1
|
Cimino S, Tambelli R, Genova F, Agostini F, Trombini E, Cerniglia L. Psychopathological risk stability and change in a sample of mothers and preschool children before, during and after the peak of COVID-19 pandemic. Stress Health 2024; 40:e3355. [PMID: 38059671 DOI: 10.1002/smi.3355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
Numerous studies have found that the COVID-19 epidemic and the measures to stop it have had a substantial impact on the mental health of the general population. Nevertheless, the majority of this research only looked at the variations in the degree of psychopathological symptoms in individuals before and after the first wave of the pandemic. In a sample of N = 380 preschoolers and their mothers assessed through the Symptom Check-List/90-R and of the Child Behaviour Check-List, the present study aimed at exploring psychopathological risk in mothers and their offspring's dysregulation levels before (T1), during (T2) and after (T3) the peak of COVID-19 pandemic. Our main results showed that mothers' relational distress increased from T1 to T2 and then increased again from T2 to T3. Moreover, maternal aggressiveness, hostility, and anxiety scores significantly decreased from T1 to T2 but slightly increased from T2 to T3. In children, dysregulation levels increased from T1 to T2 but decreased from T2 to T3. Children of mothers with clinical scores at the SCL-90/R showed significantly higher dysregulation problems at T1, T2 and T3 than children of mothers with scores below the clinical threshold. This study adds to previous literature in that it evaluates stability or change in maternal and offspring scores not only in the pre-pandemic period and during the first wave of the pandemic, but it also considers the subsequent months, focusing on a broad range of maternal symptoms, rather than assessing depressive and anxiety symptoms as most of previous research did.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Cimino
- Department of Dynamic, Clinical Psychology and Health Studies, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - R Tambelli
- Department of Dynamic, Clinical Psychology and Health Studies, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - F Genova
- Department of Human Sciences, European University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - L Cerniglia
- Faculty of Psychology, International Telematic University Uninettuno, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pozza A, Ragucci F, Angelo NL, Pugi D, Cuomo A, Garcia-Hernandez MD, Rosa-Alcazar AI, Fagiolini A, Starcevic V. Worldwide prevalence of obsessive-compulsive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychiatr Res 2024; 172:360-381. [PMID: 38452635 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.02.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic governments worldwide implemented contagion-containing measures (i.e., physical distancing, hand sanitizing, mask wearing and quarantine). The similarities between these measures and obsessive-compulsive phenomenology (e.g., contamination concerns and repetitive washing and/or checking) led to inquiries about the frequency with which obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) were encountered during the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to ascertain the prevalence of OCS in individuals of any age during the pandemic (i.e., any obsessive-compulsive symptoms that are clinically significant as shown by a score above the cut-off score of a scale, without necessarily fulfilling the diagnostic threshold for a diagnosis of OCD). A systematic search of relevant databases identified 35 studies, which were included in the systematic review following our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Most of the studies were conducted in adults from the general population and adopted an online assessment method, with 32 studies being eligible for meta-analysis. The meta-analysis resulted in a 20% average prevalence of OCS during the pandemic, with very high heterogeneity among the included studies (I2 99.6%). The highest prevalence of OCS was found in pregnant women (36%, n = 5), followed by individuals diagnosed with COVID-19 (22%, n = 4) and general population (22%, n = 19), undergraduates (21%, n = 5), and healthcare workers (5%, n = 5). The prevalence rates of OCS were higher in Asia (26%, n = 17) and North America (25%, n = 3) than in Europe (13%, n = 12) and Africa (7%, n = 4). Among the studies included, rates appeared higher in certain countries, though this difference did not reach statistical significance and was limited by very few studies conducted in certain countries. When compared to pre-pandemic rates, there seemed to be higher rates of OCS during the COVID-19 pandemic in Asia, Europe, and pregnant women. These findings are discussed considering the impact of the pandemic and contagion-containing measures on the perception and reporting of OCS, and susceptibility of the vulnerable population groups to experiencing OCS during the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Pozza
- Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Psychology Unit, Department of Mental Health, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy.
| | - Federica Ragucci
- Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Nicole Loren Angelo
- Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Daniele Pugi
- Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Alessandro Cuomo
- Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, Division of Psychiatry, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Psychiatry Unit, Department of Mental Health, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
| | | | - Ana Isabel Rosa-Alcazar
- Department of Personality, Assessment & Psychological Treatment, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Andrea Fagiolini
- Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, Division of Psychiatry, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Psychiatry Unit, Department of Mental Health, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
| | - Vladan Starcevic
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, Nepean Clinical School, University of Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jelinek L, Göritz AS, Miegel F, Schuurmans L, Moritz S, Yassari AH, Müller JC. Too much of a good thing? Hand hygiene and the long-term course of contamination-related obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Front Psychol 2024; 15:1279639. [PMID: 38524298 PMCID: PMC10959097 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1279639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Increased hygiene behavior may be a factor in the development of contamination-related obsessive-compulsive symptoms (C-OCS). We aimed at investigating (1) the course of C-OCS over 1 year after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and (2) the effects of changes in hand hygiene (i.e., duration and frequency of handwashing) and related distress regulation on the long-term course of C-OCS. In a longitudinal study, we assessed 1,220 individuals from the German general population at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic (t1), 3 months later (t2), and 12 months later (t3). Pre-pandemic data were available in a subsample from 2014 (n = 430). A decrease in C-OCS over the first year of the pandemic emerged with a small effect size. Thirty-six percent of the participants scored above the clinical cut-off score at t1, 31% at t2, and 27% at t3. In 2014, only 11% scored above the clinical cut-off score. Hierarchical regression showed that C-OCS at t1 was the strongest predictor of a long-term increase in C-OCS. With small effect sizes, change in the duration (not frequency) of handwashing from t1 to t2, as well as the distress-reducing effect of handwashing served as additional predictors. Implications for information on hand hygiene guidelines are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Jelinek
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anja S. Göritz
- Behavioral Health Technology, University Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Franziska Miegel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lea Schuurmans
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Steffen Moritz
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Amir H. Yassari
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jana Christina Müller
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schneider PS, Pantis M, Preiser C, Hagmann D, Barth GM, Renner TJ, Allgaier K. SARS-CoV-2 and Adolescent Psychiatric Emergencies at the Tübingen University Hospital: Analyzing Trends, Diagnoses, and Contributing Factors. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2024; 21:216. [PMID: 38397705 PMCID: PMC10888620 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21020216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
Psychiatric emergencies have increased in recent decades, particularly with the onset of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, and far too little is known about the backgrounds of these emergencies. In this study, we investigated the extent to which the number of psychiatric emergencies changed during and in the aftermath of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic at the Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (CAP) Tübingen. We considered age and psychiatric diagnoses. Additionally, we evaluated the backgrounds of the emergencies. We applied a mixed- (quantitative and qualitative) methods approach to data on emergency presentations at the CAP Tübingen from the pre-SARS-CoV-2 pandemic period (October 2019-January 2020) to Restriction Phase 1 (October 2020-January 2021), Restriction Phase 2 (October 2021-January 2022), and endemic phase (October 2022-January 2023). The total number of emergencies and those with eating disorders and affective disorders increased, while obsessive-compulsive disorders, expansive disorders and anxiety disorders decreased. The patients presenting in the pre-SARS-CoV-2 pandemic period were younger than those in the subsequent periods. We content-coded the reasons behind the emergency presentations. We also identified four areas of stressors and personality characteristics associated with the emergency presentations. In light of the increasing number of psychiatric emergencies, the long-term aim should be to meet the growing demands and create options for prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priska S. Schneider
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (M.P.); (G.M.B.); (T.J.R.); (K.A.)
- German Center for Mental Health (DZPG) Partner Site, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Michelle Pantis
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (M.P.); (G.M.B.); (T.J.R.); (K.A.)
- German Center for Mental Health (DZPG) Partner Site, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christine Preiser
- Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital, 72074 Tübingen, Germany;
- Centre for Public Health and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tübingen, 72016 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniela Hagmann
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (M.P.); (G.M.B.); (T.J.R.); (K.A.)
- German Center for Mental Health (DZPG) Partner Site, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Gottfried M. Barth
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (M.P.); (G.M.B.); (T.J.R.); (K.A.)
- German Center for Mental Health (DZPG) Partner Site, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Tobias J. Renner
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (M.P.); (G.M.B.); (T.J.R.); (K.A.)
- German Center for Mental Health (DZPG) Partner Site, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
- LEAD Graduate School and Research Network, University Tübingen, 72072 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Katharina Allgaier
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (M.P.); (G.M.B.); (T.J.R.); (K.A.)
- German Center for Mental Health (DZPG) Partner Site, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
- LEAD Graduate School and Research Network, University Tübingen, 72072 Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Salmani B, Hasani J, Zanjani Z, Gholami-Fesharaki M. Two Years after the Beginning of COVID-19: Comparing Families Who Had or Did not Have Patients with COVID-19 on Health Beliefs and Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 2023; 18:429-442. [PMID: 37881416 PMCID: PMC10593991 DOI: 10.18502/ijps.v18i4.13630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Revised: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare health beliefs and obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) in families with (FIM+) or without an infected member (FIM-) two years after the beginning of COVID-19. Additionally, this research intended to predict a decrease in OCS from baseline (T1) to 40 days later (T2) based on health beliefs. Method : In a longitudinal survey, 227 participants in two groups, including FIM+ (n = 98; M = 30.44; SD = 5.39) and FIM- (n = 129; M = 29.24; SD = 4.93), were selected through purposive sampling. They responded to measurements consisting of demographic characteristics, the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and COVID-19 Health Belief Questionnaire (COVID-19-HBQ) at the final assessment phase (T2). To investigate differences between the two groups and predict OCS changes from T1 to T2, data were analyzed using Chi-squared, t-tests, U-Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, Pearson correlations, and linear regression analyses. Results: At T1, FIM+ demonstrated significantly greater OCS, health beliefs, posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTS), and depressive symptoms than FIM-. Furthermore, FIM+ showed a decrease in OCS from T1 to T2 after its infected member recovered from COVID-19 (P < 0.001). A decrease in OCS was correlated with a decrease in perceived susceptibility, severity, and barriers. Lack of a vulnerable family member, lower educational attainment, and being a primary caregiver were associated with a greater decrease in OCS. Changes in perceived severity and self-efficacy accounted for 17% of variation in OCS. Conclusion: Even two years after the onset of the pandemic, COVID-19 not only impacts the life of patients with COVID-19 but family members who care for such patients respond to the disease by engaging in excessive health behaviors in the form of OCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Behzad Salmani
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Jafar Hasani
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Zahra Zanjani
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jayakumar A, Sanchez-Cerezo J, Khayam A, Spreeuwenberg B, Hodes M. Life-threatening obsessive-compulsive disorder precipitated by the COVID-19 pandemic in an adolescent. BJPsych Bull 2023; 47:280-286. [PMID: 35747939 PMCID: PMC10764884 DOI: 10.1192/bjb.2022.32] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic starting in 2020 has had massive mental health consequences worldwide. It has caused generalised fear and anxiety about catching, spreading and suffering from the virus. This article describes a fictionalised patient's presentation of life-threatening obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) associated with fears of catching COVID-19. The fears resulted in refusal to eat and drink, with subsequent weight loss that required paediatric admission. The scenario portrays the association between COVID-19 and life-threatening OCD symptoms and goes on to illustrate the patient's good response to standard OCD treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Afshan Khayam
- Enfield Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services, UK
| | | | - Matthew Hodes
- Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, UK
- Imperial College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pugi D, Angelo NL, Ragucci F, Garcia-Hernandez MD, Rosa-Alcázar AI, Pozza A. Longitudinal Course of Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review of Three Years of Prospective Cohort Studies. CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHIATRY 2023; 20:293-308. [PMID: 37791089 PMCID: PMC10544256 DOI: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20230409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
Objective During the pandemic, there has been a slight increase in obsessive-compulsive symptoms in both clinical and non-clinical samples. Three years after the pandemic, we conducted the first systematic review of prospective cohort studies assessing temporal changes in obsessive-compulsive symptoms and their extent in both patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and community samples, regardless of age or socio-cultural background, during any phase of the pandemic. Method Prospective cohort studies were included if validated self-report questionnaires or standardized interviews for obsessive-compulsive symptoms were used. Studies that enrolled OCD patients were included if OCD was diagnosed before the outbreak of the pandemic. The following were our exclusion criteria: cross-sectional and case-control studies, single case studies, editorials, commentaries, and reviews. Studies assessing the effectiveness of an intervention were excluded. Results 15 studies were included. Overall, studies showed a small upsurge in obsessive-compulsive symptoms, especially washing/contamination symptoms, during the coronavirus outbreak. The severity of symptoms seemed to follow the pattern of restriction measures and the increase in the number of COVID-19 cases. Conclusions Factors contributing to the worsening of obsessive-compulsive symptoms during the pandemic were discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Pugi
- Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, viale Mario Bracci 16 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Nicole Loren Angelo
- Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, viale Mario Bracci 16 53100 Siena, Italy
| | | | - Maria Dolores Garcia-Hernandez
- Department Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment, Faculty of Psychology, University of Murcia, Espinardo Campus, 30100-Murcia, Spain
| | - Ana Isabel Rosa-Alcázar
- Department Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment, Faculty of Psychology, University of Murcia, Espinardo Campus, 30100-Murcia, Spain
| | - Andrea Pozza
- Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, viale Mario Bracci 16 53100 Siena, Italy
- Department of Mental Health, Psychology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, viale Mario Bracci 16 53100 Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
González-Roz A, Haik AK, Rahman L, Todi AA, Kane C, Walji A, Dickerman SR, Scarfe M, Levitt EE, Belisario K, Kelly JF, MacKillop J. Impacts of the COVID-19 public health restrictions on substance use, mental health, and psychosocial functioning among individuals with alcohol use disorder. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE 2022; 48:712-723. [PMID: 36417589 DOI: 10.1080/00952990.2022.2134021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with major psychosocial disruptions and there is particular concern for individuals with substance use disorders.Objectives: This study characterized the psychosocial and experiential impacts of the pandemic on individuals seeking alcohol use disorder (AUD) recovery, including pandemic impacts on self-reported drinking, heavy drinking, tobacco, cannabis, and stimulant use.Methods: Participants were 125 AUD+ individuals (% males: 57.60; Mage = 49.11, SD = 12.13) reporting on substance use from January 1st-24th March, 2020 (pre-pandemic) and since the stay-at-home orders commenced, 24th March-June 28th 2020 (intra-pandemic). Within-subjects changes were examined and a latent profile analysis was performed to identify subgroups differentially impacted by the pandemic.Results: Large proportions reported psychosocial impacts of COVID-19, but drinking and other substance use did not reveal significant changes. Latent profile analyses revealed two subgroups: Profile 1 (n = 41/125), "Moderately Impacted") and Profile 2 (n = 84/125), "Severely Impacted"). Compared to the pre-pandemic period, the group that was moderately impacted by the pandemic exhibited significantly fewer heavy drinking days (p = .02) during the intra-pandemic period, but no other substance use changes. The group showing severe pandemic impacts did not exhibit changes in alcohol or other drug use but evidenced more severe anxiety and depression (ps < .001).Conclusions: We found heterogeneous subtypes of pandemic-related impacts in AUD recovery patients. There is need to provide psychosocial support to this particular population and further monitoring substance use and mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alba González-Roz
- Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Addictive Behaviors Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Amanda K Haik
- Recovery Research Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Liah Rahman
- Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Akshiti A Todi
- Recovery Research Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Claire Kane
- Recovery Research Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alyna Walji
- Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah R Dickerman
- Recovery Research Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Molly Scarfe
- Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emily E Levitt
- Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kyla Belisario
- Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - John F Kelly
- Recovery Research Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, Boston, MA, USA
| | - James MacKillop
- Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Grøtte T, Hagen K, Eid J, Kvale G, le Hellard S, Solem S. Changes in contamination-related obsessions and compulsions during the COVID-19 pandemic: A Norwegian longitudinal study. J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord 2022; 35:100758. [PMID: 36276590 PMCID: PMC9578966 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2022.100758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic have been associated with increasing obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS), but less is known regarding these symptoms' long-term trajectories. The aim of this study was to examine changes in contamination-related OCS in the Norwegian public during early and late stages of the pandemic, as well as characteristics that might be associated with these changes. METHODS In a longitudinal online survey, 12 580 participants completed self-report questionnaires in April 2020, including a retrospective assessment of contamination-related OCS severity (DOCS-SF) prior to COVID-19. In December 2020, 3405 (27.1%) of the participants completed the survey again. RESULTS In April, participants retrospectively recalled that their contamination-related OCS were lower prior to COVID-19 (d = 1.09). From April to December, symptoms slightly decreased (d = -0.16). The proportion of participants scoring above the clinical cut-off on DOCS-SF (≥16) changed accordingly from 2.4% pre-COVID to 27.8% in April and 24.0% in December. Previous severity of contamination-related OCS and symptoms of distress related to COVID-19 were the most powerful predictors of contamination-related OCS severity during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS Elevated levels of contamination-related OCS were detected at both early and late stages of the pandemic, but the long-term symptom trend seems to be slightly declining.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torun Grøtte
- Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
| | - Kristen Hagen
- Bergen Center for Brain Plasticity, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway
- Molde Hospital, Møre og Romsdal Hospital Trust, Norway
- Department of Mental Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
| | - Jarle Eid
- Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
- Center for Crisis Psychology, University of Bergen, Norway
| | - Gerd Kvale
- Bergen Center for Brain Plasticity, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway
- Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Bergen, Norway
| | - Stephanie le Hellard
- Bergen Center for Brain Plasticity, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway
- NORMENT, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Norway
- Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway
| | - Stian Solem
- Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
- Bergen Center for Brain Plasticity, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
First vs second wave of COVID-19 pandemic in patients with obsessive compulsive disorder: A multicentre report from tertiary clinics in Northern Italy. J Psychiatr Res 2022; 154:293-299. [PMID: 35964348 PMCID: PMC9353706 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.07.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Revised: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Among patients with mental illness, those with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) showed a significant clinical worsening by the COVID-19 pandemic. The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on OCD have been shown to worsen symptoms severity, with serious clinical consequences. However, the persistence of COVID-19 pandemic in OCD patients has been poorly investigated. The purpose of the present study was to assess the impact of the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in a sample of OCD patients and to compare the results with those obtained during the first wave on the same OCD sample. METHODS 116 OCD outpatients attending three OCD tertiary clinics in Northern Italy and previously included in a report on the impact of COVID-19, were followed-up in order to investigate sociodemographic and clinical features. Appropriate statistical analyses for categorical and continuous variables were conducted. RESULTS The 43 OCD patients with a clinical worsening (OW) reported a significant development of new obsessions/compulsions and the recurrence of past OC symptoms, higher rates of psychiatric comorbidities and sleep disturbances compared to patients without symptom worsening. Moreover, an increase in avoidance behaviors, suicidal ideation, Internet checking for reassurance, and job difficulties emerged in OW patients. Also, lower rates of pharmacological stability, and higher rates of therapy adjustment were observed. In terms of sex differences, males showed higher rates of past obsessions occurrence, while females showed a rise in Internet checking behaviors. When comparing OW patients between the first and the second wave, the latter showed significantly higher rates of past obsession occurrence and lower rates of pharmacological stability. Moreover, patients with OW showed a significantly older age during the second wave. CONCLUSION The persistence of the COVID-19 pandemic showed a globally impaired clinical picture in the analyzed OCD sample. A further worsening between the two waves timepoints emerged, mainly involving older patients with OCD. The concordance between our results and those existing in literature highlights the importance of an accurate long-term monitoring of OCD patients in light of COVID-19 pandemic persistence.
Collapse
|
11
|
Tulacı RG, Tulacı ÖD, Dolapoğlu N. Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder During the Initial Stage of COVID-19 Pandemic: Effect of Contamination Symptoms and Poor Insight on Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Exacerbation. J Nerv Ment Dis 2022; 210:570-576. [PMID: 35900776 PMCID: PMC9351510 DOI: 10.1097/nmd.0000000000001511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT We aimed to investigate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the symptom severity and dimensions of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and how patients with different levels of insight have been impacted by the pandemic. This study included 58 patients with OCD. The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS)-Obsession, Y-BOCS-Compulsion, and Y-BOCS-Total scores during the pandemic were significantly higher than the prepandemic scores (p = 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.002, respectively). Compared with the pre-COVID-19 period, severity of OCD symptoms increased in 39.7% patients, remained the same in 44.8% patients, and reduced in 15.5% patients during the pandemic. The obsession with contamination, Brown Assessment of Beliefs Scale (for insight assessment) score, and time spent following the news/data about COVID-19 were significantly associated with an increase in OCD severity. In patients with contamination obsessions as well as poor insight, close monitoring and facilitating access to treatment may reduce the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rıza Gökçer Tulacı
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Health Sciences, Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Research and Training Hospital, Ankara
| | - Özge Demircan Tulacı
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Balıkesir Atatürk Research and Training Hospital, Balıkesir
| | - Nazan Dolapoğlu
- Department of Psychiatry, Balikesir University Faculty of Medicine, Balikesir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
The COVID-19 Pandemic and Adolescents’ Psychological Distress: A Multinational Cross-Sectional Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19148261. [PMID: 35886118 PMCID: PMC9317312 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19148261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has continued for more than two years, and the impact of this pandemic on mental health has become one of the most important research topics in psychiatry and psychology. The aim of the present study was to assess psychological distress in adolescents across five countries (Sweden, Morocco, Serbia, Vietnam, and the United States of America) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Using nonparametric analyses we examined the impact of COVID-19 on distress, measured by the Brief Symptom Inventory, in a sample of 4670 adolescents. Results: Our results showed that the association between the COVID-19 impact and psychological distress in adolescents’ lives was positive and moderate in Morocco and Serbia, positive and weak in Vietnam and the United States of America, and negative and weak in Sweden. We also found that female adolescents reported higher distress levels than male adolescents. Conclusions: COVID-19 impacted adolescents and their psychological distress differently depending on their residence.
Collapse
|
13
|
Demaria F, Pontillo M, Di Vincenzo C, Di Luzio M, Vicari S. Hand Washing: When Ritual Behavior Protects! Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms in Young People during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Narrative Review. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11113191. [PMID: 35683574 PMCID: PMC9181440 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11113191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had a profound impact on the lifestyles and mental health of young people. It has been hypothesized that the focus on hygiene and the fear of contamination/infection during the pandemic may have exacerbated obsessive–compulsive (OC) symptoms in this population. OC symptoms are widespread in the general population, with varying degrees of intensity. At their most extreme, they manifest in obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), which is characterized by obsessive thoughts and compulsive behaviors. The present narrative review aimed at evaluating the relationship between the COVID-19 pandemic and OCD and OC symptoms in young people, especially children and adolescents with and without OCD, focusing on vulnerability and risk factors and the impact of lockdown measures. Of the six studies identified, four examined clinical samples diagnosed with OCD and two looked at community-based adolescent samples. Five of the six studies found that OC symptoms increased during the pandemic. Additionally, vulnerability to anxiety may constitute a risk condition and the lockdown measures and personal stressful life events can constitute potential triggers of OC symptoms, while ongoing treatment for OCD had a protective effect. The results suggest that, during the COVID-19 pandemic, obsessive and compulsive behavior (e.g., hand washing) in young people at the greatest risk should be monitored, and the intervention of mental health services should be maintained. More research is needed in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Demaria
- Child and Adolescence Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Neuroscience, IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, 00165 Rome, Italy; (M.P.); (C.D.V.); (M.D.L.); (S.V.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-06-6859-2735; Fax: +39-06-6859-2450
| | - Maria Pontillo
- Child and Adolescence Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Neuroscience, IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, 00165 Rome, Italy; (M.P.); (C.D.V.); (M.D.L.); (S.V.)
| | - Cristina Di Vincenzo
- Child and Adolescence Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Neuroscience, IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, 00165 Rome, Italy; (M.P.); (C.D.V.); (M.D.L.); (S.V.)
| | - Michelangelo Di Luzio
- Child and Adolescence Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Neuroscience, IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, 00165 Rome, Italy; (M.P.); (C.D.V.); (M.D.L.); (S.V.)
| | - Stefano Vicari
- Child and Adolescence Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Neuroscience, IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, 00165 Rome, Italy; (M.P.); (C.D.V.); (M.D.L.); (S.V.)
- Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the development of anxiety disorders - a literature review. CURRENT PROBLEMS OF PSYCHIATRY 2022. [DOI: 10.2478/cpp-2021-0024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: The COVID-19 is a disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. A number of psychological symptoms have been identified in people living during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most of them are associated with widely understood anxiety disorders, which have always been a significant problem for mental health.
Materials and methods: The available literature was reviewed on the Pubmed platform and from other sources. The analysis included original studies, reviews, meta-analyzes and internet sources. The aim of the study was to review the literature on the relationship between the COVID-19 pandemic and the occurrence and severity of symptoms of anxiety disorders.
Results: The studies conducted so far show that the COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the mental state of people around the world, especially in the area of anxiety disorders. Many studies indicate an increase in the prevalence of symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder. Research also indicates a greater incidence of post-traumatic stress disorder and panic disorder in society. Symptoms of somatization were also quite often observed in patients. However, the state of published studies indicates that the pandemic did not significantly affect the severity of symptoms associated with social phobia. In the context of phobic disorders, a new type has been formulated: COVID-19-related phobia.
Conclusions: The conducted literature review shows that the current COVID-19 pandemic is associated with an increase in the prevalence of symptoms of anxiety disorders in the general population. The multifaceted nature of the issue of anxiety disorders in the COVID-19 pandemic clearly indicates the need to continue research in this area.
Collapse
|
15
|
Carvalho S, Coelho CG, Kluwe-Schiavon B, Magalhães J, Leite J. The Acute Impact of the Early Stages of COVID-19 Pandemic in People with Pre-Existing Psychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19095140. [PMID: 35564538 PMCID: PMC9104538 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19095140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 04/09/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
People with pre-pandemic health conditions are more vulnerable and more likely to suffer greater psychosocial impact due to the current COVID-19 pandemic and the lockdown measures. Thus, the objective of this work was to systematically review the impact of the early stages COVID-19 pandemic on people with pre-existing psychiatric disorders. The search was performed between 23 January and 2 September 2021 in PubMed, PsycINFO, and EMBASE. A total of 4167 published results were identified; however, only 49 were included in this review. Results show that there was considerable heterogeneity among studies, which resulted in a low consensus. However, it seems that the impact of the first stage of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychiatric disorders was two-fold: (1) an overall effect, in which people suffering from psychiatric disorders in general experienced more psychological distress and anxiety when compared to people who had no psychiatric diagnosis, and (2) a condition-specific effect, namely in people suffering from eating disorders and obsessive compulsive disorders. Moreover, the current work highlights that there were also some external factors that were related to worsening symptoms. For instance, unemployment or experiencing work and financial difficulties can be a trigger for greater distress during the pandemic for people with mood disorders, and being alone and in social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic may actually increase substance use and relapse rates. Further studies are needed to prospectively investigate the long-term effects of the current COVID-19 pandemic on people with (pre)-existing psychiatric conditions and on the onset or deterioration of psychiatric-related symptoms in a larger number of participants, as well as exploring the long-term effects of the current pandemic on mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Carvalho
- Translational Neuropsychology Laboratory, William James Center for Research, Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
- Correspondence:
| | - Catarina G. Coelho
- Psychological Neuroscience Laboratory, CIPsi, School of Psychology, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal; (C.G.C.); (B.K.-S.); (J.M.)
| | - Bruno Kluwe-Schiavon
- Psychological Neuroscience Laboratory, CIPsi, School of Psychology, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal; (C.G.C.); (B.K.-S.); (J.M.)
| | - Juliana Magalhães
- Psychological Neuroscience Laboratory, CIPsi, School of Psychology, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal; (C.G.C.); (B.K.-S.); (J.M.)
| | - Jorge Leite
- Portucalense Institute for Human Development (INPP), Portucalense University, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal;
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dubey S, Dubey MJ, Ghosh R, Mitchell AJ, Chatterjee S, Das S, Pandit A, Ray BK, Das G, Benito-León J. The cognitive basis of psychosocial impact in COVID-19 pandemic. Does it encircle the default mode network of the brain? A pragmatic proposal. MEDICAL RESEARCH ARCHIVES 2022; 10:10.18103/mra.v10i3.2707. [PMID: 35530572 PMCID: PMC9071110 DOI: 10.18103/mra.v10i3.2707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Epigenetics, hypothalamic-pituitary axes, environmental and metabolic influences, and transgenerational plasticity govern social behavior. Cognitive research considers the brain's default mode network (DMN) as a central hub that integrates various cognitive and social processing domains responsible for emotion perception, empathy, theory of mind, and morality. Hence, DMN is regarded as the "social brain." Upsurge in social turmoil, social anxiety, panic, depression, post-traumatic stress, hoarding, herd behavior, substance and behavioral addictions, sexual abuse, and violence in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic are intricately related to personality traits resulting in disruptive social cognition and social behavior, conceptualized as the result of unsettling and disruption of the functional nexus of the DMN. Considering overt and conspicuous display of neuroticism during the current pandemic, its impact upon modulation of the DMN functional nexus and the DMN itself, and the potential to presage cognitive impairment in the future, the authors caution that an increase in the global burden of dementia may be one of the long-term ramifications of COVID-19. Social behavior, a functional derivative of the DMN, can strikingly affect the functional nexus of DMN and the DMN itself, in a centripetal way via the phenomenon called "Experience-Dependent Plasticity," with long-term consequences. In this review, we intend to 1) decipher the association between social cognition and social behavior with the DMN, in time of COVID-19; and to 2) discuss the prospective aftermath of disrupted social behavior during the pandemic on modulation/alteration of functional connectomes of DMN or the DMN itself in the time ahead.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Souvik Dubey
- Department of Neuromedicine, Bangur Institute of Neurosciences, Kolkata, India
| | - Mahua Jana Dubey
- Department of Psychiatry, Berhampore Mental Hospital, Murshidabad, India
| | - Ritwik Ghosh
- Department of General Medicine, Burdwan Medical College & Hospital, Burdwan, West Bengal, India
| | - Alex J Mitchell
- University Hospitals of Leicester, University of Leicester, Leicester, U.K
| | - Subhankar Chatterjee
- Department of Medicine, RG Kar Medical College, and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Shambaditya Das
- Department of Neuromedicine, Bangur Institute of Neurosciences, Kolkata, India
| | - Alak Pandit
- Department of Neuromedicine, Bangur Institute of Neurosciences, Kolkata, India
| | - Biman Kanti Ray
- Department of Neuromedicine, Bangur Institute of Neurosciences, Kolkata, India
| | - Gautam Das
- Department of Neuromedicine, Bangur Institute of Neurosciences, Kolkata, India
| | - Julián Benito-León
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital "12 de Octubre", Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Grant JE, Drummond L, Nicholson TR, Fagan H, Baldwin DS, Fineberg NA, Chamberlain SR. Obsessive-compulsive symptoms and the Covid-19 pandemic: A rapid scoping review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2022; 132:1086-1098. [PMID: 34740755 PMCID: PMC8570941 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.10.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been much speculation about untoward effects of the Covid-19 pandemic on psychological symptoms. OCD may be expected to be especially impacted. Our aim was to distil the current evidence base on relationships between the pandemic and obsessive-compulsive symptoms, in patients, and general population samples. METHODS We conducted a rapid scoping review, in the form of a systematic literature search, coupled with narrative review. 32 relevant papers were identified. RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION (1) A sizable proportion of people with OCD (but not all) experienced/reported symptom worsening during the pandemic, especially during initial restrictions (approximately 20-65 % of cases in longitudinal studies); (2) contamination/washing symptoms appeared particularly susceptible; and (3) OCD symptoms in general population samples were associated with trait compulsivity and pandemic-related-stress. The literature was heterogeneous with various methodological issues being commonplace. FUTURE DIRECTIONS The review identified important unaddressed issues: how should exposure based therapy be adapted during pandemics? How can we minimise harm from exacerbation of OCD in vulnerable individuals arising from public health messaging? Why do some but not all OCD patients experience worsening? And does Covid-19 infection affect (or lead to) OCD symptoms?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jon E. Grant
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - Lynne Drummond
- South West London and St George’s NHS Trust and University of Hertfordshire, UK
| | - Timothy R. Nicholson
- Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Harry Fagan
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences (CNS and Psychiatry), Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK,Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - David S. Baldwin
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences (CNS and Psychiatry), Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK,Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Naomi A. Fineberg
- National Treatment Service for OCD (England and Wales), Hertfordshire, UK
| | - Samuel R. Chamberlain
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences (CNS and Psychiatry), Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK,Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK,Corresponding author at: Clinical and Experimental Sciences (CNS and Psychiatry), Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Krishnakumar P, Rajith R. Clinical profile of obsessive-compulsive disorder in children. J Family Med Prim Care 2022; 11:251-255. [PMID: 35309610 PMCID: PMC8930109 DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1328_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Revised: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
19
|
Zaccari V, Gragnani A, Pellegrini V, Caiazzo T, D'Arienzo MC, Magno A, Femia G, Mancini F. An Observational Study of OCD Patients Treated With Cognitive Behavioral Therapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:755744. [PMID: 34744841 PMCID: PMC8569247 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.755744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives: While the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic for general mental health and the increase in anxiety and depression are clear, less is known about the potential effect of the pandemic on OCD. The purpose of this study is to collect new data to monitor the symptomatic status of patients with OCD during the period of emergency due to COVID-19 and to make a comparison between two psychodiagnostic evaluations. Methods: Eleven OCD patients and their psychotherapists were recruited. All patients had a specific psychodiagnostic assessment for OCD (SCL-90; OCI-R; Y-BOCS self-report) performed between December 2019 and January 2020 (t0), and undertook cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and exposure and prevention of response protocol (ERP) before the lockdown. The psychodiagnostic assessment carried out at t0 was re-administered (t1) to all patients, together with a set of qualitative questions collected through an online survey. The respective therapists were asked to document the status of the therapy and the monitoring of symptoms through use of a semi-structured interview (Y-BOCS) and a qualitative interview. Non-parametric analyses were conducted. Results: Patients reported a significant decrease in OCD symptoms. Data analysis showed a decrease in the scores across t0 and at t1 on the Y-BOCS (SR) total self-report, and on OCD symptoms' severity assessed by means of the OCI-r and SCL-90 r OC subscale, for 11 participants. Relating to the measures detected by psychotherapists, marginally significant improvements and lower scores were found in the Y-BOCS (I). An improvement in symptoms was noticed by 90.9% of the clinical sample; this was confirmed by 45.4% of the therapists, who claimed moderate progress in their patients. Conclusions: The data collected through standardized measurements at two different times, albeit relative to a small sample, assume relevance from a clinical point of view. In the literature, some studies document the worsening of OCD. However, in many studies, the type of treatment, the detection time, and the intervention period are not well-specified. These results confirm the effectiveness of CBT/ERP as an elective treatment for OCD through a specific intervention procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vittoria Zaccari
- Associazione Scuola di Psicoterapia Cognitiva (APC-SPC), Rome, Italy.,Department of Human Sciences, Marconi University, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Gragnani
- Associazione Scuola di Psicoterapia Cognitiva (APC-SPC), Rome, Italy
| | - Valerio Pellegrini
- Department of Social and Developmental Psychology Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Tecla Caiazzo
- Associazione Scuola di Psicoterapia Cognitiva (APC-SPC), Rome, Italy
| | | | - Antonella Magno
- Associazione Scuola di Psicoterapia Cognitiva (APC-SPC), Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Femia
- Associazione Scuola di Psicoterapia Cognitiva (APC-SPC), Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Mancini
- Associazione Scuola di Psicoterapia Cognitiva (APC-SPC), Rome, Italy.,Department of Human Sciences, Marconi University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|