1
|
Ying X, You G, Shao R. The analysis of the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy with sequential immune checkpoint inhibitors in the management of oligoprogressive advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Transl Cancer Res 2024; 13:2408-2418. [PMID: 38881915 PMCID: PMC11170538 DOI: 10.21037/tcr-23-2232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
Background No standardized treatment strategy exists for managing oligoprogression during maintenance therapy in driver-negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Similarly, a uniform response to oligoprogression during maintenance therapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has not been established. Consequently, our investigation focused on assessing the efficacy and safety of employing stereotactic total body radiotherapy in conjunction with ICIs to address oligoprogression in advanced NSCLC. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with driver-negative advanced NSCLC who received stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in combination with ICIs to manage oligoprogressive lesions within the period from October 2018 to October 2023 at our institution. Oligoprogression, defined as progression occurring in three or fewer disease sites, was the focus of our investigation. Our assessment encompassed various parameters including the local control rate (LCR), progression-free survival post-oligoprogression (PFS-P), overall survival post-oligoprogression (OS-P), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the safety profile associated with SBRT followed by sequential ICIs after oligoprogression. Results A total of 15 patients were enrolled in this study, all at stage IV, with 12 (80%) receiving a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. Before oligoprogression, 11 (73.3%) patients had undergone immunotherapy. Following the treatment of oligoprogressed lung cancer with SBRT sequential ICIs, the median PFS-P and OS-P were 8 months (95% CI: 2.7-13.3) and 12 months (95% CI: 7.3-16.7), respectively. Additionally, the median PFS and OS were 26 months (95% CI: 8.0-44.0) and 30 months (not reached), respectively. The median local control (LC) of 15 oligoprogressed lesions was 13 months (95% CI: 5.3-20.2), with a 1-year LCR of 77.9%. Notably, patients with a performance status (PS) score of less than 2 demonstrated a more favorable survival benefit. Conclusions Stereotactic systemic radiation therapy, combined with sequential ICIs, enhances both LC and survival in advanced NSCLC characterized by oligoprogression and negative driver gene mutations. This approach also exhibits the potential to postpone the transition between systemic chemotherapy regimens. Manageable adverse reactions were observed, with the absence of grade 4 reactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xixi Ying
- Department of Radiology and Oncology, Taizhou Cancer Hospital, Taizhou, China
- Taizhou Key Laboratory of Minimally Invasive Intervention and Big Data Artificial Intelligence, Taizhou, China
| | - Guangxian You
- Department of Radiology and Oncology, Taizhou Cancer Hospital, Taizhou, China
- Taizhou Key Laboratory of Minimally Invasive Intervention and Big Data Artificial Intelligence, Taizhou, China
| | - Rongjun Shao
- Department of Radiology and Oncology, Taizhou Cancer Hospital, Taizhou, China
- Taizhou Key Laboratory of Minimally Invasive Intervention and Big Data Artificial Intelligence, Taizhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang M, Jing X, Chen F, Lu S, Sun Y. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatment beyond progression with prior immunotherapy in patients with driver-gene negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:569. [PMID: 38714983 PMCID: PMC11075238 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12315-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND No definite conclusion has yet to be reached for immunotherapy beyond progression(IBP) of first-line immunotherapy as the second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC patients with negative driver genes. Therefore a retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of IBP in this population and investigated whether the cycles best response and progressive mode of first-line immunotherapy could affect the results. PATIENTS AND METHODS The clinical data of patients with advanced NSCLC whose response was evaluated as progressive disease (PD) after receiving a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as first-line therapy were retrospectively collected and the patients were assigned to the IBP and non-IBP groups. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated between the two groups. The survival effects of cycles best response and progressive mode of first-line immunotherapy were also evaluated. RESULTS Between January 2019 and January 2022, a total of 121 patients was evaluated as PD after first-line immunotherapy in our institution; 53 (43.8%) patients were included in the IBP group and 68 (56.2%) patients were included in the non-IBP group. The OS and PFS were no significantly different between the two groups in whole population. Further analysis revealed the OS was prolonged with the prolongation of first-line medication cycle. The median OS was 15.4m (15.4 vs 10.8 p=0.047) 16.1m (16.1 vs 10.8 p=0.039), 16.3m (16.3 vs 10.9 p=0.029) for patients with ≥4, ≥6, ≥8 cycles in first-line immunotherapy, respectively. The advantages of OS and PFS were also seen in the subgroup of PR (best response) and oligo progression of first-line immunotherapy. CONCLUSIONS The clinical outcomes of IBP were similar to those of non-IBP in patients with PD after first-line immnuotherapy in advanced NSCLC. But more cycles, PR as best response and oligo progression in first-line was benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, 250117, Shandong Province, China
| | - Xuquan Jing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, 250117, Shandong Province, China
| | - Feihu Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, 250117, Shandong Province, China
| | - Shuangqing Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, 250117, Shandong Province, China
| | - Yulan Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, Shandong Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yang CX, Pan YX, Ye F, Zhu XD, Xue J, Li X, Yuan ZG, Zhang L, Xu L, Chen YJ, Wang NY, Sun HC, Liu XF. The pattern of tumor progression on first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor-based systemic therapy for Chinese advanced hepatocellular carcinoma -CLEAP 004 study. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1310239. [PMID: 38711515 PMCID: PMC11070461 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1310239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Background For decades, stratification criteria for first-line clinical studies have been highly uniform. However, there is no principle or consensus for restratification after systemic treatment progression based on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The aim of this study was to assess the patterns of disease progression in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are not eligible for surgical intervention, following the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods This is a retrospective study that involved patients with inoperable China liver stage (CNLC) IIIa and/or IIIb. The patients were treated at eight centers across China between January 2017 and October 2022. All patients received at least two cycles of first-line treatment containing immune checkpoint inhibitors. The patterns of disease progression were assessed using RECIST criteria 1.1. Different progression modes have been identified based on the characteristics of imaging progress. The study's main outcome measures were post-progression survival (PPS) and overall survival (OS). Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method to compare the difference among the four groups. Subgroup analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of different immunotherapy combinations. Variations in the efficacy of immunotherapy have also been noted across patient groups exhibiting alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels equal to or exceeding 400ng/mL, in contrast to those with AFP levels below 400ng/mL. Results The study has identified four distinct patterns of progress, namely p-IIb, p-IIIa, p-IIIb, and p-IIIc. Diverse patterns of progress demonstrate notable variations in both PPS and OS. The group p-IIb had the longest PPS of 12.7m (95% 9.3-16.1) and OS 19.6m (95% 15.6-23.5), the remaining groups exhibited p-IIIb at PPS 10.5 months (95%CI: 7.9-13.1) and OS 19.2 months (95%CI 15.1-23.3). Similarly, p-IIIc at PPS 5.7 months (95%CI: 4.2-7.2) and OS 11.0 months (95%CI 9.0-12.9), while p-IIIa at PPS 3.4 months (95%CI: 2.7-4.1) and OS 8.2 months (95%CI 6.8-9.5) were also seen. Additional stratified analysis was conducted and showed there were no differences of immunotherapy alone or in combination in OS (HR= 0.92, 95%CI: 0.59-1.43, P=0.68) and PPS (HR= 0.88, 95%CI: 0.57-1.36, P=0.54); there was no significant difference in PPS (HR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.55-1.12, P=0.15) and OS (HR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.61-1.24, P=0.39) for patients with AFP levels at or over 400ng/mL. However, it was observed that patients with AFP levels above 400ng/mL experienced a shorter median progression of PPS (8.0 months vs. 5.0 months) after undergoing immunotherapy. Conclusion In this investigation of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma among Chinese patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, we identified four distinct progression patterns (p-IIb, p-IIIa, p-IIIb and p-IIIc) that showed significant differences in PPS and OS. These findings demonstrate the heterogeneity of disease progression and prognosis after immunotherapy failure. Further validation in large cohorts is necessary to develop prognostic models that integrate distinct progression patterns to guide subsequent treatment decisions. Additionally, post-immunotherapy progression in patients with AFP levels ≥400ng/mL indicates a shortened median PPS. These findings provide valuable insights for future personalized treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao-Xu Yang
- Medical Oncology, Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Yang-Xun Pan
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Feng Ye
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao-Dong Zhu
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute and Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jun Xue
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Xi Li
- Oncology Department, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Zhen-Gang Yuan
- Department of Oncology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University (Navy Medical University), Shanghai, China
| | - Lan Zhang
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University & Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China
| | - Li Xu
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yong-Jun Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Nan-Ya Wang
- Oncology Department, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Hui-Chuan Sun
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute and Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiu-Feng Liu
- Medical Oncology, Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sia TY, Wan V, Finlan M, Zhou QC, Iasonos A, Zivanovic O, Sonoda Y, Chi DS, Long Roche K, Jewell E, Tew WP, O'Cearbhaill RE, Cohen S, Makker V, Liu YL, Friedman CF, Kyi C, Zamarin D, Gardner G. Procedural interventions for oligoprogression during treatment with immune checkpoint blockade in gynecologic malignancies: a case series. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024; 34:594-601. [PMID: 38296517 PMCID: PMC11108643 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of performing procedural interventions, defined as surgical resection, tumor ablation, or targeted radiation therapy, for oligoprogressive disease among patients with gynecologic malignancies who are treated with immune checkpoint blockade. METHODS Patients with gynecologic cancers treated with immune checkpoint blockade between January 2013 and October 2021 who underwent procedural interventions including surgical resection, interventional radiology ablation, or radiation therapy for oligoprogressive disease were identified. Procedures performed before immune checkpoint therapy initiation or ≥6 months after therapy completion were excluded. Long immunotherapy duration prior to intervention was defined as ≥6 months. Progression-free survival and overall survival were calculated from procedure date until disease progression or death, respectively. RESULTS During the study period, 886 patients met inclusion criteria and received immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Of these, 34 patients underwent procedural interventions for oligoprogressive disease; 7 underwent surgical resection, 3 underwent interventional radiology ablation, and 24 underwent radiation therapy interventions. Primary disease sites included uterus (71%), ovary (24%), and cervix (6%). Sites of oligoprogression included abdomen/pelvis (26%), bone (21%), lung (18%), distant lymph node (18%), brain (9%), liver (6%), and vagina (3%). Most tumors (76%) did not exhibit microsatellite instability or mismatch repair deficiency. Approximately half (53%) of the patients had long immune checkpoint therapy duration prior to intervention. Median progression-free survival following the procedure was 5.3 months (95% CI, 3.1-9.9), and median overall survival was 21.7 months (95% CI, 14.9-not estimable). Long versus short immune checkpoint therapy duration prior to procedure and length of immune checkpoint therapy had no effect on progression-free or overall survival. CONCLUSIONS Procedural interventions for patients with oligoprogression on immune checkpoint blockade therapy are feasible and demonstrate favorable outcomes. With expanding use of immune checkpoint therapy, it is important to investigate combined modalities to maximize therapeutic benefit for patients with gynecologic cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany Y Sia
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vivian Wan
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Michael Finlan
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Qin C Zhou
- Epidemiology-Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Epidemiology-Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Elizabeth Jewell
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - William P Tew
- Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Roisin E O'Cearbhaill
- Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Seth Cohen
- Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vicky Makker
- Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ying L Liu
- Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Claire F Friedman
- Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Chrisann Kyi
- Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dmitriy Zamarin
- Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ginger Gardner
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jongbloed M, Khosla AA, Bartolomeo V, Jatwani K, Singh R, De Ruysscher DKM, Hendriks LEL, Desai A. Measured Steps: Navigating the Path of Oligoprogressive Lung Cancer with Targeted and Immunotherapies. Curr Oncol Rep 2024; 26:80-89. [PMID: 38175464 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01490-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review discusses the definitions, treatment modalities, management, future directions, and ongoing clinical trials of oligoprogressive disease in oncogene-driven and non-oncogene-driven NSCLC. RECENT FINDINGS During the last decades, diagnostic and treatment modalities for oligometastatic NSCLC have advanced significantly, leading to improved survival. Additionally, our understanding of the tumor biology of oligoprogressive disease has expanded. However, despite the efforts of organizations, such as EORTC, ESTRO, and ASTRO proposing definitions for oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease, heterogeneity in definitions persists in (ongoing) trials. Recognizing the significance of subclassification within oligoprogressive disease in NSCLC and the varying risks associated with subsequent metastatic spread, there is a call for tailored management strategies. A consensus on standardized criteria for the definition of oligoprogressive disease is urgently needed and will not only facilitate meaningful comparisons between studies but also pave the way for the development of personalized treatment plans that take into account the heterogeneous nature of oligoprogressive disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandy Jongbloed
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Atulya A Khosla
- Division of Internal Medicine, William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Valentina Bartolomeo
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Clinical Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, Pavia University, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), Maastricht University Medical Center, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction (GROW), Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Karan Jatwani
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Rohit Singh
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Dirk K M De Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), Maastricht University Medical Center, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction (GROW), Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Lizza E L Hendriks
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Aakash Desai
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1824 6th Ave S, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Seyama Y, Yamada T, Suzuki H, Fukuda S, Tsuji M, Niisato Y, Hirose S, Yamamoto Y, Moriwaki T, Hyodo I. Gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma presenting complete durable response by nivolumab treatment for multiple metastases and radiotherapy to oligoprogressive metastasis. Int Cancer Conf J 2023; 12:268-273. [PMID: 37577341 PMCID: PMC10421835 DOI: 10.1007/s13691-023-00611-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) are highly aggressive cancer with dismal prognosis. Platinum-based chemotherapy is used as the first-line treatment for this entity. However, there are no established therapeutic guidelines for platinum-resistant gastric NEC. We herein report a patient with metastatic gastric NEC who achieved durable and complete response to nivolumab with radiotherapy for oligoprogressive metastasis. A 70-year-old male patient had recurrences of resected gastric NEC, involving the liver and lymph nodes. His disease became refractory to cisplatin and etoposide combination therapy, after which he was treated with nivolumab. All the tumors showed marked shrinkage. However, 1 year after starting nivolumab, one metastatic lesion of the liver began to enlarge, and radiotherapy was performed to the lesion. Thereafter, a complete response was obtained, which has been maintained without any treatment for the past 2 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Seyama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575 Japan
| | - Takeshi Yamada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575 Japan
| | - Hirosumi Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575 Japan
| | - Satoshi Fukuda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575 Japan
| | - Miki Tsuji
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575 Japan
| | - Yusuke Niisato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575 Japan
| | - Suguru Hirose
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575 Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Yamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575 Japan
| | - Toshikazu Moriwaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575 Japan
| | - Ichinosuke Hyodo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Ehime Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ozluk AA, Karateke M, Sanli UA, Karaca B. Efficacy of local ablative therapies in patients with solid tumors treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and oligoprogression: a single-center analysis. Melanoma Res 2023; 33:417-421. [PMID: 37276020 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
The concept of oligoprogression reflects a situation where a limited number of metastatic tumor sites have progressed and other metastatic sites are under control with current systemic therapy. The optimal management of oligoprogression remains unclear. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the contribution of local ablative treatment approaches after oligoprogression to progression-free survival and response rates (RRs) in patients with renal cell carcinoma ( N : 5), nonsmall cell lung cancer ( N : 1) and melanoma ( N : 21) who received immunotherapy. We found that patients received local ablative therapies after oligoprogression had longer progression-free survival and higher RR compared to those who did not. Specifically, patients who received concurrent radiotherapy had a median survival time of 24.7 months compared to 14.5 months in those who did not. Our results suggest that local ablative therapies may have a beneficial impact on progression-free survival and RR in patients with oligoprogression who are being treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and determine the optimal use of local ablative therapies in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmet Anil Ozluk
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tulay Aktas Oncology Hospital, Izmir
| | - Murat Karateke
- Department of Medical Oncology, Manisa State Hospital, Manisa, Turkey
| | - Ulus Ali Sanli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tulay Aktas Oncology Hospital, Izmir
| | - Burcak Karaca
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tulay Aktas Oncology Hospital, Izmir
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Xu Y, Liu Y, Ge Y, Li H, Zhang Y, Wang L. Drug resistance mechanism and reversal strategy in lung cancer immunotherapy. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1230824. [PMID: 37795038 PMCID: PMC10546211 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1230824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Among all malignant tumors, lung cancer has the highest mortality and morbidity rates. The non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) are the most common histological subtypes. Although there are a number of internationally recognized lung cancer therapy regimens, their therapeutic effects remain inadequate. The outlook for individuals with lung carcinoma has ameliorated partly thanks to the intensive study of the tumor microenvironment and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Numerous cancers have been effectively treated with immunotherapy, which has had positive therapeutic results. Global clinical trials have validated that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are effective and safe for treating lung cancer either independently or in combination, and they are gradually being recommended as systemic treatment medications by numerous guidelines. However, the immunotherapy resistance restricts the immunotherapy efficacy due to the formation of tumor immunosuppressive microenvironment and tumor mutations, and immunotherapy is only effective for a small percentage of lung cancer patients. To summarize, while tumor immunotherapy is benefiting an increasing number of lung cancer patients, most of them still develop natural or acquired resistance during immunotherapy. Consequently, a crucial and urgent topic is understanding and tackling drug resistance triggered by immunotherapy in lung cancer treatment. This review will outline the presently recognized mechanisms of immunotherapy resistance and reversal strategies in lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Yi Zhang
- First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Liping Wang
- First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tan H, Torere BE, Okun S, Hinton B. Radiation-Associated Angiosarcoma as a Presentation of Disease Progression in a Patient on Immunotherapy for Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Cureus 2023; 15:e44724. [PMID: 37809227 PMCID: PMC10552933 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.44724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the dominant form of lung cancer, comprising around 85% of cases. Stage 4 NSCLC has a grim prognosis; however, immunotherapy and radiation therapy have become vital treatments for advanced-stage NSCLC, despite the risk of inducing a second primary malignancy. This case report focuses on a 45-year-old female diagnosed with NSCLC and metastasis to the 11th thoracic vertebral body. After various treatments, including radiation, a potential radiation-associated secondary malignancy, epithelial angiosarcoma, was discovered. Following treatment modification, the patient achieved complete metabolic remission, highlighting the importance of clinicians being cautious about secondary primary cancers in NSCLC patients with a history of radiation therapy. Accurate diagnosis through biopsy and continuous surveillance are essential in managing NSCLC patients effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Tan
- Hematology and Oncology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, USA
| | | | - Sherry Okun
- Pathology, North Mississippi Medical Center, Tupelo, USA
| | - Benjamin Hinton
- Radiation Oncology, North Mississippi Medical Center, Tupelo, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Singhi EK, Mott F, Worst M, Leung CH, Lee JJ, Carter B, Presley CJ, Heymach JV, Altan M. Clinical outcomes of immunotherapy continued beyond radiographic disease progression in older adult patients with advanced non‑small cell lung cancer. Oncol Lett 2023; 25:262. [PMID: 37216156 PMCID: PMC10193372 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2023.13848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy is an effective and generally well-tolerated treatment strategy for older adult patients (aged ≥70 years) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Unfortunately, most patients who receive immunotherapy eventually exhibit disease progression during treatment. The present study reports on a subset of older adult patients with advanced NSCLC who could effectively continue immunotherapy beyond radiographic disease progression due to perceived clinical benefit. Local consolidative radiotherapy may be used in select older adult patients to prolong the duration of immunotherapy they receive, with a particular consideration of their preexisting co-morbidities, performance status and tolerance of potential toxicities associated with combined modality therapy. However, prospective research is needed to determine which patients benefit most from the addition of local consolidative radiotherapy, including whether type of disease progression (i.e., sites of progression, pattern of progression) and/or extent of consolidation offered (i.e., complete or incomplete) impact clinical outcomes. Further research is also warranted to determine which patients would most benefit from the continuation of immunotherapy beyond documented radiographic disease progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric K. Singhi
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Frank Mott
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | - Cheuk Hong Leung
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - J. Jack Lee
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Brett Carter
- Department of Thoracic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Carolyn J. Presley
- Thoracic Oncology Center, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - John V. Heymach
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Mehmet Altan
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wu L, Zhang Z, Bai M, Yan Y, Yu J, Xu Y. Radiation combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors for unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: synergistic mechanisms, current state, challenges, and orientations. Cell Commun Signal 2023; 21:119. [PMID: 37221584 DOI: 10.1186/s12964-023-01139-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Until the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), definitive radiotherapy (RT) concurrently with chemotherapy was recommended for unresectable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). The trimodality paradigm with consolidation ICIs following definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy has been the standard of care since the PACIFIC trial. Preclinical evidence has demonstrated the role of RT in the cancer-immune cycle and the synergistic effect of RT combined with ICIs (iRT). However, RT exerts a double-edged effect on immunity and the combination strategy still could be optimized in many areas. In the context of LA-NSCLC, optimized RT modality, choice, timing, and duration of ICIs, care for oncogenic addicted tumors, patient selection, and novel combination strategies require further investigation. Targeting these blind spots, novel approaches are being investigated to cross the borders of PACIFIC. We discussed the development history of iRT and summarized the updated rationale for the synergistic effect. We then summarized the available research data on the efficacy and toxicity of iRT in LA-NSCLC for cross-trial comparisons to eliminate barriers. Progression during and after ICIs consolidation therapy has been regarded as a distinct resistance scenario from primary or secondary resistance to ICIs, the subsequent management of which has also been discussed. Finally, based on unmet needs, we probed into the challenges, strategies, and auspicious orientations to optimize iRT in LA-NSCLC. In this review, we focus on the underlying mechanisms and recent advances of iRT with an emphasis on future challenges and directions that warrant further investigation. Taken together, iRT is a proven and potential strategy in LA-NSCLC, with multiple promising approaches to further improve the efficacy. Video Abstract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leilei Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Zhenshan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Menglin Bai
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Yujie Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jinming Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
| | - Yaping Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jing Y, Zeng H, Cheng R, Tian P, Li Y. [Advances of Immunotherapy Resistance and Coping Strategies
in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]. ZHONGGUO FEI AI ZA ZHI = CHINESE JOURNAL OF LUNG CANCER 2023; 26:66-77. [PMID: 36792083 PMCID: PMC9987066 DOI: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2023.102.03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
Immunotherapy has significantly improved clinical outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), however, along with the popularization of immunotherapy, immune resistance has become an unavoidable problem. Immunotherapy can induce extensive cellular and molecular alterations in the tumor microenvironment. Considering the mechanisms of immune resistance are not yet fully understood and the efficacy of standard chemotherapy regimens is limited, more effective coping strategies based on resistance mechanisms are urgently needed. In this review, we intend to summarize the known mechanisms of immune resistance and feasible strategies, so as to provide a foundation for clinicians to develop more individualized and precise regimens and finally improve patients' prognosis.
.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yawan Jing
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Chengdu 610041, China.,West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Hao Zeng
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Chengdu 610041, China.,West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Ruixin Cheng
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Chengdu 610041, China.,West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Panwen Tian
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Chengdu 610041, China.,Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Yalun Li
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Chengdu 610041, China.,Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Xuzhang W, Huang H, Yu Y, Shen L, Li Z, Lu S. Treatment strategies based on different oligoprogressive patterns after immunotherapy failure in metastatic NSCLC. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2023; 15:17588359231156387. [PMID: 36895853 PMCID: PMC9989452 DOI: 10.1177/17588359231156387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Oligoprogressive disease is recognized as the overall umbrella term; however, a small number of progressions on imaging can represent different clinical scenarios. This study aims to explore the optimal treatment strategy after immunotherapy (IO) resistance in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), especially in personalized therapies for patients with different oligoprogressive patterns. Methods Based on European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer consensus, metastatic NSCLC patients with cancer progression after IO resistance were divided into four patterns, repeat oligoprogression (REO, oligoprogression with a history of oligometastatic disease), induced oligoprogression (INO, oligoprogression with a history of polymetastatic disease), de-novo polyprogression (DNP, polyprogression with a history of oligometastatic disease), and repeat polyprogression (REP, polyprogression with a history of polymetastatic disease). Patients with advanced NSCLC who received programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 inhibitors between January 2016 and July 2021 at Shanghai Chest Hospital were identified. The progression patterns and next-line progression-free survival (nPFS), overall survival (OS) were investigated stratified by treatment strategies. nPFS and OS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results A total of 500 metastatic NSCLC patients were included. Among 401 patients developed progression, 36.2% (145/401) developed oligoprogression and 63.8% (256/401) developed polyprogression. Specifically, 26.9% (108/401) patients had REO, 9.2% (37/401) patients had INO, 27.4% (110/401) patients had DNP, and 36.4% (146/401) patients had REP, respectively. The patients with REO who received local ablative therapy (LAT) had significant longer median nPFS and OS compared with no LAT group (6.8 versus 3.3 months; p = 0.0135; OS, not reached versus 24.5 months; p = 0.0337). By contrast, there were no nPFS and OS differences in INO patients who received LAT compared with no LAT group (nPFS, 3.6 versus 5.3 months; p = 0.3540; OS, 36.6 versus 45.4 months; p = 0.8659). But in INO patients, there were significant longer median nPFS and OS using IO maintenance by contrast with IO halt treatment (nPFS, 6.1 versus 4.1 months; p = 0.0264; OS, 45.4 versus 32.3 months; p = 0.0348). Conclusions LAT (radiation or surgery) is more important for patients with REO while IO maintenance plays a more dominant role in patients with INO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendi Xuzhang
- Shanghai Lung Tumor Clinical Medical Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Huayan Huang
- Shanghai Lung Tumor Clinical Medical Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yongfeng Yu
- Shanghai Lung Tumor Clinical Medical Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lan Shen
- Shanghai Lung Tumor Clinical Medical Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ziming Li
- Shanghai Lung Tumor Clinical Medical Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, West Huaihai Road 241, Shanghai 200030, China
| | - Shun Lu
- Shanghai Lung Tumor Clinical Medical Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, West Huaihai Road 241, Shanghai 200030, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jiang S, Zhang J, Chu L, Chu X, Yang X, Li Y, Guo T, Zhou Y, Xu D, Mao J, Zheng Z, An Y, Sun H, Dong H, Yu S, Ye R, Hu J, Chu Q, Ni J, Zhu Z. Atypical Response in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors: Radiographic Patterns and Clinical Value of Local Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010180. [PMID: 36612176 PMCID: PMC9818210 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore the clinical characteristics, management, and survival outcomes of advanced NSCLC patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors who presented with an atypical response (AR). METHODS A total of 926 PD-1/PD-L1-inhibitor-treated patients with metastatic NSCLC from three academic centers were retrospectively reviewed. All measurable lesions were evaluated by RECIST version 1.1. RESULTS Fifty-six (6.1%) patients developed AR. The median time to the occurrence of AR was 2.0 months. Patients with no fewer than 3 metastatic organs at baseline were more prone to develop AR in advanced NSCLC (p = 0.038). The common sites of progressive lesions were lymph nodes (33.8%) and lungs (29.7%). The majority (78.2%) of patients with AR had only 1-2 progressive tumor lesions, and most (89.1%) of the progressive lesions developed from originally existing tumor sites. There was no significance in terms of survival between patients with AR and those with typical response (TR). Local therapy was an independent predictor for PFS of patients with AR (p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS AR was not an uncommon event in patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, and it had a comparable prognosis to those with TR. Proper local therapy targeting progressive lesions without discontinuing original PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors may improve patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanshan Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Jinmeng Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Li Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Xiao Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Xi Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Yida Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Tiantian Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Yue Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Dayu Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Jiuang Mao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Zhiqin Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Yulin An
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Hua Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Huiling Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Silai Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Ruiting Ye
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Jie Hu
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Qian Chu
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430000, China
| | - Jianjiao Ni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
- Correspondence: (J.N.); (Z.Z.); Tel.: +86-137-6197-4092 (J.N.); +86-180-1731-2901 (Z.Z.); Fax: +86-216-417-5242 (J.N. & Z.Z.)
| | - Zhengfei Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
- Correspondence: (J.N.); (Z.Z.); Tel.: +86-137-6197-4092 (J.N.); +86-180-1731-2901 (Z.Z.); Fax: +86-216-417-5242 (J.N. & Z.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kuo WK, Weng CF, Lien YJ. Treatment beyond progression in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1023894. [PMID: 36465371 PMCID: PMC9713814 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1023894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 09/30/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Treatment beyond progression (TBP) is defined as treatment continuing in spite of disease progression, according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide evidence for the effects of TBP on lung cancer survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study has been conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. A systematic review of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Collaboration Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials from the inception of each database to December 2021 was conducted. Two authors independently reviewed articles for inclusion and extract data from all the retrieved articles. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software, version 3 (Biostat, Englewood, NJ, USA). Hazard ratios (HRs) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used for survival outcomes. RESULTS We identified five (15.6%) prospective randomized trials and twenty-seven (84.4%) retrospective observational studies of a total of 9,631 patients for the meta-analysis. 3,941 patients (40.9%) were in a TBP group and 5,690 patients (59.1%) were in a non-TBP group. There is a statistically significant advantage for patients who received TBP compared with those who did not in post progression progression-free survival (ppPFS), post progression overall survival (ppOS), and overall survival (OS) from initiation of drugs (ppPFS: HR, 0.746; 95% CI, 0.644-0.865; P<0.001; ppOS: HR, 0.689; 95% CI, 0.596-0.797; P<0.001; OS from initiation of drugs: HR, 0.515; 95% CI, 0.387-0.685; P<0.001). CONCLUSION This study provides further evidence in support of TBP for NSCLC, however, these results require cautious interpretation. Large, randomized, controlled trials investigating the efficacy of TBP in lung cancer treatment are warranted. SYSTEMIC REVIEW REGISTRATION https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ identifier CRD42021285147.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Ke Kuo
- Division of Respiratory Therapy and Chest Medicine, Sijhih Cathay General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Fu Weng
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hsinchu Cathay General Hospital, Hsinchu, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Yin-Ju Lien
- Department of Health Promotion and Health Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Oligoprogression of Solid Tumors on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: The Impact of Local Ablative Radiation Therapy. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10102481. [PMID: 36289743 PMCID: PMC9599608 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10102481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The breakthrough of a limited number of clones while on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), known as oligoprogression, has been previously described. The benefit of ablative radiation therapy (RT) directed at these clones, as opposed to changing systemic therapy, is unclear. We analyzed 30 patients with advanced solid tumors, the majority of whom (23/30, 86.7%) had either hepatocellular or urothelial carcinoma, who experienced oligoprogression on ICIs and were referred for RT. In this study, oligoprogression was defined as having experienced progression at three or fewer metastatic sites outside of the brain after achieving at least stable disease on ICIs for a minimum of three months. The median time to oligoprogression was 11.1 months from the initiation of immunotherapy. 24 patients had one oligoprogressive lesion and six had two. The median radiation dose delivered was 4650 cGy in a median of five fractions. The median progression-free survival (PFS) after RT was 7.1 months, and the time to oligoprogression was not a significant predictor of PFS2. 26 patients continued on ICIs after RT. While 17 patients subsequently progressed, 15 did so at three or fewer metastatic sites and could have theoretically stood to benefit from an additional course of salvage RT to further extend the lifespan of their ICIs. Overall survival at 6, 12, and 24 months was 100.0%, 96.3%, and 82.8%, respectively. These results suggest that RT may provide a PFS benefit and extend the lifespan of ICIs in patients who experience oligoprogression. Regardless of PFS, however, overall survival in this population appears to be excellent.
Collapse
|
17
|
Danesi V, Massa I, Foca F, Delmonte A, Crinò L, Bronte G, Ragonesi M, Maltoni R, Manunta S, Cravero P, Andrikou K, Priano I, Balzi W, Gentili N, Burke T, Altini M. Real-World Outcomes and Treatments Patterns Prior and after the Introduction of First-Line Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14184481. [PMID: 36139641 PMCID: PMC9497168 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14184481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The advent of immuno-oncology (IO) agents, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has changed the treatment landscape of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We performed a retro-prospective study to describe the patients’ outcomes prior to and after the local regulatory approval of pembrolizumab as a first-line (1L) treatment in the real-world setting of an Italian cancer centre. Analyses were performed of a total of 694 patients with no or unknown oncogene addicted tumour, grouped into Pre- (n = 344) and Post- (n = 350) 1L IO populations. The study provides evidence of improvements in overall survival associated with the introduction of 1L immunotherapy, suggesting that receiving immunotherapy in the first-line rather than in the second- or later lines of treatment may be more favourable. Abstract Background: This study provides insights into the treatment use and outcomes of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in a real-world setting prior to and after the availability of immuno-oncology (IO) regimens in the first line (1L). Methods: Metastatic NSCLC patients, who initiated systemic 1L anticancer treatment from 2014 to 2020, were identified from health records. Patients were grouped into Pre-1L IO and Post-1L IO, according to the availability of pembrolizumab 1L monotherapy at the date of initiating 1L systemic anticancer treatment. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes were assessed by the cohort. Overall survival (OS) and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The most common 1L treatment was platinum-based chemotherapy regimens in both groups (≥46%), followed by single-agent chemotherapy (27.0%) in Pre-1L IO and pembrolizumab (26.0%) in Post-1L IO. Median OS was 6.2 (95% CI 5.5–7.4) in Pre- and 8.9 months (95% CI 7.5–10.6) in Post-1L IO, while rwPFS was 3.7 (95% CI 3.3–4.2) and 4.7 months (95% CI 3.9–5.7), respectively. Conclusions: Even if a small proportion of patients received a 1L IO, the data showed an improved survival outcomes in the Post-1L IO group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Danesi
- Outcome Research, Healthcare Administration, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy
| | - Ilaria Massa
- Outcome Research, Healthcare Administration, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy
| | - Flavia Foca
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Angelo Delmonte
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy
| | - Lucio Crinò
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Bronte
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy
| | - Maria Ragonesi
- Nursing Service, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy
| | - Roberta Maltoni
- Outcome Research, Healthcare Administration, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy
| | - Silvia Manunta
- AULSS5, UOC Oncologia, Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia, 45100 Rovigo, Italy
| | - Paola Cravero
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy
| | - Kalliopi Andrikou
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy
| | - Ilaria Priano
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy
| | - William Balzi
- Outcome Research, Healthcare Administration, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy
| | - Nicola Gentili
- Outcome Research, Healthcare Administration, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy
| | - Thomas Burke
- Center for Observational and Real World Evidence, Merck & Co Inc., Kenilworth, NJ 07033, USA
| | - Mattia Altini
- Healthcare Administration, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale della Romagna, 48121 Ravenna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Schoenfeld AJ, Rizvi HA, Memon D, Shaverdian N, Bott MJ, Sauter JL, Tsai CJ, Lihm J, Hoyos D, Plodkowski AJ, Perez-Johnston R, Sawan P, Egger JV, Greenbaum BD, Rimner A, Riely GJ, Rudin CM, Rusch VW, Gomez DR, Hellmann MD. Systemic and Oligo-Acquired Resistance to PD-(L)1 Blockade in Lung Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:3797-3803. [PMID: 35767426 PMCID: PMC10448606 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-0657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical patterns and the associated optimal management of acquired resistance to PD-(L)1 blockade are poorly understood. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN All cases of metastatic lung cancer treated with PD-(L)1 blockade at Memorial Sloan Kettering were reviewed. In acquired resistance (complete/partial response per RECIST, followed by progression), clinical patterns were distinguished as oligo (OligoAR ≤ 3 lesions of disease progression) or systemic (sAR). We analyzed the relationships between patient characteristics, burden/location of disease, outcomes, and efficacy of therapeutic interventions. RESULTS Of 1,536 patients, 312 (20%) had an initial response and 143 developed AR (9% overall, 46% of responders). OligoAR was the most common pattern (80/143, 56%). Baseline tumor mutational burden, depth of response, and duration of response were significantly increased in oligoAR compared with sAR (P < 0.001, P = 0.03, P = 0.04, respectively), whereas baseline PD-L1 and tumor burden were similar. Post-progression, oligoAR was associated with improved overall survival (median 28 months vs. 10 months, P < 0.001) compared with sAR. Within oligoAR, post-progression survival was greater among patients treated with locally-directed therapy (e.g., radiation, surgery; HR, 0.41; P = 0.039). Fifty-eight percent of patients with oligoAR treated with locally-directed therapy alone are progression-free at last follow-up (median 16 months), including 13 patients who are progression-free more than 2 years after local therapy. CONCLUSIONS OligoAR is a common and distinct pattern of acquired resistance to PD-(L)1 blockade compared with sAR. OligoAR is associated with improved post-progression survival and some cases can be effectively managed with local therapies with durable benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam J. Schoenfeld
- Thoracic Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hira A. Rizvi
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Danish Memon
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, UK
| | - Narek Shaverdian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew J. Bott
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer L. Sauter
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - C. Jillian Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jayon Lihm
- Department of Epidemiology-Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David Hoyos
- Department of Epidemiology-Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew J. Plodkowski
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rocio Perez-Johnston
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter Sawan
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jacklynn V. Egger
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Benjamin D. Greenbaum
- Department of Epidemiology-Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gregory J. Riely
- Thoracic Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charles M. Rudin
- Thoracic Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Valerie W. Rusch
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel R. Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew D. Hellmann
- Thoracic Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Czarnecka AM, Sobczuk P, Rogala P, Świtaj T, Placzke J, Kozak K, Mariuk-Jarema A, Spałek M, Dudzisz-Śledź M, Teterycz P, Borkowska A, Rutkowski P. Efficacy of immunotherapy beyond RECIST progression in advanced melanoma: a real-world evidence. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2022; 71:1949-1958. [PMID: 35075516 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-021-03132-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Immunotherapy (ITH) holds the possibility of tumor burden decrease after initial RECIST 1.1 defined progression. The clinical concept of treating selected patients (pts) beyond disease progression (PD) is supported by so-called pseudoprogression phenomenon. The aim of this study was to evaluate real-life practice and outcomes related to treatment beyond (RECIST) progression (TBP) in advanced melanoma patients. Of 584 subsequent melanoma pts analyzed 77 (13.2%) received TBP. In this cohort, the median time to first PD (TTFP) was 5.29 months (m), while time to second PD (TTSP)-8.02 m. On TBP 23.4% pts achieved an objective response (OR), and next 42.9%-stabilization of the disease (SD). 1st PD was reported most often as the development of a new lesion or increase (> 20%) of the diameter of three or more targets. In about 50% second PD was observed as an increase in the diameter of different targets that in 1st PD. Multimodal treatment resulted in 9.82 m TTSP, while ITH alone-4.93 m (p = 0.128). An oligoprogressive pattern of first PD was associated with longer TTSP (HR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.32-0.94). Median OS after first PD was 28.75 months and correlated with OR during TBP (HR 0.18, 95% CI: 0.004-0.76). Selected clinically fit melanoma patients, despite evidence of first radiographic progression, may benefit from continued treatment with PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors, but the findings should be validated in larger prospective trials. Multidisciplinary treatment should be offered to advanced melanoma patients, including radiosurgery or stereotactic radiotherapy of single loci progressing during immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Małgorzata Czarnecka
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 5 W.K. Roentgena Street, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland. .,Department of Experimental Pharmacology, Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Paweł Sobczuk
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 5 W.K. Roentgena Street, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Physiology, Laboratory of Centre for Preclinical Research, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Paweł Rogala
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 5 W.K. Roentgena Street, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Tomasz Świtaj
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 5 W.K. Roentgena Street, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Joanna Placzke
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 5 W.K. Roentgena Street, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Kozak
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 5 W.K. Roentgena Street, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Anna Mariuk-Jarema
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 5 W.K. Roentgena Street, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Mateusz Spałek
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 5 W.K. Roentgena Street, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Monika Dudzisz-Śledź
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 5 W.K. Roentgena Street, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Paweł Teterycz
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 5 W.K. Roentgena Street, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland.,Departament of Computional Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Aneta Borkowska
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 5 W.K. Roentgena Street, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 5 W.K. Roentgena Street, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|