Training the next generation of nephrologists

Apheresis medicine education during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic introduced challenges and disruption across healthcare, including apheresis medicine (AM). In this study, we report findings from a survey conducted among American Society for Apheresis Physician Committee (ASFA-PC) members to describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on AM education practices.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A voluntary, anonymous, 24-question, institutional review board-approved survey regarding AM teaching during the pandemic was distributed to ASFA-PC members in the United States between December 1, 2020, and December 15, 2020. Descriptive analyses were reported as number and frequency of respondents for each question. Free text responses were summarized.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 14/31 (45%) of ASFA-PC members, of whom 12 practiced at academic institutions. Among these, 11/12 (92%) transitioned to virtual platform for AM trainee conferences during the pandemic. A variety of resources were employed to support independent AM learning. While 7/12 (58%) respondents did not change the informed consent process for AM procedures, others delegated this process or introduced remote alternatives. The most common method respondents used to conduct AM patient rounding was a hybrid in-person/virtual model.

CONCLUSION

This survey describes the adaptations and changes AM practitioners made to trainee education in response to the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. The transition to virtual and/or hybrid trainee learning and AM rounds underscores the importance of digital AM resources. Further study of the effects of the pandemic and its impact on AM trainee education, as well as patient care is warranted.

The Landscape of Diabetic Kidney Disease in the United States

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purposes of this review are to identify population characteristics of important risk factors for the development and progression of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) in the United States and to discuss barriers and opportunities to improve awareness, management, and outcomes in patients with DKD.

RECENT FINDINGS

The major risk factors for the development and progression of DKD include hyperglycemia, hypertension, and albuminuria. DKD disproportionately affects minorities and individuals with low educational and socioeconomic status. Barriers to effective management of DKD include the following: (a) limited patient and healthcare provider awareness of DKD, (b) lack of timely referrals of patients to a nephrologist, (c) low patient healthcare literacy, and (d) insufficient access to healthcare and health insurance. Increased patient and physician awareness of DKD has been shown to enhance patient outcomes. Multifactorial and multidisciplinary interventions targeting multiple risk factors and patient/physician education may provide better outcomes in patients with DKD.

Enhancing Nephrology Career Interest through the ASN Kidney TREKS Program

The Kidney Tutored Research and Education for Kidney Students (TREKS) Program is a product of the American Society of Nephrology (ASN) Workforce Committee that seeks to connect medical and graduate students to nephrology. This program starts with a weeklong camp-like course introducing participants to renal physiology through classic and modern experiments. Next, each student is matched with a nephrology mentor at his or her home institution to foster a better understanding of a nephrology career. Lastly, the students are encouraged to participate in scholarly activities and attend the ASN Kidney Week. Now in its third year, with a total of 84 participants, survey data suggest early success of the program, with a self-reported 40% increased interest in nephrology fellowship and/or research careers. In addition, students give high ratings to the course components and mentorship pairings. Continued student tracking will be necessary to determine the long-term program effect.

Training the next generation's nephrology workforce

The subspecialty of nephrology faces several critical challenges, including declining interest among medical students and internal medicine residents and worrisome declines in the number of applicants for nephrology fellowships. There is an urgent need to more clearly define the subspecialty and its scope of practice, reinvigorate meaningful research training and activities among trainees, and ensure that fellows who complete training and enter the practice of nephrology are experts in the broad scope of nephrology. This need requires a critical look at fellowship training programs and training requirements. A new workforce analysis is also needed that is not focused on primarily meeting estimated future clinical needs but rather, ensuring that there is alignment of supply and demand for nephrology trainees, which will ensure that those entering nephrology fellowships are highly qualified and capable of becoming outstanding nephrologists and that there are desirable employment opportunities for them when they complete their training.

How we make nephrology easier to learn: computer-based modules at the point-of-care

BACKGROUND

Novel educational tools, such as case-based learning in a web-based module format, are an effective approach to teaching clinical concepts to medical trainees, especially if the situations are clinically relevant and the intervention is delivered at the point-of-care. Though studies have evaluated the effectiveness of point-of-care reference materials, limited literature addresses active web-based interventions designed for completion at the point-of-care.

AIMS

By taking advantage of existing technological resources and integrating an effective learning modality into the clinical environment, we can increase trainee understanding of high-yield topics in clinical nephrology.

METHODS

We designed interactive, case-based computer-based modules in Principles of Dialysis, Hyponatremia, and Acid-Base abnormalities, with interwoven multiple-choice and free text questions with immediate feedback, supplemental practice questions, and enrichment material to be completed in the clinical environment. All medicine trainees at an urban, academic institution were invited to participate in a needs assessment, pre and post knowledge tests, and module completion.

RESULTS

Most trainees believed the modules were "very" or "extremely helpful" in understanding the selected topic and that they would likely change their clinical practice. Those who completed the modules performed better on a post-intervention knowledge assessment. Free-text feedback was overwhelmingly supportive of the modules.

CONCLUSION

Our findings confirmed that a novel, simplified approach to renal content by making it readily applicable to a clinical context and available at the point-of-care improves trainee understanding of high-yield topics in nephrology.

A Spanish multicentric study to evaluate the clinical activity of nephrology fellows during in-hospital on-call shifts

BACKGROUND

Nephrologists develop their work in diverse scenarios. A training programme must qualify trainees to assist different kinds of problems. The aim of this study was to characterize patients and pathologies that Spanish nephrology fellows face while on-call.

METHODS

This is a descriptive study with clinical and demographic data gathered with a form by 10 nephrology fellows of five university hospitals of Madrid (Spain), throughout their in-hospital 24 h on-call shifts in February and March 2013.

RESULTS

We collected 409 episodes over 338 patients, through 72 shifts. Among these, 16.7% had previous normal renal function, 24.6% chronic kidney disease, 39.5% were on dialysis and 18.2% had a kidney transplant. Most of the consults came from the emergency room (35.9%) or the previous on-call team (13.7%). Afterwards, the most usual destiny was admittance to a nephrology department (32.8%) or discharge (20.5%). The most frequent reason for consulting was a decline in renal function (31.6%) and the second motive an infection. Thirty-four episodes (8.3%) were related to dialysis access problems. Medical treatment was prescribed in 79.2% of the cases, primarily fluids (47.2%) and antibiotics (42.2%). The fellow had to place a central venous catheter in 24 cases (5.9%). Renal replacement therapy was prescribed in 19.8% of the episodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific renal reasons for consulting nephrologists are common, such as acute kidney injury or dialysis access complications. These patients benefit from a specialized approach to their problems. Clinical activities during in-hospital out-of-hours shifts are a priceless tool as part of the training programme of nephrology fellows.

Enhancing interest in nephrology careers during medical residency

Promoting interest in nephrology as a career is vital to sustain a workforce adequate to meet the projected demand for nephrologists. The educational experiences that internal medicine residents have may play an important role in influencing such choices, and attempts to enrich such experiences could prove a useful strategy to help facilitate interest in careers in nephrology. Like many electives, nephrology rotations typically consist of activities heavily weighted toward inpatient care. This type of elective is unlikely to provide a representative exposure to the breadth of nephrologists' roles and may lack sufficient mentoring opportunities. We describe an innovative design for a nephrology elective that provides residents with educational experiences in both inpatient and outpatient venues and exposure to faculty with diverse interests and areas of expertise. Our experience with this elective in comparison to a traditional inpatient-based elective suggests that the combined elective format is perceived favorably by medical residents and provides them with a better educational experience, more representative exposure to nephrology, positive mentoring experiences, and the potential for greater interest in pursuing nephrology as a career. Our findings offer the possibility that interventions at the level of medical resident education might be a means to help promote interest in careers in nephrology.