Cyclophosphamide/fludarabine (CF) is active in the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma

Cost-effectiveness analysis of KTE-X19 CAR T therapy versus real-world standard of care in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma post BTKi in England

AIMS

The objective of this study is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of KTE-X19 versus standard of care (SoC) in the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) post-Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) treatment from a UK healthcare perspective.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A three-state partitioned survival model (pre-progression, post-progression and death) with a cycle length of one month was used to extrapolate progression-free and overall survival over a lifetime horizon. Population inputs along with KTE-X19 (brexucabtagene autoleucel) efficacy and safety data were derived from the single-arm trial ZUMA-2 (NCT02601313). The composition of SoC was informed by a literature-based meta-analysis, SoC efficacy data were obtained from the SCHOLAR-2 real-world study. Survival was modelled using standard parametric curves for SoC and a mixture-cure methodology for KTE-X19. It was assumed that patients whose disease had not progressed after five years experienced long-term remission. Costs, resource use and utility, and adverse event disutility inputs were obtained from published literature and publicly available data sources. An annual discount rate of 3.5% was applied to costs and health outcomes. Modelled outcomes for KTE-X19 and SoC included expected life years (LY), quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and total costs. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Estimated median survival was 5.96 years for KTE-X19 and 1.38 for SoC. Discounted LYs, QALYs and lifetime costs were 8.27, 5.99 and £385,765 for KTE-X19 versus 1.98, 1.48 and £79,742 for SoC, respectively. The KTE-X19 versus SoC cost per QALY was £67,713 and the cost per LY was £48,645. Influential scenario analyses use alternative KTE-X19 survival curves and discount rates, and shorter time horizons.

CONCLUSION

Considering the survival and quality of life benefits compared to SoC, KTE-X19 for R/R MCL appears as a cost-effective treatment in the real-world UK setting.

Bortezomib in combination with fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide for patients with relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma: results of the LYM-4003 study

This study aimed to identify the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of cyclophosphamide when combined with bortezomib and fludarabine (B-FC) in a phase 1b trial, and to assess the efficacy and safety of this combination in a phase 2 trial in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL (rrMCL). Forty patients were enrolled between April 8, 2011, and October 10, 2015. The MTD of cyclophosphamide was identified to be 250 mg/m² days 1-2. At a median follow-up of 31.6 months (13.5-47.4), among 32 patients in phase 2, 10 (31%) had a complete response and 13 (41%) had a partial response. The median progression-free survival was 21 months (95% CI 7.3-34.7), and the median overall survival was 32.4 months (95% CI 17.8-47.0). Grade 3-4 hematologic AEs included neutropenia (27%) and thrombocytopenia (39%). The B-FC regimen has satisfactory responses and manageable toxicities in rrMCL patients (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01322776).

KTE-X19 CAR T-Cell Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Mantle-Cell Lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma who have disease progression during or after the receipt of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor therapy have a poor prognosis. KTE-X19, an anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, may have benefit in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma.

METHODS

In a multicenter, phase 2 trial, we evaluated KTE-X19 in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma. Patients had disease that had relapsed or was refractory after the receipt of up to five previous therapies; all patients had to have received BTK inhibitor therapy previously. Patients underwent leukapheresis and optional bridging therapy, followed by conditioning chemotherapy and a single infusion of KTE-X19 at a dose of 2×10⁶ CAR T cells per kilogram of body weight. The primary end point was the percentage of patients with an objective response (complete or partial response) as assessed by an independent radiologic review committee according to the Lugano classification. Per the protocol, the primary efficacy analysis was to be conducted after 60 patients had been treated and followed for 7 months.

RESULTS

A total of 74 patients were enrolled. KTE-X19 was manufactured for 71 patients and administered to 68. The primary efficacy analysis showed that 93% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84 to 98) of the 60 patients in the primary efficacy analysis had an objective response; 67% (95% CI, 53 to 78) had a complete response. In an intention-to-treat analysis involving all 74 patients, 85% had an objective response; 59% had a complete response. At a median follow-up of 12.3 months (range, 7.0 to 32.3), 57% of the 60 patients in the primary efficacy analysis were in remission. At 12 months, the estimated progression-free survival and overall survival were 61% and 83%, respectively. Common adverse events of grade 3 or higher were cytopenias (in 94% of the patients) and infections (in 32%). Grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome and neurologic events occurred in 15% and 31% of patients, respectively; none were fatal. Two grade 5 infectious adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

KTE-X19 induced durable remissions in a majority of patients with relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma. The therapy led to serious and life-threatening toxic effects that were consistent with those reported with other CAR T-cell therapies. (Funded by Kite, a Gilead company; ZUMA-2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02601313.).

Treatment of Older Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL): Long-Term Follow-Up of the Randomized European MCL Elderly Trial

PURPOSE

In an update of the randomized, open-label, phase III European Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) Elderly trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00209209), published in 2012, we aimed to confirm results on long-term outcome focusing on efficacy and safety of long-term use of rituximab maintenance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Five hundred sixty patients with newly diagnosed MCL underwent a first random assignment between rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) and rituximab, fludarabine, and cyclophosphamide (R-FC) induction, followed by a second random assignment in 316 responders between rituximab and interferon alfa maintenance, to be continued until progression. We compared progression-free survival from the second randomization and overall survival (OS) from the first or second randomizations.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up time of 7.6 years, the previously described difference in OS between the induction arms persisted (median, 6.4 years after R-CHOP [n = 280] v 3.9 years after R-FC [n = 280]; P = .0054). Patients responding to R-CHOP had median progression-free survival and OS times of 5.4 and 9.8 years, respectively, when randomly assigned to rituximab (n = 87), compared with 1.9 years (P < .001) and 7.1 years (P = .0026), respectively, when randomly assigned to interferon alfa (n = 97). In 58% and 32% of patients treated with R-CHOP, rituximab maintenance was still ongoing 2 and 5 years from start of maintenance, respectively. After R-FC, rituximab maintenance was associated with an unexpectedly high cumulative incidence of death in remission (22% at 5 years). Toxicity of rituximab maintenance was low after R-CHOP (grade 3-4 leukopenia or infection < 5%) but more prominent in patients on rituximab maintenance after R-FC, in whom grade 3-4 leukopenia (up to 40%) and infections were frequent (up to 15%).

CONCLUSION

The excellent results of R-CHOP followed by rituximab maintenance until progression for older patients with MCL persisted in a mature follow-up. Prolongation of rituximab maintenance beyond 2 years is effective and safe.

Mantle cell lymphoma: 2017 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and clinical management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a non-Hodgkin lymphoma characterized by involvement of the lymph nodes, spleen, blood and bone marrow with a short remission duration to standard therapies and a median overall survival (OS) of 4-5 years.

DIAGNOSIS

Diagnosis is based on lymph node, bone marrow, or tissue morphology of centrocytic lymphocytes, small cell type, or blastoid variant cells. A chromosomal translocation t (11:14) is the molecular hallmark of MCL, resulting in the overexpression of cyclin D1. Cyclin D1 is detected by immunohistochemistry in 98% of cases. The absence of SOX-11 or a low Ki-67 may correlate with a more indolent form of MCL. The differential diagnosis of MCL includes small lymphocytic lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma, and follicular lymphoma.

RISK STRATIFICATION

The MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI) is the prognostic model most often used and incorporates ECOG performance status, age, leukocyte count, and lactic dehydrogenase. A modification of the MIPI also adds the Ki-67 proliferative index if available. The median OS for the low-risk group was not reached (5-year OS of 60%). The median OS for the intermediate risk group was 51 months and 29 months for the high risk group.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

For selected indolent, low MIPI MCL patients, initial observation may be appropriate therapy. For younger patients with intermediate or high risk MIPI MCL, aggressive therapy with a cytotoxic Regimen followed by autologous stem cell transplantation should be considered. Rituximab maintenance after autologous stem cell transplantation has also improved the progression-free and overall survival. For older symptomatic MCL patients with intermediate or high risk MIPI, combination chemotherapy with R-CHOP, R-Bendamustine, or a clinical trial should be considered. In addition, rituximab maintenance therapy may prolong the progression-free survival. At the time of relapse, agents directed at activated pathways in MCL cells such as bortezomib (NFkB inhibitor), lenalidamide (anti-angiogenesis) and Ibruitinib (Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase [BTK] inhibitor) have demonstrated excellent clinical activity in MCL patients. Autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation can also be considered in young patients. Clinical trials with novel agents are always a consideration for MCL patients.

What is the optimal initial management of the older MCL patient?

The current first line treatment of a patient with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is often considered as too toxic for elderly patients. The elderly, however, comprise the majority of the patients with MCL. The results of several recent studies have shown that the outcome of this patient group is not as dismal as in the past. Indeed, if patients are not considered frail, and can tolerate rituximab and moderate intensive chemotherapy such as R-CHOP followed by rituximab maintenance or R-bendamustine, a 4-year overall survival of >80% can be achieved. In this chapter the developments of the regimens, resulting in the standard treatment options for these patients, are discussed.

Phase II Study of Bortezomib in Combination with Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab for Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has a poor prognosis. The best outcome is achieved in patients who have a partial or complete response to salvage treatment and proceed to allogeneic stem cell transplant.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients were given a combination regimen of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab at MD Anderson Cancer Center as part of a single-arm, prospective, open-label phase II clinical trial. The median age was 66 years, with a median number of prior treatments of three. Sixty-seven percent had failed intensive chemoimmunotherapy and 43% were intermediate/high risk according to the MCL international prognostic index score, with a median Ki-67 proliferation index of 45% in those who were tested.

RESULTS

The rates of overall and complete response achieved were 74% and 42%, respectively, with median progression-free and overall survivals of 9 months and 36.4 months, respectively. The regimen's toxicity profile was acceptable; only 25% of the cycles resulted in grade 3 or 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia, and only 3% of cycles produced grade 3-4 fatigue. There were no episodes of grade 3-4 neuropathy.

CONCLUSION

The combination of bortezomib with cyclophosphamide and rituximab is an effective and well-tolerated regimen in patients with relapsed/refractory MCL. Because of its low toxicity, future combinations of this regimen with other promising drugs that have different mechanisms of action offer a realistic possibility that may improve outcomes for patients who have MCL. The Oncologist 2017;22:549-553 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The combination of bortezomib with cyclophosphamide and rituximab represents an additional effective novel salvage regimen for mantle cell lymphoma. This combination adds to the growing list of treatment options available for patients with mantle cell lymphoma.

The addition of rituximab to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy results in a significant improvement in overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma: results of a randomized UK National Cancer Research Institute trial

Mantle cell lymphoma is an incurable and generally aggressive lymphoma that is more common in elderly patients. Whilst a number of different chemotherapeutic regimens are active in this disease, there is no established gold standard therapy. Rituximab has been used widely to good effect in B-cell malignancies but there is no evidence that it improves outcomes when added to chemotherapy in this disease. We performed a randomized, open-label, multicenter study looking at the addition of rituximab to the standard chemotherapy regimen of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma. A total of 370 patients were randomized. With a median follow up of six years, rituximab improved the median progression-free survival from 14.9 to 29.8 months (P<0.001) and overall survival from 37.0 to 44.5 months (P=0.005). This equates to absolute differences of 9.0% and 22.1% for overall and progression-free survival, respectively, at two years. Overall response rates were similar, but complete response rates were significantly higher in the rituximab arm: 52.7% vs. 39.9% (P=0.014). There was no clinically significant additional toxicity observed with the addition of rituximab. Overall, approximately 18% of patients died of non-lymphomatous causes, most commonly infections. The addition of rituximab to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy significantly improves outcomes in patients with mantle cell lymphoma. However, these regimens have significant late toxicity and should be used with caution. This trial has been registered (ISRCTN81133184 and clinicaltrials.gov:00641095) and is supported by the UK National Cancer Research Network.

Mantle cell lymphoma: 2015 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and clinical management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a non-Hodgkin lymphoma characterized by involvement of the lymph nodes, spleen, blood and bone marrow with a short remission duration to standard therapies and a median overall survival (OS) of 4-5 years.

DIAGNOSIS

Diagnosis is based on lymph node, bone marrow, or tissue morphology of centrocytic lymphocytes, small cell type, or blastoid variant cells. A chromosomal translocation t (11:14) is the molecular hallmark of MCL, resulting in the overexpression of cyclin D1. Cyclin D1 is detected by immunohistochemistry in 98% of cases. The absence of SOX-11 or a low Ki-67 may correlate with a more indolent form of MCL. The differential diagnosis of MCL includes small lymphocytic lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma, and follicular lymphoma.

RISK STRATIFICATION

The MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI) is the prognostic model most often used and incorporates ECOG performance status, age, leukocyte count, and lactic dehydrogenase. A modification of the MIPI also adds the Ki-67 proliferative index if available. The median OS for the low-risk group was not reached (5-year OS of 60%). The median OS for the intermediate risk group was 51 months and 29 months for the high risk group.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

For selected indolent, low MIPI MCL patients, initial observation may be appropriate therapy. For younger patients with intermediate or high risk MIPI MCL, aggressive therapy with a cytotoxic regimen ± autologous stem cell transplantation should be considered. For older MCL patients with intermediate or high risk MIPI, combination chemotherapy with R-CHOP, R-Bendamustine, or a clinical trial should be considered. In addition, rituximab maintenance therapy may prolong the progression-free survival. At the time of relapse, agents directed at activated pathways in MCL cells such as bortezomib (NFkB inhibitor), lenalidamide (anti-angiogenesis) and Ibruitinib (Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase [BTK] inhibitor) have demonstrated excellent clinical activity in MCL patients. Autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation can also be considered in young patients. Clinical trials with novel agents are always a consideration for MCL patients.

Mantle cell lymphoma: evolving management strategies

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare and aggressive form of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that generally affects older individuals and continues to have one of the worst outcomes of all the lymphomas. Over the last decade, there has been a widespread adoption of cytarabine-based therapy in younger patients, and the incorporation of rituximab into chemotherapeutic regimens has become an evidence-based standard of care. However MCL remains a largely incurable disease, and following relapse, it can be a challenge to manage. Although it is possible to define prognosis reliably, there are, as yet, no clear diagnostic or response-adjusted parameters that can help to guide therapeutic decisions. However, there are a number of highly active targeted therapies that are moving into the clinic that are set to transform the therapeutic paradigm for this disease in the very near future. This review will explore the molecular pathogenesis of MCL and the current and evolving therapeutic strategies for this disease.

Mantle cell lymphoma: 2013 Update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and clinical management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a non-Hodgkin lymphoma characterized by involvement of the lymph nodes, spleen, blood, and bone marrow with a short remission duration to standard therapies and a median overall survival of 4-5 years.

DIAGNOSIS

Diagnosis is based on lymph node, bone marrow, or tissue morphology of centrocytic lymphocytes, small cell type, or blastoid variant cells. A chromosomal translocation t(11:14) is the molecular hallmark of MCL, resulting in the overexpression of cyclin D1. Cyclin D1 is detected by immunohistochemistry in 98% of cases. The absence of SOX-11 or a low Ki-67 may correlate with a more indolent form of MCL. The differential diagnosis of MCL includes small lymphocytic lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma, and follicular lymphoma.

RISK STRATIFICATION

The Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (MIPI) is the prognostic model most often used and incorporates ECOG performance status, age, leukocyte count, and lactic dehydrogenase. A modification of the MIPI also adds the Ki-67 proliferative index if available. The median overall survival (OS) for the low risk group was not reached (5-year OS of 60%). The median OS for the intermediate risk group was 51 months and 29 months for the high risk group.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

For selected indolent, low MIPI MCL patients, initial observation may be appropriate therapy. For younger patients with intermediate or high risk MIPI MCL, aggressive therapy with a cytarabine containing regimen ± autologous stem cell transplantation should be considered. For older MCL patients with intermediate or high risk MIPI, combination chemotherapy with R-CHOP, R-Bendamustine, or a clinical trial should be considered. At the time of relapse, agents directed at activated pathways in MCL cells such as bortezomib (NFkB inhibitor) or lenalidamide (anti-angiogenesis) are approved agents. Clinical trials with Ibruitinib (Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase inhibitor) or Idelalisib (PI3K inhibitor) have demonstrated excellent clinical activity in MCL patients. Autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation can also be considered in young patients.

Clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with mantle cell lymphoma. Recommendations from the GEL/TAMO Spanish Cooperative Group

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is considered a distinct type of B-cell lymphoma genetically characterized by the t(11;14) translocation and cyclin D1 overexpression. There is also a small subset of tumors negative for cyclin D1 expression that are morphologically and immunophenotypically indistinguishable from conventional MCL. Although in the last decades, the median overall survival of patients with MCL has improved significantly, it is still considered as one of the poorest prognoses diseases among B-cell lymphomas. Election of treatment for patients with MCL is complex due to the scarcity of solid evidence. Current available data shows that conventional chemotherapy does not yield satisfactory results as in other types of B-cell lymphomas. However, the role of other approaches such as autologous or allogenic stem cell transplantation, immunotherapy, the administration of consolidation or maintenance schedules, or the use of targeted therapies still lack clear indications. In view of this situation, the Spanish Group of Lymphomas/Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation has conducted a series of reviews on different aspects of MCL, namely its diagnosis, prognosis, first-line and salvage treatment (both in young and elderly patients), new targeted therapies, and detection of minimal residual disease. On the basis of the available evidence, a series of recommendations have been issued with the intention of providing guidance to clinicians on the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of patients with MCL.

Treatment of older patients with mantle-cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

The long-term prognosis for older patients with mantle-cell lymphoma is poor. Chemoimmunotherapy results in low rates of complete remission, and most patients have a relapse. We investigated whether a fludarabine-containing induction regimen improved the complete-remission rate and whether maintenance therapy with rituximab prolonged remission.

METHODS

We randomly assigned patients 60 years of age or older with mantle-cell lymphoma, stage II to IV, who were not eligible for high-dose therapy to six cycles of rituximab, fludarabine, and cyclophosphamide (R-FC) every 28 days or to eight cycles of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) every 21 days. Patients who had a response underwent a second randomization to maintenance therapy with rituximab or interferon alfa, each given until progression.

RESULTS

Of the 560 patients enrolled, 532 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis for response, and 485 in the primary analysis for response. The median age was 70 years. Although complete-remission rates were similar with R-FC and R-CHOP (40% and 34%, respectively; P=0.10), progressive disease was more frequent with R-FC (14%, vs. 5% with R-CHOP). Overall survival was significantly shorter with R-FC than with R-CHOP (4-year survival rate, 47% vs. 62%; P=0.005), and more patients in the R-FC group died during the first remission (10% vs. 4%). Hematologic toxic effects occurred more frequently in the R-FC group than in the R-CHOP group, but the frequency of grade 3 or 4 infections was balanced (17% and 14%, respectively). In 274 of the 316 patients who were randomly assigned to maintenance therapy, rituximab reduced the risk of progression or death by 45% (in remission after 4 years, 58%, vs. 29% with interferon alfa; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.87; P=0.01). Among patients who had a response to R-CHOP, maintenance therapy with rituximab significantly improved overall survival (4-year survival rate, 87%, vs. 63% with interferon alfa; P=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

R-CHOP induction followed by maintenance therapy with rituximab is effective for older patients with mantle-cell lymphoma. (Funded by the European Commission and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00209209.).

Current status of targeted therapies for mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a type of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) with treatment outcomes that have historically been poorer than those observed with other NHL subtypes. Patients typically present with advanced-stage disease and frequent extranodal involvement; the median age at diagnosis is >60 years. Recent improvements in progression-free and overall survival have been observed with more dose-intensive strategies, although at least half of patients diagnosed with MCL are not eligible for such treatment approaches based on age and co-morbidities. In addition, therapy options for relapsed MCL are limited. Only bortezomib is approved for treatment of relapsed MCL in the US. Development of targeted therapy approaches to minimize toxicities while preserving anti-neoplastic properties is of particular importance in MCL. Multiple ongoing studies are attempting to build on the known efficacy of bortezomib by evaluating combination regimens with other targeted agents or cytotoxic chemotherapy. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor temsirolimus has known activity in MCL, making this an attractive class of agents for further investigation in combination regimens. Rituximab and other monoclonal antibodies are being evaluated for novel roles in MCL treatment, including as maintenance therapy. Other classes of drugs being investigated in MCL are immunomodulatory agents, inhibitors of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt and B-cell receptor signalling pathways, and inhibitors of bcl-2 and histone deacetylase. Although many of the agents appear to have modest single-agent activity, the favourable toxicity profile of many agents will make them best suited for incorporation into combination regimens.

A retrospective study evaluating the efficacy and safety of bendamustine in the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma

Bendamustine is approved in the United States for relapsed indolent lymphoma. However, it has not been widely studied in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients with MCL who were treated with bendamustine at three centers. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Thirty patients with MCL received bendamustine, 25 for relapsed disease. After a median follow-up of 12 months, there were 15 complete responses (CRs) with an ORR of 83% (95% confidence interval [CI] 70-97%). Factors significantly associated with longer survival were achieving a CR and classical (versus blastic) variant of MCL. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 23%, 3% and 20%, respectively. There was one case of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy 10 months after therapy completion. Bendamustine in combination with rituximab demonstrated a high response rate in this study of patients with predominantly relapsed MCL.

Mantle cell lymphoma: 2012 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and clinical management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a non-Hodgkin lymphoma characterized by involvement of the lymph nodes, spleen, blood, and bone marrow with a short remission duration to standard therapies and a median overall survival of 4-5 years.

DIAGNOSIS

Diagnosis is based on lymph node, bone marrow, or tissue morphology of centrocytic lymphocytes, small cell type, or blastoid variant cells. A chromosomal translocation t(11:14) is the molecular hallmark of MCL, resulting in the overexpression of cyclin D1. Cyclin D1 is detected by immunohistochemistry in 98% of cases. The absence of SOX-11 or a low Ki-67 may correlate with a more indolent form of MCL. The differential diagnosis of MCL includes small lymphocytic lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma, and follicular lymphoma.

RISK STRATIFICATION

The mantle cell lymphoma international prognostic index (MIPI) is the prognostic model most often used and incorporates ECOG performance status, age, leukocyte count, and lactic dehydrogenase. A modification of the MIPI also adds the Ki-67 proliferative index if available. The median overall survival (OS) for the low-risk group was not reached (5-year OS of 60%). The median OS for the intermediate risk group was 51 and 29 months for the high-risk group.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

For selected indolent, low MIPI MCL patients, initial observation may be appropriate therapy. For younger patients with intermediate or high risk MIPI MCL, aggressive therapy with a cytarabine containing regimen ± autologous stem cell transplantation should be considered. For older MCL patients with intermediate or high risk MIPI, combination chemotherapy with R-CHOP, R-Bendamustine, or a clinical trial should be considered. At the time of relapse, agents directed at activated pathways in MCL cells such as bortezomib (NFkB inhibitor), BTK inhibitors or CAL-101 (B-cell receptor inhibitors) or lenalidamide (antiangiogenesis) have clinical activity in MCL patients. Autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation can also be considered in young patients.

Mantle cell lymphoma: Frontline and salvage therapy

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a therapeutic challenge because of its lower cure rate when compared with other lymphomas such as diffuse large cell lymphoma. The current emphasis in the treatment of newly diagnosed MCL has been on intensifying chemotherapy, but there is no consensus on the need to consolidate with autologous stem cell transplantation. These approaches, however, have not resulted in a cure. Newer strategies include the use of models to aid in tailoring therapy. Likewise, autologous stem cell consolidation does not cure relapsed disease. Because of its known graft-versus-lymphoma effect, allogeneic stem cell transplantation offers a potentially curative option for relapsed MCL. New insights into resistance pathways and new drugs created to inhibit them offer great promise in the treatment of newly diagnosed and previously treated MCL.

Mantle cell lymphoma: state-of-the-art management and future perspective

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a unique subtype of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) characterized in almost all cases by the chromosomal translocation t(11;14)(q13;q32) and nuclear cyclin D1 overexpression. Most patients present with advanced stage disease, often with extranodal dissemination, and typically pursue an aggressive clinical course. Recent improvement has been achieved by the successful introduction of monoclonal antibodies and dose-intensified approaches including autologous stem cell transplantation strategies. However, with the exception of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, current treatment approaches are not curative and the corresponding survival curve is characterized by a relatively steep and continuous decline, with a median survival of about 4 years and <15% long-term survivors. Despite its rarity, MCL is of particular clinical and scientific interest by providing a paradigm for neoplasms with dysregulated control of cell cycle machinery and impaired apoptotic pathways. Recently gained insights into underlying pathobiology unravel numerous promising molecular targeting strategies, however their introduction into clinical practice and current treatment algorithms remains a challenge. This article will provide relevant information for decision making in clinical practice and give a perspective on upcoming management strategies.

Mantle cell lymphoma: biological insights and treatment advances

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) exhibits considerable molecular heterogeneity and complexity, and is regarded as one of the most challenging lymphomas to treat. With increased understanding of the pathobiology of MCL, it is proposed that MCL is the result of 3 major converging factors, namely, deregulated cell cycle pathways, defects in DNA damage responses, and dysregulation of cell survival pathways. In the present era of targeted therapies, these biologic insights have resulted in the identification of several novel rational targets for therapeutic intervention in MCL that are undergoing active clinical testing. To date, there is no standard of care in MCL. Several approaches including conventional anthracycline-based therapies and intensive high-dose strategies with and without stem cell transplantation have failed to produce durable remissions for most patients. Moreover, considering the heterogeneity of MCL, it is increasingly being recognized that risk-adapted therapy might be a relevant therapeutic approach in this disease. At the first and second Global Workshops on Mantle Cell Lymphoma, questions addressing advances in the pathobiology of MCL, optimization of existing therapies, assessment of current data with novel therapeutic strategies, and the identification of molecular or phenotypic risk factors for utilization in risk-adapted therapies were discussed and will be summarized herein.

Temsirolimus in mantle cell lymphoma and other non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes

Temsirolimus, an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), has anti-tumor activity in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and other mature lymphoid neoplasms. mTOR is an intracellular kinase that controls the mRNA translation of many proteins (eg, cyclin D1) that can act as oncogenes and contribute to lymphomagenesis. Characterized by overexpression of cyclin D1, MCL was identified as a disease that might be susceptible to mTOR inhibition. When single-agent temsirolimus was explored in two phase II studies for treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory MCL, it demonstrated anti-tumor activity, with overall response rates of 38% and 41%. Subsequently, a three-arm, randomized phase III trial was conducted to compare two dosing regimens of temsirolimus with investigator's choice of therapy for heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory MCL (N = 162; randomized 1:1:1). Once-weekly intravenous temsirolimus 175 mg for 3 weeks followed by 75 mg once weekly (175/75) significantly improved progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.44; P = .0009) versus investigator's choice therapy. Median progression-free survival durations were 4.8 and 1.9 months, respectively. The objective response rates were 22% in the 175/75 group and 2% in the investigator's choice group (P = .0019). For patients receiving temsirolimus, the most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, and asthenia. The results of this trial established a recommended clinical dose for temsirolimus monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL and validated the importance of mTOR in the pathogenesis of advanced MCL. Objective responses also have been reported for other mature B-cell neoplasms (eg, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma or follicular lymphoma) in the phase II setting. Temsirolimus as monotherapy or in combination with other active agents warrants further investigation for treatment of MCL and other non-Hodgkin lymphomas.

How I treat mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma is included in the World Health Organization classification as distinct lymphoma subtype characterized by the t(11;14)(q13;q32) translocation, which results in overexpression of Cyclin D1. The clinical presentation often includes extranodal involvement, particularly of the bone marrow and gut. The prognosis of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (median overall survival, 3-5 years) is poorest among B-cell lymphoma patients, even though a prospectively difficult to identify subgroup can survive for years with little or no treatment. Conventional chemotherapy is not curative but obtains frequent remissions (60%-90%) which are usually shorter (1-2 years) compared with other lymphoma entities. Very intensive regimens, including autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation, seem required to improve the outcome, but with the median age of diagnosis being 60 years or more, such approaches are feasible only in a limited proportion of patients. The possibility of treating patients based on prognostic factors needs to be investigated prospectively.

The Leukemic Presentation of Mantle-cell Lymphoma: Disease Features and Prognostic Factors in 58 Patients

Mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL) is a B-cell malignancy with distinct molecular genetics and pathological features. Peripheral blood involvement has been reported with variable frequency, but information on the natural history of cases presenting with leukemia is lacking. This study aimed to determine the clinical and prognostic features of such cases. We studied clinical features, tumor characteristics, prognostic factors and outcome in 58 patients with leukemic presentation of MCL. Diagnosis was based on morphology, immunophenotype, presence of t(11;14), histology and cyclin D1 expression. The median age was 62 years and male:female 2.4:1. Presenting features included splenomegaly (74%), lymphadenopathy (45%), hepatomegaly (17%) and, in a minority, gastro-intestinal involvement or involvement of Waldeyer's ring; 10% had lymphocytosis alone. Six patients developed central nervous system disease. Median lymphocyte count was 58 x 10(9)/l, 55% had anemia and 17% had thrombocytopenia. Morphology of peripheral blood showed small-cell MCL in 15% of cases, typical MCL in 46% and blastoid MCL in 39%. Immunological markers showed a typical phenotype (CD5+ CD23 -) in 68%, and atypical phenotypes, CD5- CD23- in 17% or CD5+ CD23+ in 15%. CLL scores were 0, 1 or 2 in 96%. Median overall survival was 36 months. Good response to first-line treatment (P = 0.0008) and splenomegaly (P = 0.03) were favorable prognostic factors, while other features including morphology and CD38 expression had no impact on survival or treatment response. This analysis demonstrates that except for splenomegaly, survival of MCL patients presenting with leukemia is not significantly influenced by clinical or tumor characteristics. Splenectomy is a useful treatment option in this group of patients.

Phase III study to evaluate temsirolimus compared with investigator's choice therapy for the treatment of relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma

PURPOSE

Temsirolimus, a specific inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin kinase, has shown clinical activity in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). We evaluated two dose regimens of temsirolimus in comparison with investigator's choice single-agent therapy in relapsed or refractory disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this multicenter, open-label, phase III study, 162 patients with relapsed or refractory MCL were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive one of two temsirolimus regimens: 175 mg weekly for 3 weeks followed by either 75 mg (175/75-mg) or 25 mg (175/25-mg) weekly, or investigator's choice therapy from prospectively approved options. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by independent assessment.

RESULTS

Median PFS was 4.8, 3.4, and 1.9 months for the temsirolimus 175/75-mg, 175/25-mg, and investigator's choice groups, respectively. Patients treated with temsirolimus 175/75-mg had significantly longer PFS than those treated with investigator's choice therapy (P = .0009; hazard ratio = 0.44); those treated with temsirolimus 175/25-mg showed a trend toward longer PFS (P = .0618; hazard ratio = 0.65). Objective response rate was significantly higher in the 175/75-mg group (22%) compared with the investigator's choice group (2%; P = .0019). Median overall survival for the temsirolimus 175/75-mg group and the investigator's choice group was 12.8 months and 9.7 months, respectively (P = .3519). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the temsirolimus groups were thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, and asthenia.

CONCLUSION

Temsirolimus 175 mg weekly for 3 weeks followed by 75 mg weekly significantly improved PFS and objective response rate compared with investigator's choice therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL.

Toxicity of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide with or without rituximab as initial therapy for patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma: results of a randomised phase II study

The National Cancer Research Network (NCRN) is currently coordinating a Phase III randomised study (LY05) comparing fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (FC) with or without rituximab (R) for previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). The combination of FC is well-recognised as significantly immunosuppressive and there are concerns that adding rituximab may increase infection risk further. The impact of rituximab on other markers of toxicity is also unclear. We analysed the toxicity data on 139 patients treated within the NCRN LY05 trial. Non-hematological toxicity was similar between the two treatment arms. The only difference in hematological toxicity was a higher rate of lymphocytopenia with fludarabine cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR), which did not translate into increased febrile episodes or infections. In conclusion, the addition of rituximab to FC for previously untreated MCL has no significant impact on toxicity.

Current status of older and new purine nucleoside analogues in the treatment of lymphoproliferative diseases

For the past few years more and more new cytotoxic agents active in the treatment of hematological malignancies have been synthesized and become available for either in vitro studies or clinical trials. Among them the class of antineoplastic drugs belonging to the purine nucleoside analogues group (PNAs) plays an important role. Three of them: pentostatin (DCF), cladribine (2-CdA) and fludarabine (FA) were approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of hematological malignancies. Recently three novel PNAs: clofarabine (CAFdA), nelarabine (ara-G) and forodesine (immucillin H, BCX-1777) have been synthesized and introduced into preclinical studies and clinical trials. These agents seem to be useful mainly for the treatment of human T-cell proliferative disorders and they are currently undergoing clinical trials in lymphoid malignancies. However, there are also several studies suggesting the role of these drugs in B-cell malignancies. This review will summarize current knowledge concerning the mechanism of action, pharmacologic properties, clinical activity and toxicity of PNAs accepted for use in clinical practice, as well as new agents available for clinical trials.

Current treatment standards and emerging strategies in mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a unique subtype of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas characterized by the chromosomal translocation t(11;14)(q13;q32) and nuclear cyclin D1 overexpression in the vast majority of cases. Most patients present with advanced stage disease, often with extranodal dissemination, and pursue an aggressive clinical course in the majority of cases. Recent improvement has been achieved by the successful introduction of monoclonal antibodies and dose-intensified approaches including autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) strategies. With the exception of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, current treatment approaches are non-curative and the corresponding survival curves are characterized by a delayed, but continuous decline and a median survival of 4 to 6 years. However, recently a subset (15%) of long-term survivors have been identified with a rather indolent clinical course even after conventional treatment strategies only. Emerging strategies such as proteasome inhibitors, IMIDs, mTOR inhibitors and others are based on the dysregulated control of cell cycle machinery and impaired apoptotic pathways. Monotherapy of these compounds achieves efficacy comparable to conventional chemotherapy in relapsed MCL, and combination strategies are currently being investigated in numerous trials; however, their introduction into clinical practice and current treatment algorithms remains a challenge.

Therapy of mantle cell lymphoma: current standards and future strategies

Mantle cell lymphoma is characterized clinically by an aggressive clinical course and is relatively resistant to conventional chemotherapies. When in its advanced stages, currently available immunochemotherapy regimens remain noncurative despite high initial response rates. In contrast, consolidating high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell retransfusion significantly extends progression-free survival of young patients. Currently, allogenic bone marrow transplantation represents the only therapy with the potential for a curative approach, although associated with a high rate of complications. New concepts of therapy are urgently warranted, including new molecular approaches, such as bortezomib, thalidomide, lenalidomide, and temsirolimus.

Phase 2 trial of rituximab plus hyper-CVAD alternating with rituximab plus methotrexate-cytarabine for relapsed or refractory aggressive mantle cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma has a very poor prognosis. The authors evaluated the response rates and survival times of patients treated with an intense regimen known to be effective against untreated aggressive mantle cell lymphoma: rituximab plus hyper-CVAD (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone) alternating with rituximab plus methotrexate-cytarabine.

METHODS

In this prospective, open-label, phase 2 study, patients received this combination for 6 to 8 cycles. Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for response.

RESULTS

The median number of cycles received was 5 (range, 1-7 cycles), and the overall response rate was 93% (45% complete response [CR] or CR unconfirmed [CRu] and 48% partial response [PR]). All 5 patients previously resistant to treatment had a response (1 CR, 4 PR), and both patients whose disease did not change in response to prior therapy had PRs. Toxic events occurring in response to the 104 cycles given included neutropenic fever (11%), grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (74%), and grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (63%). There were no deaths from toxicity. At a median follow-up of 40 months (range, 5-48 months), the median failure-free survival time was 11 months with no plateau in the survival curve.

CONCLUSIONS

This combination chemotherapy was effective for refractory/relapsed mantle cell lymphoma.

Long-term results of the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma with cladribine (2-CDA) alone (95-80-53) or 2-CDA and rituximab (N0189) in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to test cladribine (2-CDA) alone and in combination with rituximab in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

METHODS

Patients with MCL were treated on 2 sequential trials. In Trial 95-80-53, patients received 2-CDA as initial therapy or at relapse. In Trial N0189, patients received combination 2-CDA and rituximab as initial therapy. In both trials, 2-CDA was administered at a dose of 5 mg/m2 intravenously on Days 1 through 5 every 4 weeks for 2 to 6 cycles, depending on response. In Trial N0189, rituximab 375 mg/m2 was administered on Day 1 of each cycle.

RESULTS

Results were reported for 80 patients. Twenty-six previously untreated patients and 25 patients who had recurrent disease with a median age of 68 years received single-agent 2-CDA. The overall response rate (ORR) was 81% with 42% complete responses (CRs) in the previously untreated group. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.6 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 7.2-22.1 months), and 81% of patients remained alive at 2 years. The ORR was 46% with a 21% CR rate in the recurrent disease group. The median PFS was 5.4 months (95% CI, 4.6-13.1 months), and 36% of patients remained alive at 2 years. Twenty-nine eligible patients with a median age of 70 years received 2-CDA plus rituximab. The ORR was 66% (19 of 29 patient), and the CR rate was 52% (15 of 29 patients). The median duration of response for patients who achieved a CR had not been reached at the time of the current report, and only 3 of the patients who achieved a CR developed recurrent disease at a median follow-up of 21.5 months.

CONCLUSIONS

2-CDA had substantial single-agent activity in both recurrent and untreated MCL, and the results indicated that it may be administered safely to elderly patients. The addition of rituximab to 2-CDA may increase the duration of response.

Therapeutic options in mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive lymphoma requiring intensive chemotherapy +/- autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) to achieve optimal rates of progression-free survival. Here we review the treatment options for patients with newly-diagnosed or relapsed MCL and discuss recent advances in management, including the role of autologous and allogeneic SCT.

Bortezomib in mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) represents 6% of non-Hodgkin lymphomas, but is one of the most active fields of clinical investigation. Unfortunately, there is still no standard or curative therapy in MCL. Front-line therapy appears to benefit from intensification either through high-dose therapy with stem cell transplant consolidation or dose-intense chemotherapy with hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, adriamycin/doxorubicin and dexamethasone/rituximab. Most patients still relapse and a multitude of novel agents are currently being tested in this setting, including proteasome inhibitors with bortezomib (the first of its class and the first US FDA-approved drug for MCL), mTOR inhibitors, Bcl-2 inhibitors, antiangiogenesis agents and histone deacetylase inhibitors among others. An obvious effort is needed to enroll patients on clinical trials, the design of which might benefit from pharmacogenomics and a better understanding of MCL biology and its diversity.

Cladribine combined with cyclophosphamide and mitoxantrone is an active salvage therapy in advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility, efficacy and toxicity of the combined therapy consisting of cladribine (2-CdA), mitoxantrone and cyclophosphamide (CMC regimen) in patients with refractory or relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Thirty six patients, 14 with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), 10 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 5 with follicular lymphoma (FL), 3 with small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), and 4 with T-cell lymphoma were enrolled to the study. The CMC protocol consisted of 2-CdA at a dose of 0.12 mg/kg in a 2-hour infusion on days 1 through 3, mitoxantrone 10 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1 and cyclophosphamide 650 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1. The CMC courses were repeated at intervals of 4 weeks. Thirty three patients were available for evaluation of response. Overall response rate (OR) was 58% (95% CI, 41--75%). Seven patients (21%; 95% CI, 7--35%) achieved a complete response (CR) and 12 patients (36%; 95% CI, 20--52%) achieved a partial response (PR). Seven of 19 patients with CR/PR are still in remission with a median follow-up of 3 months (range, 2-17 months). The median failure-free survival (FFS) was 5 months (range, 2-17 months). The median overall survival (OS) for the entire group was 9 months (range, 0.1-7 months). There was a significant difference in OS between responders and nonresponders after CMC therapy (log rank test, P = 0.015). When different disease status before CMC treatment was considered, a trend toward longer survival of recurrent patients was observed (log rank test, P = 0.08). Grade 3-4 neutropenia developed in 14 (39%) patients, and 16 episodes (15%) of grade 3-4 infections were observed. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia or anemia was seen in 9 patients (25%) and 10 patients (28%), respectively. The results of our study show that the CMC regimen is effective salvage therapy with acceptable toxicity in heavily pretreated patients with NHL including MCL and DLBCL.

Expanding therapeutic options in mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) still carries a poor prognosis. Chemoimmunotherapy (combination with rituximab) is the routine first-line therapy, although data strongly suggest a benefit from intensification through high-dose therapy with stem cell transplantation consolidation or dose-intense chemotherapy with HyperCVAD (fractionated cyclophosphamide/vincristine/doxorubicin/dexamethasone)/rituximab. Unfortunately, most patients still experience relapse, and a multitude of novel agents are currently being tested in this setting, including proteasome inhibitors with bortezomib (the first of its class and first Food and Drug Administration-approved drug in MCL), mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, Bcl-2 inhibitors, and antiangiogenesis agents, among others. Because of the relative rarity of the disease-MCL represents 6% of non-Hodgkin lymphoma-an obvious effort is needed to enroll patients on clinical trials. Not surprisingly, as in other non-Hodgkin lymphomas, MCL appears more and more as a heterogeneous disease, which might impact future clinical trial design through pharmacogenomics and hopefully help us develop smaller "molecular" relevant trials.

Mantle cell lymphoma: Evolving novel options

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) represents only 6% of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma but is one of the most active fields of clinical investigation. Front-line therapy appears to benefit from intensification either through high-dose therapy with stem cell transplant consolidation or dose-intense chemotherapy with hyper-CVAD (fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone) and rituximab. Unfortunately, no standard therapy has been defined, and most patients eventually relapse. An impressive number of novel agents are currently being tested, the bulk of which are biologic agents or targeted therapies. Bortezomib is the first in class of proteasome inhibitors and the first new agent to be approved in relapsed/refractory MCL. Other small molecules have shown encouraging activity, including mTOR and Bcl-2 inhibitors, novel antibodies, and new cytotoxic agents. Future trials will also benefit from new molecular approaches through pharmacogenomics.

Therapie des Mantelzelllymphoms

Mantle cell lymphoma is characterized by an aggressive clinical course and poor prognosis, with only few long-term survivors. Conventional chemotherapy has failed to substantially alter the natural course of the disease and remains a palliative approach. However, several randomized trials have recently clearly demonstrated the superiority of a combined immunochemotherapy containing the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab. In addition, a randomized trial has shown a significantly improved progression-free survival after myeloablative radiochemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation similar to other dose-intensified approaches (hyper-CVAD). Unfortunately, the vast majority of patients will eventually relapse. However, numerous molecular targeting strategies (e.g. proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs or radiolabeled antibodies) have achieved promising results in early phase II studies.

Role of fludarabine in hematological malignancies

Fludarabine is a prodrug that is converted to the free nucleoside 9-beta-D-arabinosyl-2-fluoroadenine (F-ara-A), which enters cells and accumulates mainly as the 5'-triphosphate, F-ara-ATP. F-ara-ATP has multiple mechanisms of action, which are mostly directed toward DNA. Collectively, these actions affect DNA synthesis, which is the major mechanism of F-ara-A-induced cytotoxicity. Secondarily, incorporation into RNA and inhibition of transcription has been shown in cell lines. As a single agent, fludarabine has been effective for indolent leukemia. Biochemical modulation strategies resulted in enhanced accumulation of cytarabine triphosphate and led to the use of fludarabine for the treatment of acute leukemia. The combination of fludarabine with DNA-damaging agents to inhibit DNA repair processes has been highly effective for indolent leukemia and lymphomas. Other strategies have incorporated fludarabine into preparative regimens for nonmyeloablative stem-cell transplantation.

New Directions in the Treatment of Mantle Cell Lymphoma: An Overview

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is one of the most challenging lymphomas to treat. In the first-line setting, high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation or hyperCVAD/rituximab suggest benefit, especially in patients aged < 60 years. Nucleoside analogue-based regimens represent an alternate option in patients ineligible for HDT. Fludarabine in combination with cyclophosphamide or mitoxantrone has shown activity, and the results were superior with the addition of rituximab. Other cytotoxic agents, such as cladribine, clofarabine, or bendamustin, showed promising activity as well. A variety of new monoclonal antibody (MoAb) agents, such as humanized anti-CD20, alemtuzumab, anti-HLA-DR, anti-CD22 (as an immunotoxin carrier), anti-CD40, as well as MoAb-targeting TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2 are being tested. Radioimmunotherapy with Yttrium 90-ibritumomab tiuxetan and Iodine 131 tositumomab have been tested alone or in combination with chemotherapy, including as part of HDT and autologous stem cell transplantation, in which they showed the best results. New vaccine modalities are exploring the use of tumor cell-based vaccines or of agents that block or activate costimulatory pathways/molecules, such as CTLA-4-Ig. Allogenic transplantation represents a potential curative option for MCL, especially nonmyeloablative transplantation, more feasible in that population. A plethora of novel biologic agents have surfaced, such as bortezomib, temsirolimus, thalidomide, lenalidomide, MoAb anti-vascular endothelial growth factor or vascular endothelial growth factor-Trap, and flavopiridol. Other targets include gene transcription through histone regulation; nuclear factor-ķB pathway; protein kinase C inhibitors; small-molecules targeting apoptosis, such as antisense Bcl-2, pan-Bcl-2 family member inhibitors; MoAb agonists of cell death receptors; caspases regulators (inhibitors of apoptosis proteins, survivin); and MDM2 antagonist regulators of p53. A molecular approach to define biomarkers might help identify subgroups of patients and help develop rational therapies.

The influence of increasing age on the deliverability and toxicity of fludarabine-based combination chemotherapy regimens in patients with indolent lymphoproliferative disorders

BACKGROUND

Fludarabine-based combination chemotherapy regimens are highly effective in the treatment of patients with indolent lymphoproliferative disorders. Despite the prevalence of such disorders in older patients, the effect of increasing age on the deliverability of these regimes has not been assessed.

METHODS

The authors analyzed the effect of increasing age on the deliverability and toxicity of 3 fludarabine-based regimens, all using fludarabine 25 mg/m2 per day for 3 days intravenously every 28 days, in 180 patients who were stratified into 2 age groups (age <60 years and age > or =60 years), with multivariate analysis to control for other differences between groups. The authors also explored the impact of age > or =70 years within the older cohort.

RESULTS

Older patients were more likely to experience an episode of nonsevere hematologic or infectious toxicity, but there was no difference in the rate of severe toxicity. Toxicity rates per cycle did not differ between age groups. The rates of neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC], < 1.0 x 10(9)/L) and severe neutropenia (ANC, 0.5 x 10(9)/L) were 22% and 13%, respectively, in older patients versus 20% and 11%, respectively, in younger patients (P > .1 for both). The rates of thrombocytopenia (platelet count, <100 x 10(9)/L) and severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count, <50 x 10(9)/L) were 21% and 5%, respectively, in older patients and 16% and 5%, respectively, in younger patients (each P value > .1). The rate of infection was 18% per cycle in older patients and 15% per cycle in younger patients (P = .2), with no difference noted in severity. Other organ toxicities were uncommon and showed no difference between age groups. The treatment-related mortality rate was <1% in both cohorts (P > .5). In multivariate analysis, increasing age and performance status influenced the incidence of hematologic toxicity, whereas only performance status influenced the rate of infection and severe infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Fludarabine-based combination chemotherapy regimens were well tolerated and can be delivered safely to older patients who have a good performance status with modestly increased myelosuppression but no increase in severe infectious complications or treatment-related mortality.

Current Treatment Approaches for Mantle-Cell Lymphoma

Mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL) is now recognized as a distinct clinicopathologic subtype of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Patients with MCL are typically older adults with a male predominance and usually present with stage IV disease. The cells are characterized as CD20+CD5+CD23−with a t(11;14)(q13;q32) and cyclin D1 overexpression on immunohistochemistry. Response to chemotherapy usually results in a tumor response but unmaintained remissions are short and the median survival is 3 to 4 years. The treatment approach to newly diagnosed patients with MCL depends on the patient's eligibility for stem cell transplantation (SCT). Those who are eligible are usually treated with either rituximab-CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) followed by SCT or rituximab-HyperCVAD (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, decadron, cytarabine, and methotrexate) followed by observation. The purine nucleoside analogues also have activity as single agents and with rituximab. Unfortunately none of these approaches can definitively cure patients with MCL, and new agents are needed. Recent studies in patients with relapsed MCL have shown substantial antitumor activity of single-agent bortezomib, single-agent temsirolimus, and the combination of thalidomide and rituximab. Studies integrating these novel agents earlier in the disease course or in combination with each other will hopefully produce more durable responses with less toxicity.

A new model for predicting infectious complications during fludarabine-based combination chemotherapy among patients with indolent lymphoid malignancies

BACKGROUND

Fludarabine-containing combination chemotherapy regimens are increasingly used in the treatment of indolent lymphoid malignancies, with the associated risk of infection being the major toxicity. Predictors of infection during fludarabine-containing combination therapy are poorly defined and optimal strategies for infection prophylaxis are not known. The authors analyzed their experience with patients treated with the fludarabine-mitoxantrone (FM) or fludarabine-cyclophosphamide (FC) regimens to develop a predictive model for infections.

METHODS

Ninety-two patients with indolent lymphoid malignancies were treated with FM (n = 29) or FC (n = 63). Baseline variables including age, gender, regimen, disease histology, previous therapy, time from diagnosis to current treatment, performance status, renal function, absolute neutrophil count (ANC), lymphocyte count, and immunoglobulin G levels were examined retrospectively for their association with risk of infectious complications during or within 4 weeks of therapy.

RESULTS

Six risk factors were associated with infectious complications: age > 60 years, > or = 3 previous therapies, previous fludarabine exposure, time from diagnosis to current treatment of > 3 years, performance status > or = 2, and baseline ANC < 2.0 x 10(9)/L. Compared with patients with 0-2 risk factors, patients with > or = 3 risk factors had higher infection rates (26% vs. 7% per cycle, P < 0.0001), more Grade 4 neutropenia (41% vs. 8% per cycle, P < 0.0001), and more neutropenic sepsis (15% vs. 1% per cycle, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Infection risk during fludarabine-containing combination chemotherapy was predicted with a model comprising six baseline risk factors. Patients predicted to be at high risk of infection were an appropriate group for consideration of prophylactic strategies.

Fludarabine and cyclophosphamide using an attenuated dose schedule is a highly effective regimen for patients with indolent lymphoid malignancies

BACKGROUND

Preclinical data have supported the use of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (FC) in combination for the treatment of indolent lymphoid malignancies. Previously reported schedules were highly effective, but were complicated by significant myelotoxicity and infectious complications. In the current study, the authors analyzed their experience with an attenuated dose regimen to determine whether equivalent efficacy could be achieved with reduced toxicity.

METHODS

Sixty-four patients with indolent lymphoid malignancies were treated with intravenous fludarabine at a dose of 25 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide at a dose of 250 mg/m(2), each given on Days 1-3 for a median of 4 cycles. The median age of the patients was 60 years. Nineteen percent of the patients were previously untreated, and 45% had refractory disease; the patients had received a median of 2 prior therapies. With regard to histology, 41% of the patients had chronic lymphocytic leukemia or its variants, whereas the remainder of patients had low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma, predominantly follicule center cell lymphoma.

RESULTS

A total of 237 cycles were delivered. The principal toxicities reported were neutropenia (NCI CTC Grade 4 in 17% of cycles) and infection (Grade >/= 3 in 6% of cycles). The overall response rate and complete response rate were 86% and 29%, respectively. No significant difference could be discerned with regard to response rates for patients with untreated, recurrent, or refractory disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The FC schedule used in the current study was found to be highly effective in patients with indolent lymphoid malignancies. Toxicity was lower compared with higher dose schedules, whereas efficacy appeared to be equivalent.

Mantle cell lymphoma: therapeutic strategies are different from CLL

In contrast to the typical course of chronic lymphocytic lymphoma and despite an indolent lymphoma-like presentation, the clinical outcome of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is dismal, with a median survival time of 3 years and virtually no long-term survivors. Most patients are diagnosed with advanced stage III/IV disease. Although clinical studies did not prove a clear superiority of anthracyclin-containing combinations, CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone)-like regimens represent the standard therapeutic approach in MCL. Recent randomized studies have shown a benefit of a combined immunochemotherapy strategy (chemotherapy plus rituximab) increasing the complete and overall response rates, whereas further follow-up is pending for evaluation of the progression-free and overall survival. In patients younger than 65 years, a dose-intensive consolidation comprising high-dose radiochemotherapy and subsequent autologous stem cell transplantation after a CHOP-like induction results in an improved progression-free survival. However, despite the benefits of this multimodal approach, most patients relapse even after high-dose therapy. The only curative approach is allogeneic stem cell transplantation, which may be adapted to the elderly MCL patient cohort by modified dose-reduced conditioning regimens. Prospective randomized trials remain critical to further improve the clinical course of MCL with the addition of newer treatment modalities, such as radioactively labeled antibodies and targeted therapies (eg, flavopiridol and PS-341).