Predictors of non-adherence to follow-up visits and deferasirox chelation therapy among jordanian adolescents with Thalassemia major

Factors Related to the Quality of Life in Children with Transfusion-Dependent Thalassemia

Objective: Increased survival rate of patients with Transfusion-dependent Thalassemia (TDT) should be in line with their good quality of life (QoL). The study aimed to analyze the relationship between sociodemographic factors and clinical characteristics with the QoL of children with TDT. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Hasan Sadikin General Hospital from December 2022 to February 2023. A total of 158 eligible subjects aged 5-18 years with TDT were included in the analysis. QoL assessment was performed using child self-report and parent-proxy report questionnaires, along with physical examination findings. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to analyze the data. Results: A total of 158 subjects who met the research criteria were included in the analysis. Of 58.9% of children with TDT had a low adherence rate to iron chelating therapy (ICT). School function had the lowest score in QoL based on child-self report and parent proxy. Gender (p<0,05) and adherence to ICT (p<0,05) were significantly associated with lower quality of life. Conclusion: Female and adherence to ICT were predictors of children with TDT's QoL.

The impact of chelation compliance in health outcome and health related quality of life in thalassaemia patients: a systematic review

Understanding consequences of poor chelation compliance is crucial given the enormous burden of post-transfusional iron overload complications. We systematically reviewed iron-chelation therapy (ICT) compliance, and the relationship between compliance with health outcome and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in thalassaemia patients. Several reviewers performed systematic search strategy of literature through PubMed, Scopus, and EBSCOhost. The preferred reporting items of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Of 4917 studies, 20 publications were included. The ICT compliance rate ranges from 20.93 to 75.3%. It also varied per agent, ranging from 48.84 to 85.1% for desferioxamine, 87.2-92.2% for deferiprone and 90-100% for deferasirox. Majority of studies (N = 10/11, 90.91%) demonstrated significantly negative correlation between compliance and serum ferritin, while numerous studies revealed poor ICT compliance linked with increased risk of liver disease (N = 4/7, 57.14%) and cardiac disease (N = 6/8, 75%), endocrinologic morbidity (N = 4/5, 90%), and lower HRQoL (N = 4/6, 66.67%). Inadequate compliance to ICT therapy is common. Higher compliance is correlated with lower serum ferritin, lower risk of complications, and higher HRQoL. These findings should be interpreted with caution given the few numbers of evidence.

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia

BACKGROUND

Regularly transfused people with sickle cell disease (SCD) and people with thalassaemia are at risk of iron overload. Iron overload can lead to iron toxicity in vulnerable organs such as the heart, liver and endocrine glands, which can be prevented and treated with iron-chelating agents. The intensive demands and uncomfortable side effects of therapy can have a negative impact on daily activities and wellbeing, which may affect adherence.

OBJECTIVES

To identify and assess the effectiveness of different types of interventions (psychological and psychosocial, educational, medication interventions, or multi-component interventions) and interventions specific to different age groups, to improve adherence to iron chelation therapy compared to another listed intervention, or standard care in people with SCD or thalassaemia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ProQuest Dissertations & Global Theses, Web of Science & Social Sciences Conference Proceedings Indexes and ongoing trial databases (13 December 2021). We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register (1 August 2022).

SELECTION CRITERIA

For trials comparing medications or medication changes, only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible for inclusion. For studies including psychological and psychosocial interventions, educational interventions, or multi-component interventions, non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSIs), controlled before-after studies, and interrupted time series studies with adherence as a primary outcome were also eligible for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

For this update, two authors independently assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias, and extracted data. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 19 RCTs and one NRSI published between 1997 and 2021. One trial assessed medication management, one assessed an education intervention (NRSI) and 18 RCTs were of medication interventions. Medications assessed were subcutaneous deferoxamine, and two oral chelating agents, deferiprone and deferasirox. We rated the certainty of evidence as very low to low across all outcomes identified in this review. Four trials measured quality of life (QoL) with validated instruments, but provided no analysable data and reported no difference in QoL. We identified nine comparisons of interest. 1. Deferiprone versus deferoxamine We are uncertain whether or not deferiprone affects adherence to iron chelation therapy (four RCTs, unpooled, very low-certainty evidence), all-cause mortality (risk ratio (RR) 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18 to 1.21; 3 RCTs, 376 participants; very low-certainty evidence), or serious adverse events (SAEs) (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.83 to 2.46; 1 RCT, 228 participants; very low-certainty evidence).  Adherence was reported as "good", "high" or "excellent" by all seven trials, though the data could not be analysed formally: adherence ranged from 69% to 95% (deferiprone, mean 86.6%), and 71% to 93% (deferoxamine, mean 78.8%), based on five trials (474 participants) only. 2. Deferasirox versus deferoxamine We are uncertain whether or not deferasirox affects adherence to iron chelation therapy (three RCTs, unpooled, very low-certainty evidence), although medication adherence was high in all trials. We are uncertain whether or not there is any difference between the drug therapies in serious adverse events (SAEs) (SCD or thalassaemia) or all-cause mortality (thalassaemia). 3. Deferiprone versus deferasirox We are uncertain if there is a difference between oral deferiprone and deferasirox based on a single trial in children (average age 9 to 10 years) with any hereditary haemoglobinopathy in adherence, SAEs and all-cause mortality. 4. Deferasirox film-coated tablet (FCT) versus deferasirox dispersible tablet (DT) One RCT compared deferasirox in different tablet forms. There may be a preference for FCTs, shown through a trend for greater adherence (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.22; 1 RCT, 88 participants), although medication adherence was high in both groups (FCT 92.9%; DT 85.3%). We are uncertain if there is a benefit in chelation-related AEs with FCTs. We are uncertain if there is a difference in the incidence of SAEs, all-cause mortality or sustained adherence. 5. Deferiprone and deferoxamine combined versus deferiprone alone We are uncertain if there is a difference in adherence, though reporting was usually narrative as triallists report it was "excellent" in both groups (three RCTs, unpooled). We are uncertain if there is a difference in the incidence of SAEs and all-cause mortality.  6. Deferiprone and deferoxamine combined versus deferoxamine alone We are uncertain if there is a difference in adherence (four RCTs), SAEs (none reported in the trial period) and all-cause mortality (no deaths reported in the trial period). There was high adherence in all trials. 7. Deferiprone and deferoxamine combined versus deferiprone and deferasirox combined There may be a difference in favour of deferiprone and deferasirox (combined) in rates of adherence (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.99) (one RCT), although it was high (> 80%) in both groups. We are uncertain if there is a difference in SAEs, and no deaths were reported in the trial, so we cannot draw conclusions based on these data (one RCT). 8. Medication management versus standard care We are uncertain if there is a difference in QoL (one RCT), and we could not assess adherence due to a lack of reporting in the control group. 9. Education versus standard care One quasi-experimental (NRSI) study could not be analysed due to the severe baseline confounding.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The medication comparisons included in this review had higher than average adherence rates not accounted for by differences in medication administration or side effects, though often follow-up was not good (high dropout over longer trials), with adherence based on a per protocol analysis. Participants may have been selected based on higher adherence to trial medications at baseline. Also, within the clinical trial context, there is increased attention and involvement of clinicians, thus high adherence rates may be an artefact of trial participation. Real-world, pragmatic trials in community and clinic settings are needed that examine both confirmed or unconfirmed adherence strategies that may increase adherence to iron chelation therapy. Due to lack of evidence this review cannot comment on intervention strategies for different age groups.

A systematic review of adherence to iron chelation therapy among children and adolescents with thalassemia

INTRODUCTION

Iron chelation therapy (ICT) is essential to prevent complications of iron overload in patients with transfusion-dependent thalassaemia. However, there is currently no standard for how to best measure adherence to ICT, nor what level of adherence necessitates concern for poor outcomes, especially in paediatric patients. The objectives of this review are to identify rates of adherence to ICT, predictors of adherence, methods of measurement, and adherence-related health outcomes in children and adolescents.

METHODS

This review covers the literature published between 1980 and 2020 on ICT in thalassaemia that assessed adherence or compliance. Included studies reflect original research. The preferred reporting items of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed for reporting results, and the findings were critically appraised with the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine criteria.

RESULTS

Of the 543 articles, 37 met the inclusion criteria. The most common methods of assessing adherence included patient self-report (n = 15/36, 41.7%), and pill count (n = 15/36, 41.7%), followed by subcutaneous medication monitoring (5/36, 13.8%) and prescription refills (n = 4/36, 11.1%). Study sizes ranged from 7 to 1115 participants. Studies reported adherence either in "categories" with different levels of adherence (n = 29) or "quantitatively" as a percentage of medication taken out of those prescribed (n = 7). Quantitatively, the percentage of adherence varied from 57% to 98.4% with a median of 89.5%. Five studies focussed on interventions, four of which were designed to improve adherence. Studies varied in sample size and methods of assessment, which prohibited performing a meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to a lack of clinical consensus on how adherence is defined, it is difficult to compare adherence to ICT in different studies. Future studies should be aimed at creating guidelines for assessing adherence and identifying suboptimal adherence. These future efforts will be crucial in informing evidence-based interventions to improve adherence and health outcomes in thalassaemia patients.Key messagesPredictive factors associated with ICT adherence in the paediatric population include age, social perception of ICT, social support, and side effects/discomfort.Increased adherence in the paediatric population is associated with decreased serum ferritin and improved cardiac, hepatic, and endocrine outcomes.Inadequate adherence to ICT is associated with increased lifetime health costs.There are few studies that focussed on interventions to increase adherence in the paediatric population, and the studies that do exist all focussed on different types of interventions; successful interventions focussed on consistent, long-term engagement with patients.

Barriers to adherence to iron chelation therapy among adolescent with transfusion dependent thalassemia

STUDY BACKGROUND

Thalassemia is the commonest genetic blood disorder in Malaysia which requires life-long blood transfusions. From a total of 7,984 thalassemia patients in Malaysia, adolescent age group account for the highest number of patients (2,680 patients, 33.57%). In developed countries, the average rate of adherence to long-term treatment among children and adolescents is only 58%. Sub-optimal adherence to iron chelation therapy may impact the outcome and quality of life in these patients. Thus, assessing adherence level and identification of risk factors for non-adherence is essential in optimizing management.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the association between mean serum ferritin level with self-reported level of adherence to iron chelation therapy in transfusion dependent thalassemia (TDT) adolescents in Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan (HTAA), Kuantan and Pusat Perubatan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (PPUKM), Cheras; to determine the association between socio-demographic factors and patients' knowledge on thalassemia and iron chelation therapy with the level of adherence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study conducted between 1st March 2019 and 31st March 2020. Data was collected through face-to-face interview by a single interviewer during the thalassemia clinic follow up, with content validated questionnaires. The questionnaires comprised four sections which included socio-demographic data, medication adherence questionnaire, knowledge of disease, and clinical characteristics of the participants.

RESULTS

A total of 70 participants were recruited. Results showed that only 51.4% of participants had good adherence to iron chelation therapy. There was a significant association between monthly household incomes of the family with the level of adherence to iron chelation (p-value 0.006). There was also an association between the mean serum ferritin levels with total Adherence Starts with Knowledge (ASK-12) score (p-value 0.001). However, there was no association between knowledge on thalassemia with the level of adherence.

CONCLUSION

Adherence to iron chelation was generally unsatisfactory amongst adolescents with TDT as only 51.4% had good adherence. Low monthly household income of the family may affect adherence to iron chelation therapy in TDT patients. As adherence remains to be an issue amongst adolescent thalassemia patients, management should include regular and objective assessments to address this problem so as to optimize patient outcome.

Bullying and ART Nonadherence Among South African ALHIV: Effects, Risks, and Protective Factors

BACKGROUND

Identifying risk and protective factors for adolescent antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence is a public health priority, given high HIV-related mortality in this population. An area that merits further investigation is the relationship between bullying victimization, mental health problems, and ART nonadherence among adolescents living with HIV (ALHIV). However, no known studies assess effects of bullying on adolescent nonadherence or risk and protective factors that could moderate this relationship.

SETTING

This study investigates (1) the direct longitudinal relationship between bullying exposure and ART nonadherence, and the indirect relationship via psychological distress, and (2) potential risk and modifiable protective factors moderating these pathways, among vertically and horizontally infected ALHIV who initiated treatment across 53 public health care facilities in a South African health district.

METHODS

Survey data were collected at 2 time points, between 2014 and 2017, with 1046 ALHIV (94% retention). Various mediation and moderated mediation models were run as part of a staged analysis approach.

RESULTS

A significant longitudinal relationship was found between bullying victimization and nonadherence, operating indirectly through psychological distress [B = 0.07; 95% confidence interval (CI): (0.03 to 0.13)]. Moderation analyses indicated that older adolescents exposed to bullying are more at risk of nonadherence [B = 0.52; 95% CI: (0.07 to 0.97) P < 0.05], and parental monitoring is a potential protective factor buffering indirect effects of bullying on nonadherence [B = -0.22; 95% CI: (-0.42 to -0.02) P < 0.05].

CONCLUSIONS

These findings underscore the importance of interventions that address bullying and psychological distress, and strengthen parental monitoring, particularly among older ALHIV.

Patient Perspective on Iron Chelation Therapy: Barriers and Facilitators of Medication Adherence

Nonadherence to iron chelation therapy (ICT) remains a long-standing and serious issue in thalassemia, especially in resource-constrained developing countries. Barriers and facilitators of adherence to ICT in transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT) adult patients in Malaysia are not completely understood. This qualitative study explored factors affecting adherence to ICT among TDT adult patients at a public tertiary hospital in Malaysia. Data were collected through 21 semistructured in-depth interviews conducted among purposively sampled patients using a pretested interview guide. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed manually using thematic analysis method and managed using Atlas.Ti software. The most frequently discussed subthemes of barriers to adherence included patient-related factors, medications-related factors, sociocultural-related factors, environmental context and resources, and patient–health care provider relationship factors. The facilitators to adherence included having insights of their illness, prevailing sources of motivation emphasizing on strong self-efficacy, low medication burden, and having enabling environment. This study has identified barriers and facilitators that are unique to Malaysian thalassemic adults related to medication adherence. Options for future multifaceted interventions are suggested.

Disease Knowledge and Treatment Adherence among Adult Patients with Thalassemia: A Cross-sectional Correlational Study

Aim. To investigate the disease knowledge and treatment adherence among adult patients with thalassemia.

Material and methods. A cross-sectional correlational study was carried out with a convenience sample of 100 adult patients with thalassemia from a university teaching hospital in Jeddah city, Saudi Arabia. The Disease Knowledge about Thalassemia Major, the Treatment Adherence Scale, and sociodemographic survey were completed by participants. The data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 22. Descriptive and inferential statistics and Pearson correlations were performed.

Results. The participants had a moderate level of disease knowledge (M = 15.59, SD = 2.30) and a low level of treatment adherence (M = 3.91, SD = 1.83). There was also a weak but significant positive relationship between disease knowledge and treatment adherence (r = 0.297, P = 0.041). A significant difference in treatment adherence mean scores was found among participants with different monthly incomes (P = 0.05).

Conclusions. Knowledge gained from this study may be useful in improving nurses’ understanding of the effects of providing practical knowledge on treatment adherence. Educational strategies/interventions programs may be required to improve knowledge and adherence to treatment among thalassemia patients. Longitudinal studies are also needed to test for moderators and mediators of relationships of disease knowledge and treatment adherence.

Optimising management of deferasirox therapy for patients with transfusion-dependent thalassaemia and lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes

Effective iron chelation therapy is an important part of treatment in patients with transfusion-dependent thalassaemia and lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Key strategies for optimising iron chelation therapy include ensuring good adherence and preventing and managing adverse events (AEs). Good adherence to iron chelation therapy with deferoxamine and deferasirox has been linked to improved survival and/or reductions in complications related to iron overload; however, maintaining good adherence to iron chelators can be challenging. Patients with transfusion-dependent thalassaemia or lower-risk MDS showed better adherence to the deferasirox film-coated tablet (FCT) formulation than to the deferasirox dispersible tablet formulation in the ECLIPSE trial, reflecting in part the improved palatability and convenience of deferasirox FCT. As well as affecting adherence, AEs may lead to dose reduction, interruption or discontinuation, resulting in suboptimal iron chelation therapy. Preventing and successfully managing AEs may help limit their impact on adherence, and following dosage and administration recommendations for iron chelators such as deferasirox may help minimise AEs and optimise treatment in patients with transfusion-dependent thalassaemia and lower-risk MDS.

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia

BACKGROUND

Regularly transfused people with sickle cell disease (SCD) and people with thalassaemia (who are transfusion-dependent or non-transfusion-dependent) are at risk of iron overload. Iron overload can lead to iron toxicity in vulnerable organs such as the heart, liver and endocrine glands; which can be prevented and treated with iron chelating agents. The intensive demands and uncomfortable side effects of therapy can have a negative impact on daily activities and well-being, which may affect adherence.

OBJECTIVES

To identify and assess the effectiveness of interventions (psychological and psychosocial, educational, medication interventions, or multi-component interventions) to improve adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with SCD or thalassaemia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, Web of Science Science & Social Sciences Conference Proceedings Indexes and ongoing trial databases (01 February 2017). We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register (12 December 2017).

SELECTION CRITERIA

For trials comparing medications or medication changes, only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible for inclusion.For studies including psychological and psychosocial interventions, educational Interventions, or multi-component interventions, non-RCTs, controlled before-after studies, and interrupted time series studies with adherence as a primary outcome were also eligible for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three authors independently assessed trial eligibility, risk of bias and extracted data. The quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 16 RCTs (1525 participants) published between 1997 and 2017. Most participants had β-thalassaemia major; 195 had SCD and 88 had β-thalassaemia intermedia. Mean age ranged from 11 to 41 years. One trial was of medication management and 15 RCTs were of medication interventions. Medications assessed were subcutaneous deferoxamine, and two oral-chelating agents, deferiprone and deferasirox.We rated the quality of evidence as low to very low across all outcomes identified in this review.Three trials measured quality of life (QoL) with validated instruments, but provided no analysable data and reported no difference in QoL.Deferiprone versus deferoxamineWe are uncertain whether deferiprone increases adherence to iron chelation therapy (four trials, very low-quality evidence). Results could not be combined due to considerable heterogeneity (participants' age and different medication regimens). Medication adherence was high (deferiprone (85% to 94.9%); deferoxamine (71.6% to 93%)).We are uncertain whether deferiprone increases the risk of agranulocytosis, risk ratio (RR) 7.88 (99% confidence interval (CI) 0.18 to 352.39); or has any effect on all-cause mortality, RR 0.44 (95% CI 0.12 to 1.63) (one trial; 88 participants; very low-quality evidence).Deferasirox versus deferoxamineWe are uncertain whether deferasirox increases adherence to iron chelation therapy, mean difference (MD) -1.40 (95% CI -3.66 to 0.86) (one trial; 197 participants; very-low quality evidence). Medication adherence was high (deferasirox (99%); deferoxamine (100%)). We are uncertain whether deferasirox decreases the risk of thalassaemia-related serious adverse events (SAEs), RR 0.95 (95% CI 0.41 to 2.17); or all-cause mortality, RR 0.96 (95% CI 0.06 to 15.06) (two trials; 240 participants; very low-quality evidence).We are uncertain whether deferasirox decreases the risk of SCD-related pain crises, RR 1.05 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.62); or other SCD-related SAEs, RR 1.08 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.51) (one trial; 195 participants; very low-quality evidence).Deferasirox film-coated tablet (FCT) versus deferasirox dispersible tablet (DT)Deferasirox FCT may make little or no difference to adherence, RR 1.10 (95% CI 0.99 to 1.22) (one trial; 173 participants; low-quality evidence). Medication adherence was high (FCT (92.9%); DT (85.3%)).We are uncertain if deferasirox FCT increases the incidence of SAEs, RR 1.22 (95% CI 0.62 to 2.37); or all-cause mortality, RR 2.97 (95% CI 0.12 to 71.81) (one trial; 173 participants; very low-quality evidence).Deferiprone and deferoxamine combined versus deferiprone alone We are uncertain if deferiprone and deferoxamine combined increases adherence to iron chelation therapy (very low-quality evidence). Medication adherence was high (deferiprone 92.7% (range 37% to 100%) to 93.6% (range 56% to 100%); deferoxamine 70.6% (range 25% to 100%).Combination therapy may make little or no difference to the risk of SAEs, RR 0.15 (95% CI 0.01 to 2.81) (one trial; 213 participants; low-quality evidence).We are uncertain if combination therapy decreases all-cause mortality, RR 0.77 (95% CI 0.18 to 3.35) (two trials; 237 participants; very low-quality evidence).Deferiprone and deferoxamine combined versus deferoxamine aloneDeferiprone and deferoxamine combined may have little or no effect on adherence to iron chelation therapy (four trials; 216 participants; low-quality evidence). Medication adherence was high (deferoxamine 91.4% to 96.1%; deferiprone: 82.4%)Deferiprone and deferoxamine combined, may have little or no difference in SAEs or mortality (low-quality evidence). No SAEs occurred in three trials and were not reported in one trial. No deaths occurred in two trials and were not reported in two trials.Deferiprone and deferoxamine combined versus deferiprone and deferasirox combinedDeferiprone and deferasirox combined may improve adherence to iron chelation therapy, RR 0.84 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.99) (one trial; 96 participants; low-quality evidence). Medication adherence was high (deferiprone and deferoxamine: 80%; deferiprone and deferasirox: 95%).We are uncertain if deferiprone and deferasirox decreases the incidence of SAEs, RR 1.00 (95% CI 0.06 to 15.53) (one trial; 96 participants; very low-quality evidence).There were no deaths in the trial (low-quality evidence).Medication management versus standard careWe are uncertain if medication management improves health-related QoL (one trial; 48 participants; very low-quality evidence). Adherence was only measured in one arm of the trial.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The medication comparisons included in this review had higher than average adherence rates not accounted for by differences in medication administration or side effects.Participants may have been selected based on higher adherence to trial medications at baseline. Also, within the clinical trial context, there is increased attention and involvement of clinicians, thus high adherence rates may be an artefact of trial participation.Real-world, pragmatic trials in community and clinic settings are needed that examine both confirmed or unconfirmed adherence strategies that may increase adherence to iron chelation therapy.Due to lack of evidence this review cannot comment on intervention strategies for different age groups.

Adherence to Treatment: Doctor vs Patient Perspective

It has been demonstrated over time that patients with haemoglobinopathies who exhibit a high level of compliance to proper therapy benefit not only from higher life expectancy but also from significantly better quality of life. The treatment of thalassaemia consists of blood transfusions and iron chelation therapy. Managing any complications due to iron overload, performing all necessary clinical and laboratory examinations and dealing effectively with psychological issues are also very important. Blood transfusion scheme must be designed by the treating physician according to the patient’s clinical needs. Chelation therapy should be aimed at selecting the right medication and the right dose. Examinations should be as organized as possible, and the management of complications depends significantly on cooperation with experienced specialists in each respective field. Ultimately, effectiveness of treatment and patient’s psychological well-being (acceptance of the disease and positive attitude) are the most decisive factors, as they seem to be connected to adherence through a mechanism of positive feedback. Hence, professional psychological support should be part of multidisciplinary care. Difference of point of view between doctor and patient can often be the reason behind misinterpretations or misunderstandings.

Exploring Iranian β-Thalassemia major patients' perception of barriers and facilitators of adherence to treatment: A qualitative study

Background

Despite the clinical importance of adherence to treatment in β-Thalassemia Major (β-TM) patients, poor adherence remains a prevalent and persistent problem in these patients.

Objective

The aim of this study was to explore Iranian β-TM patients’ perception regarding the barriers and facilitators of adherence to their treatments.

Methods

In this qualitative study, data were collected using purposeful sampling and semi-structured interviews with 18 β-TM patients, 3 family members and 5 healthcare professionals (total=26) in Sari, northern Iran, between August 2015 and May 2017. Data were analyzed using conventional content analysis with the support of MAXQDA software. All the interviews were transcribed verbatim. Data were coded and grouped under specific categories.

Results

We identified and classified the perceived barriers of patients’ adherence to treatment into six main categories including: (I) long distance challenges, (II) delayed occurrence of complications, (III) fatigue of healthcare providers, (IV) staff workload, (V) insufficient follow-up of healthcare workers, and (VI) busy everyday life. Also, nine main categories emerged as facilitators including: (I) concern of appearance changing, (II) outcomes of treatment, (III) good awareness, (IV) parental monitoring, (V) fear of complications, (VI) social activity, (VII) marriage as a facilitator, (VIII) friendly interaction with the medical staff, and (IX) trusting the medical staff.

Conclusion

Our findings provide a broad range of context-specific facilitators and barriers to treatment adherence perceived by Iranian β-TM patients. These factors improve our understanding of the complex and multifactorial nature of adherence to treatments. Health care providers can use these findings in designing and implementing appropriate interventions to promote β-TM patients’ adherence to treatment.

Patient Involvement as Experts in the Development and Assessment of a Smartphone App as a Patient Education Tool for the Management of Thalassemia and Iron Overload Syndromes

Our aim was to develop and assess the feasibility of an education tool to improve health outcomes of patients with thalassemia. Thirty-five patients attending a Canadian thalassemia clinic were enrolled. Acting in an expert role, they participated in a Delphi method to reach consensus as to what tools and information should be incorporated in the development of a self management Smartphone app. One- and 6-month usability and health impact feedback surveys were built-in. Sixty percent of responders were 18-34 years old, over 50.0% had a college degree. The Delphi method successfully generated a comprehensive list of features important to patients. The app has been downloaded 147 times globally. Between March 2015 and January 2016, 19 responses for the 1-month survey were collected and the trends described. Responders reported improved medication adherence. The personal adherence pledge feature supports gamification of health apps to individualize goals of therapy. The impact of tracking iron levels was highly favorable. The Delphi method was an effective way to introduce a patient education and empowerment tool to the thalassemia population. The long-term impact requires data maturation. Use of validated methodology is essential to ensure ehealth interventions are positively contributing to patient education and disease outcomes.

Impact of medication adherence on the effectiveness of deferasirox for the treatment of transfusional iron overload in myelodysplastic syndrome

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Regular blood transfusions in the management of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) often lead to iron overload. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of medication adherence on the effectiveness of deferasirox for the treatment of transfusional iron overload in patients with MDS. Secondary objectives were to describe treatment effectiveness and safety in daily clinical practice.

METHODS

A longitudinal, retrospective, observational study was carried out in a university hospital. The inclusion criteria were age over 18 years, MDS diagnosis and treatment with deferasirox for transfusion-dependent iron overload during the period of study (from January 2011 to April 2015). Treatment effectiveness was estimated by serum ferritin (SF), and adherence was measured by medication possession ratio (MPR). Clinically relevant analytical alterations during the treatment and reasons for treatment discontinuation were also assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were included in the study. Median SF at baseline was 1636 μg/L, and it decreased to 1399 μg/L during follow-up. The median adherence rate was 92%, although only 54·8% of the patients maintained deferasirox adherence ≥90% during the whole duration of treatment. Adherence rate was inversely correlated to SF (r = -0·288, P = 0·004). The median (p25, p75) duration of treatment was 11 (3·0, 37·8) months. The most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were renal toxicity (35%) and patient's death (25%).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Deferasirox's effectiveness, measured by the decrease in SF, was significantly better in adherent patients. The most frequent reason for treatment discontinuation was renal toxicity. Developing strategies to improve deferasirox treatment adherence and monitoring renal function in those patients should be key points in pharmaceutical care.