1
|
Plášek J, Dodulík J, Gai P, Hrstková B, Škrha J, Zlatohlávek L, Vlasáková R, Danko P, Ondráček P, Čubová E, Čapek B, Kollárová M, Fürst T, Václavík J. A Simple Risk Formula for the Prediction of COVID-19 Hospital Mortality. Infect Dis Rep 2024; 16:105-115. [PMID: 38391586 PMCID: PMC10887710 DOI: 10.3390/idr16010008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 respiratory infection is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. We aimed to assess the risk factors for hospital mortality in non-vaccinated patients during the 2021 spring wave in the Czech Republic. A total of 991 patients hospitalized between January 2021 and March 2021 with a PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 acute respiratory infection in two university hospitals and five rural hospitals were included in this analysis. After excluding patients with unknown outcomes, 790 patients entered the final analyses. Out of 790 patients included in the analysis, 282/790 (35.7%) patients died in the hospital; 162/790 (20.5) were male and 120/790 (15.2%) were female. There were 141/790 (18%) patients with mild, 461/790 (58.3%) with moderate, and 187/790 (23.7%) with severe courses of the disease based mainly on the oxygenation status. The best-performing multivariate regression model contains only two predictors-age and the patient's state; both predictors were rendered significant (p < 0.0001). Both age and disease state are very significant predictors of hospital mortality. An increase in age by 10 years raises the risk of hospital mortality by a factor of 2.5, and a unit increase in the oxygenation status raises the risk of hospital mortality by a factor of 20.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiří Plášek
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital Ostrava, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic; (J.D.); (J.V.)
- Centre for Research on Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Ostrava, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Jozef Dodulík
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital Ostrava, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic; (J.D.); (J.V.)
| | - Petr Gai
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Tuberculosis, University Hospital Ostrava, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic;
| | - Barbora Hrstková
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Ostrava, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic;
| | - Jan Škrha
- Department of Internal Medicine, General University Hospital, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic; (J.Š.J.); (L.Z.); (R.V.)
| | - Lukáš Zlatohlávek
- Department of Internal Medicine, General University Hospital, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic; (J.Š.J.); (L.Z.); (R.V.)
| | - Renata Vlasáková
- Department of Internal Medicine, General University Hospital, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic; (J.Š.J.); (L.Z.); (R.V.)
| | - Peter Danko
- Department of Internal Medicine, Havířov Regional Hospital, 736 01 Havířov, Czech Republic;
| | - Petr Ondráček
- Department of Internal Medicine, Bílovec Regional Hospital, 743 01 Bílovec, Czech Republic;
| | - Eva Čubová
- Department of Internal Medicine, Fifejdy City Hospital, 728 80 Ostrava, Czech Republic;
| | - Bronislav Čapek
- Department of Internal Medicine, Associated Medical Facilities, 794 01 Krnov, Czech Republic;
| | - Marie Kollárová
- Department of Internal Medicine, Třinec Regional Hospital, 739 61 Třinec, Czech Republic;
| | - Tomáš Fürst
- Department of Mathematical Analysis and Application of Mathematics, Palacky University, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic;
| | - Jan Václavík
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital Ostrava, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic; (J.D.); (J.V.)
- Centre for Research on Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Ostrava, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wiegand M, Cowan SL, Waddington CS, Halsall DJ, Keevil VL, Tom BDM, Taylor V, Gkrania-Klotsas E, Preller J, Goudie RJB. Development and validation of a dynamic 48-hour in-hospital mortality risk stratification for COVID-19 in a UK teaching hospital: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e060026. [PMID: 36691139 PMCID: PMC9445230 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop a disease stratification model for COVID-19 that updates according to changes in a patient's condition while in hospital to facilitate patient management and resource allocation. DESIGN In this retrospective cohort study, we adopted a landmarking approach to dynamic prediction of all-cause in-hospital mortality over the next 48 hours. We accounted for informative predictor missingness and selected predictors using penalised regression. SETTING All data used in this study were obtained from a single UK teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS We developed the model using 473 consecutive patients with COVID-19 presenting to a UK hospital between 1 March 2020 and 12 September 2020; and temporally validated using data on 1119 patients presenting between 13 September 2020 and 17 March 2021. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome is all-cause in-hospital mortality within 48 hours of the prediction time. We accounted for the competing risks of discharge from hospital alive and transfer to a tertiary intensive care unit for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. RESULTS Our final model includes age, Clinical Frailty Scale score, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation/fractional inspired oxygen ratio, white cell count, presence of acidosis (pH <7.35) and interleukin-6. Internal validation achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.90 (95% CI 0.87 to 0.93) and temporal validation gave an AUROC of 0.86 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.88). CONCLUSIONS Our model incorporates both static risk factors (eg, age) and evolving clinical and laboratory data, to provide a dynamic risk prediction model that adapts to both sudden and gradual changes in an individual patient's clinical condition. On successful external validation, the model has the potential to be a powerful clinical risk assessment tool. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study is registered as 'researchregistry5464' on the Research Registry (www.researchregistry.com).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Wiegand
- Faculty of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sarah L Cowan
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - David J Halsall
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Victoria L Keevil
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Medicine for the Elderly, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Brian D M Tom
- MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Vince Taylor
- Cancer Research UK, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Jacobus Preller
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lambert B, Stopard IJ, Momeni-Boroujeni A, Mendoza R, Zuretti A. Using patient biomarker time series to determine mortality risk in hospitalised COVID-19 patients: A comparative analysis across two New York hospitals. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0272442. [PMID: 35981055 PMCID: PMC9387798 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
A large range of prognostic models for determining the risk of COVID-19 patient mortality exist, but these typically restrict the set of biomarkers considered to measurements available at patient admission. Additionally, many of these models are trained and tested on patient cohorts from a single hospital, raising questions about the generalisability of results. We used a Bayesian Markov model to analyse time series data of biomarker measurements taken throughout the duration of a COVID-19 patient's hospitalisation for n = 1540 patients from two hospitals in New York: State University of New York (SUNY) Downstate Health Sciences University and Maimonides Medical Center. Our main focus was to quantify the mortality risk associated with both static (e.g. demographic and patient history variables) and dynamic factors (e.g. changes in biomarkers) throughout hospitalisation, by so doing, to explain the observed patterns of mortality. By using our model to make predictions across the hospitals, we assessed how predictive factors generalised between the two cohorts. The individual dynamics of the measurements and their associated mortality risk were remarkably consistent across the hospitals. The model accuracy in predicting patient outcome (death or discharge) was 72.3% (predicting SUNY; posterior median accuracy) and 71.3% (predicting Maimonides) respectively. Model sensitivity was higher for detecting patients who would go on to be discharged (78.7%) versus those who died (61.8%). Our results indicate the utility of including dynamic clinical measurements when assessing patient mortality risk but also highlight the difficulty of identifying high risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Lambert
- Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
- Department of Mathematics, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Isaac J. Stopard
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Amir Momeni-Boroujeni
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Rachelle Mendoza
- Department of Pathology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, United States of America
| | - Alejandro Zuretti
- Department of Pathology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University and Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shimoni Z, Froom P, Benbassat J. Parameters of the complete blood count predict in hospital mortality. Int J Lab Hematol 2022; 44:88-95. [PMID: 34464032 DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.13684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Revised: 07/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mortality rates are used to evaluate the quality of hospital care after adjusting for disease severity and, commonly also, for age, comorbidity, and laboratory data with only few parameters of the complete blood count (CBC). OBJECTIVE To identify the parameters of the CBC that predict independently in-hospital mortality of acutely admitted patients. POPULATION All patients were admitted to internal medicine, cardiology, and intensive care departments at the Laniado Hospital in Israel in 2018 and 2019. VARIABLES Independent variables were patients' age, sex, and parameters of the CBC. The outcome variable was in-hospital mortality. ANALYSIS Logistic regression. In 2018, we identified the variables that were associated with in-hospital mortality and validated this association in the 2019 cohort. RESULTS In the validation cohort, a model consisting of nine parameters that are commonly available in modern analyzers had a c-statistics (area under the receiver operator curve) of 0.86 and a 10%-90% risk gradient of 0%-21.4%. After including the proportions of large unstained cells, hypochromic, and macrocytic red cells, the c-statistic increased to 0.89, and the risk gradient to 0.1%-29.5%. CONCLUSION The commonly available parameters of the CBC predict in-hospital mortality. Addition of the proportions of hypochromic red cells, macrocytic red cells, and large unstained cells may improve the predictive value of the CBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zvi Shimoni
- Department of Internal Medicine B, Laniado Hospital, Netanya, Israel
- Ruth and Bruce Rappaport School of Medicine, Haifa, Israel
| | - Paul Froom
- Clinical Utility Department, Sanz Medical Center, Laniado Hospital, Netanya, Israel
- School of Public Health, University of Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Jochanan Benbassat
- Department of Medicine (retired), Hadassah University Hospital Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Qi X, Shen L, Chen J, Shi M, Shen B. Predicting the Disease Severity of Virus Infection. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2022; 1368:111-139. [DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-8969-7_6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
6
|
Khan F, Ali S, Saeed A, Kumar R, Khan AW. Forecasting daily new infections, deaths and recovery cases due to COVID-19 in Pakistan by using Bayesian Dynamic Linear Models. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0253367. [PMID: 34138956 PMCID: PMC8211153 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 has caused the deadliest pandemic around the globe, emerged from the city of Wuhan, China by the end of 2019 and affected all continents of the world, with severe health implications and as well as financial-damage. Pakistan is also amongst the top badly effected countries in terms of casualties and financial loss due to COVID-19. By 20th March, 2021, Pakistan reported 623,135 total confirmed cases and 13,799 deaths. A state space model called 'Bayesian Dynamic Linear Model' (BDLM) was used for the forecast of daily new infections, deaths and recover cases regarding COVID-19. For the estimation of states of the models and forecasting new observations, the recursive Kalman filter was used. Twenty days ahead forecast show that the maximum number of new infections are 4,031 per day with 95% prediction interval (3,319-4,743). Death forecast shows that the maximum number of the deaths with 95% prediction interval are 81 and (67-93), respectively. Maximum daily recoveries are 3,464 with 95% prediction interval (2,887-5,423) in the next 20 days. The average number of new infections, deaths and recover cases are 3,282, 52 and 1,840, respectively, in the upcoming 20 days. As the data generation processes based on the latest data has been identified, therefore it can be updated with the availability of new data to provide latest forecast.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Firdos Khan
- School of Natural Sciences (SNS), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan
- * E-mail:
| | - Shaukat Ali
- Global Change Impact Studies Centre (GCISC), Ministry of Climate Change, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Alia Saeed
- Health Services Academy, Islamabad, Pakistan
- ClimatExperts, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | | | - Abdul Wali Khan
- Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations and Coordination Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|