Lipoprotein(a) in health and disease

Lipid Profile Modulates Cardiometabolic Risk Biomarkers Including Hypertension in People with Type-2 Diabetes: A Focus on Unbalanced Ratio of Plasma Polyunsaturated/Saturated Fatty Acids

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with lipid metabolism disorder, particularly elevated plasma levels of non-esterified free fatty acids (NEFFA) and an increased cardiovascular disease risk, such as essential hypertension (H). The plasma unbalance of saturated fatty acid (SFA)/polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) ratio is a likely contributor, but the mechanisms involved are not clearly elucidated. The aim of this study is to explore the association between plasma SFA/PUFA ratio and the clusters of cardiometabolic syndrome (CMS), including the atherogenic biomarkers, inflammatory status, feeding patterns, and physical activity in people with T2DM with or without essential hypertension. The study was conducted on 784 adult male and female participants, aged between 30 and 50 years, and divided into 3 groups: 100 T2DM without hypertension (D); 368 T2DM with hypertension (DM); and 316 hypertensive participants without T2DM (H). All Participants were phenotyped regarding CMS clusters according to the NCEP/ATPIII criteria. Insulin resistance was assessed by Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA model). Metabolic, atherogenic, and inflammatory parameters were analyzed by biochemical methods; NEFFA by microfluorimetry; SFA, PUFA-n6 and PUFA-n3 by gas phase chromatography. Dietary lipids and physical activity were analyzed through the use of validated questionnaires. The clusters of CMS were found in all groups. Dyslipidemia was correlated with accretion NEFFA levels in all groups, but more accentuated in the DH group (r = +0.77; p < 0.001). Similarly, plasma PUFA/SFA ratio and PUFA-3 level was lower, concomitantly with a higher plasma ApoB100/ApoA1 (p < 0.001), lipoprotein (a), homocysteine (p < 0.001), and pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNFα, IL-6, IL1-β) in the DH group. Likewise, the depletion of PUFA-n3/PUFA-n6 ratio is associated with the decrease of omega 3-DHA (docosahexaenoic acid) and omega 3-EPA (eicosapentaenoic acid) (p < 0.001). It appears that the PUFAs-n3 ratio modulates cardiometabolic risk, inflammatory state and atherogenic biomarkers. The plasma unbalanced ratio of SFA/PUFA reflects dietary fatty acids intake. The contribution of dietary lipids is undisputed. Nutritional recommendations are required to determine the fatty acids ratio (saturated and unsaturated) provided in the diet.

Lipoprotein(a) – Link between Atherogenesis and Thrombosis

Lipoprotein(a) – Lp(a) – is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Indeed, individuals with plasma concentrations of Lp(a) > 200 mg/l carry an increased risk of developing CVD. Circulating levels of Lp(a) are remarkably resistant to common lipid lowering therapies, currently available treatment for reduction of Lp(a) is plasma apheresis, which is costly and labour intensive. The Lp(a) molecule is composed of two parts: LDL/apoB-100 core and glycoprotein, apolipoprotein(a) – Apo(a), both of them can interact with components of the coagulation cascade, inflammatory pathways and blood vessel cells (smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells). Therefore, it is very important to determine the molecular pathways by which Lp(a) affect the vascular system in order to design therapeutics for targeting the Lp(a) cellular effects. This paper summarises the cellular effects and molecular mechanisms by which Lp(a) participate in atherogenesis, thrombogenesis, inflammation and development of cardiovascular diseases.

Effect of Ezetimibe Monotherapy on Plasma Lipoprotein(a) Concentrations in Patients with Primary Hypercholesterolemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Ezetimibe reduces plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels by up to 20%. However, its effect on plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia has not been defined.

OBJECTIVE

Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess this effect based on the available randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

We searched the PubMed and SCOPUS databases from inception until 28 February 2017 to identify RCTs that investigated the effect of ezetimibe monotherapy on plasma Lp(a) concentrations in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. We pooled mean percentage changes in plasma Lp(a) concentrations as a mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Seven RCTs with 2337 patients met the selection criteria and were included in the analysis. Overall pooled analysis suggested that ezetimibe 10 mg significantly reduced plasma Lp(a) concentrations in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia by - 7.06% (95% CI - 11.95 to - 2.18; p = 0.005) compared with placebo. No significant heterogeneity was observed (χ² = 5.34; p = 0.5). Excluding one study from the analysis resulted in insignificant differences between the two groups (p = 0.2). Meta-regression did not find a significant association between the mean percentage changes in Lp(a) and other potential moderator variables, which included the mean percentage changes of LDL-C concentrations (p = 0.06) and baseline Lp(a) mean values (p = 0.46).

CONCLUSIONS

Ezetimibe monotherapy (10 mg/day) showed a small (7.06%) but statistically significant reduction in the plasma levels of Lp(a) in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. According to current literature, this magnitude of reduction seems to have no clinical relevance. However, further studies are warranted to clarify the mechanism mediating this effect of ezetimibe and to investigate its efficacy in combination with other drugs that have shown promise in lowering Lp(a) levels.

Nonhuman Primates and Translational Research-Cardiovascular Disease

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Human epidemiological studies provide challenges for understanding mechanisms that regulate initiation and progression of CVD due to variation in lifestyle, diet, and other environmental factors. Studies describing metabolic and physiologic aspects of CVD, and those investigating genetic and epigenetic mechanisms influencing CVD initiation and progression, have been conducted in multiple Old World nonhuman primate (NHP) species. Major advantages of NHPs as models for understanding CVD are their genetic, metabolic, and physiologic similarities with humans, and the ability to control diet, environment, and breeding. These NHP species are also genetically and phenotypically heterogeneous, providing opportunities to study gene by environment interactions that are not feasible in inbred animal models. Each Old World NHP species included in this review brings unique strengths as models to better understand human CVD. All develop CVD without genetic manipulation providing multiple models to discover genetic variants that influence CVD risk. In addition, as each of these NHP species age, their age-related comorbidities such as dyslipidemia and diabetes are accelerated proportionally 3 to 4 times faster than in humans.In this review, we discuss current CVD-related research in NHPs focusing on selected aspects of CVD for which nonprimate model organism studies have left gaps in our understanding of human disease. We include studies on current knowledge of genetics, epigenetics, calorie restriction, maternal calorie restriction and offspring health, maternal obesity and offspring health, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and steatosis, Chagas disease, microbiome, stem cells, and prevention of CVD.

PCSK9 in cholesterol metabolism: from bench to bedside

Dyslipidemia, and specifically elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, is one of the most important cardiovascular risk factors. Statins are considered first line therapy for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. However, statins may not be adequate treatment for elevated circulating LDL levels and are ineffective in certain familial hypercholesterolemias. The discovery of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), a regulatory protein that affects LDL receptors, offers a new alternative for these patients. Moreover, gain-of-function PCSK9 mutations were discovered to be the root cause of familial autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia. Inhibition of PSCK9 reduces plasma LDL levels, even in patients for whom statins are ineffective or not tolerated. Alirocumab and evolocumab, human monoclonal antibodies that inhibit PCSK9, have been approved to lower LDL levels. While there are drawbacks to these treatments, including adverse events, administration by subcutaneous injection, and high cost, these drugs are indicated for the treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and familial hypercholesterolemia as adjunct to diet and maximally tolerated statin therapy. PCSK9 inhibitors may work synergistically with statins to lower LDL. Novel approaches to PCSK9 inhibition are currently in development with the aim of providing safe and effective treatment options to decrease cardiovascular event burden, ideally at lower cost and with oral bioavailability.

Raloxifene Lowers Plasma Lipoprotein(a) Concentrations: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a proatherogenic plasma lipoprotein and an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. We investigated the effects of raloxifene, selective estrogen receptor modulator, on circulating Lp(a) levels in postmenopausal women using a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

To identify relevant studies, electronic databases (PUBMED, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) were searched by up to May 2015 to find controlled trials exploring the effects of oral raloxifene treatment on plasma Lp(a) levels in postmenopausal women. A random-effects model and generic inverse variance method were used for quantitative data synthesis.

RESULTS

Overall, seven eligible RCTs with ten treatment arms were included in this meta-analysis. Meta-analysis suggested a significant reduction of Lp(a) levels after treatment with raloxifene (standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.42; 95% CI -0.65, -0.19; p < 0.001), which may be considered as a medium effect size. When the studies were categorized according to the administered dose, there was a significant effect in both subsets of studies with administered doses ≤60 mg/day (SMD -0.43; 95% CI -0.73, -0.13; p = 0.004) and >60 mg/day (SMD -0.36; 95% CI -0.68, -0.05; p = 0.025). No significant association between the changes in plasma concentrations of Lp(a) with dose and baseline Lp(a) levels was found in the random-effects meta-regression analysis. However, a significant inverse association was observed between the Lp(a)-lowering effect of raloxifene and duration of treatment (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Results of the present meta-analysis showed a reduction in plasma Lp(a) concentrations of postmenopausal women with oral raloxifene treatment.

Lipoprotein(a) and inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been identified as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Lp(a) levels are also high under certain clinical conditions, including familial hypercholesterolemia and high blood low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. Few effective generic therapies for modulating Lp(a) have been developed. However, new therapies involving inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) using monoclonal antibodies have markedly reduced the blood LDL levels-and the Lp(a) levels as well. Much attention has therefore been focused on this therapy and its utility. The mechanism by which PCSK9 inhibitors reduce the Lp(a) levels remains unclear. We here describe the effects of PCSK9 inhibitors on Lp(a) and discuss potential mechanisms and perspectives of this topic.

Lipoprotein (a): a historical appraisal

Initially, lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] was believed to be a genetic variant of lipoprotein (Lp)-B. Because its lipid moiety is almost identical to LDL, Lp(a) has been deliberately considered to be highly atherogenic. Lp(a) was detected in 1963 by Kare Berg, and individuals who were positive for this factor were called Lpa⁺ Lpa⁺ individuals were found more frequently in patients with coronary heart disease than in controls. After the introduction of quantitative methods for monitoring of Lp(a), it became apparent that Lp(a), in fact, is present in all individuals, yet to a greatly variable extent. The genetics of Lp(a) had been a mystery for a long time until Gerd Utermann discovered that apo(a) is expressed by a variety of alleles, giving rise to a unique size heterogeneity. This size heterogeneity, as well as countless mutations, is responsible for the great variability in plasma Lp(a) concentrations. Initially, we proposed to evaluate the risk of myocardial infarction at a cut-off for Lp(a) of 30-50 mg/dl, a value that still is adopted in numerous epidemiological studies. Due to new therapies that lower Lp(a) levels, there is renewed interest and still rising research activity in Lp(a). Despite all these activities, numerous gaps exist in our knowledge, especially as far as the function and metabolism of this fascinating Lp are concerned.

Healthy dietary interventions and lipoprotein (a) plasma levels: results from the Omni Heart Trial

BACKGROUND

Increased lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels are associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Studies of dietary interventions on changes in Lp(a) are sparse. We aimed to compare the effects of three healthy dietary interventions differing in macronutrient content on Lp(a) concentration.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of a randomized, 3-period crossover feeding study including 155 (89 blacks; 66 whites) individuals. Participants were given DASH-type healthy diets rich in carbohydrates [Carb], in protein [Prot] or in unsaturated fat [Unsat Fat] for 6 weeks each. Plasma Lp(a) concentration was assessed at baseline and after each diet.

RESULTS

Compared to baseline, all interventional diets increased mean Lp(a) by 2 to 5 mg/dl. Unsat Fat increased Lp(a) less than Prot with a difference of 1.0 mg/dl (95% CI, -0.5, 2.5; p = 0.196) in whites and 3.7 mg/dl (95% CI, 2.4, 5.0; p < 0.001) in blacks (p-value between races = 0.008); Unsat Fat increased Lp(a) less than Carb with a difference of -0.6 mg/dl, 95% CI, -2.1, 0.9; p = 0.441) in whites and -1.5 mg/dl (95% CI, -0.2, -2.8; p = 0.021) in blacks (p-value between races = 0.354). Prot increased Lp(a) more than Carb with a difference of 0.4 mg/dl (95% CI, -1.1, 1.9; p = 0.597) in whites and 2.2 mg/dl (95%CI, 0.9, 3.5; p = 0.001) in blacks (p-value between races = 0.082).

CONCLUSION

Diets high in unsaturated fat increased Lp(a) levels less than diets rich in carbohydrate or protein with greater changes in blacks than whites. Our results suggest that substitutions with dietary mono- and polyunsaturated fatty acids in healthy diets may be preferable over protein or carbohydrates with regards to Lp(a).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00051350.

Lipoprotein(a): resurrected by genetics

Plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a quantitative genetic trait with a very broad and skewed distribution, which is largely controlled by genetic variants at the LPA locus on chromosome 6q27. Based on genetic evidence provided by studies conducted over the last two decades, Lp(a) is currently considered to be the strongest genetic risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). The copy number variation of kringle IV in the LPA gene has been strongly associated with both Lp(a) levels in plasma and risk of CHD, thereby fulfilling the main criterion for causality in a Mendelian randomization approach. Alleles with a low kringle IV copy number that together have a population frequency of 25-35% are associated with a doubling of the relative risk for outcomes, which is exceptional in the field of complex genetic phenotypes. The recently identified binding of oxidized phospholipids to Lp(a) is considered as one of the possible mechanisms that may explain the pathogenicity of Lp(a). Drugs that have been shown to lower Lp(a) have pleiotropic effects on other CHD risk factors, and an improvement of cardiovascular endpoints is up to now lacking. However, it has been established in a proof of principle study that lowering of very high Lp(a) by apheresis in high-risk patients with already maximally reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels can dramatically reduce major coronary events.

The current status of lipoprotein (a) in pregnancy: a literature review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Lipoprotein (Lp) (a) is a neglected element of the blood lipid profile. It is now recognized as a determinant of coronary heart disease progression and its role in atherosclerosis and its ability to induce thrombosis make it potentially important in the course of normal and complicated pregnancies. Pregnancy involves a major transformation of metabolism to sustain fetal growth. Multiple studies have been conducted on Lp(a) in pregnancy, and it is timely to synthesize and evaluate this evidence.

METHODS AND SUBJECTS

We reviewed the MEDLINE database for all articles published concerning "lipoprotein a" and "pregnancy" from May 2003 to May 2012. A previous comprehensive review assessed the literature up to May 2003.

RESULTS

We critically analyzed 14 studies detailing the effect of complications in pregnancy on Lp(a) profile, and subsequent pregnancy outcomes where available. Studies evaluating the normal metabolic response to pregnancy, pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia and intra-uterine growth restriction were reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial mass of data has accumulated describing Lp(a) changes in pregnancy. The diversity of study design limits the ability to draw broad-ranging conclusions, but brings into focus the important questions remaining, which we discuss.

Decrease of Lp(a) during weight reduction in obese children is modified by the apo(a) kringle-IV copy number variation

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is considered an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Its concentration is mainly determined by the kringle-IV repeat copy number variation (CNV) at the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] locus.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the immediate effect of weight reduction on plasma Lp(a) levels and its dependency on the apo(a) CNV in obese children.

DESIGN

We performed a prospective longitudinal intervention study of a low-fat hypocaloric diet conducted in a 3-week dietary camp for obese children. In all, 140 obese participants (54 boys and 86 girls) with a mean age of 12.5+/-1.6 years and a mean relative body mass index (BMI) before treatment of 165.6+/-24.7% were included. Body weight and plasma levels of Lp(a), lipids, apolipoproteins A-I and B, insulin, and C-reactive protein were determined before the onset and after the end of the intervention. In addition, the number of apo(a) kringle-IV repeats were determined using sodium dodecyl sulfate agarose gel electrophoresis.

RESULTS

The mean loss of body weight was 5.0+/-1.3 kg (-6.6%), resulting in a mean decrease of the relative BMI of 6.6%. Blood chemistry revealed significant changes in all parameters, especially in Lp(a), with a decrease from 24.4+/-30.6 to 17.9+/-22.6 mg per 100 ml or -19% (P<0.001). The decrease of Lp(a) levels was higher in the group with low compared with high molecular weight apo(a) phenotypes (-23.9 vs -16.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Weight reduction in obese children is associated with significant changes in Lp(a) levels, especially in subjects with high pre-treatment Lp(a) concentrations. This effect is markedly influenced by the molecular phenotype at the copy-number variable apo(a) locus.

Plasma lipoprotein (a), homocysteine, and other cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in Nigerians with CVD

Elevated plasma lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) and total homocysteine (tHcy) concentrations, as well as fat distributions, are associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. The purpose of this study was to evaluate plasma Lp(a), tHcy, percentage body fat, anthropometric indices, and blood pressure (BP) and their relationships with each other in well-defined, hospital-based, CVD patients in a Nigerian African community. One hundred seventy patients suffering from hypertensive heart disease, hypertension, ischaemic heart disease, and myocardial infraction with the mean age of 45.3 ± 1.3 years and 58 apparently healthy volunteers with the mean age of 44.8 ±1.2 years were selected. Anthropometric indices and BP were measured. Percentage body fat, body mass index, and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) were calculated. Plasma Lp(a) and tHcy concentrations were determined. The results showed significant increases in BP, skinfold thickness (SFT) variables, and WHR in all of the CVD patients. Plasma Lp(a) was also significantly increased (p < 0.001), whereas the slight increase in the mean tHcy was not statistically significant. Positive significant correlations were found between systolic BP, triceps, SFT, and percentage body fat (p < 0.01), whereas significant correlations were found between some body composition variables, tHcy, and systolic BP (p < 0.05). Our findings provide supportive evidence for altered plasma Lp(a) concentration in addition to some other traditional CVD risk factors in Nigerians. The role of homocysteine is not well defined.

Lipid changes and statins in chronic renal insufficiency

It has been known for a long time that chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with dyslipidemia, but the full extent of abnormalities has been appreciated only recently, because routine laboratory tests fail to disclose the entire spectrum of lipid abnormalities. Lipids, particularly HDL cholesterol, are predictive of cardiovascular events, but a paradoxic inverse relation between cholesterol concentration and cardiovascular death has been noted in uremic patients. This currently is thought to be explained by the confounding effect of microinflammation and possibly calcification, but this is not definitely proved. Several retrospective analyses that included patients with mild or moderate CKD documented benefit from lowering of cholesterol by statins. In contrast, the Die Deutsche Diabetes Dialyse (4D) study and a small Scandinavian study failed to show a benefit from lowering of cholesterol by statins in ESRD. Pathomechanistically, it is possible that nonclassical pathomechanisms override statin-sensitive mechanisms as also suggested by the observation that statins fail to reduce carotid intima-media thickening. Although, experimentally, exposure to lipids (particularly oxidized lipids) aggravates progression, data on the effect of statins on progression in patients with CKD are not definite. The most likely explanation is that the impact of numerous confounders obscures their effect on progression. The increase in urinary protein excretion of patients who are treated with statins had been a cause of concern, but the underlying mechanism (i.e. interference with proximal tubular reabsorption of protein) meanwhile has been well documented.

Lipoprotein(a): an independent risk factor for ischemic heart disease that is dependent on triglycerides in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Lipoprotein(a) is an independent risk factor for Ischaemic Heart Disease (IHD) in the general population. There are conflicting reports in the extent of its association with IHD among subjects with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

The aim was to determine the concentration of Lp(a) and its relationship with other lipids parameters among Omani T2DM subjects with and without IHD. An over-night fasting blood sample from 221 T2DM subjects (86 females and 135 males) and 156 non-diabetics (69 females and 87 males) aged 30–70 years (as control) was taken for lipid profile studies.

Lp(a) was significantly lower (p = 0.012) among T2DM subjects 0.123(1.12) g/L compared to non-diabetics 0.246 (1.18)g/L, irrespective of gender.

A significant correlation (Spearman correlation, P = 0.047) was revealed between Lp(a) and IHD among Omani T2DM subjects. The proportions of T2DM subjects with IHD and an Lp(a) >0.3 g/L was higher compared to T2DM without IHD irrespective of gender, for women 42% vs. 27% and for men 17.5 vs. 8%, respectively.

A significant negative correlation existed between Lp(a) and triglycerides (r = 0.41, P = 0.002) among T2DM subjects. In contrast, a significant positive correlation existed between Lp(a) and LDL-chol among the non-diabetic subjects.

Women had significantly higher Lp(a) concentration compared to men ( 0.30 Vs. 0.16 g/L, P < 0.0001) irrespective of the diabetic status.

Lp(a) is an independent risk factor for IHD among Omani T2DM subjects. Lp(a) concentration was significantly lower and negatively correlated with triglycerides among Omani diabetic compared to non-diabetic subjects.

Quo vadis haemapheresis. Current developments in haemapheresis

The techniques of haemapheresis originated in the development of centrifugal devices separating cells from plasma and later on plasma from cells. Subsequently membrane filtration was developed allowing for plasma-cell separation. The unspecificity of therapeutic plasma exchange led to the development of secondary plasma separation technologies being specific, semi-selective or selective such as adsorption, filtration or precipitation. In contrast on-line differential separation of cells is still under development. Whereas erythrocytapheresis, granulocytapheresis, lymphocytapheresis and stem cell apheresis are technically advanced, monocytapheresis may need further improvement. Also, indications such as erythrocytapheresis for the treatment of polycythaemia vera or photopheresis though being clinically effective and of considerable importance for an appropriate disease control are to some extent under debate as being either too costly or without sufficient understanding of the mechanism. Other forms of cell therapy are under development. Rheohaemapheresis as the most advanced technology of extracorporeal haemorheotherapy is a rapidly developing approach contributing to the treatment of microcirculatory diseases and tissue repair. Whereas the control of a considerable number of (auto-) antibody mediated diseases is beyond discussion, the indication of apheresis therapy for immune complex mediated diseases is quite often still under debate. Detoxification for artificial liver support advanced considerably during the last years, whereas conclusions on the efficacy of septicaemia treatment are debatable indeed. LDL-apheresis initiated in 1981 as immune apheresis is well established since 24 years, other semi-selective or unspecific procedures, allowing for the elimination of LDL-cholesterol among other plasma components are also being used. Correspondingly Lp(a) apheresis is available as a specific, highly efficient elimination procedure superior to techniques which also eliminate Lp(a). Quality control systems, more economical technologies as for instance by increasing automation, influencing the over-interpretation of evidence based medicine especially in patients with rare diseases without treatment alternative, more insight into the need of controlled clinical trials or alternatively improved diagnostic procedures are among others tools ways to expand the application of haemapheresis so far applied in cardiology, dermatology, haematology, immunology, nephrology, neurology, ophthalmology, otology, paediatrics, rheumatology, surgery and transfusion medicine.

Lipoprotein(a)- and low-density lipoprotein-derived cholesterol in nephrotic syndrome: Impact on lipid-lowering therapy?

BACKGROUND

Patients with nephrotic syndrome have the highest lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations known. Lp(a) is an low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-like particle consisting of 45% cholesterol. The usual methods to determine LDL cholesterol do not distinguish between cholesterol derived from LDL and Lp(a) and are thus the net result of cholesterol levels from both lipoproteins. High Lp(a) concentrations therefore significantly contribute to the measured or calculated LDL cholesterol levels. Since statins have no influence on Lp(a) levels, it can be expected that the LDL cholesterol-lowering effect of statins may be diminished in patients who have a pronounced elevation of Lp(a) levels accompanied by only moderate elevations of LDL cholesterol.

METHODS

We investigated 207 patients with nondiabetic nephrotic syndrome in whom Lp(a) concentrations were strikingly elevated when compared to 274 controls (60.4 +/- 85.4 mg/dL vs. 20.0 +/- 32.8 mg/dL, P < 0.0001).

RESULTS

According to National Kidney Foundation Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) Clinical Practice Guidelines for Managing Dyslipidemias, almost 95% of these patients are candidates for a therapeutic intervention to lower LDL cholesterol. LDL cholesterol levels corrected for Lp(a)-derived cholesterol, however, were 27 mg/dL lower than uncorrected concentrations (compared to only 9 mg/dL in controls). If Lp(a)-corrected levels instead of total LDL cholesterol levels were used, 25.7% of patients with low-molecular-weight (LMW) apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] isoforms were classified no longer to be in need of LDL cholesterol-lowering therapeutic intervention compared to only 2.3% of patients with high-molecular-weight (HMW) apo(a) phenotypes (P < 0.00001). This ("pseudo") pharmacogenetic effect results in incorrect determination of LDL cholesterol.

CONCLUSION

Our observation has an impact on the indication for, and assessment of efficacy of intervention. This potential artifact should be investigated in ongoing large trials in renal patients as well as in nonrenal African American subjects who have on average markedly higher Lp(a) levels. In nonrenal Caucasian subjects with much lower Lp(a) concentrations, this issue will be less relevant.

Epidemiology, pathophysiology and therapeutic implications of lipoprotein(a) in kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease is associated with a tremendously increased risk for cardiovascular disease. Traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease, however, show a diminished predictive power in these patients compared with the general population. This review provides an overview of lipoprotein(a), which is considered a nontraditional risk factor. The characteristic genetic and nongenetic changes of lipoprotein(a) in kidney disease are discussed and set into the context of risk prediction. In particular, genetically determined apolipoprotein(a) polymorphism is a powerful risk predictor for cardiovascular disease and total mortality in these patients. Finally, the limited interventional strategies available to lower lipoprotein(a) are considered.

Lipoprotein(a): new insights into mechanisms of atherogenesis and thrombosis

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) continues to be a controversial molecule regarding its role in human vascular disease. Although the physiologic role of this molecule is still unclear, novel discoveries within the last few years have suggested numerous mechanisms whereby Lp(a) may contribute to atherosclerosis and its complications in human subjects. These effects may differentially occur in vascular tissue and circulating blood compartments. A complex interplay between tissue-specific effects is probably more relevant to the pathogenicity of this molecule than one single effect alone. This review briefly describes the structure of Lp(a) in relation to its biochemical function, summarizing the current literature on various pathophysiologic mechanisms of Lp(a)-induced vascular disease and the role of cell and tissue-specific effects in promoting atherogenesis and thrombosis.

Established and recently identified coronary heart disease risk factors in young people: the influence of physical activity and physical fitness

Epidemiological studies have identified several risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD), many of which are present in young people. [For the purpose of this review, the phrase "young people" embraces both children and adolescents.] One such risk factor is hypertension. In adults, exercise is thought to have a positive effect on blood pressure levels; however, findings are inconclusive for young people. Despite its association with CHD, obesity is on the increase in Western society's young population; prevention and intervention during early years is needed. An active lifestyle is considered to have a beneficial effect on body fatness. Lipoprotein profiles are directly associated with CHD status. In adults, there is some evidence that physical activity and/or fitness have a favourable effect on lipoprotein levels. Although information regarding the younger population is more ambiguous, it tends to concur with these findings. High levels of lipoprotein(a), are considered an independent risk factor for CHD. Relatively little has been written on young people, although some studies have postulated a favourable relationship with physical activity. An inverse relationship between aerobic fitness and CHD has been confirmed in adults; an association is not as easily verified for young people. Physical activity is similarly deemed to have a beneficial effect on health status. A high-fat diet has been linked to CHD in adults, and evidence to date reports similar findings for young people. Smoking increases the risk of CHD and even moderate smoking during youth could have damaging long-term consequences. There is some evidence that smoking is related to physical activity and fitness levels in young people. In adults, high levels of homocyst(e)ine have been associated with CHD. As yet, little has been written on the relationship between physical activity or physical fitness and homocysteine status in young people. High levels of plasma fibrinogen have been linked to CHD. Several studies have explored the relationship between plasma fibrinogen and physical activity and/or fitness in adults, but findings are inconclusive; for young people, the ambiguity is even greater. C-reactive protein is a molecular marker for CHD but, to date, little attention has been given to this aspect, especially amongst young people. The link between high levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and CHD has been confirmed, although the essence of this relationship is not established. There is a paucity of data on the younger population and the relevance of collating such information is questionable. For the younger population, most research is limited to the established CHD risk factors and further investigations of recently identified CHD risk factors are needed.

Inhibitors of lipoprotein(a) assembly

Compounds of the general structure A and B were investigated for their activity as lipoprotein(a), [Lp(a)], assembly (coupling) inhibitors. SAR around the amino acid derivatives (structure A) gave compound 14-6 as a potent coupling inhibitor. Oral dosing of compound 14-6 to Lp(a) transgenic mice and cymologous monkeys resulted in a>30% decrease in plasma Lp(a) levels after 1-2 weeks of treatment at 100 mg/kg/day.

Lipoprotein (a) downregulates lysosomal acid lipase and induces interleukin-6 in human blood monocytes

The association of elevated lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) with an increased risk for coronary events is clearly established. This increased risk may in part be due to the activation of monocytes as major cells involved in atherogenesis. High concentrations of plasma Lp(a) were shown to influence the gene expression of human blood monocytes and in the present study we demonstrate a reduced abundance of the lysosomal acid lipase (LAL) mRNA in monocytes of patients with coronary disease and selective Lp(a) hyperlipidemia. This is also supported by in vitro studies where purified Lp(a) but not low-density lipoprotein (LDL) was shown to downregulate mRNA levels of the LAL in control monocytes. A correlation of Lp(a) serum levels and the proinflammatory cytokine IL-6 was recently also described. Therefore, we investigated whether Lp(a) is capable to enhance the release of this acute phase cytokine from human blood monocytes. Purified Lp(a) led to an increased secretion of IL-6, but not TNF-alpha arguing against a general activation of these cells. The association of reduced LAL activity with the premature development of coronary artery disease has been demonstrated in patients with hypercholesterolemia, and in the present study we show for the first time that LAL expression is suppressed in monocytes from patients with Lp(a) hyperlipidemia and by purified Lp(a). In addition, increased levels of IL-6 also predict future cardiovascular events and IL-6 secretion was also induced by purified Lp(a).

Apolipoprotein(a) isoform-specific changes of lipoprotein(a) after kidney transplantation

The atherogenic lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is significantly increased in patients with kidney disease. Some studies in hemodialysis patients described this increase to be dependent on the genetic apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) isoforms. Only patients who express high molecular weight (HMW) apo(a) isoforms but not those with low molecular weight (LMW) isoforms show a relative increase of Lp(a) when compared to healthy controls matched for apo(a) isoforms. However, this was not confirmed by all studies. We therefore prospectively investigated the changes of Lp(a) deriving from each apo(a) isoform in heterozygotes following kidney transplantation. Lp(a) concentrations were measured by ELISA. To calculate the isoform-specific concentrations and the changes of Lp(a) deriving from each isoform, we densitometrically scanned the apo(a) bands from immunoblots before and after transplantation in 20 patients expressing two apo(a) isoforms. Of these, 10 patients expressed both an LMW and an HMW apo(a) isoform. The other 10 patients expressed only HMW isoforms. Densitometric scanning of apo(a) bands and calculation of isoform-derived Lp(a) concentrations clearly demonstrated that the decrease of Lp(a) following kidney transplantation is caused by changes in the expression of HMW apo(a) isoforms. In some patients, we observed an almost complete disappearance of the HMW apo(a) isoform after transplantation. This study clearly demonstrates that the changes of Lp(a) plasma concentrations in kidney disease depend on the genetically determined size of apo(a). This provides evidence for an interaction of apo(a) genetic variability and kidney function on Lp(a) concentrations.

Lipoprotein(a): an emerging cardiovascular risk factor

Lipoprotein(a) is a cholesterol-enriched lipoprotein, consisting of a covalent linkage joining the unique and highly polymorphic apolipoprotein(a) to apolipoprotein B100, the main protein moiety of low-density lipoproteins. Although the concentration of lipoprotein(a) in humans is mostly genetically determined, acquired disorders might influence synthesis and catabolism of the particle. Raised concentration of lipoprotein(a) has been acknowledged as a leading inherited risk factor for both premature and advanced atherosclerosis at different vascular sites. The strong structural homologies with plasminogen and low-density lipoproteins suggest that lipoprotein(a) might represent the ideal bridge between the fields of atherosclerosis and thrombosis in the pathogenesis of vascular occlusive disorders. Unfortunately, the exact mechanisms by which lipoprotein(a) promotes, accelerates, and complicates atherosclerosis are only partially understood. In some clinical settings, such as in patients at exceptionally low risk for cardiovascular disease, the potential regenerative and antineoplastic properties of lipoprotein(a) might paradoxically counterbalance its athero-thrombogenicity, as attested by the compatibility between raised plasma lipoprotein(a) levels and longevity.

Prevalence and progression of peripheral arterial calcifications in patients with ESRD

BACKGROUND

Peripheral arterial calcifications are seen frequently in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, prevalence and progression, as well as contributing factors, never were investigated in an unselected incident cohort of dialysis patients.

METHODS

We investigated 155 patients with ESRD at the beginning of dialysis therapy and followed them up prospectively during the first year of either hemodialysis (n = 106) or peritoneal dialysis treatment (n = 49). The prevalence and progression of arterial calcifications during the first year were graded by a single radiologist on standardized plain radiographs of the pelvis and calves. Findings were analyzed in relation to sex, age, diabetes mellitus, dialysis modality, total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) level, apolipoprotein(a) kringle-IV repeat polymorphism, calcium level, phosphorus level, intact parathyroid hormone level, and homocysteine level.

RESULTS

Patients with peripheral arterial calcifications at the start of renal replacement therapy (RRT) (n = 104) were significantly older (P < 0.001), had diabetes more often (P < 0.001), and had greater Lp(a) concentrations (P = 0.03) and a trend to greater total cholesterol concentrations. Patients with progression of calcifications during the first year of RRT had significantly greater homocysteine levels (P = 0.036). Logistic regression analysis showed that patients without calcifications either at the beginning or after 1 year of RRT were younger (P = 0.01) and had significantly lower homocysteine (P = 0.004) and Lp(a) levels (P = 0.03) and less frequently had diabetes mellitus (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Our observations suggest that the prevalence of peripheral arterial calcifications in patients with ESRD is related to age, diabetes mellitus, and Lp(a) and homocysteine levels. Progression of arterial calcifications might be related to high plasma homocysteine concentrations.

High sensitivity C-reactive protein: an emerging role in cardiovascular risk assessment

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the major cause of death in the developed world and screening for conventional cardiovascular risk factors fails to identify more than 50% of the individuals who will present with acute coronary syndromes. Chronic inflammation appears to play a significant role in the initiation and development of atherosclerosis. Recent investigations have shown an association between inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and CHD. These markers have proven useful as prognostic indicators in acute coronary syndromes and in predicting future coronary events in apparently healthy men and women. The availability of high sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP) assays has been crucial in exploring the role of this acute phase reactant in primary prevention settings. In this review, we discuss the evidence associating these inflammatory markers, especially CRP, with the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and acute coronary syndromes, and we address the mechanism of risk as well as the clinical utility of this marker.

Detection of lipoprotein(a) in intraparenchymal cerebral vessels: correlation with vascular pathology and clinical history

Serum levels of lipoprotein(a), Lp(a), have been shown to be associated with increased risk of atherosclerosis (AS) and AS-related diseases such as myocardial and ischemic cerebral infarcts (ICI). Lp(a) has been detected in the vascular wall of the aorta and coronary vessels, and we documented the presence of apo(a) in cerebral vessels of the Circle of Willis, associated with AS changes. In this study we further investigated and characterized the biochemical nature of Lp(a) detected in both large and small cerebral parenchymal vessels. Autopsy specimens of cerebral vessels of 51 patients were examined by immunohistochemistry with monoclonal antibodies against apo(a), apoB, and plasminogen. Lp(a) was detected in cerebral capillaries and arterioles. All of the 8 patients with ICI expressed Lp(a) in parenchymal vessels, generally (6/8) in both capillaries and arterioles. Of 43 patients without ICI only 25 had Lp(a) detected. Among the patients without ICI, there was a slightly increased incidence of parenchymal Lp(a) in those patients who had severe hypoxic brain damage (12/20) compared to those patients without severe hypoxic damage (9/23). Thus, the presence of Lp(a) in small cerebral parenchymal vessels may reflect the role of Lp(a) in ICI.

Instability of Lipoprotein(a) in Plasma Stored at −70 °C

Background: There is considerable evidence to suggest that plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentration is a cardiovascular risk factor. Confusing results in epidemiologic studies, however, suggest that the effects of storage should be further investigated. The influence of the assay method, the initial plasma Lp(a) concentration, and the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] genotype are all factors that should be considered.

Methods: Blood was obtained from 65 survivors of premature myocardial infarction and 95 age-matched controls. The plasma samples were stored in sterile conditions at −70 °C for 5 years in the presence of antioxidant and antiproteolytic substances. Plasma Lp(a) was measured by immunoturbidimetry, and apo(a) alleles were determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and Southern blotting.

Results: Plasma Lp(a) was significantly higher in patients. The mean kringle number for the smallest isoform was also lower in patients than in controls, but no differences were found in the distribution of the largest isoform. All patients and controls were heterozygotes. During storage, mean Lp(a) decreased significantly in samples from patients (−23%; P &lt;0.001) but not in samples from controls (−9%; P, not significant). This was not related to the kringle number and was limited to samples with initial plasma Lp(a) concentrations between 41 and 345 mg/L.

Conclusions: Plasma Lp(a) from patients is less stable than Lp(a) from controls, and the difference is not related to distribution of apo(a) genotypes but may be concentration-dependent. Differential sample stability may complicate the interpretation of several studies.

Structural elucidation of the N- and O-glycans of human apolipoprotein(a): role of o-glycans in conferring protease resistance

Apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) is a multikringle domain glycoprotein that exists covalently linked to apolipoprotein B100 of low density lipoprotein, to form the lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) particle, or as proteolytic fragments. Elevated plasma concentrations of apo(a) and its fragments may promote atherosclerosis, but the underlying mechanisms are incompletely understood. The factors influencing apo(a) proteolysis are also uncertain. Here we have used exoglycosidase digestion and mass spectrometry to sequence the Asn (N)-linked and Ser/Thr (O)-linked oligosaccharides of human apo(a). We also assessed the potential role of apo(a) O-glycans in protecting thermolysin-sensitive regions of the polypeptide. Apo(a) contained two major N-glycans that accounted for 17% of the total oligosaccharide structures. The N-glycans were complex biantennary structures present in either a mono- or disialylated state. The O-glycans were mostly (80%) represented by the monosialylated core type 1 structure, NeuNAcalpha2-3Galbeta1-3GalNAc, with smaller amounts of disialylated and non-sialylated O-glycans also detected. Removal of apo(a) O-glycans by sialidase and O-glycosidase treatment dramatically increased the sensitivity of the polypeptide to thermolysin digestion. These studies provide the first direct sequencing data for apo(a) glycans and indicate a novel function for apo(a) O-glycans that is potentially related to the atherogenicity of Lp(a).

Lipoprotein (a) up-regulates the expression of the plasminogen activator inhibitor 2 in human blood monocytes

Elevated plasma lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) and cardiac events show a modest but significant association in various clinical studies. However, the influence of high Lp(a) on the gene expression in blood monocytes as a major cell involved in atherogenesis is poorly described. To identify genes influenced by elevated serum Lp(a), the gene expression was analyzed on a complementary DNA microarray comparing monocytes from a patient with isolated Lp(a) hyperlipidemia and coronary heart disease with monocytes from a healthy blood donor with low Lp(a). By using this approach, numerous genes were found differentially expressed in patient-versus-control monocytes. Verification of these candidates by Northern blot analysis or semiquantitative polymerase chain reaction in monocytes from additional patients with Lp(a) hyperlipidemia and healthy blood donors with elevated Lp(a) confirmed a significant induction of plasminogen activator inhibitor type 2 (PAI-2) messenger RNA (mRNA) in monocytes from male, but not from female, individuals with high Lp(a), indicating that this observation is gender specific. This led also to increased intracellular and secreted PAI-2 protein in monocytes from male probands with Lp(a) hyperlipidemia. Plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) mRNA was found suppressed only in the patients' monocytes and not in healthy probands with high Lp(a) levels. Purified Lp(a) induced PAI-2 mRNA and protein and reduced PAI-1 expression in monocytes isolated from various controls. The finding that PAI-2 is elevated in monocytes from male patients with isolated Lp(a) hyperlipidemia and male healthy probands with high Lp(a) and that purified Lp(a) up-regulates PAI-2 in control monocytes in vitro indicate a direct, but gender-specific, effect of Lp(a) for the induction of PAI-2 expression.

Relationship of lipoprotein(a) to variables of coagulation in hypertensive subjects

BACKGROUND

Coagulation factors are independent predictors of cardiovascular damage in the general population. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between general cardiovascular risk factors, lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), and some hemostatic variables, and to characterize the isoforms of apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) in hypertensive subjects.

METHODS

Plasma lipids, apolipoproteins, Lp(a), apo(a) isoforms, fibrinogen, and parameters that directly reflect the coagulation activation were measured in 389 untreated essential hypertensive patients recruited at a hypertension clinic. Hypertensive patients were compared with 323 normotensive controls.

RESULTS

In normotensive subjects, Lp(a) concentrations were significantly correlated with fibrinogen (r = 0.138; P < 0.02) but not D-dimer (r = 0.074; not significant). In hypertensive subjects, log Lp(a) concentrations were significantly correlated with age (r = 0.127; P < 0.02), apo-B (r = 0.128; P < 0.02), plasma fibrinogen (r = 0.193; P < 0.001), and fibrin D-dimer (r = 0.200; P < 0.001) levels, but not with body mass index, blood pressure, cholesterol, triglycerides, apo-AI, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2, and antithrombin III. The relationship of Lp(a) with fibrinogen (male: r = 0.198, P < 0.002; female: r = 0.177, P < 0.01) and D-dimer (male: r = 0.211, P < 0.002; female: r = 0.188, P < 0.01) was significant in both sexes, whereas the relationship of Lp(a) with age and apo-B was found only in males. Multivariate analysis showed that both fibrinogen and D-dimer were independently related with Lp(a). Elevated fibrinogen, D-dimer, and Lp(a) levels were significantly and independently associated with clinical evidence of atherosclerotic disease. Apo(a) phenotypes were analyzed to investigate the genetic background of the relationships between Lp(a) and coagulation parameters. In both hypertensive and normotensive subjects, Lp(a) levels were inversely correlated with apo(a) isoform protein size, whereas fibrinogen and D-dimer concentrations were comparable in patients with apo(a) isoforms of different size.

CONCLUSIONS

The relationship between Lp(a) and clotting variables is significantly stronger in hypertensive than in normotensive subjects, providing a compelling argument for accelerated progression of atherothrombosis in these patients.

Lipoprotein (a) and stroke

Strokes are one of the most common causes of mortality and long term severe disability. There is evidence that lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) is a predictor of many forms of vascular disease, including premature coronary artery disease. Several studies have also evaluated the association between Lp(a) and ischaemic (thrombotic) stroke. Several cross sectional (and a few prospective) studies provide contradictory findings regarding Lp(a) as a predictor of ischaemic stroke. Several factors might contribute to the existing confusion--for example, small sample sizes, different ethnic groups, the influence of oestrogens in women participating in the studies, plasma storage before Lp(a) determination, statistical errors, and selection bias. This review focuses on the Lp(a) related mechanisms that might contribute to the pathogenesis of ischaemic stroke. The association between Lp(a) and other cardiovascular risk factors is discussed. Therapeutic interventions that can lower the circulating concentrations of Lp(a) and thus possibly reduce the risk of stroke are also considered.

Apolipoprotein E gene expression is reduced in apolipoprotein A-I transgenic mice

The levels of plasma apolipoprotein (apo) E, an anti-atherogenic protein involved in mammalian cholesterol transport, were found to be 2-3 fold lower in mice over-expressing human apoA-I gene. ApoE is mainly associated with VLDL and HDL-size particles, but in mice the majority of the apoE is associated with the HDL particles. Over-expression of the human apoA-I in mice increases the levels of human apoA-I-rich HDL particles by displacing mouse apoA-I from HDL. This results in lowering of plasma levels of mouse apoA-I. Since plasma levels of apoE also decreased in the apoA-I transgenic mice, the mechanism of apoE lowering was investigated. Although plasma levels of apoE decreased by 2-3 fold, apoB levels remained unchanged. As expected, the plasma levels of human apoA-I were almost 5-fold higher in the apoAI-Tg mice compared to mouse apoA-I in WT mice. If the over-expression of human apoA-I caused displacement of apoE from the HDL, the levels of hepatic apoE mRNA should remain the same in WT and the apoAI-Tg mice. However, the measurements of apoE mRNA in the liver showed 3-fold decreases of apoE mRNA in apoAI-Tg mice as compared to WT mice, suggesting that the decreased apoE mRNA expression, but not the displacement of the apoE from HDL, resulted in the lowering of plasma apoE in apoAI-Tg mice. As expected, the levels of hepatic apoA-I mRNA (transgene) were 5-fold higher in the apoAI-Tg mice. ApoE synthesis measured in hepatocytes also showed lower synthesis of apoE in the apoAI-Tg mice. These studies suggest that the integration of human apoA-I transgene in mouse genome occurred at a site that affected apoE gene expression. Identification of this locus may provide further understanding of the apoE gene expression.

High density lipoprotein, apolipoprotein A-I, and coronary artery disease

High density lipoproteins (HDL), one of the main lipoprotein particles circulating in plasma, is involved in the reverse cholesterol transport. Several lines of evidence suggest that elevated levels of HDL is protective against coronary heart disease. The role of HDL in the removal of body cholesterol and in the regression of atherosclerosis add to the importance of understanding the molecular-cellular processes that determine plasma levels of HDL. Factors modulating plasma levels of HDL may have influence on the predisposition of an individual to premature coronary artery disease. Apolipoprotein (apo) A-I is the main apolipoprotein component of HDL and, to a large extent, sets the plasma levels of HDL. Thus, understanding the regulation of apoA-I gene expression may provide clues to raise plasma levels of HDL. This review discusses the various pathways that alter plasma levels of HDL. Since apoA-I is the main protein component of HDL and determines the plasma levels of HDL, this review also covers the regulation of apoA-I gene expression.

Lipoprotein (a), haemostatic variables and cardiovascular damage in hypertensive patients

OBJECTIVE

Lipoproteins and coagulation factors are independent predictors of atherothrombotic events in the general population and their interaction may contribute to the development of cardiovascular damage. This study was designed to assess relationships between lipoproteins, haemostatic variables, and atherosclerotic complications in hypertensive patients.

METHODS

In 389 untreated essential hypertensive patients recruited at a hypertension clinic, we measured plasma lipids, apolipoproteins, lipoprotein (a), apolipoprotein (a) isoforms, fibrinogen, and parameters that directly reflect the coagulation activation. Hypertensive patients were compared to 92 normotensive controls.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis showed log lipoprotein (a) concentrations to be significantly correlated with age (P< 0.02), apolipoprotein B (P< 0.02), plasma fibrinogen (P< 0.001), and fibrin D-dimer (P< 0.001) levels, but not with body mass index, blood pressure, dietary fat intake, cholesterol, triglycerides, apolipoprotein Al, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2, and antithrombin III. The relationship of lipoprotein (a) with fibrinogen and D-dimer was present in both sexes, whereas the relationship of lipoprotein (a) with age and apolipoprotein B was found only in males. Multiple regression analysis showed that both fibrinogen and D-dimer were independently related with lipoprotein (a). Elevated fibrinogen, D-dimer, and lipoprotein (a) levels were significantly and independently associated with clinical evidence of atherosclerotic disease. To investigate whether the relationships of lipoprotein (a) with coagulation parameters are genetically determined, we analysed apolipoprotein (a) phenotypes in a subset of 188 hypertensive patients. While lipoprotein (a) levels were inversely correlated with apolipoprotein (a) isoform protein size, both fibrinogen and D-dimer concentrations were comparable in patients with apolipoprotein (a) isoforms of different size.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates a relationship between lipoprotein (a) and clotting variables in hypertensive patients that may contribute to atherosclerotic damage in these patients. There is no evidence of a genetic background for this relationship.

Are lipid-dependent indicators of cardiovascular risk affected by renal transplantation?

Hyperlipoproteinemia has been reported to frequently occur in kidney transplanted patients, thus possibly explaining, at least in part, the increased incidence of cardiovascular disease in this population. To evaluate the impact of renal transplantation (Tx), and related immunosuppressive therapy, on plasma lipoprotein and Lp(a) profile, we selected a cohort of kidney transplanted patients (36 M/14 F; age 33.8 + 12.0 yr, range 13-62) lacking significant causes of hyperlipidemia. All patients received a triple immunosuppressive regimen and showed a stable renal function after Tx (plasma creatinine: 1.36 +/- 0.35 mg/dL). One year after Tx, we found a significant increase of total cholesterol (TC), LDL, HDL, ApoB and ApoA-I (p < 0.005), while plasma triglyceride levels remained unmodified. Lp(a) plasma levels after Tx were within the normal range and displayed a significant inverse relationship with apo(a) size. Noteworthy, LDL/HDL ratio and ApoB/ ApoA-I ratio in kidney transplanted patients were almost superimposable with those of normal controls. Specifically, LDL/HDL ratio significantly decreased in 64% of patients after Tx, due to a prevalent increase of HDL, and was associated with a moderate amelioration of plasma TG. In a multiple linear regression model, post-Tx HDL level was significantly related to recipient's age, gender, BMI and cyclosporine (CyA) trough levels (Adj-R2 = 0.35, p = 0.0002), with gender and CyA trough levels being the better predictors of HDL. In conclusion, immunosuppressive regimens, in themselves, do not appear to significantly increase the atherogenic risk related to lipoproteins. Rather, other factors can affect the lipoprotein profile and its vascular effects in renal transplant recipients.

Lipoprotein(a) serum concentrations and apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes in mild and moderate renal failure

High lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) serum concentrations and the underlying apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) phenotypes are risk factors for cardiovascular disease in the general population as well as in patients with renal disease. Lp(a) concentrations are markedly elevated in patients with end-stage renal disease. However, nothing is known about the changes of Lp(a) depending on apo(a) size polymorphism in the earliest stages of renal impairment. In this study, GFR was measured by iohexol technique in 227 non-nephrotic patients with different degrees of renal impairment and was then correlated with Lp(a) serum concentrations stratified according to low (LMW) and high (HMW) molecular weight apo(a) phenotypes. Lp(a) increased significantly with decreasing GFR. Such an increase was dependent on apo(a) phenotype. Only renal patients with HMW apo(a) phenotypes expressed higher median Lp(a) concentrations, i.e., 6.2 mg/dl at GFR >90 ml/min per 1.73 m2, 14.2 at GFR 45 to 90 ml/min per 1.73 m2, and 18.0 mg/dl at GFR <45 ml/min per 1.73 m2. These values were markedly different when compared with apo(a) phenotype-matched control subjects who had a median level of 4.4 mg/dl (ANOVA, linear relationship, P < 0.001). In contrast, no significant differences were observed at different stages of renal function in patients with LMW apo(a) phenotypes when compared with phenotype-matched control subjects. The elevation of Lp(a) was independent of the type of primary renal disease and was not related to the concentration of C-reactive protein. Multiple linear regression analysis found that the apo(a) phenotype and GFR were significantly associated with Lp(a) levels. Non-nephrotic-range proteinuria modified the association between GFR and Lp(a) levels. In summary, an increase of Lp(a) concentrations, compared with apo(a) phenotype-matched control subjects, is seen in non-nephrotic patients with primary renal disease even in the earliest stage when GFR is not yet subnormal. This change is found only in subjects with HMW apo(a) phenotypes, however.

Evidence that multiple genes influence baseline concentrations and diet response of Lp(a) in baboons

We investigated the response of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels to dietary fat and cholesterol in 633 baboons fed a series of 3 diets: a basal diet low in cholesterol and fat, a high-fat diet, and a diet high in fat and cholesterol. Measurement of serum concentrations in samples taken while the baboons were sequentially fed the 3 diets allowed us to analyze 3 Lp(a) variables: Lp(a)(Basal), Lp(a)(RF) (response to increased dietary fat), and Lp(a)(RC) (response to increased dietary cholesterol in the high-fat environment). On average, Lp(a) concentrations significantly increased 6% and 28%, respectively, when dietary fat and cholesterol were increased (P<0.001). As expected, most of the variation in Lp(a)(Basal) was influenced by genes (h(2)=0.881). However, less than half of the variation in Lp(a)(RC) was influenced by genes (h(2)=0.347, P<0. 0001), whereas the increase due to dietary fat alone was not significantly heritable (h(2)=0.043, P=0.28). To determine whether Lp(a) phenotypic variation was due to variation in LPA, the locus encoding the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] protein, we conducted linkage analyses by using LPA genotypes inferred from the apo(a) isoform phenotypes. All of the genetic variance in Lp(a)(Basal) concentration was linked to the LPA locus (log of the odds [LOD] score was 30.5). In contrast, linkage analyses revealed that genetic variance in Lp(a)(RC) was not linked to the LPA locus (LOD score was 0.036, P>0.5). To begin identifying the non-LPA genes that influence the Lp(a) response to dietary cholesterol, we tested, in bivariate quantitative genetic analyses, for correlation with low density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDLC; ie, non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol less the cholesterol contribution from Lp(a)]. LDLC(Basal) was weakly correlated with Lp(a)(Basal) (rho(P)=0.018). However, LDLC(RC) and Lp(a)(RC) were strongly correlated (rho(P)=0. 382), and partitioning the correlations revealed significant genetic and environmental correlations (rho(G)=0.587 and rho(E)=0.251, respectively). The results suggest that increasing both dietary fat and dietary cholesterol caused significant increases in Lp(a) concentrations and that the response to dietary cholesterol was mediated by a gene or suite of genes that appears to exert pleiotropic effects on LDLC levels as well. The gene(s) influencing Lp(a) response to dietary cholesterol is not linked to the LPA locus.

Role of lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a) phenotype in atherogenesis: prospective results from the Bruneck study

BACKGROUND

Experimental studies have suggested both atherogenic and thrombogenic properties of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], depending on Lp(a) plasma concentrations and varying antifibrinolytic capacity of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] isoforms. Epidemiological studies may contribute to assessment of the relevance of these findings in the general population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study prospectively investigated the association between Lp(a) plasma concentrations, apo(a) phenotypes, and the 5-year progression of carotid atherosclerosis assessed by high-resolution duplex ultrasound in a random sample population of 826 individuals. We differentiated early atherogenesis (incident nonstenotic atherosclerosis) from advanced (stenotic) stages in atherosclerosis that originate mainly from atherothrombotic mechanisms. Lp(a) plasma concentrations predicted the risk of early atherogenesis in a dose-dependent fashion, with this association being confined to subjects with LDL cholesterol levels above the population median (3.3 mmol/L). Apo(a) phenotypes were distributed similarly in subjects with and without early carotid atherosclerosis. In contrast, apo(a) phenotypes of low molecular weight emerged as one of the strongest risk predictors of advanced stenotic atherosclerosis, especially when associated with high Lp(a) plasma concentrations (odds ratio, 6.4; 95% CI, 2.8 to 14. 9).

CONCLUSIONS

Lp(a) is one of the few risk factors capable of promoting both early and advanced stages of atherogenesis. Lp(a) plasma concentrations predicted the risk of early atherogenesis synergistically with high LDL cholesterol. Low-molecular-weight apo(a) phenotypes with a putatively high antifibrinolytic capacity in turn emerged as one of the leading risk conditions of advanced stenotic stages of atherosclerosis.

Lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a) isoforms and proteinuria in patients with moderate renal failure

BACKGROUND

Atherosclerotic diseases are a major cause of death in patients with renal failure. Increased serum concentrations of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] have been established as a genetically controlled risk factor for these diseases and have been demonstrated in patients with moderate renal failure, suggesting that this lipoprotein contributes to the increased cardiovascular risk seen in these patients. Variable alleles at the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] gene locus are the main determinants of the serum Lp(a) level in the general population. The purpose of this study was to investigate apo(a) isoforms in patients with moderate renal failure and mild proteinuria (less than 1.0 g/day).

METHODS

In 250 consecutive subjects recruited at a hypertension clinic, we assessed the renal function by 24-hour creatinine clearance, proteinuria, and microalbuminuria, as well as the prevalence of atherosclerotic disease, and we also measured apo(a) isoforms, serum albumin, and Lp(a) concentrations.

RESULTS

Moderate impairment of renal function (creatinine clearance, 30 to 89 ml/min per 1.73 m2 of body surface area) was found in 97 patients. Lp(a) levels were significantly greater in patients with moderate renal failure (21.7+/-23.9 mg/dl) as compared with patients with normal renal function (15.6+/-16.4 mg/dl, P<0.001), and an inverse correlation was observed between log Lp(a) and creatinine clearance (r = -0.181, P <0.01). However, no difference was found in the frequency of low molecular weight apo(a) isoforms between patients with normal (25.5%) and impaired (27.8%) renal function. Only patients with the smallest size apo(a) isoforms exhibited significantly elevated levels of Lp(a), whereas the large-size isoforms had similar concentrations in patients with normal and impaired renal function. No significant relationship was found between serum Lp(a) and proteinuria. Clinical and laboratory evidence of one or more events attributed to atherosclerosis was found in 9.8% of patients with normal renal function and 25.8% of patients with moderate renal failure (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that renal failure per se or other genes beside the apo(a) gene locus are responsible for the elevation of serum Lp(a) levels in patients with moderate impairment of renal function. The elevation of Lp(a) levels occurs independently of the level of proteinuria and may contribute to the risk for atherosclerotic disease in these patients.

Effects of exercise on lipoprotein(a)

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a unique lipoprotein complex in the blood. At high levels (> 30 mg/dl), Lp(a) is considered an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Serum Lp(a) levels are largely genetically determined, remain relatively constant within a given individual, and do not appear to be altered by factors known to influence other lipoproteins (e.g. lipid-lowering drugs, dietary modification and change in body mass). Since regular exercise is associated with favourable changes in lipoproteins in the blood, recent attention has focused on whether serum Lp(a) levels are also influenced by physical activity. Population and cross-sectional studies consistently show a lack of association between serum Lp(a) levels and regular moderate physical activity. Moreover, exercise intervention studies extending from 12 weeks to 4 years indicate that serum Lp(a) levels do not change in response to moderate exercise training, despite improvements in fitness level and other lipoprotein levels in the blood. However, recent studies suggest the possibility that serum Lp(a) levels may increase in response to intense load-bearing exercise training, such as distance running or weight lifting, over several months to years. Cross-sectional studies have reported abnormally high serum Lp(a) levels in experienced distance runners and body builders who train for 2 to 3 hours each day. However, the possible confounding influence of racial or ethnic factors in these studies cannot be discounted. Recent intervention studies also suggest that 9 to 12 months of intense exercise training may elevate serum Lp(a) levels. However, these changes are generally modest (10 to 15%) and, in most individuals, serum Lp(a) levels remain within the recommended range. It is unclear whether increased serum Lp(a) levels after intense exercise training are of clinical relevance, and whether certain Lp(a) isoforms are more sensitive to the effects of exercise training. Since elevation of both low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and Lp(a) levels in the blood exerts a synergistic effect on cardiovascular disease risk, attention should focus on changing lifestyle factors to decrease LDL-C (e.g. dietary intervention) and increase high density lipoprotein cholesterol (e.g. exercise) levels in the blood.