Serial Detection of Circulating Mucorales DNA in Invasive Mucormycosis: A Retrospective Multicenter Evaluation

Agreement between two real-time commercial PCR kits and an in-house real-time PCR for diagnosis of mucormycosis

Mucormycosis is a severe and emerging invasive fungal infection associated with high mortality rates. Early diagnosis is crucial for initiating specific antifungal treatment, with molecular tools currently representing the most efficient diagnostic approach. Presently, a standardized in-house real-time PCR method is widely employed for diagnosing mucormycosis. Our study aimed to evaluate the agreement for the Mucorales DNA detection between two commercial real-time PCR assays-the Fungiplex Mucorales Real-Time PCR Kit and the MycoGENIE Aspergillus-Mucorales spp. Real-Time PCR Kit-in comparison with the in-house PCR. We retrospectively analyzed 58 samples previously identified as positive for Mucorales using the in-house PCR. These samples, obtained from 22 patients with proven or probable mucormycosis, were tested with both commercial kits. Additionally, samples from 40 patients without mucormycosis served as negative controls. Our findings revealed that the MycoGENIE Kit demonstrated superior performance in detecting Mucorales DNA in samples identified as positive by the in-house PCR. Notably, we observed minimal variability in cycle threshold (CT) values when comparing the results of the MycoGENIE Kit with those of the in-house PCR, with an average difference of 1.8 cycles. In contrast, the Fungiplex Kit exhibited a larger discrepancy in CT values compared to the in-house PCR, with an average difference of 4.1 cycles. The MycoGENIE Kit exhibited very good agreement (kappa of 0.82) with the in-house PCR for detecting Mucorales DNA across various sample types. These findings are important for the choice of kits that could be used to diagnose mucormycosis in clinical microbiology laboratories.

IMPORTANCE

Early diagnosis of mucormycosis is crucial for initiating effective treatment. The detection of Mucorales DNA by PCR in serum has revolutionized the diagnosis of this infection. However, the use of in-house methods can be time consuming. The availability of a commercial kit eliminates the need for in-house assay development, reducing laboratory workload and ensuring consistent performance across different healthcare settings. Currently, there are several commercial assays available, but many have limited evaluation. In this study, we compared two commercial kits and found that the MycoGENIE Kit offers a promising alternative to the in-house method.

Utility of an in-house real-time PCR in whole blood samples as a minimally invasive method for early and accurate diagnosis of invasive mould infections

INTRODUCTION

Invasive mould infections (IMIs) are a leading cause of death in patients with compromised immune systems. Proven invasive mould infection requires detection of a fungus by histopathological analysis of a biopsied specimen, sterile culture, or fungal DNA amplification by PCR in tissue. However, the clinical performance of a PCR assay on blood samples taken from patients suspected of invasive mould disease has not been fully evaluated, particularly for the differential diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis (IA) and invasive Mucormycosis (IM).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the diagnostic utility of our previously validated in-house real-time PCR in blood samples for diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis in patients with suspected invasive mould infection.

METHODS

All patients with suspected invasive mould infection were prospectively enrolled from May 2021 to July 2021. Conventional fungal diagnosis was performed using tissue and respiratory samples. In-house PCR was performed on blood samples and its diagnostic performance evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 158 cases of suspected invasive mould infection were enrolled in the study. The sensitivity and specificity of in-house PCR performed on blood samples was found to be 92.5% and 81.4% respectively for diagnosis of probable IA, and 65% and 84.62% respectively for diagnosis of proven and probable IM. It was also able to detect 3 out of 5 cases of possible IM where no other microbiological evidence of IM was obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

This assay could be helpful in minimally invasive diagnosis of IMIs for patients in whom invasive sampling is not feasible, especially as a preliminary or screening test. It can help in early diagnosis, anticipating conventional laboratory confirmation by days or weeks. Possible correlation between fungal load and mortality can help in initiating aggressive treatment for patients with high initial fungal load.

PCR diagnostic platforms for non-Aspergillus mold infections: ready for routine implementation in the clinic?

INTRODUCTION

While Aspergillus spp. remain the predominant cause of invasive mold infections, non-Aspergillus molds, such as the Mucorales or Fusarium spp., account for an increasing proportion of cases. The diagnosis of non-Aspergillus invasive mold infections (NAIMI) is challenging because of the low sensitivity and delay of conventional microbiological tests. Therefore, there is a particular interest to develop molecular tools for their early detection in blood or other clinical samples.

AREAS COVERED

This extensive review of the literature discusses the performance of Mucorales-specific PCR and other genus-specific or broad-range fungal PCR that can be used for the diagnosis of NAIMI in diverse clinical samples, with a focus on novel technologies.

EXPERT OPINION

PCR currently represents the most promising approach, combining good sensitivity/specificity and ability to detect NAIMI in clinical samples before diagnosis by conventional cultures and histopathology. Several PCR assays have been designed for the detection of Mucorales in particular, but also Fusarium spp. or Scedosporium/Lomentospora spp. Some commercial Mucorales PCRs are now available. While efforts are still needed for standardized protocols and the development of more rapid and simpler techniques, PCR is on the way to becoming an essential test for the early diagnosis of mucormycosis and possibly other NAIMIs.

Use of the Mucorales qPCR on blood to screen high-risk hematology patients is associated with better survival

Our objective was to determine whether the twice-weekly screening of high-risk hematology patients by Mucorales qPCR on serum affects the prognosis of mucormycosis. Results from all serum Mucorales qPCR tests performed on patients from the hematology unit from January 2017 to December 2022 were analyzed. Patients with positive results were classified as having proven, probable or 'PCR-only' mucormycosis. One-month mortality for the local cohort was compared with that of a national cohort of cases of mucormycosis collected by the French surveillance network for invasive fungal disease ('Réseau de surveillances des infections fongiques invasives en France' (RESSIF)) from 2012 to 2018. From 2017 to 2022, 7825 serum Mucorales qPCR tests were performed for patients from the hematology unit; 107 patients with at least one positive Mucorales qPCR (164 positive samples) were identified. Sixty patients (70 positive samples, median Cq = 40) had no radiological criteria for mucormycosis and were considered not to have invasive fungal disease (70/7825, 0.9% false positives). It was not possible to classify disease status for six patients (12 positive samples, median Cq = 38). Forty-one patients (82 positive samples, median Cq = 35) had a final diagnosis of mucormycosis. In comparison with the RESSIF cohort, the local cohort was independently associated with a 48% lower one-month all-cause mortality rate (age-, sex-, and primary disease-adjusted hazard ratio = 0.52; 95% confidence interval: 0.29-0.94; P 0.03). Proactive screening for invasive mold diseases in high-risk hematology patients, including twice-weekly Mucorales qPCR on serum, was associated with mucormycosis higher survival.

Molecular mechanisms that govern infection and antifungal resistance in Mucorales

SUMMARYThe World Health Organization has established a fungal priority pathogens list that includes species critical or highly important to human health. Among them is the order Mucorales, a fungal group comprising at least 39 species responsible for the life-threatening infection known as mucormycosis. Despite the continuous rise in cases and the poor prognosis due to innate resistance to most antifungal drugs used in the clinic, Mucorales has received limited attention, partly because of the difficulties in performing genetic manipulations. The COVID-19 pandemic has further escalated cases, with some patients experiencing the COVID-19-associated mucormycosis, highlighting the urgent need to increase knowledge about these fungi. This review addresses significant challenges in treating the disease, including delayed and poor diagnosis, the lack of accurate global incidence estimation, and the limited treatment options. Furthermore, it focuses on the most recent discoveries regarding the mechanisms and genes involved in the development of the disease, antifungal resistance, and the host defense response. Substantial advancements have been made in identifying key fungal genes responsible for invasion and tissue damage, host receptors exploited by the fungus to invade tissues, and mechanisms of antifungal resistance. This knowledge is expected to pave the way for the development of new antifungals to combat mucormycosis. In addition, we anticipate significant progress in characterizing Mucorales biology, particularly the mechanisms involved in pathogenesis and antifungal resistance, with the possibilities offered by CRISPR-Cas9 technology for genetic manipulation of the previously intractable Mucorales species.

An update on current and novel molecular diagnostics for the diagnosis of invasive fungal infections

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal infections cause millions of infections annually, but diagnosis remains challenging. There is an increased need for low-cost, easy to use, highly sensitive and specific molecular assays that can differentiate between colonized and pathogenic organisms from different clinical specimens.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed the literature evaluating the current state of molecular diagnostics for invasive fungal infections, focusing on current and novel molecular tests such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), digital PCR, high-resolution melt (HRM), and metagenomics/next generation sequencing (mNGS).

EXPERT OPINION

PCR is highly sensitive and specific, although performance can be impacted by prior/concurrent antifungal use. PCR assays can identify mutations associated with antifungal resistance, non-Aspergillus mold infections, and infections from endemic fungi. HRM is a rapid and highly sensitive diagnostic modality that can identify a wide range of fungal pathogens, including down to the species level, but multiplex assays are limited and HRM is currently unavailable in most healthcare settings, although universal HRM is working to overcome this limitation. mNGS offers a promising approach for rapid and hypothesis-free diagnosis of a wide range of fungal pathogens, although some drawbacks include limited access, variable performance across platforms, the expertise and costs associated with this method, and long turnaround times in real-world settings.

Diagnosis of invasive fungal infections: challenges and recent developments

BACKGROUND

The global burden of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) has shown an upsurge in recent years due to the higher load of immunocompromised patients suffering from various diseases. The role of early and accurate diagnosis in the aggressive containment of the fungal infection at the initial stages becomes crucial thus, preventing the development of a life-threatening situation. With the changing demands of clinical mycology, the field of fungal diagnostics has evolved and come a long way from traditional methods of microscopy and culturing to more advanced non-culture-based tools. With the advent of more powerful approaches such as novel PCR assays, T2 Candida, microfluidic chip technology, next generation sequencing, new generation biosensors, nanotechnology-based tools, artificial intelligence-based models, the face of fungal diagnostics is constantly changing for the better. All these advances have been reviewed here giving the latest update to our readers in the most orderly flow.

MAIN TEXT

A detailed literature survey was conducted by the team followed by data collection, pertinent data extraction, in-depth analysis, and composing the various sub-sections and the final review. The review is unique in its kind as it discusses the advances in molecular methods; advances in serology-based methods; advances in biosensor technology; and advances in machine learning-based models, all under one roof. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no review covering all of these fields (especially biosensor technology and machine learning using artificial intelligence) with relevance to invasive fungal infections.

CONCLUSION

The review will undoubtedly assist in updating the scientific community's understanding of the most recent advancements that are on the horizon and that may be implemented as adjuncts to the traditional diagnostic algorithms.

Epidemiology, Modern Diagnostics, and the Management of Mucorales Infections

Mucormycosis is an uncommon, yet deadly invasive fungal infection caused by the Mucorales moulds. These pathogens are a WHO-assigned high-priority pathogen group, as mucormycosis incidence is increasing, and there is unacceptably high mortality with current antifungal therapies. Current diagnostic methods have inadequate sensitivity and specificity and may have issues with accessibility or turnaround time. Patients with diabetes mellitus and immune compromise are predisposed to infection with these environmental fungi, but COVID-19 has established itself as a new risk factor. Mucorales also cause healthcare-associated outbreaks, and clusters associated with natural disasters have also been identified. Robust epidemiological surveillance into burden of disease, at-risk populations, and emerging pathogens is required. Emerging serological and molecular techniques may offer a faster route to diagnosis, while newly developed antifungal agents show promise in preliminary studies. Equitable access to these emerging diagnostic techniques and antifungal therapies will be key in identifying and treating mucormycosis, as delayed initiation of therapy is associated with higher mortality.

Clinical Features and Treatment Progress of Invasive Mucormycosis in Patients with Hematological Malignancies

The incidence rate of invasive mucormycosis (IM) in patients with hematological malignancies (HMs) is increasing year by year, ranging from 0.07% to 4.29%, and the mortality rate is mostly higher than 50%. With the ongoing pandemic of COVID-19, COVID-19-associated mucormycosis (CAM) also became a global health threat. Patients with high risk factors such as active HMs, relapsed/refractory leukemia, prolonged neutropenia may still develop breakthrough mucormycosis (BT-MCR) even under the prophylaxis of Mucorales-active antifungals, and such patients often have higher mortality. Rhizopus spp. is the most common genus associated with IM, followed by Mucor spp. and Lichtheimia spp. Pulmonary mucormycosis (PM) is the most common form of IM in patients with HMs, followed by rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis (ROCM) and disseminated mucormycosis. The prognosis of IM patients with neutrophil recovery, localized IM and receiving early combined medical-surgical therapy is usually better. As for management of the disease, risk factors should be eliminated firstly. Liposome amphotericin B (L-AmB) combined with surgery is the initial treatment scheme of IM. Those who are intolerant to L-AmB can choose intravenous formulations or tablets of isavuconazole or posaconazole. Patients who are refractory to monotherapy can turn to combined antifungals therapy.

Novel Approaches in the Management of Mucormycosis

Purpose of Review

Invasive mucormycosis (IM), caused by fungi of the order Mucorales, is one of the deadliest fungal infection among hematologic cancer patients. Its incidence is also increasingly reported in immunocompetent individuals, notably with the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, there is an urgent need for novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches of IM. This review discusses the current advances in this field.

Recent Findings

Early diagnosis of IM is crucial and can be improved by Mucorales-specific PCR and development of lateral-flow immunoassays for specific antigen detection. The spore coat proteins (CotH) are essential for virulence of the Mucorales and may represent a target for novel antifungal therapies. Adjuvant therapies boosting the immune response, such as interferon-γ, anti-PDR1 or fungal-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells, are also considered.

Summary

The most promising perspectives for improved management of IM consist of a multilayered approach targeting both the pathogen and the host immune system.

What Is New in Pulmonary Mucormycosis?

Mucormycosis is a rare but life-threatening fungal infection due to molds of the order Mucorales. The incidence has been increasing over recent decades. Worldwide, pulmonary mucormycosis (PM) presents in the lungs, which are the third main location for the infection after the rhino-orbito-cerebral (ROC) areas and the skin. The main risk factors for PM include hematological malignancies and solid organ transplantation, whereas ROC infections are classically favored by diabetes mellitus. The differences between the ROC and pulmonary locations are possibly explained by the activation of different mammalian receptors—GRP78 in nasal epithelial cells and integrin β1 in alveolar epithelial cells—in response to Mucorales. Alveolar macrophages and neutrophils play a key role in the host defense against Mucorales. The diagnosis of PM relies on CT scans, cultures, PCR tests, and histology. The reversed halo sign is an early, but very suggestive, sign of PM in neutropenic patients. Recently, the serum PCR test showed a very encouraging performance for the diagnosis and follow-up of mucormycosis. Liposomal amphotericin B is the drug of choice for first-line therapy, together with correction of underlying disease and surgery when feasible. After a stable or partial response, the step-down treatment includes oral isavuconazole or posaconazole delayed release tablets until a complete response is achieved. Secondary prophylaxis should be discussed when there is any risk of relapse, such as the persistence of neutropenia or the prolonged use of high-dose immunosuppressive therapy. Despite these novelties, the mortality rate from PM remains higher than 50%. Therefore, future research must define the place for combination therapy and adjunctive treatments, while the development of new treatments is necessary.

Mucorales PCR in blood as an early marker of invasive gastrointestinal mucormycosis might decrease the delay in treatment: A case report

We describe the fatal case of a patient with gastric perforation due to ischemia and necrosis of the stomach secondary to generalized vascular thrombosis following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Histopathological examination of the resected stomach, spleen and omentum unexpectedly showed fungal hyphae suggestive of invasive mucormycosis. We retrospectively performed Mucorales PCR (MucorGenius®, PathoNostics, Maastricht, The Netherlands) in blood and tissue samples of this patient. The PCR was positive 16 days before time of death and 9 days before abdominal pain.

Blood Mucorales PCR to track down Aspergillus and Mucorales co-infections in at-risk hematology patients: A case-control study

Introduction

Serum Mucorales PCR can precede the final diagnosis of invasive mucormycosis by several days or weeks and could therefore be useful as a non-invasive screening tool.

Methods

We assessed the performance of a commercial Mucorales PCR assay (MucorGenius®, PathoNostics, Maastricht, The Netherlands) on prospectively collected banked sera from hematology patients at risk for invasive mould infections. We evaluated if there is an underestimated incidence of missed Mucorales co-infections in patients with invasive aspergillosis (IA). We tested Mucorales PCR on the sera of all patients with a diagnosis of at least possible IA (EORTC-MSGERC consensus criteria) before the start of any antifungal therapy, and in a control group of similar high-risk hematology patients without IA (in a 1:4 ratio). When a positive Mucorales PCR was observed, at least 5 serum samples taken before and after the positive one were selected.

Results

Mucorales PCR was performed in 46 diagnostic serum samples of cases and in 184 controls. Serum Mucorales PCR was positive in 4 cases of IA (8.7%; 12.9% of probable cases) and in 1 control case (0.5%) (p=0.0061, OR=17.43 (1.90-159.96). Post-mortem cultures of the positive control became positive for Rhizopus arrhizus. Mortality of IA cases with and without a positive Mucorales PCR was not significantly different. Only in the PCR positive control case, serial serum samples before and after the diagnostic sample were also positive.

Discussion

It is not entirely clear what a positive Mucorales PCR in these cases implies since the 4 Mucorales PCR positive cases were treated with antifungals with activity against Mucorales. In addition, PCR was positive only once. This study does not provide enough evidence to implement Mucorales PCR screening. However, our findings emphasize once more the importance of considering the possibility of dual mould infections, even in patients with a positive galactomannan detection.

Analytical Performance of the Commercial MucorGenius® Assay as Compared to an In-House qPCR Assay to Detect Mucorales DNA in Serum Specimens

Standardized, reproducible and validated Mucorales quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays are needed in the context of routine testing in diagnostic labs. We, therefore, compared the commercial MucorGenius^® assay (PathoNostics, Maastricht) targeting five genera of Mucorales to our in-house qPCR targeting Rhizomucor spp., Lichtheimia spp. and Mucor/Rhizopus spp. To assess their analytical sensitivity, 25 frozen leftover serum specimens, which had already tested positive based on our in-house assay, were selected. These sera were from 15 patients with probable or proven mucormycosis. For analytical specificity, 0.5 pg from 15 purified fungal DNAs from nine different Mucorales genera were spiked into pooled qPCR-negative leftover serum specimens. All samples were tested in parallel with both assays and the quantitative cycles (Cq) were compared. A total of 13/25 (52%) serum samples were amplified by one of the two assays with only four of them detected with the MucorGenius^® assay. In spiked specimens, all targeted strains were successfully amplified by our in-house qPCR. The MucorGenius^® assay was not able to detect Lichtheimia corymbifera but successfully amplified all other species targeted by the kit and two additional non-targeted species (Syncephalastrum monosporum and Saksenaea vasiformis). The MucorGenius^® assay showed lower analytical sensitivity compared to our in-house assay. Indeed, the MucorGenius^® assay amplified more species, as expected, but showed a decreased detection of the frequent species Lichtheimia corymbifera.

Optimization of a Quantitative PCR Methodology for Detection of Aspergillus spp. and Rhizopus arrhizus

Introduction

Multiplex quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) methods for the detection of Aspergillus spp. based only on SYBR Green and melting curve analysis of PCR products are difficult to develop because most targets are located within ITS regions. The aim of this study was to adapt our previously developed methodology based on a multiplex PCR assay coupled with GeneScan analysis to provide a qPCR method.

Methods

A SYBR Green-based real-time PCR assay was optimized to detect A. fumigatus, A. flavus, A. niger, A. terreus, and R. arrhizus in a multiplex assay and applied to cultured fungi and spiked plasma.

Results

Different melting temperatures allowed identification of all five pathogens and discrimination between them, even in samples with low amounts of fungal gDNA (from 1.3 to 33.0 pg/μL), which has been reported previously as problematic. No false-positive results were obtained for non-target species, including bacteria and human DNA. This method allowed detection of fungal pathogens in human plasma spiked with fungal DNA and in coinfections of A. niger/R. arrhizus.

Discussion

This work provides evidence for the use of a qPCR multiplex method based on SYBR Green and melting curve analysis of PCR products for the detection of A. fumigatus, A. flavus, A. niger, A. terreus, and R. arrhizus. The proposed method is simpler and less expensive than available kits based on fluorescent probes and can be used for aiding diagnosis of the most relevant invasive filamentous fungi, particularly in low-income health care institutions.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40291-022-00595-1.

Recent Developments in the Diagnosis of Mucormycosis

Mucormycosis is a potentially fatal infection that presents in different clinical forms and occurs in patients with various risk factors. Recently, the COVID-19 epidemic has been responsible for an increase in the incidence of mucormycosis, particularly in India. As with other invasive filamentous fungal infections, there are no specific clinical or radiological signs, and we have fewer diagnostic tools available than for other invasive fungal infections. Therefore, the diagnosis of Mucormycosis remains difficult. Nevertheless, for optimal management, early and accurate diagnosis is important. According to the latest recommendations, diagnosis is based on direct examination of clinical specimens, and/or histopathology, and culture. There are also molecular tools for direct detection from clinical specimens, but these techniques are moderately recommended. The main problems with these molecular techniques are that, until now, they were not very well standardized; there was a great heterogeneity of DNA targets and methods, which resulted in variable sensitivity. It is in this field that most advances have been made in the last two years. Indeed, recent studies have evaluated the performance and kinetics of Mucorales qPCR in serum and have shown good sensitivity and specificity. Large inter-laboratory evaluations of qPCR in serum have also been performed and have demonstrated good qualitative and quantitative reproducibility. These new results suggest the use of Mucorales qPCR as part of the diagnostic strategy for mucormycosis. One way to achieve better reproducibility could be to use commercial methods. Currently, there are at least three commercial qPCRs for Mucorales (MucorGenius from PathoNostics, MycoGenie from Ademtech, and Fungiplex from Bruker) that can be used to test serum, respiratory samples, or biopsies. However, to date, there has been little evaluation of these methods. Overall, Mucorales PCR in tissue samples, in respiratory samples, and in serum is promising and its addition as a diagnostic tool in the definitions of invasive mucormycosis should be discussed.

Diagnosis of mucormycosis using an intercalating dye-based quantitative PCR

PCR-based methods applied to various body fluids emerged in recent years as a promising approach for the diagnosis of mucormycosis. In this study, we set up and assess the value of a qPCR to detect a wide variety of Mucorales species in a single tube. A pair of degenerated primers targeting the rDNA operon was used in a qPCR utilizing an intercalating fluorescent dye. Analytical assessment, using a wide variety of both Mucorales strains (8 genera, 11 species) and non-Mucorales strains (9 genera, 14 species), showed 100% sensitivity and specificity rates with a limit of detection at 3 rDNA copy/ qPCR reaction. Subsequently, 364 clinical specimens from 166 at-risk patients were prospectively tested with the assay. All the seven patients classified as proven/probable mucormycosis using the EORTC-MSG criteria had a positive qPCR as well as a patient with a proven uncharacterized invasive mould infection. In addition, 3 out of 7 patients with possible mould invasive infections had at least one positive qPCR test. Sensitivity was calculated between 73.33% to 100% and specificity between 98.10% to 100%. The qPCR method proposed showed excellent performances and would be an important adjunctive tool for the difficult diagnosis of mucormycosis diagnosis.

An overview of using fungal DNA for the diagnosis of invasive mycoses

INTRODUCTION

Fungal PCR has undergone considerable standardization and together with the availability of commercial assays, external quality assessment schemes and extensive performance validation data, is ready for widespread use for the screening and diagnosis of invasive fungal disease (IFD).

AREAS COVERED

Drawing on the experience and knowledge of the leads of the various working parties of the Fungal PCR initiative, this review will address general considerations concerning the use of molecular tests for the diagnosis of IFD, before focussing specifically on the technical and clinical aspects of molecular testing for the main causes of IFD and recent technological developments.

EXPERT OPINION

For infections caused by Aspergillus, Candida and Pneumocystis jirovecii, PCR testing is recommended, combination with serological testing will likely enhance the diagnosis of these diseases. For other IFD (e.g. Mucormycosis) molecular diagnostics, represent the only non-classical mycological approach towards diagnoses and continued performance validation and standardization has improved confidence in such testing. The emergence of antifungal resistance can be diagnosed, in part, through molecular testing. Next-generation sequencing has the potential to significantly improve our understanding of fungal phylogeny, epidemiology, pathogenesis, mycobiome/microbiome and interactions with the host, while identifying novel and existing mechanisms of antifungal resistance and novel diagnostic/therapeutic targets.

Evaluation of serum Mucorales PCR for the diagnosis of Mucormycoses: The MODIMUCOR prospective trial

BACKGROUND

Early diagnosis and prompt initiation of specific antifungal treatment is essential for improving the prognosis of mucormycosis. We aimed to assess the performance of serum Mucorales quantitative PCR (qPCR) for the early diagnosis and follow-up of mucormycosis.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 232 patients with suspicion of invasive mold disease, evaluated using standard imaging and mycological procedures. Thirteen additional patients with proven or probable mucormycosis were included to analyze DNA load kinetics. Serum samples were collected twice-a-week for Mucorales qPCR tests targeting the Mucorales species Lichtheimia, Rhizomucor and Mucor/Rhizopus.

RESULTS

The sensitivity was 85·2%, specificity 89·8%, and positive and negative likelihood ratios 8·3 and 0·17, respectively in this prospective study. The first Mucorales qPCR-positive serum was observed a median of four days (IQR, 0-9) before sampling of the first mycological or histological positive specimen and a median of one day (IQR, (-2)-6) before the first imaging was performed. Negativity of Mucorales qPCR within seven days after liposomal-amphotericin B initiation was associated with an 85% lower 30-day mortality rate (adjusted hazard Ratio = 0·15, 95%CI [0·03-0·73], p = 0·02).

CONCLUSION

Our study argues for the inclusion of qPCR for the detection of circulating Mucorales DNA for mucormycosis diagnosis and follow-up after treatment initiation. Positive results should be added to the criteria for the consensual definitions from the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer/ Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium (EORTC/MSGERC), as already done for Aspergillus PCR.

Fungal infections diagnosis - Past, present and future

Despite the scientific advances observed in the recent decades and the emergence of new methodologies, the diagnosis of systemic fungal infections persists as a problematic issue. Fungal cultivation, the standard method that allows a proven diagnosis, has numerous disadvantages, as low sensitivity (only 50% of the patients present positive fungal cultures), and long growth time. These are factors that delay the patient's treatment and, consequently, lead to higher hospital costs. To improve the accuracy and quickness of fungal infections diagnosis, several new methodologies attempt to be implemented in clinical microbiology laboratories. Most of these innovative methods are independent of pathogen isolation, which means that the diagnosis goes from being considered proven to probable. In spite of the advantage of being culture-independent, the majority of the methods lack standardization. PCR-based methods are becoming more and more commonly used, which has earned them an important place in hospital laboratories. This can be perceived now, as PCR-based methodologies have proved to be an essential tool fighting against the COVID-19 pandemic. This review aims to go through the main steps of the diagnosis for systemic fungal infection, from diagnostic classifications, through methodologies considered as "gold standard", to the molecular methods currently used, and finally mentioning some of the more futuristic approaches.

The emergence of COVID-19 associated mucormycosis: a review of cases from 18 countries

Reports of COVID-19-associated mucormycosis have been increasing in frequency since early 2021, particularly among patients with uncontrolled diabetes. Patients with diabetes and hyperglycaemia often have an inflammatory state that could be potentiated by the activation of antiviral immunity to SARS-CoV2, which might favour secondary infections. In this Review, we analysed 80 published and unpublished cases of COVID-19-associated mucormycosis. Uncontrolled diabetes, as well as systemic corticosteroid treatment, were present in most patients with COVID-19-associated mucormycosis, and rhino-orbital cerebral mucormycosis was the most frequent disease. Mortality was high at 49%, which was particularly due to patients with pulmonary or disseminated mucormycosis or cerebral involvement. Furthermore, a substantial proportion of patients who survived had life-changing morbidities (eg, loss of vision in 46% of survivors). Our Review indicates that COVID-19-associated mucormycosis is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis of pulmonary mucormycosis is particularly challenging, and might be frequently missed in India.

When to change treatment of acute invasive aspergillosis: an expert viewpoint

Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is an acute infection affecting patients who are immunocompromised, as a result of receiving chemotherapy for malignancy, or immunosuppressant agents for transplantation or autoimmune disease. Whilst criteria exist to define the probability of infection for clinical trials, there is little evidence in the literature or clinical guidelines on when to change antifungal treatment in patients who are receiving prophylaxis or treatment for IA. To try and address this significant gap, an advisory board of experts was convened to develop criteria for the management of IA for use in designing clinical trials, which could also be used in clinical practice. For primary treatment failure, a change in antifungal therapy should be made: (i) when mycological susceptibility testing identifies an organism from a confirmed site of infection, which is resistant to the antifungal given for primary therapy, or a resistance mutation is identified by molecular testing; (ii) at, or after, 8 days of primary antifungal treatment if there is increasing serum galactomannan, or galactomannan positivity in serum, or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid when the antigen was previously undetectable, or there is sudden clinical deterioration, or a new clearly distinct site of infection is detected; and (iii) at, or after, 15 days of primary antifungal treatment if the patient is clinically stable but with ≥2 serum galactomannan measurements persistently elevated compared with baseline or increasing, or if the original lesions on CT or other imaging, show progression by >25% in size in the context of no apparent change in immune status.

First report of COVID-19-associated rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a major public health problem worldwide. These patients are at increased risk of developing secondary infections due to a combination of virus- and drug-induced immunosuppression. Recently, several countries have reported an emergence of COVID-19 associated mucormycosis (CAM), particularly among patients with uncontrolled diabetes, with India reporting an alarming increase in rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis (ROCM) in post-COVID cases. Hyperglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) are the major underlying risk factors. So far, case reports and review articles have reported CAM only in adult patients. Here, we describe the first cases of COVID-19-associated ROCM in two pediatric patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM). Both the cases had asymptomatic infection with SARS-CoV-2 and developed ROCM during the course of treatment of DKA. None of them had exposure to systemic steroids. Imaging findings in both cases revealed involvement of orbit, paranasal sinuses, and brain with cavernous sinus thrombosis. The patients underwent craniotomy with evacuation of abscess. Microbiological and histopathological findings were consistent with the diagnosis of mycormycosis, with fungal culture growing Rhizopus arrhizus. Post-operatively, the patients received liposomal amphotericin B (LAMB) and systemic antibiotics. Retrobulbar injection of LAMB was given in an attempt to halt orbital disease progression. However, it wasn't successful and both of them had to undergo orbital exenteration eventually. ROCM is a rapidly progressive disease and prompt diagnosis with aggressive surgery and timely initiation of antifungal therapy can be life-saving. Physicians should have a high index of suspicion, so as to avoid a delayed diagnosis, particularly in post-COVID patients with uncontrolled diabetes.

Interlaboratory evaluation of Mucorales PCR assays for testing serum specimens: A study by the fungal PCR Initiative and the Modimucor study group

Interlaboratory evaluations of Mucorales qPCR assays were developed to assess the reproducibility and performance of methods currently used. The participants comprised 12 laboratories from French university hospitals (nine of them participating in the Modimucor study) and 11 laboratories participating in the Fungal PCR Initiative. For panel 1, three sera were each spiked with DNA from three different species (Rhizomucor pusillus, Lichtheimia corymbifera, Rhizopus oryzae). For panel 2, six sera with three concentrations of R. pusillus and L. corymbifera (1, 10, and 100 genomes/ml) were prepared. Each panel included a blind negative-control serum. A form was distributed with each panel to collect results and required technical information, including DNA extraction method, sample volume used, DNA elution volume, qPCR method, qPCR template input volume, qPCR total reaction volume, qPCR platform, and qPCR reagents used. For panel 1, assessing 18 different protocols, qualitative results (positive or negative) were correct in 97% of cases (70/72). A very low interlaboratory variability in Cq values (SD = 1.89 cycles) were observed. For panel 2 assessing 26 different protocols, the detection rates were high (77-100%) for 5/6 of spiked serum. There was a significant association between the qPCR platform and performance. However, certain technical steps and optimal combinations of factors may also impact performance. The good reproducibility and performance demonstrated in this study support the use of Mucorales qPCR as part of the diagnostic strategy for mucormycosis.

Fungal Taxa Responsible for Mucormycosis/"Black Fungus" among COVID-19 Patients in India

Mucormycosis is caused by fungi belonging to the order Mucorales. The term “Black Fungus” has been widely applied to human pathogenic Mucorales in India. They mainly infect the sinuses and brain, lungs, stomach and intestines, and skin. While this has been considered a rare disease, thousands of cases have been reported during the second wave of COVID-19 in India, between the months of April and June 2021. Hitherto, more than 45,374 cases and over 4300 deaths have been reported among COVID-19 patients across India from April 2021 to July 21, 2021. Though the mortality rate is estimated to be 50%, it could be above 90% if left untreated. In India, Rhizopus arrhizus has been related to be the most common species to cause human mucormycosis, followed by Apophysomyces variabilis, Rhizopus microsporus, and R. homothallicus. Accurate sample identification of human pathogenic Mucorales species is challenging especially due to the frequent lack of diagnostic morphological features. Traditionally, the culture-based approach has been extensively used to isolate and characterize human pathogenic Mucorales. However, this may not be an appropriate approach to objectively isolate and characterize all species, as the germination and growth of fungal spores are highly dependent on culture media and environmental conditions. Therefore, a robust approach to the accurate and rapid identification of human pathogenic Mucorales species is a prerequisite. The metagenomic approach comprehensively sequences and analyzes all genetic material in a complex biological sample and, consequently, this could be an appropriate approach to objectively characterize human pathogenic Mucorales taxa without the need for in vitro culture. The precise identification of the species will not only be useful for the correct diagnosis of this disease, but also for the development of antifungal drugs specific for each species. Accurate and rapid species identification is desperately needed to save lives in the mucormycosis outbreak among COVID-19 patients in India and neighboring countries.

Microbiological and Molecular Diagnosis of Mucormycosis: From Old to New

Members of the order Mucorales may cause severe invasive fungal infections (mucormycosis) in immune-compromised and otherwise ill patients. Diagnosis of Mucorales infections and discrimination from other filamentous fungi are crucial for correct management. Here, we present an overview of current state-of-the-art mucormycosis diagnoses, with a focus on recent developments in the molecular field. Classical diagnostic methods comprise histology/microscopy as well as culture and are still the gold standard. Newer molecular methods are evolving quickly and display great potential in early diagnosis, although standardization is still missing. Among them, quantitative PCR assays with or without melt curve analysis are most widely used to detect fungal DNA in clinical samples. Depending on the respective assay, sequencing of the resulting PCR product can be necessary for genus or even species identification. Further, DNA-based methods include microarrays and PCR-ESI-MS. However, general laboratory standards are still in development, meaning that molecular methods are currently limited to add-on analytics to culture and microscopy.

Update on Non-Culture-Based Diagnostics for Invasive Fungal Disease

Diagnostic tests for fungi provide the mycological evidence to strengthen diagnosis of invasive fungal disease. Conventional microbiology and histopathology have their limitations. Recognizing this, there have been attempts at developing new methods to improve yield of diagnosing invasive fungal disease (IFD). The recent focus has been on non-culture-based antigen detection and molecular methods. The use of antigen detection of IFD through 1,3-β-D-glucan and galactomannan assay have been expanded, followed by development of lateral flow assays, and in combination with other diagnostic modalities to further increase diagnostic yield. The molecular diagnostic front has seen initiatives to standardize polymerase chain reaction methodologies to detect fungi and anti-fungal resistance, new platforms such as the T2Candida Biosystems and foray into fungal metagenomics. As these newer assays undergo stringent validation before incorporation into the diagnostic algorithm, the clinician needs to be mindful of their bedside utility as well as their limitation.

Recognition of Diagnostic Gaps for Laboratory Diagnosis of Fungal Diseases: Expert Opinion from the Fungal Diagnostics Laboratories Consortium (FDLC)

Fungal infections are a rising threat to our immunocompromised patient population, as well as other nonimmunocompromised patients with various medical conditions. However, little progress has been made in the past decade to improve fungal diagnostics. To jointly address this diagnostic challenge, the Fungal Diagnostics Laboratory Consortium (FDLC) was recently created. The FDLC consists of 26 laboratories from the United States and Canada that routinely provide fungal diagnostic services for patient care. A survey of fungal diagnostic capacity among the 26 members of the FDLC was recently completed, identifying the following diagnostic gaps: lack of molecular detection of mucormycosis; lack of an optimal diagnostic algorithm incorporating fungal biomarkers and molecular tools for early and accurate diagnosis of Pneumocystis pneumonia, aspergillosis, candidemia, and endemic mycoses; lack of a standardized molecular approach to identify fungal pathogens directly in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues; lack of robust databases to enhance mold identification with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry; suboptimal diagnostic approaches for mold blood cultures, tissue culture processing for Mucorales, and fungal respiratory cultures for cystic fibrosis patients; inadequate capacity for fungal point-of-care testing to detect and identify new, emerging or underrecognized, rare, or uncommon fungal pathogens; and performance of antifungal susceptibility testing. In this commentary, the FDLC delineates the most pressing unmet diagnostic needs and provides expert opinion on how to fulfill them. Most importantly, the FDLC provides a robust laboratory network to tackle these diagnostic gaps and ultimately to improve and enhance the clinical laboratory's capability to rapidly and accurately diagnose fungal infections.

The importance of mucormycosis infections on example of Rhino Orbital Cerebral Mucormycosis

Mucormycosis is an angioinvasive fungal infection, characterized by high morbidity and mortality and is strongly dependent on the patient’s general health condition, initial site of infection, and the time from diagnosis to treatment commencement. It has been reported that the occurrence of mucormycosis has increased rapidly, also among immunocompetent patients. Moreover, the rise in number is expected to continue. Among all clinical manifestations of mucormycosis, the rhino-orbital-cerebral type (ROCM) is the most common. The aim of this article is to increase the awareness of mucoral infections, especially ROCM, and to describe its first symptoms, as proper treatment requires immediate surgical and medical intervention.

The Evolving Landscape of Fungal Diagnostics, Current and Emerging Microbiological Approaches

Invasive fungal infections are increasingly recognized in immunocompromised hosts. Current diagnostic techniques are limited by low sensitivity and prolonged turnaround times. We review emerging diagnostic technologies and platforms for diagnosing the clinically invasive disease caused by Candida, Aspergillus, and Mucorales.

Epidemiology and Diagnosis of Mucormycosis: An Update

Mucormycosis is an angioinvasive fungal infection, due to fungi of the order Mucorales. Its incidence cannot be measured exactly, since there are few population-based studies, but multiple studies have shown that it is increasing. The prevalence of mucormycosis in India is about 80 times the prevalence in developed countries, being approximately 0.14 cases per 1000 population. Diabetes mellitus is the main underlying disease globally, especially in low and middle-income countries. In developed countries the most common underlying diseases are hematological malignancies and transplantation. Τhe epidemiology of mucormycosis is evolving as new immunomodulating agents are used in the treatment of cancer and autoimmune diseases, and as the modern diagnostic tools lead to the identification of previously uncommon genera/species such as Apophysomyces or Saksenaea complex. In addition, new risk factors are reported from Asia, including post-pulmonary tuberculosis and chronic kidney disease. New emerging species include Rhizopus homothallicus, Thamnostylum lucknowense, Mucor irregularis and Saksenaea erythrospora. Diagnosis of mucormycosis remains challenging. Clinical approach to diagnosis has a low sensitivity and specificity, it helps however in raising suspicion and prompting the initiation of laboratory testing. Histopathology, direct examination and culture remain essential tools, although the molecular methods are improving. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region is the most widely sequenced DNA region for fungi and it is recommended as a first-line method for species identification of Mucorales. New molecular platforms are being investigated and new fungal genetic targets are being explored. Molecular-based methods have gained acceptance for confirmation of the infection when applied on tissues. Methods on the detection of Mucorales DNA in blood have shown promising results for earlier and rapid diagnosis and could be used as screening tests in high-risk patients, but have to be validated in clinical studies. More, much needed, rapid methods that do not require invasive procedures, such as serology-based point-of-care, or metabolomics-based breath tests, are being developed and hopefully will be evaluated in the near future.

Developments in identifying and managing mucormycosis in hematologic cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

Mucormycoses represent a rare but very aggressive class of mold infections occurring in patients with hematological malignancies (HMs). In the past, patients at high risk of invasive mucomycosis (IM) were those affected by acute myeloid leukemia but over the last ten years the prophylaxis with a very effective mold-active drug, such as posaconazole, has completely modified the epidemiology. In fact, IM is now observed more frequently in patients with lymphoproliferative disorders who do not receive antifungal prophylaxis.

AREAS COVERED

The attention was focused on the epidemiology, diagnosis, prophylaxis and treatment of IM in HMs. Authors excluded pediatric patients considering the different epidemiology and differences in treatment given the limitation of the use of azoles in the pediatric field. A systematic literature review was performed using PubMed database listings between February 2014 and February 2020 using the following MeSH terms: leukemia, hematological malignancies, stem cell transplantation, mucormycosis, molds, prophilaxis, treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

The epidemiology of mucormycosis in HMs is changing in the last years. The availability of drugs more effective than in the past against this infection has reduced the mortality; however, a timely diagnosis remains a relevant problem potentially influencing the outcome of hematologic patients with IM.