The Pitfall of Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia Mimics Despite Multidisciplinary Application of the FTDC Criteria

Frontotemporal Dementia Differential Diagnosis in Clinical Practice: A Single-Center Retrospective Review of Frontal Behavioral Referrals

Background and Objectives

Many neurodegenerative syndromes present with impairment of frontal networks, especially frontoinsular networks affecting social and emotional cognition. People presenting with frontal network impairments may be considered for a frontotemporal dementia (FTD) diagnosis. We sought to examine the diagnostic mix of patients referred with frontal network impairments to a single cognitive neurology service.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted of all patients seen between January 2010 and December 2019 at the Eastern Cognitive Disorders Clinic, a quaternary cognitive neurology clinic in Melbourne, Australia. Patients were included if they met the following criteria: (1) were referred for suspected FTD or with a preexisting diagnosis of a FTD syndrome, (2) were referred for 'frontal behaviors' (i.e., disinhibition, disorganization, poor judgment, loss of empathy, apathy) and/or had an informant report of behavior change, and (3) had available referral documents and clinical consensus diagnosis. Referral diagnosis was compared against final diagnosis adjudicated by a consensus multidisciplinary team. Case details including age of symptom onset, Cambridge Behavioural Inventory-Revised scores, psychiatric history, and Charlson Comorbidity Index were compared against the final diagnosis.

Results

In total, 161 patients aged 42-82 years (mean = 64.5, SD = 9.0; 74.5% men) met inclusion criteria. The commonest final diagnosis was a FTD syndrome (44.6%: 26.7% behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), 9.3% progressive supranuclear palsy, 6.2% semantic dementia, 1.2% corticobasal syndrome, and 1.2% FTD/motor neuron disease). A primary psychiatric disorder (PPD) was the next commonest diagnosis (15.5%), followed by vascular cognitive impairment (VCI, 10.6%), Alzheimer disease (AD, 9.9%), and other neurologic diagnoses (6.2%). A final diagnosis of bvFTD was associated with higher rates of medical comorbidities and more eating behavior abnormalities compared with a diagnosis of PPD. Screening cognitive tests and preexisting psychiatric history did not distinguish these 2 groups.

Discussion

A broad spectrum of neurologic and psychiatric disorders may present with impairments to frontal networks. Almost half of patients referred had a final FTD syndrome diagnosis, with bvFTD the commonest final diagnosis. People with PPD, VCI, and AD present with similar clinical profiles but are distinguishable using MRI and FDG-PET imaging. Medical and psychiatric comorbidities are common in people with bvFTD.

A Case of Personality and Behavioral Changes with Frontotemporal and Cerebellar Atrophy on MRI with Corresponding Hypometabolism on FDG-PET

Background

The differential diagnosis of a patient with cognitive, behavioral, and motor symptoms is broad. There is much overlap between neurocognitive disorders due to frontotemporal dementia and other subcortical dementia. A less known diagnosis, cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome (CCAS), should also be considered. Case History. A 29-year-old female presented with ataxia and left-sided weakness. CSF showed oligoclonal bands, and MRI showed multiple white matter lesions with some atrophy. She was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS). At age 35, she developed frontal lobe symptoms and executive dysfunction; she was diagnosed with MS with bipolar disorder. Neuropsychological evaluation at that time showed significant deficits in multiple cognitive domains. Subsequent MRI showed progressive frontotemporal atrophy, and FDG-PET uncovered hypometabolism in the frontotemporal lobes and cerebellum. At age 38, her behavior worsened with aggression, and she was started on olanzapine. She responded well with decreased agitation and improved motivation and attention. Compared with previous scans, most recent MRI and FDG-PET showed interval increase in cerebellar atrophy with increase in hypometabolism in the cerebellum, respectively.

Conclusion

Based on cerebellar, affective, and subcortical cognitive examination findings, our diagnosis is probable CCAS. The cerebellum should be considered as a possible etiology of frontal subcortical cognitive impairment.

Social cognition differentiates phenocopy syndrome of behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia from behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia

BACKGROUND

Patients displaying clinical features of behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) but lacking both neuroimaging abnormalities and clinical progression are considered to represent the phenocopy syndrome of bvFTD (phFTD). Extensive clinical overlap between early phase bvFTD and phFTD hampers diagnostic distinction. We aimed to assess the diagnostic value of clinician-rated, self-reported and caregiver-reported symptoms for clinical distinction between phFTD and bvFTD.

METHODS

There were 33 phFTD and 95 probable bvFTD patients included in the study (total N = 128). Clinician-rated, self-reported tests and caregiver-reported symptoms were compared between phFTD and bvFTD on social cognition, behaviour, mood and activities of daily living (ADL). Scores were compared between groups, followed by multiple logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age and sex. Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted to assess diagnostic value.

RESULTS

Using clinician-rated and self-reported tests, phFTD patients performed better on facial emotion recognition and reported more depressive symptoms. Caregiver-reported behavioural symptoms indicated higher behavioural and ADL impairment in phFTD compared to bvFTD. Facial emotion recognition provided highest diagnostic accuracy for distinction of phFTD from bvFTD (area under the curve (AUC) 0.813 95% CI 0.735-0.892, P < 0.001, sensitivity 81%, specificity 74%) followed by depressive symptoms (AUC 0.769 95% 0.674-0.864, P < 0.001 sensitivity 81%, specificity of 63%).

CONCLUSION

Social cognition tests are most suitable for distinction of phFTD from bvFTD. Caregiver-reported questionnaires and phFTD diagnosis seemed inversely correlated, showing more symptoms in phFTD. Further research is needed on phFTD aetiology and in caregivers taking into account disease burden to assess what explains this discrepancy between clinician-rated and caregiver-based tools.

Diagnostic performance of molecular imaging methods in predicting the progression from mild cognitive impairment to dementia: an updated systematic review

PURPOSE

Epidemiological and logistical reasons are slowing the clinical validation of the molecular imaging biomarkers in the initial stages of neurocognitive disorders. We provide an updated systematic review of the recent advances (2017-2022), highlighting methodological shortcomings.

METHODS

Studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy values of the molecular imaging techniques (i.e., amyloid-, tau-, [18F]FDG-PETs, DaT-SPECT, and cardiac [123I]-MIBG scintigraphy) in predicting progression from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to dementia were selected according to the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) method and evaluated with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Main eligibility criteria were as follows: (1) ≥ 50 subjects with MCI, (2) follow-up ≥ 3 years, (3) gold standard: progression to dementia or diagnosis on pathology, and (4) measures of prospective accuracy.

RESULTS

Sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP) in predicting progression to dementia, mainly to Alzheimer's dementia were 43-100% and 63-94% for [18F]FDG-PET and 64-94% and 48-93% for amyloid-PET. Longitudinal studies were lacking for less common disorders (Dementia with Lewy bodies-DLB and Frontotemporal lobe degeneration-FTLD) and for tau-PET, DaT-SPECT, and [123I]-MIBG scintigraphy. Therefore, the accuracy values from cross-sectional studies in a smaller sample of subjects (n > 20, also including mild dementia stage) were chosen as surrogate outcomes. DaT-SPECT showed 47-100% SE and 71-100% SP in differentiating Lewy body disease (LBD) from non-LBD conditions; tau-PET: 88% SE and 100% SP in differentiating DLB from Posterior Cortical Atrophy. [123I]-MIBG scintigraphy differentiated LBD from non-LBD conditions with 47-100% SE and 71-100% SP.

CONCLUSION

Molecular imaging has a moderate-to-good accuracy in predicting the progression of MCI to Alzheimer's dementia. Longitudinal studies are sparse in non-AD conditions, requiring additional efforts in these settings.

A systematic review of cognitive and behavioral tools to differentiate behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia from other conditions

The behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is thought to be the commonest clinical presentation of frontotemporal lobar degeneration and is predominantly characterized by changes in behavior. In patients lacking unequivocal biomarker evidence of frontotemporal neurodegeneration, the clinical diagnosis of bvFTD is often unstable. In response, we conducted a systematic review and critical appraisal of cognitive and behavioral tools that have sought to differentiate bvFTD from other conditions. A systematic literature review of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted on December 31, 2023 for cognitive and behavioral tools that differentiated bvFTD from other cohorts. Ninety-six studies were included. The quality appraisal of almost all studies was low and introduced a high risk of bias. The few studies that were of high quality had a prospective study design and recruited patients suspected (but not yet confirmed) to have bvFTD. These studies reported that behavioral tools (e.g., the Frontal Behavioral Inventory) and social cognition tests (e.g., the Ekman's Faces Test) had good test performance in differentiating bvFTD from a broad range of psychiatric and neurological conditions. Importantly, the review highlighted the extreme paucity of studies that have evaluated methods where, in Bayesian terms, there is genuine clinical uncertainty regarding a diagnosis of bvFTD. Most studies used healthy controls of typical Alzheimer's disease as comparators-groups that often have negligible pretest probability of bvFTD. In response, we propose a study design checklist for studies seeking to develop diagnostic algorithms in bvFTD research.

The pursuit for markers of disease progression in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia: a scoping review to optimize outcome measures for clinical trials

Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by diverse and prominent changes in behavior and personality. One of the greatest challenges in bvFTD is to capture, measure and predict its disease progression, due to clinical, pathological and genetic heterogeneity. Availability of reliable outcome measures is pivotal for future clinical trials and disease monitoring. Detection of change should be objective, clinically meaningful and easily assessed, preferably associated with a biological process. The purpose of this scoping review is to examine the status of longitudinal studies in bvFTD, evaluate current assessment tools and propose potential progression markers. A systematic literature search (in PubMed and Embase.com) was performed. Literature on disease trajectories and longitudinal validity of frequently-used measures was organized in five domains: global functioning, behavior, (social) cognition, neuroimaging and fluid biomarkers. Evaluating current longitudinal data, we propose an adaptive battery, combining a set of sensitive clinical, neuroimaging and fluid markers, adjusted for genetic and sporadic variants, for adequate detection of disease progression in bvFTD.

VentRa: distinguishing frontotemporal dementia from psychiatric disorders

The volume of the lateral ventricles is a reliable and sensitive indicator of brain atrophy and disease progression in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia. In this study, we validate our previously developed automated tool using ventricular features (known as VentRa) for the classification of behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia versus a mixed cohort of neurodegenerative, vascular and psychiatric disorders from a clinically representative independent dataset. Lateral ventricles were segmented for 1110 subjects-14 behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, 30 other frontotemporal dementia, 70 Lewy body disease, 898 Alzheimer's disease, 62 vascular brain injury and 36 primary psychiatric disorder from the publicly accessible National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center dataset to assess the performance of VentRa. Using ventricular features to discriminate behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia subjects from primary psychiatric disorders, VentRa achieved an accuracy rate of 84%, a sensitivity rate of 71% and a specificity rate of 89%. VentRa was able to identify behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia from a mixed age-matched cohort (i.e. other frontotemporal dementia, Lewy body disease, Alzheimer's disease, vascular brain injury and primary psychiatric disorders) and to correctly classify other disorders as 'not compatible with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia' with a specificity rate of 83%. The specificity rates against each of the other individual cohorts were 80% for other frontotemporal dementia, 83% for Lewy body disease, 83% for Alzheimer's disease, 84% for vascular brain injury and 89% for primary psychiatric disorders. VentRa is a robust and generalizable tool with potential usefulness for improving the diagnostic certainty of behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, particularly for the differential diagnosis with primary psychiatric disorders.

Identifying and Diagnosing TDP-43 Neurodegenerative Diseases in Psychiatry

Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are common manifestations of neurodegenerative disorders and are often early signs of those diseases. Among those neurodegenerative diseases, TDP-43 proteinopathies are an increasingly recognized cause of early neuropsychiatric manifestations. TDP-43-related diseases include frontotemporal dementia (FTD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and Limbic-Predominant Age-Related TDP-43 Encephalopathy (LATE). The majority of TDP-43-related diseases are sporadic, but a significant proportion is hereditary, with progranulin (GRN) mutations and C9orf72 repeat expansions as the most common genetic etiologies. Studies reveal that NPS can be the initial manifestation of those diseases or can complicate disease course, but there is a lack of awareness among clinicians about TDP-43-related diseases, which leads to common diagnostic mistakes or delays. There is also emerging evidence that TDP-43 accumulations could play a role in late-onset primary psychiatric disorders. In the absence of robust biomarkers for TDP-43, the diagnosis remains primarily based on clinical assessment and neuroimaging. Given the association with psychiatric symptoms, clinical psychiatrists have a key role in the early identification of patients with TDP-43-related diseases. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the pathobiology of TDP-43, resulting clinical presentations, and associated neuropsychiatric manifestations to help guide clinical practice.

Rationale and Design of the "DIagnostic and Prognostic Precision Algorithm for behavioral variant Frontotemporal Dementia" (DIPPA-FTD) Study: A Study Aiming to Distinguish Early Stage Sporadic FTD from Late-Onset Primary Psychiatric Disorders

BACKGROUND

The behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is very heterogeneous in pathology, genetics, and disease course. Unlike Alzheimer's disease, reliable biomarkers are lacking and sporadic bvFTD is often misdiagnosed as a primary psychiatric disorder (PPD) due to overlapping clinical features. Current efforts to characterize and improve diagnostics are centered on the minority of genetic cases.

OBJECTIVE

The multi-center study DIPPA-FTD aims to develop diagnostic and prognostic algorithms to help distinguish sporadic bvFTD from late-onset PPD in its earliest stages.

METHODS

The prospective DIPPA-FTD study recruits participants with late-life behavioral changes, suspect for bvFTD or late-onset PPD diagnosis with a negative family history for FTD and/or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Subjects are invited to participate after diagnostic screening at participating memory clinics or recruited by referrals from psychiatric departments. At baseline visit, participants undergo neurological and psychiatric examination, questionnaires, neuropsychological tests, and brain imaging. Blood is obtained to investigate biomarkers. Patients are informed about brain donation programs. Follow-up takes place 10-14 months after baseline visit where all examinations are repeated. Results from the DIPPA-FTD study will be integrated in a data-driven approach to develop diagnostic and prognostic models.

CONCLUSIONS

DIPPA-FTD will make an important contribution to early sporadic bvFTD identification. By recruiting subjects with ambiguous or prodromal diagnoses, our research strategy will allow the characterization of early disease stages that are not covered in current sporadic FTD research. Results will hopefully increase the ability to diagnose sporadic bvFTD in the early stage and predict progression rate, which is pivotal for patient stratification and trial design.

Diagnostic Performance of Socio-Emotional Informant-Based Questionnaires for the Clinical Detection of the Behavioral Variant of Frontotemporal Dementia

BACKGROUND

Although social cognitive dysfunction is a major feature of the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), quantitative measurement of social behavior changes is poorly available in clinical settings.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of social-emotional questionnaires in distinguishing bvFTD from healthy control (HC) subjects and Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients.

METHODS

We enrolled 29 bvFTD, 24 AD, and 18 HC subjects matched for age, sex, and education. Two informant-based measures of socio-emotional sensitivity and empathy (i.e., revised Self-Monitoring Scale (rSMS) and Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI)) were administered. One-way ANOVA was performed to compare groups, whereas Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve analysis tested questionnaire ability in distinguishing groups. A short version of IRI (sIRI) was obtained by excluding the non-contributing subscale (i.e., personal distress).

RESULTS

Compared to HC and AD, bvFTD showed significantly lower scores in rSMS and IRI scores, except for IRI personal distress subscale. The sIRI showed an excellent performance in early diagnosis (bvFTD versus HC = AUC 0.95). Both sIRI and rSMS showed good performance in distinguishing bvFTD from AD (AUC 0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

ROC analyses support the usefulness of informant social questionnaires in memory clinics and their potential value in screening procedures for research eligibility in forthcoming trials. In the timely diagnosis of bvFTD patients, IRI and rSMS may supply crucial information for the early detection of signs and symptoms affecting social-emotional skills, which might otherwise be underrecognized.

Neurosyphilis Initially Misdiagnosed as Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia: Life-Changing Differential Diagnosis

Diagnosing neurosyphilis can be challenging and it may be misdiagnosed as behavior variant frontotemporal dementia, given its affinity for the frontal and temporal lobes. Here we present a model case, who, in his 40 s, was initially misdiagnosed with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia based on extreme self-neglect and disinhibition over six months and frontal lobe atrophy. He was later diagnosed as neurosyphilis with positive syphilis tests in his cerebrospinal fluid. He underwent penicillin treatment and fully recovered. Relatively rapid cognitive decline, particularly if young, should prompt physicians to consider neurosyphilis as a treatable dementia, which could completely change a patient's life.

Diagnostic Instability Over Time in the Late-Onset Frontal Lobe Syndrome: When Can We Say it's FTD?

OBJECTIVES

Distinguishing sporadic behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) from late-onset primary psychiatric disorders (PPD) remains challenging with the lack of robust biomarkers. An early bvFTD misdiagnosis in PPD cases and vice-versa is common. Little is known about diagnostic (in)stability over longer period of time. We investigated diagnostic instability in a neuropsychiatric cohort up to 8 years after baseline visit and identified which clinical hallmarks contribute to diagnostic instability.

DESIGN

Diagnoses of participants of the late-onset frontal lobe (LOF) study were collected from the baseline visit (T0) and the 2-year follow-up visit (T2). Clinical outcomes were retrieved 5-8 years after baseline visit (Tfinal). Endpoint diagnoses were categorized into bvFTD, PPD and other neurological disorders (OND). We calculated the total amount of participants that switched diagnosis between T0-T2 and T2-Tfinal. Clinical records of participants that switched diagnosis were assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 137 patients that were included in the study, the final diagnoses at Tfinal were bvFTD 24.1% (n = 33), PPD 39.4% (n = 54), OND 33.6% (n = 46) and unknown 2.9% (n = 4). Between T0 and T2, a total of 29 (21.2%) patients switched diagnosis. Between T2 and Tfinal, 8 (5.8%) patients switched diagnosis. Prolonged follow-up identified few cases with diagnostic instability. Major contributors to diagnostic instability where a nonconverting diagnosis of possible bvFTD and a probable bvFTD diagnosis based on informant-based history and an abnormal FDG-PET scan whilst having a normal MRI.

CONCLUSION

Considering these lessons, a FTD diagnosis remains stable enough to conclude that 2 years is sufficient to say if a patient with late-life behavioral disorder has FTD.

The Behavioural Dysfunction Questionnaire discriminates behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer's disease dementia and major depressive disorder

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Early-stage behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is often misdiagnosed, highlighting the need for new diagnostic instruments. Based on the revised diagnostic criteria for bvFTD, we developed the Behavioural Dysfunction Questionnaire (BDQ). In this explorative study, we aimed to determine the best scoring and analytical method for the BDQ to discriminate between bvFTD and non-bvFTD patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

34 patients with early-stage bvFTD, 56 with early-stage Alzheimer's disease dementia (ADD) and 41 with major depressive disorder (MDD) were recruited. We calculated BDQ-items with or without inclusion of a time criterion: (a) without time criterion, (b) with 10 years' time criterion (symptom presence less than 10 years), and (c) with 3 years' time criterion (symptom presentation within the first 3 years). Using these three differently calculated items, we generated six variables, i.e. 3*2 [BDQ-Global Score (BDQ-GS; domains average score); BDQ-Global Domain Score (BDQ-GDS; domains categorical score)]. Then, we performed univariate and bivariate (BDQ-GS and BDQ-GDS combined) ROC analyses.

RESULTS

Models including BDQ-GS, BDQ-GDS or both variables combined discriminated similarly between groups. In contrast, models without time criterion or with 10 years' time criterion discriminated better than models including variables with 3 years' time criterion. These models discriminated highly (AUC = 85.98-87.78) between bvFTD and MDD and bvFTD and ADD, respectively.

CONCLUSION

BDQ-scores without any time criterion discriminated highly between early-stage bvFTD and non-bvFTD groups, which could improve the early diagnosis of bvFTD. With its standardised procedure, the BDQ is also appropriate for repeated assessments.

Combining Neuropsychological Assessment with Neuroimaging to Distinguish Early-Stage Alzheimer's Disease from Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration in Non-Western Tonal Native Language-Speaking Individuals Living in Taiwan: A Case Series

Neuropsychological tests (NPTs), which are routinely used in clinical practice for assessment of dementia, are also considered to be essential for differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), especially the behavioral variants of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) and primary progressive aphasia (PPA) at their initial clinical presentations. However, the heterogeneous features of these diseases, which have many overlapping signs, make differentiation between AD and FTLD highly challenging. Moreover, NPTs were primarily developed in Western countries and for native speakers of non-tonal languages. Hence, there is an ongoing dispute over the validity and reliability of these tests in culturally different and typologically diverse language populations. The purpose of this case series was to examine which of the NPTs adjusted for Taiwanese society may be used to distinguish these two diseases. Since AD and FTLD have different effects on individuals' brain, we combined NPTs with neuroimaging. We found that participants diagnosed with FTLD had lower scores in NPTs assessing language or social cognition than AD participants. PPA participants also had lower measures in the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test than those diagnosed with bvFTD, while bvFTD participants showed poorer performances in the behavioral measures than PPA participants. In addition, the initial diagnosis was supported by the standard one-year clinical follow-up.

Bipolar Disorder and Manic-Like Symptoms in Alzheimer's, Vascular and Frontotemporal Dementia: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

An increased risk of manic episodes has been reported in patients with neurodegenerative disorders, but the clinical features of bipolar disorder (BD) in different subtypes of dementia have not been thoroughly investigated.

OBJECTIVES

The main aim of this study is to systematically review clinical and therapeutic evidence about manic syndromes in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), vascular dementia (VaD), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Since manic-mixed episodes have been associated to negative outcomes in patients with dementia and often require medical intervention, we also critically summarized selected studies with relevance for the treatment of mania in patients with cognitive decline.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched up to February 2022. Sixty-one articles on patients with AD, VaD, or FTD and BD or (hypo) mania have been included.

RESULTS

Manic symptoms seem to be associated to disease progression in AD, have a greatly variable temporal relationship with cognitive decline in VaD, and frequently coincide with or precede cognitive impairment in FTD. Overall, mood stabilizers, and electroconvulsive therapy may be the most effective treatments, while the benefits of short-term treatment with antipsychotic agents must be balanced with the associated risks. Importantly, low-dose lithium salts may exert neuroprotective activity in patients with AD.

CONCLUSION

Prevalence, course, and characteristics of manic syndromes in patients with dementia may be differentially affected by the nature of the underlying neurodegenerative conditions.

Advances in Treatment of Frontotemporal Dementia

In this review, the authors explored the clinical features of frontotemporal dementia (FTD), focusing on treatment. The clinical features of FTD are unique, with disinhibition, apathy, loss of empathy, and compulsions common. Motor changes occur later in the illness. The two major proteins that aggregate in the brain with FTD are tau and TDP-43, whereas a minority of patients aggregate FET proteins, primarily the FUS protein. Genetic causes include mutations in MAPT, GRN, and C9orf72. There are no medications that can slow FTD progression, although new therapies for the genetic forms of FTD are moving into clinical trials. Once a diagnosis is made, therapies should begin, focusing on the family and the patient. In the setting of FTD, families experience a severe burden associated with caregiving, and the clinician should focus on alleviating this burden. Advice around legal and financial issues is usually helpful. Careful consideration of environmental changes to cope with abnormal behaviors is essential. Most compounds that have been used to treat dementia of the Alzheimer's disease type are not effective in FTD, and cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine should be avoided. Although the data are scant, there is some evidence that antidepressants and second-generation antipsychotics may help individual patients.

Current Potential for Clinical Optimization of Social Cognition Assessment for Frontotemporal Dementia and Primary Psychiatric Disorders

Dodich and colleagues recently reviewed the evidence supporting clinical use of social cognition assessment in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (Dodich et al., 2021). Here, we comment on their methods and present an initiative to address some of the limitations that emerged from their study. In particular, we established the social cognition workgroup within the Neuropsychiatric International Consortium Frontotemporal dementia (scNIC-FTD), aiming to validate social cognition assessment for diagnostic purposes and tracking of change across clinical situations.

Sustained Long-term Improvement in Neuropsychiatric Symptoms of an Individual With Initial bvFTD Diagnosis: A Case Report

The behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is a neurodegenerative disease that is diagnosed by progressive neuropsychiatric changes and supportive neuroimaging. Making an accurate diagnosis of bvFTD is a challenging process that can be complicated by the presence of a subset of nonprogressive, or phenocopy, cases whose symptoms remain stable. Our patient, who presented with neuropsychiatric symptoms that are characteristic of bvFTD, improved and stabilized after thorough neuropsychiatric and neuropsychological evaluation and treatment. Our case illustrates that, despite diagnostic uncertainties, appropriate evaluation and treatment can lead to improvement and stabilization of neuropsychiatric symptoms in individuals presumed to have bvFTD.

The Diagnostic Challenge of Young-Onset Dementia Syndromes and Primary Psychiatric Diseases: Results From a Retrospective 20-Year Cross-Sectional Study

OBJECTIVE

Distinguishing a dementia syndrome from a primary psychiatric disease in younger patients can be challenging and may lead to diagnostic change over time. The investigators aimed to examine diagnostic stability in a cohort of patients with younger-onset neurocognitive disorders.

METHODS

A retrospective review of records was conducted for patients who were admitted to an inpatient neuropsychiatry service unit between 2000 and 2019, who were followed up for at least 12 months, and who received a diagnosis of young-onset dementia at any time point. Initial diagnosis included Alzheimer's disease-type dementia (N=30), frontotemporal dementia (FTD) syndromes (N=44), vascular dementia (N=7), mild cognitive impairment (N=10), primary psychiatric diseases (N=6), and other conditions, such as Lewy body dementia (N=30).

RESULTS

Among 127 patients, 49 (39%) had a change in their initial diagnoses during the follow-up period. Behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD) was the least stable diagnosis, followed by dementia not otherwise specified and mild cognitive impairment. Compared with patients with a stable diagnosis, those who changed exhibited a higher cognitive score at baseline, a longer follow-up period, greater delay to final diagnosis, and no family history of dementia. Patients whose diagnosis changed from a neurodegenerative to a psychiatric diagnosis were more likely to have a long psychiatric history, while those whose diagnosis changed from a psychiatric to a neurodegenerative one had a recent manifestation of psychiatric symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Misdiagnosis of younger patients with neurocognitive disorders is not uncommon, especially in cases of bvFTD. Late-onset psychiatric symptoms may be the harbinger to a neurodegenerative disease. Close follow-up and monitoring of these patients are necessary.

Differences in Sex Distribution Between Genetic and Sporadic Frontotemporal Dementia

Background:

Reported sex distributions differ between frontotemporal dementia (FTD) cohorts. Possible explanations are the evolving clinical criteria of FTD and its subtypes and the discovery of FTD causal genetic mutations that has resulted in varying demographics.

Objective:

Our aim was to determine the sex distribution of sporadic and genetic FTD cases and its subtypes in an international cohort.

Methods:

We included 910 patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD; n = 654), non-fluent variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA; n = 99), semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA; n = 117), and right temporal variant frontotemporal dementia (rtvFTD; n = 40). We compared sex distribution between genetic and sporadic FTD using χ²-tests.

Results:

The genetic FTD group consisted of 51.2% males, which did not differ from sporadic FTD (57.8% male, p = 0.08). In the sporadic bvFTD subgroup, males were predominant in contrast to genetic bvFTD (61.6% versus 52.9% males, p = 0.04). In the other clinical FTD subgroups, genetic cases were underrepresented and within the sporadic cases the sex distribution was somewhat equal.

Conclusion:

The higher male prevalence in sporadic bvFTD may provide important clues for its differential pathogenesis and warrants further research.

Social Cognition and Behavioral Assessments Improve the Diagnosis of Behavioral Variant of Frontotemporal Dementia in Older Peruvians With Low Educational Levels

Background: The behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), characterized by early behavioral abnormalities and late memory impairment, is a neurodegenerative disorder with a detrimental impact on patients and their caregivers. bvFTD is often difficult to distinguish from other neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), using brief cognitive tests. Combining brief socio-cognitive and behavioral evaluations with standard cognitive testing could better discriminate bvFTD from AD patients. We sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of brief socio-cognitive tests that may differentiate bvFTD and AD patients with low educational levels. Methods: A prospective study was performed on 51 individuals over the age of 50 with low educational levels, with bvFTD or AD diagnosed using published criteria, and who were receiving neurological care at a multidisciplinary neurology clinic in Lima, Peru, between July 2017 and December 2020. All patients had a comprehensive neurological evaluation, including a full neurocognitive battery and brief tests of cognition (Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination version III, ACE-III), social cognition (Mini-social Cognition and Emotional Assessment, Mini-SEA), and behavioral assessments (Frontal Behavioral Inventory, FBI; Interpersonal Reactivity Index-Emphatic Concern, IRI-EC; IRI-Perspective Taking, IRI-PT; and Self-Monitoring Scale-revised version, r-SMS). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) was performed to compare the brief screening tests individually and combined to the gold standard of bvFTD and AD diagnoses. Results: The AD group was significantly older than the bvFTD group (p < 0.001). An analysis of the discriminatory ability of the ACE-III to distinguish between patients with AD and bvFTD (AUC = 0.85) and the INECO Frontal Screening (IFS; AUC = 0.78) shows that the former has greater discriminatory ability. Social and behavioral cognition tasks were able to appropriately discriminate bvFTD from AD. The Mini-SEA had high sensitivity and high moderate specificity (83%) for discriminating bvFTD from AD, which increased when combined with the brief screening tests ACE-III and IFS. The FBI was ideal with high sensitivity (83%), as well as the IRI-EC and IRI-PT that also were adequate for distinguishing bvFTD from AD. Conclusions: Our study supports the integration of socio-behavioral measures to the standard global cognitive and social cognition measures utilized for screening for bvFTD in a population with low levels of education.

Putative Alcohol-Related Dementia as an Early Manifestation of Right Temporal Variant of Frontotemporal Dementia

Diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia is challenging in the early stages. Various psychiatric and neurological diseases are misdiagnosed as frontotemporal dementia and vice versa. Here we present a case with right temporal variant of frontotemporal dementia who presented with alcohol dependency and remarkable behavioral symptoms and was first misdiagnosed as having alcohol-related dementia. He then revealed symptoms related to right temporal variant of frontotemporal dementia, such as prosopagnosia, difficulty recognizing his housemates, loss of empathy, ritualistic behaviors, and difficulty finding and comprehending words. Retrospectively, his alcohol dependency itself was considered an early manifestation of right temporal variant of frontotemporal dementia.

The bvFTD phenocopy syndrome: a case study supported by repeated MRI, [18F]FDG-PET and pathological assessment

A clinical syndrome with neuropsychiatric features of bvFTD without neuroimaging abnormalities and a lack of decline is a phenocopy of bvFTD (phFTD). Growing evidence suggests that psychological, psychiatric and environmental factors underlie phFTD. We describe a patient diagnosed with bvFTD prior to the revision of the diagnostic guidelines of FTD. Repeated neuroimaging was normal and there was no FTD pathology at autopsy, rejecting the diagnosis. We hypothesize on etiological factors that on hindsight might have played a role. This case report contributes to the understanding of phFTD and adds to the sparse literature of the postmortem assessment of phFTD.

Distinguishing Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia From Primary Psychiatric Disorders: A Review of Recently Published Consensus Recommendations From the Neuropsychiatric International Consortium for Frontotemporal Dementia

The behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is the second most common cause of dementia for individuals <65 years old, but accurate diagnosis is often delayed for several years. While previous criteria have increased the ability of diagnosticians to distinguish between bvFTD and other neurocognitive disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, distinguishing bvFTD from a primary psychiatric disorder (PPD) has been more challenging. In early 2020, the Neuropsychiatric International Consortium for Frontotemporal Dementia published the first consensus recommendations to help clinicians distinguish between bvFTD and PPD. These recommendations were produced by a consortium of 45 scientists and clinicians from more than 15 different countries, who explored aspects of history taking, neuropsychological assessments, clinical scales, neuroimaging, CSF and serum biomarkers, and genetics. A multidisciplinary approach is encouraged throughout. In this article, the authors also review those consensus recommendations and highlight use of novel tests and techniques. Additionally, they indicate where further research is needed, including methods to assess the dissemination and implementation of these recommendations. In this way, future efforts by clinicians and researchers alike to improve accurate recognition of bvFTD are encouraged, thereby expanding opportunities for improved guidance and management.

Frontotemporal Dementia and Late-Onset Bipolar Disorder: The Many Directions of a Busy Road

It is a common pathway for patients with the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) to be first misdiagnosed with a primary psychiatric disorder, a considerable proportion of them being diagnosed with bipolar disorder (BD). Conversely, not rarely patients presenting in late life with a first episode of mania or atypically severe depression are initially considered to have dementia before the diagnosis of late-onset BD is reached. Beyond some shared features that make these conditions particularly prone to confusion, especially in the elderly, the relationship between bvFTD and BD is far from simple. Patients with BD often have cognitive complaints as part of their psychiatric disorder but are at an increased risk of developing dementia, including FTD. Likewise, apathy and disinhibition, common features of depression and mania, respectively, are among the core features of the bvFTD syndrome, not to mention that depression may coexist with dementia. In this article, we take advantage of the current knowledge on the neurobiology of these two nosologic entities to review their historical and conceptual interplay, highlighting the clinical, genetic and neuroimaging features that may be shared by both disorders or unique to each of them.

Recommendations to distinguish behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia from psychiatric disorders

The behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is a frequent cause of early-onset dementia. The diagnosis of bvFTD remains challenging because of the limited accuracy of neuroimaging in the early disease stages and the absence of molecular biomarkers, and therefore relies predominantly on clinical assessment. BvFTD shows significant symptomatic overlap with non-degenerative primary psychiatric disorders including major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, autism spectrum disorders and even personality disorders. To date, ∼50% of patients with bvFTD receive a prior psychiatric diagnosis, and average diagnostic delay is up to 5-6 years from symptom onset. It is also not uncommon for patients with primary psychiatric disorders to be wrongly diagnosed with bvFTD. The Neuropsychiatric International Consortium for Frontotemporal Dementia was recently established to determine the current best clinical practice and set up an international collaboration to share a common dataset for future research. The goal of the present paper was to review the existing literature on the diagnosis of bvFTD and its differential diagnosis with primary psychiatric disorders to provide consensus recommendations on the clinical assessment. A systematic literature search with a narrative review was performed to determine all bvFTD-related diagnostic evidence for the following topics: bvFTD history taking, psychiatric assessment, clinical scales, physical and neurological examination, bedside cognitive tests, neuropsychological assessment, social cognition, structural neuroimaging, functional neuroimaging, CSF and genetic testing. For each topic, responsible team members proposed a set of minimal requirements, optimal clinical recommendations, and tools requiring further research or those that should be developed. Recommendations were listed if they reached a ≥ 85% expert consensus based on an online survey among all consortium participants. New recommendations include performing at least one formal social cognition test in the standard neuropsychological battery for bvFTD. We emphasize the importance of 3D-T1 brain MRI with a standardized review protocol including validated visual atrophy rating scales, and to consider volumetric analyses if available. We clarify the role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET for the exclusion of bvFTD when normal, whereas non-specific regional metabolism abnormalities should not be over-interpreted in the case of a psychiatric differential diagnosis. We highlight the potential role of serum or CSF neurofilament light chain to differentiate bvFTD from primary psychiatric disorders. Finally, based on the increasing literature and clinical experience, the consortium determined that screening for C9orf72 mutation should be performed in all possible/probable bvFTD cases or suspected cases with strong psychiatric features.

Crossing Borders Between Frontotemporal Dementia and Psychiatric Disorders: An Updated Overview

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) includes a group of neurocognitive syndromes, clinically characterized by altered behaviors, impairment of language proficiency, and altered executive functioning. FTD is one of the most frequently observed forms of dementia in the elderly population and the most common in presenile age. As for other subtypes of dementia, FTD incidence is constantly on the rise due to the steadily increasing age of the population, and its recognition is now becoming a determinant for clinicians. FTD and psychiatric disorders can overlap in terms of clinical presentations by sharing a common genetic predisposition and neuropathological mechanism in some cases. Nonetheless, this association is often unclear and underestimated. Since its first reports, research into FTD has constantly grown, with the identification of recent findings related to its neuropathology, genetic, clinical, and therapeutic issues. Literature is thriving on this topic, with numerous research articles published in recent years. In the present review, we aimed to provide an updated description of the clinical manifestations that link and potentially confound the diagnosis of FTD and psychiatric disorders in order to improve their differential diagnosis and early detection. In particular, we systematically reviewed the literature, considering articles specifically focused on the behavioral variant FTD, published after 2015 on the PubMed database.

Update on PET in neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory disorders manifesting on a behavioural level: imaging for differential diagnosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To give an update on recent findings concerning the use of PET for differential diagnosis in neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory disorders manifesting on a behavioural level.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although accurate differential diagnosis of dementia can be achieved by imaging disease-specific patterns of cerebral glucose metabolism with [F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([F]FDG)-PET, the diagnostic impact of [F]FDG-PET in primary psychiatric disorders is limited. Amyloid-beta PET provides an incremental value beyond [F]FDG-PET in the differential diagnosis of dementia and was proposed as a biomarker defining the so-called Alzheimer continuum. Recently developed tau-specific tracers might also aid in the diagnostic process (biological definition of Alzheimer's disease together with amyloid-beta). Surpassing the diagnostic accuracy of other techniques, such as MRI, [F]FDG-PET has also gained widespread clinical use for diagnosis and follow-up of paraneoplastic and autoimmune disorders of the central nervous system (CNS) as an important differential diagnosis for rapid progressive dementia and subacute onset of psychiatric syndromes.

SUMMARY

Molecular neuroimaging with PET is an established method for the differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative and autoimmune CNS disorders manifesting on a behavioural level with significant therapeutic and prognostic impact. Future prospective studies are needed to define the value of tau imaging for diagnosis and prognosis in neurodegenerative disorders.

Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article describes the clinical, anatomic, genetic, and pathologic features of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) and discusses strategies to improve diagnostic accuracy, emphasizing common pitfalls to avoid. Key aspects of management and the future of diagnosis and care for the disorder are highlighted.

RECENT FINDINGS

BvFTD is a clinical syndrome, not a disease. Patients with the syndrome share core symptoms that reflect degeneration within the most consistently affected brain regions, but accompanying features vary and reflect the precise topography of regional degeneration. The clinician must distinguish a bvFTD syndrome from psychiatric illness and other neurodegenerative syndromes that feature a prominent behavioral component. Antemortem prediction of pathologic diagnosis remains imperfect but improves with careful attention to the clinical details. Management should emphasize prevention of caregiver distress, behavioral and environmental strategies, symptom-based psychopharmacology, and genetic counseling.

SUMMARY

BvFTD is an important and challenging dementia syndrome. Although disease-modifying treatments are lacking, clinicians can have a profound impact on a family coping with this disorder. Treatment trials are under way for some genetic forms of bvFTD. For sporadic disease, pathologic heterogeneity remains a major challenge, and ongoing research seeks to improve antemortem molecular diagnosis to facilitate therapeutic discovery.

Psychological and Cognitive Markers of Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia-A Clinical Neuropsychologist's View on Diagnostic Criteria and Beyond

Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is the second leading cognitive disorder caused by neurodegeneration in patients under 65 years of age. Characterized by frontal, insular, and/or temporal brain atrophy, patients present with heterogeneous constellations of behavioral and psychological symptoms among which progressive changes in social conduct, lack of empathy, apathy, disinhibited behaviors, and cognitive impairments are frequently observed. Since the histopathology of the disease is heterogeneous and identified genetic mutations only account for ~30% of cases, there are no reliable biomarkers for the diagnosis of bvFTD available in clinical routine as yet. Early detection of bvFTD thus relies on correct application of clinical diagnostic criteria. Their evaluation however, requires expertise and in-depth assessments of cognitive functions, history taking, clinical observations as well as caregiver reports on behavioral and psychological symptoms and their respective changes. With this review, we aim for a critical appraisal of common methods to access the behavioral and psychological symptoms as well as the cognitive alterations presented in the diagnostic criteria for bvFTD. We highlight both, practical difficulties as well as current controversies regarding an overlap of symptoms and particularly cognitive impairments with other neurodegenerative and primary psychiatric diseases. We then review more recent developments and evidence on cognitive, behavioral and psychological symptoms of bvFTD beyond the diagnostic criteria which may prospectively enhance the early detection and differential diagnosis in clinical routine. In particular, evidence on specific impairments in social and emotional processing, praxis abilities as well as interoceptive processing in bvFTD is summarized and potential links with behavior and classic cognitive domains are discussed. We finally outline both, future opportunities and major challenges with regard to the role of clinical neuropsychology in detecting bvFTD and related neurocognitive disorders.

Factors that predict diagnostic stability in neurodegenerative dementia

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency and characteristics of clinical diagnostic change in frontotemporal dementia (FTD)-spectrum syndromes and Alzheimer's disease (AD)-type dementia.

METHODS

We reviewed records and categorized diagnostic changes in patients seen ≥ 2 times with behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD, n = 99), nonfluent and semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA, n = 32; svPPA, n = 59), corticobasal syndrome (CBS, n = 40), progressive supranuclear palsy-Richardson syndrome (PSP-RS, n = 34), and AD-type dementia (n = 49). For bvFTD, we compared patients with and without diagnostic change, and assessed predictors of diagnostic change by logistic regression.

RESULTS

Initial diagnoses changed infrequently at subsequent visits in svPPA (6.8%), PSP-RS (8.8%), and nfvPPA (12.5%), with rare changes largely involving clinicopathological overlap or diagnostic ambiguity. Changes in AD-type dementia (30.6%) and CBS (37.5%) were more common, but reflected greater specificity, predicted co-pathology, or overlapping syndromes. Diagnostic change in bvFTD was also common (32.3%), but more diverse, including motor neuron disease development, alternative neurodegenerative syndromes, and non-neurodegenerative diseases. Diagnostic change occurred more often in those who met possible rather than probable bvFTD criteria (70.6% vs 15.3%, p < 0.001). Patients with stable diagnoses showed greater overall impairment, bvFTD behavioral severity, and atrophy in core right-hemisphere bvFTD regions. Patients with diagnostic change had more severe depression (p < 0.05) and more frequent contributing, secondary diagnoses (p = 0.01), such as cerebrovascular disease. By logistic regression, the accuracy of predicting stable bvFTD diagnoses using first-visit data was 80%.

CONCLUSION

bvFTD displays more diverse diagnostic change than other neurodegenerative syndromes. First-visit bvFTD diagnoses may waver if based on meeting possible criteria only.

Individual Prediction of Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia Development Using Multivariate Pattern Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data

BACKGROUND

Patients with behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) initially may only show behavioral and/or cognitive symptoms that overlap with other neurological and psychiatric disorders. The diagnostic accuracy is dependent on progressive symptoms worsening and frontotemporal abnormalities on neuroimaging findings. Predictive biomarkers could facilitate the early detection of bvFTD.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prognostic accuracy of clinical and structural MRI data using a support vector machine (SVM) classification to predict the 2-year clinical follow-up diagnosis in a group of patients presenting late-onset behavioral changes.

METHODS

Data from 73 patients were included and divided into probable/definite bvFTD (n = 18), neurological (n = 28), and psychiatric (n = 27) groups based on 2-year follow-up diagnosis. Grey-matter volumes were extracted from baseline structural MRI scans. SVM classifiers were used to perform three binary classifications: bvFTD versus neurological and psychiatric, bvFTD versus neurological, and bvFTD versus psychiatric group(s), and one multi-class classification. Classification performance was determined for clinical and neuroimaging data separately and their combination using 5-fold cross-validation.

RESULTS

Accuracy of the binary classification tasks ranged from 72-82% (p < 0.001) with adequate sensitivity (67-79%), specificity (77-88%), and area-under-the-receiver-operator-curve (0.80-0.9). Multi-class accuracy ranged between 55-59% (p < 0.001). The combination of clinical and voxel-wise whole brain data showed the best performance overall.

CONCLUSION

These results show the potential for automated early confirmation of diagnosis for bvFTD using machine learning analysis of clinical and neuroimaging data in a diverse and clinically relevant sample of patients.

Frontotemporal Dementia Misdiagnosed for Post-Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome or vice versa? A Treviso Dementia (TREDEM) Registry Case Report

We describe the case of a 61-year-old woman diagnosed with Borreliosis at the age of 57. Subsequently, the patient developed depression, anxiety, and behavioral disturbances. A lumbar puncture excluded the condition of Neuroborreliosis. The diagnostic workup included: an MRI scan, a 18F-FDG PET, a 123I-ioflupane-SPECT, an amyloid-β PET, a specific genetic analysis, and a neuropsychological evaluation. Based on our investigation, the patient was diagnosed with probable behavioral-frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), whereas in the previous years, the patient had been considered firstly as a case of Post-Treatment-Lyme Disease and, secondly, a psychiatric patient. We believe that, in the present case, such initial symptoms of Borrelia infection may have superimposed on those of bvFTD rather than playing as a contributory cause.

A multivariate metabolic imaging marker for behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia

Introduction

The heterogeneity of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) calls for multivariate imaging biomarkers.

Methods

We studied a total of 148 dementia patients from the Feinstein Institute (Center-A: 25 bvFTD and 10 Alzheimer's disease), Technical University of Munich (Center-B: 44 bvFTD and 29 FTD language variants), and Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (40 Alzheimer's disease subjects). To identify the covariance pattern of bvFTD (behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia–related pattern [bFDRP]), we applied principal component analysis to combined 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography scans from bvFTD and healthy subjects. The phenotypic specificity and clinical correlates of bFDRP expression were assessed in independent testing sets.

Results

The bFDRP was identified in Center-A data (24.1% of subject × voxel variance; P < .001), reproduced in Center-B data (P < .001), and independently validated using combined testing data (receiver operating characteristics–area under the curve = 0.97; P < .0001). The expression of bFDRP was specifically elevated in bvFTD patients (P < .001) and was significantly higher at more advanced disease stages (P = .035:duration; P < .01:severity).

Discussion

The bFDRP can be used as a quantitative imaging marker to gauge the underlying disease process and aid in the differential diagnosis of bvFTD.