Beyond the Lung: Geriatric Conditions Afflict Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Self-Reported Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Prevalence and burden of loneliness in COPD: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Loneliness poses significant public health concerns on a global scale. Being alone and lacking social connections have been proven to impact prognosis and response to treatment in different diseases, including COPD. Yet, the prevalence and burden of loneliness on COPD outcomes remain unclear.

METHODS

Various relevant databases were systematically searched in March 2024. The quality of the studies included was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The random effect model was used to compute the pooled prevalence and associated 95 % confidence intervals (95%CI) of loneliness and living alone in COPD patients.

RESULTS

After reviewing 256 studies, 11 studies, including 4644 COPD patients, met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. Of the included studies, 5/11 (45.5%) reported the prevalence of loneliness or lone living among COPD patients and were included in the meta-analysis. The prevalence of loneliness and lone living among COPD patients was 32% (95% CI = 16%-48%) and 29% (95% CI = 16%-41%), respectively. The Three-item UCLA loneliness scale was the most often used loneliness assessment tool (5/11, 45.5%). Loneliness and lone living were associated with poor outcomes, including emergency department visits, readmissions, depression, and reduced pulmonary rehabilitation response.

CONCLUSION

Despite one-third of COPD patients experiencing loneliness, researchers have not consistently documented its impact on COPD outcomes. More studies are needed to assess the impact of loneliness on COPD and how to mitigate the negative effects on patients' outcomes.

Exacerbation Burden in COPD and Occurrence of Mortality in a Cohort of Italian Patients: Results of the Gulp Study

Objective

To describe the burden of moderate to severe exacerbations and all-cause mortality; the secondary objectives were to analyze treatment patterns and changes over follow-up.

Design

Observational, multicenter, retrospective, cohort study with a three year follow-up period.

Setting

Ten Italian academic secondary- and tertiary-care centers.

Participants

Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD referring to the outpatient clinics of the participating centers were retrospectively recruited.

Primary and Secondary Outcome Measures

Annualized frequency of moderate and severe exacerbations stratified by exacerbation history prior to study enrollment. Patients were classified according to airflow obstruction, GOLD risk categories, and divided in 4 groups: A = no exacerbations; B = 1 moderate exacerbation; C = 1 severe exacerbation; D = ≥2 moderate and/or severe exacerbations. Overall all-cause mortality stratified by age, COPD category, and COPD therapy. A logistic regression model assessed the association of clinical characteristics with mortality.

Results

1111 patients were included (73% males), of which 41.5% had a history of exacerbations. As expected, the proportion of patients experiencing ≥1 exacerbation during follow-up increased according to pre-defined study risk categories (B: 79%, C: 84%, D: 97.4%). Overall, by the end of follow-up, 45.5% of patients without a history of exacerbation experienced an exacerbation (31% of which severe), and 13% died. Deceased patients were significantly older, more obstructed and hyperinflated, and more frequently active smokers compared with survivors. Severe exacerbations were more frequent in patients that died (23.5%, vs 10.2%; p-value: 0.002). Chronic heart failure and ischemic heart disease were the only comorbidities associated with a higher odds ratio (OR) for death (OR: 2.2, p-value: 0.001; and OR: 1.9, p-value: 0.007). Treatment patterns were similar in patients that died and survivors.

Conclusion

Patients with a low exacerbation risk are exposed to a significant future risk of moderate/severe exacerbations. Real life data confirm the strong association between mortality and cardiovascular comorbidities in COPD.

National Prevalence of Social Isolation and Loneliness in Adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Rationale: Social isolation and loneliness are gaining recognition for their role in health outcomes, yet they have not been defined in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Objective: To determine the national prevalence of and characteristics associated with social isolation and loneliness in people with COPD. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of community-dwelling adults aged ⩾50 years in the nationally representative HRS (Health and Retirement Study) (2016-2018). Participants self-reported COPD and supplemental oxygen use and were categorized into three groups: 1) no COPD; 2) COPD; and 3) COPD on oxygen. Social isolation was defined using a nine-item scale indicating minimal household contacts, social network interaction, and community engagement. Loneliness was measured using the 3-Item UCLA Loneliness Scale. Multivariable logistic regression defined prevalence and associated characteristics for both. Results: Participants (n = 10,384) were on average 68 years old (standard deviation, ±10.5), 54% female, 10% Black, 11% self-reported COPD, and 2% self-reported supplemental oxygen. Overall, 12% were socially isolated, 12% lonely, and 3% both socially isolated and lonely. People with COPD had a higher adjusted prevalence of social isolation (no COPD: 11%; COPD: 16%; COPD on oxygen: 20%; P < 0.05) and loneliness (no COPD: 11%; COPD: 18%; COPD on oxygen: 22%; P < 0.001). In those with COPD, characteristics associated with social isolation (P < 0.05) included sex (men: 22%; women: 13%), non-Hispanic White ethnicity (White: 19%; Black: 7%), low net worth (<$6,000: 32%; $81,001-$239,000: 10%), depression (depression: 24%; no depression: 14%), having difficulty with one or more activities of daily living (one or more difficulty: 22%; no difficulty: 14%), and current cigarette use (current: 24%; never: 13%). Characteristics associated with loneliness (P < 0.05) included younger age (50-64 yr: 22%; 75-84 yr: 12%), being single (single: 32%; married: 12%), depression (depression: 36%; no depression: 13%), having difficulty with one or more activities of daily living (one or more difficulty: 29%; no difficulty: 15%), diabetes (diabetes: 26%; no diabetes: 17%), and heart disease (heart disease 23%; no heart disease: 17%). Conclusions: Nearly one in six adults with COPD experience social isolation, and one in five experience loneliness, with almost twice the prevalence among those on supplemental oxygen compared with the general population. Demographic and clinical characteristics identify those at highest risk to guide clinical and policy interventions.

Experiences of Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Using the Apple Watch Series 6 Versus the Traditional Finger Pulse Oximeter for Home SpO2 Self-Monitoring: Qualitative Study Part 2

BACKGROUND

Amid the rise in mobile health, the Apple Watch now has the capability to measure peripheral blood oxygen saturation (SpO2). Although the company indicated that the Watch is not a medical device, evidence suggests that SpO2 measurements among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are accurate in controlled settings. Yet, to our knowledge, the SpO2 function has not been validated for patients with COPD in naturalistic settings.

OBJECTIVE

This qualitative study explored the experiences of patients with COPD using the Apple Watch Series 6 versus a traditional finger pulse oximeter for home SpO2 self-monitoring.

METHODS

We conducted individual semistructured interviews with 8 female and 2 male participants with moderate to severe COPD, and transcripts were qualitatively analyzed. All received a watch to monitor their SpO2 for 5 months.

RESULTS

Due to respiratory distress, the watch was unable to collect reliable SpO2 measurements, as it requires the patient to remain in a stable position. However, despite the physical limitations and lack of reliable SpO2 values, participants expressed a preference toward the watch. Moreover, participants' health needs and their unique accessibility experiences influenced which device was more appropriate for self-monitoring purposes. Overall, all shared the perceived importance of prioritizing their physical COPD symptoms over device selection to manage their disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Differing results between participant preferences and smartwatch limitations warrant further investigation into the reliability and accuracy of the SpO2 function of the watch and the balance among self-management, medical judgment, and dependence on self-monitoring technology.

Pulmonary rehabilitation and physical interventions

Pulmonary rehabilitation has established a status of evidence-based therapy for patients with symptomatic COPD in the stable phase and after acute exacerbations. Rehabilitation should have the possibility of including different disciplines and be offered in several formats and lines of healthcare. This review focusses on the cornerstone intervention, exercise training, and how training interventions can be adapted to the limitations of patients. These adaptations may lead to altered cardiovascular or muscular training effects and/or may improve movement efficiency. Optimising pharmacotherapy (not the focus of this review) and oxygen supplements, whole-body low- and high-intensity training or interval training, and resistance (or neuromuscular electrical stimulation) training are important training modalities for these patients in order to accommodate cardiovascular and ventilatory impairments. Inspiratory muscle training and whole-body vibration may also be worthwhile interventions in selected patients. Patients with stable but symptomatic COPD, those who have suffered exacerbations and patients waiting for or who have received lung volume reduction or lung transplantation are good candidates. The future surely holds promise to further personalise exercise training interventions and to tailor the format of rehabilitation to the individual patient's needs and preferences.

Is Frailty Diagnosis Important in Patients with COPD? A Narrative Review of the Literature

Frailty is prevalent in older adults and is related to a worsening functionality, quality of life, and health outcomes. Though there is an increasing interest in this field, the relationship between frailty and worsening COPD outcomes remains unknown. A narrative review of the literature with studies published between 2018 and 2022 was carried out to address three questions: the prevalence of frailty and other geriatric syndromes in COPD patients, the link between frailty and worsening health outcomes in COPD patients, and the non-pharmacological interventions performed in order to reverse frailty in these patients. A total of 25 articles were selected. Frailty prevalence ranged from 6% and 85.9%, depending on the COPD severity and the frailty measurement tool used. Frailty in COPD patients was related to a high prevalence of geriatric syndromes and to a high incidence of adverse events such as exacerbations, admissions, readmissions, and mortality. One study showed improvements in functionality after physical intervention. In conclusion, the prevalence of frailty is associated with a high incidence of geriatric syndromes and adverse events in COPD patients. The use of frailty screenings and a comprehensive geriatric assessment of COPD patients is advisable in order to detect associated problems and to establish individualized approaches for better outcomes.

The Impact of Frailty Status on Pulmonary Function and Mortality in Older Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the effect of frailty on lung function and disease outcomes in older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

At baseline, comprehensive geriatric assessment and pulmonary function tests were extracted from the case management care system of the geriatric department of a tertiary medical center.

MEASUREMENTS

Frailty was assessed by the modified Rockwood frailty index. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to analyze the primary outcome. Both the Friedman test and generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate the rate of decline in lung function.

RESULTS

Among 151 enrolled older patients, comprising 69 non-COPD and 82 COPD subjects, the mean age was 80.9±8.3 years. After a median follow-up of 2.87 years, the serial forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC), and forced expiratory flow at 25-75% of FVC (FEF25-75%) showed significantly different slope changes between older COPD patients with and without frailty. The mortality hazard ratio (HR) was 2.53 for COPD without frailty and 3.62 for COPD with frailty, versus those without COPD. Among COPD patients, the factors most strongly associated with mortality were timed up-and-go, activities of daily living (ADLs), instrumental ADLs, FEV1/FVC, and serum HCO3-. After adjustment for potential confounders, ADLs and FEV1/FVC remained independent mortality predictors.

CONCLUSION

Among older patients with COPD, frailty was common and associated with pulmonary function decline, and mortality risk was higher in frail than in non-frail subjects.

Social dimensions of chronic respiratory disease: stigma, isolation, and loneliness

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Social wellbeing is a core component of heath. However, people with chronic respiratory disease report unmet social needs, particularly in relation to stigma, social isolation, and loneliness. This review considers recent advances in understanding these social concepts within the context of chronic respiratory disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

A growing body of qualitative work illustrates the detrimental impacts of stigma in chronic respiratory disease, contributing towards poorer psychological health and self-management, and reduced engagement with professional support. Stigma, alongside physical limitations stemming from respiratory symptoms, can also contribute to social isolation and loneliness. Social isolation and loneliness are associated with poorer mental health and quality of life, declines in function, and in some cases, increased hospital admissions. Although close or cohabiting relationships can ameliorate some social challenges, isolation and loneliness can also impact informal carers of people with chronic respiratory disease.

SUMMARY

Increasing evidence illustrates the direct and indirect influences of social dimensions on health outcomes for people living with chronic respiratory disease. Although there is increased understanding of the lived experiences of stigma, less is understood about the complexities of social isolation and loneliness in chronic respiratory disease, and optimal interventions to address social challenges.