1
|
Werkman NCC, Driessen JHM, Klungel OH, Schaper NS, Souverein PC, Stehouwer CDA, Nielen JTH. Incretin-based therapy and the risk of diabetic foot ulcers and related events. Diabetes Obes Metab 2024; 26:3764-3780. [PMID: 38951877 DOI: 10.1111/dom.15721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Revised: 05/28/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/03/2024]
Abstract
AIM To investigate the effect of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4-Is) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) on diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) and DFU-related outcomes (lower limb amputation [LLA], DFU-related hospitalization and mortality). METHODS We performed a cohort study with data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum database with linkage to hospital data. We included people with type 2 diabetes starting treatment with metformin. Then we propensity score matched new users of DPP4-Is and sulphonylureas (N = 98 770), and new users of GLP1-RAs and insulin (N = 25 422). Cox proportional hazards models estimated the hazard ratios (HRs) for the outcomes. RESULTS We observed a lower risk of DFU with both DPP4-I use versus sulphonylurea use (HR 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79-0.97) and GLP1-RA use versus insulin use (HR 0.44, 95% CI: 0.32-0.60) for short-term exposure (≤ 400 days) and HR 0.74 (95% CI: 0.60-0.92) for long-term exposure (>400 days). Furthermore, the risks of hospitalization and mortality were lower with both DPP4-I use and GLP1-RA use. The risk of LLA was lower with GLP1-RA use. The results remained consistent across several sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS Incretin-based therapy was associated with a lower risk of DFU and DFU-related outcomes. This suggests benefits for the use of this treatment in people at risk of DFU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikki C C Werkman
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna H M Driessen
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Olaf H Klungel
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolaas S Schaper
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Patrick C Souverein
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Coen D A Stehouwer
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes T H Nielen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Esaifan HA, Saadah LM, Abu Hammour K, Abu Farha RK. Machine learning assessment of vildagliptin and linagliptin effectiveness in type 2 diabetes: Predictors of glycemic control. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0309365. [PMID: 39186745 PMCID: PMC11346939 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2024] [Accepted: 08/11/2024] [Indexed: 08/28/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Differential effects of linagliptin and vildagliptin may help us personalize treatment for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). The current study compares the effect of these drugs on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in an artificial neural network (ANN) model. METHODS Patients with T2DM who received either vildagliptin or linagliptin, with predefined exclusion criteria, qualified for the study. Two input variable datasets were constructed: with or without imputation for missing values. The primary outcome was HbA1c readings between 3 to 12 months or the reduction in HbA1c levels. RESULTS The cohort comprised 191 individuals (92 vildagliptin and 99 linagliptin). Linagliptin group had significantly higher disease burden. For imputed dataset, HbA1c was lower with linagliptin at 3 to 12 months (7.442 ± 0.408 vs. 7.626 ± 0.408, P < 0.001). However, there was a small yet significant difference in HbA1c reduction favoring vildagliptin over linagliptin (-1.123 ± 0.033 vs. -1.111 ± 0.043, P < 0.001). LDL level, uric acid, and the drug group were identified as predictors for HbA1c levels. In the non-imputed dataset HbA1c at 3 to 12 months was lower with linagliptin (median ± IQR: 7.489 ± 0.467 vs. 7.634 ± 0.467, P-value < 0.001). However, both linagliptin and vildagliptin exhibited similar reductions in HbA1c levels (both median ± IQR of -1.07 ± 0.02). Predictors for HbA1c levels included eGFR level and the drug group. CONCLUSION Linagliptin effectively lowers HbA1c levels more than vildagliptin including in patients with comorbidities. DPP4-I choice is a constant predictor of HbA1c in all models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanin A. Esaifan
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Loai M. Saadah
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Khawla Abu Hammour
- Department of Biopharmaceutics and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Rana K. Abu Farha
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aljohani H, Alrubaish FS, Alghamdi WM, Al-Harbi F. Safety of Linagliptin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Ther Innov Regul Sci 2024; 58:622-633. [PMID: 38634983 DOI: 10.1007/s43441-024-00637-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Linagliptin is an oral dipeptidyl peptidase DPP-4 inhibitor, which is indicated for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as monotherapy or add-on to therapy with other hypoglycemic drugs. OBJECTIVES We aimed to summarize the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the safety of linagliptin focusing on cardiovascular risks among subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS We conducted a systematic search across the following databases: Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to November 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of linagliptin compared to placebo in patients with Type 2 diabetes were included. The primary safety points were cardiovascular (CV) adverse events including non-fatal stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), CV death, MI, stroke, and hospitalization for unstable angina. While, secondary safety points included 17 reported adverse events such as infections, hypoglycemia and abdominal pain. Three reviewers independently screened and reviewed each study to extract relevant information. Any discrepancies were resolved by consensus. We conducted a meta-analysis using the random effects model. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) of targeted adverse events with linagliptin compared to placebo were estimated using the Mantel-Haenszel test. RESULTS A total of 24 studies with 19,981 adult patients were included. There was no difference in the incidence of all CV adverse events or individual CV adverse events between linagliptin and the placebo arms. The pooled estimate of the risk of upper respiratory tract infection was reported in twelve trials with a 38% risk reduction among patients treated with the linagliptin group compared to the placebo group (RR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.45-0.85, and I2 = 0%), while no difference was found in other infections. For gastrointestinal disorders, the risk of abdominal pain showed a 65% risk reduction among patients treated with the linagliptin group compared to the placebo group (RR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.16-0.77, and I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION Our study showed an overall acceptable safety profile of linagliptin in patients with T2DM. Moreover, our study showed a risk reduction of upper respiratory tract infection and abdominal pain when using linagliptin compared to placebo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadir Aljohani
- Drug Safety and Risk Management Department, Executive Directorate of Pharmacovigilance, Drug Sector, Saudi Food and Drug Authority, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Fares S Alrubaish
- Drug Safety and Risk Management Department, Executive Directorate of Pharmacovigilance, Drug Sector, Saudi Food and Drug Authority, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Waad M Alghamdi
- Drug Safety and Risk Management Department, Executive Directorate of Pharmacovigilance, Drug Sector, Saudi Food and Drug Authority, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fawaz Al-Harbi
- Drug Safety and Risk Management Department, Executive Directorate of Pharmacovigilance, Drug Sector, Saudi Food and Drug Authority, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gong Y, Bai X, Zhang D, Yang X, Qin Z, Yang Y, Zhou Y, Meng J, Liu X. Effect of DPP-4i inhibitors on renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Lipids Health Dis 2024; 23:157. [PMID: 38796440 PMCID: PMC11128128 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-024-02132-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024] Open
Abstract
AIMS About 20-40% patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) had an increased risk of developing diabetic nephropathy (DN). Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) were recommended for treatment of T2DM, while the impact of DPP-4i on renal function remained unclear. This study aimed to explore the effect of DPP-4i on renal parameter of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) in T2DM. METHODS A systematic search was performed across PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library. A fixed or random-effects model was used for quantitative synthesis according to the heterogeneity, which was assessed with I2 index. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias were performed with standard methods, respectively. RESULTS A total of 17 randomized controlled trials were identified. Administration of DPP-4i produced no significant effect on eGFR (WMD, -0.92 mL/min/1.73m2, 95% CI, -2.04 to 0.19) in diabetic condition. DPP-4i produced a favorable effect on attenuating ACR (WMD, -2.76 mg/g, 95% CI, -5.23 to -0.29) in patients with T2DM. The pooled estimate was stable based on the sensitivity test. No publication bias was observed according to Begg's and Egger's tests. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with DPP-4i preserved the renal parameter of eGFR in diabetic condition. Available evidences suggested that administration of DPP-4i produced a favorable effect on attenuating ACR in patients with T2DM. INTERNATIONAL PROSPECTIVE REGISTER FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (PROSPERO) NUMBER: CRD.42020144642.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Gong
- Department of Nephrology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xueyan Bai
- Department of Hemotology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Donglei Zhang
- Department of Hemotology, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Xingsheng Yang
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zheng Qin
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yu Yang
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yilun Zhou
- Department of Nephrology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| | - Jie Meng
- Department of Pathology, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| | - Xin Liu
- Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Laeeq T, Ahmed M, Sattar H, Zeeshan MH, Ali MB. Role of SGLT2 Inhibitors, DPP-4 Inhibitors, and Metformin in Pancreatic Cancer Prevention. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1325. [PMID: 38611003 PMCID: PMC11011099 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Revised: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic carcinoma is a highly aggressive tumor that usually presents when it has already metastasized. Therapeutic options for cure remain scarce and rely on combination chemotherapy with limited sustainability. Diabetes is considered an important risk factor for the development of pancreatic cancer due to the production of proinflammatory cytokines, which result in increased cell proliferation. More than half of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer eventually develop diabetes due to the destruction of insulin-producing cells. The interlinkage of both diseases might identify a possible preventative strategy for reducing the incidence of pancreatic carcinoma. This study reviewed the recent literature on the association between pancreatic cancer risk and SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 RA, DPP-4 inhibitors, and biguanides. There are mixed data regarding the relationship between GLP-1 RA and DPP-4 inhibitors and pancreatic cancer, with some trials suggesting that they might increase the risk. In contrast, studies have mostly revealed that SGLT2 inhibitors have an antiproliferative effect on various tumors, such as liver, pancreatic, prostate, bowel, lung, and breast carcinoma, which might be due to their mechanism of blockage of reabsorption of glucose by cells, lowering the amount of available glucose for the growth of tumor cells. Metformin, the first-line agent for diabetes, has also been shown to be associated with decreasing pancreatic cancer risk and improving prognosis in those who already have the disease. Dedicated trials are needed to further delineate the association of antidiabetic drugs with the risk of pancreatic cancer in the general population, as previous studies have mostly focused on diabetic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tooba Laeeq
- Internal Medicine, University of Nevada, 4505 S Maryland Pkwy, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA
| | - Maheen Ahmed
- Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Mission Rd., New Labour Colony, Karachi 74200, Pakistan; (M.A.); (M.H.Z.)
| | - Hina Sattar
- Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Mission Rd., New Labour Colony, Karachi 74200, Pakistan; (M.A.); (M.H.Z.)
| | - Muhammad Hamayl Zeeshan
- Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Mission Rd., New Labour Colony, Karachi 74200, Pakistan; (M.A.); (M.H.Z.)
| | - Meher Binte Ali
- Internal Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center, 827 Linden Ave., Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fariman SA, Nosrati M, Rahmani P, Nikfar S. A cost-effectiveness analysis of linagliptin add-on to insulin treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease in Iran. J Diabetes Metab Disord 2023; 22:1263-1271. [PMID: 37975115 PMCID: PMC10638343 DOI: 10.1007/s40200-023-01243-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Purpose With the high prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), determining optimal treatment strategies has become a major concern. Linagliptin is aDPP-4 inhibitor that does not require dose adjustment in patients with renal impairment. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of adding linagliptin to insulin therapy in patients with T2DM and mild (stage 2) or moderate (stage 3) CKD from a health system perspective in Iran. Methods We developed a cost-utility model using a decision tree and ran it separately for T2DM patients with mild or moderate CKD. Clinical outcomes and health-state utility values were extracted from published studies. Direct medical costs were obtained from national tariffs in Iran in 2021. We adopted an annual time horizon and calculated the difference in costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) to obtain the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). To capture parameter uncertainties, one-way sensitivity analyses were also performed. Results In T2DM patients with mild CKD, the linagliptin add-on strategy was associated with an additional $23.69 cost and 0.0148 QALYs per patient, resulting in an ICER of 1600.37 USD/QALY. In moderate CKD, the strategy was associated with $22.59 more costs and 0.0191 more QALYs, and the ICER was estimated at 1182.72 USD/QALY. In both populations, the ICER was mainly driven by the impact of HbA1c on utility, cost of linagliptin, and the reduction in insulin usage by adding linagliptin to the treatment. Conclusion With a cost-effectiveness threshold of $1550 USD/QALY in Iran, adding linagliptin to insulin is cost-effective in patients with T2DM and moderate CKD. However, for those with mild CKD, it seems that the associated costs outweigh the expected benefits. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-023-01243-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soroush Ahmadi Fariman
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 16 Azar St., Enghelab-E Islami Sq, Tehran, Iran
| | - Marzieh Nosrati
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 16 Azar St., Enghelab-E Islami Sq, Tehran, Iran
| | - Parham Rahmani
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 16 Azar St., Enghelab-E Islami Sq, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shekoufeh Nikfar
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 16 Azar St., Enghelab-E Islami Sq, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Guo C, Lin Y, Wu S, Li H, Wu M, Wang F. Association of the dietary inflammation index (DII) with the prevalence of chronic kidney disease in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus. Ren Fail 2023; 45:2277828. [PMID: 37994461 PMCID: PMC11011236 DOI: 10.1080/0886022x.2023.2277828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). Inflammation is an essential component in the process of CKD progression in patients with DM. Diet is a significant determinant of systemic inflammation levels. However, the association between the dietary inflammatory index (DII) and CKD in individuals with DM remains largely unknown; therefore, the aim of this study was to explore whether the DII is linked to the prevalence of CKD in patients with DM. The research method was as follows: first, data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 1999 and 2018 were obtained. There were 7,974 participants in our study. These individuals were then classified into three groups according to DII tertiles (T1-T3), with each group consisting of 2,658 participants. Logistic regression analysis was employed to examine whether there was a connection between the DII and CKD. We observed a significant association between the DII and the prevalence of CKD in individuals with DM. After full adjustment for age, sex, ethnicity, smoking, drinking, body mass index (BMI), triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), metabolic equivalents (METs), energy intake, hypoglycemic medications, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease (CVD), the group with a higher DII had a greater frequency of CKD (T2 group: OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.10-1.76; p = 0.006; T3 group: OR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.29-2.17; p < 0.001). The implementation of an anti-inflammatory diet could serve as an intervention strategy for patients with DM to prevent the onset of CKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunhua Guo
- Department of Cardiology, Longyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Longyan, China
| | - Yong Lin
- Department of Cardiology, Longyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Longyan, China
| | - Senchao Wu
- Department of Cardiology, Longyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Longyan, China
| | - Huaqing Li
- Department of Cardiology, Longyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Longyan, China
| | - Meng Wu
- Department of Cardiology, Longyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Longyan, China
| | - Fuzhen Wang
- Department of Cardiology, Longyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Longyan, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Huijben JA, Kramer A, Kerschbaum J, de Meester J, Collart F, Arévalo OLR, Helve J, Lassalle M, Palsson R, Ten Dam M, Casula A, Methven S, Ortiz A, Ferraro PM, Segelmark M, Mingo PU, Arici M, Reisæter AV, Stendahl M, Stel VS, Jager KJ. Increasing numbers and improved overall survival of patients on kidney replacement therapy over the last decade in Europe: an ERA Registry study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2022; 38:1027-1040. [PMID: 35974693 PMCID: PMC10064979 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfac165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to describe the trends in the incidence, prevalence and survival of patients on kidney replacement therapy (KRT) for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) across Europe from 2008 to 2017. METHODS Data from renal registries in 9 countries and 16 regions that provided individual patient data to the ERA Registry from 2008 to 2017 were included. These registries cover 34% of the general population in Europe. Crude and standardized incidence and prevalence per million population (pmp) were determined. Trends over time were studied using Joinpoint regression. Survival probabilities were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and hazard ratios (HRs) using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS The standardized incidence of KRT was stable (annual percentage change [APC]: -1.48 [-3.15; 0.21]) from 2008 (146.0 pmp) to 2011 (141.6 pmp), followed by a slight increase (APC: 1.01 [0.43; 1.60]) to 148.0 pmp in 2017, although trends in incidence varied across countries. This increase was primarily due to a rise in the incidence of KRT in men older than 65 years. Moreover, as a cause of kidney failure, diabetes mellitus is increasing. The standardized prevalence increased from 2008 (990.0 pmp) to 2017 (1166.8 pmp) (APC: 1.82 [1.75; 1.89]). Patient survival on KRT improved in the time period 2011-2013 compared with 2008-2010 (adjusted HR: 0.94 [0.93; 0.95). CONCLUSION This study showed an overall increase in the incidence and prevalence of KRT for ESKD as well as an increase in the KRT patient survival over the last decade in Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jilske A Huijben
- Department of Medical Informatics, ERA-EDTA Registry, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anneke Kramer
- Department of Medical Informatics, ERA-EDTA Registry, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Julia Kerschbaum
- Austrian Dialysis and Transplant Registry, Department of Internal Medicine IV - Nephrology and Hypertension, Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Johan de Meester
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Hypertension, Dutch-speaking Belgian Renal Registry (NBVN), Sint-Niklaas, Belgium
| | | | - Olga Lucía Rodríguez Arévalo
- Valencia Region Renal Registry, Dirección General de Salut Publica i Adiccions, Valencia, Spain.,Doctoral student of the Technologies for Health and Well-being program, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jaakko Helve
- Finnish Registry for Kidney Diseases, Helsinki, Finland.,Abdominal Center Nephrology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Mathilde Lassalle
- REIN Registry, Agence de la Biomédecine, Saint-Denis La Plaine, France
| | - Runolfur Palsson
- Division of Nephrology, Landspitali-The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.,Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Marc Ten Dam
- Dutch Registry RENINE, Nefrovisie, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Casula
- UK Renal Registry, the Renal Association, Bristol, UK
| | - Shona Methven
- Department of Renal Medicine, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Foresterhill Health Campus, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Alberto Ortiz
- School of Medicine, IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, University Autonoma of Madrid, FRIAT and REDINREN, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pietro Manuel Ferraro
- U.O.S. Terapia Conservativa della Malattia Renale Cronica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Mårten Segelmark
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Nephrology, Lund University and Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Swedish Renal Registry, Department of Internal Medicine, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - Pablo Ucio Mingo
- Coordinador Autonómico de Trasplantes de Castilla y León, Dirección General de Planificación y Asistencia Sanitaria, Valladolid, Castilla y León, Spain
| | - Mustafa Arici
- Department of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Anna Varberg Reisæter
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University hospital, Rikshospitalet, Norway
| | - Maria Stendahl
- Swedish Renal Registry, Department of Internal Medicine, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - Vianda S Stel
- Department of Medical Informatics, ERA-EDTA Registry, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kitty J Jager
- Department of Medical Informatics, ERA-EDTA Registry, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
He L, Wang J, Ping F, Yang N, Huang J, Li W, Xu L, Zhang H, Li Y. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and gallbladder or biliary disease in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2022; 377:e068882. [PMID: 35764326 PMCID: PMC9237836 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the association between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and gallbladder or biliary diseases. DESIGN Systematic review and pairwise and network meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CENTRAL from inception until 31 July 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials of adult patients with type 2 diabetes who received dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors compared with placebo or other antidiabetes drugs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Composite of gallbladder or biliary diseases, cholecystitis, cholelithiasis, and biliary diseases. DATA EXTRACTION AND DATA SYNTHESIS Two reviewers independently extracted the data and assessed the quality of the studies. The quality of the evidence for each outcome was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework (GRADE) approach. The meta-analysis used pooled odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS A total of 82 randomised controlled trials with 104 833 participants were included in the pairwise meta-analysis. Compared with placebo or non-incretin drugs, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors were significantly associated with an increased risk of the composite of gallbladder or biliary diseases (odds ratio 1.22 (95%confidence interval 1.04 to 1.43); risk difference 11 (2 to 21) more events per 10 000 person years) and cholecystitis (odds ratio 1.43 (1.14 to 1.79); risk difference 15 (5 to 27) more events per 10 000 person years) but not with the risk of cholelithiasis and biliary diseases. The associations tended to be observed in patients with a longer duration of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor treatment. In the network meta-analysis of 184 trials, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors increased the risk of the composite of gallbladder or biliary diseases and cholecystitis compared with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors but not compared with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. CONCLUSIONS Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors increased the risk of cholecystitis in randomised controlled trials, especially with a longer treatment duration, which requires more attention from physicians in clinical practice. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42021271647.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liyun He
- Department of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology of National Health Commission, Translation Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jialu Wang
- Department of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology of National Health Commission, Translation Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Fan Ping
- Department of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology of National Health Commission, Translation Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Na Yang
- Department of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology of National Health Commission, Translation Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jingyue Huang
- Department of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology of National Health Commission, Translation Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Li
- Department of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology of National Health Commission, Translation Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lingling Xu
- Department of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology of National Health Commission, Translation Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Huabing Zhang
- Department of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology of National Health Commission, Translation Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuxiu Li
- Department of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology of National Health Commission, Translation Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mohammad Zadeh Gharabaghi MA, Rezvanfar MR, Saeedi N, Aghajani F, Alirezaei M, Yarahmadi P, Nakhostin-Ansari A. Comparison of effects of Empagliflozin and Linagliptin on renal function and glycaemic control: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Clin Diabetes Endocrinol 2022; 8:5. [PMID: 35610696 PMCID: PMC9131518 DOI: 10.1186/s40842-022-00142-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to compare the effects of Linagliptin and Empagliflozin on renal function and glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Method We conducted a randomized, double-blind, parallel trial on patients aged 30 to 80 years with type 2 DM and HbA1c ≤ 9%, regardless of background medical therapy, to compare the effects of Empagliflozin and Linagliptin on albuminuria, FBS, HbA1c, and eGFR. Participants were given the mentioned drugs for 12 weeks. Statistical analysis was performed using appropriate tests in IBM™SPSS® statistics software for windows version 24. Results In total, 60 patients participated in the study, thirty patients in each group. The mean age of participants was 56.8 (SD = 8.15) in the Empagliflozin group and 60.9 (SD = 7.22) in the Linagliptin group. Before the intervention, FBS, HbA1C, and albuminuria values were significantly higher in the Empagliflozin group than those in the Linagliptin group (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between groups regarding eGFR (P = 0.271). Changes in the FBS, HbA1C, and eGFR were not significantly different between groups (P > 0.05), but there was more decrease in albuminuria in the Empagliflozin group compared to the Linagliptin group (P = 0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.98). Conclusions Regardless of baseline albuminuria, eGFR, or HbA1c, Empagliflozin 10 mg daily significantly reduced albuminuria at 12 weeks compared to Linagliptin 5 mg daily in patients with type 2 diabetes. Trial registration Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials, IRCT20200722048176N1. Registered 3 August 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mohammad Reza Rezvanfar
- Internal Medicine Department, Arak University of Medical Sciences, A'lam-Al-Hoda Street, Shahid Shiroodi Street, Arak, Iran
| | - Nasser Saeedi
- Internal Medicine Department, Arak University of Medical Sciences, A'lam-Al-Hoda Street, Shahid Shiroodi Street, Arak, Iran
| | - Faezeh Aghajani
- Research Development Center, Arash Women's Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Pourya Yarahmadi
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Amin Nakhostin-Ansari
- Sports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lee YT, Hsu CN, Fu CM, Wang SW, Huang CC, Li LC. Comparison of Adverse Kidney Outcomes With Empagliflozin and Linagliptin Use in Patients With Type 2 Diabetic Patients in a Real-World Setting. Front Pharmacol 2022; 12:781379. [PMID: 34992535 PMCID: PMC8724779 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.781379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: To compare the effects of empagliflozin and linagliptin use on kidney outcomes of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients in a real-world setting. Methods: The study involved a propensity score-matched cohort comprising new users of empagliflozin or linagliptin with T2DM between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2018 from a large healthcare delivery system in Taiwan. Clinical outcomes assessed: acute kidney injury (AKI), post-AKI dialysis, and mortality. Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate the relative risk of empagliflozin or linagliptin use; a linear mixed model was used to compare the average change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over time. Results: Of the 7,042 individuals, 67 of 3,521 (1.9%) in the empagliflozin group and 144 of 3,521 (4.1%) in the linagliptin group developed AKI during the 2 years follow-up. Patients in the empagliflozin group were at a 40% lower risk of developing AKI compared to those in the linagliptin group (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.82, p = 0.001). Stratified analysis showed that empagliflozin users ≥65 years of age (aHR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.43-1.13, p = 0.148), or with a baseline eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (aHR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.57-1.65, p = 0.899), or with a baseline glycohemoglobin ≦7% (aHR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.51-2.00, p =0.973) experienced attenuated benefits with respect to AKI risk. A smaller decline in eGFR was observed in empagliflozin users compared to linagliptin users regardless of AKI occurrence (adjusted β = 1.51; 95% CI, 0.30-2.72 ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.014). Conclusion: Empagliflozin users were at a lower risk of developing AKI and exhibited a smaller eGFR decline than linagliptin users. Thus, empagliflozin may be a safer alternative to linagliptin for T2DM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yueh-Ting Lee
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Ning Hsu
- Department of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,School of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Ming Fu
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Wei Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chiang-Chi Huang
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Lung-Chih Li
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Institute for Translational Research in Biomedicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chenchula S, Varthya SB, Padmavathi R. Rationality, Efficacy, Tolerability of Empagliflozin Plus Linagliptin Combination for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies. Curr Diabetes Rev 2022; 18:e100921196392. [PMID: 34514991 DOI: 10.2174/1573399817666210910165402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Revised: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of diabetes mellitus includes more than one drug of different groups, which may lead to a high pill burden and non-adherence to drugs. We have aimed to systematically analyze the clinical efficacy, safety, and pharmacoeconomic cost-effectiveness of the fixed-dose combination of empagliflozin plus a linagliptin in Type-2 Diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. METHODS A literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Google Scholar, and EMBASE was performed using the MeSH terms and/or keywords"((Single-pill combination) OR ((Fixeddose combination) OR (Combination therapy)) AND (Empagliflozin add on-to Linagliptin) OR (Empagliflozin combined with Linagliptin) OR ((Combination of Empagliflozin and Linagliptin)" from the inception to February 2021. RESULTS Search results were found in a total of 13 clinical studies. After removing duplicates and studies not according to inclusion criteria, a total of eight clinical studies (Randomized controlled trials: 7; Observational cohort studies: 1) were included (n=7491). A significant reduction in the primary endpoint, the mean changes in baseline HbA1c at the end of 24 weeks and/or 52 weeks was found in the empagliflozin plus a linagliptin combination group in all included studies. In addition, significant efficacy was seen in decreasing the secondary endpoints such as the mean change in the fasting plasma glucose, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and body weight with fewer adverse events than the adverse effects with either drug alone. CONCLUSION After reviewing findings from the available clinical studies of the combination of empagliflozin plus linagliptin, we conclude that the combination is effective, safe, tolerable, and rationale cost effective compared to placebo and either drug alone for the management of T2DM in patients with inadequate glycemic control with metformin alone, patients with intolerance to metformin, increased baseline HbA1c, patients with overweight or obesity and diabetic hypertensive, CHF, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and renal dysfunction patients. Future randomized controlled trials in a larger number of T2DM patients with or without CHF and renal failure patients are recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santenna Chenchula
- Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal, India
| | - Shoban Babu Varthya
- Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Li Y, Hu Y, Huyan X, Chen K, Li B, Gu W, Mu Y. Comparison of efficacy and safety of three novel hypoglycemic agents in patients with severe diabetic kidney disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:1003263. [PMID: 36353233 PMCID: PMC9637657 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1003263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze the efficacy and safety of three novel hypoglycemic agents, glucagon-like peptidyl-1 receptor agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i), and sodium-glucose cotransporter two inhibitors (SGLT2i) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) (defined in this study as CKD stage 3 B or above, eGFR< 45 mL/min/1.73 m²) based on important RCTs to date. METHODS We retrieved studies published before April 15, 2022, from EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and included randomized controlled trials in which the participants were patients with T2DM and severe CKD. Frequentist methods were used in the network meta-analysis. RESULTS Nineteen studies of 17 trials involving 6,607 participants met our inclusion criteria. Compared with placebo and DPP-4i, SGLT2i demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of serious renal-related adverse events or renal death, and the odds ratios (OR) were 0.69 (0.58, 0.81) and 0.63 (0.40, 1.00), respectively. Compared with placebo, SGLT2i significantly reduced the incidence of all-cause death and severe AE; the ORs were 0.72 (0.55, 0.94) and 0.65 (0.47, 0.91), respectively. Compared with placebo, DPP-4i significantly reduced the level of HbA1c, and the difference between mean changes from baseline was -0.36 (-0.63, -0.09). CONCLUSIONS Patients with T2DM complicated by severe CKD may benefit from SGLT2i. SGLT2i can reduce the incidence of serious renal-related AEs or renal death, as well as severe side effects, and has a positive effect on the patient's renal function and survival, even for only CKD patients can also be considered. GLP-1 RAs can be used as a supplement if blood sugar control is poor. For dialysis patients, DPP-4i can assist blood glucose control, reduce insulin dosage, and reduce the risk of hypoglycemia. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION INPLASY https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2021-12-0106/, identifier INPLASY2021120106.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yijun Li
- Department of Endocrinology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ying Hu
- Department of Endocrinology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoyuan Huyan
- The First Health Care Department, the Second Medical Center & National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Kang Chen
- Department of Endocrinology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Bing Li
- Department of Endocrinology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Weijun Gu
- Department of Endocrinology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Yiming Mu, ; Weijun Gu,
| | - Yiming Mu
- Department of Endocrinology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Yiming Mu, ; Weijun Gu,
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kanasaki K, Qu S, Yamamoto F, Schepers C, Sani Simões R, Yabe D, Ji L. Safety and tolerability of linagliptin in Asians with type 2 diabetes: a pooled analysis of 4457 patients from 21 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2021; 21:425-434. [PMID: 34711126 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2022.1999409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Safety and tolerability of glucose-lowering drugs is a key consideration for use in type 2 diabetes (T2D). We evaluated the safety and tolerability of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor linagliptin in Asian patients with T2D. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This was a post-hoc, descriptive pooled analysis of 21 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials of linagliptin in T2D patients lasting ≤52 weeks. We evaluated adverse events (AEs) and laboratory parameters in Asian participants living in Asia, both overall and in the East Asian subgroup. RESULTS This analysis included 4457 Asian patients overall (2712 receiving linagliptin; 1745 receiving placebo) and 3057 (68.6%) East Asians. AEs were reported in 1510 (55.7%) Asian patients receiving linagliptin and 1032 (59.1%) receiving placebo but were considered drug-related in only 13.0% of each group. Serious AEs occurred in 109 (4.0%) linagliptin patients and 90 (5.2%) placebo patients. The most common AEs were nasopharyngitis (6.4% linagliptin, 7.3% placebo), upper respiratory tract infection (5.7% linagliptin, 6.5% placebo), and hypoglycemia (7.3% linagliptin, 6.3% placebo). One linagliptin patient had pancreatitis; none had bullous pemphigoid. No clinically relevant mean changes in laboratory parameters occurred. These findings were consistent in East Asians. CONCLUSIONS Linagliptin is well tolerated in Asian T2D patients, including East Asians, with low risk for AEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keizo Kanasaki
- Department of Internal Medicine 1, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Izumo, Japan
| | - Shen Qu
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Fumiko Yamamoto
- Medicine Division, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Cornelia Schepers
- Biostatistics and Data Sciences, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Ingelheim, Germany
| | - Rafael Sani Simões
- Global Patient Safety & Pharmacovigilance, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany
| | - Daisuke Yabe
- Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism and Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan.,Yutaka Seino Distinguished Center for Diabetes Research, Kansai Electric Power Medical Research Institute, Kobe, Japan.,Division of Molecular and Metabolic Medicine, Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.,Center for Healthcare Information Technology (C-HIT), Tokai National Higher Education and Research System, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Linong Ji
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Seidu S, Kunutsor SK, Topsever P, Khunti K. Benefits and harms of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2-I) and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAAS-I) versus SGLT2-Is alone in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. ENDOCRINOLOGY DIABETES & METABOLISM 2021; 5:e00303. [PMID: 34636161 PMCID: PMC8754244 DOI: 10.1002/edm2.303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 09/19/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Introduction It is uncertain if the combination of sodium‐glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2‐Is) and renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system inhibitors (RAAS‐Is) provides better cardio‐renal clinical outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) compared with SGLT2‐Is alone. Using a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we evaluated the efficacy and safety with respect to cardio‐renal outcomes of the combination of SGLT2 and RAAS inhibitors vs SGLT2‐Is in patients with T2DM. Methods Studies were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library and search of bibliographies to May 2021. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias of each study. Study‐specific risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled. Quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE. Results Nine articles comprising 8 RCT evaluations (n = 34,551 participants) that compared SGLT2‐Is with placebo in patients with T2DM against a background of standard care and reported subgroup results for those treated with or without RAAS‐Is at baseline were included. No RCT specifically investigated the combination of SGLT2 and RAAS inhibitors compared with SGLT2‐Is alone. The RRs (95% CIs) for composite cardiovascular outcome and composite CVD death/heart failure hospitalization comparing SGLT2‐Is vs placebo in patients on RAAS‐Is were 0.93 (0.85–1.01) and 0.88 (0.76–1.02), respectively. The corresponding estimates for patients not on RAAS‐Is were 0.78 (0.65–0.93) and 0.73 (0.65–0.82), respectively. There was no evidence of interactions between RAAS‐I status and the effects of SGLT2‐Is for both outcomes. Single study results showed that SGLT2‐Is vs placebo reduced the risk of composite kidney outcome and cardiovascular death in patients with RAAS inhibition. The effect of SGLT2 inhibition vs placebo on kidney parameters, genital infections, volume depletion, hyperkalaemia, hypokalaemia, hypoglycaemia and other adverse events was similar in patients with or without RAAS inhibition. The quality of the evidence ranged from very low to moderate. Conclusions Aggregate published data suggest that the combination of SGLT2 and RAAS inhibitors in the treatment of patients with T2DM may be similar in efficacy and safety if not superior to SGLT2‐Is alone. Head‐to‐head comparisons of the two interventions are warranted to inform T2DM management. The use of SGLT2 inhibition as a first‐line therapy in T2DM or its early use in the prevention of renal deterioration and cardiovascular complications in addition to its glycaemic control deserves further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Seidu
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Setor K Kunutsor
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Learning & Research Building (Level 1), University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Pinar Topsever
- Department of Family Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University School of Medicine, Kerem Aydinlar Campus, Atasehir, Turkey
| | - Kamlesh Khunti
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ben-David E, Hull R, Banerjee D. Diabetes mellitus in dialysis and renal transplantation. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab 2021; 12:20420188211048663. [PMID: 34631007 PMCID: PMC8495524 DOI: 10.1177/20420188211048663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus is the commonest cause of end-stage kidney failure worldwide and is a proven and significant risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease. Renal impairment has a significant impact on the physiology of glucose homeostasis as it reduces tissue sensitivity to insulin and reduces insulin clearance. Renal replacement therapy itself affects glucose control: peritoneal dialysis may induce hyperglycaemia due to glucose-rich dialysate and haemodialysis often causes hypoglycaemia due to the relatively low concentration of glucose in the dialysate. Autonomic neuropathy which is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and diabetes increases the risk for asymptomatic hypoglycaemia. Pharmacological options for improving glycaemic control are limited due to alterations to drug metabolism. Impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes are also common in the post-kidney-transplant setting and increase the risk of graft failure and mortality. This review seeks to summarise the literature and tackle the intricacies of glycaemic management in patients with CKD who are either on maintenance haemodialysis or have received a kidney transplant. It outlines changes to glycaemic targets, monitoring of glycaemic control, the use of oral hypoglycaemic agents, the management of severe hyperglycaemia in dialysis and kidney transplantation patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eyal Ben-David
- Renal and Transplantation Unit, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Richard Hull
- Renal and Transplantation Unit, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Debasish Banerjee
- Renal and Transplantation Unit, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Room G2.113, Second Floor, Grosvenor Wing, Blackshaw Road, Tooting, London SW17 0QT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Aziz S, Ghadzi SMS, Sulaiman SAS, Hanafiah NHM, Harun SN. Can Newer Anti-Diabetic Therapies Delay the Development of Diabetic Nephropathy? JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES 2021; 13:341-351. [PMID: 35399797 PMCID: PMC8985833 DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_497_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Revised: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is progressive in nature and leads to hyperglycemia-associated microvascular and macrovascular complications. Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is one of the most prominent microvascular complication induced by T2DM and is characterized by albuminuria and progressive loss of kidney function. Aggressive management of hyperglycemia and hypertension has been found effective in delaying the development and progression of DN. Although the conventional antidiabetic treatment is effective in the earlier management of hyperglycemia, the progressive loss of beta cells ultimately needs the addition of insulin to the therapy. The emergence of newer antidiabetic agents may address the limitations associated with conventional antidiabetic therapies, which not only improve the glycemic status but also effective in improving cardio-renal outcomes. Nevertheless, the exact role of these agents and their role in minimizing diabetes progression to DN still needs elaboration. The present review aimed to highlights the impact of these newer antidiabetic agents in the management of hyperglycemia and their role in delaying the progression of diabetes to DN/management of DN in patients with T2DM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sohail Aziz
- Discipline of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
| | | | - Syed Azhar Syed Sulaiman
- Discipline of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
- Advanced Medical and Dental Institute, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
| | - Nur Hafzan Md Hanafiah
- Discipline of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
| | - Sabariah Noor Harun
- Discipline of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dalui SK, Chakraverty R, Yasmin N, Pattanaik S, Pandit K, Chatterjee S. Effects of DPP4 Inhibitors on Renal Outcomes in Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2021; 25:283-292. [PMID: 35136733 PMCID: PMC8793961 DOI: 10.4103/ijem.ijem_237_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT) intends to evaluate the efficacy of DPP4 Inhibitors (DPP4I) compared with placebo, other antidiabetics (or DPP4I) on renal outcomes, adverse events (AEs), and all-cause mortality. METHODS We searched relevant scientific database for RCTs with DPP4I and prespecified renal end point. The effect size (mean difference or risk ratio) was reported with its 95% confidence interval. RESULTS Eight RCTs (n = 39040 participants) were included in the analysis. The rate of change in eGFR was not different in DPP4 inhibitor and control group. DPP4I use beyond 52 weeks did not worsen albuminuria progression (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.80 to 0.96; high quality evidence) compared to placebo. The risk of AEs within 52 weeks (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.80 to 1.08; moderate quality evidence), beyond 52 weeks (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.97 to 1.00; low quality evidence), and all-cause mortality (RR 1.04; 95% CI 0.96 to 1.12; very low quality evidence) were similar to placebo. In head-to-head comparison between two DPP4I studies, no significant differences were found between alogliptin and vildagliptin for improvement in eGFR, UACR, or AE at 24 weeks. CONCLUSIONS DPP4I do not seem to provide persuasive benefit in the renal outcomes or all-cause mortality in diabetes mellitus, though there was no evidence for increased AEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saikat K Dalui
- Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Raja Chakraverty
- Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Nafisha Yasmin
- Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Smita Pattanaik
- Department of Pharmacology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Kaushik Pandit
- Department of Endocrinology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Suparna Chatterjee
- Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Katsuno T, Shiraiwa T, Iwasaki S, Park H, Watanabe N, Kaneko S, Terasaki J, Hanafusa T, Imagawa A, Shimomura I, Ikegami H, Koyama H, Namba M, Miyagawa JI. Benefit of Early Add-on of Linagliptin to Insulin in Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Randomized-Controlled Open-Label Trial (TRUST2). Adv Ther 2021; 38:1514-1535. [PMID: 33507500 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-021-01631-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This trial was conducted to assess the long-term safety, efficacy, and benefit of early add-on of linagliptin to insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS This trial enrolled 246 subjects. The subjects were randomized to the linagliptin group or the control group and were observed for 156 weeks. After week 16, subjects in the control group were also allowed to add linagliptin to evaluate the benefit of early add-on of linagliptin to insulin. The primary end point was a change in HbA1c from baseline to week 16. Secondary end points included fasting plasma glucose, daily insulin dose, and frequency of adverse events. RESULTS HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose levels significantly decreased from baseline to week 16 in the linagliptin group compared with the control group. The significant improvement in HbA1c continued until week 52. The daily insulin dose significantly decreased in the linagliptin group compared with the control group. The frequency of hypoglycemia and adverse events was comparable in both groups. CONCLUSIONS Add-on of linagliptin to insulin was tolerated, improved glycemic control, and reduced the daily insulin dose. This study demonstrates the long-term safety, efficacy and benefit of early add-on of linagliptin to insulin in Japanese T2DM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoyuki Katsuno
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
- Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, Hyogo University of Health Sciences, Hyogo, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jungo Terasaki
- Department of Internal Medicine (I), Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Akihisa Imagawa
- Department of Internal Medicine (I), Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan
| | - Iichiro Shimomura
- Department of Metabolic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Ikegami
- Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hidenori Koyama
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Mitsuyoshi Namba
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
- Takarazuka City Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Jun-Ichiro Miyagawa
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
- Keiseikai Medical Corporation, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kyriakos G, Quiles-Sanchez LV, Garmpi A, Farmaki P, Kyre K, Gkogkos S, Savvanis S, Memi E. Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes of Incretin-based Therapies: A Review of Recent Clinical Trials. Curr Cardiol Rev 2021; 16:253-257. [PMID: 31161994 PMCID: PMC7903512 DOI: 10.2174/1573403x15666190603111056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2018] [Revised: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background To report the cardiovascular and renal effects of incretin-based therapies. Methods The studies of clinical trials on incretin-based therapy published in medical journals from the years 2010 to 2017 were comprehensively searched using MEDLINE and EMBASE with no language restriction. The studies were reviewed and the cardiovascular and renal risks reported were recorded. Results Incretin-based therapeutics represent novel and promising anti-diabetes drugs, the direct cardiovascular actions which may translate into demonstrable clinical benefits on cardiovascular outcomes. Furthermore, incretin-based therapies do not adversely affect renal function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Kyriakos
- Seccion de Endocrinologia y Nutrition, Hospital General Universitario Santa Lucia, Cartagena, Spain
| | | | - Anna Garmpi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athen, Athens, Greece
| | - Paraskevi Farmaki
- 1st Department of Pediatrics, "Aghia Sophia Children's Hospital" Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantina Kyre
- Department of Internal Medicine, KAT General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Spyridon Gkogkos
- Department of Surgery, Health Center of Peristeri, Athens, Greece
| | - Spyridon Savvanis
- Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital of Athens "Elpis", Athens, Greece
| | - Eleni Memi
- Unit of Endocrinology, Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolism, Aretaieion University Hospital, Medical School of Athens, Ethnikon and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Yang W, Xu X, Lei T, Ma J, Li L, Shen J, Ye B, Zhu S, Meinicke T. Efficacy and safety of linagliptin as add-on therapy to insulin in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab 2021; 23:642-647. [PMID: 33074590 DOI: 10.1111/dom.14231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Revised: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
This 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of linagliptin in 206 Chinese patients with inadequately controlled (glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c] 7.5%-10.0%) type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) receiving insulin (basal or premixed) ± metformin. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive linagliptin 5 mg/d or placebo. The decrease from baseline in HbA1c (primary endpoint) was greater with linagliptin than with placebo (-0.61% vs. -0.20%, adjusted mean difference -0.40%; P = 0.0016). Linagliptin demonstrated significantly greater improvement in 2-hour postprandial glucose (-1.77 mmol/L [-31.95 mg/dL]; P < 0.001), and a numerical reduction in fasting plasma glucose (-0.34 mmol/L [-6.2 mg/dL]; P = 0.2241) versus placebo. Proportionally more patients on linagliptin achieved a HbA1c reduction of ≥0.5% versus those on placebo (odds ratio 2.293, P < 0.01). Adverse events in both groups were similar, with no new safety findings or clinically relevant changes in body weight. Among investigator-defined hypoglycaemic events (linagliptin: 17.3%; placebo: 12.7%; odds ratio 1.48, P = 0.337), none were severe. In Chinese patients with T2DM, linagliptin add-on to insulin improved glycaemic control and was well tolerated, without increased risk of hypoglycaemia or weight gain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenying Yang
- China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiangjin Xu
- The 900th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force, PLA, Fujian, People's Republic of China
| | - Tao Lei
- Putuo Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianhua Ma
- Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| | - Ling Li
- Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University Endocrinology, Liaoning, People's Republic of China
| | - Jie Shen
- Boehringer Ingelheim (China) Investment Co. Ltd, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Binqi Ye
- Boehringer Ingelheim (China) Investment Co. Ltd, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Sandy Zhu
- Boehringer Ingelheim (China) Investment Co. Ltd, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Oikonomaki D, Dounousi E, Duni A, Roumeliotis S, Liakopoulos V. Incretin based therapies and SGLT-2 inhibitors in kidney transplant recipients with diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2021; 172:108604. [PMID: 33338553 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Revised: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
AIMS We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis regarding the use of incretin-based therapies including dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists as well as sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitorsin persons with posttransplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) so as to assess both their efficacy and safety. METHODS We searched for publications on Kidney/Renal Transplantation and DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1-receptor agonists and SGLT-2 inhibitors and included every study using these antidiabetics. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistical significant. RESULTS Sixteen studies and 310 individuals with a mean age of 55.98 ± 8.81 years were included in the analysis. Participants received DPP-4 inhibitors in 8 studies, SGLT-2 inhibitors in 6 studies and GLP-1 receptor agonists in 2 studies, with a mean follow-up of 22.03 ± 14.95 weeks. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) reduction was demonstrated in 10 studies (mean +/- standard deviation (MD) = - 0.38%, I2 = 45%). MD of HbA1c was -0.3741 and -0.4596 mg/dl for DPP-4 inhibitors and SGLT-2 inhibitors respectively. Nine studies demonstrated differences in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (MD = - 25,76) and 5 studies in post-prandial glucose (PPG) (MD = - 6.61) before and following treatment. Most studies did not show adverse effects on the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and hepatic function. CONCLUSIONS DPP-4 inhibitors and SGLT2 inhibitors appear both efficacious and safe in renal transplant recipients. More high-quality studies are required to guide therapeutic choices for PTDM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dora Oikonomaki
- Department of Nephrology, Evaggelismos General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Evangelia Dounousi
- Department of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
| | - Anila Duni
- Department of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Stefanos Roumeliotis
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Vassilios Liakopoulos
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Palmer SC, Tendal B, Mustafa RA, Vandvik PO, Li S, Hao Q, Tunnicliffe D, Ruospo M, Natale P, Saglimbene V, Nicolucci A, Johnson DW, Tonelli M, Rossi MC, Badve SV, Cho Y, Nadeau-Fredette AC, Burke M, Faruque LI, Lloyd A, Ahmad N, Liu Y, Tiv S, Millard T, Gagliardi L, Kolanu N, Barmanray RD, McMorrow R, Raygoza Cortez AK, White H, Chen X, Zhou X, Liu J, Rodríguez AF, González-Colmenero AD, Wang Y, Li L, Sutanto S, Solis RC, Díaz González-Colmenero F, Rodriguez-Gutierrez R, Walsh M, Guyatt G, Strippoli GFM. Sodium-glucose cotransporter protein-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2021; 372:m4573. [PMID: 33441402 PMCID: PMC7804890 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m4573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 314] [Impact Index Per Article: 104.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes at varying cardiovascular and renal risk. DESIGN Network meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL up to 11 August 2020. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES Randomised controlled trials comparing SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists with placebo, standard care, or other glucose lowering treatment in adults with type 2 diabetes with follow up of 24 weeks or longer. Studies were screened independently by two reviewers for eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Frequentist random effects network meta-analysis was carried out and GRADE (grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation) used to assess evidence certainty. Results included estimated absolute effects of treatment per 1000 patients treated for five years for patients at very low risk (no cardiovascular risk factors), low risk (three or more cardiovascular risk factors), moderate risk (cardiovascular disease), high risk (chronic kidney disease), and very high risk (cardiovascular disease and kidney disease). A guideline panel provided oversight of the systematic review. RESULTS 764 trials including 421 346 patients proved eligible. All results refer to the addition of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists to existing diabetes treatment. Both classes of drugs lowered all cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and kidney failure (high certainty evidence). Notable differences were found between the two agents: SGLT-2 inhibitors reduced admission to hospital for heart failure more than GLP-1 receptor agonists, and GLP-1 receptor agonists reduced non-fatal stroke more than SGLT-2 inhibitors (which appeared to have no effect). SGLT-2 inhibitors caused genital infection (high certainty), whereas GLP-1 receptor agonists might cause severe gastrointestinal events (low certainty). Low certainty evidence suggested that SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists might lower body weight. Little or no evidence was found for the effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists on limb amputation, blindness, eye disease, neuropathic pain, or health related quality of life. The absolute benefits of these drugs vary substantially across patients from low to very high risk of cardiovascular and renal outcomes (eg, SGLT-2 inhibitors resulted in 3 to 40 fewer deaths in 1000 patients over five years; see interactive decision support tool (https://magicevidence.org/match-it/200820dist/#!/) for all outcomes. CONCLUSIONS In patients with type 2 diabetes, SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists reduced cardiovascular and renal outcomes, with some differences in benefits and harms. Absolute benefits are determined by individual risk profiles of patients, with clear implications for clinical practice, as reflected in the BMJ Rapid Recommendations directly informed by this systematic review. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42019153180.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suetonia C Palmer
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Britta Tendal
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Reem A Mustafa
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, USA
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Per Olav Vandvik
- Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sheyu Li
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Division of Population Health and Genomics, Ninewells Hospital, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Qiukui Hao
- Centre for Gerontology and Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - David Tunnicliffe
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Marinella Ruospo
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Piazza Giulio CESARE, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Patrizia Natale
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Piazza Giulio CESARE, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Valeria Saglimbene
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Piazza Giulio CESARE, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Antonio Nicolucci
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Clinical Epidemiology (CORESEARCH), Pescara, Italy
| | - David W Johnson
- Department of Nephrology, Division of Medicine, University of Queensland at Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
| | - Marcello Tonelli
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Maria Chiara Rossi
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Clinical Epidemiology (CORESEARCH), Pescara, Italy
| | - Sunil V Badve
- George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Yeoungjee Cho
- Department of Nephrology, Division of Medicine, University of Queensland at Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
| | | | | | - Labib I Faruque
- Department of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Anita Lloyd
- Department of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Nasreen Ahmad
- Department of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Yuanchen Liu
- Department of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Sophanny Tiv
- Department of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Tanya Millard
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lucia Gagliardi
- Endocrine and Diabetes Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA, Australia
- Endocrine and Metabolic Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Nithin Kolanu
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rahul D Barmanray
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Rita McMorrow
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ana Karina Raygoza Cortez
- Plataforma INVEST Medicina UANL-KER Unit Mayo Clinic (KER Unit Mexico), Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Heath White
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Xiangyang Chen
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xu Zhou
- Evidence-based Medicine Research Centre, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China
| | - Jiali Liu
- Chinese Evidence-based Medicine Centre, Cochrane China Centre
| | - Andrea Flores Rodríguez
- Plataforma INVEST Medicina UANL-KER Unit Mayo Clinic (KER Unit Mexico), Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Mexico
| | | | - Yang Wang
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ling Li
- Chinese Evidence-based Medicine Centre, Cochrane China Centre
| | - Surya Sutanto
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ricardo Cesar Solis
- Plataforma INVEST Medicina UANL-KER Unit Mayo Clinic (KER Unit Mexico), Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Mexico
| | | | - René Rodriguez-Gutierrez
- Plataforma INVEST Medicina UANL-KER Unit Mayo Clinic (KER Unit Mexico), Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Michael Walsh
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Gordon Guyatt
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Giovanni F M Strippoli
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Piazza Giulio CESARE, 70124 Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Pinto LC, Rados DV, Remonti LR, Viana LV, Pulz GT, Carpena MP, Borges RP, Marobin R, Beretta MV, Pedrollo EF, Londero TM, Machry R, Janeczko L, Moehlecke M, Falcetta MR, Bauer AC, Silveiro SP, Gerchman F, Rodrigues TC, Kramer CK, Bertoluci MC, Leitão CB. Patient-centered Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Based on Specific Clinical Scenarios: Systematic Review, Meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2020; 105:5892802. [PMID: 32797182 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION New antihyperglycemic medications have been proven to have cardiovascular (CV) and renal benefits in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); however, an evidence-based decision tree in specific clinical scenarios is lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), with trial sequential analysis (TSA). Randomized controlled trial inclusion criteria were patients with T2DM from 1 of these subgroups: elderly, obese, previous atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD), previous coronary heart disease (CHD), previous heart failure (HF), or previous chronic kidney disease (CKD). Randomized controlled trials describing those subgroups with at least 48 weeks of follow-up were included. Outcomes: 3-point major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), CV death, hospitalization due to HF, and renal outcomes. We performed direct meta-analysis with the number of events in the intervention and control groups in each subset, and the relative risk of the events was calculated. RESULTS Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) were the only antihyperglycemic agents related to a reduction in CV events in different populations. For obese and elderly populations, GLP-1 RA were associated with benefits in 3-point MACE; for patients with ASCVD, both SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA had benefits in 3-point MACE, while for patients with CHD, only SGLT2i were beneficial. CONCLUSIONS SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA reduced CV events in selected populations: SGLT2i led to a reduction in events in patients with previous CHD, ASCVD, and HF. GLP-1 RA led to a reduction in CV events in patients with ASCVD, elderly patients, and patients with obesity. Trial sequential analysis shows that these findings are conclusive. This review opens a pathway towards evidence-based, personalized treatment of T2DM. REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42019132807.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lana C Pinto
- Internal Medicine Department, Post-graduate Program in Medical Sciences: Endocrinology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Endocrine Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Endocrine Division, Ramiro Barcelos, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Dimitris V Rados
- Internal Medicine Department, Post-graduate Program in Medical Sciences: Endocrinology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Endocrine Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Endocrine Division, Ramiro Barcelos, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Luciana R Remonti
- Internal Medicine Department, Post-graduate Program in Medical Sciences: Endocrinology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Endocrine Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Endocrine Division, Ramiro Barcelos, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Luciana V Viana
- Internal Medicine Department, Post-graduate Program in Medical Sciences: Endocrinology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Endocrine Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Endocrine Division, Ramiro Barcelos, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Georgia T Pulz
- Internal Medicine Department, Post-graduate Program in Medical Sciences: Endocrinology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Endocrine Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Endocrine Division, Ramiro Barcelos, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Mariana P Carpena
- Internal Medicine Department, Post-graduate Program in Medical Sciences: Endocrinology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Endocrine Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Endocrine Division, Ramiro Barcelos, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Roberta P Borges
- Internal Medicine Department, Post-graduate Program in Medical Sciences: Endocrinology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Endocrine Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Endocrine Division, Ramiro Barcelos, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Roberta Marobin
- Internal Medicine Department, Post-graduate Program in Medical Sciences: Endocrinology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Endocrine Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Endocrine Division, Ramiro Barcelos, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Mileni V Beretta
- Internal Medicine Department, Post-graduate Program in Medical Sciences: Endocrinology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Endocrine Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Endocrine Division, Ramiro Barcelos, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Elis F Pedrollo
- Internal Medicine Department, Post-graduate Program in Medical Sciences: Endocrinology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Endocrine Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Endocrine Division, Ramiro Barcelos, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Thizá M Londero
- Internal Medicine Department, Post-graduate Program in Medical Sciences: Endocrinology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Endocrine Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Endocrine Division, Ramiro Barcelos, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Rafael Machry
- Internal Medicine Department, Post-graduate Program in Medical Sciences: Endocrinology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Endocrine Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Endocrine Division, Ramiro Barcelos, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Lais Janeczko
- Internal Medicine Department, Post-graduate Program in Medical Sciences: Endocrinology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Endocrine Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Endocrine Division, Ramiro Barcelos, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Milene Moehlecke
- Internal Medicine Department, Post-graduate Program in Medical Sciences: Endocrinology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Endocrine Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Endocrine Division, Ramiro Barcelos, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Mariana R Falcetta
- Internal Medicine Department, Post-graduate Program in Medical Sciences: Endocrinology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Endocrine Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Endocrine Division, Ramiro Barcelos, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Andrea C Bauer
- Internal Medicine Department, Post-graduate Program in Medical Sciences: Endocrinology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Endocrine Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Endocrine Division, Ramiro Barcelos, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Sandra P Silveiro
- Internal Medicine Department, Post-graduate Program in Medical Sciences: Endocrinology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Endocrine Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Endocrine Division, Ramiro Barcelos, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Fernando Gerchman
- Internal Medicine Department, Post-graduate Program in Medical Sciences: Endocrinology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Endocrine Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Endocrine Division, Ramiro Barcelos, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Ticiana C Rodrigues
- Internal Medicine Department, Post-graduate Program in Medical Sciences: Endocrinology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Endocrine Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Endocrine Division, Ramiro Barcelos, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | | | - Marcello C Bertoluci
- Internal Medicine Department, Post-graduate Program in Medical Sciences: Endocrinology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Endocrine Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Endocrine Division, Ramiro Barcelos, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Cristiane B Leitão
- Internal Medicine Department, Post-graduate Program in Medical Sciences: Endocrinology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Endocrine Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Endocrine Division, Ramiro Barcelos, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Taylor OM, Lam C. The Effect of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors on Macrovascular and Microvascular Complications of Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 2020; 93:100596. [PMID: 32817765 PMCID: PMC7424199 DOI: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2020.100596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The World Health Organization estimates that diabetes is the seventh leading cause of death. Uncontrolled diabetes may cause severe consequences such as cardiovascular (CV) events (myocardial infarction, stroke, or CV mortality), lower-extremity amputations, and end-stage renal disease. Microvascular complications include retinopathy, autonomic and peripheral neuropathy, nephropathy, and diabetic ulcers. Major CV outcomes trials that were by the Food and Drug Administration for all new antihyperglycemia medications for patients at high risk for CV events were recently completed for all 4 US-marketed dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. Objective To present a comprehensive review of the clinical trials that evaluate macrovascular and microvascular complications reported with DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods In this review, we analyzed published articles in PubMed and Ovid databases between January 2008 and September 2019 that evaluated the effect of DPP-4 inhibitors on macrovascular and microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Results A total of 18 studies, which included randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses were assessed. Current evidence demonstrates that the addition of DPP-4 inhibitors to standard antihyperglycemic and CV risk reduction treatment has not shown CV benefit relative to placebo in contrast to recently published studies for other medications within the glucagon-like peptide 1 agonist and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor classes. Notably, the potential risk for heart failure hospitalizations may exist for saxagliptin, and this effect is not extrapolated as a class effect. Based on our review, DPP-4 inhibitors may not influence microvascular complications in patients with diabetes. However, some studies have shown that saxagliptin and linagliptin may slow down the progression of albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The overall quality of the studies included in this review was high due to the inclusion of randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. Conclusions DPP-4 inhibitors were found to have a neutral effect on macrovascular and microvascular complications, with the exception of saxagliptin, which may increase the risk for heart failure hospitalizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olesya M Taylor
- Department of Pharmacy, Morristown Medical Center, Morristown, NJ 0760
| | - Christine Lam
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of the Incarnate Word Feik School of Pharmacy, San Antonio, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tuttle KR, McGill JB. Evidence-based treatment of hyperglycaemia with incretin therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes and advanced chronic kidney disease. Diabetes Obes Metab 2020; 22:1014-1023. [PMID: 32009296 PMCID: PMC7317405 DOI: 10.1111/dom.13986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2019] [Revised: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes is the leading cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The prevalence of CKD is growing in parallel with the rising number of patients with type 2 diabetes globally. At present, the optimal approach to glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes and advanced CKD (categories 4 and 5) remains uncertain, as these patients were largely excluded from clinical trials of glucose-lowering therapies. Nonetheless, clinical trial data are available for the use of incretin therapies, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, for patients with type 2 diabetes and advanced CKD. This review discusses the role of incretin therapies in the management of these patients. Because the presence of advanced CKD in patients with type 2 diabetes is associated with a markedly elevated risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), treatment strategies must include the reduction of both CKD and CVD risks because death, particularly from cardiovascular causes, is more probable than progression to end-stage kidney disease. The management of hyperglycaemia is essential for good diabetes care even in advanced CKD. Current evidence supports an individualized approach to glycaemic management in patients with type 2 diabetes and advanced CKD, taking account of the needs of each patient, including the presence of co-morbidities and concomitant therapies. Although additional studies are needed to establish optimal strategies for glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes and advanced CKD, treatment regimens with currently available pharmacotherapy can be individually tailored to meet the needs of this growing patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine R. Tuttle
- Providence Medical Research CenterProvidence Health CareSpokaneWashington
- Division of Nephrology, Kidney Research Institute, and Institute of Translational Health SciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashington
| | - Janet B. McGill
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Lipid ResearchWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMissouriUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hoogwerf BJ, MacKenzie M, Sealls W, Cordova J, Gandhi P. Real-World Glycemic Lowering Effectiveness of Linagliptin Among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes by Age, Renal Function, and Race. Diabetes Ther 2020; 11:1527-1536. [PMID: 32462538 PMCID: PMC7324460 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-020-00841-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To assess real-world effectiveness of linagliptin in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) across a range of ages and renal function. Effectiveness was assessed in different races, with a focus on African Americans (AA). METHODS This was a non-interventional retrospective cohort study using data in the Optum clinical database from adults with T2DM initiating linagliptin. Date of the first linagliptin prescription was the index date. Outcomes included change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and the percentage of persons achieving an HbA1c < 7% (53 mmol/mol) during the 60-180 days following linagliptin initiation. Analyses of age by renal function were conducted. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess change in HbA1c, controlling for an a priori list of covariates. RESULTS Overall, 11,001 persons were included. Mean pre-index HbA1c value was 8.2% (66 mmol/mol), with higher levels in younger versus older persons and AAs versus other race groups. Persons initiating linagliptin had an average HbA1c reduction of 0.51% (5.6 mmol/mol). Without adjusting for age, renal function, race, and pre-index HbA1c, greater reductions in HbA1c were observed in younger versus older persons, persons with higher versus lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and AAs versus white or Asians. After multivariate analysis, variables significantly associated with a greater HbA1c reduction included higher pre-index HbA1c and older age. CONCLUSIONS These results support the HbA1c-lowering effectiveness of linagliptin across age, race, and renal function categories among a large real-world population of adults with T2DM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jeanine Cordova
- Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, CT, USA
| | - Pranav Gandhi
- Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Leite KM, Long AM, Ostroff ML, Borges L, Braden G. A Review of the Renoprotective Effects of Novel Antidiabetic Agents. J Pharm Pract 2020; 34:141-148. [PMID: 32067559 DOI: 10.1177/0897190020902344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
The objective of this review article was to identify and examine current evidence surrounding the potential renoprotective effects of newer antidiabetic agents such as sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, glucose-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonists, and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. A literature search of MEDLINE and PubMed (January 2000 to April 2019) was performed using the following search terms: "diabetes treatment," "renoprotection," "kidneys," "SGLT-2 inhibitors," "GLP-1 receptor agonists," "DPP-4 inhibitors," and the drug names in each of those classes as well as any combination of these terms. Literature was excluded if published in a language other than English, performed in nonhuman subjects, did not include patients from the United States, was nonrandomized, or the data were available from poster presentations. There were 11 studies that met the search criteria. The majority of the studies focused on renal outcomes as secondary end points and looked at albuminuria, estimated glomerular filtration rate changes from baseline, urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio, serum creatinine, and need for renal replacement therapy. There are fewer studies that focused on renal protection as a primary end point. After reviewing the available literature, the use of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists in addition to standard of care may be considered in patients with or at risk of developing chronic kidney disease. SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists should be considered when patients' diabetes is no longer well controlled with metformin. Other factors such as cost, cardiovascular disease, and other comorbidities may also be taken into consideration when recommending therapy for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey M Leite
- 307289College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Western New England University, Springfield, MA, USA
| | - Allissa M Long
- 307289College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Western New England University, Springfield, MA, USA
| | - Marissa L Ostroff
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 307289Western New England University, Springfield, MA, USA
| | - Leanna Borges
- 307289College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Western New England University, Springfield, MA, USA
| | - Gregory Braden
- Kidney Care and Transplant Associates of New England, Springfield, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Yamamoto F, Ikeda R, Ochiai K, Hirase T, Hayashi N, Okamura T. Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of Linagliptin in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Renal Dysfunction: a Post-Marketing Surveillance Study. Diabetes Ther 2020; 11:523-533. [PMID: 31933070 PMCID: PMC6995795 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-019-00754-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION International clinical trials have shown that linagliptin significantly improves glycemic control and can be used at a single dose regardless of renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, to date, no studies have evaluated the use of linagliptin in Japanese patients with T2D by renal function in routine clinical care. METHODS This was a subgroup analysis of data from a prospective observational post-marketing surveillance (PMS) study of linagliptin conducted in Japan that evaluated the safety and effectiveness of linagliptin in routine clinical care for 3 years in Japanese patients with T2D. The subgroup analysis examined the patient population of this PMS study according to renal function using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) data. The incidence of linagliptin-related adverse events (adverse drug reactions [ADRs]) was the primary endpoint, and the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to last observation was the secondary endpoint. RESULTS Of the 2235 patients included in the safety analysis, eGFR was ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 (defined as group G1) in 16.9% (n = 377), ≥ 60 to < 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 (group G2) in 44.5% (n = 995), ≥ 30 to < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (group G3) in 21.7% (n = 486), ≥ 15 to < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (group G4) in 2.6% (n = 58) and < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 (group G5) in 1.7% (n = 37). No eGFR data were available for 12.6% (n = 282) of patients. In these GFR groups, the incidence of ADRs with linagliptin was 6.9% in group G1, 11.1% in group G2, 13.8% in group G3, 15.5% in group G4 and 16.2% in group G5; the change in HbA1c from baseline to the last observation was - 1.11, - 0.64, - 0.35, - 0.46 and - 0.54% in the respective subgroups. CONCLUSIONS Long-term linagliptin use showed sustained improvements in glycemic control with no new safety concerns regardless of renal function. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01650259). FUNDING This study was funded by Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd. and Eli Lilly Japan K.K.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fumiko Yamamoto
- Medicine Division, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Rie Ikeda
- Medicine Division, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Tetsuaki Hirase
- Medicine Development Unit Japan, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Kobe, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Hayashi
- Medicine Division, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoo Okamura
- Medicine Division, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Guardado-Mendoza R, Cázares-Sánchez D, Evia-Viscarra ML, Jiménez-Ceja LM, Durán-Pérez EG, Aguilar-García A. Linagliptin plus insulin for hyperglycemia immediately after renal transplantation: A comparative study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2019; 156:107864. [PMID: 31539565 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Revised: 08/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Post-renal-transplanted patients frequently present hyperglycemia immediately after the procedure. The goal of this work was to evaluate the effect of linagliptin + insulin in post-renal-transplanted patients with hyperglycemia. METHODS Retrospective comparative study in post-renal transplanted patients with hyperglycemia after transplantation who were treated with linagliptin 5 mg daily plus insulin vs insulin alone for 5 days after renal transplantation with hyperglycemia. Main outcomes were glucose levels, insulin dose and severity of hypoglycemia. RESULTS There were 14 patients treated with linagliptin + insulin and 14 patients treated only with insulin. Glucose levels and insulin doses were lower in the linagliptin + insulin group in comparison with the insulin alone group, 131.0 ± 15.1 vs 191.1 ± 22.5 mg/dl (7.27 ± 0.84 vs 10.61 ± 1.25 mmol/l) and 37.5 ± 6.3 vs 24.2 ± 6.6 U, respectively (p < 0.05). Hypoglycemia was less severe in the linagliptin + insulin group, 65.1 ± 2.2 vs 54.2 ± 3.3 mg/dl (3.61 ± 0.12 vs 3.00 ± 3.3 ± 0.18 mmol/l), p 0.036. CONCLUSIONS The combination of linagliptin + insulin provided better glycemic control with a lower insulin dose and less severe hypoglycemia in comparison to insulin alone in patients with hyperglycemia immediately after renal transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodolfo Guardado-Mendoza
- Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad del Bajío, University of Guanajuato, León, Guanajuato, Mexico.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abouelkheir M, El-Metwally TH. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors can inhibit angiotensin converting enzyme. Eur J Pharmacol 2019; 862:172638. [PMID: 31491403 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.172638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2019] [Revised: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 09/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Angiotensin-1 converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) improve insulin sensitivity. Inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) are anti-diabetic drugs with several cardio-renal effects. Both ACE and DPP-4 share common features. Thus, we tested if they could be inhibited by one inhibitor. First, in silico screening was used to investigate the ability of different DPP-4 inhibitors or ACEIs to interact with DPP-4 and ACE. The results of screening were then extrapolated into animal study. Fifty Sprague Dawley rats were randomly assigned into 5 groups treated with vehicle, captopril, enalapril, linagliptin or sitagliptin. Both low and high doses of each drug were tested. Baseline blood samples and samples at days 1, 8, 10, 14 were used to measure plasma DPP-4 and ACE activities and angiotensin II levels. Active glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) levels were measured after oral glucose challenge. All tested DPP-4 inhibitors could interact with ACE at a relatively reasonable binding energy while most of the ACEIs only interacted with DPP-4 at a predicted high inhibition constant. In rats, high dose of sitagliptin was able to inhibit ACE activity and reduce angiotensin II levels while linagliptin had only a mild effect. ACEIs did not significantly affect DPP-4 activity or prevent GLP-1 degradation. It seems that some DPP-4 inhibitors could inhibit ACE and this could partially explain the cardio-renal effects of these drugs. Further studies are required to determine if such inhibition could take place in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Abouelkheir
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Medicines, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia; Pharmacology department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
| | - Tarek H El-Metwally
- Departments of Medical Biochemistry, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia; Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
More than just an enzyme: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) and its association with diabetic kidney remodelling. Pharmacol Res 2019; 147:104391. [PMID: 31401210 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2019] [Revised: 08/04/2019] [Accepted: 08/07/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW This review article discusses recent advances in the mechanism of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) actions in renal diseases, especially diabetic kidney fibrosis, and summarizes anti-fibrotic functions of various DPP-4 inhibitors in diabetic nephropathy (DN). RECENT FINDINGS DN is a common complication of diabetes and is a leading cause of the end-stage renal disease (ESRD). DPP-4 is a member of serine proteases, and more than 30 substrates have been identified that act via several biochemical messengers in a variety of tissues including kidney. Intriguingly, DPP-4 actions on the diabetic kidney is a complex mechanism, and a variety of pathways are involved including increasing GLP-1/SDF-1, disrupting AGE-RAGE pathways, and integrin-β- and TGF-β-Smad-mediated signalling pathways that finally lead to endothelial to mesenchymal transition. Interestingly, an array of DPP-4 inhibitors is well recognized as oral drugs to treat type 2 diabetic (T2D) patients, which promote better glycemic control. Furthermore, recent experimental and preclinical data reveal that DPP-4 inhibitors may also exhibit protective effects in renal disease progression including anti-fibrotic effects in the diabetic kidney by attenuating above signalling cascade(s), either singly or as a combinatorial effect. In this review, we discussed the anti-fibrotic effects of DPP-4 inhibitors based on recent reports along with the possible mechanism of actions and future perspectives to underscore the beneficial effects of DPP-4 inhibitors in DN. SUMMARY With recent experimental, preclinical, and clinical evidence, we summarized DPP-4 activities and its mechanism of actions in diabetic kidney diseases. A knowledge gap of DPP-4 inhibition in controlling renal fibrosis in DN has also been postulated in this review for future research perspectives.
Collapse
|
33
|
Makrilakis K. The Role of DPP-4 Inhibitors in the Treatment Algorithm of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: When to Select, What to Expect. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:ijerph16152720. [PMID: 31366085 PMCID: PMC6696077 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16152720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2019] [Revised: 07/26/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a growing global public health problem, the prevalence of which is projected to increase in the succeeding decades. It is potentially associated with many complications, affecting multiple organs and causing a huge burden to the society. Due to its multi-factorial pathophysiology, its treatment is varied and based upon a multitude of pharmacologic agents aiming to tackle the many aspects of the disease pathophysiology (increasing insulin availability [either through direct insulin administration or through agents that promote insulin secretion], improving sensitivity to insulin, delaying the delivery and absorption of carbohydrates from the gastrointestinal tract, or increasing urinary glucose excretion). DPP-4 (dipeptidyl peptidase-4) inhibitors (or “gliptins”) represent a class of oral anti-hyperglycemic agents that inhibit the enzyme DPP-4, thus augmenting the biological activity of the “incretin” hormones (glucagon-like peptide-1 [GLP-1] and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide [GIP]) and restoring many of the pathophysiological problems of diabetes. They have already been used over more than a decade in the treatment of the disease. The current manuscript will review the mechanism of action, therapeutic utility, and the role of DPP-4 inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Makrilakis
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Laiko General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma St., 11527 Athens, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Spinowitz BS, Fishbane S, Pergola PE, Roger SD, Lerma EV, Butler J, von Haehling S, Adler SH, Zhao J, Singh B, Lavin PT, McCullough PA, Kosiborod M, Packham DK. Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate among Individuals with Hyperkalemia: A 12-Month Phase 3 Study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2019; 14:798-809. [PMID: 31110051 PMCID: PMC6556727 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.12651018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 120] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2018] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Oral sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (formerly ZS-9) binds and removes potassium via the gastrointestinal tract. Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate-associated restoration and maintenance of normokalemia and adverse events were evaluated in a two-part, open label, phase 3 trial. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS In the correction phase, adult outpatients with plasma potassium ≥5.1 mmol/L (i-STAT Point-of-Care) received sodium zirconium cyclosilicate 10 g three times daily for 24-72 hours until normokalemic (potassium =3.5-5.0 mmol/L). Qualifying participants entered the ≤12-month maintenance phase and received sodium zirconium cyclosilicate 5 g once daily titrated to maintain normokalemia without dietary or medication restrictions. Prespecified primary end points were restoration of normal serum potassium values (3.5-5.0 mmol/L) during the correction phase and maintenance of serum potassium ≤5.1 mmol/L during the maintenance phase. Adverse events were assessed throughout. RESULTS Of 751 participants, 746 (99%) achieved normokalemia during the correction phase (mean serum potassium =4.8 mmol/L; 95% confidence interval, 4.7 to 4.8) and entered the maintenance phase; 466 (63%) participants completed the 12-month trial. Participants were predominantly white, men, and age ≥65 years old; 74% had an eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, and 65% used renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors. Mean time on sodium zirconium cyclosilicate was 286 days. Mean daily sodium zirconium cyclosilicate dose was 7.2 g (SD=2.6). Over months 3-12, mean serum potassium was 4.7 mmol/L (95% confidence interval, 4.6 to 4.7); mean serum potassium values ≤5.1 and ≤5.5 mmol/L were achieved by 88% and 99% of participants, respectively. Of 483 renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor users at baseline, 87% continued or had their dose increased; 11% discontinued. Among 263 renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor-naïve participants, 14% initiated renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor therapy. Overall, 489 (66%) participants experienced adverse events during the maintenance phase, and 22% experienced a serious adverse event. Of eight (1%) deaths, none were considered related to sodium zirconium cyclosilicate. Nine (1%) and 34 (5%) participants experienced serum potassium <3.0 and 3.0-3.4 mmol/L, respectively. CONCLUSIONS After achieving normokalemia, individualized once daily sodium zirconium cyclosilicate was associated with maintenance of normokalemia without substantial renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor changes for ≤12 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce S Spinowitz
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Queens, New York, New York;
| | - Steven Fishbane
- Department of Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Great Neck, New York
| | | | | | - Edgar V Lerma
- Section of Nephrology, Advocate Christ Medical Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, Oak Lawn, Illinois
| | - Javed Butler
- Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi, Jackson, Mississippi
| | - Stephan von Haehling
- Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | | | | | - Bhupinder Singh
- ZS Pharma, Inc. (part of AstraZeneca), San Mateo, California.,School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California
| | - Philip T Lavin
- Boston Biostatistics Research Foundation, Framingham, Massachusetts
| | - Peter A McCullough
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Baylor University Medical Center, Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute, Dallas, Texas
| | - Mikhail Kosiborod
- Department of Cardiology, Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri.,Department of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri.,The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - David K Packham
- Melbourne Renal Research Group, Reservoir Private Hospital, Reservoir, Australia.,Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
IN BRIEF The number of medications used to treat diabetes has increased dramatically in the past 15 years. With so many options that have shown significant A1C improvement, it is important to consider side effects, precautions, and additional benefits these agents may offer. This article is a review of some of the most compelling literature available on the nonglycemic benefits of sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, biguanides, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. Other classes of antihyperglycemic agents, such as dopamine agonists, meglitinides, and amylin agonists, are not discussed in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Sze
- Becton Dickinson and Company, Andover, MA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ling J, Cheng P, Ge L, Zhang DH, Shi AC, Tian JH, Chen YJ, Li XX, Zhang JY, Yang KH. The efficacy and safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for type 2 diabetes: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of 58 randomized controlled trials. Acta Diabetol 2019; 56:249-272. [PMID: 30242726 DOI: 10.1007/s00592-018-1222-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2018] [Accepted: 08/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The aim is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4-I: sitagliptin, saxagliptin, linagliptin, vildagliptin and alogliptin) in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and the Wanfang Database from inception to April, 2018. Randomized controlled trials were included if they compared the different versions of DPP4-I with each other or with placebo in treatment of type 2 diabetes. Bayesian network meta-analysis and pairwise meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the different kinds of DPP4-I and placebo. The data were analyzed using STATA 12.0 and WinBUGS1.4 software. RESULTS We identified 58 eligible studies (with 31356 patients) involving 14 treatment arms. Indirect comparison results showed that except for alogliptin, a decrease was found for all DPP4-I versus the placebo for hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) with vildagliptin50 twice daily (BID) showing the highest probability. Linagliptin5 once daily (QD) decreased the level of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) the most for all DPP4-I versus the placebo; when comparing them with each other, alogliptin25QD was more effective when compared with sitagliptin100QD and vildaglipti50BID; linagliptin5qd had the highest decrease impact on body mass index (BMI). Except for hypoglycemia and upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), there are no statistical significance on incidence of adverse events and the body weight when DPP4-I are compared with each other or with placebo. CONCLUSION Our network meta-analysis presents the associations of DPP4-I versus placebos on HbA1c, FPG, 2 h postprandial blood glucose (2HPPG), BMI, body weight and adverse events. DPP4-I have a lowering effect on the glycemic level (HbA1c, FPG), especially vildaglipti50BID and linagliptin10QD, respectively. Besides, linagliptin5QD has the greatest probabilities of reducing BMI. In addition, DPP4-I were associated with not increasing the incidence of adverse events. Among them, vildagliptin100QD and sitagliptin100QD have the lowest probability in reducing the incidence of hypoglycemia and URTI, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Ling
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- Key Laboratory of Evidence-based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- Chinese GRADE Center, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- WHO Collaborating Center for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Peng Cheng
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Long Ge
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- Key Laboratory of Evidence-based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- Chinese GRADE Center, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- WHO Collaborating Center for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Ding-Hua Zhang
- Department of Endocrinology, Gansu Province Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China
| | - An-Chen Shi
- Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Jin-Hui Tian
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- Key Laboratory of Evidence-based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- Chinese GRADE Center, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- WHO Collaborating Center for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Ya-Jing Chen
- School of Public Health of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
| | - Xiu-Xia Li
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- Key Laboratory of Evidence-based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- Chinese GRADE Center, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- WHO Collaborating Center for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Jing-Yun Zhang
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- Key Laboratory of Evidence-based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- Chinese GRADE Center, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- WHO Collaborating Center for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Ke-Hu Yang
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
- Key Laboratory of Evidence-based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
- Chinese GRADE Center, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
- WHO Collaborating Center for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Modafferi S, Ries M, Calabrese V, Schmitt CP, Nawroth P, Kopf S, Peters V. Clinical Trials on Diabetic Nephropathy: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Diabetes Ther 2019; 10:229-243. [PMID: 30617943 PMCID: PMC6349284 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-018-0551-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treatment options and decisions are often based on the results of clinical trials. We have evaluated the public availability of results from completed, registered phase III clinical trials on diabetic nephropathy and current treatment options. METHODS This was a cross-sectional analysis in which STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology criteria were applied for design and analysis. In June 2017, 34 completed phase III clinical trials on diabetic nephropathy in the ClinicalTrials. gov registry were identified and matched to publications in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry and to those in the PubMed and Google Scholar databases. If no publication was identified, the principal investigator was contacted. The ratio of published and non-published studies was calculated. Various parameters, including study design, drugs, and comparators provided, were analyzed. RESULTS Drugs/supplements belonged to 26 different categories of medications, with the main ones being angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-II receptors blockers, and dipeptidyl-peptidase-4-inhibitors. Among the trials completed before 2016 (n = 32), 22 (69%) were published, and ten (31%) remained unpublished. Thus, data on 11 different interventions and more than 1000 patients remained undisclosed. Mean time to publication was 26.5 months, which is longer than the time constrictions imposed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act. Most trials only showed weak effects on micro- and macroalbuminuria, with an absolute risk reduction of 1.0 and 0.3%, respectively, and the number needed to treat varied between 91 and 333, without any relevant effect on end-stage-renal disease by intensive glucose-lowering treatment. Comparison of the results, however, was difficult since study design, interventions, and the renal outcome parameters vary greatly between the studies. CONCLUSION Despite the financial and human resources involved and the relevance for therapeutic guidelines and clinical decisions, about one-third of phase III clinical trials on diabetic nephropathy remain unpublished. Interventions used in published trials showed a low efficacy on renal outcome. FUNDING Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG): SFB 1118.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Modafferi
- Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Markus Ries
- Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Vittorio Calabrese
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Claus P Schmitt
- Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Nawroth
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Heidelberg, University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Diabetesforschung e.V. (DZD), Neuherberg, Germany
- Joint Heidelberg-IDC Translational Diabetes Program, Institute for Diabetes and Cancer, Helmholtz Zentrum, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Kopf
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Heidelberg, University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Diabetesforschung e.V. (DZD), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Verena Peters
- Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
In the 1990s it was discovered that the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inactivates the incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). DPP-4 inhibition results in raised levels of the two incretin hormones which in turn result in lowering of circulating glucose through stimulation of insulin secretion and inhibition of glucagon secretion. Since then, several small orally available molecules have been developed with DPP-4 inhibitory action. Early studies in the 1990s showed that the DPP-4 inhibitors improve glycemia in animals. Subsequent clinical studies during the 2000s showed a glucose-lowering action of DPP-4 inhibitors also in human subjects with type 2 diabetes. This action was seen when DPP-4 inhibitors were used both as monotherapy and as add-on to other therapies, i.e., metformin, sulfonylureas, tiazolidinediones or exogenous insulin. The DPP-4 inhibitors were also found to have a low risk of adverse events, including hypoglycemia. Five of the DPP-4 inhibitors (sitagliptin, vildagliptin, alogliptin, saxagliptin and linagliptin) were approved by regulatory authorities and entered the market between 2006 and 2013. DPP-4 inhibitors have thereafter undergone long-term cardiovascular outcome trials, showing non-inferiority for risk of major acute cardiovascular endpoints. Also the risk of other potential adverse events is low in these long-term studies. DPP-4 inhibitors are at present included in guidelines as a glucose-lowering concept both as monotherapy and in combination therapies. This article summarizes the development of the DPP-4 inhibition concept from its early stages in the 1990s. The article underscores that the development has its basis in scientific studies on pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes and the importance of targeting the islet dysfunction, that the development has been made possible through academic science in collaboration with the research-oriented pharmaceutical industry, and that the development of a novel concept takes time and requires focused efforts, persistence and long-term perserverance.
Collapse
|
39
|
Nauck M, Araki A, Hehnke U, Plat A, Clark D, Khunti K. Risk of hypoglycaemia in people aged ≥65 years receiving linagliptin: pooled data from 1489 individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Clin Pract 2018; 72:e13240. [PMID: 30216648 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.13240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2018] [Accepted: 07/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS To investigate the risk of hypoglycaemia in people aged ≥65 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with linagliptin, in the largest pooled analysis performed to date. MATERIALS AND METHODS One thousand four hundred and eighty-nine patients aged ≥65 years with T2DM were pooled from 11 randomised, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled trials evaluating linagliptin 5 mg alone, or in addition to various background therapies. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of investigator-defined hypoglycaemia. RESULTS There was no significant difference in the risk of hypoglycaemia between linagliptin and placebo in the all-patient population at 24 weeks (hazard ratio [HR] 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84, 1.36; P = 0.5943)-despite significant (P < 0.0001) improvements in glycaemic control-and 1 year (HR 1.02; 95% CI: 0.81, 1.27; P = 0.8803). Similar findings were observed for linagliptin vs placebo in subgroup analyses by background medication (eg, sulphonylureas (SUs) and/or insulin vs no such drugs), age, baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), ethnicity, and baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate. Patients with a baseline HbA1c ≥7.5% had significantly higher odds of achieving HbA1c <7.5% without hypoglycaemia in the linagliptin group compared with placebo at 24 weeks (34.1% vs 13.7%; 95% CI: 2.04, 4.12; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS This pooled analysis indicates that linagliptin was effective in treating older people with T2DM towards their HbA1c targets with a favourable safety and tolerability profile and low risk of hypoglycaemia. The safety profile was maintained even on background therapies with known risk of hypoglycaemia, such as insulin and SU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Nauck
- Diabetes Center Bochum-Hattingen, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | | | - Uwe Hehnke
- Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany
| | - Arian Plat
- Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany
- Eli Lilly and Company, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Douglas Clark
- Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany
| | - Kamlesh Khunti
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Lo C, Toyama T, Wang Y, Lin J, Hirakawa Y, Jun M, Cass A, Hawley CM, Pilmore H, Badve SV, Perkovic V, Zoungas S. Insulin and glucose-lowering agents for treating people with diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 9:CD011798. [PMID: 30246878 PMCID: PMC6513625 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011798.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diabetes is the commonest cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Both conditions commonly co-exist. Glucometabolic changes and concurrent dialysis in diabetes and CKD make glucose-lowering challenging, increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia. Glucose-lowering agents have been mainly studied in people with near-normal kidney function. It is important to characterise existing knowledge of glucose-lowering agents in CKD to guide treatment. OBJECTIVES To examine the efficacy and safety of insulin and other pharmacological interventions for lowering glucose levels in people with diabetes and CKD. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 12 February 2018 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs looking at head-to-head comparisons of active regimens of glucose-lowering therapy or active regimen compared with placebo/standard care in people with diabetes and CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Four authors independently assessed study eligibility, risk of bias, and quality of data and performed data extraction. Continuous outcomes were expressed as post-treatment mean differences (MD). Adverse events were expressed as post-treatment absolute risk differences (RD). Dichotomous clinical outcomes were presented as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN RESULTS Forty-four studies (128 records, 13,036 participants) were included. Nine studies compared sodium glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors to placebo; 13 studies compared dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors to placebo; 2 studies compared glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists to placebo; 8 studies compared glitazones to no glitazone treatment; 1 study compared glinide to no glinide treatment; and 4 studies compared different types, doses or modes of administration of insulin. In addition, 2 studies compared sitagliptin to glipizide; and 1 study compared each of sitagliptin to insulin, glitazars to pioglitazone, vildagliptin to sitagliptin, linagliptin to voglibose, and albiglutide to sitagliptin. Most studies had a high risk of bias due to funding and attrition bias, and an unclear risk of detection bias.Compared to placebo, SGLT2 inhibitors probably reduce HbA1c (7 studies, 1092 participants: MD -0.29%, -0.38 to -0.19 (-3.2 mmol/mol, -4.2 to -2.2); I2 = 0%), fasting blood glucose (FBG) (5 studies, 855 participants: MD -0.48 mmol/L, -0.78 to -0.19; I2 = 0%), systolic blood pressure (BP) (7 studies, 1198 participants: MD -4.68 mmHg, -6.69 to -2.68; I2 = 40%), diastolic BP (6 studies, 1142 participants: MD -1.72 mmHg, -2.77 to -0.66; I2 = 0%), heart failure (3 studies, 2519 participants: RR 0.59, 0.41 to 0.87; I2 = 0%), and hyperkalaemia (4 studies, 2788 participants: RR 0.58, 0.42 to 0.81; I2 = 0%); but probably increase genital infections (7 studies, 3086 participants: RR 2.50, 1.52 to 4.11; I2 = 0%), and creatinine (4 studies, 848 participants: MD 3.82 μmol/L, 1.45 to 6.19; I2 = 16%) (all effects of moderate certainty evidence). SGLT2 inhibitors may reduce weight (5 studies, 1029 participants: MD -1.41 kg, -1.8 to -1.02; I2 = 28%) and albuminuria (MD -8.14 mg/mmol creatinine, -14.51 to -1.77; I2 = 11%; low certainty evidence). SGLT2 inhibitors may have little or no effect on the risk of cardiovascular death, hypoglycaemia, acute kidney injury (AKI), and urinary tract infection (low certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether SGLT2 inhibitors have any effect on death, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), hypovolaemia, fractures, diabetic ketoacidosis, or discontinuation due to adverse effects (very low certainty evidence).Compared to placebo, DPP-4 inhibitors may reduce HbA1c (7 studies, 867 participants: MD -0.62%, -0.85 to -0.39 (-6.8 mmol/mol, -9.3 to -4.3); I2 = 59%) but may have little or no effect on FBG (low certainty evidence). DPP-4 inhibitors probably have little or no effect on cardiovascular death (2 studies, 5897 participants: RR 0.93, 0.77 to 1.11; I2 = 0%) and weight (2 studies, 210 participants: MD 0.16 kg, -0.58 to 0.90; I2 = 29%; moderate certainty evidence). Compared to placebo, DPP-4 inhibitors may have little or no effect on heart failure, upper respiratory tract infections, and liver impairment (low certainty evidence). Compared to placebo, it is uncertain whether DPP-4 inhibitors have any effect on eGFR, hypoglycaemia, pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer, or discontinuation due to adverse effects (very low certainty evidence).Compared to placebo, GLP-1 agonists probably reduce HbA1c (7 studies, 867 participants: MD -0.53%, -1.01 to -0.06 (-5.8 mmol/mol, -11.0 to -0.7); I2 = 41%; moderate certainty evidence) and may reduce weight (low certainty evidence). GLP-1 agonists may have little or no effect on eGFR, hypoglycaemia, or discontinuation due to adverse effects (low certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether GLP-1 agonists reduce FBG, increase gastrointestinal symptoms, or affect the risk of pancreatitis (very low certainty evidence).Compared to placebo, it is uncertain whether glitazones have any effect on HbA1c, FBG, death, weight, and risk of hypoglycaemia (very low certainty evidence).Compared to glipizide, sitagliptin probably reduces hypoglycaemia (2 studies, 551 participants: RR 0.40, 0.23 to 0.69; I2 = 0%; moderate certainty evidence). Compared to glipizide, sitagliptin may have had little or no effect on HbA1c, FBG, weight, and eGFR (low certainty evidence). Compared to glipizide, it is uncertain if sitagliptin has any effect on death or discontinuation due to adverse effects (very low certainty).For types, dosages or modes of administration of insulin and other head-to-head comparisons only individual studies were available so no conclusions could be made. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Evidence concerning the efficacy and safety of glucose-lowering agents in diabetes and CKD is limited. SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists are probably efficacious for glucose-lowering and DPP-4 inhibitors may be efficacious for glucose-lowering. Additionally, SGLT2 inhibitors probably reduce BP, heart failure, and hyperkalaemia but increase genital infections, and slightly increase creatinine. The safety profile for GLP-1 agonists is uncertain. No further conclusions could be made for the other classes of glucose-lowering agents including insulin. More high quality studies are required to help guide therapeutic choice for glucose-lowering in diabetes and CKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clement Lo
- Monash UniversityMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive MedicineClaytonVICAustralia
- Monash HealthDiabetes and Vascular Medicine UnitClaytonVICAustralia
- Monash UniversityDivision of Metabolism, Ageing and Genomics, School of Public Health and Preventive MedicinePrahanVICAustralia
| | - Tadashi Toyama
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW SydneyRenal and Metabolic DivisionNewtownNSWAustralia2050
- Kanazawa University HospitalDivision of NephrologyKanazawaJapan
| | - Ying Wang
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW SydneyRenal and Metabolic DivisionNewtownNSWAustralia2050
| | - Jin Lin
- Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityDepartment of Critical Care Medicine95 Yong‐An Road, Xuan Wu DistrictBeijingChina100050
| | - Yoichiro Hirakawa
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW SydneyProfessorial UnitNewtownNSWAustralia
| | - Min Jun
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW SydneyRenal and Metabolic DivisionNewtownNSWAustralia2050
| | - Alan Cass
- Menzies School of Health ResearchPO Box 41096CasuarinaNTAustralia0811
| | - Carmel M Hawley
- Princess Alexandra HospitalDepartment of NephrologyIpswich RoadWoolloongabbaQLDAustralia4102
| | - Helen Pilmore
- Auckland HospitalDepartment of Renal MedicinePark RoadGraftonAucklandNew Zealand
- University of AucklandDepartment of MedicineGraftonNew Zealand
| | - Sunil V Badve
- St George HospitalDepartment of Renal MedicineKogarahNSWAustralia
| | - Vlado Perkovic
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW SydneyRenal and Metabolic DivisionNewtownNSWAustralia2050
| | - Sophia Zoungas
- Monash HealthDiabetes and Vascular Medicine UnitClaytonVICAustralia
- Monash UniversityDivision of Metabolism, Ageing and Genomics, School of Public Health and Preventive MedicinePrahanVICAustralia
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW SydneyProfessorial UnitNewtownNSWAustralia
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Mi DH, Fang HJ, Zheng GH, Liang XH, Ding YR, Liu X, Liu LP. DPP-4 inhibitors promote proliferation and migration of rat brain microvascular endothelial cells under hypoxic/high-glucose conditions, potentially through the SIRT1/HIF-1/VEGF pathway. CNS Neurosci Ther 2018; 25:323-332. [PMID: 30136405 DOI: 10.1111/cns.13042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2018] [Revised: 07/12/2018] [Accepted: 07/15/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vascular disease in diabetes, for example, stroke, presents a significant public health burden. Recently, the dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitor linagliptin has been found to counteract stroke among diabetic patients, showing great promise in drug repurposing and indication expansion. However, the molecular basis of this protection mechanism remains unknown. METHODS The expression and localization of DPP-4 in rat brain microvascular endothelial cells (rBMVECs) were assessed with immunofluorescent staining and Western blotting. The effects of DPP-4 inhibitors on cell proliferation and migration of rBMVECs were determined using MTT and transwell assays, separately. The influence of DPP-4 inhibition on the expression of molecular markers (eg, VEGF, eNOS, HIF-1α. SIRT1) was examined at both mRNA and protein levels with qRT-PCR and Western blotting, individually. RESULTS DPP-4 inhibitors (40 nmol/L linagliptin, 30 μmol/L berberine) offer protection from hypoxia/high glucose induced impairments in the proliferation and migration of rBMVECs. Treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors counteracted the attenuating effects of hypoxic/high-glucose conditions on the expression of VEGF, eNOS, HIF-1α, and SIRT1, which can be completely eliminated by the inhibition of SIRT1 with 1 mmol/L nicotinamide. CONCLUSIONS The protection of rBMVECs from hypoxia/high-glucose induced impairment by DPP-4 inhibitors may be mediated by the SIRT1/HIF-1α/VEGF pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong-Hua Mi
- Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hong-Juan Fang
- Department of Endocrinology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Guang-Hui Zheng
- Department of Clinical laboratory, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xian-Hong Liang
- Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Ya-Rong Ding
- Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Liu
- Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Li-Ping Liu
- Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Molina-Vega M, Muñoz-Garach A, Fernández-García JC, Tinahones FJ. The safety of DPP-4 inhibitor and SGLT2 inhibitor combination therapies. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2018; 17:815-824. [DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2018.1497158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- María Molina-Vega
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain
| | - Araceli Muñoz-Garach
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
| | - José C. Fernández-García
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
- Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red. Fisiopatologia de la Obesidad y Nutricion (CIBERObn CB06/003), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francisco J. Tinahones
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
- Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red. Fisiopatologia de la Obesidad y Nutricion (CIBERObn CB06/003), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Seidu S, Kunutsor SK, Cos X, Gillani S, Khunti K. SGLT2 inhibitors and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes with or without renal impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prim Care Diabetes 2018; 12:265-283. [PMID: 29482993 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2018.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2017] [Revised: 01/22/2018] [Accepted: 02/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors may have renal protective effects in people with impaired kidney function. We assessed the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in people with type 2 diabetes with or without renal impairment [defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥30 and <60ml/min/1.73m2 and/or UACR>300 and ≤5000mg/g] by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of available studies. METHODS Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from MEDLINE, EMABASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and search of bibliographies to March 2017. No relevant observational study was identified. Summary measures were presented as mean differences and narrative synthesis performed for studies that could not be pooled. RESULTS 42 articles which included 40 RCTs comprising 29,954 patients were included. In populations with renal impairment, SGLT2 inhibition compared with placebo was consistently associated with an initial decrease in eGFR followed by an increase and return to baseline levels. In pooled analysis of 17 studies in populations without renal impairment, there was no significant change in eGFR comparing SGLT2 inhibitors with placebo (mean difference, 0.51ml/min/1.73m2; 95% CI: -0.69, 1.72; p=403). SGLT2 inhibition relative to placebo was associated with preservation in serum creatinine levels or initial increases followed by return to baseline levels in patients with renal impairment, but levels were preserved in patients without renal impairment. In populations with or without renal impairment, SGLT2 inhibitors (particularly canagliflozin and empagliflozin) compared with placebo were associated with decreased urine albumin, improved albuminiuria, slowed progression to macroalbuminuria, and reduced the risk of worsening renal impairment, the initiation of kidney transplant, and death from renal disease. CONCLUSIONS Emerging data suggests that with SGLT2 inhibition, renal function seems to be preserved in people with diabetes with or without renal impairment. Furthermore, SGLT2 inhibition prevents further renal function deterioration and death from kidney disease in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Seidu
- Leicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4WP, UK; Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4WP, UK.
| | - Setor K Kunutsor
- Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Learning and Research Building (Level 1) Bristol, UK; National Institute of Health Research, Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Xavier Cos
- Barcelona Ciutat Research Support Unit-IDIAP Jordo Gol, redlAPP, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Syed Gillani
- University of Wolverhampton, Diabetes Centre, New Cross Hospital, Wednesfield Road, Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP, UK
| | - Kamlesh Khunti
- Leicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4WP, UK; Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4WP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Chung JW, Hartzler ML, Smith A, Hatton J, Kelley K. Pharmacological Agents Utilized in Patients With Type-2 Diabetes: Beyond Lowering A1c. P & T : A PEER-REVIEWED JOURNAL FOR FORMULARY MANAGEMENT 2018; 43:214-227. [PMID: 29622942 PMCID: PMC5871242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Staying up to date with evolving pharmacotherapies is important to providing optimal therapies to patients. The authors present available evidence to support the role of novel and existing agents in treating type-2 diabetes.
Collapse
|
45
|
Comparing SGLT-2 inhibitors to DPP-4 inhibitors as an add-on therapy to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. DIABETES & METABOLISM 2018; 44:112-120. [DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2018.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2017] [Revised: 01/10/2018] [Accepted: 01/26/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
46
|
Coppolino G, Leporini C, Rivoli L, Ursini F, di Paola ED, Cernaro V, Arturi F, Bolignano D, Russo E, De Sarro G, Andreucci M. Exploring the effects of DPP-4 inhibitors on the kidney from the bench to clinical trials. Pharmacol Res 2018; 129:274-294. [DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2017] [Revised: 10/15/2017] [Accepted: 12/01/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
47
|
Kanasaki K. The role of renal dipeptidyl peptidase-4 in kidney disease: renal effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors with a focus on linagliptin. Clin Sci (Lond) 2018; 132:489-507. [PMID: 29491123 PMCID: PMC5828949 DOI: 10.1042/cs20180031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2018] [Revised: 02/12/2018] [Accepted: 02/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Emerging evidence suggests that dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors used to treat type 2 diabetes may have nephroprotective effects beyond the reduced renal risk conferred by glycemic control. DPP-4 is a ubiquitous protein with exopeptidase activity that exists in cell membrane-bound and soluble forms. The kidneys contain the highest levels of DPP-4, which is increased in diabetic nephropathy. DPP-4 inhibitors are a chemically heterogeneous class of drugs with important pharmacological differences. Of the globally marketed DPP-4 inhibitors, linagliptin is of particular interest for diabetic nephropathy as it is the only compound that is not predominantly excreted in the urine. Linagliptin is also the most potent DPP-4 inhibitor, has the highest affinity for this protein, and has the largest volume of distribution; these properties allow linagliptin to penetrate kidney tissue and tightly bind resident DPP-4. In animal models of kidney disease, linagliptin elicited multiple renoprotective effects, including reducing albuminuria, glomerulosclerosis, and tubulointerstitial fibrosis, independent of changes in glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose levels. At the molecular level, linagliptin prevented the pro-fibrotic endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition by disrupting the interaction between membrane-bound DPP-4 and integrin β1 that enhances signaling by transforming growth factor-β1 and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1. Linagliptin also increased stromal cell derived factor-1 levels, ameliorated endothelial dysfunction, and displayed unique antioxidant effects. Although the nephroprotective effects of linagliptin are yet to be translated to the clinical setting, the ongoing Cardiovascular and Renal Microvascular Outcome Study with Linagliptin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (CARMELINA®) study will definitively assess the renal effects of this DPP-4 inhibitor. CARMELINA® is the only clinical trial of a DPP-4 inhibitor powered to evaluate kidney outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keizo Kanasaki
- Department of Diabetology and Endocrinology, Kanazawa Medical University, Uchinada, Japan
- Division of Anticipatory Molecular Food Science and Technology, Medical Research Institute, Kanazawa Medical University, Uchinada, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Han SY, Yoon SA, Han BG, Kim SG, Jo YI, Jeong KH, Oh KH, Park HC, Park SH, Kang SW, Na KR, Kang SW, Kim NH, Jang Y, Kim B, Shin S, Cha DR. Comparative efficacy and safety of gemigliptin versus linagliptin in type 2 diabetes patients with renal impairment: A 40-week extension of the GUARD randomized study. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018; 20:292-300. [PMID: 28719008 DOI: 10.1111/dom.13059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2017] [Revised: 07/12/2017] [Accepted: 07/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The long-term safety and efficacy of gemigliptin was evaluated in the present extension study after a 12-week study during a 40-week follow-up period. METHODS The main study was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, phase IIIb study in which 50 mg of gemigliptin (N = 66) or placebo (N = 66) was administered to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and moderate or severe renal impairment over a 12-week period. Patients with a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level of 7% to 11% and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 15 to 59 mL/min/1.73 m2 were enrolled in the main study. After 12 weeks, patients in the gemigliptin group continued to receive gemigliptin (N = 50), whereas patients in the placebo group were transitioned from placebo to linagliptin (N = 52). Each group received the indicated treatment over the subsequent 40-week period. A total of 102 patients consented to participate in the extension study, and 79 patients ultimately completed the study. RESULTS The HbA1c levels of both groups were significantly reduced at week 52 compared with baseline. Specifically, the adjusted mean change ± standard error in HbA1c level in the gemigliptin and placebo/linagliptin groups was 1.00% ± 0.21% and 0.65% ± 0.22% lower at week 52 than at baseline (P < .001 and P = .003), respectively. No significant difference in the change in HbA1c level was found between the 2 groups (P = .148). Trends in fasting plasma glucose, fructosamine and glycated albumin levels in the 2 groups were similar to trends in HbA1c levels. The eGFR of both groups was also significantly lower at week 52 than at baseline, and no significant difference in change in eGFR was found between the 2 groups. In contrast, both drugs had little effect on urinary albumin excretion, although both drugs significantly reduced the urinary type IV collagen level. The overall rates of adverse events were similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS Gemigliptin and linagliptin did not differ with respect to safety and efficacy in patients with T2DM and renal impairment. The 2 drugs had similar glucose-lowering effects, and the changes in eGFR and albuminuria were also similar. Additionally, the risk of side effects, including hypoglycaemia, was similar between the 2 groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Youb Han
- Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Ae Yoon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic University Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea
| | - Byoung Geun Han
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Gyun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Young-Il Jo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung Hwan Jeong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kook-Hwan Oh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyeong Cheon Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun-Hee Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Shin-Wook Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ki-Ryang Na
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Woo Kang
- Department of Nephrology, Busan Paik Hospital Inje University, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Nam-Ho Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | | | - Dae Ryong Cha
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Deacon CF. A review of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. Hot topics from randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018; 20 Suppl 1:34-46. [PMID: 29364584 DOI: 10.1111/dom.13135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2017] [Revised: 10/19/2017] [Accepted: 10/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The first clinical study to investigate effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibition was published in 2002, and since then, numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that DPP-4 inhibitors are efficacious, safe and well-tolerated. This review will focus upon RCTs which have investigated DPP-4 inhibitors in patient groups which are often under-represented or excluded from typical phase 3 clinical trials. Large cardiovascular (CV) safety outcome trials in patients with established CV disease have confirmed that DPP-4 inhibitors are not associated with any additional CV risk in these already-at-high-risk individuals, while raising awareness of any uncommon adverse events, such as heart failure hospitalization seen in one of the trials. Studies in patients with kidney disease have shown DPP-4 inhibitors to be efficacious without increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia, irrespective of the degree of renal impairment, while data from the large CV trials as well as smaller RCTs have even pointed towards potential renoprotective effects such individuals. The use of DPP-4 inhibitors with insulin when therapy requires intensification may be beneficial without affecting the incidence or severity of hypoglycaemia, with these effects also being replicated in patients with chronic kidney disease, for whom other agents may not be suitable. Attention is now turning towards exploring the potential utility of DPP-4 inhibitors in other circumstances, including for in-hospital management of hyperglycaemia and in other metabolic disorders. Together, these RCTs raise the possibility that in the future, DPP-4 inhibitors may have a broader use which may extend beyond glycaemic control in the typical type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patient seen in general practice and may encompass conditions other than T2DM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn F Deacon
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Yang M, Wang L, Gu L, Yuan W. Effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using unadjusted data. J Diabetes 2017; 9:1107-1117. [PMID: 28266136 DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.12546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2016] [Revised: 02/24/2017] [Accepted: 02/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Three meta-analyses recently evaluated the effects of dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, the combination of adjusted and unadjusted data in these meta-analyses may be questionable. The present study performed a meta-analysis of the effects of DPP-4 inhibitors in T2D patients with moderate to severe CKD using unadjusted data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS The PubMed, Embase (via Ovid), and Cochrane Central databases were searched for papers regarding the effects of DPP-4 inhibitors in CKD patients published before 1 August 2016. Data were independently extracted by two authors. A pooled analysis of unadjusted data was performed using random-effects models. RESULTS Twelve studies representing 10 RCTs were included in the present analysis. Comparing mean HbA1c change between placebo and treatment, DPP-4 inhibitors significantly improved HbA1c levels at 12 weeks (mean difference [MD] -0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.54, -0.29), but improvements in HbA1c were seen only in dialysis patients at 24 weeks (MD -0.52; 95% CI -0.72, -0.32)*. Improvements in HbA1c were equivalent between DPP-4 inhibitors and sulfonylureas at 52 or 54 weeks. There were no significant differences in the incidence of severe or any hypoglycemic events between DPP-4 inhibitors and control (placebo or sulfonylureas) at 12, 24, and 52 or 54 weeks. However, DPP-4 inhibitors induced fewer symptomatic hypoglycemic events compared with sulfonylureas at 52 or 54 weeks. *[Correction added on 30 October 2017, after first online publication: The value '0.32' has been corrected to '-0.32'.] CONCLUSIONS: The present analysis shows that DPP-4 inhibitors are effective and comparable with sulfonylureas in T2D patients with moderate to severe CKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Man Yang
- Department of Nephrology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ling Wang
- Department of Nephrology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lijie Gu
- Department of Nephrology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weijie Yuan
- Department of Nephrology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|