Incidence of diabetes following ramipril or rosiglitazone withdrawal

Should Prediabetes be Treated Pharmacologically?

OBJECTIVE

In this commentary I will evaluate whether prediabetes should be treated pharmacologically. To consider this question, certain information concerning prediabetes is relevant.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

(1) Prediabetes is not independently associated with cardiovascular disease; the other factors in the metabolic syndrome increase that risk; (2) various tests and criteria for diagnosing prediabetes are recommended, yielding prevalences varying from 6% to 38% depending on which are used; (3) one-third of patients with prediabetes revert to normal over time; (4) up to two-thirds of patients with prediabetes do not develop diabetes; (5) people with prediabetes have insulin resistance and impaired insulin secretion; (6) although pharmacological treatment of the dysglycemia temporarily lowers it, when the drugs are discontinued, incident diabetes develops similarly as that in those who received placebos; (7) when the drugs are discontinued, there are no changes in insulin resistance or impaired insulin secretion; (8) incident diabetes was similar at 10 years in people remaining on metformin in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcome Study compared with those who did not receive the drug; (9) no current drugs will directly increase insulin secretion (except sulfonylureas and glinides which have not been used to treat prediabetes because of hypoglycemia concerns); (10) sufficient weight loss to lower insulin resistance by nutritional means is challenging and especially difficult to maintain.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacological treatment of the dysglycemia of prediabetes is not warranted. On the other hand, the ability of high doses of glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 receptor agonists and the combination of a GLP-1 receptor agonist and the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) to lower weight by 15% and 20%, respectively, deserves consideration for the treatment of prediabetes. This amount of weight loss should decrease insulin resistance, allowing endogenous insulin secretion to be more effective and lower the risk for developing diabetes.

Historical review of the diagnosis of prediabetes/intermediate hyperglycemia: Case for the international criteria

In 1997, the ADA recommended an IFG criterion for diagnosing prediabetes/intermediate hyperglycemia of FPG concentrations of 6.1-6.9 mmol/L (110-125 mg/dL). In 2003, they lowered it to 5.6-6.9 mmol/L (100-125 mg/dL) to equalize developing diabetes between IGT and IFG. International organizations accepted the first IFG criterion but not the second. The ADA subsequently recommended HbA1c levels for diagnosing prediabetes/intermediate hyperglycemia of 39-47 mmol/mol (5.7-6.4%) based on a model that utilized the composite risk of developing diabetes and CVD. However, the evidence that the intermediate hyperglycemia that defines prediabetes is independently associated with CVD is weak. Rather, the other risk factors for CVD in the metabolic syndrome are responsible. The WHO opined that prediabetes/intermediate hyperglycemia could not be diagnosed by HbA1c levels but the Canadians and Europeans recommended its diagnosis by values of 42-47 mmol/mol (6.0-6.4%). With the ADA criteria, approximately one-half of people are normal on re-testing, one-third spontaneously revert to normal over time and two-thirds never develop diabetes in their lifetimes. The international criteria for prediabetes/intermediate hyperglycemia increase the risk of developing diabetes and might motivate these individuals to more seriously undertake lifestyle interventions as a preventive measure.

Prediabetes: how pathophysiology drives potential intervention on a subclinical disease with feared clinical consequences

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic metabolic disorder whose rising incidence suggests the epidemic proportions of the disease. Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) and Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT) - alone or combined - represent two intermediate metabolic condition between Normal Glucose Tolerance (NGT) and overt T2DM. Several studies have demonstrated that insulin resistance and beta-cell impairment can be identified even in normoglycemic prediabetic individuals. Worsening of these two conditions may lead to progression of IGT and/or IFG status to overt diabetes. Starting from these assumptions, it seems logical to suppose that interventions aimed at improving metabolic conditions, even in prediabetes, could represent an effective target to halt transition from IGT/IFG to manifest T2DM. Starting from pathophysiological knowledge, in this review we evaluate two possible interventions (lifestyle modifications and pharmacological agents) eligible as prediabetes therapy since they have been demonstrated to improve insulin resistance and beta-cell impairment. Detecting high-risk people and treating them could represent an effective strategy to slow down progression to overt diabetes, normalize glucose tolerance, and even prevent micro- and macrovascular complications.

Metformin Should Not Be Used to Treat Prediabetes

Based on the results of the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study (DPPOS), in which metformin significantly decreased the development of diabetes in individuals with baseline fasting plasma glucose (FPG) concentrations of 110-125 vs. 100-109 mg/dL (6.1-6.9 vs. 5.6-6.0 mmol/L) and A1C levels 6.0-6.4% (42-46 mmol/mol) vs. <6.0% and in women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus, it has been suggested that metformin should be used to treat people with prediabetes. Since the association between prediabetes and cardiovascular disease is due to the associated nonglycemic risk factors in people with prediabetes, not to the slightly increased glycemia, the only reason to treat with metformin is to delay or prevent the development of diabetes. There are three reasons not to do so. First, approximately two-thirds of people with prediabetes do not develop diabetes, even after many years. Second, approximately one-third of people with prediabetes return to normal glucose regulation. Third, people who meet the glycemic criteria for prediabetes are not at risk for the microvascular complications of diabetes and thus metformin treatment will not affect this important outcome. Why put people who are not at risk for the microvascular complications of diabetes on a drug (possibly for the rest of their lives) that has no immediate advantage except to lower subdiabetes glycemia to even lower levels? Rather, individuals at the highest risk for developing diabetes-i.e., those with FPG concentrations of 110-125 mg/dL (6.1-6.9 mmol/L) or A1C levels of 6.0-6.4% (42-46 mmol/mol) or women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus-should be followed closely and metformin immediately introduced only when they are diagnosed with diabetes.

Regression from prediabetes to normal glucose regulation: State of the science

IMPACT STATEMENT

Prediabetes increases the risks of future type 2 diabetes (T2D) and vascular complications, risks that can be prevented by restoring normal glucose regulation (NGR). Few studies have pre-specified reversal of prediabetes and restoration of NGR as primary outcome, and current approaches that prevent T2D in people with prediabetes do not always reverse the prediabetes. The present review focuses on studies that have assessed reversal of the prediabetes, and discusses known and emerging predictors of prediabetes. We argue that fuller knowledge of such predictors could inform the discovery of novel, targeted interventions for reversing prediabetes.

Evidence for the Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a common chronic metabolic condition. Before receiving this diagnosis, persons typically have a long period of prediabetes. There is good evidence that T2DM can often be prevented or delayed by means of lifestyle interventions (39%-71%), medications (28%-79%), or metabolic surgery (75%). However, despite consistent data demonstrating their efficacy, these tools are underused, and knowledge about them among primary care physicians is limited. In an effort to engage physicians in addressing this public health crisis more effectively, the authors reviewed the evidence that T2DM can be prevented or delayed in persons at risk.

Medications affecting the biochemical conversion to type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The extent to which some pharmacological interventions reduce or increase the risk of biochemical conversion to T2DM in at-risk individuals is unclear.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Scopus through August 24, 2017, for randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of drugs suspected to modify the risk of biochemical conversion to T2DM.

RESULTS

We included 43 trials with 192,156 subjects (mean age 60 years; 56% men; mean BMI 30.4 kg/m2). Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, metformin, orlistat, phentermine-topiramate and pioglitazone significantly reduced the risk of biochemical conversion to T2DM, whereas statins and nateglinide increased the risk. There was insufficient direct evidence regarding the effects of sulfonylureas, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. Most trials were brief and evaluated this outcome during treatment without a withdrawal or washout period.

CONCLUSIONS

Several drugs modify the risk of biochemical conversation to T2DM, although whether this effect is persistent and clinically relevant is unclear. Future studies need to focus on cardiovascular disease prevention, mortality and patient-important outcomes instead of biochemical conversion to T2DM.

Long-term Sustainability of Diabetes Prevention Approaches: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Importance

Diabetes prevention is imperative to slow worldwide growth of diabetes-related morbidity and mortality. Yet the long-term efficacy of prevention strategies remains unknown.

Objective

To estimate aggregate long-term effects of different diabetes prevention strategies on diabetes incidence.

Data Sources

Systematic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. The initial search was conducted on January 14, 2014, and was updated on February 20, 2015. Search terms included prediabetes, primary prevention, and risk reduction.

Study Selection

Eligible randomized clinical trials evaluated lifestyle modification (LSM) and medication interventions (>6 months) for diabetes prevention in adults (age ≥18 years) at risk for diabetes, reporting between-group differences in diabetes incidence, published between January 1, 1990, and January 1, 2015. Studies testing alternative therapies and bariatric surgery, as well as those involving participants with gestational diabetes, type 1 or 2 diabetes, and metabolic syndrome, were excluded.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Reviewers extracted the number of diabetes cases at the end of active intervention in treatment and control groups. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to obtain pooled relative risks (RRs), and reported incidence rates were used to compute pooled risk differences (RDs).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome was aggregate RRs of diabetes in treatment vs control participants. Treatment subtypes (ie, LSM components, medication classes) were stratified. To estimate sustainability, post-washout and follow-up RRs for medications and LSM interventions, respectively, were examined.

Results

Forty-three studies were included and pooled in meta-analysis (49 029 participants; mean [SD] age, 57.3 [8.7] years; 48.0% [n = 23 549] men): 19 tested medications; 19 evaluated LSM, and 5 tested combined medications and LSM. At the end of the active intervention (range, 0.5-6.3 years), LSM was associated with an RR reduction of 39% (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.54-0.68), and medications were associated with an RR reduction of 36% (RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.54-0.76). The observed RD for LSM and medication studies was 4.0 (95% CI, 1.8-6.3) cases per 100 person-years or a number-needed-to-treat of 25. At the end of the washout or follow-up periods, LSM studies (mean follow-up, 7.2 years; range, 5.7-9.4 years) achieved an RR reduction of 28% (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.60-0.86); medication studies (mean follow-up, 17 weeks; range, 2-52 weeks) showed no sustained RR reduction (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.79-1.14).

Conclusions and Relevance

In adults at risk for diabetes, LSM and medications (weight loss and insulin-sensitizing agents) successfully reduced diabetes incidence. Medication effects were short lived. The LSM interventions were sustained for several years; however, their effects declined with time, suggesting that interventions to preserve effects are needed.

Relationships between blood pressure and blood glucose among offspring of parents with type 2 diabetes: Prediction of incident dysglycemia in a biracial cohort

AIMS

We assessed blood pressure (BP) and blood glucose (BG) values in healthy subjects, and examined baseline BP as a predictor of incident prediabetes during follow-up.

METHODS

Participants in the Pathobiology of Prediabetes in a Biracial Cohort (POP-ABC) study underwent screening assessments (anthropometry, BP, OGTT) and were stratified into normal BP (NBP), prehypertension, or hypertension, and normal glucose regulation (NGR), prediabetes (IFG/IGT), or type 2 diabetes (T2D) status. NGR subjects who met all inclusion criteria were enrolled in a 5-yr prospective study, with the primary outcome of incident prediabetes.

RESULTS

We screened 602 adults (341 black, 261 white) and enrolled 343 (193 black, 150 white) for prospective follow-up. Systolic and diastolic BP correlated significantly with fasting and nonfasting BG (P=0.003-<0.0001). Compared to NGR group, more prediabetic subjects had prehypertension (42.5% vs. 36.2%) and fewer had NBP (35.9% vs. 48.6%) (P=0.009). During ~5years of follow-up, 26.3% of NBP and 35.7% of prehypertensive subjects developed prediabetes (P=0.02). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed higher probability of incident prediabetes among participants with prehypertension compared to NBP during ~5years of follow-up (P=0.0012).

CONCLUSIONS

In our biracial cohort, BP and BG values were significantly correlated, and BP status predicted incident prediabetes among initially normoglycemic individuals. These findings suggest co-evolution of factors involved in the dysregulation of BP and BG.

Pioglitazone Prevents Diabetes in Patients With Insulin Resistance and Cerebrovascular Disease

OBJECTIVE

The Insulin Resistance Intervention after Stroke (IRIS) trial recently found that pioglitazone reduced risk for stroke and myocardial infarction in patients with insulin resistance but without diabetes who had had a recent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). This report provides detailed results on the metabolic effects of pioglitazone and the trial's prespecified secondary aim of diabetes prevention.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 3,876 patients with recent ischemic stroke or TIA, no history of diabetes, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) <126 mg/dL, and insulin resistance by homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) score >3.0 were randomly assigned to pioglitazone or placebo. Surveillance for diabetes onset during the trial was accomplished by periodic interviews and annual FPG testing.

RESULTS

At baseline, the mean FPG, HbA1c, insulin, and HOMA-IR were 98.2 mg/dL (5.46 mmol/L), 5.8% (40 mmol/mol), 22.4 μIU/mL, and 5.4, respectively. After 1 year, mean HOMA-IR and FPG decreased to 4.1 and 95.1 mg/dL (5.28 mmol/L) in the pioglitazone group and rose to 5.7 and 99.7 mg/dL (5.54 mmol/L), in the placebo group (all P < 0.0001). Over a median follow-up of 4.8 years, diabetes developed in 73 (3.8%) participants assigned to pioglitazone compared with 149 (7.7%) assigned to placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0.48 [95% CI 0.33-0.69]; P < 0.0001). This effect was predominately driven by those with initial impaired fasting glucose (FPG >100 mg/dL [5.6 mmol/L]; HR 0.41 [95% CI 0.30-0.57]) or elevated HbA1c (>5.7% [39 mmol/mol]; HR 0.46 [0.34-0.62]).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with insulin resistance but without diabetes who had had a recent ischemic stroke or TIA, pioglitazone decreased the risk of diabetes while also reducing the risk of subsequent ischemic events. Pioglitazone is the first medication shown to prevent both progression to diabetes and major cardiovascular events as prespecified outcomes in a single trial.

Prevention of type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Potential of pharmacological agents

People with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose, or "pre-diabetes", are at high risk for progression to type 2 diabetes, as are those with metabolic syndrome or a history of gestational diabetes. Both glucose-lowering and anti-obesity pharmacotherapies have been studied to determine if the onset of type 2 diabetes can be delayed or prevented. Here we review the available data in the field. The most common theme is the reduction in insulin resistance, such as with weight loss, decreasing demands on the beta cell to improve insulin secretion and prolong its function. Overall, therapies which decrease diabetes incidence in high-risk populations delay the onset of diabetes but do not correct the underlying beta cell defect.

Treatment of prediabetes

Progression of normal glucose tolerance (NGT) to overt diabetes is mediated by a transition state called impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). Beta cell dysfunction and insulin resistance are the main defects in type 2 diabetes mellitus (type 2 DM) and even normoglycemic IGT patients manifest these defects. Beta cell dysfunction and insulin resistance also contribute to the progression of IGT to type 2 DM. Improving insulin sensitivity and/or preserving functions of beta-cells can be a rational way to normalize the GT and to control transition of IGT to type 2 DM. Loosing weight, for example, improves whole body insulin sensitivity and preserves beta-cell function and its inhibitory effect on progression of IGT to type 2 DM had been proven. But interventions aiming weight loss usually not applicable in real life. Pharmacotherapy is another option to gain better insulin sensitivity and to maintain beta-cell function. In this review, two potential treatment options (lifestyle modification and pharmacologic agents) that limits the IGT-type 2 DM conversion in prediabetic subjects are discussed.

Therapeutic Challenges in Diabetes Prevention: We Have Not Found the "Exercise Pill"

Type 2 diabetes has become an enormous public health burden, making diabetes prevention a pressing issue. While lifestyle modification is the most effective preventive strategy, it is resource-intensive and not universally sustainable. We review the evidence on pharmacological options for diabetes prevention, in search of a medication that is efficacious, easy to adhere to, well tolerated, and cost-effective. With the exception of metformin, most other drugs have either limited efficacy or costly side effects.

Rosiglitazone induces cardiotoxicity by accelerated apoptosis

Present investigation explores the cardiotoxicity of rosiglitazone (ROSI) using rat heart cardiomyocytes and db/db mice. In H9c2 cells, ROSI at 50 and 60 μM induced an increase in the percentage of apoptotic cells and superoxide generation, along with an increase in the expression of various subunits of NADPH oxidase and nitric oxide synthases, confirmed that ROSI-induced apoptosis in H9c2 cells is by ROS generation. The increase in the expression of the antioxidants like superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, glutathione reductase (GR), glutathione-S-transferase (GST), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) further confirmed this notion. Heme oxygenase-1, having an important role in cell protection against oxidative stress, was found to be increased along with induction of nuclear translocation of NF-E2-related factor and increased protein kinase C δ expression. Moreover, in db/db mice, oral administration of ROSI (10 mg/kg) for 10 days induced an increase in serum creatinine kinase-MB, tissue antioxidants like SOD, catalase, GR, GST, GPx expression, cardiac troponin T, and inducible nitric oxide synthase protein expression strongly support the in vitro findings. Furthermore, global gene expression studies also showed the perturbation of oxidative phosphorylation, fat cell differentiation, and electron transport chain following ROSI treatment in vivo. These results suggested that ROSI-induced cardiac damage is due to accelerated apoptosis both in vitro and in vivo.

A nondigestible saccharide, fructooligosaccharide, increases the promotive effect of a flavonoid, α-glucosyl-isoquercitrin, on glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) secretion in rat intestine and enteroendocrine cells

This study conducted in vivo and in situ experiments with rats to investigate the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) secretion in response to oral or ileal administration of α-glucosyl-isoquercitrin (20-40 mmol in 2 mL; Q3G), fructooligosaccharides (200 mmol in 2 mL; FOS) and Q3G + FOS. Direct effects on GLP-1-producing l-cells were also examined by an in vitro study using a murine enteroendocrine cell line, GLUTag. To evaluate the plasma GLP-1 level, blood samples from jugular cannula for in vivo and portal cannula for in situ experiments were obtained before and after administration of Q3G, FOS, or Q3G + FOS. We found tendencies for increases but transient stimulation of GLP-1 secretion by Q3G in in vivo and in situ experiments. Although FOS alone did not have any effects, Q3G + FOS enhanced and prolonged high plasma GLP-1 level in both experiments. In addition, application of Q3G on GLUTag cells stimulated GLP-1 secretion while FOS enhanced the effect of Q3G. Our results suggest that Q3G + FOS possess the potential for the management or prevention of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) by enhancing and prolonging the GLP-1 secretion via direct stimulation of GLP-1 producing l-cell.

Demographic and health factors associated with enrollment in posttrial studies: the Women's Health Initiative Hormone Therapy Trials

BACKGROUND

After clinical trials end, continued follow-up of the assembled cohort often is desirable for additional research. Factors influencing participants' decisions to consent to additional follow-up and how these shape posttrial cohorts have not been broadly studied.

PURPOSE

We examined how two re-enrollment campaigns and the passage of time altered features of the posttrial cohorts compared with the original Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Hormone Therapy clinical trials.

METHODS

We examined associations that markers of sociodemography, health, lifestyle, and on-trial experiences had with re-enrollment and contrasted the characteristics of successive posttrial cohorts with those of the original enrollees.

RESULTS

The posttrial enrollment campaigns re-enrolled 81.1% and 82.5% of available women, respectively. Women who re-enrolled tended to have better health characteristics than those not re-enrolled. Compared to women of comparable age in the original cohort, women retained for the second posttrial follow-up less often had a history of cardiovascular disease (odds ratio (OR) = 0.36), hypertension (OR = 0.57), diabetes (OR = 0.59), or measured cognitive deficit (OR = 0.40). These women more often had graduated from high school (OR = 1.72) and had participated in other WHI trials (OR = 1.76).

LIMITATIONS

We have examined experience with creating follow-up cohorts from participants in a single study. Thus, our findings may not apply to other cohorts and protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

Posttrial enrollment in follow-up studies can be successful; however, the characteristics of the resulting cohort may differ substantially from the originally assembled group of trial participants. Collection during the original trial of potential predictors of differential re-enrollment may strengthen interpretation of findings.

Preventing diabetes mellitus in developing countries

By the year 2030, >70% of people living with T2DM will reside in developing countries, and primary prevention of T2DM should be an urgent priority for such regions. The disease predominantly affects working-age persons and has a devastating economic impact, compounded by the frequent occurrence and interaction of T2DM with infectious diseases (such as AIDS and tuberculosis). Evidence from landmark T2DM prevention trials indicates that lifestyle modification is more effective, cheaper and safer than medication and provides sustained benefits. Lifestyle modification is, therefore, the most promising approach to T2DM prevention in developing countries; however, programmes adapted to their specific needs are lacking. Low-cost strategies to identify at-risk individuals, followed by the implementation of group-based, inexpensive lifestyle interventions, seem to be the best options for resource-poor countries. However, widespread implementation of T2DM prevention in developing countries will require coordinated efforts throughout society, along with comprehensive government policies and novel funding sources.

Prediabetes: to treat or not to treat?

The incidence of diabetes is continuously increasing worldwide. Pre-diabetes (defined as impaired glucose tolerance, impaired fasting glucose or both) represents an intermediate state, which often progresses to overt diabetes within a few years. In addition, pre-diabetes may be associated with increased risk of microvascular and macrovascular complications. Thus, reverting a pre-diabetic state as well as preventing the development of diabetes represents enormous challenge for the clinician. Lifestyle modification in pre-diabetic individuals was found particularly effective in the prevention of diabetes. However, compliance to lifestyle modification measures can be a crucial problem in the everyday clinical practice, especially in developing countries. During the last decade many studies support the use of anti-diabetic treatment schemes in pre-diabetic subjects to be advantageous. The American Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) as well as other minor studies and meta-analyses has convincingly demonstrated the efficacy of metformin in this patient group. In addition, results of the 10 year DPP follow up have recently been published, demonstrating the long term safety and sustainability of metformin treatment benefits in this population. In contrast to metformin, the evidence from the use of other anti-diabetic agents (thiazolidinediones, a-glucosidase inhibitors, incretin mimetics) in pre-diabetic individuals is rather inadequate and prospective data is further needed. Furthermore, large scale studies with hard clinical endpoints are needed to delineate the effect of pre-diabetes treatment on macro- and microvascular complications. In conclusion, several strategies of patient management, mainly lifestyle modification and pharmacological interventions can prevent diabetes development in subjects diagnosed with pre-diabetes or even revert pre-diabetic state. However, whether this biochemical improvement can be translated into actual clinical benefit remains to be established.