1
|
Herings SDA, van den Elshout R, de Wit R, Mannil M, Ravesloot C, Scheenen TWJ, Arens A, van der Kolk A, Meijer FJA, Henssen DJHA. How to evaluate perfusion imaging in post-treatment glioma: a comparison of three different analysis methods. Neuroradiology 2024; 66:1279-1289. [PMID: 38714545 PMCID: PMC11246270 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-024-03374-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/10/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion weighted (PW)-MRI can aid in differentiating treatment related abnormalities (TRA) from tumor progression (TP) in post-treatment glioma patients. Common methods, like the 'hot spot', or visual approach suffer from oversimplification and subjectivity. Using perfusion of the complete lesion potentially offers an objective and accurate alternative. This study aims to compare the diagnostic value and assess the subjectivity of these techniques. METHODS 50 Glioma patients with enhancing lesions post-surgery and chemo-radiotherapy were retrospectively included. Outcome was determined by clinical/radiological follow-up or biopsy. Imaging analysis used the 'hot spot', volume of interest (VOI) and visual approach. Diagnostic accuracy was compared using receiving operator characteristics (ROC) curves for the VOI and 'hot spot' approach, visual assessment was analysed with contingency tables. Inter-operator agreement was determined with Cohens kappa and intra-class coefficient (ICC). RESULTS 29 Patients suffered from TP, 21 had TRA. The visual assessment showed poor to substantial inter-operator agreement (κ = -0.72 - 0.68). Reliability of the 'hot spot' placement was excellent (ICC = 0.89), while reference placement was variable (ICC = 0.54). The area under the ROC (AUROC) of the mean- and maximum relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) (VOI-analysis) were 0.82 and 0.72, while the rCBV-ratio ('hot spot' analysis) was 0.69. The VOI-analysis had a more balanced sensitivity and specificity compared to visual assessment. CONCLUSIONS VOI analysis of DSC PW-MRI data holds greater diagnostic accuracy in single-moment differentiation of TP and TRA than 'hot spot' or visual analysis. This study underlines the subjectivity of visual placement and assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siem D A Herings
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
- Radboudumc Center of Expertise Neuro-Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Rik van den Elshout
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Radboudumc Center of Expertise Neuro-Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Rebecca de Wit
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Radboudumc Center of Expertise Neuro-Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Manoj Mannil
- University Clinic for Radiology, Westfälische Wilhelms-University Muenster and University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, E48149, Muenster, Germany
| | - Cécile Ravesloot
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Radboudumc Center of Expertise Neuro-Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tom W J Scheenen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Radboudumc Center of Expertise Neuro-Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Anne Arens
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Radboudumc Center of Expertise Neuro-Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Anja van der Kolk
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frederick J A Meijer
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Radboudumc Center of Expertise Neuro-Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Dylan J H A Henssen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Radboudumc Center of Expertise Neuro-Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fisch L, Zumdick S, Barkhau C, Emden D, Ernsting J, Leenings R, Sarink K, Winter NR, Risse B, Dannlowski U, Hahn T. deepbet: Fast brain extraction of T1-weighted MRI using Convolutional Neural Networks. Comput Biol Med 2024; 179:108845. [PMID: 39002314 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Revised: 07/01/2024] [Accepted: 07/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain extraction in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data is an important segmentation step in many neuroimaging preprocessing pipelines. Image segmentation is one of the research fields in which deep learning had the biggest impact in recent years. Consequently, traditional brain extraction methods are now being replaced by deep learning-based methods. METHOD Here, we used a unique dataset compilation comprising 7837 T1-weighted (T1w) MR images from 191 different OpenNeuro datasets in combination with advanced deep learning methods to build a fast, high-precision brain extraction tool called deepbet. RESULTS deepbet sets a novel state-of-the-art performance during cross-dataset validation with a median Dice score (DSC) of 99.0 on unseen datasets, outperforming the current best performing deep learning (DSC=97.9) and classic (DSC=96.5) methods. While current methods are more sensitive to outliers, deepbet achieves a Dice score of >97.4 across all 7837 images from 191 different datasets. This robustness was additionally tested in 5 external datasets, which included challenging clinical MR images. During visual exploration of each method's output which resulted in the lowest Dice score, major errors could be found for all of the tested tools except deepbet. Finally, deepbet uses a compute efficient variant of the UNet architecture, which accelerates brain extraction by a factor of ≈10 compared to current methods, enabling the processing of one image in ≈2 s on low level hardware. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, deepbet demonstrates superior performance and reliability in brain extraction across a wide range of T1w MR images of adults, outperforming existing top tools. Its high minimal Dice score and minimal objective errors, even in challenging conditions, validate deepbet as a highly dependable tool for accurate brain extraction. deepbet can be conveniently installed via "pip install deepbet" and is publicly accessible at https://github.com/wwu-mmll/deepbet.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Fisch
- University of Münster, Institute for Translational Psychiatry, Münster, Germany.
| | - Stefan Zumdick
- University of Münster, Institute for Translational Psychiatry, Münster, Germany
| | - Carlotta Barkhau
- University of Münster, Institute for Translational Psychiatry, Münster, Germany
| | - Daniel Emden
- University of Münster, Institute for Translational Psychiatry, Münster, Germany
| | - Jan Ernsting
- University of Münster, Institute for Translational Psychiatry, Münster, Germany; Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Ramona Leenings
- University of Münster, Institute for Translational Psychiatry, Münster, Germany
| | - Kelvin Sarink
- University of Münster, Institute for Translational Psychiatry, Münster, Germany
| | - Nils R Winter
- University of Münster, Institute for Translational Psychiatry, Münster, Germany
| | - Benjamin Risse
- Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Udo Dannlowski
- University of Münster, Institute for Translational Psychiatry, Münster, Germany
| | - Tim Hahn
- University of Münster, Institute for Translational Psychiatry, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Galldiks N, Kaufmann TJ, Vollmuth P, Lohmann P, Smits M, Veronesi MC, Langen KJ, Rudà R, Albert NL, Hattingen E, Law I, Hutterer M, Soffietti R, Vogelbaum MA, Wen PY, Weller M, Tonn JC. Challenges, limitations, and pitfalls of PET and advanced MRI in patients with brain tumors: A report of the PET/RANO group. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:1181-1194. [PMID: 38466087 PMCID: PMC11226881 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Brain tumor diagnostics have significantly evolved with the use of positron emission tomography (PET) and advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques. In addition to anatomical MRI, these modalities may provide valuable information for several clinical applications such as differential diagnosis, delineation of tumor extent, prognostication, differentiation between tumor relapse and treatment-related changes, and the evaluation of response to anticancer therapy. In particular, joint recommendations of the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Group, the European Association of Neuro-oncology, and major European and American Nuclear Medicine societies highlighted that the additional clinical value of radiolabeled amino acids compared to anatomical MRI alone is outstanding and that its widespread clinical use should be supported. For advanced MRI and its steadily increasing use in clinical practice, the Standardization Subcommittee of the Jumpstarting Brain Tumor Drug Development Coalition provided more recently an updated acquisition protocol for the widely used dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI. Besides amino acid PET and perfusion MRI, other PET tracers and advanced MRI techniques (e.g. MR spectroscopy) are of considerable clinical interest and are increasingly integrated into everyday clinical practice. Nevertheless, these modalities have shortcomings which should be considered in clinical routine. This comprehensive review provides an overview of potential challenges, limitations, and pitfalls associated with PET imaging and advanced MRI techniques in patients with gliomas or brain metastases. Despite these issues, PET imaging and advanced MRI techniques continue to play an indispensable role in brain tumor management. Acknowledging and mitigating these challenges through interdisciplinary collaboration, standardized protocols, and continuous innovation will further enhance the utility of these modalities in guiding optimal patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), Germany
| | | | - Philipp Vollmuth
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine and Brain Tumour Center, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael C Veronesi
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elke Hattingen
- Goethe University, Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Markus Hutterer
- Department of Neurology with Acute Geriatrics, Saint John of God Hospital, Linz, Austria
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Michael A Vogelbaum
- Department of Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgery, Moffit Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, and University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hoffmann M, Hoopes A, Greve DN, Fischl B, Dalca AV. Anatomy-aware and acquisition-agnostic joint registration with SynthMorph. IMAGING NEUROSCIENCE (CAMBRIDGE, MASS.) 2024; 2:1-33. [PMID: 39015335 PMCID: PMC11247402 DOI: 10.1162/imag_a_00197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Revised: 04/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
Affine image registration is a cornerstone of medical-image analysis. While classical algorithms can achieve excellent accuracy, they solve a time-consuming optimization for every image pair. Deep-learning (DL) methods learn a function that maps an image pair to an output transform. Evaluating the function is fast, but capturing large transforms can be challenging, and networks tend to struggle if a test-image characteristic shifts from the training domain, such as the resolution. Most affine methods are agnostic to the anatomy the user wishes to align, meaning the registration will be inaccurate if algorithms consider all structures in the image. We address these shortcomings with SynthMorph, a fast, symmetric, diffeomorphic, and easy-to-use DL tool for joint affine-deformable registration of any brain image without preprocessing. First, we leverage a strategy that trains networks with widely varying images synthesized from label maps, yielding robust performance across acquisition specifics unseen at training. Second, we optimize the spatial overlap of select anatomical labels. This enables networks to distinguish anatomy of interest from irrelevant structures, removing the need for preprocessing that excludes content which would impinge on anatomy-specific registration. Third, we combine the affine model with a deformable hypernetwork that lets users choose the optimal deformation-field regularity for their specific data, at registration time, in a fraction of the time required by classical methods. This framework is applicable to learning anatomy-aware, acquisition-agnostic registration of any anatomy with any architecture, as long as label maps are available for training. We analyze how competing architectures learn affine transforms and compare state-of-the-art registration tools across an extremely diverse set of neuroimaging data, aiming to truly capture the behavior of methods in the real world. SynthMorph demonstrates high accuracy and is available at https://w3id.org/synthmorph, as a single complete end-to-end solution for registration of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malte Hoffmann
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, United States
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Andrew Hoopes
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, United States
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Computer Science & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Douglas N. Greve
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, United States
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Bruce Fischl
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, United States
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Computer Science & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Adrian V. Dalca
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, United States
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Computer Science & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Grover J, Liu P, Dong B, Shan S, Whelan B, Keall P, Waddington DEJ. Super-resolution neural networks improve the spatiotemporal resolution of adaptive MRI-guided radiation therapy. COMMUNICATIONS MEDICINE 2024; 4:64. [PMID: 38575723 PMCID: PMC10994938 DOI: 10.1038/s43856-024-00489-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers superb non-invasive, soft tissue imaging of the human body. However, extensive data sampling requirements severely restrict the spatiotemporal resolution achievable with MRI. This limits the modality's utility in real-time guidance applications, particularly for the rapidly growing MRI-guided radiation therapy approach to cancer treatment. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) could reduce the trade-off between the spatial and the temporal resolution of MRI, thus increasing the clinical utility of the imaging modality. METHODS We trained deep learning-based super-resolution neural networks to increase the spatial resolution of real-time MRI. We developed a framework to integrate neural networks directly onto a 1.0 T MRI-linac enabling real-time super-resolution imaging. We integrated this framework with the targeting system of the MRI-linac to demonstrate real-time beam adaptation with super-resolution-based imaging. We tested the integrated system using large publicly available datasets, healthy volunteer imaging, phantom imaging, and beam tracking experiments using bicubic interpolation as a baseline comparison. RESULTS Deep learning-based super-resolution increases the spatial resolution of real-time MRI across a variety of experiments, offering measured performance benefits compared to bicubic interpolation. The temporal resolution is not compromised as measured by a real-time adaptation latency experiment. These two effects, an increase in the spatial resolution with a negligible decrease in the temporal resolution, leads to a net increase in the spatiotemporal resolution. CONCLUSIONS Deployed super-resolution neural networks can increase the spatiotemporal resolution of real-time MRI. This has applications to domains such as MRI-guided radiation therapy and interventional procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Grover
- Image X Institute, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- Department of Medical Physics, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Paul Liu
- Image X Institute, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Physics, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Bin Dong
- Department of Medical Physics, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Shanshan Shan
- Image X Institute, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Physics, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School for Radiological and Interdisciplinary Sciences (RAD-X), Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiation Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Brendan Whelan
- Image X Institute, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Physics, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paul Keall
- Image X Institute, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Physics, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - David E J Waddington
- Image X Institute, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Physics, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hu LS, Smits M, Kaufmann TJ, Knutsson L, Rapalino O, Galldiks N, Sundgrene PC, Cha S. Advanced Imaging in the Diagnosis and Response Assessment of High-Grade Glioma: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2024. [PMID: 38477525 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.23.30612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
This AJR Expert Panel Narrative explores the current status of advanced MRI and PET techniques for the post-therapeutic response assessment of high-grade adult-type gliomas, focusing on ongoing clinical controversies in current practice. Discussed techniques that complement conventional MRI and aid the differentiation of recurrent tumor from post-treatment effects include DWI and diffusion tensor imaging; perfusion MRI techniques including dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC), dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and arterial spin labeling; MR spectroscopy including assessment of 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) concentration; glucose- and amino acid (AA)-based PET; and amide proton transfer imaging. Updated criteria for Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology are presented. Given the abundant supporting clinical evidence, the panel supports a recommendation that routine response assessment after HGG treatment should include perfusion MRI, particularly given the development of a consensus recommended DSC-MRI protocol. Although published studies support 2HG MRS and AA PET, these techniques' widespread adoption will likely require increased availability (for 2HG MRS) or increased insurance funding in the United States (for AA PET). The article concludes with a series of consensus opinions from the author panel, centered on the clinical integration of the advanced imaging techniques into posttreatment surveillance protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
- Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Medical Delta, Delft, The Netherlands
| | | | - Linda Knutsson
- F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Otto Rapalino
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Dept. of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
- Inst. of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany
| | - Pia C Sundgrene
- Institution of Clinical Sciences Lund/Radiology, Lund University, Lund Sweden
- Lund BioImaging Center, Lund University, Lud, Sweden
- Department of Medical Imaging and Function Skane University hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Soonmee Cha
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Prah MA, Schmainda KM. Practical guidance to identify and troubleshoot suboptimal DSC-MRI results. FRONTIERS IN RADIOLOGY 2024; 4:1307586. [PMID: 38445104 PMCID: PMC10913595 DOI: 10.3389/fradi.2024.1307586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) derived from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion MR imaging (pMRI) has been shown to be a robust marker of neuroradiological tumor burden. Recent consensus recommendations in pMRI acquisition strategies have provided a pathway for pMRI inclusion in diverse patient care centers, regardless of size or experience. However, even with proper implementation and execution of the DSC-MRI protocol, issues will arise that many centers may not easily recognize or be aware of. Furthermore, missed pMRI issues are not always apparent in the resulting rCBV images, potentiating inaccurate or missed radiological diagnoses. Therefore, we gathered from our database of DSC-MRI datasets, true-to-life examples showcasing the breakdowns in acquisition, postprocessing, and interpretation, along with appropriate mitigation strategies when possible. The pMRI issues addressed include those related to image acquisition and postprocessing with a focus on contrast agent administration, timing, and rate, signal-to-noise quality, and susceptibility artifact. The goal of this work is to provide guidance to minimize and recognize pMRI issues to ensure that only quality data is interpreted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa A. Prah
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Kathleen M. Schmainda
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
- Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI,United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shiroishi MS, Weinert D, Cen SY, Varghese B, Dondlinger T, Prah M, Mendoza J, Nazemi S, Ameli N, Amini N, Shohas S, Chen S, Bigjahan B, Zada G, Chen T, Neman-Ebrahim J, Chang EL, Chow FE, Fan Z, Yang W, Attenello FJ, Ye J, Kim PE, Patel VN, Lerner A, Acharya J, Hu LS, Quarles CC, Boxerman JL, Wu O, Schmainda KM. A cross-sectional study to test equivalence of low- versus intermediate-flip angle dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI measures of relative cerebral blood volume in patients with high-grade gliomas at 1.5 Tesla field strength. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1156843. [PMID: 37799462 PMCID: PMC10548232 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1156843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction 1.5 Tesla (1.5T) remain a significant field strength for brain imaging worldwide. Recent computer simulations and clinical studies at 3T MRI have suggested that dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI using a 30° flip angle ("low-FA") with model-based leakage correction and no gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) preload provides equivalent relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) measurements to the reference-standard acquisition using a single-dose GBCA preload with a 60° flip angle ("intermediate-FA") and model-based leakage correction. However, it remains unclear whether this holds true at 1.5T. The purpose of this study was to test this at 1.5T in human high-grade glioma (HGG) patients. Methods This was a single-institution cross-sectional study of patients who had undergone 1.5T MRI for HGG. DSC-MRI consisted of gradient-echo echo-planar imaging (GRE-EPI) with a low-FA without preload (30°/P-); this then subsequently served as a preload for the standard intermediate-FA acquisition (60°/P+). Both normalized (nrCBV) and standardized relative cerebral blood volumes (srCBV) were calculated using model-based leakage correction (C+) with IBNeuro™ software. Whole-enhancing lesion mean and median nrCBV and srCBV from the low- and intermediate-FA methods were compared using the Pearson's, Spearman's and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results Twenty-three HGG patients composing a total of 31 scans were analyzed. The Pearson and Spearman correlations and ICCs between the 30°/P-/C+ and 60°/P+/C+ acquisitions demonstrated high correlations for both mean and median nrCBV and srCBV. Conclusion Our study provides preliminary evidence that for HGG patients at 1.5T MRI, a low FA, no preload DSC-MRI acquisition can be an appealing alternative to the reference standard higher FA acquisition that utilizes a preload.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark S. Shiroishi
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Imaging Genetics Center, USC Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Marina del Rey, CA, United States
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Dane Weinert
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Steven Y. Cen
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Bino Varghese
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | | | - Melissa Prah
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Jesse Mendoza
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Sina Nazemi
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Nima Ameli
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Negin Amini
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Salman Shohas
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Shannon Chen
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Bavrina Bigjahan
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Gabriel Zada
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Thomas Chen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Josh Neman-Ebrahim
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Eric L. Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Frances E. Chow
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Zhaoyang Fan
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Wensha Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Frank J. Attenello
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jason Ye
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Paul E. Kim
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Vishal N. Patel
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Alexander Lerner
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jay Acharya
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Leland S. Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - C. Chad Quarles
- Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jerrold L. Boxerman
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Ona Wu
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Kathleen M. Schmainda
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang B, Pan Y, Xu S, Zhang Y, Ming Y, Chen L, Liu X, Wang C, Liu Y, Xia Y. Quantitative Cerebral Blood Volume Image Synthesis from Standard MRI Using Image-to-Image Translation for Brain Tumors. Radiology 2023; 308:e222471. [PMID: 37581504 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.222471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/16/2023]
Abstract
Background Cerebral blood volume (CBV) maps derived from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced (DSC) MRI are useful but not commonly available in clinical scenarios. Purpose To test image-to-image translation techniques for generating CBV maps from standard MRI sequences of brain tumors using the bookend technique DSC MRI as ground-truth references. Materials and Methods A total of 756 MRI examinations, including quantitative CBV maps produced from bookend DSC MRI, were included in this retrospective study. Two algorithms, the feature-consistency generative adversarial network (GAN) and three-dimensional encoder-decoder network with only mean absolute error loss, were trained to synthesize CBV maps. The performance of the two algorithms was evaluated quantitatively using the structural similarity index (SSIM) and qualitatively by two neuroradiologists using a four-point Likert scale. The clinical value of combining synthetic CBV maps and standard MRI scans of brain tumors was assessed in several clinical scenarios (tumor grading, prognosis prediction, differential diagnosis) using multicenter data sets (four external and one internal). Differences in diagnostic and predictive accuracy were tested using the z test. Results The three-dimensional encoder-decoder network with T1-weighted images, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images, and apparent diffusion coefficient maps as the input achieved the highest synthetic performance (SSIM, 86.29% ± 4.30). The mean qualitative score of the synthesized CBV maps by neuroradiologists was 2.63. Combining synthetic CBV with standard MRI improved the accuracy of grading gliomas (standard MRI scans area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.707; standard MRI scans with CBV maps AUC, 0.857; z = 15.17; P < .001), prediction of prognosis in gliomas (standard MRI scans AUC, 0.654; standard MRI scans with CBV maps AUC, 0.793; z = 9.62; P < .001), and differential diagnosis between tumor recurrence and treatment response in gliomas (standard MRI scans AUC, 0.778; standard MRI scans with CBV maps AUC, 0.853; z = 4.86; P < .001) and brain metastases (standard MRI scans AUC, 0.749; standard MRI scans with CBV maps AUC, 0.857; z = 6.13; P < .001). Conclusion GAN image-to-image translation techniques produced accurate synthetic CBV maps from standard MRI scans, which could be used for improving the clinical evaluation of brain tumors. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Branstetter in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bao Wang
- From the Department of Radiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China (B.W.); School of Computer Science and Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China (Y.P., Y.X.); Departments of Neurosurgery (B.W., S.X., Y.L.) and Radiology (Y.Z.), Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250021, China; Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China (Y.M., L.C., Y.L.); Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China (X.L.); Department of Neurosurgery, the Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China (C.W.); and Shandong Institute of Brain Science and Brain-inspired Research, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China (Y.L.)
| | - Yongsheng Pan
- From the Department of Radiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China (B.W.); School of Computer Science and Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China (Y.P., Y.X.); Departments of Neurosurgery (B.W., S.X., Y.L.) and Radiology (Y.Z.), Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250021, China; Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China (Y.M., L.C., Y.L.); Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China (X.L.); Department of Neurosurgery, the Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China (C.W.); and Shandong Institute of Brain Science and Brain-inspired Research, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China (Y.L.)
| | - Shangchen Xu
- From the Department of Radiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China (B.W.); School of Computer Science and Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China (Y.P., Y.X.); Departments of Neurosurgery (B.W., S.X., Y.L.) and Radiology (Y.Z.), Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250021, China; Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China (Y.M., L.C., Y.L.); Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China (X.L.); Department of Neurosurgery, the Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China (C.W.); and Shandong Institute of Brain Science and Brain-inspired Research, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China (Y.L.)
| | - Yi Zhang
- From the Department of Radiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China (B.W.); School of Computer Science and Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China (Y.P., Y.X.); Departments of Neurosurgery (B.W., S.X., Y.L.) and Radiology (Y.Z.), Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250021, China; Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China (Y.M., L.C., Y.L.); Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China (X.L.); Department of Neurosurgery, the Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China (C.W.); and Shandong Institute of Brain Science and Brain-inspired Research, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China (Y.L.)
| | - Yang Ming
- From the Department of Radiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China (B.W.); School of Computer Science and Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China (Y.P., Y.X.); Departments of Neurosurgery (B.W., S.X., Y.L.) and Radiology (Y.Z.), Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250021, China; Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China (Y.M., L.C., Y.L.); Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China (X.L.); Department of Neurosurgery, the Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China (C.W.); and Shandong Institute of Brain Science and Brain-inspired Research, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China (Y.L.)
| | - Ligang Chen
- From the Department of Radiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China (B.W.); School of Computer Science and Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China (Y.P., Y.X.); Departments of Neurosurgery (B.W., S.X., Y.L.) and Radiology (Y.Z.), Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250021, China; Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China (Y.M., L.C., Y.L.); Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China (X.L.); Department of Neurosurgery, the Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China (C.W.); and Shandong Institute of Brain Science and Brain-inspired Research, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China (Y.L.)
| | - Xuejun Liu
- From the Department of Radiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China (B.W.); School of Computer Science and Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China (Y.P., Y.X.); Departments of Neurosurgery (B.W., S.X., Y.L.) and Radiology (Y.Z.), Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250021, China; Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China (Y.M., L.C., Y.L.); Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China (X.L.); Department of Neurosurgery, the Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China (C.W.); and Shandong Institute of Brain Science and Brain-inspired Research, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China (Y.L.)
| | - Chengwei Wang
- From the Department of Radiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China (B.W.); School of Computer Science and Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China (Y.P., Y.X.); Departments of Neurosurgery (B.W., S.X., Y.L.) and Radiology (Y.Z.), Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250021, China; Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China (Y.M., L.C., Y.L.); Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China (X.L.); Department of Neurosurgery, the Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China (C.W.); and Shandong Institute of Brain Science and Brain-inspired Research, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China (Y.L.)
| | - Yingchao Liu
- From the Department of Radiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China (B.W.); School of Computer Science and Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China (Y.P., Y.X.); Departments of Neurosurgery (B.W., S.X., Y.L.) and Radiology (Y.Z.), Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250021, China; Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China (Y.M., L.C., Y.L.); Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China (X.L.); Department of Neurosurgery, the Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China (C.W.); and Shandong Institute of Brain Science and Brain-inspired Research, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China (Y.L.)
| | - Yong Xia
- From the Department of Radiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China (B.W.); School of Computer Science and Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China (Y.P., Y.X.); Departments of Neurosurgery (B.W., S.X., Y.L.) and Radiology (Y.Z.), Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250021, China; Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China (Y.M., L.C., Y.L.); Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China (X.L.); Department of Neurosurgery, the Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China (C.W.); and Shandong Institute of Brain Science and Brain-inspired Research, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China (Y.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hirschler L, Sollmann N, Schmitz‐Abecassis B, Pinto J, Arzanforoosh F, Barkhof F, Booth T, Calvo‐Imirizaldu M, Cassia G, Chmelik M, Clement P, Ercan E, Fernández‐Seara MA, Furtner J, Fuster‐Garcia E, Grech‐Sollars M, Guven NT, Hatay GH, Karami G, Keil VC, Kim M, Koekkoek JAF, Kukran S, Mancini L, Nechifor RE, Özcan A, Ozturk‐Isik E, Piskin S, Schmainda K, Svensson SF, Tseng C, Unnikrishnan S, Vos F, Warnert E, Zhao MY, Jancalek R, Nunes T, Emblem KE, Smits M, Petr J, Hangel G. Advanced MR Techniques for Preoperative Glioma Characterization: Part 1. J Magn Reson Imaging 2023; 57:1655-1675. [PMID: 36866773 PMCID: PMC10946498 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Preoperative clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols for gliomas, brain tumors with dismal outcomes due to their infiltrative properties, still rely on conventional structural MRI, which does not deliver information on tumor genotype and is limited in the delineation of diffuse gliomas. The GliMR COST action wants to raise awareness about the state of the art of advanced MRI techniques in gliomas and their possible clinical translation or lack thereof. This review describes current methods, limits, and applications of advanced MRI for the preoperative assessment of glioma, summarizing the level of clinical validation of different techniques. In this first part, we discuss dynamic susceptibility contrast and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, arterial spin labeling, diffusion-weighted MRI, vessel imaging, and magnetic resonance fingerprinting. The second part of this review addresses magnetic resonance spectroscopy, chemical exchange saturation transfer, susceptibility-weighted imaging, MRI-PET, MR elastography, and MR-based radiomics applications. Evidence Level: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydiane Hirschler
- C.J. Gorter MRI Center, Department of RadiologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Nico Sollmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyUniversity Hospital UlmUlmGermany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der IsarTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany
- TUM‐Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum rechts der IsarTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany
| | - Bárbara Schmitz‐Abecassis
- Department of RadiologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
- Medical Delta FoundationDelftThe Netherlands
| | - Joana Pinto
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering ScienceUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | | | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear MedicineAmsterdam UMC, Vrije UniversiteitAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image ComputingUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Thomas Booth
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging SciencesKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Department of NeuroradiologyKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | | | | | - Marek Chmelik
- Department of Technical Disciplines in Medicine, Faculty of Health CareUniversity of PrešovPrešovSlovakia
| | - Patricia Clement
- Department of Diagnostic SciencesGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
- Department of Medical ImagingGhent University HospitalGhentBelgium
| | - Ece Ercan
- Department of RadiologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Maria A. Fernández‐Seara
- Department of RadiologyClínica Universidad de NavarraPamplonaSpain
- IdiSNA, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de NavarraPamplonaSpain
| | - Julia Furtner
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image‐guided TherapyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Research Center of Medical Image Analysis and Artificial IntelligenceDanube Private UniversityKrems an der DonauAustria
| | - Elies Fuster‐Garcia
- Biomedical Data Science Laboratory, Instituto Universitario de Tecnologías de la Información y ComunicacionesUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaValenciaSpain
| | - Matthew Grech‐Sollars
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer ScienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and NeurosurgeryUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Nazmiye Tugay Guven
- Institute of Biomedical EngineeringBogazici University IstanbulIstanbulTurkey
| | - Gokce Hale Hatay
- Institute of Biomedical EngineeringBogazici University IstanbulIstanbulTurkey
| | - Golestan Karami
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging SciencesKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Vera C. Keil
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear MedicineAmsterdam UMC, Vrije UniversiteitAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Cancer Center AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Mina Kim
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering and Department of NeuroinflammationUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Johan A. F. Koekkoek
- Department of NeurologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
- Department of NeurologyHaaglanden Medical CenterThe HagueThe Netherlands
| | - Simran Kukran
- Department of BioengineeringImperial College LondonLondonUK
- Department of Radiotherapy and ImagingInstitute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Laura Mancini
- Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and NeurosurgeryUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, Institute of NeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Ruben Emanuel Nechifor
- Department of Clinical Psychology and PsychotherapyInternational Institute for the Advanced Studies of Psychotherapy and Applied Mental Health, Babes‐Bolyai UniversityCluj‐NapocaRomania
| | - Alpay Özcan
- Electrical and Electronics Engineering DepartmentBogazici University IstanbulIstanbulTurkey
| | - Esin Ozturk‐Isik
- Institute of Biomedical EngineeringBogazici University IstanbulIstanbulTurkey
| | - Senol Piskin
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Natural Sciences and EngineeringIstinye University IstanbulIstanbulTurkey
| | - Kathleen Schmainda
- Department of BiophysicsMedical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeWisconsinUSA
| | - Siri F. Svensson
- Department of Physics and Computational RadiologyOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
- Department of PhysicsUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Chih‐Hsien Tseng
- Medical Delta FoundationDelftThe Netherlands
- Department of Imaging PhysicsDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
| | - Saritha Unnikrishnan
- Faculty of Engineering and DesignAtlantic Technological University (ATU) SligoSligoIreland
- Mathematical Modelling and Intelligent Systems for Health and Environment (MISHE), ATU SligoSligoIreland
| | - Frans Vos
- Medical Delta FoundationDelftThe Netherlands
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear MedicineErasmus MCRotterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of Imaging PhysicsDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
| | - Esther Warnert
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear MedicineErasmus MCRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Moss Y. Zhao
- Department of RadiologyStanford UniversityStanfordCaliforniaUSA
- Stanford Cardiovascular InstituteStanford UniversityStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - Radim Jancalek
- Department of NeurosurgerySt. Anne's University Hospital, BrnoBrnoCzech Republic
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic
| | - Teresa Nunes
- Department of NeuroradiologyHospital Garcia de OrtaAlmadaPortugal
| | - Kyrre E. Emblem
- Department of Physics and Computational RadiologyOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| | - Marion Smits
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering ScienceUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear MedicineErasmus MCRotterdamThe Netherlands
- Brain Tumour CentreErasmus MC Cancer InstituteRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Jan Petr
- Helmholtz‐Zentrum Dresden‐RossendorfInstitute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer ResearchDresdenGermany
| | - Gilbert Hangel
- Department of NeurosurgeryMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- High Field MR Centre, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image‐guided TherapyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Christian Doppler Laboratory for MR Imaging BiomarkersViennaAustria
- Medical Imaging ClusterMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cho NS, Hagiwara A, Sanvito F, Ellingson BM. A multi-reader comparison of normal-appearing white matter normalization techniques for perfusion and diffusion MRI in brain tumors. Neuroradiology 2023; 65:559-568. [PMID: 36301349 PMCID: PMC9905164 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-022-03072-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE There remains no consensus normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) normalization method to compute normalized relative cerebral blood volume (nrCBV) and apparent diffusion coefficient (nADC) in brain tumors. This reader study explored nrCBV and nADC differences using different NAWM normalization methods. METHODS Thirty-five newly diagnosed glioma patients were studied. For each patient, two readers created four NAWM regions of interests: (1) a single plane in the centrum semiovale (CSOp), (2) 3 spheres in the centrum semiovale (CSOs), (3) a single plane in the slice of the tumor center (TUMp), and (4) 3 spheres in the slice of the tumor center (TUMs). Readers repeated NAWM segmentations 1 month later. Differences in nrCBV and nADC of the FLAIR hyperintense tumor, inter-/intra-reader variability, and time to segment NAWM were assessed. As a validation step, the diagnostic performance of each method for IDH-status prediction was evaluated. RESULTS Both readers obtained significantly different nrCBV (P < .001), nADC (P < .001), and time to segment NAWM (P < .001) between the four normalization methods. nrCBV and nADC were significantly different between CSO and TUM methods, but not between planar and spherical methods in the same NAWM region. Broadly, CSO methods were quicker than TUM methods, and spherical methods were quicker than planar methods. For all normalization techniques, inter-reader reproducibility and intra-reader repeatability were excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9), and the IDH-status predictive performance remained similar. CONCLUSION The selected NAWM region significantly impacts nrCBV and nADC values. CSO methods, particularly CSOs, may be preferred because of time reduction, similar reader variability, and similar diagnostic performance compared to TUM methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas S Cho
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Medical Scientist Training Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Akifumi Hagiwara
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Francesco Sanvito
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Unit of Radiology, Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic, and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Department of Bioengineering, Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Guo ZH, Khattak S, Rauf MA, Ansari MA, Alomary MN, Razak S, Yang CY, Wu DD, Ji XY. Role of Nanomedicine-Based Therapeutics in the Treatment of CNS Disorders. Molecules 2023; 28:molecules28031283. [PMID: 36770950 PMCID: PMC9921752 DOI: 10.3390/molecules28031283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Revised: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Central nervous system disorders, especially neurodegenerative diseases, are a public health priority and demand a strong scientific response. Various therapy procedures have been used in the past, but their therapeutic value has been insufficient. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) and the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier is two of the barriers that protect the central nervous system (CNS), but are the main barriers to medicine delivery into the CNS for treating CNS disorders, such as brain tumors, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, and Huntington's disease. Nanotechnology-based medicinal approaches deliver valuable cargos targeting molecular and cellular processes with greater safety, efficacy, and specificity than traditional approaches. CNS diseases include a wide range of brain ailments connected to short- and long-term disability. They affect millions of people worldwide and are anticipated to become more common in the coming years. Nanotechnology-based brain therapy could solve the BBB problem. This review analyzes nanomedicine's role in medication delivery; immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and gene therapy are combined with nanomedicines to treat CNS disorders. We also evaluated nanotechnology-based approaches for CNS disease amelioration, with the intention of stimulating the immune system by delivering medications across the BBB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zi-Hua Guo
- Department of Neurology, Kaifeng Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 54 East Caizhengting St., Kaifeng 475000, China
| | - Saadullah Khattak
- Henan International Joint Laboratory for Nuclear Protein Regulation, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
| | - Mohd Ahmar Rauf
- Department of Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Henan-Macquarie University Joint Centre for Biomedical Innovation, School of Life Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
| | - Mohammad Azam Ansari
- Department of Epidemic Disease Research, Institute for Research & Medical Consultations (IRMC), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P.O. Box 1982, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammad N. Alomary
- National Centre for Biotechnology, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST), P.O. Box 6086, Riyadh 11442, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sufyan Razak
- Dow Medical College, John Hopkins Medical Center, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Chang-Yong Yang
- School of Nursing and Health, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
- Correspondence: (C.-Y.Y.); (D.-D.W.); (X.-Y.J.); Tel.: +86-371-23885066 (C.-Y.Y.); +86-371-23880525 (D.-D.W.); +86-371-23880585 (X.-Y.J.)
| | - Dong-Dong Wu
- Henan International Joint Laboratory for Nuclear Protein Regulation, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
- School of Stomatology, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
- Correspondence: (C.-Y.Y.); (D.-D.W.); (X.-Y.J.); Tel.: +86-371-23885066 (C.-Y.Y.); +86-371-23880525 (D.-D.W.); +86-371-23880585 (X.-Y.J.)
| | - Xin-Ying Ji
- Henan International Joint Laboratory for Nuclear Protein Regulation, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
- Correspondence: (C.-Y.Y.); (D.-D.W.); (X.-Y.J.); Tel.: +86-371-23885066 (C.-Y.Y.); +86-371-23880525 (D.-D.W.); +86-371-23880585 (X.-Y.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Anil A, Stokes AM, Chao R, Hu LS, Alhilali L, Karis JP, Bell LC, Quarles CC. Identification of single-dose, dual-echo based CBV threshold for fractional tumor burden mapping in recurrent glioblastoma. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1046629. [PMID: 36733305 PMCID: PMC9887158 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1046629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) obtained from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI is widely used to distinguish high grade glioma recurrence from post treatment radiation effects (PTRE). Application of rCBV thresholds yield maps to distinguish between regional tumor burden and PTRE, a biomarker termed the fractional tumor burden (FTB). FTB is generally measured using conventional double-dose, single-echo DSC-MRI protocols; recently, a single-dose, dual-echo DSC-MRI protocol was clinically validated by direct comparison to the conventional double-dose, single-echo protocol. As the single-dose, dual-echo acquisition enables reduction in the contrast agent dose and provides greater pulse sequence parameter flexibility, there is a compelling need to establish dual-echo DSC-MRI based FTB mapping. In this study, we determine the optimum standardized rCBV threshold for the single-dose, dual-echo protocol to generate FTB maps that best match those derived from the reference standard, double-dose, single-echo protocol. Methods The study consisted of 23 high grade glioma patients undergoing perfusion scans to confirm suspected tumor recurrence. We sequentially acquired single dose, dual-echo and double dose, single-echo DSC-MRI data. For both protocols, we generated leakage-corrected standardized rCBV maps. Standardized rCBV (sRCBV) thresholds of 1.0 and 1.75 were used to compute single-echo FTB maps as the reference for delineating PTRE (sRCBV < 1.0), tumor with moderate angiogenesis (1.0 < sRCBV < 1.75), and tumor with high angiogenesis (sRCBV > 1.75) regions. To assess the sRCBV agreement between acquisition protocols, the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was computed between the mean tumor sRCBV values across the patients. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the optimum dual-echo sRCBV threshold. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were compared between the obtained optimized threshold (1.64) and the standard reference threshold (1.75) for the dual-echo sRCBV threshold. Results The mean tumor sRCBV values across the patients showed a strong correlation (CCC = 0.96) between the two protocols. The ROC analysis showed maximum accuracy at thresholds of 1.0 (delineate PTRE from tumor) and 1.64 (differentiate aggressive tumors). The reference threshold (1.75) and the obtained optimized threshold (1.64) yielded similar accuracy, with slight differences in sensitivity and specificity which were not statistically significant (1.75 threshold: Sensitivity = 81.94%; Specificity: 87.23%; Accuracy: 84.58% and 1.64 threshold: Sensitivity = 84.48%; Specificity: 84.97%; Accuracy: 84.73%). Conclusions The optimal sRCBV threshold for single-dose, dual-echo protocol was found to be 1.0 and 1.64 for distinguishing tumor recurrence from PTRE; however, minimal differences were observed when using the standard threshold (1.75) as the upper threshold, suggesting that the standard threshold could be used for both protocols. While the prior study validated the agreement of the mean sRCBV values between the protocols, this study confirmed that their voxel-wise agreement is suitable for reliable FTB mapping. Dual-echo DSC-MRI acquisitions enable robust single-dose sRCBV and FTB mapping, provide pulse sequence parameter flexibility and should improve reproducibility by mitigating variations in preload dose and incubation time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aliya Anil
- Division of Neuroimaging Research and Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neuroimaging Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Ashley M. Stokes
- Division of Neuroimaging Research and Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neuroimaging Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Renee Chao
- Division of Neuroimaging Research and Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neuroimaging Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Leland S. Hu
- Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Lea Alhilali
- Neuroradiology, Southwest Neuroimaging at Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - John P. Karis
- Neuroradiology, Southwest Neuroimaging at Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Laura C. Bell
- Early Clinical Development, Genentech, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - C. Chad Quarles
- Cancer System Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States,*Correspondence: C. Chad Quarles,
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Suter Y, Knecht U, Valenzuela W, Notter M, Hewer E, Schucht P, Wiest R, Reyes M. The LUMIERE dataset: Longitudinal Glioblastoma MRI with expert RANO evaluation. Sci Data 2022; 9:768. [PMID: 36522344 PMCID: PMC9755255 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01881-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Publicly available Glioblastoma (GBM) datasets predominantly include pre-operative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or contain few follow-up images for each patient. Access to fully longitudinal datasets is critical to advance the refinement of treatment response assessment. We release a single-center longitudinal GBM MRI dataset with expert ratings of selected follow-up studies according to the response assessment in neuro-oncology criteria (RANO). The expert rating includes details about the rationale of the ratings. For a subset of patients, we provide pathology information regarding methylation of the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter status and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1), as well as the overall survival time. The data includes T1-weighted pre- and post-contrast, T2-weighted, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI. Segmentations from state-of-the-art automated segmentation tools, as well as radiomic features, complement the data. Possible applications of this dataset are radiomics research, the development and validation of automated segmentation methods, and studies on response assessment. This collection includes MRI data of 91 GBM patients with a total of 638 study dates and 2487 images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yannick Suter
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Urspeter Knecht
- Radiology Department, Spital Emmental, Burgdorf, Switzerland
| | - Waldo Valenzuela
- Support Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Ekkehard Hewer
- Institute of Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Roland Wiest
- Support Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Mauricio Reyes
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Calabrese E, Villanueva-Meyer JE, Rudie JD, Rauschecker AM, Baid U, Bakas S, Cha S, Mongan JT, Hess CP. The University of California San Francisco Preoperative Diffuse Glioma MRI Dataset. Radiol Artif Intell 2022; 4:e220058. [PMID: 36523646 PMCID: PMC9748624 DOI: 10.1148/ryai.220058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Supplemental material is available for this article. Keywords: Informatics, MR Diffusion Tensor Imaging, MR Perfusion, MR Imaging, Neuro-Oncology, CNS, Brain/Brain Stem, Oncology, Radiogenomics, Radiology-Pathology Integration © RSNA, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan Calabrese
- From the Center for Intelligent Imaging (Ci), Department
of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California San
Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143 (E.C., J.E.V.M., J.D.R.,
A.M.R., S.C., J.T.M., C.P.H.); and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and
Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (U.B.,
S.B.)
| | - Javier E. Villanueva-Meyer
- From the Center for Intelligent Imaging (Ci), Department
of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California San
Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143 (E.C., J.E.V.M., J.D.R.,
A.M.R., S.C., J.T.M., C.P.H.); and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and
Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (U.B.,
S.B.)
| | - Jeffrey D. Rudie
- From the Center for Intelligent Imaging (Ci), Department
of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California San
Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143 (E.C., J.E.V.M., J.D.R.,
A.M.R., S.C., J.T.M., C.P.H.); and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and
Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (U.B.,
S.B.)
| | - Andreas M. Rauschecker
- From the Center for Intelligent Imaging (Ci), Department
of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California San
Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143 (E.C., J.E.V.M., J.D.R.,
A.M.R., S.C., J.T.M., C.P.H.); and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and
Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (U.B.,
S.B.)
| | - Ujjwal Baid
- From the Center for Intelligent Imaging (Ci), Department
of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California San
Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143 (E.C., J.E.V.M., J.D.R.,
A.M.R., S.C., J.T.M., C.P.H.); and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and
Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (U.B.,
S.B.)
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- From the Center for Intelligent Imaging (Ci), Department
of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California San
Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143 (E.C., J.E.V.M., J.D.R.,
A.M.R., S.C., J.T.M., C.P.H.); and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and
Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (U.B.,
S.B.)
| | - Soonmee Cha
- From the Center for Intelligent Imaging (Ci), Department
of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California San
Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143 (E.C., J.E.V.M., J.D.R.,
A.M.R., S.C., J.T.M., C.P.H.); and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and
Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (U.B.,
S.B.)
| | - John T. Mongan
- From the Center for Intelligent Imaging (Ci), Department
of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California San
Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143 (E.C., J.E.V.M., J.D.R.,
A.M.R., S.C., J.T.M., C.P.H.); and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and
Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (U.B.,
S.B.)
| | - Christopher P. Hess
- From the Center for Intelligent Imaging (Ci), Department
of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California San
Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143 (E.C., J.E.V.M., J.D.R.,
A.M.R., S.C., J.T.M., C.P.H.); and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and
Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (U.B.,
S.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hoopes A, Mora JS, Dalca AV, Fischl B, Hoffmann M. SynthStrip: skull-stripping for any brain image. Neuroimage 2022; 260:119474. [PMID: 35842095 PMCID: PMC9465771 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The removal of non-brain signal from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, known as skull-stripping, is an integral component of many neuroimage analysis streams. Despite their abundance, popular classical skull-stripping methods are usually tailored to images with specific acquisition properties, namely near-isotropic resolution and T1-weighted (T1w) MRI contrast, which are prevalent in research settings. As a result, existing tools tend to adapt poorly to other image types, such as stacks of thick slices acquired with fast spin-echo (FSE) MRI that are common in the clinic. While learning-based approaches for brain extraction have gained traction in recent years, these methods face a similar burden, as they are only effective for image types seen during the training procedure. To achieve robust skull-stripping across a landscape of imaging protocols, we introduce SynthStrip, a rapid, learning-based brain-extraction tool. By leveraging anatomical segmentations to generate an entirely synthetic training dataset with anatomies, intensity distributions, and artifacts that far exceed the realistic range of medical images, SynthStrip learns to successfully generalize to a variety of real acquired brain images, removing the need for training data with target contrasts. We demonstrate the efficacy of SynthStrip for a diverse set of image acquisitions and resolutions across subject populations, ranging from newborn to adult. We show substantial improvements in accuracy over popular skull-stripping baselines - all with a single trained model. Our method and labeled evaluation data are available at https://w3id.org/synthstrip.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Hoopes
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13(th) St, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Jocelyn S Mora
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13(th) St, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Adrian V Dalca
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13(th) St, Charlestown, MA, USA; Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA, USA; Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 32 Vassar St, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Bruce Fischl
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13(th) St, Charlestown, MA, USA; Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA, USA; Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 32 Vassar St, Cambridge, MA, USA; Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Malte Hoffmann
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13(th) St, Charlestown, MA, USA; Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bakas S, Sako C, Akbari H, Bilello M, Sotiras A, Shukla G, Rudie JD, Santamaría NF, Kazerooni AF, Pati S, Rathore S, Mamourian E, Ha SM, Parker W, Doshi J, Baid U, Bergman M, Binder ZA, Verma R, Lustig RA, Desai AS, Bagley SJ, Mourelatos Z, Morrissette J, Watt CD, Brem S, Wolf RL, Melhem ER, Nasrallah MP, Mohan S, O'Rourke DM, Davatzikos C. The University of Pennsylvania glioblastoma (UPenn-GBM) cohort: advanced MRI, clinical, genomics, & radiomics. Sci Data 2022; 9:453. [PMID: 35906241 PMCID: PMC9338035 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01560-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most common aggressive adult brain tumor. Numerous studies have reported results from either private institutional data or publicly available datasets. However, current public datasets are limited in terms of: a) number of subjects, b) lack of consistent acquisition protocol, c) data quality, or d) accompanying clinical, demographic, and molecular information. Toward alleviating these limitations, we contribute the "University of Pennsylvania Glioblastoma Imaging, Genomics, and Radiomics" (UPenn-GBM) dataset, which describes the currently largest publicly available comprehensive collection of 630 patients diagnosed with de novo glioblastoma. The UPenn-GBM dataset includes (a) advanced multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging scans acquired during routine clinical practice, at the University of Pennsylvania Health System, (b) accompanying clinical, demographic, and molecular information, (d) perfusion and diffusion derivative volumes, (e) computationally-derived and manually-revised expert annotations of tumor sub-regions, as well as (f) quantitative imaging (also known as radiomic) features corresponding to each of these regions. This collection describes our contribution towards repeatable, reproducible, and comparative quantitative studies leading to new predictive, prognostic, and diagnostic assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Chiharu Sako
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hamed Akbari
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michel Bilello
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Aristeidis Sotiras
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology and Institute for Informatics, Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Gaurav Shukla
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christiana Care Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jeffrey D Rudie
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Natali Flores Santamaría
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Anahita Fathi Kazerooni
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sarthak Pati
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Saima Rathore
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Mamourian
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sung Min Ha
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology and Institute for Informatics, Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - William Parker
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jimit Doshi
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ujjwal Baid
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mark Bergman
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Zev A Binder
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ragini Verma
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Robert A Lustig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Arati S Desai
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Stephen J Bagley
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Zissimos Mourelatos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer Morrissette
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christopher D Watt
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Steven Brem
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ronald L Wolf
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Elias R Melhem
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - MacLean P Nasrallah
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Suyash Mohan
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Donald M O'Rourke
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Brighi C, Verburg N, Koh ES, Walker A, Chen C, Pillay S, de Witt Hamer PC, Aly F, Holloway LC, Keall PJ, Waddington DE. Repeatability of radiotherapy dose-painting prescriptions derived from a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging model of glioblastoma infiltration. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 23:8-15. [PMID: 35734265 PMCID: PMC9207284 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2022] [Revised: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging was used to derive dose-painting prescriptions in glioma. Dose prescriptions derived from magnetic resonance imaging are highly repeatable. Dose-painting plans are more repeatable than their dose prescriptions.
Background and purpose Glioblastoma (GBM) patients have a dismal prognosis. Tumours typically recur within months of surgical resection and post-operative chemoradiation. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) biomarkers promise to improve GBM outcomes by identifying likely regions of infiltrative tumour in tumour probability (TP) maps. These regions could be treated with escalated dose via dose-painting radiotherapy to achieve higher rates of tumour control. Crucial to the technical validation of dose-painting using imaging biomarkers is the repeatability of the derived dose prescriptions. Here, we quantify repeatability of dose-painting prescriptions derived from mpMRI. Materials and methods TP maps were calculated with a clinically validated model that linearly combined apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and relative cerebral blood volume (rBV) or ADC and relative cerebral blood flow (rBF) data. Maps were developed for 11 GBM patients who received two mpMRI scans separated by a short interval prior to chemoradiation treatment. A linear dose mapping function was applied to obtain dose-painting prescription (DP) maps for each session. Voxel-wise and group-wise repeatability metrics were calculated for parametric, TP and DP maps within radiotherapy margins. Results DP maps derived from mpMRI were repeatable between imaging sessions (ICC > 0.85). ADC maps showed higher repeatability than rBV and rBF maps (Wilcoxon test, p = 0.001). TP maps obtained from the combination of ADC and rBF were the most stable (median ICC: 0.89). Conclusions Dose-painting prescriptions derived from a mpMRI model of tumour infiltration have a good level of repeatability and can be used to generate reliable dose-painting plans for GBM patients.
Collapse
|
19
|
Kuo F, Ng NN, Nagpal S, Pollom EL, Soltys S, Hayden-Gephart M, Li G, Born DE, Iv M. DSC Perfusion MRI-Derived Fractional Tumor Burden and Relative CBV Differentiate Tumor Progression and Radiation Necrosis in Brain Metastases Treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2022; 43:689-695. [PMID: 35483909 PMCID: PMC9089266 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Differentiation between tumor and radiation necrosis in patients with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery is challenging. We hypothesized that MR perfusion and metabolic metrics can differentiate radiation necrosis from progressive tumor in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively evaluated MRIs comprising DSC, dynamic contrast-enhanced, and arterial spin-labeling perfusion imaging in subjects with brain metastases previously treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. For each lesion, we obtained the mean normalized and standardized relative CBV and fractional tumor burden, volume transfer constant, and normalized maximum CBF, as well as the maximum standardized uptake value in a subset of subjects who underwent FDG-PET. Relative CBV thresholds of 1 and 1.75 were used to define low and high fractional tumor burden. RESULTS Thirty subjects with 37 lesions (20 radiation necrosis, 17 tumor) were included. Compared with radiation necrosis, tumor had increased mean normalized and standardized relative CBV (P = .002) and high fractional tumor burden (normalized, P = .005; standardized, P = .003) and decreased low fractional tumor burden (normalized, P = .03; standardized, P = .01). The area under the curve showed that relative CBV (normalized = 0.80; standardized = 0.79) and high fractional tumor burden (normalized = 0.77; standardized = 0.78) performed the best to discriminate tumor and radiation necrosis. For tumor prediction, the normalized relative CBV cutoff of ≥1.75 yielded a sensitivity of 76.5% and specificity of 70.0%, while the standardized cutoff of ≥1.75 yielded a sensitivity of 41.2% and specificity of 95.0%. No significance was found with the volume transfer constant, normalized CBF, and standardized uptake value. CONCLUSIONS Increased relative CBV and high fractional tumor burden (defined by a threshold relative CBV of ≥1.75) best differentiated tumor from radiation necrosis in subjects with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. Performance of normalized and standardized approaches was similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Kuo
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention (F.K., N.N.N., M.I.)
| | - N N Ng
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention (F.K., N.N.N., M.I.)
| | - S Nagpal
- Departments of Neurology (Neuro-Oncology) (S.N.)
| | | | - S Soltys
- Radiation Oncology (E.L.P., S.S.)
| | | | - G Li
- Neurosurgery (M.H.-G., G.L.)
| | - D E Born
- Pathology (D.E.B.), Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - M Iv
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention (F.K., N.N.N., M.I.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Henriksen OM, del Mar Álvarez-Torres M, Figueiredo P, Hangel G, Keil VC, Nechifor RE, Riemer F, Schmainda KM, Warnert EAH, Wiegers EC, Booth TC. High-Grade Glioma Treatment Response Monitoring Biomarkers: A Position Statement on the Evidence Supporting the Use of Advanced MRI Techniques in the Clinic, and the Latest Bench-to-Bedside Developments. Part 1: Perfusion and Diffusion Techniques. Front Oncol 2022; 12:810263. [PMID: 35359414 PMCID: PMC8961422 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.810263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Summarize evidence for use of advanced MRI techniques as monitoring biomarkers in the clinic, and highlight the latest bench-to-bedside developments. Methods Experts in advanced MRI techniques applied to high-grade glioma treatment response assessment convened through a European framework. Current evidence regarding the potential for monitoring biomarkers in adult high-grade glioma is reviewed, and individual modalities of perfusion, permeability, and microstructure imaging are discussed (in Part 1 of two). In Part 2, we discuss modalities related to metabolism and/or chemical composition, appraise the clinic readiness of the individual modalities, and consider post-processing methodologies involving the combination of MRI approaches (multiparametric imaging) or machine learning (radiomics). Results High-grade glioma vasculature exhibits increased perfusion, blood volume, and permeability compared with normal brain tissue. Measures of cerebral blood volume derived from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI have consistently provided information about brain tumor growth and response to treatment; it is the most clinically validated advanced technique. Clinical studies have proven the potential of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for distinguishing post-treatment related effects from recurrence, but the optimal acquisition protocol, mode of analysis, parameter of highest diagnostic value, and optimal cut-off points remain to be established. Arterial spin labeling techniques do not require the injection of a contrast agent, and repeated measurements of cerebral blood flow can be performed. The absence of potential gadolinium deposition effects allows widespread use in pediatric patients and those with impaired renal function. More data are necessary to establish clinical validity as monitoring biomarkers. Diffusion-weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient analysis, diffusion tensor or kurtosis imaging, intravoxel incoherent motion, and other microstructural modeling approaches also allow treatment response assessment; more robust data are required to validate these alone or when applied to post-processing methodologies. Conclusion Considerable progress has been made in the development of these monitoring biomarkers. Many techniques are in their infancy, whereas others have generated a larger body of evidence for clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Otto M. Henriksen
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Patricia Figueiredo
- Department of Bioengineering and Institute for Systems and Robotics-Lisboa, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Gilbert Hangel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University, Vienna, Austria
- High-Field MR Centre, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Vera C. Keil
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ruben E. Nechifor
- International Institute for the Advanced Studies of Psychotherapy and Applied Mental Health, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Frank Riemer
- Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre (MMIV), Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Kathleen M. Schmainda
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | | | - Evita C. Wiegers
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Thomas C. Booth
-
School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, St. Thomas’ Hospital, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Neuroradiology, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Woodall RT, Sahoo P, Cui Y, Chen BT, Shiroishi MS, Lavini C, Frankel P, Gutova M, Brown CE, Munson JM, Rockne RC. Repeatability of tumor perfusion kinetics from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in glioblastoma. Neurooncol Adv 2022; 3:vdab174. [PMID: 34988454 PMCID: PMC8715899 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdab174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) parameters have been shown to be biomarkers for treatment response in glioblastoma (GBM). However, variations in analysis and measurement methodology complicate determination of biological changes measured via DCE. The aim of this study is to quantify DCE-MRI variations attributable to analysis methodology and image quality in GBM patients. Methods The Extended Tofts model (eTM) and Leaky Tracer Kinetic Model (LTKM), with manually and automatically segmented vascular input functions (VIFs), were used to calculate perfusion kinetic parameters from 29 GBM patients with double-baseline DCE-MRI data. DCE-MRI images were acquired 2-5 days apart with no change in treatment. Repeatability of kinetic parameters was quantified with Bland-Altman and percent repeatability coefficient (%RC) analysis. Results The perfusion parameter with the least RC was the plasma volume fraction (v p ), with a %RC of 53%. The extra-cellular extra-vascular volume fraction (v e ) %RC was 82% and 81%, for extended Tofts-Kety Model (eTM) and LTKM respectively. The %RC of the volume transfer rate constant (K trans ) was 72% for the eTM, and 82% for the LTKM, respectively. Using an automatic VIF resulted in smaller %RCs for all model parameters, as compared to manual VIF. Conclusions As much as 72% change in K trans (eTM, autoVIF) can be attributable to non-biological changes in the 2-5 days between double-baseline imaging. Poor K trans repeatability may result from inferior temporal resolution and short image acquisition time. This variation suggests DCE-MRI repeatability studies should be performed institutionally, using an automatic VIF method and following quantitative imaging biomarkers alliance guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan T Woodall
- Division of Mathematical Oncology, Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Prativa Sahoo
- Division of Mathematical Oncology, Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Yujie Cui
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Bihong T Chen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Mark S Shiroishi
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Cristina Lavini
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Frankel
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Margarita Gutova
- Department of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Christine E Brown
- Department of Hematology & Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA.,Department of Immuno-Oncology, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Jennifer M Munson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering & Mechanics, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, Virginia, USA
| | - Russell C Rockne
- Division of Mathematical Oncology, Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Brighi C, Keall PJ, Holloway LC, Walker A, Whelan B, de Witt Hamer PC, Verburg N, Aly F, Chen C, Koh ES, Waddington DEJ. An investigation of the conformity, feasibility, and expected clinical benefits of multiparametric MRI-guided dose painting radiotherapy in glioblastoma. Neurooncol Adv 2022; 4:vdac134. [PMID: 36105390 PMCID: PMC9466270 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background New technologies developed to improve survival outcomes for glioblastoma (GBM) continue to have limited success. Recently, image-guided dose painting (DP) radiotherapy has emerged as a promising strategy to increase local control rates. In this study, we evaluate the practical application of a multiparametric MRI model of glioma infiltration for DP radiotherapy in GBM by measuring its conformity, feasibility, and expected clinical benefits against standard of care treatment. Methods Maps of tumor probability were generated from perfusion/diffusion MRI data from 17 GBM patients via a previously developed model of GBM infiltration. Prescriptions for DP were linearly derived from tumor probability maps and used to develop dose optimized treatment plans. Conformity of DP plans to dose prescriptions was measured via a quality factor. Feasibility of DP plans was evaluated by dose metrics to target volumes and critical brain structures. Expected clinical benefit of DP plans was assessed by tumor control probability. The DP plans were compared to standard radiotherapy plans. Results The conformity of the DP plans was >90%. Compared to the standard plans, DP (1) did not affect dose delivered to organs at risk; (2) increased mean and maximum dose and improved minimum dose coverage for the target volumes; (3) reduced minimum dose within the radiotherapy treatment margins; (4) improved local tumor control probability within the target volumes for all patients. Conclusions A multiparametric MRI model of GBM infiltration can enable conformal, feasible, and potentially beneficial dose painting radiotherapy plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Brighi
- ACRF Image X Institute, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney , Sydney , Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research , Sydney , Australia
| | - Paul J Keall
- ACRF Image X Institute, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney , Sydney , Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research , Sydney , Australia
| | - Lois C Holloway
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research , Sydney , Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres , Liverpool , Australia
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong , Wollongong, Australia
| | - Amy Walker
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research , Sydney , Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres , Liverpool , Australia
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong , Wollongong, Australia
| | - Brendan Whelan
- ACRF Image X Institute, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney , Sydney , Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research , Sydney , Australia
| | - Philip C de Witt Hamer
- Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam , Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam , The Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery , Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Niels Verburg
- Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam , Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam , The Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery , Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Farhannah Aly
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research , Sydney , Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres , Liverpool , Australia
| | - Cathy Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres , Liverpool , Australia
| | - Eng-Siew Koh
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research , Sydney , Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres , Liverpool , Australia
| | - David E J Waddington
- ACRF Image X Institute, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney , Sydney , Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research , Sydney , Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Stokes AM, Bergamino M, Alhilali L, Hu LS, Karis JP, Baxter LC, Bell LC, Quarles CC. Evaluation of single bolus, dual-echo dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI protocols in brain tumor patients. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2021; 41:3378-3390. [PMID: 34415211 PMCID: PMC8669280 DOI: 10.1177/0271678x211039597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) obtained from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI is adversely impacted by contrast agent leakage in brain tumors. Using simulations, we previously demonstrated that multi-echo DSC-MRI protocols provide improvements in contrast agent dosing, pulse sequence flexibility, and rCBV accuracy. The purpose of this study is to assess the in-vivo performance of dual-echo acquisitions in patients with brain tumors (n = 59). To verify pulse sequence flexibility, four single-dose dual-echo acquisitions were tested with variations in contrast agent dose, flip angle, and repetition time, and the resulting dual-echo rCBV was compared to standard single-echo rCBV obtained with preload (double-dose). Dual-echo rCBV was comparable to standard double-dose single-echo protocols (mean (standard deviation) tumor rCBV 2.17 (1.28) vs. 2.06 (1.20), respectively). High rCBV similarity was observed (CCC = 0.96), which was maintained across both flip angle (CCC = 0.98) and repetition time (CCC = 0.96) permutations, demonstrating that dual-echo acquisitions provide flexibility in acquisition parameters. Furthermore, a single dual-echo acquisition was shown to enable quantification of both perfusion and permeability metrics. In conclusion, single-dose dual-echo acquisitions provide similar rCBV to standard double-dose single-echo acquisitions, suggesting contrast agent dose can be reduced while providing significant pulse sequence flexibility and complementary tumor perfusion and permeability metrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley M Stokes
- Division of Neuroimaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Maurizio Bergamino
- Division of Neuroimaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Lea Alhilali
- Neuroradiology, Southwest Neuroimaging at Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - John P Karis
- Neuroradiology, Southwest Neuroimaging at Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Leslie C Baxter
- Division of Neuroimaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.,Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Laura C Bell
- Division of Neuroimaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - C Chad Quarles
- Division of Neuroimaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Schmainda KM, Prah MA, Marques H, Kim E, Barboriak DP, Boxerman JL. Value of dynamic contrast perfusion MRI to predict early response to bevacizumab in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: results from ACRIN 6686 multicenter trial. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:314-323. [PMID: 32678438 PMCID: PMC7906067 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0825, a phase III trial of standard therapy with bevacizumab or without (placebo) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma, 44 patients underwent dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) and/or dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) trial 6686. The association between early changes in relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and volume transfer constant (Ktrans) with overall survival (OS) was evaluated. METHODS MRI was performed at postop baseline (S0), immediately before (S1), 1 day after (S2), and 7 weeks after (S3) bevacizumab or placebo initiation. Mean normalized and standardized rCBV (nRCBV, sRCBV) and Ktrans were measured within contrast-enhancing lesion. Wilcoxon rank sum tests compared parameter changes from S1-S2 and S1-S3. Association with OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Treatment response for groups stratified by pretreatment nRCBV (S0, S1) was explored. The intraclass correlation coefficient and repeatability coefficient for the placebo arm (S1-S2) were used to assess repeatability. RESULTS Evaluable were 27-36 datasets per time point. Significant differences between treatment arms were found for changes in nRCBV and sRCBV from S1-S2 and S1-S3, and in Ktrans for S1-S3. Improved PFS (P = 0.05) but not OS (P = 0.46) was observed. High pretreatment rCBV predicted improved OS for bevacizumab-treated patients. Based on the intraclass correlation coefficient, sRCBV (0.92) was more repeatable than nRCBV (0.71) and Ktrans (0.75), consistent with repeatability coefficient values. CONCLUSIONS Bevacizumab significantly changes rCBV but not Ktrans as early as 1 day posttreatment in newly diagnosed glioblastoma unrelated to outcomes. Improvements in clinical trial design to maximize rCBV benefit are indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen M Schmainda
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.,Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Melissa A Prah
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Helga Marques
- Department of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Eunhee Kim
- Merck Research Laboratories, Kenilworth, New Jersey
| | | | - Jerrold L Boxerman
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, and Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Assessment of tumor hypoxia and perfusion in recurrent glioblastoma following bevacizumab failure using MRI and 18F-FMISO PET. Sci Rep 2021; 11:7632. [PMID: 33828310 PMCID: PMC8027395 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84331-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Tumoral hypoxia correlates with worse outcomes in glioblastoma (GBM). While bevacizumab is routinely used to treat recurrent GBM, it may exacerbate hypoxia. Evofosfamide is a hypoxia-targeting prodrug being tested for recurrent GBM. To characterize resistance to bevacizumab and identify those with recurrent GBM who may benefit from evofosfamide, we ascertained MRI features and hypoxia in patients with GBM progression receiving both agents. Thirty-three patients with recurrent GBM refractory to bevacizumab were enrolled. Patients underwent MR and 18F-FMISO PET imaging at baseline and 28 days. Tumor volumes were determined, MRI and 18F-FMISO PET-derived parameters calculated, and Spearman correlations between parameters assessed. Progression-free survival decreased significantly with hypoxic volume [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14 to 2.46, P = 0.009] and increased significantly with time to the maximum value of the residue (Tmax) (HR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.88, P = 0.01). Overall survival decreased significantly with hypoxic volume (HR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.12 to 12.61, p = 0.01), standardized relative cerebral blood volume (srCBV) (HR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.38, p = 0.02), and increased significantly with Tmax (HR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.62, p < 0.001). Decreases in hypoxic volume correlated with longer overall and progression-free survival, and increases correlated with shorter overall and progression-free survival. Hypoxic volume and volume ratio were positively correlated (rs = 0.77, P < 0.0001), as were hypoxia volume and T1 enhancing tumor volume (rs = 0.75, P < 0.0001). Hypoxia is a key biomarker in patients with bevacizumab-refractory GBM. Hypoxia and srCBV were inversely correlated with patient outcomes. These radiographic features may be useful in evaluating treatment and guiding treatment considerations.
Collapse
|
26
|
Menze B, Isensee F, Wiest R, Wiestler B, Maier-Hein K, Reyes M, Bakas S. Analyzing magnetic resonance imaging data from glioma patients using deep learning. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2021; 88:101828. [PMID: 33571780 PMCID: PMC8040671 DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2020.101828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2020] [Revised: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The quantitative analysis of images acquired in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with brain tumors has seen a significant rise in the clinical use of computational tools. The underlying technology to the vast majority of these tools are machine learning methods and, in particular, deep learning algorithms. This review offers clinical background information of key diagnostic biomarkers in the diagnosis of glioma, the most common primary brain tumor. It offers an overview of publicly available resources and datasets for developing new computational tools and image biomarkers, with emphasis on those related to the Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge. We further offer an overview of the state-of-the-art methods in glioma image segmentation, again with an emphasis on publicly available tools and deep learning algorithms that emerged in the context of the BraTS challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bjoern Menze
- Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | | | - Roland Wiest
- Support Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.
| | | | | | | | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Boxerman JL, Quarles CC, Hu LS, Erickson BJ, Gerstner ER, Smits M, Kaufmann TJ, Barboriak DP, Huang RH, Wick W, Weller M, Galanis E, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Shankar L, Jacobs P, Chung C, van den Bent MJ, Chang S, Al Yung WK, Cloughesy TF, Wen PY, Gilbert MR, Rosen BR, Ellingson BM, Schmainda KM. Consensus recommendations for a dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI protocol for use in high-grade gliomas. Neuro Oncol 2020; 22:1262-1275. [PMID: 32516388 PMCID: PMC7523451 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the widespread clinical use of dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI, DSC-MRI methodology has not been standardized, hindering its utilization for response assessment in multicenter trials. Recently, the DSC-MRI Standardization Subcommittee of the Jumpstarting Brain Tumor Drug Development Coalition issued an updated consensus DSC-MRI protocol compatible with the standardized brain tumor imaging protocol (BTIP) for high-grade gliomas that is increasingly used in the clinical setting and is the default MRI protocol for the National Clinical Trials Network. After reviewing the basis for controversy over DSC-MRI protocols, this paper provides evidence-based best practices for clinical DSC-MRI as determined by the Committee, including pulse sequence (gradient echo vs spin echo), BTIP-compliant contrast agent dosing (preload and bolus), flip angle (FA), echo time (TE), and post-processing leakage correction. In summary, full-dose preload, full-dose bolus dosing using intermediate (60°) FA and field strength-dependent TE (40-50 ms at 1.5 T, 20-35 ms at 3 T) provides overall best accuracy and precision for cerebral blood volume estimates. When single-dose contrast agent usage is desired, no-preload, full-dose bolus dosing using low FA (30°) and field strength-dependent TE provides excellent performance, with reduced contrast agent usage and elimination of potential systematic errors introduced by variations in preload dose and incubation time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerrold L Boxerman
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
- Representative of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group–American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) Cancer Research Group
- Representative of the American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR)
- Representative of the American Society of Functional Neuroradiology (ASFNR)
| | - Chad C Quarles
- Department of Neuroimaging Research and Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
- Representative of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
- Representative of the American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR)
| | - Bradley J Erickson
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Representative of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
- Representative of the RSNA Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA)
- Representative of the American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR)
| | - Elizabeth R Gerstner
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Representative of the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC)
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC–University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Representative of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)
| | - Timothy J Kaufmann
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Representative of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
| | - Daniel P Barboriak
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Representative of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group–American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) Cancer Research Group
- Representative of the RSNA Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA)
- Representative of the American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR)
| | - Raymond H Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Representative of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Representative of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)
| | - Evanthia Galanis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Representative of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
| | - Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
- Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lalitha Shankar
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Paula Jacobs
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Representative of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
| | - Martin J van den Bent
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Representative of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)
| | - Susan Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - W K Al Yung
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Representative of the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC)
| | - Mark R Gilbert
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Representative of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)
| | - Bruce R Rosen
- Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Departments of Radiological Sciences, Psychiatry, and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Representative of the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC)
- Representative of the Ivy Consortium for Early Phase Clinical Trials
- Representative of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group–American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) Cancer Research Group
- Representative of the RSNA Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA)
- Representative of the American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR)
| | - Kathleen M Schmainda
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
- Representative of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group–American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) Cancer Research Group
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Benzakoun J, Robert C, Legrand L, Pallud J, Meder JF, Oppenheim C, Dhermain F, Edjlali M. Anatomical and functional MR imaging to define tumoral boundaries and characterize lesions in neuro-oncology. Cancer Radiother 2020; 24:453-462. [PMID: 32278653 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2020.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Neuroimaging and especially MRI has emerged as a necessary imaging modality to detect, measure, characterize and monitor brain tumours. Advanced MRI sequences such as perfusion MRI, diffusion MRI and spectroscopy as well as new post-processing techniques such as automatic segmentation of tumours and radiomics play a crucial role in characterization and follow up of brain tumours. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview on anatomical and functional MRI use for brain tumours boundaries determination and tumour characterization in the specific context of radiotherapy. The usefulness of anatomical and functional MRI on particular challenges posed by radiotherapy such as pseudo progression and pseudo esponse and new treatment strategies such as dose painting is also described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Benzakoun
- Radiology Department, GHU de Paris, centre hospitalier Sainte-Anne, 1, rue Cabanis, 75014 Paris, France; Université de Paris, 85, boulevard Saint-Germain, 75006 Paris, France; Imabrain, Institut de psychiatrie et neurosciences de Paris (IPNP), 102-108, rue de la Santé, 75014 Paris, France; Inserm, U1266, 102, rue de la Santé, 75013 Paris, France.
| | - C Robert
- Medical Physics Department, Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France; Molecular Radiotherapy, Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France; Inserm, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France; Paris-Sud University, Paris-Saclay University, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - L Legrand
- Radiology Department, GHU de Paris, centre hospitalier Sainte-Anne, 1, rue Cabanis, 75014 Paris, France; Université de Paris, 85, boulevard Saint-Germain, 75006 Paris, France; Imabrain, Institut de psychiatrie et neurosciences de Paris (IPNP), 102-108, rue de la Santé, 75014 Paris, France; Inserm, U1266, 102, rue de la Santé, 75013 Paris, France
| | - J Pallud
- Université de Paris, 85, boulevard Saint-Germain, 75006 Paris, France; Imabrain, Institut de psychiatrie et neurosciences de Paris (IPNP), 102-108, rue de la Santé, 75014 Paris, France; Inserm, U1266, 102, rue de la Santé, 75013 Paris, France; Neurosurgery Department, GHU de Paris, centre hospitalier Sainte-Anne, 1, rue Cabanis, 75014 Paris, France
| | - J-F Meder
- Radiology Department, GHU de Paris, centre hospitalier Sainte-Anne, 1, rue Cabanis, 75014 Paris, France; Université de Paris, 85, boulevard Saint-Germain, 75006 Paris, France; Imabrain, Institut de psychiatrie et neurosciences de Paris (IPNP), 102-108, rue de la Santé, 75014 Paris, France; Inserm, U1266, 102, rue de la Santé, 75013 Paris, France
| | - C Oppenheim
- Radiology Department, GHU de Paris, centre hospitalier Sainte-Anne, 1, rue Cabanis, 75014 Paris, France; Université de Paris, 85, boulevard Saint-Germain, 75006 Paris, France; Imabrain, Institut de psychiatrie et neurosciences de Paris (IPNP), 102-108, rue de la Santé, 75014 Paris, France; Inserm, U1266, 102, rue de la Santé, 75013 Paris, France
| | - F Dhermain
- Radiotherapy Department, Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - M Edjlali
- Radiology Department, GHU de Paris, centre hospitalier Sainte-Anne, 1, rue Cabanis, 75014 Paris, France; Université de Paris, 85, boulevard Saint-Germain, 75006 Paris, France; Imabrain, Institut de psychiatrie et neurosciences de Paris (IPNP), 102-108, rue de la Santé, 75014 Paris, France; Inserm, U1266, 102, rue de la Santé, 75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hoxworth JM, Eschbacher JM, Gonzales AC, Singleton KW, Leon GD, Smith KA, Stokes AM, Zhou Y, Mazza GL, Porter AB, Mrugala MM, Zimmerman RS, Bendok BR, Patra DP, Krishna C, Boxerman JL, Baxter LC, Swanson KR, Quarles CC, Schmainda KM, Hu LS. Performance of Standardized Relative CBV for Quantifying Regional Histologic Tumor Burden in Recurrent High-Grade Glioma: Comparison against Normalized Relative CBV Using Image-Localized Stereotactic Biopsies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020; 41:408-415. [PMID: 32165359 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a6486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Perfusion MR imaging measures of relative CBV can distinguish recurrent tumor from posttreatment radiation effects in high-grade gliomas. Currently, relative CBV measurement requires normalization based on user-defined reference tissues. A recently proposed method of relative CBV standardization eliminates the need for user input. This study compares the predictive performance of relative CBV standardization against relative CBV normalization for quantifying recurrent tumor burden in high-grade gliomas relative to posttreatment radiation effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS We recruited 38 previously treated patients with high-grade gliomas (World Health Organization grades III or IV) undergoing surgical re-resection for new contrast-enhancing lesions concerning for recurrent tumor versus posttreatment radiation effects. We recovered 112 image-localized biopsies and quantified the percentage of histologic tumor content versus posttreatment radiation effects for each sample. We measured spatially matched normalized and standardized relative CBV metrics (mean, median) and fractional tumor burden for each biopsy. We compared relative CBV performance to predict tumor content, including the Pearson correlation (r), against histologic tumor content (0%-100%) and the receiver operating characteristic area under the curve for predicting high-versus-low tumor content using binary histologic cutoffs (≥50%; ≥80% tumor). RESULTS Across relative CBV metrics, fractional tumor burden showed the highest correlations with tumor content (0%-100%) for normalized (r = 0.63, P < .001) and standardized (r = 0.66, P < .001) values. With binary cutoffs (ie, ≥50%; ≥80% tumor), predictive accuracies were similar for both standardized and normalized metrics and across relative CBV metrics. Median relative CBV achieved the highest area under the curve (normalized = 0.87, standardized = 0.86) for predicting ≥50% tumor, while fractional tumor burden achieved the highest area under the curve (normalized = 0.77, standardized = 0.80) for predicting ≥80% tumor. CONCLUSIONS Standardization of relative CBV achieves similar performance compared with normalized relative CBV and offers an important step toward workflow optimization and consensus methodology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Hoxworth
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.M.H., Y.Z., L.S.H.)
| | | | | | - K W Singleton
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Lab (K.W.S., G.D.L., B.R.B., K.R.S.), Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - G D Leon
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Lab (K.W.S., G.D.L., B.R.B., K.R.S.), Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - K A Smith
- Keller Center for Imaging Innovation (A.M.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - A M Stokes
- Keller Center for Imaging Innovation (A.M.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Y Zhou
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.M.H., Y.Z., L.S.H.)
| | - G L Mazza
- Department of Health Sciences Research (G.L.M.), Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | | | | | | | - B R Bendok
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Lab (K.W.S., G.D.L., B.R.B., K.R.S.), Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - D P Patra
- Departments of Neurosurgery (D.P.P.)
| | | | - J L Boxerman
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging (J.L.B.), Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - L C Baxter
- Neuropsychology (L.C.B.), Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - K R Swanson
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Lab (K.W.S., G.D.L., B.R.B., K.R.S.), Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - K M Schmainda
- Department of Radiology (K.M.S.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - L S Hu
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.M.H., Y.Z., L.S.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hormuth DA, Sorace AG, Virostko J, Abramson RG, Bhujwalla ZM, Enriquez-Navas P, Gillies R, Hazle JD, Mason RP, Quarles CC, Weis JA, Whisenant JG, Xu J, Yankeelov TE. Translating preclinical MRI methods to clinical oncology. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 50:1377-1392. [PMID: 30925001 PMCID: PMC6766430 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2019] [Revised: 03/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The complexity of modern in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods in oncology has dramatically changed in the last 10 years. The field has long since moved passed its (unparalleled) ability to form images with exquisite soft-tissue contrast and morphology, allowing for the enhanced identification of primary tumors and metastatic disease. Currently, it is not uncommon to acquire images related to blood flow, cellularity, and macromolecular content in the clinical setting. The acquisition of images related to metabolism, hypoxia, pH, and tissue stiffness are also becoming common. All of these techniques have had some component of their invention, development, refinement, validation, and initial applications in the preclinical setting using in vivo animal models of cancer. In this review, we discuss the genesis of quantitative MRI methods that have been successfully translated from preclinical research and developed into clinical applications. These include methods that interrogate perfusion, diffusion, pH, hypoxia, macromolecular content, and tissue mechanical properties for improving detection, staging, and response monitoring of cancer. For each of these techniques, we summarize the 1) underlying biological mechanism(s); 2) preclinical applications; 3) available repeatability and reproducibility data; 4) clinical applications; and 5) limitations of the technique. We conclude with a discussion of lessons learned from translating MRI methods from the preclinical to clinical setting, and a presentation of four fundamental problems in cancer imaging that, if solved, would result in a profound improvement in the lives of oncology patients. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1377-1392.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A. Hormuth
- Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences,Livestrong Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin
| | - Anna G. Sorace
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin,Department of Diagnostic Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin,Department of Oncology, The University of Texas at Austin,Livestrong Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin
| | - John Virostko
- Department of Diagnostic Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin,Department of Oncology, The University of Texas at Austin,Livestrong Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin
| | - Richard G. Abramson
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| | | | - Pedro Enriquez-Navas
- Departments of Cancer Imaging and Metabolism, Cancer Physiology, The Moffitt Cancer Center
| | - Robert Gillies
- Departments of Cancer Imaging and Metabolism, Cancer Physiology, The Moffitt Cancer Center
| | - John D. Hazle
- Imaging Physics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Ralph P. Mason
- Department of Radiology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
| | - C. Chad Quarles
- Department of NeuroImaging Research, The Barrow Neurological Institute
| | - Jared A. Weis
- Department of Biomedical Engineering Wake Forest School of Medicine
| | | | - Junzhong Xu
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center,Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| | - Thomas E. Yankeelov
- Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences,Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin,Department of Diagnostic Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin,Department of Oncology, The University of Texas at Austin,Livestrong Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Iv M, Liu X, Lavezo J, Gentles AJ, Ghanem R, Lummus S, Born DE, Soltys SG, Nagpal S, Thomas R, Recht L, Fischbein N. Perfusion MRI-Based Fractional Tumor Burden Differentiates between Tumor and Treatment Effect in Recurrent Glioblastomas and Informs Clinical Decision-Making. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019; 40:1649-1657. [PMID: 31515215 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a6211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 08/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Fractional tumor burden better correlates with histologic tumor volume fraction in treated glioblastoma than other perfusion metrics such as relative CBV. We defined fractional tumor burden classes with low and high blood volume to distinguish tumor from treatment effect and to determine whether fractional tumor burden can inform treatment-related decision-making. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-seven patients with high-grade gliomas (primarily glioblastoma) with recurrent contrast-enhancing lesions on DSC-MR imaging were retrospectively evaluated after surgical sampling. Histopathologic examination defined treatment effect versus tumor. Normalized relative CBV thresholds of 1.0 and 1.75 were used to define low, intermediate, and high fractional tumor burden classes in each histopathologically defined group. Performance was assessed with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Consensus agreement among physician raters reporting hypothetic changes in treatment-related decisions based on fractional tumor burden was compared with actual real-time treatment decisions. RESULTS Mean lower fractional tumor burden, high fractional tumor burden, and relative CBV of the contrast-enhancing volume were significantly different between treatment effect and tumor (P = .002, P < .001, and P < .001), with tumor having significantly higher fractional tumor burden and relative CBV and lower fractional tumor burden. No significance was found with intermediate fractional tumor burden. Performance of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was the following: high fractional tumor burden, 0.85; low fractional tumor burden, 0.7; and relative CBV, 0.81. In comparing treatment decisions, there were disagreements in 7% of tumor and 44% of treatment effect cases; in the latter, all disagreements were in cases with scattered atypical cells. CONCLUSIONS High fractional tumor burden and low fractional tumor burden define fractions of the contrast-enhancing lesion volume with high and low blood volume, respectively, and can differentiate treatment effect from tumor in recurrent glioblastomas. Fractional tumor burden maps can also help to inform clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Iv
- From the Departments of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention (M.I., N.F.)
| | - X Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery (X.L.), Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - J Lavezo
- Pathology (J.L., R.G., S.L., D.E.B.)
| | - A J Gentles
- Medicine (Biomedical Informatics Research) (A.J.G.)
| | - R Ghanem
- Pathology (J.L., R.G., S.L., D.E.B.)
| | - S Lummus
- Pathology (J.L., R.G., S.L., D.E.B.)
| | - D E Born
- Pathology (J.L., R.G., S.L., D.E.B.)
| | | | - S Nagpal
- Neurology (Neuro-Oncology) (S.N., R.T., L.R.), Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - R Thomas
- Neurology (Neuro-Oncology) (S.N., R.T., L.R.), Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - L Recht
- Neurology (Neuro-Oncology) (S.N., R.T., L.R.), Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - N Fischbein
- From the Departments of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention (M.I., N.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Schmainda KM, Prah MA, Zhang Z, Snyder BS, Rand SD, Jensen TR, Barboriak DP, Boxerman JL. Quantitative Delta T1 (dT1) as a Replacement for Adjudicated Central Reader Analysis of Contrast-Enhancing Tumor Burden: A Subanalysis of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6677/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0625 Multicenter Brain Tumor Trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019; 40:1132-1139. [PMID: 31248863 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a6110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2019] [Accepted: 05/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Brain tumor clinical trials requiring solid tumor assessment typically rely on the 2D manual delineation of enhancing tumors by ≥2 expert readers, a time-consuming step with poor interreader agreement. As a solution, we developed quantitative dT1 maps for the delineation of enhancing lesions. This retrospective analysis compares dT1 with 2D manual delineation of enhancing tumors acquired at 2 time points during the post therapeutic surveillance period of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6677/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0625 (ACRIN 6677/RTOG 0625) clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients enrolled in ACRIN 6677/RTOG 0625, a multicenter, randomized Phase II trial of bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma, underwent standard MR imaging before and after treatment initiation. For 123 patients from 23 institutions, both 2D manual delineation of enhancing tumors and dT1 datasets were evaluable at weeks 8 (n = 74) and 16 (n = 57). Using dT1, we assessed the radiologic response and progression at each time point. Percentage agreement with adjudicated 2D manual delineation of enhancing tumor reads and association between progression status and overall survival were determined. RESULTS For identification of progression, dT1 and adjudicated 2D manual delineation of enhancing tumor reads were in perfect agreement at week 8, with 73.7% agreement at week 16. Both methods showed significant differences in overall survival at each time point. When nonprogressors were further divided into responders versus nonresponders/nonprogressors, the agreement decreased to 70.3% and 52.6%, yet dT1 showed a significant difference in overall survival at week 8 (P = .01), suggesting that dT1 may provide greater sensitivity for stratifying subpopulations. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that dT1 can predict early progression comparable with the standard method but offers the potential for substantial time and cost savings for clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K M Schmainda
- From the Departments of Biophysics (K.M.S., M.A.P.) .,Radiology (K.M.S., S.D.R.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - M A Prah
- From the Departments of Biophysics (K.M.S., M.A.P.)
| | - Z Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics (Z.Z.).,Center for Statistical Sciences (Z.Z., B.S.S.), Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - B S Snyder
- Center for Statistical Sciences (Z.Z., B.S.S.), Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - S D Rand
- Radiology (K.M.S., S.D.R.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - T R Jensen
- Jensen Informatics LLC (T.R.J.), Brookfield, Wisconsin
| | - D P Barboriak
- Department of Radiology (D.P.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.,Department of Diagnostic Imaging (D.P.B., J.L.B.), Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - J L Boxerman
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging (D.P.B., J.L.B.), Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.,Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University (J.L.B.), Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Schmainda KM, Prah MA, Hu LS, Quarles CC, Semmineh N, Rand SD, Connelly JM, Anderies B, Zhou Y, Liu Y, Logan B, Stokes A, Baird G, Boxerman JL. Moving Toward a Consensus DSC-MRI Protocol: Validation of a Low-Flip Angle Single-Dose Option as a Reference Standard for Brain Tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019; 40:626-633. [PMID: 30923088 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a6015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2018] [Accepted: 01/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE DSC-MR imaging using preload, intermediate (60°) flip angle and postprocessing leakage correction has gained traction as a standard methodology. Simulations suggest that DSC-MR imaging with flip angle = 30° and no preload yields relative CBV practically equivalent to the reference standard. This study tested this hypothesis in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighty-four patients with brain lesions were enrolled in this 3-institution study. Forty-three patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. DSC-MR imaging (3T, single-dose gadobutrol, gradient recalled-echo-EPI, TE = 20-35 ms, TR = 1.2-1.63 seconds) was performed twice for each patient, with flip angle = 30°-35° and no preload (P-), which provided preload (P+) for the subsequent intermediate flip angle = 60°. Normalized relative CBV and standardized relative CBV maps were generated, including postprocessing with contrast agent leakage correction (C+) and without (C-) contrast agent leakage correction. Contrast-enhancing lesion volume, mean relative CBV, and contrast-to-noise ratio obtained with 30°/P-/C-, 30°/P-/C+, and 60°/P+/C- were compared with 60°/P+/C+ using the Lin concordance correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. Equivalence between the 30°/P-/C+ and 60°/P+/C+ protocols and the temporal SNR for the 30°/P- and 60°/P+ DSC-MR imaging data was also determined. RESULTS Compared with 60°/P+/C+, 30°/P-/C+ had closest mean standardized relative CBV (P = .61), highest Lin concordance correlation coefficient (0.96), and lowest Bland-Altman bias (μ = 1.89), compared with 30°/P-/C- (P = .02, Lin concordance correlation coefficient = 0.59, μ = 14.6) and 60°/P+/C- (P = .03, Lin concordance correlation coefficient = 0.88, μ = -10.1) with no statistical difference in contrast-to-noise ratios across protocols. The normalized relative CBV and standardized relative CBV were statistically equivalent at the 10% level using either the 30°/P-/C+ or 60°/P+/C+ protocols. Temporal SNR was not significantly different for 30°/P- and 60°/P+ (P = .06). CONCLUSIONS Tumor relative CBV derived from low-flip angle, no-preload DSC-MR imaging with leakage correction is an attractive single-dose alternative to the higher dose reference standard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K M Schmainda
- From the Departments of Biophysics (K.M.S., M.A.P.) .,Radiology (K.M.S., S.D.R.)
| | - M A Prah
- From the Departments of Biophysics (K.M.S., M.A.P.)
| | - L S Hu
- Departments of Radiology (L.S.H., Y.Z.)
| | - C C Quarles
- Division of Imaging Research (C.C.Q., N.S., A.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - N Semmineh
- Division of Imaging Research (C.C.Q., N.S., A.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | | | - B Anderies
- Neurosurgery (B.A.), Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Y Zhou
- Departments of Radiology (L.S.H., Y.Z.)
| | - Y Liu
- Division of Biostatistics, Institute for Health and Society (Y.L., B.L.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - B Logan
- Division of Biostatistics, Institute for Health and Society (Y.L., B.L.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - A Stokes
- Division of Imaging Research (C.C.Q., N.S., A.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - G Baird
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging (J.L.B., G.B.), Rhode Island Hospital and Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - J L Boxerman
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging (J.L.B., G.B.), Rhode Island Hospital and Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Press RH, Shu HKG, Shim H, Mountz JM, Kurland BF, Wahl RL, Jones EF, Hylton NM, Gerstner ER, Nordstrom RJ, Henderson L, Kurdziel KA, Vikram B, Jacobs MA, Holdhoff M, Taylor E, Jaffray DA, Schwartz LH, Mankoff DA, Kinahan PE, Linden HM, Lambin P, Dilling TJ, Rubin DL, Hadjiiski L, Buatti JM. The Use of Quantitative Imaging in Radiation Oncology: A Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN) Perspective. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 102:1219-1235. [PMID: 29966725 PMCID: PMC6348006 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2018] [Revised: 05/25/2018] [Accepted: 06/14/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Modern radiation therapy is delivered with great precision, in part by relying on high-resolution multidimensional anatomic imaging to define targets in space and time. The development of quantitative imaging (QI) modalities capable of monitoring biologic parameters could provide deeper insight into tumor biology and facilitate more personalized clinical decision-making. The Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN) was established by the National Cancer Institute to advance and validate these QI modalities in the context of oncology clinical trials. In particular, the QIN has significant interest in the application of QI to widen the therapeutic window of radiation therapy. QI modalities have great promise in radiation oncology and will help address significant clinical needs, including finer prognostication, more specific target delineation, reduction of normal tissue toxicity, identification of radioresistant disease, and clearer interpretation of treatment response. Patient-specific QI is being incorporated into radiation treatment design in ways such as dose escalation and adaptive replanning, with the intent of improving outcomes while lessening treatment morbidities. This review discusses the current vision of the QIN, current areas of investigation, and how the QIN hopes to enhance the integration of QI into the practice of radiation oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert H. Press
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Hui-Kuo G. Shu
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Hyunsuk Shim
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - James M. Mountz
- Dept. of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | | | - Ella F. Jones
- Dept. of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Nola M. Hylton
- Dept. of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Elizabeth R. Gerstner
- Dept. of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Lori Henderson
- Cancer Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Bhadrasain Vikram
- Radiation Research Program/Division of Cancer Treatment & Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Michael A. Jacobs
- Dept. of Radiology and Radiological Science, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore MD
| | - Matthias Holdhoff
- Brain Cancer Program, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore MD
| | - Edward Taylor
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - David A. Jaffray
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - David A. Mankoff
- Dept. of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Philippe Lambin
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas J. Dilling
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | | | | | - John M. Buatti
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Pipe JG. High‐Value MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2018; 49:e12-e13. [DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- James G. Pipe
- Imaging ResearchBarrow Neurological Institute Mayo ClinicRochester MinnesotaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Quarles CC, Bell LC, Stokes AM. Imaging vascular and hemodynamic features of the brain using dynamic susceptibility contrast and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Neuroimage 2018; 187:32-55. [PMID: 29729392 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2017] [Revised: 04/27/2018] [Accepted: 04/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
In the context of neurologic disorders, dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI provide valuable insights into cerebral vascular function, integrity, and architecture. Even after two decades of use, these modalities continue to evolve as their biophysical and kinetic basis is better understood, with improvements in pulse sequences and accelerated imaging techniques and through application of more robust and automated data analysis strategies. Here, we systematically review each of these elements, with a focus on how their integration improves kinetic parameter accuracy and the development of new hemodynamic biomarkers that provide sub-voxel sensitivity (e.g., capillary transit time and flow heterogeneity). Regarding contrast mechanisms, we discuss the dipole-dipole interactions and susceptibility effects that give rise to simultaneous T1, T2 and T2∗ relaxation effects, including their quantification, influence on pulse sequence parameter optimization, and use in methods such as vessel size and vessel architectural imaging. The application of technologic advancements, such as parallel imaging, simultaneous multi-slice, undersampled k-space acquisitions, and sliding window strategies, enables improved spatial and/or temporal resolution of DSC and DCE acquisitions. Such acceleration techniques have also enabled the implementation of, clinically feasible, simultaneous multi-echo spin- and gradient echo acquisitions, providing more comprehensive and quantitative interrogation of T1, T2 and T2∗ changes. Characterizing these relaxation rate changes through different post-processing options allows for the quantification of hemodynamics and vascular permeability. The application of different biophysical models provides insight into traditional hemodynamic parameters (e.g., cerebral blood volume) and more advanced parameters (e.g., capillary transit time heterogeneity). We provide insight into the appropriate selection of biophysical models and the necessary post-processing steps to ensure reliable measurements while minimizing potential sources of error. We show representative examples of advanced DSC- and DCE-MRI methods applied to pathologic conditions affecting the cerebral microcirculation, including brain tumors, stroke, aging, and multiple sclerosis. The maturation and standardization of conventional DSC- and DCE-MRI techniques has enabled their increased integration into clinical practice and use in clinical trials, which has, in turn, spurred renewed interest in their technological and biophysical development, paving the way towards a more comprehensive assessment of cerebral hemodynamics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Chad Quarles
- Division of Neuro imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, 350 W. Thomas Rd, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
| | - Laura C Bell
- Division of Neuro imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, 350 W. Thomas Rd, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Ashley M Stokes
- Division of Neuro imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, 350 W. Thomas Rd, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Prah MA, Al-Gizawiy MM, Mueller WM, Cochran EJ, Hoffmann RG, Connelly JM, Schmainda KM. Spatial discrimination of glioblastoma and treatment effect with histologically-validated perfusion and diffusion magnetic resonance imaging metrics. J Neurooncol 2017; 136:13-21. [PMID: 28900832 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2617-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2017] [Accepted: 09/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The goal of this study is to spatially discriminate tumor from treatment effect (TE), within the contrast-enhancing lesion, for brain tumor patients at all stages of treatment. To this end, the diagnostic accuracy of MRI-derived diffusion and perfusion parameters to distinguish pure TE from pure glioblastoma (GBM) was determined utilizing spatially-correlated biopsy samples. From July 2010 through June 2015, brain tumor patients who underwent pre-operative DWI and DSC-MRI and stereotactic image-guided biopsy were considered for inclusion in this IRB-approved study. MRI-derived parameter maps included apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), normalized cerebral blood flow (nCBF), normalized and standardized relative cerebral blood volume (nRCBV, sRCBV), peak signal-height (PSR) and percent signal-recovery (PSR). These were co-registered to the Stealth MRI and median values extracted from the spatially-matched biopsy regions. A ROC analysis accounting for multiple subject samples was performed, and the optimal threshold for distinguishing TE from GBM determined for each parameter. Histopathologic diagnosis of pure TE (n = 10) or pure GBM (n = 34) was confirmed in tissue samples from 15 consecutive subjects with analyzable data. Perfusion thresholds of sRCBV (3575; SN/SP% = 79.4/90.0), nRCBV (1.13; SN/SP% = 82.1/90.0), and nCBF (1.05; SN/SP% = 79.4/80.0) distinguished TE from GBM (P < 0.05), whereas ADC, PSR, and PH could not (P > 0.05). The thresholds for CBF and CBV can be applied to lesions with any admixture of tumor or treatment effect, enabling the identification of true tumor burden within enhancing lesions. This approach overcomes current limitations of averaging values from both tumor and TE for quantitative assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa A Prah
- Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| | - Mona M Al-Gizawiy
- Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| | - Wade M Mueller
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W. Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| | - Elizabeth J Cochran
- Department of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W. Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| | - Raymond G Hoffmann
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| | - Jennifer M Connelly
- Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W. Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| | - Kathleen M Schmainda
- Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA. .,Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Choi YS, Ahn SS, Lee HJ, Chang JH, Kang SG, Kim EH, Kim SH, Lee SK. The Initial Area Under the Curve Derived from Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Improves Prognosis Prediction in Glioblastoma with Unmethylated MGMT Promoter. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017. [PMID: 28642265 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a5265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Although perfusion and permeability MR parameters have known to have prognostic value, they have reproducibility issues. Our aim was to evaluate whether the initial area under the time-to-signal intensity curve (IAUC) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging can improve prognosis prediction in patients with glioblastoma with known MGMT status. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively examined 88 patients with glioblastoma who underwent preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. The means of IAUC values at 30 and 60 seconds (IAUC30mean and IAUC60mean) were extracted from enhancing tumors. The prognostic values of IAUC parameters for overall survival and progression-free survival were assessed with log-rank tests, according to the MGMT status. Multivariate overall survival and progression-free survival models before and after adding the IAUC parameters as covariates were explored by net reclassification improvement after receiver operating characteristic analysis for 1.5-year overall survival and 1-year progression-free survival and by random survival forest. RESULTS High IAUC parameters were associated with worse overall survival and progression-free survival in the unmethylated MGMT group, but not in the methylated group. In the unmethylated MGMT group, 1.5-year overall survival and 1-year progression-free survival prediction improved significantly after adding IAUC parameters (overall survival area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.86; progression-free survival area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.74-0.76) to the model with other prognostic factors (overall survival area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.81; progression-free survival area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.69; P < .05 for all) except in the case of IAUC60mean for 1-year progression-free survival prediction (P = .059). Random survival forest models indicated that the IAUC parameters were the second or most important predictors in the unmethylated MGMT group, except in the case of the IAUC60mean for progression-free survival. CONCLUSIONS IAUC can be a useful prognostic imaging biomarker in patients with glioblastoma with known MGMT status, improving prediction of glioblastoma prognosis with the unmethylated MGMT promoter status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y S Choi
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science (Y.S.C., S.S.A., H.-J.L., S.-K.L.)
| | - S S Ahn
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science (Y.S.C., S.S.A., H.-J.L., S.-K.L.)
| | - H-J Lee
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science (Y.S.C., S.S.A., H.-J.L., S.-K.L.)
| | - J H Chang
- Neurosurgery (J.H.C., S.-G.K., E.H.K.), Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - S-G Kang
- Neurosurgery (J.H.C., S.-G.K., E.H.K.), Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - E H Kim
- Neurosurgery (J.H.C., S.-G.K., E.H.K.), Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - S H Kim
- Departments of Pathology (S.H.K.)
| | - S-K Lee
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science (Y.S.C., S.S.A., H.-J.L., S.-K.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Clinical Applications of Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MRI Techniques in Gliomas: Recent Advances and Current Challenges. CONTRAST MEDIA & MOLECULAR IMAGING 2017; 2017:7064120. [PMID: 29097933 PMCID: PMC5612612 DOI: 10.1155/2017/7064120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2016] [Accepted: 02/23/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Gliomas possess complex and heterogeneous vasculatures with abnormal hemodynamics. Despite considerable advances in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques for improving tumor management and patient care in recent years, the prognosis of malignant gliomas remains dismal. Perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging techniques that could noninvasively provide superior information on vascular functionality have attracted much attention for evaluating brain tumors. However, nonconsensus imaging protocols and postprocessing analysis among different institutions impede their integration into standard-of-care imaging in clinic. And there have been very few studies providing a comprehensive evidence-based and systematic summary. This review first outlines the status of glioma theranostics and tumor-associated vascular pathology and then presents an overview of the principles of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and dynamic susceptibility contrast-MRI (DSC-MRI), with emphasis on their recent clinical applications in gliomas including tumor grading, identification of molecular characteristics, differentiation of glioma from other brain tumors, treatment response assessment, and predicting prognosis. Current challenges and future perspectives are also highlighted.
Collapse
|
40
|
Korfiatis P, Kline TL, Kelm ZS, Carter RE, Hu LS, Erickson BJ. Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-MRI Quantification Software Tool: Development and Evaluation. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 2:448-456. [PMID: 28066810 PMCID: PMC5217187 DOI: 10.18383/j.tom.2016.00172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) is a magnetic resonance imaging biomarker that is used to differentiate progression from pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma multiforme, the most common primary brain tumor. However, calculated rCBV depends considerably on the software used. Automating all steps required for rCBV calculation is important, as user interaction can lead to increased variability and possible inaccuracies in clinical decision-making. Here, we present an automated tool for computing rCBV from dynamic susceptibility contrast-magnetic resonance imaging that includes leakage correction. The entrance and exit bolus time points are automatically calculated using wavelet-based detection. The proposed tool is compared with 3 Food and Drug Administration-approved software packages, 1 automatic and 2 requiring user interaction, on a data set of 43 patients. We also evaluate manual and automated white matter (WM) selection for normalization of the cerebral blood volume maps. Our system showed good agreement with 2 of the 3 software packages. The intraclass correlation coefficient for all comparisons between the same software operated by different people was >0.880, except for FuncTool when operated by user 1 versus user 2. Little variability in agreement between software tools was observed when using different WM selection techniques. Our algorithm for automatic rCBV calculation with leakage correction and automated WM selection agrees well with 2 out of the 3 FDA-approved software packages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Zachary S Kelm
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Rickey E Carter
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MR Imaging in Glioma: Review of Current Clinical Practice. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2016; 24:649-670. [PMID: 27742108 DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2016.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR imaging, a perfusion-weighted MR imaging technique typically used in neuro-oncologic applications for estimating the relative cerebral blood volume within brain tumors, has demonstrated much potential for determining prognosis, predicting therapeutic response, and assessing early treatment response of gliomas. This review highlights recent developments using DSC-MR imaging and emphasizes the need for technical standardization and validation in prospective studies in order for this technique to become incorporated into standard-of-care imaging for patients with brain tumors.
Collapse
|
42
|
Choi YS, Lee HJ, Ahn SS, Chang JH, Kang SG, Kim EH, Kim SH, Lee SK. Primary central nervous system lymphoma and atypical glioblastoma: differentiation using the initial area under the curve derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR and the apparent diffusion coefficient. Eur Radiol 2016; 27:1344-1351. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4484-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2016] [Revised: 06/05/2016] [Accepted: 06/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|