A Novel E3 Probiotics Formula Restored Gut Dysbiosis and Remodelled Gut Microbial Network and Microbiome Dysbiosis Index (MDI) in Southern Chinese Adult Psoriasis Patients

Fecal microbiota is associated with extraintestinal manifestations in inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

A large proportion of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) experience IBD-related inflammatory conditions outside of the gastrointestinal tract, termed extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs) which further decreases quality of life and, in extreme cases, can be life threatening. The pathogenesis of EIMs remains unknown, and although gut microbiota alterations are a well-known characteristic of patients with IBD, its relationship with EIMs remains sparsely investigated. This study aimed to compare the gut microbiota of patients with IBD with and without EIMs.

METHODS

A total of 131 Danish patients with IBD were included in the study, of whom 86 had a history of EIMs (IBD-EIM) and 45 did not (IBD-C). Stool samples underwent 16S rRNA sequencing. Amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were mapped to the Silva database. Diversity indices and distance matrices were compared between IBD-EIM and IBD-C. Differentially abundant ASVs were identified using a custom multiple model statistical analysis approach, and modules of co-associated bacteria were identified using sparse correlations for compositional data (SparCC) and related to patient EIM status.

RESULTS

Patients with IBD and EIMs exhibited increased disease activity, body mass index, increased fecal calprotectin levels and circulating monocytes and neutrophils. Microbiologically, IBD-EIM exhibited lower fecal microbial diversity than IBD-C (Mann-Whitney's test, p = .01) and distinct fecal microbiota composition (permutational multivariate analysis of variance; weighted UniFrac, R2 = 0.018, p = .01). A total of 26 ASVs exhibited differential relative abundances between IBD-EIM and IBD-C, including decreased Agathobacter and Blautia and increased Eggerthella lenta in the IBD-EIM group. SparCC analysis identified 27 bacterial co-association modules, three of which were negatively related to EIM (logistic regression, p < .05) and included important health-associated bacteria, such as Agathobacter and Faecalibacterium.

CONCLUSIONS

The fecal microbiota in IBD patients with EIMs is distinct from that in IBD patients without EIM and could be important for EIM pathogenesis.

Advances in the mechanism of action of short-chain fatty acids in psoriasis

Psoriasis is a prevalent chronic inflammatory and immunological disorder. Its lesions are present as scaly erythema or plaques. Disruptions in the body's immune system play a significant role in developing psoriasis. Recent evidence suggests a potential role of the gut microbiome in autoimmune diseases. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are the primary metabolites created by gut microbes and play a crucial fuction in autoimmunity. SCFAs act on various cells by mediating signaling to participate in host physiological and pathological processes. These processes encompass body metabolism, maintenance of intestinal barrier function, and immune system modulation. SCFAs can regulate immune cells to enhance the body's immune function, potentially influencing the prevention and treatment of psoriasis. However, the mechanisms underlying the role of SCFAs in psoriasis remain incompletely understood. This paper examines the relationship between SCFAs and psoriasis, elucidating how SCFAs influence the immune system, inflammatory response, and gut barrier in psoriasis. According to the study, in psoriasis, SCFAs have been shown to regulate neutrophils, macrophages, and dendritic cells in the adaptive immune system, as well as T and B cells in the innate immune system. Additionally, we explore the role of SCFAs in psoriasis by maintaining intestinal barrier function, restoring intestinal ecological homeostasis, and investigating the potential therapeutic benefits of SCFAs for psoriasis.

Psoriatic skin transcript phenotype: androgen/estrogen and cortisone/cortisol imbalance with increasing DNA damage response

BACKGROUND

Patients prone to psoriasis suffer after a breakdown of the epidermal barrier and develop poorly healing lesions with abnormal proliferation of keratinocytes. Strong inflammatory reactions with genotoxicity (short telomeres) suggest impaired immune defenses with DNA damage repair response (DDR) in patients with psoriasis. Recent evidence indicates the existence of crosstalk mechanisms linking the DDR machinery and hormonal signaling pathways that cooperate to influence both progressions of many diseases and responses to treatment. The aim of this study was to clarify whether steroid biosynthesis and genomic stability markers are altered in parallel during the formation of psoriatic skin. Understanding the interaction of the steroid pathway and DNA damage response is crucial to addressing underlying fundamental issues and managing resulting epidermal barrier disruption in psoriasis.

METHODS

Skin (Lesional, non-lesional) and blood samples from twenty psoriasis patients and fifteen healthy volunteers were collected. Real-Time-PCR study was performed to assess levels of known transcripts such as: estrogen (ESR1, ESR2), androgen (AR), glucocorticoid/mineralocorticoid receptors (NR3C1, NR3C2), HSD11B1/HSD11B2, and DNA damage sensors (SMC1A, TREX1, TREX2, SSBP3, RAD1, RAD18, EXO1, POLH, HUS1).

RESULTS

We found that ESR1, ESR2, HSD11B1, NR3C1, NR3C2, POLH, and SMC1A transcripts were significantly decreased and AR, TREX1, RAD1, and SSBP3 transcripts were increased dramatically in the lesional skin compared to skin samples of controls.

CONCLUSION

We found that the regulation of the steroidogenic pathway was disrupted in the lesional tissue of psoriasis patients and that a sufficient glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid response did not form and the estrogen/androgen balance was altered in favour of androgens. We suggest that an increased androgen response in the presence of DDR increases the risk of developing psoriasis. Although this situation may be the cause or the consequence of a disruption of the epidermal barrier, our data suggest developing new therapeutic strategies.

Gut microbiota and psoriasis: pathogenesis, targeted therapy, and future directions

Background

Psoriasis is one of the most common autoimmune skin diseases. Increasing evidence shows that alterations in the diversity and function of microbiota can participate in the pathogenesis of psoriasis through various pathways and mechanisms.

Objective

To review the connection between microbial changes and psoriasis, how microbial-targeted therapy can be used to treat psoriasis, as well as the potential of prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, diet, and Traditional Chinese Medicine as supplementary and adjunctive therapies.

Methods

Literature related to the relationship between psoriasis and gut microbiota was searched in PubMed and CNKI.

Results

Adjunct therapies such as dietary interventions, traditional Chinese medicine, and probiotics can enhance gut microbiota abundance and diversity in patients with psoriasis. These therapies stimulate immune mediators including IL-23, IL-17, IL-22, and modulate gamma interferon (IFN-γ) along with the NF-kB pathway, thereby suppressing the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and ameliorating systemic inflammatory conditions.

Conclusion

This article discusses the direction of future research and clinical treatment of psoriasis from the perspective of intestinal microbiota and the mechanism of traditional Chinese medicine, so as to provide clinicians with more comprehensive diagnosis and treatment options and bring greater hope to patients with psoriasis.

Efficacy of probiotic supplementation in the treatment of psoriasis-A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Many studies have emphasized the possible role of probiotics in psoriasis, probiotic supplementation might be helpful to treat psoriasis. This study systematically evaluated the efficacy of probiotic supplementation for the treatment of psoriasis.

METHODS

We searched some databases with keywords until November 10, 2023, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science. These keywords included probiotics, psoriasis RCT, and so on. After rigorous literature screening by two authors, five studies were identified. Eventually, the required data were independently extracted by another author.

RESULTS

A total of five studies with 286 patients were included. The pooled results showed that the efficacy of probiotic supplementation was superior to placebo in the treatment of psoriasis. The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (SMD = -1.40, 95% Cl = -2.63 to -0.17, p < 0.00001) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (SMD = -0.92, 95% Cl = -1.86 to 0.01, p < 0.00001). Score decreased after probiotic supplementation.

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis showed that probiotic supplementation could be a new treatment option for psoriasis.

Modulation of the skin and gut microbiome by psoriasis treatment: a comprehensive systematic review

The microbiome is intricately linked to the development of psoriasis, serving as both a potential cause and consequence of the psoriatic process. In recent years, there has been growing interest among psoriasis researchers in exploring how psoriasis treatments affect the skin and gut microbiome. However, a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of modern treatment approaches on the microbiome has yet to be conducted. In this systematic review, we analyze studies investigating alterations in the skin and gut microbiome resulting from psoriasis treatment, aiming to understand how current therapies influence the role of the microbiome in psoriasis development. The systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for eligible studies from the inception dates until July 5, 2023. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were carried out by three overlapping pairs of reviewers, resolving any disagreements through consensus. Our analysis of various treatments, including biologics, conventional medications, phototherapy, and probiotics, reveals significant shifts in microbial diversity and abundance. Importantly, favorable treatment outcomes are associated with microbiota alterations that approach those observed in healthy individuals. While the studies reviewed exhibit varying degrees of bias, underscoring the need for further research, this review supports the potential of microbiome modulation as both a preventive and therapeutic strategy for psoriasis patients. The findings underscore the importance of personalized therapeutic approaches, recognizing the profound impact of treatment on the microbiome. They also highlight the promise of probiotics, prebiotics, and dietary interventions in psoriasis management.

Current Approaches to Prevent or Reverse Microbiome Dysbiosis in Chronic Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases

Advances in knowledge of the microbiome and its relationship with the immune system have led to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (CIRD). Indeed, the microbiome dysbiosis now occupies a particular place with implications for the determinism and clinical expression of CIRD, as well as the therapeutic response of affected patients. Several approaches exist to limit the impact of the microbiome during CIRD. This review aimed to present current strategies to prevent or reverse microbiome dysbiosis based on existing knowledge, in order to provide practical information to healthcare professionals treating patients suffering from CIRD.

Gut microbiota and inflammatory factor characteristics in major depressive disorder patients with anorexia

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to explore the gut microbiota and inflammatory factor characteristics in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients with anorexia and to analyze the correlation between gut microbiota and inflammatory factors, anorexia, and HAMD scores.

METHODS

46 MDD patients and 46 healthy controls (HC) were included in the study. The 46 MDD patients were divided into two groups according to whether they had anorexia:20 MDD without anorexia (MDA0 group) and 26 MDD with anorexia (MDA1 group). We used the Hamilton Depression Scale-24 (HAMD-24) to evaluate the depression status of all participants and 16 S ribosomal RNA (16 S rRNA)sequencing to evaluate the composition of the gut microbiota. Inflammatory factors in peripheral blood such as C-reactive protein (CRP) were detected using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Spearman's correlation analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between gut microbiota and inflammatory factors, HAMD scores, and anorexia.

RESULTS

1). CRP was significantly higher in the MDA0, MDA1, than HC. 2). An analysis of α-diversity shows: the Simpson and Pielou indices of the HC group are higher than the MDA1 group (P < 0.05). 3). The β-diversity analysis shows differences in the composition of microbial communities between the MDA0, MDA1, and HC group. 4). A correlation analysis showed that Blautia positively correlated with anorexia, HAMD scores, and CRP level, whereas Faecalibacterium, Bacteroides, Roseburia, and Parabacteroides negatively correlated with anorexia, HAMD scores, and CRP level. 5). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn using the differential bacterial genera between MDD patients with or without anorexia as biomarkers to identify whether MDD patients were accompanied with anorexia, and its area under curve (AUC) was 0.85. The ROC curve was drawn using the differential bacterial genera between MDD patients with anorexia and healthy controls as biomarkers to diagnose MDD patients with anorexia, with its AUC was 0.97.

CONCLUSION

This study suggested that MDD patients with anorexia had a distinct gut microbiota compared to healthy individuals, with higher level of CRP. Blautia was more abundant in MDD patients with anorexia and positively correlated with CRP, HAMD scores, and anorexia. The gut microbiota might have influenced MDD and anorexia through the inflammatory factor CRP.

Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities of Nano-probiotics Versus Free Probiotics Against Gastrointestinal Pathogenic Bacteria

Antibiotic-resistant pathogenic bacteria and the oxidative stress related to their infections are dangerous health problems. Finding new safe, effective antibacterial and antioxidant agents is an urgent global need. Probiotics are a strong candidate for possible antibacterial and antioxidant agents. The delivery of these probiotics without any effect on gastrointestinal digestion is the most important point for their application. The encapsulation of the probiotics on nanoparticles or other supports is a well-known method for the safe delivery of the probiotics. Little information is known about the effect of the probiotic encapsulation on its antibacterial and antioxidant activity. The present study tried to investigate the effect of probiotic encapsulation on nano-chitosan on its antioxidant activity and antibacterial activity against some pathogenic bacteria. We encapsulated some known probiotic species on nano-chitosan and investigated the antibacterial activity of the nano-probiotics and free probiotics against gastrointestinal pathogenic bacteria. The antioxidant characters of the free and encapsulated probiotics were investigated in terms of DPPH radicle scavenging activity, ferric ion chelating activity, hydroxyl radicle scavenging activity, superoxide anion radicle scavenging activity, and anti-lipid peroxidation activity. Results showed the superiority of the encapsulated probiotics as antibacterial and antioxidant agents over the free ones. The encapsulation improved the antibacterial activity of Sporolactobacillus laevolacticus against Bacteroides fragilis by 134% compared to the free one. Also, significantly, the encapsulation increased the hydroxyl radicle scavenging activity of Enterococcus faecium by about 180% compared to the free one. Nano-chitosan encapsulation synergistically increased the antioxidant and antibacterial activity of the studied probiotics. This can be promising for controlling pathogenic bacteria.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12088-023-01140-2.

The Role of the Gut Microbiome and Microbial Dysbiosis in Common Skin Diseases

Dermatoses are an increasingly common problem, particularly in developed countries. The causes of this phenomenon include genetic factors and environmental elements. More and more scientific reports suggest that the gut microbiome, more specifically its dysbiosis, also plays an important role in the induction and progression of diseases, including dermatological diseases. The gut microbiome is recognised as the largest endocrine organ, and has a key function in maintaining human homeostasis. In this review, the authors will take a close look at the link between the gut-skin axis and the pathogenesis of dermatoses such as atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, alopecia areata, and acne. The authors will also focus on the role of probiotics in remodelling the microbiome and the alleviation of dermatoses.

A Novel Multi-Strain E3 Probiotic Formula Improved the Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Quality of Life in Chinese Psoriasis Patients

Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disease affecting the skin and other systems. Gastrointestinal disease was found to be correlated with psoriasis in previous studies and it can significantly affect the quality of life of psoriasis patients. Despite the importance of the gut microbiome in gut and skin health having already been demonstrated in many research studies, the potential effect of probiotics on GI comorbidities in psoriasis patients is unclear. To investigate the effects of probiotics on functional GI comorbidities including irritable bowel syndrome, functional constipation, and functional diarrhea in psoriasis patients, we conducted a targeted 16S rRNA sequencing and comprehensive bioinformatic analysis among southern Chinese patients to compare the gut microbiome profiles of 45 psoriasis patients over an 8-week course of novel oral probiotics. All the participants were stratified into responders and non-responders according to their improvement in GI comorbidities, which were based on their Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) scores after intervention. The Dermatological Life Quality Index (DLQI) score revealed a significant improvement in quality of life within the responder group (DLQI: mean 10.4 at week 0 vs. mean 15.9 at week 8, p = 0.0366). The proportion of psoriasis patients without GI comorbidity manifestation at week 8 was significantly higher than that at week 0 (week 0: Normal 53.33%, Constipation/Diarrhea 46.67%; week 8: Normal 75.56%, Constipation/Diarrhea 24.44%, p = 0.0467). In addition, a significant difference in the gut microbiome composition between the responders and non-responders was observed according to alpha and beta diversities. Differential abundance analysis revealed that the psoriasis patients exhibited (1) an elevated relative abundance of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Parabacteroides distasonis, and Ruminococcus bromii and (2) a reduced relative abundance of Oscillibacter, Bacteroides vulgatus, Escherichia sp., and Biophila wadsworthia after the 8-week intervention. The responders also exhibited a higher relative abundance of Fusicatenibacter saccharivorans when compared to the non-responders. In summary, our study discovers the potential clinical improvement effects of the novel probiotic formula in improving GI comorbidities and quality of life in psoriasis patients. We also revealed the different gut microbiome composition as well as the gut microbial signatures in the patients who responded to probiotics. These findings could provide insight into the use of probiotics in the management of psoriasis symptoms.

Advances in psoriasis and gut microorganisms with co-metabolites

This review summarizes the potential role of gut microbes and their metabolites as novel mediators of psoriasis, including their composition and function in disease pathogenesis, progression, and management. Gut microbiota network analysis, colony construction, and in vivo large-scale interaction experiments showed that different degrees of damage and repair in psoriasis, both in animals and humans, involve cross-border homeostasis of the microbial community. Which gut microbiota interactions are present in psoriasis and how they collaborate with immune cells and influence psoriasis development via the gut-skin axis remain incompletely elucidated. In this article, we review the latest information on the unique patterns of gut microbiota and co-metabolites involved in the pathogenesis of psoriasis and attempt to explore microbial-based therapeutic targets derived from mono-and polymicrobial probiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, pharmacomicrobiomics, and dietary interventions as diagnostic or therapeutic approaches promising to provide new options and long-term management for psoriasis.

Causal Associations Between Gut Microbiota and Psoriasis: A Mendelian Randomization Study

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have proposed a possible gut-skin axis, and linked gut microbiota to psoriasis risks. However, there is heterogeneity in existing evidence. Observational research is prone to bias, and it is hard to determine causality. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate possible causal associations between gut microbiota (GM) and psoriasis.

METHODS

With published large-scale GWAS (genome-wide association study) summary datasets, two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) was performed to sort out possible causal roles of GM in psoriasis and arthropathic psoriasis (PsA). The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was taken as the primary evaluation of causal association. As complements to the IVW method, we also applied MR-Egger, weighted median. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using Cochrane's Q test, MR-Egger intercept test, MR-PRESSO (Mendelian Randomization Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier) global test, and leave-one-out analysis.

RESULTS

By primary IVW analysis, we identified nominal protective roles of Bacteroidetes (odds ratio, OR 0.81, P = 0.033) and Prevotella9 (OR 0.87, P = 0.045) in psoriasis risks. Bacteroidia (OR 0.65, P = 0.03), Bacteroidales (OR 0.65, P = 0.03), and Ruminococcaceae UCG002 (OR 0.81, P = 0.038) are nominally associated with lower risks for PsA. On the other hand, Pasteurellales (OR 1.22, P = 0.033), Pasteurellaceae (OR 1.22, P = 0.033), Blautia (OR 1.46, P = 0.014), Methanobrevibacter (OR 1.27, P = 0.026), and Eubacterium fissicatena group (OR 1.21, P = 0.028) are nominal risk factors for PsA. Additionally, E. fissicatena group is a possible risk factor for psoriasis (OR 1.22, P = 0.00018). After false discovery rate (FDR) correction, E. fissicatena group remains a risk factor for psoriasis (PFDR = 0.03798).

CONCLUSION

We comprehensively evaluated possible causal associations of GM with psoriasis and arthropathic psoriasis, and identified several nominal associations. E. fissicatena group remains a risk factor for psoriasis after FDR correction. Our results offer promising therapeutic targets for psoriasis clinical management.