1
|
Kluge A, Baum RP, Bitterlich N, Kulkarni HR, Schorr-Neufing U, van Echteld CJA. Immune Response to Molecular Radiotherapy with 177Lu-DOTATOC: Predictive Value of Blood Cell Counts for Therapy Outcome. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2024. [PMID: 38905126 DOI: 10.1089/cbr.2024.0031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose: In a prior, retrospective study, 76% of patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors undergoing 177Lu-DOTATOC molecular radiotherapy (MRT) showed their best response within 8 months from the first MRT cycle. In 24% of patients, latency was much greater up to >22 months after the first cycle, and long after near-complete decay of 177Lu from the last cycle. An immune response induced by MRT seems a likely explanation. As a crude measure of immunocompetence, the authors investigated whether blood cell counts (BCCs) may have predictive value for MRT outcome with 177Lu-DOTATOC. Methods: 56 Patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET) were administered 177Lu-DOTATOC (mean 2.1 cycles; range 1-4) with median radioactivity of 7.0 GBq/cycle at 3-month intervals. Patients' BCCs were evaluated for four responder categories: CR, PR, SD, and PD (RECIST 1.1). Furthermore, baseline BCCs were correlated with progression-free survival (PFS). Finally, BCCs of patients with (PMT+) and without prior medical therapy (PMT-) were compared. Results: Significant differences between responder categories were found for baseline hemoglobin (Hb), erythrocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and LEHN-score, integrating lymphocyte, erythrocyte, and neutrophil counts, and Hb level, but not for leukocytes and platelets. LEHN-score yielded an almost complete separation between CR and PD groups. In analogy, PFS times showed significant correlations with baseline Hb, erythrocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, NLR, PLR, and LEHN-score, the LEHN-score showing the strongest correlation, but not with leukocytes and platelets. For PMT- patients, median PFS was 34.5 months, compared with 20.8 months in PMT+ patients, with corresponding baseline lymphocyte (32.1 ± 9.6% vs. 24.5 ± 11.6%, p = 0.028) and neutrophil (54.9 ± 11.6% vs. 63.5 ± 13.7%, p = 0.039) counts. Conclusion: These findings emphasize the significance of an immune response to MRT for obtaining optimal therapy efficacy and support concepts to enhance the immune response of less immunocompetent patients before MRT. It seems advisable to avoid prior or concomitant immunosuppressant medical therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Kluge
- ABX-CRO Advanced Pharmaceutical Services, Dresden, Germany
| | - Richard P Baum
- Theranostics Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Molecular Imaging, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
- CURANOSTICUM Wiesbaden-Frankfurt-Advanced Theranostics Center for Radiomolecular Precision Oncology, HELIOS DKD Klinik, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | | | - Harshad R Kulkarni
- Theranostics Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Molecular Imaging, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
- BAMF Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
| | | | - Cees J A van Echteld
- ABX-CRO Advanced Pharmaceutical Services, Dresden, Germany
- Helacor Consultancy, Hillegom, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang T, Lei H, Chen X, Dou Z, Yu B, Su W, Wang W, Jin X, Katsube T, Wang B, Zhang H, Li Q, Di C. Carrier systems of radiopharmaceuticals and the application in cancer therapy. Cell Death Discov 2024; 10:16. [PMID: 38195680 PMCID: PMC10776600 DOI: 10.1038/s41420-023-01778-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiopharmaceuticals play a vital role in cancer therapy. The carrier of radiopharmaceuticals can precisely locate and guide radionuclides to the target, where radionuclides kill surrounding tumor cells. Effective application of radiopharmaceuticals depends on the selection of an appropriate carrier. Herein, different types of carriers of radiopharmaceuticals and the characteristics are briefly described. Subsequently, we review radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and their derivatives, and novel strategies of radiolabeled mAbs and their derivatives in the treatment of lymphoma and colorectal cancer. Furthermore, this review outlines radiolabeled peptides, and novel strategies of radiolabeled peptides in the treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasms, prostate cancer, and gliomas. The emphasis is given to heterodimers, bicyclic peptides, and peptide-modified nanoparticles. Last, the latest developments and applications of radiolabeled nucleic acids and small molecules in cancer therapy are discussed. Thus, this review will contribute to a better understanding of the carrier of radiopharmaceuticals and the application in cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taotao Zhang
- Bio-Medical Research Center, Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 101408, Beijing, China
- School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 101408, Beijing, China
| | - Huiwen Lei
- Bio-Medical Research Center, Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 101408, Beijing, China
- School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 101408, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaohua Chen
- Bio-Medical Research Center, Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 101408, Beijing, China
- School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 101408, Beijing, China
- Advanced Energy Science and Technology Guangdong Laboratory, Huizhou, 516029, China
| | - Zhihui Dou
- Bio-Medical Research Center, Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 101408, Beijing, China
- School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 101408, Beijing, China
| | - Boyi Yu
- Bio-Medical Research Center, Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 101408, Beijing, China
- School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 101408, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Su
- Bio-Medical Research Center, Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 101408, Beijing, China
- School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 101408, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Wang
- College of Life Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Xiaodong Jin
- Bio-Medical Research Center, Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China
- Advanced Energy Science and Technology Guangdong Laboratory, Huizhou, 516029, China
| | - Takanori Katsube
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan
| | - Bing Wang
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan
| | - Hong Zhang
- Bio-Medical Research Center, Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
- Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
- College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 101408, Beijing, China.
- School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 101408, Beijing, China.
- Advanced Energy Science and Technology Guangdong Laboratory, Huizhou, 516029, China.
| | - Qiang Li
- Bio-Medical Research Center, Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
- Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
- College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 101408, Beijing, China.
- School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 101408, Beijing, China.
- Advanced Energy Science and Technology Guangdong Laboratory, Huizhou, 516029, China.
| | - Cuixia Di
- Bio-Medical Research Center, Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
- Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
- College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 101408, Beijing, China.
- School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 101408, Beijing, China.
- Advanced Energy Science and Technology Guangdong Laboratory, Huizhou, 516029, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zboralski D, Osterkamp F, Christensen E, Bredenbeck A, Schumann A, Hoehne A, Schneider E, Paschke M, Ungewiss J, Haase C, Robillard L, Simmons AD, Harding TC, Nguyen M. Fibroblast activation protein targeted radiotherapy induces an immunogenic tumor microenvironment and enhances the efficacy of PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibition. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:2621-2635. [PMID: 37086273 PMCID: PMC10317891 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06211-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE FAP is a membrane-bound protease under investigation as a pan-cancer target, given its high levels in tumors but limited expression in normal tissues. FAP-2286 is a radiopharmaceutical in clinical development for solid tumors that consists of two functional elements: a FAP-targeting peptide and a chelator used to attach radioisotopes. Preclinically, we evaluated the immune modulation and anti-tumor efficacy of FAP-2287, a murine surrogate for FAP-2286, conjugated to the radionuclide lutetium-177 (177Lu) as a monotherapy and in combination with a PD-1 targeting antibody. METHODS C57BL/6 mice bearing MCA205 mouse FAP-expressing tumors (MCA205-mFAP) were treated with 177Lu-FAP-2287, anti-PD-1, or both. Tumor uptake of 177Lu- FAP-2287 was assessed by SPECT/CT scanning, while therapeutic efficacy was measured by tumor volume and survival. Immune profiling of tumor infiltrates was evaluated through flow cytometry, RNA expression, and immunohistochemistry analyses. RESULTS 177Lu-FAP-2287 rapidly accumulated in MCA205-mFAP tumors leading to significant tumor growth inhibition (TGI) and longer survival time. Significant TGI was also observed from anti-PD-1 and the combination. In flow cytometry analysis of tumors, 177Lu-FAP-2287 increased CD8+ T cell infiltration which was maintained in the combination with anti-PD-1. The increase in CD8+ T cells was accompanied by an induction of STING-mediated type I interferon response and higher levels of co-stimulatory molecules such as CD86. CONCLUSION In a preclinical model, FAP-targeted radiotherapy enhanced anti-PD-1-mediated TGI by modulating the TME and increasing the recruitment of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells. These findings provide a rationale for clinical studies of combined 177Lu-FAP-2286 radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibition in FAP-positive tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Zboralski
- 3B Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Magnusstraße 11, D-12489, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Frank Osterkamp
- 3B Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Magnusstraße 11, D-12489, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Anne Bredenbeck
- 3B Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Magnusstraße 11, D-12489, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anne Schumann
- 3B Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Magnusstraße 11, D-12489, Berlin, Germany
| | - Aileen Hoehne
- 3B Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Magnusstraße 11, D-12489, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Matthias Paschke
- 3B Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Magnusstraße 11, D-12489, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan Ungewiss
- 3B Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Magnusstraße 11, D-12489, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Haase
- 3B Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Magnusstraße 11, D-12489, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhu M, Zhang J, Yang M, Zhang H, Xu T, Kan F, Zhang X, Zhang S, Yin Y, Yu F. In vitro and in vivo study on the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer with radionuclide labeled PD-L1 nanobody. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023:10.1007/s00432-023-04793-0. [PMID: 37085729 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04793-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Nanobodies have become promising carriers due to excellent in vivo properties. Radiopharmaceutical therapy targeting programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is an effective therapeutic strategy. Our study aimed to explore therapeutic efficacy of 131I labeled PD-L1 nanobody (Nb109) in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) in vitro and in vivo. METHODS 131I-Nb109 was synthesized by chloramine-T method. We implemented stability analysis, SDS-PAGE and lipid-water partition coefficient test to assess its quality. Cell uptake assay and SPECT/CT scan were applied to evaluate its ability to target NSCLCs (H460 and A549). CCK8 assay and in vivo efficacy assay were conducted to estimate its therapeutic effect in H460 tumors. Damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) release in H460 cells incubated with 131I-Nb109 was investigated by western blot and ATP test kit. RESULTS 131I-Nb109 was hydrophilic with high labeling rate (69.51-98.06%), radiochemical purity (99.17% ± 0.76%) and stability. Cell uptake experiments showed that H460 cells (PD-L1 positive) compared with A549 cells (PD-L1 negative) had higher 131I-Nb109 uptake. SPECT/CT imaging revealed the accumulation of 131I-Nb109 in H460 tumor within 48 h. 131I-Nb109 inhibited H460 tumor growth without toxic side effects in contrast with control group. It also induced H460 cells to release DAMPs (adenosine triphosphate, high mobility group box 1, and heat shock protein 70). CONCLUSION 131I-Nb109 had high stability, excellent ability to target and treatment PD-L1 positive tumors, and can improve tumor immunogenicity. The results of our study were expected to inspire the development of more novel radiopharmaceuticals to treat NSCLCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengqin Zhu
- Shanghai Clinical College, Anhui Medical University, Shanghai, 200040, China
- The Fifth Clinical Medical College, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, China
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, 301 Yanchang Road, Shanghai, 200040, China
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Jiajia Zhang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, 301 Yanchang Road, Shanghai, 200040, China
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Mengdie Yang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, 301 Yanchang Road, Shanghai, 200040, China
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Han Zhang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, 301 Yanchang Road, Shanghai, 200040, China
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Tao Xu
- Smart-Nuclide Biopharma Co. Ltd, No. 218 Xing-Hu Rd., Suzhou, 215125, China
| | - Fei Kan
- Smart-Nuclide Biopharma Co. Ltd, No. 218 Xing-Hu Rd., Suzhou, 215125, China
| | - Xiaoyi Zhang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, 301 Yanchang Road, Shanghai, 200040, China
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Shenghong Zhang
- Shanghai Clinical College, Anhui Medical University, Shanghai, 200040, China
- The Fifth Clinical Medical College, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, China
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, 301 Yanchang Road, Shanghai, 200040, China
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Yuzhen Yin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, 301 Yanchang Road, Shanghai, 200040, China
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Fei Yu
- Shanghai Clinical College, Anhui Medical University, Shanghai, 200040, China.
- The Fifth Clinical Medical College, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, China.
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, 301 Yanchang Road, Shanghai, 200040, China.
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200040, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Constanzo J, Bouden Y, Godry L, Kotzki PO, Deshayes E, Pouget JP. Immunomodulatory effects of targeted radionuclide therapy. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF CELL AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 2023; 378:105-136. [PMID: 37438015 DOI: 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2023.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
It is now clear that conventional radiation therapy can reinstate cell death immunogenicity. Recent preclinical data indicate that targeted radionuclide therapy that irradiate tumors at continuous low dose rate also can elicit immunostimulatory effects and represents a promising strategy to circumvent immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance. In this perspective, we discuss the accumulating preclinical and clinical data suggesting that activation of the immune system through the cGAS-STING axis and the release of extracellular vesicles by irradiated cells, participate to this antitumor immunity. This should need to be considered for adapting clinical practices to state of the art of the radiobiology and to increase targeted radionuclide therapy effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Constanzo
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France.
| | - Y Bouden
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - L Godry
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - P-O Kotzki
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - E Deshayes
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - J-P Pouget
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lückerath K, Trajkovic-Arsic M, Mona CE. Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor Theranostics. PET Clin 2023:S1556-8598(23)00019-6. [PMID: 36990945 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2023.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
Fibroblast activation protein (FAP)-radioligand therapy might be effective in some patients without being curative. FAP-radioligands deliver ionizing radiation directly to FAP+ cancer-associated fibroblasts and, in some cancers, to FAP+ tumor cells; in addition, they indirectly irradiate FAP- cells in tumor tissue via cross-fire and bystander effects. Here, we discuss the potential to improve FAP-radioligand therapy through interfering with DNA damage repair, immunotherapy, and co-targeting cancer-associated fibroblasts. As the molecular and cellular effects of FAP-radioligands on the tumor and its microenvironment have not been investigated yet, we call for future research to close this gap in knowledge, which prevents the development of more effective FAP-radioligand therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Lückerath
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Marija Trajkovic-Arsic
- Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology, DKTK and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Partner Side Essen, Hufelandstrasse 15, 45147, Germany; Bridge Institute of Experimental Tumor Therapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Christine E Mona
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostic Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles, 650 Charles E Young Drive S, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sun Q, Li J, Ding Z, Liu Z. Radiopharmaceuticals heat anti-tumor immunity. Theranostics 2023; 13:767-786. [PMID: 36632233 PMCID: PMC9830438 DOI: 10.7150/thno.79806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) has proven to be an effective cancer treatment with minimal toxicity. With several RPT agents approved by FDA, the remarkable potential of this therapy is now being recognized, and the anti-tumor immunity induced by RPT is beginning to be noticed. This review evaluates the potential of RPT for immune activation, including promoting the release of danger associated-molecular pattern molecules that recruit inflammatory cells into the tumor microenvironment, and activating antigen-presenting cells and cytotoxic T cells. We also discuss the progress of combining RPT with immunotherapy to increase efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Sun
- Peking University-Tsinghua University Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Jiyuan Li
- Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Radiochemistry and Radiation Chemistry Key Laboratory of Fundamental Science, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | | | - Zhibo Liu
- Peking University-Tsinghua University Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China,Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Radiochemistry and Radiation Chemistry Key Laboratory of Fundamental Science, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China,Changping Laboratory, Beijing 102206, China,✉ Corresponding author: Zhibo Liu:
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kleinendorst SC, Oosterwijk E, Bussink J, Westdorp H, Konijnenberg MW, Heskamp S. Combining Targeted Radionuclide Therapy and Immune Checkpoint Inhibition for Cancer Treatment. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:3652-3657. [PMID: 35471557 PMCID: PMC9433955 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-4332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
The development of immunotherapy, in particular immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), has revolutionized cancer treatment in the past decades. However, its efficacy is still limited to subgroups of patients with cancer. Therefore, effective treatment combination strategies are needed. Here, radiotherapy is highly promising, as it can induce immunogenic cell death, triggering the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, thereby creating an immunogenic phenotype and sensitizing tumors to ICI. Recently, targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) has attained significant interest for cancer treatment. In this approach, a tumor-targeting radiopharmaceutical is used to specifically deliver a therapeutic radiation dose to all tumor cells, including distant metastatic lesions, while limiting radiation exposure to healthy tissue. However, fundamental differences between TRT and conventional radiotherapy make it impossible to directly extrapolate the biological effects from conventional radiotherapy to TRT. In this review, we present a comprehensive overview of studies investigating the immunomodulatory effects of TRT and the efficacy of combined TRT-ICI treatment. Preclinical studies have evaluated a variety of murine cancer models in which α- or β-emitting radionuclides were directed to a diverse set of targets. In addition, clinical trials are ongoing to assess safety and efficacy of combined TRT-ICI in patients with cancer. Taken together, research indicates that combining TRT and ICI might improve therapeutic response in patients with cancer. Future research has to disclose what the optimal conditions are in terms of dose and treatment schedule to maximize the efficacy of this combined approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone C. Kleinendorst
- Department of Medical Imaging, Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Egbert Oosterwijk
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Johan Bussink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Harm Westdorp
- Department of Tumor Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Mark W. Konijnenberg
- Department of Medical Imaging, Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Sandra Heskamp
- Department of Medical Imaging, Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Corresponding Author: Sandra Heskamp, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Phone: 243-614-511; E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hope TA, Pavel M, Bergsland EK. Neuroendocrine Tumors and Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy: When Is the Right Time? J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:2818-2829. [PMID: 35649195 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Since its approval in 2018 by the US Food and Drug Administration, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has become a mainstay in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Lutetium-177-DOTATATE, the only approved agent, is indicated for the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic-neuroendocrine tumors. Although patient selection appears straightforward with somatostatin receptor-positron emission tomography, there is considerable complexity when deciding which patients to treat and when to start PRRT. Herein, we review the many factors that affect patient selection, focusing on the optimal patients to treat. Although significant effort has been expended to determine which patients benefit the most from PRRT, a validated predictive biomarker remains elusive. Although PRRT has been used for more than 2 decades in Europe and standards of care exist for safe treatment, there remain numerous questions regarding when PRRT should be used relative to other treatments. It is important to remember that multidisciplinary discussions are essential. Currently, there are a number of ongoing studies looking to assess the efficacy of PRRT compared with other treatment options and to optimize treatment through combination therapy, different dosing strategies, or use of different radionuclides and radioligands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.,Department of Radiology, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Marianne Pavel
- Department of Medicine 1, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Emily K Bergsland
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.,Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Treatment of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms with Radiolabeled Peptides-Where Are We Now. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030761. [PMID: 35159027 PMCID: PMC8833798 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been one of the most successful and exciting examples of theranostics in nuclear medicine in recent decades and is now firmly embedded in many treatment algorithms for unresectable or metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) worldwide. It is widely considered to be an effective treatment for well- or moderately differentiated neoplasms, which express high levels of somatostatin receptors that can be selectively targeted. This review article outlines the scientific basis of PRRT in treatment of NENs and describes its discovery dating back to the early 1990s. Early treatments utilizing Indium-111, a γ-emitter, showed promise in reduction in tumor size and improvement in biochemistry, but were also met with high radiation doses and myelotoxic and nephrotoxic effects. Subsequently, stable conjugation of DOTA-peptides with β-emitting radionuclides, such as Yttrium-90 and Lutetium-177, served as a breakthrough for PRRT and studies highlighted their potential in eliciting progression-free survival and quality of life benefits. This article will also elaborate on the key trials which paved the way for its approval and will discuss therapeutic considerations, such as patient selection and administration technique, to optimize its use.
Collapse
|
11
|
Emanuel O, Liu J, Schartinger VH, Nei WL, Chan YY, Tsang CM, Riechelmann H, Masterson L, Haybaeck J, Oppermann U, Willems SM, Ooft ML, Wollmann G, Howard D, Vanhaesebroeck B, Lund VJ, Royle G, Chua MLK, Lo KW, Busson P, Lechner M. SSTR2 in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Relationship with Latent EBV Infection and Potential as a Therapeutic Target. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4944. [PMID: 34638429 PMCID: PMC8508244 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Revised: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a malignant epithelial tumor, most commonly located in the pharyngeal recess and endemic to parts of Asia. It is often detected at a late stage which is associated with poor prognosis (5-year survival rate of 63%). Treatment for this malignancy relies predominantly on radiotherapy and/or systemic chemotherapy, which can be associated with significant morbidity and impaired quality of life. In endemic regions NPC is associated with infection by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) which was shown to upregulate the somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) cell surface receptor. With recent advances in molecular techniques allowing for an improved understanding of the molecular aetiology of this disease and its relation to SSTR2 expression, we provide a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of this disease and highlight the emergence of SSTR2 as a key tumor biomarker and promising target for imaging and therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oscar Emanuel
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (O.E.); (J.L.); (B.V.); (V.J.L.); (G.R.)
| | - Jacklyn Liu
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (O.E.); (J.L.); (B.V.); (V.J.L.); (G.R.)
| | - Volker H. Schartinger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (V.H.S.); (H.R.)
| | - Wen Long Nei
- National Cancer Centre, Divisions of Radiation Oncology and Medical Sciences, Singapore 169610, Singapore; (W.L.N.); (M.L.K.C.)
- Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore
| | - Yuk Yu Chan
- Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China; (Y.Y.C.); (C.M.T.); (K.W.L.)
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
| | - Chi Man Tsang
- Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China; (Y.Y.C.); (C.M.T.); (K.W.L.)
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
| | - Herbert Riechelmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (V.H.S.); (H.R.)
| | - Liam Masterson
- Department of Otolaryngology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK;
| | - Johannes Haybaeck
- Institute of Pathology, Neuropathology and Molecular Pathology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria;
| | - Udo Oppermann
- Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK;
- Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies (FRIAS), University of Freiburg, 79085 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Stefan M. Willems
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands; (S.M.W.); (M.L.O.)
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marc L. Ooft
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands; (S.M.W.); (M.L.O.)
- King’s College Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Guido Wollmann
- Institute of Virology and Christian Doppler Laboratory for Viral Immunotherapy of Cancer, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria;
| | - David Howard
- ENT Department, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W6 9EP, UK;
- Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London WC1E 6DG, UK
| | - Bart Vanhaesebroeck
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (O.E.); (J.L.); (B.V.); (V.J.L.); (G.R.)
| | - Valerie J. Lund
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (O.E.); (J.L.); (B.V.); (V.J.L.); (G.R.)
- Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London WC1E 6DG, UK
| | - Gary Royle
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (O.E.); (J.L.); (B.V.); (V.J.L.); (G.R.)
| | - Melvin L. K. Chua
- National Cancer Centre, Divisions of Radiation Oncology and Medical Sciences, Singapore 169610, Singapore; (W.L.N.); (M.L.K.C.)
- Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore
| | - Kwok Wai Lo
- Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China; (Y.Y.C.); (C.M.T.); (K.W.L.)
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
| | - Pierre Busson
- CNRS-UMR 9018-Metsy, Gustave Roussy and Université Paris-Saclay, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Matt Lechner
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (O.E.); (J.L.); (B.V.); (V.J.L.); (G.R.)
- Rhinology & Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-H&N Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Prasad V, Zengerling F, Steinacker JP, Bolenz C, Beer M, Wiegel T, Eiber M, Fleshner N, Beer AJ. First Experiences with 177Lu-PSMA Therapy in Combination with Pembrolizumab or After Pretreatment with Olaparib in Single Patients. J Nucl Med 2021; 62:975-978. [PMID: 33246977 PMCID: PMC8882875 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.249029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Synergistic effects of immunotherapy with pembrolizumab or drugs targeting DNA damage, such as olaparib, might be used to overcome the limitations of radioligand therapy (RLT) with 177Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in metastasized castration-resistant prostate cancer. Here, we present 2 patients receiving such combination or sequential therapies. Methods: RLT was performed at 6- to 8-wk intervals after the patients either exhausted or were considered unfit for all approved conventional treatments. Patient 1 was on pembrolizumab for his squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, whereas patient 2 received RLT sequentially 4 wk after 3 mo of monotherapy with olaparib. Results: Both patients tolerated RLT without any significant hematotoxicity. Patient 2 showed a radiologic and biochemical response, whereas patient 1 achieved prostate-specific antigen stabilization after 3 therapy cycles. Conclusion: These cases indicate that RLT in combination with pembrolizumab or sequentially after olaparib might be well tolerated in single patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikas Prasad
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany;
| | | | | | | | - Meinrad Beer
- Department of Radiology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; and
| | - Neil Fleshner
- Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ambros J Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Delbart W, Ghanem GE, Karfis I, Flamen P, Wimana Z. Investigating intrinsic radiosensitivity biomarkers to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with [ 177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE in a panel of cancer cell lines. Nucl Med Biol 2021; 96-97:68-79. [PMID: 33839677 DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2021.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/20/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE is an effective systemic targeted radionuclide therapy for somatostatin receptor (SSTR) positive metastatic or inoperable neuroendocrine tumours (NET). However, for a given injected activity, tumour responses are variable. Our aim was to investigate whether SSTR expression/functionality and known characteristics of intrinsic radiosensitivity, namely proliferation rate, glucose metabolism, cell cycle phase, DNA repair and antioxidant defences were predictors of sensitivity to [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE in SSTR expressing human cancer cell lines. METHODS In six human cancer cell lines and under basal condition, SSTR expression was assessed by qRT-PCR and immunocytochemistry. Its functionality was evaluated by binding/uptake assays with [68Ga]Ga- and [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE. The radiosensitivity parameters were evaluated as follows: proliferation rate (cell counting), glucose metabolism ([18F]FDG uptake), antioxidant defences (qRT-PCR, colorimetric assay, flow cytometry), DNA repair (qRT-PCR) and cell cycle (flow cytometry). Effect of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE on cell viability was assessed 3, 7 and 10 days after 4 h incubation with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE using crystal violet. RESULTS Based on cell survival at day 10, cell lines were classified into two groups of sensitivity to [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE. One group with <20% of survival decrease (-14 to -1%) and one group with >20% of survival decrease (-22 to -33%) compared to the untreated control cell lines. The latter had significantly lower total antioxidant capacity, glutathione (GSH) levels and glucose metabolism (p < 0.05) compared to the first group. SSTR (p = 0.64), proliferation rate (p = 0.74), cell cycle phase (p = 0.55), DNA repair (p > 0.22), combined catalase and GSH peroxidase expression (p = 0.42) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity (p = 0.41) were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION Antioxidant defences may be major determinants in [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE radiosensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy Delbart
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium; Laboratory of Oncology and Experimental Surgery, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Ghanem E Ghanem
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium; Laboratory of Oncology and Experimental Surgery, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Ioannis Karfis
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Patrick Flamen
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Zéna Wimana
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium; Laboratory of Oncology and Experimental Surgery, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Predictive and Prognostic Impact of Blood-Based Inflammatory Biomarkers in Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Commencing Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11030504. [PMID: 33809226 PMCID: PMC8000284 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11030504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Tumor microenvironment inflammation contributes to the proliferation and survival of malignant cells, angiogenesis, metastasis, subversion of adaptive immunity, and reduced treatment response. We aimed to evaluate the early predictive and prognostic significance of markers of systemic inflammation in patients receiving somatostatin-receptor targeted peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). This retrospective observational cohort study included 33 patients with advanced gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) treated with PRRT. Pretreatment blood-based inflammatory biomarkers, e.g., C-reactive protein levels (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), and absolute neutrophil count (ANC), were documented and inflammation indexes, e.g., neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and Platelet × CRP multiplier (PCM), were calculated. Tumor burden was determined using [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT before enrollment and every 2 cycles thereafter until progression. Therapy response was assessed using RECIST 1.1, including its volumetric modification. Inflammatory biomarkers and inflammatory indexes demonstrated marked heterogeneity among patients, and were significantly higher in non-responders (e.g., CRP (p < 0.001), ANC (p = 0.002), and PCM (p < 0.001)). Change in whole-body tumor burden after two cycles of PRRT was significantly associated with CRP (p = 0.0157) and NLR (p = 0.0040) in multivariate regression analysis. A cut-off of 2.5 mg/L for CRP (AUC = 0.84, p = 0.001) revealed a significant outcome difference between patients with adversely high vs. low CRP (median PFS 508 days vs. not yet reached (HR = 4.52; 95% CI, 1.27 to 16.18; p = 0.02)). Tumor-driven systemic inflammatory networks may be associated with treatment response, change in tumor burden, and prognosis in patients with GEP-NETs receiving PRRT.
Collapse
|
15
|
Czernin J, Current K, Mona CE, Nyiranshuti L, Hikmat F, Radu CG, Lückerath K. Immune-Checkpoint Blockade Enhances 225Ac-PSMA617 Efficacy in a Mouse Model of Prostate Cancer. J Nucl Med 2021; 62:228-231. [PMID: 32646877 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.246041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radionuclide therapy (RNT) may increase tumor immunogenicity. We aimed at exploiting this effect by combining RNT with immunotherapy in a mouse model of prostate cancer (PC). Methods: C57BL/6-mice bearing syngeneic RM1-PGLS tumors were treated with 225Ac-PSMA617, an anti-PD-1 antibody, or both. Therapeutic efficacy was assessed by tumor volume measurements (CT), time to progression (TTP), and survival. Results: PSMA RNT or anti-PD-1 alone tended to prolong TTP (isotype control, 25 d; anti-PD-1, 33.5 d [P = 0.0153]; RNT, 30 d [P = 0.1038]) and survival (control, 28 d; anti-PD-1, 37 d [P = 0.0098]; RNT, 32 d [P = 0.1018]). Combining PSMA RNT and anti-PD-1 significantly improved disease control compared with either monotherapy. TTP was extended to 47.5 d (P ≤ 0.0199 vs. monotherapies), and survival to 51.5 d (P ≤ 0.0251 vs. monotherapies). Conclusion: PSMA RNT and PD-1 blockade synergistically improve therapeutic outcomes in our PC model, supporting the evaluation of RNT and immunotherapy combinations for PC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Czernin
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Kyle Current
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Christine E Mona
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Lea Nyiranshuti
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Firas Hikmat
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Caius G Radu
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Katharina Lückerath
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Paul DM, Ghiuzeli CM, Rini J, Palestro CJ, Fung EK, Ghali M, Ben-Levi E, Prideaux A, Vallabhajosula S, Popa EC. A pilot study treatment of malignant tumors using low-dose 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18F-FDG). AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING 2020; 10:334-341. [PMID: 33329935 PMCID: PMC7724279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Photons, electrons and protons have therapeutic use however positrons have only been used for diagnostic imaging purposes. The energies of positrons (β+) from F-18 (0.633 MeV) and electrons (β-) from I-131 (0.606 MeV) are very close and have similar equilibrium dose constants. Since [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) clears rapidly from circulation, administration of 37-74 GBq (1-2 Ci) of 18F-FDG is relatively safe from an internal radiation dosimetry point of view. We initiated a phase I dose escalation study to assess the safety, toxicity, and potential therapeutic utility of administering 100-200 mCi/m2 18F-FDG delivered over a 1 to 5 day period in patients with advanced lymphomas and solid tumors refractory to standard of care treatment (SCT). Here we report the results of the first four patients treated. Four patients with advanced cancers received a single dose of 3.7-7.4 GBq/m2 (100-200 mCi/m2) 18F-FDG. We monitored the patients for adverse effects and for response. No treatment-related toxicities were observed. There was no increased radiation exposure to personnel. Two patients showed decrease in the index lesions' SUVs by 17-33% (Day 1) and 25-31% (Day 30) post treatment. The two other patients showed stable disease on 18F-PET-CT. Interestingly, responses were seen at low radiotherapy doses (below 1 Gy). This exploratory study demonstrated the safety of therapeutic administration of up to 14.2 GBq (385 mCi) 18F-FDG. In patients with 18F-FDG-avid cancers, targeted radionuclide 18F-FDG therapy appears safe and may offer clinical benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doru M Paul
- Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College (WCMC)New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Maged Ghali
- Radiation Oncology, Northwell HealthLake Success, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Elizabeta C Popa
- Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College (WCMC)New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Guzik P, Siwowska K, Fang HY, Cohrs S, Bernhardt P, Schibli R, Müller C. Promising potential of [ 177Lu]Lu-DOTA-folate to enhance tumor response to immunotherapy-a preclinical study using a syngeneic breast cancer model. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 48:984-994. [PMID: 33078260 PMCID: PMC8041666 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-05054-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE It was previously demonstrated that radiation effects can enhance the therapy outcome of immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this study, a syngeneic breast tumor mouse model was used to investigate the effect of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-folate as an immune stimulus to enhance anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy. METHODS In vitro and in vivo studies were performed to characterize NF9006 breast tumor cells with regard to folate receptor (FR) expression and the possibility of tumor targeting using [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-folate. A preclinical therapy study was performed over 70 days with NF9006 tumor-bearing mice that received vehicle only (group A); [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-folate (5 MBq; 3.5 Gy absorbed tumor dose; group B); anti-CTLA-4 antibody (3 × 200 μg; group C), or both agents (group D). The mice were monitored regarding tumor growth over time and signs indicating adverse events of the treatment. RESULTS [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-folate bound specifically to NF9006 tumor cells and tissue in vitro and accumulated in NF9006 tumors in vivo. The treatment with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-folate or an anti-CTLA-4 antibody had only a minor effect on NF9006 tumor growth and did not substantially increase the median survival time of mice (23 day and 19 days, respectively) as compared with untreated controls (12 days). [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-folate sensitized, however, the tumors to anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy, which became obvious by reduced tumor growth and, hence, a significantly improved median survival time of mice (> 70 days). No obvious signs of adverse effects were observed in treated mice as compared with untreated controls. CONCLUSION Application of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-folate had a positive effect on the therapy outcome of anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy. The results of this study may open new perspectives for future clinical translation of folate radioconjugates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrycja Guzik
- Center for Radiopharmaceutical Sciences ETH-PSI-USZ, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232, Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
| | - Klaudia Siwowska
- Center for Radiopharmaceutical Sciences ETH-PSI-USZ, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232, Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
| | - Hsin-Yu Fang
- Center for Radiopharmaceutical Sciences ETH-PSI-USZ, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232, Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
| | - Susan Cohrs
- Center for Radiopharmaceutical Sciences ETH-PSI-USZ, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232, Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
| | - Peter Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Physics, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, SE-413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Medical Physics and Medical Bioengineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Roger Schibli
- Center for Radiopharmaceutical Sciences ETH-PSI-USZ, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232, Villigen-PSI, Switzerland.,Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, 8093, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Cristina Müller
- Center for Radiopharmaceutical Sciences ETH-PSI-USZ, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232, Villigen-PSI, Switzerland. .,Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, 8093, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rouanet J, Benboubker V, Akil H, Hennino A, Auzeloux P, Besse S, Pereira B, Delorme S, Mansard S, D'Incan M, Degoul F, Rouzaire PO. Immune checkpoint inhibitors reverse tolerogenic mechanisms induced by melanoma targeted radionuclide therapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2020; 69:2075-2088. [PMID: 32447411 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-020-02606-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
In line with the ongoing phase I trial (NCT03784625) dedicated to melanoma targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT), we explore the interplay between immune system and the melanin ligand [131I]ICF01012 alone or combined with immunotherapy (immune checkpoint inhibitors, ICI) in preclinical models. Here we demonstrate that [131I]ICF01012 induces immunogenic cell death, characterized by a significant increase in cell surface-exposed annexin A1 and calreticulin. Additionally, [131I]ICF01012 increases survival in immunocompetent mice, compared to immunocompromised (29 vs. 24 days, p = 0.0374). Flow cytometry and RT-qPCR analyses highlight that [131I]ICF01012 induces adaptive and innate immune cell recruitment in the tumor microenvironment. [131I]ICF01012 combination with ICIs (anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1) has shown that tolerance is a main immune escape mechanism, whereas exhaustion is not present after TRT. Furthermore, [131I]ICF01012 and ICI combination has systematically resulted in a prolonged survival (p < 0.0001) compared to TRT alone. Specifically, [131I]ICF01012 + anti-CTLA-4 combination significantly increases survival compared to anti-CTLA-4 alone (41 vs. 26 days; p = 0.0011), without toxicity. This work represents the first global characterization of TRT-induced modifications of the antitumor immune response, demonstrating that tolerance is a main immune escape mechanism and that combining TRT and ICI is promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacques Rouanet
- UMR1240 INSERM, Université Clermont Auvergne, 58, rue Montalembert, BP 184, 63005, Clermont-Ferrand, France. .,Department of Dermatology and Oncodermatology, CHU Estaing, 1 place Lucie et Raymond Aubrac, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France. .,Centre Jean Perrin, 58, rue Montalembert, 63011, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
| | - Valentin Benboubker
- UMR1240 INSERM, Université Clermont Auvergne, 58, rue Montalembert, BP 184, 63005, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,Department of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, CHU Gabriel Montpied, 58 rue Montalembert, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Hussein Akil
- UMR1240 INSERM, Université Clermont Auvergne, 58, rue Montalembert, BP 184, 63005, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Ana Hennino
- UMR INSERM 1052 CNRS 5286 CRCL, 28 rue Laennec, 69008, Lyon, France
| | - Philippe Auzeloux
- UMR1240 INSERM, Université Clermont Auvergne, 58, rue Montalembert, BP 184, 63005, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Sophie Besse
- UMR1240 INSERM, Université Clermont Auvergne, 58, rue Montalembert, BP 184, 63005, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Bruno Pereira
- Biostatistics Unit, DRCI, CHU Gabriel Montpied, 58 rue Montalembert, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Solène Delorme
- UMR1240 INSERM, Université Clermont Auvergne, 58, rue Montalembert, BP 184, 63005, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Sandrine Mansard
- Department of Dermatology and Oncodermatology, CHU Estaing, 1 place Lucie et Raymond Aubrac, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Michel D'Incan
- UMR1240 INSERM, Université Clermont Auvergne, 58, rue Montalembert, BP 184, 63005, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,Department of Dermatology and Oncodermatology, CHU Estaing, 1 place Lucie et Raymond Aubrac, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Françoise Degoul
- UMR1240 INSERM, Université Clermont Auvergne, 58, rue Montalembert, BP 184, 63005, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Paul-Olivier Rouzaire
- UMR1240 INSERM, Université Clermont Auvergne, 58, rue Montalembert, BP 184, 63005, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,Department of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, CHU Gabriel Montpied, 58 rue Montalembert, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Starr JS, Sonbol MB, Hobday TJ, Sharma A, Kendi AT, Halfdanarson TR. Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for the Treatment of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Recent Insights. Onco Targets Ther 2020; 13:3545-3555. [PMID: 32431509 PMCID: PMC7205451 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s202867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2019] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a paradigm shifting approach to the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Although there are no prospective randomized trials directly studying PRRT in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs), there are data to suggest benefit in this patient population. Collectively, the data, consisting of two prospective and six retrospective studies, show a median PFS ranging from 20 to 39 months and a median OS ranging from 37 to 79 months. There are ongoing (and upcoming) prospective, randomized trials of PRRT in panNETs, which will provide further evidence to support this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason S Starr
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Timothy J Hobday
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Akash Sharma
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Ayse Tuba Kendi
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Taïeb D, Jha A, Treglia G, Pacak K. Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma in the era of genomic characterization of disease subgroups. Endocr Relat Cancer 2019; 26:R627-R652. [PMID: 31561209 PMCID: PMC7002202 DOI: 10.1530/erc-19-0165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 09/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
In recent years, advancement in genetics has profoundly helped to gain a more comprehensive molecular, pathogenic, and prognostic picture of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs). Newly discovered molecular targets, particularly those that target cell membranes or signaling pathways have helped move nuclear medicine in the forefront of PPGL precision medicine. This is mainly based on the introduction and increasing experience of various PET radiopharmaceuticals across PPGL genotypes quickly followed by implementation of novel radiotherapies and revised imaging algorithms. Particularly, 68Ga-labeled-SSAs have shown excellent results in the diagnosis and staging of PPGLs and in selecting patients for PRRT as a potential alternative to 123/131I-MIBG theranostics. PRRT using 90Y/177Lu-DOTA-SSAs has shown promise for treatment of PPGLs with improvement of clinical symptoms and/or disease control. However, more well-designed prospective studies are required to confirm these findings, in order to fully exploit PRRT's antitumoral properties to obtain the final FDA approval. Such an approval has recently been obtained for high-specific-activity 131I-MIBG for inoperable/metastatic PPGL. The increasing experience and encouraging preliminary results of these radiotherapeutic approaches in PPGLs now raises an important question of how to further integrate them into PPGL management (e.g. monotherapy or in combination with other systemic therapies), carefully taking into account the PPGLs locations, genotypes, and growth rate. Thus, targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) should preferably be performed at specialized centers with an experienced interdisciplinary team. Future perspectives include the introduction of dosimetry and biomarkers for therapeutic responses for more individualized treatment plans, α-emitting isotopes, and the combination of TRT with other systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Taïeb
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, La Timone University Hospital, CERIMED, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Abhishek Jha
- Section on Medical Neuroendocrinology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Giorgio Treglia
- Clinic of Nuclear Medicine and PET/CT Center, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Health Technology Assessment Unit, General Directorate, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Karel Pacak
- Section on Medical Neuroendocrinology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Black JRM, Atkinson SR, Singh A, Evans J, Sharma R. The Inflammation-Based Index Can Predict Response and Improve Patient Selection in NETs Treated With PRRT: A Pilot Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2019; 104:285-292. [PMID: 30219888 DOI: 10.1210/jc.2018-01214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2018] [Accepted: 09/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an effective treatment of certain patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Tumor response is highly variable; no biomarker in clinical practice has been demonstrated to reliably predict outcome. The inflammation-based index (IBI), derived from serum C-reactive protein and albumin levels, predicts survival and response to treatment in patients in several cancer types and was therefore explored in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS Clinico-pathological data from patients undergoing PRRT for metastatic NETs were collected at baseline and during treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) with a secondary endpoint of overall survival (OS). Cox regression analysis tested associations between baseline variables and their dynamic changes and PFS and OS. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to determine the net benefit associated with a treatment strategy determined by the baseline IBI and nonresponse to PRRT. RESULTS Fifty-five patients were recruited. Baseline IBI > 0 was associated with inferior PFS (hazard ratio, 14.2; 95% CI, 5.25 to 38.5; P < 0.001) and OS (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed an independent association between IBI and PFS (P = 0.001). DCA indicated a net clinical benefit at risk thresholds between 0.03 and 0.58. CONCLUSION Baseline IBI score and its dynamic change through treatment are associated with both PFS and OS. At a risk threshold equivalent to the currently accepted rate of nonresponse to therapy, implementation of this easily derived score could avoid a substantial number of futile treatments. These findings should be validated in additional independent cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James R M Black
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen R Atkinson
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Amal Singh
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joanne Evans
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rohini Sharma
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gahete MD, Jimenez-Vacas JM, Alors-Perez E, Herrero-Aguayo V, Fuentes-Fayos AC, Pedraza-Arevalo S, Castaño JP, Luque RM. Mouse models in endocrine tumors. J Endocrinol 2018; 240:JOE-18-0571.R1. [PMID: 30475226 DOI: 10.1530/joe-18-0571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Endocrine and neuroendocrine tumors comprise a highly heterogeneous group of neoplasms that can arise from (neuro)endocrine cells, either from endocrine glands or from the widespread diffuse neuroendocrine system, and, consequently, are widely distributed throughout the body. Due to their diversity, heterogeneity and limited incidence, studying in detail the molecular and genetic alterations that underlie their development and progression is still a highly elusive task. This, in turn, hinders the discovery of novel therapeutic options for these tumors. To circumvent these limitations, numerous mouse models of endocrine and neuroendocrine tumors have been developed, characterized and used in pre-clinical, co-clinical (implemented in mouse models and patients simultaneously) and post-clinical studies, for they represent powerful and necessary tools in basic and translational tumor biology research. Indeed, different in vivo mouse models, including cell line-based xenografts (CDXs), patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) and genetically engineered mouse models (GEMs), have been used to delineate the development, progression and behavior of human tumors. Results gained with these in vivo models have facilitated the clinical application in patients of diverse breakthrough discoveries made in this field. Herein, we review the generation, characterization and translatability of the most prominent mouse models of endocrine and neuroendocrine tumors reported to date, as well as the most relevant clinical implications obtained for each endocrine and neuroendocrine tumor type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel D Gahete
- M Gahete, Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Cordoba, 14011, Spain
| | - Juan M Jimenez-Vacas
- J Jimenez-Vacas, Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Emilia Alors-Perez
- E Alors-Perez, Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Inmunology, Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba (IMIBIC) / University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Vicente Herrero-Aguayo
- V Herrero-Aguayo, Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Antonio C Fuentes-Fayos
- A Fuentes-Fayos, Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Sergio Pedraza-Arevalo
- S Pedraza-Arevalo, Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Justo P Castaño
- J Castaño, Dpt. of Cell Biology-University of Córdoba, IMIBIC-Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba, Cordoba, E-14004, Spain
| | - Raul M Luque
- R Luque, Dept of Cell Biology, Phisiology and Inmunology, Section of Cell Biology, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain, Cordoba, 14014, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is a form of systemic radiotherapy shown to be effective in treating neuroendocrine tumors expressing somatostatin receptors. The NETTER-1 trial was the first randomized phase III clinical trial evaluating a radiolabeled somatostatin analog, and demonstrated significant improvement in progression-free survival among patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumors treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE versus high-dose octreotide. This article discusses the evolution of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, side effects, and potential future treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taymeyah Al-Toubah
- Department of GI Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Jonathan Strosberg
- Department of GI Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
PRRT genomic signature in blood for prediction of 177Lu-octreotate efficacy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018; 45:1155-1169. [PMID: 29484451 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-3967-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2017] [Accepted: 01/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) utilizes somatostatin receptor (SSR) overexpression on neuroendocrine tumors (NET) to deliver targeted radiotherapy. Intensity of uptake at imaging is considered related to efficacy but has low sensitivity. A pretreatment strategy to determine individual PRRT response remains a key unmet need. NET transcript expression in blood integrated with tumor grade provides a PRRT predictive quotient (PPQ) which stratifies PRRT "responders" from "non-responders". This study clinically validates the utility of the PPQ in NETs. METHODS The development and validation of the PPQ was undertaken in three independent 177Lu-PRRT treated cohorts. Specificity was tested in two separate somatostatin analog-treated cohorts. Prognostic value of the marker was defined in a cohort of untreated patients. The developmental cohort included lung and gastroenteropancreatic [GEP] NETs (n = 72) from IRST Meldola, Italy. The majority were GEP (71%) and low grade (86% G1-G2). Prospective validation cohorts were from Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Germany (n = 44), and Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands (n = 42). Each cohort included predominantly well differentiated, low grade (86-95%) lung and GEP-NETs. The non-PRRT comparator cohorts included SSA cohort I, n = 28 (100% low grade, 100% GEP-NET); SSA cohort II, n = 51 (98% low grade; 76% GEP-NET); and an untreated cohort, n = 44 (64% low grade; 91% GEP-NET). Baseline evaluations included clinical information (disease status, grade, SSR) and biomarker (CgA). NET blood gene transcripts (n = 8: growth factor signaling and metabolism) were measured pre-therapy and integrated with tumor Ki67 using a logistic regression model. This provided a binary output: "predicted responder" (PPQ+); "predicted non-responder" (PPQ-). Treatment response was evaluated using RECIST criteria [Responder (stable, partial and complete response) vs Non-Responder)]. Sample measurement and analyses were blinded to study outcome. Statistical evaluation included Kaplan-Meier survival and standard test evaluation analyses. RESULTS In the developmental cohort, 56% responded to PRRT. The PPQ predicted 100% of responders and 84% of non-responders (accuracy: 93%). In the two validation cohorts (response: 64-79%), the PPQ was 95% accurate (Bad Berka: PPQ + =97%, PPQ- = 93%; Rotterdam: PPQ + =94%, PPQ- = 100%). Overall, the median PFS was not reached in PPQ+ vs PPQ- (10-14 months; HR: 18-77, p < 0.0001). In the comparator cohorts, the predictor (PPQ) was 47-50% accurate for SSA-treatment and 50% as a prognostic. No differences in PFS were respectively noted (PPQ+: 10-12 months vs. PPQ-: 9-15 months). CONCLUSION The PPQ derived from circulating NET specific genes and tumor grade prior to the initiation of therapy is a highly specific predictor of the efficacy of PRRT with an accuracy of 95%.
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a form of systemic radiotherapy that allows targeted delivery of radionuclides to tumor cells expressing high levels of somatostatin receptors. The two radiopeptides most commonly used for PRRT, 90Y-DOTATOC and 177Lu-DOTATATE, have been successfully employed for more than a decade for the treatment of advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Recently, the phase III, randomized NETTER-1 trial has compared 177Lu-DOTATATE versus high-dose octreotide LAR in patients with progressive, metastatic midgut NETs, demonstrating exceptional tolerability and efficacy. This review summarizes recent developments in the field of radionuclide therapy for gastroenteropancreatic and lung NETs and considers possible strategies to further enhance its clinical efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauro Cives
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Jonathan Strosberg
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|