients and gain insight into their current status. AMOS 24.0 was used for mediation modeling. Bootstrap mediation effect test was used to evaluate the mediation effect among the 3 variables.

RESULTS

The questionnaires survey showed that the scores of FRQ, SESN, and MMAS-4 were 78.60±12.49, 7.99±5.60, and 5.93±1.40, respectively; and the medication adherence rate was 18.8%. Pearson correlation analysis showed that family resilience was negatively correlated with self-neglect (r=-0.432, P<0.001), and was positively correlated with medication adherence (r=0.169, P<0.001). Self-neglect was negatively correlated with medication adherence (r=-0.217, P<0.001). Mediating effect analysis showed that the total effect of family resilience on medication adherence was significant (β=0.214, 95% CI 0.121 to 0.313, P<0.001), and the direct effect was not significant (β=0.058, 95% CI -0.073 to 0.187, P>0.05). Self-neglect played a major mediating effect between family resilience and medication adherence (β=0.156, 95% CI 0.088 to 0.240, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Family resilience, self-neglect, and medication adherence among older patients on MHD are significantly related, with family resilience primarily influencing medication adherence indirectly through self-neglect.

Phosphate Control in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: Issues, Solutions, and Open Questions

Hyperphosphatemia is a common complication in advanced chronic kidney disease and contributes to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The present narrative review focuses on the management of phosphatemia in uremic patients receiving peritoneal dialysis. These patients frequently develop hyperphosphatemia since phosphate anion behaves as a middle-size molecule despite its low molecular weight. Accordingly, patient transporter characteristics and peritoneal dialysis modalities and prescriptions remarkably influence serum phosphate control. Given that phosphate peritoneal removal is often insufficient, especially in lower transporters, patients are often prescribed phosphate binders whose use in peritoneal dialysis is primarily based on clinical trials conducted in hemodialysis because very few studies have been performed solely in peritoneal dialysis populations. A crucial role in phosphate control among peritoneal dialysis patients is played by diet, which must help in reducing phosphorous intake while preventing malnutrition. Moreover, residual renal function, which is preserved in most peritoneal dialysis patients, significantly contributes to maintaining phosphate balance. The inadequate serum phosphate control observed in many patients on peritoneal dialysis highlights the need for large and well-designed clinical trials including exclusively peritoneal dialysis patients to evaluate the effects of a multiple therapeutic approach on serum phosphate control and on hard clinical outcomes in this high-risk population.

High Phosphate-Binding Capacity of Oxylanthanum Carbonate with a Low Medication Volume: Comparison with Commercially Available Phosphate Binders

BACKGROUND

A key focus for chronic kidney disease management is phosphate control, but currently available binders have suboptimal phosphate-binding capacity, and their characteristics result in low adherence and poor phosphate regulation. Oxylanthanum carbonate, a novel compound that uses proprietary nanoparticle technology to deliver lanthanum, has the potential to combine high phosphate-binding capacity with good intake convenience, thus improving adherence and patient quality of life. The goal of this study was to assess the volume of oxylanthanum Carbonate required to bind 1 g of phosphate and compare it with other currently available phosphate binders to determine which binder allows for the highest normalized potency with the lowest daily medication volume.

METHODS

Six phosphate binders were assessed: ferric citrate, calcium acetate, lanthanum carbonate, sevelamer carbonate, sucroferric oxyhydroxide, and oxylanthanum carbonate. Table volume measurements were taken using fluid displacement in corn oil or water. Mean daily dose volume to bind 1 g of phosphate was calculated as volume per tablet multiplied by the mean number of tablets taken per day. Volume to bind 1 g of phosphate was calculated by dividing the volume per tablet by its in vivo binding capacity.

RESULTS

Oxylanthanum carbonate had the lowest mean volume, daily phosphate binder dose volume, and equivalent phosphate-binding dose volume (volume to bind 1 g of phosphate for each binder).

CONCLUSIONS

Oxylanthanum carbonate has the lowest daily phosphate binder dose volume and the smallest volume required to bind 1 g of phosphate compared to all other commercially available phosphate binders. A randomized trial that compares gastrointestinal tolerability across binders would be warranted to demonstrate acceptability and adherence in the target population.

Health-related quality of life of dialysis patients during early COVID-19 lockdowns: a snapshot from a public hospital in Malaysia

Background

End-stage renal disease is the last stage of chronic kidney disease and can affect the quality of life (QOL) of dialysis patients. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of life and examine its determinants.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey involving patients on dialysis in a tertiary hospital was conducted from July 2020 to September 2020. Demographic data were collected using a predesigned questionnaire. QOL was measured using the 36-item KDQOL questionnaire, and statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS version 25.

Results

Of the 108 patients, 59 were men and 49 were women, and the mean age was 48.15 ± 15.4 years. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the mean score of all components of health-related quality of life in different types of dialysis. The demographic data, which included age, gender, ethnicity, marital status, education level, occupation, and monthly income, did not significantly affect the QOL of dialysis patients. Patients with a dialysis duration of more than 5 years had a better QOL compared to other groups. Laboratory parameters such as low albumin and low hemoglobin showed a significant correlation with the health-related quality of life of dialysis patients.

Conclusion

The quality of life among patients on dialysis was impaired, especially in terms of burden of the kidney disease. Hypoalbuminemia and anemia were the two factors that influenced QOL.

The tragic paradoxical effect of telemedicine on healthcare disparities- a time for redemption: a narrative review

BACKGROUND

Telemedicine has become more convenient and advantageous due to the rapid development of the internet and telecommunications. A growing number of patients are turning to telemedicine for health consultations and health-related information. Telemedicine can increase access to medical care by removing geographical and other barriers. In most nations, the COVID-19 pandemic imposed social isolation. This has accelerated the transition to telemedicine, which has become the most commonly utilized method of outpatient care in many places. Telehealth can assist resolve gaps in access to healthcare services and health outcomes, in addition to its primary function of boosting accessibility to remote health services. However, as the benefits of telemedicine become more apparent, so do the limitations of serving vulnerable groups. Some populations may lack digital literacy or internet access. Homeless persons, the elderly, and people with inadequate language skills are also affected. In such circumstances, telemedicine has the potential to exacerbate health inequities.

AIM AND METHODS

In this narrative review (using the PubMed and Google scholar database), the different benefits and drawbacks of telemedicine are discussed, both globally and in Israel, with particular focus paid to special populations and to the telehealth usage during the Covid-19 period.

FINDINGS

The contradiction and paradox of using telemedicine to address health inequities yet sometimes making them worse is highlighted. The effectiveness of telemedicine in bridging access to healthcare inequities is explored along with a number of potential solutions.

CONCLUSIONS

Policy makers should identify barriers among special populations to using telemedicine. They should initiate interventions to overcome these barriers, while adapting them to the needs of these groups.

Digital Healthy Diet Literacy and Fear of COVID-19 as Associated with Treatment Adherence and Its Subscales among Hemodialysis Patients: A Multi-Hospital Study

Treatment adherence (TA) is a critical issue and is under-investigated in hemodialysis patients. A multi-center study was conducted from July 2020 to March 2021 on 972 hemodialysis patients in eight hospitals in Vietnam to explore the factors associated with TA during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were collected, including socio-demographics, an End-Stage Renal Disease Adherence Questionnaire (ESRD-AQ), 12-item short-form health literacy questionnaire (HLS-SF12), 4-item digital healthy diet literacy scale (DDL), 10-item hemodialysis dietary knowledge scale (HDK), 7-item fear of COVID-19 scale (FCoV-19S), and suspected COVID-19 symptoms (S-COVID19-S). Bivariate and multivariate linear regression models were used to explore the associations. Higher DDL scores were associated with higher TA scores (regression coefficient, B, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 95%CI, 0.59, 2.12; p = 0.001). Higher FCoV-19S scores were associated with lower TA scores (B, -1.78; 95%CI, -3.33, -0.24; p = 0.023). In addition, patients aged 60-85 (B, 24.85; 95%CI, 6.61, 43.11; p = 0.008) with "very or fairly easy" medication payment ability (B, 27.92; 95%CI, 5.89, 44.95; p = 0.013) had higher TA scores. Patients who underwent hemodialysis for ≥5 years had a lower TA score than those who received <5 years of hemodialysis (B, -52.87; 95%CI, -70.46, -35.28; p < 0.001). These findings suggested that DDL and FCoV-19S, among other factors, should be considered in future interventions to improve TA in hemodialysis patients.

Redefying the therapeutic strategies against cardiorenal morbidity and mortality: Patient phenotypes

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients face an unacceptably high morbidity and mortality, mainly from cardiovascular diseases. Diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension and dyslipidemia are highly prevalent in CKD patients. Established therapeutic protocols for the treatment of diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, and dyslipidemia are not as effective in CKD patients as in the general population. The role of non-traditional risk factors (RF) has gained interest in the last decades. These entail the deranged clinical spectrum of secondary hyperparathyroidism involving vascular and valvular calcification, under the term “CKD-mineral and bone disorder” (CKD-MBD), uremia per se, inflammation and oxidative stress. Each one of these non-traditional RF have been addressed in various study designs, but the results do not exhibit any applied clinical benefit for CKD-patients. The “crusade” against cardiorenal morbidity and mortality in CKD-patients is in some instances, derailed. We propose a therapeutic paradigm advancing from isolated treatment targets, as practiced today, to precision medicine involving patient phenotypes with distinct underlying pathophysiology. In this regard we propose two steps, based on current stratification management of corona virus disease-19 and sepsis. First, select patients who are expected to have a high mortality, i.e., a prognostic enrichment. Second, select patients who are likely to respond to a specific therapy, i.e., a predictive enrichment.

Reducing inappropriate polypharmacy for older patients at specialist outpatient clinics: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Polypharmacy is associated with negative clinical consequences. The efficacy of deprescribing interventions within medical specialist outpatient clinics remains unclear. Here, we reviewed the research on the effectiveness of deprescribing interventions implemented within specialist outpatient clinics for patients ≥ 60 years.

METHODS

Systematic searches of key databases were undertaken for studies published between January 1990 and October 2021. The diverse nature of the study designs made it unsuitable for pooling for meta-analysis, thus, a narrative review was conducted and presented in both text and tabular formats. The primary outcome for review was that intervention resulted in a change in medication load (either total number of medications or appropriateness of medication). Secondary outcomes were the maintenance of deprescription and clinical benefits. Methodological quality of the publications was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tools.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies with a total of 10,914 participants were included for review. These included geriatric outpatient clinics, oncology/hematology clinics, hemodialysis clinics, and designated polypharmacy/multimorbidity clinics. Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported statistically significant reductions in medication load with intervention; however, all studies had a high risk of bias. The inclusion of a pharmacist in outpatient clinics aims to increase deprescribing, however, the current evidence is mainly restricted to prospective and pilot studies. The data on secondary outcomes were very limited and highly variable.

CONCLUSIONS

Specialist outpatient clinics may provide valuable settings for implementing deprescribing interventions. The addition of a multidisciplinary team including a pharmacist and the use of validated medication assessment tools appear to be enablers. Further research is warranted.

Physiopathology of Phosphate Disorders

Intracellular phosphate is critical for cellular processes such as signaling, nucleic acid synthesis, and membrane function. Extracellular phosphate (Pi) is an important component of the skeleton. Normal levels of serum phosphate are maintained by the coordinated actions of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, parathyroid hormone and fibroblast growth factor-23, which intersect in the proximal tubule to control the reabsorption of phosphate via the sodium-phosphate cotransporters Npt2a and Npt2c. Furthermore, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 participates in the regulation of dietary phosphate absorption in the small intestine. Clinical manifestations associated with abnormal serum phosphate levels are common and occur as a result of genetic or acquired conditions affecting phosphate homeostasis. For example, chronic hypophosphatemia leads to osteomalacia in adults and rickets in children. Acute severe hypophosphatemia can affect multiple organs leading to rhabdomyolysis, respiratory dysfunction, and hemolysis. Patients with impaired kidney function, such as those with advanced CKD, have high prevalence of hyperphosphatemia, with approximately two-thirds of patients on chronic hemodialysis in the United States having serum phosphate levels above the recommended goal of 5.5 mg/dL, a cutoff associated with excess risk of cardiovascular complications. Furthermore, patients with advanced kidney disease and hyperphosphatemia (>6.5 mg/dL) have almost one-third excess risk of death than those with phosphate levels between 2.4 and 6.5 mg/dL. Given the complex mechanisms that regulate phosphate levels, the interventions to treat the various diseases associated with hypophosphatemia or hyperphosphatemia rely on the understanding of the underlying pathobiological mechanisms governing each patient condition.

Health Economic Benefits of Introducing Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide in the Treatment of Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease under Dialysis in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Hyperphosphatemia is an electrolyte disorder highly prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis (HD) that usually requires treatment with oral phosphate binders (PBs). Sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SO) is a calcium-free, iron-based PB indicated for the control of serum phosphorus. In the real-world setting, SO has shown clinical effectiveness with a lower pill burden and has also been associated with reduced hospital admission rates. This study aims to assess the potential economic benefits resulting from the introduction of SO to the health-care setting of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). An economic analysis using data from a retrospective real-world study that compared HD patients with uninterrupted SO prescriptions with patients who discontinued SO and switched to other PBs (oPBs). Annual drug costs for the estimated PB-eligible population in KSA were quantified. Costs per responder were estimated for all treatments. Hospital admissions' incidence rates were converted into annual inpatient cost savings and were deducted from drug costs to estimate the annual economic effect of SO versus oPBs. Sensitivity and breakeven analyses were also conducted. The eligible population for PB therapy in KSA was estimated at n = 14,748. Treating therapy-eligible populations exclusively with SO was estimated to generate annual inpatient cost-savings of SAR 107.4-119.4 million compared to treating the population with oPBs. The estimated economic effect signified overall annual savings ranging from SAR 82.8 to SAR 94.8 million when the population is treated with SO. Sensitivity analyses showed persistent cost savings. The estimated benefit-cost ratios showed that for every SAR 1 spent on SO, the expected return on investment was SAR 4.4-4.9. SO is an effective therapy that may result in substantial cost savings from reducing hospital admission costs that are attributable to hyperphosphatemia among HD patients.

"What matters to you?": The relevance of patient priorities in dialysis care for assessment and clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Dialysis patients are confronted with numerous, complex problems, which make it difficult to identify individual patient's most prominent problems. The objectives of this study were to (1) identify dialysis patients' most prominent problems from a patient perspective and (2) to calculate disease-specific norms for questionnaires measuring these problems.

METHODS

One hundred seventy-five patients treated with hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis completed a priority list on several domains of functioning (e.g., physical health, mental health, social functioning, and daily activities) and a set of matching questionnaires assessing patient functioning on these domains. Patient priorities were assessed by calculating the importance ranking of each domain on the priority list. Subsequently, disease-specific norm scores were calculated for all questionnaires, both for the overall sample and stratified by patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Fatigue was listed as patients' most prominent problem. Priorities differed between male and female patients, younger and older patients, and home and center dialysis patients, which was also reflected in their scores on the corresponding domains of functioning. Therefore, next to general norm scores, we calculated corrections to the general norms to take account of patient characteristics (i.e., sex, age, and dialysis type).

CONCLUSIONS

Results highlight the importance of having attention for the specific priorities and needs of each individual patient. Adequate disease-specific, norm-based assessment is not only necessary for diagnostic procedures but is an essential element of patient-centered care: It will help to better understand and respect individual patient needs and tailor treatment accordingly.

Pill-Burden and its Association with Treatment Burden among Patients with Advanced Stages of Chronic Kidney Disease

Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with multimorbidity and high treatment burden. Pill-burden is one component of the overall treatment burden. However, little is known about its magnitude and contribution to the overall treatment burden among patients with advanced stages of CKD. This study aimed to quantify the magnitude of pill-burden in dialysis-dependent vs. non-dialysis-dependent advanced-stage CKD patients and its association with treatment burden.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study for the assessment of pill-burden and treatment burden among non-dialysis and hemodialysis (HD)-dependent CKD patients. Pill-burden was quantified as "number of pills/patient/week" through electronic medical record, while treatment burden was assessed using the "Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ)". Furthermore, oral and parenteral medication burden was also quantified. Data were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential analysis, including Mann - Whitney U test and two-way between groups analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Results

Among the 280 patients included in the analysis, the median (IQR) number of prescribed chronic medications was 12 (5.7) oral and 3 (2) parenteral medications. The median (IQR) pill-burden was 112 (55) pills/week. HD patients experienced higher pill-burden than non-dialysis patients [122 (61) vs. 109 (33) pills/week]; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.81). The most commonly prescribed oral medications were vitamin D (90.4%), sevelamer carbonate (65%), cinacalcet (67.5%), and statins (67.1%). Overall, patients who had high pill-burden (≥112 pills/week) had significantly higher perceived treatment burden compared to low pill-burden patients (<112 pills/week) [47(36.2) vs. 38.5(36.7); p = 0.0085]. However, two-way ANOVA showed that dialysis status is the significant contributor to the treatment-burden in the high overall pill-burden group (p < 0.01), the high oral-medication-burden group (p < 0.01), and the high parenteral-medication-burden group (p = 0.004).

Conclusions

Patients with advanced CKD experienced a high pill-burden, which increases the treatment burden; however, the dialysis status of the patient is the main factor affecting the overall treatment burden. Future intervention studies should target this population with an aim to reduce polypharmacy, pill-burden, and treatment burden, which may ultimately improve CKD patients' quality of life.

Identification of Prescribing Patterns in Hemodialysis Outpatients Taking Multiple Medications

We investigated the relationship between multidrug administration and the characteristics, pathophysiology, and drug class in outpatients with hemodialysis. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Saitama Medical University Hospital in October 2018. Multidrug administration was defined as receiving either more than six drugs or more than the median number of drugs. The drugs used were represented by their anatomical classification codes in the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemistry Classification System (ATC classification). A latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify clusters at risk of receiving multiple medications. A stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed to select ATC classifications prone to being involved in multidrug administration. As of October 2018, 98 outpatients with hemodialysis were enrolled in the study. In the LCA, when diabetes was the main primary disease, oral hypoglycemic agents available to dialysis patients were limited, but the number of drugs administered was large. Old age, poor nourishment, a long history of dialysis, and chronic nephritis were associated with multidrug administration among nondiabetic patients. In the second level of the ATC classification, the drugs frequently used were coded A02 (drugs for acid-related disorders), A07 (antidiarrheal agents, intestinal anti-inflammatory/anti-infective agents), B01 (antithrombotic agents), and N05 (psycholeptics). The prescribing patterns for either diabetic patients or nondiabetic elderly patients were identified in outpatients with hemodialysis taking multiple medications, and drugs for acid-related disorders, antidiarrheal agents, intestinal anti-inflammatory/anti-infective agents, antithrombotic agents, and psycholeptics are frequently used in those patients.