Effect of Serotonin Transporter 5-HTTLPR Polymorphism on Gastrointestinal Intolerance to Metformin: A GoDARTS Study

View on Metformin: Antidiabetic and Pleiotropic Effects, Pharmacokinetics, Side Effects, and Sex-Related Differences

Metformin is a synthetic biguanide used as an antidiabetic drug in type 2 diabetes mellitus, achieved by studying the bioactive metabolites of Galega officinalis L. It is also used off-label for various other diseases, such as subclinical diabetes, obesity, polycystic ovary syndrome, etc. In addition, metformin is proposed as an add-on therapy for several conditions, including autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases, and cancer. Although metformin has been used for many decades, it is still the subject of many pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies in light of its extensive use. Metformin acts at the mitochondrial level by inhibiting the respiratory chain, thus increasing the AMP/ATP ratio and, subsequently, activating the AMP-activated protein kinase. However, several other mechanisms have been proposed, including binding to presenilin enhancer 2, increasing GLP1 release, and modification of microRNA expression. Regarding its pharmacokinetics, after oral administration, metformin is absorbed, distributed, and eliminated, mainly through the renal route, using transporters for cationic solutes, since it exists as an ionic molecule at physiological pH. In this review, particular consideration has been paid to literature data from the last 10 years, deepening the study of clinical trials inherent to new uses of metformin, the differences in effectiveness and safety observed between the sexes, and the unwanted side effects. For this last objective, metformin safety was also evaluated using both VigiBase and EudraVigilance, respectively, the WHO and European databases of the reported adverse drug reactions, to assess the extent of metformin side effects in real-life use.

Tailoring Type II Diabetes Treatment: Investigating the Effect of 5-HTT Polymorphisms on HbA1c Levels after Metformin Initiation

Aims

To investigate the effect of serotonin transporter (5-HTT) polymorphisms on change in HbA1c levels six months after metformin initiation in type 2 diabetes patients.

Materials and Methods

Participants of PROVALID (PROspective cohort study in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus for VALidation of biomarkers) within the GIANTT (Groningen Initiative to ANalyse Type 2 Diabetes Treatment) cohort who initiated metformin were genotyped for combined 5-HTTLPR/rs25531 (L∗L∗, L∗S∗, and S∗S∗) and 5-HTT VNTR (STin 2.12, 12/-, and 10/-) polymorphisms, respectively. Multiple linear regression was applied to determine the change in HbA1c level from baseline date to six months across 5-HTTLPR/VNTR genotype groups, adjusted for baseline HbA1c, age, gender, triglyceride level, low-density lipoprotein level, and serum creatinine.

Results

157 participants were included, of which 56.2% were male. The average age was 59.3 ± 9.23 years, and the mean baseline HbA1c was 7.49% ± 1.21%. 5-HTTLPR was characterized in 46 patients as L∗L∗, 70 patients as L∗S∗, and 41 patients as S∗S∗ genotypes. No significant association was found between 5-HTTLPR and 5-HTT VNTR genotypes and change in HbA1c after adjustments.

Conclusions

5-HTT polymorphisms did not affect HbA1c levels six months after the start of metformin. Further long-term studies in large samples would be relevant to determine which polymorphisms can explain the variation in response to metformin treatment.

Advancements in pharmacotherapy options for treating diabetes ‎in children and adolescents

INTRODUCTION

This study compares diabetes management between pediatric and adult patients and identifies treatment challenges and gaps.

AREAS COVERED

We searched PubMed and Clinicaltrails.gov databases for studies published from 2001 to 2023 on diabetes management in different age groups.

EXPERT OPINION

Research shows children have lower insulin sensitivity, clearance, and β cell function than adults. The US FDA only allows insulin, metformin, and liraglutide as antidiabetic medication options for children. However, some off-label drugs, like meglitinides, sulfonylureas, and alogliptin, have demonstrated positive results in treating certain types of diabetes caused by gene mutations. It's crucial to adopt personalized and precise approaches to managing diabetes in pediatrics, which vary from those used for adult patients. New studies support the classification of type 2 diabetes into several subtypes based on age, BMI, glycemia, homeostasis model estimates, varying insulin resistance, ‎different rates of complications‎, and islet ‎autoantibodies. With this insight, prevention, treatment, and precision medicine of diabetes might be changed. More research is necessary to assess the safety and efficacy of different antidiabetic drugs and improve diabetes treatment for children and adolescents.

Clinical Trial: Probiotics in Metformin Intolerant Patients with Type 2 Diabetes (ProGasMet)

BACKGROUND

For decades, metformin has been the drug of first choice in the management of type 2 diabetes. However, approximately 2-13% of patients do not tolerate metformin due to gastrointestinal (GI) side effects. Since metformin influences the gut microbiota, we hypothesized that a multi-strain probiotics supplementation would mitigate the gastrointestinal symptoms associated with metformin usage.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center, cross-over trial (ProGasMet study) assessed the efficacy of a multi-strain probiotic in 37 patients with metformin intolerance. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive probiotic (PRO-PLA) or placebo (PLA-PRO) at baseline and, after 12 weeks (period 1), they crossed-over to the other treatment arm (period 2). The primary outcome was the reduction of GI adverse events of metformin.

RESULTS

37 out of 82 eligible patients were enrolled in the final analysis of whom 35 completed the 32 weeks study period and 2 patients resigned at visit 5. Regardless of the treatment arm allocation, while on probiotic supplementation, there was a significant reduction of incidence (for the probiotic period in PRO-PLA/PLA-PRO: P = 0.017/P = 0.054), quantity and severity of nausea (P = 0.016/P = 0.024), frequency (P = 0.009/P = 0.015) and severity (P = 0.019/P = 0.005) of abdominal bloating/pain as well as significant improvement in self-assessed tolerability of metformin (P < 0.01/P = 0.005). Moreover, there was significant reduction of incidence of diarrhea while on probiotic supplementation in PRO-PLA treatment arm (P = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

A multi-strain probiotic diminishes the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects in patients with type 2 diabetes and metformin intolerance.

Effects of Medications on Heat Loss Capacity in Chronic Disease Patients: Health Implications Amidst Global Warming

Pharmacological agents used to treat or manage diseases can modify the level of heat strain experienced by chronically ill and elderly patients via different mechanistic pathways. Human thermoregulation is a crucial homeostatic process that maintains body temperature within a narrow range during heat stress through dry (i.e., increasing skin blood flow) and evaporative (i.e., sweating) heat loss, as well as active inhibition of thermogenesis, which is crucial to avoid overheating. Medications can independently and synergistically interact with aging and chronic disease to alter homeostatic responses to rising body temperature during heat stress. This review focuses on the physiologic changes, with specific emphasis on thermolytic processes, associated with medication use during heat stress. The review begins by providing readers with a background of the global chronic disease burden. Human thermoregulation and aging effects are then summarized to give an understanding of the unique physiologic changes faced by older adults. The effects of common chronic diseases on temperature regulation are outlined in the main sections. Physiologic impacts of common medications used to treat these diseases are reviewed in detail, with emphasis on the mechanisms by which these medications alter thermolysis during heat stress. The review concludes by providing perspectives on the need to understand the effects of medication use in hot environments, as well as a summary table of all clinical considerations and research needs of the medications included in this review. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Long-term medications modulate thermoregulatory function, resulting in excess physiological strain and predisposing patients to adverse health outcomes during prolonged exposures to extreme heat during rest and physical work (e.g., exercise). Understanding the medication-specific mechanisms of altered thermoregulation has importance in both clinical and research settings, paving the way for work toward refining current medication prescription recommendations and formulating mitigation strategies for adverse drug effects in the heat in chronically ill patients.

Precision Medicine in Diabetes

Tailoring treatment or management to groups of individuals based on specific clinical, molecular, and genomic features is the concept of precision medicine. Diabetes is highly heterogenous with respect to clinical manifestations, disease progression, development of complications, and drug response. The current practice for drug treatment is largely based on evidence from clinical trials that report average effects. However, around half of patients with type 2 diabetes do not achieve glycaemic targets despite having a high level of adherence and there are substantial differences in the incidence of adverse outcomes. Therefore, there is a need to identify predictive markers that can inform differential drug responses at the point of prescribing. Recent advances in molecular genetics and increased availability of real-world and randomised trial data have started to increase our understanding of disease heterogeneity and its impact on potential treatments for specific groups. Leveraging information from simple clinical features (age, sex, BMI, ethnicity, and co-prescribed medications) and genomic markers has a potential to identify sub-groups who are likely to benefit from a given drug with minimal adverse effects. In this chapter, we will discuss the state of current evidence in the discovery of clinical and genetic markers that have the potential to optimise drug treatment in type 2 diabetes.

Gut microbiota is correlated with gastrointestinal adverse events of metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes

Aim

Gastrointestinal discomfort is the most common adverse event in metformin treatment for type 2 diabetes. The mechanism of action of metformin is associated with gut microbiota. However, the gut microbial community structure related to metformin-induced gastrointestinal adverse events remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate it.

Methods

50 patients with newly diagnosed diabetes were treated with metformin 1500mg/d for 12 weeks. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether gastrointestinal adverse events occurred (group B) or did not occur (group A) after treatment. The fecal bacterial communities and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were sequenced and compared. 70 diabetes mice were randomly divided into 8 groups and treated with metformin (Met), clindamycin (Clin) and/or SCFA, which were the Met+/Clin+, Met+/Clin-, Met-/Clin+, Met-/Clin-, Met+/SCFA+, Met+/SCFA-, Met-/SCFA+ and Met-/SCFA- group. After 4 weeks of metformin treatment, blood glucose, food intake, fecal SCFAs, gut microbiota and gut hormones were measured.

Results

Metformin increased the abundance of Phascolarctobacterium, Intestinimonas and Clostridium III. Functional prediction analysis showed that the propanoate metabolism pathway was significantly up-regulated. The concentrations of acetic acid and propanoic acid in feces were significantly increased. The abundance of Clostridium sensu stricto, Streptococcus and Akkermansia induced by metformin in group B was higher than that in group A. The propanoate metabolism pathway and propanoic acid in feces were significantly up-regulated in group B. In the animal experiments, the food intake decreased and glucose control increased in metformin groups compared with those in the control groups. The total GLP-1 level in the Met+/Clin- group was significantly higher than that in the Met-/Clin- group, while there was no statistical difference between the Met-/Clin- and Met+/Clin+ group. The total GLP-1 level in the Met-/SCFA+ group was significantly higher than that in the Met-/SCFA-group, while the levels of total GLP-1 and active GLP-1 in the Met+/SCFA- group and the Met+/SCFA+ group were significantly higher than those in the Met-/SCFA-group.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that metformin promotes the secretion of intestinal hormones such as GLP-1 by increasing the abundance of SCFA-producing bacteria, which not only plays an anti-diabetic role, but also may causes gastrointestinal adverse events.

Pharmacoepigenetics in type 2 diabetes: is it clinically relevant?

Data generated over nearly two decades clearly demonstrate the importance of epigenetic modifications and mechanisms in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. However, the role of pharmacoepigenetics in type 2 diabetes is less well established. The field of pharmacoepigenetics covers epigenetic biomarkers that predict response to therapy, therapy-induced epigenetic alterations as well as epigenetic therapies including inhibitors of epigenetic enzymes. Not all individuals with type 2 diabetes respond to glucose-lowering therapies in the same way, and there is therefore a need for clinically useful biomarkers that discriminate responders from non-responders. Blood-based epigenetic biomarkers may be useful for this purpose. There is also a need for a better understanding of whether existing glucose-lowering therapies exert their function partly through therapy-induced epigenetic alterations. Finally, epigenetic enzymes may be drug targets for type 2 diabetes. Here, I discuss whether pharmacoepigenetics is clinically relevant for type 2 diabetes based on studies addressing this topic.

Effects of single-nucleotide polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of metformin

INTRODUCTION

Metformin has been recognized as the first-choice drug for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The potency of metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes has always been in the spotlight and shown significant individual differences. Based on previous studies, the efficacy of metformin is related to the single-nucleotide polymorphisms of transporter genes carried by patients, amongst which a variety of gene polymorphisms of transporter and target protein genes affect the effectiveness and adverse repercussion of metformin.

AREAS COVERED

Here, we reviewed the current knowledge about gene polymorphisms impacting metformin efficacy based on transporter and drug target proteins.

EXPERT OPINION

The reason for the difference in clinical drug potency of metformin can be attributed to the gene polymorphism of drug transporters and drug target proteins in the human body. Substantial evidence shows that genetic polymorphisms in transporters such as organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1) and organic cation transporter 2 (OCT2) affect the glucose-lowering effectiveness of metformin. However, optimization of individualized dosing regimens of metformin is necessary to clarify the role of several polymorphisms.

A Fat-Promoting Botanical Extract From Artemisia scoparia Exerts Geroprotective Effects on Caenorhabditis elegans Life Span and Stress Resistance

Like other biological processes, aging is not random but subject to molecular control. Natural products that modify core metabolic parameters, including fat content, may provide entry points to extend animal life span and promote healthy aging. Here, we show that a botanical extract from Artemisia scoparia (SCO), which promotes fat storage and metabolic resiliency in mice, extends the life span of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans by up to 40%. Notably, this life-span extension depends significantly on SCO's effects on fat; SCO-treated worms exhibit heightened levels of unsaturated fat, and inhibition of Δ9 desaturases, which oversee biosynthesis of monounsaturated fatty acids, prevents SCO-dependent fat accumulation and life-span extension. At an upstream signaling level, SCO prompts changes to C. elegans fat regulation by stimulating nuclear translocation of transcription factor DAF-16/FOXO, an event that requires AMP-activated protein kinase under this condition. Importantly, animals treated with SCO are not only long-lived but also show improved stress resistance in late adulthood, suggesting that this fat-promoting intervention may enhance some aspects of physiological health in older age. These findings identify SCO as a natural product that can modify fat regulation for longevity benefit and add to growing evidence indicating that elevated fat can be prolongevity in some circumstances.

Population stratification in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review

AIMS

There is increasing interest in using stratification in type 2 diabetes to target resources, individualise care and improve outcomes. We aim to systematically review and collate literature that has utilised population stratification methods in the study of adults with type 2 diabetes; and to describe and compare stratification methodologies, population characteristics, variables used to stratify and outcome variables.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to July 2020. Studies included adults with type 2 diabetes using population stratification methods. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42020206604) and conducted in line with PRISMA guidance. Extracted data included study aims; study setting (primary or secondary care); population characteristics; stratification variables and outcomes; and methodological approach to stratification.

RESULTS

Across 348 included studies, there were a total of 10,776,009 participants with a mean age of 61.0 years (SD 5.94). 6.7% of studies used data-driven methods and the rest employed expert-driven approaches using pre-defined stratification criteria. The commonest variable used to stratify populations was HbA_1c (n = 57, 16.4%); few studies stratified using clinically important non-traditional variables such as health behaviours and beliefs.

CONCLUSIONS

Most studies performing population stratification in type 2 diabetes used expert-driven approaches with the aim of predicting outcomes in glycaemic control, mortality and cardiovascular complications. We identified relatively few studies using data-driven approaches, which offer opportunities generate hypotheses beyond current expert knowledge. We describe important research gaps including stratification with regard to disease remission.

Gastrointestinal adverse events of metformin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

Metformin is the first choice drug in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus but its administration may be linked to gastrointestinal adverse events limiting its use.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the risk of gastrointestinal adverse events related to metformin use in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin.

METHODS

PUB MED/CINAHL/Web of Science/Scopus were searched from database inception until 08.11.2020 for articles in English and randomized controlled trials related to patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin were included.

RESULTS

From 5315 publications, we identified 199 potentially eligible full-text articles. Finally, 71 randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. In these studies, metformin use was associated with higher risk of abdominal pain, diarrhea and nausea comparing to control. The risks of abdominal pain and nausea were highest comparing to placebo. Bloating risk was only elevated when metformin treatment was compared to DPP4i.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of gastrointestinal adverse events such as abdominal pain, nausea and diarrhea is higher in type 2 diabetes patients treated with metformin compared to other antidiabetic drugs. There is a higher risk of bloating and diarrhea with metformin immediate-release than with metformin extended release formulation.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021289975, identifier CRD42021289975.

A Two-Stage Study Identifies Two Novel Polymorphisms in PRKAG2 Affecting Metformin Response in Chinese Type 2 Diabetes Patients

Objective

Individual differences in glycemic response to metformin in antidiabetic treatment exist widely. Although some associated genetic variations have been discovered, they still cannot accurately predict metformin response. In the current study, we set out to investigate novel genetic variants affecting metformin response in Chinese type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients.

Methods

A two-stage study enrolled 500 T2D patients who received metformin, glibenclamide or a combination of both were recruited from 2009 to 2012 in China. Change of HbA_1c, adjusted by clinical covariates, was used to evaluate glycemic response to metformin. Selected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were genotyped using the Infinium iSelect and/or Illumina GoldenGate genotyping platform. A linear regression model was used to evaluate the association between SNPs and response.

Results

A total of 3739 SNPs were screened in Stage 1, of which 50 were associated with drug response. Except for one genetic variant preferred to affect glibenclamide, the remaining SNPs were subsequently verified in Stage 2, and two SNPs were successfully validated. These were PRKAG2 rs2727528 (discovery group: β=−0.212, P=0.046; validation group: β=−0.269, P=0.028) and PRKAG2 rs1105842 (discovery group: β=0.205, P=0.048; validation group: β=0.273, P=0.025). C allele carriers of rs2727528 and C allele carriers of rs1105842 would have a larger difference of HbA_1c level when using metformin.

Conclusion

Two variants rs2727528 and rs1105842 in PRKAG2, encoding γ2 subunit of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), were found to be associated with metformin response in Chinese T2D patients. These findings may provide some novel information for personalized pharmacotherapy of metformin in China.

The Genetics of Adverse Drug Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review

Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADR) are a major clinical problem accounting for significant hospital admission rates, morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. One-third of people with diabetes experience at least one ADR. However, there is notable interindividual heterogeneity resulting in patient harm and unnecessary medical costs. Genomics is at the forefront of research to understand interindividual variability, and there are many genotype-drug response associations in diabetes with inconsistent findings. Here, we conducted a systematic review to comprehensively examine and synthesize the effect of genetic polymorphisms on the incidence of ADRs of oral glucose-lowering drugs in people with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: A literature search was made to identify articles that included specific results of research on genetic polymorphism and adverse effects associated with oral glucose-lowering drugs. The electronic search was carried out on 3rd October 2020, through Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science using keywords and MeSH terms.

Result: Eighteen articles consisting of 10, 383 subjects were included in this review. Carriers of reduced-function alleles of organic cation transporter 1 (OCT 1, encoded by SLC22A1) or reduced expression alleles of plasma membrane monoamine transporter (PMAT, encoded by SLC29A4) or serotonin transporter (SERT, encoded by SLC6A4) were associated with increased incidence of metformin-related gastrointestinal (GI) adverse effects. These effects were shown to exacerbate by concomitant treatment with gut transporter inhibiting drugs. The CYP2C9 alleles, ^*2 (rs1799853C>T) and ^*3 (rs1057910A>C) that are predictive of low enzyme activity were more common in subjects who experienced hypoglycemia after treatment with sulfonylureas. However, there was no significant association between sulfonylurea-related hypoglycemia and genetic variants in the ATP-binding cassette transporter sub-family C member 8 (ABCC8)/Potassium Inwardly Rectifying Channel Subfamily J Member 11 (KCNJ11). Compared to the wild type, the low enzyme activity C allele at CYP2C8^*3 (rs1057910A>C) was associated with less weight gain whereas the C allele at rs6123045 in the NFATC2 gene was significantly associated with edema from rosiglitazone treatment.

Conclusion: In spite of limited studies investigating genetics and ADR in diabetes, some convincing results are emerging. Genetic variants in genes encoding drug transporters and metabolizing enzymes are implicated in metformin-related GI adverse effects, and sulfonylurea-induced hypoglycemia, respectively. Further studies to investigate newer antidiabetic drugs such as DPP-4i, GLP-1RA, and SGLT2i are warranted. In addition, pharmacogenetic studies that account for race and ethnic differences are required.

Therapeutic Dilemma in personalized medicine

The practice of medicine depends over a long time on identifying therapies that target an entire population. The increase in scientific knowledge over the years has led to the gradual change towards individualization and personalization of drug therapy. The hope of this change is to achieve a better clinical response to given medications and reduction of their adverse effects. Tailoring of medicine on the road of personalized medicine considers molecular and genetic mapping of the individual. However, many factors still impede the smooth application of personalized medicine and represent challenges or limitations in its achievement. In this article, we put some clinical examples that show dilemmas in the application of personalized medicine such as opioids in pain control, fluoropyrimidines in malignancy, clopidogrel as antiplatelet therapy and oral hypoglycemic drugs in Type2 diabetes in adults. Shaping the future of medicine through the application of personalized medicine for a particular patient needs to put into consideration many factors such as patient's genetic makeup and life style, pathology of the disease and dynamic changes in its course as well as interactions between administered drugs and their effects on metabolizing enzymes. We hope in the coming years, the personalized medicine will foster changes in health care system in the way not only to treat patients but also to prevent diseases.

Impact of serotonin transporter gene polymorphism on gut motility in patients with type 2 Diabetes mellitus

Background/Aims

The pathogenesis of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is yet to be delineated clearly. Serotonin, a monoamine neurotransmitter, resides primarily in the gut and plays a vital role in GI system. However, no study has been documented the role of serotonin and serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4) polymorphism in the development of GI symptoms in T2DM patients.

Methods

Three hundred diabetes patients attending diabetes clinic at Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, and matched healthy controls were enrolled for this study. Plasma from collected blood sample was used for serotonin measurement by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method and buffy coat was used for isolation of DNA by phenol chloroform method. Serotonin transporter gene polymorphism was analyzed by polymerase chain reaction method.

Results

The frequency of short allele (S) and SS genotype was significantly higher in patients with T2DM than controls and was associated with increased risk of T2DM. The frequency of LS genotype showed an association with protection from the disease. Regarding GI symptoms, 78.2% of patients with constipation showed LL and LS genotypes, and 97.7% of patients with diarrhea had SS genotype. The patients without GI symptoms did not show any association of gut motility with genotype. Furthermore, serotonin was significantly higher in diabetic patients who belonged to SS genotype compared to LS or LL genotype and who presented with diarrhea.

Conclusion

SS genotypes are prone to develop diarrhea because of faster gut motility resulting from higher serotonin levels as compared to LS and LL genotype in T2DM patients.

Metformin Biodistribution: A Key to Mechanisms of Action?

Metformin has undisputed glucose-lowering effects in diabetes and an impressive safety record. It has also shown promising effects beyond diabetes, and several hundred clinical trials involving metformin are currently planned or active. Metformin targets intracellular effectors, but exactly which remain to be established, and in an era of precision medicine, an incomplete understanding of mechanisms of action may limit the use of metformin. Distribution of metformin depends on specific organic cation transporter proteins that are organ- and species-specific. Therefore, target tissues of metformin can be identified by cellular uptake of the drug, and exploring the biodistribution of the drug in humans becomes an attractive strategy to assist the many investigations into the mechanisms of action of metformin performed in animals. In this review, we combine the emerging evidence from the use of 11C-labeled metformin in humans to discuss metformin action in liver, intestines, and kidney, which are the organs with the most avid uptake of the drug.

Epigenetic markers associated with metformin response and intolerance in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes

Metformin is the first-line pharmacotherapy for managing type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, many patients with T2D do not respond to or tolerate metformin well. Currently, there are no phenotypes that successfully predict glycemic response to, or tolerance of, metformin. We explored whether blood-based epigenetic markers could discriminate metformin response and tolerance by analyzing genome-wide DNA methylation in drug-naïve patients with T2D at the time of their diagnosis. DNA methylation of 11 and 4 sites differed between glycemic responders/nonresponders and metformin-tolerant/intolerant patients, respectively, in discovery and replication cohorts. Greater methylation at these sites associated with a higher risk of not responding to or not tolerating metformin with odds ratios between 1.43 and 3.09 per 1-SD methylation increase. Methylation risk scores (MRSs) of the 11 identified sites differed between glycemic responders and nonresponders with areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.80 to 0.98. MRSs of the 4 sites associated with future metformin intolerance generated AUCs of 0.85 to 0.93. Some of these blood-based methylation markers mirrored the epigenetic pattern in adipose tissue, a key tissue in diabetes pathogenesis, and genes to which these markers were annotated to had biological functions in hepatocytes that altered metformin-related phenotypes. Overall, we could discriminate between glycemic responders/nonresponders and participants tolerant/intolerant to metformin at diagnosis by measuring blood-based epigenetic markers in drug-naïve patients with T2D. This epigenetics-based tool may be further developed to help patients with T2D receive optimal therapy.

Current treatment for polycystic ovary syndrome: focus on adolescence

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most frequent endocrine disorder in women and it is associated with an increased rate of infertility. Its etiology remains largely unknown, although both genetic and environmental factors play a role. PCOS is characterized by insulin resistance, metabolic disorders and low-grade chronic inflammation. To date, the treatment of PCOS is mainly symptomatic and aimed at reducing clinical signs of hyperandrogenism (hirsutism and acne), at improving menstrual cyclicity and at favoring ovulation. Since PCOS pathophysiology is still largely unknown, the therapeutic interventions currently in place are rarely cause-specific. In such cases, the therapy is mainly directed at improving hormonal and metabolic dysregulations typical of this condition. Diet and exercise represent the main environmental factors influencing PCOS. Thus, therapeutic lifestyle changes represent the first line of intervention, which, in combination with oral contraceptives, represent the customary treatment. Insulin resistance is becoming an increasingly studied target for therapy, most evidence stemming from the time-honored metformin use. Relatively novel strategies also include the use of thiazolidinediones and GLP1-receptor agonists. In recent years, a nutraceutical approach has been added to the therapeutic toolkit targeting insulin resistance. Indeed, emerging data support inositol and alpha-lipoic acid as alternative compounds, alone or in combination with the aforementioned strategies, with favorable effects on ovulation, insulin resistance and inflammation. Nevertheless, additional studies are required in adolescents, in order to assess the effectiveness of diet supplements in preventing negative impacts of PCOS on fertility in adult age. This review focuses on the main therapeutic options for PCOS to date.

Diabetes: Is There a Future for Pharmacogenomics Guided Treatment?

Diabetes is a disease defined on the basis of hyperglycemia. There are monogenic forms of diabetes where defining the genetic cause has a dramatic impact on treatment—with patients being able to transition from insulin to sulfonylureas. However, the majority of diabetes is type 2 diabetes. This review outlines the robust evidence accrued to date for pharmacogenetics of metformin, sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, and dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors but highlights that these variants will only be of clinical utility when the genotype is already known at the point of prescribing. The future of pharmacogenetics in diabetes and other common complex disease relies on a paradigm shift—that of preemptive panel genotyping and use of clinical decision support tools to assimilate this genetic information with other clinical phenotypic data and to present this information simply to the prescriber. Given the recent dramatic fall in genotyping costs, this future is not far off.

Genome-wide association study of angioedema induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker treatment

Angioedema in the mouth or upper airways is a feared adverse reaction to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) treatment, which is used for hypertension, heart failure and diabetes complications. This candidate gene and genome-wide association study aimed to identify genetic variants predisposing to angioedema induced by these drugs. The discovery cohort consisted of 173 cases and 4890 controls recruited in Sweden. In the candidate gene analysis, ETV6, BDKRB2, MME, and PRKCQ were nominally associated with angioedema (p < 0.05), but did not pass Bonferroni correction for multiple testing (p < 2.89 × 10⁻⁵). In the genome-wide analysis, intronic variants in the calcium-activated potassium channel subunit alpha-1 (KCNMA1) gene on chromosome 10 were significantly associated with angioedema (p < 5 × 10⁻⁸). Whilst the top KCNMA1 hit was not significant in the replication cohort (413 cases and 599 ACEi-exposed controls from the US and Northern Europe), a meta-analysis of the replication and discovery cohorts (in total 586 cases and 1944 ACEi-exposed controls) revealed that each variant allele increased the odds of experiencing angioedema 1.62 times (95% confidence interval 1.05–2.50, p = 0.030). Associated KCNMA1 variants are not known to be functional, but are in linkage disequilibrium with variants in transcription factor binding sites active in relevant tissues. In summary, our data suggest that common variation in KCNMA1 is associated with risk of angioedema induced by ACEi or ARB treatment. Future whole exome or genome sequencing studies will show whether rare variants in KCNMA1 or other genes contribute to the risk of ACEi- and ARB-induced angioedema.

Comparison of gastrointestinal adverse events with different doses of metformin in the treatment of elderly people with type 2 diabetes

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Gastrointestinal discomfort is the most common adverse event of metformin treatment for type 2 diabetes, especially in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to compare gastrointestinal adverse events resulting from different doses of metformin used for the treatment of elderly people with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

A total of 361 elderly patients with newly diagnosed diabetes were randomly divided into three groups: metformin 1000 mg/d (N = 120), metformin 1500 mg/d (N = 121) and metformin 2000 mg/d (N = 120). Glycaemic control and gastrointestinal adverse events (abdominal pain, diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, bloating and anorexia) were assessed and compared among the three groups after 12 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

At baseline, there was no significant difference in gastrointestinal symptoms among the three groups. After 12 weeks of treatment with metformin, the change in HbA_1c level was -0.7%, -0.9% and -1.0% for the 1000 mg/d, 1500 mg/d and 2000 mg/d groups, respectively (P < .0001). There was no significant difference in gastrointestinal adverse events among the three groups after treatment with metformin. In total, 62 people (17.2%) could not tolerate the adverse effects of metformin, and most of them stopped treatment in the first 4 weeks. Logistic regression analysis shows that female sex (OR = 2.660, 95%CI 1.692-4.183, P < .0001) and the concurrent use of organic cation transporter 1-inhibiting drugs (OR = 1.874, 95%CI 1.076-3.265, P = .027) are independent risk factors for adverse events.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate that metformin doses of 1000 mg/d-2000 mg/d have similar adverse events but that 2000 mg/d of metformin yields the best glycaemic control in elderly people with diabetes. If elderly people can tolerate 1000 mg/d of metformin, we could gradually increase the dose to 2000 mg/d to achieve better glycaemic control.

Mechanisms of action of metformin with special reference to cardiovascular protection

Management guidelines continue to identify metformin as initial pharmacologic antidiabetic therapy of choice for people with type 2 diabetes without contraindications, despite recent randomized trials that have demonstrated significant improvements in cardiovascular outcomes with newer classes of antidiabetic therapies. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current state of knowledge of metformin's therapeutic actions on blood glucose and cardiovascular clinical evidence and to consider the mechanisms that underlie them. The effects of metformin on glycaemia occur mainly in the liver, but metformin-stimulated glucose disposal by the gut has emerged as an increasingly import site of action of metformin. Additionally, metformin induces increased secretion of GLP-1 from intestinal L-cells. Clinical cardiovascular protection with metformin is supported by three randomized outcomes trials (in newly diagnosed and late stage insulin-treated type 2 diabetes patients) and a wealth of observational data. Initial evidence suggests that cotreatment with metformin may enhance the impact of newer incretin-based therapies on cardiovascular outcomes, an important observation as metformin can be combined with any other antidiabetic agent. Multiple potential mechanisms support the concept of cardiovascular protection with metformin beyond those provided by reduced blood glucose, including weight loss, improvements in haemostatic function, reduced inflammation, and oxidative stress, and inhibition of key steps in the process of atherosclerosis. Accordingly, metformin remains well placed to support improvements in cardiovascular outcomes, from diagnosis and throughout the course of type 2 diabetes, even in this new age of improved outcomes in type 2 diabetes.

Understanding the glucoregulatory mechanisms of metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Despite its position as the first-line drug for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, the mechanisms underlying the plasma glucose level-lowering effects of metformin (1,1-dimethylbiguanide) still remain incompletely understood. Metformin is thought to exert its primary antidiabetic action through the suppression of hepatic glucose production. In addition, the discovery that metformin inhibits the mitochondrial respiratory chain complex 1 has placed energy metabolism and activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) at the centre of its proposed mechanism of action. However, the role of AMPK has been challenged and might only account for indirect changes in hepatic insulin sensitivity. Various mechanisms involving alterations in cellular energy charge, AMP-mediated inhibition of adenylate cyclase or fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase 1 and modulation of the cellular redox state through direct inhibition of mitochondrial glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase have been proposed for the acute inhibition of gluconeogenesis by metformin. Emerging evidence suggests that metformin could improve obesity-induced meta-inflammation via direct and indirect effects on tissue-resident immune cells in metabolic organs (that is, adipose tissue, the gastrointestinal tract and the liver). Furthermore, the gastrointestinal tract also has a major role in metformin action through modulation of glucose-lowering hormone glucagon-like peptide 1 and the intestinal bile acid pool and alterations in gut microbiota composition.

Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interactions Between Trospium Chloride and Ranitidine Substrates of Organic Cation Transporters in Healthy Human Subjects

Trospium chloride, a muscarinic receptor blocker, is poorly absorbed with different rates from areas in the jejunum and the cecum/ascending colon. To evaluate whether organic cation transporter (OCT) 1, OCT2 and multidrug and toxin extrusion (MATE) 1 and MATE2-K are involved in pharmacokinetics, competitions with ranitidine, a probe inhibitor of the cation transporters, were evaluated in transfected HEK293 cells. Furthermore, a drug interaction study with trospium chloride after intravenous (2 mg) and oral dosing (30 mg) plus ranitidine (300 mg) was performed in 12 healthy subjects and evaluated by noncompartmental analysis and population pharmacokinetic modeling. Ranitidine inhibited OCT1, OCT2, MATE1, and MATE2-K with half maximal inhibitory concentration values of 186 ± 25 µM, 482 ± 105 µM, 134 ± 37 µM, and 35 ± 11 µM, respectively. In contrast to our hypothesis, coadministration of ranitidine did not significantly decrease oral absorption of trospium. Instead, renal clearance was lowered by ∼15% (530 ± 99 vs 460 ± 120 mL/min; P < .05). It is possible that ranitidine was not available in competitive concentrations at the major colonic absorption site, as the inhibitor is absorbed in the small intestine and undergoes degradation by microbiota. The renal effects apparently result from inhibition of MATE1 and/or MATE2-K by ranitidine as predicted by in vitro to in vivo extrapolation. However, all pharmacokinetic changes were not of clinical relevance for the drug with highly variable pharmacokinetics. Intravenous trospium significantly lowered mean absorption time and relative bioavailability of ranitidine, which was most likely caused by muscarinic receptor blocking effects on intestinal motility and water turnover.

Variation in the Plasma Membrane Monoamine Transporter (PMAT) (Encoded by SLC29A4) and Organic Cation Transporter 1 (OCT1) (Encoded by SLC22A1) and Gastrointestinal Intolerance to Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes: An IMI DIRECT Study

OBJECTIVE

Gastrointestinal adverse effects occur in 20-30% of patients with metformin-treated type 2 diabetes, leading to premature discontinuation in 5-10% of the cases. Gastrointestinal intolerance may reflect localized high concentrations of metformin in the gut. We hypothesized that reduced transport of metformin via the plasma membrane monoamine transporter (PMAT) and organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1) could increase the risk of severe gastrointestinal adverse effects.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The study included 286 severe metformin-intolerant and 1,128 metformin-tolerant individuals from the IMI DIRECT (Innovative Medicines Initiative: DIabetes REsearCh on patient straTification) consortium. We assessed the association of patient characteristics, concomitant medication, and the burden of mutations in the SLC29A4 and SLC22A1 genes on odds of intolerance.

RESULTS

Women (P < 0.001) and older people (P < 0.001) were more likely to develop metformin intolerance. Concomitant use of transporter-inhibiting drugs increased the odds of intolerance (odds ratio [OR] 1.72, P < 0.001). In an adjusted logistic regression model, the G allele at rs3889348 (SLC29A4) was associated with gastrointestinal intolerance (OR 1.34, P = 0.005). rs3889348 is the top cis-expression quantitative trait locus for SLC29A4 in gut tissue where carriers of the G allele had reduced expression. Homozygous carriers of the G allele treated with transporter-inhibiting drugs had more than three times higher odds of intolerance compared with carriers of no G allele and not treated with inhibiting drugs (OR 3.23, P < 0.001). Use of a genetic risk score derived from rs3889348 and SLC22A1 variants found that the odds of intolerance were more than twice as high in individuals who carry three or more risk alleles compared with those carrying none (OR 2.15, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that intestinal metformin transporters and concomitant medications play an important role in the gastrointestinal adverse effects of metformin.

Metformin-induced glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion contributes to the actions of metformin in type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Metformin reduces plasma glucose and has been shown to increase glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) secretion. Whether this is a direct action of metformin on GLP-1 release, and whether some of the glucose-lowering effect of metformin occurs due to GLP-1 release, is unknown. The current study investigated metformin-induced GLP-1 secretion and its contribution to the overall glucose-lowering effect of metformin and underlying mechanisms in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Twelve patients with type 2 diabetes were included in this placebo-controlled, double-blinded study. On 4 separate days, the patients received metformin (1,500 mg) or placebo suspended in a liquid meal, with subsequent i.v. infusion of the GLP-1 receptor antagonist exendin9-39 (Ex9-39) or saline. During 240 minutes, blood was sampled. The direct effect of metformin on GLP-1 secretion was tested ex vivo in human ileal and colonic tissue with and without dorsomorphin-induced inhibiting of the AMPK activity.

RESULTS

Metformin increased postprandial GLP-1 secretion compared with placebo (P = 0.014), and the postprandial glucose excursions were significantly smaller after metformin + saline compared with metformin + Ex9-39 (P = 0.004). Ex vivo metformin acutely increased GLP-1 secretion (colonic tissue, P < 0.01; ileal tissue, P < 0.05), but the effect was abolished by inhibition of AMPK activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Metformin has a direct and AMPK-dependent effect on GLP-1-secreting L cells and increases postprandial GLP-1 secretion, which seems to contribute to metformin's glucose-lowering effect and mode of action.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02050074 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02050074).

FUNDING

This study received grants from the A.P. Møller Foundation, the Novo Nordisk Foundation, the Danish Medical Association research grant, the Australian Research Council, the National Health and Medical Research Council, and Pfizer Inc.

Metformin transporter pharmacogenomics: insights into drug disposition-where are we now?

INTRODUCTION

Metformin is recommended as first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes (T2D) by all major diabetes guidelines. With appropriate usage it is safe and effective overall, but its efficacy and tolerability show considerable variation between individuals. It is a substrate for several drug transporters and polymorphisms in these transporter genes have shown effects on metformin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Areas covered: This article provides a review of the current status of the influence of transporter pharmacogenomics on metformin efficacy and tolerability. The transporter variants identified to have an important influence on the absorption, distribution, and elimination of metformin, particularly those in organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1, gene SLC22A1), are reviewed. Expert opinion: Candidate gene studies have shown that genetic variations in SLC22A1 and other drug transporters influence the pharmacokinetics, glycemic responses, and gastrointestinal intolerance to metformin, although results are somewhat discordant. Conversely, genome-wide association studies of metformin response have identified signals in the pharmacodynamic pathways rather than the transporters involved in metformin disposition. Currently, pharmacogenomic testing to predict metformin response and tolerability may not have a clinical role, but with additional data from larger studies and availability of safe and effective alternative antidiabetic agents, this is likely to change.

Pharmacokinetics of metformin in patients with gastrointestinal intolerance

AIMS

To assess potential causes of metformin intolerance, including altered metformin uptake from the intestine, increased anaerobic glucose utilization and subsequent lactate production, altered serotonin uptake, and altered bile acid pool.

METHODS

For this pharmacokinetic study, we recruited 10 severely intolerant and 10 tolerant individuals, matched for age, sex and body mass index. A single 500-mg dose of metformin was administered, with blood sampling at 12 time points over 24 hours. Blood samples were analysed for metformin, lactate, serotonin and bile acid concentrations, and compared across the phenotypes.

RESULTS

The intolerant individuals were severely intolerant to 500 mg metformin. No significant difference was identified between tolerant and intolerant cohorts in metformin pharmacokinetics: median (interquartile range [IQR]) peak concentration 2.1 (1.7-2.3) mg/L and 2.0 (1.8-2.2) mg/L, respectively (P = .76); time to peak concentration 2.5 hours; median (IQR) area under the curve (AUC)_0-24 16.9 (13.9-18.6) and 13.9 (12.9-16.8) mg/L*h, respectively (P = .72). Lactate concentration peaked at 3.5 hours, with mean peak concentration of 2.4 mmol/L in both cohorts (95% CI 2.0-2.8 and 1.8-3.0 mmol/L, respectively), and similar incremental AUC_0-24 in each cohort: tolerant cohort 6.98 (95% CI 3.03-10.93) and intolerant cohort 4.47 (95% CI -3.12-12.06) mmol/L*h (P = .55). Neither serotonin nor bile acid concentrations were significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite evidence of severe intolerance in our cohort, there was no significant difference in metformin pharmacokinetics or systemic measures of lactate, serotonin or bile acids. This suggests that metformin intolerance may be attributable to local factors within the lumen or enterocyte.

Pharmacogenetics and target identification in diabetes

In diabetes, pharmacogenetics can be used both to identify patient subgroups who will have most benefit and/or least harm from a particularly treatment, and to gain insights into the molecular mechanisms of drug action and disease aetiology. There is increasing evidence that genetic variation alters response to diabetes treatments-both in terms of glycaemic response and side effects. This can be seen with dramatic impact on clinical care, in patients with genetic forms of diabetes such as Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young caused by HNF1A mutations, and Neonatal diabetes due to activating mutations in ABCC8 or KCNJ11. Beyond monogenic diabetes, pharmacogenetic variants have yet to impact on clinical practice, yet the effect sizes (e.g. for metformin intolerance and OCT1 variants; or for metformin action and SLC2A2 variants) are potentially of clinical utility, especially if the genotype is already known at the point of prescribing. Over the next few years, increasing cohort sizes and linkage at scale to electronic medical records will provide considerable potential for stratification and novel target identification in diabetes.

Updates on the biology of serotonin and tryptophan hydroxylase

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the most recent findings relevant to the biology of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) and the enzyme tryptophan hydroxylase (TPH) in human gastrointestinal disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Serotonin is synthesized in the central nervous system (CNS) and the gastrointestinal tract where it is secreted from enteroendocrine cells. Its biosynthesis is regulated by two isoforms of the enzyme TPH of which TPH1 is localized predominantly in gastrointestinal enteroendocrine cells. Serotonin activates the peristaltic reflexes, regulates gastrointestinal motility, and has a role in intestinal inflammation. Inhibition of TPH with novel molecules represents a new pharmacological tool in the successful management of carcinoid syndrome in patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GI-NETs). Certain 5-HT receptor subtype agonists and antagonists are useful in the treatment of functional gastrointestinal disorders.

SUMMARY

The gastrointestinal tract is the largest storage organ for serotonin where its biosynthesis is regulated by TPH1. It has several important functions in gastrointestinal motility, secretion, and inflammation. Furthermore, TPH represents a target for inhibitory pharmacological therapy of serotonin access states such as the carcinoid syndrome.

The mechanisms of action of metformin

Metformin is a widely-used drug that results in clear benefits in relation to glucose metabolism and diabetes-related complications. The mechanisms underlying these benefits are complex and still not fully understood. Physiologically, metformin has been shown to reduce hepatic glucose production, yet not all of its effects can be explained by this mechanism and there is increasing evidence of a key role for the gut. At the molecular level the findings vary depending on the doses of metformin used and duration of treatment, with clear differences between acute and chronic administration. Metformin has been shown to act via both AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-dependent and AMPK-independent mechanisms; by inhibition of mitochondrial respiration but also perhaps by inhibition of mitochondrial glycerophosphate dehydrogenase, and a mechanism involving the lysosome. In the last 10 years, we have moved from a simple picture, that metformin improves glycaemia by acting on the liver via AMPK activation, to a much more complex picture reflecting its multiple modes of action. More work is required to truly understand how this drug works in its target population: individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Type 2 diabetes in adolescents: a severe phenotype posing major clinical challenges and public health burden

Type 2 diabetes in adolescence manifests as a severe progressive form of diabetes that frequently presents with complications, responds poorly to treatment, and results in rapid progression of microvascular and macrovascular complications. Although overall still a rare disease, adolescent type 2 diabetes now poses major challenges to paediatric and adult diabetes services in many countries. Therapeutic options are heavily curtailed by a dearth of knowledge about the condition, with low numbers of participants and poor trial recruitment impeding research. Together with lifestyle modification, metformin remains the first-line therapy for adolescents with type 2 diabetes, although the majority rapidly progress to treatment failure and insulin therapy. Early bariatric surgery is controversial but has great potential to transform outcomes. Health systems must respond by both concentrating patients in specialist clinical services integrated with translational research programmes, but also by joining up with local health and social care services to improve engagement and uptake of services.