Remdesivir Decreases Mortality in COVID-19 Patients with Active Malignancy

Remdesivir-Associated Survival Outcomes Among Immunocompromised Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: Real-world Evidence From the Omicron-Dominant Era

BACKGROUND

Patients with immunocompromising conditions are at increased risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related hospitalizations and deaths. Randomized clinical trials provide limited enrollment, if any, to provide information on the outcomes in such patients treated with remdesivir.

METHODS

Using the US PINC AI Healthcare Database, we identified adult patients with immunocompromising conditions, hospitalized for COVID-19 between December 2021 and February 2024. The primary outcome was all-cause inpatient mortality examined in propensity score-matched patients in remdesivir vs nonremdesivir groups. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with cancer, hematological malignancies, and solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

RESULTS

Of 28 966 patients included in the study, 16 730 (58%) received remdesivir during the first 2 days of hospitalization. After propensity score matching, 8822 patients in the remdesivir and 8822 patients in the nonremdesivir group were analyzed. Remdesivir was associated with a significantly lower mortality rate among patients with no supplemental oxygen (adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.73 [.62-.86] at 14 days and 0.79 [.68-.91] at 28 days) and among those with supplemental oxygen (0.75 [.67-.85] and 0.78 [.70-.86], respectively). Remdesivir was also associated with lower mortality rates in subgroups of patients with cancer, hematological malignancies (leukemia, lymphoma, or multiple myeloma), and solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplants.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort of patients with immunocompromising conditions hospitalized for COVID-19, remdesivir was associated with significant improvement in survival, including patients with varied underlying immunocompromising conditions. The integration of current real-world evidence into clinical guideline recommendations can inform clinical communities to optimize treatment decisions in the evolving COVID-19 era, extending beyond the conclusion of the public health emergency declaration.

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Patients with Cancer and COVID-19 in Mexico

OBJECTIVES

Vaccination is the best preventive measure for SARS-CoV-2 infection; however, efficacy is lower in cancer patients. During the pandemic period, Mexico was characterized by the use of seven different COVID-19 vaccine platforms, and oncologic patients were not prioritized for vaccination. We report the outcomes of COVID-19 in cancer patients after the beginning of the national vaccine campaign in Mexico.

METHODS

All patients with cancer and COVID-19 diagnosed at Instituto Nacional de Cancerología from 14 February 2021 to 28 February 2022 were included. Primary outcomes were the proportion of individuals who required hospital admission and/or invasive mechanical ventilation, according to the vaccination status; 30-day mortality; the period of infection; and other cancer-related variables.

RESULTS

A total of 691 patients were included; 524 (76%) had solid tumors (STs), and 167 (24%) had hematologic malignancies (HMs). Patients infected in the first two periods, had lower rates of vaccination and higher rates of mortality and hospitalization compared to those infected in the Omicron period. In the multivariate analysis, vaccination status was independently associated with hospitalization in patients with STs (aOR 0.38, 95%CI 0.19-0.75, p = 0.005), but it was not associated with invasive mechanical ventilation and 30-day mortality. In those with HMs, vaccination status was not associated with any outcome; in this group, only recent chemotherapy and time of infection were associated with invasive ventilation.

CONCLUSIONS

Vaccination significantly reduced hospital admissions in patients with STs. Infections occurring during the Omicron period were associated with improved outcomes in both ST and HM patients. Despite having a lesser impact in immunosuppressed patients, vaccination is an essential strategy, and access to vaccination campaigns in patients with cancer needs to be prioritized.

Association between Liver Damage and Disease Progression Markers with Mortality Risk and Mechanical Ventilation in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Nationwide Retrospective SARSTer Study

(1) Background: Liver damage is an important component of acute COVID-19, and the advancement of preexisting liver disease is associated with a worse prognosis; (2) Methods: A nationwide retrospective study including 7444 patients aimed to evaluate levels of selected markers of liver damage and disease advancement and their association with mortality and mechanical ventilation (MV); (3) Results: Elevation of the following markers in multivariate models were associated with increased odds of mortality: Alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4), AST-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), and decreased levels of platelet count (PLT). Elevated levels of AST, LDH, APRI, FIB-4, and the AST/ALT ratio and decreased levels of PLT were associated with increased odds of MV in multivariate models. The best predictive accuracy against mortality was achieved with FIB-4 with AUC = 0.733 (95% CI, 0.718-0.749) at the optimal cut-off point of 2.764, while against MV was achieved with LDH with AUC = 0.753 (95% CI, 0.727-0.778) at the optimal cut-off point of 449.5 IU/L. (4) Conclusions: Our study confirms that the advancement of liver damage contributes to a worse prognosis in COVID-19 patients. Markers for liver damage and the advancement of liver disease can provide predictive value in clinical practice among COVID-19 patients.

COVID‐19 and cancer: Dichotomy of the menacing dilemma

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic brought about unprecedented challenges to global healthcare systems. Among the most vulnerable populations are cancer patients, who face dilemmas due to their compromised immune systems and the intricate interplay with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) virus. This comprehensive review delves into the multifaceted relationship between COVID‐19 and cancer. Through an analysis of existing literature and clinical data, this review unravels the structural intricacies of the virus and examines its profound implications for cancer patients, thereby bridging the knowledge gap between virology and oncology. The review commences with an introduction regarding the COVID‐19 pandemic and cancer. It then transitions into a detailed examination of the SARS‐CoV‐2 virus and its variants such as Alpha (PANGO lineage B.1.1.7), Beta (B.1.351), Gamma (P.1), Delta (B.1.617.2), and Omicron (B.1.1.529 lineage). Subsequently, an insightful analysis of the impact of COVID‐19 on major cancer types (viz., Lung, Colon, Brain, and gastrointestinal cancer) is elaborated. Finally, the therapeutic avenues, oncological care, and management are discussed. The nexus between COVID‐19 and cancer adds a layer of complexity to patient care, emphasizing the importance of tailored approaches for those grappling with both conditions. Amid the landscape defined by the evolving viral strains, this review navigates through the multifaceted implications of COVID‐19 on cancer patients and underscores the significance of integrating virology and oncology.

The Impact COVID-19 Infection on Cancer Patients: A Tertiary Cancer Center Experience in Jordan

BACKGROUND

Cancer patients are at higher risk of serious complications of COVID-19. Few studies evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on cancer patients in low- and middle-income countries. Our study aims to evaluate the outcomes of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients treated at our institution.  Methods: Medical records of patients with a positive COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) between April 2020 and October 2020 were reviewed. Fisher's exact test and logistic regression analysis were employed to correlate various variables with mortality. Survival estimates were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 317 patients were included, with a median age was 55 years (range: 19-88). 82 (25.9%) had hematological neoplasms while the remainder had solid cancers. At the time of infection, 220 (69.4%) had active cancer, and 99 (31.2%) had received systemic anticancer treatment (SACT) within four weeks. Hospitalization was required for 101 (31.8%), 17 (5.3%) were admitted to the ICU and 50 (15.8%) died. Among patients with active cancer, SACT was delayed or discontinued in 140 (63.6%) patients.  In the entire patient cohort, low albumin (p=<0.001) and leucocytosis (p=<0.001) correlated with mortality within six months of COVID-19 infection. The six-month mortality rate in patients with active cancer was significantly higher in patients with hypertension (p=0.024), no recent SACT (0.017), hematological cancer (p=0.029), low albumin (p=<0.001), leucocytosis (p=0.002) and lymphocyte count of less than 500/µL (p=0.004). Recent chemotherapy was associated with better 6-month survival rates (78.8% vs 89.9%, p=0.012) in patients with active cancer, patients with solid cancers (95.9% vs 82.2%, p=0.006) and was non-inferior in patient with hematological neoplasms (72% vs 65.4%, p=0.519).  Conclusion: COVID-19 infection in our cancer patients was associated with significant morbidity and mortality and adversely affected their treatment. The decision to delay or discontinue SACT should be individualized, considering other risk factors for mortality.

The Burden of COVID-19 in Adult Patients With Hematological Malignancies: A Single-center Experience After the Implementation of Mass-vaccination Programs Against SARS-CoV-2

BACKGROUND/AIM

Despite the widespread mass-vaccination programs worldwide and the continuing evolution of COVID-19 therapeutics, the burden of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with hematological malignancies (HM) remains elusive. The aim of the present study was to assess the clinical characteristics, outcomes and therapeutic strategies applied in HM patients hospitalized during the post-vaccine period in Greece.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From June 2021 to October 2022, 60 HM patients with COVID-19 were retrospectively analyzed. Exploratory end-points included the incidence of intubation, probability of recovery, mortality, and duration of remdesivir (RDV) administration.

RESULTS

Overall, mechanical ventilation (MV) was required for five patients and crude mortality was 8.3%. HM of lymphocytic origin (p=0.035) and obesity (p=0.03) were the main determinants of the risk of intubation and among several laboratory markers, only LDH>520 IU/l was proven to be an independent MV predictor (p=0.038). The number of co-existing comorbidities (p=0.05) and disease severity on admission (p<0.001) were found to rule the probability of recovery, and dexamethasone was associated with worse prognosis, particularly in patients with mild/moderate COVID-19. RDV was administered to the entire cohort, of whom 38 were managed with an extended course. In the multivariate analysis, patients with HM of lymphocytic origin were more likely to receive RDV for more than five days (p=0.002).

CONCLUSION

Our study emphasizes the frailty of HM patients, even in the era of Omicron-variant predominance, and underlines the need to optimize therapy.

Omicron related COVID-19 prevention and treatment measures for patients with hematological malignancy and strategies for modifying hematologic treatment regimes

The Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 has rapidly become the dominant strain worldwide due to its high transmissibility, although it appears to be less pathogenic than previous strains. However, individuals with hematological malignancy (HM) and COVID-19 remain susceptible to severe infection and mortality, especially those with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and those undergoing chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) treatment. Hematologists should thoroughly assess the severity of the patient's hematological disease and the potential risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection before initiating chemotherapy or immunosuppressive treatment. Vaccination and booster doses are strongly recommended and patients with a poor vaccine response may benefit from long-acting COVID-19 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (such as Evusheld). Early use of small molecule antiviral drugs is recommended for managing mild COVID-19 in HM patients and those with severe immunodeficiency may benefit from SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing monoclonal antibody therapy and high-titer COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP). For moderate to severe cases, low-dose glucocorticoids in combination with early antiviral treatment can be administered, with cytokine receptor antagonists or JAK inhibitors added if the condition persists or worsens. In the treatment of hematological malignancies, delaying chemotherapy is preferable for CLL, acute leukemia (AL), and low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), but if the disease progresses, appropriate adjustments in dosage and frequency of treatment are required, with the avoidance of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, CAR-T and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Patients with chronic myelocytic leukemia (CML) and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) can continue current treatment. What's more, non-drug protective measures, the development of new vaccines and antiviral drugs, and monitoring of mutations in immunocompromised populations are particularly important.

COVID-19 does not impact on outcome of myeloma patients infected while undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation

Here we report two cases of myeloma patients who became positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection during the acute phase of autologous stem cell transplant. Both patients were promptly treated with monoclonal antibodies and remdesivir, and, despite the profound neutropenia and lymphopenia, they did not develop respiratory failure and they remained paucisymptomatic during the entire period of aplasia. Neutrophil engraftment took place as expected and the patients were discharged quickly and did not experience adverse effects after discharge.

COVID-19 in Adult Patients with Hematological Malignancies-Lessons Learned after Three Years of Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic is undoubtedly the most difficult health challenge of the 21st century with more than 600 million laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections and over 6.5 million deaths worldwide. The coronavirus pandemic contributed to rapid development of mRNA vaccines, which, along with new antiviral drugs, have been the subject of extensive research for many decades. Nevertheless, elderly, multi-morbid and immunocompromised patients continue to face a more severe clinical course and a higher risk of death from COVID-19, even now that the risk of COVID-19 in the general population is significantly reduced due to the introduction of global vaccination strategies. In this paper, we present the mechanisms of increased susceptibility to infectious complications and the evolution of the clinical course of COVID-19 in patients with hematological malignancies, taking into account the mutation of the virus and the introduction of vaccines and new antiviral drugs. We also present current recommendations for prophylactic and therapeutic management in patients with hematological malignancies.

Retrospective Analysis of the Effectiveness of Remdesivir in COVID-19 Treatment during Periods Dominated by Delta and Omicron SARS-CoV-2 Variants in Clinical Settings

Continuous evaluation of real-world treatment effectiveness of COVID-19 medicines is required due to the ongoing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 and the possible emergence of resistance. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze, in a retrospective manner, the outcomes in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 during the pandemic waves dominated by Delta and Omicron variants and treated with remdesivir (RDV) (n = 762) in comparison to a demographically and clinically matched group not treated with any antivirals (n = 1060). A logistic regression analysis revealed that RDV treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk of death during both Delta wave (OR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.29-0.60; p < 0.0001) and Omicron-dominated period (OR = 0.56, 95%CI: 0.35-0.92; p = 0.02). Moreover, RDV-treated groups were characterized by a lower percentage of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, but the difference was not statistically significant. This study is the first real-world evidence that RDV remains effective during the dominance of more pathogenic SARS-CoV-2 variants and those that cause a milder course of the disease, and continues to be an essential element of COVID-19 therapy.

An overview on the treatments and prevention against COVID-19

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to plague the world. While COVID-19 is asymptomatic in most individuals, it can cause symptoms like pneumonia, ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome), and death in others. Although humans are currently being vaccinated with several COVID-19 candidate vaccines in many countries, however, the world still is relying on hygiene measures, social distancing, and approved drugs.

RESULT

There are many potential therapeutic agents to pharmacologically fight COVID-19: antiviral molecules, recombinant soluble angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), monoclonal antibodies, vaccines, corticosteroids, interferon therapies, and herbal agents. By an understanding of the SARS-CoV-2 structure and its infection mechanisms, several vaccine candidates are under development and some are currently in various phases of clinical trials.

CONCLUSION

This review describes potential therapeutic agents, including antiviral agents, biologic agents, anti-inflammatory agents, and herbal agents in the treatment of COVID-19 patients. In addition to reviewing the vaccine candidates that entered phases 4, 3, and 2/3 clinical trials, this review also discusses the various platforms that are used to develop the vaccine COVID-19.