1
|
Feng X, Liu J. A novel dose-adjustment protocol for interrupted subcutaneous immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis. Immunotherapy 2023; 15:1171-1181. [PMID: 37585664 DOI: 10.2217/imt-2023-0051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to develop a novel dose strategy for subcutaneous immunotherapy to reduce medical waste and financial burdens for patients who are required to restart subcutaneous immunotherapy. Patients & methods: A prospective, nonrandomized concurrent controlled trial was performed to assess the safety and advantages of the novel dose-adjustment protocol compared with the conventional one. 76 subjects were grouped to receive novel or conventional dose-adjustment protocols. Results: The injections, visits and time needed to reach the pre-established dose with the novel regimen were decreased. Furthermore, there were no differences in side reactions between the two groups. Conclusion: The novel protocol seemed safe and well tolerated, offering the advantages of time efficiency and reduced healthcare costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xian Feng
- Department of Otolaryngology, Affiliated Eye Ear Nose & Throat Hospital, Fudan University, No. 83, Fenyang Road, Shanghai, 200031, PR China
| | - Juan Liu
- Department of Otolaryngology, Affiliated Eye Ear Nose & Throat Hospital, Fudan University, No. 83, Fenyang Road, Shanghai, 200031, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Intradermal Allergen Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis: Current Evidence. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12081341. [PMID: 36013290 PMCID: PMC9409804 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12081341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Allergic rhinitis (AR) is an immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated inflammatory disease that is induced by allergen introduction to the nasal mucosa, which triggers an inflammatory response. The current treatments for AR include allergen avoidance and pharmacotherapy; however, allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only treatment that can be employed to modify immunologic responses and to achieve a cure for allergic diseases. The current standard routes of AIT administration are the subcutaneous and sublingual routes. Alternatively, the dermis contains a high density of dermal dendritic cells that act as antigen-presenting cells, so intradermal administration may confer added advantages and increase the efficacy of AIT. Moreover, intradermal immunotherapy (IDIT) may facilitate a reduction in the allergen dosage and a shortening of the treatment duration. The aim of this review was to search and evaluate the current evidence specific to IDIT, including its modified formulations, such as allergoids and peptides. The results of this review reveal conflicting evidence that suggests that the overall benefit of IDIT remains unclear. As such, further clinical trials are needed to establish the clinical utility of IDIT, and to determine the optimal treatment-related protocols.
Collapse
|
3
|
Soletchnik M, Vacher-Godet F, Bounaud N, Dabin-Pouchard S, Rousseau G. [Path of a fighter]. REVUE DE L'INFIRMIERE 2022; 71:30-32. [PMID: 36150836 DOI: 10.1016/j.revinf.2022.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Allergy is a frequent and often disabling condition for the patients. In the context of allergic rhinitis and asthma or anaphylactic shock to hymenoptera venom, allergenic desensitization can be proposed to limit the symptoms or recurrence of major reactions. Access to this treatment is made difficult by a lack of allergists, a lack of products or, more recently, by the Covid-19 crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mickael Soletchnik
- Département de médecine d'urgence, CHRU Tours, hôpital Trousseau, avenue de la République, 37170 Chambray-lès-Tours, France
| | - Fabienne Vacher-Godet
- Service transversal d'allergologie et immunologie clinique, CHRU Tours, hôpital Bretonneau, 2 boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours, France
| | - Nicolas Bounaud
- Structure des urgences, CH Montauban, 100 rue Léon-Cladel, 82000 Montauban, France
| | - Sophie Dabin-Pouchard
- Département de médecine d'urgence, CHRU Tours, hôpital Trousseau, avenue de la République, 37170 Chambray-lès-Tours, France
| | - Geoffroy Rousseau
- Département de médecine d'urgence, CHRU Tours, hôpital Trousseau, avenue de la République, 37170 Chambray-lès-Tours, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yadav S, Singh S, Mandal P, Tripathi A. Immunotherapies in the treatment of immunoglobulin E‑mediated allergy: Challenges and scope for innovation (Review). Int J Mol Med 2022; 50:95. [PMID: 35616144 DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2022.5151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunoglobulin E (IgE)‑mediated allergy or hypersensitivity reactions are generally defined as an unwanted severe symptomatic immunological reaction that occurs due to shattered or untrained peripheral tolerance of the immune system. Allergen‑specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only therapeutic strategy that can provide a longer‑lasting symptomatic and clinical break from medications in IgE‑mediated allergy. Immunotherapies against allergic diseases comprise a successive increasing dose of allergen, which helps in developing the immune tolerance against the allergen. AITs exerttheirspecial effectiveness directly or indirectly by modulating the regulator and effector components of the immune system. The number of success stories of AIT is still limited and it canoccasionallyhave a severe treatment‑associated adverse effect on patients. Therefore, the formulation used for AIT should be appropriate and effective. The present review describes the chronological evolution of AIT, and provides a comparative account of the merits and demerits of different AITs by keeping in focus the critical guiding factors, such as sustained allergen tolerance, duration of AIT, probability of mild to severe allergic reactions and dose of allergen required to effectuate an effective AIT. The mechanisms by which regulatory T cells suppress allergen‑specific effector T cells and how loss of natural tolerance against innocuous proteins induces allergy are reviewed. The present review highlights the major AIT bottlenecks and the importantregulatory requirements for standardized AIT formulations. Furthermore, the present reviewcalls attention to the problem of 'polyallergy', which is still a major challenge for AIT and the emerging concept of 'component‑resolved diagnosis' (CRD) to address the issue. Finally, a prospective strategy for upgrading CRD to the next dimension is provided, and a potential technology for delivering thoroughly standardized AIT with minimal risk is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarika Yadav
- Systems Toxicology and Health Risk Assessment Group, CSIR‑Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226001, India
| | - Saurabh Singh
- Systems Toxicology and Health Risk Assessment Group, CSIR‑Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226001, India
| | - Payal Mandal
- Food, Drugs and Chemical Toxicology Group, CSIR‑Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226001, India
| | - Anurag Tripathi
- Systems Toxicology and Health Risk Assessment Group, CSIR‑Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226001, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Murty R, Sankaranarayanan A, Bowland II, Mena-Lapaix J, Prausnitz MR. Angled Insertion of Microneedles for Targeted Antigen Delivery to the Epidermis. Pharmaceutics 2022; 14:pharmaceutics14020347. [PMID: 35214079 PMCID: PMC8874562 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14020347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Peanut and tree nut allergies account for most food-induced anaphylactic events. The standard allergy immunotherapy approach involves subcutaneous injection, which is challenging because severe adverse reactions can occur when antigens spread systemically. Allergen localization within the epidermis (i.e., the upper 20–100 µm of skin) should significantly reduce systemic uptake, because the epidermis is avascular. Microneedle (MN) patches provide a convenient method for drug delivery to the skin, but they generally target both epidermis and dermis, leading to systemic delivery. In this study, we adapted MN technology for epidermal localization by performing angled insertion of 250 µm–long MNs that limits MN insertion depth mostly to the epidermis. We designed a biplanar insertion device to aid the repeatability of angled insertions into porcine skin ex vivo at specified angles (90°, 45°, and 20°). When compared to 90° insertions, MN application at 20° decreased mean insertion depth from 265 ± 45 µm to 97 ± 15 µm. Image analysis of histological skin sections revealed that acute-angle insertion increased epidermal localization of delivery for antigen-coated MNs from 25% ± 13% to 70% ± 21%. We conclude that angled insertion of MNs can target antigen delivery to epidermis.
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhang Z, Li Z, Lin H. Reducing the Allergenicity of Shrimp Tropomyosin and Allergy Desensitization Based on Glycation Modification. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY 2021; 69:14742-14750. [PMID: 34427086 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c03953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Shrimp is a major allergic food that could trigger severe food allergy, with the most significant and potent allergen of shrimp referred to as tropomyosin (TM). Glycation modification (Maillard reaction) could reportedly weaken the allergenicity of TM and generate hypoallergenic TM, while up to now, there is still a lack of investigations on the hypoallergenic glycated tropomyosin (GTM) as a candidate immunotherapy for desensitizing the shrimp TM-induced allergy. This study analyzed the effects of glycation modification on decreasing the allergenicity of TM and generated hypoallergenic GTM and how GTM absorbed to the Al(OH)3 function as a candidate immunotherapy for desensitizing allergy. As the results, in comparison to TM, the saccharides of smaller molecular sizes could lead to more advanced glycation end products in GTMs than saccharides of greater molecular sizes, and TM glycated by saccharides of different molecular sizes (glucose, maltose, maltotriose, maltopentaose, and maltoheptaose) exhibited lower allergenicity as a hypoallergen upon activating the allergic reactions of the mast cell and mouse model, while TM glycated by maltose had insignificant allergenicity changes upon activating the allergic reactions of the mast cell and mouse model. In addition, the hypoallergenic GTM + Al(OH)3 was efficient as a candidate immunotherapy; this work intended to offer preclinical data to promote GTM + Al(OH)3 as a candidate allergen-specific immunotherapy for desensitizing the allergy reactions for patients allergic to shrimp food.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziye Zhang
- Laboratory of Food Safety, College of Food Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, Shandong 266003, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhenxing Li
- Laboratory of Food Safety, College of Food Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, Shandong 266003, People's Republic of China
| | - Hong Lin
- Laboratory of Food Safety, College of Food Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, Shandong 266003, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang Z, Li XM, Li Z, Lin H. Investigation of glycated shrimp tropomyosin as a hypoallergen for potential immunotherapy. Food Funct 2021; 12:2750-2759. [PMID: 33683237 DOI: 10.1039/d0fo03039b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Tropomyosin (TM) is the most important allergen in shrimps that could cause food allergy. Glycation is reported to be effective in reducing TM allergenicity and produce hypoallergen; however, up to now, there are very few reports on the potential of hypoallergenic glycated TM (GTM) as allergen immunotherapy for shrimp TM-induced food allergy. This study investigated the glycation of TM-produced hypoallergen and the immunotherapeutic efficacy of GTM + Al(OH)3 as potential allergen immunotherapy. Compared to TM, the TM glycated by glucose (TM-G), maltotriose (TM-MTS), maltopentaose (TM-MPS) and maltoheptaose (TM-MHS) had weaker allergy activation on mast cells and mouse model as a hypoallergen. However, the TM glycated by maltose (TM-M) insignificantly affected the allergenicity. In addition, the GTM absorbed into Al(OH)3 could be efficacious as potential allergen immunotherapy, particularly for the TM glycated by the saccharides having larger molecular size (e.g., TM-MHS), which could provide preclinical data to develop GTM + Al(OH)3 as a candidate immunotherapy for shrimp allergic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziye Zhang
- Laboratory of Food Safety, College of Food Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pang W, Jiang Y, Li A, Zhang J, Chen M, Hu L, Li Z, Wang D. Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron Ameliorates Experimental Allergic Airway Inflammation via Activation of ICOS +Tregs and Inhibition of Th2 Response. Front Immunol 2021; 12:620943. [PMID: 33815374 PMCID: PMC8010693 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.620943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Inhibition of allergic airway diseases (AAD) by immunomodulation of the adaptive immune system through restoration of the enteric dysbiosis is an emerging therapeutic strategy. Patients with allergic rhinitis (n = 6) and healthy controls (n = 6) were enrolled, and gut microbiome composition analysis was performed by 16S rDNA sequencing. We also established an ovalbumin (OVA)-induced allergic airway inflammation murine model. Dysbiosis of the gut flora was observed in both AAD patients and the mice, with the decrease of the biodiversity and the quantity of the Bacteroidetes phylum. Oral application of Bacteroides (B.) thetaiotaomicron ameliorated the symptoms of OVA-induced airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and attenuated the airway inflammation in mice. In addition, nasal lavage fluid (NALF) and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) from AAD mice orally administered with B. thetaiotaomicron showed reduced numbers of immune cells, and diminished secretion of T helper (Th)-2 cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13) compared with the corresponding control mice, whereas the levels of Th1 cytokineIFN-γ was not changed in both the groups. When B. thetaiotaomicron was co-administered with metronidazole in AAD mice, the immunomodulatory effect was weakened and the allergic inflammatory response was aggravated. The ratios of CD4+Foxp3+ cells, CD4+ICOS+ T cells, CD4+ICOS+ Foxp3+ regulatory T cells, and IL-10-expressing CD4+Foxp3+ cells were increased in lymphocytes of spleen, mesenteric, and cervical lymph nodes of AAD mice administrated with B. thetaiotaomicron. Therefore, our data indicate that oral administration of B. thetaiotaomicron effectively inhibited the development of AAD in murine model; inhibition was mediated by the activation of Tregs and inhibition of Th2 response without promoting a Th1 response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenhui Pang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.,ENT Institute and Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yan Jiang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Aifeng Li
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Jisheng Zhang
- Medical Research Center, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Min Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Li Hu
- ENT Institute and Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhiyuan Li
- Medical Research Center, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Dehui Wang
- ENT Institute and Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Alberca-Custodio RW, Faustino LD, Gomes E, Nunes FPB, de Siqueira MK, Labrada A, Almeida RR, Câmara NOS, da Fonseca DM, Russo M. Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy With Liposome Containing CpG-ODN in Murine Model of Asthma Relies on MyD88 Signaling in Dendritic Cells. Front Immunol 2020; 11:692. [PMID: 32391011 PMCID: PMC7191058 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Changing the immune responses to allergens is the cornerstone of allergen immunotherapy. Allergen-specific immunotherapy that consists of repeated administration of increasing doses of allergen extract is potentially curative. The major inconveniences of allergen-specific immunotherapy include failure to modify immune responses, long-term treatment leading to non-compliance and the potential for developing life-threating anaphylaxis. Here we investigated the effect of a novel liposomal formulation carrying low dose of allergen combined with CpG-ODN, a synthetic TLR9 agonist, on established allergic lung inflammation. We found that challenge with allergen (OVA) encapsulated in cationic liposome induced significantly less severe cutaneous anaphylactic reaction. Notably, short-term treatment (three doses) with a liposomal formulation containing co-encapsulated allergen plus CpG-ODN, but not allergen or CpG-ODN alone, reversed an established allergic lung inflammation and provided long-term protection. This liposomal formulation was also effective against allergens derived from Blomia tropicalis mite extract. The attenuation of allergic inflammation was not associated with increased numbers of Foxp3-positive or IL-10-producing regulatory T cells or with increased levels of IFN-gamma in the lungs. Instead, the anti-allergic effect of the liposomal formulation was dependent of the innate immune signal transduction generated in CD11c-positive putative dendritic cells expressing MyD88 molecule. Therefore, we highlight the pivotal role of dendritic cells in mediating the attenuation of established allergic lung inflammation following immunotherapy with a liposomal formulation containing allergen plus CpG-ODN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lucas D. Faustino
- Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Eliane Gomes
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Department of Immunology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Alexis Labrada
- Department of Allergens, National Center of Bioproducts (BIOCEN), Havana, Cuba
| | - Rafael Ribeiro Almeida
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Department of Immunology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Denise Morais da Fonseca
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Department of Immunology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Momtchilo Russo
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Department of Immunology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kleij HPM, Warmenhoven HJM, Ree R, Versteeg SA, Pieters RHH, Dreskin SC, Knulst AC, Hoffen E, Opstelten DJE, Koppelman SJ, Smit JJ. Chemically modified peanut extract shows increased safety while maintaining immunogenicity. Allergy 2019; 74:986-995. [PMID: 30506686 DOI: 10.1111/all.13687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2018] [Revised: 10/28/2018] [Accepted: 11/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peanuts are most responsible for food-induced anaphylaxis in adults in developed countries. An effective and safe immunotherapy is urgently needed. The aim of this study was to investigate the immunogenicity, allergenicity, and immunotherapeutic efficacy of a well-characterized chemically modified peanut extract (MPE) adsorbed to Al(OH)3 . METHODS Peanut extract (PE) was modified by reduction and alkylation. Using sera of peanut-allergic patients, competitive IgE-binding assays and mediator release assays were performed. The immunogenicity of MPE was evaluated by measuring activation of human PE-specific T-cell lines and the induction of PE-specific IgG in mice. The safety and efficacy of MPE adsorbed to Al(OH)3 was tested in two mouse models by measuring allergic manifestations upon peanut challenge in peanut-allergic mice. RESULTS Compared to PE, the IgE-binding and capacity to induce allergic symptoms of MPE were lower in all patients. PE and MPE displayed similar immunogenicity in vivo and in vitro. In mice sensitized to PE, the threshold for anaphylaxis (drop in BT) upon subcutaneous challenge with PE was 0.01 mg, while at 0.3 mg MPE no allergic reaction occurred. Anaphylaxis was not observed when PE and MPE were fully adsorbed to Al(OH)3 . Both PE and MPE + Al(OH)3 showed to be efficacious in a model for immunotherapy. CONCLUSION In our studies, an Al(OH)3 adsorbed MPE showed reduced allergenicity compared to unmodified PE, while the efficacy of immunotherapy is maintained. The preclinical data presented in this study supports further development of modified peanut allergens for IT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ronald Ree
- Department of Experimental Immunology Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam AmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Serge A. Versteeg
- Department of Experimental Immunology Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Raymond H. H. Pieters
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences Immunotoxicology Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - Stephen C. Dreskin
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department of Medicine Denver School of Medicine University of Colorado Aurora Colorado
| | - André C. Knulst
- Department Dermatology/Allergology University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - Els Hoffen
- Department Dermatology/Allergology University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Joost J. Smit
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences Immunotoxicology Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Roberts G, Pfaar O, Akdis CA, Ansotegui IJ, Durham SR, Gerth van Wijk R, Halken S, Larenas-Linnemann D, Pawankar R, Pitsios C, Sheikh A, Worm M, Arasi S, Calderon MA, Cingi C, Dhami S, Fauquert JL, Hamelmann E, Hellings P, Jacobsen L, Knol E, Lin SY, Maggina P, Mösges R, Oude Elberink JNG, Pajno G, Pastorello EA, Penagos M, Rotiroti G, Schmidt-Weber CB, Timmermans F, Tsilochristou O, Varga EM, Wilkinson JN, Williams A, Zhang L, Agache I, Angier E, Fernandez-Rivas M, Jutel M, Lau S, van Ree R, Ryan D, Sturm GJ, Muraro A. EAACI Guidelines on Allergen Immunotherapy: Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Allergy 2018; 73:765-798. [PMID: 28940458 DOI: 10.1111/all.13317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 430] [Impact Index Per Article: 71.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (AR) is an allergic disorder of the nose and eyes affecting about a fifth of the general population. Symptoms of AR can be controlled with allergen avoidance measures and pharmacotherapy. However, many patients continue to have ongoing symptoms and an impaired quality of life; pharmacotherapy may also induce some side-effects. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) represents the only currently available treatment that targets the underlying pathophysiology, and it may have a disease-modifying effect. Either the subcutaneous (SCIT) or sublingual (SLIT) routes may be used. This Guideline has been prepared by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology's (EAACI) Taskforce on AIT for AR and is part of the EAACI presidential project "EAACI Guidelines on Allergen Immunotherapy." It aims to provide evidence-based clinical recommendations and has been informed by a formal systematic review and meta-analysis. Its generation has followed the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) approach. The process included involvement of the full range of stakeholders. In general, broad evidence for the clinical efficacy of AIT for AR exists but a product-specific evaluation of evidence is recommended. In general, SCIT and SLIT are recommended for both seasonal and perennial AR for its short-term benefit. The strongest evidence for long-term benefit is documented for grass AIT (especially for the grass tablets) where long-term benefit is seen. To achieve long-term efficacy, it is recommended that a minimum of 3 years of therapy is used. Many gaps in the evidence base exist, particularly around long-term benefit and use in children.
Collapse
|
12
|
The usefulness of the basophil activation test in monitoring specific immunotherapy with house dust mite allergens. Postepy Dermatol Alergol 2018; 35:93-98. [PMID: 29599678 PMCID: PMC5872250 DOI: 10.5114/ada.2018.73169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2016] [Accepted: 12/01/2016] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction In clinical practice, reliable tools for monitoring specific immunotherapy (SIT) are of utmost importance. Aim To assess the usefulness of the basophil activation test (BAT) in monitoring SIT in paediatric patients with allergy to house dust mites (HDM). Material and methods Thirty-one children qualified for SIT with HDM, of whom 21 completed the SIT during the observation period. The BAT was carried out prior to commencing the SIT (time point BAT1) and upon finishing the initial pack of allergy vaccine (cumulative dose of allergen 12487.5 PNU; BAT2), as well as after the second vaccine pack (cumulative dose of allergen 23750.0 PNU; BAT3). Peripheral blood of the patients was stimulated with allergen solutions in five concentrations from 0.00225 ng/ml to 22.5 ng/ml. Basophil activation was measured by CD63 expression in flow cytometry. Results For the allergen concentration of 0.225 ng/ml, a statistically significant decrease in median basophil activation was observed, from 51.29% at BAT1 to 8.48% at BAT2 (p = 0.004) and 4.21% at BAT3 (p < 0.001). For the allergen concentration of 0.0225 ng/ml, a statistically significant decrease was seen between BAT1 (1.72%) and BAT3 (0.21%, p = 0.01). Median CD-sens index decreased significantly from 1099.02 at BAT1 to 179.31 at BAT2 (p < 0.002) and 168.04 at BAT3 (p < 0.001). Conclusions There is a significant decrease in BAT results in the course of specific immunotherapy with HDM allergens in children, with the optimum allergen concentration for monitoring basophil response at 0.225 ng/ml. The CD-sens index seems to be a better monitoring parameter than the plain percentage of CD63-expressing basophils.
Collapse
|
13
|
Şahin E, Bafaqeeh SA, Güven SG, Çetinkaya EA, Muluk NB, Coşkun ZO, Lopatin A, Kar M, Pinarbasli MO, Cingi C. Mechanism of action of allergen immunotherapy. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2018; 30:1-3. [PMID: 27658024 DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2016.30.4367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) leads to the production of antiallergen immunoglobulin (IgG) or "blocking antibody" in the serum and an increase in antiallergen IgG and IgA in nasal secretions. There is also a decrease in the usual rise in antiallergen IgE that occurs after the pollen season. METHODS In this paper, mechanisms of action of allergen immunotherapy is reviewed. RESULTS Regulatory T (Treg) cells and their cytokines, primarily interleukin (IL) 10 and transforming growth factor beta, suppress T-helper type 2 immune responses and control allergic diseases in many ways. AIT induces a shift in the proportion of IL-4-secreting T-helper type 2 cells in favor of IL-10-secreting inducible Treg cells specific for the same allergenic epitope that increases in number and function. Different types of inducible Treg control several facets of allergic inflammation. There are two main types of immunotherapy: subcutaneous immunotherapy and sublingual immunotherapy. Subcutaneous immunotherapy is efficacious and is indicated for the reduction of seasonal symptoms. Sublingual immunotherapy involves the regular self-administration and retention of allergen extract under the tongue for 1-2 minutes before the extract is swallowed. The allergens cross the mucosa in 15-30 minutes and are then captured by tolerogenic dendritic cells and processed as small peptides. Next, via the lymphatic system, a systemic immune response is created to produce an early decrease in mast cell and basophil degranulation. CONCLUSION AIT is indicated for the treatment of moderate-to-severe intermittent or persistent symptoms of allergic rhinitis. AIT can be administered to those >5 years of age and has been shown to be safe in children as young as 3 years of age. In this article, AIT and other types of immunotherapies were discussed as well as the indications for immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethem Şahin
- Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) Clinics; Bayındır Içerenköy Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Choi SP, Oh HN, Choi CY, Ahn H, Yun H, Chung Y, Kim B, Lee S, Chun T. Oral administration of Lactobacillus plantarum
CJLP133 and CJLP243 alleviates birch pollen-induced allergic rhinitis in mice. J Appl Microbiol 2018; 124:821-828. [DOI: 10.1111/jam.13635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2017] [Revised: 09/01/2017] [Accepted: 11/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S.-P. Choi
- Department of Biotechnology; College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology; Korea University; Seoul Korea
| | - H.-N. Oh
- Department of Biotechnology; College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology; Korea University; Seoul Korea
| | - C.-Y. Choi
- Department of Biotechnology; College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology; Korea University; Seoul Korea
| | - H. Ahn
- CJ CheilJedang Corporation; Suwon-si Korea
| | - H.S. Yun
- CJ CheilJedang Corporation; Suwon-si Korea
| | - Y.M. Chung
- CJ CheilJedang Corporation; Suwon-si Korea
| | - B. Kim
- CJ CheilJedang Corporation; Suwon-si Korea
| | - S.J. Lee
- Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science; College of Health Science; Cheongju University; Cheongju-si Korea
| | - T. Chun
- Department of Biotechnology; College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology; Korea University; Seoul Korea
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bao Y, Chen J, Cheng L, Guo Y, Hong S, Kong W, Lai H, Li H, Li H, Li J, Li T, Lin X, Liu S, Liu Z, Lou H, Meng J, Qiu Q, Shen K, Tang W, Tao Z, Wang C, Wang X, Wei Q, Xiang L, Xie H, Xu Y, Zhang G, Zhang Y, Zheng Y, Zhi Y, Chen D, Hong H, Li Q, Liu L, Meng Y, Wang N, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Zhang L. Chinese Guideline on allergen immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis. J Thorac Dis 2017; 9:4607-4650. [PMID: 29268533 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.10.112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
The present document is based on a consensus reached by a panel of experts from Chinese Society of Allergy (CSA) and Chinese Allergic Rhinitis Collaborative Research Group (C2AR2G). Allergen immunotherapy (AIT), has increasingly been used as a treatment for allergic rhinitis (AR) globally, as it has been shown to provide a long-term effect in improving nasal and ocular symptoms, reducing medication need, and improving quality of life. AIT is currently the only curative intervention that can potentially modify the immune system in individuals suffering from AR and prevent the development of new sensitization and the progression of disease from AR to asthma. Although the use of AIT is becoming more acceptable in China, to date no AR immunotherapy guideline from China is available for use by the international community. This document has thus been produced and covers the main aspects of AIT undertaken in China; including selection of patients for AIT, the allergen extracts available on the Chinese market, schedules and doses of allergen employed in different routes of AIT, assessment of effect and safety, patients' administration and follow-up, and management of adverse reactions. The Chinese guideline for AR immunotherapy will thus serve as a reference point by doctors, healthcare professionals and organizations involved in the AIT of AR in China. Moreover, this guideline will serve as a source of information for the international community on AIT treatment strategies employed in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yixiao Bao
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Pubin Children Hospital, Shanghai Children Medical Center Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China
| | - Jianjun Chen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Lei Cheng
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.,International Centre for Allergy Research, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
| | - Yinshi Guo
- Department of Allergy & Immunology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China
| | - Suling Hong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
| | - Weijia Kong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - He Lai
- Department of Allergy, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510260, China
| | - Houyong Li
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Affiliated Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200031, China
| | - Huabin Li
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Affiliated Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200031, China
| | - Jing Li
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China
| | - Tianying Li
- Department of otolaryngology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Xiaoping Lin
- The PLA Center of respiratory and allergic disease diagnosing and management, Shenyang 110016, China
| | - Shixi Liu
- Department of Otolaryngology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Zheng Liu
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Hongfei Lou
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Nasal Diseases, Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Beijing 100005, China
| | - Juan Meng
- Department of Otolaryngology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Qianhui Qiu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510282, China
| | - Kunling Shen
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing 100045, China
| | - Wei Tang
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| | - Zezhang Tao
- Department of Otolaryngology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
| | - Chengshuo Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Nasal Diseases, Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Beijing 100005, China
| | - Xiangdong Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Nasal Diseases, Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Beijing 100005, China
| | - Qingyu Wei
- Department of Allergy, NO.202 Hospital of PLA, Shenyang 110003, China
| | - Li Xiang
- Department of Allergy, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing 100045, China
| | - Hua Xie
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, the General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region, Shenyang 110016, China
| | - Yu Xu
- Department of Otolaryngology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
| | - Gehua Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
| | - Yuan Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Nasal Diseases, Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Beijing 100005, China
| | - Yiwu Zheng
- Scientific Affairs, ALK, Guangzhou 510300, China
| | - Yuxiang Zhi
- Department of Allergy, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100720, China
| | - Dehua Chen
- Department of otolaryngology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Haiyu Hong
- Department of otolaryngology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Quansheng Li
- Department of Allergy, NO.202 Hospital of PLA, Shenyang 110003, China
| | - Lin Liu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
| | - Yifan Meng
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Nasal Diseases, Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Beijing 100005, China
| | - Nan Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Yihui Wang
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Pubin Children Hospital, Shanghai Children Medical Center Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China
| | - Yue Zhou
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Luo Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Nasal Diseases, Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Beijing 100005, China.,Department of Allergy, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Weber M, Niespodziana K, Linhart B, Neubauer A, Huber H, Henning R, Valenta R, Focke-Tejkl M. Comparison of the immunogenicity of BM32, a recombinant hypoallergenic B cell epitope-based grass pollen allergy vaccine with allergen extract-based vaccines. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2017; 140:1433-1436.e6. [PMID: 28576673 PMCID: PMC6392172 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.03.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2016] [Revised: 03/05/2017] [Accepted: 03/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Milena Weber
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center of Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Katarzyna Niespodziana
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center of Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Birgit Linhart
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center of Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | - Rudolf Valenta
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center of Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Margarete Focke-Tejkl
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center of Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Clinical and immunological effect of subcutaneous immunotherapy in allergic asthma. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF CHEST DISEASES AND TUBERCULOSIS 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcdt.2016.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
18
|
Safety of immunotherapy with glutaraldehyde modified allergen extracts in children and adults. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 2017; 45:198-207. [PMID: 27939406 DOI: 10.1016/j.aller.2016.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2016] [Revised: 07/28/2016] [Accepted: 08/19/2016] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glutaraldehyde-modified natural allergen extracts show significant reduction in the IgE-binding capacity and proteolytic activity. This allows the administration of higher doses in a shorter period of time, and to mix different allergen extracts. OBJECTIVE Evaluate the safety of different concentrations and mixtures of glutaraldehyde-modified allergen extracts in a large group of paediatric and adult patients undergoing specific immunotherapy treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS 1855 patients (1156 adults and 699 children), suffering from rhinoconjunctivitis and/or asthma, participated in an observational multicentre cohort study, to evaluate the safety of immunotherapy using vaccines containing modified allergen extracts. Patients were monosensitised, or polysensitised, and received a therapeutic vaccine containing polymerised allergen extracts adsorbed onto aluminium hydroxide. Safety was assessed by recording all side reactions related to immunotherapy. RESULTS The clinically relevant local reactions totalled 120, (90 immediate and 30 delayed) (1.02% of injections). Of them, 31 (0.26% of injections) occurred in children (26 immediate and 5 delayed) and 89 (0.76% of injections) in adults (64 immediate and 25 delayed). There were 38 systemic reactions. Eleven reactions were immediate (9 of grade 1 and 2 of grade 2) and 27 delayed (22 of grade 1 and 5 of grade 2). There were seven grade 2 systemic reactions (0.06% of the injections). No differences (P>0.05) in the number of reactions were observed between adults and children and between treatments were found in systemic reactions. All systemic reactions were mild and resolved spontaneously without the need of medication. CONCLUSION Specific immunotherapy using natural modified allergen vaccines is safe to treat allergic patients, even at higher doses and in mixtures of unrelated allergen extracts. The percentage of adverse reactions detected is lower than those reported in the literature with native unmodified allergen extracts.
Collapse
|
19
|
Turkalj M, Banic I, Anzic SA. A review of clinical efficacy, safety, new developments and adherence to allergen-specific immunotherapy in patients with allergic rhinitis caused by allergy to ragweed pollen ( Ambrosia artemisiifolia). Patient Prefer Adherence 2017; 11:247-257. [PMID: 28243068 PMCID: PMC5317300 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s70411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Allergic rhinitis is a common health problem in both children and adults. The number of patients allergic to ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) is on the rise throughout Europe, having a significant negative impact on the patients' and their family's quality of life. Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) has disease-modifying effects and can induce immune tolerance to allergens. Both subcutaneous immunotherapy and sublingual immunotherapy with ragweed extracts/preparations have clear positive clinical efficacy, especially over pharmacological treatment, even years after the treatment has ended. AIT also has very good safety profiles with extremely rare side effects, and the extracts/preparations used in AIT are commonly well tolerated by patients. However, patient adherence to treatment with AIT seems to be quite low, mostly due to the fact that treatment with AIT is relatively time-demanding and, moreover, due to patients not receiving adequate information and education about the treatment before it starts. AIT is undergoing innovations and improvements in clinical efficacy, safety and patient adherence, especially with new approaches using new adjuvants, recombinant or modified allergens, synthetic peptides, novel routes of administration (epidermal or intralymphatic), and new protocols, which might make AIT more acceptable for a wider range of patients and novel indications. Patient education and support (eg, recall systems) is one of the most important goals for AIT in the future, to further enhance treatment success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjana Turkalj
- Children’s Hospital Srebrnjak, Zagreb
- Faculty of Medicine, JJ Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Valenta R, Campana R, Focke-Tejkl M, Niederberger V. Vaccine development for allergen-specific immunotherapy based on recombinant allergens and synthetic allergen peptides: Lessons from the past and novel mechanisms of action for the future. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2016; 137:351-7. [PMID: 26853127 PMCID: PMC4861208 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.12.1299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2015] [Revised: 12/18/2015] [Accepted: 12/18/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
In the past, the development of more effective, safe, convenient, broadly applicable, and easy to manufacture vaccines for allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) has been limited by the poor quality of natural allergen extracts. Progress made in the field of molecular allergen characterization has now made it possible to produce defined vaccines for AIT and eventually for preventive allergy vaccination based on recombinant DNA technology and synthetic peptide chemistry. Here we review the characteristics of recombinant and synthetic allergy vaccines that have reached clinical evaluation and discuss how molecular vaccine approaches can make AIT more safe and effective and thus more convenient. Furthermore, we discuss how new technologies can facilitate the reproducible manufacturing of vaccines of pharmaceutical grade for inhalant, food, and venom allergens. Allergy vaccines in clinical trials based on recombinant allergens, recombinant allergen derivatives, and synthetic peptides allow us to target selectively different immune mechanisms, and certain of those show features that might make them applicable not only for therapeutic but also for prophylactic vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rudolf Valenta
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Raffaela Campana
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Margit Focke-Tejkl
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Stylianou E, Ueland T, Borchsenius F, Michelsen AE, Øvstebø R, Mollnes TE, Skjønsberg OH, Aukrust P. Specific allergen immunotherapy: effect on IgE, IgG4 and chemokines in patients with allergic rhinitis. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation 2016; 76:118-27. [PMID: 26878875 DOI: 10.3109/00365513.2015.1110856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT) is considered as the most effective treatment for Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergies. However, how specific immunotherapy attenuates allergic responses is still not clear, but could potentially involve cytokines as well as IgG4-mediated responses. Based on the role of chemokines in IgE-mediated inflammation, we examined the SIT-induced chemokine response in patients with allergic rhinitis. METHODS We included 35 patients with allergic rhinitis; 20 patients received SIT and 15 patients were not treated with specific immunotherapy. The patients were followed for 3 years. Blood samples were collected before SIT and 3, 5, 7 and 21 weeks and 1, 2 and 3 years after the start of therapy. Total IgE, specific IgE, IgG4 and chemokine levels were assessed. RESULTS Our main findings were: (i) SIT was associated with an early increase in total and specific IgE during the first 7 weeks, with a subsequent decline, accompanied by a marked increase in specific IgG4 when IgE started to decline; (ii) these SIT-induced responses were accompanied by and in some degree correlated with increased plasma concentrations of the chemokines, monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, and eotaxin; and (iii) within the SIT group, these correlations with chemokines were restricted to IgE and IgG4 against birch tree pollen. CONCLUSION Our findings further support a role for IgG4-mediated mechanisms in the beneficial effects of SIT in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR) and that increased levels of certain chemokines also could be of importance for the effect of such therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Stylianou
- a Department of Pulmonary Medicine , Oslo University Hospital Ullevål , Oslo
| | - Thor Ueland
- b Research Institute of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet , Oslo ;,c Faculty of Medicine , University of Oslo , Oslo ;,d K.G. Jebsen Inflammatory Research Center, University of Oslo , Oslo
| | - Fredrik Borchsenius
- a Department of Pulmonary Medicine , Oslo University Hospital Ullevål , Oslo
| | - Annika E Michelsen
- b Research Institute of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet , Oslo ;,c Faculty of Medicine , University of Oslo , Oslo
| | - Reidun Øvstebø
- e Blood Cell Research Group, Section for Research, Department of Medical Biochemistry , Oslo University Hospital Ullevål , Oslo
| | - Tom Eirik Mollnes
- c Faculty of Medicine , University of Oslo , Oslo ;,d K.G. Jebsen Inflammatory Research Center, University of Oslo , Oslo ;,f Department of Immunology , Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo , Oslo ;,g Research Laboratory , Nordland Hospital Bodø, University of Tromsø , Tromsø ;,h Center of Molecular Inflammation Research, Norwegian University of Science and Technology , Trondheim
| | - Ole H Skjønsberg
- a Department of Pulmonary Medicine , Oslo University Hospital Ullevål , Oslo ;,c Faculty of Medicine , University of Oslo , Oslo
| | - Pål Aukrust
- b Research Institute of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet , Oslo ;,c Faculty of Medicine , University of Oslo , Oslo ;,d K.G. Jebsen Inflammatory Research Center, University of Oslo , Oslo ;,i Section of Clinical Immunology and Infectious Diseases , Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet , Oslo , Norway
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sandrini A, Rolland JM, O'Hehir RE. Current developments for improving efficacy of allergy vaccines. Expert Rev Vaccines 2015; 14:1073-87. [PMID: 26013124 DOI: 10.1586/14760584.2015.1050385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Allergic diseases are prevalent worldwide. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is a current treatment for allergy, leading to modification of the natural course of disease. Mechanisms of efficacy include Treg through release of IL-10 and TGF-β and specific IgG4 blocking antibodies. Subcutaneous and sublingual routes are popular, but uptake is limited by inconvenience and safety concerns. Inclusion criteria limit application to a small proportion of allergic patients. New forms of immunotherapy are being investigated for more efficacious, convenient and safer options with promising advances in recent years. The rationale of reducing vaccine allergenicity to increase safety while improving immunogenicity led to investigation of T-cell epitope-based peptides and recombinant allergen derivatives. Additionally, different routes of administration and adjuvants and adjunct therapies are being explored. This review discusses the current status of AIT and recent advances to improve clinical efficacy, safety and long-term immune tolerance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Sandrini
- Department of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Leitlinie zur (allergen-)spezifischen Immuntherapie bei IgE-vermittelten allergischen Erkrankungen. ALLERGO JOURNAL 2014. [DOI: 10.1007/s15007-014-0707-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
24
|
Senna G, Caminati M, Lockey RF. Allergen Immunotherapy Adherence in the Real World: How Bad Is It and How Can It Be Improved? CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ALLERGY 2014. [DOI: 10.1007/s40521-014-0037-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
25
|
Klimek L, Uhlig J, Mösges R, Rettig K, Pfaar O. A high polymerized grass pollen extract is efficacious and safe in a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study using a novel up-dosing cluster-protocol. Allergy 2014; 69:1629-38. [PMID: 25130503 PMCID: PMC4238814 DOI: 10.1111/all.12513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/12/2014] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cluster immunotherapy represents an interesting alternative to conventional up-dosing schedules because it allows achieving the maintenance dose within a shorter time interval. In this study, the efficacy and safety of cluster immunotherapy with a high polymerized allergen extract of a grass/rye pollen mixture have been evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. METHODS In total, 121 patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis due to grass pollen were randomized 1 : 1 to verum or placebo group. A short cluster up-dosing schedule of only 1 week was applied to achieve the maintenance dose which was administered monthly during the study period of 1 year. Total combined symptom and medication score (TCS) was defined as primary outcome parameter. Secondary outcome parameters were individual symptom and medication scores, 'well days,' global improvement as well as immunological effects and nasal allergen challenge. The safety profile was evaluated based on the European academy of allergy and clinical immunology grading system. RESULTS Significant reduction in the verum compared to the placebo group (intention-to-treat, population, verum: n = 55; placebo: n = 47) was found regarding TCS (P = 0.005), rhinoconjunctivitis total symptom score (RTSS, P = 0.006), and total rescue medication score (TRMS, P = 0.002). Additionally, secondary outcomes such as 'well days,' nasal challenge results, and increase of specific IgG4 were in favor of the active treatment. All systemic adverse reactions (0.8% of all injections in the verum group) were of mild intensity. No severe reactions related to the study medication were observed. CONCLUSION Cluster immunotherapy with high polymerized grass pollen extracts resulted in significant clinical efficacy and has been shown to be a safe treatment for grass pollen-allergic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Klimek
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Quiralte J, Justicia JL, Cardona V, Dávila I, Moreno E, Ruiz B, García MA. Is faster safer? Cluster versus short conventional subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy. Immunotherapy 2014; 5:1295-303. [PMID: 24283840 DOI: 10.2217/imt.13.133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Few studies have compared cluster immunotherapy and conventional administration regimens. The aim of this study was to establish the safety profile of these different regimens in patients with allergic respiratory diseases who received index-of-reactivity (IR)-standardized allergen extracts by the subcutaneous route. MATERIALS & METHODS The safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT), administered by means of a 4-week cluster titration schedule (cluster-SCIT) or by an 8-week short conventional titration schedule (SC-SCIT), both with a target dose of 8 IR, was assessed in a retrospective, observational, multicenter study. RESULTS A total of 658 patients (339 cluster-SCIT and 319 SC-SCIT) were recruited from 92 sites in Spain. Injection site reactions occurred in 25.1 and 27.3% of patients treated with cluster-SCIT and SC-SCIT, respectively. Systemic reactions (European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology criteria) were reported for 0.2% of doses and 1.5% of patients with cluster-SCIT, and 0.7% of doses and 4.4% of patients with SC-SCIT. Most reactions were mild and there were no grade 3 or 4 systemic reactions. No life-threatening systemic reactions, anaphylactic shock, or adverse events leading to therapy discontinuation were reported. CONCLUSION The safety profile of the cluster regimen supports the use of accelerated SCIT schedules with IR-standardized allergen extracts compared with short conventional schedules, particularly if similar extracts and application methods are used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joaquín Quiralte
- Allergology Service, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Calderon MA, Cox LS. Monoallergen sublingual immunotherapy versus multiallergen subcutaneous immunotherapy for allergic respiratory diseases: a debate during the AAAAI 2013 Annual Meeting in San Antonio, Texas. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2014; 2:136-43. [PMID: 24607039 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2013] [Revised: 12/18/2013] [Accepted: 12/30/2013] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Moises A Calderon
- Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Imperial College London, National Heart and Lung Institute, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Linda S Cox
- College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Davie, Fla
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Burks A, Calderon M, Casale T, Cox L, Demoly P, Jutel M, Nelson H, Akdis C. Mise à jour sur l’immunothérapie allergénique : Rapport de Consensus PRACTALL de l’AAAAI (American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology) et de l’EAACI (European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology). REVUE FRANCAISE D ALLERGOLOGIE 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.reval.2013.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
|
29
|
Hui Y, Li L, Qian J, Guo Y, Zhang X, Zhang X. Efficacy analysis of three-year subcutaneous SQ-standardized specific immunotherapy in house dust mite-allergic children with asthma. Exp Ther Med 2014; 7:630-634. [PMID: 24520258 PMCID: PMC3919950 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2014.1469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2013] [Accepted: 11/27/2013] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of three-year subcutaneous SQ-standardized specific immunotherapy (SCIT) in house dust mite (HDM)-allergic children with asthma. Ninety children with allergic asthma to HDMs, with or without allergic rhinitis, were randomly divided into two groups, the treatment group and the control group. The treatment group received SCIT combined with standardized glucocorticoid management and the control group received standardized glucocorticoid management alone for a period of three years. The mean daily dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), a four-week diary recording the symptom scores of asthma, peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements, skin prick test results and serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels were assessed prior to treatment and following one, two and three years of treatment. The median dose of ICS was reduced in the treatment group after two and three years of treatment compared with that of the control group. After three years of treatment, the discontinuation percentage of ICS in the treatment group was higher than that in the control group. The treatment group demonstrated significantly reduced daytime and night-time asthmatic symptom scores, increased PEF values and reduced serum IgE levels after two and three years of treatment compared with those in the control group (P<0.05). In conclusion, three-year SCIT treatment combined with ICS is an effective immunotherapy for children with allergic asthma and resulted in a reduction of the required ICS dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Hui
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Wuxi Children's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214023, P.R. China
| | - Ling Li
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Wuxi Children's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214023, P.R. China
| | - Jun Qian
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Wuxi Children's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214023, P.R. China
| | - Yun Guo
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Wuxi Children's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214023, P.R. China
| | - Xilian Zhang
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Wuxi Children's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214023, P.R. China
| | - Xiaojuan Zhang
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Wuxi Children's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214023, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Pfaar O, Bachert C, Bufe A, Buhl R, Ebner C, Eng P, Friedrichs F, Fuchs T, Hamelmann E, Hartwig-Bade D, Hering T, Huttegger I, Jung K, Klimek L, Kopp MV, Merk H, Rabe U, Saloga J, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Schuster A, Schwerk N, Sitter H, Umpfenbach U, Wedi B, Wöhrl S, Worm M, Kleine-Tebbe J, Kaul S, Schwalfenberg A. Guideline on allergen-specific immunotherapy in IgE-mediated allergic diseases: S2k Guideline of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), the Society for Pediatric Allergy and Environmental Medicine (GPA), the Medical Association of German Allergologists (AeDA), the Austrian Society for Allergy and Immunology (ÖGAI), the Swiss Society for Allergy and Immunology (SGAI), the German Society of Dermatology (DDG), the German Society of Oto- Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO-KHC), the German Society of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (DGKJ), the Society for Pediatric Pneumology (GPP), the German Respiratory Society (DGP), the German Association of ENT Surgeons (BV-HNO), the Professional Federation of Paediatricians and Youth Doctors (BVKJ), the Federal Association of Pulmonologists (BDP) and the German Dermatologists Association (BVDD). ALLERGO JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL 2014; 23:282-319. [PMID: 26120539 PMCID: PMC4479478 DOI: 10.1007/s40629-014-0032-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 247] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
The present guideline (S2k) on allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) was established by the German, Austrian and Swiss professional associations for allergy in consensus with the scientific specialist societies and professional associations in the fields of otolaryngology, dermatology and venereology, pediatric and adolescent medicine, pneumology as well as a German patient organization (German Allergy and Asthma Association; Deutscher Allergie- und Asthmabund, DAAB) according to the criteria of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften, AWMF). AIT is a therapy with disease-modifying effects. By administering allergen extracts, specific blocking antibodies, toler-ance-inducing cells and mediators are activated. These prevent further exacerbation of the allergen-triggered immune response, block the specific immune response and attenuate the inflammatory response in tissue. Products for SCIT or SLIT cannot be compared at present due to their heterogeneous composition, nor can allergen concentrations given by different manufacturers be compared meaningfully due to the varying methods used to measure their active ingredients. Non-modified allergens are used for SCIT in the form of aqueous or physically adsorbed (depot) extracts, as well as chemically modified allergens (allergoids) as depot extracts. Allergen extracts for SLIT are used in the form of aqueous solutions or tablets. The clinical efficacy of AIT is measured using various scores as primary and secondary study endpoints. The EMA stipulates combined symptom and medication scores as primary endpoint. A harmonization of clinical endpoints, e. g., by using the combined symptom and medication scores (CSMS) recommended by the EAACI, is desirable in the future in order to permit the comparison of results from different studies. The current CONSORT recommendations from the ARIA/GA2LEN group specify standards for the evaluation, presentation and publication of study results. According to the Therapy allergen ordinance (TAV), preparations containing common allergen sources (pollen from grasses, birch, alder, hazel, house dust mites, as well as bee and wasp venom) need a marketing authorization in Germany. During the marketing authorization process, these preparations are examined regarding quality, safety and efficacy. In the opinion of the authors, authorized allergen preparations with documented efficacy and safety, or preparations tradeable under the TAV for which efficacy and safety have already been documented in clinical trials meeting WAO or EMA standards, should be preferentially used. Individual formulations (NPP) enable the prescription of rare allergen sources (e.g., pollen from ash, mugwort or ambrosia, mold Alternaria, animal allergens) for specific immunotherapy. Mixing these allergens with TAV allergens is not permitted. Allergic rhinitis and its associated co-morbidities (e. g., bronchial asthma) generate substantial direct and indirect costs. Treatment options, in particular AIT, are therefore evaluated using cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses. From a long-term perspective, AIT is considered to be significantly more cost effective in allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma than pharmacotherapy, but is heavily dependent on patient compliance. Meta-analyses provide unequivocal evidence of the efficacy of SCIT and SLIT for certain allergen sources and age groups. Data from controlled studies differ in terms of scope, quality and dosing regimens and require product-specific evaluation. Therefore, evaluating individual preparations according to clearly defined criteria is recommended. A broad transfer of the efficacy of certain preparations to all preparations administered in the same way is not endorsed. The website of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (www.dgaki.de/leitlinien/s2k-leitlinie-sit; DGAKI: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allergologie und klinische Immunologie) provides tables with specific information on available products for AIT in Germany, Switzerland and Austria. The tables contain the number of clinical studies per product in adults and children, the year of market authorization, underlying scoring systems, number of randomized and analyzed subjects and the method of evaluation (ITT, FAS, PP), separately given for grass pollen, birch pollen and house dust mite allergens, and the status of approval for the conduct of clinical studies with these products. Strong evidence of the efficacy of SCIT in pollen allergy-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in adulthood is well-documented in numerous trials and, in childhood and adolescence, in a few trials. Efficacy in house dust mite allergy is documented by a number of controlled trials in adults and few controlled trials in children. Only a few controlled trials, independent of age, are available for mold allergy (in particular Alternaria). With regard to animal dander allergies (primarily to cat allergens), only small studies, some with methodological deficiencies are available. Only a moderate and inconsistent therapeutic effect in atopic dermatitis has been observed in the quite heterogeneous studies conducted to date. SCIT has been well investigated for individual preparations in controlled bronchial asthma as defined by the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2007 and intermittent and mild persistent asthma (GINA 2005) and it is recommended as a treatment option, in addition to allergen avoidance and pharmacotherapy, provided there is a clear causal link between respiratory symptoms and the relevant allergen. The efficacy of SLIT in grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis is extensively documented in adults and children, whilst its efficacy in tree pollen allergy has only been shown in adults. New controlled trials (some with high patient numbers) on house dust mite allergy provide evidence of efficacy of SLIT in adults. Compared with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, there are only few studies on the efficacy of SLIT in allergic asthma. In this context, newer studies show an efficacy for SLIT on asthma symptoms in the subgroup of grass pollen allergic children, adolescents and adults with asthma and efficacy in primary house dust mite allergy-induced asthma in adolescents aged from 14 years and in adults. Aspects of secondary prevention, in particular the reduction of new sensitizations and reduced asthma risk, are important rationales for choosing to initiate treatment early in childhood and adolescence. In this context, those products for which the appropriate effects have been demonstrated should be considered. SCIT or SLIT with pollen or mite allergens can be performed in patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis using allergen extracts that have been proven to be effective in at least one double-blind placebo-controlled (DBPC) study. At present, clinical trials are underway for the indication in asthma due to house dust mite allergy, some of the results of which have already been published, whilst others are still awaited (see the DGAKI table "Approved/potentially completed studies" via www.dgaki.de/Leitlinien/s2k-Leitlinie-sit (according to www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu)). When establishing the indication for AIT, factors that favour clinical efficacy should be taken into consideration. Differences between SCIT and SLIT are to be considered primarily in terms of contraindications. In individual cases, AIT may be justifiably indicated despite the presence of contraindications. SCIT injections and the initiation of SLIT are performed by a physician experienced in this type of treatment and who is able to administer emergency treatment in the case of an allergic reaction. Patients must be fully informed about the procedure and risks of possible adverse events, and the details of this process must be documented (see "Treatment information sheet"; available as a handout via www.dgaki.de/Leitlinien/s2k-Leitlinie-sit). Treatment should be performed according to the manufacturer's product information leaflet. In cases where AIT is to be performed or continued by a different physician to the one who established the indication, close cooperation is required in order to ensure that treatment is implemented consistently and at low risk. In general, it is recommended that SCIT and SLIT should only be performed using preparations for which adequate proof of efficacy is available from clinical trials. Treatment adherence among AIT patients is lower than assumed by physicians, irrespective of the form of administration. Clearly, adherence is of vital importance for treatment success. Improving AIT adherence is one of the most important future goals, in order to ensure efficacy of the therapy. Severe, potentially life-threatening systemic reactions during SCIT are possible, but - providing all safety measures are adhered to - these events are very rare. Most adverse events are mild to moderate and can be treated well. Dose-dependent adverse local reactions occur frequently in the mouth and throat in SLIT. Systemic reactions have been described in SLIT, but are seen far less often than with SCIT. In terms of anaphylaxis and other severe systemic reactions, SLIT has a better safety profile than SCIT. The risk and effects of adverse systemic reactions in the setting of AIT can be effectively reduced by training of personnel, adhering to safety standards and prompt use of emergency measures, including early administration of i. m. epinephrine. Details on the acute management of anaphylactic reactions can be found in the current S2 guideline on anaphylaxis issued by the AWMF (S2-AWMF-LL Registry Number 061-025). AIT is undergoing some innovative developments in many areas (e. g., allergen characterization, new administration routes, adjuvants, faster and safer dose escalation protocols), some of which are already being investigated in clinical trials. Cite this as Pfaar O, Bachert C, Bufe A, Buhl R, Ebner C, Eng P, Friedrichs F, Fuchs T, Hamelmann E, Hartwig-Bade D, Hering T, Huttegger I, Jung K, Klimek L, Kopp MV, Merk H, Rabe U, Saloga J, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Schuster A, Schwerk N, Sitter H, Umpfenbach U, Wedi B, Wöhrl S, Worm M, Kleine-Tebbe J. Guideline on allergen-specific immunotherapy in IgE-mediated allergic diseases - S2k Guideline of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), the Society for Pediatric Allergy and Environmental Medicine (GPA), the Medical Association of German Allergologists (AeDA), the Austrian Society for Allergy and Immunology (ÖGAI), the Swiss Society for Allergy and Immunology (SGAI), the German Society of Dermatology (DDG), the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO-KHC), the German Society of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (DGKJ), the Society for Pediatric Pneumology (GPP), the German Respiratory Society (DGP), the German Association of ENT Surgeons (BV-HNO), the Professional Federation of Paediatricians and Youth Doctors (BVKJ), the Federal Association of Pulmonologists (BDP) and the German Dermatologists Association (BVDD). Allergo J Int 2014;23:282-319.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Pfaar
- />Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
- />Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
- />Center for Rhinology and Allergology Wiesbaden, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, An den Quellen 10, 65189 Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Claus Bachert
- />Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Albrecht Bufe
- />Department of Experimental Pneumology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Roland Buhl
- />Pulmonary Department, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Christof Ebner
- />Outpatient Clinic for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Eng
- />Department of Children and Adolescent Medicine, Aarau and Children‘s Hospital Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Frank Friedrichs
- />Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine Practice, Laurensberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Fuchs
- />Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Eckard Hamelmann
- />Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Pediatric Center Bethel, Evangelical Hospital, Bielefeld, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Hering
- />Pulmonary Outpatient Practice, Tegel, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isidor Huttegger
- />Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Salzburg Regional Hospitals, Salzburg, Austria
| | | | - Ludger Klimek
- />Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Matthias Volkmar Kopp
- />Clinic of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Lübeck University, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Member of the German Lung Center (DZL), Lübeck, Germany
| | - Hans Merk
- />Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Uta Rabe
- />Department of Allergology, Johanniter-Krankenhaus im Fläming Treuenbrietzen GmbH, Treuenbrietzen Germany, Treuenbrietzen, Germany
| | - Joachim Saloga
- />Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Antje Schuster
- />Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Nicolaus Schwerk
- />University Children’s hospital, Department of Pediatric Pneumology, Allergology and Neonatology, Hanover Medical University, Hannover, Germany
| | - Helmut Sitter
- />Institute for Theoretical Surgery, Marburg University, Marburg, Germany
| | | | - Bettina Wedi
- />Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Venereology, Hannover Medical University, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Margitta Worm
- />Allergy-Centre-Charité, Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Susanne Kaul
- />Division of Allergology, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines, Langen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Fan Y, Ji P, Leonard-Segal A, Sahajwalla CG. An overview of the pediatric medications for the symptomatic treatment of allergic rhinitis, cough, and cold. J Pharm Sci 2013; 102:4213-29. [PMID: 24185951 DOI: 10.1002/jps.23720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2013] [Revised: 07/26/2013] [Accepted: 08/06/2013] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Upper respiratory infections and allergic rhinitis are common diseases in children. In recent years, U.S. Food and Drug Administration has been promoting pediatric drug development with marketing exclusivity incentives and requirements. The assessment of clinical pharmacology, efficacy, and safety data has facilitated pediatric drug development and provided appropriate labeling for pediatric use. Regulatory decision making involves multiple evaluation processes, including drug exposure comparison between adult and pediatric population, formulation bridging, dose selection, and evaluation of efficacy and safety in pediatric patients. This article reviews the pediatric drugs indicated for cough, cold, and allergic rhinitis, focusing on the utility of clinical pharmacology, safety, and efficacy data in determining the pediatric dosing regimen and the approaches taken for regulatory decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Fan
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology II, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20993
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Makatsori M, Pfaar O, Lleonart R, Calderon MA. Recombinant allergen immunotherapy: clinical evidence of efficacy--a review. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2013; 13:371-80. [PMID: 23740287 DOI: 10.1007/s11882-013-0359-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Recombinant allergens for immunotherapy aim to overcome the problems of natural extracts as they can be produced in unlimited amounts with exact physiochemical and immunological properties. These can be modified to have more favourable characteristics including reduced IgE reactivity or enhanced immunogenicity. Different types of recombinant allergens have been evaluated in clinical phase II and III trials whilst others are currently under development. In this review, we identified double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of various recombinant allergen preparations. The majority of studies have up to now focused on cat, grass, birch, ragweed and bee venom allergens. Some studies have shown some of these preparations to be effective and well tolerated. However, there are still outstanding issues regarding optimum doses, minimising side effects and long-term effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melina Makatsori
- Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Imperial College London, NHLI, Royal Brompton Hospital, London SW3 6LY, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Burks AW, Calderon MA, Casale T, Cox L, Demoly P, Jutel M, Nelson H, Akdis CA. Update on allergy immunotherapy: American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology/European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology/PRACTALL consensus report. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2013; 131:1288-96.e3. [PMID: 23498595 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.01.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 324] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2012] [Revised: 01/24/2013] [Accepted: 01/28/2013] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Allergy immunotherapy (AIT) is an effective treatment for allergic asthma and rhinitis, as well as venom-induced anaphylaxis. In addition to reducing symptoms, AIT can change the course of allergic disease and induce allergen-specific immune tolerance. In current clinical practice immunotherapy is delivered either subcutaneously or sublingually; some allergens, such as grass pollen, can be delivered through either route, whereas others, such as venoms, are only delivered subcutaneously. Both subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy appear to have a duration of efficacy of up to 12 years, and both can prevent the development of asthma and new allergen sensitivities. In spite of the advances with AIT, safer and more effective AIT strategies are needed, especially for patients with asthma, atopic dermatitis, or food allergy. Novel approaches to improve AIT include use of adjuvants or recombinant allergens and alternate routes of administration. As part of the PRACTALL initiatives, the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology nominated an expert team to develop a comprehensive consensus report on the mechanisms of AIT and its use in clinical practice, as well as unmet needs and ongoing developments in AIT. This resulting report is endorsed by both academies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Wesley Burks
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7220, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Melamed J, Mehra A, Ahuja-Malik A. A 5-year study of systemic reactions using both shared and patient-specific vaccines. ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY (PROVIDENCE, R.I.) 2013; 4:88-93. [PMID: 27792632 PMCID: PMC3793119 DOI: 10.2500/ar.2013.4.0057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The safety of shared specific vaccines (SSVs) has been questioned by some experts. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of SSVs. Details of systemic allergic reactions after subcutaneous immunotherapy injections were captured on a standardized form from July 2005 to July 2010. Patient records were evaluated for factors that might be associated with increased rate of systemic reactions and, in addition, were examined for any errors. Systemic reaction rates (SRRs) using a combination of shared and patient-specific vaccines (PSVs) were similar to previously reported studies (0.23 reactions per 100 shots). There were no systemic reactions resulting from errors where the incorrect shared allergen was administered, but we did note one reaction after an erroneously administered PSV. There were two dosage errors associated with both shared and patient-specific immunotherapy. Most reactions were mild to moderate (World Allergy Organization grade, 1 or 2). Severe reactions with 911 activations were noted in six patients. Thirty percent of reactions occurred out of the office and the average time to reaction was 48 minutes. Epinephrine was administered in only 60% of patients. Epicutaneous reactivity to mites, cats, dogs, and pollen but not mold occurred significantly more in reactors. Differences in SRRs were encountered between satellite offices. Using a combination of SSV and PSV, SRRs were similar to previously reported studies; moreover, no systemic reactions occurred where a SSV was erroneously administered. SRR surveillance is a useful safety tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Melamed
- From the Allergy and Asthma Specialists, Chelmsford, Massachusetts
| | - Ami Mehra
- From the Allergy and Asthma Specialists, Chelmsford, Massachusetts
| | | |
Collapse
|