Predictors of Long-Term Outcome in Patients with Well-Differentiated Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors After Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with 177Lu-Octreotate

Prediction of lesion-based response to PRRT using baseline somatostatin receptor PET

Aim

The heterogeneous expression of somatostatin receptors in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) leads to significant intra-individual variability in tracer uptake during pre-therapeutic [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT for patients receiving peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). This study aims to evaluate the lesion-based relationship between receptor-mediated tracer uptake and the functional response to PRRT.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 32 patients with metastatic GEP-NET (12 pancreatic and 20 non-pancreatic), all treated with [177Lu]Lu-octreotate (4 cycles, with a mean of 7.9 GBq per cycle). [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT was performed at baseline and 3 months after the final PRRT cycle. Tumor uptake was quantified using the standardized uptake value (SUV). For each patient, 2 to 3 well-delineated tumor lesions were selected as target lesions. SUVmax, SUVmean (automated segmentation with a 50% SUVmax threshold), and corresponding tumor-to-liver ratios (SUVmaxT/L and SUVmeanT/L) were calculated. Functional tumor response was assessed based on the relative change in metabolic tumor volume (%ΔTVPET). The correlation between baseline SUV parameters and lesion-based functional response was analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation.

Results

A total of 71 lesions were included in the analysis. The mean baseline SUVmax and SUVmean were 28.1 ± 15.9 and 13.6 ± 5.1, respectively. Three months after PRRT completion, the mean %ΔTVPET was 39.6 ± 52.1%. Baseline SUVmax and SUVmean demonstrated a poor correlation with lesion-based response (p = 0.706 and p = 0.071, respectively). In contrast, SUVmaxT/L and SUVmeanT/L were significantly correlated with lesion-based response (SUVmeanT/L: p = 0.011, r = 0.412; SUVmaxT/L: p = 0.004, r = 0.434). Among patient characteristics-including primary tumor origin, baseline tumor volume, and metastatic sites-only pancreatic origin was significantly associated with functional tumor volume reduction (ΔTVPET%: 56.8 ± 39.8 in pancreatic vs. 28.4 ± 50.1 in non-pancreatic NET; p = 0.020).

Conclusion

The lesion-based molecular response to PRRT correlates with pretreatment somatostatin receptor PET uptake, particularly when expressed as tumor-to-liver SUV ratios (SUVmaxT/L and SUVmeanT/L).

Organ-specific response to [177Lu]DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) assessed by sequential [68Ga]DOTATOC PET/CT in patients with metastatic small intestine neuroendocrine tumors

PURPOSE

To evaluate organ-specific response to [177Lu]DOTATATE Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) in patients with small intestine neuroendocrine tumor (SiNET) through [68Ga]DOTATOC PET/CT, and to analyze tumor uptake and functional volume variations at different metastatic sites in relation to disease progression during clinical follow-up after treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 33 metastatic patients. PET/CT were performed pre-treatment (PET0), mid-treatment after two PRRT cycles (PET2), and post-treatment (PET4). SUVmax and somatostatin receptor-expressing tumor volume (SRETV) were measured in liver, lymph node, peritoneum/mesentery, and bone metastases.

RESULTS

Liver metastases showed significant reduction in both SUVmax and SRETV from PET0 to PET4, with early response evident after two PRRT cycles. Nodal lesions exhibited a delayed response, with significant reductions at PET4. Peritoneal and bone metastases showed a continuous decline in SUVmax, but no significant changes in SRETV. Objective response rates were highest in liver metastases after treatment completion with lesser responses in nodal, peritoneal, and bone lesions. At a median follow-up of 24.3 months, 70% of patients experienced disease progression, while 30% did not. Liver metastases showed no significant changes in SUVmax or SRETV regardless of progression. Conversely, in non-progressing patients, peritoneal/mesenteric lesions showed a significant reduction in SUVmax, with unchanged SRETV, and nodal metastases exhibited reduced SRETV. Bone lesions in non-progressing patients showed significant decreases in both SUVmax and SRETV.

CONCLUSION

[177Lu]DOTATATE PRRT effectively reduces tumor functional activity in patients with SiNETs, with organ-specific responses highlighting the need for personalized treatment strategies to optimize efficacy and minimize toxicity.

Grade 3 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Refractory to Chemotherapy Successfully Treated with Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Leading to Conversion Surgery

A 59-year-old woman was diagnosed with a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (P-NET; grade 3, Ki67: 25%) with multiple liver and lymph node metastases and started chemotherapy with streptozosin (500 mg/m2/day) in combination with lanreotide acetate (120 mg). After six courses of (daily) streptozosin, the patient had progressive disease, as assessed by computed tomography (CT), and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) was started as second-line treatment. As PRRT was remarkably successful and the tumor shrank, surgery was performed to resect the primary pancreatic tumor, liver metastases, and lymph node metastases. CT evaluation performed six months after the surgery showed a complete response.

177Lu-DOTATATE Plus Capecitabine Versus 177Lu-DOTATATE Alone in Patients with Advanced Grade 1/2 Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (LuCAP): A Randomized, Phase 2 Trial

177Lu-DOTATATE has emerged as a viable treatment strategy for advanced well-differentiated grade 1/2 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Few retrospective studies have shown concomitant 177Lu-DOTATATE with radiosensitizing low-dose capecitabine to be effective in advanced NETs. However, this has not been validated in prospective randomized-controlled trials. Methods: In this investigator-initiated, parallel-group, open-label, phase 2 trial, patients with grade 1/2 GEP-NETs, having progressive somatostatin receptor-positive, locally advanced, or metastatic disease on 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to 177Lu-DOTATATE plus capecitabine (experimental arm) or 177Lu-DOTATATE only (control arm). 177Lu-DOTATATE was administered at approximately 7.4 GBq/cycle intravenously, for up to 4 cycles, at 8 wk intervals, whereas capecitabine was given at 1,250 mg/m2/d orally from day 0 to day 14 of each cycle of 177Lu-DOTATATE. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. Secondary endpoints included the disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse events. Results: Seventy-two patients (median age, 53 y; range, 18-79 y) were enrolled. The objective response rate was 33.3% (95% CI, 18.6-50.9%) in the experimental arm versus 30.6% (95% CI, 16.4-48.1%) in the control arm (P = 0.800). The disease control rate was 88.9% (95% CI, 73.9-96.9%) and 91.7% (95% CI, 77.5-98.2%) in the experimental and control arms, respectively (P = 1.000). The estimated median progression-free survival in the experimental arm was 29 mo (95% CI, 22-29 mo) versus 31 mo (95% CI, 29-32 mo) in the control arm (P = 0.401). The median overall survival was not reached in either arm (P = 0.876). Overall, adverse events of at least grade 3 were noted in 7 patients in the experimental arm versus 6 patients in the control arm (P = 0.759). Conclusion: Based on the results of this trial, the addition of low-dose capecitabine to 177Lu-DOTATATE in advanced grade 1/2 GEP-NETs did not lead to superior radiographic responses. Further studies are needed to evaluate its potential role in high-grade NETs.

Biomarkers to Inform Prognosis and Treatment for Unresectable or Metastatic GEP-NENs

Importance

Evidence-based treatment decisions for advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) require individualized patient-centered decision-making that accounts for patient and cancer characteristics.

Objective

To create an accessible guidance document to educate clinicians and patients on biomarkers informing prognosis and treatment in unresectable or metastatic GEP-NENs.

Methods

A multidisciplinary panel in-person workshop was convened to define methods. English language articles published from January 2016 to January 2023 in PubMed (MEDLINE) and relevant conference abstracts were reviewed to investigate prognostic and treatment-informing features in unresectable or metastatic GEP-NENs. Data from included studies were used to form evidence-based recommendations. Quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were determined using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework. Consensus was reached via electronic survey following a modified Delphi method.

Findings

A total of 131 publications were identified, including 8 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, 6 randomized clinical trials, 29 prospective studies, and 88 retrospective cohort studies. After 2 rounds of surveys, 24 recommendations and 5 good clinical practice statements were developed, with full consensus among panelists. Recommendations focused on tumor and functional imaging characteristics, blood-based biomarkers, and carcinoid heart disease. A single strong recommendation was made for symptomatic carcinoid syndrome informing treatment in midgut neuroendocrine tumors. Conditional recommendations were made to use grade, morphology, primary site, and urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic levels to inform treatment. The guidance document was endorsed by the Commonwealth Neuroendocrine Tumour Collaboration and the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society.

Conclusions and Relevance

The study results suggest that select factors have sufficient evidence to inform care in GEP-NENs, but the evidence for most biomarkers is weak. This article may help guide management and identify gaps for future research to advance personalized medicine and improve outcomes for patients with GEP-NENs.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Improves Survival in Patients Who Progress After Resection of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an effective treatment for advanced gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). We investigated a 2-decade experience with PRRT to determine whether PRRT confers a survival advantage to patients who progress after surgery versus other therapies.

METHODS

We identified patients from our clinic who had resection/cytoreduction of GEP-NETs, then disease progression by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. The Kaplan-Meier method assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), calculated from progression after surgery (no-PRRT group) or the start of PRRT. Cox regression with time-dependent covariates controlled for immortal time bias and other confounders.

RESULTS

Overall, 237 patients progressed after surgery; 95 received PRRT and 142 did not. No differences existed in sex, T or N stage, tumor grade/differentiation, primary site, or time to progression; 94% of PRRT patients had metastases at diagnosis versus 77% in the no-PRRT group. Median PFS was longer in the PRRT group versus the no-PRRT group (32.4 vs. 11.0 months, p < 0.001), as was median OS (49.8 vs. 38.4 months; p = 0.009). In subgroup analysis, the PRRT group had improved PFS in small bowel NETs and pancreatic NETs. Time-dependent covariate analysis revealed a lower risk of death associated with PRRT (hazard ratio 0.61, p = 0.028) after adjusting for sex, age, M stage, tumor grade, and primary site.

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection and cytoreduction is an effective treatment for patients with GEP-NETs, but most patients with metastatic disease develop recurrent disease. Surgery followed by PRRT after progression conferred superior PFS and OS over no PRRT/other therapies, and is an effective strategy for managing patients with GEP-NETs.

Subgrading of G2 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors as 2A (Ki67 3% to < 10%) Versus 2B (10% to ≤ 20%) Identifies Behaviorally Distinct Subsets in Keeping with the Evolving Management Protocols

BACKGROUND

Grade 1/2 PanNETs are mostly managed similarly, typically without any adjunct treatment with the belief that their overall metastasis rate is low. In oncology literature, Ki67-index of 10% is increasingly being used as the cutoff in stratifying patients to different protocols, although there are no systematic pathology-based studies supporting this approach.

METHODS

Ki67-index was correlated with clinicopathologic parameters in 190 resected PanNETs. A validation cohort (n = 145) was separately analyzed.

RESULTS

In initial cohort, maximally selected rank statistics method revealed 12% to be the discriminatory cutoff (close to 10% rule of thumb). G2b cases had liver/distant metastasis rate of almost threefold higher than that of G2a and showed significantly higher frequency of all histopathologic signs of aggressiveness (tumor size, perineural/vascular invasion, infiltrative growth pattern, lymph node metastasis). In validation cohort, these figures were as striking. When all cases were analyzed together, compared with G1, the G2b category had nine times higher liver/distant metastasis rate (6.1 vs. 58.5%; p < 0.001) and three times higher lymph node metastasis rate (20.5 vs. 65.1%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

G2b PanNETs act very similar to G3, supporting management protocols that regard them as potential therapy candidates. Concerning local management, metastatic behavior in G2b cases indicate they may not be as amenable for conservative approaches, such as watchful waiting or enucleation. This substaging should be considered into diagnostic guidelines, and clinical trials need to be devised to determine the more appropriate management protocols for G2b (10% to ≤ 20%) group, which shows liver/distant metastasis in more than half of the cases, which at minimum warrants closer follow-up.

Trans-arterial embolization versus chemoembolization for neuroendocrine liver metastases: a propensity matched analysis

INTRODUCTION

Locoregional therapies are a mainstay of treatment for patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM), yet the optimal transarterial approach remains undefined and recent studies have raised concern over the safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

METHODS

Patients with NELM who underwent TACE or transarterial embolization (TAE) at a single institution between 2000-2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching (PSM) controlling for age, sex, bilateral disease, tumor size, lobar embolization, grade, and extrahepatic disease was utilized to compare short- and long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 412 patients with NELM, 329 underwent TACE and 83 TAE. Mean age was 60.7 ± 11.1 years. Patients primarily presented with synchronous (69.2%), bilateral (84.2%), and G1 disease (48.8%) and underwent staged procedures (55.8%). Following PSM, TACE was associated with slightly worse post-procedure laboratory values, but no difference in complications compared to TAE (23.3%vs29.3%, p = 0.247). TACE was associated with improved mean PFS (21.8vs10.7 months, p = 0.002), but no difference in radiographic size, chromogranin level, or median overall survival (50.0 months vs not met, p = 0.833).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with NELM, TACE was associated with similar short-term outcomes and improved PFS, but no difference in OS compared to TAE. These findings highlight the need for additional research on the optimal locoregional therapy for NELM.

Head-to-head comparison of contrast-enhanced CT, dual-layer spectral-detector CT, and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR in detecting neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases

PURPOSE

To explore the optimal of kiloelectron voltage (keV) of virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI) of dual-layer spectral-detector CT (DLCT) in detecting neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases (NETLM) and to investigate diagnostic performance of polyenergetic images (PEI), DLCT, and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR.

METHODS

Seventy-two patients with suspected NETLM who underwent DLCT and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR were retrospectively enrolled. Tumor signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were compared between PEI and VMI at 40-140 keV. Two radiologists read the CT examinations with and without VMI separately in consensus. Two other radiologists read the Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR in consensus. The diagnostic performance was evaluated. Reference standard was histopathology, follow-up, and interpretation of all available imaging.

RESULTS

The highest SNR and CNR were observed at VMI40keV, significantly higher than PEI in the arterial and venous phases (all P<0.01). A total of 477 lesions were identified (396 metastases, 81 benign lesions). Per-lesion AUC was 0.86, 0.91, and 0.97 (PEI, DLCT, and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR, respectively). Sensitivity of PEI, DLCT, and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI were 0.76, 0.86, and 0.95, respectively. DLCT significantly improved sensitivity compared to PEI. MR had significantly higher sensitivity than DLCT and PEI. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the difference in diagnostic performance was concentrated on lesions < 10 mm.

CONCLUSION

The image quality of VMI40keV is higher than that of PEI. DLCT with VMI40keV provides better diagnostic sensitivity for NETLM detection than PEI. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR yielded the best diagnostic performance for NETLM detection.

Intra-arterial PRRT with Lu-177 DOTATATE in Liver-dominant Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Early Assessment of Efficacy and Toxicity

Purpose

We proposed to administer Lu-177-DOTATATE in intra-arterial (IA) mode for higher first-pass localization to somatostatin receptors, higher residence time in liver metastases, and more radiation to tumor. This study aimed at assessing early hematological, renal and hepatotoxicity; and objective response to IA peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT).

Materials and Methods

Fourteen patients (4 females and 10 males) were prospectively assessed. 5/14 patients underwent 2 cycles, whereas 3/14 underwent 3 cycles, and 6/14 received 1 cycle of IA PRRT. 200 mCi of Lu-177-DOTATATE was administered in 15-20 min by IA route under angiographic guidance. Patients were asked to follow-up at 4 and 8 weeks with hematological, liver, and renal functional parameters, and Ga-68 DOTATATE positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) after 8 weeks. Response was assessed using RECIST 1.1 and EORTC PET criteria.

Results

Safety: 2/14 patients had high total and direct bilirubin, which reverted to normal after IA PRRT. Three patients had low albumin, which improved after 1 cycle. Nine patients showed no worsening of liver function. Two patients showed Grade 1 hematotoxicity which reverted to normal. Five patients showed high creatinine, but preserved glomerular filtration rate and EC clearance. On follow-up at 8 weeks, serum creatinine reverted to normal. Efficacy: In five patients who underwent 2 cycles of IA PRRT, 3 showed partial response (PR) on RECIST 1.1 and partial metabolic response (PMR) on EORTC criteria, whereas 2 showed stable disease (SD). In patients who underwent 3 cycles, 1 showed SD, whereas other patient showed PMR on DOTANOC PET/CT, with PR in size. Among the remaining seven patients, 5 showed PMR, whereas the other 2 showed SD. Thus 9/14 patients showed PR, whereas 5 showed SD on metabolic and size criteria.

Conclusions

IA PRRT is a safe and efficacious approach for the treatment of liver dominant metastatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Pathological complete response of initially unresectable multiple liver metastases achieved using combined peptide receptor radionuclide therapy and somatostatin analogs following pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor resection: a case report

BACKGROUND

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) serves as a novel and effective treatment option for somatostatin receptor-positive unresectable liver metastases of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). However, there are few reported cases of surgical resection for initially unresectable liver metastases of PNET that were converted to resectable after PRRT. Here we report a case where PRRT and somatostatin analogs (SSAs) led to a pathological complete response of initially unresectable multiple liver metastases following PNET resection.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 52-year-old man underwent pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for PNET at age 40 and subsequent hepatectomies for resectable liver metastases at 44 and 47 years of age. At age 48, a follow-up examination revealed unresectable multiple liver metastases, and PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy was initiated. After four cycles of PRRT, most liver metastases diminished according to imaging studies, and the remaining two hepatic lesions continued to shrink with additional lanreotide. Conversion surgery for liver metastases was successfully performed, revealing no viable tumor cells in tissue specimens. Seventeen months after surgery, imaging showed no detectable residual tumor or recurrence. We present a review of the relevant literature that highlights the significance of our findings.

CONCLUSIONS

This rare case highlights the pathological complete response of initially unresectable multiple liver metastases achieved by PRRT and SSAs following PNET resection, suggesting their potential as a multimodality treatment option for unresectable PNET.

Efficacy and Safety of Lu-177 DOTATATE Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients with Unresectable or Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in Korea

BACKGROUND

Lutetium (Lu)-177 peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is one of the standard treatments for somatostatin receptor-positive well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, limited Asian representation in the pivotal NETTER-1 trial and a lack of real-world data for Lu-177 PRRT from Asian regions exist.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Lu-177 PRRT in Korean patients with advanced NETs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study analyzed 64 patients treated with Lu-177 DOTATATE PRRT at the Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, between November 2019 and December 2022. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety profile.

RESULTS

The median age of patients was 55 years. Prior to PRRT, patients received a median of two lines (range 0-6) of systemic therapy. Fifty (78%) patients received the planned four cycles of Lu-177 DOTATATE PRRT. The median PFS was 21.7 months (95% confidence interval 16.7-not available) and the ORR was 20%. With a median follow-up of 15.7 months (range 1.0-39.3), the median OS was not reached and the 1-year OS rate was 88%. The median PFS was better in patients with grade 1-2 NETs than in those with grade 3 NET (not reached vs. 14.2 months; hazard ratio 3.15; p = 0.0058). Hematological toxicities were the common adverse events, including grade ≥ 3 anemia (7.8%), neutropenia (10.9%), and thrombocytopenia (9.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

In Korean patients with advanced NETs, Lu-177 DOTATATE PRRT showed efficacy and safety outcomes, consistent with those in the NETTER-1 trial and previous Western real-world studies.

Neuroendocrine liver metastases treated using transarterial radioembolization: Identification of prognostic parameters at 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT

PURPOSE

To identify prognostic clinical and imaging parameters for patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELMs) undergoing transarterial radioembolization (TARE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-seven patients (27 men; mean age, 64 years) with NELMs who received TARE, along with pre-procedure liver MRI and 68Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography/computed tomography were included. Apparent diffusion coefficient and standardized uptake value (SUV) of three liver metastases, normal spleen and liver were measured. SUVmax or SUVmean were used for the calculation of tumor-to-organ ratios (tumor-to-spleen and tumor-to-liver ratios) using all possible combinations (including SUVmax/SUVmax, SUVmax/SUVmean, and SUVmean/SUVmean). Clinical parameters (hepatic tumor-burden, presence of extra-hepatic metastases, chromograninA, Ki-67 and bilirubin levels) were assessed. Overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS) and hepatic progression-free survival (HPFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

Median overall survival, PFS and HPFS were 49.6, 13.1 and 28.3 months, respectively. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, low Ki-67 (≤ 5%), low hepatic tumor-burden (< 10%), absence of extrahepatic metastases, and increased Tmean/Lmax ratio were significant prognostic factors of longer overall survival and HPFS. High baseline chromograninA (> 1330 ng/mL) was associated with shorter HPFS. Tmean/Lmax > 1.9 yielded a median overall survival of 69 vs. 33 months (P < 0.04), and a median HPFS of 30 vs. 19 months (P = 0.09). For PFS, high baseline SUVmax of NELMs was the single significant parameter in the multivariable model. SUVmax > 28 resulted in a median PFS of 16.9 vs. 6.5 months, respectively (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

High preinterventional Tmean/Lmax ratios, and high SUVmax on 68Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography/computed tomography seem to have prognostic value in patients with NELMs undergoing TARE, potentially aiding patient selection and management alongside conventional variables.

Targeted radionuclide therapy in endocrine-related cancers: advances in the last decade

Targeted radionuclide therapy plays an increasingly important role in managing endocrine-related tumors and significantly advances the therapeutic landscape for patients with these diseases. With increasing FDA-approved therapies and advances in the field, come an increased knowledge of the potential for long-term toxicities associated with these therapies and the field must develop new strategies to increase potency and efficacy while individualizing the selection of patients to those most likely to respond to treatment. Novel agents and modalities of therapy are also being explored. This review will discuss the current landscape and describe the avenues for growth in the field currently being explored.

New horizon of radiopharmaceuticals in management of neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine neoplasms are rare and heterogenous group of tumors with varying degrees of clinical presentations and involvement of multiple organ systems in the body. In the modern clinical practice somatostatin receptor molecular imaging and targeted radioligand therapy plays a vital role in the diagnosis and management of the disease. Several new and promising radiotracers for NET imaging and theranostics, belonging to various groups and classes are being studied and investigated. This exponential growth of radiotracers poses concerns about the indication, clinical benefit, and safety profile of the agents. We discuss the basis behind these radiotracers clinical use, receptor targeting and intra and inter tumor heterogeneity. Furthermore, role of dual tracer imaging, combination therapy and potential applications of dosimetry in predicting treatment outcome and safety profile is reviewed. Individualized precision medicine with better tumor characterization, maximum therapeutic benefit and minimum toxicity is the way forward for future medicine.

The relationship between tumour dosimetry, response, and overall survival in patients with unresectable Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NEN) treated with 177Lu DOTATATE (LuTate)

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) delivers targeted radiation to Somatostatin Receptor (SSR) expressing Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NEN). We sought to assess the predictive and prognostic implications of tumour dosimetry with respect to response by 68 Ga DOTATATE (GaTate) PET/CT molecular imaging tumour volume of SSR (MITVSSR) change and RECIST 1.1, and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

Patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) NEN who received LuTate followed by quantitative SPECT/CT (Q-SPECT/CT) the next day (Jul 2010 to Jan 2019) were retrospectively reviewed. Single time-point (STP) lesional dosimetry was performed for each cycle using population-based pharmacokinetic modelling. MITVSSR and RECIST 1.1 were measured at 3-months post PRRT.

RESULTS

Median of 4 PRRT cycles were administered to 90 patients (range 2-5 cycles; mean 27.4 GBq cumulative activity; mean 7.6 GBq per cycle). 68% received at least one cycle with radiosensitising chemotherapy (RSC). RECIST 1.1 partial response was 24%, with 70% stable and 7% progressive disease. Cycle 1 radiation dose in measurable lesions was associated with local response (odds ratio 1.5 per 50 Gy [95% CI: 1.1-2.0], p = 0.002) when adjusted by tumour grade and RSC. Median change in MITVSSR was -63% (interquartile range -84 to -29), with no correlation with radiation dose to the most avid lesion on univariable or multivariant analyses (5.6 per 10 Gy [95% CI: -1.6, 12.8], p = 0.133). OS at 5-years was 68% (95% CI: 56-78%). Neither baseline MITVSSR (hazard ratio 1.1 [95% CI: 1.0, 1.2], p = 0.128) nor change in baseline MITVSSR (hazard ratio 1.0 [95% CI: 1.0, 1.1], p = 0.223) were associated with OS when adjusted by tumour grade and RSC but RSC was (95% CI: 0.2, 0.8, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Radiation dose to tumour during PRRT was predictive of radiologic response but not survival. Survival outcomes may relate to other biological factors. There was no evidence that MITVSSR change was associated with OS, but a larger study is needed.

A dosimetric comparison of systemic peptide receptor radionuclide therapy and intra-arterial peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with liver dominant gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

OBJECTIVES

Intra-arterial radionuclide therapy (IART) treatment allows direct delivery of 177 Lu-DOTATATE to the overexpressed somatostatin-positive neuroendocrine liver metastases, which led to higher tumour concentration compared with systemic radionuclide therapy (SRT). The aim was to evaluate and compare the absorbed doses of both IART and SRT to organs and hepatic metastatic sites.

METHODS

A total of 48 patients received SRT and IART. In SRT, activity was administered intravenously, whereas in IART, activity was administered directly into hepatic arteries. The sequential whole-body images were acquired at 2, 4, 24, 72 and 160 h. The reconstructed whole-body planar and single-photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography images were processed using the Dosimetry Toolkit for the estimation of normalized cumulated activity in the organs and tumour lesions. The absorbed dose was computed using OLINDA EXM 2.0 software.

RESULTS

The median absorbed dose (mGy/MBq) of kidneys and spleen in IART was compared with SRT and found to be decreased by 30.7% ( P  = 0.03) and 37.5% ( P  = 0.08), whereas it was found to be increased by 40% ( P  = 0.26) and 8.1% ( P  = 0.28) in the liver and lungs. The median dose (mGy/MBq) of tumours determined in IART was found to be increased by 62.2% ( P  = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

IART with 177 Lu-DOTATATE significantly increases tumour dose while reducing overall systemic toxicity in comparison to SRT treatment. After considering the maximum tolerance limit of kidneys in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, the number of treatment cycles and injected activity can be optimized further with IART for better response and survival.

Safety and Efficacy of 177Lu-DOTATATE in Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients With Extensive Bone Disease

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of 177Lu-DOTATATE in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and extensive bone metastases, that is, more than 50% of the skeleton involved.

METHOD

A single-center retrospective analysis was performed in 30 patients (13 women and 17 men, mean age, 60 years; range, 35-77 years) undergoing 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy. Patients had progressive metastatic NETs with extensive skeletal metastases (>50% skeletal involvement seen on baseline 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT). The average administered activity was 7.308 (SD, 0.02) GBq per cycle with average treatment interval of 15 weeks. Survival analyses (progression-free survival [PFS], overall survival), radiological response assessment, toxicity assessment, and health-related quality of life (QoL) was performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 26 patients completed 4 cycles, and 4 patients had less than 4 cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE. One patient (3%) did not complete treatment because of hematological toxicity. The estimated median PFS and median overall survival were calculated at 27 and 35 months, respectively. End-of-treatment radiological assessment showed partial response in 5 patients (17%), stable disease in 20 patients (66%), and radiological progressive disease in 3 patients (10%). Clinical progression was seen in a further 2 patients (7%).The incidence of grade 3/4 bone marrow toxicity was 10%. No patient had grade 3/4 peptide receptor radionuclide therapy-related nephrotoxicity. There was overall improvement in global QoL score (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Gastrointestinal NET-21) (P = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

177Lu-DOTATATE seems to have satisfactory therapeutic outcome in patients with advanced metastatic NET with extensive bone disease, with reasonable PFS and significant improvement in the global health-related QoL. The bone marrow toxicity was within the accepted range. Increasing the interval between cycles does not seem to reduce efficacy and may reduce toxicity, ensuring the bone marrow has sufficient time to recover between cycles.

Safety and Therapeutic Optimization of Lutetium-177 Based Radiopharmaceuticals

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using Lutetium-177 (¹⁷⁷Lu) based radiopharmaceuticals has emerged as a therapeutic area in the field of nuclear medicine and oncology, allowing for personalized medicine. Since the first market authorization in 2018 of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTATATE (Lutathera®) targeting somatostatin receptor type 2 in the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, intensive research has led to transfer innovative ¹⁷⁷Lu containing pharmaceuticals to the clinic. Recently, a second market authorization in the field was obtained for [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (Pluvicto®) in the treatment of prostate cancer. The efficacy of ¹⁷⁷Lu radiopharmaceuticals are now quite well-reported and data on the safety and management of patients are needed. This review will focus on several clinically tested and reported tailored approaches to enhance the risk-benefit trade-off of radioligand therapy. The aim is to help clinicians and nuclear medicine staff set up safe and optimized procedures using the approved ¹⁷⁷Lu based radiopharmaceuticals.

Neuroendocrine Tumors: Genomics and Molecular Biomarkers with a Focus on Metastatic Disease

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are considered rare tumors that originate from specialized endocrine cells. Patients often present with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis, which negatively impacts their quality of life and overall survival. An understanding of the genetic mutations that drive these tumors and the biomarkers used to detect new NET cases is important to identify patients at an earlier disease stage. Elevations in CgA, synaptophysin, and 5-HIAA are most commonly used to identify NETs and assess prognosis; however, new advances in whole genome sequencing and multigenomic blood assays have allowed for a greater understanding of the drivers of NETs and more sensitive and specific tests to diagnose tumors and assess disease response. Treating NET liver metastases is important in managing hormonal or carcinoid symptoms and is imperative to improve patient survival. Treatment for liver-dominant disease is varied; delineating biomarkers that may predict response will allow for better patient stratification.

Wnt/β-catenin modulating drugs regulate somatostatin receptor expression and internalization of radiolabelled octreotide in neuroendocrine tumor cells

BACKGROUND

Differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) express somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), targets for therapy with either unlabeled or radioactively labeled somatostatin analogs (SSA). Associated with worse prognosis, dedifferentiated NET loose SSTR expression, which may be linked to deregulation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling on an intracellular level. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway alterations on SSTR expression and its function in NET.

METHODS

The NET cell lines BON-1 and QGP-1 were incubated with the Wnt-inhibitors 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-aza-CdR), Quercetin, or Niclosamide, or the Wnt activator lithium chloride (LiCl). Expression of SSTR1, SSTR2, and SSTR5 was determined by quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR), immunocytomicroscopy and western blot. Changes in the Wnt pathway were analyzed by qRT-PCR of selected target genes and the TaqMan Array Human WNT Pathway. Receptor-associated function was determined by measuring the cellular uptake of [125I-Tyr3] octreotide.

RESULTS

The mRNAs of SSTRs 1-5 were expressed in both cell lines. Wnt inhibitors caused downregulation of Wnt target genes, while 5-aza-CdR had the highest inhibitory effect. LiCl lead to an upregulation of Wnt genes, which was more marked in QGP-1 cells. SSTR expression increased in both cell lines upon Wnt inhibition. All three Wnt inhibitors lead to a marked increase in the specific uptake of [125I-Tyr3]octreotide, with 5-aza-CdR showing the greatest effect (increase by more than 50% in BON-1 cells), while a decreased uptake of [125I-Tyr3]octreotide was seen upon activation of Wnt signaling by LiCl.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate here that Wnt signaling orchestrates SSTR expression and function in a preclinical NET model. Wnt inhibition increases [125I-Tyr3]octreotide uptake offering an opportunity to enhance the efficacy of SSTR-targeted theranostic approaches.

225Ac-Labeled Somatostatin Analogs in the Management of Neuroendocrine Tumors: From Radiochemistry to Clinic

The widespread use of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) represents a major therapeutic breakthrough in nuclear medicine, particularly since the introduction of 177Lu-radiolabeled somatostatin analogs. These radiopharmaceuticals have especially improved progression-free survival and quality of life in patients with inoperable metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors expressing somatostatin receptors. In the case of aggressive or resistant disease, the use of somatostatin derivatives radiolabeled with an alpha-emitter could provide a promising alternative. Among the currently available alpha-emitting radioelements, actinium-225 has emerged as the most suitable candidate, especially regarding its physical and radiochemical properties. Nevertheless, preclinical and clinical studies on these radiopharmaceuticals are still few and heterogeneous, despite the growing momentum for their future use on a larger scale. In this context, this report provides a comprehensive and extensive overview of the development of 225Ac-labeled somatostatin analogs; particular emphasis is placed on the challenges associated with the production of 225Ac, its physical and radiochemical properties, as well as the place of 225Ac-DOTATOC and 225Ac-DOTATATE in the management of patients with advanced metastatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Tumour Heterogeneity and the Consequent Practical Challenges in the Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Tumour heterogeneity is a common phenomenon in neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) and a significant cause of treatment failure and disease progression. Genetic and epigenetic instability, along with proliferation of cancer stem cells and alterations in the tumour microenvironment, manifest as intra-tumoural variability in tumour biology in primary tumours and metastases. This may change over time, especially under selective pressure during treatment. The gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) tract is the most common site for NENs, and their diagnosis and treatment depends on the specific characteristics of the disease, in particular proliferation activity, expression of somatostatin receptors and grading. Somatostatin receptor expression has a major role in the diagnosis and treatment of GEP-NENs, while Ki-67 is also a valuable prognostic marker. Intra- and inter-tumour heterogeneity in GEP-NENS, however, may lead to inaccurate assessment of the disease and affect the reliability of the available diagnostic, prognostic and predictive tests. In this review, we summarise the current available evidence of the impact of tumour heterogeneity on tumour diagnosis and treatment of GEP-NENs. Understanding and accurately measuring tumour heterogeneity could better inform clinical decision making in NENs.

Case report: Metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour associated with portal vein thrombosis; successful management with subsequent pregnancies

Background

Splanchnic vein thrombosis due to co-existing metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (pNET) and JAK2V617F mutation is a rare condition.

Case report

Here we present a case of a young woman with complete remission of a non-functioning grade 2 pNET with unresectable liver metastases, coexisting with JAK2V617F mutation. Splenectomy and distal pancreatectomy were performed. Neither surgical removal, nor radiofrequency ablation of the liver metastases was possible. Therefore, somatostatin analogue (SSA) and enoxaparine were started. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) was given in 3 cycles 6-8 weeks apart. Genetic testing revealed no multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) gene mutations. After shared decision making with the patient, she gave birth to two healthy children, currently 2 and 4 years old. On pregnancy confirmation, SSA treatment was interrupted and resumed after each delivery. Ten years after the diagnosis of pNET, no tumour is detectable by MRI or somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. PRRT followed by continuous SSA therapy, interrupted only during pregnancies, resulted in complete remission and enabled the patient to complete two successful pregnancies.

What have we learnt from the past - would treatment decisions for GEP-NET patients differ between 2012 to 2016 by the new recommendations in 2022?

BACKGROUND

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors with a broad range of local and systemic treatment options. Still a lack of data regarding treatment sequences exists. The aim of this study was to analyse outcomes in GEP-NETs depending on stage and treatment steps and compare our treatment decisions to the latest treatment recommendations of European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2020 for GEP-NETs.

METHODS

Patients were included in this retrospective single-center analysis from 2012-2016. All patients suffering from a GEP-NET, who were screened, treated or evaluated at ENETS Center in Zurich, Switzerland were included in analysis. Patients with any other diagnosis of NET were not included. We used Kaplan Meier estimator as well as Cox regression to compare survival rates between different sites of localization, grades or stages and treatment sequences.

RESULTS

Overall, we identified 256 GEP-NETs, most in advanced stage (62%) and located in small intestine tract or pancreatic gland. Survival depended on stage, grade, primary site and duration of response for the early systemic treatment. On average patients underwent 2.6 different treatment modalities, mostly depending on stage and higher tumor grade. Surgery was performed early but also in advanced stages, usually followed by Somatostatine-Agonist modalities. In distant disease (Stage IV), we investigated a positive effect of PFS after treatment with Somatostatine Analogues (SSA) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21 - 0.97; p = 0.04) and systemic treatment (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.26 - 0.99; p = 0.047) if patients underwent prior surgery or endoscopic resection. Kaplan Meier distributions predict shorter OS in distant disease (Stage IV), (Figure. 1; HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.46 - 2.89; log-rank test, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This retrospective analysis presents a great overview of all patients', disease and treatment characteristics of GEP-NETs at ENETS Center in Zurich, Switzerland. We illustrated survival (PFS) depending on implemented therapies. According to these findings, we formed a suggested treatment algorithm for advanced GEP-NETs, which does not differ from the latest treatment recommendation by ESMO guidelines for GEP-NETs. The results of this project may define GEP-NET patients' selection for upcoming clinical prospective studies.

Relevance of Volumetric Parameters Applied to [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in NET Patients Treated with PRRT

BACKGROUND

this study aims to explore the prognostic and predictive role of volumetric parameters on [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in neuroendocrine tumors (NET) patients treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 39 NET patients (21 male, 18 female; mean age 60.7 y) within the FENET-2016 trial (CTiD:NCT04790708). PRRT was proposed with [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTATOC alone or combined with [⁹⁰Y]Y-DOTATOC. [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT was performed at baseline and 3 months after PRRT. For each PET/CT, we calculated SUVmax, SUVmean, somatostatin receptor expressing tumor volume (SRETV), and total lesion somatostatin receptor expression (TLSRE), as well as their percentage of changes (Δ), both for liver (_L) and for total tumor burden (_WB). Early clinical response (3 months after PRRT) and PFS were evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 and institutional NET board.

RESULTS

Early clinical response identified 9 partial response (PR), 25 stable disease (SD), and 5 progressive disease (PD). Post-SRETV_WB and ΔSRETV_WB were progressively increased among response groups (p = 0.02 and p = 0.03, respectively). Likewise, median post-SRETV_L was significantly higher in PD patients (p = 0.03). SUVmax and TLSRE did not correlate with early clinical response. Median PFS was 31 months. Patients with ΔSRETV_WB lower than -4.17% as well as those with post-SRETV_WB lower than 34.8 cm³ showed a longer PFS (p = 0.006 and p = 0.06, respectively). Finally, multivariate analysis identified ΔSRETV_WB as an independent predictor for PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

our results could strengthen the importance of evaluating the burden of disease on [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in NET patients treated with PRRT.

A Clinical Guide to Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE in Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-[DOTA⁰,Tyr³]-octreotate (¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE) has become an established second- or third-line treatment option for patients with somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positive advanced well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Clinical evidence of the efficacy of PRRT in tumor control has been proven and lower risks of disease progression or death are seen combined with an improved quality of life. When appropriate patient selection is performed, PRRT is accompanied by limited risks for renal and hematological toxicities. Treatment of NET patients with PRRT requires dedicated clinical expertise due to the biological characteristics of PRRT and specific characteristics of NET patients. This review provides an overview for clinicians dealing with NET on the history, molecular characteristics, efficacy, toxicity and relevant clinical specifics of PRRT.

Efficacy and safety of 177Lu-DOTATATE targeted therapy in advanced/metastatic pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To perform a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety about ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE therapy for advanced/metastatic pNETs based on the current clinical evidence.

Methods

This systematic review follows the PRISMA guideline. Search PubMed, Medline, EMBASE and CNKI, VIP, Wanfang databases, from establishment to June 2022, on the study of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE for advanced/metastatic pNETs, the primary endpoint was to evaluate the treatment effect through DRRs and DCRs. Secondary endpoint included assessment of OS, PFS, and treatment-related adverse events across all studies. Two researchers conducted literature screening, data extraction and quality evaluation according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using stata16.0 software, and the data were merged and displayed using forest graphs.

Results

A total of 5 studies, 174 patients, on ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE for advanced/metastatic pNETs were included. The pools of DRRs and DCRs were 24% (95% CI: 15%~32%) and 77% (95% CI: 62%~92%), respectively. The pool of OS was 48.78 months (95% CI: 41~56.57 months) and the pool of PFS was 21.59 months (95% CI: 17.65~25.53 months). In all studies, the most common side effect of treatment was hematological toxicity. In 174 patients, hematological toxicity of grade III accounted for 4.0% (7/174), and only 4.0% (7/174) and 1.0% (2/174) of patients had mild nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity. Gastrointestinal adverse reactions in 3% (6/174), nausea in 2% (3/174), superior vena cava occlusion in 0.5% (1/174).

Conclusion

¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE is effective and safe for advanced/metastatic pNETs, which can delay the progression of the disease, may improve patients' survival, and has low treatment-related toxicity and high safety. However, its efficacy and safety need to be further evaluated in high-quality, multicenter randomized controlled trials in the future.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022344436.

Single centre retrospective review of outcome of 177 Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in the treatment of progressive metastatic neuroendocrine tumours: Survival, toxicity, and prognostic factors

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ¹⁷⁷ Lu-DOTATATE therapy in advanced metastatic disease. A retrospective analysis of 395 patients (180 female, 215 males, mean age 62) with progressive metastatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) who were treated with ¹⁷⁷ Lu-DOTATATE was performed. Overall, 115 patients had less than four cycles and 280 completed four cycles of treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Analysis of survival predictors was performed using Cox regression model. Toxicity was defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5 (CTCAE 5.0). The percentage of patients with liver and skeletal metastases were 91 and 57%, respectively. Median PFS and OS were calculated at 33 months (95% CI: 29-37 months) and 46 months (95% CI: 48-56 months), respectively. End of treatment response assessment was performed using cross sectional imaging demonstrated partial response in 22%, stable disease in 64% and progressive disease in 14% of patients. Overall, grade 3 and 4 bone marrow toxicity was seen in 8%. One patient (0.3%) developed irreversible grade 4 nephrotoxicity. Myelodysplastic disease was recorded in one patient (0.3%). Univariate analysis of PFS predictors showed that body mass index (BMI), baseline chromogranin A (CgA) >400 ng/l, baseline alkaline phosphatase (ALP) >130 mg/dl, liver tumour volume and overall tumour burden were significant. On multivariate analysis only Ki67, high CgA and low BMI retained significance. ¹⁷⁷ Lu-DOTATATE is an effective treatment in advanced NETs with generally high-volume metastases. It is well-tolerated. Ki-67, CgA and BMI appear to be predictors for PFS.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Using 177Lu-DOTATATE in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs) in a Limited-Resource Environment

Background  This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using ¹⁷⁷ Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-octreotate (DOTATATE) in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).

Methods  Sixteen patients with pathologically verified NETs including eight females and eight males were enrolled in this study. Before PRRT, the patients underwent ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography/computed tomography or ^99m Tc-octreotide scintigraphy for evaluation of somatostatin receptor expression. Response to treatment was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) classified as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD). In addition, for evaluation of toxicity, monthly blood analysis was performed including hematology, renal function (creatinine) test, and liver function test. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status performance was applied to estimate the patients' general condition in a scale of 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead). In addition, overall survival (OS) was calculated as the time interval from the start of PRRT to death from any reason.

Results  Sixteen patients including eight females and eight males with a median age of 60.5 years (range: 24–74) were enrolled in this study. The patients underwent PRRT with a median cycle of 3.5 (range: 1–7) and a median dose of 20.35 (range: 7.4–49.95 GBq). At the end of data collection, PR, CR, SD, and PD were seen in 11, 2, 1, and 2 patients according to the RECIST, respectively. Three patients expired during or after the PRRT period. The median ECOG and Karnofsky Performance Scale was 1.5 and 75 before PRRT, which improved significantly to 1 and 80 after PRRT, respectively ( p  < 0.05). According to the Kaplan–Meier test, the median OS was 23 months (95% confidence interval: 7.90–38.09). According to the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, three patients showed grade I and three patients showed grade II leucopenia. Furthermore, three and seven patients had grade II and grade I anemia, respectively.

Conclusion  Since PRRT using ¹⁷⁷ Lu-DOTATATE has a favorable response rate and few adverse effects and improves the quality of life in NETs, it can be used as an effective therapeutic option, especially in nonoperative, metastatic, and progressive NETs.

Therapeutic strategies for patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms: current perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of malignancies mainly arising in the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) and bronchopulmonary systems, with steadily increasing incidence. The therapeutic landscape has widened and the therapeutic strategy should be based on new sequences and combinations, still debated.

AREAS COVERED

Herein, we provide an overview of current approved pharmacological treatments in patients with NENs, with the aim to summarize evidence of efficacy of the main different options in GEP and pulmonary NENs, principally focusing on somatostatin analogs (SSAs), targeted therapy with everolimus and sunitinib, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and chemotherapy. We discuss biological rationale and toxicities, including current indications according to differentiation and placement in the therapeutic algorithm, clinical trials, and combinations. Furthermore, we recommend areas for further research.

EXPERT OPINION

Therapeutic management of patients with NENs represents a challenge for clinicians and the identification of effective sequences and combinations is of utmost importance. Major efforts should be directed to early identify and overcome resistance and to limit toxicity. The progress in the therapeutic management of NENs grows faster and the choice of the best approach should be based on randomized clinical trials, as well as on long-term, real-world data.

ACR-ACNM-ASTRO-SNMMI Practice Parameter for Lutetium-177 (Lu-177) DOTATATE Therapy

OBJECTIVES

This practice parameter (PP) for Lutetium-177 (Lu-177) DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) aims to guide authorized users in selection of appropriate adult candidates with gastroeneropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) from foregut, midgut, and hindgut. The essential selection criteria include somatostatin receptor-positive GEP-NETs, which are usually inoperable and progressed despite standard therapy. Lu-177 DOTATATE is a radiopharmaceutical with high avidity for somatostatin receptors that are overexpressed by these tumors. This document ensures safe handling of Lu-177 DOTATATE by the authorized users and safe management of affected patients.

METHODS

The document was developed according to the systematic process developed by the American College of Radiology (ACR) and described on the ACR Web site (https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards). The PP development was led by 2 ACR Committees on Practice Parameters (Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging and Radiation Oncology) collaboratively with the American College of Nuclear Medicine, American Society of Radiation Oncology, and Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

RESULTS

The Lu-177 DOTATATE PP reviewed pharmacology, indications, adverse effects, personnel qualifications, and required clinical evaluation before starting the treatment, as well as the recommended posttherapy monitoring, quality assurance, documentation, and appropriate radiation safety instructions provided in written form and explained to the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Lu-177 DOTATATE is available for therapy of inoperable and/or advanced GEP-NETs when conventional therapy had failed. It can reduce tumor size, improve symptoms, and increase the progression free survival. The PP document provides clinical guidance for authorized users to assure an appropriate, consistent, and safe practice of Lu-177 DOTATATE.

Real-world efficacy of lutetium peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with neuroendocrine tumours

Lutetium peptide receptor radio nuclide therapy (Lu-PRRT) is an effective treatment for progressive, metastatic, somatostatin-receptor-positive, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (WD-NETs). Here, we report a single centre experience of real-world efficacy, long-term side effects, and challenges of this treatment. This was a retrospective analysis. All patients linked with our centre who had Lu-PRRT were included. Clinicopathological data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression. A total of 45 patients had Lu-PRRT, of those 30 (67%) were males, and 13 (29%) were more than 65 years old. The primary site was small intestine in 30 (67%) patients, pancreas in seven (16%) patients, and lung in three (7%) patients. The tumor was grade 1 in 15 (35%) patients, grade 2 in 22 (48%) patients, and grade 3 in six (13%) patients. A total of 41 (91%) patients had liver metastasis, and 20 (44%) patients had carcinoid syndrome. Lu-PRRT was the second-line therapy in all patients. Krenning's score was 4 in 36 (80%) patients and 3 in nine (20%) patients. The median waiting time to start Lu-PRRT therapy was 87 days. The median follow-up was 41 months. A total of 23 (51%) patients had a partial response, 18 (40%) patients had stable disease, and four (9%) patients had progression. None of the patients had a complete response. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 38 months (95% CI: 25.8-50.1). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Nine patients died during follow-up (death from any cause). Prior treatment with targeted therapies or high dose somatostatin analogues were negative predictors of Lu-PRRT outcome (p-values of < .001 and < .045, respectively). There were two serious haematological toxicities, one patient developed acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), and the other developed chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). Lu-PRRT is an effective second-line treatment for metastatic WD-NETs. The effect of targeted therapies on Lu-PRRT outcome was significant and needs to be clarified in further studies.

Radiolabeled Nanocarriers as Theranostics-Advancement from Peptides to Nanocarriers

Endogenous targeted radiotherapy is emerging as an integral modality to treat a variety of cancer entities. Nevertheless, despite the positive clinical outcome of the treatment using radiolabeled peptides, small molecules, antibodies, and nanobodies, a high degree of hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity still persist. This limits the amount of dose that can be injected. In an attempt to mitigate these side effects, the use of nanocarriers such as nanoparticles (NPs), dendrimers, micelles, liposomes, and nanogels (NGs) is currently being explored. Nanocarriers can prolong circulation time and tumor retention, maximize radiation dosage, and offer multifunctionality for different targeting strategies. In this review, the authors first provide a summary of radiation therapy and imaging and discuss the new radiotracers that are used preclinically and clinically. They then highlight and identify the advantages of radio-nanomedicine and its potential in overcoming the limitations of endogenous radiotherapy. Finally, the review points to the ongoing efforts to maximize the use of radio-nanomedicine for efficient clinical translation.

ACR-ACNM-ASTRO-SNMMI Practice Parameter for Lutetium-177 (Lu-177) DOTATATE Therapy

OBJECTIVES

This practice parameter (PP) for Lutetium-177 (Lu-177) DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) aims to guide authorized users in selection of appropriate adult candidates with gastroeneropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) from foregut, midgut, and hindgut. The essential selection criteria include somatostatin receptor-positive GEP-NETs, which are usually inoperable and progressed despite standard therapy. Lu-177 DOTATATE is a radiopharmaceutical with high avidity for somatostatin receptors that are overexpressed by these tumors. This document ensures safe handling of Lu-177 DOTATATE by the authorized users and safe management of affected patients.

METHODS

The document was developed according to the systematic process developed by the American College of Radiology (ACR) and described on the ACR Web site (https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards). The PP development was led by 2 ACR Committees on Practice Parameters (Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging and Radiation Oncology) collaboratively with the American College of Nuclear Medicine, American Society of Radiation Oncology, and Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

RESULTS

The Lu-177 DOTATATE PP reviewed pharmacology, indications, adverse effects, personnel qualifications, and required clinical evaluation before starting the treatment, as well as the recommended posttherapy monitoring, quality assurance, documentation, and appropriate radiation safety instructions provided in written form and explained to the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Lu-177 DOTATATE is available for therapy of inoperable and/or advanced GEP-NETs when conventional therapy had failed. It can reduce tumor size, improve symptoms, and increase the progression free survival. The PP document provides clinical guidance for authorized users to assure an appropriate, consistent, and safe practice of Lu-177 DOTATATE.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy implementation and results in a predominantly gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumor population: A two-year experience in a nonuniversity setting

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare, but the incidence and prevalence of NETs are increasing in the United States. While surgery is the preferred treatment for NETs, it is not a viable option for metastatic disease. Lutathera (177Lu-DOTATATE) is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP)-NETs in adults. There is limited information on GEP-NET treatment responses to Lutathera.Our institution launched a peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) service line using Lutathera with involvement from a multidisciplinary team and complete collaboration between hospital administration and clinical providers. A prospective registry study was also established in order to collect patient demographics and clinical data regarding the treatment of GEP primary NETs with Lutathera.Between August 2018 and July 2020, 35 GEP-NET patients were treated with Lutathera, of which 65.71% received 4 complete cycles and 25.71% received 3 cycles; 5.71% and 2.86% received 2 and 1 cycles of PRRT, respectively. Most adverse events during the course of our study were low grade using the common terminology criteria for adverse events system. Of the patients who completed all 4 cycles: 22% showed partial response to Lutathera, 44% showed stable disease, and 13% showed disease progression based on a qualitative assessment of positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging.From our experience, Lutathera was well tolerated in patients with GEP-NET. Additional studies are needed to examine long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes associated with GEP-NET treatment as well as financial considerations for hospitals embarking on a PRRT program.

Predictive Factors for Resistant Disease with Medical/Radiologic/Liver-Directed Anti-Tumor Treatments in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Recent Advances and Controversies

Simple Summary

Tumor resistance, both primary and acquired, is leading to increased complexity in the nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced panNENs, which would be greatly helped by reliable prognostic/predictive factors. The importance in identifying resistance is being contributed to by the increased array of possible treatments available for treating resistant advanced disease; the variable clinical course as well as response to any given treatment approach of patients within one staging or grading system, the advances in imaging which are providing increasing promising results/parameters that correlate with grading/outcome/resistance, the increased understanding of the molecular pathogenesis providing promising prognostic markers, all of which can contribute to selecting the best treatment to overcome resistance disease. Several factors have been identified that have prognostic/predictive value for identifying development resistant disease and affecting overall survival (OS)/PFS with various nonsurgical treatments of patients with advanced panNENs. Prognostic factors identified for patients with advanced panNENs for both OS/PFSs include various clinically-related factors (clinical, laboratory/biological markers, imaging, treatment-related factors), pathological factors (histological, classification, grading) and molecular factors. Particularly important prognostic factors for the different treatment modalities studies are the recent grading systems. Most prognostic factors for each treatment modality for OS/PFS are not specific for a given treatment option. These advances have generated several controversies and new unanswered questions, particularly those related to their possible role in predicting the possible sequence of different anti-tumor treatments in patients with different presentations. Each of these areas is reviewed in this paper.

Abstract

Purpose: Recent advances in the diagnosis, management and nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) have led to an emerging need for sensitive and useful prognostic factors for predicting responses/survival. Areas covered: The predictive value of a number of reported prognostic factors including clinically-related factors (clinical/laboratory/imaging/treatment-related factors), pathological factors (histological/classification/grading), and molecular factors, on therapeutic outcomes of anti-tumor medical therapies with molecular targeting agents (everolimus/sunitinib/somatostatin analogues), chemotherapy, radiological therapy with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, or liver-directed therapies (embolization/chemoembolization/radio-embolization (SIRTs)) are reviewed. Recent findings in each of these areas, as well as remaining controversies and uncertainties, are discussed in detail, particularly from the viewpoint of treatment sequencing. Conclusions: The recent increase in the number of available therapeutic agents for the nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced panNENs have raised the importance of prognostic factors predictive for therapeutic outcomes of each treatment option. The establishment of sensitive and useful prognostic markers will have a significant impact on optimal treatment selection, as well as in tailoring the therapeutic sequence, and for maximizing the survival benefit of each individual patient. In the paper, the progress in this area, as well as the controversies/uncertainties, are reviewed.

Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analogues for Diagnosis and Treatment of Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare and heterogeneous tumors that require multidisciplinary discussion for optimal care. The theranostic approach (DOTA peptides labelled with 68Ga for diagnosis and with 90Y or 177Lu for therapy) plays a crucial role in the management of NENs to assess disease extension and as a criteria for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) eligibility based on somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression. On the diagnostic side, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA peptides PET/CT (SSTR PET/CT) is the gold standard for imaging well-differentiated SSTR-expressing neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). [18F]FDG PET/CT is useful in higher grade NENs (NET G2 with Ki-67 > 10% and NET G3; NEC) for more accurate disease characterization and prognostication. Promising emerging radiopharmaceuticals include somatostatin analogues labelled with 18F (to overcome the limits imposed by 68Ga), and SSTR antagonists (for both diagnosis and therapy). On the therapeutic side, the evidence gathered over the past two decades indicates that PRRT is to be considered as an effective and safe treatment option for SSTR-expressing NETs, and is currently included in the therapeutic algorithms of the main scientific societies. The positioning of PRRT in the treatment sequence, as well as treatment personalization (e.g., tailored dosimetry, re-treatment, selection criteria, and combination with other alternative treatment options), is warranted in order to improve its efficacy while reducing toxicity. Although very preliminary (being mostly hampered by lack of methodological standardization, especially regarding feature selection/extraction) and often including small patient cohorts, radiomic studies in NETs are also presented. To date, the implementation of radiomics in clinical practice is still unclear. The purpose of this review is to offer an overview of radiolabeled SSTR analogues for theranostic use in NENs.

Treatment patterns and oncological outcome of patients with advanced small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors: real-world data from the Medical University of Vienna

Background:

Different oncological therapies have been approved for small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NETs), but relatively little is known about efficacy and long-term outcome outside of phase III trials.

Methods:

This retrospective analysis assessed patients with well-differentiated, metastatic SI-NETs treated at the Medical University of Vienna, an approved European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) Center of Excellence for neuroendocrine tumors. The primary objective was to assess progression-free survival (PFS) following approved therapies, that is, octreotide, lanreotide, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), and everolimus, in a representative real-world collective.

Results:

A total of 77 patients receiving systemic treatment for advanced SI-NETs between 2010 and 2021 were included, with a median follow-up time of 82.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 57.8–106.8 months]. In the entire collective, the estimated median PFS following first-line therapy was 32.0 months (95% CI, 23.5–40.5 months). Peritoneal carcinomatosis was significantly associated with worse PFS ( p = 0.016). Regarding therapeutic strategies and outcome, 59 patients received somatostatin analogs first line and no significant difference in PFS was observed between lanreotide and octreotide (29.3 versus 35.5 months, p = 0.768). Across all treatment lines, 42 patients underwent PRRT (estimated median PFS: 32.0 months; 95% CI, 25.6–38.3 months) and a small subgroup of 7 patients received everolimus (estimated median PFS: 9.2 months; 95% CI, 1.6–17.0 months). For the total cohort, the estimated median OS following first-line therapy was 100.6 months (95% CI, 82.3–118.8 months), but the high proportion of deaths attributed to NET (77.8%) underlines the lethal nature of the disease. No unexpected toxicities were observed.

Conclusions:

While peritoneal carcinomatosis emerged as an adverse prognostic factor for PFS in this collective, the long-term outcome of patients treated at a specialized NET center using approved therapies appeared comparable to pivotal studies in SI-NET.

Radiotheranostics - Precision Medicine in Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

'See what you treat and treat what you see, at a molecular level', could be the motto of theranostics. The concept implies diagnosis (imaging) and treatment of cells (usually cancer) using the same molecule, thus guaranteeing a targeted cytotoxic approach of the imaged tumor cells while sparing healthy tissues. As the brilliant late Sam Gambhir would say, the imaging agent acts like a 'molecular spy' and reveals where the tumoral cells are located and the extent of disease burden (diagnosis). For treatment, the same 'molecular spy' docks to the same tumor cells, this time delivering cytotoxic doses of radiation (treatment). This duality represents the concept of a 'theranostic pair', which follows the scope and fundamental principles of targeted precision and personalized medicine. Although the term theranostic was noted in medical literature in the early 2000s, the principle is not at all new to nuclear medicine. The first example of theranostic dates back to 1941 when Dr. Saul Hertz first applied radioiodine for radionuclide treatment of thyroid cells in patients with hyperthyroidism. Ever since, theranostics has been an integral element of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. The more we understand tumor biology and molecular pathology of carcinogenesis, including specific mutations and receptor expression profiles, the more specific these 'molecular spies' can be developed for diagnostic molecular imaging and subsequent radionuclide targeted therapy (radiotheranostics). The appropriate selection of the diagnostic and therapeutic radionuclide for the 'theranostic pair' is critical and takes into account not only the type of cytotoxic radiation emission, but also the linear energy transfer (LET), and the physical half-lives. Advances in radiochemistry and radiopharmacy with new radiolabeling techniques and chelators are revolutionizing the field. The landscape of cytotoxic systemic radionuclide treatments has dramatically expanded through the past decades thanks to all these advancements. This article discusses present and promising future theranostic applications for various types of diseases such as thyroid disorders, neuroendocrine tumors (NET), pediatric malignancies, and prostate cancer (PC), and provides an outlook for future perspectives.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Targeting the Somatostatin Receptor: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Optimization Strategies

Simple Summary

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a systemic treatment consisting of the administration of a tumor-targeting radiopharmaceutical into the circulation of a patient. The radiopharmaceutical will bind to a specific peptide receptor leading to tumor-specific binding and retention. This will subsequently cause lethal DNA damage to the tumor cell. The only target that is currently used in widespread clinical practice is the somatostatin receptor, which is overexpressed on a range of tumor cells, including neuroendocrine tumors and neural-crest derived tumors. Academia played an important role in the development of PRRT, which has led to heterogeneous literature over the last two decades, as no standard radiopharmaceutical or regimen has been available for a long time. This review focuses on the basic principles and clinical applications of PRRT, and discusses several PRRT-optimization strategies.

Abstract

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) consists of the administration of a tumor-targeting radiopharmaceutical into the circulation of a patient. The radiopharmaceutical will bind to a specific peptide receptor leading to tumor-specific binding and retention. The only target that is currently used in clinical practice is the somatostatin receptor (SSTR), which is overexpressed on a range of tumor cells, including neuroendocrine tumors and neural-crest derived tumors. Academia played an important role in the development of PRRT, which has led to heterogeneous literature over the last two decades, as no standard radiopharmaceutical or regimen has been available for a long time. This review provides a summary of the treatment efficacy (e.g., response rates and symptom-relief), impact on patient outcome and toxicity profile of PRRT performed with different generations of SSTR-targeting radiopharmaceuticals, including the landmark randomized-controlled trial NETTER-1. In addition, multiple optimization strategies for PRRT are discussed, i.e., the dose–effect concept, dosimetry, combination therapies (i.e., tandem/duo PRRT, chemoPRRT, targeted molecular therapy, somatostatin analogues and radiosensitizers), new radiopharmaceuticals (i.e., SSTR-antagonists, Evans-blue containing vector molecules and alpha-emitters), administration route (intra-arterial versus intravenous) and response prediction via molecular testing or imaging. The evolution and continuous refinement of PRRT resulted in many lessons for the future development of radionuclide therapy aimed at other targets and tumor types.

Safety and response after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177 Lu-DOTATATE for neuroendocrine tumors in phase 1/2 prospective Japanese trial

BACKGROUND

The present prospective phase 1/2 study aimed to elucidate the efficacy and safety of ¹⁷⁷ Lu-DOTATATE (four cycles of 7.4 GBq) in Japanese patients with unresectable, progressive neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).

METHODS

From April 2018 to October 2020, 15 patients with advanced NETs (five midgut, eight pancreatic, and two lung NETs) were enrolled. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated. Pharmacokinetics and dosimetry were also evaluated in three midgut patients.

RESULTS

The mean absorbed doses of ¹⁷⁷ Lu-DOTATATE to the kidneys (20.7 Gy/29.6 GBq) and the bone marrow (0.631 Gy/29.6 GBq) were within the radiation tolerance doses. The ORR of the whole population was 53% (90% CI, 30%-76%). ORRs of the midgut and non-midgut NETs were 60% (90% CI, 19%-92%) and 50% (90% CI, 22%-78%), respectively. There was no difference in the maximum reduction rate of the sum of the target lesion diameters between patients with midgut and non-midgut NET. The median PFS was not reached; the PFS rate at 52 weeks was 80% (90% CI, 56.1%-91.7%). AEs of Grade 3 or higher were lymphopenia (47%) and leukopenia (7%).

CONCLUSION

¹⁷⁷ Lu-DOTATATE demonstrated remarkable tumor shrinkage and tolerability in Japanese patients with advanced NETs.

Prophylactic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Collection in Patients with Extensive Bone-Marrow Infiltration of Neuroendocrine Tumours Prior to Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET) can be successfully repeated but may eventually be dose-limited. Since ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE dose limitation may come from hematological rather than renal function, hematological peripheral blood stem cell backup might be desirable. Here, we report our initial experience of peripheral blood stem-cell collection (PBSC) in patients with treatment-related cytopenia and therefore high risk of bone-marrow failure. Five patients with diffuse bone-marrow infiltration of NET and relevant myelosuppression (≥grade 2) received PBSC before one PRRT cycle with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE (7.6 ± 0.8 GBq/cycle). Standard stem-cell mobilization with Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was applied, and successful PBSC was defined as a collection of >2 × 10⁶/kg CD34+ cells. In case of initial failure, Plerixafor was administered in addition to G-CSF prior to apheresis. PBSC was successfully performed in all patients with no adverse events. Median cumulative activity was 44.8 GBq (range, 21.3-62.4). Three patients had been previously treated with PRRT, two of which needed the addition of Plerixafor for stem-cell mobilization. Only one of five patients required autologous peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation during the median follow up time of 28 months. PBSC collection seems to be feasible in NET with bone-marrow involvement and might be worth considering as a backup strategy prior to PRRT, in order to overcome dose-limiting bone-marrow toxicity.

90Y/177Lu-DOTATOC: From Preclinical Studies to Application in Humans

The PRRT (Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy) is a promising modality treatment for patients with inoperable or metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of these patients are favorably comparable with standard therapies. The protagonist in this type of therapy is a somatostatin-modified peptide fragment ([Tyr3] octreotide), equipped with a specific chelating system (DOTA) capable of creating a stable bond with β-emitting radionuclides, such as yttrium-90 and lutetium-177. In this review, covering twenty five years of literature, we describe the characteristics and performances of the two most used therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals for the NETs radio-treatment: [90Y]Y-DOTATOC and [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC taking this opportunity to retrace the most significant results that have determined their success, promoting them from preclinical studies to application in humans.

PRRT: identikit of the perfect patient

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been strengthened since the publication of NETTER-1. Nevertheless, the correct positioning in the therapeutic algorithm is debated, and no optimal sequence has yet been standardized. Possible criteria to predict the response to PRRT in neuroendocrine tumors (NET) have been proposed. The aim of this review is to define the perfect identity of the eligible patient who can mostly benefit from this therapy. Possible predictive criteria which have been analysed were: primary tumor site, grading, tumor burden, FDG PET and ⁶⁸Ga-PET uptake. Primary tumor site and ⁶⁸Ga-PET uptake do not play a pivotal role in predicting the response, while tumor burden, FDG PET uptake and grading seem to represent predictive/prognostic factors for response to PRRT. The heterogeneity in trial designs, patient populations, type of radionuclides, previous therapies and measurement of outcomes, inevitably limits the strength of our conclusions, therefore care must be taken in applying these results to clinical practice. In conclusion, the perfect patient, selected by ⁶⁸Ga-PET uptake, will likely have a relatively limited liver tumor burden, a ki67 index <20% and will respond to PRRT irrespective to primary tumor. Nevertheless, we have mostly prognostic than predictive factors to predict the efficacy of PRRT in individual patients, while a promising tool could be the NETest. However, to date, the identikit of the perfect patient for PRRT is a puzzle without some pieces and still we cannot disregard a multidisciplinary discussion of the individual case to select the patients who will mostly benefit from PRRT.

177Lu-DOTATATE Plus Radiosensitizing Capecitabine Versus Octreotide Long-Acting Release as First-Line Systemic Therapy in Advanced Grade 1 or 2 Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Single-Institution Experience

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and safety of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE plus radiosensitizing capecitabine and octreotide long-acting release (LAR) as first-line systemic therapy in advanced well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data of consecutive patients of advanced inoperable or metastatic grade 1 or 2 GEP-NETs treated with first-line ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE plus radiosensitizing capecitabine or octreotide LAR from September 2012 to December 2019 were collected and analyzed for response, toxicity, and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients (median age: 53 years; range 14-81 years) with treatment-naïve advanced grade 1 or 2 GEP-NETs were included. Thirty-six patients received a median cumulative dose of 27.3 GBq of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE intravenously at 8-12 weeks' intervals along with 1,250 mg/m² oral capecitabine on days 0-14 of each cycle of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE, whereas 40 patients were administered 30 mg octreotide LAR intramuscularly every 4 weeks. Using response evaluation criteria in solid tumor 1.1, the objective response rate was 38% in the ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE arm compared with 15% in the octreotide LAR arm (P = .025), whereas the disease control rates were 88% and 67% in ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE and octreotide LAR arms, respectively (P = .035). The median durations of progression-free survival in the ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE and octreotide LAR arms were 54 months and 16 months, respectively (P = .017), whereas the median overall survival was not reached and not significantly different across both the arms. Of the treatment-related adverse events, no major difference was observed in the occurrence of grade 3 or 4 toxicities between the two treatment arms.

CONCLUSION

First-line systemic ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE plus radiosensitizing capecitabine achieved better radiologic response and longer progression-free survival compared with octreotide LAR in patients with advanced grade 1 or 2 GEP-NETs. Future randomized controlled trials are, however, required to determine the best treatment sequence for the treatment-naïve patients with advanced GEP-NETs.

Prior Resection of the Primary Tumor Prolongs Survival After Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy of Advanced Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare impact on survival after resection of primary tumors (PTs) after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT).

BACKGROUND

PRRT is a highly effective therapeutic option to treat locally advanced or metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 889 patients with advanced NEN (G1-G3, stage IV) treated with at least 1 cycle of PRRT. In 486 of 889 patients (55%, group 1), PT had been removed before PRRT. Group 2 constituted 403 patients (45%) with no prior PT resection. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was determined by 68Ga SSTR-PET/CT in all patients applying RECIST and EORTC.

RESULTS

Most patients had their PT in pancreas (n = 335; 38%) and small intestine (n = 284; 32%). Both groups received a mean of 4 cycles of PRRT (P = 0.835) with a mean cumulative administered radioactivity of 21.6 ± 11.7 versus 22.2 ± 11.2 GBq (P = 0.407). Median OS in group 1 was 134.0 months [confidence interval (CI): 118-147], whereas OS in group 2 was 67.0 months (CI: 60-80; hazard ratio 2.79); P < 0.001. Likewise, the median progression-free survival after first PRRT was longer in group 1 with 18.0 (CI: 15-20) months as compared to group 2 with 14.0 (CI: 15-18; hazard ratio 1.21) months; P = 0.012.

CONCLUSIONS

A previous resection of the PT before PRRT provides a significant survival benefit in patients with NENs stage IV.

Rapid Progression After 177Lu-DOTATATE in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors

ABSTRACT

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a treatment option for somatostatin receptor-positive, unresectable or metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Despite high disease control rates seen with PRRT, a subset of the NET population seems to have a short progression-free interval. We hypothesize that patients with NETs with rapid progression post-PRRT may have mixed low- and high-grade cell populations, and PRRT treats the lower-grade component, allowing the more aggressive high-grade component to progress.We report 7 patients with biopsy-proven NET who received PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE at the Stanford Cancer Center who had evidence of progressive disease (PD) on or within 6 months of therapy.All patients had primary pancreatic, metastatic, well-differentiated NET on diagnosis and were heavily pretreated before receiving PRRT. Two patients had PD while on PRRT; 5 had PD within 6 months of completing PRRT. The median time from the last cycle to PD was 3.2 months (range, 1.1-4.6 months). The median progression-free survival was 7.7 months (95% confidence interval, 5.7-9.8 months). Three patients had a repeat biopsy post-PRRT, 2 of which demonstrated higher disease grade compared with their initial pathology. Further evaluation in larger patient cohorts is warranted to elucidate predictive factors of PRRT response/nonresponse to enable better patient selection.