Racial Disparities in Health Care With Timing to Amputation Following Diabetic Foot Ulcer

Health Disparities Across the Spectrum of Amputation Care: A Review of Literature

Limb loss is a common and disabling experience for patients, frequently caused by critical limb ischemia or deterioration of chronic wounds. Disparities in outcomes for prevention of amputation, level of amputation, and postamputation outcomes have been described. Understanding the nature of these disparities and the populations most affected can help clinicians and policymakers target interventions and programs. This article reviews existing literature regarding disparities in amputation care, including prevention methods, surgical outcomes, and postamputation outcomes. The authors identified several potential racial, socioeconomic, and gender disparities, particularly affecting Black, Native American, and Latino/a/x patients, female gender, and those in rural settings.

Racial Disparities in Foot Examination among People with Diabetes in Brazil: A Nationwide Survey, 2019

Objective

To assess the absence of diabetic foot examination in Brazil and how ethnicity affected this outcome.

Design

This is an analysis of a nationwide survey held in Brazil in 2019. Participants with diabetes and that were 15 years of age or older were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. Adjusted Poisson regression with robust variance was used to calculate prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of never having had the foot examined, with separate models according to ethnicity. Stata 14.2 was used for all calculations.

Results

We included 6216 individuals with diabetes; 52.1% (95%CI: 50.0%-54.2%) reported never having had their feet examined by a health care professional and 61% self-declared as Black (Black and Brown [Brazilian mixed race]). A higher frequency of negligence was observed among Black individuals (55.3%; 52.5%-58.1%) than among White individuals (48.2%; 45.0%-51.5%). Negligence was higher between 15- to 39-year-old participants (PR = 1.34, 1.14-1.57), lower educational level (PR = 1.37, 1.13-1.65), higher alcohol consumption (PR = 1.18, 1.06-1.31), fair health status (PR = 1.11, 1.01-1.21), and diabetes diagnosis of up to 10 years (PR = 1.42, 1.28-1.57). Among Blacks, tobacco use and other factors increased the frequency of the outcome, whereas participation in the Brazilian Unified Health System primary care program was a protection factor (P<.05).

Conclusion

Black Brazilians with diabetes had higher negligence of foot examination by health care professionals. Strengthening primary care would help mitigate systemic racism in Brazil.

Association of Race With Referral Disparities for Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers at an Institution Serving Rural and Urban Populations

Background

Racial minorities are more likely to develop type 2 diabetes and experience associated microvascular complications. Non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics initially present with more severe diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and peripheral artery disease (PAD), with an associated 10-fold increase in risk for lower extremity amputation within the first year after diagnosis. This study was designed to determine if race is associated with a failure to refer to specialists for DFU treatment, and the severity of DFU at the time of initial presentation.

Methods

Patients were identified from the medical record based on a diagnosis related to diabetic foot complications between January 1, 2018, and June 1, 2023, in the family medicine, endocrinology, orthopaedic, or emergency clinics at a Midwest Academic Hospital serving rural and urban populations. Patients self-reported race, demographics, severity of ulcer based on Wagner ulcer scale at time of referral, eventual amputation status, and measures of social determinants of health including the national Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes were manually extracted and analyzed for correlations with referral status.

Results

A total of 597 patients were eligible for inclusion. Race was not associated with lower referral rates (P > .99) or source of referral (P = .58) to specialty clinic and ulcer severity at initial examination (P = .34). Patients who initially presented to the emergency department had more severe ulcers (P = .016), and higher severity was significantly associated with lower limb amputation vs mild ulcers (odds ratio = 38.8, P = .02). No significant differences in referral source or severity of ulcer at presentation were seen for sex, age, marital status, insurance type, rural status, ADI, time from referral to appointment, or eventual amputation.

Conclusion

In this study, we found that patient race was not associated with severity of DFU at presentation or subsequent referral to a Midwest academic specialty orthopaedic clinic for care.Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective review.

Prevalence of secondary prosthesis use in lower limb prosthesis users

PURPOSE

Prostheses designed for daily use are often inappropriate for high-level activities and/or are susceptible to water damage and mechanical failure. Secondary prostheses, such as activity-specific or back-up prostheses, are typically required to facilitate uninterrupted participation in desired life pursuits. This study estimated the prevalence of secondary prosthesis use in a large, national sample of lower limb prosthesis users (LLPUs).

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of survey data from three cross-sectional studies that assessed mobility in LLPUs. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the percentage of secondary prosthesis users and percentages of LLPUs that used different type(s) of secondary prosthesis(es). Secondary prosthesis users and non-users were compared to identify differences in participant characteristics between groups.

RESULTS

Of participants in the analysis (n = 1566), most (65.8%) did not use a secondary prosthesis. The most common secondary prosthesis types were back-up (19.2%) and activity-specific prostheses (13.5%). Secondary prosthesis users differed significantly from non-users with respect to gender, race, and other characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that secondary prosthesis use for most LLPUs is limited and may differ based on users' demographic and clinical characteristics. Future research should determine how LLPUs' health-related quality-of-life outcomes are affected by access to and use of secondary prostheses.Implications for RehabilitationSecondary prostheses, including activity-specific, back-up, and shower prostheses, have the potential to improve function, mobility, and participation for people who use lower limb prostheses.Most lower limb prosthesis users do not use secondary prostheses, and access to these devices may be related to users' demographic and clinical characteristics.Rehabilitation professionals play a key role in facilitating prosthesis users' access to secondary prostheses and should advocate for those who need them.

Association of Race, Ethnicity, and Gender to Disparities in Functional Recovery and Social Health After Major Lower Limb Amputation: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study

OBJECTIVE

To assess if evidence of disparities exists in functional recovery and social health post-lower limb amputation.

DESIGN

Race-ethnicity, gender, and income-based group comparisons of functioning and social health in a convenience sample of lower limb prosthetic users.

SETTING

Prosthetic clinics in 4 states.

PARTICIPANTS

A geographically diverse cohort of 56 English and Spanish speaking community-dwelling individuals with dysvascular lower limb amputation, between 18-80 years old.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Primary outcomes included 2 physical performance measures, the Timed Up and Go test and 2-minute walk test, and thirdly, the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility. The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities survey measured social health.

RESULTS

Of the study participants, 45% identified as persons of color, and 39% were women (mean ± SD age, 61.6 (9.8) years). People identifying as non-Hispanic White men exhibited better physical performance than men of color, White women, and women of color by -7.86 (95% CI, -16.26 to 0.53, P=.07), -10.34 (95% CI, -19.23 to -1.45, P=.02), and -11.63 (95% CI, -21.61 to -1.66, P=.02) seconds, respectively, on the TUG, and by 22.6 (95% CI, -2.31 to 47.50, P=.09), 38.92 (95% CI, 12.53 to 65.30, P<.01), 47.53 (95% CI, 17.93 to 77.13, P<.01) meters, respectively, on the 2-minute walk test. Income level explained 14% and 11% of the variance in perceived mobility and social health measures, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Study results suggest that sociodemographic factors of race-ethnicity, gender, and income level are associated with functioning and social health post-lower limb amputation. The clinical effect of this new knowledge lies in what it offers to health care practitioners who treat this patient population, in recognizing potential barriers to optimal recovery and quality of life. More work is required to assess lived experiences after amputation and provide better understanding of amputation-related health disparities.

Advances in prosthetic technology: a perspective on ethical considerations for development and clinical translation

Technological advancements of prostheses in recent years, such as haptic feedback, active power, and machine learning for prosthetic control, have opened new doors for improved functioning, satisfaction, and overall quality of life. However, little attention has been paid to ethical considerations surrounding the development and translation of prosthetic technologies into clinical practice. This article, based on current literature, presents perspectives surrounding ethical considerations from the authors' multidisciplinary views as prosthetists (HG, AM, CLM, MGF), as well as combined research experience working directly with people using prostheses (AM, CLM, MGF), wearable technologies for rehabilitation (MGF, BN), machine learning and artificial intelligence (BN, KKQ), and ethics of advanced technologies (KKQ). The target audience for this article includes developers, manufacturers, and researchers of prosthetic devices and related technology. We present several ethical considerations for current advances in prosthetic technology, as well as topics for future research, that may inform product and policy decisions and positively influence the lives of those who can benefit from advances in prosthetic technology.

The awareness and determinants of diabetic foot ulcer prevention among diabetic patients: Insights from NHANES (2011-2018)

The prevention of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) precedes treatment, in that early prevention significantly reduces the incidence of foot ulcers. The main objectives of this study were to examine the current prevalence of proactive foot ulcer examinations among diabetic patients and analyze influencing factors, in order to provide a scientific reference for the prevention of DFU in diabetic patients. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011-2018 (n = 1278) data were utilized in this cross-sectional study. The dependent variable was whether patients underwent self-initiated foot ulcer inspections; risk factors that may lead to foot ulcers were included as independent variables. To explore the connection between the patient's subjective motivation to inspect foot ulcers and risk variables, the weighted logistic regression model was further carried out. Among all risk factors, race, body mass index (BMI) and hypertension were statistically significant between whether patients were examined for foot ulcers or not. In the fully adjusted logistic regression model, only hypertension was positively correlated with diabetic patient-initiated examination for foot ulcers. This study suggests that there is still room for improvement in the knowledge and behavior of diabetic patients to be proactive in preventing DFU. Health care and community workers should conduct targeted training on diabetic foot prevention to reduce and prevent DFU by reinforcing knowledge to build positive attitudes and drive preventive behavior change.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Management of Diabetic Feet

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic medical condition affecting many individuals worldwide and leads to billions of dollars spent within the healthcare system for its treatment and complications. Complications from diabetes include diabetic foot conditions that can have a devasting impact on quality of life. Diabetic foot ulcers and amputations occur in minority individuals at an increased rate compared to Caucasian individuals. This review provides an update examining the racial and ethnic disparities in the management of diabetic foot conditions and the differences in rates of amputation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current research continues to show a disparity as it relates to diabetic foot management. There are novel treatment options for diabetic foot ulcers that are currently being explored. However, there continues to be a lack in racial diversity in new treatment studies conducted in the USA. Individuals from racial and ethnic minority groups have diabetes at higher rates compared to Caucasian individuals, and are also more likely to develop diabetic foot ulcers and receive amputations. Over the last few years, more efforts have been made to improve health disparities. However, there needs to be an improvement in increasing racial diversity when investigating new therapies for diabetic foot ulcers.

Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Review

Importance

Approximately 18.6 million people worldwide are affected by a diabetic foot ulcer each year, including 1.6 million people in the United States. These ulcers precede 80% of lower extremity amputations among people diagnosed with diabetes and are associated with an increased risk of death.

Observations

Neurological, vascular, and biomechanical factors contribute to diabetic foot ulceration. Approximately 50% to 60% of ulcers become infected, and about 20% of moderate to severe infections lead to lower extremity amputations. The 5-year mortality rate for individuals with a diabetic foot ulcer is approximately 30%, exceeding 70% for those with a major amputation. The mortality rate for people with diabetic foot ulcers is 231 deaths per 1000 person-years, compared with 182 deaths per 1000 person-years in people with diabetes without foot ulcers. People who are Black, Hispanic, or Native American and people with low socioeconomic status have higher rates of diabetic foot ulcer and subsequent amputation compared with White people. Classifying ulcers based on the degree of tissue loss, ischemia, and infection can help identify risk of limb-threatening disease. Several interventions reduce risk of ulcers compared with usual care, such as pressure-relieving footwear (13.3% vs 25.4%; relative risk, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.28-0.84), foot skin measurements with off-loading when hot spots (ie, greater than 2 °C difference between the affected foot and the unaffected foot) are found (18.7% vs 30.8%; relative risk, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.31-0.84), and treatment of preulcer signs. Surgical debridement, reducing pressure from weight bearing on the ulcer, and treating lower extremity ischemia and foot infection are first-line therapies for diabetic foot ulcers. Randomized clinical trials support treatments to accelerate wound healing and culture-directed oral antibiotics for localized osteomyelitis. Multidisciplinary care, typically consisting of podiatrists, infectious disease specialists, and vascular surgeons, in close collaboration with primary care clinicians, is associated with lower major amputation rates relative to usual care (3.2% vs 4.4%; odds ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.32-0.51). Approximately 30% to 40% of diabetic foot ulcers heal at 12 weeks, and recurrence after healing is estimated to be 42% at 1 year and 65% at 5 years.

Conclusions and Relevance

Diabetic foot ulcers affect approximately 18.6 million people worldwide each year and are associated with increased rates of amputation and death. Surgical debridement, reducing pressure from weight bearing, treating lower extremity ischemia and foot infection, and early referral for multidisciplinary care are first-line therapies for diabetic foot ulcers.

Metrics of Gender Differences in Mortality Risk after Diabetic Foot Disease

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to clarify any gender differences in the mortality risk of people with DFD since patients with diabetic foot disease (DFD) are at a high risk of mortality and, at the same time, are more likely to be men.

METHODS

From regional administrative sources, the survival probability was retrospectively evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method and using the Cox proportional-hazards model comparing people with DFD to those without DFD across the years 2011-2018 in Tuscany, Italy. Gender difference in mortality was evaluated by the ratio of hazard ratios (RHR) of men to women after initial DFD hospitalizations (n = 11,529) or in a cohort with prior history of DFD hospitalizations (n = 11,246).

RESULTS

In both cohorts, the survival probability after DFD was lower among women. Compared to those without DFD, after initial DFD hospitalizations, the mortality risk was significantly (18%) higher for men compared to women. This excess risk was particularly high after major amputations but also after ulcers, infections, gangrene, or Charcot, with a lower reduction after revascularization procedures among men. In the cohort that included people with a history of prior DFD hospitalizations, except for the risk of minor amputations being higher for men, there was no gender difference in mortality risk.

CONCLUSIONS

In people with DFD, the overall survival probability was lower among women. Compared to those without DFD after a first DFD hospitalization, men were at higher risk of mortality. This excess risk disappeared in groups with a history of previous DFD hospitalizations containing a greater percentage of women who were older and probably had a longer duration of diabetes and thus becoming, over time, progressively frailer than men.

Using the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities framework to better understand disparities in major amputations

Recently, the United States experienced its first resurgence of major amputations in more than 20 years. Compounding this rise is a longstanding history of disparities. Patients identifying as non-Hispanic Black are twice as likely to lose a limb as those identifying as non-Hispanic White. Those identifying as Latino face a 30% increase. Rural patients are also more likely to undergo major amputations, and the rural-urban disparity is widening. We used the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities framework to better understand these disparities and identify common factors contributing to them. Common factors were abundant and included increased prevalence of diabetes, possible lower rates of foot self-care, transportation barriers to medical appointments, living in disadvantaged neighborhoods, and lack of insurance. Solutions within and outside the health care realm are needed. Health care-specific interventions that embed preventative and ambulatory care services within communities may be particularly high yield.

Management patterns and outcomes of patients hospitalized with diabetic foot ulcers at one tertiary care hospital

A diabetic foot ulcer is present in approximately 2.4% of hospitalized patients. Care for diabetic foot ulcers is highly variable. We sought to describe care practice patterns and risk factors for poor outcomes for patients hospitalized with a diabetic foot ulcer in our institution, an 894-bed tertiary care academic hospital located in downtown Chicago, IL. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized with a diabetic foot ulcer between March 3rd, 2018 and December 31st, 2019. We categorized patients into having an uncomplicated ulcer or a complicated ulcer with cellulitis, wound infection, osteomyelitis, or gangrene. We evaluated rates of diagnostic resource utilization (imaging, cultures, biopsies, and antibiotics) and outcomes of osteomyelitis, amputation, and death. There were 305 patients of interest in the study cohort. A complicated lower extremity ulcer was found in 79% of patients. Amputation was required in 25% of patients, 21% were readmitted, and 13% died. Imaging was obtained in less than 50% of all patients, and in 60% or less of those with osteomyelitis. Bone biopsies were rarely acquired. Empiric antibiotics were prescribed in 77% of patients with osteomyelitis. Male, Black or African-American patients, and those with high Charlson score had the highest risk of poor outcomes. Care practices for patients hospitalized with diabetic foot ulcers were highly variable. Future interventions should target standardization to improve outcomes, with particular attention to health inequities as vulnerable populations have a higher risk of poor outcomes.

Etiology, Epidemiology, and Disparities in the Burden of Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are a major source of preventable morbidity in adults with diabetes. Consequences of foot ulcers include decline in functional status, infection, hospitalization, lower-extremity amputation, and death. The lifetime risk of foot ulcer is 19% to 34%, and this number is rising with increased longevity and medical complexity of people with diabetes. Morbidity following incident ulceration is high, with recurrence rates of 65% at 3-5 years, lifetime lower-extremity amputation incidence of 20%, and 5-year mortality of 50-70%. New data suggest overall amputation incidence has increased by as much as 50% in some regions over the past several years after a long period of decline, especially in young and racial and ethnic minority populations. DFU are a common and highly morbid complication of diabetes. The pathway to ulceration, involving loss of sensation, ischemia, and minor trauma, is well established. Amputation and mortality after DFU represent late-stage complications and are strongly linked to poor diabetes management. Current efforts to improve care of patients with DFU have not resulted in consistently lower amputation rates, with evidence of widening disparities and implications for equity in diabetes care. Prevention and early detection of DFU through guideline-directed multidisciplinary care is critical to decrease the morbidity and disparities associated with DFU. This review describes the epidemiology, presentation, and sequelae of DFU, summarizes current evidence-based recommendations for screening and prevention, and highlights disparities in care and outcomes.