Molecular subtypes of gastrointestinal stromal tumors and their prognostic and therapeutic implications

Gene Mutations in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Advances in Treatment and Mechanism Research

Although gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) has been reported in patients of all ages, its diagnosis is more common in elders. The two most common types of mutation, receptor tyrosine kinase (KIT) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor a (PDGFRA) mutations, hold about 75 and 15% of GISTs cases, respectively. Tumors without KIT or PDGFRA mutations are known as wild type (WT)-GISTs, which takes up for 15% of all cases. WT-GISTs have other genetic alterations, including mutations of the succinate dehydrogenase and serine-threonine protein kinase BRAF and neurofibromatosis type 1. Other GISTs without any of the above genetic mutations are named "quadruple WT" GISTs. More types of rare mutations are being reported. These mutations or gene fusions were initially thought to be mutually exclusive in primary GISTs, but recently it has been reported that some of these rare mutations coexist with KIT or PDGFRA mutations. The treatment and management differ according to molecular subtypes of GISTs. Especially for patients with late-stage tumors, developing a personalized chemotherapy regimen based on mutation status is of great help to improve patient survival and quality of life. At present, imatinib mesylate is an effective first-line drug for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic recurrent GISTs, but how to overcome drug resistance is still an important clinical problem. The effectiveness of other drugs is being further evaluated. The progress in the study of relevant mechanisms also provides the possibility to develop new targets or new drugs.

Therapeutic advances of targeting receptor tyrosine kinases in cancer

Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), a category of transmembrane receptors, have gained significant clinical attention in oncology due to their central role in cancer pathogenesis. Genetic alterations, including mutations, amplifications, and overexpression of certain RTKs, are critical in creating environments conducive to tumor development. Following their discovery, extensive research has revealed how RTK dysregulation contributes to oncogenesis, with many cancer subtypes showing dependency on aberrant RTK signaling for their proliferation, survival and progression. These findings paved the way for targeted therapies that aim to inhibit crucial biological pathways in cancer. As a result, RTKs have emerged as primary targets in anticancer therapeutic development. Over the past two decades, this has led to the synthesis and clinical validation of numerous small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), now effectively utilized in treating various cancer types. In this manuscript we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of the RTKs in the context of cancer. We explored the various alterations and overexpression of specific receptors across different malignancies, with special attention dedicated to the examination of current RTK inhibitors, highlighting their role as potential targeted therapies. By integrating the latest research findings and clinical evidence, we seek to elucidate the pivotal role of RTKs in cancer biology and the therapeutic efficacy of RTK inhibition with promising treatment outcomes.

Introduction and impact of routine whole genome sequencing in the diagnosis and management of sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Sarcomas are diverse neoplasms with highly variable histological appearances in which diagnosis is often challenging and management options for metastatic/unresectable disease limited. Many sarcomas have distinctive molecular alterations, but the range of alterations is large, variable in type and rapidly increasing, meaning that testing by limited panels is unable to capture the broad spectrum of clinically pertinent genomic drivers required. Paired whole genome sequencing (WGS) in contrast allows comprehensive assessment of small variants, copy number and structural variants along with mutational signature analysis and germline testing.

METHODS

Introduction of WGS as a diagnostic standard for all eligible patients with known or suspected soft tissue sarcoma over a 2-year period at a soft tissue sarcoma treatment centre.

RESULTS

WGS resulted in a refinement in the diagnosis in 37% of cases, identification of a target for personalised therapy in 33% of cases, and a germline alteration in 4% of cases.

CONCLUSION

Introduction of WGS poses logistical and training challenges, but offers significant benefits to this group of patients.

Genomic profiling in GIST: Implications in clinical outcome and future challenges

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) are the most frequent mesenchymal neoplasia of the digestive tract. Genomic alterations in KIT, PDFGRA, SDH, and BRAF genes are essential in GIST oncogenesis. Therefore, the mutations in these genes have demonstrated clinical implications. Tumors with deletions in KIT-exon 11 or duplications in exon 9 are associated with a worse prognosis. In contrast, KIT-exon 11 substitutions and duplications are associated with a better clinical outcome. Moreover, mutations in Kit exon 9 and 11 are actionable, due to their response to imatinib, while mutations in PDGFRA respond to sunitinib and/or avapritinib. Although, molecular testing on tissue samples is effective; it is invasive, requires adequate amounts of tissue, and a long experimental process is needed for results. In contrast, liquid biopsy has been proposed as a simple and non-invasive method to test biomarkers in cancer. The most common molecule analyzed by liquid biopsy is circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). GISTs ctDNA testing has been demonstrated to be effective in identifying known and novel KIT mutations that were not detected using traditional tissue DNA testing and have been useful in determining progression risk and response to TKI therapy. This allows the clinician to have an accurate picture of the genetic changes of the tumor over time. In this work, we aimed to discuss the implications of mutational testing in clinical outcomes, the methods to test ctDNA and the future challenges in the establishment of alternatives of personalized medicine.

Efficacy and safety of ripretinib vs. sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor previously treated with imatinib: A phase 2, multicenter, randomized, open-label study in China

AIM

A bridging study of INTRIGUE study to assess the efficacy and safety of ripretinib versus sunitinib as second-line treatment in Chinese GIST patients.

METHODS

This was a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, open-label study in China. GIST patients previously treated with imatinib were randomized (1:1) to receive ripretinib 150 mg once daily (QD) by continuous dosing in 42-day cycles or sunitinib 50 mg QD in 42-day cycles (four weeks on/two weeks off). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by independent radiological review (IRR).

RESULTS

Between 6 December 2020 and 15 September 2021, 108 patients were randomized to receive ripretinib (n = 54) or sunitinib (n = 54) (all-patient [AP] intention-to-treat [ITT] population). Seventy patients had primary KIT exon 11 mutations (ripretinib, n = 35; sunitinib, n = 35; Ex11 ITT population). By data cut-off (20 July 2022), in AP ITT population, PFS by IRR was comparable between ripretinib and sunitinib arms (HR 0·99, 95 % CI 0·57, 1·69; nominal p = 0·92; median PFS [mPFS] 10·3 vs 8·3 months). In Ex11 ITT population, PFS by IRR was longer for ripretinib than sunitinib (HR 0·46, 95 % CI 0·23, 0·92; nominal p = 0·03; mPFS not reached in ripretinib arm and 4·9 months in sunitinib arm). Fewer patients experienced grade 3/4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events with ripretinib (17%) versus sunitinib (56%).

CONCLUSIONS

Ripretinib demonstrated similar efficacy and a favorable safety profile versus sunitinib as second-line treatment in Chinese GIST patients. Furthermore, ripretinib provided greater clinically meaningful benefit versus sunitinib in patients with KIT exon 11 mutation.

Sarcoma care in the era of precision medicine

Sarcoma subtype classification is currently mainly based upon histopathological morphology. Molecular analyses have emerged as an efficient addition to the diagnostic workup and sarcoma care. Knowledge about the sarcoma genome increases, and genetic events that can either support a histopathological diagnosis or suggest a differential diagnosis are identified, as well as novel therapeutic targets. In this review, we present diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic molecular markers that are, or might soon be, used clinically. For sarcoma diagnostics, there are specific fusions highly supportive or pathognomonic for a diagnostic entity-for instance, SYT::SSX in synovial sarcoma. Complex karyotypes also give diagnostic information-for example, supporting dedifferentiation rather than low-grade central osteosarcoma or well-differentiated liposarcoma when detected in combination with MDM2/CDK4 amplification. Molecular treatment predictive sarcoma markers are available for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and locally aggressive benign mesenchymal tumors. The molecular prognostic markers for sarcomas in clinical practice are few. For solitary fibrous tumor, the type of NAB2::STAT6 fusion is associated with the outcome, and the KIT/PDGFRA pathogenic variant in GISTs can give prognostic information. With the exploding availability of sequencing technologies, it becomes increasingly important to understand the strengths and limitations of those methods and their context in sarcoma diagnostics. It is reasonable to believe that most sarcoma treatment centers will increase the use of massive-parallel sequencing soon. We conclude that the context in which the genetic findings are interpreted is of importance, and the interpretation of genomic findings requires considering tumor histomorphology.

Computed tomography texture-based models for predicting KIT exon 11 mutation of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Background

KIT exon 11 mutation in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is associated with treatment strategies. However, few studies have shown the role of imaging-based texture analysis in KIT exon 11 mutation in GISTs. In this study, we aimed to show the association between computed tomography (CT)-based texture features and KIT exon 11 mutation.

Methods

Ninety-five GISTs confirmed by surgery and identified with mutational genotype of KIT were included in this study. By amplifying the samples using over-sampling technique, a total of 183 region of interest (ROI) segments were extracted from 63 patients as training cohort. The 63 new ROI segments were extracted from the 63 patients as internal validation cohort. Thirty-two patients who underwent KIT exon 11 mutation test during 2021-2023 was selected as external validation cohort. The textural parameters were evaluated both in training cohort and validation cohort. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithms and logistic regression analysis were used to select the discriminant features.

Results

Three of textural features were obtained using LASSO analysis. Logistic regression analysis showed that patients' age, tumor location and radiomics features were significantly associated with KIT exon 11 mutation (p < 0.05). A nomogram was developed based on the associated factors. The area under the curve (AUC) of clinical features, radiomics features and their combination in training cohort was 0.687 (95 % CI: 0.604-0.771), 0.829 (95 % CI: 0.768-0.890) and 0.874 (95 % CI: 0.822-0.926), respectively. The AUC of radiomics features in internal validation cohort and external cohort was 0.880 (95 % CI: 0.796-0.964) and 0.827 (95%CI: 0.667-0.987), respectively.

Conclusion

The CT texture-based model can be used to predict KIT exon 11 mutation in GISTs.

Imatinib plasma levels in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumour under routine clinical practice conditions

OBJECTIVES

Imatinib is the first therapeutic option for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Previous studies have shown an improvement in patient survival rates following the use of imatinib. Nevertheless, adequate plasma concentrations of imatinib are necessary to achieve such improvement in survival and limit the toxicity of the drug. This study aims to analyse the influence of imatinib plasma concentrations on efficacy and safety in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumour.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This descriptive, multicentre study analysed plasma levels of imatinib in patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumour in the period 2019-2020. An optimal therapeutic range of 750-1500 ng/mL was established for the patient stratification based on their minimum plasma concentrations measured at the steady state.

RESULTS

This study included 11 patients with metastatic disease in total, among whom only 54.5% (n  =  6) had a minimum plasma concentrations measured at the steady state value within the therapeutic range. A median progression-free survival of 7.0 months was recorded for those patients with minimum plasma concentrations measured at the steady state < 750 ng/mL, while that median progression-free survival value remained unachieved for the group with minimum plasma concentrations measured at the steady state > 750 ng/mL (p  =  0.005). The toxicity rate was 25% and 14.3% for patients with minimum plasma concentrations measured at the steady state > 1500 ng/mL and minimum plasma concentrations measured at the steady state ≤1500 ng/mL, respectively (p  =  0.66).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study aims to describe the correlation between the toxicity and effectiveness of imatinib as a function of minimum plasma concentrations measured at the steady state under routine clinical practice conditions. The results described here show the usefulness of imatinib plasma concentrations monitoring as part of the standard daily routine in our hospitals.

Local treatment in metastatic GIST patients: A multicentre analysis from the Dutch GIST Registry

BACKGROUND

The added value of local treatment in selected metastatic GIST patients is unclear. This study aims to provide insight into the usefulness of local treatment in metastatic GIST by use of a survey study and retrospective analyses in a clinical database.

METHODS

A survey study was conducted among clinical specialists to select most relevant characteristics of metastatic GIST patients considered for local treatment, defined as elective surgery or ablation. Patients were selected from the Dutch GIST Registry. A multivariate Cox-regression model for overall survival since time of diagnosis of metastatic disease was estimated with local treatment as a time-dependent variable. An additional model was estimated to assess prognostic factors since local treatment.

RESULTS

The survey's response rate was 14/16. Performance status, response to TKIs, location of active disease, number of lesions, mutation status, and time between primary diagnosis and metastases, were regarded the 6 most important characteristics. Of 457 included patients, 123 underwent local treatment, which was associated with better survival after diagnosis of metastases (HR = 0.558, 95%CI = 0.336-0.928). Progressive disease during systemic treatment (HR = 3.885, 95%CI = 1.195-12.627) and disease confined to the liver (HR = 0.269, 95%CI = 0.082-0.880) were associated with worse and better survival after local treatment, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Local treatment is associated with better survival in selected patients with metastatic GIST. Locally treated patients with response to TKIs and disease confined to the liver have good clinical outcome. These results might be considered for tailoring treatment, but should be interpreted with care because only specific patients are provided with local treatment in this retrospective study.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours (GISTs) with KRAS Mutation: A Rare but Important Subset of GISTs

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumours of the GI tract, usually found in the stomach, jejunum, and ileum. Typically, they are KIT or PDGFR-mutated, allowing for targetable treatments with tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as imatinib. Here, we present two KRAS-mutated wild-type gastrointestinal tumours (GISTs). Both cases occurred in the small bowel of females. Immunohistochemical studies on both tumours showed KIT and DOG-1 positivity, with SDHB retained. Molecular analysis revealed a KRAS G12D mutation and a KRAS G13D mutation, respectively. Wild-type GISTs are extremely uncommon. They typically occur in the stomach or the small bowel. KRAS is one of the genes implicated in this subset of GIST, with KRAS G12D being the most frequently encountered mutation. GIST KRAS mutations can arise alone or in conjunction with KIT, PDFRA, or BRAF mutations. Identification of these rare molecular subtypes is clinically important due to their resistance to imatinib therapy.

Microvessel density in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are considered the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Microvessel density (MVD) constitutes a direct method of vascularity quantification and has been associated with survival rates in multiple malignancies.

AIM

To appraise the effect of MVD on the survival of patients with GIST.

METHODS

This study adhered to Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Electronic scholar databases and grey literature repositories were systematically screened. The Fixed Effects or Random Effects models were used according to the Cochran Q test.

RESULTS

In total, 6 eligible studies were identified. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) for disease free survival (DFS) was 8.52 (95%CI: 1.69-42.84, P = 0.009). The odds ratios of disease-free survival between high and low MVD groups at 12 and 60 mo did not reach statistical significance. Significant superiority of the low MVD group in terms of DFS was documented at 36 and 120 mo (OR: 8.46, P < 0.0001 and OR: 22.71, P = 0.0003, respectively) as well as at metastases rate (OR: 0.11, P = 0.0003).

CONCLUSION

MVD significantly correlates with the HR of DFS and overall survival rates at 36 and 120 mo. Further prospective studies of higher methodological quality are required.

Long-term response to pimitespib in postoperative recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors with PDGFRA D842V mutation: a case report

BACKGROUND

Exon 18 D842V, which is a point mutation from aspartic acid to valine at codon 842, is the most frequent mutation in Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor alpha (PDGFRA)-mutated gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). In the Japanese GIST guidelines, no standard systematic therapy is available for this type of GIST, which is refractory after recurrence. Recently, pimitespib (PIMI), a novel heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitor, was approved for the treatment of advanced GIST in a phase III study. This report presents a case of a long-term response to PIMI in GIST with PDGFRA D842V mutation.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 55-year-old woman was diagnosed with primary GIST of the stomach and underwent partial gastrectomy. Eight years after the operation, recurrent GISTs were identified as multiple recurrent peritoneal GISTs in the upper right abdomen and pelvic cavity. We administered tyrosine kinase inhibitors, but they achieved poor effects. After failure of the standard treatment, PIMI was administered and achieved a partial response in the patient. The highest reduction rate was 32.7%. After PIMI failed, we performed multiplex gene panel testing, which revealed the PDGFRA D842V mutation.

CONCLUSIONS

We report the first case of long-term response to PIMI in PDGFRA D842V mutant GIST. Pimitespib may be effective for treating GIST harboring this mutation by inhibiting HSP90.

Emerging Targeted Therapeutic Strategies to Overcome Imatinib Resistance of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common malignant mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. The gold standard for the diagnosis of GISTs is morphologic analysis with an immunohistochemical evaluation plus genomic profiling to assess the mutational status of lesions. The majority of GISTs are driven by gain-of-function mutations in the proto-oncogene c-KIT encoding the tyrosine kinase receptor (TKR) known as KIT and in the platelet-derived growth factor-alpha receptor (PDGFRA) genes. Approved therapeutics are orally available as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting KIT and/or PDGFRA oncogenic activation. Among these, imatinib has changed the management of patients with unresectable or metastatic GISTs, improving their survival time and delaying disease progression. Nevertheless, the majority of patients with GISTs experience disease progression after 2-3 years of imatinib therapy due to the development of secondary KIT mutations. Today, based on the identification of new driving oncogenic mutations, targeted therapy and precision medicine are regarded as the new frontiers for GISTs. This article reviews the most important mutations in GISTs and highlights their importance in the current understanding and treatment options of GISTs, with an emphasis on the most recent clinical trials.

Clinicopathological and mutational characteristics of primary double mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a single center study with review of the literature

AIMS

Primary double KIT/PDGFRA mutations are very rare in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) but have not been comprehensively studied to date. In the present study, we investigated the clinicopathologic and genetic features of eight cases of primary double-mutant GISTs, and we reviewed the literature.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The tumours occurred in six males and two females (age range 57-83 years) and involved the small intestine (n = 4), stomach (n = 2), rectum (n = 1) and retroperitoneum (n = 1). Clinical manifestations were variable, ranging from indolent (no symptoms) to aggressive disease (tumour rupture and haemorrhage). All patients underwent surgical excision, and six of them were treated with imatinib. No one experienced recurrence or other complications during the follow-up time (10 to 61 months). Histologically, all the tumours exhibited mixed cell types, accompanied by variable interstitial changes. KIT mutations were detected in all cases, and the majority of them were present in different exons (n = 5). No PDGFRA exon 12, 14 or 18 mutations were found. All the mutations were validated by next-generation sequencing, and two additional variants with comparatively low allelic fractions were identified in one case. Two of the cases had available allele distribution data, one with an in cis compound mutation and the other with an in trans compound mutation.

CONCLUSION

Primary double-mutant GISTs have distinctive clinicopathologic and mutational features. Studies of more cases are necessary for a better understanding of these tumours.

Rectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare types of tumors, but the incidence is increasing, and we now know more about the pathogenesis and management of rectal GIST. The main goal is to resect the tumor with negative microscopic margins. With the development of neoadjuvant Imatinib therapy, preoperative reduction in tumor size has become possible, thus introducing the chance for anus-preserving surgery, with better quality of life. We present a case of a 55-year-old female who presented to the emergency department with complaints of bleeding per rectum, abdominal pain, and pain on defecation. A 6-cm mass was detected during the rectal examination and a biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of GIST. The patient was given neoadjuvant imatinib chemotherapy for four months followed by trans-anal resection of the mass. The procedure was done successfully, and she received further adjuvant imatinib for a course of three years. Follow-up by magnetic resonance imaging and a colonoscopy after two years showed no recurrence. The patient is living healthily and doing well.

Molecular Mechanisms of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors and Their Impact on Systemic Therapy Decision

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are soft tissue sarcomas that mostly derive from Cajal cell precursors. They are by far the most common soft tissue sarcomas. Clinically, they present as gastrointestinal malignancies, most often with bleeding, pain, or intestinal obstruction. They are identified using characteristic immunohistochemical staining for CD117 and DOG1. Improved understanding of the molecular biology of these tumors and identification of oncogenic drivers have altered the systemic treatment of primarily disseminated disease, which is becoming increasingly complex. Gain-of-function mutations in KIT or PDGFRA genes represent the driving mutations in more than 90% of all GISTs. These patients exhibit good responses to targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Gastrointestinal stromal tumors lacking the KIT/PDGFRA mutations, however, represent distinct clinico-pathological entities with diverse molecular mechanisms of oncogenesis. In these patients, therapy with TKIs is hardly ever as effective as for KIT/PDGFRA-mutated GISTs. This review provides an outline of current diagnostics aimed at identifying clinically relevant driver alterations and a comprehensive summary of current treatments with targeted therapies for patients with GISTs in both adjuvant and metastatic settings. The role of molecular testing and the selection of the optimal targeted therapy according to the identified oncogenic driver are reviewed and some future directions are proposed.

Metabolomic and transcriptomic response to imatinib treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumour in xenograft-bearing mice

BACKGROUND

Although imatinib is a well-established first-line drug for treating a vast majority of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST), GISTs acquire secondary resistance during therapy. Multi-omics approaches provide an integrated perspective to empower the development of personalised therapies through a better understanding of functional biology underlying the disease and molecular-driven selection of the best-targeted individualised therapy. In this study, we applied integrative metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses to elucidate tumour biochemical processes affected by imatinib treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A GIST xenograft mouse model was used in the study, including 10 mice treated with imatinib and 10 non-treated controls. Metabolites in tumour extracts were analysed using gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS). RNA sequencing was also performed on the samples subset (n=6).

RESULTS

Metabolomic analysis revealed 21 differentiating metabolites, whereas next-generation RNA sequencing data analysis resulted in 531 differentially expressed genes. Imatinib significantly changed the profile of metabolites associated mainly with purine and pyrimidine metabolism, butanoate metabolism, as well as alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism. The related changes in transcriptomic profiles included genes involved in kinase activity and immune responses, as well as supported its impact on the purine biosynthesis pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

Our multi-omics study confirmed previously known pathways involved in imatinib anticancer activity as well as correlated imatinib-relevant downregulation of expression of purine biosynthesis pathway genes with the reduction of respectful metabolites. Furthermore, considering the importance of the purine biosynthesis pathway for cancer proliferation, we identified a potentially novel mechanism for the anti-tumour activity of imatinib. Based on the results, we hypothesise metabolic modulations aiming at the reduction in purine and pyrimidine pool may ensure higher imatinib efficacy or re-sensitise imatinib-resistant tumours.

Insights into the medical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours: lessons learnt from a dedicated gastrointestinal stromal tumour clinic in North India

Background

The advent of molecular driver alterations has brought in a revolutionary transformation in the treatment landscape of gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST). However, there is a paucity of data regarding mutational testing prevalence and associated outcomes from India.

Methods

It was a retrospective study. We reviewed the case records of all patients diagnosed with GIST in a tertiary care centre from 2015 to 2021. The clinicopathological, mutational analysis and treatment plans were recorded. The study cohort was characterised by descriptive statistics.

Results

Our study included 120 patients with a median age of 53 years (range: 28-77), with a male preponderance of 2:1. The most common site of the primary was the stomach (50%), followed by the small intestine (37%), with 55.8% of the patients having disseminated disease at presentation with a predominance of liver metastasis (67%). The prevalence of mutational analysis among patients prior to referral was 4%. 60.8% of the patients at our clinic had mutational analysis performed, and unavailability of analysis in the rest was due to financial constraints (12.5%), exhaustion of tissue (7.5%), reluctance to repeat biopsy (4.1%) and low-risk patients. We report c-kit in the majority (52%), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) in 19.2% and wild type in 16.4% along with the rarer subtypes: succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient GIST in 10.9% and Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusion in 1.3%. Four of the eight SDH-deficient GIST patients had germline mutations (50%). The knowledge of driver mutations led to a change of treatment in 39.7% (29/73), i.e. stoppage of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in 3, switch of TKI in 23, increase in TKI dose in 2 and upfront surgery in 1. The most common change was the use of sunitinib and regorafenib in patients with SDH-deficient GIST.

Conclusion

Our study is one of the largest comprehensive series describing the clinical and mutational profile of GIST from India. The mutation testing rates at primary care centres continue to be low. Despite the hurdles, a large percentage of our patients underwent molecular testing, aiding in therapeutic decision-making.

Patient-reported outcomes in individuals with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated with ripretinib in the fourth-line setting: analysis from the phase 3 INVICTUS trial

BACKGROUND

Ripretinib is a novel switch-control kinase inhibitor that inhibits KIT and PDGFRA signaling. In the INVICTUS phase 3 trial, ripretinib increased median progression-free survival and prolonged overall survival vs. placebo in ≥ fourth-line advanced GIST. Here, we report prespecified analysis of quality of life (QoL) as assessed by patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and an exploratory analysis evaluating the impact of alopecia on QoL.

METHODS

In the INVICTUS trial (NCT03353753), QoL was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30; physical function, role function, overall health, and overall QoL) and the EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5 L; visual analogue scale). Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models compared changes in scores from baseline to treatment cycle 2, day 1 within and between ripretinib and placebo. Within the ripretinib arm, repeated measures models assessed the impact of alopecia on QoL.

RESULTS

Patients receiving ripretinib maintained QoL (as assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5 L PRO measures) from baseline to cycle 2, day 1 whereas QoL declined with placebo, resulting in clinically significant differences between treatments (nominal P < 0.01). The most common treatment-emergent adverse event with ripretinib was alopecia; however, QoL was similarly maintained out to treatment cycle 10, day 1 in patients receiving ripretinib who developed alopecia and those who did not.

CONCLUSION

PRO assessments in the INVICTUS trial suggest that patients on ripretinib maintain their QoL out to C2D1, unlike patients receiving placebo. Longitudinal QoL was maintained for patients receiving ripretinib out to cycle 10, day 1 (approximately 8 months; past the point of median progression-free survival with ripretinib [6.3 months]), even if the patients developed alopecia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03353753 ; first posted: November 27, 2017.

Ripretinib Versus Sunitinib in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor After Treatment With Imatinib (INTRIGUE): A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial

PURPOSE

Sunitinib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is approved for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) after imatinib failure. Ripretinib is a switch-control TKI approved for advanced GIST after prior treatment with three or more TKIs, including imatinib. We compared efficacy and safety of ripretinib versus sunitinib in patients with advanced GIST who were previously treated with imatinib (INTRIGUE, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03673501).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Random assignment was 1:1 to once-daily ripretinib 150 mg or once-daily sunitinib 50 mg (4 weeks on/2 weeks off) and stratified by KIT/platelet-derived growth factor α mutation and imatinib intolerance. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by independent radiologic review using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary end points included objective response rate by independent radiologic review, safety, and patient-reported outcome measures.

RESULTS

Overall, 453 patients were randomly assigned to ripretinib (intention-to-treat [ITT], n = 226; KIT exon 11 ITT, n = 163) or sunitinib (ITT, n = 227; KIT exon 11 ITT, n = 164). Median PFS for ripretinib and sunitinib (KIT exon 11 ITT) was 8.3 and 7.0 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.16; P = .36); median PFS (ITT) was 8.0 and 8.3 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.33; nominal P = .72). Neither was statistically significant. Objective response rate was higher for ripretinib versus sunitinib in the KIT exon 11 ITT population (23.9% v 14.6%, nominal P = .03). Ripretinib was associated with a more favorable safety profile, fewer grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (41.3% v 65.6%, nominal P < .0001), and better scores on patient-reported outcome measures of tolerability.

CONCLUSION

Ripretinib was not superior to sunitinib in terms of PFS. However, meaningful clinical activity, fewer grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events, and improved tolerability were observed with ripretinib.

Effects of CYP3A Inhibition, CYP3A Induction, and Gastric Acid Reduction on the Pharmacokinetics of Ripretinib, a Switch Control KIT Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor

Ripretinib is a switch control KIT kinase inhibitor approved for treatment of adults with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors who received prior treatment with 3 or more kinase inhibitors, including imatinib. Ripretinib and its active metabolite (DP-5439) are cleared mainly via cytochrome P450 enzyme 3A4/5 (CYP3A4/5), and ripretinib solubility is pH-dependent, thus the drug-drug interaction potentials of ripretinib with itraconazole (strong CYP3A inhibitor), rifampin (strong CYP3A inducer), and pantoprazole (proton pump inhibitor) were each evaluated in open-label, fixed-sequence study designs. Overall, 20 participants received ripretinib 50 mg alone and with itraconazole 200 mg once daily, 24 participants received ripretinib 100 mg alone and with rifampin 600 mg once daily, and 25 participants received ripretinib 50 mg alone and with pantoprazole 40 mg once daily. Ripretinib exposure increased with concomitant itraconazole, with geometric least-squares (LS) mean ratios of ripretinib area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to ∞ (AUC_0-∞ ) and maximum observed concentration (C_max ) of 199% and 136%. Ripretinib exposure decreased with concomitant rifampin: geometric LS mean ratios for ripretinib AUC_0-∞ and C_max were 39% and 82%. Pantoprazole coadministration had no effect on ripretinib pharmacokinetics. No unexpected safety signals occurred. No dose adjustment is required for ripretinib coadministered with gastric acid reducers and strong CYP3A inhibitors; patients also receiving strong CYP3A inhibitors should be monitored more frequently for adverse reactions. Concomitant ripretinib use with strong CYP3A inducers should be avoided. Prescribers should refer to approved labeling for specific dose recommendations with concomitant use of strong and moderate CYP3A inducers.

Advances in the research of the mechanism of secondary resistance to imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. At present, surgery is the first-line treatment for primary resectable GISTs; however, the recurrence rate is high. Imatinib mesylate (IM) is an effective first-line drug used for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic recurrent GISTs. More than 80% of patients with GISTs show significantly improved 5-year survival after treatment; however, approximately 50% of patients develop drug resistance after 2 years of IM treatment. Therefore, an in-depth research is urgently needed to reveal the mechanisms of secondary resistance to IM in patients with GISTs and to develop new therapeutic targets and regimens to improve their long-term prognoses. In this review, research on the mechanisms of secondary resistance to IM conducted in the last 5 years is discussed and summarized from the aspects of abnormal energy metabolism, gene mutations, non-coding RNA, and key proteins. Studies have shown that different drug-resistance mechanism networks are closely linked and interconnected. However, the influence of these drug-resistance mechanisms has not been compared. The combined inhibition of drug-resistance mechanisms with IM therapy and the combined inhibition of multiple drug-resistance mechanisms are expected to become new therapeutic options in the treatment of GISTs. In addition, implementing individualized therapies based on the identification of resistance mechanisms will provide new adjuvant treatment options for patients with IM-resistant GISTs, thereby delaying the progression of GISTs. Previous studies provide theoretical support for solving the problems of drug-resistance mechanisms. However, most studies on drug-resistance mechanisms are still in the research stage. Further clinical studies are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of the inhibition of drug-resistance mechanisms as a potential therapeutic target.

Correlation of treatment outcome in sanger/RT‑qPCR KIT/PDGFRA wild‑type metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors with next‑generation sequencing results: A single‑center report

In patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), it has become mandatory to determine the driver mutation in order to predict the response to standard treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). A total of 10–15% of all GIST lack activating mutations in KIT proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase (KIT)/platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) and have been classified as KIT/PDGFRA wild-type (WT) GIST. They are characterized by poor response to TKI. From a group of 119 metastatic GIST patients, 17 patients with KIT/PDGFRA/BRAF WT GIST as determined by reverse transcription-quantitative (RT-q) PCR and Sanger sequencing were profiled by a targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach and their treatment outcome was assessed. In the present study, 41.2% of patients as KIT/PDGFRA/BRAF WT GIST examined with RT-qPCR and Sanger sequencing were confirmed to be carriers of pathogenic KIT/PDGFRA mutations by NGS and were responsive to TKI. The percentage of genuinely KIT/PDGFRA WT GIST in the present study thereby dropped from the initial 14.3% detected with the RT-qPCR and Sanger sequencing to 7.6% after NGS. Their outcome was universally poor. The reliability of RT-qPCR and direct Sanger sequencing results in this setting is therefore insufficient and it is recommended that NGS becomes a requirement for treatment decision at least in KIT/PDGFRA/BRAF WT GIST as determined by RT-qPCR and Sanger sequencing.

An overview of agents and treatments for PDGFRA-mutated gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Platelet-derived growth factor receptor A (PDGFRA) mutations occur in approximately 10-15% of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). These tumors with PDGFRA mutations have a different pathogenesis, clinical characteristics, and treatment response compared to tumors with receptor tyrosine kinase protein (KIT) mutations (60-70%). Many clinical studies have investigated the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors mainly in patients with KIT mutations; however, there is a lack of attention to the PDGFRA-mutated molecular subtype. The main effective inhibitors of PDGFRA are ripretinib, avapritinib, and crenolanib, and their mechanisms and efficacy in GIST (as confirmed in clinical trials) are described in this review. Some multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors with inhibitory effects on this molecular subtype are also introduced and summarized in this paper. This review focuses on PDGFRA-mutated GISTs, introduces their clinical characteristics, downstream molecular signaling pathways, and existing resistance mechanisms. We focus on the most recent literature that describes the development of PDGFRA inhibitors and their use in clinical trials, as well as the potential benefits from different combination therapy strategies.

Efficacy of SCF drug conjugate targeting c-KIT in gastrointestinal stromal tumor

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a rare type of cancer that occurs in the gastrointestinal tract. The majority of GIST cases carry oncogenic forms of KIT, the receptor for stem cell factor (SCF). Small molecule kinase inhibitor imatinib is effective in prolonging the survival of GIST patients by targeting KIT. However, drug resistance often develops during the therapeutic treatment. Here, we produced a SCF-emtansine drug conjugate (SCF-DM1) with favorable drug efficacy towards GIST cells.

METHODS

Recombinant human SCF (rhSCF) was expressed in E. coli cells and further purified with Ni-NTA Sepharose and Phenyl Sepharose. It was then conjugated with DM1, and the conjugated product SCF-DM1 was evaluated using in vitro cell-based assays and in vivo xenograft mouse model.

RESULTS

SCF-DM1 was effective in inhibiting imatinib-sensitive and -resistant GIST cell lines and primary tumor cells, with IC₅₀ values of < 30 nM. It induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in GIST cells. In xenograft mouse model, SCF-DM1 showed favorable efficacy and safety profiles.

CONCLUSIONS

rhSCF is a convenient and effective vector for drug delivery to KIT positive GIST cells. SCF-DM1 is an effective drug candidate to treat imatinib-sensitive and -resistant GIST.

GIST: Correlation of risk classifications and outcome

In clinical practice, there are often discrepancies between the oncological prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) and the actual clinical course. This study aimed to check with our collective how reliably the current classifications (Miettinen, Fletcher) predict the prognosis of GIST and to evaluate whether an extension of the classifications by the parameter proliferation activity could make sense. This prospective study enrolled 58 patients who underwent surgery on GIST from 01/2006 to 12/2016. The postoperative course (curation, recurrence, progress) was correlated with the identified risk classification and the proliferative activity. Coincidences with other tumors were strikingly common in patients with GIST (43%). Based on the risk group assignment of GIST, no assessment of the probability of the occurrence of second neoplasia could be derived. Individual patients were under- or over-graduated concerning the assessment of biological behavior based on the standard risk classifications. The inclusion of proliferative activity did not allow for a more precise predictive power - neither to the risk of recurrence and metastasis nor to the development of a second neoplasia. The study showed that there is currently no parameter or logarithm that reliably predicts the biological behavior of GIST. Due to the frequency of coincidence of second neoplasia and (rare) distant metastases, for everyday clinical practice, appropriate staging diagnostic and regular follow-up care should also be used for benign GIST.

Ripretinib in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an overview of current evidence and drug approval

Over the past 20 years, the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors has acted as an important model in the advancement of molecularly targeted therapies for solid tumors. The success of imatinib has established it as a lasting therapy in the management of early-stage and advanced disease in the first-line setting. Imatinib resistance inevitably develops, resulting in the need for further lines of therapy. Ripretinib is an orally administered switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor, specifically developed to target both primary and secondary KIT and PDGFRα resistance mutations. Herein, the authors discuss the molecular rationale, the preclinical evidence and the clinical use of ripretinib in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the advanced stages of disease.

The analysis of prognostic factors of primary small intestinal gastrointestinal stromal tumors with R0 resection: A single-center retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

We aim to assess factors that affect overall survival in patients with primary small intestinal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) who had undergone R0 resection.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis reviewed the data of 82 consecutive confirmed GIST patients at a single medical center in China from January 2012 to June 2020. The survival curve was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and independent prognostic factors were confirmed using the Cox regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 82 patients were included in the study: 42 men and 40 women, the mean age was 59 years old (23-83 years old). Tumors were commonly found in the jejunum (46.3%), ileum (20.7%), and duodenum (32.9%). The median tumor size was 6.0 cm (range: 1.0-15.0 cm). The number of mitoses per one 50 high-power field was used to define the mitotic rates. In our present study, 56 patients presented a mitotic rate ≤5 (68.3%) and 26 patients showed a rate >5 (31.7%) at the time of diagnosis. All patients accepted tumor resection without lymph node resection. The positivity rate was 97.6% for CD117, 96.3% for delay of germination 1, 65.9% for CD34, 6.1% for S-100, and 59.8% for smooth muscle actin using immunohistochemistry. Tumor size, tumor rupture, Ki67 index, mitotic index, and postoperative imatinib were independent prognostic factors for small intestinal GISTs.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, larger tumor size, high Ki67 index, high mitotic index, the occurrence of tumor rupture, and use of imatinib were independent unfavorable prognostic indicators.

Exploratory analysis of tumor imaging in a Phase 2 trial with cabozantinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor: lessons learned from study EORTC STBSG 1317 'CaboGIST'

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are malignant mesenchymal tumors arising in the gastrointestinal tract. Their systemic treatment is based on the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with imatinib, sunitinib, and regorafenib being the preferred agents. Assessment of tumor response to TKI treatment in GISTs is traditionally done according the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), while Choi criteria have also been proposed as alternative tool assessing both volumetric and density changes on computer tomography (CT) scans. EORTC STBSG 1317 'CaboGIST' was a single-arm prospective Phase 2 trial which met its primary endpoint, as 60% of patients previously treated with imatinib and sunitinib were progression-free at 12 weeks (95% CI 45-74%) based on local RECIST assessment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We report here an exploratory analysis of local versus central RECIST version 1.1 assessment and a comparison of RECIST version 1.1 versus Choi criteria.

RESULTS

Comparisons between local and central RECIST version 1.1 at week 12 revealed discrepancies in 17/43 evaluable cases (39.5%). When comparing Choi with local and central RECIST version 1.1, discrepancies were observed in 27/43 (62.8%) and 21/43 (48.8%) cases, respectively. A total of 68% of evaluable patients were progression-free and alive at week 12 based on local RECIST, 84% according to central RECIST analysis and 81% when applying Choi criteria. Central assessment upgraded the treatment response both with RECIST version 1.1 and Choi.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this exploratory analysis support the conclusion that cabozantinib is active in patients with metastatic or recurrent GIST after treatment with imatinib and sunitinib and confirm once again the limitations of RECIST to capture response to TKI in GIST, and the importance to include density changes in the response evaluation in this setting. Clinical trial number: EORTC 1317, NCT02216578.

Current treatment strategies and future perspectives for gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are mesenchymal tumors that originate from the gastrointestinal tract, mostly from the stomach. GISTs are derived from the myenteric interstitial cells of Cajal and are caused by several mutations in the c-kit and platelet-derived growth factor receptor genes. Clinically, GISTs are detected by endoscopic and imaging findings and are diagnosed by immunostaining. Surgery is the first line of treatment, and if the tumor is relatively small, minimally invasive surgery such as laparoscopy is performed. In recent years, neoadjuvant therapy has been administered to patients with GISTs that are suspected of having a large size or infiltration to other organs. Postoperative adjuvant imatinib is the standard therapy for high-risk GISTs. It is important to assess the risk of recurrence after GIST resection. However, the effect of tyrosine kinase inhibitor use will vary by the mutation of c-kit genes and the site of mutation. Furthermore, information regarding gene mutation is indispensable when considering the treatment policy for recurrent GISTs. This article reviews the clinicopathological characteristics of GISTs along with the minimally invasive and multidisciplinary treatment options available for these tumors. The future perspectives for diagnostic and treatment approaches for these tumors have also been discussed.

Broad spectrum of regorafenib activity on mutant KIT and absence of clonal selection in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): correlative analysis from the GRID trial

BACKGROUND

In the phase 3 GRID trial, regorafenib improved progression-free survival (PFS) independent of KIT mutations in exons 9 and 11. In this retrospective, exploratory analysis of the GRID trial, we investigated whether a more comprehensive KIT mutation analysis could identify mutations that impact treatment outcome with regorafenib and a regorafenib-induced mutation pattern.

METHODS

Archived tumor samples, collected at any time prior to enrollment in GRID, were analyzed by Sanger sequencing (n = 102) and next-generation sequencing (FoundationONE; n = 47). Plasma samples collected at baseline were analyzed by BEAMing (n = 163) and SafeSEQ (n = 96).

RESULTS

In archived tumor samples, 67% (68/102) had a KIT mutation; 61% (62/102) had primary KIT mutations (exons 9 and 11) and 12% (12/102) had secondary mutations (exons 13, 14, 17, and 18). At baseline, 81% of samples (78/96) had KIT mutations by SafeSEQ, including the M541L polymorphism (sole event in 6 patients). Coexisting mutations in other oncogenes were rare, as were mutations in PDGFR, KRAS, and BRAF. Regorafenib showed PFS benefit across all primary and secondary KIT mutational subgroups examined. Available patient-matched samples taken at baseline and end of treatment (n = 41; SafeSEQ), revealed heterogeneous KIT mutational changes with no specific mutation pattern emerging upon regorafenib treatment.

CONCLUSION

These data support the results of the GRID trial, and suggest that patients may benefit from regorafenib in the presence of KIT mutations and without the selection of particular mutation patterns that confer resistance. The study was not powered to address biomarker-related questions, and the results are exploratory and hypothesis-generating.

Clinical Activity of Ripretinib in Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Harboring Heterogeneous KIT/PDGFRA Mutations in the Phase III INVICTUS Study

PURPOSE

Most patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) have activating mutations in KIT/PDGFRA and are initially responsive to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). The acquisition of secondary mutations leads to refractory/relapsed disease. This study reports the results of an analysis from the phase III INVICTUS study (NCT03353753) characterizing the genomic heterogeneity of tumors from patients with advanced GIST and evaluating ripretinib efficacy across KIT/PDGFRA mutation subgroups.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Tumor tissue and liquid biopsy samples that captured circulating tumor DNA were collected prior to study enrollment and sequenced using next-generation sequencing. Subgroups were determined by KIT/PDGFRA mutations and correlation of clinical outcomes and KIT/PDGFRA mutational status was assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 129 patients enrolled (ripretinib 150 mg once daily, n = 85; placebo, n = 44). The most common primary mutation subgroup detected by combined tissue and liquid biopsies were in KIT exon 11 (ripretinib, 61.2%; placebo, 77.3%) and KIT exon 9 (ripretinib, 18.8%; placebo, 15.9%). Patients receiving ripretinib demonstrated progression-free survival (PFS) benefit versus placebo regardless of mutation status (HR 0.16) and in all assessed subgroups in Kaplan-Meier PFS analysis (exon 11, P < 0.0001; exon 9, P = 0.0023; exon 13, P < 0.0001; exon 17, P < 0.0001). Among patients with wild-type KIT/PDGFRA by tumor tissue, PFS ranged from 2 to 23 months for ripretinib versus 0.9 to 10.1 months for placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Ripretinib provided clinically meaningful activity across mutation subgroups in patients with advanced GIST, demonstrating that ripretinib inhibits a broad range of KIT/PDGFRA mutations in patients with advanced GIST who were previously treated with three or more TKIs.

New FDA oncology small molecule drugs approvals in 2020: Mechanism of action and clinical applications

In 2020, fifty-three new drugs, including forty small-molecules (thirty-six new chemical entities and four new diagnostic agents) and thirteen biologic drugs were approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This year, small-molecules continue to play a role in innovative treatments representing around 75% of all drugs accepted by FDA. The dominant therapeutic area was oncology, accounting for twenty-three new approvals, including thirteen new chemical entities, four new diagnostic agents, and thirteen biologic drugs. Recognizing the importance of small-molecules on cancer treatment, this review aims to provide an overview regarding the clinical applications and mechanism of action of the thirteen new small-molecules (excluding new diagnostic agents) approved by FDA in 2020.

A Randomized Phase 2 Study Of Nivolumab Monotherapy Or Nivolumab Combined with Ipilimumab In Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

PURPOSE

Most GISTs are driven by KIT/PDGFRa mutations. TKI benefit is progressively less after imatinib failure. This phase II trial analyzed the efficacy of nivolumab (N) or nivolumab + ipilimumab (N + I) in refractory GIST patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Advanced/metastatic GIST patients refractory to at least imatinib were randomized 1:1 in a noncomparative, parallel group, unblinded Phase 2 trial of N (240mg Q2wks) or N + I (240 mg Q2wks + 1mg/kg Q6wks). The primary endpoint was the ORR of N alone or N+I by RECIST 1.1 in the ITT population.

RESULTS

36 patients with a median of 3 (1-6) prior lines of therapies were enrolled. 10/19(52.6%) patients had SD for a CBR of 52.6 % in the N arm and the median PFS was 11.7 wks (95% CI, 7.0, 17.4). In the N+I arm, 1/16(6.7%) patients had a CR and 4/16(25.0%) had SD for a CBR of 31.3% and a median PFS of 8.3wks (95% CI, 5.6, 22.2). The 4 and 6 month PFS were 42.1% and 26.3%, respectively for N and 31.3% and 18.8%, respectively for N+I. The most common adverse events (AEs) attributed to N and N+I were fatigue: 13.9% and 22.2%, respectively. There were 9 total attributable grade 3-4 AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary endpoint of RR>15% was not observed for N or N + I. In a heavily pretreated GIST population, responses and long term disease control with both N and N+I were observed. No new safety signals have been observed.

Ripretinib intrapatient dose escalation after disease progression provides clinically meaningful outcomes in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour

PURPOSE

Ripretinib is a switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor that broadly inhibits KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor α kinase signalling. Ripretinib showed preliminary efficacy in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) in a phase I study across a range of doses. Results were confirmed in the phase III INVICTUS study, and ripretinib 150 mg once daily (QD) was subsequently approved as a ≥fourth-line therapy. Here, we report the phase I study results of intrapatient dose escalation (IPDE) in patients with GIST treated across second, third and later lines of therapy.

METHODS

Patients with advanced GIST who experienced disease progression (PD) at ripretinib 150 mg QD could dose escalate to 150 mg twice daily (BID). Progression-free survival (PFS) 1 was calculated from the date of the first dose of ripretinib 150 mg QD to PD (as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1); PFS2 was from the date of IPDE (150 mg BID) to PD or death. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were summarised by dosing periods and compared descriptively.

RESULTS

Of 142 patients with GIST receiving ripretinib 150 mg QD, 67 underwent IPDE. IPDE provided benefit across all lines of therapy; the median PFS2 was 5.6, 3.3 and 4.6 months for patients on second-, third- and ≥fourth-line therapy, respectively. A partial metabolic response after IPDE was demonstrated in 13 of 37 patients with available positron emission tomography scans. TEAEs reported at both doses were similar.

CONCLUSION

Ripretinib IPDE after PD provided continued clinical benefit in advanced GIST across second, third and later lines of therapy with a similar safety profile to that observed with the QD regimen.

Location of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) in the Stomach Predicts Tumor Mutation Profile and Drug Sensitivity

PURPOSE

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) commonly arise in different regions of the stomach and are driven by various mutations (most often in KIT, PDGFRA, and SDHx). We hypothesized that the anatomic location of gastric GIST is associated with unique genomic profiles and distinct driver mutations.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We compared KIT versus non-KIT status with tumor location within the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for 2,418 patients with primary gastric GIST. Additionally, we compiled an international cohort (TransAtlantic GIST Collaborative, TAGC) of 236 patients and reviewed sequencing results, cross-sectional imaging, and operative reports. Subgroup analyses were performed for tumors located proximally versus distally. Risk factors for KIT versus non-KIT tumors were identified using multivariate regression analysis. A random forest machine learning model was then developed to determine feature importance.

RESULTS

Within the NCDB cohort, non-KIT mutants dominated distal tumor locations (P < 0.03). Proximal GIST were almost exclusively KIT mutant (96%) in the TAGC cohort, whereas 100% of PDGFRA and SDH-mutant GIST occurred in the distal stomach. On multivariate regression analysis, tumor location was associated with KIT versus non-KIT mutations. Using random forest machine learning analysis, stomach location was the most important feature for predicting mutation status.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide the first evidence that the mutational landscape of gastric GIST is related to tumor location. Proximal gastric GIST are overwhelmingly KIT mutant, irrespective of morphology or age, whereas distal tumors display non-KIT genomic diversity. Anatomic location of gastric GIST may therefore provide immediate guidance for clinical treatment decisions and selective confirmatory genomic testing when resources are limited.

Early and Next-Generation KIT/PDGFRA Kinase Inhibitors and the Future of Treatment for Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

The majority of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) harbor an activating mutation in either the KIT or PDGFRA receptor tyrosine kinases. Approval of imatinib, a KIT/PDGFRA tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), meaningfully improved the treatment of advanced GIST. Other TKIs subsequently gained approval: sunitinib as a second-line therapy and regorafenib as a third-line therapy. However, resistance to each agent occurs in almost all patients over time, typically due to secondary kinase mutations. A major limitation of these 3 approved therapies is that they target the inactive conformation of KIT/PDGFRA; thus, their efficacy is blunted against secondary mutations in the kinase activation loop. Neither sunitinib nor regorafenib inhibit the full spectrum of KIT resistance mutations, and resistance is further complicated by extensive clonal heterogeneity, even within single patients. To combat these limitations, next-generation TKIs were developed and clinically tested, leading to 2 new USA FDA drug approvals in 2020. Ripretinib, a broad-spectrum KIT/PDGFRA inhibitor, was recently approved for the treatment of adult patients with advanced GIST who have received prior treatment with 3 or more kinase inhibitors, including imatinib. Avapritinib, a type I kinase inhibitor that targets active conformation, was approved for the treatment of adults with unresectable or metastatic GIST harboring a PDGFRA exon 18 mutation, including PDGFRA D842V mutations. In this review, we will discuss how resistance mutations have driven the need for newer treatment options for GIST and compare the original GIST TKIs with the next-generation KIT/PDGFRA kinase inhibitors, ripretinib and avapritinib, with a focus on their mechanisms of action.

An updated review of the treatment landscape for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Before the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the overall survival of patients with advanced or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) was 10 to 20 months because of the lack of approved therapies. In the last 20 years, a treatment algorithm for patients with advanced GISTs, which includes imatinib, sunitinib, and regorafenib as first‐, second‐, and third‐line therapies, respectively, has been established. Recently, 2 new TKIs have been approved: ripretinib for fourth‐line therapy and avapritinib as first‐line therapy in patients harboring platelet‐derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRA) exon 18 D842V mutations. Additionally, there are several experimental therapies under investigation that could advance individualized patient care. All of these therapies have varying efficacies and safety profiles that warrant an updated treatment landscape review. This review article summarizes the efficacy and safety data currently available for conventional TKIs along with recently approved and experimental therapies.

With evolving treatment options and effective toxicity management, patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors are living longer than ever before. Recently approved targeted therapies and the investigation of experimental treatment options have the potential to alter the current treatment algorithm and encourage personalized patient care.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a review of current and emerging therapies

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are rare neoplasms arising from the interstitial cell of Cajal in the gastrointestinal tract. Two thirds of GIST in adult patients have c-Kit mutation and smaller fractions have platelet derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) mutation. Surgery is the only curative treatment for localized disease. Imatinib improves survival when used adjuvantly and in advanced disease. Several targeted therapies have also improved survival in GIST patients after progression on imatinib including sunitinib and regorafenib. Recently, United States Federal and Drug Administration (FDA) approved two new tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of heavily pretreated advanced/unresectable GIST including avapritinib (a selective inhibitor for PDGFRA exon 18 mutation including D842V mutations) and ripretinib (a broad-spectrum kinase inhibitor of c-Kit and PDGFRA). In this article, we will provide a comprehensive review of GIST including the current standard of care treatment and exploring future paradigm shifts in therapy.

Diagnosis of digestive system tumours

The WHO Classification of Tumours provides the international standards for the classification and diagnosis of tumours. It enables direct comparisons to be made between different countries. In the new fifth edition, the series has gone digital with the launch of a website as well as a series of books, known widely as the WHO Blue Books. The first volume to be produced is on the classification of Digestive System tumours, replacing the successful 2010 version. It has been rewritten and updated accordingly. This article summarises the major diagnostic innovations that have occurred over the last decade and that have now been incorporated in the classification. As an example, it incorporates the recently proposed classification of neuroendocrine tumours, based on the recognition that neuroendocrine tumours and carcinomas differ substantially in the genetic abnormalities that drive their growth, findings relevant to treatment selection and outcome prediction. Several themes have emerged during the production process. One is the importance of the progression from hyperplasia to dysplasia to carcinoma in the evolution of the malignant process. Advances in imaging techniques and endoscopy have resulted in enhanced access to precancerous lesions in the gastrointestinal and biliary tract, necessitating both changes in classification schema and clinical practice. Diagnosis of tumours is no longer the sole purview of pathologists, and some patients now receive treatment before tissue is obtained, based on clinical, radiological and liquid biopsy results. This makes the classification relevant to many disciplines involved in the care of patients with tumours of the digestive system.

Type and Gene Location of KIT Mutations Predict Progression-Free Survival to First-Line Imatinib in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Look into the Exon

Simple Summary

Although effective in the majority of patients, the progression-free survival (PFS) to imatinib treatment can vary widely in effectiveness. Based on the known predictive role of tyrosine kinase (KIT) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGRA) tumor genotypes, the differential clinical response to first-line imatinib treatment might be related to the different types and gene locations of the mutations. In our study, metastatic patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST)-carrying KIT exon 11 deletion or a deletion/insertion involving codons 557/558 showed significantly shorter PFS to imatinib compared with those with deletion in codons other than 557/558 and patients with exon 11 duplication, insertion or single nucleotide variants (SNVs). Conversely, the latter subgroup showed the longest PFS first-line to imatinib. These results highlight the predictive role of pathogenic variant (PV) type and codon location in GIST, and can support stratification via mutational status in future clinical trials.

Abstract

In previous studies on localized GISTs, KIT exon 11 deletions and mutations involving codons 557/558 showed an adverse prognostic influence on recurrence-free survival. In the metastatic setting, there are limited data on how mutation type and codon location might contribute to progression-free survival (PFS) variability to first-line imatinib treatment. We analyzed the type and gene location of KIT and PDGFRA mutations for 206 patients from a GIST System database prospectively collected at an Italian reference center between January 2005 and September 2020. By describing the mutational landscape, we focused on clinicopathological characteristics according to the critical mutations and investigated the predictive role of type and gene location of the KIT exon 11 mutations in metastatic patients treated with first-line imatinib. Our data showed a predictive impact of KIT exon 11 pathogenic variant on PFS to imatinib treatment: patients with deletion or insertion/deletion (delins) in 557/558 codons had a shorter PFS (median PFS: 24 months) compared to the patients with a deletion in other codons, or duplication/insertion/SNV (median PFS: 43 and 49 months, respectively) (p < 0.001). These results reached an independent value in the multivariate model, which showed that the absence of exon 11 deletions or delins 557/558, the female gender, primitive tumor diameter (≤5 cm) and polymorphonuclear leucocytosis (>7.5 109/L) were significant prognostic factors for longer PFS. Analysis of the predictive role of PDGFRA PVs showed no significant results. Our results also confirm the aggressive biology of 557/558 deletions/delins in the metastatic setting and allow for prediction at the baseline which GIST patients would develop resistance to first-line imatinib treatment earlier.

Rare Occurrence of Microsatellite Instability in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to objectively determine microsatellite instability (MSI) status using a next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based MSI panel and to resolve the discrepancy regarding whether or not MSI is a rare phenomenon, irrespective of diverse genomic alterations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Materials and Methods: Genomic DNA was subjected to MSI panel sequencing using an Ion AmpliSeq Microsatellite Instability Assay, as well as to cancer gene panel sequencing using an Oncomine Focus DNA Assay. Results: All of our GIST patients showed microsatellite-stable (MSS) status, which confirmed that MSI status did not affect the molecular pathogenesis of GIST. The KIT gene (79%, 38/48) was the most frequently mutated gene, followed by the PDGFRA (8%, 4/48), PIK3CA (8%, 4/48), and ERBB2 (4%, 2/48) mutations. KIT exon 11 mutant patients were more favorable in responding to imatinib than those with exon 9 mutant or wild-type GISTs, and compared to non-KIT exon 11 mutant GISTs (p = 0.041). The NGS-based MSI panel with MSICall confirmed a rare phenomenon of microsatellite instability in GISTs irrespective of diverse genomic alterations. Conclusion: Massively parallel sequencing can simultaneously provide the MSI status as well as the somatic mutation profile in a single test. This combined approach may help us to understand the molecular pathogenesis of GIST carcinogenesis and malignant progression.

Update on Molecular Genetics of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. The majority are sporadic, solitary tumors that harbor mutually exclusive KIT or PDGFRA gain-of-function mutations. The type of mutation in addition to risk stratification corresponds to the biological behavior of GIST and response to treatment. Up to 85% of pediatric GISTs and 10–15% of adult GISTs are devoid of these (KIT/PDGFRA) mutations and are referred to as wild-type GISTs (wt-GIST). It has been shown that these wt-GISTs are a heterogeneous tumor group with regard to their clinical behavior and molecular profile. Recent advances in molecular pathology helped to further sub-classify the so-called “wt-GISTs”. Based on their significant clinical and molecular heterogeneity, wt-GISTs are divided into a syndromic and a non-syndromic (sporadic) subgroup. Recently, the use of succinate dehydrogenase B (SDHB) by immunohistochemistry has been used to stratify GIST into an SDHB-retained and an SDHB-deficient group. In this review, we focus on GIST sub-classification based on clinicopathologic, and molecular findings and discuss the known and yet emerging prognostic and predictive genetic alterations. We also give insights into the limitations of targeted therapy and highlight the mechanisms of secondary resistance.

Efficacy evaluation of nilotinib treatment in different genomic subtypes of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Nilotinib has been used as a third-line drug for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) after a failure of sunitinib. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of nilotinib in different genomic subtypes of GISTs. We searched the English articles through EMBASE, Cochrane Library and PubMed Database regarding to the use of nilotinib on GISTs, which published up to February 15, 2019. Inclusion criteria were: GISTs patients received nilotinib in a clinical trial and had detailed genetic subtype records (such as KIT exon 9, KIT exon 11, or PDGFRA mutations, or wild-type). The clinical benefit rate was used to assess the efficacy of nilotinib. A total of 3 studies involving 218 GISTs were included in this meta-analysis. The overall OR (KIT group vs WT group) was 3.26 (95% CI: 1.14-9.28; P = 0.027, P_{heterogeneity} = 0.613). The overall OR in KIT exon 11 group vs WT group was 5.30 (95% CI: 1.79-15.68; P = 0.003, P_{heterogeneity} = 0.409). The overall OR in KIT exon 9 group vs WT group was 0.13 (95% CI: 0.02-0.86; P = 0.035, P_{heterogeneity} = 0.229). The overall OR in KIT exon 11 group vs exon 9 group was 9.96 (95% CI: 0.39-254.66; P < 0.0001, P_{heterogeneity} = 0.024). Different genotypes of GISTs showed different responses to nilotinib, and KIT exon 11-mutant GISTs mostly benefited from nilotinib, followed by KIT exon 9-mutant or WT one.

Canadian Consensus for Biomarker Testing and Treatment of TRK Fusion Cancer in Adults

The tyrosine receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors larotrectinib and entrectinib were recently approved in Canada for the treatment of solid tumours harbouring neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions. These NTRK gene fusions are oncogenic drivers found in most tumour types at a low frequency (<5%), and at a higher frequency (>80%) in a small number of rare tumours (e.g., secretory carcinoma of the salivary gland and of the breast). They are generally mutually exclusive of other common oncogenic drivers. Larotrectinib and entrectinib have demonstrated impressive overall response rates and tolerability in Phase I/II trials in patients with TRK fusion cancer with no other effective treatment options. Given the low frequency of TRK fusion cancer and the heterogeneous molecular testing landscape in Canada, identifying and optimally managing such patients represents a new challenge. We provide a Canadian consensus on when and how to test for NTRK gene fusions and when to consider treatment with a TRK inhibitor. We focus on five tumour types: thyroid carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, non-small cell lung carcinoma, soft tissue sarcoma, and salivary gland carcinoma. Based on the probability of the tumour harbouring an NTRK gene fusion, we also suggest a tumour-agnostic consensus for NTRK gene fusion testing and treatment. We recommend considering a TRK inhibitor in all patients with TRK fusion cancer with no other effective treatment options.

Targeted Deep Sequencing Reveals Unrecognized KIT Mutation Coexistent with NF1 Deficiency in GISTs

Purpose

NF1-deficient GISTs account for about 1% of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and are usually considered as a subtype of KIT/PDGFRA wild-type GISTs that have no detectable KIT and PDGFRA mutations. Some KIT/PDGFRA wild-type GISTs actually have cryptic KIT mutations (mKIT). So we investigate whether concurrent mKIT existed in NF1-associated GISTs.

Patients and Methods

Three independent cohorts were retrospectively analyzed. KIT/PDGFRA wild-type GISTs in Xiangya Hospital between May 2017 and Oct 2019 were investigated by next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach targeted 1021 cancer-related genes regions. GISTs cases in Gene+ dataset from May 2017 to May 2020 were collected from the platform of this company. The genotypes of GISTs in MSKCC cohort were downloaded from cBioPortal.

Results

A total of 290 cases including 23 KIT/PDGFRA wild-type GISTs in Xiangya Hospital, 136 GISTs in Gene+ database, and 131 GISTs in MSKCC were enrolled. Twenty-six cases have NF1 mutations (mNF1), and 48% (12/26) of NF1-mutated GISTs have concurrent mKIT. Compared with MSKCC (2/10, 20%), a higher ratio of mKIT in NF1-associated GISTs was detected in Xiangya Hospital (3/5, 60%) and Gene+ (7/11, 64%) (p<0.05). No mutation hotspot existed in mNF1. Most of mKIT centered within exon 11 (7/12, 58%) and others including exon 17 (3/12, 25%), exon 9(1/12, 8%), exon 13 (1/12, 8%) and exon 21 (1/12, 8%). No differences in age, gender, and location were detected between NF1-related GISTs with mKIT and those without mKIT. Three GIST cases of type I neurofibromatosis, skin neurofibromas and micro-GISTs (≤1 cm) were devoid of mKIT, but all the mini-GISTs (1~2 cm) and clinic GIST lesions (>2 cm) in two cases harbored mKIT.

Conclusion

mKIT was not unusual in NF1-associated GISTs, especially in Chinese populations. The gain-of-function mKIT possibly facilitated the progression of NF1-deficient lesions to clinic GISTs, however, the underlying mechanism warrants further studies.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs): Novel Therapeutic Strategies with Immunotherapy and Small Molecules

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common types of malignant mesenchymal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract, with an estimated incidence of 1.5/100.000 per year and 1–2% of gastrointestinal neoplasms. About 75–80% of patients have mutations in the KIT gene in exons 9, 11, 13, 14, 17, and 5–10% of patients have mutations in the platelet-derived growth factor receptor a (PDGFRA) gene in exons 12, 14, 18. Moreover, 10–15% of patients have no mutations and are classified as wild type GIST. The treatment for metastatic or unresectable GISTs includes imatinib, sunitinib, and regorafenib. So far, GIST therapies have raised great expectations and offered patients a better quality of life, but increased pharmacological resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors is often observed. New treatment options have emerged, with ripretinib, avapritinib, and cabozantinib getting approvals for these tumors. Nowadays, immune checkpoint inhibitors form a new landscape in cancer therapeutics and have already shown remarkable responses in various tumors. Studies in melanoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, and renal cell carcinoma are very encouraging as these inhibitors have increased survival rates. The purpose of this review is to present alternative approaches for the treatment of the GIST patients, such as combinations of immunotherapy and novel inhibitors with traditional therapies (tyrosine kinase inhibitors).