A Rapid, Highly Sensitive and Open-Access SARS-CoV-2 Detection Assay for Laboratory and Home Testing

Pipette-free field-deployable molecular diagnostic kit for bimodal visual detection of infectious RNA viruses

Here, we developed a field-deployable molecular diagnostic kit for the detection of RNA viruses that operates in a pipette-free manner. The kit is composed of acrylic sticks, PCR tubes, and palm-sized three-dimensional(3D)-printed heaters operated by batteries. The kit performs RNA extraction, reverse transcriptase loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP), and visual detection in one kit. An acrylic stick was engraved with one shallow and one deep cylindrical chamber at each end for the insertion of an FTA card and ethidium homodimer-1 (EthD-1), respectively, to perform RNA extraction/purification and bimodal visual detection of the target amplicons. First, an intercalation of EthD-1 into the target DNA initially produces fluorescence upon UV illumination. Next, the addition of a strong oxidant, in this case sodium (meta) periodate (NaIO4 ), produces intense aggregates in the presence of EthD-1-intercalated DNA, realized by electrostatic interaction. In the absence of the target amplicon, no fluorescence or aggregates are observed. Using this kit, two major infectious viruses-severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus (SFTSV) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2)-were successfully detected in 1 h, and the limits of detection (LOD) were approximately 1 virus μL-1 for SFTSV and 103 copies μL-1 for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. The introduced kit is portable, end-user-friendly, and can be operated in a pipette-free manner, paving the way for simple and convenient virus detection in resource-limited settings.

An Open One-Step RT-qPCR for SARS-CoV-2 detection

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in millions of deaths globally, and while several diagnostic systems were proposed, real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) remains the gold standard. However, diagnostic reagents, including enzymes used in RT-PCR, are subject to centralized production models and intellectual property restrictions, which present a challenge for less developed countries. With the aim of generating a standardized One-Step open RT-qPCR protocol to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinical samples, we purified and tested recombinant enzymes and a non-proprietary buffer. The protocol utilized M-MLV RT and Taq DNA pol enzymes to perform a Taqman probe-based assay. Synthetic RNA samples were used to validate the One-Step RT-qPCR components, demonstrating sensitivity comparable to a commercial kit routinely employed in clinical settings for patient diagnosis. Further evaluation on 40 clinical samples (20 positive and 20 negative) confirmed its comparable diagnostic accuracy. This study represents a proof of concept for an open approach to developing diagnostic kits for viral infections and diseases, which could provide a cost-effective and accessible solution for less developed countries.

Direct Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Saliva with Colorimetric RT-LAMP

RT-LAMP is an effective alternative to RT-PCR-based diagnostics, offering high specificity, sensitivity, and rapid results. One notable advantage is the robustness of its enzymes, allowing for direct amplification from crude samples without the need for prior isolation of RNA. Colorimetric LAMP is particularly attractive as it eliminates the need for complex instrumentation, making it suitable for point-of-care applications. Here, we present a comprehensive step-by-step protocol for establishing an RT-LAMP-based test for direct detection of SARS-CoV-2 genomic RNA in saliva samples using different colorimetric detection methods. Importantly, this versatile test can be easily adapted to detect emerging pathogens.

Improved protocol for Bst polymerase and reverse transcriptase production and application to a point-of-care diagnostics system

The pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has raised awareness in the scientific community about the importance of being prepared for sanitary emergencies. Many measures implemented during the COVID pandemic are now being expanded to other applications. In the field of molecular and immunological diagnostics, the need to massively test the population worldwide resulted in the application of a variety of methods to detect viral infection. Besides gold standard reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), the use of reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) arose as an alternative and sensitive method to amplify and detect viral genetic material. We have used openly available protocols and have improved the protein production of RT-LAMP enzymes Bst polymerase and HIV-reverse transcriptase. To optimize enzyme production, we tested different protein tags, and we shortened the protein purification protocol, resulting in reduced processing time and handling of the enzymes and, thus, preserved the protein activity with high purity. The enzymes showed significant stability at 4 °C and 25 °C, over 60 days, and were highly reliable when used as a one-step RT-LAMP reaction in a portable point-of-care device with clinical samples. The enzymes and the reaction setup can be further expanded to detect other infectious diseases agents.

Recent advances in RNA sample preparation techniques for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva and gargle

Molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 in gargle and saliva complements the standard analysis of nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) specimens. Although gargle and saliva specimens can be readily obtained non-invasively, appropriate collection and processing of gargle and saliva specimens are critical to the accuracy and sensitivity of the overall analytical method. This review highlights challenges and recent advances in the treatment of gargle and saliva samples for subsequent analysis using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and isothermal amplification techniques. Important considerations include appropriate collection of gargle and saliva samples, on-site inactivation of viruses in the sample, preservation of viral RNA, extraction and concentration of viral RNA, removal of substances that inhibit nucleic acid amplification reactions, and the compatibility of sample treatment protocols with the subsequent nucleic acid amplification and detection techniques. The principles and approaches discussed in this review are applicable to molecular detection of other microbial pathogens.

Accuracy of a raw saliva-based COVID-19 RT-LAMP diagnostic assay

The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic demanded rapid diagnosis to isolate new COVID-19 cases and prevent disease transmission. Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR) rapidly became the gold standard for diagnosis. However, due to the high cost and delay of the results, other types of diagnosis were implemented, such as COVID-19 Ag Rapid Tests and Reverse Transcription Technique followed by Loop-Mediated isothermal Amplification (RT-LAMP). In this work, we validated the use of RT-LAMP in saliva samples rather than nasopharyngeal swabs, as the collection is more comfortable. First, we selected 5 primer sets based on the limit of detection for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, then validated their sensitivity and specificity in patient samples. A total of 117 samples were analyzed by fluorometric RT-LAMP and compared with qRT-PCR results. Our results show that the use of a high-sensitive primer ORF1-a, together with a low-sensitive primer set Gene E (time to threshold of 22.9 and 36.4 minutes, respectively, using 200 copies of viral RNA), achieved sensitivity in purified RNA from saliva samples of 95.2% (95% CI 76.1‒99.8) with 90.5% specificity (95% CI 69.6‒98.8) (n = 42).As RNA purification increases the turnaround time, we tested the outcome of RT-LAMP utilizing raw saliva samples without purification. The test achieved a sensitivity of 81.8% (95% CI 59.7‒94.8) and a specificity of 90.9% (95% CI 70.8‒98.8). As a result, the accuracy of 92.9% (95% CI 80.5‒98.5) in purified RNA-saliva samples was lowered to an acceptable level of 86.4% (95% CI 72.6‒94.8) in raw saliva. Although mass vaccination has been implemented, new strains and low vaccination progress helped to spread COVID-19. This study shows that it is feasible to track new COVID-19 cases in a large population with the use of raw saliva as sample in RT-LAMP assay which yields accurate results and offers a less invasive test.

Carryover Contamination-Controlled Amplicon Sequencing Workflow for Accurate Qualitative and Quantitative Detection of Pathogens: a Case Study on SARS-CoV-2

Carryover contamination during amplicon sequencing workflow (AMP-Seq) put the accuracy of the high-throughput detection for pathogens at risk. The purpose of this study is to develop a carryover contaminations-controlled AMP-Seq (ccAMP-Seq) workflow to enable accurate qualitative and quantitative detection for pathogens. By using the AMP-Seq workflow to detect SARS-CoV-2, Aerosols, reagents and pipettes were identified as potential sources of contaminations and ccAMP-Seq was then developed. ccAMP-Seq used filter tips and physically isolation of experimental steps to avoid cross contamination, synthetic DNA spike-ins to compete with contaminations and quantify SARS-CoV-2, dUTP/uracil DNA glycosylase system to digest the carryover contaminations, and a new data analysis procedure to remove the sequencing reads from contaminations. Compared to AMP-Seq, the contamination level of ccAMP-Seq was at least 22-folds lower and the detection limit was also about an order of magnitude lower-as low as one copy/reaction. By testing the dilution series of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid standard, ccAMP-Seq showed 100% sensitivity and specificity. The high sensitivity of ccAMP-Seq was further confirmed by the detection of SARS-CoV-2 from 62 clinical samples. The consistency between qPCR and ccAMP-Seq was 100% for all the 53 qPCR-positive clinical samples. Seven qPCR-negative clinical samples were found to be positive by ccAMP-Seq, which was confirmed by extra qPCR tests on subsequent samples from the same patients. This study presents a carryover contamination-controlled, accurate qualitative and quantitative amplicon sequencing workflow that addresses the critical problem of pathogen detection for infectious diseases. IMPORTANCE Accuracy, a key indicator of pathogen detection technology, is compromised by carryover contamination in the amplicon sequencing workflow. Taking the detection of SARS-CoV-2 as case, this study presents a new carryover contamination-controlled amplicon sequencing workflow. The new workflow significantly reduces the degree of contamination in the workflow, thereby significantly improving the accuracy and sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 detection and empowering the ability of quantitative detection. More importantly, the use of the new workflow is simple and economical. Therefore, the results of this study can be easily applied to other microorganism, which has great significance for improving the detection level of microorganism.

Vivid COVID-19 LAMP is an ultrasensitive, quadruplexed test using LNA-modified primers and a zinc ion and 5-Br-PAPS colorimetric detection system

Sensitive and rapid point-of-care assays have been crucial in the global response to SARS-CoV-2. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) has emerged as an important diagnostic tool given its simplicity and minimal equipment requirements, although limitations exist regarding sensitivity and the methods used to detect reaction products. We describe the development of Vivid COVID-19 LAMP, which leverages a metallochromic detection system utilizing zinc ions and a zinc sensor, 5-Br-PAPS, to circumvent the limitations of classic detection systems dependent on pH indicators or magnesium chelators. We make important strides in improving RT-LAMP sensitivity by establishing principles for using LNA-modified LAMP primers, multiplexing, and conducting extensive optimizations of reaction parameters. To enable point-of-care testing, we introduce a rapid sample inactivation procedure without RNA extraction that is compatible with self-collected, non-invasive gargle samples. Our quadruplexed assay (targeting E, N, ORF1a, and RdRP) reliably detects 1 RNA copy/µl of sample (=8 copies/reaction) from extracted RNA and 2 RNA copies/µl of sample (=16 copies/reaction) directly from gargle samples, making it one of the most sensitive RT-LAMP tests and even comparable to RT-qPCR. Additionally, we demonstrate a self-contained, mobile version of our assay in a variety of high-throughput field testing scenarios on nearly 9,000 crude gargle samples. Vivid COVID-19 LAMP can be an important asset for the endemic phase of COVID-19 as well as preparing for future pandemics.

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification combined with lateral flow biosensor for rapid and sensitive detection of monkeypox virus

The ongoing outbreak of the monkeypox, caused by monkeypox virus (MPXV), has been a public health emergency of international concern, indicating an urgent need for rapid and sensitive MPXV detection. Here, we designed a diagnostic test based on loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and nanoparticle-based lateral flow biosensor(LFB)for diagnosis of MPXV infection, termed MPX-LAMP-LFB. A set of six LAMP primers was designed based the ATI gene of MPXV, and LAMP amplification of MPXV templates was performed at 63°C for only 40 min. The results were rapidly and visually decided using the LFB test within 2 min. The MPX-LAMP-LFB assay can specifically detect MPXV strains without cross-reaction with non-MPXV pathogens. The sensitivity of the MPX-LAMP-LFB assay is as low as 5 copies/μl of plasmid template and 12.5 copies/μl of pseudovirus in human blood samples. The whole process of the MPX-LAMP-LFB assay could be completed ~1 h, including rapid template preparation (15 min), LAMP reaction (40 min)and result reporting (<2 min). Collectively, MPX-LAMP-LFB assay developed here is a useful tool for rapid and reliable diagnosis of MPXV infection.

Advances in RT-LAMP for COVID-19 testing and diagnosis

INTRODUCTION

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, and the subsequent limitations on standard diagnostics, has vastly expanded the user base of Reverse Transcription Loop-mediated isothermal Amplification (RT-LAMP) in fundamental research and development. RT-LAMP has also penetrated commercial markets, with emergency use authorizations for clinical diagnosis.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses the role of RT-LAMP within the context of other technologies like RT-qPCR and rapid antigen tests, progress in sample preparation strategies to enable simplified workflow for RT-LAMP directly from clinical specimens, new challenges with primer and assay design for the evolving pandemic, prominent detection modalities including colorimetric and CRISPR-mediated methods, and translational research and commercial development of RT-LAMP for clinical applications.

EXPERT OPINION

RT-LAMP occupies a middle ground between RT-qPCR and rapid antigen tests. The simplicity approaches that of rapid antigen tests, making it suitable for point-of-care use, but the sensitivity nears that of RT-qPCR. RT-LAMP still lags RT-qPCR in fundamental understanding of the mechanism, and the interplay between sample preparation and assay performance. Industry is now beginning to address issues around scalability and usability, which could finally enable LAMP and RT-LAMP to find future widespread application as a diagnostic for other conditions, including other pathogens with pandemic potential.

Comparison of Reverse Transcriptase (RT) Activities of Various M-MuLV RTs for RT-LAMP Assays

Reverse transcriptases (RTs) are a family of enzymes synthesizing DNA using RNA as a template and serving as indispensable tools in studies related to RNA. M-MuLV RT and its analogs are the most commonly used RTs. RTs are widely applied in various diagnostics methods, including reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP). However, the performance of different RTs in LAMP remains relatively unknown. Here, we report on the first direct comparison of various M-MuLV RTs in RT-LAMP, including enzymes with a different number of mutations and fusions with Sto7d. Several parameters were assessed, namely: optimal reaction temperature, enzyme concentration, reverse transcription time, a minimal amount of RNA template, and tolerance to inhibitors. Mutations increased the optimal reaction temperature from 55 °C to 60-65 °C. All of the RTs were suitable for RT-LAMP with RNA templates in the range of 10¹-10⁶ copies per reaction. Highly mutated enzymes were 1.5-3-fold more tolerant to whole blood, blood plasma, and guanidinium, but they were two-fold more sensitive to high concentrations of NaCl. The comparison of different RTs presented here could be helpful for selecting the optimal enzyme when developing novel LAMP-based diagnostic tests.

Development of an optimized colorimetric RT-LAMP for SARS-CoV-2 assay with enhanced procedure controls for remote diagnostics

The coronavirus pandemic accentuated the need for molecular diagnostic tests. A technique highly used to this end is the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-a sensitive and specific technique commonly used as the gold standard for molecular diagnostics. However, it demands highly trained personnel and high-maintenance equipment and is relatively time-consuming. An alternative is the Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) technique, which doesn't need sample purification or expensive equipment, and is similar to PCR when compared in sensitivity and specificity. In this paper, we developed an optimized colorimetric Reverse Transcriptase Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (RT-LAMP) Point-of-Care test using a portable device to diagnose COVID-19. Variables such as concentration of primers, magnesium sulfate, betaine, hydrochloride guanidine, Bst, and temperature of the reactions were tested. We also created a pipetting quality control system-using a combination of dyes-to avoid false negatives due to a lack of samples added to the reaction test tube. Mineral oil was incorporated in the composition of the RT-LAMP reactions to avoid evaporation when a heating lid isn't available. The final RT-LAMP test is tenfold more sensitive when compared to the WarmStart Colorimetric Master mix from New England Biolabs with a sensitivity of 5 copies per μL.

Performance of saline and water gargling for SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase PCR testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The performance of gargling for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR testing has not been previously reviewed. This review systematically assessed the performance of saline and water gargling for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing in the settings of diagnosing and monitoring viral shedding.We included original studies comparing the performance of gargling and (oropharyngeal-)nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing. Studies conducted in either suspected individuals or confirmed cases were included and analysed separately. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were examined using random-effects models.Gargles achieved a high overall sensitivity (91%), specificity (97%), PPV (95%) and NPV (91%) for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing. Studies using saline gargle and water gargle have an overall sensitivity of 97% and 86%, respectively. The sensitivity values were largely maintained for saline and water gargling on stratified analysis, for both diagnosis (96% and 92%) and viral shedding monitoring (98% and 78%). A higher sensitivity was also reported by studies using sterile saline (100%), a smaller amount of gargling solution (92% versus 87%) and a longer gargling duration (95% versus 86%).Our results supported the use of gargling as a sampling approach for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing, which achieved a high sensitivity for both diagnosis and viral shedding monitoring purposes. Further investigation on the comparative performance of different gargling mediums is needed to draw a definitive conclusion.

Rapid antigen test for SARS-CoV-2: results of validation and use in real life

Aim: To verify a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test (RAT) compared with PCR. Materials & methods: Validation of RAT included 2295 subjects. Next matching of RAT with the PCR was checked in 13,852 subjects referred to PCR after being positive in RAT. Results: Sensitivity and specificity of RAT were 77.38 and 99.10%, respectively. A 74.60% of RAT positive results were confirmed with PCR. Conclusion: The test met WHO susceptibility criteria in a group of symptomatic subjects. In terms of specificity, it met requirements in all subjects. The concordance of RAT with PCR in real life was in line with our verification data.

Strategies That Facilitate Extraction-Free SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in an unprecedented global demand for in vitro diagnostic reagents. Supply shortages and hoarding have impacted testing capacity which has led to inefficient COVID-19 case identification and transmission control, predominantly in developing countries. Traditionally, RNA extraction is a prerequisite for conducting SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT); however, simplified methods of sample processing have been successful at bypassing typical nucleic acid extraction steps, enabling extraction-free SARS-CoV-2 NAAT workflows. These methods involve chemical and physical approaches that are inexpensive and easily accessible alternatives to overcome extraction kit supply shortages, while offering acceptable test performance. Here we provide an overview of three main sample preparation strategies that have been shown to facilitate extraction-free SARS-CoV-2 NAATs.

An ultrafast SARS-CoV-2 virus enrichment and extraction method compatible with multiple modalities for RNA detection

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a zoonotic RNA virus characterized by high transmission rates and pathogenicity worldwide. Continued control of the COVID-19 pandemic requires the diversification of rapid, easy to use, sensitive, and portable methods for SARS-CoV-2 sample preparation and analysis. Here, we propose a method for SARS-CoV-2 viral enrichment and enzymatic extraction of RNA from clinically relevant matrices in under 10 min. This technique utilizes affinity-capture hydrogel particles to concentrate SARS-CoV-2 from solution, and leverages existing PDQeX technology for RNA isolation. Characterization of our method is accomplished with reverse transcription real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for relative, comparative RNA detection. In a double-blind study analyzing viral transport media (VTM) obtained from clinical nasopharyngeal swabs, our sample preparation method demonstrated both comparable results to a routinely used commercial extraction kit and 100% concordance with laboratory diagnoses. Compatibility of eluates with alternative forms of analysis was confirmed using microfluidic RT-PCR (μRT-PCR), recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA), and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP). The alternative methods explored here conveyed successful amplification from all RNA eluates originating from positive clinical samples. Finally, this method demonstrated high performance within a saliva matrix across a broad range of viral titers and dilutions up to 90% saliva matrix, and sets the stage for miniaturization to the microscale.

Homebrew reagents for low-cost RT-LAMP

Reverse transcription-loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) has gained popularity for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The high specificity, sensitivity, simple protocols, and potential to deliver results without the use of expensive equipment has made it an attractive alternative to RT-PCR. However, the high cost per reaction, the centralized manufacturing of required reagents, and their distribution under cold chain shipping limit RT-LAMP's applicability in low-income settings. The preparation of assays using homebrew enzymes and buffers has emerged worldwide as a response to these limitations and potential shortages. Here, we describe the production of Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase and BstLF DNA polymerase for the local implementation of RT-LAMP reactions at low cost. These reagents compared favorably to commercial kits, and optimum concentrations were defined in order to reduce time to threshold, increase ON/OFF range, and minimize enzyme quantities per reaction. As a validation, we tested the performance of these reagents in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 from RNA extracted from clinical nasopharyngeal samples, obtaining high agreement between RT-LAMP and RT-PCR clinical results. The in-house preparation of these reactions results in an order of magnitude reduction in costs; thus, we provide protocols and DNA to enable the replication of these tests at other locations. These results contribute to the global effort of developing open and low-cost diagnostics that enable technological autonomy and distributed capacities in viral surveillance.