1
|
Stengl C, Muñoz ID, Arbes E, Rauth E, Christensen JB, Vedelago J, Runz A, Jäkel O, Seco J. Dosimetric study for breathing-induced motion effects in an abdominal pancreas phantom for carbon ion mini-beam radiotherapy. Med Phys 2024; 51:5618-5631. [PMID: 38631000 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Particle mini-beam therapy exhibits promise in sparing healthy tissue through spatial fractionation, particularly notable for heavy ions, further enhancing the already favorable differential biological effectiveness at both target and entrance regions. However, breathing-induced organ motion affects particle mini-beam irradiation schemes since the organ displacements exceed the mini-beam structure dimensions, decreasing the advantages of spatial fractionation. PURPOSE In this study, the impact of breathing-induced organ motion on the dose distribution was examined at the target and organs at risk(OARs) during carbon ion mini-beam irradiation for pancreatic cancer. METHODS As a first step, the carbon ion mini-beam pattern was characterized with Monte Carlo simulations. To analyze the impact of breathing-induced organ motion on the dose distribution of a virtual pancreas tumor as target and related OARs, the anthropomorphic Pancreas Phantom for Ion beam Therapy (PPIeT) was irradiated with carbon ions. A mini-beam collimator was used to deliver a spatially fractionated dose distribution. During irradiation, varying breathing motion amplitudes were induced, ranging from 5 to 15 mm. Post-irradiation, the 2D dose pattern was analyzed, focusing on the full width at half maximum (FWHM), center-to-center distance (ctc), and the peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR). RESULTS The mini-beam pattern was visible within OARs, while in the virtual pancreas tumor a more homogeneous dose distribution was achieved. Applied motion affected the mini-beam pattern within the kidney, one of the OARs, reducing the PVDR from 3.78 ± $\pm$ 0.12 to 1.478 ± $\pm$ 0.070 for the 15 mm motion amplitude. In the immobile OARs including the spine and the skin at the back, the PVDR did not change within 3.4% comparing reference and motion conditions. CONCLUSIONS This study provides an initial understanding of how breathing-induced organ motion affects spatial fractionation during carbon ion irradiation, using an anthropomorphic phantom. A decrease in the PVDR was observed in the right kidney when breathing-induced motion was applied, potentially increasing the risk of damage to OARs. Therefore, further studies are needed to explore the clinical viability of mini-beam radiotherapy with carbon ions when irradiating abdominal regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Stengl
- Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Iván D Muñoz
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department for Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eric Arbes
- Department for Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Evelyn Rauth
- Department for Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jeppe B Christensen
- Department of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland
| | - José Vedelago
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Armin Runz
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joao Seco
- Department for Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Reaz F, Traneus E, Bassler N. Tuning spatially fractionated radiotherapy dose profiles using the moiré effect. Sci Rep 2024; 14:8468. [PMID: 38605022 PMCID: PMC11009409 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55104-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy (SFRT) has demonstrated promising potential in cancer treatment, combining the advantages of reduced post-radiation effects and enhanced local control rates. Within this paradigm, proton minibeam radiotherapy (pMBRT) was suggested as a new treatment modality, possibly producing superior normal tissue sparing to conventional proton therapy, leading to improvements in patient outcomes. However, an effective and convenient beam generation method for pMBRT, capable of implementing various optimum dose profiles, is essential for its real-world application. Our study investigates the potential of utilizing the moiré effect in a dual collimator system (DCS) to generate pMBRT dose profiles with the flexibility to modify the center-to-center distance (CTC) of the dose distribution in a technically simple way.We employ the Geant4 Monte Carlo simulations tool to demonstrate that the angle between the two collimators of a DCS can significantly impact the dose profile. Varying the DCS angle from 10∘ to 50∘ we could cover CTC ranging from 11.8 mm to 2.4 mm, respectively. Further investigations reveal the substantial influence of the multi-slit collimator's (MSC) physical parameters on the spatially fractionated dose profile, such as period (CTC), throughput, and spacing between MSCs. These findings highlight opportunities for precision dose profile adjustments tailored to specific clinical scenarios.The DCS capacity for rapid angle adjustments during the energy transition stages of a spot scanning system can facilitate dynamic alterations in the irradiation profile, enhancing dose contrast in normal tissues. Furthermore, its unique attribute of spatially fractionated doses in both lateral directions could potentially improve normal tissue sparing by minimizing irradiated volume. Beyond the realm of pMBRT, the dual MSC system exhibits remarkable versatility, showing compatibility with different types of beams (X-rays and electrons) and applicability across various SFRT modalities.Our study illuminates the dual MSC system's potential as an efficient and adaptable tool in the refinement of pMBRT techniques. By enabling meticulous control over irradiation profiles, this system may expedite advancements in clinical and experimental applications, thereby contributing to the evolution of SFRT strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fardous Reaz
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | | | - Niels Bassler
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stengl C, Arbes E, Thai LYJ, Echner G, Vedelago J, Jansen J, Jäkel O, Seco J. Development and characterization of a versatile mini-beam collimator for pre-clinical photon beam irradiation. Med Phys 2023; 50:5222-5237. [PMID: 37145971 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interest in spatial fractionation radiotherapy has exponentially increased over the last decade as a significant reduction of healthy tissue toxicity was observed by mini-beam irradiation. Published studies, however, mostly use rigid mini-beam collimators dedicated to their exact experimental arrangement such that changing the setup or testing new mini-beam collimator configurations becomes challenging and expensive. PURPOSE In this work, a versatile, low-cost mini-beam collimator was designed and manufactured for pre-clinical applications with X-ray beams. The mini-beam collimator enables variability of the full width at half maximum (FWHM), the center-to-center distance (ctc), the peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR), and the source-to-collimator distance (SCD). METHODS The mini-beam collimator is an in-house development, which was constructed of 10 × 40 mm2 tungsten or brass plates. These metal plates were combined with 3D-printed plastic plates that can be stacked together in the desired order. A standard X-ray source was used for the dosimetric characterization of four different configurations of the collimator, including a combination of plastic plates of 0.5, 1, or 2 mm width, assembled with 1 or 2 mm thick metal plates. Irradiations were done at three different SCDs for characterizing the performance of the collimator. For the SCDs closer to the radiation source, the plastic plates were 3D-printed with a dedicated angle to compensate for the X-ray beam divergence, making it possible to study ultra-high dose rates of around 40 Gy/s. All dosimetric quantifications were performed using EBT-XD films. Additionally, in vitro studies with H460 cells were carried out. RESULTS Characteristic mini-beam dose distributions were obtained with the developed collimator using a conventional X-ray source. With the exchangeable 3D-printed plates, FWHM and ctc from 0.52 to 2.11 mm, and from 1.77 to 4.61 mm were achieved, with uncertainties ranging from 0.01% to 8.98%, respectively. The FWHM and ctc obtained with the EBT-XD films are in agreement with the design of each mini-beam collimator configuration. For dose rates in the order of several Gy/min, the highest PVDR of 10.09 ± 1.08 was achieved with a collimator configuration of 0.5 mm thick plastic plates and 2 mm thick metal plates. Exchanging the tungsten plates with the lower-density metal brass reduced the PVDR by approximately 50%. Also, increasing the dose rate to ultra-high dose rates was feasible with the mini-beam collimator, where a PVDR of 24.26 ± 2.10 was achieved. Finally, it was possible to deliver and quantify mini-beam dose distribution patterns in vitro. CONCLUSIONS With the developed collimator, we achieved various mini-beam dose distributions that can be adjusted according to the needs of the user in regards to FWHM, ctc, PVDR and SCD, while accounting for beam divergence. Therefore, the designed mini-beam collimator may enable low-cost and versatile pre-clinical research on mini-beam irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Stengl
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eric Arbes
- Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department for Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Long-Yang Jan Thai
- Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department for Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gernot Echner
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - José Vedelago
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jeannette Jansen
- Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joao Seco
- Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department for Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sharp dose profiles for high precision proton therapy using strongly focused proton beams. Sci Rep 2022; 12:18919. [PMID: 36344543 PMCID: PMC9640624 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22677-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
The main objective of radiotherapy is to exploit the curative potential of ionizing radiation while inflicting minimal radiation-induced damage to healthy tissue and sensitive organs. Proton beam therapy has been developed to irradiate the tumor with higher precision and dose conformity compared to conventional X-ray irradiation. The dose conformity of this treatment modality may be further improved if narrower proton beams are used. Still, this is limited by multiple Coulomb scattering of protons through tissue. The primary aim of this work was to develop techniques to produce narrow proton beams and investigate the resulting dose profiles. We introduced and assessed three different proton beam shaping techniques: (1) metal collimators (100/150 MeV), (2) focusing of conventional- (100/150 MeV), and (3) focusing of high-energy (350 MeV, shoot-through) proton beams. Focusing was governed by the initial value of the Twiss parameter [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]), and can be implemented with magnetic particle accelerator optics. The dose distributions in water were calculated by Monte Carlo simulations using Geant4, and evaluated by target to surface dose ratio (TSDR) in addition to the transverse beam size ([Formula: see text]) at the target. The target was defined as the location of the Bragg peak or the focal point. The different techniques showed greatly differing dose profiles, where focusing gave pronouncedly higher relative target dose and efficient use of primary protons. Metal collimators with radii [Formula: see text] gave low TSDRs ([Formula: see text]) and large [Formula: see text]([Formula: see text]). In contrast, a focused beam of conventional ([Formula: see text]) energy produced a very high TSDR ([Formula: see text]) with similar [Formula: see text] as a collimated beam. High-energy focused beams were able to produce TSDRs [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] around 1.5 mm. From this study, it appears very attractive to implement magnetically focused proton beams in radiotherapy of small lesions or tumors in close vicinity to healthy organs at risk. This can also lead to a paradigm change in spatially fractionated radiotherapy. Magnetic focusing would facilitate FLASH irradiation due to low losses of primary protons.
Collapse
|
5
|
Longitudinally Heterogeneous Tumor Dose Optimizes Proton Broadbeam, Interlaced Minibeam, and FLASH Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14205162. [PMID: 36291946 PMCID: PMC9601234 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14205162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Revised: 10/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The aim of any kind of external radiation therapy is to control a tumor with the highest possible probability of the lowest possible side effects. Here, we study further opportunities of reducing the side effects of proton therapy by applying longitudinally heterogeneous dose distributions in the tumor respecting the delivery of a minimum prescribed dose. In our simulations, the longitudinally heterogeneous dose distributions show a reduced dose in the healthy tissue already in the case of proton broadbeam irradiations, but a much higher (calculated) mean cell survival in the case of proton minibeam irradiation. This demonstrates its potential to substantially reduce side effects at a simultaneously higher tumor control probability, opening new opportunities of easier application when striving for high dose-rate applications of proton beams (>~10 Gy/s), in order to additionally profit from the so-called FLASH effects. Abstract The prerequisite of any radiation therapy modality (X-ray, electron, proton, and heavy ion) is meant to meet at least a minimum prescribed dose at any location in the tumor for the best tumor control. In addition, there is also an upper dose limit within the tumor according to the International Commission on Radiation Units (ICRU) recommendations in order to spare healthy tissue as well as possible. However, healthy tissue may profit from the lower side effects when waving this upper dose limit and allowing a larger heterogeneous dose deposition in the tumor, but maintaining the prescribed minimum dose level, particularly in proton minibeam therapy. Methods: Three different longitudinally heterogeneous proton irradiation modes and a standard spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) irradiation mode are simulated for their depth-dose curves under the constraint of maintaining a minimum prescribed dose anywhere in the tumor region. Symmetric dose distributions of two opposing directions are overlaid in a 25 cm-thick water phantom containing a 5 cm-thick tumor region. Interlaced planar minibeam dose distributions are compared to those of a broadbeam using the same longitudinal dose profiles. Results and Conclusion: All longitudinally heterogeneous proton irradiation modes show a dose reduction in the healthy tissue compared to the common SOBP mode in the case of broad proton beams. The proton minibeam cases show eventually a much larger mean cell survival and thus a further reduced equivalent uniform dose (EUD) in the healthy tissue than any broadbeam case. In fact, the irradiation mode using only one proton energy from each side shows better sparing capabilities in the healthy tissue than the common spread-out Bragg peak irradiation mode with the option of a better dose fall-off at the tumor edges and an easier technical realization, particularly in view of proton minibeam irradiation at ultra-high dose rates larger than ~10 Gy/s (so-called FLASH irradiation modes).
Collapse
|
6
|
Eley JG, Haga CW, Keller A, Lazenby EM, Raver C, Rusek A, Dilmanian FA, Krishnan S, Waddell J. Heavy Ion Minibeam Therapy: Side Effects in Normal Brain. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13246207. [PMID: 34944825 PMCID: PMC8699126 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13246207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 12/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this work was to investigate whether minibeam therapy with heavy ions might offer improvements of the therapeutic ratio for the treatment of human brain cancers. To assess neurotoxicity, we irradiated normal juvenile rats using 120 MeV lithium-7 ions at an absorbed integral dose of 20 Gy. Beams were configured either as a solid parallel circular beam or as an array of planar parallel minibeams having 300-micron width and 1-mm center-to-center spacing within a circular array. We followed animals for 6 months after treatment and utilized behavioral testing and immunohistochemical studies to investigate the resulting cognitive impairment and chronic pathologic changes. We found both solid-beam therapy and minibeam therapy to result in cognitive impairment compared with sham controls, with no apparent reduction in neurotoxicity using heavy ion minibeams instead of solid beams under the conditions of this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John G. Eley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, USA;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA;
- Correspondence:
| | - Catherine W. Haga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA;
| | - Asaf Keller
- Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA; (A.K.); (C.R.)
| | - Ellis M. Lazenby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, USA;
| | - Charles Raver
- Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA; (A.K.); (C.R.)
| | - Adam Rusek
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA;
- NASA Space Radiation Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA
| | - Farrokh Avraham Dilmanian
- Health Sciences Center, Departments of Radiation Oncology, Radiology, and Neurology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA;
| | - Sunil Krishnan
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA;
| | - Jaylyn Waddell
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sotiropoulos M, Prezado Y. A scanning dynamic collimator for spot-scanning proton minibeam production. Sci Rep 2021; 11:18321. [PMID: 34526628 PMCID: PMC8443660 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97941-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
In proton minibeam radiation therapy, proton minibeams are typically produced by modulating a uniform field using a multislit collimator. Multislit collimators produce minibeams of fixed length and width, and a new collimator has to be manufactured each time a new minibeam array is required, limiting its flexibility. In this work, we propose a scanning dynamic collimator for the generation of proton minibeams arrays. The new collimator system proposed is able to produce any minibeam required on an on-line basis by modulating the pencil beam spots of modern proton therapy machines, rather than a uniform field. The new collimator is evaluated through Monte Carlo simulations and the produced proton minibeams are compared with that of a multislit collimator. Furthermore, a proof of concept experiment is conducted to demonstrate the feasibility of producing a minibeam array by repositioning (i.e. scanning) a collimator. It is concluded that besides the technical challenges, the new collimator design is producing equivalent minibeam arrays to the multislit collimator, whilst is flexible to produce any minibeam array desired.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marios Sotiropoulos
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400, Orsay, France.
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Durante M. Failla Memorial Lecture: The Many Facets of Heavy-Ion Science. Radiat Res 2021; 195:403-411. [PMID: 33979440 DOI: 10.1667/rade-21-00029.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Heavy ions are riveting in radiation biophysics, particularly in the areas of radiotherapy and space radiation protection. Accelerated charged particles can indeed penetrate deeply in the human body to sterilize tumors, exploiting the favorable depth-dose distribution of ions compared to conventional X rays. Conversely, the high biological effectiveness in inducing late effects presents a hazard for manned space exploration. Even after half a century of accelerator-based experiments, clinical applications and flight research, these two topics remain both fascinating and baffling. Heavy-ion therapy is very expensive, and despite the clinical success it remains controversial. Research on late radiation morbidity in spaceflight led to a reduction in uncertainty, but also pointed to new risks previously underestimated, such as possible damage to the central nervous system. Recently, heavy ions have also been used in other, unanticipated biomedical fields, such as treatment of heart arrhythmia or inactivation of viruses for vaccine development. Heavy-ion science nicely merges physics and biology and remains an extraordinary research field for the 21st century.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Durante
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany; and Technische Universität Darmstadt, Institute of Condensed Matter Physics, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Scholz M. State-of-the-Art and Future Prospects of Ion Beam Therapy: Physical and Radiobiological Aspects. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RADIATION AND PLASMA MEDICAL SCIENCES 2020. [DOI: 10.1109/trpms.2019.2935240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
10
|
Mazal A, Prezado Y, Ares C, de Marzi L, Patriarca A, Miralbell R, Favaudon V. FLASH and minibeams in radiation therapy: the effect of microstructures on time and space and their potential application to protontherapy. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20190807. [PMID: 32003574 PMCID: PMC7066940 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
After years of lethargy, studies on two non-conventional microstructures in time and space of the beams used in radiation therapy are enjoying a huge revival. The first effect called “FLASH” is based on very high dose-rate irradiation (pulse amplitude ≥106 Gy/s), short beam-on times (≤100 ms) and large single doses (≥10 Gy) as experimental parameters established so far to give biological and potential clinical effects. The second effect relies on the use of arrays of minibeams (e.g., 0.5–1 mm, spaced 1–3.5 mm). Both approaches have been shown to protect healthy tissues as an endpoint that must be clearly specified and could be combined with each other (e.g., minibeams under FLASH conditions). FLASH depends on the presence of oxygen and could proceed from the chemistry of peroxyradicals and a reduced incidence on DNA and membrane damage. Minibeams action could be based on abscopal effects, cell signalling and/or migration of cells between “valleys and hills” present in the non-uniform irradiation field as well as faster repair of vascular damage. Both effects are expected to maintain intact the tumour control probability and might even preserve antitumoural immunological reactions. FLASH in vivo experiments involving Zebrafish, mice, pig and cats have been done with electron beams, while minibeams are an intermediate approach between X-GRID and synchrotron X-ray microbeams radiation. Both have an excellent rationale to converge and be applied with proton beams, combining focusing properties and high dose rates in the beam path of pencil beams, and the inherent advantage of a controlled limited range. A first treatment with electron FLASH (cutaneous lymphoma) has recently been achieved, but clinical trials have neither been presented for FLASH with protons, nor under the minibeam conditions. Better understanding of physical, chemical and biological mechanisms of both effects is essential to optimize the technical developments and devise clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- IMNC, University Paris-Sud and Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, Orsay, France
| | - Carme Ares
- Centro de Protonterapia Quironsalud, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ludovic de Marzi
- Institut Curie, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay 91898, France.,Institut Curie, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Paris-Saclay and PSL Research Universities, Orsay, France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Institut Curie, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay 91898, France
| | | | - Vincent Favaudon
- Institut Curie, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Paris-Saclay and PSL Research Universities, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dilmanian FA, Venkatesulu BP, Sahoo N, Wu X, Nassimi JR, Herchko S, Lu J, Dwarakanath BS, Eley JG, Krishnan S. Proton minibeams-a springboard for physics, biology and clinical creativity. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20190332. [PMID: 31944824 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton minibeam therapy (PMBT) is a form of spatially fractionated radiotherapy wherein broad beam radiation is replaced with segmented minibeams-either parallel, planar minibeam arrays generated by a multislit collimator or scanned pencil beams that converge laterally at depth to create a uniform dose layer at the tumor. By doing so, the spatial pattern of entrance dose is considerably modified while still maintaining tumor dose and efficacy. Recent studies using computational modeling, phantom experiments, in vitro and in vivo preclinical models, and early clinical feasibility assessments suggest that unique physical and biological attributes of PMBT can be exploited for future clinical benefit. We outline some of the guiding principle of PMBT in this concise overview of this emerging area of preclinical and clinical research inquiry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Avraham Dilmanian
- Departments of Radiology, Health Sciences Center and Cancer Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.,Departments of Radiation Oncology, Health Sciences Center and Cancer Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.,Departments of Neurology, Health Sciences Center and Cancer Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.,Departments of Psychiatry, Health Sciences Center and Cancer Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Bhanu P Venkatesulu
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, Health Sciences Center and Cancer Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Narayan Sahoo
- Departments of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xiaodong Wu
- Biophysics Research Institute of America, Miami, FL, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Jessica R Nassimi
- Departments of Radiology, Health Sciences Center and Cancer Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Steven Herchko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Jiade Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China
| | | | - John G Eley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Sunil Krishnan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Yan W, Khan MK, Wu X, Simone CB, Fan J, Gressen E, Zhang X, Limoli CL, Bahig H, Tubin S, Mourad WF. Spatially fractionated radiation therapy: History, present and the future. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2020; 20:30-38. [PMID: 31768424 PMCID: PMC6872856 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2019.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2019] [Revised: 10/14/2019] [Accepted: 10/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Weisi Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mohammad K. Khan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Charles B. Simone
- New York Proton Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jiajin Fan
- Radiation Oncology, Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Inova Health System, USA
| | - Eric Gressen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Xin Zhang
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Charles L. Limoli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Ivine 92697-2695, USA
| | - Houda Bahig
- Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Slavisa Tubin
- KABEG Klinikum Klagenfurt, Institute of Radiation Oncology, Feschnigstraße 11, 9020 Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Austria
| | - Waleed F. Mourad
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky – College of Medicine, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sammer M, Zahnbrecher E, Dobiasch S, Girst S, Greubel C, Ilicic K, Reindl J, Schwarz B, Siebenwirth C, Walsh DWM, Combs SE, Dollinger G, Schmid TE. Proton pencil minibeam irradiation of an in-vivo mouse ear model spares healthy tissue dependent on beam size. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0224873. [PMID: 31765436 PMCID: PMC6876838 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2019] [Accepted: 10/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton radiotherapy using minibeams of sub-millimeter dimensions reduces side effects in comparison to conventional proton therapy due to spatial fractionation. Since the proton minibeams widen with depth, the homogeneous irradiation of a tumor can be ensured by adjusting the beam distances to tumor size and depth to maintain tumor control as in conventional proton therapy. The inherent advantages of protons in comparison to photons like a limited range that prevents a dosage of distal tissues are maintained by proton minibeams and can even be exploited for interlacing from different beam directions. A first animal study was conducted to systematically investigate and quantify the tissue-sparing effects of proton pencil minibeams as a function of beam size and dose distributions, using beam widths between σ = 95, 199, 306, 411, 561 and 883 μm (standard deviation) at a defined center-to-center beam distance (ctc) of 1.8 mm. The average dose of 60 Gy was distributed in 4x4 minibeams using 20 MeV protons (LET ~ 2.7 keV/μm). The induced radiation toxicities were measured by visible skin reactions and ear swelling for 90 days after irradiation. The largest applied beam size to ctc ratio (σ/ctc = 0.49) is similar to a homogeneous irradiation and leads to a significant 3-fold ear thickness increase compared to the control group. Erythema and desquamation was also increased significantly 3–4 weeks after irradiation. With decreasing beam sizes and thus decreasing σ/ctc, the maximum skin reactions are strongly reduced until no ear swelling or other visible skin reactions should occur for σ/ctc < 0.032 (extrapolated from data). These results demonstrate that proton pencil minibeam radiotherapy has better tissue-sparing for smaller σ/ctc, corresponding to larger peak-to-valley dose ratios PVDR, with the best effect for σ/ctc < 0.032. However, even quite large σ/ctc (e.g. σ/ctc = 0.23 or 0.31, i.e. PVDR = 10 or 2.7) show less acute side effects than a homogeneous dose distribution. This suggests that proton minibeam therapy spares healthy tissue not only in the skin but even for dose distributions appearing in deeper layers close to the tumor enhancing its benefits for clinical proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Sammer
- Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Esther Zahnbrecher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), Oberschleißheim, Germany
| | - Sophie Dobiasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), Oberschleißheim, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Girst
- Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Greubel
- Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Katarina Ilicic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), Oberschleißheim, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Judith Reindl
- Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Schwarz
- Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Christian Siebenwirth
- Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Dietrich W M Walsh
- Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), Oberschleißheim, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Günther Dollinger
- Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Thomas E Schmid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), Oberschleißheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Friedrich T. Proton RBE dependence on dose in the setting of hypofractionation. Br J Radiol 2019; 93:20190291. [PMID: 31437004 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Hypofractionated radiotherapy is attractive concerning patient burden and therapy costs, but many aspects play a role when it comes to assess its safety. While exploited for conventional photon therapy and carbon ion therapy, hypofractionation with protons is only rarely applied. One reason for this is uncertainty in the described dose, mainly due to the relative biological effectiveness (RBE), which is small for protons, but not negligible. RBE is generally dose-dependent, and for higher doses as used in hypofractionation, a thorough RBE evaluation is needed. This review article focuses on the RBE variability in protons and associated issues or implications for hypofractionation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Friedrich
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Schneider T, Patriarca A, Prezado Y. Improving the dose distributions in minibeam radiation therapy: Helium ions vs protons. Med Phys 2019; 46:3640-3648. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.13646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2019] [Revised: 05/27/2019] [Accepted: 05/27/2019] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Schneider
- IMNC‐UMR 8165 CNRS Paris 7 and Paris 11 Universities 15 rue Georges Clemenceau Orsay Cedex 91405France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Institut Curie PSL Research University Centre de protonthrapie d’Orsay Campus universitaire btiment 101 Orsay 91898France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- IMNC‐UMR 8165 CNRS Paris 7 and Paris 11 Universities 15 rue Georges Clemenceau Orsay Cedex 91405France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Durante M, Flanz J. Charged particle beams to cure cancer: Strengths and challenges. Semin Oncol 2019; 46:219-225. [DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2019.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Accepted: 07/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
17
|
Hainfeld JF, Ridwan SM, Stanishevskiy Y, Panchal R, Slatkin DN, Smilowitz HM. Iodine nanoparticles enhance radiotherapy of intracerebral human glioma in mice and increase efficacy of chemotherapy. Sci Rep 2019; 9:4505. [PMID: 30872755 PMCID: PMC6418169 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41174-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2018] [Accepted: 03/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Gliomas and other brain tumors have evaded durable therapies, ultimately causing about 20% of all cancer deaths. Tumors are widespread in the brain at time of diagnosis, limiting surgery and radiotherapy effectiveness. Drugs are also poorly effective. Radiotherapy (RT) is limited by dose to normal tissue. However, high-atomic-number elements absorb X-rays and deposit the absorbed dose locally, even doubling (or more) the local dose. Previously we showed that gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) with RT could eradicate some brain tumors in mice and many other preclinical studies confirmed AuNPs as outstanding radioenhancers. However, impediments to clinical translation of AuNPs have been poor clearance, skin discoloration, and cost. We therefore developed iodine nanoparticles (INPs) that are almost colorless, non-toxic, lower cost, and have reasonable clearance, thus overcoming major drawbacks of AuNPs. Here we report the use of iodine nanoparticle radiotherapy (INRT) in treating advanced human gliomas (U87) grown orthotopically in nude mice resulting in a more than a doubling of median life extension compared to RT alone. Significantly, INRT also enhanced the efficacy of chemotherapy when it was combined with the chemotherapeutic agent Doxil, resulting in some longer-term survivors. While ongoing optimization studies should further improve INRT, clinical translation appears promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James F Hainfeld
- Nanoprobes, Inc, 95 Horseblock Rd., Unit 1, Yaphank, NY, 11980, USA.
| | - Sharif M Ridwan
- University of Connecticut Health Center, Department of Cell Biology, 263 Farmington Ave., Farmington, CT, USA
| | | | - Rahul Panchal
- University of Connecticut Health Center, Department of Cell Biology, 263 Farmington Ave., Farmington, CT, USA
| | - Daniel N Slatkin
- Nanoprobes, Inc, 95 Horseblock Rd., Unit 1, Yaphank, NY, 11980, USA
| | - Henry M Smilowitz
- University of Connecticut Health Center, Department of Cell Biology, 263 Farmington Ave., Farmington, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Meyer J, Stewart RD, Smith D, Eagle J, Lee E, Cao N, Ford E, Hashemian R, Schuemann J, Saini J, Marsh S, Emery R, Dorman E, Schwartz J, Sandison G. Biological and dosimetric characterisation of spatially fractionated proton minibeams. Phys Med Biol 2017; 62:9260-9281. [PMID: 29053105 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa950c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The biological effectiveness of proton beams varies with depth, spot size and lateral distance from the beam central axis. The aim of this work is to incorporate proton relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and equivalent uniform dose (EUD) considerations into comparisons of broad beam and highly modulated proton minibeams. A Monte Carlo model of a small animal proton beamline is presented. Dose and variable RBE is calculated on a per-voxel basis for a range of energies (30-109 MeV). For an open beam, the RBE values at the beam entrance ranged from 1.02-1.04, at the Bragg peak (BP) from 1.3 to 1.6, and at the distal end of the BP from 1.4 to 2.0. For a 50 MeV proton beam, a minibeam collimator designed to produce uniform dose at the depth of the BP peak, had minimal impact on the open beam RBE values at depth. RBE changes were observed near the surface when the collimator was placed flush with the irradiated object, due to a higher neutron contribution derived from proton interactions with the collimator. For proton minibeams, the relative mean RBE weighted entrance dose (RWD) was ~25% lower than the physical mean dose. A strong dependency of the EUD with fraction size was observed. For 20 Gy fractions, the EUD varied widely depending on the radiosensitivity of the cells. For radiosensitive cells, the difference was up to ~50% in mean dose and ~40% in mean RWD and the EUD trended towards the valley dose rather than the mean dose. For comparative studies of uniform dose with spatially fractionated proton minibeams, EUD derived from a per-voxel RWD distribution is recommended for biological assessments of reproductive cell survival and related endpoints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juergen Meyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356043, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sammer M, Greubel C, Girst S, Dollinger G. Optimization of beam arrangements in proton minibeam radiotherapy by cell survival simulations. Med Phys 2017; 44:6096-6104. [PMID: 28880369 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2017] [Revised: 08/30/2017] [Accepted: 08/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton minibeam radiotherapy using submillimeter beam dimensions allows to enhance tissue sparing in the entrance channel by spatial fractionation additionally to advantageous proton depth dose distribution. In the entrance channel, spatial fractionation leads to reduced side effects compared to conventional proton therapy. The submillimeter sized beams widen with depth due to small angle scattering and enable therefore, in contrary to x-ray microbeam radiation therapy (MRT), the homogeneous irradiation of a tumor. Proton minibeams can either be applied as planar minibeams or pencil shaped with an additional possibility to vary between a quadratic and a hexagonal arrangement for pencil minibeams. The purpose of this work is to deduce interbeam distances to achieve a homogeneous dose distribution for different tumor depths and tumor thicknesses. Furthermore, we aim for a better understanding of the sparing effect on the basis of surviving cells calculated by the linear-quadratic model. METHODS Two-dimensional dose distributions are calculated for proton minibeams of different shapes and arrangements. For a tumor in 10-15 cm depth, treatment plans are calculated with initial beam size of σ0 = 0.2 mm in a water phantom. Proton minibeam depth dose distributions are finally converted into cell survival using a linear-quadratic model. RESULTS Inter proton beam distances are maximized under the constraint of dose homogeneity in the tumor for tumor depths ranging from 4 to 15 cm and thickness ranging from 0.5 to 10 cm. Cell survival calculations for a 5 cm thick tumor covered by 10 cm healthy tissue show less cell death by up to 85%, especially in the superficial layers, while keeping the cell death in the tumor as in conventional therapy. In the entrance channel, the pencil minibeams result in higher cell survival in comparison to the planar minibeams while all proton minibeam irradiations show higher cell survival than conventional broadbeam irradiation. CONCLUSION The deduced constraints for interbeam distances simplify treatment planning for proton minibeam radiotherapy applications in future studies. The cell survival results indicate that proton minibeam radiotherapy reduces side effects but keeps tumor control as in conventional proton therapy. It makes proton minibeam, especially pencil minibeam radiotherapy a potentially attractive new approach for radiation therapy.
Collapse
|