KEYNOTE-585: Phase III study of perioperative chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab for gastric cancer

Comprehensive integration of single-cell RNA and transcriptome RNA sequencing to establish a pyroptosis-related signature for improving prognostic prediction of gastric cancer

Cell pyroptosis, a Gasdermin-dependent programmed cell death characterized by inflammasome, plays a complex and dynamic role in Gastric cancer (GC), a serious threat to human health. Therefore, the value of pyroptosis-related genes (PRGs) as prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic indicators for patients needs to be exploited in GC. This study integrates single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) dataset GSE183904 with GC transcriptome data from the TCGA database, focusing on the expression and distribution of PRGs in GC at the single-cell level. The prognostic signature of PRGs was established by using Cox and LASSO analyses. The differences in long-term prognosis, immune infiltration, mutation profile, CD274 and response to chemotherapeutic drugs between the two groups were analyzed and evaluated. A tissue array was used to verify the expression of six PRGs, CD274, CD163 and FoxP3. C12orf75, VCAN, RGS2, MKNK2, SOCS3 and TNFAIP2 were successfully screened out to establish a signature to potently predict the survival time of GC patients. A webserver (https://pumc.shinyapps.io/GastricCancer/) for prognostic prediction in GC patients was developed based on this signature. High-risk score patients typically had worse prognoses, resistance to classical chemotherapy, and a more immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. VCAN, TNFAIP2 and SOCS3 were greatly elevated in the GC while RGS2 and MKNK2 were decreased in the tumor samples. Further, VCAN was positively related to the infiltrations of Tregs and M2 TAMs in GC TME and the CD274 in tumor cells. In summary, a potent pyroptosis-related signature was established to accurately forecast the survival time and treatment responsiveness of GC patients.

Updates in Translational Science for Esophageal and Gastric Cancers

In this article, the authors summarize the current state of translational science for esophageal and gastric cancers. The available targeted therapies, immunotherapies, and recently discovered molecular targets are reviewed. The authors introduce circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid and its promise as a biomarker to detect disease recurrence. The authors present patient-derived organoids as a new model for studying carcinogenesis and treatment responses. Finally, we discuss the implications of organoid models for precision oncology and describe exciting new work applying gene editing technology to organoids and studying tumor-microenvironment interactions using 3-dimensional co-culture systems.

Advances in diagnosis and management of cancer of the esophagus

Esophageal cancer is the seventh most common malignancy worldwide, with over 470 000 new cases diagnosed each year. Two distinct histological subtypes predominate, and should be considered biologically separate disease entities.1 These subtypes are esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Outcomes remain poor regardless of subtype, with most patients presenting with late stage disease.2 Novel strategies to improve early detection of the respective precursor lesions, squamous dysplasia, and Barrett's esophagus offer the potential to improve outcomes. The introduction of a limited number of biologic agents, as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors, is resulting in improvements in the systemic treatment of locally advanced and metastatic esophageal cancer. These developments, coupled with improvements in minimally invasive surgical and endoscopic treatment approaches, as well as adaptive and precision radiotherapy technologies, offer the potential to improve outcomes still further. This review summarizes the latest advances in the diagnosis and management of esophageal cancer, and the developments in understanding of the biology of this disease.

Management of Microsatellite Instability High (MSI-H) Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal cancer is a major cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Treatment of both early stage and advanced disease remains highly reliant on cytotoxic chemotherapy. About 4-24% of gastroesophageal cancers are microsatellite instability high (MSI-H). The MSI-H subtype is associated with favorable prognosis, resistance to cytotoxic chemotherapy, and sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Recent studies have demonstrated promising activity of ICIs in the MSI-H subtype, resulting in fundamental changes in the management of MSI-H gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE

In this review, we discuss the prevalence, characteristics, prognosis, and management of MSI-H gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, with a focus on recent and ongoing studies that have changed the landscape of treatment for the MSI-H subtype. We also discuss current challenges in the management of resectable and advanced MSI-H gastroesophageal cancer, including the need for more accurate biomarkers of response to ICI therapy.

Top Gastric Cancer Articles from 2022 and 2023 to Inform Your Cancer Practice

BACKGROUND

The multimodality management of patients with gastroesophageal cancers is rapidly evolving, with the introduction of new therapies against potential molecular targets paving the way to personalized medicine for patients with both resectable and metastatic disease. Over the past 2 years, several important studies evaluating these new targeted therapies, as well as minimally invasive surgical approaches to gastric cancer, have been published.

METHODS

This review article summarizes the top studies published in gastric cancer over the past 2 years that are fundamentally changing our practice approach to gastric cancer patients.

RESULTS

First, the long-term safety and efficacy of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy as compared with open gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer was confirmed with the publication of the 5-year outcomes of the CLASS-01 and KLASS-02 randomized clinical trials. In addition, several important studies of perioperative immunotherapy for patients with resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancers are ongoing, and in 2022, an interim analysis of the DANTE trial and the final results of the GERCOR NEONIPIGA study were reported. Lastly, the KEYNOTE-859 and SPOTLIGHT trials address an unmet need for additional targeted therapies for patients with previously untreated, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative, unresectable or metastatic gastroesophageal cancers, incorporating immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeting Claudin-18 isoform 2 (CLDN18.2) with the monoclonal antibody zolbetuximab, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This article summarizes the findings and implications of several important studies published over the past 2 years that are fundamentally changing the way we treat patients with gastroesophageal cancer.

Immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant treatment of gastrointestinal tumors: is the time ripe?

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) revolutionized the management of mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Based on notable results observed in the metastatic setting, several clinical trials investigated ICIs as neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) for localized dMMR/MSI-H GI cancers, achieving striking results in terms of clinical and pathological responses and creating the opportunity to spare patients from neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy and even surgical resection. Nevertheless, these impressive findings are mainly derived from small proof of concept phase II studies and there are still several open questions to address. Moreover, dMMR/MSI-H represents a limited subgroup accounting for less than 10% of GI cancers. Consequently, many efforts have been produced to investigate neoadjuvant ICIs also in mismatch repair-proficient/microsatellite stable (MSS) cancers, considering the potential synergistic effect in combining immune-targeted agents with standard therapies such as chemo and/or radiotherapy. However, results for combining ICIs to the standard of care in the unselected population are still unsatisfactory, without improvements in event-free survival in esophago-gastric adenocarcinoma for the addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy, and sometimes limited benefit in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Therefore, a major challenge will be to identify among the heterogenous spectrum of this disease, those patients that could take advantage of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and deliver the most effective treatment. In this review we discuss the rationale of NAT in GI malignancies, summarize the available evidence regarding the completed trials that evaluated this treatment strategy in both MSI-H and MSS tumors. Finally, we discuss ongoing studies and future perspectives to render neoadjuvant immunotherapy another arrow in the quiver for the treatment of locally advanced GI tumors.

Multimodal Treatment of Resectable Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

The current guidelines for the treatment of esophageal cancer recommend a multimodal approach that includes chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy, radiation, and surgery. Despite advances in treatment, rates of treatment failure, pathologic incomplete response, tumor metastasis, and death remain unacceptably high.

METHODS

This study was a narrative literature review using the terms "resectable esophageal cancer" and "multimodal therapy" to identify prospective trials of neoadjuvant radiation and chemotherapy, individually or combined with surgery, for esophageal cancer. Trials performed between 1984 and 2022 were identified and analyzed.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov was queried to identify ongoing studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-one clinical studies were identified: 15 randomized controlled trials and 6 prospective nonrandomized trials. The results of the randomized trials suggest that multimodal therapy-in the form of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in combination with radiation or chemotherapy alone, followed by surgery-is associated with better rates of local disease control and partial clinical response and, potentially, longer survival than is surgery alone. Immunotherapy is an emerging option for the treatment of patients with esophageal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of patients with resectable esophageal cancer is rapidly evolving. Although previous treatment options have had only limited benefits for patients, significant progress has been made during last 3 decades. The results of the available studies suggest that advances in the treatment of esophageal cancer have the potential to improve survival in these patients; however, questions remain regarding mechanisms of action, patient selection, and the use of personalized approaches that are based on genetics.

Akkermansia muciniphila improves gastric cancer treatment by modulating the immune microenvironment

Background: Gut microbiota is pivotal in tumor occurrence and development, and there is a close relationship between Akkermansia muciniphila (AKK) and cancer immunotherapy. Methods: The effects of AKK and its outer membrane proteins on gastric cancer (GC) were evaluated in vitro and in vivo using cell counting kit-8 assay, flow cytometry, western blotting, ELISA, immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence. Results: AKK outer membrane protein facilitated apoptosis of GC cells and exerted an immunostimulatory effect (by promoting M1 polarization of macrophages, enhancing expression of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-related cytokines and suppressing that of Treg-related cytokines). Additionally, AKK and its formulation could inhibit tumor growth of GC and enhance the infiltration of immune cells in tumor tissues. Conclusion: AKK could improve GC treatment by modulating the immune microenvironment.

Safety and efficacy of a programmed cell death 1 inhibitor combined with oxaliplatin plus S-1 in patients with Borrmann large type III and IV gastric cancers

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most common and the fourth most lethal malignant tumour in the world. Most patients are already in the advanced stage when they are diagnosed, which also leads to poor overall survival. The effect of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced GC is unsatisfactory with a high rate of distant metastasis and local recurrence.

AIM

To investigate the safety and efficacy of a programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 (SOX) in the treatment of Borrmann large type III and IV GCs.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis (IRB-2022-371) was performed on 89 patients with Borrmann large type III and IV GCs who received neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) from January 2020 to December 2021. According to the different neoadjuvant treatment regimens, the patients were divided into the SOX group (61 patients) and the PD-1 + SOX (P-SOX) group (28 patients).

RESULTS

The pathological response (tumor regression grade 0/1) in the P-SOX group was significantly higher than that in the SOX group (42.86% vs 18.03%, P = 0.013). The incidence of ypN0 in the P-SOX group was higher than that in the SOX group (39.29% vs 19.67%, P = 0.05). The use of PD-1 inhibitors was an independent factor affecting tumor regression grade. Meanwhile, the use of PD-1 did not increase postoperative complications or the adverse effects of NAT.

CONCLUSION

A PD-1 inhibitor combined with SOX could significantly improve the rate of tumour regression during NAT for patients with Borrmann large type III and IV GCs.

Chemotherapy Plus Atezolizumab Pre- and Post-Resection in Localized Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinomas: A Phase I/II Single-Arm Study

Efforts to improve the prognosis for patients with locally advanced esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma have focused on neoadjuvant approaches to increase the pathological complete response (pathCR) rate, improve surgical resection, and prolong event-free and overall survival (OS). Building on the recent evidence that PD-1 inhibition plus chemotherapy improves the OS of patients with metastatic GEJ adenocarcinoma, we evaluated whether the application of this strategy in the neoadjuvant setting would improve the pathological response. This single-center phase I/II trial evaluated the safety, toxicity, and efficacy of neoadjuvant atezolizumab with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (modified FOLFOX) followed by esophagectomy followed by atezolizumab. The primary objective goal was to achieve 20% pathCR. From the twenty enrolled patients, eighteen underwent resection and two (10%, 95% CI: 1.24-31.7%) achieved pathCR. After a median follow-up duration of 40.7 months, 11 patients had disease recurrence and 10 had died. The median disease-free and OS were 28.8 (95% CI: 14.7, NA) and 38.6 months (95% CI: 30.5, NA), respectively. No treatment-related adverse events led to death. Although modified FOLFOX plus atezolizumab did not achieve the expected pathCR, an acceptable safety profile was observed. Our results support the continued development of a more refined strategy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus perioperative immunotherapy/targeted agents) with molecular/immune profiling in parallel.

Immunotherapy in Esophagogastric Cancer: Treatment Landscape, Challenges, and New Directions

BACKGROUND

Cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract represent a lethal disease entity comprising the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction, and stomach. The backbone of therapy in esophagogastric cancers has predominantly been chemotherapy-based. However, over the last decade, with the debut of immune checkpoint inhibitors, sophisticated molecular testing, and a more comprehensive understanding of the tumor microenvironment, immunotherapy has been incorporated into the treatment of localized and advanced esophagogastric cancers with promising results.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to review the unique tumor microenvironment and role of immunotherapy in esophagogastric cancers.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of clinical and translational research for immunotherapy in esophagogastric cancers.

RESULTS

This article will explore the unique tumor microenvironment in gastroesophageal cancers, the role of immunotherapy in localized and advanced disease, challenges in management, and new therapeutic approaches in clinical trials.

CONCLUSION

With further exploration into targeted therapy and immunotherapy, we anticipate the emergence of novel treatments that will improve survival and quality of life in patients with esophagogastric cancers.

Safety and feasibility of minimally invasive gastrectomy after neoadjuvant immunotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis in China

Background

The effect of neoadjuvant immunotherapy on minimally invasive gastrectomy (MIG) for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) remains controversial. This study aimed to compare short-term outcomes between MIG after neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy (NICT-MIG) and MIG after neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (NCT-MIG), and determine risk factors for post-operative complications (POCs).

Methods

This retrospective study included clinicopathologic data from 193 patients who underwent NCT-MIG or NICT-MIG between January 2020 and February 2023 in the Department of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital First Medical Center (Beijing, China). Propensity score-matched analysis at a ratio of 1:2 was performed to reduce bias from confounding patient-related variables and short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results

The baseline characteristics were comparable between 49 patients in the NICT-MIG group and 86 patients in the NCT-MIG group after propensity score matching. Objective and pathologic complete response rates were significantly higher in the NICT-MIG group than in the NCT-MIG group (P < 0.05). The overall incidence of treat-related adverse events, intraoperative bleeding, operation time, number of retrieved lymph nodes, time to the first flatus, post-operative duration of hospitalization, overall morbidity, and severe morbidity were comparable between the NCT-MIG and NICT-MIG groups (P > 0.05). By multivariate logistic analysis, estimated blood loss of >200 mL (P = 0.010) and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) score of <45 (P = 0.003) were independent risk factors for POCs after MIG following neoadjuvant therapy.

Conclusions

Safety and feasibility of NICT were comparable to those of NCT in patients undergoing MIG for LAGC. Patients with an estimated blood loss of >200 mL or a PNI score of <45 should be carefully evaluated for increased POCs risk.

Perioperative Atezolizumab Plus Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, and Docetaxel for Resectable Esophagogastric Cancer: Interim Results From the Randomized, Multicenter, Phase II/III DANTE/IKF-s633 Trial

PURPOSE

This trial evaluates the addition of the PD-L1 antibody atezolizumab (ATZ) to standard-of-care fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) as a perioperative treatment for patients with resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA).

METHODS

DANTE started as multicenter, randomized phase II trial, which was subsequently converted to a phase III trial. Here, we present the results of the phase II proportion, focusing on surgical pathology and safety outcomes on an exploratory basis. Patients with resectable EGA (≥cT2 or cN+) were assigned to either four preoperative and postoperative cycles of FLOT combined with ATZ, followed by eight cycles of ATZ maintenance (arm A) or FLOT alone (arm B).

RESULTS

Two hundred ninety-five patients were randomly assigned (A, 146; B, 149) with balanced baseline characteristics between arms. Twenty-three patients (8%) had tumors with microsatellite instability (MSI), and 58% patients had tumors with a PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) of ≥1. Surgical morbidity (A, 45%; B, 42%) and 60-day mortality (A, 3%; B, 2%) were comparable between arms. Downstaging favored arm A versus arm B (ypT0, 23% v 15% [one-sided P = .044]; ypT0-T2, 61% v 48% [one-sided P = .015]; ypN0, 68% v 54% [one-sided P = .012]). Histopathologic complete regression rates (pathologic complete response or TRG1a) were higher after FLOT plus ATZ (A, 24%; B, 15%; one-sided P = .032), and the difference was more pronounced in the PD-L1 CPS ≥10 (A, 33%; B, 12%) and MSI (A, 63%; B, 27%) subpopulations. Complete margin-free (R0) resection rates were relatively high in both arms (A, 96%; B, 95%). The incidence and severity of adverse events were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of the exploratory nature of the data, the addition of ATZ to perioperative FLOT is safe and improved postoperative stage and histopathologic regression.

The Evolving Landscape of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Gastroesophageal Cancer

Despite advances in treatment strategies and surgical approaches in recent years, improving survival outcomes in esophagogastric cancer (EGC) patients treated with curative intent remains a significant area of unmet need. The recent emergence of adjuvant immunotherapy as the standard of care for resected EGC demonstrates the impact of immunotherapy in improving recurrence-free survival. Neoadjuvant and perioperative immunotherapies represent another promising approach with potential advantages over adjuvant therapy. Despite the promising results of early neoadjuvant immunotherapy studies, there are several challenges and future research needs. The optimal timing, duration and number of doses in relation to surgery and the optimal combination of immunotherapies are still unclear. In addition, rigorous correlative studies need to be performed to identify biomarkers for patient selection and treatment response prediction to maximize the benefits of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. In this review, we provide a concise summary of the current standard of care for resectable EGC and discuss the rationale for the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in this setting and the pre-clinical and early clinical data of these novel therapies. Finally, we will examine the potential role and future direction of immunotherapy in the treatment paradigm and the perceived challenges and opportunities that lay ahead.

Evolving perspectives regarding the role of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in gastric cancer immunotherapy

Gastric cancer (GC) is an increasing global health problem and is one of the leading cancers worldwide. Traditional therapies, such as radiation and chemotherapy, have made limited progress in enhancing their efficacy for advanced GC. The development of immunotherapy for advanced GC has considerably improved with a deeper understanding of the tumor microenvironment. Immunotherapy using checkpoint inhibitors is a new therapeutic option that has made substantial advances in the treatment of other malignancies and is increasingly used in other clinical oncology treatments. Particularly, therapeutic antibodies targeting the programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway have been effectively used in the clinical treatment of cancer. Monoclonal antibodies blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway have been developed for cancer immunotherapy to enhance T cell function to restore the immune response and represent a breakthrough in the treatment of GC. This review provides an outline of the progress of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy and its expression characteristics and clinical application in advanced GC.

DNA mismatch repair deficiency and outcomes of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer treated with preoperative docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 plus surgery and postoperative S-1 or surgery plus postoperative S-1: a sub-analysis of the phase 3 PRODIGY trial

BACKGROUND

The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients with DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency (D-MMR) is controversial due to concerns about its potential detrimental effect. The PRODIGY trial showed the survival benefit of adding preoperative docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) to surgery plus postoperative S-1 for LAGC patients. In this sub-analysis, we evaluated the benefit of preoperative DOS according to MMR status.

METHODS

Among patients enrolled in the PRODIGY trial treated with either preoperative DOS followed by surgery and postoperative S-1 (CSC arm), or surgery and postoperative S-1 (SC arm) at Asan Medical Center (n = 249), those in the full analysis set with available tissue to assess MMR status were included in the present analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 231 patients (CSC arm, n = 108; SC arm, n = 123) were included (median age, 58 years [range, 27-75]), and 21 patients (CSC arm, n = 8 [7.4%]; SC arm, n = 13 [10.6%]) had D-MMR tumors. Progression-free survival and overall survival tended to be superior in the CSC arm than in the SC arm among D-MMR patients (HR 0.48 [95% CI 0.09-2.50]; log-rank P = 0.37 and HR 0.55 [95% CI 0.11-2.86]; log-rank P = 0.46, respectively), as well as among proficient MMR (P-MMR) patients (HR 0.68 [95% CI 0.46-1.03]; log-rank P = 0.07 and HR 0.75 [95% CI 0.49-1.14]; log-rank P = 0.17, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative DOS followed by surgery and postoperative S-1 may be considered a treatment option for LAGC patients regardless of MMR status.

Tumour microenvironment influences response to treatment in oesophageal adenocarcinoma

The poor treatment response of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) leads to low survival rates. Its increasing incidence makes finding more effective treatment a priority. Recent treatment improvements can be attributed to the inclusion of the tumour microenvironment (TME) and immune infiltrates in treatment decisions. OAC TME is largely immunosuppressed and reflects treatment resistance as patients with inflamed TME have better outcomes. Priming the tumour with the appropriate neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy treatment could lead to higher immune infiltrations and higher expression of immune checkpoints, such as PD-1/PDL-1, CTLA4 or emerging new targets: LAG-3, TIM-3, TIGIT or ICOS. Multiple trials support the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors to the current standard of care. However, results vary, supporting the need for better response biomarkers based on TME composition. This review explores what is known about OAC TME, the clinical significance of the various cell populations infiltrating it and the emerging therapeutical combination with a focus on immune checkpoints inhibitors.

Retrospective Analysis of Real-Life Data Evaluating the Optimal Time Between Gastrectomy and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Resected Gastric Cancer

PURPOSE

Although adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) increases survival in early-stage gastric cancer, the effect of the time between gastrectomy and the initiation of AC on survival has not been clearly demonstrated. This study aimed to examine the effect of AC timing on survival.

METHODS

The data of patients who received AC in the postoperative period with the diagnosis of stage II and stage III gastric cancer were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were separated into two groups based on a 4-week cut-off value between the date of gastrectomy and the initiation of AC.

RESULTS

There were 151 patients enrolled in the study. It was determined that 63 (41.7%) patients started AC in the first 4 weeks and 88 (58.3%) patients after the first 4 weeks. Patients who received AC during the first 4 weeks had a median recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 46 months, while those who received AC after 4 weeks had a median RFS of 29 months (p = 0.039). The median overall survival (OS) for patients administered AC in the first 4 weeks was 65 months, compared to 45 months for those administered AC after 4 weeks (p = 0.036). The early time interval from surgery to AC resulted as an independent prognostic factor for both OS and RFS.

CONCLUSION

The optimal time to start AC in patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative resection is unknown. This study reported that an interval shorter than 4 weeks was an independent prognostic risk factor for both OS and RFS.

Treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma: A rapidly evolving landscape

Gastric adenocarcinoma (GC) and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma represent frequent and severe diseases whose management has radically changed over the last 10 years. With the advent of second- and third-line standard therapies for metastatic GC patients in the 2010s, the molecular dismemberment of the disease and positive trials with immunotherapy and targeted agents will mark the 2020s. New treatment options have emerged in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic setting. In addition to improved multimodal treatment in operable patients, new subgroups have emerged depending on molecular alterations (HER2, Microsatellite instability) or expression of specific proteins in the tumour (PDL1, Claudin 18.2) making immunohistochemistry central in profiling the tumour for an optimal individualised management. The aim of this review is to describe the current standards of management of early and late stage GC and the molecular markers needed today to optimally manage our patients together with future perspectives on this disease.

SOX combined with sintilimab versus SOX alone in the perioperative management of locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of SOX combined with a programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor compared with SOX alone in the perioperative management of locally advanced gastric cancer and to explore biomarkers that may predict response to anti-PD-1 therapy.

METHODS

Data of patients with clinical stage T3-4aN0-3M0 (IIb-III) gastric cancer were reviewed to create a primary database. Patients treated with perioperative SOX combined with sintilimab were included in Group A, while those treated with SOX alone were included in Group B. After one-to-one propensity score matching, pathological response and short-term survival outcomes were compared between the two groups. In addition, potential efficacy-related biomarkers were analyzed.

RESULTS

Between January 2018 and December 2022, a total of 150 patients were included in the analysis, with 75 patients in each group. The rates of pathological complete response (21.3% vs. 4.0%; P = 0.001) and major pathological response (45.3% vs. 22.7%; P = 0.003) in Group A were statistically higher than those in Group B. There was no significant difference in 1-year overall survival (92.8% vs. 92.0%; P = 0.392) and disease-free survival (88.9% vs. 88.0%; P = 0.357) between the two groups. Subgroup analysis of Group A showed that the pathological complete response (40.6% vs. 8.6%; P = 0.002) and major pathological response (65.6% vs. 28.6%; P = 0.002) rates were significantly higher in programmed death ligand-1-positive patients with a combined positive score of ≥ 5. A pathological complete response was achieved in 42.9% patients (3/7) with mismatch repair deficiency. For the two patients confirmed as Epstein-Barr virus-positive, one patient achieved a pathological complete response and the other achieved a major pathological response.

CONCLUSIONS

The adoption of SOX combined with a PD-1 inhibitor may improve the pathological response rate of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer, especially those with programmed death ligand-1 combined positive score ≥ 5, Epstein-Barr virus-positivity and mismatch repair deficiency. However, further prospective studies are still warranted to confirm the long-term survival benefit.

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Versus Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in the European Multicenter ENSURE Study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare clinicopathologic, oncologic, and health-related quality of life (HRQL) outcomes following neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) and chemotherapy (nCT) in the ENSURE international multicenter study.

BACKGROUND

nCT and nCRT are the standards of care for locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC) treated with curative intent. However, no published randomized controlled trial to date has demonstrated the superiority of either approach.

METHODS

ENSURE is an international multicenter study of consecutive patients undergoing surgery for LAEC (2009-2015) across 20 high-volume centers (NCT03461341). The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS), secondary outcomes included histopathologic response, recurrence pattern, oncologic outcome, and HRQL in survivorship.

RESULTS

A total of 2211 patients were studied (48% nCT, 52% nCRT). pCR was observed in 4.9% and 14.7% ( P <0.001), with R0 in 78.2% and 94.2% ( P <0.001) post nCT and nCRT, respectively. Postoperative morbidity was equivalent, but in-hospital mortality was independently increased [hazard ratio (HR)=2.73, 95% CI: 1.43-5.21, P= 0.002] following nCRT versus nCT. Probability of local recurrence was reduced (odds ratio=0.71, 95% CI: 0.54-0.93, P =0.012), and distant recurrence-free survival time reduced (HR=1.18, 95% CI: 1.02-1.37, P =0.023) after nCRT versus nCT, with no difference in OS among all patients (HR=1.10, 95% CI: 0.98-1.25, P =0.113). On subgroup analysis, patients who underwent R0 resection following nCT as compared with nCRT had improved OS (median: 60.7 months, 95% CI: 49.5-71.8 vs 40.8 months, 95% CI: 42.8-53.4, P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this European multicenter study, nCRT compared with nCT was associated with reduced probability of local recurrence but reduced distant recurrence-free survival for patients with LAEC, without differences in OS. These data support tailored patient-specific decision-making in the overall approach to achieving optimum outcomes in LAEC.

Updated Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer

Surgical resection is currently the best curative approach for gastric cancer (GC); however, the prognosis of patients with advanced GC remains poor even with curative resection. For this reason, perioperative chemotherapy has been combined with surgery to reduce the risk of postoperative recurrence. Standard perioperative chemotherapy for resectable advanced GC varies from region to region. Postoperative S-1 therapy was standardized via the ACTS-GC study in East Asia, perioperative ECF (Epirubicin + Cisplatin + Fluorouracil) was standardized via the MAGIC study in Europe, and postoperative chemoradiotherapy was standardized via the US intergroup study in North America. Since then, more intensive regimens have been developed. In recent years, perioperative therapy using novel agents, such as molecular-targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has also been tested and evaluated in the three major regions (East Asia, Europe, and North America) with promising results. Perioperative chemotherapy has become an integral part of many treatment strategies and requires continued research and evaluation.

Gastric Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms, Novel Targets, and Immunotherapies: From Bench to Clinical Therapeutics

Gastric cancer is a global health concern, ranking fifth in cancer diagnoses and fourth in cancer-related deaths worldwide. Despite recent advancements in diagnosis, most cases are detected at advanced stages, resulting in poor outcomes. However, recent breakthroughs in genome analysis have identified biomarkers that hold positive clinical significance for GC treatment. These biomarkers and classifications offer the potential for more precise diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for GC patients. In this review, we explore the classification and molecular pathways in this disease, highlighting potential biomarkers that have emerged in recent studies including targeted therapies and immunotherapies. These advancements provide a promising direction for improving the management of GC.

Pembrolizumab and trastuzumab in combination with FLOT in the perioperative treatment of HER2-positive, localized esophagogastric adenocarcinoma-a phase II trial of the AIO study group (AIO STO 0321)

Background

Esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA) presents a substantial global health challenge as the number of cases continues to rise. The current standard approach for treating localized EGA involves a combination of triplet chemotherapy, which consists of a platinum compound, a fluoropyrimidine, and a taxane (known as FLOT), followed by surgery. In cases of metastatic EGA with HER2-positive status or in certain studies with localized EGA, the use of HER2-targeted antibodies such as trastuzumab has shown improved responses. Recently, the addition of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab, when combined with 5-FU, platinum-based chemotherapy, and trastuzumab, has demonstrated significant enhancements in response rates for HER2-positive metastatic EGA. However, there is currently insufficient evidence regarding this treatment approach in localized HER2-positive disease.

Methods

The PHERFLOT study is an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, exploratory phase II trial designed to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of perioperative pembrolizumab, FLOT, and trastuzumab in patients with previously untreated localized HER2-positive EGA. In total, 30 patients will be recruited. The co-primary end points are pathological complete response rate and disease-free survival rate after 2 years. Secondary objectives include safety and tolerability, efficacy in terms of progression-free survival and objective response rate and translational markers, such as blood-based signatures (e.g., immune repertoire changes or emergence of anti-HER2 resistance variants) or microbiota signatures that may correlate with immune activation and therapy response.

Discussion

Recent evidence from phase II clinical trials demonstrated improved efficacy through the addition of trastuzumab to perioperative FLOT. Furthermore, in advanced or metastatic EGA, the combination of trastuzumab, FLOT, and the PD1-inhibitor pembrolizumab significantly improved treatment response. The PHERFLOT study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of this treatment approach in HER2-positive-localized EGA, potentially identifying a promising new perioperative regimen for localized EGA, which then needs to be confirmed within a randomized trial. Furthermore, the accompanying translational program of the study might help to improve the stratification of suitable patients and to identify potential translational targets for future clinical trials.

Clinical trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT05504720.

The oesophageal adenocarcinoma tumour immune microenvironment dictates outcomes with different modalities of neoadjuvant therapy - results from the AGITG DOCTOR trial and the cancer evolution biobank

A plateau in treatment effect can be seen for the current 'one-size-fits-all' approach to oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) management using neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) or chemotherapy (nCT). In OAC, the tumour microenvironment (TME) is largely immunosuppressed, however a subgroup of patients with an immune-inflamed TME exist and show improved outcomes. We aimed to understand the overall immune-based mechanisms underlying treatment responses and patient outcomes in OAC, and in relation to neoadjuvant therapy modality. This study included 107 patients; 68 patients were enrolled in the Australian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group sponsored DOCTOR Trial, and 38 patients were included from the Cancer Evolution Biobank. Matched pre-treatment and post-treatment tumour biopsies were used to perform multi-modality analysis of the OAC TME including NanoString mRNA expression analysis, multiplex and single colour immunohistochemistry (IHC), and peripheral blood mononuclear cell analysis of tumour-antigen specific T cell responses. Patients with the best clinicopathological outcomes and survival had an immune-inflamed TME enriched with anti-tumour immune cells and pathways. Those with the worst survival showed a myeloid T regulatory cell enriched TME, with decreased CD8+ cell infiltration and increased pro-tumour immune cells. Multiplex IHC analysis identified that high intra-tumoural infiltration of CD8+ cells, and low infiltration with CD163+ cells was associated with improved survival. High tumour core CD8+ T cell infiltration, and a low tumour margin infiltration of CD163+ cells was also associated with improved survival. nCRT showed improved survival compared with nCT for patients with low CD8+, or high CD163+ cell infiltration. Poly-functional T cell responses were seen with tumour-antigen specific T cells. Overall, our study supports the development of personalised therapeutic approaches based on the immune microenvironment in OAC. Patients with an immune-inflamed TME show favourable outcomes regardless of treatment modality. However, in those with an immunosuppressed TME with CD163+ cell infiltration, treatment with nCRT can improve outcomes. Our findings support previous studies into the TME of OAC and with more research, immune based biomarker selection of treatment modality may lead in improved outcomes in this deadly disease.

Randomized phase II study comparing neoadjuvant 5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin/docetaxel versus docetaxel/oxaliplatin/S-1 for patients with type 4 or large type 3 gastric cancer

Macroscopic type 4 and large type 3 gastric cancer, mostly overlapping with scirrhous or linitis plastica type, exhibit a highly invasive nature and show unfavorable prognosis after curative surgery, even with adjuvant chemotherapy. A randomized phase III trial (JCOG0501) failed to demonstrate a survival advantage of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin for this population. The current authors initiated a randomized phase II study comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin/docetaxel versus docetaxel/oxaliplatin/S-1 for type 4 and large type 3 gastric cancer. 76 patients are planned to be enrolled over two years. The primary end point is the proportion of patients with a pathological response (grade 1b or higher) and secondary end points include overall survival and adverse events. Clinical Trial Registration: jRCTs031230231 (rctportal.niph.go.jp).

Safety and Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy in Gastric Cancer Patients with a PD-L1 Positive Status: A Case Report

INTRODUCTION

The landscape of gastric cancer treatment has changed owing to the widespread use of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Autophagy, involved in regulating the immune system, is a potential trigger of immunity in tumors. This study aims to find molecular-based evidence for the effectiveness of FLOT chemotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in gastric cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three patients with advanced gastric cancer received FLOT neoadjuvant chemotherapy with immunotherapy and surgery. IHC was used to determine the PD-L1 status. Real-time PCR was used to analyze expression patterns of transcriptional growth factors, AKT/mTOR signaling components, PD-1, PD-L1, PD-L2 and LC3B. The LC3B content was measured via Western blotting analysis.

RESULTS

The combination of FLOT neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy was found to be efficient in patients with a PD-L1-positive status. Gastric tumors with a PD-L1-positive status exhibited autophagy activation and decreased PD-1 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

FLOT chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors showed high efficacy in gastric cancer patients with a positive PD-L1 status. Autophagy was involved in activating the tumor immunity. Further research is needed to clarify the mechanism of effective anticancer treatment.

Prognostic Value of T-Cell Density in the Tumor Center and Outer Margins in Gastric Cancer

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are associated with the survival of gastric cancer patients. T-cell densities in the tumor and its periphery were previously identified as prognostic T-cell markers for resectable gastric cancer. Immunohistochemistry for 5 T-cell markers, CD3, CD45RO, CD8, FOXP3, and granzyme B was performed on serial sections of N = 251 surgical resection specimens of patients treated with surgery only in the D1/D2 trial. Positive T cells were digitally quantified into tiles of 0.25 mm2 across 3 regions: the tumor center (TC), the inner invasive margin, and the outer invasive margin (OIM). A classification and regression tree model was employed to identify the optimal combination of median T-cell densities per region with cancer-specific survival (CSS) as the outcome. All statistical tests were 2-sided. CD8OIM was identified as the most dominant prognostic factor, followed by FOXP3TC, resulting in a decision tree containing 3 prognostically distinct subgroups with high (Hi) or low (Lo) density of the markers: CD8OIMHi, CD8OIMLo/FOXP3TCHi, and CD8OIMLo/FOXP3TCLo. In a multivariable Cox regression analysis, which included pathological T and N stages, Lauren histologic types, EBV status, microsatellite instability, and type of surgery, the immune subgroups were independent predictors for CSS. CSS was lower for CD8OIMLo/FOXP3TCHi (HR: 5.02; 95% CI: 2.03-12.42) and for CD8OIMLo/FOXP3TCLo (HR: 7.99; 95% CI: 3.22-19.86), compared with CD8OIMHi (P < .0001). The location and density of both CD8+ and FOXP3+ T cells in resectable gastric cancer are independently associated with survival. The combination of CD8OIM and FOXP3TC T-cell densities is a promising stratification factor that should be validated in independent studies.

The Present and Future of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer is a highly prevalent and lethal disease worldwide. Given the insidious nature of the presenting symptoms, patients are frequently diagnosed with advanced, unresectable disease. However, many patients will present with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC), which is often defined as the primary tumor extending beyond the muscularis propria (cT3-T4) or having nodal metastases (cN+) disease and without distant metastases (cM0). LAGC is typically treated with surgical resection and perioperative chemotherapy. The treatment of LAGC remains a challenge, given the heterogeneity of this disease, and the optimal multimodal treatment regimen may be different for different LAGC subtypes. However, many promising treatments are on the horizon based on knowledge of molecular subtypes and key biomarkers of LAGC, such as microsatellite instability, HER2, Claudin 18.2, FGFR2, and PD-L1. This review will expand upon the discussion of current standard neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies for LAGC and explore the ongoing and future clinical trials for novel therapies, with information obtained from searches in PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov.

Role of Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Management of Gastroesophageal Cancers

PURPOSE

This article reviews the essential clinical trials that have led to these immunotherapy approvals and explores the use of predictive biomarkers, such as PD-L1 expression and MSI status, to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from immunotherapies.

METHODS

This case review series describe findings from different clinical trials and contribute to the evolving understanding of the role of CPIs in managing advanced gastroesophageal cancers and may lead to improved treatment options and patient outcomes. Ongoing clinical trials also hold promise for expanding treatment options and improving patient outcomes in the future.

METHODS

The systematic review followed the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The protocol has not been registered. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify relevant clinical trials and studies that describe the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in managing advanced gastroesophageal cancers. Electronic database (PubMed, Clinicaltrials.gov, Society of Immunotherapy of Cancer, Aliment Pharmacology & Therapeutics, BMC cancer, Molecular Cancer Research, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, American Association for Cancer Research, Science, Nature, Cancer Discovery, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Advanced Immunology, Oncotarget, Nature Medicine, Nature Genetics, Gut, Pathology and Oncology Research, Journal of Clinical Oncology, The New England Journal of Medicine, Gastrointestinal oncology, JAMA Oncology, Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Current Oncology, Annals of Oncology, The Lancet, JCO Oncology Practice, Future Oncology, Gastric Cancer, CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, American Journal of Gastroenterology, Gastroenterology, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, International Journal of Epidemiology, Helicobacter, Gastroenterology Review) were searched using a combination of relevant keywords and MESH terms. The search encompassed articles published up to 5/2023. Additionally, manual searches of reference lists of selected articles and pertinent review papers were conducted to ensure comprehensive coverage of relevant studies. Studies were included if they provided insights into clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of CPIs in treating advanced gastroesophageal cancers. Relevant case reviews and trials exploring combination therapies involving CPIs were also considered. Articles discussed in the utilization of predictive biomarkers were included to assess their impact on treatment outcomes. Data from selected studies were extracted to inform the narrative review. Key findings were summarized, including clinical trial designs, patient populations, treatment regimens, response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. The role of predictive biomarkers, particularly PD-L1 expression and MSI status, in identifying patients likely to benefit from CPIs was critically evaluated based on study results. Ongoing clinical trials investigating novel combination strategies and exploring the broader scope of CPIs in gastroesophageal cancers were also highlighted. The collected data were synthesized to provide a comprehensive overview of the crucial clinical trials that have contributed to the approval of CPIs for advanced gastroesophageal cancers. The role of CPIs in different lines of therapy, including first-line regimens, was discussed. Furthermore, the evolving landscape of predictive biomarkers was examined, emphasizing their potential significance in optimizing patient selection for CPI therapy. Ongoing clinical trials were reviewed to underscore the continuous efforts in expanding treatment options and improving patient outcomes in the future.

Microsatellite instability and sex-specific differences of survival in gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy without and with taxane: An observational study in real world patients

PURPOSE

To investigate the prognostic role of microsatellite instability (MSI) in association with sex of patients treated with platinum/fluoropyrimidine neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CTx) with or without a taxane-containing compound.

METHODS

Of the 505 retrospectively analyzed patients with gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, 411 patients were treated without taxane and 94 patients with a taxane-containing compound. MSI was determined using standard assays.

RESULTS

Females demonstrated a better overall survival (OS) than males in the non-taxane group (HR, 0.59; 95% CI 0.41-0.86; p = 0.005), whereas no significant difference was found in the taxane group (HR 1.22; 95% CI 0.55-2.73, p = 0.630). MSI-High (-H) was associated with a better prognosis in both groups (without taxane: HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.33-0.97; p = 0.038; with taxane: HR 0.28; 95% CI 0.04-2.02, p = 0.204). In the non-taxane group, female MSI-H patients showed the best OS (HR 0.18, 95% CI 0.05-0.73; p = 0.016), followed by the female microsatellite stable (MSS) (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.98, p = 0.040) and the male MSI-H group (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.42-1.37, p = 0.760) taken the male MSS group as reference. In the taxane group, female and male MSI-H patients demonstrated the best OS (female MSI-H: HR 0.05, 95% CI 0.00-240.46; male MSI-H: HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.61-3.63, p = 0.438), whereas the female MSS group showed a decreased OS (HR 1.39 95% CI 0.62-3.12, p = 0.420) compared to male MSS patients.

CONCLUSION

OS in gastric/gastroesophageal cancer after CTx might depend on sex and MSI status and may differ between patients treated with or without a taxane compound in the chemotherapeutic regimen.

Survival impact of microsatellite instability in stage II gastric cancer patients who received S-1 adjuvant monotherapy after curative resection

Adjuvant S-1 monotherapy is the standard of care for stage II gastric cancer (GC) after curative resection in Japan, but its efficacy for microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors has remained unknown. Among a multi-institutional cohort of patients with stage II GC who underwent R0 resection followed by S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy between February 2008 and December 2018, we assessed MSI status with an MSI-IVD Kit (Falco). MSI status was assessable for 184 (88.5%) of the 208 enrolled patients, with MSI-H being identified in 24 (13.0%) individuals. Although neither relapse-free survival (RFS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.00, p = 0.997) nor overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.66, p = 0.488) differed between MSI-H versus microsatellite-stable (MSS) patients, MSI-H patients showed a nonsignificant but better RFS (HR = 0.34, p = 0.064) and OS (HR = 0.22, p = 0.057) than did MSS patients after adjustment for background characteristics by propensity score (PS) analysis. Gene expression analysis in the PS-matched cohort suggested that recurrence was associated with the immunosuppressive microenvironment in MSI-H tumors but with expression of cancer/testis antigen genes in MSS tumors. Our data reveal a better adjusted survival for MSI-H versus MSS stage II GC treated with S-1 adjuvant therapy, and they suggest that mechanisms of recurrence differ between MSI-H and MSS tumors.

Perioperative TAS-118 plus oxaliplatin in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: APOLLO-11 study

BACKGROUND

We investigated the feasibility of perioperative chemotherapy with S-1 and leucovorin (TAS-118) plus oxaliplatin in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients with clinical T3-4N1-3M0 gastric cancer received four courses of TAS-118 (40-60 mg/body, orally, twice daily for seven days) plus oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2, intravenously, day one) every two weeks preoperatively followed by gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy, followed by postoperative chemotherapy with either 12 courses of TAS-118 monotherapy (Step 1) or eight courses of TAS-118 plus oxaliplatin (Step 2). The primary endpoints were completion rates of preoperative chemotherapy with TAS-118 plus oxaliplatin and postoperative chemotherapy with TAS-118 monotherapy (Step 1) or TAS-118 plus oxaliplatin (Step 2).

RESULTS

Among 45 patients enrolled, the preoperative chemotherapy completion rate was 88.9% (90% CI 78.0-95.5). Major grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were diarrhoea (17.8%) and neutropenia (8.9%). The R0 resection rate was 95.6% (90% CI 86.7-99.2). Complete pathological response was achieved in 6 patients (13.3%). Dose-limiting toxicity was not observed in 31 patients receiving postoperative chemotherapy (Step 1, n = 11; Step 2, n = 20), and completion rates were 90.9% (95% CI 63.6-99.5) for Step 1 and 80.0% (95% CI 59.9-92.9) for Step 2. No more than 10% of grade ≥ 3 AEs were observed in  patients receiving Step 1. Hypokalaemia and neutropenia occurred in 3 and 2 patients, respectively, receiving Step 2. The 3-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates were 66.7% (95% CI 50.9-78.4) and 84.4% (95% CI 70.1-92.3), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative chemotherapy with TAS-118 plus oxaliplatin with D2 gastrectomy is feasible.

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, including esophageal, gastroesophageal junction, gastric, duodenal and distal small bowel, biliary tract, pancreatic, colon, rectal, and anal cancer, comprise a heterogeneous group of malignancies that impose a significant global burden. Immunotherapy has transformed the treatment landscape for several GI cancers, offering some patients durable responses and prolonged survival. Specifically, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) directed against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), either as monotherapies or in combination regimens, have gained tissue site-specific regulatory approvals for the treatment of metastatic disease and in the resectable setting. Indications for ICIs in GI cancer, however, have differing biomarker and histology requirements depending on the anatomic site of origin. Furthermore, ICIs are associated with unique toxicity profiles compared with other systemic treatments that have long been the mainstay for GI cancer, such as chemotherapy. With the goal of improving patient care by providing guidance to the oncology community, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a panel of experts to develop this clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of GI cancer. Drawing from published data and clinical experience, the expert panel developed evidence- and consensus-based recommendations for healthcare professionals using ICIs to treat GI cancers, with topics including biomarker testing, therapy selection, and patient education and quality of life considerations, among others.

Gastric cancer treatment: recent progress and future perspectives

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Most patients are diagnosed at advanced stages due to the subtle symptoms of earlier disease and the low rate of regular screening. Systemic therapies for GC, including chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy, have evolved significantly in the past few years. For resectable GC, perioperative chemotherapy has become the standard treatment. Ongoing investigations are exploring the potential benefits of targeted therapy or immunotherapy in the perioperative or adjuvant setting. For metastatic disease, there have been notable advancements in immunotherapy and biomarker-directed therapies recently. Classification based on molecular biomarkers, such as programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), microsatellite instability (MSI), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), provides an opportunity to differentiate patients who may benefit from immunotherapy or targeted therapy. Molecular diagnostic techniques have facilitated the characterization of GC genetic profiles and the identification of new potential molecular targets. This review systematically summarizes the main research progress in systemic treatment for GC, discusses current individualized strategies and presents future perspectives.

Advances in translational therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer

Translational therapy refers to a combination of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer who are initially unable to undergo R0 resection. This treatment can achieve partial or complete remission of the unresectable tumors to meet the criteria for R0 resection, thus enabling the patients to prolong their survival time and improve their quality of life. In gastric cancer, translational therapy has been tried and improved. At present, there are a large number of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer in China, and the selection of suitable patients for translational therapy to prolong objective survival and improve survival quality is one of the hot spots in the field of gastric cancer research.

Integrating multiple machine learning algorithms for prognostic prediction of gastric cancer based on immune-related lncRNAs

Background: Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) play an important role in the immune regulation of gastric cancer (GC). However, the clinical application value of immune-related lncRNAs has not been fully developed. It is of great significance to overcome the challenges of prognostic prediction and classification of gastric cancer patients based on the current study.

Methods: In this study, the R package ImmLnc was used to obtain immune-related lncRNAs of The Cancer Genome Atlas Stomach Adenocarcinoma (TCGA-STAD) project, and univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to find prognostic immune-related lncRNAs. A total of 117 combinations based on 10 algorithms were integrated to determine the immune-related lncRNA prognostic model (ILPM). According to the ILPM, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was employed to find the major lncRNAs and develop the risk model. ssGSEA, CIBERSORT algorithm, the R package maftools, pRRophetic, and clusterProfiler were employed for measuring the proportion of immune cells among risk groups, genomic mutation difference, drug sensitivity analysis, and pathway enrichment score.

Results: A total of 321 immune-related lncRNAs were found, and there were 26 prognostic immune-related lncRNAs. According to the ILPM, 18 of 26 lncRNAs were selected and the risk score (RS) developed by the 18-lncRNA signature had good strength in the TCGA training set and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) validation datasets. Patients were divided into high- and low-risk groups according to the median RS, and the low-risk group had a better prognosis, tumor immune microenvironment, and tumor signature enrichment score and a higher metabolism, frequency of genomic mutations, proportion of immune cell infiltration, and antitumor drug resistance. Furthermore, 86 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between high- and low-risk groups were mainly enriched in immune-related pathways.

Conclusion: The ILPM developed based on 26 prognostic immune-related lncRNAs can help in predicting the prognosis of patients suffering from gastric cancer. Precision medicine can be effectively carried out by dividing patients into high- and low-risk groups according to the RS.

Current Strategy to Treat Immunogenic Gastrointestinal Cancers: Perspectives for a New Era

Since pembrolizumab, an anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibody, showed a dramatic response to immunogenic cancers with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) and/or deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) in the pilot clinical trial KEYNOTE-016, subsequent studies have confirmed durable responses of anti-PD-1 inhibitors for MSI-H/dMMR solid tumors. As immunotherapy is described as a "game changer," the therapeutic landscape for MSI-H/dMMR solid tumors including gastrointestinal cancers has changed considerably in the last decade. An MSI/MMR status has been established as the predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint blockades, playing an indispensable role in the clinical practice of patients with MSI-H/dMMR tumors. Immunotherapy is also now investigated for locally advanced MSI-H/dMMR gastrointestinal cancers. Despite this great success, a few populations with MSI-H/dMMR gastrointestinal cancers do not respond to immunotherapy, possibly due to the existence of intrinsic or acquired resistance mechanisms. Clarifying the underlying mechanisms of resistance remains a future task, whereas attempts to overcome resistance and improve the efficacy of immunotherapy are currently ongoing. Herein, we review recent clinical trials with special attention to MSI-H/dMMR gastrointestinal cancers together with basic/translational findings, which provide their rationale, and discuss perspectives for the further therapeutic development of treatment in this field.

Recent Advances in the Systemic Treatment of Localized Gastroesophageal Cancer

The overall survival expectancy of localized gastroesophageal cancer patients still remains under 5 years despite advances in neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment strategies in recent years. For almost a decade, immunotherapy has been successfully implemented as a first-line treatment for various oncological diseases in advanced stages. In the case of advanced gastroesophageal cancer, 2021 witnessed several approvals of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies by different authorities. Although it is still a debate whether this treatment should be restricted to a certain subgroup of patients based on biomarker selection, immunotherapy agents are making remarkable steps in resectable settings as well. The Checkmate-577 study demonstrated significant benefits of nivolumab as an adjuvant treatment for resectable esophageal and gastroesophageal junction tumors and thereby obtained approvals both from U.S. American and European authorities. First results of further potential practice-changing clinical trials are expected in 2023, which might change the treatment armamentarium for resectable gastroesophageal cancers significantly. This review aims to demonstrate the advances of immunotherapy and targeted therapies in treatment of localized gastric, gastroesophageal junction and esophageal tumors and gives a short summary on promising ongoing clinical trials.

Recent advances in immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy for gastric cancer

Our increasing understanding of the molecular biological characteristics of cancer and of cancer genomics is facilitating the development of immunotherapy and molecular targeted drugs for gastric cancer. After the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for melanoma in 2010, many different cancers have been shown to respond to such treatments. Thus, the anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab was reported to prolong survival in 2017, and ICIs have become the mainstay of treatment development. Many clinical trials of combination therapies with cytotoxic agents and molecular-targeted agents, as well as combinations of immunotherapeutic agents acting via different mechanisms, are currently underway for each treatment line. As a result, further improvements in therapeutic outcomes for gastric cancer are anticipated in the near future.

Immunotherapy in the Management of Esophagogastric Cancer: A Practical Review

Recent data support incorporation of immune checkpoint inhibitors into the treatment armamentarium for esophageal, gastroesophageal junction, and gastric (esophagogastric) cancer. This practical review focuses on clinical trials that influenced US Food and Drug Administration approvals and treatment guidelines in esophagogastric cancer, including the impact of location, stage, histology, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status, and PD-(L)1 expression on these guidelines. The role of immunotherapy in the locally advanced and metastatic setting is constantly expanding. Over the next few years, the many ongoing trials exploring immunotherapy are anticipated to bring new treatment regimens into the frontline setting with the potential to improve survival in patients with advanced disease.

Current developments in gastric cancer: from molecular profiling to treatment strategy

Gastric cancer and gastro-oesophageal junction cancer represent a global health-care challenge. Despite the efficacy of improved chemotherapy and surgical options, these patients still have a poor prognosis. In advanced disease, only trastuzumab and some immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab in addition to chemotherapy, have demonstrated consistent and reliable efficacy in patients with HER2-positive and PDL1-positive tumours, respectively. In this Review, we discuss the intrinsic characteristics of gastric and gastro-oesophageal cancer from the molecular and clinical perspectives and provide a comprehensive review of previously reported and ongoing phase II and III clinical trials with targeted agents and immunotherapy in advanced and localized settings. Finally, we suggest alternative strategies to help overcome current challenges in precision medicine and to improve outcomes for these patients.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Solid Tumors in the Adjuvant Setting: Current Progress, Future Directions, and Role in Transplant Oncology

The rationale for administering immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the adjuvant setting is to eradicate micro-metastases and, ultimately, prolong survival. Thus far, clinical trials have demonstrated that 1-year adjuvant courses of ICIs reduce the risk of recurrence in melanoma, urothelial cancer, renal cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers. Overall survival benefit has been shown in melanoma while survival data are still not mature in other malignancies. Emerging data also show the feasibility of utilizing ICIs in the peri-transplant setting for hepatobiliary malignancies. While ICIs are generally well-tolerated, the development of chronic immune-related adverse events, typically endocrinopathies or neurotoxicities, as well as delayed immune-related adverse events, warrants further scrutiny regarding the optimal duration of adjuvant therapy and requires a thorough risk-benefit determination. The advent of blood-based, dynamic biomarkers such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can help detect minimal residual disease and identify the subset of patients who would likely benefit from adjuvant treatment. In addition, the characterization of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and ctDNA-adjusted blood tumor mutation burden (bTMB) has also shown promise in predicting response to immunotherapy. Until additional, prospective studies delineate the magnitude of overall survival benefit and validate the use of predictive biomarkers, a tailored, patient-centered approach to adjuvant ICIs that includes extensive patient counseling on potentially irreversible adverse effects should be routinely incorporated into clinical practice.

Perioperative chemotherapy with 5-FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: ten years real-life experience from a surgical perspective

PURPOSE

According to the results of FLOT4 trial, perioperative FLOT chemotherapy improved overall survival (OS) in locally advanced, resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA) compared to perioperative ECF/ECX. We report real-life data 10 years after introduction of perioperative FLOT at our institution.

METHODS

Survival of 356 consecutive EGA patients (cT3/4 and/or cN + and/or cM1) who underwent curative surgical resection was retrospectively analysed from a prospective database. A total of 263 patients received preoperative chemotherapy according to FLOT protocol and 93 patients received an epirubicin/platinum/5FU-based regimen (EPF). Propensity score matching (PSM) according to pretretment characteristics was performed to compensate for heterogeneity between groups.

RESULTS

Median OS did not differ between groups (FLOT/EPF 52.1/46.4 months, p = 0.577). After PSM, survival was non-significantly improved after FLOT compared to EPF (median OS not reached/46.4 months, p = 0.156). Perioperative morbidity and mortality did not differ between groups. Histopathologic response rate was 35% after FLOT and 26% after EPF (p = 0.169). R0 resection could be achieved more frequently after FLOT than after EPF (93%/79%, p = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

Overall survival after perioperative FLOT followed by surgery is comparable to clinical trials. However, collective real-life application of FLOT failed to provide a significant survival benefit compared to EPF. In clinical reality, patient selection is triggered by age, comorbidity, tumor localization, and clinical tumor stage. Yet matched analyses support FLOT4 trial findings.

Presurgical radiation and chemotherapy in preparation for thoracic tumor resection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article aims at describing the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiation therapy as well the novel immunotherapy and targeted therapy in thoracic oncology with focus on anesthetic considerations of such treatments for the surgical patient.

RECENT FINDINGS

In recent years, immune check point inhibitors have changed the landscape of thoracic oncology treatment. In this review, we summarize the key studies that have been fundamental in this change.

SUMMARY

Rather than a comprehensive review, the purpose of this work is to provide the reader with an overview of the most common neoadjuvant regimens used in current practice, with the corresponding most prevalent adverse effects as it pertains for patients with esophageal and lung cancer, malignant pleural mesothelioma and mediastinal tumors. Considerations relevant to the anesthesiologist, including specific toxicities related to each treatment type, and the impact of each treatment type on perioperative outcomes and complications will be discussed.

New molecular and immunologic targets of therapy for esophageal cancer and the prospects for ongoing and future clinical trials

Esophageal cancer is a deadly disease worldwide. Advancements in diagnosis, surgical technique, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy have improved survival over the years. While targeted therapy and immunotherapy have significantly impacted survival for patients with advanced disease, they have also been demonstrating efficacy when added to trimodality therapy for locoregional disease. This review focuses on molecular and immunologic targets of therapy for esophageal cancer and the prospects for ongoing and future clinical trials.

Predictive significance of surgery-induced lymphopenia on the survival after curative resection for locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

Following the establishment of the anti-cancer effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors, lymphopenia has attracted attention as a parameter of preexisting cancer-related immune tolerance. Although the pretreatment absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) has been reported as a prognostic factor in gastric cancer patients, the impact of perioperative changes in the ALC remains unknown. The aim of the present study was to explore the relationship between surgery-induced lymphopenia and outcome.

METHODS

Database entries for 584 patients who underwent curative resections for pathological Stage IB-III gastric cancer were reviewed. We retrospectively compared clinicopathological factors including pretreatment ALC (pre-ALC) and ALC at first visit after discharge (post-ALC) with the survival. The low ALC was defined as < 1000/μL.

RESULTS

The ALC decreased significantly at 1 and 3 days after surgery and then recovered to the baseline value. A low pre-ALC (p < 0.001) and a low post-ALC (p < 0.001) were both correlated with a poor relapse-free survival (RFS). A multivariate analysis of RFS identified a low post-ALC (hazard ratio 1.875, 95% CI 1.156-3.402, p = 0.01), age, gender, BMI, T disease, N disease, severe vessel invasion, type of gastrectomy and postoperative morbidity as independent factors. The low post-ALC group had a poor RFS among patients with Stage II (p = 0.04) and Stage III (p = 0.04) disease, but not among patients with Stage IB disease (p = 0.13). Consistently, the overall survival (OS) rate was significantly lower among patients with a low post-ALC for all stage (p < 0.001), stage II (p = 0.02) and stage III (p = 0.01) disease, not for stage IB (p = 0.09). A low post-ALC was identified as an independent factor for predicting OS by multivariate analysis (hazard ratio: 2.275, 95% CI 1.373-3.769, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

A decrease in post-ALC was correlated with both of RFS and OS after curative resection in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.

HIGHLIGHTS

Postoperative lymphopenia was a poor prognostic factor for gastric cancer.